Polaris Inc. Q3 FY2022 Earnings Call

Thank you, Chuck, and good morning or afternoon, everyone. I'm J.C. Weigelt, Vice President of Investor Relations at Polaris. Thank you for joining us for our 2022 Third Quarter Earnings Call. We will reference a slide presentation today, which is accessible on our website at ir.polaris.com. Joining me on the call today are Michael Speetzen, our Chief Executive Officer; and Bob Mack, our Chief Financial Officer. Both have prepared remarks summarizing the quarter and our expectations for 2022 as well as some early thoughts on 2023, then we'll take some questions. During the call, we will be discussing various topics, which should be considered forward-looking for the purpose of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projections in the forward-looking statements. You can refer to our 2021 10-K for additional details regarding risks and uncertainties. All references to third quarter actual results and 2022 guidance are for our continuing operations and are reported on an adjusted non-GAAP basis unless otherwise noted. Please refer to our Reg G reconciliation schedules at the end of the presentation for the GAAP to non-GAAP adjustments. Now, I will turn the call over to Mike Speetzen. Go ahead, Mike.

Thanks, J.C. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I want to start off with our third quarter results, which reflect record quarterly revenue of $2.3 billion and while not a record adjusted EPS of $3.25, grew nicely at 64%. This is a testament to the hard work and dedication of our global teams from supply chain to sales, corporate functions, and manufacturing. Everyone played a role in achieving these results. Margins improved during the quarter with positive contributions from price and volume, offsetting higher year-over-year costs. Both price and volume should continue to play a role in expanding margins as we exit the year. While the retail story is mixed for the quarter with retail sales down 8% year-over-year, our premium products across utility and recreation and Off-Road continue to see stable demand. In addition, snowmobile demand has been strong as we enter the riding season. We did experience some softness in RZR and ATV with more pronounced softness in models that tend to be more price sensitive and/or more leisure-based. Pontoon retail declined low double digits due to continued supply chain constraints. Our 8% retail growth in On-Road was driven by Indian motorcycles and a high mix of rework to ship a significant number of bikes that have been waiting for specific parts. As shared last quarter, striking the right balance of inventory at our dealers is a key focus for us. We are closely monitoring inventory levels to enable dealers to have an optimal level of support for customer demand as the supply chain continues to improve. In fact, there are a handful of models where we believe we are close to optimal inventory levels already, such as ATVs and several off-road vehicles in our recreation category. All in, our strong third quarter results allow us to maintain our full year adjusted EPS guidance and move to the upper end of our sales guidance. As we look at demand, the story has become more mixed. Polaris ORV retail was down sequentially by 4%. This was mainly driven by softness in the recreational space. Drilling down to more specific areas of softness, we are seeing some customers be more price sensitive on value models, which is consistent with last quarter. This impacted some RZR and ATV sales. Across the industry, the utility segment continues to have stable demand indicators, while the recreational space seems to be slowing. Our premium models such as RZR Pro, Turbo R, and RANGER NorthStar remain favorites with customers. We're also seeing customer appeal for vehicles with the latest RIDE COMMAND+ connected technology. As this continues to be an area where we have out-innovated the competition. As anticipated, the backlog of pre-sold units is declining as shipments improve, and that was certainly the case this quarter. Pre-sold units as a percentage of retail hit their peak last year at 75% in the third quarter. And this year, during the third quarter, they are trending near 40% with the decline being driven by a mix of improved availability and softening demand. A few other points on demand include pre-sold order cancellation rates are staying low across our business. We continue to see a steady mix of customers new to Polaris, which is consistent with historical trends, while both short- and long-term repurchase rates remain elevated or within the historic range. Additionally, PG&A attachment rates are at or near record levels, indicating that customers are looking to upgrade their vehicles with higher-margin accessories. Concurrently, parts and oil service kits had a record quarter, pointing to strong riding trends. Another bright spot is the continued consumer interest in getting outside, as evidenced by organic search for industry terms staying well ahead of 2019. This level of elevated organic search gives us confidence that this is the time to increase spending on demand creation. The top end of the customer funnel is healthy, and we believe that investing in demand creation can amplify organic interest and increase the number of leads at the bottom of the funnel. As this process can take time, we've made the decision to invest in growth and are increasing our spend on demand creation in the fourth quarter. Broadly speaking, we continue to track how the consumer is faring with pressure from rising interest rates, inflation, and higher gas prices. While we've not seen drastic changes in consumer behavior due to these factors, we will continue to closely monitor consumer behavior and react accordingly. We also weigh these dynamics with the fact that our average consumer is affluent, owning their own home and belonging to dual-income households. Importantly, approximately 60% of our off-road business is in the utility space as well as the commercial and defense sectors, where the purchase is not characterized as leisure or discretionary. We believe this part of the business is more insulated from external factors impacting consumer buying patterns. We'll continue to be vigilant in monitoring these metrics and will remain agile as we see shifts in consumer demand trends. So by segment, let me wrap up our thoughts on demand. In Off-Road, there is a clear delineation between utility and recreation. Demand indicators remain stable in utility, while recreation is softening with pronounced moderation in the value segment. In On-Road, we had a very strong Q3, and we're able to ship a high percentage of rework bikes. Dealer inventory seems to be in a healthier spot, and we believe we are closer to a normal operating environment. As we enter the traditionally slower winter season, we expect to see a seasonally driven softening in demand. For Marine, demand at the entry and premium levels continues to be healthy, while we are seeing demand slow in the middle of the lineup. Similar to motorcycles, we do see the industry is moving closer to a normal seasonal environment, and with healthier dealer inventory levels, we expect seasonal weakness as we finish the year. As discussed last quarter, filling the channel remains one of the biggest opportunities for us in the near to medium term. We made progress in the third quarter given improvements in the supply chain and expect this to continue as we progress through the fourth quarter and into next year. With the progress made this quarter, we see inventory down approximately 50% compared to 2019. We believe an optimal level of inventory represents an approximate 1.5x increase from current inventory levels, which we estimate could total almost $400 million to refill the channel to this new optimal level of inventory. We've seen recent evidence that where we can supply product, we can gain share. That was evident in Indian Motorcycles and RZR during the third quarter and is playing out in October for ATVs as we had heavy ATV shipments in the last couple of weeks of the third quarter. Given an improving supply chain and recent softness in retail, we expect this channel refill opportunity to last through the fourth quarter and into early next year, but the exact timing remains uncertain. The Utility segment remains our greatest near-term opportunity as the supply chain improves, given lower dealer inventory levels, coupled with continued consumer demand. Moving to some of our newest rider-driven innovations announced recently for our 2023 model year lineups. We continue to push forward with industry-first technologies, next-level performance, and features that deliver for our customers. For RANGER, our NorthStar Trail Boss edition is packed with new upgrades, specifically designed to meet the demands of hard-working consumers. The Polaris RZR lineup introduced new color, audio, lighting, and tire options to allow our customers to make their statement when riding their own industry-leading RZR. Lastly, on Off-Road, we announced that RIDE COMMAND+ will come standard in all 2023 RANGER XP 1000 NorthStar editions and is available as an add-on accessory in several 2023 RANGER, RZR, and ATV models. A first in the industry, RIDE COMMAND+ uses connected vehicle technology to create a more seamless ownership and riding experience through features like vehicle health monitoring and remote location services. The technology also allows us to provide users with over-the-air updates, meaning our team can roll out new benefits as soon as they're ready. We've already shared that location alerts, post-ride report, and group ride plus are new features that will be available on RIDE COMMAND+ later this year. This platform continues to elevate our position in connected vehicles to deliver the best customer experience. In Marine, Godfrey Pontoons launched the Mighty G built from the ground up to optimize for electric propulsion, while also being compatible with a more traditional gas-powered engine. The Mighty G is the ultimate entry into Pontoon and boating, providing plenty of room for passengers while delivering a highly maneuverable and comfortable ride. Hurricane announced the new SunDeck 2600, offering over 26 feet, which will be one of the largest deck boats in the Hurricane lineup. The versatility of this boat is unmatched, providing power and performance for an exhilarating time whether it be tow sports, fishing, or leisurely cruise. As you can see, Polaris continues to lead the way by powering the passion and pioneering new possibilities for all those who play, work, and think outside. I'll now turn it over to Bob who will summarize our third quarter performance as well as our expectations for the remainder of the year.

