Silvercorp Metals Inc 6-K, filed May 26, 2020
Silvercorp Metals Inc (SVM)
About this 6-K
Silvercorp Metals Inc filed this 6-K on May 26, 2020.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
May 21, 2020
Commission File No. 0001-34184
SILVERCORP METALS INC.
(Translation of registrant's name into English)
Suite 1750 - 1066 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC Canada V6E 3X1
(Address of principal executive office)
[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F]
Form 20-F [ ] Form 40-F [ X ]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) [ ]
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is “submitting” the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T “Rule” 101(b)(7) [ ]
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrant's “home country”), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which the registrant's securities are traded, as long as the report or other document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the registrant's security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes [ ] No [ X ]
If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
1
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Dated: May 21, 2020 | SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
/s/ Derek Liu |
|
Derek Liu |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
2
EXHIBIT INDEX
| EXHIBIT | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
3
![]() |
| |
| NEWS RELEASE | ||
| Trading Symbol: | TSX: SVM | |
| NYSE AMERICAN: SVM | ||
SILVERCORP REPORTS NET INCOME OF $34.3 MILLION, $0.20 PER SHARE, AND CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS OF $77.2 MILLION FOR FISCAL 2020
VANCOUVER, British Columbia – May 21, 2020 – Silvercorp Metals Inc. (“Silvercorp” or the “Company”) (TSX: SVM) (NYSE American: SVM) reported its financial and operating results for the fourth quarter and twelve months ended March 31, 2020 (“Fiscal 2020”). All amounts are expressed in US Dollars.
Despite the extended shut-down during the three months ended March 31, 2020 (“Q4 Fiscal 2020”) due to COVID-19, the Company was able to achieve full year production target, surpassing its Fiscal 2020 guidance. As reported in the Company’s news release dated May 7, 2020, the Company’s operations were ramped up to full capacity in March 2020 with no employee infection and the Company is in full compliance with government measures to prevent spread of COVID-19.
FISCAL YEAR 2020 HIGHLIGHTS
-
Silver, lead and zinc production surpassed annual guidance by 3%, 3% and 17%; respectively;
-
Ore mined down 2% to 885,830 tonnes compared to the prior year;
-
Sold approximately 6.3 million ounces of silver, 3,300 ounces of gold, 65.3 million pounds of lead, and 25.4 million pounds of zinc, representing a decrease of 2% and 6% in silver and gold sold and an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold compared to the prior year;
-
Revenue of $158.8 million, down 7%, compared to $170.5 million in the prior year;
-
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of $34.3 million or $0.20 per share compared to $39.7 million or $0.23 per share in the prior year. Excluding the impairment reversal of $9.2 million recorded in Fiscal 2019, the net income to equity shareholders in Fiscal 2020 was up 6% compared to the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders1 of $32.2 million, or $0.19 per share, in the prior year. In Fiscal 2020, the Company’s consolidated financial results were impacted mainly by operations in China being suspended for an extra month in Q4 Fiscal 2020 due to COVID-19;
-
Cash cost per ounce of silver1, net of by-product credits, of negative $1.91 compared to negative $4.29 in the prior year;
-
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver1, net of by-product credits, of $6.86, compared to $3.52 in the prior year;
-
Cash flow from operations of $77.2 million, up 10% compared to $70.4 million in the prior year;
-
Paid $4.3 million of dividends to the Company’s shareholders, compared to $4.2 million in the prior year;
-
Invested $7.0 million in New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) to maintain the Company’s ownership interest at 28.8%; and
| 1 Alternative performance (Non-IFRS) measure. Please refer to section 13 of the corresponding MD&A for reconciliation. | |
1
-
Strong balance sheet with $142.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, an increase of $27.2 million or 24% compared to $115.3 million as at March 31, 2019.
HIGHLIGHTS FOR Q4 FISCAL 2020
-
Ore mined down 34% to 106,595 tonnes compared to the prior year quarter;
-
Sold approximately 0.8 million ounces of silver, 500 ounces of gold, 9.7 million pounds of lead, and 3.1 million pounds of zinc, down 39%, 29%, 24%, and 58% respectively, compared to approximately 1.3 million ounces of silver, 700 ounces of gold, 12.7 million pounds of lead, and 7.3 million pounds of zinc in the prior year quarter.
-
Revenue of $18.9 million, down 46% compared to $35.0 million in the prior year quarter;
-
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of $3.2 million, or $0.02 per share, compared to the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders of $4.6 million or $0.03 per share, in the prior year quarter. In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the Company’s consolidated financial results were impacted mainly by the decrease in metal prices and operations in China being suspended for an extra month due to COVID-19;
-
Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, of negative $0.85 compared to negative $3.97 in the prior year quarter;
-
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, of $15.17, compared to $4.49 in the prior year quarter; and
-
Cash flow from operations of $6.3 million, compared to $8.3 million in the prior year quarter.
FINANCIALS
| 1. | Fiscal 2020 vs. Fiscal 2019 |
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of the Company in Fiscal 2020 was $34.3 million or $0.20 per share, compared to $39.7 million or $0.23 per share in Fiscal 2019. Excluding the impairment reversal of $9.2 million recorded in Fiscal 2019, the net income attributable to equity shareholders in Fiscal 2020 was up 6% compared to the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders of $32.2 million, or $0.19 per share in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the Company’s consolidated financial results were mainly impacted by i) operations in China being suspended for an extra month in Q4 Fiscal 2020 due to COVID-19; ii) an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold, offset by a 2% decrease in silver sold, respectively; iii) an increase of 7%, in the realized selling price for silver, offset by decreases of 19% and 32% in the realized selling prices for lead and zinc, respectively; and iv) an increase of $2.7 million in foreign exchange gain arising from the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar.
Revenue in Fiscal 2020 was $158.8 million, down $11.7 million compared to $170.5 million in Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in the realized selling prices for lead and zinc. Revenue from silver and gold was $84.9 million and $3.9 million, up 5% and 7%, respectively, compared to $80.7 million and $3.6 million in Fiscal 2019, while revenue from lead and zinc was $52.0 million and $15.8 million, down 19% and 24%, compared to $64.1 and 20.7 million in Fiscal 2019.
Production costs expensed in Fiscal 2020 were $62.0 million, a slight decrease compared to $62.5 million in Fiscal 2019. The production costs expensed represent approximately 900,000 tonnes of ore processed and expensed at a cost of $68.91 per tonne, compared to approximately 893,000 tonnes at $69.92 per tonne in Fiscal 2019.
Mineral resource taxes in Fiscal 2020 were $4.5 million, compared to $4.9 million in Fiscal 2019, and the decrease was mainly due to lower revenue.
Government fees and other taxes in Fiscal 2020 were $2.1 million compared to $2.7 million in Fiscal 2019. Government fees and other taxes are comprised of environmental protection fees, surtaxes on
2
value-added tax, land usage levies, stamp duties and other miscellaneous levies, duties and taxes imposed by the state and local Chinese governments.
Income from mine operations in Fiscal 2020 was $59.4 million, or 37% of revenue, compared to $70.9 million or 42% of revenue in Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in the realized selling prices for lead and zinc. Income from mine operations at the Ying Mining District was $54.1 million or 41% of revenue, compared to $65.2 million or 46% of revenue in Fiscal 2019. Income from mine operations at the GC Mine was $5.7 million or 21% of revenue, compared to $7.5 million or 26% of revenue in Fiscal 2019.
General and administrative expenses in Fiscal 2020 were $20.2 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 6%, compared to $19.0 million in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $0.7 million in share-based compensation expenses and an increase of $0.7 million in amortization and depreciation expenses. General and administrative expenses include corporate administrative expenses of $10.1 million (Fiscal 2019 - $9.5 million) and mine administrative expenses of $10.1 million (Fiscal 2019 - $9.6 million).
