OR Royalties Inc 6-K, filed Nov 19, 2020
OR Royalties Inc. (OR)
About this 6-K
OR Royalties Inc filed this 6-K on November 19, 2020.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of October 2020
Commission File Number: 001-37814
OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD
(Translation of registrant's name into English)
1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 300, Montréal, Qc H3B 2S2
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
[ ] Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ]
SUBMITTED HEREWITH
Exhibit
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| OSISKO GOLD ROYALTIES LTD | |
| (Registrant) |
| Date: November 18, 2020 | By: | /s/ André Le Bel |
| André Le Bel | ||
| Title: | Vice President, Legal Affairs and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
Val-d'Or Head Office 560, 3e Avenue Val-d'Or (Québec) J9P 1S4
|
|
|
Québec Office 725, Lebourgneuf Blvd. Suite 310-12 Québec (Québec) G2J 0C4 |
Montréal Office 859, Jean-Paul-Vincent Blvd. Suite 201 Longueuil (Québec) J4G 1R3 |
Phone: 819-874-0447 Toll-Free: 866-749-8140 Email: info@innovexplo.com Website: www.innovexplo.com |
NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate
for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada
Prepared for:
![]() |
![]() |
|
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd 1100, av. des Canadiens-de-Montreal Suite 300, P.O. Box 211 Montreal, QC, H3B 2S2 |
Osisko Development Corp. 1100, av. des Canadiens-de-Montreal Suite 300, P.O. Box 211 Montreal, QC, H3B 2S2 |

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd
Suite 1440 - 155 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3B7
Project Location
Latitude: 53°06' North; Longitude: 121°34' West
Province of British Columbia, Canada
Prepared by:
|
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo. |
|
InnovExplo Inc. Val-d'Or (Québec) |
Effective Date: October 5, 2020
Signature Date: October 5, 2020
![]() |
SIGNATURE PAGE - INNOVEXPLO
NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate
for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada
Project Location
Latitude: 53°06' North; Longitude: 121°34' West
Province of British Columbia, Canada
Prepared for
![]() |
![]() |
|
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd 1100, av. des Canadiens-de-Montreal Suite 300, P.O. Box 211 Montreal, QC, H3B 2S2 |
Osisko Development Corp. 1100, av. des Canadiens-de-Montreal Suite 300, P.O. Box 211 Montreal, QC, H3B 2S2 |

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd
Suite 1440 - 155 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3B7
Effective Date: October 5, 2020
|
(Original signed and sealed) |
|
Signed at Val-d'Or on October 5th, 2020 |
|
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo. InnovExplo Inc. Val-d'Or (Québec) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Original signed and sealed) |
|
Signed at Val-d'Or on October 5th, 2020 |
|
Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. InnovExplo Inc. Val-d'Or (Québec) |
|
|
| NI 43-101 Technical Report – Cariboo Gold Project – OCTOBER 2020 | ii |
![]() |
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR - CHRISTINE BEAUSOLEIL
I, Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo. (OGQ No. 656, PGO No. 2958, EGBC No. 36156), do hereby certify that:
1. I am a professional geoscientist, employed as Geology Director of InnovExplo Inc., located at 560, 3e Avenue, Val-d'Or, Québec, Canada, J9P 1S4.
2. This certificate applies to the report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada" (the "Technical Report") with an effective date and signature date of October 5, 2020. The Technical Report was prepared for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd, Barkerville Gold Mine Ltd and Osisko Development Corp (the "issuers").
3. I graduated with a Bachelor of Geology degree from Université du Québec à Montréal (Montréal, Québec) in 1997.
4. I am a member in good standing of the Ordre des Géologues du Québec (OGQ licence No. 656), the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (PGO licence No. 2958) and the Engineers & Geoscientists of British Columbia (EGBC licence No. 36156).
5. I have practiced my profession continuously as a geologist for a total of 23 years. During that time, I have been involved in mineral exploration, mine geology, ore control and resource modelling projects for gold, copper, zinc and silver properties in Canada.
6. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101/Regulation 43-101 ("NI 43-101") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a qualified person for the purposes of that instrument.
7. I conducted two site visits from January 22-25, 2019 and April 3-6, 2018.
8. I am the author of items 4 to 11, 23 and 24 of the Technical Report, and I am co-author and share responsibility for sections of items 1 to 3, 12 to 14 and 25 to 27.
9. I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of this Technical Report.
10. I am independent of the issuer - Osisko Gold Royalties as well as Osisko Development and Barkerville Gold Mines - in accordance with the application of Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.
11. I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in accordance with that instrument and form.
12. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Technical Report that is not reflected in the Technical Report, the omission to disclose which makes the Technical Report misleading.
Signed this 5th day of October 2020 in Val-d'Or, Québec.
(Original signed and sealed)
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo.
InnovExplo Inc.
christine.beausoleil@innovexplo.com
| NI 43-101 Technical Report – Cariboo Gold Project – OCTOBER 2020 | iii |
![]() |
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR - CARL PELLETIER
I, Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. (OGQ No. 384, PGO No. 1713, EGBC No. 43167 and NAPEG No. L4160), do hereby certify that:
1. I am a professional geoscientist and Co-President Founder of InnovExplo Inc., located at 560, 3e Avenue, Val-d'Or, Québec, Canada, J9P 1S4.
2. This certificate applies to the report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada" (the "Technical Report") with an effective and signature date of October 5, 2020. The Technical Report was prepared for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd, Barkerville Gold Mine Ltd and Osisko Development Corp (the "issuers").
3. I graduated with a Bachelor's degree in Geology (B.Sc.) from Université du Québec à Montréal (Montréal, Québec) in 1992, and I initiated a Master's degree at the same university for which I completed the course program but not the thesis.
4. I am a member of the Ordre des Géologues du Québec (OGQ, No. 384), the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (PGO, No. 1713), the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia (EGBC, No. 43167), the Northwest Territories Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists (NAPEG, No. L4160), and the Canadian Institute of Mines (CIM).
5. My relevant experience includes a total of 28 years since my graduation from university. My mining expertise has been acquired at the Silidor, Sleeping Giant, Bousquet II, Sigma-Lamaque and Beaufor mines. My exploration experience has been acquired with Cambior Inc. and McWatters Mining Inc. I have been a consulting geologist for InnovExplo Inc. since February 2004.
6. I have read the definition of a "qualified person" set out in National Instrument 43-101/Regulation 43-101 ("NI 43-101") and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a qualified person for the purposes of that instrument.
7. I am co-author and share responsibility for items 1 to 3, 12 to 14 and 25 to 27 of the Technical Report.
8. I did not visit the site in 2020; however, I conducted two site visits in the past: February 1-4, 2016 and May 3-12, 2016.
9. I have not had prior involvement with the property that is the subject of this Technical Report.
10. I am independent of issuer - Osisko Gold Royalties as well as Osisko Development and Barkerville Gold Mines - in accordance with the application of Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.
11. I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the sections of the Technical Report for which I am responsible have been prepared in accordance with that instrument and form.
12. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Technical Report that is not reflected in the Technical Report, the omission to disclose which makes the Technical Report misleading.
Signed this 5th day of October 2020 in Val-d'Or, Québec.
(Original signed and sealed)
Carl Pelletier, P.Geo.
InnovExplo Inc.
carl.pelletierl@innovexplo.com
| NI 43-101 Technical Report – Cariboo Gold Project – OCTOBER 2020 | iv |
![]() |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
LIST OF FIGURES
![]() |
![]() |
LIST OF TABLES
![]() |
![]() |
1. SUMMARY
Introduction
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd ("Osisko Royalties"), through its wholly-owned subsidiary Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. ("Barkerville), retained InnovExplo Inc. ("InnovExplo") to prepare this technical report (this "Technical Report") to present an updated mineral resource estimate and geological model (the "2020 MRE") for the Cariboo Gold Project, located in the historic Cariboo Mining District in east-central British Columbia, east and southeast of the City of Quesnel, British Columbia (the "Project"). This Technical Report has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and Form 43-101F1 and follows the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves ("CIM Definition Standards").
The 2020 MRE was prepared by Barkerville staff under the supervision of Maggie Layman, Vice-President Exploration of Barkerville and reviewed and validated by InnovExplo, an independent mining and exploration consulting firm based in Val-d'Or, Québec.
The 2020 MRE updates the previous mineral resource estimates of the Project (see Beausoleil and Pelletier (2019) and Morgan et al. (2019)).
The Project is comprised of three key mineral deposits, which include Cow Mountain, Island Mountain and Barkerville Mountain (collectively, the "Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor").
This Technical Report has been addressed to each of Osisko Royalties, Barkerville and Osisko Development Corp. ("Osisko Development" and, together with Osisko Royalties and Barkerville, the "Issuers"). While the Project is owned by Barkerville, a wholly owned subsidiary of Osisko Royalties as of the date of this Technical Report, Osisko Royalties announced a transaction on October 5, 2020, which would result in Barkerville (including the Project) being transferred to a company to be renamed "Osisko Development Corp.", resulting from the reverse take-over of Barolo Ventures Corp. This Technical Report has been addressed to "Osisko Development Corp." as the authors intend that Osisko Development be entitled to rely on the 2020 MRE.
Osisko Royalties is an intermediate Canadian mining company focused on acquiring and managing precious metal and other high-quality royalties, streams and similar interests in Canada and worldwide. Osisko Royalties is currently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") and the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "OR".
Osisko Development will have a mandate of becoming a North American mine development company with a focus towards becoming a mid-tier gold miner with opportunities for immediate production. Osisko Development will be listed on the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSXV") under the symbol "ODV" upon closing of the transaction announced on October 5, 2020.
Qualified Persons
This Technical Report was prepared by Christine Beausoleil (P.Geo.), Geology Director of InnovExplo, and Carl Pelletier (P.Geo.), Co-President Founder of InnovExplo. Both are independent and qualified persons ("QPs") under NI 43-101.
![]() |
Ms. Beausoleil is a professional geologist in good standing with the OGQ (No. 656), PGO (No. 2958) and EGBC (No. 36156). She is the author of items 4 to 11, 13, 23 and 24, and co-author of items 1 to 3, 12, 14 and 25 to 27.
Mr. Pelletier is a professional geologist in good standing with the OGQ (No. 384), PGO (No. 1713), EGBC (No. 43167) and NAPEG (No. L4160). He is co-author of items 1 to 3, 12, 14 and 25 to 27.
Property Description and Location
The Project is located in the historical Wells-Barkerville mining camp (also known as the Cariboo Gold District) of British Columbia and extends for approximately 60 km from northwest to southeast.
The Project falls within the Cariboo Regional District, a division of the local government system in British Columbia. The main towns in the Project area are Wells and Barkerville Historic Town & Park. Wells is situated 74 km east of Quesnel, approximately 115 km southeast of Prince George, and roughly 500 km north of Vancouver.
The Project comprises 407 mineral titles totalling 151,891.99 ha including the QR Mill Property, which consist to 355 mineral claims, 38 placer claims, 13 placer leases and one (1) mineral lease (QR Mill). The Project also contains 234 private land parcels from Crown-granted mineral claims.
Barkerville holds all the placer claims and placer leases, all the QR Mill mineral titles and 355 of the 372 mineral titles for the rest of the Porject. The remaining 17 mineral titles are jointly owned with other companies and individuals: a 97.5% interest in six (6), an 85% interest in two (2), and a 50% interest in the other nine (9).
An NSR royalty of 4% payable to Osisko Gold Royalties ("Osisko") is the only royalty that applies to the Project.
Geology
The Project lies within the Kootenay Terrane of the Omineca Tectonic Belt in the south-central Canadian Cordillera. The Omineca rocks were complexly deformed by Middle Jurassic to Early Tertiary compressional tectonics, and by Tertiary transtension and extension. The Kootenay Terrane in the vicinity of the Project is subdivided into the eastern Cariboo and western Barkerville subterranes. The Cariboo Subterrane is juxtaposed on the Barkerville Subterrane by the east-dipping Pleasant Valley Thrust.
The Snowshoe Group, central to the Barkerville Subterrane, hosts the Project.
The Barkerville and Cariboo subterranes comprise metamorphosed equivalents of continent-derived siliciclastic protoliths with interlayered marble units and granitic orthogneiss. The subterranes are pericratonic their character and are thought to have formed near the current western margin of Laurentia. Various authors suggest that both Barkerville and Cariboo subterranes share the same tectostratigraphic position and depositional environment.
The principal gold-producing areas in the Barkerville Subterrane are in areas of greenschist-grade metamorphism (chlorite grade) and do not extend into amphiboIite-grade domains. The S1 and S2 fabrics are defined by metamorphic muscovite, quartz, albite, chlorite and locally biotite, and its character is governed by rock type. The metamorphic micas generally define foliation suggesting that peak metamorphic temperature coincided with the formation of cleavage.
![]() |
Lode-gold mineralization in the Wells-Barkerville mining camp (Cariboo Gold District) shares many characteristics with orogenic gold deposits. Gold mineralization is associated with orogenic silica-carbonate-sericite-pyrite stable fluids moving along secondary permeability induced by the interaction of metamorphic fabrics, sublayer-parallel strike-slip faults, contacts between lithological units, and rheological contrasts between lithologies.
Deposit types on the Project consist of vein and replacement-type mineralization grouped into five inter-related styles: 1) Fault-fill breccia veins subparallel to foliation (S1), hosted in carbonaceous mudstone; 2) Vertical NE-trending extensional (AP) veins dominantly hosted in sandstone units in S3 cleavages; 3) Fractured moderately dipping ENE-trending shear veins, hosted in sandstone units; 4) Gold-bearing sulphide replacements hosted in fold hinges of calcareous sandstone units; and 5) Gold-bearing sulphide replacement mineralization hosted in fault-bounded calcareous siltstone units.
Data Verification
InnovExplo's data verification included the diamond drill hole databases used for the 2020 MRE, as well as the review and validation of the geological models of each deposits, and the review of information on mined-out areas and the data for selected drill holes (assays, QA/QC program, downhole surveys, lithologies, alteration and structures).
The QPs also reviewed and validated the resource estimation process followed by Barkerville and Talisker Exploration Services Inc. ("Talisker"), including all parameters, geological interpretation, basic statistics, variography, interpolation parameters, block model construction, scripts that run the model, volumetric report, and the validation process.
Historical work subject to verification consisted of the holes used for the 2019 MRE. Basic cross-check routines were performed between the current Barkerville Databases and the previously validated database for the 2019 MRE.
InnovExplo was granted access to the assay certificates for all holes in the 2019 drilling programs. Assays were verified for 5% of the drill holes. No discrepancies were found.
Overall, InnovExplo's data verification demonstrates that the data, protocols and estimation process for the Project are acceptable. InnovExplo considers the Barkerville databases to be valid and of sufficient quality to be used for the mineral resource estimate herein.
Mineral Resource Estimates
The 2020 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Project (the "2020 MRE") encompasses updated resources for the deposits of Cow Mountain (Cow), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito), and Barkerville Mountain (BC Vein (including the BC Vein Splays), KL and Lowhee). The updates were prepared by Leonardo de Souza, MAusIMM (CP), of Talisker, and reviewed and validated by Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., and Carl Pelletier, P.Geo., both of InnovExplo, using all available information. No changes are reported for the Valley (Cow Mountain) and the Bonanza Ledge (Barkerville Mountain) deposits.
![]() |
The effective date of the 2020 MRE is April 28, 2020.
The 2020 MRE covers all the deposits in the Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor. The resource area for the Cow/Island segment covers a strike length of 3.7 km and a width of approximately 700 m, down to a vertical depth of 600 m below surface. The estimate for the Barkerville segment covers a strike length of 3 km and a width of approximately 700 m, down to a vertical depth of 500 m below surface.
Four (4) diamond drill hole databases cover the Project: Cow Mountain (Cow and Valley deposits), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito deposits), Barkerville Mountain (BC Vein, KL, and Lowhee deposits), and Bonanza Ledge. The Cow Mountain database contains 1,259 validated drill holes. The Island Mountain database contains 1,321 validated drill holes. The Barkerville Mountain database contains 535 validated surface DDH. The Bonanza Ledge database contains 213 validated holes.
Barkerville updated the 2020 geological models for the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, and BC Vein deposits using historical data, the data from the 2015-2018 and 2019. Barkerville also modelled two additional deposits, KL and Lowhee. The Bonanza Ledge geological model, initially from Brousseau et al. (2017), was reviewed and validated by the QPs.
A total of 335 geological solids were created and/or updated for all the deposits.
InnovExplo is of the opinion that the current mineral resource estimate can be categorized as Measured, Indicated, and Inferred mineral resources based on data density, search ellipse criteria, drill hole density, and interpolation parameters. InnovExplo considers the 2020 MRE to be reliable and based on quality data and geological understanding with parameters that follow CIM Definition Standards.
The table below displays the results of the 2020 Mineral Resource Estimate at the official 2.1 g/t Au cut-off grade for the eight (8) deposits on the Project: Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein & Splays, Kl, Lowhee and Bonanza Ledge deposits.
Cariboo Gold Project Mineral Resource Estimate at 2.1 g/t Au cut-off (Table 14.8)
|
Category |
Deposit |
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
* 1000 |
(Au g/t) |
* 1000 |
||
|
Measured |
Bonanza Ledge |
240 |
5.1 |
39 |
|
Indicated |
Bonanza Ledge |
86 |
3.9 |
11 |
|
BC Vein |
1,192 |
4.7 |
179 |
|
|
KL |
393 |
3.3 |
42 |
|
|
Lowhee |
381 |
3.7 |
46 |
|
|
Mosquito |
783 |
6.0 |
150 |
|
|
Shaft |
10,889 |
4.7 |
1,644 |
|
|
Valley |
1,744 |
4.5 |
251 |
|
|
Cow |
5,734 |
4.5 |
838 |
|
|
Total Indicated Resources |
21,201 |
4.6 |
3,160 |
|
![]() |
|
Category |
Deposit |
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
* 1000 |
(Au g/t) |
* 1000 |
||
| Inferred | BC Vein | 472 | 3.9 | 60 |
|
KL |
1,926 |
2.9 |
181 |
|
|
Lowhee |
1,032 |
3.2 |
105 |
|
|
Mosquito |
1,348 |
4.8 |
208 |
|
|
Shaft |
7,913 |
4.2 |
1,081 |
|
|
Valley |
5,683 |
4.0 |
722 |
|
|
Cow |
3,276 |
3.5 |
364 |
|
|
Total Measured and Indicated Resources |
21,441 |
4.6 |
3,200 |
|
|
Total Inferred Resources |
21,649 |
3.9 |
2,721 |
|
Mineral Resource Estimate notes:
1. The independent and qualified persons for the mineral resource estimates, as defined by NI 43-101, are Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., and Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. (InnovExplo Inc.). The effective date of the 2020 mineral resource estimate is April 28, 2020.
2. These mineral resources are not mineral reserves as they do not have demonstrated economic viability.
3. The mineral resource estimate follows CIM Definition Standards.
4. A total of 334 vein zones were modelled for the Cow Mountain (Cow and Valley), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito), Barkerville Mountain (BC Vein, KL, and Lowhee) deposits and one (1) gold zone for Bonanza Ledge. A minimum true thickness of 2.0 m was applied, using the grade of the adjacent material when assayed or a value of zero when not assayed.
5. The estimate is reported for a potential underground scenario at cut-off grade of 2.1 g/t Au. The cut-off grades were calculated using a gold price of USD1,350 per ounce; a USD/CAD exchange rate of 1.31; a mining cost of $65.39/t; a processing, environment & transport cost of $28.67/t; and a G&A cost of $11.07/t. The cut-off grade should be re-evaluated in light of future prevailing market conditions (metal prices, exchange rate, mining cost, etc.).
6. Density values for Cow, Shaft, and BC Vein were estimated using the ID2 interpolation method, with a minimum default value of 2.81 g/cm3 for Cow, 2.78 g/cm3 for Shaft, and 269 g/cm3 for BC Vein. Median densities were applied for Valley (2.80 g/cm3), Mosquito (2.78 g/cm3), KL (2.81 g/cm3) and Lowhee (2.73 g/cm3). An average density of 3.20 g/cm3 was applied for Bonanza Ledge.
7. A three-step capping procedure was applied to composited data for Cow (3.0 m), Valley (1.5 m), Shaft (2.0 m), Mosquito (3.0 m), BC Vein (2.0 m), KL (1.75 m), and Lowhee (1.75 m). Restricted search ellipsoids ranged from 7 to 60 g/t Au at three different distances ranging from 25 to 100 m for each deposit. High grades at Bonanza Ledge were capped at 70 g/t Au on 2.0 m composited data.
8. The resources for the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein, KL, and Lowhee vein zones were estimated using Datamine Studio RM 1.5 software using hard boundaries on composited assays. The OK method was used to interpolate a sub-blocked model (parent block size = 5 m x 5 m x 5 m). Resources for Bonanza Ledge were estimated using GEOVIA GEMS 6.7 software using hard boundaries on composited assays. The OK method was used to interpolate a block model (block size = 2 m x 2 m x 5 m).
9. Results are presented in-situ. Ounce (troy) = metric tons x grade / 31.10348. Calculations used metric units (metres, tonnes, g/t). The number of tonnes was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects. Rounding followed the recommendations as per NI 43-101.
10. InnovExplo Inc. is not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title-related, taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant issues that could materially affect the mineral resource estimate other than those disclosed in this NI 43-101 compliant technical report.
Interpretation and Conclusions
After conducting a detailed review of all pertinent information and completing the 2020 MRE mandate, InnovExplo concludes the following:
- The results demonstrate the geological and grade continuities for all eight (8) gold deposits in the Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor.
- In an underground scenario, the Cariboo Gold Project contains an estimated Measured Resource of 34,000 ounces of gold, and Indicated Resource of 3,161,000 ounces, and an Inferred Resource of 2,721,000 ounces.
- The resource estimates for the Cow, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein & Splays deposits were updated using the 2019 drill results.
- Initial mineral resource estimates for the KL and Lowhee deposits used the 2019 drill results.
- No change is reported for the Valley and Bonanza Ledge deposits.
- Additional diamond drilling on multiple zones would likely increase the Inferred Resources and upgrade some of the Inferred Resources to Indicated Resources.
![]() |
InnovExplo concludes that the results of the 2020 MRE supports the recommendation to advance the Project to the feasibility stage.
InnovExplo considers the 2020 MRE to be reliable, thorough, based on quality data, reasonable hypotheses, and parameters compliant with NI 43 101 requirements and CIM Definition Standards.
Recommendations
Based on the results of the 2020 MRE, InnovExplo recommends that the Project move to an advanced phase of development, which would involve the preparation of a feasibility study covering all eight deposits: Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, Bonanza Ledge, BC Vein & Splays, KL and Lowhee.
Specifically, InnovExplo recommends: continuing the exploration program (see below for details); updating the existing PEA for new mining scenarios at lower grades using data from the geotechnical, hydrogeological and metallurgical studies; continuing the permitting process for an underground bulk sample; conducting a feasibility study after obtaining said permits; continuing the community outreach program; and conducting a characterization study of the mining project environment in tandem with these other projects.
It is recommended that the exploration program consist of drilling (infill and exploration), geological mapping and grab sampling to test the extensions of known high-grade vein corridors and to identify new targets.
The recommended two-phase work program is detailed below:
Phase 1 - PEA and Exploration Work:
A) Update the PEA:
- Metallurgical testwork
- Geotechnical work
- Permitting
- Social licence management
B) Exploration Work
- Infill drilling in high-grade vein corridors (> 5.0 g/t Au) to potentially convert inferred resources to the indicated category;
- Exploration drilling on all zones to explore the true depth potential of high-grade vein corridors using 50 m step-outs downdip
- Continued geological mapping and surface sampling programs to identify and define new targets.
![]() |
Phase 2 - Feasibility and Bulk Sampling Program (conditional on the success of Phase 1):
1. Underground bulk sampling program to test geological and grade continuities, metallurgical and geotechnical parameters.
2. Feasibility study.
InnovExplo has prepared a cost estimate for the proposed program to serve as a guideline for the Project. The budget is presented below. The estimated cost for the PEA and exploration work program would amount to approximately $24.54 million and would include a resource estimate update. The estimated cost for the feasibility study is approximately $10.2 million. For a total budget of $38.34 million.
Estimated costs for the recommended work program (Table 26.1)
|
Phase 1 - PEA and Exploration Work |
Cost Estimate ($) |
|
1A) PEA update |
500,000 |
|
1B) Exploration work: |
|
|
1. Infill and exploration drilling (90,000 m) |
19,800,000 |
|
2. Surface mapping and sampling |
150,000 |
|
Subtotal |
20,450,000 |
|
Contingency (20%) |
4,090,000 |
|
Total Phase 1 |
24,540,000 |
|
|
|
|
Phase 2 - Feasibility and bulk sampling program |
|
|
Feasibility study |
8,500,000 |
|
Contingency (20%) |
1,700,000 |
|
Total Phase 2 |
10,200,000 |
|
TOTAL Phase 1 and 2 |
38,340,000 |
InnovExplo believes the recommended work program and proposed expenditures are appropriate and well thought out, and that the proposed budget reasonably reflects the contemplated activities.
![]() |
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Overview
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd ("Osisko Royalties"), through its wholly-owned subsidiary Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. ("Barkerville), retained InnovExplo Inc. ("InnovExplo") to prepare this technical report (this "Technical Report") to present an updated mineral resource estimate and geological model (the "2020 MRE") for the Cariboo Gold Project, located in the historic Cariboo Mining District in east-central British Columbia, east and southeast of the City of Quesnel, British Columbia (the "Project"). This Technical Report has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") and Form 43-101F1 and follows the CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves ("CIM Definition Standards").
The 2020 MRE was prepared by Barkerville staff under the supervision of Maggie Layman, Vice-President Exploration of Barkerville and reviewed and validated by InnovExplo, an independent mining and exploration consulting firm based in Val-d'Or, Québec.
The 2020 MRE updates the previous mineral resource estimates of the Project (see Beausoleil and Pelletier (2019) and Morgan et al. (2019)).
The Project is comprised of three key mineral deposits, which include Cow Mountain, Island Mountain and Barkerville Mountain (collectively, the "Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor").
This Technical Report has been addressed to each of Osisko Royalties, Barkerville and Osisko Development Corp. ("Osisko Development" and, together with Osisko Royalties and Barkerville, the "Issuers"). While the Project is owned by Barkerville, a wholly owned subsidiary of Osisko Royalties as of the date of this Technical Report, Osisko Royalties announced a transaction on October 5, 2020, which would result in Barkerville (including the Project) being transferred to a company to be renamed "Osisko Development Corp.", resulting from the reverse take-over of Barolo Ventures Corp. This Technical Report has been addressed to "Osisko Development Corp." as the authors intend that Osisko Development be entitled to rely on the 2020 MRE.
Osisko Royalties is an intermediate Canadian mining company focused on acquiring and managing precious metal and other high-quality royalties, streams and similar interests in Canada and worldwide. Osisko Royalties is currently listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") and the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "OR".
Osisko Development will have a mandate of becoming a North American mine development company with a focus towards becoming a mid-tier gold miner with opportunities for immediate production. Osisko Development will be listed on the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSXV") under the symbol "ODV" upon closing of the transaction announced on October 5, 2020.
2.2 Report Responsibility, Qualified Persons
This Technical Report was prepared by Christine Beausoleil (P.Geo.), Geology Director of InnovExplo, and Carl Pelletier (P.Geo.), Co-President Founder of InnovExplo. Both are independent and qualified persons ("QPs") under NI 43-101.
![]() |
Ms. Beausoleil is a professional geologist in good standing with the OGQ (No. 656), PGO (No. 2958) and EGBC (No. 36156). She is the author of items 4 to 11, 13, 23 and 24, and co-author of items 1 to 3, 12, 14 and 25 to 27.
Mr. Pelletier is a professional geologist in good standing with the OGQ (No. 384), PGO (No. 1713), EGBC (No. 43167) and NAPEG (No. L4160). He is co-author of items 1 to 3, 12, 14 and 25 to 27.
2.3 Site Visit
The last site visit by a QP is considered current for the purposes of this Technical Report.
The last site visit was conducted by the main author, Ms. Christine Beausoleil, who visited the Project from January 22 to 25, 2019, and before that April 3 to 6, 2018. During both site visits, the author reviewed the core facilities, logging and sampling methodology and drill rigs. Since the last site visit, the same implemented procedure and protocols were followed and documented by Barkerville team with the same professional involved. Due to the exceptional pandemic situation (COVID-19) and the impossibility for travelling no additional site visit was conducted in 2020. This has been communicated and deemed acceptable by the AMF (Autorité des marches financier).
Mr. Pelletier has also previously visited the Project. He conducted a site visit from February 1 to 4 and again from May 3 to 12, 2016. The first visit included the Bonanza Ledge pit, the Cow Mountain area and the Island Mountain area. The second involved a visit to the core logging facilities and several drill hole collars. While onsite with the co-authors of the 2017 MRE, he also reviewed selected core intervals from the Barkerville Mountain and Cow Mountain deposits, performed an independent resampling program of said core, and verified the project databases.
2.4 Sources of Information
The documentation listed in items 3 and 27 supports this Technical Report. Excerpts or summaries from documents authored by other consultants are indicated in the text.
The authors based their assessment of the Project on published material in addition to data, professional opinions and unpublished material provided by the issuer. The authors reviewed all the relevant data provided by the issuer and/or its agents.
InnovExplo also consulted other information sources, mainly the Government of British Columbia's online mineral title administration system (Mineral Titles Online: "MTO") and the British Columbia Geological Survey assessment work database, as well as technical reports, annual information forms, MD&A reports and press releases published by Barkerville on SEDAR (http://www.sedar.com/).
The authors have reviewed and appraised the information in this Technical Report, including the conclusions and recommendations, and they believe such information is valid and appropriate considering the status of the Project and the purpose for which the Technical Report has been prepared. The authors have thoroughly researched and documented the conclusions and recommendations made in this Technical Report.
![]() |
2.5 Effective Date
The effective date of the MRE is April 28, 2020.
The effective date of the Technical Report is October 5, 2020.
2.6 Currency, Units of Measure, and Acronyms
The abbreviations, acronyms and units used in this report are provided in Table 2.1 and Table 2.2. All currency amounts are stated in Canadian Dollars ($, C$, CAD) or US dollars (US$, USD). Quantities are stated in metric units, as per standard Canadian and international practice, including metric tons (tonnes, t) and kilograms (kg) for weight, kilometres (km) or metres (m) for distance, hectares (ha) for area, percentage (%) for copper and nickel grades, and gram per metric ton (g/t) for precious metal grades. Wherever applicable, imperial units have been converted to the International System of Units (SI units) for consistency (Table 2.3).
Table 2.1 - List of Acronyms
|
Acronyms |
Term |
|
43-101 |
National Instrument 43-101 (Regulation 43-101 in Québec) |
|
CAD:USD |
Canadian-American dollar exchange rate |
|
CIM |
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum |
|
CIM Definition Standards |
CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves |
|
CoG |
cut-off grade |
|
CRM |
Certified reference material |
|
CSA |
Canadian Securities Administrators |
|
CV |
Coefficient of variation |
|
DDH |
Diamond drill hole |
|
EA |
Environmental assessment |
|
ECCC |
Environment and Climate Change Canada |
|
ESIA |
Environmental and social impact assessment |
|
FS |
Feasibility study |
|
G&A |
General and administration |
|
ID2 |
Inverse distance squared |
|
ISO |
International Organization for Standardization |
|
JV |
Joint venture |
|
JVA |
Joint venture agreement |
|
mesh |
US mesh |
|
MLO |
Mining Licence of Occupation |
|
MRE |
Mineral resource estimate |
|
MSHA |
Mine Safety & Health Administration |
|
n/a |
Not applicable |
![]() |
|
Acronyms |
Term |
|
N/A |
Not available |
|
NAD 83 |
North American Datum of 1983 |
|
nd |
Not determined |
|
NN |
Nearest neighbour |
|
NRC |
Natural Resources Canada |
|
NSR |
Net smelter return |
|
NTS |
National Topographic System |
|
OK |
Ordinary kriging |
|
PFS |
Prefeasibility study |
|
QA/QC |
Quality assurance/quality control |
|
QP |
Qualified person (as defined in National Instrument 43-101) |
|
RQD |
Rock quality designation |
|
SCC |
Standards Council of Canada |
|
SD |
Standard deviation |
|
SG |
Specific gravity |
|
TSXV |
TSX Venture Exchange |
|
UTM |
Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system |
Table 2.2 - List of units
|
Symbol |
Unit |
|
% |
Percent |
|
$, C$ |
Canadian dollar |
|
$/t |
Dollars per metric ton |
|
° |
Angular degree |
|
°C |
Degree Celsius |
|
μm |
Micron (micrometre) |
|
cm |
Centimetre |
|
ft |
Foot (12 inches) |
|
g |
Gram |
|
Ga |
Billion years |
|
g/cm3 |
Gram per cubic centimetre |
|
g/t |
Gram per metric ton (tonne) |
|
ha |
Hectare |
|
in |
Inch |
|
kg |
Kilogram |
|
kg/t |
Kilogram per metric ton |
|
km |
Kilometre |
![]() |
|
Symbol |
Unit |
|
km2 |
Square kilometre |
|
lb |
Pound |
|
lb/st |
Pounds per short ton |
|
M |
Million |
|
m |
Metre |
|
Ma |
Million years (annum) |
|
masl |
Metres above mean sea level |
|
mm |
Millimetre |
|
Moz |
Million (troy) ounces |
|
Mt |
Million metric tons |
|
oz |
Troy ounce |
|
oz/t |
Ounce (troy) per short ton (2,000 lbs) |
|
ppb |
Parts per billion |
|
ppm |
Parts per million |
|
t |
Metric tonne (1,000 kg) |
|
ton |
Short ton (2,000 lbs) |
|
tpd |
Metric tonnes per day |
|
US$ |
American dollar |
|
y |
Year (365 days) |
Table 2.3 - Conversion Factors for Measurements
|
Imperial Unit |
Multiplied by |
Metric Unit |
|
1 inch |
25.4 |
mm |
|
1 foot |
0.3048 |
m |
|
1 acre |
0.405 |
ha |
|
1 ounce (troy) |
31.1035 |
g |
|
1 pound (avdp) |
0.4535 |
kg |
|
1 ton (short) |
0.9072 |
t |
|
1 ounce (troy) / ton (short) |
34.2857 |
g/t |
![]() |
3. RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS
InnovExplo did not relied on other experts to prepared this Technical.
![]() |
4. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
4.1 Location
The Project is located in the historic Wells-Barkerville mining camp (also known as the Cariboo Gold District) of British Columbia and extends for approximately 60 km from northwest to southeast.
The Project falls within the Cariboo Regional District, a division of the local government system in British Columbia. The main towns in the Project area are Wells and Barkerville Historic Town & Park. Wells is situated 74 km east of Quesnel, approximately 115 km southeast of Prince George, and approximately 500 km north of Vancouver (Figure 4.1).
The coordinates of the centre of the Project are 121°34'46"W and 53°06'07"N (UTM coordinates: 595102E and 5884577N, NAD 83, Zone 10). The Project lies on NTS maps sheets 93A/12/13/14, 93G/08, and 93H/03/04/05.
4.2 Mineral Title Status
Barkerville supplied all mineral title maps and tables. Barkerville's Free Miner Certificate number is 104256. InnovExplo verified the status of all mineral titles using Mineral Titles Online ("MTO"), the British Columbia's internet-based electronic mineral titles administration system (MTO, 2020).
The Cariboo Gold Project consists of 407 mineral titles totalling 151,891.99 ha across two (2) contiguous property blocks known as the Cariboo Main Block and the QR Mill Property. These mineral titles include mineral claims, mineral leases, placer claims and placer leases. These titles grant Barkerville the rights to explore for metal ores in bedrock or talus rock, including rock and other materials from mine tailings, dumps and previously mined deposits of minerals, as set out in the Mineral Tenure Act. The breakdown according to type of mineral title is as follows:
Cariboo Main Block: 372 mineral titles (139,420.83 ha):
- 321 mineral claims totalling 135,432.54 ha (Figure 4.2);
- 38 placer claims totalling 1,592.55 ha (Figure 4.3); and
- 13 placer leases totalling 2,395.74 ha (Figure 4.3).
QR Mill Property area: 35 mineral titles (12,471.16 ha):
- 34 mineral claims totalling 9,306.76 ha (Figure 4.2) ; and
- 1 mineral lease (QR Mineral Lease #320752) totalling 3,164.4 ha (Figure 4.2).
Barkerville holds all the placer claims and placer leases, all the QR Mill mineral titles and 355 of the 372 mineral titles for the rest of the Project. The remaining 17 mineral titles are jointly owned with other companies and individuals: a 97.5% interest in six (6), an 85% interest in two (2), and a 50% interest in the other nine (9).
A map showing mineral title distribution and ownership is presented in Figure 4.2.
The Project also contains 234 private land parcels from Crown-granted mineral claims (3129.47 ha) that overlap many of the mineral titles, where Barkerville is the registered owner on title of the surface and/or undersurface rights to the parcels. (Figure 4.4).
![]() |

Figure 4.1 - Location of the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

Figure 4.2 - Mineral title and ownership map for the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

Figure 4.3 - Map of placer claims and placer leases on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

