SUIG 10-K
SUI Group Holdings Ltd. (SUIG)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
|
|
For the fiscal year ended | |
|
|
| or |
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
|
|
For the transition period from ______________________ to ______________________ |
Commission File Number
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ||
Emerging growth company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to Section 240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by persons other than officers, directors and more than 5% shareholders of the registrant as of December 31, 2024 was approximately $
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED IN PART BY REFERENCE
None.
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Form 10-K
Table of Contents
| 2 |
| Table of Contents |
PART I
ITEM 1 BUSINESS
Overview
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. is a Minnesota corporation that was incorporated in January 2006. From our inception until December 13, 2012, we were a development-stage company involved in the gaming and entertainment industry. In 2013, we elected to become a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We operated as a BDC until we withdrew our BDC election on December 27, 2019. Since that time, we have engaged in the business of providing short-term specialty finance solutions primarily to private businesses, micro- and small-cap public companies and high-net-worth individuals. To avoid again becoming subject to regulation under the 1940 Act, we generally seek to structure our short-term loans such that they do not constitute “securities” under federal securities law, and we monitor our holdings as a whole to ensure that no more than 40% of our total assets may consist of “investment securities,” as that term is defined and understood under the 1940 Act.
The principal specialty finance solutions we provide are high-interest short-term lending arrangements. Typically, these lending arrangements involve us obtaining collateral as security for the borrower’s repayment of funds to us, the right to seek and obtain such collateral, or personal guarantees from the principals or affiliates of the borrower. In some circles, short-term high-interest collateralized lending is referred to as “hard-money lending.”
We believe we are generally able to charge high interest for our specialty finance solutions because: (i) banks and other traditional providers of credit may have neither the expertise nor the infrastructure needed to evaluate creditworthiness and risks in a timeframe suitable for a potential borrower, preferring instead to process transactions and structures that present few novel issues or risks; and (ii) we will often be able to devote time and attention to transactions involving a smaller dollar amount than an institutional lender will view as worthwhile. These beliefs essentially explain why we refer to our business as “specialty finance”— financing that may involve structures that are unique, creative, and often bespoke; and that may involve dollar amounts that are not suitable for institutional lenders.
We generally seek to provide specialty finance solutions that are short-term in nature. By this, we mean lending arrangements that mature or come due within nine months of the lending date. We view the provision of short-term finance as desirable for two principal reasons: (i) it helps minimize the risk of non-performance; and (ii) it helps minimize regulatory risk.
In terms of non-performance risk, short-term lending requires us to focus upon, and a potential borrower to identify to us, a near-term source of liquidity for repayment of the funds they borrow from us. This permits us to evaluate that source of repayment clearly and carefully, thus helping identify the potential risks involved in a particular transaction and how we may be able to include structural terms, such as specific collateral and collateral-related arrangements, guarantees, or other types of covenants or arrangements that mitigate those risks.
In terms of regulatory risk, we believe that short-term lending permits us to avail ourselves of a court-recognized exception for treating promissory notes (evidencing a loan) as “securities” under federal securities law. This exception generally applies to promissory notes with short-term maturities of nine months or less. Our ability to avail ourselves of this exception, and to more generally structure our transactions in such a way to avoid them being properly considered as “securities” under federal securities laws, is important because we believe that it enables us to avoid once again becoming subject to regulation under the 1940 Act. Below we discuss in further detail our process for evaluating transactional terms and structures with a view to remaining outside of the regulatory regime of the 1940 Act (please refer to “Investment Process” below).
Examples of the kinds of the specialty finance solutions we have considered or provided to date, and may continue to provide in the future, include:
| · | Short-term secured loans for real estate development; |
| · | Short-term unsecured loans (with an option to acquire collateral security) to a business; |
| · | Short-term secured loans to a business for operating capital; and |
| · | Short-term secured loans to an individual owed a forthcoming tax refund |
| 3 |
| Table of Contents |
In addition, we occasionally explore and evaluate our ability to enter into other kinds of short-term specialty finance transactions. Examples include the expansion of our efforts to purchase adjudicated settlements, the purchase (at discounted rates) of receivables owing to professionals on account of certain workers’ compensation claim, and short-term consumer finance lending.
Sourcing Transactions
We believe that our management’s strong combination of experience and contacts in the securities and investment finance sector, including the experience and contacts of our independent directors, should be sufficient to continue attracting suitable prospective investment opportunities. To date, the network of contacts of our management and directors has been successful in sourcing all of the transactions in which we have participated. Accordingly, we presently do not have any plans to hire any business development professionals to assist us with transactional volume.
Competition
The market for specialty finance is competitive, largely as a result of the participation of various types of professionally managed pooled investment funds such as private equity and private credit funds, including secured, non-secured debt and mezzanine-debt funds, and other types of professional finance companies seeking the high returns that are possible in specialty finance and hard-money lending. Nevertheless, we believe we are well positioned to compete successfully in this market because of our entrepreneurial, creative and flexible approach to specialty finance opportunities, and our management’s experience in entrepreneurial ventures and finance.
Throughout our history and in particular after ceasing to be a BDC, we have approached investment opportunities flexibly and creatively in terms of transactional structures and terms. In part, we are able to be flexible and creative because we are not subject to many of the regulatory restrictions that govern our other more traditional or institutional competitors. Those competitors are often subject to limitations on the type transactions they undertake, the amount that may be invested in a specific transaction or a particular type of transaction, the markets in which they operate, the maturity or time horizon of their investment, uses of proceeds, or otherwise. These limitations are often imposed by the agreements and documents governing the pooled investment vehicles, or otherwise self-imposed in order to facilitate the investment vetting and due-diligence process, and the documentation and structuring process. More rarely, these limitations may arise from governing regulations or interpretations thereof. For our part, we believe that approaching investment opportunities flexibly expands our overall transactional opportunities, diversifies our risk by avoiding dependence in any material way on a particular borrower, type of transaction, or market or industry niche, and permits us to avail ourselves of the maximum number of relationships from which we source investment opportunities. Moreover, we believe that this flexible approach to structuring our transactions and investments will facilitate the development of positive long-term relationships with our borrowers.
We believe that the only significant limitation on our ability to flexibly structure transactions arises from our desire to remain outside the regulation of the 1940 Act. In order to meet this goal, we intend and aim to structure the vast majority of our transactions (by dollar amount) in ways such that they are not properly considered “securities” under federal securities laws, including the 1940 Act.
For our investors, the freedom afforded to us through the lack of substantive regulation governing the types of transactions we enter into and our methods of operation permits us to allocate our resources, at any given point in time, to those types of transactions that we believe may lead to the highest risk-adjusted returns or the steadiest stream of such returns.
Our management team and Board of Directors has significant experience in a variety of entrepreneurial ventures, including service as management and directors for small and large public companies, private businesses, start-up and development-stage businesses, and the securities and finance industries. As a result of this diverse general experience and particular experience in transactional finance, we believe we are able to manage the evaluation and due-diligence process involved in our investment opportunities swiftly and efficiently, by collaborating with our professional advisers and focusing on high-level and material issues.
| 4 |
| Table of Contents |
Other Matters
In general, we do not believe that we are dependent in any material way on any particular borrower, type of specialty finance transaction, or industry. At this time, however, we have a significant amount invested in a particular borrower, Mustang Funding, LLC (a provider of litigation finance), as a result of a potential strategic combination transaction that was ultimately abandoned in August 2024. The failure of this combination transaction to occur resulted in our need to restructure our loan to Mustang Funding in a way that ensured the maximum collateral security we could reasonably obtain, consistent with prevailing market-based commercial lending terms, while acceding to the requirements of their senior lender in respect of a subordination and intercreditor agreement and an extension of the maturity date for our loan.
We do not own or use through license any patents, trademarks, or other intellectual properties and we do not believe that any such assets would be material to our business.
Sometimes the types of transactions we engage in are governed by particular laws, regulations, or rules. For example, lending transactions in which high-net-worth individuals (as opposed to entities) are the borrower will nearly always involve state law usury limitations. Transactions in which we seek and obtain collateral as security for obligations owed to us involve legal issues arising under the Uniform Commercial Code or its various state law iterations. To date, we have not engaged in transactions that require us to obtain licensure or a permit prior to entering into the transaction—e.g., brokering transactions or engaging in licensed consumer finance activities.
Pending the consummation of transactions and deployment of cash, we generally keep the majority of our assets in cash, cash equivalents such as money-market investments, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.
Our Investment Process
We have identified several criteria that we believe are important general guidelines for us to meet our financial objectives. These criteria are, however, only general guidelines for our investment decisions and, in the case of some transactions in which we invest, fewer than all—or even none—of these criteria will be met.
| · | Existing Liquidity Source. Because the vast majority of our transactions involve short-term maturities, we typically seek to identify a liquidity source for the borrower to repay us. Examples of sources of potential liquidity may include accounts receivable, another valuable asset, or a pending payment (e.g., a tax refund, or a litigation judgment or settlement payment) or pending transaction, that is reasonably expected to close and pay out prior to the maturity of the credit we provide. |
|
|
|
| · | Collateral Value. We will often, but not always, seek to collateralize the obligations owing to us. Our ability to identify valuable collateral is a significant factor in our credit analysis and determination of the attractiveness of a potential transaction. This analysis will often involve legal counsel, both to assist in the identification of potential collateral assets, and to better understand the ease with a security interest in the collateral may be granted, perfected and, if necessary, foreclosed upon and the relevant jurisdiction(s) involved. |
|
|
|
| · | Experienced and Capable Management. In transactions involving business borrowers, we seek businesses that have an experienced, knowledgeable and capable management team. |
|
|
|
| · | Competitive Position. In transactions involving business borrowers, we will seek to invest in transactions with businesses that have developed, or appear poised to develop, a strong competitive position within their respective industry sector or niche. |
|
|
|
| · | Cash Flow. In transactions involving business borrowers, we will seek to invest in businesses that are profitable or nearly profitable on an operating cash flow basis, principally so that the business’ operating cash flow may serve as another source of liquidity from which we may ultimately be repaid. |
| 5 |
| Table of Contents |
If we believe a potential transaction generally meets the characteristics described above or if we otherwise determine that a potential transaction may be desirable to enter into, we may perform a more rigorous due-diligence examination of the prospective borrower, the likely source or sources of liquidity for their repayment to us, and other aspects of the borrower or its assets (e.g., assets of the borrower that may serve as collateral security for the obligations that may be owing to us). Our due-diligence examination for each transaction will necessarily be unique and tailored to the specific transaction, but will generally be undertaken in light of the following facts and circumstances:
| · | our familiarity with the borrower (or, in the case of a business borrower, our familiarity with management or other persons such as directors involved with the borrower); |
|
|
|
| · | in the case of a business borrower, our review and assessment of the potential borrower’s financing history, overall capitalization, existing senior and secured lending positions, existing affiliated lending positions, as well as the likely need for additional financings after our transaction; |
|
|
|
| · | the industry in which the borrower operates, our knowledge and familiarity with that industry, our assessment of the complexity of the business, any regulatory matters or other unique aspects presenting special risks, and the competitive landscape faced by the borrower; |
|
|
|
| · | the amount of dollars involved in the potential transaction; |
|
|
|
| · | where the borrower is located, how it is organized as an entity, as well as its management and ownership structure and profile; |
|
|
|
| · | whether we might have been involved with a transaction of the same or similar kind before; |
|
|
|
| · | the ease with which we can evaluate the borrower’s source or sources of liquidity; |
|
|
|
| · | the ease with which we can apprehend the process involved with taking collateral security in some or all of the borrower’s assets; and |
|
|
|
| · | the ease with which we could realize on that collateral if repayment were not otherwise forthcoming. |
The assessments described above outlines our general approach for our investment decisions, although not all of such activities will be followed in each instance, or some may be stressed more so than others depending on facts and circumstances. Upon successful completion of this preliminary evaluation, we will typically (1) evaluate our own regulatory concerns (i.e., to what extent the potential transaction may properly be considered an investment in a “security” for purposes of the 1940 Act and, if necessary, consider alternative structures to alleviate any risks to our company relating thereto), and (2) decide whether to move forward towards negotiating a letter of intent and, thereafter, definitive documentation for our transaction. Depending on timing, we may not use a letter of intent and will instead proceed directly to definitive documentation.