Income tax expenses in Fiscal 2020 were $8.9 million, compared to $20.9 million in Fiscal 2019. The income tax expense recorded in Fiscal 2020 included a current income tax expense of $5.6 million (Fiscal 2019 - $17.8 million) and a deferred income tax expense of $3.3 million (Fiscal 2019 - $3.1 million). The current income tax included $2.8 million of withholding tax (Fiscal 2019 - $5.2 million), which was paid at a rate of 10% on dividends and interest distributed out of China. The decrease in income tax expenses was mainly due to the tax benefit realized arising from the disposal of the XHP project and less income from mine operations.
Cash flow provided by operating activities in Fiscal 2020 was $77.2 million, up $6.9 million or 10% compared to $70.4 million in Fiscal 2019.
The Company ended the fiscal year with $142.5 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, an increase of $27.2 million or 24%, compared to $115.3 million as at March 31, 2019.
Working capital as at March 31, 2020 was $130.4 million, an increase of $33.4 million or 34%, compared to $97.0 million as at March 31, 2019.
| 2. | Q4 Fiscal 2020 vs. Q4 Fiscal 2019 |
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of the Company in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $3.2 million or $0.02 per share, compared to $12.1 million or $0.07 per share in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Excluding the impairment reversal of $9.2 million recorded in Q4 Fiscal 2019, the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders was $4.6 million or $0.03 per share in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Compared to the prior year quarter, the Company’s consolidated financial results in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were mainly impacted by the following: i) operations in China being suspended for an extra month due to COVID-19; ii) a decrease of 3%, 26%, and 32% in the net realized selling price of silver, lead and zinc; and iii) a foreign exchange gain of $5.4 million recorded arising from the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar.
Revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $18.9 million, down 46%, compared to $35.0 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to lower production and the decrease in net realized selling prices. Revenue from silver and gold was $9.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, compared to $16.7 million and $0.8 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019, while revenue from base metals was $8.4 million, compared to $17.5 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Production costs expensed in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $8.3 million, compared to $13.0 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to less metal sold in the current quarter. The production costs expensed in Q4 Fiscal 2019 represent approximately 121,000 tonnes of ore processed and expensed at a cost of $68.93 per tonne, compared to 174,000 tonnes at a cost of $74.80 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
3
Income from mine operations in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $3.2 million or 17% of revenue, compared to $13.6 million or 39% of revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in metal sold and realized selling prices. Income from mine operations at the Ying Mining District was $3.1 million or 20% of revenue, compared to $12.2 million or 44% of revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Income from mine operations at the GC Mine was $0.2 million or 7% of revenue, compared to $1.7 million or 24% of revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Cash flows provided by operating activities in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $6.3 million, a decrease of $2.0 million, compared to $8.3 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
OPERATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT
| 1. | Fiscal 2020 vs. Fiscal 2019 |
In Fiscal 2020, on a consolidated basis, the Company mined 885,830 tonnes of ore, a decrease of 2% or 20,964 tonnes, compared to 906,794 tonnes in Fiscal 2019. Ore milled in Fiscal 2020 was 892,215 tonnes, a decrease of 2% or 16,631 tonnes compared to 908,846 tonnes in Fiscal 2019.
The Company sold approximately 6.3 million ounces of silver, 3,300 ounces of gold, 65.3 million pounds of lead, and 25.4 million pounds of zinc, representing a decrease of 2% and 6% in silver and gold sold and an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold, respectively, compared to 6.4 million ounces of silver, 3,500 ounces of gold, 64.8 million pounds of lead, and 22.7 million pounds of zinc in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the consolidated total mining cost and cash mining cost were $76.25 and $54.90 per tonne, up 2% and down 1%, respectively, compared to $74.98 and $55.35 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. The decrease in the cash mining cost was mainly due to a decrease of 5% in mining preparation costs, offset by an increase of 3% in direct mining contractors’ cost.
The consolidated total milling cost and cash milling cost were $13.17 and $11.36 per tonne, down 6% and 3%, respectively, compared to $13.99 and $11.69 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. The improvement in the cash milling cost was mainly due to decreases of 4% in utility costs and 6% in raw material costs.
The consolidated cash production cost per tonne of ore processed in Fiscal 2020 was $68.91, a decrease of 1% compared to $69.92 in Fiscal 2019 and 4% below the Company’s annual guidance. The consolidated all-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed was $125.29, an increase of 5% compared to $119.48 in Fiscal 2019, but in line with the Company’s annual guidance.
In Fiscal 2020, the consolidated cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was negative $1.91, compared to negative $4.29 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $15.9 million in by-product credits. The decrease in by-product credits was mainly due to a decrease of 19% and 32%, respectively, in net realized selling prices for lead and zinc, partially offset by an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold. Sales from lead and zinc in Fiscal 2020 amounted to $67.7 million, a decrease of $17.1 million, compared to $84.8 million in Fiscal 2019.
The consolidated all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was $6.86, compared to $3.52 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to the increase in the cash cost per ounce of silver as discussed above and an increase of $4.7 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
| 2. | Q4 Fiscal 2020 vs. Q4 Fiscal 2019 |
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the Company mined 106,595 tonnes of ore, a decrease of 34%, compared to 161,400 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Ore milled in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was 102,431 tonnes, a decrease of 36% compared to 159,904 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the Company sold approximately 0.8 million ounces of silver, 500 ounces of gold, 9.7 million pounds of lead, and 3.1 million pounds of zinc, down 39%, 29%, 24%, and 58%, respectively, compared to approximately 1.3 million ounces of silver, 700 ounces of gold, 12.7 million pounds of lead, and 7.3 million pounds of zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
4
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the consolidated total mining cost and cash mining cost were $75.91 and $53.26 per tonne, down 5% and 7%, respectively, compared to $80.22 and $57.55 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The consolidated total milling cost and cash milling cost in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $15.67 and $13.10 per tonne, down 11% and 10%, respectively, compared to $17.58 and $14.53 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The consolidated all-in sustaining production cost per tonne was $188.57, up 37%, compared to $138.01 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to lower production resulting in higher per tonne fixed cost allocation. The all-in sustaining production cost in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $19.6 million, a decrease of $2.6 million, compared to $22.2 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the consolidated cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was negative $0.85, compared to negative $3.97 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $9.2 million in by-product credits.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the consolidated all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was $15.17, compared to $4.49 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to i) a decrease of $9.2 million in by-product credits; ii) less silver sold resulting in a higher per ounce cost, and partially offset by iii) a decrease of $2.2 million in all-in sustaining production cost.