Figure 4.4 - Map of Crown-granted mineral claims on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |
All placer claims and leases and the wholly owned mineral claims (304 out of 321) are registered in the name of Barkerville. The remaining 17 mineral claims are registered jointly with various other companies and individuals. All mineral titles held entirely or partially by Barkerville are in good standing according to the MTO database.
The Project is subject to various royalties, agreements and encumbrances, as discussed below. A detailed list of mineral titles, ownership, royalties and expiration dates is provided in Appendix I, II and III.
Due to COVID-19, MTO granted an extension to Barkerville until December 31, 2021 to all tenure owners to file work or pay cash in lieu to extend tenures with 2020 "good to" dates. The protection order does not change tenure "good to" dates however none of the claims are expired. Barkerville policy is still to renew tenures past 2020/2021 "good to" dates where possible, while making use of the COVID-19 extension for planning and execution of the work programs on regional and Cariboo regional mineral claims where practicable.
4.3 Acquisition of the Cariboo Gold Project
Barkerville began acquiring land in the Barkerville area in 1994. Under an option agreement dated October 4, 1994 (the "Cariboo Option Agreement"), Barkerville was granted an option to acquire a 50% interest in the Cariboo Gold Quartz Property in the Cariboo Gold District. In 2009, Barkerville completed the consolidation of the land package by acquiring contiguous projects belonging to Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd ("IGM") and Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd ("Golden Cariboo"), both related parties to Barkerville and listed on the TSX Venture Exchange.
On May 12, 1999, Barkerville optioned to IGM a 50% interest in the Island Mountain/Aurum gold mine and the properties belonging to Mosquito Creek Gold Mining Company Limited. That option was then renegotiated in October 2004. In January 2006, Barkerville agreed to buy back the 50% interest in the optioned lands and purchase all of IGM's land holdings northwest of the town of Wells, British Columbia. This was approved by the TSX Venture Exchange on May 2, 2006.
To finalize the consolidation of the major land holdings in the Cariboo Gold District, Barkerville acquired all of the lands controlled by Golden Cariboo that lay along strike of the known mineralized trend for some 25 km from Barkerville Historic Town & Park, southeast of the Cariboo Hudson Mine. The acquisition of Golden Cariboo's mineral tenure holdings was approved by the TSX Venture Exchange on April 9, 2009, resulting in Barkerville's land tenure extending 60 km and encompassing the majority of the known strike length of the Barkerville Gold Belt.
Since 1994, Barkerville has acquired many mineral titles by staking and through agreements with other owners of titles within the Cariboo Gold District. Several claim groups are subject to net smelter return ("NSR") royalties (see Appendix I, II and III for details).
Surface and undersurface rights to Crown Granted surveyed land parcels within the Project have also been acquired by the Company as per Table 4.1.
4.4 Agreement and Royalties with Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd
On November 30, 2015, Barkerville entered into a letter agreement with Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd ("Osisko") whereby Osisko agreed to purchase 32 million common shares of Barkerville (the "Private Placement") and a 1.5% NSR royalty on the Project (the "Royalty Financing"). Pursuant to the Private Placement, Osisko agreed to acquire 32 million flow-through common shares of Barkerville at a price of C$0.32 per share, for total proceeds to Barkerville of C$10,240,000. Following the Private Placement, Osisko expected to have ownership over 47,625,000 common shares of Barkerville, representing approximately 19.9% of the issued and outstanding Barkerville shares.
![]() |
Osisko also agreed to acquire a 1.5% NSR royalty on the Project for a cash consideration of C$25 million. As part of the Royalty Financing, Osisko and Barkerville also agreed to negotiate a gold stream agreement ("Gold Stream Agreement") following the completion by Barkerville of a feasibility study on the Project. According to the terms, following a 60-day negotiation period, if Osisko and Barkerville had not entered into a Gold Stream Agreement, Barkerville would either grant a right to Osisko to purchase an additional 0.75% NSR royalty for consideration of C$12.5 million or make a payment of C$12.5 million to Osisko.
On March 27, 2017, Barkerville announced it had entered into a letter agreement with Osisko whereby Osisko agreed to purchase an additional 0.75% NSR royalty on the Project for a cash consideration of $12,500,000 (paid). At the time, Osisko owned a total NSR royalty of 2.25% on all mineral current rights held by Barkerville. The grant of the additional royalty would cancel Osisko's royalty right, which was granted pursuant to the investment agreement between Osisko and Barkerville dated February 5, 2016; however, Osisko would retain a right of first refusal relating to any gold stream offer received by Barkerville with respect to the Project.
On September 05, 2018, Barkerville entered into the Second Amended and Restated Royalty Purchase Agreement whereby Osisko purchased an additional 1.75% NSR royalty on the Cariboo Gold Project for a cash consideration of $20,000,000 (paid), with an option for Osisko to purchase an additional 1.0% NSR royalty for $13,000,000 to bring the Cariboo NSR to 5.0%.
On September 23, 2019, Barkerville and Osisko entered into a definitive agreement, pursuant to which Osisko acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Barkerville that it did not already own by way of a plan of arrangement (the "Arrangement"). Under the terms of the Arrangement, each shareholder of Barkerville (excluding Osisko) received 0.0357 (the "Exchange Ratio") of a common share of Osisko for each share of Barkerville held. The Exchange Ratio implied a consideration of $0.58 per Barkerville share, based on the closing price of Osisko shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) on September 20, 2019. The Exchange Ratio implied an equity value of approximately $338 million on a fully diluted in-the-money basis, inclusive of Barkerville shares held by Osisko.
On November 21, 2019, the Arrangement became effective at 12:01 a.m. (Vancouver Time), and resulted in Barkerville becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Osisko.
Osisko's 4% NSR royalty is the only royalty that applies to the mineral resource area of the Project.
4.5 Surface Rights Option Agreements
Table 4.1 lists properties where Barkerville owns the surface rights as well as the underlying option agreements under which the properties were acquired.
![]() |
![]() |
Table 4.1 - Barkerville surface rights option agreements
|
PID |
DISTRICT LOT |
TITLE # |
CROWN GRANT # |
FEE SIMPLE OWNER |
AGREEMENT NAME |
VENDEE |
VENDOR |
EXECUTION DATE |
|
004-056-582 |
41F |
BB1960681 |
41F/34 |
Barkerville |
Myrtle-Proserpine & Promise Properties |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Huakan International Mining Inc. |
2011-May-05 |
|
004-056-710 |
1F |
CA6623323 |
1F/34 |
Barkerville |
Williams Creek Crown Grants |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Williams Creek Gold |
2016-May-02 |
|
004-056-736 |
1B |
CA6623292 |
1B/35 |
Barkerville |
Williams Creek Crown Grants |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Williams Creek Gold |
2016-May-02 |
|
004-056-752 |
32F |
CA4347922 |
32F |
Barkerville |
Williams Creek Crown Grants |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Williams Creek Gold |
2016-May-02 |
|
004-056-787 |
4B |
CA4347919 |
4B/35 |
Barkerville |
Williams Creek Crown Grants |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Williams Creek Gold |
2016-May-02 |
|
004-078-543 |
2F |
CA3322186 |
2F/34 |
Barkerville |
Blackbull & Canusa |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Grand Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd. |
2000-Jul-28 |
|
004-078-560 |
42F |
CA332187 |
42F |
Barkerville |
Blackbull & Canusa |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Grand Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd. |
2000-Jul-28 |
|
004-078-578 |
17F |
CA3322185 |
17F/34 |
Barkerville, GOLDEN CARIBOO RESOURCES LTD |
Xmas Claims |
Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd. |
P. Wright Contracting Ltd. |
2002-Oct-30 |
|
004-078-608 |
35F |
CA5682814 |
35F/34 |
Barkerville |
35F St George |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Prairie Flower Company Inc. |
2016-Nov-14 |
|
004-078-632 |
5F |
FB503371 |
5F/34 |
Barkerville |
4050 Bowron Lake Rd (Ballarat) |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Jane Ball |
2019-Jun-10 |
|
004-086-627 |
2B |
CA3393199 |
2B/35 |
Barkerville |
District Lot 10518 & Crown Grant 2B |
Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd. |
P. Wright Contracting Ltd. |
2006-Jan-27 |
|
004-086-872 |
20F |
PT5233, PC16246 |
20F/34 |
Barkerville |
Island Mountain & Mosquito Creek Properties |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines |
1997-Apr-15 |
|
004-086-902 |
30F |
PT5234, PC16247 |
30F |
Barkerville |
Island Mountain & Mosquito Creek Properties |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines |
1997-Apr-15 |
|
004-087-054 |
39F |
PT5232, PC16245 |
39F |
Barkerville |
Island Mountain & Mosquito Creek Properties |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines |
1997-Apr-15 |
|
004-087-097 |
38F |
PT5235, PC16248 |
38F |
Barkerville |
Island Mountain & Mosquito Creek Properties |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines |
1997-Apr-15 |
|
006-787-592 |
131 |
CA3322184 |
4215/55 |
Barkerville |
Parcel B Block 7 DL 131 - 12422 Barkerville Hwy |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Kenneth Pollock |
1999-Nov-13 |
|
008-218-803 |
10518 |
CA3393918 |
5313/624 |
Barkerville |
District Lot 10518 (PARCEL A) |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Elizabeth Van Halderen (Premanco Industries Ltd.) |
2013-Jan-21 |
|
008-801-908 |
93 |
CA3322180 |
35/36 |
Barkerville |
Cariboo Gold Quartz |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. |
1994-Oct-03 |
|
014-385-643 |
7795 |
CA3322188 |
5436/625 |
Barkerville |
Cariboo Gold Quartz |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. |
1994-Oct-03 |
|
014-385-686 |
7798 |
CA3322189 |
5439/625 |
Barkerville |
Cariboo Gold Quartz |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. |
1994-Oct-03 |
|
014-385-732 |
391 |
CA3322183 |
2517/101 |
Barkerville |
P Wright District Lots Mosquito |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
P.Wright Contracting Ltd. |
2004-Jun-10 |
|
014-385-741 |
318 |
CA3322182 |
535/92 |
Barkerville |
P Wright District Lots Mosquito |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
P.Wright Contracting Ltd. |
2004-Jun-10 |
|
014-385-759 |
92 |
CA3322179 |
35/36 |
Barkerville |
Cariboo Gold Quartz |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. |
1994-Oct-03 |
|
014-982-013 |
94 |
CA3322181 |
35/36 |
Barkerville |
Cariboo Gold Quartz |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. |
1994-Oct-03 |
|
015-289-681 |
10467 |
CA4347921 |
385/674 |
Barkerville |
Williams Creek Crown Grants |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Williams Creek Gold |
2016-May-02 |
|
017-589-517 |
391 |
CA4545743 |
2517/101 |
Barkerville |
P Wright District Lots Mosquito |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
P.Wright Contracting Ltd. |
2004-Jun-10 |
|
018-685-056 |
289 |
CA6190280 |
1036/97 |
Barkerville |
District Lot 289 (PARCEL 1) |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Dennis Wayne Manuel |
2017-Aug-03 |
|
018-856-870 |
131 |
CA801713 |
4215/55 |
Barkerville |
12438 Barkerville Hwy (Hubs Motel) |
Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. |
Harald Dietrich Andreesen and Dianne Elaine Andreesen |
2019-Aug-19 |
|
026-025-906 |
391 |
BB1991819 |
2517/101 |
Barkerville |
P Wright District Lots Mosquito |
International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. |
P.Wright Contracting Ltd. |
2004-Jun-10 |
![]() |
4.6 Environment
Environmental reclamation securities or bonds are posted for each of the areas where mining or exploration has been approved. The issuer also maintains regular water, environmental and wildlife monitoring activities as part of their permitting requirements within the Project area.
4.6.1 Environmental Liabilities
Environmental liabilities associated with the development and operation of the Project must be addressed for each disturbance associated with the proposed operations by posting new reclamation bonds, or updates to existing bonds for the mill and waste dump, and by the active management and reclamation/closure of the Project sites as the operation winds down. A new reclamation liability bond will be calculated for the proposed mine site development work, and updates to two existing securities will be developed for the QR Mill and Bonanza Ledge Mine. Closure and reclamation liabilities will be further defined during the detailed design and permitting phases. The mine is situated on an abandoned brownfield mine site with historical tailings, waste dumps and buildings, partly on Barkerville-owned property and partly on the Crown land, all of which must be studied during the next design phases. The closure and reclamation liabilities are known for the existing mill and mine sites situated on Crown land. To date, Barkerville is responsible for exploration-related reclamation for minor disturbances (trails, drill pads) at the proposed mine sites, but this will be confirmed during the design and permitting stage.
4.6.2 Required Permits and Status
The Project requires a provincial environmental assessment ("EA") because it exceeds the following threshold under the Reviewable Projects Regulation (B.C. Reg. 243/2019): "A new mine facility that, during operations, will have a production capacity of >75,000 tonnes/year (t/yr) of mineral ore".
The Project will require review as per the BC Environmental Assessment Act 2018, and issuance of an Environmental Assessment Certificate ("EAC"). An initial Project Description and Engagement Plan have been submitted to the BC Environmental Assessment Office (the "EAO") to initiate the EA process. The proposed submission date of the EAC Application is Q2 2020.
In addition to the provincial EA approval, the federal and provincial permits, approvals and authorizations that could potentially be applicable to the proposed Project are summarized in Table 4.2 and Table 4.3. As the Project proceeds, specific permit requirements will be determined based on discussions with the regulatory agencies.
![]() |
Table 4.2 - Federal permits and approvals potentially applicable to the Project
|
Permit/Approval |
Responsible Agency |
Federal Statute |
|
Fisheries Act Authorization |
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) |
Fisheries Act |
|
Migratory Birds Convention Act Authorization |
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) |
Migratory Birds Convention Act and Migratory Bird Sanctuary Regulations |
|
Navigation Protection Program Notification and/ or approval |
Transport Canada |
Canadian Navigable Waters Act |
|
Species at Risk Act Authorizations |
Environment and Climate Change Canada, DFO, and Parks Canada |
Species at Risk Act (SARA) |
|
Explosive magazine, factory Licences and Permits |
Natural Resources Canada |
Explosives Act |
|
Transportation of Dangerous Goods |
Transport Canada |
Transportation of Dangerous Goods Ac |
Table 4.3 - Provincial permits and approvals potentially applicable to the Project
|
Permit/Approval |
Responsible Agency |
Provincial Statute |
|
Mines Act Permit |
BC Ministry of Mines, Energy, and Petroleum Resources |
Mines Act |
|
Effluent Discharge Permit and Waste Storage Approval |
BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (MOE; formerly BC Ministry of Environment) |
Environmental Management Act |
|
Heritage Conservation Act permits |
BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (FLNR; formerly BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations), Archaeology Branch |
Heritage Conservation Act |
|
Heritage Conservation Act Concurrence letters |
FLNR, Archaeology Branch |
Heritage Conservation Act |
|
License of Occupation |
FLNR |
Land Act |
|
Statutory Right of Way |
FLNR |
Land Act |
|
Wildlife Act Permit |
MOE, Environmental Stewardship Division |
Wildlife Act |
|
Construction Permit for a Potable Water Well |
BC Ministry of Health, Northern Health Authority |
Drinking Water Protection Act |
|
Water System Construction Permit |
BC Ministry of Health, Northern Health Authority |
Drinking Water Protection Act |
|
Drinking Water System Operations Permit |
BC Ministry of Health, Northern Health Authority |
Drinking Water Protection Act |
|
Short Term Use of Water Permit |
MOE, Water Stewardship Branch |
Water Sustainability Act |
|
Water Sustainability Act Approval |
MOE, Water Stewardship Branch |
Water Sustainability Act |
|
Water License |
MOE, Water Stewardship Branch |
Water Sustainability Act |
|
Licenses to Cut and Special Use Permit |
FLNR, Forest Tenures Branch |
Forest Act, Part 3, Section 8.2 Licence to Cut Regulation Provincial Forest Use Regulation |
|
Industrial Access Permit |
BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MOTI) |
Transportation Act |
|
Permit for regulated activities |
Ministry of Health |
Public Health Act |
![]() |
4.7 Communication and Consultation with the Community
4.7.1 First Nations
Barkerville is committed to ongoing engagement and consultation with First Nations that may be affected by the Project. Barkerville initiated discussions in 2015, and engagement and consultation activities are ongoing. To date, activities have included meetings, written correspondence, emails, and telephone conversations with leaders and representatives of First nations. Barkerville will continue to consult Indigenous peoples to understand better how the Project may affect past or current Indigenous practices, traditions and customs, and how measures may be incorporated into the Project to avoid, mitigate or otherwise address potential effects.
Engagement activities are currently underway with the following First Nations:
- Lhtako Dené Nation;
- Xatśūll First Nation;
- Williams Lake Indian Band (T'exelc);
- Tsilhqot'in National Government;
- Nazko First Nation;
- Neskonlith Indian Band.
As per the BC EAO regulatory agency direction in March 2020, Barkerville has been instructed to cease engagement with Neskonlith.
The Project entered the review process in fall of 2019 and has an accepted Project Description and Section 10 order under the BC Environmental Assessment Act, 2002 (BCEAA, 2002). The Project Description submitted in 2019 has been accepted as fulfilling the requirements of the Initial Project Description (IPD) for the purposes of the BCEAA, 2018 and the Project is now entering the Early Engagement Phase. The Project is not subject to review under the Federal Impact Assessment Act. The preliminary engagement approach can be summarized as follows:
Barkerville first initiated meetings with the Chief and Council of Lhtako Dené Nation and Xatśūll First Nation, respectively, to discuss the Project in 2016. At the direction of the EAO, Barkerville later expanded the scope of its engagement activities to include the Williams Lake Indian Band, Nazko First Nation, Neskonlith Indian Band and Tsilhqot'in National Government.
Based on early discussions with and concerns expressed by Lhtako Dené Nation with respect to open pit mining, Barkerville changed the mine plan from open pit to an entirely underground mine in early 2017.
Barkerville sent a draft IPD to Indigenous nations on December 21, 2018, for review and comment. Indigenous nations were asked to provide comments on the draft IPD by January 31, 2019.
Lhtako Dené Nation and Xatśūll First Nation provided comments to Barkerville. Neskonlith Indian Band requested spatial files for information in the IPD but did not provide comments on the IPD. No comments on the IPD were received from Williams Lake Indian Band, Nazko First Nation, or the Tsilhqot'in National Government. Barkerville provided the spatial files requested by Neskonlith Indian Band and revised the IPD based on the comments received from Lhtako Dene Nation and Xatśūll First Nation.
![]() |
Barkerville sent a revised IPD to Indigenous nations for review and comment on April 18, 2019.
Lhtako Dené Nation and Xatśūll First Nation provided comments on the IPD to Barkerville on May 16, 2019. Barkerville revised the IPD based on the comments received from Lhtako Dené Nation and Xatśūll First Nation. No comments on the IPD were received from Neskonlith Indian Band, Williams Lake Indian Band, Nazko First Nation, or the Tsilhqot'in National Government.
Barkerville sent a revised IPD to Indigenous nations for review and comment on July 26, 2019.
On July 29, 2019, Lhtako Dené Nation notified BARKERVILLE that it supported the submission of the IPD in its current form.
Xatśūll First Nation provided comments to Barkerville on August 22, 2019. Barkerville revised the PD based on the comments received from Xatśūll First Nation. No comments on the IPD were received from Neskonlith Indian Band, Williams Lake Indian Band, Nazko First Nation, or the Tsilhqot'in National Government.
Barkerville received additional comments from the EAO requesting additional detail and refinement of certain project components on August 28, 2019. Barkerville revised the IPD based on the EAO's comments and recirculated the IPD to Indigenous nations for review and comment on September 5, 2019. No additional comments on the IPD were received from Lhtako Dené Nation, Xatśūll First Nation, Neskonlith Indian Band, Williams Lake Indian Band, Nazko First Nation, or the Tsilhqot'in National Government.
Barkerville submitted the final IPD to Indigenous nations and the EAO on October 24, 2019.
In addition to direct engagement on the IPD, Barkerville's engagement activities from 2016 to 2020 also included the following:
Barkerville has provided regular Project updates to each of the six Indigenous nations and organized site tours and field visits with elected leaders, technical staff and members of the Lhtako Dené Nation, Xatśūll First Nation and Williams Lake Indian Band.
Barkerville invited representatives from Indigenous nations to participate in Project-specific baseline studies from 2016 to 2020 for wildlife, vegetation, water quality and aquatic health, fish habitat, terrain and soils, hydrology, heritage, human health and ecology risk assessment, and hydrogeology.
Barkerville funded a Project-specific traditional use and knowledge study for the Lhtako Dené Nation, which was completed in August 2019.
Barkerville entered into capacity funding agreements with Lhtako Dené Nation (June 2016, November 2016, May 2017, April 2019), Xatśūll First Nation (2017, 2019) and Williams Lake Indian Band (2019).
Barkerville has held discussions with Lhtako Dené Nation and Xatśūll First Nation regarding Valued Component selection since the submission of the IPD.
The focus of preliminary engagement has been to establish consistent points of contact with the authorized representatives of each Indigenous nation, inform Indigenous nations about the next steps in the regulatory review, and respond to questions and concerns raised by Indigenous nations about the IPD and the Project in general.
![]() |
As noted above, Barkerville has reached Project-specific agreements that provide funding capacity to Indigenous nations. They include agreements with Lhtako Dené Nation, Xatśūll First Nation and Williams Lake Indian Band.
4.7.2 Stakeholders
Barkerville is committed to communicating and consulting with stakeholders, including members of the general public, local, regional, provincial and federal government elected officials and staff, community organizations, recreational groups, authorization holders, landowners, resource users, temporary residents of the District of Wells, and others.
Stakeholder engagement began in 2016 and is ongoing. Engagement initially focused on the District of Wells and introducing the Project to the residents of Wells. Barkerville also met with the BC EAO early in the planning process to discuss the Project. Engagement with stakeholders to date has primarily been via public meetings and one-on-one meetings.
Engagement activities held with stakeholders are presented in Table 4.4.
![]() |
Table 4.4 - Barkerville engagement activities with stakeholders Activity Dates
|
Activity |
Dates |
|
Community Meetings |
Wells:
Quesnel:
|
|
Events |
Wells:
Industry events:
|
|
Correspondence |
Stakeholder contact has been undertaken through meetings (2017 to 2019), e-mails (2017 to 2019) and a project introduction letter (2019). Barkerville has engaged with the following stakeholders:
|
Community meetings were advertised broadly in the District of Wells, and posters were placed at key locations between Wells and Quesnel. The sessions were announced on social media, and community members on the District of Wells' contact list were notified through email. The September 2019 meetings were also announced in the Quesnel Observer. Approximately 225 people have attended community meetings. Although Indigenous nations were invited to participate in stakeholder and public events, and Indigenous individuals may have attended these events, their participation is not considered part of the formal Indigenous engagement program.
![]() |
5. ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
Barkerville is committed to communicating and consulting with stakeholders in the District of Wells and the surrounding Project area, including but not limited to the provincial government, third party mineral and placer owners operating in the area, neighbouring property owners, Barkerville Historic Town & Park, and Indigenous communities.
Wells is a mining town with a rich history of mineral exploration and production and is also a regional centre and tourist attraction for artists and outdoor enthusiasts. Barkerville maintains and fosters relationships with the community through public and stakeholder meetings (see Section 4.7), and through recruiting employees and sponsoring community events. The town of Quesnel, with a population of 23,000, is located 80 km to the west. It has an airport and can provide the goods and services Barkerville requires. Williams Lake and Prince George are the nearest other major transportation and logistical hubs in the federal electoral district of Cariboo-Prince George, located 193 km and 175 km from Wells, respectively.
The following descriptions of the accessibility, climate, local resources, infrastructure and physiography for the Project and the Cariboo Gold District are taken from Georges et al. (2013) and Dzick (2015). Slight modifications have been made to adapt the text to the style of this report.
5.1 Accessibility
The Project is located in Wells, Central, British Columbia, roughly 80 km east of the City of Quesnel. The Project is accessible via Highway 26, which branches off Provincial Highway 97 at Quesnel (Figure 5.1). A network of gravel roads provides access to the Cow, Island and Barkerville mountains.
Barkerville's project offices and related facilities are located in the town of Wells. The QR Mill is a wholly-owned and fully permitted milling and tailings facility approximately 110 km from Wells. An all-season road provides access (500 Nyland Lake Road).
5.2 Infrastructure and Local Resources
The City of Quesnel is the primary supply and service centre for natural resource industries and has the closest regional hospital. Manpower is also available in the region.
The Project has sufficient power and water to support a mining operation. Canadian National Railway provides rail access from Quesnel to the Port of Vancouver.
![]() |

Figure 5.1 - Access to the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |
Barkerville has sufficient surface rights in the Project area for mineral exploration and development operations. These rights are generally conveyed by the issuer's Barkerville's Crown-granted mineral claims or by specific permits, like those related to tailings and waste disposal areas, or water and timber use.
Currently, local resources include single-phase 7.2 kV power, potable water from the District of Wells public works (supplying roughly 985,000 L per day to the town), local sewage treatment, waste disposal sites, and high-speed internet and telecommunication services, including communication towers maintained by Barkerville for use by company personnel and site contractors.
Barkerville holds four water licences: one (1) for Willow River, two (2) at the QR mill, and one (1) for a well at the geological compound and field offices at Lowhee Creek. The climate allows for year-round mining operations, and there is enough readily available water to conduct diamond drilling.
5.3 Climate
The Project area is subject to a semi-alpine continental climate with cool summers and cold winters. The weather is wet throughout the year, with a mean annual precipitation of up to 120 cm and accumulated snow depths up to 1.8 m. The mean 24-h temperature at Wells-Barkerville at an elevation of approximately 1,256 m (4,121 ft) is 9.2°C in January and 12.3°C in July.
5.4 Physiography
The topography in the Project area is mountainous (Figure 5.2), rising from a low point of approximately 1,190 masl in the incised river valleys around the towns of Wells and Barkerville Historic Town & Park to a peak of 2,060 masl at Roundtop Mountain located 25 km south of Wells. Mount Proserpine, 11 km south of the town, summits at 1,830 masl.
Mountain summits are generally rounded, reflecting the passage of continental ice sheets during the Pleistocene Epoch. Pleistocene glacial till and clay are widespread. Moderately drained and well-drained morainal and colluvial materials dominate at higher elevations. Valley bottoms are overlain by very poorly drained organic deposits or moderately drained fluvial sands adjacent to Willow River, downstream of Jack of Clubs Lake, lower Lowhee Creek and Willow River. Ice direction is generally to the northwest near Wells, and glacial till is the most widespread surficial deposit in the area.
The relatively small drainage basins of Jack of Clubs Lake and Williams Creek converge at Wells and together compose the upper headwaters of Willow River. They represent a combined catchment area of approximately 100 km2 at the southern extremity of the Willow River Basin and together embody roughly 3% of the total area of the basin. Willow River flows into Fraser River east of Prince George.
The area is well forested, and the mountains are typically covered with subalpine forests, except near their peaks. Vegetation is dominated by Engelmann Spruce (Picea engelmann), Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and Subalpine Fir (Abies lasiocarpa), accompanied by alders and other deciduous varieties on lower wetter slopes flanking river valleys. Prominent in the subalpine flora is the shrub Rhododendron albiflorum. Bedrock exposure is poor, except along creeks, ridgelines and logging roads.
![]() |

Photograph looking east from above Island Mountain. Mount Murray (left) and Mt. Waverly (right) are the highest peaks in the distance, with the Cariboo Mountains beyond. Island Mountain forms the foreground with Valley Mountain to the left and Cow Mountain to the right, on the south side of the town of Wells (center). Barkerville Mountain is located beyond Cow Mountain to the right of the photo. The southeastern part of Wells is built on a fan of placer tailings that issued from Lowhee Creek, right, into Jack of Clubs Lake (bottom right). (Photo from Google Earth, 2020) Sutherland Brown and Ash, 2009).
Figure 5.2 - Aerial view of the town of Wells looking east Accessibility
![]() |
6. HISTORY
The Project contains several historical mines, including Cariboo Gold Quartz, Aurum and Mosquito Creek. The extensive work on the Project's placer gold deposits will not be discussed as it is not relevant to this report.
6.1 Historical Mines
6.1.1 Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine
Fred Wells purchased the Rainbow claim group from A.W. Sanders and formed Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Ltd. ("Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining") in 1927. The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine operated from 1927 to 1959 at Cow Mountain.
Production from the mine (Figure 6.1) was from several zones: No.1, Tailings, Rainbow, Sanders and Pinkerton.
In October 1942, gold mining was classified as a non-war industry by the federal government and received no priority for labour or supplies. As a result, gold mines in British Columbia were unable to hire replacement labour for the duration of the war. The mining operation never recovered from the loss of revenue caused by a 50% reduction in production and the depletion of reserves in the absence of exploration drilling and only minor development during this period.
Following the purchase of the Island Mountain Mine in 1954, Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining focused on developing higher grade pyrite-type replacement ore. Subsequent activities in the mine were mainly confined to the No. 1 and Tailings zones below the 1500 level (through the No.1 shaft), in the Rainbow Zone (No. 2 shaft and No. 1-No. 2 shaft connection), in the Sanders Zone (No. 3 shaft), and the Pinkerton Zone.
The mine closed on August 31, 1959.
In 1959, in its 33rd Annual Report, the company reported book reserves of 95,265 t of ore, including a 1952 reserve write-down of 42,275 t of 9.26 g/t Au and another 52,990 t of 12.69 g/t Au scattered in 51 ore remnants through 13 levels and across a distance of 10,500 ft (3,200 m).
These "Reserves" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral reserves.
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mill continued operating using feed from the Aurum Mine until March 1967. During the period between 1933 and 1967, a total of 1,951,944 t of ore were mined, and 863,307 oz of gold and 91,652 oz of silver were recovered (MINFILE number 093H 019). The average recovery during that period was 95.3%.
![]() |

(from Richards, 1948)
Figure 6.1 - Historical geological plan of the 1500 level and longitudinal section, Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine
6.1.2 Island Mountain Mine (Aurum Mine)
In 1925, C.J. Seymour Baker acquired the original five (5) Crown-granted mineral claims (later known as the Aurum Group), which he worked until 1932.
In 1932, Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") acquired the Aurum Group and eight (8) adjacent claims to form Island Mountain Mines Company Ltd.
Milling commenced in 1934 at a rate of 50 short tons ("st") per day and reached a peak of 149 st/d in 1941. Quartz-type ore in diagonal vein structures and pyrite-type ore in the Aurum limestone unit were both extracted. The mine was developed over a strike length of 4,500 ft (1,371.6 m). After 1945, no further exploration or development was carried out west of the Aurum Fault, and in 1952 the mine suspended active exploration and development.
Under Newmont's ownership, production from the mine (Figure 6.2) was 770,093 st (699,536 t) from which 333,705 oz of gold and 48,130 oz of silver were recovered (MINFILE number 093H 006). The mill also recovered 531 lb of zinc and 134 lb of lead.
Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining purchased the mine and equipment from Newmont in 1954 for a sum of $305,000. Underground workings extending northwest from the Island Mountain Mine into the Mosquito Group are formally known as the Aurum Mine. The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine and Island Mountain Mine do not connect below Jack of Clubs Lake.
![]() |