As indicated above, to avoid becoming subject to the regulatory requirements of the 1940 Act, we monitor our investment holdings as a whole with a view towards ensuring that investments and other holdings which may be considered “investment securities” do not comprise more than 40% of our total assets. We undertake this analysis (1) at least on a quarterly basis and in connection with the review and preparation of our financial statements filed as part of our quarterly and annual reports with the SEC, and (2) at other times when we are considering how to structure a new transaction that is of a significant size—with “significance” largely based on the outcome of our most recent quarterly review. This review is generally undertaken by our Chief Financial Officer and may involve our outside legal counsel, in particular in a case where we are considering the structure of a potential new transaction.
| 6 |
| Table of Contents |
In general, our analysis starts with the length or duration of a potential new transaction. Although federal securities laws generally define “securities” in such a way as to include promissory notes, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Reves v. Ernst & Young, 110 S. Ct. 945 (1990), that certain kinds of promissory notes are not properly considered securities. Over time, court precedent has developed to identify these kinds of promissory notes as generally not constituting securities:
| · | notes that mature in nine months or less; |
|
|
|
| · | notes secured by a mortgage or lien on a home; |
|
|
|
| · | notes secured by a small business or business assets; |
|
|
|
| · | so-called “character loans” made to a bank customer; |
|
|
|
| · | notes delivered or borrowings entered into through consumer finance; |
|
|
|
| · | commercial loans made to businesses; |
|
|
|
| · | loans secured by accounts receivable (e.g., factoring); |
In addition to the “types” of financing arrangements noted above, court precedent indicates that there may be facts and circumstances surrounding a transaction that may cause a promissory note to not be considered a “security” under federal securities laws. For example, while it is presumed that a promissory note that matures in more than nine months is a “security,” this presumption may be rebutted (with the conclusion that such a promissory note is not a properly considered a security) upon an evaluation of the following factors:
| · | whether the borrower’s motivation is to raise money for general business use, and whether the lender’s motivation is to make a profit, including interest; |
|
|
|
| · | whether the borrower’s plan of distribution for the promissory note resembles the plan of distribution of a security; |
|
|
|
| · | whether the investing public, or the parties to the transaction, reasonably expects that the note is a security; and |
|
|
|
| · | whether there is a regulatory scheme that protects the investor other than the securities laws (e.g., Federal Deposit Insurance). |
While the application of these factors can be helpful in some instances, often the factors and the proper manner of weighting them are unclear. As a result, the analyses we periodically undertake focuses on the more bright-line types of lending arrangements enumerated above—i.e., promissory notes maturing in nine months or less, etc.
Our Management and Employees
Currently, Mr. Douglas M. Polinsky, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors, and Joseph A. Geraci, II, our Chief Financial Officer and a director of the company, serve as our senior management team. These are also the only two persons employed by our company that have a management role. There are three persons in total employed by our company.
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS
You should consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information presented or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating our business and any investment decision relating to our securities.
We have a relatively short operating history upon which to evaluate our current business.
We withdrew our election to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act at the end of 2019, and during the years since that time have refocused our business on providing short-term specialty finance solutions to private businesses, small-cap public companies and high-net-worth individuals. Given that our current business has been developed and pursued over the five years prior to this filing, investors have a relatively limited means to evaluate our performance, its evolution, and the likelihood of our future success.
| 7 |
| Table of Contents |
We may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations, and such capital may not be available to us in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms.
For the time being, management believes that our current cash is sufficient to continue operations for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, various future developments may cause us to seek or require additional financing. In addition, we may determine to seek additional financing in order to avail ourselves of additional opportunities to provide specialty finance solutions to borrowers. Alternatively, we may seek additional financing in the event that a material portion of our investments default, leaving us with diminished means to pay for our operations and continue making investments.
In any event, additional financing could be sought from a number of sources, including but not limited to sales of additional equity or debt securities, or loans from financial institutions or our affiliates. We cannot, however, be certain that any such financing will be available on terms favorable or acceptable to us if at all. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of our equity securities, such as through the issuance of stock, convertible securities, or the issuance and exercise of warrants, then the ownership interest of our existing shareholders will be diluted. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of debt or other equity instruments, we may become subject to certain operational limitations, and such securities may have rights senior to the rights of our common shareholders. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to consummate acquisitions or investments desired by our management and board.
If we are unable to maintain diverse and robust sources of capital, our growth prospects, business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our business depends in part on maintaining diverse and robust sources of capital to originate our short-term loans. In January 2022, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Eastman Investment, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Lyle A. Berman, as trustee of the Lyle A. Berman Revocable Trust (collectively, the “Lenders”). Mr. Berman is a director of our company. Under the Loan Agreement, the Lenders made available to us a $5 million revolving line of credit for us to use in the ordinary course of our short-term specialty finance business. Amounts drawn under the Loan Agreement accrued interest at the per annum rate of 8%, and all our obligations under the Loan Agreement were secured by a grant of a collateral security interest in substantially all of our assets. As a Lender, Mr. Berman was obligated to furnish only one-half of the aggregate $5 million available under the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement had a five-year term ending on January 3, 2027, at which time all amounts owing under the Loan Agreement were to become due and payable; subject, however, to each Lender’s right, including Mr. Berman, to terminate the Loan Agreement, solely with respect to such Lender’s obligation to provide further credit, at any time after January 3, 2023. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” In January 2024, we terminated the Loan Agreement having earlier satisfied all of our obligations thereunder.
If we were to borrow money in the future, events of default or breaches of financial, performance or other covenants, or worse than expected performance of one or more of our short-term loans, could reduce or terminate our future access to funding. The availability and capacity of sources of capital also depends on many factors that are outside of our control, such as credit market volatility and regulatory reforms. In the event that we do not maintain adequate sources of capital, we may not be able to maintain the necessary levels of funding to retain current loan volume, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although we have identified general guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective investment opportunities, we may enter into transactions with borrowers that do not meet such guidelines, increasing the risk that the price of our common stock could be volatile.
Although we have identified general guidelines for evaluating prospective investment opportunities, it is possible that a borrower with which we enter into a transaction will not have all, or any, of the attributes outlined in those guidelines. If we complete transactions with borrowers that do not meet some or any of these guidelines, it is possible that such an investment may not be as successful as an alternative opportunity that were to satisfy some or all of those guidelines. Investments that do not perform as well as imagined, or as well as they otherwise might have, in combination with the public knowledge that we may stray, or have strayed, from strict implementation of our investment guidelines, could affect the volatility of the trading price of our common stock.
| 8 |
| Table of Contents |
We may provide specialty finance solutions to early-stage companies, financially unstable businesses, or a borrower lacking an established record of revenue or earnings, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
While we believe that being entrepreneurial in our approach to specialty finance is a strength, we may complete investments with an early-stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenues, cash flows or earnings. These kinds of transactions present numerous risks associated with investing in a business without a proven business model and with limited historical financial data, volatile revenues, cash flows or earnings and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel. Although our management endeavors to evaluate the risks inherent in each particular investment we consider and make, we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors and we may not have adequate time to complete a full evaluation of those risks. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a borrower or our likelihood of repayment. The manifestation of any of these risks could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Many of our specialty finance investment transactions involve borrowers about which little, if any, information is publicly available, which may impair our ability to identify borrowers able to repay our loans and adversely affect the price of our common stock.
In pursuing our business, we often interact with a privately held companies about which very little public information exists. As a result, we are often required to make our investment decision on the basis of limited information, nearly all of which is obtained from the business itself, which may result in our consummating an investment with a borrower that is not as solvent or profitable as we suspected, if at all. These risks could affect our results of operations and, ultimately, the trading price of our common stock.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted. In such an event, our business would likely be materially and adversely affected.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act, then our activities may be restricted or complicated, including through:
| · | restrictions on the nature of our investments; |
| · | restrictions on our issuance of securities; |
| · | a requirement to register as an investment company; |
| · | adoption of a specific form of corporate structure and changes in corporate governance; |
| · | the hiring of a chief compliance officer, and adoption and implementation of various policies and requirements; and |
| · | compliance with additional reporting, record-keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements, together with other rules and regulations. |
In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the 1940 Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of “securities” and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.
We do not believe that our principal activities will subject us to the 1940 Act. To this end, we hold reserve un-invested assets in cash and United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the 1940 Act, which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Furthermore, we periodically monitor our investment holdings as a whole with a view towards ensuring that investments and other holdings which may be considered “investment securities” do not comprise more than 40% of our total assets. We undertake this analysis (1) on a quarterly basis and in connection with the review and preparation of our financial statements filed as part of our quarterly and annual reports with the SEC, and (2) at other times when we are considering how to structure a new transaction that is of a significant size—with “significance” largely based on the outcome of our most recent quarterly review. This review is generally undertaken by our Chief Financial Officer and may involve outside legal counsel, in particular in a case where we are considering the structure of a potential new transaction.
| 9 |
| Table of Contents |
If, however, we do not invest as discussed above or are otherwise unsuccessful in ensuring that no more than 40% of our total assets consist of “investment securities,” then we may be deemed to be subject to the 1940 Act. It is also possible that regulatory authorities, such as the SEC, may disagree with our analysis of whether certain investment holdings constitute “investment securities,” and may more broadly disagree with our position that the short-term promissory notes we receive in exchange for our short-term loans, are not properly considered “investment securities” under federal securities law and the 1940 Act in particular. If that were to be the case, we would likely incur significant costs and be required to spent significant time restructuring parts of our operations and/or complying with the additional regulatory burdens imposed under the 1940 Act. Any restructuring or additional regulatory requirements would surely hinder our ability to operate as profitably as we have since the withdrawal of our BDC election, and would of course adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Our $10 million in principal amount loan to Mustang Funding, LLC is subordinated to senior lenders in right of payment, in respect of our exercise of rights and remedies, and in right of collateral, with the result that our investment portfolio and results of operations will for the foreseeable future be highly concentrated in and dependent upon the operational and financing success of Mustang Funding.
On December 12, 2022, contemporaneously with our entry into a non-binding letter of intent with Mustang Funding, LLC (“Mustang”) contemplating a combination or merger transaction, we entered into a lending agreement with Mustang pursuant to which we loaned Mustang the principal amount of $5 million maturing in September 2023. Among other things, our related loan agreement with Mustang requires us to consent to any additional indebtedness Mustang may incur, subject to certain limitations and exceptions.
Although our loan to Mustang was not secured at the time that it was made, we negotiated for and obtained the right in the governing documents to seek and obtain collateral in the event that there were a default by Mustang or our negotiations for a combination transaction were to break down. At that time, we believed it was important to obtain this right because (i) Mustang was contemporaneously seeking a senior secured lending facility with whom we had no previous working experience, and (ii) a breakdown in combination negotiations, combined with our anticipated subordination (discussed below) could mean that we would need to extend the terms of this loan beyond nine months. In sum, as a creditor we believed that we need to secure our loan on more traditional commercial lending terms in order to better protect our investment.