| 3. |
Ying Mining District, Henan Province, China |
| Ying Mining District | Q4 2020 | Q3 2020 | Q2 2020 | Q1 2020 | Q4 2019 | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||
| March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | September 30, 2019 | June 30, 2019 | March 31, 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 69,379 | 176,149 | 176,085 | 176,584 | 111,032 | 598,197 | 622,576 | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 69,188 | 175,488 | 179,248 | 177,681 | 107,039 | 601,605 | 619,851 | ||||||||
| Head Grades | |||||||||||||||
|
Silver (gram/tonne) |
297 | 296 | 306 | 330 | 324 | 309 | 311 | ||||||||
|
Lead (%) |
4.6 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.4 | ||||||||
|
Zinc (%) |
1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | ||||||||
| Recoveries | |||||||||||||||
|
Silver (%) |
95.3 | 96.1 | 96.2 | 95.8 | 95.5 | 96.0 | 95.8 | ||||||||
|
Lead (%) |
95.7 | 96.3 | 95.7 | 95.9 | 96.1 | 95.9 | 95.7 | ||||||||
|
Zinc (%) |
67.7 | 70.3 | 58.6 | 58.3 | 63.7 | 63.2 | 54.1 | ||||||||
| Metal Sales | |||||||||||||||
|
Silver (in thousands of ounce) |
711 | 1,475 | 1,711 | 1,662 | 1,141 | 5,558 | 5,764 | ||||||||
|
Gold (in thousands of ounce) |
0.5 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 3.5 | ||||||||
|
Lead (in thousands of pound) |
8,322 | 14,912 | 16,389 | 14,835 | 10,310 | 54,459 | 56,138 | ||||||||
|
Zinc (in thousands of pound) |
865 | 2,882 | 1,428 | 2,090 | 2,464 | 7,264 | 6,626 | ||||||||
|
Cash mining costs ($/tonne) |
68.10 | 64.69 | 59.26 | 63.05 | 65.24 | 63.00 | 63.39 | ||||||||
|
Shipping costs ($/tonne) |
3.96 | 3.89 | 3.82 | 4.04 | 3.97 | 3.92 | 4.22 | ||||||||
|
Cash milling costs ($/tonne) |
11.53 | 10.99 | 9.81 | 9.15 | 12.57 | 10.16 | 10.43 | ||||||||
| Cash production costs ($/tonne) | 83.59 | 79.57 | 72.89 | 76.24 | 81.78 | 77.08 | 78.04 | ||||||||
| All-in sustaining production costs ($/tonne) | 195.78 | 126.43 | 117.37 | 129.14 | 141.63 | 132.52 | 126.93 | ||||||||
| Cash costs per ounce of silver ($) | 0.30 | (0.72 | ) | (1.95 | ) | (1.44 | ) | (3.02 | ) | (1.18 | ) | (3.35 | ) | ||
| All-in sustaining costs per ounce of silver ($) | 11.86 | 5.57 | 3.40 | 4.82 | 3.28 | 5.49 | 2.60 | ||||||||
Fiscal 2020 vs. Fiscal 2019
In Fiscal 2020, the total ore mined at the Ying Mining District was 598,197 tonnes, a decrease of 4% or 24,379 tonnes, compared to 622,576 tonnes mined in Fiscal 2019. Ore milled was 601,605 tonnes, a decrease of 3% or 18,246 tonnes, compared to 619,851 tonnes in Fiscal 2019.
Head grades of ore milled at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 were 309 grams per tonne (“g/t”) for silver, 4.6% for lead, and 0.9% for zinc, compared to 311 g/t for silver, 4.4% for lead, and 0.9% for zinc in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the Ying Mining District sold approximately 5.6 million ounces of silver, 3,300 ounces of gold, and 54.5 million pounds of lead, down 4%, 6%, and 3%, respectively, compared to 5.8 million ounces of silver, 3,500 ounces of gold, and 56.1 million pounds of lead in Fiscal 2019 while zinc sold was 7.3 million pounds in Fiscal 2020, up 10% compared to 6.6 million pounds in Fiscal 2019.
Total mining cost and cash mining cost per tonne at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 were $90.61 and $63.00 per tonne, respectively, compared to $88.19 and $63.39 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. Total milling cost and cash milling cost per tonne at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 were $12.03 and $10.16, down by 4% and 3%, respectively, compared to $12.58 and $10.43, respectively, in Fiscal 2019.
Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne of ore processed at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 was $77.08, down 1% compared to $78.04 in Fiscal 2019. The all-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore
5
processed was $132.52, up 4%, compared to $126.93 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $2.9 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020, was negative $1.18 compared to negative $3.35 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $13.0 million in by-product credits.
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 was $5.49 compared to $2.60 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to the increase in cash cost per ounce of silver as discussed above and an increase of $2.9 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Fiscal 2020, approximately 85,643 metres or $2.5 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Fiscal 2019 – 75,955 metres or $1.8 million) and 19,088 metres or $5.7 million worth of preparation tunnelling (Fiscal 2019 – 18,656 metres or $5.4 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the Ying Mining District. In addition, approximately 70,240 metres or $23.9 million worth of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps and declines (Fiscal 2019 – 65,653 metres or $23.2 million) were completed and capitalized.
Q4 Fiscal 2020 vs. Q4 Fiscal 2019
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, a total of 69,379 tonnes of ore were mined at the Ying Mining District, a decrease of 38% or 41,653 tonnes, compared to 111,032 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Ore milled was 69,188 tonnes, a decrease of 35% or 37,851 tonnes, compared to 107,039 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Average head grades of ore processed were 297 g/t for silver, 4.6% for lead, and 1.0% for zinc compared to 324 g/t for silver, 4.5% for lead, and 0.9% for zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Metals sold were approximately 0.7 million ounces of silver, 500 ounces of gold, 8.3 million pounds of lead, and 0.9 million pounds of zinc, compared to 1.1 million ounces of silver, 700 ounces of gold, 10.3 million pounds of lead, and 2.5 million pounds of zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the cash mining cost at the Ying Mining District was $68.1 per tonne, up 4% compared to $65.24 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The cash milling cost was $11.53 per tonne, down 8% compared to $12.57 in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne of ore processed at the Ying Mining District in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $83.59, up 2% compared to $81.78 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The all-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed was $195.78, up 38%, compared to $141.63 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to lower production output resulting in a higher per tonne fixed cost allocation. The all-in sustaining production cost at the Ying Mining District was $13.6 million, a decrease of $1.9 million, compared to $15.4 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the cash cost per ounce of silver and all in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of byproduct credits, at the Ying Mining District were $0.30 and $11.86, respectively, compared to negative $3.02 and $3.28 in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, approximately 12,412 metres or $0.4 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 6,083 metres or $0.3 million) and 1,810 metres or $0.6 million worth of preparation tunnelling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 3,061 metres or $1.0 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the Ying Mining District. In addition, approximately 7,979 metres or $2.9 million worth of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps, and declines (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 10,730 metres or $4.0 million) were completed and capitalized.
6
| 4. |
GC Mine, Guangdong Province, China |
| GC Mine | Q4 2020 | Q3 2020 | Q2 2020 | Q1 2020 | Q4 2019 | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||
| March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | September 30, 2019 | June 30, 2019 | March 31, 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 37,216 | 86,437 | 83,172 | 80,808 | 50,368 | 287,633 | 284,218 | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 33,243 | 89,372 | 86,134 | 81,861 | 52,865 | 290,610 | 288,995 | ||||||||
| Head Grades | |||||||||||||||
|
Silver (gram/tonne) |
94 | 96 | 100 | 95 | 101 | 97 | 86 | ||||||||
|
Lead (%) |
1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.5 | ||||||||
|
Zinc (%) |
3.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.0 | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | |||||||||||||||
|
Silver (%) |
80.7 | 78.0 | 75.9 | 76.8 | 81.3 | 77.4 | 78.4 | ||||||||
|
Lead (%) |
90.4 | 90.4 | 88.3 | 88.7 | 91.5 | 89.3 | 90.4 | ||||||||
|
Zinc (%) |
87.7 | 85.5 | 86.1 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 86.0 | 84.9 | ||||||||
| Metal Sales | |||||||||||||||
|
Silver (in thousands of ounce) |
89 | 234 | 183 | 193 | 173 | 699 | 626 | ||||||||
|
Lead (in thousands of pound) |
1,332 | 3,867 | 2,680 | 3,007 | 2,360 | 10,885 | 8,650 | ||||||||
|
Zinc (in thousands of pound) |
2,194 | 5,471 | 5,227 | 5,244 | 4,874 | 18,137 | 16,090 | ||||||||
|
Cash mining cost ($/tonne) |
25.58 | 42.96 | 37.80 | 38.83 | 40.58 | 38.06 | 37.73 | ||||||||
|
Cash milling cost ($/tonne) |
16.36 | 14.01 | 12.72 | 13.85 | 18.52 | 13.85 | 14.39 | ||||||||
| Cash production cost ($/tonne) | 41.94 | 56.97 | 50.52 | 52.68 | 59.10 | 51.91 | 52.12 | ||||||||
| All-in sustaining production costs ($/tonne) | 88.18 | 71.03 | 62.94 | 67.33 | 72.11 | 69.33 | 63.59 | ||||||||
| Cash cost per ounce of silver ($) | (10.03 | ) | (4.33 | ) | (9.98 | ) | (8.38 | ) | (10.23 | ) | (7.65 | ) | (12.97 | ) | |
| All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver ($) | 8.31 | 2.18 | (2.89 | ) | (0.96 | ) | (4.97 | ) | 0.77 | (6.28 | ) | ||||
Fiscal 2020 vs. Fiscal 2019
In Fiscal 2020, the total ore mined at the GC Mine was 287,633 tonnes, an increase of 1% or 3,415 tonnes, compared to 284,218 tonnes in Fiscal 2019, while ore milled was 290,610 tonnes, an increase of 1% or 1,615 tonnes, compared to 288,995 tonnes in Fiscal 2019.