Thanks, Mike, and good morning or afternoon to everyone on the call today. Looking at the quarter, it was great to see record sales and near-record adjusted EPS in what continues to be a very dynamic market. Sales benefited from strong volume and price, offsetting amplified FX headwinds. In spite of the dramatic foreign currency fluctuations, international sales were up 10%, driven by strength in EMEA and Latin America, while Asia Pacific saw modest declines. Total PG&A revenue in the quarter was up 17% year-over-year, achieving a new quarterly record, driven by strong attachment rates and parts sales. Adjusted EBITDA margin was up 153 basis points to 13.7%, driven by strong pricing, higher shipment volume, and cost containment. These positives more than offset higher warranty costs and higher-than-expected FX headwinds. Supply chain cost premiums decreased sequentially, but remained a cost headwind on a quarter-over-quarter basis. Below operating profit, interest expense continued to tick up given higher rates and debt levels. We were opportunistic with share repurchases and bought 1.7 million shares in the quarter. We remain committed to executing the share buyback levels included within our guidance, subject to market and other conditions. Turning to our segments. Let's start with Off-Road. Sales of $1.7 billion were up 33% relative to last year. Whole goods were up 38% and PG&A was up 18%, with the variance made up of whole goods price. Adjusted gross margins were up 340 basis points. Pricing and higher shipment volumes had a positive impact on sales and margin, offsetting increased supply chain cost premiums, warranty expenses, and FX headwinds. Looking at retail performance, we were down high single digits in North America with better performance in side-by-side versus ATVs. We believe the industry was up low single digits, thus pointing to share loss in the quarter. Breaking out the recreational ORV business, which includes RZR and Youth, we believe we continue to hold share with strength in the wide-open and crossover subsegments. In the Utility segment, which includes RANGER and ATV, we lost shares; shipments continued to be constrained by supply chain challenges. On a 12-month rolling average, we estimate ORV share was down approximately 3.5 points. We still believe share shifts in this environment are the result of component availability and decisions around product production priority such as prioritizing less contented value product versus complex premium product and not the result of the launch of new products by competitors. While demand trends are mixed, we do see an opportunity to gain share with increased shipment volumes. In particular, we continue to see strong demand and opportunities for share gains in our utility segment and commercial businesses, driven in large part by RANGER as the supply chain eases. For reference, over 60% of our sales mix in Off-Road is made up of our utility business, plus commercial and government and defense. We think of each of these businesses as more resilient and less discretionary. Our ability to increase shipments and serve these customers should position us well as we move through Q4 and into 2023. Switching to On-Road now. Sales of $334 million were up 30% versus last year with whole goods up 32% and PG&A up 17%. Again, the main variance between whole goods and PG&A was price. Remember that our On-Road segment includes a mix of international revenue, which saw meaningful pressure from FX. An improving supply chain helped increase shipments meaningfully on a sequential basis, leading to volume leverage and share gains for both Indian Motorcycles and Slingshot. Margin was up 293 basis points and could have been even higher than that if not for a substantial FX headwind, which is expected to continue. Demand trends remain stable across a number of indicators. Indian motorcycle retail in the quarter was up high single digits in North America versus the industry down low single digits. Looking at share on a 12-month rolling basis, we believe share down 1% due to the strength we saw in the third quarter. The On-Road team continues to execute at a high level, and it was great to see the margin improvement despite the FX headwinds. The combination of a strong product portfolio and strong execution sets the segment up for future success in share gains. Moving to our Marine segment. Sales of $260 million were up 42%. Shipment volume was the largest driver, followed by price and mix. Similar to last quarter, Marine grew shipment volumes by over 20% year-over-year. The industry is beginning to return to a normal level of seasonality with demand slowing at this time of year. In addition, dealer inventory continues to right size, but remains 25% below 2019 levels. North American retail was down low double digits for Pontoons, and we believe the industry was up low double digits. We believe this share loss was largely attributable to supply chain challenges. On a 12-month rolling average view, we believe our share was down approximately 4 points versus the industry. Margin was down 91 basis points, reflecting a difficult comp; however, strong pricing helped partially offset supply chain inefficiency costs. Summing up our third quarter performance by segment, easing supply chain challenges improved our ability to manufacture and ship product. We believe our teams are well positioned to finish the year strong, and we are investing in the future. As Mike said, we are closely watching demand trends and have yet to see material shifts in consumer behavior, but are tracking softness in recreational Off-Road and possibly a return to normal seasonality across the portfolio. On-Road trends remain encouraging and align well with specific measures we took earlier in the year to improve component availability. We expect demand creation spend to increase during the fourth quarter as we work to stimulate the top end of our funnel, which will be more pronounced in our Off-Road segment. Pricing is expected to remain a positive contributor to margin in the near term as well as declining year-over-year commodity and logistics costs. Moving to our financial position, we continue to expect 2022 will be a strong cash generation year with both operating cash flow and free cash flow well above 2021 levels. In Q3, we generated $179 million in operating cash flow. Our capital deployment priorities have not changed. We continue to focus on high-return organic investments, dividends, and opportunistic share repurchases. During the quarter, we bought back $206 million worth of Polaris stock, bringing our year-to-date repurchase amount to $379 million. We continue to view our stock as undervalued, subject to market and other conditions, and view these price levels as an opportunistic entry point. Looking at cash, we believe there are a couple of main drivers to help improve our cash flow generation profile. The first is an improving supply chain that should allow us to ramp production to consume raw materials and complete and ship our rework inventory to dealers. We started to see this phenomenon in the quarter, especially in On-Road where they worked through a good portion of rework. Second, the pricing actions taken throughout 2022 have provided a cash lift. We view our balance sheet and financial position as a competitive strength as it allows us to invest in our business for the long term while also providing the flexibility to deploy excess cash to generate strong returns for our shareholders. Turning to our updated full year guidance expectations. Most of the changes here are a function of narrowing our ranges due to the fact that we are nine months into the year. Sales guidance has been narrowed to the upper end of our original range and now stands at 15% to 16% growth. Within that, we did move Off-Road to the upper end of the range due to an improving supply chain leading to increased shipments. We also anticipate strong snow shipments in Q4 as the season ramps. We lowered our outlook for On-Road due to increased FX headwinds. Note, this segment has the greatest percentage of business with international exposure. For Marine, we raised our outlook due to their ability to increase shipments and strong price. Adjusted EPS from continuing operations is still expected to grow 11% to 14%. While we are more comfortable with the middle to upper end of the range, recent movements in FX have resulted in increased headwinds, and further pressure could negatively impact our EPS assumptions. Modeling Q4, every penny change in the Canadian dollar has an impact of approximately $2 million, and every penny change in the euro has a Q4 impact of approximately $0.5 million. If foreign exchange rates were to hold at current rates, there is an approximate $40 million full year headwind to operating profit compared to 2021. This is $10 million to $15 million greater than what we had assumed in July and has been accounted for in our guidance. A couple of items on margins. First, we narrowed our expected gross profit margins to a decline of 78 to 80 basis points at the high end of our prior range, driven by FX and increased warranty expense in the third quarter. We expect EBITDA margin to decline by approximately 30 basis points, which is narrowed to the high end of our prior guidance, driven by FX and higher demand creation spending in the fourth quarter. As we look at the fourth quarter compared to the prior year quarter, we expect volume and price to remain positive contributors. Overall, it is encouraging to see improvements in the supply chain lead to increased shipping volume. The health of the global supply chain continues to have an impact on our performance, thus we remain focused on execution. Increasing shipping volume should not only help our top line but also benefit margin as we work through higher-cost inventory. Polaris has a long track record of navigating challenging economic environments, and we do not expect this time to be any different.