On December 28, 2022, we entered into a subordination agreement with Orion Pip LLC, in its capacity as administrative and collateral agent for itself and other senior lenders under a senior secured lending agreement with Mustang (collectively, the “Senior Lenders”), pursuant to which we subordinated our right to payment (subject to certain exceptions) and our right to exercise rights and remedies, to Mustang’s prior repayment in full of all amounts owing to the Senior Lenders. The subordination agreement prohibited the Senior Lenders or Mustang from extending the stated maturity of amounts owing under the senior secured lending agreement beyond December 2026. The Senior Lenders are owed $15.675 million in principal amount under the senior secured lending agreement.
In June, August and September 2023, we advanced additional principal to Mustang as we continued working with them on a potential definitive merger agreement and related deliverables. These additional principal advances resulted in the loan principal growing to an aggregate of $10 million. In connection with these advances, the maturity date of our loan was ultimately extended to June 2024. In April 2024, we agreed to a final extension of the maturity date to the earlier of December 31, 2024, or 90 days after the termination of negotiations for our combination transaction with Mustang.
On August 20, 2024, we terminated the non-binding letter of intent with Mustang. As a result, amounts owing under our $10 million loan to Mustang were to mature on November 18, 2024. Nevertheless, the subordination agreement with the Senior Lenders effectively worked to prohibit Mustang’s payment, and our collection, of our loan. Accordingly, at that time we invoked our right to obtain collateral security from Mustang for our loan for the purpose of protecting our investment and essentially converting our loan position from a short-term unsecured loan to a longer-term loan involving standard commercial lending terms, including terms relating to collateral security. Ultimately, in late January 2025 we were able to enter into an amendment to our loan agreement with Mustang that extended the maturity date of our loan to March 2027 and increased the interest rate on our loan principal to 20% per annum (with 15% per annum remaining payable in cash on a monthly basis, and the additional 5% per annum being payable upon maturity), and also enter into an amended and restated subordination agreement with Orion Pip LLC that subordinated our right to collateral on customary and negotiated terms and conditions. Presently and for the foreseeable future, we expect that we will receive interest payments as required by our loan agreement with Mustang.
| 10 |
| Table of Contents |
In light of all of the foregoing, a significant and material amount of our assets are now invested in Mustang through March 2027. Given the size of the investment relative to our balance sheet, Mustang’s payment of interest and repayment of principal owed under that loan will likely materially contribute to our results of operation and may affect the trading price of common stock. Furthermore, while we believe that the addition of collateral security and the termination of our combination negotiations permits us to classify our investment in Mustang as a “commercial lending transaction” that will not be considered an “investment security” for purposes of the 1940 Act, we cannot be certain that regulatory authorities will concur with our analysis and conclusion. For more information and context for these risks, please see “Business — Our Investment Process” and “Risk Factors — If we are deemed to be an investment company under the 1940 Act ….”
A limited number of shareholders control a significant majority of our voting stock and, as a result, control the election of our Board of Directors. As a result, these shareholders may exert an influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.
Nine shareholders (five of whom are presently officers and directors) beneficially own shares representing a majority of our issued and outstanding common stock. As a result, investors in our common stock cannot reasonably expect to have any significant influence over the election of our directors or other matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders. Instead, our existing significant shareholders will exert a substantial influence on the election of our directors and any actions requiring or otherwise put to a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support. Examples of such voting matters, apart from the election of our directors, includes amendments to our articles of incorporation, bylaws, and approval of major corporate transactions. The concentrated amount of control over our affairs held by a relatively few number of significant investors could serve to reduce the attractiveness or liquidity of our common stock, and thereby depress its trading price.
Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with laws and regulations, whether by us or by our borrowers, may adversely affect our business, including our results of operations and ultimately the price of our common stock.
Both we and our borrowers are typically subject to various local, state and federal laws and regulations. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and manner of application or enforcement may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Any of these outcomes would likely adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.
Changes in consumer finance and other applicable laws and regulations, as well as changes in government enforcement policies and priorities, may negatively impact the management of our business, results of operations, ability to offer certain kinds of specialty finance solutions or the terms and conditions upon which they are offered, and our ability to compete.
Consumer finance regulation is constantly changing, and new laws or regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, could have a materially adverse impact on our ability to operate as currently intended or as we may intend to expand in the future, and cause us to incur significant expense in order to ensure compliance. Federal and state financial services regulators are also enforcing existing laws, regulations, and rules aggressively and enhancing their supervisory expectations regarding the management of legal and regulatory compliance risks. These regulatory changes and uncertainties make our business planning more difficult and could result in changes to our business model and potentially adversely impact our results of operations. Because we operate as a non-bank lender, we are sometimes subject to state usury laws and other laws and regulations. Furthermore, to the extent applicable, these laws can impose specific statutory liabilities upon creditors who fail to comply with their provisions and may affect the enforceability of a loan. If the application of consumer protection laws were to cause our loans, or any of the terms of our loans, to be unenforceable against the relevant borrowers, our business may be materially adversely affected. Even if we seek to comply with licensing and other requirements that we believe may be applicable to us, if we are found to not have complied with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or authorizations or face other sanctions or penalties or be required to obtain a license in one or more such jurisdictions, which may have an adverse effect on our business.
| 11 |
| Table of Contents |
New laws, regulations, policy or changes in enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business, or reexamination of current practices, could adversely impact our profitability, limit our ability to continue existing or pursue new business activities, require us to change certain of our business practices, affect retention of key personnel, or expose us to additional costs, including compliance costs. These changes also may require us to invest significant resources, and devote significant management attention, to make any necessary changes and could adversely affect our business.
We may engage in transactions with businesses that may be affiliated with our officers, directors or significant shareholders, and which may involve actual or potential conflicts of interest.
We may decide to make investments in one or more businesses affiliated with our officers, directors or significant shareholders. Such investment opportunities may compete with other opportunities for our investment dollars. Although we are not specifically focusing on, or targeting, any particular transaction with any affiliates or affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such an affiliated investment were attractive from a risk-adjusted return perspective, and such transaction were approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Any such activity would involve actual or potential conflicts of interest. Although we are confident that we can navigate these conflicts consistent with best practices and applicable law, the existence or appearance of such conflicts of interest could make our common stock less attractive and thereby reduce its trading price.
Our ability to identify and consummate investment opportunities, and any need we may have for additional capital, will almost certainly be affected by general economic conditions.
General economic conditions will almost certainly impact our ability to (i) identify, pursue and consummate investment opportunities, and (ii) if necessary, seek and obtain additional financing on terms acceptable or favorable to us, if at all. Therefore, a deterioration in general economic conditions may adversely affect our business or slow the growth of our business.
Our reputation and brand are important to our success, and if we are unable to continue developing our reputation and brand, our ability to retain existing capital sources, and to attract borrowers could be adversely affected.
We believe that maintaining a strong brand and trustworthy reputation is critical to our success and our ability to attract borrowers, attract new capital sources and maintain existing capital sources. Factors that we believe affect our brand and reputation include:
| · | the non-bank lending industry generally; |
| · | our company specifically, including the quality and reliability of our investment process, our ability to effectively manage and resolve issues with our borrowers, our collection practices, our privacy and security practices, any litigation in which we may become involved; any regulatory activity to which we may become involved; and the overall experience of our borrowers. |
Negative publicity or negative public perception of these factors, even if inaccurate, could adversely affect our brand and reputation. Any negative publicity or negative public perception of the loans we make, or similar loans made by similar lenders or our competitors, may also result in negative publicity that is adverse to our reputation. If we are unable to protect our reputation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We are highly dependent on the services provided by certain executives and key personnel.
Our success depends in significant part upon the continued service of our senior management personnel. In particular, we are materially dependent upon the services of Douglas M. Polinsky, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Joseph A. Geraci, II, our Chief Financial Officer and a director of our company. Practically, we cannot prevent the departure of these executives, whether due to death, disability, retirement or otherwise. Any loss of the services provided by these executives would likely have a material and adverse effect on our operations and ability to execute our business plans.
| 12 |
| Table of Contents |
Our articles of incorporation grant our Board of Directors the power to designate and issue additional shares and classes of common and preferred stock.
Our authorized capital consists of 111,111,111 shares of capital stock. Pursuant to authority granted by our articles of incorporation, our Board of Directors, without any action by our shareholders, may designate and issue shares in such classes or series (including other classes or series of preferred stock) as it deems appropriate, and may establish the rights, preferences and privileges of such shares, including dividends, liquidation and voting rights. The rights of holders of new classes or series of stock that may be so designated and issued could be superior to the rights of holders of our common shares. The designation and issuance of shares of capital stock having preferential rights could adversely affect other rights appurtenant to shares of our common stock. Furthermore, any issuances of additional stock—common or preferred—will dilute the ownership interest of then-current holders of our common stock and may dilute our book value per share.
We may issue additional common stock or preferred shares without the approval of our shareholders. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 111,111,111 shares of capital stock. Because we presently have only 6,385,255 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, our Board of Directors has the power and authority to issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock or preferred shares. The issuance of additional common stock or preferred shares:
| · | may significantly dilute the equity interest of our then-current shareholders; |
| · | may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred shares are issued with rights senior to those afforded our common stock; |
| · | could cause a change in control if a substantial number of common stock are issued, which could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; and |
| · | may adversely affect prevailing market price for our common stock. |
Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those belonging to third parties with whom we deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. We have not made a significant investment in data security protection (preferring instead to rely upon the data-security know-how and investments made by the third parties with whom we deal and upon whom we rely), and we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.
Our stock price may be volatile, or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you could lose all or part of your investment as a result.
You should consider an investment in our common stock to be risky, and you should invest in our common stock only if you can withstand a significant loss and wide fluctuation in the market value of your investment. The market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to the factors described in this section and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Among the many factors that could affect our stock price are:
| · | The historically limited trading volume of our common stock; |
| · | Actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly and annual operating results or those of companies perceived to be similar to us; |
| 13 |
| Table of Contents |
| · | Changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors, or differences between our actual results and those expected by investors and securities analysts; |
| · | Fluctuations in the market valuations of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us; |
| · | The public’s response to our or our competitors’ filings with the SEC or announcements regarding, significant transactions, acquisitions, strategic investments, litigation, or other significant matters; |
| · | Speculation about our business in the press or the investment community; |
| · | Future sales of our shares; |
| · | Actions by our competitors; |
| · | Additions or departures of members of our senior management or other key personnel; and |
| · | The passage of legislation or other regulatory developments affecting us or our industry. |
In addition, the securities markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect market price of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, systemic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, loss of investor confidence, interest rate changes, or international currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the market price of our shares.
If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to securities class action litigation that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock.
We intend to retain all of our earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to compliance with applicable law and any contractual provisions, and will depend on, among other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant. As a result, investors in our common shares should expect to receive a return on investment only if the market price of the common shares increases, which may never occur.
One of the manners in which we may seek to grow our company is through acquisition or combination transactions. It is possible that, even after our announcement of a potential acquisition or combination transaction, such transactions may not ultimately close and occur. Our announcement of these potential transactions, and the occasional failure of them to occur, may cause the price of our common stock to be volatile.
In prior reports, we have publicly announced our intention to grow our company both organically, including by expanding our specialty finance operations into new markets or niches, and through acquisition or combination transactions such as mergers or similarly structured transactions. In the past, we have announced our execution of non-binding letters of intent for these kinds of acquisition or combination transactions. These announcements may create volatility in the trading volume and price of our common stock, in particular when there is not significant publicly available information about the counterparty to such a transaction. Moreover, the failure of the transactions contemplated in these announcements to close could similarly create volatility in the trading volume and price of our common stock. This volatility could ultimately mean that there are fewer buyers or sellers of our common stock at particular times, which creates the risk that you might not be able to sell any common stock of our company that you own at a time or a price that you believe is fair or desirable.