(from Campbell, 1969)
Figure 6.2 - Historical longitudinal section, Island Mountain and Cariboo Gold Quartz mines
![]() |
6.1.3 Mosquito Creek Mine
Andrew H. Jukes of Calgary acquired the Mosquito Creek claim group and formed Mosquito Creek Gold Mining Company Ltd. ("Mosquito Creek Gold") in 1971 to explore the ground above the Aurum Mine. Surface exploration drilling and underground development from 1971 to 1975 were financed by a joint venture agreement with the Home Oil Company Ltd. of Calgary. They conducted an extensive surface and underground exploration and development program on the property. In 1975, Mosquito Creek Gold purchased all of Home Oil Company's interest in the property. Subsequently, Peregrine entered into a joint venture agreement with Mosquito Creek Gold, whereby it ultimately earned a 50% working interest in the property.
A total of 27,384 oz of gold were recovered from 86,248 t of mostly pyrite-type ore milled during the main production period (1980 to 1983). The operation failed due to low initial reserves and a low discovery rate of new ore. The latter was the result of insufficient development at depth and northwest of the Mosquito Fault.
In 1984, Hudson Bay Mining and Smelting Co. Ltd. ("Hudson Bay") optioned the property but dropped it after earning a 10% interest. Hudson Bay sold its interest back to Mosquito Creek Gold, and Peregrine sold its 50% interest to Mosquito.
In 1986, the property was optioned by Hecla Mining Company of Canada Ltd who conducted underground exploration work and then dropped it.
Mining operations were intermittent until 1987 when Mosquito Creek Gold became Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd. After the gold price dropped, and new ore became hard to find, the mine closed in 1987. During the period between 1980 and 1987, a total of 92,826 t of ore were mined from which 35,054 oz of gold and 9,750 oz of silver were recovered (MINFILE number 093H 010).
In 1988, Lyon Lake Mines Ltd. optioned the property and earned a 50% interest after performing underground exploration.
6.2 Surface Work Programs
6.2.1 Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Ltd. (1968)
In 1968, Dolmage Campbell and Associates Ltd. carried out 5 km of bulldozer trenching on behalf of Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining.
Seventeen (17) trenches approximately 2 m to 2.5 m deep were excavated across the Baker-Rainbow contact over a strike length of 1.6 km on Island Mountain. Pyritic mineralization, 6 m long by 1 m wide, was discovered in Trench J.
6.2.2 Wharf Resources Ltd. (1980-1981)
In 1972, Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining amalgamated with Coseka Resources Ltd to form a company with the name of the latter. In April 1973, Wharf Resources Ltd (formerly Plateau Metals and Industries) amalgamated with French Exploration Ltd (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coseka Resources).
Wharf Resources carried out surface drilling programs in 1980 and 1981 to search for near-surface ore on the Cariboo and Island Mountain claim groups. A total of 7,010 m of percussion drilling and 1,219 m of diamond drilling were completed in 1980 and 1981 (Bolin, 1984).
![]() |
6.2.3 Blackberry Gold Resources Inc. (1988)
In 1987, Blackberry Gold Resources Inc. completed several work programs on the ARCH 1-4 claim group located on Cow and Richfield mountains. The objective of the work was to discover gold mineralization associated with the system of north-striking fault structures. Ground VLF geophysical surveys were used to define conductors inferred to be the strike extension of major faults on the Cariboo Group of Crown-granted mineral claims. Four strong conductive trends were tested along six fences of percussion drill holes for a total of 2,424 m of drilled in 79 holes. This was followed by 2,465 m of diamond drilling in 19 holes.
6.2.4 Pan Orvana Resources Inc. (1989-1991)
On July 12, 1985, Mosquito Creek Gold purchased the Cariboo and Island Mountain claim groups from Wharf Resources Ltd. Pan Orvana Resources Inc. ("Pan Orvana") signed the Cariboo Gold Option Agreement on May 20, 1988, obtaining the right to earn a 50% interest in the Cariboo Group, but terminated the agreement in 1991 without exercising the option.
Pan Orvana excavated 20 surface trenches, drilled four (4) holes and conducted ground geophysical surveys, geochemical sampling programs and geological mapping.
6.2.5 Gold City Mining Corp. (1994-1995)
In 1994 and 1995, Gold City Mining Corp. ("Gold City Mining") assembled a large land position consisting of 13,000 ha of mineral titles between Mount Tom and the Cariboo Hudson Mine to form the Welbar Gold Project.
Doing so involved seven (7) option agreements, including one that covered the Mosquito Creek, Island Mountain and Cariboo claim groups. The latter was subject to the Cariboo Option Agreement between Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Ltd and International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. lntera Information Technologies Corp. flew a synthetic aperture radar survey in July 1995. DIGHEM I Power completed a regional airborne radiometric-Mag-EM survey of 1,280 line-km, as well as trenching and diamond drilling on some of their properties, including one (1) hole on the Mosquito Creek Group.
From October 1 to November 30, 1995, Gold City Mining conducted a 13-hole (1,865 m) diamond drilling program on the Cariboo-Hudson Property (Chapman, 1996a).
Gold City Mining optioned the Cariboo-Hudson Property from Cathedral Gold Corp. in 1994.
In November 1995, Gold City Mining sunk four (4) diamond drill holes (560 m) on the Williams Creek Property (Chapman, 1996b). That same month, Gold City Mining drilled two (2) holes (390 m) on the Island Mountain Property (Chapman, 1997).
6.3 International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. (1999-2014)
Table 6.1 summarizes the work conducted by International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. ("IWGM") on the Island Mountain Project between 1999 and 2014, as documented in Pickett (2000; 2001; 2002; 2003), Pautler (2003; 2004), Johnson (2005), Moore (2006), Yin and Daignault (2007a) and Yin (2011), as well as MD&A reports from IGM, IWGM and Barkerville.
![]() |
Table 6.1 - Summary of drilling on the Island Mountain Project from 1999 to 2014
|
Year |
Zone/Area |
Surface diamond drilling |
|
|
(hole) |
(m) |
||
|
1999 |
Footwall of the West Fault |
10 |
902.2 |
|
2000 |
Northwest of the Mosquito Creek Mine |
10 |
1,750.5 |
|
2001 |
Gold-in-soil anomaly |
2 |
367.3 |
|
Favourable stratigraphy |
1 |
183.8 |
|
|
Kutney Zone |
4 |
672.7 |
|
|
2002 |
Gold-in-soil anomaly and IP anomaly |
2 |
191.7 |
|
Gold-in-soil anomaly |
2 |
210.3 |
|
|
2003 |
2003 trenching program |
13 |
1,397.5 |
|
2004 |
Snapjack Zone |
3 |
303.9 |
|
Teapot Vein |
3 |
555.0 |
|
|
2005 |
Snapjack Zone |
9 |
906.1 |
|
Southern soil anomaly |
4 |
780.3 |
|
|
Channel sample anomaly |
2 |
202.1 |
|
|
2006-2009 |
No drilling |
0 |
0.0 |
|
2010 |
Reconnaissance exploration |
1 |
178.6 |
|
2011-2014 |
No drilling |
0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
66 |
8,602.0 |
|
6.4 International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. (1995-2009)
The following descriptions cover the history of exploration work conducted by IWGM on the Cariboo Gold Quartz Project between 1995 and 2009 and are taken from Lord and Reid (1997), Reid (1999), Hall (1999), Lord and Hall (2001), Walton (2002a; 2002b; 2003a; 2003b), Gates (2005), Duba (2005), Daignault and Moore (2006), Sandefur and Stone (2006), Yin and Daignault, (2007a; 2008), Brown (2009), Fier et al. (2009) and Yin (2010a; 2010b). The text retains the references therein.
6.4.1 1995-1999 Work Programs
IWGM worked the Project area continuously from May 1, 1995. Most of the work was carried out on the main mine trend, either from the surface or underground from the 1200 level adit.
In 1998 and 1999, a secondary target, the BC Vein, was explored over a strike length of 384 m by 31 surface drill holes totalling 2,245.2 m. The goal of this program was to find high-grade ore shoots of the kind located by Cariboo GoId Quartz Mining in the 1940s. Table 6.2 summarizes IWGM's drilling on the Project between 1995 and 1999.
![]() |
In the summer of 1997, IWGM carried out a geochemical and prospecting program to find new mineralized showings and generate targets for further exploration. The geochemical surveys yielded 1,079 soil samples, 59 stream sediment samples and 121 rock samples.
Table 6.2 - Summary of drilling on the Cariboo Gold Project from 1995 to 1999
|
Year |
Zone |
Surface diamond drilling |
Underground diamond drilling |
Underground percussion drilling |
|||
|
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
||
|
1995 |
Rainbow |
17 |
844.0 |
12 |
496.5 |
6 |
96.9 |
|
1996 |
Rainbow |
8 |
424.0 |
5 |
157.6 |
38 |
867.8 |
|
Pinkerton |
5 |
385.3 |
- |
- |
25 |
998.5 |
|
|
1997 |
Rainbow |
20 |
1,617.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Pinkerton |
17 |
1,359.4 |
- |
- |
9 |
481.5 |
|
|
Sanders |
2 |
170.1 |
- |
- |
33 |
2,023.6 |
|
|
1998 |
Pinkerton |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
307.2 |
|
Sanders |
2 |
157.9 |
- |
- |
19 |
964.4 |
|
|
Butts |
2 |
146.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
BC Vein |
13 |
846.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
1999 |
BC Vein |
18 |
1,398.4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total |
104 |
7,349.4 |
17 |
654.1 |
135 |
5,739.9 |
|
An internal polygonal mineral inventory calculation and bench plans for an open pit target were prepared in 1997 to identify areas that needed assay information by drilling (Dykes, 1997). The infill drilling was completed in 1997-1998 and resulted in a block model calculation (the "1999 Estimate") by S. Dykes (P.Geo.) of Geologic Systems Ltd. The 1999 Estimate did not include the BC Vein. Historical resource estimates from this period are superseded by those reported herein. They are described in detail in the previous technical report (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) available on SEDAR.
The 1999 Estimate used ID2 interpolation on a block model. The estimate comprised measured resources of 7,158,100 t at 2.43 g/t Au for a total of 559,200 oz of gold, indicated resources of 1,394,300 t at 2.02 g/t Au for a total of 90,500 oz of gold, and inferred resources of 802,000 t at 2.06 g/t Au for a total of 53,100 oz of gold.
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources .
![]() |
6.4.2 2000-2009 Work Programs
IWGM carried out extensive work from 2000 to 2009. Table 6.3 summarizes the drilling by year and area of interest.
Table 6.3 - Summary of drilling on the Cariboo Gold Project from 2000 to 2009
|
Year |
Zone/Area |
Surface diamond drilling |
Underground diamond drilling |
||
|
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
||
|
2000 |
BC Vein |
48 |
6,227.4 |
- |
- |
|
Bonanza Ledge |
|||||
|
2001 |
BC Vein |
22 |
5,145.9 |
- |
- |
|
Bonanza Ledge |
|||||
|
Cow Mountain |
3 |
653.8 |
- |
- |
|
|
2002 |
BC Vein |
18 |
3,394.0 |
- |
- |
|
Bonanza Ledge |
|||||
|
Myrtle Property |
5 |
1,206.1 |
- |
- |
|
|
2003 |
Bonanza Ledge |
26 |
3,037.3 |
3 |
203.3 |
|
Myrtle Property |
4 |
781.5 |
- |
- |
|
|
2004 |
Bonanza Ledge |
60 |
7,788.6 |
73 |
5,974.1 |
|
Bonanza Ledge - engineering |
17 |
1,899.5 |
- |
- |
|
|
Myrtle Property |
5 |
861.4 |
- |
- |
|
|
Goldfinch Target |
6 |
826.6 |
- |
- |
|
|
Groundwater monitoring well holes |
2 |
120.1 |
- |
- |
|
|
2005 |
Lowhee Creek |
23 |
4,422.4 |
- |
- |
|
Black Bull |
3 |
474.9 |
- |
- |
|
|
2006 |
Mucho Oro |
31 |
4,682.1 |
- |
- |
|
2007 |
Cow Mountain |
15 |
1,463.6 |
- |
- |
|
2008 |
Goldfinch and Bonanza Ledge |
10 |
1,762.1 |
- |
- |
|
2009 |
Cow Mountain |
11 |
1,900.2 |
- |
- |
|
Lowhee Creek |
2 |
329.8 |
- |
- |
|
|
Bonanza Ledge |
18 |
1,781.5 |
- |
- |
|
|
Groundwater monitoring well holes |
7 |
362.7 |
- |
- |
|
|
Total |
336 |
47,222.0 |
76 |
6,177.4 |
|
6.4.2.1 2000 Work Program
On March 23, 2000, IWGM announced the discovery of a new mineralized zone while drilling the BC Vein. The type of mineralization encountered had not previously been identified in the region. The new zone was named the Bonanza Ledge Zone.
![]() |
Subsequent geochemical, geophysical and diamond drilling programs explored the Bonanza Ledge and BC Vein zones to look for new Bonanza Ledge-type targets away from the initial discovery. The work program consisted of 48 holes for 6,227.4 m, and focused on area adjacent to the BC Vein. Surface exploration, completed mainly between August and October 2000, included geological mapping, prospecting, 44.2 line-km of soil sampling (2,400 samples on cut grid lines, spacing of 61 m by 15.2 m), and 32.9 line-km of ground geophysical surveys including SP, IP, VLF-EM and ground Mag surveys. To provide an accurate topographic base map for the project, an aerial photographic survey was flown in August and September 2000, covering the full extent of IWGM's claims. Historical resource estimates from this period are superseded by those reported herein. They are described in detail in the previous technical report (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) available on SEDAR.
In 2000, IWGM hired an independent consultant, R.G. Simpson (P.Geo.), to review the Cow Mountain data and the 1999 Resource (Dykes, 1999). Simpson estimated an inferred resource of approximately 7.9 Mt grading 2.03 g/t Au, at a cut-off grade of 0.69 g/t Au (see IWGM's 2000 AIF).
Due to uncertainty in the reliability of conventional percussion drilling and the lack of density measurements, no measured or indicated resources were defined. Simpson's inferred resource estimate replaced the "measured" and "indicated" resources of the 1999 Estimate.
Following the recommendations from Simpson, another mineral resource estimate was completed by G.H. Giroux, yielding an inferred resource of 6.01 Mt grading 2.23 g/t Au (Girous, 2000). An additional inferred resource of 1.53 Mt grading 1.85 g/t Au for Cow Mountain, at a cut-off grade of 0.69 g/t Au (Giroux, 2000).
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance or reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources .
6.4.2.2 2001 Work Program
The program in 2001 included diamond drilling, 20 line-km IP survey along 22 lines on Cow Mountain, 24.3 line-km of SP surveying, and 7.2 line-km of brushing out of lines for the IP survey on 11 lines.
6.4.2.3 2002 Work Program
Diamond drilling was carried out in 2002, along with a resource estimate by Giroux Consulting (the "2002 Estimate"; Giroux, 2002).
The 2002 Estimate included the Bonanza Ledge, BC Vein and Cow Mountain zones to provide an overall indicated resource of 6,647,000 t grading 2.67 g/t Au for 570,000 oz of gold at a cut-off grade of 0.69 g/t Au, and an inferred resource of 1,859,000 t grading 1.95 g/t Au for 121,000 oz of contained gold at a cut-off grade of 0.69 g/t Au.
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 criteria or CIM Standards and Definitions, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources.
![]() |
6.4.2.4 2003 Work Program
The 2003 work program involved 70 m of trenching in six trenches. The work concentrated on the Bonanza Ledge Zone, the adjacent Myrtle Group, and the Sanders Zone. The program also included surface and underground drilling. Historical resource estimates from this period are superseded by those reported herein. They are described in detail in the previous technical report (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) available on SEDAR.
In 2003, an independent preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") by DJP Consultants Ltd. (Pow, 2003) concluded that the 2002 Estimate yielded a probable reserve of 3,109,000 t grading 2.95 g/t Au for 294,700 oz of contained gold, and that there were sufficient reserves to supply an onsite processing plant with 1,359 tpd using open pit mining methods over 6.5 years, for LOM production of 261,900 oz of gold.
This "PEA" is historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Additionally, the assumptions for the cut-off grade calculations, as well as the estimated capital and operating costs, are likely to have changed since 2003. Consequently, this "PEA" cannot be considered as current. It is included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
6.4.2.5 2004 Work Program
The work program in 2004 focused mainly on the Bonanza Ledge Zone. The Bonanza Ledge Zone was drilled from the surface and underground.
Underground development at Bonanza Ledge started in late 2003 and continued into 2004.
Exploration activities also included underground and surface drilling, geological mapping, trenching, a soil grid extension, and channel sampling along road exposures.
6.4.2.6 2005 Work Program
In March 2005, 10,000 dry tonnes of concentrate from Bonanza Ledge was shipped via CN Rail to Noranda Inc.'s smelter in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, for refining into gold bullion. IWGM received net proceeds before royalties of $1,505,720 for 5,200 oz recovered post-milling from the Bonanza Ledge bulk sample collected in 2004.
The exploration program included surface drilling, surface mapping and sampling.
A gravity geophysical survey was planned to cover the Bonanza Ledge and Lowhee Creek areas. The survey was initiated in November 2005 but only covered the grid on the Bonanza Ledge deposit.
6.4.2.7 2006 Work Program
The work program in 2006 consisted of surface drilling, prospecting, surface mapping and sampling.
![]() |
IWGM retained Chlumsky, Armbrust and Meyer LLC of Lakewood, Colorado ("CAM") to prepare an NI 43-101 compliant PEA (the "2006 PEA"). Prior to the 2006 PEA, CAM and Minefill Services Inc. had completed an internal "scoping study" for IWGM on the Bonanza Ledge Zone. CAM advanced this internal study to comply with NI 43-101 standards. The study used the 2002 Estimate of Giroux (2002).
IWGM intended to process the material mined from Bonanza Ledge at a nearby facility, in particular, the QR facility belonging to Cross Lake Minerals. Testing showed good amenability to cyanidation with recoveries ranging from 93% to 97%. These recoveries were attained rapidly, with 98% of the recovery occurring in the first six hours of the 72-hour leach.
6.4.2.8 2007-2008 Work Programs
The work programs in 2007 and 2008 consisted of surface drilling. In 2007, 1,463.54 m were drilled on Cow Mountain in 15 holes to test the Rainbow and Sanders zones. In 2008, 1,762.07 m were drilled in 10 holes to further define the Bonanza Ledge Zone and test the adjacent Goldfinch Target.
6.4.2.9 2009 Work Program
Surface drilling was conducted during the 2009 work program.
In 2009, an NI 43-101 compliant technical report was prepared for IWGM and Barkerville. It addressed the geology and exploration history for gold on properties in the IWGM land package comprising the Cariboo Gold Project. The scope of the technical report included an update and compilation of recent exploration activities completed by IWGM on the land tenure of the Cariboo Gold Project from 2006 to 2008. This report built on previous technical reports that outlined gold resources contained in the Project area, with resource calculations specific to the Cow Mountain area (Giroux, 2006) and the Bonanza Ledge Zone area (Sandefur and Stone, 2006).
A pre-feasibility study ("PFS") was prepared for the Bonanza Ledge Project by EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd ("EBA") of Vancouver, British Columbia, and several independent professionals and consultants. The study used the resource and reserve evaluation (the "2009 Estimate") of Mintec Inc. of Tucson, Arizona, as the basis of its economic analysis. The PFS was an update of the previously disclosed resource (Sandefur and Stone, 2006). A NI 43-101 technical report was prepared by EBA. Historical Resource estimates from this period are superseded by those reported herein. They are described in detail in the previous technical report (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) available on SEDAR.
The 2009 Estimate yielded 569,110 t grading 5.87 g/t Au in the measured and indicated categories (measured resource of 234,677 t grading 6.69 g/t Au, and indicated resource of 334,433 t grading 5.31 g/t Au). Total contained gold was estimated at 107,532 oz of gold. The estimate also included an inferred resource of 373,123 t grading 6.10 g/t Au for 73,087 oz of contained gold. The cut-off grade grade was 0.69 g/t Au.
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources.
![]() |
The Base Case economics of the PFS use the assumptions of of US$750 per ounce gold for the operating cost based on an open pit operation at a rate of 200 tpd and be expected to produce an average of 20,000 oz of gold per year by batch toll milling at a nearby CIP plant for an estimated mine life of four (4) years. The exchange rate was established at 1.18 USD/CAD.
The Base Case economics used a total reserve estimated at 297,536 t grading 9.03 g/t Au in the proven and probable categories (proven reserves of 130,726 t grading 10.23 g/t Au, and probable reserve of 166,810 t grading 8.11 g/t Au), for 86,400 oz of total contained gold. The milling cut-off was 2.84 g/t Au, and the reserves were reported at 5% dilution.
These "Resources" and "Reserves" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
6.5 Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. (2010-2014)
The following description of work conducted by Barkerville on the Project between 2010 and 2014 is taken from Yin (2011; 2013), Georges (2012), Georges et al. (2013), Dzick (2015), Layman (2015), and the issuer's MD&A reports. The text retains the references therein.
Table 6.4 outlines the drilling on the Project from 2010 to 2014.
Table 6.4 - Summary of drilling on the Cariboo Gold Project from 2010 to 2014
|
Year |
Zone/Area |
Surface Diamond Drilling |
|
|
Holes |
Metres |
||
|
2010 |
Bonanza Ledge |
17 |
2,918.2 |
|
Cow Mountain |
45 |
5,792.3 |
|
|
Island Mountain |
1 |
178.6 |
|
|
2011 |
Pit Vein Zone |
10 |
1,045.2 |
|
BC Vein |
30 |
9,284.6 |
|
|
Bonanza Ledge (ARD samples) |
5 |
943.1 |
|
|
Cow Mountain |
163 |
43,410.6 |
|
|
Stouts Gulch and Myrtle Property |
2 |
212.2 |
|
|
Groundwater monitoring well holes |
21 |
3,019.9 |
|
|
2012 |
Cow Mountain |
14 |
2,753.2 |
|
2013 |
No drilling |
0 |
0 |
|
2014 |
Cow Mountain |
10 |
4,142.2 |
| TOTAL | 318 | 73,700.1 | |
![]() |
6.5.1 2010-2011 Work Programs
Surface trenching and sampling work were completed in 2010. A total of 175 samples were collected from 18 channels. The channels were spaced approximately 6 m apart along a 125-m-long trench.
The work program in 2011 included surface drilling and trenching. A total of 66 channel samples were collected from the trenches.
6.5.2 2012 Work Program
On June 28, 2012, Barkerville announced an NI 43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate for the Gold Quartz open pit model on Cow Mountain (the "Gold Quartz Estimate") and the geological potential of the 6.4-km Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor (Barkerville news release of June 28, 2012). Geoex Ltd. ("Geoex") prepared the independent estimate. The announcement of the estimate led to a cease trade order ("CTO") from the BC Securities Commission ("BCSC") against Barkerville and initiated a series of events involving the Geoex QP (Peter T. George). The Gold Quartz Estimate is superseded by the resource estimate herein. It is described in detail in the previous technical report (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) available on SEDAR.
The Gold Quartz Estimate, which covered an open pit model between elevations of 1,082.0 m and 1,386.8 m above sea level, consisted of 62,632,200 t of indicated resources at an average grade of 5.28 g/t Au, for 10,626,100 oz of contained gold, calculated at a cut-off grade of 0.857 g/t Au. Geoex concluded that this resource had a reasonable prospect of economic extraction. Geoex also estimated a "potential" of 405 to 684 million short tons containing approximately 65 Moz to 90 Moz of gold. The assessment of the geological potential was based solely on the Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain areas.
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources .
Following Barkerville's news release of June 28, 2012, Barkerville received a technical disclosure review letter from the BCSC on July 4, 2012, asking Barkerville to provide the BCSC with additional information to support the Gold Quartz Estimate and exploration target disclosed in the original news release of July 11, 2012. Barkerville's QP, Peter T. George, immediately provided the BCSC with a draft technical report. Upon review of the draft technical report, the BCSC expressed concerns about certain methods, parameters and assumptions used to estimate the mineral resources and potential exploration targets at Cow Mountain, as well as the estimates themselves. The BCSC expressed concern that the 10.6 Moz indicated resource and the 65 to 90 Moz additional "potential" resources disclosed in the original news release were inadequately supported in the draft technical report and had been estimated in a manner that appeared contrary to normal industry practice, and therefore could be construed as misleading.
![]() |
The final version of the NI 43-101 technical report was filed on SEDAR on August 13, 2012 (Georges, 2012). The Gold Quartz Estimate (open pit model) comprised an estimated capped indicated resource of 51,600,000 t at an average grade of 2.57 g/t Au, for 4,251,000 oz of contained gold. The report also provided an estimated capped inferred resource of 27,278,000 t at an average grade of 3.67 g/t Au for 3,205,200 oz of contained gold.
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance or reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources .
On August 14, 2012, the BCSC issued a cease trade order ("CTO") against Barkerville, stating that the report was not in the required form under NI 43-101 (Barkerville press release of August 15, 2012). Barkerville was advised that the CTO would remain in place until Barkerville filed an NI 43-101 compliant report acceptable to the BCSC, addressing all technical disclosure concerns.
On October 19, 2012, Barkerville retained Snowden Mining Industry Consultants Pty ("Snowden") to review the report in question and help satisfy the CTO conditions. On November 5, 2012, Barkerville provided an additional update on its technical review. As requested by Snowden, fourteen (14) twin holes had been drilled on Cow Mountain between September 22 and October 14, 2012 (holes CM12-01A to CM12-09C), for a total of 2,759.4 m. The total meterage included five (5) holes that had to be abandoned after hitting shafts and/or underground workings before reaching their target. Channel samples were also collected from the 2012 trenches on Cow Mountain.
During its review of the NI 43-101 report, Snowden examined historical samples not included in the original Gold Quartz Estimate. Snowden recommended that these samples be included in the ongoing resource estimate for Cow Mountain after being validated. The Gold Quartz Estimate was based on a database containing 619 drill holes. About 2,142 holes had been drilled on the property of which more than 1,464 had been verified by Mintec.
In July 2012, Barkerville received an amendment to Mines Act Permit M-198 to allow the custom milling of up to 300,000 t of ore from the Bonanza Ledge Mine, as well as the disposal of associated mine tailings in the QR Main Zone Pit. In December 2012, Barkerville received an amended Environmental Management Act Permit, PE 17876, to allow effluent discharge associated with active mining at Bonanza Ledge.
6.5.3 2013 Work Program
On June 18, 2013, Barkerville filed an NI 43-101 technical report to present and support the updated mineral resource estimate for Cow Mountain (the "2013 Estimate"; Georges et al., 2013). As part of the mandate, Snowden assisted Geoex and Barkerville in the review and audit of the data validation and verification aspects of the Cow Mountain data, the determination of the most appropriate estimation method for Cow Mountain, and the preparation of the independent resource estimate for the Cow Mountain area.
The 2013 Estimate was reported at a range of cut-off grades for the indicated and inferred categories (Georges et al., 2013). No measured resources were estimated. The base case cut-off of 0.40 g/t (0.40 ppm) results is shown in Table 6.5 and Table 6.6.
![]() |
Table 6.5 - Cow Mountain Indicated Mineral Resource at a cut-off grade of 0.40 g/t Au
|
Cut-off grade (Au oz/ton) |
Tons (M st) |
Grade |
Cut-off grade (Au ppm) |
Tonnes (Mt) |
Grade |
Total ounces of gold (Moz) |
|
0.012 |
17.75 |
0.058 |
0.40 |
16.11 |
2.00 |
1.04 |
(Georges et al., 2013)
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and should not be disclosed out of context.
Table 6.6 - Cow Mountain Inferred Mineral Resource at a cut-off grade of 0.40 g/t Au
|
Cut-off grade (Au oz/t) |
Tons |
Grade |
Cut-off grade (Au ppm) |
Tonnes |
Grade |
Total Ounces of Gold (Moz) |
|
0.012 |
49.23 |
0.08 |
0.40 |
44.66 |
2.74 |
3.94 |
(Georges et al., 2013)
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources .
Also in 2013, Mintec prepared an updated mineral resource estimate for the Bonanza Ledge deposit (Georges et al., 2013). Total measured and indicated resources were estimated at 420,000 t grading 7.63 g/t Au (170,000 t at 8.74 g/t Au for measured, and 240,000 t at 6.86 g/t Au for indicated), representing 102,000 oz of contained gold. In addition, inferred resources were estimated at 280,000 t grading 7.78 g/t Au, for 70,000 oz of contained gold. The cut-off grade was 1.70 g/t Au.
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources
Georges et al. (2013) noted that a costing and economic analysis for the Bonanza Ledge deposit, prepared by EBA Consultants as part of the PFS (Fier et al., 2009), had become outdated due to changes in capital and operating costs over time, changes in metal prices, purchase of the QR Mill such that toll milling was no longer applicable, and purchase of property interests such that royalty payments were no longer applicable.
Consequently, Snowden updated the economic analysis for Bonanza Ledge to assess the relevance of the mineral reserve under revised modifying factors.
On July 15, 2013, the BCSC revoked the CTO issued on August 14, 2012. On October 9, 2013, common shares of Barkerville resumed trading on the TSXV.
To satisfy some of the recommendations of the last technical report (Georges et al., 2013), Barkerville reviewed core sampling records for all drill holes in the Cow Mountain resource model. A core sampling and assaying program was conducted to provide assays for any previously unsampled drill core intervals. The infill sampling program (55,698.6 m) was conducted on 250 holes drilled in 2007, 2009, 2010 and 2011 on Cow Mountain (Barkerville press release of January 20, 2014). The program was completed in January 2014. Available reject samples for all the Cow Mountain drill holes were shipped to AcmeLabs for fire assay-metallic screen analysis. In total, 25,280 samples were sent to AcmeLabs.
![]() |
Historical resource estimates from this period are superseded by the 2020 MRE reported herein. They are described in detail in the previous technical report (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) available on SEDAR.
6.5.4 2014 Work Program
Barkerville conducted surface drilling in 2014.
In March 2014, Barkerville announced the commencement of operations at the Bonanza Ledge Mine. The first production blast was on March 12, 2014. Over the course of the year, Barkerville milled 53,090 t of ore at an average head grade of 6.23 g/t Au and a recovery rate of 90%. The average net operating cost was $1,669 per ounce.
6.6 Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. (2015-2019)
During 2015, Barkerville milled 11,275 tonnes of Bonanza Ledge ore at an average head grade of 10.14 g/t Au, a recovery rate of 94%, and an average net operating cost of $877/oz. Based on the results as of February 28, 2015, management decided to cease production and place Bonanza Ledge under care and maintenance.
In January 2017, Barkerville began commissioning its wholly-owned QR Mill using the low-grade stockpile at the Bonanza Ledge open pit. Material sorting was done at the stockpile, producing relatively high-grade pre-concentrate. By the end of February 2017, Barkerville had transported 2,860 t to the QR Mill for an average grade of 2.94 g/t Au. During the second quarter of 2017, Barkerville began portal and underground development at the Bonanza Ledge Mine to prepare for the processing of in-situ Bonanza Ledge material. A total of 470 m of underground development was completed in 2017, resulting in the processing of approximately 7,000 t of both low- and high-grade development material at the QR Mill for commissioning and training purposes.
In 2015, Snowden (Dzick, 2015) prepared a mineral resource estimate for Cow Mountain (the "2015 Estimate") using the Multiple Indicator Kriging ("MIK") method and all of Barkerville's drill hole data available by the end of September 2014 (Table 6.7). The 2015 Estimate was reported at a cut-off grade of 0.50 g/t Au and was based on the results of a Whittle pit optimization to a depth of 1,000 ft (304.8 m) below the surface, around the underground workings of the Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine. The effective date of the 2015 Estimate is March 31, 2015.
Table 6.7 - Cow Mountain Mineral Resource reported at a cut-off grade of 0.50 g/t Au
|
Classification |
Tonnes |
Au |
Au |
|
Indicated |
35.8 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
|
Inferred |
27.5 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
![]() |
(Dzick, 2015)
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. It is unlikely they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements or follow CIM Definition Standards, and their relevance and reliability have not been verified. They are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources
In 2016, Barkerville mandated InnovExplo (Brousseau et al., 2017) to complete an NI 43-101 technical report and Mineral Resource Estimate (the "2017 MRE") for the Barkerville Mountain deposit. GEOVIA GEMS was used for modelling purposes and the estimation approach, which consisted of 3D block modelling and the OK interpolation method. The results of the in situ 2017 MRE for the Barkerville Mountain deposit at a 3.5 g/t cut-off grade are presented in Table 6.8.
The close-out date of the database is July 18, 2016, and the effective date of the 2017 Estimate is March 21, 2017 (Brousseau et al., 2017).
Table 6.8 - 2017 Mineral Resource Estimate at a 3.5 g/t Au cut-off grade
|
> 3.5 g/t Au |
Tonnes |
Au |
Contained Au |
|
|
Measured (M) |
Measured |
248,200 |
8.07 |
64,400 |
|
Indicated |
436,700 |
6.72 |
94,400 |
|
|
Total M+I |
684,900 |
7.21 |
158,800 |
|
|
Inferred |
In-situ |
108,100 |
5.34 |
18,600 |
(Brousseau et al., 2017)
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Although they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements and follow CIM Definition Standards, they are included in this section for illustrative purposes only the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources
In 2017, Barkerville mandated InnovExplo (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018) to update the 2017 MRE and perform a review and validation of the maiden resource estimate for the Cow Mountain and Island Mountain deposits combined (the "2018 MRE"). The OK grade interpolation method was used. The results of the in situ 2018 MRE at the 3.0 g/t cut-off grade are presented in Table 6.9.
The close-out date of the database is December 31, 2017, and the effective date for the 2018 MRE is May 2, 2018.
Table 6.9 - 2018 Cariboo Gold Project Mineral Resource Estimate at a cut-off of 3.0 g/t Au
![]() |
|
Deposit by Categories |
Tonnes |
Au (g/t) |
Au (Oz) |
|
Measured (total) |
|||
|
Bonanza Ledge |
264,000 |
7.3 |
61,900 |
|
Indicated |
|||
|
Bonanza Ledge |
63,400 |
4.8 |
9,700 |
|
BC Vein |
444,900 |
6.4 |
91,600 |
|
Mosquito |
247,000 |
9.5 |
75,700 |
|
Shaft |
4,373,200 |
5.9 |
835,600 |
|
Valley |
769,600 |
5.8 |
142,700 |
|
Cow |
1,947,800 |
6.1 |
381,800 |
|
Total Indicated |
7,845,900 |
6.1 |
1,537,100 |
|
Total Measured and Indicated |
8,109,900 |
6.1 |
1,599,000 |
|
Inferred |
|||
|
BC Vein |
173,400 |
4.6 |
25,400 |
|
Mosquito |
699,200 |
6.0 |
135,600 |
|
Shaft |
7,357,000 |
5.1 |
1,213,000 |
|
Valley |
2,454,300 |
5.4 |
423,400 |
|
Cow |
2,047,300 |
5.4 |
358,300 |
|
Total Inferred |
12,731,200 |
5.2 |
2,155,700 |
(Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2018)
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Although they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements and follow CIM Definition Standards, they are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources
In 2019, Barkerville mandated InnovExplo (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2019) to review, validate and update the 2018 MRE. The OK grade interpolation method was used. The overall results of the 2019 MRE at the official 3.0 g/t cut-off grade are presented in Table 6.10.
Table 6.10 - 2019 Cariboo Gold Project Mineral Resource Estimate at a cut-off of 3.0 g/t Au
|
Category |
Deposit |
Tonnes (000) |
Grade (Au g/t) |
Ounces (000) |
|
Measured |
Bonanza Ledge |
175 |
6.1 |
34 |
|
Indicated |
Bonanza Ledge |
55 |
4.6 |
8 |
|
BC Vein |
734 |
5.6 |
132 |
|
|
Mosquito |
542 |
7.1 |
124 |
|
|
Shaft |
7,200 |
5.6 |
1,300 |
|
|
Valley |
1,212 |
5.3 |
208 |
|
|
Cow |
3,578 |
5.5 |
637 |
|
|
Total Indicated Resources |
13,266 |
5.63 |
2,401 |
|
|
Inferred |
BC Vein |
87 |
3.6 |
10 |
|
Mosquito |
690 |
6.5 |
144 |
|
|
Shaft |
5,817 |
5.0 |
941 |
|
|
Valley |
3,475 |
4.9 |
545 |
|
|
Cow |
1,867 |
4.7 |
282 |
|
|
Total Measured and Indicated Resources |
13,495 |
5.6 |
2,443 |
|
|
Total Inferred Resources |
11,936 |
5.0 |
1,922 |
|
(Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2019)
![]() |
These "Resources" are historical in nature and should not be relied upon. The qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Although they comply with current NI 43-101 requirements and follow CIM Definition Standards, they are included in this section for illustrative purposes only and the issuer is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources
Based on the results of the 2019 MRE, Barkerville mandated BBA Inc. ("BBA") to prepare a technical report and PEA for the Cariboo Gold Project (Morgan et al., 2019). A number of specialized consultants assisted BBA with the PEA: Allnorth Consultants Ltd., Golder Associates Ltd., InnovExplo Inc., Mining Plus Canada Consulting Ltd., SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., and WSP Canada Inc. The effective date of the PEA is August 18, 2019. The purpose was to complete a review and compilation of the resources, mining designs, processing options and preliminary economics of the Project, and to support the results disclosed in Barkerville's press release entitled "Barkerville Gold Mines Delivers Positive PEA for Cariboo Gold Project" dated August 19, 2019.
The PEA provided a base case assessment for developing the Cariboo gold deposit (4,000 tpd) as an underground mine, with a concentrator located at the mine site at Wells and further processing at the QR Mill. The key project outcomes are summarized below and are discussed in more detail in the technical report filed on SEDAR.
- Project resources: 13.3 Mt of mineralized material at 5.6 g/t Au (Indicated) and 11.9 Mt at 5.0 g/t Au (Inferred).
- Total mineralized material mined (In-stope Resources) from four deposits (Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito): 14.683 Mt at 4.5 g/t Au average diluted gold grade.
- Mine life of 11 years, with peak year payable production of 206,000 oz, average LOM annual payable production of 185,000 oz of gold.
- Gold payable recovery of 92.1%.
- Payable production (LOM) of 1.966 Moz of gold.
- Operating cost (total average) of $105.13/t mined.
- Estimated 70 construction personnel required during the construction period and 333 employees during operations.
- Concentrator construction starting in Q2 2022. Commercial production planned for Q3 2022.
6.6.1 Drilling and Exploration
From 2015 to 2018, Barkerville's exploration team executed a systematic pipeline approach on the Project with surface mapping, geochemical sampling and drilling (diamond and RC). Table 6.11 summarizes the drilling on the Project from 2015 to 2018, and Table 6.12 summarizes all surface geochemical samples.
Figure 6.3 shows the locations of the DDH drilled on the Project from 2015 to 2018, and Figure 6.4 highlights the DDH completed in 2018. Figure 6.5 shows the collar locations of the DDH completed on regional targets during 2018.
![]() |
Table 6.11 - Summary of drilling on the Cariboo Gold Project from 2015 to 2018
|
Deposit |
BC Vein and BL |
Barkerville Mountain |
Cow Mountain |
Valley Zone |
Shaft Zone |
Mosquito Creek |
Regional Targets |
Total/ |
|||||||
|
Year |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
(m) |
(hole) |
|
|
2015 |
33,429 |
164 |
7,890 |
42 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
41,319 |
|
2016 |
8,695 |
57 |
2,621 |
10 |
32,291 |
242 |
- |
- |
11,290 |
33 |
16,027 |
50 |
- |
- |
70,924 |
|
2017 |
4,772 |
34 |
3,918 |
8 |
4,479 |
14 |
41,369 |
93 |
93,958 |
212 |
13,456 |
44 |
- |
- |
161,952 |
|
2018 |
2,305 |
14 |
- |
- |
67,936 |
250 |
503 |
2 |
53,609 |
169 |
4,597 |
20 |
4,903 |
14 |
133,853 |
|
Total |
49,209 |
269 |
14,429 |
60 |
104,706 |
506 |
41,872 |
95 |
158,857 |
414 |
34,080 |
114 |
4,903 |
14 |
408,048 |
Table 6.12 - Surface geochemical samples collected on the Cariboo Gold Project 2015-2018
|
Year |
Rock sample (qty) |
Soil sample (qty) |
|||||
|
Grab |
Select |
Float |
Linear |
Channel |
Panel |
||
|
2015 |
- |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
111 |
- |
|
2016 |
81 |
75 |
1 |
17 |
341 |
50 |
4,928 |
|
2017 |
121 |
42 |
- |
10 |
11 |
- |
3,775 |
|
2018 |
108 |
182 |
25 |
8 |
26 |
4 |
6,307 |
|
Total |
310 |
324 |
26 |
35 |
378 |
165 |
15,010 |
![]() |

Figure 6.3 - Location of DDH drilled on the Cariboo Gold Project by Barkerville between 2015 and 2018
![]() |

Figure 6.4 - Location of DDH drilled on the Cariboo Gold Project by Barkerville in 2018
![]() |

Figure 6.5 - Location of all DDH drilled on the regional Grouse Creek target in 2018
![]() |
7. GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION
7.1 Regional Geological Setting
The Project lies within the Kootenay Terrane of the Omineca Tectonic Belt in the south-central Canadian Cordillera (Figure 7.1). The Omineca Belt, as defined by Monger and Price (2002), consists of the following tectonic elements:
1. Paleoproterozoic continental crust (North American Craton);
2. Neoproterozoic rift-related clastics and volcanics (Kootenay Terrane);
3. Paleozoic pericratonic, off-shelf clastic, and volcanic rocks (Kootenay Terrane including the Cariboo and Barkerville subterranes);
4. Accreted late Paleozoic to Early Jurassic volcanic and sedimentary rocks formed in island arcs (Quesnel Terrane) and marginal basins (Slide Mountain Terrane);
5. Early Cenozoic continental volcanic and sedimentary rocks; and
6. Paleozoic to early Tertiary granitic rocks.
Omineca rocks were complexly deformed by Middle Jurassic to Early Tertiary compressional tectonics, and by Tertiary transtension and extension. (Struik, 1988)
Figure 7.2 from Struik (1988) details the architecture of the Cariboo Gold District. The Kootenay Terrane in the vicinity of the Project is subdivided into the eastern Cariboo and western Barkerville subterranes. The Cariboo Subterrane is juxtaposed on the Barkerville Subterrane by the east dipping Pleasant Valley Thrust.

Figure 7.1 - Tectonic cross section showing the elements of the Canadian Cordillera
The Barkerville and Cariboo subterranes comprise metamorphosed equivalents of continent-derived siliciclastic protoliths with interlayered marble units and granitic orthogneiss. The subterranes are pericratonic in character and are thought to have formed near the current western margin of Laurentia. Various authors (Monger and Berg, 1984; Struik, 1986; Ferri and Schiarizza, 2006) suggest that both Barkerville and Cariboo subterranes share the same tectostratigraphic position and depositional environment.
![]() |
Structurally overlying both the Barkerville and Cariboo subterranes in the northern part of the Project are metamorphosed mafic volcanic rocks and associated pelagic sedimentary units of the oceanic Antler allochthon, which forms part of the Mississippian to Permian Slide Mountain Terrane (Struik, 1988, Figure 7.2). Allan et. al. (2017) noted shear sense indicators 47-347 (dip-dip direction) supporting southeasterly directed thrust kinematics.