With that, I will now turn it back over to Mike for some initial thoughts on 2023. Thanks, Bob. We thought it would be helpful to give you some of our initial thoughts on 2023. So like many of you, we are closely watching a number of demand indicators while being agile with our manufacturing and shipment plans so that we can swiftly respond to positive or negative trends. We expect organic investments to continue as we look to drive future growth through market expansion and introducing new vehicles and innovation to our customers. We expect dealer inventory to reset to new optimal levels as the supply chain continues to recover. Similar to the rest of the year, there remains a strong correlation between the health of the supply chain and shipments. On pricing, we expect to annualize our 2022 pricing actions. Given current trends we're seeing in the global economy, we expect foreign exchange and interest to continue to be a headwind into next year. And on cash, we expect working capital to decline and operating cash flow to improve, allowing us to continue to invest in our capital deployment priorities, which entail organic investments as well as buying back our own stock, which we believe is currently undervalued, subject to market and other conditions. Wrapping up, we're seeing mixed signals in demand with retail down year-over-year. Our plan is to take an agile approach in managing our portfolio of businesses and brands in the near term while keeping close to the data so that we can swiftly react. Improvements in the supply chain are encouraging, but challenges remain. We continue to expect modest improvements as we progress through the remainder of the year, which are expected to have a positive impact on inventory levels. While it's nice to celebrate the revenue milestone and strong adjusted EPS growth this quarter, we realize there's more work to be done. Agility will be key as we navigate near-term headwinds, while at the same time, remaining aggressive in our desire to grow the business and expand the market. We know that winning in a competitive environment requires our entire organization to be focused on delivering innovation, the best customer experience, and efficient operations. We remain committed to being the global leader in powersports while delivering shareholder value. Finishing strong in 2022 is our next step in that journey. We believe the decisions and investments we're making today will not only set Polaris up to deliver the fourth quarter but also generate strong growth and returns over the long term. With that, I'll turn it over to Chuck to open the lineup for questions.