An historical example of the foregoing is our December 2022 announcement of a non-binding letter of intent with Mustang Funding, LLC, a private litigation-funding business, in which letter we contemplated a merger transaction. Although we negotiated the terms of a definitive agreement with Mustang Funding, we were unable to finalize that agreement and enter into it. Ultimately, we determined to abandon the transaction and to terminate the non-binding letter of intent in August 2024. The volatility in the trading volume and price of our common stock that occurred contemporaneously with our related public announcements of having entered into the non-binding letter of intent, and then having terminated it, together with certain related announcements touching upon amendments to our prior loans made to Mustang Funding, was not insignificant from a comparative standpoint.
| 14 |
| Table of Contents |
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock, including the general volume of transactions in our common stock, will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, and may never, publish research on our company. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our company, the trading price for our stock may be negatively impacted. In the event securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price may decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY
Our risk management strategy for cybersecurity generally includes:
| · | Assessment: We periodically assess our risks relating to cybersecurity threats, including risks relating to our reliance on third parties, as part of our overall risk-management efforts and program. In so doing, we consider the likelihood and impact that could result from the manifestation of such risks, together with the sufficiency of existing policies, procedures, systems, and safeguards to manage such risks. |
|
|
|
| · | Identification: We aim to proactively identify the manners in which our business could be materially impacted by cybersecurity risks. |
|
|
|
| · | Management: If deemed appropriate, we would design and implement reasonable safeguards to address any identified gaps in our existing processes and procedures. |
We presently do not engage third parties to assist us with the assessment, identification or management of cybersecurity risks, or in evaluating the effectiveness of our existing approaches.
We are unaware of any material cybersecurity breaches during the year ended December 31, 2024, and given that we rely on relatively few and well known well capitalized larger third-party enterprises for certain of our data and information storage and communication needs, we do not believe that an overall material cybersecurity risk presently exists for our business. Our criteria for determining the materiality of cybersecurity incidents includes assessing potential or actual financial impacts, reputational damage, and operational disruptions.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is the governance body involved in, and ultimately responsible for, cybersecurity oversight. They will generally coordinate with our Chief Financial Officer in this regard, with management alerting the committee members to any specific concerns of which management may be aware. In the event of a cybersecurity concern or event, our Chief Financial Officer would report the events or his or her concerns to our Audit Committee and full Board of Directors, as well as legal counsel. None of our directors on the Audit Committee nor our Chief Financial Officer have particular experience in cybersecurity matters.
ITEM 2 PROPERTIES
Our executive offices are located at 1907 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 205, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391, and our telephone number is: (952) 479-1923. We are party to an operating lease for office space expiring May 31, 2025. The lease does not have significant lease escalations, rent abatements or concessions, leasehold improvements, or other build-out clauses; and they do not contain contingent-rent provisions. The lease does not include options to renew. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.
ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There is no material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any members of our management team in their capacity as such.
| 15 |
| Table of Contents |
PART II
ITEM 5 MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq under the symbol “MCVT”. The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Pacific Stock Transfer Company, 6725 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300, Las Vegas, NV 89119. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
Period |
|
| Market Price (High/Low) 2024 |
| Market Price (High/Low) 2023 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
| $ | 2.27 – 3.01 |
| $ | 2.54-2.02 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
| $ | 2.50 - 3.01 |
| $ | 2.44 – 2.17 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
| $ | 2.25 – 3.56 |
| $ | 3.58 – 2.09 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
| $ | 1.79 – 2.26 |
| $ | 3.59 – 2.22 |
|
Holders
As of the date of this filing, we had approximately 180 holders of record of our common stock and shares held in street name by approximately 655 non-objecting beneficial owners.
Dividends
We do not expect that the Board of Directors will declare any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Plan category |
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
| Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
| Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| |||
|
| (a) |
|
| (b) |
|
| (c) |
| |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
| 670,000 |
|
| $ | 2.11 |
|
|
| 30,000 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Total |
|
| 670,000 |
|
| $ | 2.11 |
|
|
| 30,000 |
|
| 16 |
| Table of Contents |
The securities reflected in column (a) above were issued pursuant to the company’s 2022 Stock Incentive Plan.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
In November and December 2022, the Company issued options for the purchase of an aggregate of 870,000 shares of common stock to officers, directors and employees of, and consultants to, the Company contemporaneously with the adoption of a 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. These option grants were made subject to subsequent shareholder approval of the 2022 Stock Incentive Plan in accordance with Nasdaq rules. The options were granted pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and other applicable exemptions. The shareholders of the company subsequently approved the 2022 Stock Incentive Plan on January 20, 2023 at a special meeting of shareholders called for that purpose. Options for 200,000 of these common shares were subsequently exercised, and the common shares issued, in September 2023. No options were exercised in 2024.
ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth below should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements, and notes thereto, filed together with this Form 10-K.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this report may constitute “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management team’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.
The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this report and those summarized below:
| · | our being a company with little operating history; |
| · | our ability to select appropriate specialty finance investment opportunities; |
| · | our expectations around the performance of borrowers in which we invest; |
| · | our regulatory structure and the regulations that govern us; |
| · | the ability of significant borrowers to pay their obligations to us as they come due; |
| · | our success in retaining our officers and directors, or replacing them in the event we lose their services; |
| · | actual and potential conflicts of interest involving our directors or management team; |
| · | our ability to obtain additional financing, if needed and on acceptable terms; |
| · | our ability to source quality prospective borrowers for our specialty finance solutions; |
| · | our ability to consummate transactions due to the uncertainty resulting from unpredictable events such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or other significant outbreaks of infectious diseases; |
| · | the dependence of our success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest; |
| · | the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives; |
| · | the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; |
| · | the timing of cash flows, if any, we receive from our investments; |
| · | our overall financial performance and financial condition following this offering; |
| · | our public securities’ potential liquidity and trading price; |
| · | the lack of a market for our securities; and |
| · | the other risks and uncertainties discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. |
| 17 |
| Table of Contents |
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in our forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
Results of Operations
|
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||
Investment Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Income |
| $ | 3,301,119 |
|
| $ | 3,298,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Operating Expenses |
|
| 92,214 |
|
|
| 149,708 |
|
Legal and Accounting Expenses |
|
| 550,248 |
|
|
| 761,525 |
|
Payroll |
|
| 933,157 |
|
|
| 1,848,393 |
|
Insurance Expense |
|
| 99,936 |
|
|
| 108,039 |
|
Director’s Fees |
|
| 300,000 |
|
|
| 772,968 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
| 320 |
|
|
| 78,000 |
|
Total Operating Expenses |
|
| 1,975,875 |
|
|
| 3,718,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Gain (Loss) |
| $ | 1,325,244 |
|
| $ | (419,998 | ) |
For the year ended December 31, 2024, we earned $2,758,744 from 10 different short-term loans; and an aggregate of $542,375 in related origination fees.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we earned $2,836,060 from 26 different short-term loans; and an aggregate of $462,575 in related origination fees.
As the table above indicates, we incurred operating expenses aggregating $1,975,875 for the year ended December 31, 2024, and $3,718,633 for the year ended December 31, 2023. A summary of the various components of our operating expenses for these periods is set forth below.
General Operating Expenses. Our general operating expenses were $92,214 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $149,708 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the current period results primarily from higher fees we incurred in 2023 for the unused portion on our line of credit (see Liquidity and Capital Resources below for more information).
Legal and Accounting Expenses. Our legal and accounting expenses were $550,248 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $761,525 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the current period results primarily to a decreased need for legal and consulting services, and the decision to spend less on marketing.
| 18 |
| Table of Contents |
Executive Management Compensation. Our executive management compensation was $933,157 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $1,848,393 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the current period results from the absence of any stock-based compensation expense in the current period.
Director’s Fees. Our director’s fees were $300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $722,968 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the current period is results from the absence of any stock-based compensation expense in the current period.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense was $320 for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $78,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the current period results from our repayment in full and termination of the line of credit arrangement in January 2024. (see Liquidity and Capital Resources below for more information).
For the year ended December 31, 2024 our net investment gain was $1,325,244. For the year ended December 31, 2023, our net investment loss was $419,998. The increased net investment gain during 2024 results primarily from the absence of stock-based compensation expense in 2024 compared to significant stock-based compensation expense in 2023 from the issuance of stock options to our officers and directors.
Financial Condition
At December 31, 2024, we had an increase in net assets of $1,167,726 as compared to December 31, 2023. This increase in net assets was primarily due to the overall reduction in operating expenses. Our net assets increased by $718,703 at December 31, 2023 as compared to December 31, 2022, due to the capitalized issuance and exercise of stock options, partially offset by the decrease in the fair value of our investments and reduced cash and cash equivalents.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Summary cash flow data is as follows:
|
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||
Cash flows provided (used) by: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating activities |
| $ | 5,650,086 |
|
| $ | (1,137,617 | ) |
Financing activities |
|
| — |
|
|
| 424,000 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
| 5,650,086 |
|
|
| (713,617 | ) |
Cash, beginning of period |
|
| 376,024 |
|
|
| 1,089,641 |
|
Cash, end of period |
| $ | 6,026,110 |
|
| $ | 376,024 |
|
On January 3, 2022, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Eastman Investment, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Lyle A. Berman, as trustee of the Lyle A. Berman Revocable Trust. The Loan Agreement provided us with a $5 million revolving line of credit to use in the ordinary course of our short-term specialty finance business. Amounts drawn under the Loan Agreement accrued interest at the per annum rate of 8%, and all our obligations under the Loan Agreement were secured by a grant of a collateral security interest in substantially all of our assets. In January 2024, we terminated the Loan Agreement after having earlier satisfied all amounts thereunder. Any applicable fees for early termination of the Agreement were waived.
During the course of 2023, the Loan Agreement, together with our cash and cash equivalents, were our primary sources of liquidity. With the termination of the Loan Agreement, however, our cash and cash equivalents are our remaining sources of liquidity. In addition, we expect that some of our investment positions will mature, resulting in additional available cash. Management believes that these sources of liquidity, will be sufficient for the Company to fund its operations through the entirety of fiscal 2025. Accordingly, at present we have no definitive plans to obtain other sources of liquidity through borrowing or otherwise.
| 19 |
| Table of Contents |
Investment Activity
In 2024, we made new investments aggregating $5,665,526, and refinanced or otherwise extended the term to maturity of investments aggregating $17,795,000. Of these amounts, $5 million in principal amount was initially loaned to Mustang Funding, LLC in 2023, while another $5 million in principal amount (earlier been loaned in 2022) was refinanced, such that we had an aggregate of $10 million invested in Mustang Funding, LLC at December 31, 2024, all of which is currently due to mature at March 28, 2027.
In 2024, we also recognized as worthless one of our preferred stock investments. This investment had been de-valued in previous years by $635,000, and we recognized an additional loss in 2024 of $265,000. We also settled through litigation on one of our short-term loans and recognized a loss of $100,000. This was offset by $500,000 of valuation losses recorded in prior years, resulting in a net gain of $400,000 in 2024. The write-offs were offset by an increase in market valuations of our remaining short-term loan portfolio as well as market changes in our common stock and other equity holdings, resulting in a net change in unrealized depreciation of $1,029,277 as reflected in the statement of operations.
Capital Expenditures
We did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures in fiscal 2024 and we do not anticipate any such capital expenditures for fiscal 2025.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor are we a party to any contract or other obligation not included on its balance sheet that has, or is reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are policies that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting policies relate to investment valuation and interest and dividend income as an investment company.
Investment Valuation
Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized, and include investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Unrealized gains or losses primarily reflect the change in investment values, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses when gains or losses are realized.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are typically valued at such market quotations. In order to validate market quotations, we look at a number of factors to determine if the quotations are representative of fair value, including the source and nature of the quotations. Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors, based on, among other things, the input of our executive management, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and any independent third-party valuation expert that may be engaged by management to assist in the valuation of our portfolio investments. Valuation determinations are in all cases made in conformity with the written valuation policies and procedures respecting the valuation of company investments.