Average head grades of ore processed at the GC Mine were 97 g/t for silver, 1.9% for lead, and 3.3% for zinc, compared to 86 g/t for silver, 1.5% for lead, and 3.0% for zinc in the prior year. Recovery rates for ore processed at the GC Mine were 77.4% for silver, 89.3% for lead, and 86.0% for zinc, compared to 78.4% for silver, 90.4% for lead, and 84.9% for zinc in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the GC Mine sold 699,000 ounces of silver, 10.9 million pounds of lead, and 18.1 million pounds of zinc, up 12%, 26%, and 13%, respectively, compared to 626,000 ounces of silver, 8.7 million pounds of lead, and 16.1 million pounds of zinc in Fiscal 2019.
Total mining cost and cash mining cost at the GC Mine in Fiscal 2020 were $46.40 and $38.06 per tonne, respectively, a slight increase of 1% compared to $46.04 and $37.73 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. Total milling cost and cash milling cost per tonne at the GC Mine were $15.52 and $13.85, respectively, down 9% and 4%, compared to $17.01 and $14.39, respectively, in Fiscal 2019.
Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne of ore processed at the GC Mine in Fiscal 2020 was $51.91, a slight decrease compared to $52.12 in Fiscal 2019. All-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed was $69.57, up 9%, compared to $63.59 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $1.3 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the GC Mine, was negative $7.65 compared to negative $12.97 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $2.9 million in by-product credits resulting from a decrease of 18% and 33%, respectively, in the net realized selling prices for lead and zinc, offset by an increase of 26% and 13%, respectively, in lead and zinc sold.
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the GC Mine in Fiscal 2020 was $0.77 compared to negative $6.28 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to i) the increase in cash cost per ounce of silver as discussed above, ii) an increase of $0.8 million in general and administrative expenses, and iii) an increase of $1.3 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Fiscal 2020, approximately 22,513 metres or $1.0 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Fiscal 2019 – 24,727 metres or $1.3 million) and 19,315 metres or $4.6 million worth of tunnelling (Fiscal 2019 –19,844 metres or $5.2 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the GC Mine. In addition, approximately 3,327 metres or $2.4 million of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps, and declines (Fiscal 2019 – 1,374 metres or $1.0 million) were completed and capitalized.
7
Q4 Fiscal 2020 vs. Q4 Fiscal 2019
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, a total of 37,216 tonnes of ore were mined and 33,243 tonnes were milled at the GC Mine, down 26% and 37%, respectively, compared to 50,368 tonnes mined and 52,865 tonnes milled in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Average head grades of ore milled were 94 g/t for silver, 1.8% for lead, and 3.5% for zinc compared to 101 g/t for silver, 1.8% for lead, and 3.3% for zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Metals sold were approximately 89,000 ounces of silver, 1.3 million pounds of lead, and 2.2 million pounds of zinc, down 49%, 44%, and 55%, respectively, compared to 173,000 ounces of silver, 2.4 million pounds of lead, and 4.9 million pounds of zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
The cash mining cost at the GC Mine was $25.58 per tonne, down 37% compared to $40.58 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in tunneling expensed as mining preparation costs. The cash milling cost was $16.36 per tonne, down 12% compared to $18.52 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne decreased by 29% to $41.94 from $59.10 in Q4 Fiscal 2019, while the all-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed increased by 22% to $88.18 from $72.11 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase in all-in sustaining production cost was mainly due to less production output resulting in a higher per tonne fixed cost allocation.
Cash cost per ounce of silver and all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by product credits, at the GC Mine in Q4 Fiscal 2020, were negative $10.03 and $8.31, respectively, compared to negative $10.23 and negative $4.97 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to i) a decrease of $3.5 million in byproduct credits, ii) an increase of $0.5 million in general and administrative expenses, and iii) an increase of $0.6 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, approximately 2,200 metres or $0.1 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 2,864 metres or $0.3 million) and 353 metres or $0.1 million of tunnelling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 –3,366 metres or $0.9 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the GC Mine. In addition, approximately 1,851 metres or $1.4 million of horizontal tunnels, raise, and declines (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 262 metres or $0.2 million) were completed and capitalized.
Mr. Guoliang Ma, P.Geo., Manager of Exploration and Resources of the Company, is the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and has reviewed and given consent to the technical information contained in this news release.
This earnings release should be read in conjunction with the Company's Management Discussion & Analysis, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements for the corresponding period, which have been posted on SEDAR under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com and are also available on the Company's website at www.silvercorp.ca.
About Silvercorp
Silvercorp is a profitable Canadian mining company producing silver, lead and zinc metals in concentrates from mines in China. The Company’s goal is to continuously create healthy returns to shareholders through efficient management, organic growth and the acquisition of profitable projects. Silvercorp balances profitability, social and environmental relationships, employees’ wellbeing, and sustainable development. For more information, please visit our website at www.silvercorp.ca.
For further information
Silvercorp Metals Inc. Lon Shaver Vice President Phone: (604) 669-9397 Toll Free 1(888) 224-1881 Email: investor@silvercorp.ca Website: www.silvercorp.ca
8
CAUTIONARY DISCLAIMER - FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain of the statements and information in this news release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial securities laws (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Any statements or information that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategies”, “targets”, “goals”, “forecasts”, “objectives”, “budgets”, “schedules”, “potential” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things: the price of silver and other metals; the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates at the Company’s material properties; the sufficiency of the Company’s capital to finance the Company’s operations; estimates of the Company’s revenues and capital expenditures; estimated production from the Company’s mines in the Ying Mining District and the GC Mine; timing of receipt of permits and regulatory approvals; availability of funds from production to finance the Company’s operations; and access to and availability of funding for future construction, use of proceeds from any financing and development of the Company’s properties.