And the first question will come from Joe Altobello with Raymond James.

Not surprisingly, I did want to dig a little deeper into the share loss in ORVs. You mentioned on the last call, you were seeing some momentum late in the quarter. And it looks like your inventory situation improved sequentially here in 3Q. So is the issue simply that competitors are seeing supply chains improving faster? Or is there something else going on?

Yes. I'd say there's a couple of things at play. I mean, first and foremost, while the third quarter improved, I would tell you that we had a pretty substantial portion of our shipments go in September. And within September, over half shipped in the last couple of weeks. And so we ended up with a push up in dealer inventory, but I can tell you, we mentioned it in our prepared remarks, we've seen very high retail levels for ATV, where we saw a substantial number of those shipments into the channel. And so I suspect we're clearing out a lot of that inventory. From a share perspective, I talked about it being a mixed story. Where we had strong supply throughout the quarter, places like Indian, RZR, Godfrey, Hurricane and at the high end of our markets, we did really well. We struggled a bit with Bennington given the complexity of some of the products. We feel like we're in a better spot now. And then RANGER specifically at the high end of the market where we have continued strong demand. We talked about the pre-sold situation. If you pulled our pre-solds apart, there is a very high percentage of those that are at that high-end RANGER market, the NorthStar specifically. So we're working hard to get ourselves into a better position. We know that when we improve supply, the share situation moves in the right direction for us. And I suspect the timing of the shipments through the third quarter had some impact on that. And so as we look at October, retail performance is really good. We've got good momentum sequentially up from where we were in September. And so at this point, we think we're in a good spot.

Got it. Very helpful, Mike. And I guess second question, you mentioned earlier that you expect modest margin improvement next year. Maybe help us think about the puts and takes. And I guess, in particular, what you're thinking about promotion activity next year?

Sure. I would say there are a couple of factors at play. We anticipate that the cost environment will continue to improve. It has already been moderating, especially compared to Q3 last year when we experienced significant cost growth in the early part of 2022. However, commodity and transportation prices are beginning to decline, and our levels of rework are decreasing. Therefore, we expect these trends to positively impact us as we move into next year. We will see the full effects of price increases in the first half of next year, as our adjustments were implemented in April and we only started to realize their benefits in this quarter. This positive momentum should carry over into next year. Regarding promotions, our objective has been to keep dealer inventory at more manageable levels to limit promotional activity. We do plan to invest in advertising, but if promotions do return, they will be strategically aimed at slower-moving models or customers who are in a favorable position in the buying process to encourage them to make a purchase. Additionally, foreign exchange will be a headwind. Overall, I believe that this combination will enable us to continue improving margins, alongside ongoing cost-saving measures we have discussed while we stay focused on our platforming and modularization strategies, particularly in the off-road vehicle segment and our supply chain improvements. There are various factors to consider, but I am optimistic about our potential for margin enhancement next year.

The next question will come from Craig Kennison with Baird.