Use of Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. The application of GAAP requires that we make estimates that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of investment income and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.
| 20 |
| Table of Contents |
ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
| F-1 |
| Table of Contents |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders’ of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, including the investment schedules and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter – Investment Valuation
As explained in Note 6 to the financial statements, the accompanying financial statements include investments valued at $13,006,231 and $17,284,676 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, whose fair values have been estimated by management in absence of readily determinable fair values. Such estimates are based on financial and other information provided by management of its portfolio companies and pertinent market and industry data. The investments are valued based on unobservable inputs as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time. These determinations of fair value could differ materially from the values that would have been utilized had a ready market for these investments existed.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgements. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
| F-2 |
| Table of Contents |
|
| Valuation of investments which utilize significant unobservable inputs | |
Description of the Matter |
| At December 31, 2024, the balances of the Company’s investments, at fair value, categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy totaled $13,006,231. The fair values of these investments are determined by management using the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs described in Notes 5 and 6 to the financial statements.
Auditing the fair value of the Company’s investments categorized as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy was complex and involved a high degree of auditor subjectivity and judgement due to the estimation uncertainty resulting from the unobservable nature of the inputs used in the valuations and the limited number of comparable market transactions for the same or similar investments. | |
|
|
|
|
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
|
| We obtained an understanding and evaluated the design of controls over the Company’s valuation process, including management’s assessment of the significant inputs and estimates used in the fair value measurements.
We performed the following procedures, among others, for the Company’s Level 3 investments: | |
|
|
|
|
|
| · | We evaluated the valuation techniques used by the Company and considered the consistency in application of the valuation techniques to each subject investment and investment class. |
|
|
|
|
|
| · | We assigned senior, more experienced audit team members to perform audit procedures related to the valuation of investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
| · | We evaluated the reasonableness of the significant unobservable inputs by comparing the inputs used by the Company to third-party sources, if available, such as market indexes or other market data. |
|
|
|
|
|
| · | We considered the other information obtained during the audit that corroborated or contradicted the Company’s inputs or fair value measurements. |
|
|
|
|
|
| · | For investments sold during the year or subsequent to year-end, we compared the transaction price to the Company’s fair value estimate to assess the reasonableness of management’s fair value estimates. |
/s/
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
March 7, 2025
| F-3 |
| Table of Contents |
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Balance Sheets
|
| December 31, 2024 |
|
| December 31, 2023 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investments, at fair value (cost: $ |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Note receivable, related party |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest and dividend receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Right-of-use operating lease asset |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
Accrued payroll liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating lease liability |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accrued income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (NET ASSETS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $ |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additional paid-in capital - stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Accumulated undistributed investment loss |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Accumulated undistributed net realized gains on investment transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net unrealized depreciation in value of investments |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Net Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
Net Asset Value Per Common Share |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| F-4 |
| Table of Contents |
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Statements of Operations
|
| Year Ended |
| ||||||
|
| December 31, 2024 |
|
| December 31, 2023 |
| |||
Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest income |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| |||
Total Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Professional fees |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Payroll |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Occupancy |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Director’s fees |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other general and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net Investment Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | ||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net realized loss on investments |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | ||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations Before Taxes |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provision For (Benefit From) Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations per share: | |||||||||
Basic |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | ||
Diluted |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| F-5 |
| Table of Contents |
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
Year Ended December 31, 2024 |
| Common Shares |
|
| Par Value |
|
| Additional Paid In Capital |
|
| Accumulated Deficit |
|
| Accumulated Undistributed Net Investment Gain (Loss) |
|
| Accumulated Undistributed Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions |
|
| Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) in Value of Investments |
|
| Total Shareholders’ Equity |
| ||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2023 |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
| |||||
Undistributed net investment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Undistributed net realized loss on investment transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |||||
Appreciation in value of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2024 |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
| |||||
Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
| Common Shares |
|
| Par Value |
|
| Additional Paid In Capital |
|
| Accumulated Deficit |
|
| Accumulated Undistributed Net Investment Gain (Loss) |
|
| Accumulated Undistributed Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions |
|
| Net Unrealized Depreciation in Value of Investments |
|
| Total Shareholders’ Equity |
| ||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2022 |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
| |||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Undistributed net investment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Undistributed net realized loss on investment transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |||||
Depreciation in value of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) | |||||
Balance as of December 31, 2023 |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ |
| |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| F-6 |
| Table of Contents |
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Statements of Cash Flows
|
| Year Ended |
| |||||
|
| December 31, 2024 |
|
| December 31, 2023 |
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from operations to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
| |
Net realized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of investments |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Proceeds from sales of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest and dividends receivable |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |
Note receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |
Deferred interest income |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided (used) in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Repayments on line of credit |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | |
Cash, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash, end of period |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
Cash paid for interest |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| F-7 |
| Table of Contents |
Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.
Investment Schedule
As of December 31, 2024
Investment / Industry |
| Cost |
|
| Fair Value |
|
| Percentage of Net Assets |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Short-Term Non-banking Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Business Services - 15% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Mustang Litigation Funding |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| % | |||
Consumer - 18% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Real Estate - 15% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alatus Development Corp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Real Estate - 24% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coventry Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Total Short-Term Non-Banking Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Information Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Total Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments and Cash |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| % | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| F-8 |
| Table of Contents |
Investment Schedule
As of December 31, 2023
Investment / Industry |
| Cost |
|
| Fair Value |
|
| Percentage of Net Assets |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Short-Term Non-banking Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Business Services - 15% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Mustang Litigation Funding |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| % | |||
Consumer - 23% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intelligent Mapping, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Financial - 12% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Information Technology - 15% convertible note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Real Estate - 18% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Tailwind, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Real Estate - 12% secured loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alatus Development Corp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Total Short-Term Non-Banking Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisdom Gaming, Inc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Information Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
Total Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments and Cash |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
| % | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
| F-9 |
| Table of Contents |
NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION
In this report, we generally refer to Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. in the first person “we.” On occasion, we refer to our company in the third person as “Mill City Ventures” or the “Company.” The Company follows accounting and reporting guidance in Accounting Standards (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services – Investment Companies”.
We were incorporated in Minnesota in January 2006. Until December 13, 2012, we were a development-stage company that focused on promoting and placing a proprietary poker game online and into casinos and entertainment facilities nationwide. In 2013, we elected to become a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We operated as a BDC until we withdrew our BDC election at the end of December 2019. Since that time, we have remained a public reporting company filing periodic reports with the SEC. We engage in the business of providing short-term specialty finance solutions, typically in the form of short-term loans, primarily to small businesses, both private and public, and high-net-worth individuals. To avoid regulation under the 1940 Act, we generally seek to structure our investments so they do not constitute “securities” for purposes of federal securities laws, and we monitor our investments as a whole to ensure that no more than
NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management and our independent board members to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For more information, see the “Valuation of portfolio investments” caption below, and “Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments” below. The Company presents its financial statements as an investment company following accounting and reporting guidance in ASC 946.
Cash deposits: We maintain our cash balances in financial institutions and with regulated financial investment brokers. Cash on deposit in excess of FDIC and similar coverage is subject to the usual banking risk of funds in excess of those limits.
Valuation of portfolio investments: We carry our investments in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is generally based on quoted market prices provided by independent pricing services, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative price sources. In the absence of quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative price sources, investments are measured at fair value as determined by the our Board of Directors based on, among other things, the input of our executive management, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and any independent third-party valuation experts that may be engaged by management to assist in the valuation of our portfolio investments, but in all cases consistent with our written valuation policies and procedures.
Due to the inherent uncertainties of valuation, certain estimated fair values may differ significantly from the values that would have been realized had a ready market for these investments existed, and these differences could be material. In addition, such investments are generally less liquid than publicly traded securities. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we could realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded it.
Accounting guidance establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Observable inputs must be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability based upon the best information available. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are to be categorized into one of the three hierarchy levels based on the relative observability of inputs used in the valuation. The three levels are defined as follows:
| ● | Level 1: Observable inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
| ● | Level 2: Observable inputs based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets. |
|
|
|
| ● | Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about what inputs a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. |
| F-10 |
| Table of Contents |
Our valuation policy and procedures: Under our valuation policies and procedures, we evaluate the source of inputs, including any markets in which our investments are trading, and then apply the resulting information in determining fair value. For our Level 1 investment assets, our valuation policy generally requires us to use a market approach, considering the last quoted closing price of a security we own that is listed on a securities exchange, and in a case where a security we own is listed on an over-the-counter market, to average the last quoted bid and ask price on the most active market on which the security is quoted. In the case of traded debt securities the prices for which are not readily available, we may value those securities using a discounted cash flows approach, at their weighted-average yield to maturity.
The estimated fair value of our Level 3 investment assets is determined on a quarterly basis by the Company. In general, we value our Level 3 equity investments at cost unless circumstances warrant a different approach. Examples of these circumstances includes a situation in which a portfolio company has engaged in a subsequent financing of more than a de minimis size involving sophisticated investors (in which case we may use the price involved in that financing as a determinative input absent other known factors), or when a portfolio company is engaged in the process of a transaction that we determine is reasonably likely to occur (in which case we may use the price involved in the pending transaction as a determinative input absent other known factors). Other facts and circumstances that may serve as an input supporting a change in the valuation of our Level 3 equity investments include (i) a third-party valuation conducted by an independent and qualified professional, (ii) changes in the performance of long-term financial prospects of the portfolio company, (iii) a subsequent financing that changes the distribution rights associated with the equity security we hold, or (iv) sale transactions involving comparable companies, but only if further supported by a third-party valuation conducted by an independent and qualified professional.
When valuing preferred equity investments, we generally view intrinsic value as a key input. Intrinsic value means the value of any conversion feature (if the preferred investment is convertible) or the value of any liquidation or other preference. Discounts to intrinsic value may be applied in cases where the issuer’s financial condition is impaired or, in cases where intrinsic value relating to a conversion is determined to be a key input, to account for resale restrictions applicable to the securities issuable upon conversion.
When valuing warrants, our valuation policy and procedures indicate that value will generally be the difference between the closing price of the underlying equity security and the exercise price, after applying an appropriate discount for restriction, if applicable, in situations where the underlying security is marketable. If the underlying security is not marketable, then intrinsic value will be considered consistent with the principles described above. Generally, “out-of-the-money” warrants will be valued at cost or zero.
For non-traded (Level 3) debt instruments with a residual maturity less than or equal to 60 days, we will generally value such instruments based on a discounted cash flows approach, considering the straight-line amortized face value of the debt unless justification for impairment exists. For level 3 non-banking loans with a maturity in excess of 60 days, fair value is determined based on the initial purchase price and adjusted as necessary to reflect any changes in the financial strength of the creditor and changes in interest rates in the high-yield credit markets.
On a quarterly basis, our management provides members of our Board of Directors with recommendations, if any, to change any existing valuations of our portfolio investments or hierarchy levels for purposes of determining the fair value of such investments based upon the foregoing. In such a case, the Board of Directors would then discuss these materials and, consistent with the policies and approaches outlined above, makes final determinations respecting the valuation and hierarchy levels of our portfolio investments.
We made no changes to our valuation policy and procedures during the reporting period.
Income taxes: We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the tax year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income for the period that includes the enactment date.
| F-11 |
| Table of Contents |
We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine we would not be able to realize our deferred income tax assets, we would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company does not believe there will be any material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2021 through 2023, which are the tax years that remain subject to examination by the tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2024.
Revenue recognition: Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are calculated using the specific investment method.
Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, is recorded on an accrual basis. Discounts from and premiums to par value on securities purchased are accreted or amortized, as applicable, into interest income over the life of the related security using the effective-yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost, adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, if any. Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due 30 days or more, or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected in full. Loan origination fees are recognized when loans are issued. Accrued and unpaid interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past-due principal and interest is paid and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. We may make exceptions to the policy described above if a loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.