(Struik, 1988)
Figure 7.2 - Tectonic architecture of the Cariboo Gold District
The southwestern margin of the Barkerville Subterrane is structurally overlain along the Eureka Thrust by much less deformed and less metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary strata of the Quesnel Terrane. The Quesnel Terrane consists of Middle-Late Triassic volcanic rocks and phyllitic siliciclastic units. The Crooked amphibolite occurs as a discontinuous, strongly deformed and metamorphosed lens of mafic metavolcanic rocks and minor serpentinite along the Eureka Thrust between the Quesnel Terrane and the underlying Barkerville Subterrane. The nature and terrane affiliation of the Crooked amphibolite is uncertain, with some workers interpreting it to be a basal unit of the Quesnel Terrane (Bloodgood 1992; Panteleyev et al., 1996) and others a thrust-bounded slice of the Slide Mountain Terrane, sandwiched between the underlying Barkerville Subterrane and the base of the Quesnel Terrane (Ash, 2001; Ray et al., 2001; Ferri and Schiarizza, 2006). Isolated klippes of mafic metavolcanic rocks of uncertain terrane affiliation overlie the Barkerville Subterrane metamorphic rocks of Hardscrabble Mountain and Island Mountain (Struik, 1988; Ferri and Schiarizza, 2006).
Figure 7.3 shows the regional geological setting of the Project, principal terranes, major lithological packages and faults.
![]() |

(Mortensen et al., 2011)
Figure 7.3 - Regional geological setting of the Cariboo Gold District
7.1.1 Snowshoe Group
Central to the Barkerville Subterrane and hosting the Project is the Snowshoe Group (Struik 1986; Monger and Berg 1984). Deposition of the Snowshoe Group is interpreted to have occurred within a continent-margin rift environment. Various stratigraphic interpretations based on fieldwork by Struik (1982, 1984 and 1988) have been presented for the Snowshoe Group and are displayed in Struik (1988) and Ferre and Schiarizza (2006) (Figure 7.4).
![]() |

Struik (1988) and Ferre and Schiarizza (2006)
Figure 7.4 - Stratigraphic interpretations of the Snowshoe Group
Ferri and Schiarizza (2006) redefined the Snowshoe Group as a stratigraphic sequence composed of three major succession (from oldest to youngest): Downey, Harveys Ridge and Goose Peak (Figure 7.4). In historical mine terminology (Hanson, 1935), the 'Baker' unit corresponds to Downey succession, and the 'Rainbow' unit and 'Lowhee' unit correspond to the Harveys Ridge succession.
The Downey succession represents the lower part of the Snowshoe Group and includes units formerly referred to as the Downey, Keithley and Ramos successions by Struik (1988) (Figure 7.4). The Late Proterozoic to Early Cambrian Downey succession is dominated by green-grey micaceous quartzite to feldspathic quartzite, phyllite, and schist, with orthoquartzite (the 'Keithley quartzite') occurring near the top of the sequence. This succession includes the previously defined Keithley, Kee Khan, Ramos, and Tregillus successions defined by Struik (1988). The Downey succession includes alkaline mafic metavolcanic rocks, which range from thin horizons of chloritic phyllite in the Wells-Barkerville camp, to thick, regionally mappable exposures of chlorite±actinolite phyllite and schist north of Cariboo Lake (Allan et. al., 2017).
The Early Paleozoic Harvey's Ridge succession is defined mainly by dark grey to black carbonaceous and locally pyritic phyllite, siltstone, quartzite with light grey quartzite to feldspathic quartzite more abundant up-section. This succession includes carbonaceous phyllite of the previously defined 'Hardscrabble Mountain succession' of Struik (1988), as well as the 'Agnes conglomerate' in its upper part. The Harvey's Ridge succession locally includes alkaline mafic metavolcanic rocks and is in sharp contact with the underlying Downey succession (Ferri and Schiarizza, 2006).
The Early Paleozoic Goose Peak (Goose Peak and upper Eaglesnest successions of Struik 1988) includes light grey to light green-grey quartzite to feldspathic quartzite with interbedded dark grey phyllite and siltstone. The Goose Peak succession is in apparent gradational contact with the underlying Harvey's Ridge succession.
![]() |
The Snowshoe Group is intruded locally by felsic to mafic intrusive bodies, especially in the southern Cariboo Lake area (Ferri and O'Brien, 2002). These include Early Mississippian granitic sills of the Quesnel Lake gneiss, which is particularly deformed near the Eureka thrust (Ferri and Schiarizza, 2006).
Snowshoe Group stratigraphy is interpreted by Ferri and Schiarizza (2006) to be repeated along refolded, southwest-verging nappe structures. These folds are large, being some 25 km in amplitude and spanning the entire width of the Kootenay Terrane at this latitude. They are comparable in scale to regional fold structures elsewhere in the Kootenay Terrane. The upper limb of the nappe in the Cariboo Lake area is cut by the Pleasant Valley Thrust, which may have post-dated nappe development, or have formed late in the same deformational event.
7.1.2 Metamorphism
The principal gold-producing areas in the Barkerville Subterrane are in areas of greenschist-grade metamorphism (chlorite grade) and do not extend into amphiboIite-grade domains (Struik, 1988). The S1 and S2 fabrics are defined by metamorphic muscovite, quartz, albite, chlorite and locally biotite, and its character is governed by rock type. The metamorphic micas generally define foliation suggesting that peak metamorphic temperature coincided with the formation of the cleavages (Struik, 1988).
Most of the absolute age constraints on the timing of the various metamorphic and structural events that have affected the Barkerville and Quesnel terranes prior to the Rhys et. al. (2009) study is limited. Peak metamorphism is thought to have occurred at approximately 174±4 Ma, based on a U-Pb age for metamorphic titanite collected near Quesnel Lake (Mortensen et al., 1987). Andrew et al. (1983) reported a similar K-Ar whole-rock age of 179±8 Ma for phyllite at the Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine. Rhys et al. (2009) constrained the age of the metamorphism at Cariboo Gold Quartz and Bonanza Ledge Mines between 146.6±1.1 and 151.5±0.8 Ma.
7.2 Property Geology
Recent work by Barkerville (Harbort, 2017a) redefined the property geology into a sequence of tectonostratigraphic units ((Harbort, 2017a) Figure 7.5 and (Harbort, 2017a) Figure 7.6). As all units are metamorphosed and show phyllitic fabrics, the prefix meta- and the sufix phyllite have been dropped from the nomenclature for this report. Eight tecotostratigraphic units are recognized, beginning with a basal carbonaceous mudstone that transitions upward into coarse quartz-rich mature sandstone then to coarse calcareous sandstone, fining to a calcareous siltstone and then to a limestone. Two calcareous volcanic units are identified above and below the calcareous sandstone unit. Barkerville interprets this sequence to be a transgressive shelfal sequence ((Harbort, 2017a) Figure 7.7) with carbonaceous units deposited in near-shore organic swamp or deltaic environments, and sandstone representing the littoral zone, receiving more calcareous input off-shore towards the near-shelf, to become a calcareous siltstone, which then transitions into a limestone in the far shelfal environment. The sequence demonstrates a clear upward trend of decreasing carbonaceous material and increasing grain size into a coarse quartz-rich unit, which then reverses above the quartzose unit.
![]() |

(Harbort, 2017a)
Figure 7.5 - Techtonostratigraphic facies model for Island and Cow Mountains
![]() |

(Harbort, 2017a)
Figure 7.6 - Tectonostratigraphic facies model for Barkerville Mountain
![]() |

(Harbort, 2017a)
Figure 7.7 - Depositional model for metasedimentary units hosting the Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Moutain deposits
![]() |
Figure 7.8 shows the geology map of Wells and Barkerville area.
In historical mine terminology, the Baker unit correlates with the Calcareous Sandstone and the Upper Calcareous Volcaniclastic units, the Rainbow unit correlates with the Lower Calcareous Volcaniclastic, Sandstone and Basal transitional units, and the Lowhee unit corresponds to the Basal Carbonaceous unit.
Figure 7.9 shows examples of the principal geological units for the Project.
7.3 Structural Geology
The structural geology described herein is the currently accepted interpretation by Barkerville based on over 33,000 structural measurements collected from surface and underground by Barkerville geologists Harbort, Shaw and Prince during 2015 to 2019 field mapping campaigns. Figure 7.10 and Figure 7.11 illustrate the complex array of intersection and cross-cutting deformational fabrics in the four phases of deformation recognized within the Project area.
7.3.1 Deformation 1
The earliest observed fabrics in rocks of the Cariboo Gold District are represented by a transpositional layering with the development of a bedding-subparallel penetrative axial planar foliation (S1) defined predominantly by phyllosilicate minerals (sericite and chlorite). F1 folds are expressed as rarely observed, isoclinal, highly asymmetric fold hinges and rootless folds (Figure 7.10a). S1 is largely the dominant fabric identified in the area. Despite widespread transposition, original bedding (S0) and rare graded bedding and sedimentary structures can be identified. D1 is interpreted to be related to early sea floor layer parallel thrusting in the early stages of accretion and is believed to be transitional to D2.
![]() |

Figure 7.8 - Surface geology on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

a) Basal carbonaceous mudstone; b) Transitional carbonaceous mudstone interlayered with fine-grained sandstone; c) Coarse-grained sandstone; d) Calcareous volcaniclastic; e) Calcareous siltstone; f) Micritic limestone; g) Rhyolite porphyry; h) Foliated diorite.
Figure 7.9 - Geological units observed on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

a) F1 isoclinal fold hinges attributed to remnant transposed layering during D1; b) F2 folds with weakly developed S2 foliations axial planar to folds; c) L21 intersection lineation; d) rod-shaped L-tectonite fold hinge structure of F2 fold axis; e) Open gentle F3 folds with weakly developed spaced axial planar cleavage; f) Weakly developed F3 crenulation cleavage.
Figure 7.10 - Deformation phases and associated fabrics on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

(Shaw, 2019)
Figure 7.11 - Schematic illustration showing relative orientation of variable structures arising from polyphase deformation within the Wells Barkerville area
7.3.2 Deformation 2
The second phase of deformation in the area (D2) is attributed to the accretion of the Quesnel Terrane to the North American craton and resulted in widespread development of moderately inclined to recumbent tight folds with fold axes gently plunging mostly west-northwest. A weak to moderately developed crenulation cleavage (S2: Figure 7.10b) formed axial planar to F2 folds and generally strikes west-northwest and dips between 50-70°. A strong intersection lineation (Figure 7.10c) developed between S1 and S2 parallel to the fold axis. In F2 hinge zones, a well-developed mineral elongation lineation is subparallel to the intersection lineation. Also, in hinge zones are well-developed rod-shaped L-tectonite fabrics caused by uniaxial strain (Figure 7.10d). The long axes of replacement mineralization at Mosquito Creek and Island Mountain are parallel to these lineations and have geometries oriented along the tight fold hinges. A set of layer parallel veins (historically called strike veins) commonly developed in the carbonaceous mudstone unit are considered associated with the formation of L-tectonite fabrics; the veins are generally pod shaped or extensively boudinaged with long axis orientations parallel to the extension and intersection lineations. A set of shear veins (historically called diagonal veins due to their orientation 45° to S1) are interpreted to have formed during D2 compression, the acute bisector of the conjugate set approximates the convergence vector. Both layer-parallel and shear veins are barren of gold mineralization except where layer-parallel veins were brecciated along layer-parallel faults and where shear veins are in close proximity to AP veins (discussed below).
![]() |
7.3.3 Deformation 3
The final ductile deformation is expressed as open rounded folds (F3: Figure 7.10e) that plunge to the north-northeast and have a regionally developed spaced fracture cleavage, axial planar to the folds. Localized areas also show D3 related crenulation cleavage (Figure 7.10f) parallel to the fracture cleavage. S3 surfaces host the economic vein set (AP veins) as they are parallel to the axial plane of the F3 fold hinge. The D3 deformation is interpreted to be caused by a NNW-SSE directed thrusting event, possibly related to the thin-skinned emplacement of the Antler allochthon. F3 fold geometry is best recognized by the refolding of the L21 intersection lineation and by deflections in the S1 strike (Prince and Shaw, 2019). Figure 7.11 is a schematic section that illustrates the relative orientations of structures.
7.3.4 Deformation 4
A final brittle deformation is expressed as north-to-northeast striking oblique and normal faults. These faults exhibit tens to hundreds of metres of displacement and are usually exhibited as breccia-gouge complexes with extensive damage zones. This phase is recognized by the development of both S3-parallel to N-S faults with the normal to normal-oblique offsets accommodating extension most likely related to post-orogenic relaxation. They are considered to be late-stage accommodation structures related to the D3 folding event, probably late in the exhumation process.
7.4 Mineralization and Alteration
The mineralization is defined in the Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor. The Cow/Island segment covers a strike length of 3.7 km and a width of approximately 700 m, down to a vertical depth of 600 m below surface. The Barkerville segment covers a strike length of 3 km and a width of approximately 700 m, down to a vertical depth of 500 m below surface.
Five inter-related styles of mineralization are observed on the Project:
1. Fault-fill breccia veins subparallel to foliation (S1), hosted in carbonaceous mudstone (BC Vein style);
2. Vertical NE-trending extensional (AP) veins dominantly hosted in sandstone units in S3 cleavages (Cow Mountain, Shaft Zone, Mosquito Creek, Lowhee Zone and KL Zone vein mineralization);
3. Fractured moderately dipping ENE-trending shear veins, hosted in sandstone units (Cow Mountain, Shaft Zone, Mosquito Creek, Lowhee Zone and KL Zone vein mineralization);
4. Gold-bearing sulphide replacements hosted in fold hinges of calcareous sandstone units (Island Mountain and Mosquito Creek Replacement Style);
5. Gold-bearing sulphide replacement mineralization hosted in fault-bounded calcareous siltstone units (Bonanza Ledge style).
![]() |
Figure 7.12 and Figure 7.13 summarize the mineralization styles and structural controls respectively observed on the Project.
Vein mineralogy is largely simple, composed predominantly of quartz and lesser iron carbonate gangue. Pyrite is the dominant sulphide mineral with vein content ranging from trace amounts to tens of percent (Figure 7.12b). Pyrite content appears to have a direct association with gold content in the veins. Although galena (Figure 7.12c) and arsenopyrite can also occur in individual veins in amounts up to several percent, these minerals generally occur in trace amounts as does sphalerite (Figure 7.12d), chalcopyrite, argentite and scheelite. Generally increasing amounts of galena and argentite are related to elevated silver values. At least two sulphide events are observed in veins: one early event inter-grown with quartz (Figure 7.12b) and a secondary event infilling pre-existing void spaces (Figure 7.12e) or vein margins (Figure 7.12f). The bismuth-lead sulphosalt cosalite also occurs in isolated veins and appears to be associated with high-grade gold independent of pyrite content. Cosalite is only observed as intergrowths with quartz and its timing is considered early.
Replacement mineralization (Figure 7.12h) in calcareous sandstones varies from fine to coarse-grained pyrite with lesser arsenopyrite. Bonanza Ledge replacement mineralization, hosted in calcareous siltstone, consists entirely of fine-grained pyrite ore. Sulphide content in replacement ore types is generally high, ranging from 10% (replacing thin calcareous bands) to massive (replacing entire beds). The timing relationship for observed mineralization types is considered to be contemporaneous, with vertical veins acting as feeders for the fault fill veins, replacement horizons and earlier shear veins (Figure 7.13b).
Figure 7.14 details the observed relationship of alteration in the Cariboo Gold District. Large veins tend to exhibit a strong silica alteration halo with pyrite contents that range from several percent to massive (Figure 7.15a). Farther from the large veins, the pyrite content drops to trace amounts with intense silicification (Figure 7.15b). Most smaller veins have strong silica with trace pyrite proximal to vein margins; they rarely show the massive pyrite deposition exhibited in larger veins. A widespread moderate silica envelope with patchy but intense silica closer to the veins is observed within the vein corridors. More distal from the vein corridors, the intensity of silica alteration becomes weak, and sericite is the dominant alteration mineral (Figure 7.15) with an iron carbonate halo outside of the sericite (Figure 7.15d). Localized veins show argillic (smectite-illite Figure 7.15e) and chloritic (Figure 7.15f) alteration within the vertical AP veins.
![]() |

a) BC Vein-style layer-parallel breccia mineralization; b) Pyrite in quartz vein; c) Galena in quartz vein; d) Sphalerite in quartz vein; e) Pyrite deposition along the centerline of veins in pre-existing inter-crystal void space; f) Pyrite deposition along vein margin; g) Cosalite in quartz vein; h) Sulphide replacement mineralization.
Figure 7.12 - Mineralization styles observed on the Cariboo Gold Project.
![]() |

a) Vertical S3 structures bounding sericite-Fe-carbonate alteration; b) Vertical AP veins acting as multiple feeders to sulphide replacement body; c) Diffuse AP vein boundary with silica bleeding into replacement band; d) Outgrowths of pyrite from vein into carbonate replacement bands; e) Semi-vertical AP vein cutting across boudinaged layer-parallel vein; f) Vertical AP vein crosscutting oblique-dipping shear veins.
Figure 7.13 - Structural controls on the mineralization of the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

Figure 7.14 - Schematic vertical section (looking NE) of vein alteration observed on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

a) Intense silica alteration with boxwork textures after pyrite in vein margin; b) Intense silica alteration with trace pyrite adjacent to vein margin; c) Moderate sericite alteration distal from vein array; d) Iron carbonate alteration distal from vein array; e) Late argillic alteration in vertical AP vein; f) Late chlorite alteration in vertical AP vein
Figure 7.15 - Alteration on the Cariboo Gold Project
7.5 Age of Mineralization
A compilation of age dates by Mortensen et. al. (2011) and recent work by Allen et. al. (2017) places mineralization approximately at the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary (Figure 7.16).
![]() |

(Mortensen et. al., 2011)
Figure 7.16 - Compilation of age dating for the Cariboo Gold District
![]() |
Table 7.1 - Recent age dating of mineralization in the Cariboo Gold District
|
Sample (Mineral) |
Terrane |
Location / Unit |
Description |
Age (Ma) ± 2σ |
Analytical Notes |
|
MA16-CB05 (muscovite) |
Cariboo |
Locality 59 / Cunningham Fm. (Cariboo Gp.) |
Coarse muscovite in calcite vein; vein cuts pale grey dolomitic marble |
155.4 ± 0.6 |
Sample treated with dilute HCl; plateau age; steps 2-4 of 4; MSWD = 2.2; prob = 0.11; includes 74.7% of 39Ar |
|
MA16-CB23 (sericite) |
Cariboo |
Locality 100/42/ Midas Fm.? (Cariboo Gp) |
Fibrous quartz-carbonate-muscovite-covelite-pyrite vein |
154.6 ± 0.8 (aliquot 1) 153.6 ± 1.5 (aliquot 2) |
Aliquot l: rising age spectrum; steps 5-11 of 12; MSWD = 17; prob= 0.0; includes 81.6% of the 39Ar Aliquot 2: rising age spectrum; steps 4-7 of 13; MSWD = 8.2; prob= 0.0; includes 57.5% of the 39Ar |
|
MA16-CB15 (sericite) |
Barkerville |
Silver Mine/Harvey's Ridge succession (Hardscrabble Mountain succession) |
Quartz-pyrite vein, including sericitized phyllite seams |
136.7 ± 0.2 (aliquot 2) |
Rising spectrum; steps 4-7 of 12; MSWD= 1.7; prob. = 0.17; includes 59.9% of the 39Ar |
|
MA16-CB21 (sericite) |
Barkerville |
Penny Creek |
Quartz-pyrite-sericite vein |
~140 Ma |
Rising spectrum; no plateau |
|
RG16-CB03 (biotite) |
N/A |
Silver Mine/ lamprophyre |
Biotite-clinopyroxene- olivine-lamprophyre, talc-serpentine-carbonate altered |
114.2 ± 1.2 |
Grain l: weighted average of steps 3-4 of 4; includes 89.0% of the 39Ar |
|
RG16-CB06 (biotite) |
N/A |
Silver Mine/ lamprophyre |
Biotite-clinopyroxene- olivine-lamprophyre, talc-serpentine-carbonate altered; pyritic |
112.2 ± 1.7 |
Grain 4: weighted average of steps 2-3 of 4; includes 96.7% of the 39Ar |
|
WB15 (biotite) |
N/A |
Penny Creek/ lamprophyre |
Altered lamprophyre with fresh biotite |
113.4 ± 0.8 |
Excellent plateau; steps 4-7 of 7: MSWD = 0.50; prob.= 0.68; includes 86% of the 39Ar |
(Allen et. al., 2017)
![]() |
8. DEPOSIT TYPES
Lode-gold mineralization on the Project shares many characteristics with orogenic gold deposits (Chapman and Mortensen, 2016). Gold mineralization is associated with orogenic silica-carbonate-sericite-pyrite stable fluids moving along secondary permeability induced by the interaction of metamorphic fabrics, sublayer-parallel strike-slip faults, contacts between lithological units, and rheological contrasts between lithologies (Groves et al., 2003).
The majority of gold deposits in metamorphic terranes, such as the Barkerville Subterrane, are found adjacent to first-order, deep-crustal fault zones (such as the Pleasant Valley Thrust as a possible example), which show complex structural histories and may extend along strike for hundreds of kilometres and widths of as much as a few thousand metres (Goldfarb et al., 2005). Fluid expulsion from crustal metamorphic dehydration along such zones was driven by episodes of major pressure fluctuations during seismic events (Cox et al., 2005). Deposits form as simple to complex networks of gold-bearing, laminated quartz-carbonate fault-fill veins of second- and third-order shears and faults, particularly at jogs or changes in strike along the major deformation zones. Mineralization styles vary from stockworks and breccias in shallow, brittle regimes, through laminated crack-seal veins and sigmoidal vein arrays in brittle-ductile crustal regions, to replacement- and disseminated-type orebodies in deeper, ductile environments (Groves et al., 2003). Most orogenic gold deposits occur in greenschist facies rocks, but significant orebodies can be present in lower and higher-grade rocks (Phillips and Powell, 2010). The mineralization is syn- to late-deformation and typically post-peak metamorphism. They are typically associated with iron-carbonate alteration. Gold is largely confined to the quartz-carbonate vein network but may also be present in significant amounts within iron-rich sulphidized wall-rock selvages or within silicified and sulphide-rich replacement zones (Dubé and Gosselin, 2007). One of the key structural factors for gold mineralization emplacement is the late strike-slip movement event that reactivates earlier-formed structures within the orogeny (Goldfarb et al., 2001).
8.1 Vein Deposits
Axial planar (AP) vein deposits on Cow, Island and Barkerville mountains are composed predominantly of quartz and lesser iron carbonate gangue. Pyrite is the dominant sulphide mineral with vein content varying from trace amounts to tens of percent and appears to have a direct association with gold content in the veins. These veins range in width from millimetres to several metres, and where the density is high, they are considered a vein corridor and trend over 300 m within the sandstone unit.
AP veins are the primary source of vein-hosted gold within the Mosquito Creek, Shaft, Valley, Cow, Lowhee and KL deposits. AP veins are vertically dipping and strike from N020 to N050 Az. Vein corridors are defined as a high-density zone of mineralized AP veins (Figure 8.1).
Extensional veins are classified based on surface and underground mapping as veins with margins oblique to foliation. Extensional veins are locally observed as conjugate sets to have formed pre-F3 buckling in the early states of D3 compression. The extensional veins can show sulphide mineralization when they are intersected by AP veins (Figure 8.1).
![]() |
Fault-fill breccia veins such as that of the BC Vein are subparallel to foliation (S1) and hosted in carbonaceous mudstone. This vein is continuous along strike for 1.4 km and is bound on the hanging wall by carbonaceous mudstone and on the footwall by calcareous siltstone. The vein dips moderately at 65° to the northeast. Mineralization within the fault-filled breccia vein consists of fine disseminated pyrite in a re-healed breccia matrix.
8.2 Replacement Deposits
Replacement mineralization in calcareous sandstones varies from fine- to coarse-grained pyrite with lesser arsenopyrite. Bonanza Ledge replacement, hosted in calcareous siltstone, consists of fine-grained pyrite ore only. Sulphide content in replacement ore types is generally high, from 10% replacing thin calcareous bands to massive, largely replacing entire beds completely. The Bonanza Ledge replacement is fault-bounded in the footwall of the BC Vein structure. The replacement deposits observed at Island Mountain and Mosquito Creek are largely controlled by the F2 fold hinges of the D2 deformation event and are hosted in calcareous siltstone and sandstone. The observed mineralization types are considered contemporaneous, with vertical veins acting as feeders for the fault fill veins, replacement horizons and earlier shear veins.
8.3 Relationships between Mineralization Types and their Potential Controls
Recent work by Harbort (2017b), Harbort (2018) and Harbort et al. (2017) has redefined the structural controls of mineralization in the Cariboo Gold District. The model, based on detailed mapping of historical underground workings, surface mapping and more than 30,000 structural readings from oriented core, explains observed mineralized veins as occupying large-aperture mode I joint cracks oriented axial planar to F3 fold hinges, with vein long axes parallel to the direction of minimum curvature of a meta-sandstone layer (Figure 8.2). Mapped vein arrays are preferentially developed in anticlinal F3 fold axes above the neutral surface of the fold. Meta-siltstone layers bound the upper and lower layer of the sandstone and deform predominantly by flexural slip resulting in poor vein development. Early shear veins and layer-parallel veins are mineralized when located adjacent to the axial planar vein arrays and joints, decreasing in gold content with distance from AP vein corridors. Where the vein arrays have intersected calcareous sandstone, sulphide replacement mineralization is developed, particularly in attenuated F2 fold hinges.
![]() |

(Harbort, 2017)
Figure 8.1 - Composite model of the mineralization styles on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |

(Harbort, 2017)
Figure 8.2 - Model for the formation of vertical AP veins on the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |
9. EXPLORATION
Barkerville's exploration team carried out exploration work on the Project from May to December 2019. The program consisted of geological mapping and surface rock sampling, followed by interpretation and the preparation of an internal mapping report. Mapping and sampling efforts specifically targeted the northwest and southeast strike extensions of the known mineralization and defined resources in the Wells area, as well as a parallel trend at Mount Burns (Lightning Creek Trend).
9.1 Geological mapping
The principal aims of the 2019 regional mapping program were to expand the coverage of Barkerville 1:2,000-scale mapping within the prospective sandstone of the Barkerville Trend in an effort to delineate greenfield exploration targets and provide recommendations for the targeting methodology.
Mapping was carried out over 19 weeks during the late-May to early-October field season, with data interpretation spanning into December. The field component of the program consisted of detailed geological mapping and surface structural data collection carried out across approximately 2,900 ha within the Barkerville Trend, split between the Island Mountain and Proserpine prospects. The focus of late-season mapping shifted to the Lightning Creek trend, exposed at Mount Burns (Figure 9.1). The office-based data interpretation component produced an updated geological map for the Project presented in Section 7.2.
A total of 200 surface samples or various types (grab, select, panel, linear) were collected in 2019 across all mapping areas (Table 9.1). The mapping and sampling confirmed the extension of the corridors and allowed BGM to develop drilling targets. The Table 9.2 provides significant results of the sampling.
Table 9.1 - 2019 Cariboo Gold Project surface rock samples
|
Prospect |
Grab Samples |
Select Mineralized Samples |
Panel Samples |
Linear Samples |
Total Samples |
|
Antler Creek |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Mount Burns |
4 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
Island Mtn |
11 |
53 |
2 |
0 |
66 |
|
Proserpine Mtn |
35 |
78 |
6 |
1 |
120 |
|
Total |
52 |
139 |
8 |
1 |
200 |
![]() |
Table 9.2 - Significant results of surface exploration sampling
|
Prospect |
Sample Type |
Au ppm |
Site Type |
Mineralization Style |
Location (UTM) Meters East (mE), Meters N (mN), Elevation (m) |
|
Mosquito Creek (Island Mountain) |
Rock Select |
69.8 |
Outcrop |
Replacement in Limestone |
593730mE, 5885079mN, 1357m |
|
Mosquito Creek (Island Mountain) |
Rock Select |
55.4 |
Outcrop |
Replacement in Limestone |
593622mE, 5885116mN, 1405m |
|
Burns |
Vein Select |
49 |
Dump |
Vein Hosted (Type Unknown) |
588741mE, 5877914mN, 1579m |
|
Mosquito Creek (Island Mountain) |
Rock Select |
47.8 |
Workings |
Replacement in Limestone |
593746mE, 5885077mN, 1338m |
|
Mosquito Creek (Island Mountain) |
Rock Select |
40.1 |
Outcrop |
Replacement in Limestone |
593625mE, 5885110mN, 1402m |
|
Mosquito Creek (Island Mountain) |
Vein Select |
39 |
Outcrop |
Extensional Vein Hosted |
593634mE, 5885156mN, 1401m |
|
Burns |
Rock Grab |
29 |
Float |
Vein Hosted (Type Unknown) |
588364mE, 5879048mN, 1571m |
|
Prosperpine |
Vein Select |
28.2 |
Dump |
Vein Hosted (Type Unknown) |
600231mE, 5878630mN, 1591m |
|
Shaft Zone (Island Mountain) |
Vein Select |
26.7 |
Workings |
Axial Planar Vein Hosted |
594517mE, 5884507mN, 1401m |
|
Shaft Zone (Island Mountain) |
Vein Select |
26.4 |
Workings |
Axial Planar Vein Hosted |
594708mE, 5884449mN, 1382m |
|
Prosperpine |
Vein Select |
23.9 |
Subcrop |
Vein Hosted (Type Unknown) |
602567mE, 5875879mN, 1633m |
|
Burns |
Vein Select |
16.7 |
Float |
Vein Hosted (Type Unknown) |
589018mE, 9877936mN, 1583m |
|
Shaft Zone (Island Mountain) |
Vein Select |
14.3 |
Outcrop |
Axial Planar Vein Hosted |
594583mE, 5884335mN, 1416m |
|
Proserpine |
Rock Select |
13.3 |
Outcrop |
BC Vein-style Vein Hosted |
602270mE, 5876181mN, 1676m |
|
Teapot (Island Mountain) |
Vein Select |
11.2 |
Outcrop |
BC Vein-style Vein Hosted |
593772mE, 5884351mN, 1545m |
|
Mosquito Creek (Island Mountain) |
Rock Select |
10.8 |
Outcrop |
Replacement in Limestone |
593615mE, 5885119mN, 1408m |
|
Teapot (Island Mountain) |
Vein Select |
10 |
Outcrop |
BC Vein-style Vein Hosted |
593775mE, 5884334mN, 1548m |
![]() |