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, risks relating to: global economic and social impact of COVID-19; fluctuating commodity prices; calculation of resources, reserves and mineralization and precious and base metal recovery; interpretations and assumptions of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; exploration and development programs; feasibility and engineering reports; permits and licences; title to properties; property interests; joint venture partners; acquisition of commercially mineable mineral rights; financing; recent market events and conditions; economic factors affecting the Company; timing, estimated amount, capital and operating expenditures and economic returns of future production; integration of future acquisitions into the Company’s existing operations; competition; operations and political conditions; regulatory environment in China and Canada; environmental risks; foreign exchange rate fluctuations; insurance; risks and hazards of mining operations; key personnel; conflicts of interest; dependence on management; internal control over financial reporting; and bringing actions and enforcing judgments under U.S. securities laws.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Company’s Annual Information Form under the heading “Risk Factors”. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, described or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
The Company’s forward-looking statements are based on the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date of this news release, and other than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management’s assumptions, beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, or changes in any other events affecting such statements. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
9
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Financial Position |
| (Unaudited - Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
| As at March 31, | As at March 31, | |||||
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| ASSETS | ||||||
| Current Assets | ||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | ||
|
Short-term investments |
76,742 | 47,836 | ||||
|
Trade and other receivables |
1,178 | 467 | ||||
|
Current portion of lease receivable |
186 | - | ||||
|
Inventories |
8,430 | 10,836 | ||||
|
Due from a related party |
1,519 | 3,022 | ||||
|
Income tax receivable |
1,093 | 1,301 | ||||
|
Prepaids and deposits |
3,254 | 3,958 | ||||
| 158,179 | 134,861 | |||||
| Non-current Assets | ||||||
|
Long-term prepaids and deposits |
390 | 769 | ||||
|
Long-term portion lease receivable |
348 | - | ||||
|
Reclamation deposits |
9,230 | 7,953 | ||||
|
Investment in an associate |
44,555 | 38,703 | ||||
|
Other investments |
8,750 | 9,253 | ||||
|
Plant and equipment |
66,722 | 68,617 | ||||
|
Mineral rights and properties |
224,586 | 238,920 | ||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 512,760 | $ | 499,076 | ||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||
| Current Liabilities | ||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 23,129 | $ | 29,856 | ||
|
Current portion of lease obligation |
567 | - | ||||
|
Bank Loan |
- | 4,475 | ||||
|
Deposits received |
3,195 | 3,040 | ||||
|
Income tax payable |
937 | 502 | ||||
| 27,828 | 37,873 | |||||
| Non-current Liabilities | ||||||
|
Long-term portion of lease obligation |
1,502 | - | ||||
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
35,758 | 34,334 | ||||
|
Environmental rehabilitation |
8,700 | 13,688 | ||||
| Total Liabilities | 73,788 | 85,895 | ||||
| Equity | ||||||
|
Share capital |
243,926 | 231,269 | ||||
|
Equity reserves |
(21,142 | ) | (557 | ) | ||
|
Retained earnings |
145,898 | 116,734 | ||||
| Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company | 368,682 | 347,446 | ||||
| Non-controlling interests | 70,290 | 65,735 | ||||
| Total Equity | 438,972 | 413,181 | ||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 512,760 | $ | 499,076 |
10
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Income |
| (Unaudited - Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for per share figures) |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 18,859 | $ | 34,952 | $ | 158,829 | $ | 170,519 | |||||
| Costs of mine operations | |||||||||||||
|
Production costs |
8,344 | 13,005 | 62,029 | 62,461 | |||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
3,146 | 4,601 | 20,715 | 19,997 | |||||||||
|
Mineral resource taxes |
559 | 1,002 | 4,540 | 4,864 | |||||||||
|
Government fees and other taxes |
238 | 505 | 2,115 | 2,699 | |||||||||
|
General and administrative |
3,368 | 2,277 | 10,056 | 9,566 | |||||||||
| 15,655 | 21,390 | 99,455 | 99,587 | ||||||||||
| Income from mine operations | 3,204 | 13,562 | 59,374 | 70,932 | |||||||||
| Corporate general and administrative | 2,590 | 2,623 | 10,094 | 9,475 | |||||||||
| Property evaluation and business development | 274 | 111 | 679 | 386 | |||||||||
| Foreign exchange gain | (5,437 | ) | 1,034 | (4,103 | ) | (1,361 | ) | ||||||
| Loss on disposal of plant and equipment | 88 | 13 | 461 | 401 | |||||||||
| Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties | - | - | (1,477 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Share of loss in associate | 429 | 118 | 1,276 | 330 | |||||||||
| Dilution gain on investment in associate | - | - | (723 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Reclassification of other comprehensive income upon ownership dilution of investment in associate | - | - | (21 | ) | - | ||||||||
| Impairment reversal of investment in associate | - | (1,899 | ) | - | (1,899 | ) | |||||||
| Impairment reversal of mineral rights and properties | - | (7,279 | ) | - | (7,279 | ) | |||||||
| Other expense | 718 | 130 | 1,026 | 806 | |||||||||
| Income before finance items and income taxes | 4,542 | 18,711 | 52,162 | 70,073 | |||||||||
| Finance income | 1,154 | 874 | 4,023 | 3,476 | |||||||||
| Finance costs | (1,628 | ) | (168 | ) | (2,073 | ) | (631 | ) | |||||
| Income before income taxes | 4,068 | 19,417 | 54,112 | 72,918 | |||||||||
| Income tax expense | 543 | 3,477 | 8,909 | 20,871 | |||||||||
| Net income | $ | 3,525 | $ | 15,940 | $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | |||||
| Attributable to: | |||||||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | $ | 3,163 | $ | 12,107 | $ | 34,274 | $ | 39,724 | |||||
| Non-controlling interests | 362 | 3,833 | 10,929 | 12,323 | |||||||||
| $ | 3,525 | $ | 15,940 | $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | ||||||
| Earnings per share attributable to the equity holders of the Company | |||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.24 | |||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.23 | |||||
| Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - Basic | 173,326,682 | 169,705,269 | 171,713,263 | 168,483,412 | |||||||||
| Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - Diluted | 175,381,704 | 170,645,002 | 174,079,387 | 170,386,993 | |||||||||
11
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow |
| (Unaudited - Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
| Three Months Ended March 31, | Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||
| Cash provided by | |||||||||||||
| Operating activities | |||||||||||||
|
Net income |
$ | 3,525 | $ | 15,940 | $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | |||||
|
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash: |
|||||||||||||
|
Finance costs |
1,628 | 168 | 2,073 | 631 | |||||||||
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
3,982 | 4,942 | 22,673 | 21,250 | |||||||||
|
Share of loss in associate |
429 | 118 | 1,276 | 330 | |||||||||
|
Dilution gain on investment in associate |
- | - | (723 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Reclassification of other comprehensive loss upon ownership dilution of investment in associate |