It's on repurchase rates. You mentioned that repurchase rates were healthy. Wondered if you could just define what you mean by short-term and long-term repurchase rates? And then maybe comment on what you're seeing in terms of early trends from that pandemic buyer?

Yes. So the distinction that we make, Craig, is you've got the short-term repurchase rates where we're tracking people who will buy a vehicle and come back in 3, 6 months, or a year. And those are actually at or above what we've seen historically. So it indicates that consumers who have come in more recently into the category still have a really strong propensity to spend. And then when we talk about long-term, it tends to be a 3-year, 5-year, 10-year time frame, and that's important because that's measuring the health of the customers that were pre-pandemic. And that is trending pretty consistent with what we've seen historically. The other thing that we track, and I mentioned it briefly in my prepared remarks, we get a lot of visibility through RIDE COMMAND as well as through our PG&A business in terms of rider activity. And we talked about the fact that our oil kits and our parts had record performance, which is indicative of the fact that consumers are out riding and using the vehicle. This is an important fact because as you look forward, even in a softening market, consumers using their vehicles is still going to drive business into the PG&A business. So the consumers who bought primarily in 2020, when we saw the 57% increase in retail in the second quarter, those consumers are still heavily engaged, as you know, through your used side-by-side pricing reports. The pricing has moderated a bit from where it was during the pandemic, but it's still well above historical levels, which means that the availability of used is low, which indicates people holding on to their vehicles.

The next question will come from Robin Farley with UBS.

I wanted to ask how you expect the product mix to affect 2023 as your availability improves. Specifically, if your focus is on parts availability for higher-end vehicles, will next year's mix reflect that, considering it seems to be favorable this year? Additionally, I’d like to understand why your On-Road shipment guidance has been lowered. I know you cited foreign exchange impacts, but are you also adjusting for unit sales? Are you becoming more cautious due to the recreational ORV trends you’re observing, or is it solely related to foreign exchange?

Yes, I'll start with that one. A big part of it was foreign exchange. I mean, obviously, we're tempering shipments a bit, but the largest driver would be around foreign exchange. As I think about availability into next year, key point that I want to reiterate that I had in my prepared remarks is, in our off-road vehicle business, over 60% is utility and utility really doesn't react to a lot of the same dynamics that you see with the leisure side of the business. We're selling into the ag markets, which are pretty good. We're selling into the commercial space, government, defense. There's a lot of construction activity, not residential, more of the commercial and the infrastructure investments that are being made. We sell through rental companies. All those indicators are very positive. And when you think about where we've struggled this year relative to getting enough product, it's improving sequentially from a supply chain standpoint, but it's really in our utility segment. It's in that RANGER business. I think if you were to talk to dealers, they would tell you that that inventory level is still well below where they would like to see it. And so we think that presents a good opportunity for us. And as we move into '23. And as you know, we make pretty good margins in that part of the business.

Great. And I don't know if you had a comment on the mix in 2023?

Well, I mean I think that really plays into the mix. I mean I think you're seeing some softening at the lower end of the market in the recreation. The high end of the recreation space is still holding up, and we make good margins there. But really, the play is on the utility side. So it's tough to know; we're going through the planning process with our teams right now, which you can imagine is a pretty complex process for us. So we'll have a lot more visibility into that in January.

The next question will come from Anna Glaessgen with Jefferies.

I'm interested to dig into the demand creation spend. Do you feel you're missing eyeballs that competitors are getting looking to widen the funnel to people new to powersports reengage past customers? And is this expected to be concentrated in one segment in particular or across the business?

Yes. I would say that it's happening throughout the business, but will be focused. When considering the demand softness we've discussed in the recreational space, that will clearly be a priority for us. We have experienced a significant amount of demand, and this trend isn't exclusive to Polaris; it’s prevalent across the industry. Over the last few years, we didn't need to invest heavily because everyone has been struggling to meet that demand level. Much of the cultivation activity requires time, which is why we began our spending in the third quarter and are increasing it in the fourth quarter. This spending is aimed at reengaging past customers and attracting new customers to the segment, which we are doing effectively. Essentially, if the market is expected to slow down in 2023, we want to ensure we convert upper funnel consumers into viable leads for our dealers. We believe this is the appropriate time to invest.

Great. And thinking a little bit more tactically on how you approach this. We know that customers have shifted how they shop for off-road vehicles and other vehicles over COVID; more comfortable being online and social media has become more important. How are you thinking through the best way to reach these customers?

Yes, we have made a significant effort over the past few years to enhance our online capabilities. We've improved our configurators and are continuing to prioritize this area. We recognize that consumers prefer online shopping, and our e-commerce business is on the rise. Therefore, we aim to simplify the process for our customers. We have additional website improvements planned for early 2023, which will further help consumers identify the right vehicle for them. Considering the number of new customers we are attracting, it is crucial to provide an easy web experience. We are willing to invest in this because we understand its importance. Statistically, consumers visit our website five to seven times before stepping into a dealership. This aspect must remain a primary focus for us. We believe we are competitively positioned, but there is still much more to be done, and we are committing resources to this as we move into 2023.

The next question will come from James Hardiman with Citi.