Dividend income on preferred equity securities is recorded as dividend income on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are payable by the portfolio company and are expected to be collected. Dividend income on common equity securities is recorded on the record date for private portfolio companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly traded portfolio companies.
Certain investments may have contractual payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest or dividends. PIK represents accrued interest or accumulated dividends that are added to the loan principal or stated value of the investment on the respective interest- or dividend-payment dates rather than being paid in cash, and generally becomes due at maturity or upon being repurchased by the issuer. PIK interest or dividends is recorded as interest or dividend income, as applicable. If at any point we believe that PIK interest or dividends is not expected be realized, the PIK-generating investment will be placed on non-accrual status. Accrued PIK interest or dividends are generally reversed through interest or dividend income, respectively, when an investment in placed on non-accrual status.
Allocation of net gains and losses: All income, gains, losses, deductions and credits for any investment are allocated in a manner proportionate to the shares owned.
Stock-based compensation: The Company’s stock-based compensation consists of stock options issued to certain employees and directors of the Company. The Company recognizes compensation expense based on an estimated grant date fair value using the Black Scholes option-pricing method. If the factors change and different assumptions are used, the Company’s stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for these options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.
Management and service fees: We do not incur expenses related to management and service fees. Our executive management team manages our investments as part of their employment responsibilities.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements: In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07: Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. This ASU, which amends Topic 280: Segment Reporting, improves disclosure requirements for reportable segments and enhances disclosures for companies with single reportable segments. The Company has a single reportable segment based on the nature of its operations. The nature of business and the accounting policies of the segment are the same as described throughout Notes 1 and 2. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) is its executive team. The CODM assesses the reportable segment’s performance and allocates resources for the reportable segment based on the net income and total assets which are the same amounts in all material respects as those reported on the Statement of Operations and Balance Sheet. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2024. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
| F-12 |
| Table of Contents |
NOTE 3 — NET GAIN (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net gain (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted net gain per common share follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||||||||||
|
| Basic |
|
| Diluted |
|
| Basic |
|
| Diluted |
| ||||
Numerator: Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ | ( | ) | ||
Denominator: Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and diluted net gain (loss) per common share |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) |
| $ | ( | ) | ||
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not have any options or warrants outstanding or any other dilutive common equivalent shares other than conditional option grants (for an aggregate of
NOTE 4—SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, a total of
In connection with a public offering on August 11, 2022, the Company issued a five-year warrant to the underwriter. The warrant allows the underwriter to purchase up to
During 2024, there were no shares issued related to the exercise of stock options or warrants. During 2023 there were
NOTE 5 — INVESTMENTS
The following table shows the composition of our investment portfolio by major class, at amortized cost and fair value, as of December 31, 2024 (together with the corresponding percentage of total portfolio investments):
|
| As of December 31, 2024 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Investments at Amortized Cost |
|
| Percentage of Amortized Cost |
|
| Investments at Fair Value |
|
| Percentage of Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Short-term Non-banking Loans |
| $ |
|
|
| % |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||||
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| $ |
|
|
| % |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||||
| F-13 |
| Table of Contents |
The following table shows the composition of our investment portfolio by major class, at amortized cost and fair value, as of December 31, 2023 (together with the corresponding percentage of total portfolio investments):
|
| As of December 31, 2023 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Investments at Amortized Cost |
|
| Percentage of Amortized Cost |
|
| Investments at Fair Value |
|
| Percentage of Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Short-term Non-banking Loans |
| $ |
|
|
| % |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||||
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| $ |
|
|
| % |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||||
The following table shows the composition of our investment portfolio by industry grouping, based on fair value as of December 31, 2024:
|
| As of December 31, 2024 |
| |||||
|
| Investments at Fair Value |
|
| Percentage of Fair Value |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Business Services |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Information Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||
The following table shows the composition of our investment portfolio by industry grouping, based on fair value as of December 31, 2023:
|
| As of December 31, 2023 |
| |||||
|
| Investments at Fair Value |
|
| Percentage of Fair Value |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Business Services |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Information Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total |
| $ |
|
|
| % | ||
NOTE 6 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Level 3 valuation information: Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, the estimate of the fair value of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 may differ materially from values that would have been used had a readily available market for the securities existed.
| F-14 |
| Table of Contents |
The following table presents the fair value measurements of our portfolio investments by major class, as of December 31, 2024, according to the fair value hierarchy:
|
| As of December 31, 2024 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Level 1 |
|
| Level 2 |
|
| Level 3 |
|
| Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Short-term Non-banking Loans |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||
The following table presents the fair value measurements of our portfolio investments by major class, as of December 31, 2023, according to the fair value hierarchy:
|
| As of December 31, 2023 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| Level 1 |
|
| Level 2 |
|
| Level 3 |
|
| Total |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Short-term Non-banking Loans |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value balances for our Level 3 portfolio investment assets for the year ended December 31, 2024:
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2024 |
| |||||||||||||
|
| ST Non-banking Loans |
|
| Preferred Stock |
|
| Common Stock |
|
| Other Equity |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2024 |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) | ||
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
|
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
Sales and redemptions |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Realized loss |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Conversion from preferred to common stock |
|
| — |
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
| — |
| |
Transfers between level 3 and level 1 |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2024 |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||||
The net change in unrealized depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2024 attributable to Level 3 portfolio investments still held as of December 31, 2024 is $
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value balances for our Level 3 portfolio investment assets for the year ended December 31, 2023:
|
| For the year ended December 31, 2023 |
| |||||||||
|
| ST Non-banking Loans |
|
| Preferred Stock |
|
| Other Equity |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2023 |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| 600,000 |
|
Purchases and other adjustments to cost |
|
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
Sales and redemptions |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Realized loss |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| ( | ) |
Transfers between level 3 and level 1 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| ( | ) |
Balance as of December 31, 2023 |
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| |||
| F-15 |
| Table of Contents |
The net change in unrealized depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2023 attributable to Level 3 portfolio investments still held as of December 31, 2023 is
The following table lists our Level 3 investments held as of December 31, 2024 and the unobservable inputs used to determine their valuation:
Security Type |
|
| 12/31/24 FMV |
| Valuation Technique |
| Unobservable Inputs |
| Range |
ST Non-banking Loans |
| $ |
| discounted cash flow |
| determining private company interest rate based on changes in market rates of instruments with comparable creditworthiness |
| ||
Other Equity |
|
| last secured funding known by company |
| economic changes since last funding |
|
| ||
Common Stock |
|
| last funding secured by company |
| economic changes since last funding |
|
| ||
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value balances for our Level 3 portfolio investment assets for the year ended December 31, 2023:
Security Type |
|
| 12/31/23 FMV |
| Valuation Technique |
| Unobservable Inputs |
| Range |
ST Non-banking Loans |
| $ |
| discounted cash flow |
| determining private company interest rate based on changes in market rates of instruments with comparable creditworthiness |
| ||
Other Equity |
|
| last secured funding known by company |
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred Stock |
|
| last funding secured by company |
| economic changes since last funding |
|
| ||
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was one transfer between levels during 2023 due to an initial public offering of a previously privately held security. The shares of that security are now free trading. There were no transfers between levels during the years ended December 31, 2024.
NOTE 7 – LINE OF CREDIT
The Company had a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with a third party and director (collectively, the Lenders). Under the Loan Agreement, the Lenders made available to us a $
At December 31, 2023, the balance outstanding on the line was $
NOTE 8 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company’s 2022 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) authorized the issuance of incentives relating to
| F-16 |
| Table of Contents |
The following table summarizes the activity for all stock options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||||||||||
|
| Shares |
|
| Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
| Shares |
|
| Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| ||||
Options outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
| $ |
| ||||
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
| |||
Forfeited |
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| ||
Options outstanding at end of year |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
| $ |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31: |
|
|
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
| $ |
| ||||
The following table summarizes additional information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2024:
Options Outstanding |
|
| Options Exercisable |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Options Outstanding |
|
| Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|
| Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
| Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|
| Options Exercisable |
|
| Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
| Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
|
|
|
|
| $ |
|
| $ |
| |||||||
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for stock options of $
|
| 2023 |
| |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
| % | |
Expected volatility |
|
| % | |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
| |
Expected dividend yield |
| % | ||
The inputs for the Black-Scholes valuation model require management’s significant assumptions. The price per share of common stock is determined by using the closing market price on the Nasdaq Capital Market on the grant date. The risk-free interest rates are based on the rate for U.S. Treasury securities at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at the grant date. The expected life is based on the simplified method in accordance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Nos. 107 and 110. The expected volatility is estimated based on historical volatility information of peer companies that are publicly available in combination with the Company’s calculated volatility.
NOTE 9 – RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We maintain a conflicts of interest and related-party transactions policy requiring (i) certain disclosures be made to our Board of Directors in relation to situations where officers, directors, significant shareholders, or any of their affiliates may enter into transactions with us, and (ii) certain disclosures appear in the reports we prepare and file with the SEC. In this regard, during the period covered by this report we entered into, or remained a party to, the following related-party transactions:
| · | We held a promissory note with two shareholders in the principal amount of $ |
|
|
|
| · | As disclosed in Note 7, a component of our now terminated loan agreement was with a director of our Company. |
| F-17 |
| Table of Contents |
NOTE 10 — RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLANS
Our three full-time employees are eligible to participate in a qualified defined contribution 401(k) plan whereby they may elect to have a specified portion of their salary contributed to the plan. We will make a safe harbor match equal to 100% of their elective deferrals up to a maximum of 5% of eligible earnings in addition to our option to make discretionary contributions to the plan. We made aggregate contributions to the plan totaling $
NOTE 11 — INCOME TAXES
Presently, we are a “C-corporation” for tax purposes and have booked an income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2024, and 2023 are described below.
|
| December 31 |
| |||||
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||
Current taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Federal |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
State |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
State |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | |
A reconciliation of income tax provisions at the U.S. statutory rate for fiscal year 2024 and 2023 is as follows:
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||
Rate reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tax expense at U.S. statutory rate |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | |
Change in deferred tax rate |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Prior year over / under accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision-to-return reconciliation |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Other |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Income tax provision |
| $ |
|
| $ | ( | ) | |
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023 we had a deferred tax asset of $
|
| December 31 |
| |||||
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||
Deferred tax components |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
Capital loss carryforward |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
R&D and foreign credits |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accrued bonuses |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other |
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
Net deferred tax asset |
| $ |
|
| $ |
| ||
| F-18 |
| Table of Contents |
NOTE 12 — FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2024 through 2020:
|
| Year Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
|
| 2022 |
|
| 2021 |
|
| 2020 |
| |||||
Per Share Data (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net asset value at beginning of period |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net investment gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes |
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) | ||
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Other changes in equity |
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Payment of common stock dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | ) |
|
| ( | ) | |||
Net asset value at end of period |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio / Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value of investments at end of period |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Average weighted shares outstanding for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net assets at end of period |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Average net assets (2) |
| $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total investment return |
|
| % |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| % | ||||
Portfolio turnover rate (3) |
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| % | |||||
Ratio of operating expenses to average net assets (3) |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| ( | )% |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets (3) |
|
| % |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| % | ||||
Ratio of realized gains (losses) to average net assets (3) |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| ( | )% |
|
| % |
|
| % |
|
| % | |||
(1) | Per-share data was derived using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. |
(2) | Based on the monthly average of net assets as of the beginning and end of each period presented. |
(3) | Ratios are annualized. |
| F-19 |
| Table of Contents |
NOTE 13 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On January 22, 2025, we entered into an Amendment No. 5 to Fourth Short-Term Loan Agreement and Fourth Short-Term Promissory Note with Mustang Funding, LLC, deemed effective January 21, 2025. The amendment extends the maturity date of our loan to Mustang Funding to March 28, 2027, and increases the per annum rate of interest to
Effective January 24, 2025, we entered into a Security Agreement with Mustang Funding, LLC pursuant to which Mustang Funding granted us a security interest in substantially all of Mustang Funding’s assets, subject to certain enumerated exceptions, as collateral security for our $
Also effective January 24, 2025, we entered into an Amended and Restated Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement with Orion Pip, LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent for senior lenders to Mustang Funding, LLC, and with Mustang Funding. The agreement contains customary and negotiated terms and conditions relating to the full subordination of our right to payment (subject to certain exceptions), exercise of rights and remedies, and our right to collateral pledged by Mustang Funding in our favor to secure the obligations of Mustang Funding under that certain Fourth Short-Term Loan Agreement and Fourth Short-Term Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $
On February 1, 2025, we entered into new Executive Employment Agreements with each of Douglas M. Polinsky, our Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph A. Geraci II, our Chief Financial Officer. These new Executive Employment Agreements are substantially identical to the prior executive employment agreements with these executives that had expired on December 31, 2024, each containing the same two-year term and restrictive covenants, and were deemed to be effective as of January 1, 2025. The new Executive Employment Agreements increase the base salary of each executive to $
| F-20 |
| Table of Contents |
ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance the objectives of the control system are met.