- | - | (21 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Impairment reversal of investment in associate |
- | (1,899 | ) | - | (1,899 | ) | |||||||
|
Impairment reversal of mineral rights and properties |
- | (7,279 | ) | - | (7,279 | ) | |||||||
|
Income tax expense |
543 | 3,476 | 8,909 | 20,871 | |||||||||
|
Finance income |
(1,154 | ) | (874 | ) | (4,023 | ) | (3,476 | ) | |||||
|
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment |
88 | 13 | 461 | 401 | |||||||||
|
Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties |
- | - | (1,477 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Share-based compensation |
696 | 479 | 2,669 | 1,896 | |||||||||
|
Reclamation expenditures |
(89 | ) | (121 | ) | (385 | ) | (187 | ) | |||||
|
Income taxes paid |
(1,597 | ) | (5,745 | ) | (5,012 | ) | (18,225 | ) | |||||
|
Interest received |
1,154 | 874 | 4,023 | 3,476 | |||||||||
|
Interest paid |
(27 | ) | (48 | ) | (162 | ) | (144 | ) | |||||
|
Changes in non-cash operating working capital |
(2,900 | ) | (1,700 | ) | 1,762 | 659 | |||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 6,278 | 8,344 | 77,246 | 70,351 | |||||||||
| Investing activities | |||||||||||||
|
Mineral rights and properties |
|||||||||||||
|
Capital expenditures |
(5,983 | ) | (8,639 | ) | (27,904 | ) | (28,049 | ) | |||||
|
Proceeds on disposals |
- | - | 6,146 | - | |||||||||
|
Plant and equipment |
|||||||||||||
|
Additions |
(1,162 | ) | (1,934 | ) | (7,400 | ) | (6,258 | ) | |||||
|
Proceeds on disposals |
2 | 2 | 10 | 31 | |||||||||
|
Reclamation deposits |
|||||||||||||
|
Paid |
(167 | ) | (2,334 | ) | (1,727 | ) | (2,601 | ) | |||||
|
Other investments |
|||||||||||||
|
Acquisition |
(3,992 | ) | (1,018 | ) | (7,851 | ) | (1,018 | ) | |||||
|
Proceeds on disposals |
2,313 | - | 8,454 | - | |||||||||
|
Investment in associate |
- | (107 | ) | (7,030 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||||
|
Net (purchases) redemptions of short-term investments |
11,878 | 10,574 | (33,606 | ) | 5,969 | ||||||||
|
Principal received on lease receivable |
47 | - | 118 | - | |||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | 2,936 | (3,456 | ) | (70,790 | ) | (32,033 | ) | ||||||
| Financing activities | |||||||||||||
|
Related parties |
|||||||||||||
|
Payments made |
(1,436 | ) | (2,989 | ) | (1,436 | ) | (2,989 | ) | |||||
|
Repayments received |
- | - | 2,922 | - | |||||||||
|
Bank loan |
|||||||||||||
|
Proceeds |
- | - | - | 4,527 | |||||||||
|
Repayment |
- | - | (4,369 | ) | - | ||||||||
|
Principal payments on lease obligation |
(134 | ) | - | (503 | ) | - | |||||||
|
Non-controlling interests |
|||||||||||||
|
Distribution |
- | (3,333 | ) | (3,259 | ) | (13,259 | ) | ||||||
|
Acquisition |
- | - | - | (1,121 | ) | ||||||||
|
Cash dividends distributed |
- | - | (4,287 | ) | (4,208 | ) | |||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
1,007 | 209 | 8,001 | 1,852 | |||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (563 | ) | (6,113 | ) | (2,931 | ) | (15,198 | ) | |||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (4,768 | ) | 528 | (5,189 | ) | (4,878 | ) | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 3,883 | (697 | ) | (1,664 | ) | 18,242 | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year | 61,894 | 68,138 | 67,441 | 49,199 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | |||||
12
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Mining Data |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for mining data figures) |
| Consolidated | Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | |||||||||||
| Production Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Mine Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 106,595 | 161,400 | -34 | % | 885,830 | 906,794 | -2 | % | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 102,431 | 159,904 | -36 | % | 892,215 | 908,846 | -2 | % | ||||||||
| Head Grades | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) | 231 | 250 | -8 | % | 240 | 240 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3 | % | 3.7 | 3.5 | 6 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 1.8 | 1.7 | 7 | % | 1.7 | 1.6 | 5 | % | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (%) | 93.4 | 93.6 | 0 | % | 93.5 | 93.8 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 94.8 | 95.3 | 0 | % | 94.8 | 94.9 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 80.3 | 77.7 | 3 | % | 77.8 | 72.8 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Cost Data | ||||||||||||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 75.91 | 80.22 | -5 | % | 76.25 | 74.98 | 2 | % | |||||||
| Cash mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 53.26 | 57.55 | -7 | % | 54.90 | 55.35 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore mined ($) | 22.65 | 22.67 | 0 | % | 21.35 | 19.63 | 9 | % | ||||||||
| + | Unit shipping costs ($) | 2.57 | 2.72 | -6 | % | 2.65 | 2.88 | -8 | % | |||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 15.67 | 17.58 | -11 | % | 13.17 | 13.99 | -6 | % | |||||||
| Cash milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 13.10 | 14.53 | -10 | % | 11.36 | 11.69 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore milled ($) | 2.57 | 3.05 | -16 | % | 1.81 | 2.30 | -21 | % | ||||||||
| + | Cash production cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 68.93 | 74.80 | -8 | % | 68.91 | 69.92 | -1 | % | |||||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 188.57 | 138.01 | 37 | % | 125.29 | 119.48 | 5 | % | |||||||
| + | Cash cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | (0.85 | ) | (3.97 | ) | 79 | % | (1.91 | ) | (4.29 | ) | 55 | % | |||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 15.17 | 4.49 | 238 | % | 6.86 | 3.52 | 95 | % | |||||||
| Concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||
| Lead concentrate (tonne) | 2,520 | 3,248 | -22 | % | 2,520 | 3,248 | -22 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc concentrate (tonne) | 370 | 368 | 1 | % | 370 | 368 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Sales Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Metal Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of ounces) | 800 | 1,314 | -39 | % | 6,257 | 6,390 | -2 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of ounces) | 0.5 | 0.7 | -29 | % | 3.3 | 3.5 | -6 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of pounds) | 9,654 | 12,670 | -24 | % | 65,344 | 64,788 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of pounds) | 3,059 | 7,338 | -58 | % | 25,401 | 22,716 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of $) | 9,834 | 16,732 | -41 | % | 84,872 | 80,654 | 5 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of $) | 625 | 759 | -18 | % | 3,911 | 3,642 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of $) | 6,454 | 11,420 | -43 | % | 51,966 | 64,111 | -19 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of $) | 1,546 | 5,529 | -72 | % | 15,780 | 20,654 | -24 | % | ||||||||
| Other (in thousands of $) | 401 | 512 | -22 | % | 2,300 | 1,458 | 58 | % | ||||||||
| 18,860 | 34,952 | -46 | % | 158,829 | 170,519 | -7 | % | |||||||||
| Average Selling Price, Net of Value Added Tax and Smelter Charges | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver ($ per ounce) | 12.29 | 12.73 | -3 | % | 13.56 | 12.62 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Gold ($ per ounce) | 1,250 | 1,084 | 15 | % | 1,185 | 1,041 | 14 | % | ||||||||
| Lead ($ per pound) | 0.67 | 0.90 | -26 | % | 0.80 | 0.99 | -19 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound) | 0.51 | 0.75 | -32 | % | 0.62 | 0.91 | -32 | % | ||||||||
13
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Mining Data |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for mining data figures) |
| Ying Mining District | Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | |||||||||||