So I wanted to spend a little bit of time on this inventory slide, I think it's Slide 5 in the deck. It seems like there's a lot of information being conveyed here, and I just wanted to parse through some of it. I mean, I guess one of the big questions, I think, is sort of where we're going to finish the year in terms of inventory and what replenishment opportunity that we use for next year? I guess maybe if we did look at that $400 million replenishment number, that was $750 million coming out of the second quarter, so $350 million drawdown. How do we think about where you think that going to finish the year given the fourth quarter is typically the replenishment quarter?

Yes, it's a challenging question to answer, James, and I don’t mean to be evasive, but there are many factors involved. What I can share is that as we contemplated our guidance, we believe our retail performance in the fourth quarter will be positive. The overall year will show a decline, but we anticipate a positive fourth quarter. I do expect inventory to increase slightly, and I think the opportunity for replenishment will persist as we enter 2023. However, I want to emphasize that we set our guidance range fairly wide because there’s still a quarter remaining. We did this because we are committed to ensuring dealer inventory levels are where they need to be. If we encounter a slowdown or any situation that might jeopardize dealer inventory, we will adjust our shipments accordingly, which is why the guidance range is broad. Nonetheless, if conditions proceed as we expect, we believe there will be continued opportunities for dealer inventory replenishment into 2023.

Okay. That is helpful. And then as I think about the market share conversation that we've had, it seems like you guys believe that it is more a product availability issue than it is a product issue per se, which in theory, would create a pretty big opportunity once you get back to sort of normalized stocking levels. Maybe walk us through that. I don't know if you have any market share numbers today versus pre-pandemic. It seems like pretty big delta. But how you think about that opportunity as we get back to normal inventory levels, particularly given that it does seem that dealer floor space has shifted pretty meaningfully. And so that's maybe an incremental barrier to clawing back some of that market share.

Yes, I guess I'd say a couple of things. We do know when we have availability, we do well. RZR has gained share now pretty consistently, pretty much across the board. And so we feel good about that. Indian, we struggled earlier in the year. We had some black part paint issues that was constraining our ability to ship. We've cleared through most of that in the third quarter and put us in a really strong share position. In our boat businesses in areas like Godfrey and Hurricane, we did really well. Bennington obviously struggled with more complex products. The ramp rate in the production levels has improved, and we've seen that making an impact. So yes, supply does make a big difference. We don't like seeing the negative share performance. As we look into 2023, given what we're seeing from a supply chain improvement perspective and the sequential movement, even though we're not back to optimal levels, we do see that as a share gain opportunity. Utility is our probably our number one focus area because it’s where we've probably struggled the most. We've done really well at the high end of the market where you look at the crews and the NorthStar vehicles. It tends to be in the lower end, smaller 3-seat vehicles where we have focused our production efforts around where our customers are asking for product, but that does create a bit of a void from a product availability standpoint. I think the floor space thing, I don't know if I would agree with the comment that that's shifted dramatically. As we've gone out to our dealers, you have to be careful and you have to ask what's sitting on the floor because they typically will have sold vehicles sitting there. They'll have used vehicles. They are just trying to have as much as they can. And so I don't think that's reflective of where we'll be in the future. Steve Menneto and his team have done a really good job through our NorthStar program to incentivize the dealers to have the appropriate level of stocking based on those local market dynamics, which has a direct impact on their profitability. And we believe that as we get back to more optimized and normal inventory levels that we'll have the appropriate share of the dealership floor.

The next question will come from Gerrick Johnson with BMO Capital Markets.

Great. Now that we're seeing some stabilization rep growth in gross margin, will you be eliminating some of the logistic surcharges at retail or scaling those back?

Yes, we will certainly evaluate that. That's why we implemented the surcharge as we did instead of adjusting the MSRP. Our teams are actively working on this issue. We may experience a slight delay in making a decision because we've encountered similar situations before where we underestimated the duration of challenges and were slow to adapt, which led to prolonged issues. We want to ensure that any improvements we make are sustainable as we move into 2023, and the teams will take appropriate action.

Yes. The other thing to keep in mind, a lot of that is on trucking; while trucking availability is better and trucking cost has come down, diesel obviously continues to be a challenge. So that as a factor impacts the surcharges as well.

Okay. Great. And maybe a question on your new model rollout, the recent '23 rollout. In light of weakness at the low end, maybe go through the decision to discontinue the RZR 570 and RANGER 500.

Yes. I think the reality around those models is the success rate was relatively low. And so we felt that pivoting the business in a different direction was the right thing to do, both from a profitability standpoint as well as a share perspective.

The next question will come from David MacGregor with Longbow Research.

Mike, can you just talk about some of the levers that you could pull to flex the business model in 2023 in order to protect margins in that scenario where maybe unit volumes are down sharply?