As of December 31, 2024, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in conjunction with our Chief Compliance Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s internal controls were not effective as of December 31, 2024 due to a material weakness in our controls related to the proper accounting for transactions in accordance with GAAP. In order to remediate this matter, we plan to retain the assistance of an accounting expert to assist in the accounting and reporting of transactions. We will consider the material weakness to be fully remediated once the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and our management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.
Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Board of Directors and Shareholders Mill City Ventures III, Ltd.:
The management of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. It should be noted that any system of internal control, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
| 21 |
| Table of Contents |
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company’s management assessed the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 based on the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024 due to the material weakness described above. Boulay PLLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, is not required to issue, and thus has not issued, an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.
Changes in Internal Control
Other than the material weakness mentioned above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Douglas M. Polinsky |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
| 22 |
| Table of Contents |
PART III
ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, and Control Persons
Name |
| Age |
| Positions |
Douglas M. Polinsky |
| 65 |
| Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
Joseph A. Geraci, II |
| 55 |
| Director and Chief Financial Officer |
Howard Liszt |
| 78 |
| Director |
Lyle Berman |
| 83 |
| Director |
Laurence Zipkin |
| 85 |
| Director |
Douglas M. Polinsky co-founded the Company in January 2006 and since that time has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Since 1994, Mr. Polinsky has been the President of Great North Capital Consultants, Inc., a financial advisory and investment company that he founded. Great North Capital Consultants, Inc. primarily engages in the business of investing in hard money lending with collateral on the loans being first or second mortgages in both residential and commercial properties. In addition, Great North Capital Consultants, Inc. makes direct investments into public and private companies. Since 2015, Mr. Polinsky has been an independent director of Liberated Syndication, Inc., a Nevada corporation with its operations in Pennsylvania. Liberated Syndication, Inc. is a host and publisher of podcasts. Mr. Polinsky is a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of the Board of Directors of Liberated Syndication. Mr. Polinsky earned a Bachelor of Science degree in hotel administration at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in 1981.
Joseph A. Geraci, II co-founded the Company in January 2006 and has been a director and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since that time. Since February 2002 through the present time, Mr. Geraci has been managing member of Isles Capital, LLC, an advisory and consulting firm that assists small businesses, both public and private, in business development. In March 2005, Mr. Geraci also became the managing member of Mill City Advisors, LLC, the general partner of Mill City Ventures, LP, and Mill City Ventures II, LP, each a Minnesota limited partnership that invested directly into both private and public companies. From January 2005 until August 2005, Mr. Geraci served as the Director of Finance for Gelstat Corporation, a purveyor of homeopathic remedies, based in Bloomington, Minnesota. Mr. Geraci provided investment advice to clients as a stockbroker and Vice President of Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc., a Minneapolis-based broker-dealer firm, from June 2000 to December 2004. While at Oak Ridge Financial Services, Mr. Geraci’s business was focused on structuring and negotiating debt and equity private placements with both private and publicly held companies. Mr. Geraci was employed at other Minneapolis brokerage firms from July 1991 to June 2000. From his career and investment experiences, Mr. Geraci has established networks of colleagues, clients, co-investors, and the officers and directors of public and private companies. These networks offer a range of contacts across a number of sectors and companies that may provide opportunities for investment, including many that meet the Company’s screening criteria.
In August 2003, the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) found in an administrative hearing that Mr. Geraci, while employed by and affiliated with a NASD member, had violated NASD Conduct Rule 2110 and SEC Rule 10b-5 in August 1999, and barred him from associating with any NASD member in the future.
Howard Liszt served as Chief Executive Officer of Campbell Mithun, a national marketing communications agency he joined in 1976, until 2001. Under his leadership, Campbell Mithun grew to be one of the 20 largest agencies in the world. Mr. Liszt has served as a Board member for several industry-leading companies including Land O’ Lakes, ShuffleMaster, Ocular Sciences, Coleman Natural Foods, and Eggland’s Best. Mr. Liszt holds a Bachelor of Arts in Journalism and Marketing and a Masters of Science in Marketing from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
| 23 |
| Table of Contents |
Lyle Berman is a 1964 graduate of the University of Minnesota with a degree in Business Administration. Mr. Berman began his career with Berman Buckskin, his family’s leather business. He helped grow the business into a major specialty retailer with 27 outlets. In 1990, Mr. Berman participated in the founding of Grand Casinos, Inc. Mr. Berman is credited as one of the early visionaries in the development of casinos outside of the traditional gaming markets of Las Vegas and Atlantic City. In less than five years, the company opened eight casino resorts in four states. In 1994, Mr. Berman financed the initial development of Rainforest Cafe. He served as the Chairman and CEO from 1994 until 2000. In October 1995, Mr. Berman was honored with the B’nai B’rith “Great American Traditions Award.” In April 1996, he received the Gaming Executive of the Year Award; in 2004, Mr. Berman was inducted into the Poker Hall of Fame; and in 2009, he received the Casino Lifetime Achievement Award from Raving Consulting & Casino Journal. In 1998, Lakes Entertainment, Inc. was formed. In 2002, as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Lakes Entertainment, Inc., Mr. Berman was instrumental in creating the World Poker Tour. Since January 2005, Mr. Berman has also served as Chairman of the Board of Pokertek, Inc.
Laurence Zipkin is nationally recognized for his expertise in the gaming industry, restaurants, and emerging small growth companies. From 1996 to 2006, Mr. Zipkin owned Oakridge Securities, Inc. where, as an investment banker, he successfully raised capital for various early growth-stage companies and advising clients with regard to private placements, initial public offerings, mergers, debt offerings, bridge and bank financings, developing business plans and evaluating cash needs and resources. He has extensive experience in the merger and acquisition field and has represented companies on both the buy and sell side. Since 2006, Mr. Zipkin has been self-employed, engaging in various consulting activities, owning and operating two restaurant properties, and purchasing distressed real estate. Mr. Zipkin is a licensed insurance agent for both life and health insurance. Mr. Zipkin attended the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Finance.
Under the Company’s bylaws, the directors serve for indefinite terms expiring upon the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders.
When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to enable the
Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business and structure, the Board of Directors focuses primarily on the industry and transactional experience, and other background, in addition to any unique skills or attributes associated with a director. With regard to Messrs. Polinsky and Geraci, the Board of Directors considered their significant experience, expertise and background with regard to investing in general and the Company in particular. With regard to Mr. Berman, the Board of Directors considered his background and experience with the public securities markets and his former employment and experience in operational capacities. With regard to Mr. Liszt, the Board of Directors considered his experience on other boards of public companies, his past experience in the communications and advertising fields, and his organizational experience. With regard to Mr. Zipkin, the Board of Directors considered his knowledge, experience and skills in the finance, public securities and investment banking fields.
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics on August 5, 2008, and revised March 6, 2013 in connection with the Company’s election to become a BDC. The Code of Ethics includes our Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as required by Sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Company formally revised the Code of Ethics again in March 2021, to reflect the Company’s withdrawal of its BDC election. Our Code of Ethics is available at our website, www.millcityventures3.com, or without charge, to any shareholder upon written request made to Mill City Ventures III, Ltd., Attention: Chief Executive Officer, 1907 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 205, Wayzata, MN 55391.
Changes to Board of Director Nomination Procedures
In March 2021, the Board of Directors formally created a Nominating and Governance Committee and adopted and associated charter. The charter alters the manner in which candidates for service as directors will be nominated for election or re-election and delegates that authority to the committee in lieu of the entire Board of Directors.
Communication with Board Members
Our Board of Directors has provided the following process for shareholders and interested parties to send communications to our board and/or individual directors. All communications should be addressed to Mill City Ventures III, Ltd., 1907 Wayzata Boulevard, Ste. 205, Wayzata, MN 55391, Attention: Chief Executive Officer. Communications to individual directors may also be made to such director at our company’s address. All communications sent to any individual director will be received directly by such individuals and will not be screened or reviewed by any company personnel. Any communications sent to the board in the care of the Chief Executive Officer will be reviewed by that officer to ensure that such communications relate to the business of the Company before being reviewed by the board.
| 24 |
| Table of Contents |
Committees of the Board of Directors; Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The members of the Audit Committee are Laurence Zipkin, Howard Liszt and Lyle Berman., each of whom is independent for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Berman currently serves as chair of the Audit Committee. The board has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee a copy of which is available at the Company’s website at www.millcityventures3.com. The Audit Committee is responsible for approving the Company’s independent accountants and recommending them to the board (including a majority of the independent directors) for approval and submission to the shareholders for ratification, if any, reviewing with its independent accountants the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by its independent accountants, reviewing the independence of its independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of its internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee is also responsible for discussing with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. The board has determined that Mr. Berman is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the Commission. Mr. Berman’s relevant experience is detailed in his biography above. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the Audit Committee members is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and that at least one member of the Audit Committee has past employment experience in finance or accounting.
The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Zipkin, Liszt and Berman, each of whom is independent for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Liszt currently serves as chair of the Compensation Committee. The compensation committee is responsible for approving the Company’s compensation arrangements with its executive management, including bonus-related decisions and employment agreements with respect to such individuals. The board has adopted a charter for the Compensation Committee, a copy of which is available at www.millcityventures3.com.
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Zipkin, Liszt and Berman, each of whom is independent for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Liszt currently serves as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance committee is responsible for advising the Board on a broad range of issues surrounding the composition and operation of the Board of Directors and its committees, specifically including identifying criteria for suitable board candidates, identifying individuals suited to service on the board (consistent with those criteria), recommending director candidates to the board and to the shareholders, conducting annual reviews of corporate governance matters and making related recommendations to the Board of Directors and its committees. The board has adopted a charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a copy of which is available at www.millcityventures3.com.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requires our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC certain reports regarding their ownership of common stock or any changes in such ownership. Based on our own review, our directors and officers appear to have filed all required Section 16(a) reports on a timely basis. Nevertheless, a greater-than-ten-percent shareholder has advised us that they engaged in three sales during 2024 that were reported late on Form 4.
| 25 |
| Table of Contents |
ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the total compensation paid by the Company during its two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 to those persons who served as the Company’s President or Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer during such periods (collectively, the “named executives”).