| Production Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Mine Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 69,379 | 111,032 | -38 | % | 598,197 | 622,576 | -4 | % | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 69,188 | 107,039 | -35 | % | 601,605 | 619,851 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Head Grades | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) | 297 | 324 | -8 | % | 309 | 311 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 4.6 | 4.5 | 3 | % | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 10 | % | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (%) | 95.3 | 95.5 | 0 | % | 96.0 | 95.8 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 95.7 | 96.1 | 0 | % | 95.9 | 95.7 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 67.7 | 63.7 | 6 | % | 63.2 | 54.1 | 17 | % | ||||||||
| Cost Data | ||||||||||||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 97.79 | 93.86 | 4 | % | 90.61 | 88.19 | 3 | % | |||||||
| Cash mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 68.10 | 65.24 | 4 | % | 63.00 | 63.39 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore mined ($) | 29.69 | 28.62 | 4 | % | 27.61 | 24.80 | 11 | % | ||||||||
| + | Unit shipping costs ($) | 3.96 | 3.97 | 0 | % | 3.92 | 4.22 | -7 | % | |||||||
| + | Milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 14.31 | 15.55 | -8 | % | 12.03 | 12.58 | -4 | % | |||||||
| Cash milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 11.53 | 12.57 | -8 | % | 10.16 | 10.43 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore milled ($) | 2.78 | 2.98 | -7 | % | 1.87 | 2.15 | -13 | % | ||||||||
| + | Cash production cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 83.59 | 81.78 | 2 | % | 77.08 | 78.04 | -1 | % | |||||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 195.78 | 141.63 | 38 | % | 132.52 | 126.93 | 4 | % | |||||||
| + | Cash cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 0.30 | (3.02 | ) | 110 | % | (1.18 | ) | (3.35 | ) | 65 | % | ||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 11.86 | 3.28 | 262 | % | 5.49 | 2.60 | 111 | % | |||||||
| Concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||
| Lead concentrate (tonne) | 2,475 | 3,150 | -21 | % | 2,475 | 3,150 | -21 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc concentrate (tonne) | 280 | 250 | 12 | % | 280 | 250 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Sales Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Metal Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of ounces) | 711 | 1,141 | -38 | % | 5,558 | 5,764 | -4 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of ounces) | 0.5 | 0.7 | -29 | % | 3.3 | 3.5 | -6 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of pounds) | 8,322 | 10,310 | -19 | % | 54,459 | 56,138 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of pounds) | 865 | 2,464 | -65 | % | 7,264 | 6,626 | 10 | % | ||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of $) | 8,968 | 15,137 | -41 | % | 77,617 | 74,702 | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of $) | 625 | 759 | -18 | % | 3,911 | 3,642 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of $) | 5,562 | 9,318 | -40 | % | 43,312 | 55,739 | -22 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of $) | 452 | 2,028 | -78 | % | 4,911 | 6,305 | -22 | % | ||||||||
| Other (in thousands of $) | 74 | 344 | -78 | % | 1,683 | 1,095 | 54 | % | ||||||||
| 15,681 | 27,586 | -43 | % | 131,434 | 141,483 | -7 | % | |||||||||
| Average Selling Price, Net of Value Added Tax and Smelter Charges | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver ($ per ounce) | 12.61 | 13.27 | -5 | % | 13.96 | 12.96 | 8 | % | ||||||||
| Gold ($ per ounce) | 1,250 | 1,084 | 15 | % | 1,185 | 1,041 | 14 | % | ||||||||
| Lead ($ per pound) | 0.67 | 0.90 | -26 | % | 0.80 | 0.99 | -19 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound) | 0.52 | 0.82 | -37 | % | 0.68 | 0.95 | -28 | % | ||||||||
14
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Mining Data |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for mining data figures) |
| GC Mine | Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | |||||||||||
| Production Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Mine Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 37,216 | 50,368 | -26 | % | 287,633 | 284,218 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 33,243 | 52,865 | -37 | % | 290,610 | 288,995 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Head Grades | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) | 94 | 101 | -7 | % | 97 | 86 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1 | % | 1.9 | 1.5 | 27 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 3.5 | 3.3 | 7 | % | 3.3 | 3.0 | 10 | % | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (%) * | 80.7 | 81.3 | -1 | % | 77.4 | 78.4 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 90.4 | 91.5 | -1 | % | 89.3 | 90.4 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 87.7 | 85.7 | 2 | % | 86.0 | 84.9 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Cost Data | ||||||||||||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 35.09 | 50.13 | -30 | % | 46.40 | 46.04 | 1 | % | |||||||
| Cash mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 25.58 | 40.58 | -37 | % | 38.06 | 37.73 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore mined ($) | 9.51 | 9.55 | 0 | % | 8.34 | 8.31 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| + | Millng cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 18.50 | 21.70 | -15 | % | 15.52 | 17.01 | -9 | % | |||||||
| Cash milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 16.36 | 18.52 | -12 | % | 13.85 | 14.39 | -4 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore milled ($) | 2.14 | 3.18 | -33 | % | 1.67 | 2.62 | -36 | % | ||||||||
| + | Cash production cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 41.94 | 59.10 | -29 | % | 51.91 | 52.12 | 0 | % | |||||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 88.18 | 72.11 | 22 | % | 69.33 | 63.59 | 9 | % | |||||||
| + | Cash cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | (10.03 | ) | (10.23 | ) | 2 | % | (7.65 | ) | (12.97 | ) | 41 | % | |||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 8.31 | (4.97 | ) | 267 | % | 0.77 | (6.28 | ) | 112 | % | |||||
| Concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||
| Lead concentrate (tonne) | 45 | 98 | -54 | % | 45 | 98 | -54 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc concentrate (tonne) | 90 | 118 | -24 | % | 90 | 118 | -24 | % | ||||||||
| Sales Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Metal Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of ounces) | 89 | 173 | -49 | % | 699 | 626 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of pounds) | 1,332 | 2,360 | -44 | % | 10,885 | 8,650 | 26 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of pounds) | 2,194 | 4,874 | -55 | % | 18,137 | 16,090 | 13 | % | ||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of $) | 866 | 1,595 | -46 | % | 7,255 | 5,952 | 22 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of $) | 892 | 2,102 | -58 | % | 8,654 | 8,372 | 3 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of $) | 1,094 | 3,501 | -69 | % | 10,869 | 14,349 | -24 | % | ||||||||
| Other (in thousands of $) | 327 | 168 | 95 | % | 617 | 363 | 70 | % | ||||||||
| 3,179 | 7,366 | -57 | % | 27,395 | 29,036 | -6 | % | |||||||||
| Average Selling Price, Net of Value Added Tax and Smelter Charges | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver ($ per ounce) ** | 9.73 | 9.22 | 6 | % | 10.38 | 9.51 | 9 | % | ||||||||
| Lead ($ per pound) | 0.67 | 0.89 | -25 | % | 0.80 | 0.97 | -18 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound) | 0.50 | 0.72 | -31 | % | 0.60 | 0.89 | -33 | % | ||||||||
* Silver recovery rate includes silver recovered in lead concentrate and silver recovered in zinc concentrate.
** Silver sold in zinc concentrates is subjected to higher smelter and refining charges which lowers the net silver selling price.