Certainly. We've discussed our recession playbook for many years, and we saw it begin to take effect during the early days of the pandemic when circumstances were uncertain. We are currently revisiting our approach, and our teams are clear on the priorities. We are focusing on maintaining liquidity, similar to our actions during the pandemic, ensuring we have a stable cash position while managing our leverage and staying within our covenants. We are also prioritizing our strategic investments to support our growth agenda in a responsible manner. As we analyze the business, we are aware of potential weaknesses, particularly in the recreational segment. It's important to note that over 60% of our offered vehicle business is in utility vehicles, which tend to be more stable in the face of a potential recession. Additionally, we have a $1.7 billion parts, garments, and accessories business. While a recession might impact it, a significant portion consists of service parts and accessories that customers typically purchase when they are trying to prolong the life of their vehicles, which often occurs during economic downturns. This trend is expected to provide some insulation for our business. We are committed to managing dealer inventory levels, adjusting shipments as needed. Currently, dealer inventory levels are significantly lower than historical averages. Our teams are preparing for the possibility of volume declines and are clear on the cost management strategies to implement, which may involve deferring spending or reducing costs if necessary. While we do not see any immediate concerns, Bob and his team are continuously monitoring the situation, and our readiness and responsiveness have been demonstrated by our actions in the first and second quarters of 2020.

My second question, just with respect to gross margins. You're up 15 basis points on 32% revenue growth. There's a lot going on this quarter, I appreciate that. But can you help us just understand some of the puts and takes there and why the lack of leverage and how we should be thinking about that going Q4 into early '23?

Yes, I think much of what you're observing is related to the challenges of year-over-year comparisons. While supply chain costs in Q3 are beginning to trend positively compared to Q3 2021, they remain high. This is the primary reason for the limited leverage in the quarter. However, as we move through Q4 and into next year, we anticipate that these supply chain costs will continue to decrease. This will affect our inventory, and we expect to see improved leverage as a result.

The next question will come from Fred Wightman with Wolfe Research.

I just wanted to come back to the restocking opportunity and really just to see if that $350 million sequential decline was in line with sort of what you guys were expecting last quarter? And then just to sort of get a sense if that was a matter of fulfillment that actually drove that number to come down? Or if you're actually seeing some change to dealer orders or backlogs or cancellations or anything like that?

Yes, I would describe it as a sequential improvement in shipments and the supply chain. However, we shipped a significant amount in September due to the supply chain improvements that allowed us to address the rework in our business. Many of those shipments occurred in the last few weeks of the quarter. Once items leave us, we recognize revenue, and they arrive at dealership lots where they go through setup and eventually sold. This process is occurring in October. While dealer inventory improved sequentially, our daily retail observations show that we have sold through a substantial amount of that inventory in October, particularly on ATVs and side-by-sides. While we achieved a progress of $350 million in the quarter, some of that has been offset by stronger retail activity in October. Additionally, we noticed a slowdown in the lower end of the recreational category. Our inventory is not yet at optimal levels, but it is getting close and performed somewhat better than we anticipated.

Okay. Great. And then, Bob, you made a comment that you guys were comfortable in sort of the middle to upper end of the EPS guidance range, but then there was also some discussion about FX headwinds. So was that comment sort of including or excluding FX? And maybe if you could just reiterate what you were trying to get across there.

Yes. In my prepared remarks, I mentioned that we were comfortable in the mid- to upper end of our guidance, subject to foreign exchange considerations. This is a bit of a cautious approach on our part since we cannot predict the fluctuation of FX rates in the fourth quarter. They changed significantly in the third quarter, more than we anticipated. While they seem stable right now, the actions of global governments regarding interest rates are unpredictable. Therefore, we are allowing ourselves some flexibility in case the situation shifts in an unexpected way. Additionally, as Mike pointed out, we will remain attentive to keeping dealer inventories at appropriate levels. If we observe further deterioration in the fourth quarter, we are prepared to adjust our production and shipments accordingly. That is the reason for the margin we established for the bottom line.

The next question will come from Xian Siew with BNP Paribas.

I wanted to follow up on gross margin, particularly off-road. You almost did 26% gross margin in 3Q. Is this kind of the right baseline going forward into 4Q and '23? Should we continue to expect to see sequential improvement from here? Or how are you thinking about it?

Yes, we expect to see continued improvement going into 2023. In any quarter, there will be some mix dynamics. In Q3 and Q4, there will be some shipments of snow units, and if we return to a more typical seasonality, there will be some impact from that. However, looking at it on a normal production basis, our aim is to get back to the levels we previously achieved as the supply chain starts to normalize and continues to improve, especially as we concentrate on modularity platforming and our supply base. We are currently at this level, but we will keep working to enhance it because we are not satisfied with the margins at this time.

Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And then you mentioned price sensitivity on the value models. Maybe can you talk about what's happening in that scenario? So are consumers seeing the price and maybe thinking the products are too expensive and walking away? Are you stepping up promotions to move the unit? Or would you like look to lower pricing on some of those value units? Maybe just some color on what exactly is happening in that scenario.

Sure. When considering the buyer in the recreational segment, especially those financing their purchases, we see that financing costs are increasing due to rising rates. However, financing usage has also increased as more customers choose to finance through dealers. We have implemented some promotions on select value units to help lower financing rates for 36 months in order to encourage sales. Additionally, we are offering promotions on items that are moving more slowly. The consumers in this segment are more sensitive to price and will compare options among competitors. This may influence their decision to purchase or not. If we continue to notice a slowdown, we will take steps through advertising and promotions that we can manage, but currently, this area is the weakest part of the consumer market, a trend we see reflected across the automotive sector and beyond.

Okay. Got it. And I guess just maybe just the mix between the value versus premium. You mentioned utility versus recreational. But do you have any color on value versus premium guess?