Figure 9.1 - 2019 regional mapping and sampling location map for the Cariboo Gold Project
![]() |
10. DRILLING
Barkerville is continuously drilling on the property and the drilling was still ongoing at the time of the report. The drilling performed from January to December 2019 was included in the current MRE update and is defined as the "2019 Program" and the potential impact on the MRE is presented below for the drilling completed to date in 2020 (Figure 10.1). The objectives were to test new brownfields targets adjacent to known deposits, infill high-grade MSO stopes modelled from the PEA and currently classified as inferred, explore the depth potential of known deposits, and continue exploration on regional targets. Barkerville's previous drilling programs are summarized in Chapter 6. Figure 10.1 shows an overview map of the 2019 Program.
Diamond drill core is the principal source of geological information for the Project.
10.1 Drilling Methodology
The 2019 Program was performed by Hy-Tech Drilling Ltd ("Hy-Tech"), based in Smithers, British Columbia. Collar locations were determined using a Trimble DGPS.
Drills were lined up using a Reflex TN14 Gyrocompass or a Suunto compass. The downhole dip and azimuth were surveyed using a Reflex EZ-shot tool. Surveys started 10 m below the casing, and readings were taken at least every 30 m downhole. A reading was also taken at the bottom of the hole if the EOH depth was 15 m or more from the last test. A multi-shot survey was performed in exploration holes upon completion. Drilling contractors handled the instruments, and survey information was transcribed and provided in paper format to Barkerville geologists. Starting in January 2019, survey information was also copied from the instruments to USB drives and transferred into the Barkerville database.
At the drill rig, the drill helpers placed core into core boxes and marked off every 3-m drill run using a labelled wooden block. Oriented core measurements were taken for all exploration holes, but stopped for most infill holes from July 2019 onward. The drill helpers were responsible for marking the core using a Reflex Act III tool. All holes were drilled in NQ diameter unless noted otherwise in this report.
10.2 Core Logging Procedures
The drill core was transported to Barkerville's facility in Wells where it was cleaned of drilling additives and mud, and the metres were marked before collecting the data.
Geotechnical data collection includes RQD at 1-m intervals. Magnetic susceptibility data were not collected because it was concluded that such data are not relevant to the deposit. Geotechnicians performed hardness testing on all core.
Downhole orientation lines were connected where possible, and orientation measurements recorded.
All data were recorded using Datamine DHLogger software. Sample intervals and pertinent information regarding lithology, mineralization and alteration were marked on the core.
After recording the sampling information, drill core samples were sawn in half, labelled, and bagged. The remaining drill core is stored onsite in a secured location for future reference. Numbered security tags were applied to lab shipments for chain of custody requirements. Samples were then shipped to the laboratory of ALS Minerals in North Vancouver, British Columbia, for analysis.
![]() |
10.3 2019 Drilling Program
The 2019 Program focused on the Cow-Island-Barkerville Corridor, as well as Proserpine Mountain (Figure 10.1).
Barkerville drilled 92,297 m in 264 surface holes at an average recovery rate of 96%. A summary of the drilling program is presented in Table 10.1.
Table 10.1 - Summary of Barkerville's 2019 Program
|
Deposit |
Total metres |
Number of Holes |
|
BCV |
3,744 |
24 |
|
BM |
36,376 |
87 |
|
LZ |
8,422 |
24 |
|
WC |
1,572 |
4 |
|
CM |
16,137 |
72 |
|
MC |
8,259 |
15 |
|
SZ |
12,032 |
26 |
|
WLO |
3,079 |
6 |
|
PSP |
2,676 |
6 |
|
Totals |
92,297 |
264 |
The 2019 Program at Island Mountain focused on the Shaft Zone, Mosquito Creek and the Willow Regional Target, totalling 23,370 m in 47 holes (Figure 10.2).
The drilling conducted at Shaft Zone and Mosquito Creek continued the category conversion work and followed up on the results from 2018 to expand known mineralized vein corridors. The Shaft Zone (12,032 m, 26 holes) was explored and defined from surface to a maximum vertical depth of 750 m, while drilling at Mosquito Creek (8,259 m, 15 holes) targeted shallow modelled vein corridors to a maximum vertical depth of 370 m and replacement-style mineralized zones. Infill drilling on these two deposits was designed to intercept modelled vein corridors with a 25-m spacing at depth in order to convert inferred resources to indicated. Figure 10.3 shows a cross-section of selected 2019 drill holes on the Shaft deposit.
Drilling at the Willow prospect tested the 2017 gold-in-soil anomalies in the northwest area of Island Mountain and followed up on 2018 mapping recommendations. Two (2) stratigraphic holes were drilled at an azimuth of 225° followed by four (4) holes drilled at an azimuth between 120° and 130° to test surface anomalies, for a total of six (6) drill holes and 3,079 m.
The 2019 Program at Cow Mountain (Figure 10.4) continued the category conversion work on known vein corridors (inferred to indicated) and explored the down-dip extent of selected targets. The targeted vein corridors were drilled from surface to a maximum vertical depth of 280 m with a 25-m intercept spacing at depth. A total of 16,137 m was drilled in 72 holes. No new holes were drilled on the Valley deposit during the 2019 Program. Figure 10.5 shows a cross-section of selected drilling on the Cow Mountain and Valley Zone deposits for 2019.
![]() |
The aim of the 2019 Program at Barkerville Mountain (Figure 10.6) was to provide infill data on the BC Vein and to explore targets identified during the 2018 mapping program on the KL Zone, Williams Creek, and Lowhee Zone prospects. Historical drilling and surface geochemical data also contributed to the generation of these exploration targets.
BC Vein drilling, totalling 3,744 m in 23 holes, improved block model confidence and further delineated the deposit. Drilling at the three exploration prospects targeted mineralized vein corridors within the prospective sandstone unit analogous to those on the Cow and Island mountains. In total, 86 holes (36,250 m) were drilled on the KL prospect, four (4) holes (1,572 m) on the Williams Creek prospect, and 24 holes (8,422 m) on the Lowhee prospect. Figure 10.7 shows a cross-section of selected 2019 Barkerville Mountain drill holes.
At the Proserpine prospect, a single drill rig tested surface geochemical results and the down-dip extent of mineralization reported from historical workings. One (1) stratigraphic hole was drilled at an azimuth of 210°, followed by five (5) holes drilled at 120° azimuth to intersect the anomalies. Six (6) drill holes were completed for 2,676 m. Collar locations for the 2019 drill holes on regional targets are shown in Figure 10.8. Figure 10.9 shows a cross-section of selected 2019 Proserpine drill holes.
No geotechnical or metallurgical holes were drilled in 2019.
Table 10.2 presents the highlights of the 2019 Program. The intercepts are reported uncut. The true widths of the intersections are estimated to be 50 to 75% of reported core length intervals. Intervals not recovered by drilling were assigned zero grade.
Table 10.3 presents the collar information of holes of Table 10.2
Table 10.2 - Highlights of the 2019 Program
|
TARGET |
OBJECTIVE |
HOLE ID |
|
DEPTH |
DEPTH TO |
LENGTH (M) |
AU (G/T) |
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-003 |
|
127.20 |
153.00 |
25.80 |
5.11 |
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-005 |
|
98.90 |
106.60 |
7.70 |
8.91 |
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-007 |
|
108.00 |
115.00 |
7.00 |
12.83 |
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-008 |
|
125.60 |
149.00 |
23.40 |
9.90 |
|
INCLUDING |
125.60 |
126.60 |
1.00 |
52.70 |
|||
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-012 |
|
142.70 |
150.00 |
7.30 |
9.87 |
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-015 |
|
75.15 |
83.00 |
7.85 |
21.91 |
|
INCLUDING |
76.10 |
76.70 |
0.60 |
275.00 |
|||
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-017 |
|
97.20 |
105.80 |
8.60 |
22.43 |
|
AND |
99.00 |
100.20 |
1.20 |
60.70 |
|||
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-018 |
|
99.90 |
106.25 |
6.35 |
12.07 |
![]() |
|
TARGET |
OBJECTIVE |
HOLE ID |
|
DEPTH |
DEPTH TO |
LENGTH (M) |
AU (G/T) |
|
BC Vein |
Delineation |
BCVN-19-020 |
|
102.50 |
106.05 |
3.55 |
12.46 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-004 |
INCLUDING |
254.50 |
255.00 |
0.50 |
102.00 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-008 |
|
159.90 |
162.50 |
2.60 |
83.19 |
|
INCLUDING |
161.00 |
161.50 |
0.50 |
358.00 |
|||
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-014 |
|
177.00 |
182.60 |
5.60 |
14.61 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-019 |
|
143.40 |
154.50 |
11.10 |
9.60 |
|
INCLUDING |
144.30 |
144.80 |
0.50 |
129.00 |
|||
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-020 |
|
91.05 |
101.30 |
10.25 |
9.17 |
|
INCLUDING |
94.80 |
96.20 |
1.40 |
60.70 |
|||
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-022 |
INCLUDING |
148.95 |
149.45 |
0.50 |
88.90 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-025 |
|
261.70 |
274.10 |
12.40 |
5.94 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-029 |
|
101.45 |
112.85 |
11.40 |
9.47 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-030 |
|
44.00 |
76.55 |
32.55 |
5.50 |
|
INCLUDING |
44.00 |
48.95 |
4.95 |
25.67 |
|||
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-030 |
AND |
48.10 |
48.95 |
0.85 |
102.50 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-044 |
|
141.00 |
144.50 |
3.50 |
20.94 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-055 |
|
89.60 |
98.30 |
8.70 |
15.87 |
|
AND |
96.50 |
97.40 |
0.90 |
98.20 |
|||
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-057 |
|
246.70 |
247.60 |
0.90 |
73.80 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-059 |
|
221.05 |
222.50 |
1.45 |
51.90 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-070 |
|
134.10 |
139.30 |
5.20 |
16.56 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-071 |
|
125.90 |
132.90 |
7.00 |
18.70 |
|
Cow |
Delineation |
CM-19-072 |
|
264.00 |
273.40 |
9.40 |
7.75 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-003 |
|
170.80 |
171.30 |
0.50 |
102.00 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-005 |
|
47.50 |
53.80 |
6.30 |
19.30 |
|
AND |
50.25 |
50.75 |
0.50 |
69.40 |
|||
|
AND |
51.25 |
52.00 |
0.75 |
40.50 |
|||
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-009 |
|
300.00 |
322.55 |
22.55 |
1.20 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-011 |
|
42.60 |
43.10 |
0.50 |
54.60 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-022 |
|
69.00 |
74.15 |
5.15 |
6.25 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-025 |
|
122.45 |
124.80 |
2.35 |
49.63 |
|
INCLUDING |
124.00 |
124.80 |
0.80 |
145.00 |
|||
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-026 |
|
401.50 |
410.10 |
8.60 |
3.84 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-036 |
|
68.10 |
70.80 |
2.70 |
10.08 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-040 |
|
164.65 |
171.25 |
6.60 |
5.36 |
![]() |
|
TARGET |
OBJECTIVE |
HOLE ID |
|
DEPTH |
DEPTH TO |
LENGTH (M) |
AU (G/T) |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-047 |
|
60.50 |
61.50 |
1.00 |
28.40 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-057 |
|
258.25 |
261.90 |
3.65 |
10.92 |
|
AND |
261.00 |
261.90 |
0.90 |
30.20 |
|||
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-068 |
|
185.30 |
192.55 |
7.25 |
6.60 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-074 |
|
179.20 |
185.60 |
6.40 |
7.91 |
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-079 |
|
134.50 |
140.30 |
5.80 |
11.87 |
|
INCLUDING |
136.65 |
137.65 |
1.00 |
52.90 |
|||
|
KL Zone |
Exploration |
BM-19-094 |
|
100.00 |
105.85 |
5.85 |
9.46 |
|
AND |
104.40 |
105.40 |
1.00 |
43.30 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-087 |
|
90.70 |
96.65 |
5.95 |
5.10 |
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-088 |
|
37.40 |
42.55 |
5.15 |
6.13 |
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-093 |
|
32.60 |
43.00 |
10.40 |
8.84 |
|
INCLUDING |
32.60 |
33.40 |
0.80 |
58.10 |
|||
|
AND |
33.40 |
33.90 |
0.50 |
70.00 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-100 |
|
40.60 |
41.25 |
0.65 |
69.30 |
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-101 |
|
93.50 |
96.00 |
2.50 |
40.25 |
|
INCLUDING |
94.00 |
94.50 |
0.50 |
186.50 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-102 |
|
87.80 |
94.55 |
6.75 |
5.76 |
|
|
105.40 |
109.50 |
4.10 |
8.43 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-105 |
|
99.80 |
112.60 |
12.80 |
20.66 |
|
INCLUDING |
100.30 |
100.95 |
0.65 |
352.00 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-107 |
|
91.60 |
96.60 |
5.00 |
6.37 |
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-108 |
|
31.10 |
36.55 |
5.45 |
6.49 |
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-109 |
|
120.00 |
138.70 |
18.70 |
10.53 |
|
AND |
131.70 |
137.50 |
5.80 |
31.30 |
|||
|
AND |
135.50 |
136.00 |
0.50 |
74.70 |
|||
|
AND |
136.00 |
136.50 |
0.50 |
109.50 |
|||
|
AND |
136.50 |
137.00 |
0.50 |
90.10 |
|||
|
|
151.95 |
156.50 |
4.55 |
8.02 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-111 |
|
78.25 |
87.50 |
9.25 |
6.82 |
|
INCLUDING |
78.75 |
79.25 |
0.50 |
60.60 |
|||
|
|
258.40 |
258.90 |
0.50 |
327.00 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
Exploration |
BM-19-113 |
|
135.00 |
136.20 |
1.20 |
30.00 |
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-004 |
|
398.40 |
402.60 |
4.20 |
10.65 |
|
INCLUDING |
402.10 |
402.60 |
0.50 |
85.70 |
![]() |
|
TARGET |
OBJECTIVE |
HOLE ID |
|
DEPTH |
DEPTH TO |
LENGTH (M) |
AU (G/T) |
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-005 |
|
160.65 |
166.15 |
5.50 |
5.94 |
|
INCLUDING |
160.65 |
161.35 |
0.70 |
40.60 |
|||
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-008 |
|
282.25 |
283.00 |
0.75 |
48.80 |
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-010 |
|
158.75 |
192.00 |
33.25 |
1.25 |
|
|
339.00 |
339.60 |
0.60 |
66.00 |
|||
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-018 |
|
487.75 |
491.20 |
3.45 |
7.64 |
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-036 |
|
90.00 |
93.00 |
3.00 |
7.39 |
|
|
129.35 |
131.80 |
2.45 |
14.50 |
|||
|
|
130.50 |
131.15 |
0.65 |
46.80 |
|||
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-043 |
|
183.90 |
191.05 |
7.15 |
33.62 |
|
INCLUDING |
187.90 |
188.40 |
0.50 |
399.00 |
|||
|
AND |
188.40 |
189.10 |
0.70 |
31.80 |
|||
|
|
266.20 |
266.90 |
0.70 |
35.90 |
|||
|
Mosquito Creek |
Delineation and Deep Exploration |
IM-19-047 |
|
212.35 |
217.80 |
5.45 |
7.55 |
|
|
220.50 |
224.45 |
3.95 |
8.16 |
|||
|
INCLUDING |
222.25 |
222.90 |
0.65 |
45.50 |
|||
|
|
487.40 |
491.70 |
4.30 |
6.87 |
|||
|
|
560.00 |
562.80 |
2.80 |
7.93 |
|||
|
Proserpine |
Exploration |
PSP-19-001 |
|
476.20 |
476.70 |
0.50 |
16.70 |
|
Proserpine |
Exploration |
PSP-19-002 |
|
48.40 |
56.00 |
7.60 |
14.27 |
|
INCLUDING |
48.40 |
49.00 |
0.60 |
125.50 |
|||
|
AND |
53.00 |
54.00 |
1.00 |
30.70 |
|||
|
|
200.50 |
203.00 |
2.50 |
5.16 |
|||
|
INCLUDING |
202.00 |
202.50 |
0.50 |
23.20 |
|||
|
|
323.50 |
326.50 |
3.00 |
26.08 |
|||
|
|
325.00 |
325.90 |
0.90 |
84.90 |
|||
|
Proserpine |
Exploration |
PSP-19-003 |
|
217.50 |
219.75 |
2.25 |
4.49 |
|
|
230.60 |
231.10 |
0.50 |
95.20 |
|||
|
Proserpine |
Exploration |
PSP-19-006 |
|
215.70 |
216.80 |
1.10 |
9.18 |
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-007 |
|
26.75 |
39.90 |
13.15 |
10.06 |
|
AND |
37.00 |
37.90 |
0.90 |
76.40 |
|||
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-012 |
|
161.25 |
171.50 |
10.25 |
7.02 |
|
AND |
162.00 |
163.40 |
1.40 |
31.40 |
![]() |
|
TARGET |
OBJECTIVE |
HOLE ID |
|
DEPTH |
DEPTH TO |
LENGTH (M) |
AU (G/T) |
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-013 |
|
92.00 |
94.40 |
2.40 |
26.24 |
|
|
92.00 |
93.50 |
1.50 |
38.10 |
|||
|
|
111.50 |
129.40 |
17.90 |
19.34 |
|||
|
AND |
114.55 |
115.05 |
0.50 |
151.50 |
|||
|
AND |
115.05 |
116.35 |
1.30 |
37.90 |
|||
|
AND |
116.85 |
118.35 |
1.50 |
32.80 |
|||
|
AND |
118.35 |
119.85 |
1.50 |
59.30 |
|||
|
|
442.45 |
447.80 |
5.35 |
15.78 |
|||
|
AND |
447.15 |
447.80 |
0.65 |
59.60 |
|||
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-019 |
|
488.00 |
508.00 |
20.00 |
10.76 |
|
|
504.50 |
505.75 |
1.25 |
157.50 |
|||
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-020 |
|
143.00 |
143.50 |
0.50 |
162.50 |
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-023 |
|
194.50 |
198.55 |
4.05 |
21.97 |
|
INCLUDING |
194.50 |
195.25 |
0.75 |
87.60 |
|||
|
|
450.25 |
455.85 |
5.60 |
10.57 |
|||
|
|
485.35 |
493.30 |
7.95 |
10.12 |
|||
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-025 |
|
26.40 |
32.70 |
6.30 |
6.80 |
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-029 |
|
222.40 |
226.80 |
4.40 |
14.91 |
|
INCLUDING |
223.10 |
223.90 |
0.80 |
55.90 |
|||
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-032 |
INCLUDING |
698.00 |
698.50 |
0.50 |
18.20 |
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-039 |
|
639.90 |
642.05 |
2.15 |
27.23 |
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-040 |
|
399.25 |
405.45 |
6.20 |
8.94 |
|
|
490.00 |
493.20 |
3.20 |
21.18 |
|||
|
INCLUDING |
490.00 |
490.90 |
0.90 |
54.10 |
|||
|
|
525.00 |
532.85 |
7.85 |
7.31 |
|||
|
Shaft Zone |
Exploration |
IM-19-045 |
|
661.80 |
668.30 |
6.50 |
7.75 |
|
Williams |
Exploration |
BM-19-013 |
|
148.20 |
149.00 |
0.80 |
27.30 |
|
|
183.15 |
184.15 |
1.00 |
11.17 |
|||
|
INCLUDING |
183.65 |
184.15 |
0.50 |
20.00 |
|||
|
|
197.00 |
199.80 |
2.80 |
12.23 |
|||
|
INCLUDING |
197.00 |
197.50 |
0.50 |
33.60 |
|||
|
AND |
198.60 |
199.30 |
0.70 |
20.10 |
|||
|
|
407.50 |
408.30 |
0.80 |
40.10 |
|||
|
Williams |
Exploration |
BM-19-015 |
|
446.05 |
448.30 |
2.25 |
5.17 |
|
Willow |
Exploration |
IM-19-041 |
|
338.10 |
340.00 |
1.90 |
4.88 |
![]() |
Table 10.3 - Collar information for selected hole with significant results
|
Hole |
Location X (m) |
Location Y (m) |
Location Z (m) |
Azimuth |
Dip |
|
BCVN-19-003 |
597180 |
5881644 |
1549 |
227 |
-48 |
|
BCVN-19-005 |
597193 |
5881597 |
1542 |
228 |
-45 |
|
BCVN-19-007 |
597193 |
5881598 |
1542 |
224 |
-56 |
|
BCVN-19-008 |
597180 |
5881644 |
1549 |
214 |
-44 |
|
BCVN-19-012 |
597179 |
5881645 |
1549 |
229 |
-54 |
|
BCVN-19-015 |
597335 |
5881497 |
1539 |
224 |
-51 |
|
BCVN-19-017 |
597081 |
5881702 |
1540 |
223 |
-44 |
|
BCVN-19-018 |
597081 |
5881702 |
1540 |
224 |
-51 |
|
BCVN-19-020 |
597067 |
5881716 |
1538 |
227 |
-47 |
|
BM-19-003 |
598317 |
5881123 |
1525 |
113 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-005 |
598280 |
5881093 |
1520 |
118 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-009 |
597898 |
5881354 |
1558 |
123 |
-46 |
|
BM-19-011 |
597948 |
5881392 |
1572 |
120 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-013 |
598847 |
5880331 |
1340 |
120 |
-44 |
|
BM-19-015 |
598783 |
5880270 |
1356 |
120 |
-44 |
|
BM-19-022 |
598041 |
5881353 |
1572 |
123 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-025 |
597942 |
5881261 |
1539 |
118 |
-46 |
|
BM-19-026 |
597808 |
5881574 |
1598 |
121 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-036 |
597642 |
5881492 |
1566 |
123 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-040 |
597261 |
5881535 |
1539 |
112 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-047 |
597335 |
5881465 |
1532 |
110 |
-46 |
|
BM-19-057 |
596948 |
5881888 |
1533 |
110 |
-46 |
|
BM-19-068 |
597813 |
5881454 |
1573 |
109 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-074 |
597846 |
5881492 |
1587 |
112 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-079 |
597809 |
5881600 |
1601 |
107 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-087 |
596563 |
5882703 |
1472 |
297 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-088 |
596582 |
5882755 |
1470 |
296 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-093 |
596548 |
5882644 |
1472 |
107 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-094 |
597992 |
5881225 |
1535 |
108 |
-44 |
|
BM-19-100 |
596542 |
5882615 |
1466 |
303 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-101 |
596469 |
5882659 |
1444 |
305 |
-43 |
|
BM-19-102 |
596464 |
5882708 |
1440 |
297 |
-46 |
|
BM-19-105 |
596465 |
5882709 |
1441 |
110 |
-53 |
![]() |
|
Hole |
Location X (m) |
Location Y (m) |
Location Z (m) |
Azimuth |
Dip |
|
BM-19-107 |
596475 |
5882779 |
1438 |
292 |
-54 |
|
BM-19-108 |
596483 |
5882811 |
1435 |
299 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-109 |
596483 |
5882811 |
1436 |
298 |
-56 |
|
BM-19-111 |
596482 |
5882808 |
1438 |
108 |
-45 |
|
BM-19-113 |
596494 |
5882909 |
1429 |
300 |
-55 |
|
CM-19-004 |
595874 |
5883817 |
1291 |
128 |
-45 |
|
CM-19-008 |
595686 |
5883809 |
1274 |
308 |
-67 |
|
CM-19-014 |
595711 |
5883727 |
1302 |
305 |
-57 |
|
CM-19-019 |
595790 |
5883688 |
1323 |
136 |
-56 |
|
CM-19-020 |
595824 |
5883702 |
1321 |
146 |
-70 |
|
CM-19-022 |
595874 |
5883671 |
1338 |
140 |
-48 |
|
CM-19-025 |
595908 |
5883648 |
1347 |
135 |
-52 |
|
CM-19-029 |
595909 |
5883648 |
1348 |
132 |
-58 |
|
CM-19-030 |
595819 |
5883600 |
1349 |
111 |
-62 |
|
CM-19-044 |
595885 |
5883465 |
1403 |
141 |
-44 |
|
CM-19-055 |
595789 |
5883681 |
1323 |
135 |
-62 |
|
CM-19-057 |
595708 |
5883722 |
1302 |
316 |
-56 |
|
CM-19-059 |
595710 |
5883723 |
1303 |
324 |
-54 |
|
CM-19-070 |
595802 |
5883790 |
1292 |
135 |
-60 |
|
CM-19-071 |
595802 |
5883791 |
1293 |
143 |
-59 |
|
CM-19-072 |
595802 |
5883790 |
1292 |
141 |
-60 |
|
IM-19-004 |
593779 |
5885124 |
1349 |
303 |
-47 |
|
IM-19-005 |
593652 |
5885163 |
1402 |
299 |
-45 |
|
IM-19-007 |
594140 |
5884631 |
1438 |
123 |
-44 |
|
IM-19-008 |
593628 |
5885278 |
1397 |
308 |
-46 |
|
IM-19-010 |
593641 |
5885218 |
1400 |
312 |
-43 |
|
IM-19-012 |
594336 |
5884663 |
1408 |
138 |
-53 |
|
IM-19-013 |
594221 |
5884638 |
1427 |
129 |
-46 |
|
IM-19-018 |
593714 |
5885231 |
1386 |
314 |
-45 |
|
IM-19-019 |
594446 |
5884542 |
1410 |
142 |
-60 |
|
IM-19-020 |
594365 |
5884675 |
1405 |
137 |
-59 |
|
IM-19-023 |
594372 |
5884690 |
1398 |
127 |
-46 |
|
IM-19-025 |
594221 |
5884638 |
1427 |
132 |
-52 |
|
IM-19-029 |
594486 |
5884607 |
1398 |
140 |
-48 |
![]() |
|
Hole |
Location X (m) |
Location Y (m) |
Location Z (m) |
Azimuth |
Dip |
|
IM-19-032 |
594555 |
5884639 |
1375 |
135 |
-49 |
|
IM-19-036 |
593500 |
5885225 |
1434 |
315 |
-45 |
|
IM-19-039 |
594752 |
5884630 |
1353 |
133 |
-45 |
|
IM-19-040 |
594554 |
5884638 |
1375 |
137 |
-45 |
|
IM-19-043 |
593965 |
5885038 |
1371 |
317 |
-56 |
|
IM-19-045 |
594721 |
5884649 |
1360 |
130 |
-45 |
|
IM-19-047 |
593964 |
5885039 |
1369 |
321 |
-53 |
|
PSP-19-001 |
601573 |
5877155 |
1731 |
207 |
-45 |
|
PSP-19-002 |
601672 |
5876851 |
1734 |
119 |
-46 |
|
PSP-19-003 |
601497 |
5876950 |
1713 |
118 |
-44 |
|
PSP-19-006 |
602004 |
5876163 |
1738 |
122 |
-46 |
![]() |

Figure 10.1 - Barkerville holes location on the Cariboo Gold Project as of September 28, 2020
![]() |

Figure 10.2 - Barkerville 2019 Program holes location on Island Mountain
![]() |

Figure 10.3 - Drill hole cross-section of the Shaft deposit on Island Mountain
![]() |

Figure 10.4 - Barkerville 2019 Program holes location on Cow Mountain
![]() |

Figure 10.5 - Drill hole cross-section of 2019 Cow Mountain Select DDH
![]() |

Figure 10.6 - Barkerville 2019 Program holes location on Barkerville Mountain
![]() |

![]() |
Figure 10.7 - Drill hole cross-section of 2019 Lowhee Zone (Barkerville Mt) Select DDH

Figure 10.8 - Barkerville 2019 Program holes location on Proserpine Mountain
![]() |

Figure 10.9 - Drill hole cross-section of 2019 Proserpine Mountain Select DDH
![]() |
10.4 2020 Drilling Program
Parallel to the 2020 MRE update, which includes all drilling to the end of 2019, Barkerville began their 2020 drilling program. The 2020 program again focuses on the Cow-Island-Barkerville Corridor.
Barkerville has currently drilled 25,397.7 meters in 82 holes at an average recovery rate of 97% (as of September 28, 2020). A summary of the Drilling Program to date is presented in Table 10.4.
Table 10.4 - Summary of Barkerville's 2020 Program as of September 28, 2020
|
Deposit |
Total metres |
Number of Holes |
|
BCV |
560.60 |
3 |
|
LZ |
10,144.50 |
24 |
|
CM |
4,353.90 |
21 |
|
VZ |
9,342.70 |
30 |
|
SZ |
996.00 |
4 |
|
Totals |
25,397.70 |
82 |
To date, the majority of the 2020 drilling has been focused in the Valley Zone (Figure 10.11) to continue the category conversion work, expand known mineralized vein corridors, and follow up on results from the 2018 MRE. The targeted vein corridors are being drilled from surface to a maximum vertical depth of 825 m with a 25-m intercept spacing at depth. So far, a total of 9,342.70 m have been drilled in 30 holes with drilling planned to continue into 2021.
The 2020 Program at Cow Mountain (Figure 10.11) continued the category conversion work on known vein corridors (inferred to indicated) and explored the down-dip extent of selected targets. The targeted vein corridors were drilled from surface to a maximum vertical depth of 350 m with a 25-m intercept spacing at depth. A total of 4,353.90 m were drilled in 21 holes. No further drilling is currently planned.
The aim of the 2020 Program at Barkerville Mountain (Figure 10.14) was to provide infill data on the BC Vein and to further define the Lowhee Zone prospect.
BC Vein drilling, totalling 560.60 m in 3 holes, improved block model confidence and further delineated the deposit. Drilling at the Lowhee Zone targeted mineralized vein corridors within the prospective sandstone unit analogous to those on Cow and Island mountains. The targeted vein corridors were drilled from surface to a maximum vertical depth of 370 m with a 50-m intercept spacing at depth. A total of 10,144.50 m were drilled in 24 holes. No further drilling is currently planned.
The 2020 Program at Island Mountain has so far consisted of four (4) holes drilled at Shaft Zone for a total of 996.00 m (Figure 10.16). Further drilling at Shaft Zone is set to continue in the winter of 2020 and will continue the category conversion work.
Barkerville's 2020 Drilling Program was paused from March through June 2020 due to COVID-19.
The intersections were visually compared in 3D to the mineralized zones 3D solids and interpolated block grades of the 2020 MRE.
![]() |
Overall, the visual inspection of the 2020 drilling results demonstrated that the thickness and the grade of the mineralized zones are in the same order of magnitude as the 2020 MRE. The 2020 drilling continues to confirm the geological and grade continuities that were demonstrated in the 2020 MRE.
For the purpose of this MRE Report, InnovExplo is of the opinion that the gains and the losses would balance each other, and the resulting difference would not be material to the overall resource. According to the drilling results in the extension of the known mineralized zones and with the discovery of new zones, there is a potential to increase the mineral resources.
![]() |
11. SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY
The following paragraphs describe the sample preparation, analysis, and security procedures for the 2019 diamond drill holes program ("2019 Program") included in the current resource estimate. InnovExplo reviewed the QA/QC procedures and results. The reader is referred to Beausoleil and Pelletier (2019) for details of the 2018 drilling program and to Beausoleil and Pelletier (2018) for the 2016 and 2017 programs.
11.1 Core Handling, Sampling and Security
Core handling, sampling, and security procedures are managed by Barkerville personnel. The procedures are described in detail below.
The drill core is placed into wooden core boxes at the drill site with the end of each drill run marked with a small wooden block displaying the depth of the hole. Box labels indicate the hole and box numbers. The boxes are racked and covered at the drill, secured with ratchet straps, and then transported daily from the drill site to Barkerville's core storage and logging facility by truck by the drilling contractor. The boxes are labelled in permanent marker with the hole and box number (e.g. GR-15-01 Bx 1). The secure core storage and logging facility is located in the town of Wells.
Upon receiving a load of core from the drill crew, the core is brought into the logging room. Meterage blocks are checked for errors, the core is oriented in the box and cleaned, and the metre-marks are drawn on the core before logging begins. The geological and geotechnical core logging data is collected with Datamine's DHLogger software.
The sample intervals are between 0.5 m and 1.5 m in length and do not cross geological contacts. A line is drawn with a pencil along the length of the core to indicate where the core will be sawn. Each sampling ticket is divided into three tags. One tag is stapled to the core box at the beginning of the interval to record the drill hole number and sample interval recorded. The second tag is placed in the sample bag, which is sent to the laboratory; this tag does not reference the drill hole or meterage. The last tag remains in the sample ticket book with the hole number and recorded interval. All samples are assigned a unique sample number.
After the core boxes with tags are photographed, the core boxes are moved to the cutting station. The core is cut lengthwise by diamond saw, with half the core submitted as the primary sample and the remaining half core retained in the core box for future reference.
The sample are individually bagged with the corresponding tag. The tag number is written on the bag and there and every bag is sealed. The bags are then placed in rice bags and the rice bags are sealed with numbered security tags for chain of custody requirements. If any tampering with security tags is suspected, the laboratory will communicate with Barkerville. Samples are transported to the ALS lab in Vancouver by Van Kam transport trucking service. The remaining drill core is subsequently stored on site at the Company's secure facility in Wells, BC.
11.2 Laboratories Accreditation and Certification
The International Organization for Standardization ("ISO") and the International Electrotechnical Commission ("IEC") form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories sets out the criteria for laboratories wishing to demonstrate that they are technically competent, operating an effective quality system, and able to generate technically valid calibration and test results. The standard forms the basis for the accreditation of competence of laboratories by accreditation bodies. ISO 9001 applies to management support, procedures, internal audits and corrective actions. It provides a framework for existing quality functions and procedures.
![]() |
All the samples of the 2019 Program were submitted to the ALS laboratory in BC. The ALS laboratory is ISO 9001 certified and accredited (ISO/IEC 17025) for the analytical methods used routinely on the samples from the Cow, Island and Barkerville Mountains. The ALS facility is a commercial laboratory independent of Barkerville and has no interest in the Project.
11.3 Sample Preparation and Assay
11.3.1 Sample Preparation
- Samples are sorted and logged into the ALS LIMS program.
- Samples are dried and weighed.
- Samples are crushed to +70% passing 2 mm (CRU-31).
- The crushed sample split of up to 500 g is pulverized to +85% passing 75 μm screen (PUL 32m).
- Samples containing visible gold or cosalite mineralization are assayed by metallic screen method; a crushed sample split of 1,000 g is pulverized (method PUL-32) to pass 100 μm (Tyler 150 mesh) stainless steel screen to separate the oversize fractions (method SCR-21).
11.3.2 Gold Assaying
- A 50-g pulp aliquot is analyzed by Au-AA26: fire assay followed by aqua regia digestion (HNO3‐HCl) with an atomic absorption spectroscopy finish ("AAS").
- When assay results are higher than 100 g/t Au, a second 50-g pulp aliquot is analysed by Au-GRA22: fire assay, parting with nitric acid (HNO3) with a gravimetric finish.
- All samples containing visible gold or cosalite mineralization are assayed by the metallic screen method (method Au-SCR21). At the request of Barkerville, any sample exceeding 100 g/t Au (Au-AA26) is rerun with the screen method following the procedure below.
- For visible gold assays or cosalite mineralization, the +100 μm fraction (Au+) is analyzed in its entirety by FA with gravimetric finish. The 100 μm fraction (minus) is homogenized and two (2) subsamples are analyzed by FA with AAS (Au-AA25) or gravimetric finish (Au-GRA21). The average of the two (2) minus fraction subsamples are taken and reported as the Au- fraction result. The gold content is then determined by the weighted average of the Au+ and Au- fractions.
![]() |
11.3.3 Multi-element Assaying
- Some samples are analyzed by trace-level multi-element method ME‐MS61: a 0.25-g aliquot is digested by four-acid digestion (HNO3‐HClO4‐HF‐HCl) and HCl leach (method GEO-4A01) and analyzed by ICP-AES.
- Following this analysis, the results are reviewed for high concentrations of bismuth, mercury, molybdenum, silver and tungsten and diluted accordingly. Samples meeting these criteria are then analyzed by ICP-MS. Results are corrected for spectral interelement interferences.
11.3.4 Specific Gravity Measurements
- Before crushing and pulverizing, the specific gravity of selected samples is determined by the bulk sample method (water displacement, OA GRA08).
11.4 Quality Assurance and Quality Control
This section summarizes the reviews of Barkerville's 2019 assay QA/QC program.
A total of 84,039 samples (including QA/QC samples) were assayed during 2019. The 2019 QA/QC program included a routine insertion of standards and blanks. Barkerville included one (1) standard in every 20 samples and one (1) blank in every 40 samples. The 2019 QA/QC program did not include field or coarse reject duplicates.
11.4.1 2019 Certified Reference Materials (Standards) performance
Accuracy is monitored by adding standards at the rate of one CRM for every 20 samples. Standards are used to detect assay problems with specific sample batches and any possible long-term biases in the overall dataset. Barkerville's definition of a quality control failure is when:
- Assays for a CRM are outside ±three standard deviations (±3SD) or ±10%; or
- Assays for two consecutive CRMs are outside ±2SD.
A total of 4,202 standards were analyzed during the 2019 Program, for an insertion rate of 5.0%. Eight different CRMs from Ore Research and Exploration Pty Ltd. (OREAS) were used.
A total of 149 QC failures were recognized, and reruns were requested in 123 cases. Reruns were not requested for the other 26 cases, as per Barkerville's protocol, because the surrounding samples assayed at or below the lower detection limit (0.01 g/t Au). A total of 55 corrected certificates were issued, and the corrected assays were loaded into the database.
The average CRM results are all within ±1.5% of the expected values (Table 11.1). Most assays were within ±3SD of the accepted value (Figure 11.1).
![]() |
Table 11.1 - Results of standards used by Barkerville for the 2019 Program
|
CRM |
Count |
Expected Au (g/t) |
Observed Au (g/t) |
Percent of Expected (%) |
||
|
Average |
SD |
Average |
SD |
|||
|
OREAS 210 |
5 |
5.49 |
0.152 |
5.454 |
0.155 |
99.3% |
|
OREAS 217 |
4 |
0.338 |
0.010 |
0.338 |
0.010 |
99.9% |
|
OREAS 218 |
1094 |
0.531 |
0.017 |
0.534 |
0.017 |
100.7% |
|
OREAS 226 |
1014 |
5.45 |
0.126 |
5.445 |
0.119 |
99.9% |
|
OREAS 228 |
81 |
8.73 |
0.279 |
8.662 |
0.252 |
99.2% |
|
OREAS 228b |
992 |
8.57 |
0.199 |
8.573 |
0.179 |
100.0% |
|
OREAS 237 |
305 |
2.21 |
0.054 |
2.216 |
0.041 |
100.3% |
|
OREAS 60d |
707 |
2.47 |
0.079 |
2.507 |
0.074 |
101.5% |
|
Total |
4202 |
Weighted average |
100.41% |
|||

Figure 11.1 - Example of results for standard OREAS 226 for the 2019 Program
11.4.1.1 Comment for Monitoring Accuracy
InnovExplo is of the opinion that Barkerville's quality control program for monitoring accuracy using standards is reliable and valid based on the results presented by Barkerville personnel.
11.4.2 2019 Blank Samples Performance
Contamination during preparation is monitored by the routine insertion of coarse barren material (a "blank") that goes through the same sample preparation and analytical procedures as the core samples. Elevated values for blanks may indicate sources of contamination in the fire assay procedure (contaminated reagents or crucibles) or sample solution carry-over during instrumental finish.
![]() |
In 2019, 2,101 blanks were submitted to ALS with the core samples. Barkerville personnel identified three cases of contamination for gold in coarse blank material, and all cases were sent for repeat assaying. Two cases passed on the rerun, and one remained high. The latter was preceded by a high-grade sample and was likely contaminated during the crushing process. The corrected assay certificates were loaded into the database.
All the blanks analyzed at ALS, except for the one high failure, assayed less than or equal to 0.1 g/t Au, which is 10 times the detection limit of 0.01 g/t Au, and are thus considered acceptable. Table 11.2 summarizes the performance of the blanks. Figure 11.2 shows the results over the year.
Table 11.2 - Results of blanks used by Barkerville for the 2019 Program
|
Total blanks |
2,101 |
|
Minimum Au g/t |
<0.01 |
|
Maximum Au g/t |
0.2 |
|
Below detection limit (# and %) |
1896 (90.2%) |
|
QC Failures (# and %) |
3 (0.14%) |

Figure 11.2 - Results of blanks for the 2019 Program
![]() |
11.4.2.1 Comment on Monitoring Contamination
InnovExplo is of the opinion that Barkerville's quality control program for monitoring contamination using blanks is reliable and valid based on the results presented by Barkerville personnel.
11.5 Conclusions
A total of 256 holes were drilled in 2019 on the Project. InnovExplo is of the opinion that the sample preparation, analysis, QA/QC and security protocols used for the Project follow generally accepted industry standards, and that the data is valid.
![]() |
12. DATA VERIFICATION
This item covers the data verification of the diamond drill hole databases used for the 2020 MRE (the "Barkerville Databases"), as well as the review and validation of the geological models of each deposits, and the review of information on mined-out areas and the data for selected drill holes (assays, QA/QC program, downhole surveys, lithologies, alteration and structures).
The QPs also reviewed and validated the resource estimation process followed by Barkerville and Talisker Exploration Services Inc. ("Talisker"), including all parameters, geological interpretation, basic statistics, variography, interpolation parameters, block model construction, scripts that run the model, volumetric report, and the validation process.
The Barkerville Databases contain the 2,218 completed and validated DDH used for the 2020 MRE. They are divided among four (4) databases covering the eight (8) deposits as follows:
- Cow Mountain database for the Cow and Valley deposits (1,014 holes);
- Island Mountain database for the Shaft and Mosquito deposits (645 holes);
- Barkerville database for the BC Vein & Splays, and the KL and Lowhee deposits (397 holes); and
- Bonanza Ledge database (162 holes).
Since the 2019 MRE, no activities have been carried out on the Valley and Bonanza Ledge deposits. The 2019 MRE results for the Valley and Bonanza Ledge deposits remains current for the 2020 MRE.
The verification for this Technical Report did not include a site visit. The last site visit by a QP is considered current for the purposes of this Technical Report.
The last site visit by a QP was conducted by the main author, Ms. Christine Beausoleil, who visited the Project from January 22 to 25, 2019, and before that from April 3 to 6, 2018. During both site visits, the author reviewed the core facilities, logging and sampling methodology and drill rigs.
Mr. Pelletier has also previously visited the Project. He conducted a site visit from February 1 to 4 and from May 3 to 12, 2016. The first included the Bonanza Ledge pit, the Cow Mountain area and the Island Mountain area. The second involved a visit to the core logging facilities and several drill hole collars.
Barkerville has been implementing the same procedure and protocols since the last site visit in 2019, and the same professionals are involved. Verification and data validation were done by video conferencing with Barkerville's team.
12.1 Historical Work
Historical work subject to verification consisted of the holes used for the 2019 MRE (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2019). Basic cross-check routines were performed between the current Barkerville Databases and the previously validated database for the 2019 MRE; i.e., collar, downhole surveys, assay fields. No discrepancies with the current database were found.
![]() |
12.2 Barkerville Databases
The Barkerville Databases were verified for consistency against the Datamine DHLogger export.
InnovExplo was granted access to the assay certificates for all holes in the 2019 drilling programs (January to December 2019). Assays were verified for 5% of the drill holes from these programs. No discrepancies were found.
The final databases are considered to be of good overall quality. InnovExplo considers the Barkerville Databases to be valid and reliable.
12.3 Barkerville Drill Hole Collar and Downhole Surveys
The 2019 surface drill hole collars in the resource area were surveyed using a Trimble DGPS unit. InnovExplo 2019 verifications included a visit to an active drill site.
Downhole surveys (single shot and multi shots) were conducted on the majority of surface holes. The Reflex survey information was verified for 5% of the holes from the latest drilling programs. No discrepancies were found.
12.4 Assays
The author had access to the assay certificates for all historical and current holes in the Barkerville Databases. All assays were verified for selected drill holes from the latest drilling program, i.e., 5% of the 2019 drilling program. The assays recorded in the databases were compared to the original certificates from ALS Minerals (North Vancouver, BC). The electronic transfer of the laboratory results via e-mail, followed by the electronic transfer directly into the databases by Barkerville staff, allowed for immediate error detection and prevented any typing errors.
No errors or discrepancies were found. The final databases are considered to be of good overall quality. InnovExplo considers the Barkerville databases to be valid and reliable.
Discussions and reviews with Barkerville personnel during video conferencing convinced the author that the protocols and the QA/QC program in place are adequate.
12.5 Mined-out Voids
No underground activities were carried out in 2019. The 2019 voids model for Bonanza Ledge (all types of historical underground workings combined; see below) remains current and was used for the 2020 MRE.
For the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosiquito, KL, Lowhee and BC Vein & Splays deposits, the drilling program continues to intercept undocumented voids. To reduce the associated risk, a spherical buffer with a 10-m radius was applied around the intercepts to represent a potential stope of 20 m in diameter. These "buffer voids" were used to deplete the final resource estimate.
The voids are a combination of the historical underground workings (stopes, drifts and shafts) of the Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine (Cow Mountain), the Aurum and Mosquito Creek mines (Island Mountain), and the Barkerville Mountain Mine (Barkerville Mountain).
![]() |
InnovExplo considers the level of detail in the void triangulation to be of good quality and reliable, despite some uncertainty related to previously undocumented voids.
12.6 Barkerville Logging, Sampling and Assaying Procedures
InnovExplo reviewed several sections of the mineralized core by comparing core photographs, drill logs and the database. The pictures in Figure 12.1 document the core review.
12.7 Mineral Resource Estimation Process
The 2020 MRE for the Cow, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein & Splays, KL and Lowhee deposits was prepared by Talisker. The geological interpretation and 3D geological model were prepared by Barkerville. InnovExplo reviewed and validated all the parameters for the six (6) updated models including: geological interpretation, basic statistics, variography, interpolation parameters, block model construction, scripts running the model, volumetric report, and the validation process.
InnovExplo has reviewed the estimation process described in Item 14 for the Cow, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein & Splays, KL and Lowhee deposits and considers these models to be acceptable.
Since the 2019 MRE, no activities have been carried out on the Valley and Bonanza Ledge deposits. The 2019 MRE for the Valley and the Bonanza Ledge deposit as published in both technical reports (Beausoleil and Pelletier, 2019 and Morgan et al., 2019), remains current for the 2020 MRE.
12.8 Conclusion
Overall, InnovExplo's data verification demonstrates that the data, protocols interpretation and estimation process for the Project are acceptable. The authors consider the Barkerville Databases to be valid and of sufficient quality to be used for the mineral resource estimate herein.
![]() |

Figure 12.1 - Core review example (hole ID BM-19-072)
![]() |
13. MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING
In 2019, BBA, Osisko and Barkerville developed a metallurgical testwork program to characterize the behaviour of mineralized material from the Project during mineral processing and extraction. It included composite samples composed of NQ diamond drill core obtained from the Shaft, Cow, Valley and Mosquito zones during the issuer's 2016, 2017 and 2018 drilling programs. The results were presented in the 2019 PEA (Morgan et al., 2019) and transcribe below
13.1 Sample Selection and Compositing
The metallurgical testwork program was developed by BBA, Osisko and BGM in order to characterize Cariboo Gold mineralized material behaviour to mineral processing and extraction processes. It included composite samples from four zones; Shaft, Cow, Valley and Mosquito. The material for the composites was obtained from NQ drill core intervals from the diamond drill core of the drilling campaigns performed by BGM in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The spatial distribution of the selected intervals is represented in Figure 13-1 and Figure 13-2.
The testwork program was designed to determine the mineralized material response to a preconcentration process and subsequently to the QR Mill process.
The selected mineralized intervals for the LOM composite included wall rock/shoulder samples from quartered NQ drill core and were separated on site into two size fractions: (-60 mm/+10 mm) sized material sent to Steinert in Kentucky, USA for mineral sorting testwork; and (-25 mm) sized material sent to SGS Burnaby, British Columbia, for compositing for metallurgical testwork. The amount of material received is presented in Table 13-1.
A single composite of fines (-25 mm) fraction was prepared at SGS by blending the material from each zone to represent the expected LOM distribution. The testwork for the fines (-25 mm) fraction involved mineralized material characterization, grindability, gravity and flotation. Mineral sorting pre-concentration products received from Steinert were also blended to create composites, representing the expected LOM distribution and individual mineralized zones. Cyanide leaching response of pre-concentrates from both the mineral sorting and flotation samples were tested individually. A bulk sample representing the QR Mill feed blend of mineral sorter concentrate and flotation concentrate was prepared for leach optimization.
Table 13.1: Material received for LOM composites

![]() |
Drill core intervals for variability composites that represented Gold grade variation of each mineralized zone were selected by BGM, Osisko and BBA and sent to SGS for a second metallurgical testwork campaign. The material received for the variability testwork program was 1,243 kg from Shaft Zone, 728 kg from Cow Zone and 180 kg from Valley Zone (Table 13-2). The drill core intervals received were crushed to -35 mm and screened. The coarse fraction (-35+10 mm) of the material was sent to Steinert for mineral sorting testwork. (-10 mm) sized material was kept at SGS for metallurgical testwork. Mineral sorting products received back from Steinert were assayed and prepared for metallurgical testwork at SGS. A map of the testwork program and samples produced for extended testwork is provided in Figure 13-3.
Table 13.2: Material received for variability composites


Figure 13.1: Sample locations - Plan view
![]() |

Figure 13.2: Sample locations - Section view

Figure 13.3: Testwork program map and samples produced for extended testwork
![]() |
13.1.1 Composite Characterization
13.1.1.1 Head Assays
The composites were submitted to screened metallic analysis for gold at +150 (oversize) and -150 (undersize) meshes and subjected to semi-quantitative ICP scan for multi element analysis. Table 13-3 summarizes the results of LOM composite fines and Table 13-4 summarizes the results of LOM composite mineral sorting samples for major elements.
Table 13.3: LOM Composite fines head assay

Table 13.4: LOM mineral sorting samples head assays

(1) Head grades calculated using mineral sorting product assays.
(2) Feed crushed to -38 mm.
The variability composites were also submitted to screened metallic analysis for gold at +150 (oversize) and -150 (undersize) meshes and subjected to semi-quantitative ICP scan for multi element analysis. Table 13-5 summarizes the results of variability composite fines and Table 13-6 summarizes the results of variability mineral sorting samples for major elements.
![]() |
Table 13.5: Variability composites - Fines (-10mm) head assays

Table 13.6: Variability composites - Mineral sorting samples head assays

13.1.1.2 Gold deportment
A sample of LOM fines composite was submitted for gold deportment analysis at SGS. The study reported 13.8% of total liberated gold (liberated and pure gold minerals) and 86.2% gold associated with other minerals. 59.9% of the gold was associated with pyrite, 7.3% with heavy silicates and 2.5% with complex sulphides (Figure 13-4).
![]() |

Figure 13.4: Mineralogical distribution of gold occurrences
The gold association by size is presented in Figure 13-5. Approximately 43% of pure gold was found in the coarse size range of 125-180 microns and gold associated with heavy silicates was under 20 microns.