Name and Principal Position |
| Year |
| Salary |
|
| Cash Bonus (1) |
|
| All Other Compensation (2) |
|
| Total |
| ||||
Douglas M. Polinsky, |
| 2024 |
| $ | 200,000 |
|
| $ | 150,000 |
|
| $ | 40,274 |
|
| $ | 390,274 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2023 |
| $ | 200,000 |
|
| $ | 125,000 |
|
| $ | 36,512 |
|
| $ | 361,512 |
|
Joseph A. Geraci, II, |
| 2024 |
| $ | 200,000 |
|
| $ | 150,000 |
|
| $ | 39,602 |
|
| $ | 389,602 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2023 |
| $ | 200,000 |
|
| $ | 125,000 |
|
| $ | 45,014 |
|
| $ | 370,014 |
|
| (1) | $250,000 of the 2023 cash bonus amount reflected in the table was declared by the Compensation Committee and paid to the executive in January, 2024. $300,000 of the 2024 cash bonus amount reflected in the table was declared by the Compensation Committee and paid to the executive in January 2025. |
|
|
|
| (2) | Includes additional compensation of payment of health premiums and 401(k) matching contributions under the employment retirement program. |
On January 1, 2025, we entered into new executive employment agreements with Mr. Douglas M. Polinsky, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Joseph A. Geraci, II, our Chief Financial Officer. Those two executives have been executive officers of our company since its founding.
Each employment agreement was effective as of January 1, 2025, and has a term that lasts for two full years thereafter, ending on December 31, 2026 (subject to extension by mutual agreement of the parties). Each employment agreement provides the executive with a base annual salary of $220,000. Each executive is also entitled to have health insurance provided by us and the ability to contribute to our 401(k) plan.
Each employment agreement contains two-year non-competition and non-solicitation covenants, as well as a customary covenants relating to the confidentiality of our company information. In the event that an executive is terminated for cause, as defined in the employment agreements, or in the event that an executive’s services are terminated due to death or disability, the terminated executive will be entitled to receive only his base annual salary through the date of termination. In the event of other non-cause terminations, we will be obligated to pay the terminated executive’s base annual salary through the remainder of the employment term.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
At December 31, 2023, we had issued to our named executive, and there were outstanding, an aggregate of 500,000 non-statutory ten-year stock options to purchase common stock at the purchase price of $2.12 per share, under our 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. These stock options and the plan itself were, at that time, subject to the approval of our shareholders. Subsequently, our shareholders did approve the plan on January 20, 2023, at a special shareholder meeting called for that purpose. At December 31, 2024, all 500,000 of these options remained outstanding.
| 26 |
| Table of Contents |
Director Compensation
For 2024, we paid a total of $300,000 in director fees to our independent directors. Presently, each such director receives an annualized cash fee of $40,000, generally paid in quarterly installments.
Name |
| Year |
| Compensation |
|
| Bonus (1) |
|
| Total |
| |||
Joseph A. Geraci, II |
| 2024 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
Douglas M. Polinsky |
| 2024 |
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
| $ | - |
|
Lyle Berman |
| 2024 |
| $ | 40,000 |
|
| $ | 60,000 |
|
| $ | 100,000 |
|
Howard P. Liszt |
| 2024 |
| $ | 40,000 |
|
| $ | 60,000 |
|
| $ | 100,000 |
|
Laurence S. Zipkin |
| 2024 |
| $ | 40,000 |
|
| $ | 60,000 |
|
| $ | 100,000 |
|
| (1) | The 2024 cash bonuses reflected in the table were declared by the Board of Directors and paid to the director in January 2025. |
ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth certain information, as of the date of this report, with respect to any person (including any “group,” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, and as to those shares of our equity securities beneficially owned by each of our directors and executive officers and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. As of the date of this report, we had 6,385,255 shares of common stock outstanding.
Unless otherwise indicated in the table or its footnotes, the business address of each of the following persons or entities is 1907 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 205, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391, and each such person or entity has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock set forth opposite their respective name.
|
| Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) |
|
| Percentage of Outstanding Shares (1) |
| ||
Douglas M. Polinsky (2) |
|
| 680,762 |
|
|
| 10.26 | % |
Joseph A. Geraci, II (3) |
|
| 713,165 |
|
|
| 10.75 | % |
Howard Liszt (4) |
|
| 125,434 |
|
|
| 1.93 | % |
Lyle Berman (5) |
|
| 315,556 |
|
|
| 4.87 | % |
Laurence Zipkin (6) |
|
| 160,661 |
|
|
| 2.48 | % |
Neal Linnihan SEP/IRA (8) |
|
| 1,088,036 |
|
|
| 17.04 | % |
Scott and Elizabeth Zbikowski (9) |
|
| 768,445 |
|
|
| 12.03 | % |
David Bester (10) |
|
| 444,445 |
|
|
| 6.96 | % |
Patrick Kinney (11) |
|
| 418,794 |
|
|
| 6.56 | % |
All current directors and executive officers as a group (7) (five persons) |
|
| 1,866,663 |
|
|
| 25.98 | % |
| (1) | The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person is determined under the rules of the Commission and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which such person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days after the date hereof, through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table. The inclusion herein of any shares deemed beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares. |
| 27 |
| Table of Contents |
| (2) | Mr. Polinsky is our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Figure includes 128,915 shares of common stock held by Lantern Advisers, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company co-owned by Messrs. Polinsky and Geraci; 301,847 shares of common stock held individually and directly by Mr. Polinsky. The reported figure also includes a presently exercisable non-statutory stock option for the purchase of up to 250,000 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
| (3) | Mr. Geraci is a director our company and our Chief Financial Officer. Figure includes 128,915 shares of common stock held by Lantern Advisers, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company co-owned by Messrs. Geraci and Polinsky; 325,481 shares of common stock held individually and directly by Mr. Geraci; 7,677 shares of common stock held individually by Mr. Geraci’s spouse, and 445 shares of common stock held by Mr. Geraci’s minor child. The reported figure also includes a presently exercisable non-statutory stock option for the purchase of up to 250,000 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
| (4) | Mr. Liszt is a director of our Company. The reported figures include a presently exercisable non-statutory stock option for the purchase of up to 100,000 shares of common stock. |
|
|
|
| (5) | Mr. Berman is a director of our Company. |
|
|
|
| (6) | Mr. Zipkin is a director of our Company. |
|
|
|
| (7) | Consists of Messrs. Polinsky, Geraci, Liszt, Berman and Zipkin. |
|
|
|
| (8) | Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Mr. Linnihan, and subsequent information obtained by the Company. |
|
|
|
| (9) | Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Mr. and Mrs. Zbikowski, and subsequent information obtained by the Company. |
|
|
|
| (10) | Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Mr. Bester, and subsequent information obtained by the Company. |
|
|
|
| (11) | Based upon a Schedule 13G filed by Mr. Kinney (including shares held by Mr. Kinney as a custodian for grandchildren), and subsequent information obtained by the Company. |
ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Transactions with Related Persons and Certain Conflict Disclosures
Our Board of Directors has adopted a policy to require our disclosure of instances in our periodic filings with the SEC. Our related-party transactions requiring disclosure under this policy are as follows:
| · | We held a promissory note with two shareholders in the principal amount of $250,000. The promissory note bore interest payable monthly at the rate of 10% per annum. The note was secured by the debtors’ pledge to us of 277,778 shares of common stock. The note was paid in full including all accrued interest on September 26, 2024. |
|
|
|
| · | On January 3, 2022, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Eastman Investment, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Lyle A. Berman, as trustee of the Lyle A. Berman Revocable Trust (collectively, the “Lenders”). Mr. Berman is a director of our company. Under the Loan Agreement, the Lenders made available to us a $5 million revolving line of credit for us to use in the ordinary course of our short-term specialty finance business. Amounts drawn under the Loan Agreement accrued interest at the per annum rate of 8%, and all our obligations under the Loan Agreement are secured by a grant of a collateral security interest in substantially all of our assets. |
|
|
|
|
| As a Lender, Mr. Berman was obligated to furnish only one-half of the aggregate $5 million available under the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement had a five-year term ending on January 3, 2027, at which time all amounts owing under the Loan Agreement were to become due and payable; subject, however, to each Lender’s right, including Mr. Berman, to terminate the Loan Agreement, solely with respect to such Lender’s obligation to provide further credit, at any time after January 3, 2023. We terminated the Loan Agreement in January 2024 having earlier satisfied all obligations owing thereunder. |
| 28 |
| Table of Contents |
Related-Party Transaction Policy
The Board of Directors has adopted a written Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transaction Policy. That policy governs the approval of all related-party transactions, subject only to certain customary exceptions (e.g., compensation, certain charitable donations, transactions made available to all employees generally, etc.). The policy contains a minimum dollar threshold of $5,000.
The entire Board of Directors administers the policy and approves any related-party transactions. In general, after full disclosure of all material facts, review and discussion, the board approves or disapproves related-party transactions by a vote of a majority of the directors who have no direct or indirect interest in such transaction. Procedurally, no director is allowed vote in any approval of a related-party transaction for which he or she is the related party, except that such a director may otherwise participate in a related discussion and shall provide to the board all material information concerning the related-party transaction and the director’s interest therein. If a related-party transaction will be ongoing, the board may establish guidelines for management to follow in its ongoing dealings with the related party.
Director Independence
The Company currently has five directors, and our Board of Directors has determined that three of our directors—Messrs. Liszt, Berman and Zipkin—qualify as independent directors in accordance with the published listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Nasdaq independence definition includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees and that neither the director, nor any of his family members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, our Board of Directors has made a subjective determination as to each director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
ITEM 14 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following table summarizes the fees for professional audit services provided by (i) Boulay PLLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, as well as the fees billed for other services rendered by Boulay PLLP.
|
| 2024 |
|
| 2023 |
| ||
Audit Fees |
| $ | 181,370 |
|
| $ | 206,500 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
| 2,500 |
|
|
| — |
|
Total |
| $ | 183,870 |
|
| $ | 206,500 |
|
| 29 |
| Table of Contents |
Audit Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for professional services rendered by Boulay PLLP for the years ended 2024 and 2023 in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The amounts also include fees for services that are normally provided by the independent public registered accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and engagements for the years identified.
Audit-Related Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for assurance and related services that were related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and were not reported under the caption “Audit Fees.” This category may include fees related to the performance of audits and attestation services not required by statute or regulations, and accounting consultations about the application of generally accepted accounting principles to proposed transactions.
Tax Fees. The fees identified under this caption were for tax compliance and corporate tax services. Corporate tax services encompass a variety of permissible services, including technical tax advice related to tax matters; assistance with state and local taxes.
Approval Policy. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors approves in advance all services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. All engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm in years ended 2024 and 2023 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
| 30 |
| Table of Contents |
PART IV
ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Exhibits
Exhibit Number |
| Description |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
10.9 |
| Fourth Short-Term Promissory Note issued by Mustang Funding, LLC in favor of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 15, 2023) |
10.10 |
| Amendment No. 1 to Fourth Short-Term Loan Agreement and Fourth Short-Term Promissory Note with Mustang Funding, LLC, dated April 29, 2024 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 15, 2023) |
10.11 |
| Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement with Orion Pip, LLC dated December 28, 2022 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on August 15, 2023) |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| 23.1 |
| |
| ||
| ||
|
_______________
* Filed electronically herewith.
| 31 |
| Table of Contents |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| MILL CITY VENTURES III, LTD. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| /s/ Douglas Polinsky |
| |
| Douglas Polinsky |
| |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Dated: March 7, 2025 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Douglas M. Polinsky | Chief Executive Officer, President and |
| March 7, 2025 | |
Douglas M. Polinsky | Director (principal executive officer) |
| March 7, 2025 | |
|
|
|
| |
/s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II | Chief Financial Officer and Director |
| March 7, 2025 | |
Joseph A. Geraci, II | (principal accounting and financial officer) |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
/s/ Lyle Berman |
| Director |
| March 7, 2025 |
Lyle Berman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Howard Liszt |
| Director |
| March 7, 2025 |
Howard Liszt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Laurence Zipkin |
| Director |
| March 7, 2025 |
| 32 |