Yes. I mean we definitely overweight towards premium, not necessarily in units, but obviously in dollars. So if you think about 2 or 3 seats versus crew model, we tend to overindex towards crew and then premium things like high-end wide open RZR and NorthStars and crew Rangers, we tend to overindex towards premium.

Our next question will come from Brandon Rollé with D.A. Davidson.

Just a couple of quick questions on optimal inventory levels. One, compared to where you were pre-pandemic, how do your current plans for optimal inventory levels compare to maybe what you thought they should be pre-pandemic? And two, what type of market share levels are you baking in for that 1.5x current inventory levels for dealer replenishment and Off-Road vehicle?

I think from an optimal inventory level perspective, the simple answer is below where we were in 2019. It depends on the segment of the business within each of the categories. What I would say more generically is as you get into lower price categories, dealers like to have more inventory on hand. Those consumers tend to shop based on price. They’re not looking at customizing the vehicle as much, and they're not necessarily willing to wait. So you might see inventory levels that may not be quite where 2019 was, but they'll certainly be close to it. And then as you get into some of the higher-end segments, dealers want constrained inventory because it helps from a profitability standpoint. Those customers also tend to want to customize the vehicle more. If you think about somebody who's buying a NorthStar RANGER or a Pro R or Turbo R RZR, they tend to want to make those vehicles a little bit more unique and get them tailored made. And as long as we're able to quickly deliver those vehicles, you'll see lower than what we saw in 2019 inventory levels. And we're still working through all that. Obviously, the supply chain dynamics play into that as well because what we don't want to do is constrain dealer inventory and then have supply chain issues that hamper our ability to deliver. So it's going to be a bit of a journey as we calibrate what those inventory levels are. What I would tell you is we've got the team focused on gaining share as we move forward. I talked a lot about the fact that our inventory levels in our utility business are low, below where we would like them to be. We're delivering to what consumers are pre-buying, but we're not able to get our inventory up above those levels, and that's going to be a big focus, which has us in a positive share position, not just in the fourth quarter, but as we get into 2023.

Okay. Great. And just one last follow-up. The Japanese competition has been largely absent this year, maybe planning to come back next year. How do you plan to compete against what seems like a couple of more players potentially having more inventory in the space in 2023?

I think it's the same focus we've had. The availability is absolutely key. And on top of that, making sure that we've got the right innovation coming out. We've got an exciting year coming up from an innovation standpoint, and I think whether it's the Japanese or some of our other competitors, I think it's going to put us in a really strong position.

The next question will come from Jaime Katz with Morningstar.

In the last quarter, you provided some valuable insights on suppliers facing part shortages that were affecting both those with over 100 units and those with over 1,000 units. I'm curious if that situation is still improving. If it has resolved completely, does that imply that the costs associated with expedited shipping that you were incurring have also reduced?

Yes. There's a reason we didn't put a chart in there. It's just becoming less and less of a dialogue. So all those metrics have improved sequentially. They continue to improve in the fourth quarter in terms of what we've seen. That said, I don't want to make it sound like the supply chain is back to an optimal level. There are pockets where things are back to where we wanted to see them, but there are some areas that we still see constrained supply. Semiconductor is a prime example, in a much better spot than it was trending in the right direction, but it's going to be a bit of a journey until we get back to the levels that would be able to meet all the demand that we have in front of us, if you think about the amount of tech that we now have on the vehicles. So it's just not as big of a part of the equation. I think it's shifted towards the macro and the demand environment. But we're obviously spending a lot of time still managing the supplier situation internally. And it's not yet to a level that allows us to get everything out there. That's a big part of this market share discussion we've had, specifically around our utility business, but it is moving in the right direction, and we're going to continue to push and do everything we can to make sure those improvements, not only stick but continue to move in the right direction.

And on the cost side, I mean we've definitely seen things like the expedite costs start to come down as we have to sort of fly less inventory over the top of what's on the water. The port congestion has cleared up pretty dramatically here in the last 60 days or so. So those costs are starting to come down. But to Mike's point, there are still challenges with various suppliers. And so those costs don't fully correct, and we expect to see that continue to moderate as we go into 2024, absent any other changes to the economy.

Okay. And then just quickly, I know this wasn't mentioned, but are you guys finding any opportunities without saying too much for maybe tuck-in acquisitions to improve the vertical capabilities of the business, the way the next time we go through one of these cycles, we may be a little better positioned?

Yes. I mean, look, we're certainly doing some work to make sure that we're prepared. But I'll tell you, given the macro backdrop as well as just where we're trading, it's hard for me to imagine a better investment than ourselves right now. But we are keeping an eye out there, and there are things that are of interest, but we've got our priority set right now. We've got a lot to do on the execution side. We've got a lot of exciting innovation coming, and I want to make sure that we're successful as that comes out in 2023. And at the current valuation, we think that Polaris is a really attractive investment.

I do think we talk a lot about investing in our business, and we've ramped up the level of CapEx in the investment in the last couple of years, and a lot of that has been focused on not really exciting projects, but just adding more back shop production capacity and capability around the world at our various factories to allow us to bring back in things that have been outsourced just due to volumes. So we are making investments. And then to your point, some of the things that we were challenged with, we're looking at investments internally to do some of that, but not necessarily from an M&A perspective, more from a more organic investment perspective.

This concludes our question-and-answer session as well as our conference call for today. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.