Figure 13.5: Gold association by size
13.2 Comminution Testwork
Samples were submitted to crusher work index ("CWi"), Bond ball mill work index ("BWi") and abrasion index ("Ai") testing at SGS. The test results are presented in Table 13-7, Table 13-8 and Table 13-9. CWi and BWi results categorize the hardness of the mineralized material as medium, and the abrasiveness of the mineralized material is categorized as medium to moderately abrasive based on Ai.
![]() |
Table 13.7: Crusher work index

Table 13.8: Abrasion index

Grindability testwork was performed on the fines and mineral sorter concentrates ("OSC") individually.
![]() |
Table 13.9: Bond ball mill work index

13.3 Mineral Sorting Testwork
Mineral sorting testwork was conducted at Steinert facilities in Kentucky, USA, in August 2018. The initial testwork program focused on 1,264 kg of drill core material, from all four deposits, crushed to -60 mm/+10 mm. The mineral sorting products of two samples from Shaft Zone and Cow Zone were recombined to reproduce the previously tested -60 mm/+10 mm feed, crushed to -35 mm/+10 mm and sent back to Steinert for mineral sorting. A summary of these samples is presented in Table 13-10.
![]() |
Table 13.10: Mineral sorted LOM composites

The second mineral sorting testwork program involved the variability samples from three mineralized deposits. Ten variability samples sized -35 mm/+10 mm were mineral sorted at Steinert in January 2019. The summary of the variability samples is presented in Table 13-11.
Once the mineral sorting tests were completed, the mineral sorting products were sent to SGS for analysis along with the -8 mm fines generated during mineral sorting due to sample handling.
Table 13.11: Mineral sorted variability composites

13.3.1 Sensor Evaluation
In order to determine the best sensor suited to the Cariboo material, hand-picked core samples representing mineralized rock and waste rock were prepared. The response of these two groups of rocks to X-Ray Transmission ("XRT"), colour camera, induction and XRT/laser combination scanners were evaluated.
A XRT/laser combination was used for the testing based on the results of the evaluation.
13.3.2 Flowsheet Tests and Results
The tests on each sample were run in a five-stage process. The first four stages were considered to be "rougher" stages consisting of XRT only at different scanner settings. The purpose of the XRT scanner is to collect the sulphide minerals. The 5th stage was a laser scanner "scavenger" to collect quartz bearing particles.
![]() |
The XRT rougher stage conditions were set up to be highly selective at first to produce the highest grade concentrate with the least amount of mass pull. With each additional stage, the conditions became less selective, increasing recovery but decreasing concentrate grade. Conditions for maximum gold recovery and simultaneous waste rejection were selected based on the analysis of the results. A summary of the results for each sample tested is presented in Table 13-12. The "Fines" in the table refers to the fines generated during the sorting test manipulation. According to the mineral sorter strategy, they can be combined with concentrate. The "grade vs. recovery" curves for each sample are illustrated in Figure 13-6.
Table 13.12: Mineral sorting test results - LOM composites

![]() |
Table 13.13: Mineral sorting test results - Variability composites


Figure 13.6: Mineral sorting grade recovery curves
The XRT was successful in recovering 70% to 94% of the gold after four roughing stages targeting sulphide bearing rock with only 23% to 37% mass pull. The implementation of a laser scavenging step to collect quartz particles increased gold recovery on average by ~2% for Shaft samples and ~9% for Cow and Valley samples. However, the associated mass recovery increased by 19% on average; ranging between 7% and 32%. In general, Shaft Zone samples had lower mass recoveries at the laser stage. With further testing, it may be possible to optimize the mineral sorter setting for quartz recovery to maintain gold recovery and limit mass pull.
The samples prepared and sent to Steinert were screened to the designated feed sizes (-60 mm/+10 mm or -35 mm/+10 mm), however there were fines generated during transport, material handling and testing. The mass and gold recoveries of the generated fines (-8 mm) collected at the end of the tests were included in the total recovery and grade. It is critical to consider the fines during circuit design as they represent an average of 5% of the gold fed at the mineral sorting stage. In the testwork, the concentrate was targeted for separation by air jet while the fines reported with the waste to the conveyor belt and then were screened out. In operations, the waste will be removed by air jetting and the fines will report with the concentrate. (Refer to Steinert report).
![]() |
13.3.3 Mineral sorter Performance
Table 13.14: Summary - Average mineral sorting recoveries

The average mass recovery of the Cow and Valley mineral sorting concentrates were higher than the Shaft mineral sorting concentrates. Although gold recoveries for the majority of the tested samples were higher than 87%, SZ Deep, CZ LOM and CZ (-35 mm/+10 mm) samples were outliers with lower recoveries. The global average recovery increases to 95.7% excluding these outlying data points. Further testwork is required to determine the response to mineralogical variation and to optimize the mineral sorting settings.
13.3.4 Effect of Particle Size
The Shaft and Cow Zone samples of -60 mm/+10 mm size fraction, which were outside the recommended top size to minimum size range of 3:1, were re-crushed to -35 mm/+10 mm and re-submitted to the mineral sorting procedure. The results of re-runs are presented in Table 13-12. For the Shaft Zone, the mass recovery improved significantly from an average of 65% to 44% without compromising the gold recovery. However, for the Cow Zone, gold recovery dropped unexpectedly. Although the mass pull was higher, 4.6% of gold was reported to waste. The testwork on the -35mm/+10mm size range with the variability samples followed the same trend for Shaft Zone.
13.4 Flotation Testwork
13.4.1 Samples
Kinetic flotation tests were conducted on samples: fine fraction gravity tails, fine fraction of whole rock composites, OSC, and blend of mineral sorter concentrate with fines.
The gravity tails composites were produced from bulk gravity concentration tests, while the whole rock samples consisted of the -25 mm fines. The effect of grind size on flotation performance at target P80 values of 200, 150 and 100 microns was tested on these samples. Whole rock variability composites (SZ1, SZ2, SZ3 and SZ4) were tested at two target P80 values of 200 and 400 microns. The results of the flotation tests on the fines are provided in Table 13-15. Variability fines of CZ and SZ were also tested at 100 and 200 microns (Table 13-16).
Mineral sorting concentrate of CZ and SZ variability samples were tested at 100 and 200 microns. The same mineral sorter concentrate samples were blended with their generated fines and tested at 100 and 200 microns. The results are provided in Table 13-17.
![]() |
Table 13.15: Flotation test results - Fines

Table 13.16 Flotation test results - Variability composite fines

![]() |
13.4.2 Fines Flotation
As seen in Table 13-15 and Table 13-16, regardless of grind size, the average gold recovery of fines flotation achieved was ~99% after 9 min flotation. In general, an increase in mass pull was observed with decreasing grind size, with no discernible improvement in recovery. It is therefore recommended to use a flotation time of 9 min at a targeted grind size of 200 microns.
A graph of the gold recovery as a function of flotation time is presented in Figure 13-7. The plot illustrates that gold recovery reaches a plateau after 9 minutes beyond which additional flotation time does not improve recovery. While gold recovery is not improved, Figure 13-8 illustrates that increasing flotation time from 9 min to 20 min results in an average increase of ~5% in mass pull for an average 0.2% increase in gold recovery.

Figure 13.7: Gold recovery flotation kinetics
![]() |

Figure 13.8: Impact of flotation time on mass pull and gold recovery
13.4.3 Mineral Sorter Concentrate Flotation
Table 13-17 shows that the mineral sorter concentrate flotation average gold recovery was higher than 98.6% after 9 min of flotation. In general, an increase in mass pull was observed with decreasing grind size, without any noticeable improvement in recovery. CZ-LOM blend of mineral sorter concentrate and fines achieved 72% and 78% at 9 min flotation and >99% at 15 min. Further testwork is recommended on mineral sorter concentrate and fines blend.
Table 13.17: Flotation test results - Mineral sorter concentrate

![]() |
13.5 Gravity Concentration
Gravity concentration tests were performed on the blend of mineral sorter concentrate and flotation concentrate prior to leach tests. The samples were first subjected to gravity concentration using a lab scale Knelson concentrator and further concentrated with Mozley table. The average gold recovery was 28.1%.
13.6 Leaching Testwork
A leaching program was conducted and included flotation rougher concentrates, OSC and blended flotation/mineral sorter concentrates at 70:30, 50:50 and 30:70 of fines-to-coarse ratios. The fines-to-coarse proportion for operations has not yet been established, the testwork program was designed to cover a range of scenarios. The samples were prepared to a pulp density of 45% (w/w) solids, with the exception of the flotation rougher concentrate leach tests that were run at 35% (w/w) solids. All leaching tests were conducted at a target pH of 11 to 11.5 and dissolved oxygen levels of 6 ppm to 8 ppm. A summary of the leaching conditions and results for individual tests are presented in Table 13-18 and averages by sample type are presented in Table 13-19.
Fines flotation concentrate, mineral sorter concentrate flotation concentrate and mineral sorter concentrate of variability composites were blended in proportions, which would represent the preconcentrate production and leached at 45 and 75 microns with and without pre-treatment. Results of the leach tests are presented in Table 13-19 and the averages are presented in Table 13-21.
Table 13.18: Summary of leaching results

![]() |
Table 13.19: Leaching results of flowsheet blends

13.6.1 Results
In general, excellent gold leach recoveries between 95% and 98% were observed for all tests performed on OSC and blended OSC/flotation concentrate samples. A 3-4% decrease in recovery was observed for the rougher flotation concentrates when leached alone.
Silver recoveries were quite variable averaging 77% and 86% for the flotation concentrates and mineral sorter concentrates respectively. While gold recoveries were excellent for the blended samples, silver recoveries for the same samples averaged 46%.
Table 13.20: Leach test result averages by sample type

Leaching of blended pre-concentrates at ~50 microns on average resulted in 94% gold recovery. A range of 0.8-2.4% decrease in recovery was observed for leaching at 75 microns compared to 45 microns. In general, the pre-aeration stage decreased cyanide consumption insignificantly; however, lime consumption increased 0.6 kg/t on average.
![]() |
Table 13.21: Leach test result averages for flowsheet blends

The fines flotation concentrates were leached at three grinding sizes: 75, 45 and 30 micron. With decreasing particle size, gold recovery improved, reagent consumption of lime (CaO) and cyanide (NaCN) increased as expected with the exposure of additional mineral surfaces produced by finer grinding. The flotation concentrates were leached for 72 hours while the mineral sorting products and blended samples were leached for 48 hours.

Figure 13.9: Leach recovery and residue grade as a function of grind size
13.6.2 Reagent Consumption
When comparing the tests conducted at a P80 of 45 microns, the highest lime and cyanide consumptions of 0.48 kg/t and 1.72 kg/t respectively, were in the tests where the fines flotation concentrates were leached on their own. The average lime and cyanide consumptions when leaching the mineral sorting concentrates were considerably lower at 0.21 kg/t and 1.09 kg/t respectively. The lime consumption of the blends was lower than either the OSC and fines flotation concentrate consumptions. The cyanide consumption of the blends was equivalent to that of the OSC concentrates when leached on their own.
![]() |
13.7 Cyanide Destruction Testwork
Cyanide destruction testwork was performed on a bulk gravity tailings sample of the 50:50 (fines to coarse ratio) blend of flotation concentrate and mineral sorter concentrate at Cyanco following cyanidation. To reduce the reagent consumption rates, a pre-aeration step added to leaching ahead of cyanide destruction. The addition of the pre-aeration step reduced the cyanide consumption and the amount of total cyanide in leach tails by reducing the formation of stable metal cyanide complexes, which were suspected to be cyanide consumers, and as a result reduced the detox reagent consumption rates. Targeted cyanide levels were successfully achieved with both conditions.
13.8 Thickening, Filtration and Rheology Testwork
13.8.1 Samples Tested
Three samples were sent to Pocock Industrial in Salt Lake City, Utah for thickening, filtration and rheology testing; these included flotation tailings, pre-leach thickener feed and detoxed tailings. The characteristics of the as-received materials are summarized in Table 13-22.
Table 13.22: Pocock sample characterization

13.8.2 Thickening
13.8.2.1 Flocculant Screening
All three samples were submitted to flocculant screening tests to identify the best reagent for flocculation of solids to promote rapid settling and reducing suspended solids concentration in overflow. The screening tests also provided an indication of the required reagent dosing. The selected flocculant for all three samples was a high molecular weight, 10% charge anionic polyacrylamide.
Once an appropriate flocculant was selected, static settling tests were conducted to provide an estimate of the optimized operating parameters, including feed slurry density and flocculant dosing, for dynamic testing. The recommended flocculant dosing for dynamic testing ranged between 24 g/t and 36 g/t.
13.8.2.2 Dynamic Testing
Dynamic thickening tests were performed on each material to determine the recommended maximum hydraulic design basis for high rate thickener design. Expected underflow solids concentrations and overflow suspended solids concentrations were also determined in testing. Table 13-23 provides high rate thickener design criteria and operating parameters for each material. The design conditions shown represent a moderately aggressive design philosophy and correspond to the feed and overflow solids concentrations and flocculant dosages indicated.
![]() |
Table 13.23: Recommended high rate thickener operating parameters

The overflow clarities achieved were shown to be in the range of what is generally acceptable. For further reduction of overflow suspended solids concentration, a polish filtration step may be required to treat the thickener overflow.
Each of the three thickening applications requires dilution of feed to between 13% and 17% (w/w) solids.
The suggested maximum design hydraulic loading rate is as follows:
- For the flotation tailings material is 3.7 m3/m2/h with a maximum recommended underflow density of 71% (w/w);
- For the pre-leach thickener feed material is 4.0 m3/m2/h with a maximum recommended underflow density of 62% (w/w);
- For the detoxed tailings material is 3.8 m3/m2/h the maximum recommended underflow density of 64% (w/w).
13.8.3 Rheology
Rheological measurement were performed on thickened samples on each of the flotation tailings, pre-leach thickener feed and detoxed tailings materials. A typical yield stress vs. percent solids is presented in Figure 13-10.
![]() |

Figure 13.10: Yield value versus percent solids
The rheology results indicate that for each of the materials, the yield value was less than 30 Pa at the maximum thickened underflow density recommended from the thickening tests. For these materials, a heavy duty thickener rake mechanism is recommended to minimize the thickener underflow density due to insufficient rake torque.
13.8.4 Filtration Tests
Pressure filtration tests were conducted on both flotation and detox tailings. The tests were done in a 60 mm chamber, using air blow with and without membrane squeeze. The test conditions and main filtration results are presented in Table 13-24.
Table 13.24: Pressure filtration results and design parameters

The results demonstrate that both with and without the membrane squeeze, both tailings materials dewatered well within an acceptable cycle time (12 min to 12.5 min). The cake moisture achieved for the flotation tailings and detoxed tailings ranged from 8.0% to 8.5% and from 12.7% to 13.9% respectively. Obtained results for detoxed tailings are in the industry standard for tailings dry stacking (above 80% solid weight/weight).
![]() |
13.9 Pre-concentration Recovery and Mass Pull Projection
The average recovery and mass pull results presented in this section were for the preconcentrate blends prepared for the testwork program. The blends were prepared using a fixed proportion of each mineralized zone considering the preliminary mine plan at the time. Annual recovery projections are expected to differ from the average testwork results according to the final mine plan proportions of mineralized zones.
The average gold recovery and mass pull results from the testwork performed are summarized in Table 13-25. The projected pre-concentrate transferred to the QR Mill is 21.2% of the Mine site feed mass and the overall gold recovery is 92.2%.
Table 13.25: Average gold recovery and mass pull for each process step

![]() |
14. MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
The 2020 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Project (the "2020 MRE") encompasses updated resources for the deposits of Cow Mountain (Cow), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito), and Barkerville Mountain (BC Vein (including the BC Vein Splays), KL and Lowhee). The updates were prepared by Leonardo de Souza, MAusIMM (CP), of Talisker, and reviewed and validated by Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., and Carl Pelletier, P.Geo., both of InnovExplo, using all available information. No changes are reported for the Valley (Cow Mountain) and the Bonanza Ledge (Barkerville Mountain) deposits.
The 2020 MRE relied on information from the 2019 exploration program.
The effective date of the 2020 MRE is April 28, 2020.
14.1 Methodology
The 2020 MRE covers all the deposits in the Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor. The resource area for the Cow/Island segment covers a strike length of 3.7 km and a width of approximately 700 m, down to a vertical depth of 600 m below surface. The estimate for the Barkerville segment covers a strike length of 3 km and a width of approximately 700 m, down to a vertical depth of 500 m below surface.
The models for the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein, KL and Lowhee deposits were prepared using LeapFrog GEO v.5.0.4 ("LeapFrog") and Datamine Studio RM 1.5.62.0 ("Datamine"). Leapfrog was used for the modelling, which included the construction of 334 mineralized solids: 101 for Cow; 39 for Valley; 74 for Shaft; 50 for Mosquito; 6 for BC Vein and five BC Vein splays; 40 for KL; and 24 for Lowhee. Datamine was used for the estimation, which consisted of 3D block modelling and the ordinary kriging ("OK") interpolation method. Statistical studies, capping and variography were completed using Datamine, GSLIB and Excel. Capping and validations were carried out in Datamine and Microsoft Excel.
The Bonanza Ledge model was prepared using GEOVIA GEMS software v.6.7 ("GEMS"). GEMS was used for the modelling, which included the construction of one (1) mineralized solid, and for the estimation, which consisted of 3D block modelling and OK interpolation. Statistical studies and variography were done using Snowden Supervisor v.8.6 software ("Supervisor"). Capping and several validations were carried out in Microsoft Excel and Supervisor.
The main steps in the methodology were as follows:
- Compile and validate the diamond drill hole databases used for mineral resource estimation;
- Validate the geological model and interpretation of the mineralized zones based on lithological and structural information, historical underground mapping and general orientation of stopes, and metal content;
- Validate the drill hole intercepts database, compositing database and capping values, for the purposes of geostatistical analysis and variography;
- Validate the block models and grade interpolation;
- Revise the classification criteria and validate the clipping areas for mineral resource classification;
- Assess the resources with "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" and select appropriate cut-off grades; and
![]() |
- Generate a mineral resource statement.
14.2 Drill Hole Database
Four (4) diamond drill hole databases cover the Project: Cow Mountain (Cow and Valley deposits), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito deposits), Barkerville Mountain (BC Vein, KL, and Lowhee deposits), and Bonanza Ledge.
The close-out date for the Cow Mountain database is January 29, 2020. It contains 1,259 validated drill holes (1,107 surface DDH and 152 underground DDH).
The close-out date for the Island Mountain database is August 29, 2019. It contains 1,321 validated drill holes (641 surface DDH and 680 underground DDH).
The close-out date for the Barkerville Mountain database is February 14, 2020. It contains 535 validated surface DDH.
These databases were filtered by deposit (Cow, Shaft, Valley, Mosquito, BC Vein, KL or Lowhee) before working in Datamine. A subset of drill holes was used to generate the 2020 MRE resource database for each deposit (Table 14.1 and Figure 14.1).
The close-out date for the Bonanza Ledge GEMS database is July 18, 2016. It contains 213 validated holes, of which a subset of 162 was used as the resource database (103 surface DDH and 59 underground DDH) (Table 14.1 and Figure 14.2). The database also contains 7,432 blast holes that were used to guide the interpretation only.
All databases include lithological, alteration and structural descriptions taken from drill core logs. Oriented core data have been available since the 2016 Program.
The databases cover the strike length of each resource area at variable drill spacings, ranging from 10 to 60 m for the Cow, Island and Barkerville mountains deposits, and from 5-15 m for the Bonanza Ledge deposit.
In addition to the tables of raw data, each database includes several tables of calculated drill hole composites and wireframe solid intersections, which are required for the statistical evaluation and resource block modelling.
Table 14.1 - Number of drill holes in each database
|
Database |
Deposit |
Validated DDH |
DDH used for the 2020 MRE |
Total DDH used for the 2020 MRE |
||
|
Surface |
Underground |
Surface |
Underground |
|||
|
Cow Mountain |
Cow |
1009 |
152 |
830 |
99 |
929 |
|
Valley |
98 |
0 |
85 |
0 |
85 |
|
|
Island Mountain |
Shaft |
473 |
159 |
418 |
1 |
419 |
|
Mosquito |
168 |
521 |
97 |
129 |
226 |
|
|
Barkerville Mountain |
KL |
133 |
0 |
92 |
0 |
92 |
|
Lowhee |
30 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
23 |
|
|
BC Vein |
372 |
0 |
282 |
0 |
282 |
|
|
Bonanza Ledge |
Bonanza Ledge |
128 |
85 |
103 |
59 |
162 |
![]() |

Figure 14.1 - Surface plan view of the validated diamond drill holes used to in the 2020 MRE for the deposits of the Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor
![]() |

The inset figure shows the location of Bonanza Ledge (red) along the BC Vein (blue).
Figure 14.2 - Surface plan view of the validated Bonanza Ledge diamond drill holes used for the 2019 MRE
14.3 Geological Model
Barkerville updated the 2020 geological models for the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, and BC Vein deposits using historical data, the data from the 2015-2018 drilling programs, and new holes from the 2019 drilling program.
Barkerville also modelled two additional deposits, KL and Lowhee, using the new 2019 DDH data.
The Bonanza Ledge geological model, initially from Brousseau et al. (2017), was reviewed and validated by the QPs. No new data have been acquired at Bonanza Ledge since the technical report of Brousseau et al. (2017).
The data used to update the geological models consists of drill hole data (including oriented core), underground mapping from historical level plans, and stope orientations. Oriented core data have been available since 2016 for all the deposits.
A total of 335 geological solids were created and/or updated for all the deposits.
The Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, Lowhee, and KL geological models consist of 328 mineralized solids representing Axial Planar ("AP") veins (Figure 14.3). All geological solids were modelled in Leapfrog. The solids were designed with a minimum thickness of 2 m and based on a cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au. The solids veins extend to a radius of up to 50 m from the last selected intercept or are fixed at the mid-distance of an intercept that does not meet the minimum grade criterion. The solids were snapped to drill holes. The solids were created from the AP structural data using 3-g/t indicator interpolants.
![]() |
Figure 14.4 shows the Shaft deposit model as an example.
The geological model for the BC Vein includes one (1) sheared solid representing the mineralized Layer Parallel ("LP") vein, along with five (5) solids representing mineralized LP splays (Figure 14.5). The solids were modelled in Leapfrog. The BC Vein and splays were modelled from geological logs and grade intervals. The BC Vein was designed with a minimum thickness of 2 m, controlled by the hanging and footwall of the shear, and was based on a cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au. Geological contacts were given precedent over grade. The splays were designed with a minimum thickness of 2 m and were based on a cut-off grade of 1.0 g/t Au. All solids were snapped to drill holes.
A geological structural contact was modelled between the BC Vein and the KL deposits. The surface is a major lithological contact between the brittle sandstone, which hosts the KL AP veins, and the more ductile carbonaceous mudstones and siltstones that host the BC Vein shear and LP veins. This contact was used as a hard boundary to limit the extent of the mineralized geological models (Figure 14.5).
In 2017, InnovExplo created one (1) solid for the Bonanza Ledge deposit (Brousseau, 2017). Construction lines were created on cross-sections spaced 5 to 25 m apart, which were snapped to drill hole intercepts. The solid was inspired by a sulphide shell defined in Brousseau et al. (2017) using a threshold of 3% pyrite and clipped to the Footwall Fault to the southwest, which was modelled from drill hole logs (Figure 14.6). The authors reviewed and validated the 2017 model and concluded that the model remains accurate for the 2020 MRE update.
Two surfaces were created for each deposit to define the topography and the overburden/bedrock contact. The topography was created using LIDAR data from 2016, except for Bonanza Ledge, which used LIDAR data from 2000 (before the test pit was excavated at the Bonanza Ledge mine). The overburden-bedrock contact was modelled using logged overburden intervals. A waste solid was also created for Bonanza Ledge corresponding to the block model limits.
![]() |

a) Surface plan view; b) Section view looking NNE
Figure 14.3 - Mineralized solids of the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, Lowhee, BC Vein and KL models
![]() |

Vein solid (yellow); 3.0-g/t Au indicator interpolant (cyan); oriented core AP veins (blue); 25-m-thick cross-section.
Figure 14.4 - Example of data used for the 3D Shaft deposit model

BC Vein (dark red); KL (blue); AP-LP Contact (yellow)
Figure 14.5 - Isometric view of the BC Vein and KL deposit models, and the AP-LP contact surface
![]() |

BC Vein (dark red); Bonanza Ledge (red); KL (blue).
Figure 14.6 - Isometric view of the BC Vein, Bonanza Ledge, and KL deposit models
14.4 Voids Model
The voids represent historical underground workings (combined stopes, drifts and shafts). No new underground activities were carried out in 2019. The 2019 voids model was checked for errors before using it for the 2020 MRE.
InnovExplo estimates that nearly one-third of the stope voids in the Cow deposit cannot be modelled in 3D due to missing coordinates, whereas less than 2% of the stope voids in the Shaft and Mosquito deposits have the same problem. Most of the missing 3D voids at the Cow deposit are likely at depth.
A 5-m buffer was applied to the modelled voids of the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, Lowhee, and BC Vein deposits to compensate for the uncertainty in void locations.
The Barkerville drilling program continues to intercept undocumented voids. To reduce the associated risk, a spherical buffer with a 10-m radius was applied around the intercepts to represent a potential stope of 20 m in diameter. These "buffer voids" were used to deplete the final resource estimate.
Based on the available data, the voids in the Datamine and GEMS projects are considered accurate.
Figure 14.7 and Figure 14.8 show the voids used to deplete the current resource estimate.
![]() |

Figure 14.7 - Plan and longitudinal view of the 5-m buffer voids for Cow Mountain and Island Mountain
![]() |

5-m buffer voids (green); BC Vein (transparent red); Bonanza Ledge (red); KL (blue); looking NNE.
Figure 14.8 - Longitudinal view of the 5-m buffer voids for the BC Vein, Bonanza Ledge, and KL deposits
14.5 Compositing
Codes were automatically attributed to DDH assay intervals intersecting the mineralized veins. Codes use the name of the corresponding 3D solid. The coded intercepts were used to analyze sample lengths and generate statistics for raw assays and composites. Table 14.2 summarizes the statistical analysis of the original (raw) assays for each deposit. The raw sample statistics used for composite length, capping and variograms were defined by deposit and not individual veins due to the paucity of data.
Table 14.2 - Summary statistics for the DDH raw assays
|
Deposits |
Solids count |
Number of samples |
Max (Au g/t) |
Mean (Au g/t) |
Standard deviation |
COV |
|
Cow |
101 |
15,654 |
925.09 |
3.59 |
16.28 |
4.53 |
|
Valley |
39 |
3,659 |
1,870 |
4.19 |
33.24 |
7.91 |
|
Shaft |
74 |
19,903 |
3,780 |
4.08 |
31.69 |
7.72 |
|
Mosquito |
50 |
2,278 |
256 |
4.40 |
14.29 |
3.25 |
|
BC Vein |
6 |
4,125 |
309 |
2.73 |
10.93 |
4.01 |
|
KL |
40 |
2,554 |
145 |
1.81 |
5.98 |
3.30 |
|
Lowhee |
24 |
788 |
332 |
3.79 |
16.23 |
4.28 |
|
Bonanza Ledge |
1 |
3,062 |
234.5 |
7.08 |
15.35 |
2.17 |
The DDH gold assays were composited within each of the mineralized veins to minimize any bias introduced by variable sample lengths. Vein thickness, proposed block size, and original sample length were taken into consideration when calculating the composite length for each deposit: 3.0 m at Cow, 1.5 m at Valley, 2.0 m at Shaft, 3.0 m at Mosquito, 2.0 m at BC Vein, and 2.0 m at Bonanza Ledge. The composite length of 1.75 m for KL and Lowhee is the best-fit to assay sample lengths based on histograms and probability plots.
Tails were redistributed for all intervals less than half the composite length. A grade of 0.00 g/t Au was assigned to missing sample intervals from historical holes (pre-2016) within the solids. Missing samples from the 2016-2019 drilling programs due to lost core, voids or lost samples were ignored. A few holes from the 2016-2019 programs were only partially sampled; a value of 0.00 g/t Au was assigned to these missing intervals.
![]() |
Table 14.3 presents the summary statistics by deposit.
Table 14.3 - Summary statistics for composites
|
Deposits |
Solids count |
Number of samples |
Max |
Mean |
SD |
COV |
|
Cow |
101 |
5,857 |
50 |
2.69 |
5.91 |
2.19 |
|
Valley |
39 |
1,981 |
40 |
2.68 |
5.53 |
2.07 |
|
Shaft |
74 |
9,538 |
50 |
2.94 |
6.77 |
2.30 |
|
Mosquito |
50 |
896 |
60 |
3.42 |
7.93 |
2.32 |
|
BC Vein |
6 |
2,059 |
40 |
2.30 |
5.45 |
2.37 |
|
KL |
40 |
1,311 |
20 |
1.39 |
2.66 |
1.91 |
|
Lowhee |
24 |
365 |
15 |
2.17 |
3.35 |
1.54 |
|
Bonanza Ledge |
1 |
2,602 |
70 |
5.98 |
10.77 |
1.80 |
14.6 High-grade Capping
Although the indicator variograms suggest that high-grade continuity ranges increase with decreasing grade, the lack of detailed underground mapping and sampling is an obstacle to defining the most suitable grade ranges in areas with wider drilling grids.
Multiple capping (capping at different ranges in each deposit) was selected as the capping methodology for the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, KL, Lowhee, and BC Vein models (see below for Bonanza Ledge).
For these deposits, the highest selected capping value corresponds to the grade at 99% of the total variance on indicator variograms. The highest grades vary from 15 to 60 g/t Au. The second and third grades were selected based on the probability plot and vary from 7 to 30 g/t Au. The Shaft deposit is shown as an example in Figure 14.9 and Figure 14.10.
The maximum range for high-grade connectivity was established using the indicator variograms, which suggest a loss of connectivity after 17 to 33 m, depending on the mineralized zone. A range of 25 m was selected and applied to all zones as a general average, given the lack of detailed information for each deposit.
![]() |

Figure 14.9 - Indicator variograms for the Shaft deposit

Figure 14.10 - Grade log histogram and probability plot for the Shaft deposit
For Bonanza Ledge, basic univariate statistics were performed on individual composited gold assay datasets. The capping applied for Bonanza Ledge was a single top cap of 70 g/t Au on the composited data. Sixteen (16) samples were capped with this value, which was selected by combining the dataset analysis with the probability plot and log-normal grade distribution.
![]() |
14.7 Density
Bulk densities were determined by standard water immersion methods on half-core samples. Barkerville's resource databases contain 3,740 measurements taken on samples from all deposits. Table 14.4 provides a breakdown of bulk density measurements in modelled mineralized solids by zone.
Table 14.4 - Bulk density by mineralized zone
|
Deposit |
Number of samples |
Median SG |
|
Cow |
987 |
2.81 |
|
Valley |
18 |
2.80 |
|
Shaft |
1,379 |
2.78 |
|
Mosquito |
232 |
2.78 |
|
BC Vein |
323 |
2.69 |
|
KL |
437 |
2.81 |
|
Lowhee |
159 |
2.73 |
|
Bonanza Ledge |
205 |
3.20 |
For the Cow, Shaft and BC Vein models, the bulk density was estimated by the Inverse Distance Squared ("ID2") interpolation method in the block model. The median bulk density was applied to non-estimated blocks: 2.81 g/cm3 at Cow, 2.78 g/cm3 at Shaft, and 2.69 g/cm3 at BC Vein.
Due to the paucity of data, the median value of the bulk density measurements was applied to all blocks in the Valley (2.80 g/cm3), Mosquito (2.78 g/cm3), KL (2.81 g/cm3) and Lowhee (2.73 g/cm3) deposits.
For Bonanza Ledge, the average value of 3.20 g/cm3 from Sandefur and Stone (2006) was applied. In 2017, InnovExplo confirmed this value with 23 bulk density measurements during the independent resampling program, returning an average of 3.19 g/cm3 (Brousseau et al., 2017).
A density of 2.00 g/cm3 was assigned to the overburden, 2.70 g/cm3 to the waste rock and 0.00 g/cm3 to the 5-m buffer voids (including underground drifts and stopes). The 3D mineralized zones were clipped at the overburden.
Bulk densities were used to calculate tonnages from the volume estimates in the block model.
14.8 Block Model
A block model was created for each of the deposits.
For the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, Lowhee, KL, and BC Vein models, unrotated sub-block models were used in Datamine. The sub-blocks were created within each mineralized vein zone.
The Bonanza Ledge block model corresponds to an unrotated percent block model in GEMS. All blocks with more than 0.01% of their volume falling within a selected solid were assigned the corresponding block code for that solid in their respective folder. A percent block model was generated, reflecting the proportion of each block inside every solid (i.e., individual mineralized zones, overburden, voids and waste).
![]() |
The origin of each block model is the lower-left corner. Block dimensions reflect the sizes of mineralized zones and plausible mining methods.
Table 14.5 shows the properties of each block model.
Table 14.5 - Block model properties
|
Deposits |
Description |
Easting (m) |
Northing (m) |
Elevation (m) |
|
Cow |
Block Model Origin |
595,500 |
5,883,050 |
850 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
190 |
180 |
128 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
0.625 |
0.625 |
0.5 |
|
|
Valley |
Block Model Origin |
595,000 |
5,883,700 |
600 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
160 |
160 |
130 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
0.625 |
0.625 |
0.5 |
|
|
Shaft |
Block Model Origin |
594,160 |
5,884,010 |
690 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
192 |
150 |
154 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
0.625 |
0.625 |
0.5 |
|
|
Mosquito |
Block Model Origin |
593,250 |
5,884,850 |
820 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
150 |
130 |
124 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
0.625 |
0.625 |
0.5 |
|
|
BC Vein |
Block Model Origin |
596,500 |
5,880,800 |
940 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
370 |
284 |
118 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
1 |
1 |
1 |
![]() |
|
Deposits |
Description |
Easting (m) |
Northing (m) |
Elevation (m) |
|
KL |
Block Model Origin |
597,500 |
5,880,900 |
1,000 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
201 |
190 |
130 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
Lowhee |
Block Model Origin |
596,350 |
5,882,450 |
1,100 |
|
Parent Block Dimension |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
Number of Parent Blocks |
80 |
110 |
80 |
|
|
Sub-block Dimension |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
Bonanza Ledge |
Block Model Origin |
596,700 |
5,880,800 |
1,600 |
|
Block size |
2 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
Block extent (m) |
1,300 |
1,200 |
620 |
14.9 Variography and Search Ellipsoids
For the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, KL, Lowhee, and BC Vein models, the 3D directional-specific search ellipses were guided by the hanging wall and footwall of each vein for an anisotropic search. The search radii were determined by the indicator variograms in Section 14.6.
Variogram models were designed for gold using composited assay data. Spherical variograms were modelled for each of these deposits.
Figure 14.11 shows an example of the variogram models used in the resource estimation for the Shaft model.
![]() |

Figure 14.11 - Variogram models of gold grade for the Shaft deposit
For the Bonanza Ledge model, a 3D directional variography was completed on DDH composites of capped gold assay data. The study was carried out in Supervisor software. The 3D directional-specific investigations yielded the best-fit model along an orientation that corresponds to the strike and dip of the mineralized zones.
The downhole variograms suggest a low nugget effect of 3% for the Bonanza Ledge zones. Two (2) sets of search ellipsoids were built from the variogram analysis, corresponding to 1x the results and 1.5x the results.
14.10 Grade Interpolation
The interpolation profiles were customized for each vein of each deposit to estimate grades with hard boundaries.
For the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, KL, Lowhee, and BC Vein deposits, the mineralized vein blocks were estimated independently, with an anisotropic three-pass search to estimate all blocks within the veins. For each pass, the high grades were restricted, as determined in Section 14.6. The first pass range and distance for the restricted search grade (high-grade capping) correspond to a maximum of 25 m, as determined in Section 14.6. For the second and third passes, the ranges were doubled but the restricted search grade decreased. The grade values are determined from indicator variograms and the geological knowledge for each deposit.
For the Bonanza Ledge deposit, passes ranges were derived from the variography using capped composites. The interpolation was run on a point area workspace extracted from the DDH dataset in GEMS. A two-pass search was used for the resource estimate. The ellipsoid radii for Pass 1 were the same as the variography results (1x). The ellipsoid radii from Pass 2 were 1.5x the results for blocks not interpolated during Pass 1.
![]() |
The OK method was selected for the final resource estimation as it better honours the grade distribution for all the deposits.
The grade estimation parameters are summarized in Table 14.6.
Table 14.6 - Grade estimation parameters
|
Deposit |
Pass |
Min Cmp |
Max Cmp |
Min DDH |
Orientation |
Ranges |
High-Grade Restricted Search |
|||||
|
Azi |
Dip |
Azi |
X (m) |
Y (m) |
Z (m) |
Dist. (m) |
Au g/t Cap |
|||||
|
Cow |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
12.5 |
25 |
25 |
50 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
25 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
15 |
|||
|
Valley |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
12.5 |
25 |
25 |
40 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
25 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
15 |
|||
|
Shaft |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
12.5 |
25 |
25 |
50 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
30 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
15 |
|||
|
Mosquito |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
12.5 |
25 |
25 |
60 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
15 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
30 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
15 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
15 |
|||
|
BC Vein |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
40 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
50 |
15 |
50 |
30 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
100 |
25 |
100 |
10 |
|||
|
KL |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
12.5 |
25 |
25 |
20 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
10 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
7 |
|||
|
Lowhee |
1 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
25 |
12.5 |
25 |
25 |
15 |
||
|
2 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
50 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
10 |
|||
|
3 |
4 |
12 |
2 |
Anisotropic |
100 |
50 |
100 |
100 |
7 |
|||
|
Bonanza Ledge |
1 |
3 |
15 |
2 |
320 |
25 |
140 |
31 |
16 |
14 |
NA |
NA |
|
2 |
3 |
15 |
2 |
320 |
25 |
140 |
47 |
24 |
21 |
NA |
NA |
|
14.11 Block Model Validation
The block models were validated visually and statistically. The visual validation confirmed that the block models honours the drill hole composite data and justifies the multiple capping for the second and third passes (Figure 14.12).
![]() |
ID2 and NN models were produced to check for local bias in the models. The ID2 models matched well with the OK models, and the differences in the high-grade composite areas are within acceptable limits. The trend and local variation of the estimated ID2 and OK models were compared with the NN models and composite data using swath plots in three directions (North, East and Elevation) for the first pass. The ID2, NN and OK models show similar trends in grades with the expected smoothing for each method when compared to the composite data. Figure 14.13 shows the swath plot in the three (3) principal directions of the Shaft deposit as an example.
The Bonanza Ledge model of Brousseau et al. (2017) was reviewed and validated, and a reconciliation exercise performed, but no changes were made to the block model. According to the reconciliation results of the 2018 development in the Bonanza Ledge mine, grade produced versus estimated is 87.5% for a combined dilution-recovery rate of 14.3%. No activities were carried out at the Bonanza Ledge mine in 2019. The author believes the Bonanza Ledge block model reconciliation results were acceptable for the 2019 MRE given the nature of the deposit, and these data can be used to update the 2020 MRE.

a) Cross section looking northeast (±5 m); b) Long section of Vein 1 showing all blocks
Figure 14.12 - Validation of the Shaft block model, comparing drill hole composites and block model grade values
![]() |

Figure 14.13 - Shaft model validation using three-direction swath plots comparing the different interpolation methods to the DDH composites
![]() |
14.12 Cut-off Parameters
A cut-off grade of 2.1 g/t Au was calculated using the parameters presented in Table 14.7. This cut-off grade was applied to the entire Project (all 8 deposits).
Table 14.7 - Input parameters used to calculate the underground cut-off grade
|
Input parameter |
Value |
|
Gold price (US$/oz) |
1,350 |
|
Exchange rate (USD/CAD) |
1.31 |
|
Gold Price (C$/oz) |
1,769 |
|
Royalty (%) |
4 |
|
Recovery (%) |
92.2 |
|
Global mining costs (C$/t) |
65.39 |
|
Processing, env. & transport costs (C$/t) |
28.67 |
|
G&A costs (C$/t) |
11.07 |
|
Total cost (C$/t) |
105.13 |
|
Resource cut-off grade (g/t Au) |
2.1 |
The author considers the selected cut-off grade of 2.1 g/t Au to be adequate based on the current knowledge of the Project and to be instrumental in outlining resources with reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction for an underground mining scenario in each deposit.
14.13 Mineral Resource Classification
14.13.1 Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, KL, Lowhee, and BC Vein deposits
No measured resources were defined.
Indicated resources were defined for blocks estimated with a minimum of 2 DDH and within 25 m of a drill hole. The classification can extend up to 35 m if the mineralized trend is demonstrated by multiple adjacent holes.
Inferred resources were defined for blocks estimated with a minimum of 2 DDH and within 50 m of a drill hole. The classification can extend to 60-65 m from a hole if the mineralized trend is demonstrated by multiple adjacent holes.
Figure 14.14 shows an example of the mineral resource classification for the Shaft deposit.
![]() |

Indicated category clip (red); Inferred category clip (green) for the V24 vein of the Shaft deposit
Figure 14.14 - Example of a clipping boundary for classification
14.13.2 Bonanza Ledge deposit
Measured resources were defined for blocks showing geological and grade continuity interpolated during Pass 1 only, with a minimum of three (3) drill holes and a closest distance of less than 10 m, and for blocks no more than 40 m below the pit.
Indicated resources were defined for blocks showing geological and grade continuity interpolated with a minimum of two (2) drill holes during Pass 1 and a closest distance of less than 20 m.
Inferred resources were defined by the remaining blocks interpolated from Pass 1 and Pass 2.
Figure 14.15 shows the mineral resource classification for the Bonanza Ledge deposit.
For all the deposits, a series of outline rings (clipping boundaries) were created in longitudinal views using the criteria described above, keeping in mind that a significant cluster of blocks would be necessary to obtain an indicated resource. Within the indicated category outlines, some inferred blocks were upgraded, whereas some indicated blocks were downgraded outside these outlines. InnovExplo considers this a necessary step to homogenize (smooth out) the resource volumes in each category and to avoid the inclusion of isolated blocks in the indicated category.
![]() |
In some areas, interpolated blocks remained unclassified due to the lack of confidence in grade and/or continuity; these are kept as exploration potential.

Figure 14.15 - Longitudinal view showing the classified mineral resources of the Bonanza Ledge deposit
14.14 Mineral Resource Estimate
The author has classified the 2020 MRE as measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources based on geological and gradecontinuity, data density, search ellipse criteria, drill hole density, and interpolation parameters. The author is of the opinion that the reasonable prospect for an eventual economical extraction requirement is met by having a minimum width for the modelling of the mineralized zones and with a cut-off grade that using reasonable input, both for a potential underground extraction scenario.
The 2020 MRE is considered to be reliable and based on quality data and geological knowledge. The mineral resource estimate follow CIM Definition Standards.
Table 14.8 displays the results of the 2020 MRE for the Project at the official 2.1 g/t Au cut-off grade for all eight deposits: Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, KL, Lowhee, BC Vein and Bonanza Ledge.
Table 14.9 shows the cut-off grade sensitivity analysis of the 2020 MRE. The reader should be cautioned that the figures provided in Table 14.9 should not be interpreted as a mineral resource statement. The reported quantities and grade estimates at different cut-off grades are presented for the sole purpose of demonstrating the sensitivity of the resource model to the selection of a reporting cut-off grade.
![]() |
Table 14.8 - 2020 Cariboo Gold Project Mineral Resource Estimate at 2.1 g/t Au cut-off
|
Category |
Deposit |
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
* 1000 |
(Au g/t) |
* 1000 |
||
|
Measured |
Bonanza Ledge |
240 |
5.1 |
39 |
|
Indicated |
Bonanza Ledge |
86 |
3.9 |
11 |
|
BC Vein |
1192 |
4.7 |
179 |
|
|
KL |
393 |
3.3 |
42 |
|
|
Lowhee |
381 |
3.7 |
46 |
|
|
Mosquito |
783 |
6.0 |
150 |
|
|
Shaft |
10889 |
4.7 |
1644 |
|
|
Valley |
1744 |
4.5 |
251 |
|
|
Cow |
5734 |
4.5 |
838 |
|
|
Total Indicated Resources |
21,201 |
4.6 |
3,160 |
|
|
Inferred |
BC Vein |
472 |
3.9 |
60 |
|
KL |
1926 |
2.9 |
181 |
|
|
Lowhee |
1032 |
3.2 |
105 |
|
|
Mosquito |
1348 |
4.8 |
208 |
|
|
Shaft |
7913 |
4.2 |
1081 |
|
|
Valley |
5683 |
4.0 |
722 |
|
|
Cow |
3276 |
3.5 |
364 |
|
|
Total Measured and Indicated Resources |
21,441 |
4.6 |
3,200 |
|
|
Total Inferred Resources |
21,649 |
3.9 |
2,721 |
|
Mineral Resource Estimate notes:
1. The independent and qualified persons for the mineral resource estimates, as defined by NI 43-101, are Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo., and Carl Pelletier, P.Geo. (InnovExplo Inc.). The effective date of the 2020 mineral resource estimate is April 28, 2020.
2. These mineral resources are not mineral reserves as they do not have demonstrated economic viability.
3. The mineral resource estimate follows CIM Definition Standards.
4. A total of 334 vein zones were modelled for the Cow Mountain (Cow and Valley), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito), Barkerville Mountain (BC Vein, KL, and Lowhee) deposits and one (1) gold zone for Bonanza Ledge. A minimum true thickness of 2.0 m was applied, using the grade of the adjacent material when assayed or a value of zero when not assayed.
5. The estimate is reported for a potential underground scenario at cut-off grade of 2.1 g/t Au. The cut-off grades were calculated using a gold price of USD1,350 per ounce; a USD/CAD exchange rate of 1.31; a mining cost of $65.39/t; a processing, environment & transport cost of $28.67/t; and a G&A cost of $11.07/t. The cut-off grade should be re-evaluated in light of future prevailing market conditions (metal prices, exchange rate, mining cost, etc.).
6. Density values for Cow, Shaft, and BC Vein were estimated using the ID2 interpolation method, with a minimum default value of 2.81 g/cm3 for Cow, 2.78 g/cm3 for Shaft, and 269 g/cm3 for BC Vein. Median densities were applied for Valley (2.80 g/cm3), Mosquito (2.78 g/cm3), KL (2.81 g/cm3) and Lowhee (2.73 g/cm3). An average density of 3.20 g/cm3 was applied for Bonanza Ledge.
7. A three-step capping procedure was applied to composited data for Cow (3.0 m), Valley (1.5 m), Shaft (2.0 m), Mosquito (3.0 m), BC Vein (2.0 m), KL (1.75 m), and Lowhee (1.75 m). Restricted search ellipsoids ranged from 7 to 60 g/t Au at three different distances ranging from 25 to 100 m for each deposit. High grades at Bonanza Ledge were capped at 70 g/t Au on 2.0 m composited data.
![]() |
8. The resources for the Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein, KL, and Lowhee vein zones were estimated using Datamine Studio RM 1.5 software using hard boundaries on composited assays. The OK method was used to interpolate a sub-blocked model (parent block size = 5 m x 5 m x 5 m). Resources for Bonanza Ledge were estimated using GEOVIA GEMS 6.7 software using hard boundaries on composited assays. The OK method was used to interpolate a block model (block size = 2 m x 2 m x 5 m).
9. Results are presented in-situ. Ounce (troy) = metric tons x grade / 31.10348. Calculations used metric units (metres, tonnes, g/t). The number of tonnes was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects. Rounding followed the recommendations as per NI 43-101.
10. InnovExplo Inc. is not aware of any known environmental, permitting, legal, title-related, taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant issues that could materially affect the mineral resource estimate other than those disclosed in this NI 43-101 compliant technical report.
Table 14.9 - Cut-off grade sensitivity analysis for the Cariboo Gold Project
|
Cut-off Grade |
MEASURED + INDICATED |
INFERRED |
||||
|
Tonnes ('000) |
Grade Au g/t |
Ounces ('000) |
Tonnes ('000) |
Grade Au g/t |
Ounces ('000) |
|
|
1.50 |
27,674 |
4.0 |
3,559 |
29,380 |
3.3 |
3,164 |
|
1.75 |
24,945 |
4.3 |
3,416 |
25,822 |
3.6 |
2,978 |
|
2.00 |
22,422 |
4.5 |
3,265 |
22,823 |
3.8 |
2,798 |
|
2.10 |
21,441 |
4.6 |
3,200 |
21,649 |
3.9 |
2,721 |
|
2.25 |
20,110 |
4.8 |
3,107 |
19,913 |
4.1 |
2,599 |
|
2.50 |
18,193 |
5.1 |
2,961 |
17,470 |
4.3 |
2,413 |
|
2.75 |
16,451 |
5.3 |
2,814 |
15,024 |
4.6 |
2,206 |
|
3.00 |
14,761 |
5.6 |
2,658 |
12,925 |
4.8 |
2,013 |
![]() |
15. MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
16. MINING METHODS
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
17. RECOVERY METHODS
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
18. PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
19. MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
20. ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING, AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
21. CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
22. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Not applicable at the current stage of the Project.
![]() |
23. ADJACENT PROPERTIES
There are no adjacent properties that would provide significant information relating to the Project. Barkerville maintains a significant land position in the Cariboo Gold District of British Columbia, and the district's historical lode mines are located mainly within the boundaries of the Project.
![]() |
24. OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
24.1 Operations in 2019
Test mining at Bonanza Ledge was completed in December 2018. The objective was to gain technical information and personnel training that can benefit ongoing advanced studies, permitting and future mining. A total of 1,900 m of development took place at the Bonanza Ledge mine in 2018. Approximately 120,000 t were extracted and processed at a grade of 5.94 g/t Au, and 21,000 oz of gold were poured in 2018 (P. Ratte, internal communication).
Barkerville has also applied for a permit amendment to extend test mining of the BC Vein on Barkerville Mountain.
![]() |
25. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS
The objective of InnovExplo's mandate was to present and support the updated mineral resource estimate for the Project (the "2020 MRE"). The Project combines the deposits of three contiguous mountains separated by valleys: Cow Mountain (Cow and Valley deposits), Island Mountain (Shaft and Mosquito) and Barkerville Mountain (Bonanza Ledge; BC Vein & Splays, KL and Lowhee). This technical report and the mineral resource estimate presented herein meet these objectives.
The following conclusions are based on InnovExplo's detailed review of all pertinent information and the 2020 MRE results:
- The results demonstrate the geological and grade continuities for all eight (8) gold deposits in the Cow-Island-Barkerville Mountain Corridor.
In an underground scenario, the Cariboo Gold Project contains an estimated Measured Resource of 240,000 tonnes grading at 5.1 g/t Au for a total of 39,000 ounces of gold, and Indicated Resource of 21,201,000 tonnes grading at 4.6 g/t Au for a total of 3,161,000 ounces, and an Inferred Resource of 21,649,000 tonnes grading 3.9 g/t Au for a total of 2,721,000 ounces.
- The resource estimates for the Cow, Shaft, Mosquito, BC Vein & Splays deposits were updated using the 2019 drill results.
- Initial mineral resource estimates for the KL and Lowhee deposits used the 2019 drill results.
- No change is reported for the Valley and Bonanza Ledge deposits.
- Additional diamond drilling on multiple zones would likely increase the Inferred Resources and upgrade some of the Inferred Resources to Indicated Resources.
Table 25.1 identifies any significant internal risks, potential impacts and possible risk mitigation measures that could affect the economic outcome of the Project. This excludes the external risks that apply to all mining projects (e.g., changes in metal prices, exchange rates, availability of investment capital, change in government regulations, etc.). Significant opportunities that could improve the economics, timing and permitting of the project are also identified in this table. Further information and evaluation are required before these opportunities can be included in the project economics.
InnovExplo concludes that the results of the 2020 MRE supports the recommendation to advance the Project to the feasibility stage.
InnovExplo considers the 2020 MRE to be reliable, thorough, based on quality data, reasonable hypotheses, and parameters compliant with NI 43-101 requirements and CIM Definition Standards.
![]() |
Table 25.1 - Risks and opportunities of the Cariboo Gold Project
|
RISK |
Potential Impact |
Possible Risk Mitigation |
|
Proximity to the Town of Wells |
Possibility that the population does not accept the mining project |
Maintain a pro-active and transparent strategy to identify all stakeholders and maintain a communication plan. The main stakeholders have been identified, and their needs/concerns understood. Continue to organize information sessions, publish information on the mining project, and meet with host communities. |
|
Difficulty in attracting experienced professionals |
The ability to attract and retain competent, experienced professionals is a key success factor. |
The early search for professionals will help identify and attract critical people. It may be necessary to provide accommodation for key people (not included in project costs). |
|
OPPORTUNITIES |
Explanation |
Potential benefit |
|
Surface definition diamond drilling |
Potential to upgrade inferred resources to the indicated category |
Adding indicated resources increases the economic value of the mining project. |
|
Surface exploration drilling |
Potential to identify additional inferred resources |
Adding inferred resources increases the economic value of the mining project. |
![]() |
26. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of the 2020 MRE, InnovExplo recommends that the Project move to an advanced phase of development, which would involve the preparation of a feasibility study covering all eight deposits: Cow, Valley, Shaft, Mosquito, Bonanza Ledge, BC Vein & Splays, KL and Lowhee.
Specifically, InnovExplo recommends: continuing the exploration program (see below for details); updating the existing PEA for new mining scenarios at lower grades using data from the geotechnical, hydrogeological and metallurgical studies; continuing the permitting process for an underground bulk sample; conducting a feasibility study after obtaining said permits; continuing the community outreach program; and conducting a characterization study of the mining project environment in tandem with these other projects.
It is recommended that the exploration program consist of drilling (infill and exploration), geological mapping and grab sampling to test the extensions of known high-grade vein corridors and to identify new targets.
The recommended two-phase work program is detailed below:
Phase 1 - PEA and Exploration Work:
A) Update the PEA:
- Metallurgical testwork
- Geotechnical work
- Permitting
- Social licence management
B) Exploration Work
- Infill drilling in high-grade vein corridors (> 5.0 g/t Au) to potentially convert inferred resources to the indicated category;
- Exploration drilling on all zones to explore the true depth potential of high-grade vein corridors using 50 m step-outs downdip
- Continued geological mapping and surface sampling programs to identify and define new targets
Phase 2 - Feasibility and Bulk Sampling Program (conditional on the success of Phase 1):
1. Underground bulk sampling program to test geological and grade continuities, metallurgical and geotechnical parameters.
2. Feasibility study.
InnovExplo has prepared a cost estimate for the proposed program to serve as a guideline for the Project. The budget is presented in Table 26.1. The estimated cost for the PEA and exploration work program would amount to approximately $24.54 million and would include a resource estimate update. The estimated cost for the feasibility study is approximately $10.2 million. For a total budget of $38.34 million.
![]() |
Table 26.1 - Estimated costs for the recommended work program
|
Phase 1 - PEA and Exploration Work |
Cost Estimate ($) |
|
1A) PEA update |
500,000 |
|
1B) Exploration work: |
|
|
19,800,000 |
|
150,000 |
|
Subtotal |
20,450,000 |
|
Contingency (20%) |
4,090,000 |
|
Total Phase 1 |
24,540,000 |
|
|
|
|
Phase 2 - Feasibility and bulk sampling program |
|
|
Feasibility study |
8,500,000 |
|
Contingency (20%) |
1,700,000 |
|
Total Phase 2 |
10,200,000 |
|
TOTAL Phase 1 and 2 |
38,340,000 |
InnovExplo believes the recommended work program and proposed expenditures are appropriate and well thought out, and that the proposed budget reasonably reflects the contemplated activities.
![]() |
27. REFERENCES
Allan, M.M., Rhys, D.A. and Hart, C.J.R., 2017, Orogenic gold mineralization of the eastern Cordilleran gold belt, British Columbia: Structural ore controls in the Cariboo (093A/H), Cassiar (104P) and Sheep Creek (082F) mining districts: Geoscience BC Report 2017-15, 108 p.
Andrew, A., Godwin, C. I. and Sinclair, A. J., 1983. Age and genesis of Cariboo gold mineralization determined by isotope methods (93H). In Geological Fieldwork 1982, BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Paper 1983-1, p. 305-313.
Ash, C. H., 2001. Relationship between ophiolites and gold-quartz veins in the North American Cordillera. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Bulletin 108, 140 pages.
Beausoleil, C. and Pelletier, C., 2018. NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Cariboo Gold Project, B.C., Canada. Prepared by InnovExplo Inc. for Barkerville Gold Mine Ltd. Published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on Juin 14, 2018. 268 pages.
Beausoleil, C., Pelletier, C. and Dorval, A., 2019. NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate Update for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada. Prepared by InnovExplo Inc. for Barkerville Gold Mine Ltd. Published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on July 11, 2019. 182 pages.
Bloodgood, M. A., 1992. Geology of the Eureka Peak and Spanish Lake map areas, British Columbia; BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Paper 1990-3, 36 pages.
Bolin, D. S., 1984. Report to Wharf Resources Ltd on the Cariboo Gold Quartz Mine, Wells, British Columbia, Canada. Report prepared by Golder Associates for Wharf Resources Ltd. 17 pages. Internal report.
Brousseau, K., Faure, S. and Pelletier, C., 2017. Technical report for the Cariboo Gold Project and Mineral resource estimate on the Barkerville Mountain Deposit. NI 43-101 Technical Report prepared by InnovExplo for Barkerville Gold Mine Ltd. Published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on May 17, 2017. 250 pages.
Brown, J.A., 2009. 2009 technical Report for the Cariboo Gold Project, Barkerville/Wells, B. C. Cariboo MD. NI 43-101 Technical Report prepared by Giroux Consultants Ltd for International Wayside Gold Mines Limited and Barkerville Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on December 18, 2009. 90 pages.
Campbell, D. D., 1969. Summary Report of 1968 Surface Exploration and Production Potential of Cariboo Gold-Quartz Mine, Wells, B. C. Report prepared by Dolmage, Campbell & Associates for Cariboo Gold Quartz Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Property File 014868, 24 pages.
![]() |
Chapman, J., 1996a. Mineral Exploration Report, Diamond Drilling, Welbar Gold Project, Cariboo-Hudson Property, Cariboo Mining Division, Wells, B. C. Works done by Gold City Mining Corporation. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 24 791, 5 pages.
Chapman, J., 1996b. Mineral Exploration Report, Diamond Drilling, Welbar Gold Project, William Creek Property, Cariboo Mining Division, Wells, B. C. Works done by Gold City Mining Corporation. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 24 722, 4 pages.
Chapman, J., 1997. Mineral Exploration Report, Diamond Drilling, Welbar Gold Project, Island Mountain Property, Cariboo Mining Division, Wells, B. C. Works done by Gold City Mining Corporation. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 24 723, 4 pages.
Chapman, R.J. and Mortensen, J.K. 2016. Characterization of Gold Mineralization in the Northern Cariboo Gold District, British Columbia, Canada, Through Integration of Compositional Studies of Lode and Detrital Gold with Historical Placer Production: a template for Evaluation of Orogenic Gold Districts. Economic Geology, v. 111, p. 1321-1345.
Cox, S.F. 2005. Coupling between Deformation, Fluid Pressures, and Fluid Flow in Ore-Producing Hydrothermal Systems at Depth in the Crust. Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, pp. 39-75.
Daignault, P. M., and Moore, C., 2006. Report on the 2005 Exploration Program on the Cariboo Gold Project (Lowhee Creek Area), Wells, British Columbia. Works done by International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 28 148C-1, 15 pages.
Duba, D., 2005. Report on 2004 Diamond Drilling on the Myrtle Claim Group, Wells, British Columbia. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 27 757G, 20 pages.
Dubé, B., and Gosselin, P., 2007, Greenstone-hosted quartz-carbonate vein deposits, in Goodfellow, W.D., ed., Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, Special Publication No. 5, p. 49-73.
Dykes, S., 1997: Cariboo Quartz Gold Project, Geological Mineral Inventory Calculation. International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. 6 pages. Internal Report.
Dykes, S., 1999. New Mineral Inventory Calculation. International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. 6 pages. Internal Report.
Dzick, W., 2015. Cow Mountain NI43-101 Technical Report (Project No. V1458), Cariboo Gold Project. Report prepared by Snowden Mining Industry Consultants for Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on May 15, 2015. 159 pages.
![]() |
Ferri, F. and O'Brien, B. H., 2002. Preliminary geology of the Cariboo Lake area, central British Columbia (093A/11, 12, 13 and 14). In Geological Fieldwork 2001, B.C. Ministry of Energy and Mines, Paper 2002-1, p. 59-81.
Ferri, F. and Schiarizza, P., 2006. Reinterpretation of the Snowshoe Group stratigraphy across a south west-verging nappe structure and its implications for regional correlations within the Kootenay Terrane. In Paleozoic Evolution and Metallogeny of Pericratonic Terranes at the Ancient Pacific Margin of North America. M. Colpron and J. L. Nelson (ed.), Canadian and Alaskan Cordillera, Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 45, p. 415-432.
Fier, N. E., Reggin, L., Martin, S., Wright, F., Arik, A., 2009. Pre-Feasibility Study of the Bonanza Ledge Deposit, Wells, BC, Canada. NI 43-101 Technical Report prepared by EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd for International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on October 23, 2009. 119 pages.
Gates, E. E., Ridell, J., and Duba, D., 2005. Report on the 2004 Exploration and Development Program on the Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, British Columbia. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 27 757A, 29 pages.
Georges, P. T., 2012. Technical Report Mineral resources and Potential, Cariboo Gold Project, Cariboo Mining District, British Columbia. Report prepared by GEOEX Limited for Barkerville Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on August 13, 2012. 52 pages.
Georges, P. T., Jones, I. W. O., McCarthy, R., and Dufresne, M. B., 2013. Technical Report Cariboo Gold Project, Cariboo Mining District, British Columbia. Report prepared by EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd for Barkerville Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on June 18, 2013. 160 pages.
Giroux, G.H., 2000. A Resource estimate on the Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, B.C.: internal company report for International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd.
Giroux, G. H., 2002. A Resource Estimate on the BC Vein and Bonanza Ledge Deposits, Wells, British Columbia. NI 43-101 Technical Report prepared by Giroux Consultants Ltd for International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on April 9, 2003. 50 pages.
Giroux, G. H., 2006. Resource Estimate on the Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, British Columbia. Amended NI 43-101 Technical Report prepared by Giroux Consultants Ltd for International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on July 17, 2006. 57 pages.
![]() |
Globe news wire website https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/09/23/1918980/0/en/Osisko-Gold-Royalties-to-Acquire-Barkerville-Gold-Mines.html
Goldfarb R.J. Groves D.I., and Gardoll, S. 2001. Orogenic gold and geologic time: a global synthesis. Ore Geology Reviews 18: 1-75.
Goldfarb R.J., Baker, T., Dubé, B., Groves, D.I., and Hart, C.J.R., 2005. Distribution, character, and genesis of gold deposits in metamorphic terranes. Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume: 407-450.
Groves D.I., Goldfarb R.J., Robert, F., and Hart, C.J.R., 2003. Gold deposits in metamorphic belts: Overview of current understanding, outstanding problems, future research, and exploration significance. Economic Geology, 98: 1-29.
Hall, R. D., 1999. Cariboo gold project at Wells, British Columbia. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on October 5, 2000. 42 pages.
Harbort, T. A., 2017a. Island Mountain Tectonostratigraphic Facies Model. Barkerville Gold Mines Internal Company Report.
Harbort, T. A., 2017b. Geology of the Barkerville Gold Deposit. Toronto Geological Discussion Group Abstract and Presentation September 2017.
Harbort, T.A.. 2018. A New Kinematic Mechanism for Orogenic Vein Formation: The Application of a Laminated Thin Plate Curvature Model to Explain Vein Genesis in the Cariboo Gold District, Canada. Abstract with Programs, SEG Metals, Minerals and Society Conference, Keystone, Colorado.
Harbort, T.A. Shaw, J., Yarra, R., Prince, J., Padilla, R. Structural Controls of Mineralisation in the Cariboo Gold District, South Central British Colombia, Canada in preparation.
Hanson, G. 1935. Barkerville Gold Belt, Cariboo District, British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 181, 42 p.
Johnson, D. L., 2005. Report on the 2004 Diamond Drilling Program on the Island Mountain Gold Property, Wells, British Colombia. Works done by Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 27 757F, 24 pages.
Layman, M. E., 2015. Report on the 2014 Diamond Drilling on the Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, British Columbia. Report prepared for Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 35 452, 17 pages.
Lord, K., and Reid, R., 1997. Geochemical survey and Propecting Report for Assessment Cariboo Gold Project at Wells, B. C. Report prepared for International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 25 241, 25 pages.
![]() |
Lord, K., and Hall, R., 2001. Report for Assessment, cariboo Gold Project, Wells, B. C. Report prepared for International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 26 604, 43 pages.
Monger, J. W. H. and Berg, H. C., 1984. Lithotectonic terrane map of western Canada and southeastern Alaska. In Silberling, N.J. and Jones, D.L., eds., Lithotectonic terrane maps of the North American Cordillera, part B: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 84-523, p. B1-B31.
Monger, J. and Price, R. 2002. The Canadian Cordillera: Geology and Tectonic Evolution. Canadian Society of Geophysicists Recorder. (27) 2: p. 17-36.
Moore, C., 2006. Report on the 2005 Diamond Drilling Program on the Island Mountain Gold Property, Wells, British Colombia. Works done by Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 28 148D, 23 pages.
Morgan, G.J., Dorval, A., Hardie, C., Bratty, M., Jones, E., Tremblay, M., Beausoleil, C., Pelletier, C., Allwright, Z., Coleman, T., Bélisle, M., Fontaine, R., and Lemaire, D., 2019. NI 43-101 Technical Report - Preliminary economic assessment of the Cariboo Gold Project, District of Wells, British Columbia, Canada. Prepared by for Barkerville Gold Mine Ltd. Published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on September 17, 2019. 486 pages.
Mortensen, J. K., Montgomery, J. R. and Fillipone, J., 1987. U-Pb zircon, monazite and sphene ages for granitic orthogneiss of the Barkerville Terrane, east-central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 24, p. 1261-1266.
Mortensen, J. K., Rhys, D. A. and Ross, K., 2011. Investigations of orogenic gold deposits in the Cariboo gold district, east-central British Columbia (parts of NTS 093A, H): final report. In Geoscience BC Summary of Activities 2010, Geoscience BC, Report 2011-1, p. 97-108.
MTO, May 2019. Mineral titles online of Bristish Columbia government. "http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/mineral-exploration-mining/mineral-titles/mineral-placer-titles/mineraltitlesonline"
Panteleyev, A., Bailey, D. G., Bloodgood, M. A. and Hancock, K. D., 1996. Geology and mineral deposits of the Quesnel River-Horsefly map area, central Quesnel Trough, British Columbia (NTS map sheets 93A/5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13; 93B/9, 16; 93G/1; 93H/4). BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Bulletin 97, 156 pages.
Pautler, J. W., 2003. Report on the 2003 Diamond Drill and Trenching Program on the Island Mountain Gold Property, Wells, British Columbia. Report published on SEDAR website (Starr Peak Exploration Ltd) on December 31, 2003. 30 pages.
Pautler, J., 2004. Report on the 2003 Diamond Drill and Trenching Program on the Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, British Columbia. International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 27 386, 15 pages.
![]() |
Phillips, G.N. and Powell, R., 2010. Formation of gold deposits: a metamorphic devolatilization model. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 28: 689-718.
Pickett, J. W., 2000. Report on the Mosquito Creek and Island Mountain Claims Groups, Cariboo Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada. Report published on SEDAR website (Starr Peak Exploration Ltd) on April 5, 2001. 18 pages.
Pickett, J. W., 2001. Diamond drilling and geochemical soil sampling report on a portion of the IGM Group of mineral claims. Works done by Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd and International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 26 492A, 57 pages.
Pickett, J. W., 2002. Diamond Drilling, Geochemical Soil Sampling, Induced Polarization Geophysics, and Rock Sampling, report on a portion of the IGM Group of mineral claims. Works done by Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd and International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 26 888A, 24 pages.
Pickett, J. W., 2003. Technical Report on the 2002 Exploration Program of Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd, Wells Area, BC. Report published on SEDAR website (Starr Peak Exploration Ltd) on February 10, 2003. 30 pages.
Pow, D. J., 2003. A Preliminary Assessment Report on the Cow Mountain and Bonanza Ledge Deposits, Wells, British Columbia for International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on April 14, 2003. 42 pages.
Ray, G. E., Webster, I. C. L., Ross, K. and Hall, R., 2001. Geochemistry of auriferous pyrite mineralization at the Bonanza Ledge, Mosquito Creek mine and other properties in the Wells-Barkerville area, British Columbia. In Geological Fieldwork 2000, BC Ministry of Energy and Mines, Paper 2001-1, p. 135-167.
Reid, R., 1999. Underground Percussion Drilling and Surface Diamond Drilling, cariboo Gold Project at Wells, B. C. Report prepared for International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 25 940, 25 pages.
Rhys, D. A., Mortensen, J. K. and Ross, K., 2009. Investigations of orogenic gold deposits in the Cariboo gold district, east-central British Columbia (parts of NTS 093A, H): progress report. In Geoscience BC Summary of Activities 2008, Geoscience BC, Report 2009-1, p. 49-74.
Richards, F., 1948. Cariboo Gold Quartz mine. In Structural Geology of Canadian Ore Deposits, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, p. 162-168.
Sandefur, R. L., and Stone, D. M., 2006. Preliminary Assessment Report The Bonanza Ledge Mine, Wells, British Columbia. Report prepared by Chlumsky, Armbrust & Meyer, LLC for International Wayside Gold Mines Ltd. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on May 2, 2006. 88 pages.
![]() |
Struik, L.C., 1982: Snowshoe Formation (1982), central British Columbia; in Current Research, Part B, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82-1B, pages 117-124.
Struik, L.C., 1984: Outcrop geology, Cariboo Lake, Spectacle Lakes, Swift River, and Wells map areas, Cariboo District, British Columbia; Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 1109
Struik, L.C., 1986: Imbricated terranes of the Cariboo gold belt with correlations and implications for tectonics in southeastern British Columbia; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Volume 23, pages 1047-1061.
Struik, L. C., 1988. Structural geology of the Cariboo Gold Mining District, east-central British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 421, 100 pages.
Sutherland Brown, A., and Ash, C. H., 2009. Great Mining Camps of Canada 3. The History and Geology of cariboo Goldfield, Barkerville and Wells, BC. Geoscience Canada, volume 36, number 1. p. 1-31.
Walton, G., 2002a. Report for Assessment Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, B. C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 26 906, 13 pages.
Walton, G., 2002b. Report on the 2001 Exploration Program on the Cariboo Gold Properties, Central British Columbia. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. Report published on SEDAR website (Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd) on August 27, 2002. 38 pages.
Walton, G., 2003a. Report for Assessment Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, B. C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited, Island Mountain Gold Mines Ltd, Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 27 146, 31 pages.
Walton, G., 2003b. Report for Assessment Cariboo Gold Project, Wells, B. C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 27 211, 26 pages.
Yin, J. and Daignault, P., 2007. Report on the 2006 exploration program on the Cariboo Gold project, Wells, B.C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 28 990B, 44 pages.
Yin, J. and Daignault, P., 2008. Report on the 2007 exploration program on the Cariboo Gold project, Wells, B.C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 29 803, 29 pages
Yin, J., 2010a. Assessment Report on the 2008 exploration program on the Cariboo Gold project, Wells, B.C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 30 662A, 40 pages.
![]() |
Yin, J., 2010b. Assessment Report on the 2009 drill program on the Cariboo Gold project, Wells, B.C. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 31 464A, 28 pages.
Yin, J., 2011. Assessment Report on the 2010 drill program on the Cariboo Gold project, Wells, British Columbia. Barkervile Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 32 282, 32 pages.
Yin, J., 2013. Report on the 2011 exploration program on the Cariboo Gold project, Wells, British Columbia. International Wayside Gold Mines Limited. BC Mintstry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Assessment Report 29 803, 29 pages
![]() |
APPENDIX I - LIST OF MINERAL CLAIMS AND LEASES
(as of September 28, 2020)
![]() |
|
Title # |
Type |
Property |
Owner |
Issue Date |
Good to Date |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
203991 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
9/7/1976 |
7/15/2025 |
75.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
204176 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
8/14/1979 |
7/15/2025 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
204177 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
8/14/1979 |
7/15/2025 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
204753 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
7/11/1983 |
7/15/2025 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
204754 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
7/11/1983 |
7/15/2025 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
204755 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
7/11/1983 |
7/15/2025 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
205247 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
8/19/1986 |
7/15/2025 |
500.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
205267 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
9/18/1986 |
7/15/2025 |
300.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
319636 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/17/1993 |
7/17/2020 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
319637 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/17/1993 |
7/17/2020 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
320752 |
Mineral Lease |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
4/30/1994 |
4/30/2021 |
3164.40 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Foxcorp Holdings Ltd. (NOP) (whole) (2.5%), Revolution Technologies Inc. (NOP) (whole), 2.5%, Newmont Goldcorp Corp. (whole) (1%) |
|
367303 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/5/1999 |
2/5/2021 |
161.77 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
367954 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/23/1999 |
6/22/2020 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
367955 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/23/1999 |
6/22/2020 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
369917 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/3/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
369918 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/3/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370011 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370012 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370013 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370014 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370015 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370028 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
![]() |
|
370029 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/6/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370010 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/7/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
500.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370030 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/7/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370016 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/8/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370230 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/14/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370234 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/15/1999 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (whole) (2.5%) |
|
370373 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/1999 |
10/19/2020 |
46.26 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374225 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374226 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374227 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374228 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374229 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374230 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374231 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374232 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374233 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374234 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/13/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374706 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374707 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374708 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374709 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374710 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374711 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374712 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
374713 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/8/2000 |
2/28/2030 |
25.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
375260 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (50%) and Imperial Metals Corp. (50%) |
4/9/2000 |
7/15/2025 |
400.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
384112 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/19/2001 |
6/22/2020 |
300.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
384113 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/19/2001 |
6/22/2020 |
400.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
384442 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/15/2001 |
5/15/2021 |
254.86 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
394333 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/19/2002 |
8/19/2021 |
518.80 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
395284 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/28/2002 |
8/28/2021 |
524.70 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
396850 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/20/2003 |
1/20/2021 |
271.10 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
401340 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/16/2003 |
5/16/2021 |
17.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
401342 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/16/2003 |
5/16/2021 |
124.55 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
401442 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/16/2003 |
5/16/2021 |
282.36 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
404854 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/24/2003 |
11/24/2020 |
29.10 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
412065 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/8/2004 |
2/28/2030 |
500.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Roundtop Exploration Inc. & Estate of Bryan Muloin (whole) (2%) |
|
412066 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/8/2004 |
2/28/2030 |
375.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Roundtop Exploration Inc. & Estate of Bryan Muloin (whole) (2%) |
|
505901 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
349.67 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505905 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
972.78 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505910 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1265.76 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505914 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1399.53 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505916 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1164.10 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
505917 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
658.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
505921 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
914.78 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505922 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
583.13 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505924 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
543.58 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505925 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1066.31 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
505926 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
310.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
505927 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
738.06 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
505936 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/4/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
426.62 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
506154 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/7/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
155.56 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506236 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/7/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
738.15 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506315 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/8/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
894.11 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506436 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/9/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
408.28 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506440 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/9/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
972.35 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
506489 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/9/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
388.47 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506493 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/9/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1549.54 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506497 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/9/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
853.84 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young / 643990 B.C. Ltd. (partial) (2%) |
|
506614 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1167.70 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506618 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
622.63 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
506620 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
933.89 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
![]() |
|
506630 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
350.79 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & 643990 B.C. Ltd. (partial) (2%) |
|
506637 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1131.33 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel Skiber & 643990 B.C. Ltd (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
506658 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
506.36 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
506720 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1085.46 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Charnobay/Wells Syndicate |
|
506721 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/10/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1070.04 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
506956 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/11/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1247.95 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel Skiber & 643990 B.C. Ltd (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
507131 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (85%), Starr Peak Exploration (12.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
2/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
562.74 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507132 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (97.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
2/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
931.38 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), William G. Timmins |
|
507133 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (97.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
2/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1339.02 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507134 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (97.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
2/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
543.03 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), William G. Timmins |
|
507135 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (97.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
2/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
911.60 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507136 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (97.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
2/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
872.37 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
507247 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
698.82 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507248 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
621.30 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507259 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
252.33 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507260 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
19.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507261 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
620.63 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
507264 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1026.62 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Charnobay/Wells Syndicate |
|
507265 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
542.59 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
507288 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/16/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
426.36 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
507304 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/16/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
388.20 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young / 643990 B.C. Ltd. (partial) (2%) |
![]() |
|
507309 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/16/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
1030.24 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young |
|
508778 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/11/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
775.28 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
508905 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
871.72 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
509015 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/16/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
193.86 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
509017 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/16/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
639.85 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), William G. Timmins (partial) (2.5%) 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
509179 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/17/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
833.23 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
511280 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
4/20/2005 |
2/10/2021 |
588.13 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Foxcorp Holdings Ltd. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Revolution Technologies Inc. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Newmont Goldcorp Corp. (partial) (1%) |
|
512571 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (85%), Starr Peak Exploration (12.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
5/14/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
484.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), William G. Timmins |
|
512739 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/16/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
877.72 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%), Roundtop Exploration Inc. |
|
512795 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (97.5%), Shane Morgan Williams (2.5%) |
5/17/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
155.22 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
512954 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/18/2005 |
2/10/2021 |
607.40 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Foxcorp Holdings Ltd. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Revolution Technologies Inc. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Newmont Goldcorp Corp. (partial) (1%) |
|
512957 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/18/2005 |
2/10/2021 |
528.81 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
513739 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/1/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
484.88 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), William G. Timmins |
|
514441 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/13/2005 |
6/13/2021 |
104.80 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
514442 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/13/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
155.75 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
514446 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/13/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
291.87 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
517260 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/12/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
38.87 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young |
|
517416 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/12/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
58.28 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
517423 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/12/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
252.39 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
517433 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/12/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
19.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
519556 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/31/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
485.01 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
519559 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/31/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
484.79 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
519563 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/31/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
484.60 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
520330 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
9/22/2005 |
2/10/2021 |
78.44 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521241 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
485.66 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young |
|
521242 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/15/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.17 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521329 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.72 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521330 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.84 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521331 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.11 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521332 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.40 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521333 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.63 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521336 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.79 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521337 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.69 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521338 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.69 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521339 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.08 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521340 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.96 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521342 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.75 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521346 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.06 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521348 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.04 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521349 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521350 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
486.94 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521351 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.17 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521352 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.35 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521353 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.35 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521356 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.43 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521357 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
487.19 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521358 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/19/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
428.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521829 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.14 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521839 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.20 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521844 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.43 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521852 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.19 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521872 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.16 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521877 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.45 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521880 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.32 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521881 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
488.65 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
521883 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/2/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
390.78 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
522125 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/8/2005 |
2/28/2030 |
581.01 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Charnobay/Wells Syndicate |
|
528996 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/27/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
466.26 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
529036 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/27/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
19.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
529712 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
330.14 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
529713 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
720.92 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & 643990 B.C. Ltd. (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%), Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
529715 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
835.61 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
529717 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
545.68 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (partial) (2.5%) |
|
529719 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
757.72 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young (partial) (1%), Timothy A. Young / 643990 B.C Ltd. (partial) (2%) |
|
529720 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
603.80 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
529721 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
1615.57 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
529722 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
507.38 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
535526 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/13/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
465.85 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
535671 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/14/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
953.05 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
535855 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/17/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
39.02 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
536691 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/7/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
467.11 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
537354 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/17/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
19.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
541435 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
9/15/2006 |
9/15/2021 |
24.76 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
545967 |
Placer Lease |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/27/2006 |
11/27/2020 |
35.69 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546306 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
331.89 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546307 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
815.89 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546308 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
504.85 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546309 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
1438.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young (partial) (1%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
546310 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
854.59 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young |
|
546311 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
563.12 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young / 643990 B.C. Ltd. (partial) (2%) |
|
546314 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
1299.19 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young / 643990 B.C. Ltd. (partial) (2%), 643990 B.C. Ltd. & Timothy A. Young (partial) (2%) |
|
546315 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
1027.11 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Charnobay/Wells Syndicate |
|
546611 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/5/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
604.62 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546612 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/5/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
719.15 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
546613 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/5/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
663.22 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546614 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/5/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
619.46 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546617 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/5/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
955.51 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Roundtop Exploration Inc. & Estate of Bryan Muloin |
|
546620 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/5/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
954.67 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Roundtop Exploration Inc. & Estate of Bryan Muloin |
|
546722 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/6/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
1147.58 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
546723 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/6/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
702.56 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546724 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/6/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
837.09 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
546725 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/6/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
953.60 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546726 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/6/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
971.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
546727 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/6/2006 |
2/28/2030 |
952.84 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554735 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
484.18 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554737 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
484.18 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554739 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.95 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554740 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.95 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554741 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
484.16 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554742 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554743 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
484.16 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554745 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.70 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554746 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.98 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554747 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
484.12 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554748 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.96 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554749 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.74 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554750 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/20/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
483.99 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
554802 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/21/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
38.71 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
560453 |
Placer Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/11/2007 |
11/15/2020 |
19.43 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
564597 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/15/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
564598 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/15/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
567677 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/9/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
39.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
567678 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/9/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
572001 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/15/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.51 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
572011 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/16/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.51 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
572348 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/21/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.51 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
572437 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/23/2007 |
2/28/2030 |
19.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
573880 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/16/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
38.98 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
577422 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
349.90 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (639940 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2%) |
|
581059 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/12/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
468.39 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Dustin Alsager Rivard (whole) (2%) |
|
592159 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
9/29/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
350.74 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Roundtop Exploration Inc. (partial) (2%) |
|
593162 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/20/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
58.29 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593959 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.28 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593960 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.04 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593961 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.80 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593962 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.79 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593963 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.03 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593965 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.27 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593966 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
466.03 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593967 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
465.87 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593968 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
465.68 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593969 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
465.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593970 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
465.21 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593971 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
466.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593972 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
465.34 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593973 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
387.63 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593974 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
77.64 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593975 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
155.26 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593979 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.22 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593980 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.00 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593981 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.77 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593982 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.62 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593983 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.62 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593984 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.87 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593985 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
484.87 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593986 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
465.72 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593987 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
485.19 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
593988 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
252.34 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
594001 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/7/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
58.18 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
594002 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/7/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
38.80 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
594003 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/7/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
38.81 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
595151 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
116.51 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
595157 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
388.25 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
595164 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
427.12 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
595165 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
116.53 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
595166 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
38.83 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
595167 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
77.68 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
595168 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
58.23 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
596023 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/13/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
77.50 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
596024 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/13/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
464.96 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
596025 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/13/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
58.13 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Douglas Merrick & Harold Merrick (partial) (2%) |
|
596144 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/16/2008 |
2/28/2030 |
350.60 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
598430 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/1/2009 |
3/8/2021 |
97.64 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600139 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
155.27 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600140 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
38.82 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600141 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
19.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600142 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
135.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600143 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
213.54 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600144 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
19.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
600145 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/28/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
77.66 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
606644 |
Placer Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/26/2009 |
11/15/2020 |
97.23 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
624892 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/27/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
116.51 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
624894 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/27/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
38.84 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
624895 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/27/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
19.42 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
625567 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/29/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
19.42 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
667163 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/10/2009 |
2/28/2030 |
77.77 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
675423 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/27/2009 |
2/10/2021 |
489.58 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
675443 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/27/2009 |
2/10/2021 |
489.35 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
675444 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/27/2009 |
2/10/2021 |
450.24 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
675445 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/27/2009 |
2/10/2021 |
469.74 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
675448 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/27/2009 |
2/11/2021 |
469.75 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755342 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
389.34 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755362 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
389.53 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755382 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
467.64 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755402 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
486.70 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755422 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
486.94 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755442 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
486.88 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
755462 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/23/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
467.43 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
780203 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/27/2010 |
2/11/2021 |
19.58 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
780562 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/27/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
193.97 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
835729 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/12/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
448.31 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
835730 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/12/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
487.49 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
835731 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/12/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
487.47 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
835733 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/12/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
390.22 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
835734 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/12/2010 |
2/28/2030 |
487.72 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
837502 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/4/2010 |
2/11/2021 |
156.89 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
838953 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/25/2010 |
2/10/2021 |
392.06 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
838954 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
11/25/2010 |
2/10/2021 |
391.86 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
839402 |
Placer Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
12/1/2010 |
12/31/2020 |
19.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
850212 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
3/31/2011 |
2/11/2021 |
489.54 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
850217 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
3/31/2011 |
2/11/2021 |
176.21 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
853622 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/5/2011 |
2/28/2030 |
116.56 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
854573 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/16/2011 |
2/10/2021 |
489.63 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
855732 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/26/2011 |
2/11/2021 |
391.87 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
856509 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/9/2011 |
2/28/2030 |
407.82 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
856510 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
6/9/2011 |
2/28/2030 |
155.41 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
896709 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
9/13/2011 |
2/28/2030 |
913.22 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Samuel D. Skiber & Timothy A. Young |
|
928311 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/6/2011 |
2/28/2030 |
487.33 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1013933 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
10/23/2012 |
2/11/2021 |
39.18 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1013935 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
10/23/2012 |
2/10/2021 |
39.18 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1014607 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
11/19/2012 |
2/28/2030 |
19.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1017340 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
3/1/2013 |
2/11/2021 |
58.78 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019141 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
274.70 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019143 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
470.94 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019146 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
157.01 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019149 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
137.32 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Foxcorp Holdings Ltd. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Revolution Technologies Inc. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Newmont Goldcorp Corp. (partial) (1%) |
|
1019151 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
294.36 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019154 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
78.47 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019158 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
19.62 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1019172 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
5/2/2013 |
2/11/2021 |
156.93 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Foxcorp Holdings Ltd. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Revolution Technologies Inc. (NOP) (partial) (2.5%), Newmont Goldcorp Corp. (partial) (1%) |
|
1020349 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
6/16/2013 |
2/11/2021 |
293.75 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1020538 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
6/26/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
195.88 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1022111 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
9/5/2013 |
2/10/2021 |
137.15 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1023288 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
10/24/2013 |
2/11/2021 |
78.38 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1027056 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
3/31/2014 |
2/11/2021 |
117.57 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1027057 |
Mineral Claim |
QR |
BGM (100%) |
3/31/2014 |
2/11/2021 |
78.47 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1027058 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
3/31/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
77.66 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1033403 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/16/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
97.64 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1033404 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
4/16/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
136.67 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
|
1028446 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/23/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
19.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1028453 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/23/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
19.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1028454 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/23/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
78.08 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1028464 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
5/23/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
175.33 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1029935 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
7/30/2014 |
2/28/2030 |
19.49 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%), Timothy A. Young (643990 B.C. Ltd.) (partial) (2.5%) |
|
1033303 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
1/11/2015 |
2/28/2030 |
19.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1038243 |
Placer Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
8/28/2015 |
8/26/2021 |
213.66 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1039381 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
10/18/2015 |
2/28/2030 |
19.52 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1042111 |
Placer Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/17/2016 |
10/13/2020 |
174.75 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1042112 |
Placer Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/17/2016 |
10/13/2020 |
58.26 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1042345 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/26/2016 |
2/28/2030 |
1798.94 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1042346 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/26/2016 |
2/28/2030 |
1933.33 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1042347 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/26/2016 |
2/28/2030 |
1932.17 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
|
1042348 |
Mineral Claim |
Cariboo Gold |
BGM (100%) |
2/26/2016 |
2/28/2030 |
1351.80 |
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. (4%) |
![]() |
APPENDIX II - LIST OF PLACER CLAIMS AND LEASES
(as of September 28, 2020)
![]() |
|
TENURE ID |
TENURE DESCRIPTION |
CLAIM NAME |
OWNER 1 NAME |
ISSUE DATE |
GOOD TO DATE |
AREA (HA) |
ROYALTIES |
|
367303 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2/5/1999 |
2/5/2021 |
161.77 |
NA |
|
370373 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/19/1999 |
10/19/2020 |
46.26 |
NA |
|
384442 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5/15/2001 |
5/15/2021 |
254.86 |
NA |
|
394333 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8/19/2002 |
8/19/2021 |
518.80 |
NA |
|
395284 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8/28/2002 |
8/28/2021 |
524.70 |
NA |
|
396850 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1/20/2003 |
1/20/2021 |
271.10 |
NA |
|
401342 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5/16/2003 |
5/16/2021 |
124.55 |
NA |
|
401340 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5/16/2003 |
5/16/2021 |
17.00 |
NA |
|
401442 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5/16/2003 |
5/16/2021 |
282.36 |
NA |
|
404854 |
Lease of Placer Minerals |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/24/2003 |
11/24/2020 |
29.10 |
NA |
|
514441 |
Placer Lease |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6/13/2005 |
6/13/2021 |
104.80 |
NA |
|
541435 |
Placer Lease |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9/15/2006 |
9/15/2021 |
24.76 |
NA |
|
545967 |
Placer Lease |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/27/2006 |
11/27/2020 |
35.69 |
NA |
|
560453 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
STOUTS |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6/11/2007 |
11/15/2020 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
606644 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
ST. LAWRENCE |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6/26/2009 |
11/15/2020 |
97.23 |
NA |
|
839402 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
JUKES |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12/1/2010 |
12/31/2020 |
19.41 |
NA |
|
1038243 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
MUCHO ORO XI |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8/28/2015 |
8/26/2021 |
213.66 |
NA |
|
1042112 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2/17/2016 |
10/13/2020 |
58.26 |
NA |
|
1042111 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2/17/2016 |
10/13/2020 |
174.75 |
NA |
|
1045734 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
DEVO 1 |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8/3/2016 |
8/3/2021 |
38.80 |
NA |
|
1046530 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9/8/2016 |
9/8/2021 |
19.40 |
NA |
|
1048024 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/24/2016 |
11/24/2020 |
19.40 |
NA |
|
1049379 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1/22/2017 |
1/22/2021 |
38.82 |
NA |
|
1049537 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1/27/2017 |
1/27/2021 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
1050158 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2/20/2017 |
2/20/2021 |
19.42 |
NA |
|
1052277 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
WILLIAMS CREEK |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5/31/2017 |
5/31/2021 |
19.41 |
NA |
![]() |
|
TENURE ID |
TENURE DESCRIPTION |
CLAIM NAME |
OWNER 1 NAME |
ISSUE DATE |
GOOD TO DATE |
AREA (HA) |
ROYALTIES |
|
1052361 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6/4/2017 |
6/4/2021 |
38.80 |
NA |
|
1052637 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
LOWHEE |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6/18/2017 |
6/18/2021 |
19.42 |
NA |
|
1055510 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
BGM 1 |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/13/2017 |
10/13/2020 |
38.80 |
NA |
|
1055674 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/20/2017 |
10/20/2020 |
19.42 |
NA |
|
1057397 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1/2/2018 |
10/18/2020 |
174.78 |
NA |
|
1058336 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2/6/2018 |
2/6/2021 |
19.42 |
NA |
|
1058337 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2/6/2018 |
2/6/2021 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
1063142 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
MCARTHUR GULCH |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9/16/2018 |
9/16/2021 |
19.41 |
NA |
|
1063186 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
G&J RICH SLIVER |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9/19/2018 |
5/19/2021 |
38.83 |
NA |
|
1063528 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
G&J GULCH 2 |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/2/2018 |
10/2/2021 |
38.85 |
NA |
|
1063975 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
HIGH GRADE WELLS |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/22/2018 |
10/22/2020 |
19.41 |
NA |
|
1064017 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/24/2018 |
10/24/2020 |
19.42 |
NA |
|
1064016 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/24/2018 |
10/24/2020 |
19.41 |
NA |
|
1064018 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/24/2018 |
10/24/2020 |
19.41 |
NA |
|
1067277 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
3/17/2019 |
3/17/2021 |
19.41 |
NA |
|
1068909 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6/4/2019 |
6/4/2021 |
58.31 |
NA |
|
1072073 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
GOLD RUSH |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10/23/2019 |
7/17/2022 |
58.23 |
NA |
|
1072331 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
58.32 |
NA |
|
1072332 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
1072334 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
1072335 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.44 |
NA |
|
1072336 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.44 |
NA |
|
1072337 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
1072338 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.43 |
NA |
|
1072333 |
Placer Cell Title Submission |
|
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11/1/2019 |
11/1/2020 |
19.44 |
NA |
![]() |
APPENDIX III - CROWN-GRANTED MINERAL CLAIMS
(as of September 28, 2020)
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-329-411 |
PD38 |
6294/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.2 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-307-743 |
PC58828 |
3299/503 |
Charles John Seymour Baker |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.72 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-313 |
PD31 |
6287/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.9 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-330 |
PD32 |
6288/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.85 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-356 |
PD33 |
6289/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
4.58 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-372 |
PD34 |
6290/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.1 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-381 |
PD35 |
6291/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.66 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-343-634 |
PD456 |
2683/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.56 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-402 |
PD37 |
6293/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9.07 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-306-992 |
PC58824 |
126/47 |
The British Columbia Milling and Mining Company (Limited) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.31 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-437 |
PD39 |
6295/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.7 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-342-778 |
PD348 |
6433/635 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.05 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-342-824 |
PD349 |
6434/635 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.98 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
016-016-114 |
15203M |
4609/717 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5.41 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
016-562-895 |
13459M |
2685/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.95 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
016-563-051 |
13460M |
2686/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.49 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-329-399 |
PD36 |
6292/633 |
William A. Simkins |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.15 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-812 |
13456M |
2682/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.89 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
010-422-862 |
PB12572 |
2683/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.56 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
004-056-582 |
BB1960681 |
41F/34 |
Unknown (Pre-Tantalis) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5.59 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
013-724-533 |
PC18150 |
8910/760 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9.63 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-685 |
13451M |
2677/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.61 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-723 |
13452M |
2678/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.88 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-766 |
13453M |
2679/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.9 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-307-425 |
PC58826 |
3302/504 |
Charles John Seymour Baker |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.73 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-804 |
13455M |
2681/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.21 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-307-000 |
PC58825 |
3301/504 |
Charles John Seymour Baker |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.69 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-839 |
13458M |
2684/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.09 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-292-045 |
12368M |
790/678 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.9 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-292-096 |
19027M |
8396/754 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2.57 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-292-274 |
9758M |
6436/635 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.54 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-292-347 |
9756M |
6437/635 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.75 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-292-363 |
9757M |
6435/635 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.86 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-307-751 |
PC58829 |
3300/503 |
Charles John Seymour Baker |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.76 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-291-791 |
13454M |
2680/697 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.22 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
015-307-727 |
PC58827 |
3298/503 |
Charles John Seymour Baker |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.8 |
Osisko (4%) and Franco Nevada Corporation (3%) |
|
018-856-870 |
CA801713 |
4215/55 |
Ada Jane Bruce Mason |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
WHARF RESOURCES LTD. |
0.19 |
Osisko (4%) - pending registration |
|
013-699-202 |
PC17190 |
6210/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.15 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-307-603 |
PC58843 |
2085/130 |
The Oriole Syndicate Limited |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.12 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-326 |
PC17193 |
8323/654 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6.32 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-288 |
PC17192 |
5448/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
3.97 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-253 |
PC17191 |
420/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
3.85 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-181 |
PC17189 |
6209/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.73 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
013-699-172 |
PC17205 |
6208/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-148 |
PC17188 |
6207/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.37 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
008-222-762 |
PD44700 |
6206/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
WELLS HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.09 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
016-292-987 |
PD30176 |
5433/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.05 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-086-902 |
PT5234, PC16247 |
30F |
John Lauyon, Michael Driscoll and William P. Williams |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2.16 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-307-654 |
PC58844 |
2088/130 |
The Oriole Syndicate Limited |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11.99 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-087-054 |
PT5232, PC16245 |
39F |
Robert Johus and George Henry Johus |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.53 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-289-800 |
W21851 |
211/673 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6.67 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-287-131 |
U40874 |
6211/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.73 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-286-649 |
S28511 |
3925/510 |
Laurent Muller |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.68 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-194-183 |
U40877 |
5434/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.92 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-194-167 |
U40878 |
5435/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.57 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-194-141 |
U40875 |
5437/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-194-116 |
U40879 |
5438/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.94 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-194-027 |
U40880 |
5440/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.76 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-985 |
U40881 |
5441/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.04 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
008-218-722 |
Y31875 |
6206/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.61 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-307-662 |
PC58845 |
2087/130 |
The Oriole Syndicate Limited |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.27 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-652 |
PC17203 |
422/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.84 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-740 |
PC17208 |
5974/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.22 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-731 |
PC17207 |
5973/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9.81 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-715 |
PC17206 |
5972/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.04 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-367 |
PC17223 |
5312/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.56 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-162 |
PC17222 |
428/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.04 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-903 |
PC17221 |
427/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.57 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
013-699-822 |
PC17220 |
426/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.05 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-784 |
PC17219 |
425/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.05 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-733 |
PC17218 |
424/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.9 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-086-872 |
PT5233, PC16246 |
20F/34 |
Hilaire Molleur, Angelo Pendola, Olivier D'Arpentigny and Alexanfder Garant |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9.55 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-695 |
PC17204 |
423/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.91 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
014-385-686 |
CA3322189 |
5439/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.79 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-598 |
PC17202 |
421/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.56 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-563 |
PC17201 |
6527/636 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.74 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-539 |
PC17200 |
6218/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.83 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-491 |
PC17199 |
6217/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.99 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-440 |
PC17198 |
6216/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.77 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-415 |
PC17197 |
6215/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.81 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
013-699-393 |
PC17196 |
6214/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.36 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-385 |
PC17195 |
6213/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.15 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-369 |
PC17194 |
6212/633 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.57 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-087-097 |
PT5235, PC16248 |
38F |
William Sauders and Edward Collins Neufelder |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.29 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-699-709 |
PC17217 |
461/675 |
Cariboo Amalgamated Gold Mines Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.55 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-942 |
U40885 |
5445/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.17 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-417 |
PC54221 |
6966/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-450 |
PC54222 |
6967/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.9 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-557 |
PC54228 |
6794/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.84 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-590 |
PC54229 |
6795/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.54 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-697 |
PC54230 |
6712/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.17 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-151-727 |
PC54231 |
6796/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.88 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-794 |
PC54232 |
6797/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.91 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-859 |
PC54223 |
6957/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.66 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-977 |
U40882 |
5442/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.48 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
008-801-908 |
CA3322180 |
35/36 |
The British Columbia Milling and Mining Company (Limited) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.36 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-951 |
U40884 |
5444/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.11 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-093 |
PC54218 |
6963/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.23 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-934 |
U40886 |
5446/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.17 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-845 |
U40887 |
5447/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.64 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-152-405 |
PC54217 |
6792/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.85 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-152-367 |
PC54216 |
6791/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.98 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-152-341 |
PC54215 |
6790/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.87 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-152-294 |
PC54214 |
6789/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.9 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-152-103 |
PC54213 |
6788/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.08 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-152-049 |
PC54227 |
6968/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.99 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-999 |
PC54226 |
6962/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.91 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-930 |
PC54225 |
6961/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.08 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-193-969 |
U40883 |
5443/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.95 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-135-021 |
W21838 |
9416/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.32 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-905 |
PC54224 |
6960/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.8 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
014-385-759 |
CA3322179 |
35/36 |
The British Columbia Milling and Mining Company (Limited) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.09 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
014-982-013 |
CA3322181 |
35/36 |
The British Columbia Milling and Mining Company (Limited) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.27 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-038-688 |
W21719 |
3268/154 |
John Pinkerton |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.8 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-133-702 |
W21889 |
6802/639 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.49 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-133-991 |
W21853 |
9412/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.91 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-134-792 |
W21849 |
9413/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.95 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-134-806 |
W21842 |
9411/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.34 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-134-911 |
W21839 |
6959/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
3.77 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-134-954 |
W21843 |
9418/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
4.93 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-301 |
PC54220 |
6965/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-135-004 |
W21840 |
9415/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11.78 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-174 |
PC54219 |
6964/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.07 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-135-039 |
W21854 |
9414/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.28 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-135-055 |
W21837 |
6969/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.01 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
013-700-758 |
PC17209 |
5975/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.37 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-150-470 |
PC54208 |
6793/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.08 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-104 |
PC17233 |
5978/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.36 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-150-640 |
PC54209 |
6798/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.3 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-000 |
PC54210 |
6799/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.59 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-018 |
PC54211 |
6800/638 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.9 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-151-026 |
PC54212 |
6801/639 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.89 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
014-385-643 |
CA3322188 |
5436/625 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.88 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-134-971 |
W21841 |
9417/665 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.84 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-282-155 |
15499M |
4883/719 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.23 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-074 |
PC17225 |
5315/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.51 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-384-586 |
12073M |
382/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus and Thomas Albert Blair |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.2 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-292-509 |
12075M |
386/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.07 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-292-312 |
11510M |
9496/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.48 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-292-304 |
11956M |
214/673 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.35 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-291-537 |
12080M |
383/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus and Thomas Albert Blair |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.87 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-291-481 |
12079M |
389/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.63 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-291-448 |
12078M |
384/674 |
Thomas Albert Blair |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.06 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-291-413 |
12077M |
388/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.38 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-201 |
11508M |
9493/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.84 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-289-681 |
CA4347921 |
385/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
8.2 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-243 |
PD15664 |
9498/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus and Albert James Blair |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.87 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-282-147 |
15497M |
4881/719 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.07 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-282-104 |
15496M |
4880/719 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.09 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-282-082 |
15495M |
4879/719 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.99 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-282-074 |
15494M |
4878/719 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.02 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-724-631 |
PC18148 |
215/673 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11.77 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-724-541 |
PC18149 |
216/673 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.34 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-724-509 |
PC18151 |
4882/719 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.12 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-056-787 |
CA4347919 |
4B/35 |
Unknown (Pre-Tantalis) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5.14 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-056-752 |
CA4347922 |
32F |
Lewis Wintrip |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
32.97 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-056-736 |
CA6623292 |
1B/35 |
Unknown (Pre-Tantalis) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
4.85 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-291-391 |
12076M |
387/674 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.7 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-361-225 |
PD717 |
1192/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.55 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-282-163 |
31938M |
8766/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5.27 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-360-211 |
PD703 |
8765/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.74 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-360-202 |
PD704 |
8764/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.6 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-360-172 |
PD705 |
8763/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.24 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-359-891 |
PD706 |
8762/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.26 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-359-786 |
PD707 |
8761/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.74 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-361-403 |
PD712 |
1187/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.22 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-361-373 |
PD713 |
1188/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
2.84 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-361-322 |
PD714 |
1189/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.85 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-197 |
11509M |
9495/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.86 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-361-233 |
PD716 |
1191/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.18 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
008-218-803 |
CA3393918 |
5313/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
21.54 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-360-971 |
PD718 |
1193/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.12 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-871 |
PC17215 |
8767/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.73 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
004-078-632 |
FB503371 |
5F/34 |
John Bowron, Daniel Carey, Andrew Fletcher, Wesley Hall, William Jeffares, John McAlister, Donald McEwen, Archibald McNaughton, John Munroe, Alexander Munroe and Felix Neufelder |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
16.26 |
Osisko (4%) - pending registration |
|
004-078-608 |
CA5682814 |
35F/34 |
Robert Druikall |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
22.91 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-324 |
PD15661 |
9497/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.9 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-278 |
PD15660 |
9494/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.1 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-235 |
PD15663 |
9498/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus and Thomas Albert Blair |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.9 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-614-941 |
PC17398 |
213/673 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.58 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-375 |
PD15662 |
9497/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.92 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-939-251 |
PD15660 |
9494/665 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, MINISTER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HERITAGE CONSERVATION ACT |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
12.07 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
015-361-276 |
PD715 |
1190/682 |
Cariboo Consolidated Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.28 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-906 |
PC17231 |
5323/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.29 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-139 |
PC17239 |
5982/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.16 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-121 |
PC17235 |
5980/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.07 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-112 |
PC17234 |
5979/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.26 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
018-685-056 |
CA6190280 |
1036/97 |
Archibald McIntyre |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
WHARF RESOURCES LTD. / HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
0.15 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-091 |
PC17232 |
5977/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-134-008 |
W21852 |
6958/640 |
The Cariboo Gold Quartz Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5.12 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-066 |
PC17251 |
5989/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6.27 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-058 |
PC17250 |
5988/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.81 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-965 |
PC17248 |
5987/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.87 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-056-710 |
CA6623323 |
1F/34 |
George Truman, George W. Robinson, Felix Neufelder, A. Coutts, John Jordan, Frederick Steritry and P. Manetta |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.65 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-914 |
PC17247 |
5320/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
14.25 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
013-708-198 |
PC17244 |
5985/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-892 |
PC17229 |
5319/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.69 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
015-332-438 |
8407M |
1036/97 |
Archibald McIntyre |
THE LOWHEE MINING COMPANY LIMITED (NON-PERSONAL LIABILITY) (FORFEITED TO CROWN) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
83.25 |
Osisko (4%) - pending registration |
|
004-933-206 |
CA71100 |
2517/101 |
Mary Agnes Mason (transferred to Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd.) |
CLIFFORD CECIL COLLINS |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.76 |
Osisko (4%) - pending registration |
|
014-997-347 |
CA4769286 |
2517/101 |
Mary Agnes Mason (transferred to Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd.) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.64 |
Osisko (4%) - pending registration |
|
013-707-884 |
PC17227 |
5317/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.43 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-876 |
PC17226 |
5316/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.69 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-868 |
PC17224 |
5314/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.21 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-850 |
PC17230 |
5322/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
0.19 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-880 |
PC17216 |
8768/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.85 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-863 |
PC17214 |
8772/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
13.66 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-847 |
PC17213 |
8771/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.93 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-839 |
PC17212 |
8770/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
19.17 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-812 |
PC17211 |
8769/858 |
Barkerville Mining Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.42 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-707-922 |
PC17228 |
5318/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.77 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
004-078-543 |
CA3322186 |
2F/34 |
William Andrew Meacham and Ithiel Blake Mason |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
9.73 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-700-791 |
PC17210 |
5976/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.88 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-086-627 |
CA3393199 |
2B/35 |
Unknown (Pre-Tantalis) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
NONE |
8.92 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
017-589-517 |
CA4545743 |
2517/101 |
Mary Agnes Mason (transferred to Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd.) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
1.99 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
026-025-906 |
BB1991819 |
2517/101 |
Mary Agnes Mason (transferred to Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd.) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
WHARF RESOURCES LTD. |
0.16 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
014-385-732 |
CA3322183 |
2517/101 |
Mary Agnes Mason (transferred to Lowhee Mining Co. Ltd.) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
27.5 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
014-385-741 |
CA3322182 |
535/92 |
The Oriole Syndicate Limited |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.14 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
006-411-193 |
Y6522 |
2187/792 |
Dalby B. Morkill |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.87 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
006-411-070 |
Y6521 |
2186/792 |
Dalby B. Morkill |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
006-410-987 |
Y6520 |
2185/792 |
Dalby B. Morkill |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11.18 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-078-578 |
CA3322185 |
17F/34 |
William Boswell Steele, Thomas Bell, Angelo Pendola, Peter Manetta, Joseph Huot de St. Laurent, William H. Thompson, Olivier d'Arpentigny, Nicolas Cunio, James Boyce, John McLean, Angus McPherson and Isaac Birch Fisher |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD., GOLDEN CARIBOO RESOURCES LTD. |
NONE |
39.77 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-163 |
PC17241 |
5983/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.13 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
004-078-560 |
CA332187 |
42F |
Philip Richard Taylor Leacy and John Butts |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
4.51 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-180 |
PC17243 |
5984/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
18.75 |
Osisko (4%) |
![]() |
|
PID |
Title # |
Crown Grant # |
Original Crown Grant Issued To |
Registered Owner in Fee Simple |
Undersurface Rights Registered Owner |
Area (ha) |
Royalties |
|
006-787-592 |
CA3322184 |
4215/55 |
Ada Jane Bruce Mason |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
WHARF RESOURCES LTD. |
0.42 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-201 |
PC17245 |
5986/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
5.1 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-228 |
PC17237 |
5320/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
4.08 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-023 |
PC17249 |
5988/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
6.48 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-155 |
PC17240 |
5983/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.48 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-171 |
PC17242 |
5984/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
7.83 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
017-164-923 |
PC17236 |
5981/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
20.91 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-236 |
PC17238 |
5321/624 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
15.72 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-708-210 |
PC17246 |
5986/630 |
Island Mountain Mines Company Limited (Non-Personal Liability) |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
11.96 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
013-614-959 |
24187M |
213/673 |
Frederick James Tregillus |
WILLIAMS CREEK GOLD LTD. (FORFEITED TO CROWN) |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
10.52 |
Osisko (4%) |
|
006-411-215 |
Y6523 |
2188/792 |
Dalby B. Morkill |
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA |
BARKERVILLE GOLD MINES LTD. |
17.61 |
Osisko (4%) |
| NI 43-101 Technical Report – Cariboo Gold Project – OCTOBER 2020 | 222 |

To: Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd.
1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 300
Montréal, Québec H3B 2S2
And to: Osisko Development Corp. (formerly, Barolo Ventures Corp.)
1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 300
Montréal, Québec H3B 2S2
And to: British Columbia Securities Commission
Alberta Securities Commission
Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan, Securities Division
Manitoba Securities Commission
Ontario Securities Commission
Autorité des marchés financiers (Québec)
Financial and Consumer Services Commission, New Brunswick
Nova Scotia Securities Commission
Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador
Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island
And to: TSX Venture Exchange
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Christine Beausoleil, P. Geo, (OGQ No. 656, PGO No. 2958, EGBC, No. 36156) employed with InnovExplo Inc., do hereby consent to the public filing of the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada" and dated October 5, 2020 (with an effective date of October 5, 2020) (the "Technical Report") with the securities regulatory authorities referred to above and on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) under the issuer profiles of Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd and Osisko Development Corp. (together, the "Issuers") and with the TSX Venture Exchange, which Technical Report is being filed in support of a press release dated October 5, 2020 (the "Press Release"). I acknowledge that the Technical Report will become part of the public record of the Issuers.
I, the undersigned, consent to the use of extracts from or a summary of, the Technical Report in the Press Release. I, the undersigned, hereby confirm that I have read the Press Release and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the above-mentioned Technical Report for which I am responsible.
Date this 17th day of November 2020
(Original signed)
Christine Beausoleil, P.Geo.

To: Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd.
1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 300
Montréal, Québec H3B 2S2
And to: Osisko Development Corp. (formerly, Barolo Ventures Corp.)
1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 300
Montréal, Québec H3B 2S2
And to: British Columbia Securities Commission
Alberta Securities Commission
Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan, Securities Division
Manitoba Securities Commission
Ontario Securities Commission
Autorité des marchés financiers (Québec)
Financial and Consumer Services Commission, New Brunswick
Nova Scotia Securities Commission
Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador
Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island
And to: TSX Venture Exchange
CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON
I, Carl Pelletier, P. Geo, (OGQ No. 384, PGO No. 1713, EGBC No. 43167 and NAPEG No. L4160), employed with InnovExplo Inc., do hereby consent to the public filing of the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report and Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cariboo Gold Project, British Columbia, Canada" and dated October 5, 2020 (with an effective date of October 5, 2020) (the "Technical Report") with the securities regulatory authorities referred to above and on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) under the issuer profiles of Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd and Osisko Development Corp. (together, the "Issuers") and with the TSX Venture Exchange, which Technical Report is being filed in support of a press release dated October 5, 2020 (the "Press Release"). I acknowledge that the Technical Report will become part of the public record of the Issuers.
I, the undersigned, consent to the use of extracts from or a summary of, the Technical Report in the Press Release. I, the undersigned, hereby confirm that I have read the Press Release and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the above-mentioned Technical Report for which I am responsible.
Date this 17th day of November 2020
___(Original signed)_____
Carl Pelletier, P.Geo.