15
Form 52-109F1
Certification of Annual Filings
Full Certificate
I, Derek Liu, Chief Financial Officer of Silvercorp Metals Inc. certify the following:
| 1. |
Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Silvercorp Metals Inc. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended March 31, 2020. |
|
| |
| 2. |
No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings. |
|
| |
| 3. |
Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings. |
|
| |
| 4. |
Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer. |
|
| |
| 5. |
Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end |
|
|
| (a) | designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that | ||
| (i) | material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and | ||
| (ii) | information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and | ||
| (b) | designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP. | ||
| 5.1 |
Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). |
|
| |
| 5.2 |
ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A |
|
| |
| 5.3 |
Limitation on scope of design: N/A |
| 6. |
Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have |
|
|
| (a) | evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and | ||
| (b) | evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A | ||
| (i) | our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and | ||
| (ii) | N/A. | ||
| 7. |
Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2020 and ended on March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR. |
|
| |
| 8. |
Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR. |
Date: May 21, 2020
“Derek Liu”
Derek Liu
Chief Financial Officer
2
Form 52-109F1
Certification of Annual Filings
Full Certificate
I, Rui Feng, Chief Executive Officer of Silvercorp Metals Inc. certify the following:
| 1. |
Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the “annual filings”) of Silvercorp Metals Inc. (the “issuer”) for the financial year ended March 31, 2020. |
|
| |
| 2. |
No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings. |
|
| |
| 3. |
Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings. |
|
| |
| 4. |
Responsibility: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer. |
|
| |
| 5. |
Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end |
|
|
| (a) | designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that | ||
| (i) | material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared; and | ||
| (ii) | information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and | ||
| (b) | designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP. | ||
| 5.1 |
Control framework: The control framework the issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). |
|
| |
| 5.2 |
ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A |
|
| |
| 5.3 |
Limitation on scope of design: N/A |
| 6. |
Evaluation: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have |
|
|
| (a) | evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and | ||
| (b) | evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer’s ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A | ||
| (i) | our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and | ||
| (ii) | N/A. | ||
| 7. |
Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on January 1, 2020 and ended on March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s ICFR. |
|
| |
| 8. |
Reporting to the issuer’s auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer’s auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s ICFR. |
Date: May 21, 2020
“Rui Feng”
Rui Feng
Chief Executive Officer
2
Exhibit 99.4
SILVERCORP METALS INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2020 and 2019
(Expressed in thousands of US dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated)
1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Silvercorp Metals Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Silvercorp Metals Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in equity for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2020 and 2019, and the financial performance and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2020, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated May 21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte LLP
Vancouver, Canada
May 21, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Silvercorp Metals Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Silvercorp Metals Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated May 21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte LLP
Vancouver, Canada
May 21, 2020
3
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Financial Position |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
| As at March 31, | As at March 31, | ||||||
| Notes | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| ASSETS | |||||||
| Current Assets | |||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
23 | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | ||
|
Short-term investments |
3 | 76,742 | 47,836 | ||||
|
Trade and other receivables |
1,178 | 467 | |||||
|
Current portion of lease receivable |
10 | 186 | - | ||||
|
Inventories |
4 | 8,430 | 10,836 | ||||
|
Due from related parties |
15 | 1,519 | 3,022 | ||||
|
Income tax receivable |
1,093 | 1,301 | |||||
|
Prepaids and deposits |
3,254 | 3,958 | |||||
| 158,179 | 134,861 | ||||||
| Non-current Assets | |||||||
|
Long-term prepaids and deposits |
390 | 769 | |||||
|
Long-term portion lease receivable |
10 | 348 | - | ||||
|
Reclamation deposits |
9,230 | 7,953 | |||||
|
Investment in an associate |
5 | 44,555 | 38,703 | ||||
|
Other investments |
6 | 8,750 | 9,253 | ||||
|
Plant and equipment |
7 | 66,722 | 68,617 | ||||
|
Mineral rights and properties |
8 | 224,586 | 238,920 | ||||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 512,760 | $ | 499,076 | |||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||
| Current Liabilities | |||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 23,129 | $ | 29,856 | |||
|
Current portion of lease obligation |
10 | 567 | - | ||||
|
Bank loan |
9 | - | 4,475 | ||||
|
Deposits received |
3,195 | 3,040 | |||||
|
Income tax payable |
937 | 502 | |||||
| 27,828 | 37,873 | ||||||
| Non-current Liabilities | |||||||
|
Long-term portion of lease obligation |
10 | 1,502 | - | ||||
|
Deferred income tax liabilities |
19 | 35,758 | 34,334 | ||||
|
Environmental rehabilitation |
11 | 8,700 | 13,688 | ||||
| Total Liabilities | 73,788 | 85,895 | |||||
| Equity | |||||||
|
Share capital |
243,926 | 231,269 | |||||
|
Equity reserves |
(21,142 | ) | (557 | ) | |||
|
Retained earnings |
145,898 | 116,734 | |||||
| Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company | 368,682 | 347,446 | |||||
| Non-controlling interests | 14 | 70,290 | 65,735 | ||||
| Total Equity | 438,972 | 413,181 | |||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 512,760 | $ | 499,076 | |||
Approved on behalf of the Board:
(Signed) David Kong
Director
(Signed) Rui Feng
Director
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
4
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Income |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except numbers for share and per share figures) |
| Years Ended March 31, | |||||||
| Notes | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Sales | 22 (b)(c) | $ | 158,829 | $ | 170,519 | ||
| Costs of mine operations | |||||||
|
Production costs |
62,029 | 62,461 | |||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
20,715 | 19,997 | |||||
|
Mineral resource taxes |
4,540 | 4,864 | |||||
|
Government fees and other taxes |
17 | 2,115 | 2,699 | ||||
|
General and administrative |
16 | 10,056 | 9,566 | ||||
| 99,455 | 99,587 | ||||||
| Income from mine operations | 59,374 | 70,932 | |||||
| Corporate general and administrative | 16 | 10,094 | 9,475 | ||||
| Property evaluation and business development | 679 | 386 | |||||
| Foreign exchange gain | (4,103 | ) | (1,361 | ) | |||
| Loss on disposal of plant and equipment | 7 | 461 | 401 | ||||
| Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties | 8 | (1,477 | ) | - | |||
| Share of loss in associate | 5 | 1,276 | 330 | ||||
| Dilution gain on investment in associate | 5 | (723 | ) | - | |||
| Reclassification of other comprehensive income upon ownership dilution of investment in associate | 5 | (21 | ) | - | |||
| Impairment reversal of investment in associate | 5 | - | (1,899 | ) | |||
| Impairment reversal of mineral rights and properties | 8 | - | (7,279 | ) | |||
| Other expense | 1,026 | 806 | |||||
| Income before finance items and income taxes | 52,162 | 70,073 | |||||
| Finance income | 18 | 4,023 | 3,476 | ||||
| Finance costs | 18 | (2,073 | ) | (631 | ) | ||
| Income before income taxes | 54,112 | 72,918 | |||||
| Income tax expense | 19 | 8,909 | 20,871 | ||||
| Net income | $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | |||
| Attributable to: | |||||||
|
Equity holders of the Company |
$ | 34,274 | $ | 39,724 | |||
|
Non-controlling interests |
14 | 10,929 | 12,323 | ||||
| $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | ||||
| Earnings per share attributable to the equity holders of the Company | |||||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.24 | |||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.23 | |||
| Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - Basic | 171,713,263 | 168,483,412 | |||||
| Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - Diluted | 174,079,387 | 170,386,993 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
5
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
| Years Ended March 31, | |||||||
| Notes | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Net income | $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | |||
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes: | |||||||
| Items that may subsequently be reclassified to net income or loss: | |||||||
|
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $nil |
(24,312 | ) | (21,831 | ) | |||
|
Share of other comprehensive income in associate |
5 | 1,077 | 398 | ||||
|
Reclassification to net income upon ownership dilution of investment in associate |
5 | (21 | ) | - | |||
| Items that will not subsequently be reclassified to net income or loss: | |||||||
|
Change in fair value on equity investments designated as FVTOCI, net of tax of $nil |
6 | 249 | 2,380 | ||||
| Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes | $ | (23,007 | ) | $ | (19,053 | ) | |
| Attributable to: | |||||||
|
Equity holders of the Company |
$ | (19,892 | ) | $ | (15,989 | ) | |
|
Non-controlling interests |
14 | (3,115 | ) | (3,064 | ) | ||
| $ | (23,007 | ) | $ | (19,053 | ) | ||
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 22,196 | $ | 32,994 | |||
| Attributable to: | |||||||
|
Equity holders of the Company |
$ | 14,382 | $ | 23,735 | |||
|
Non-controlling interests |
7,814 | 9,259 | |||||
| $ | 22,196 | $ | 32,994 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
6
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
| Years Ended March 31, | |||||||
| Notes | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Cash provided by | |||||||
| Operating activities | |||||||
|
Net income |
$ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | |||
|
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash: |
|||||||
|
Finance costs |
18 | 2,073 | 631 | ||||
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
22,673 | 21,250 | |||||
|
Share of loss in associate |
5 | 1,276 | 330 | ||||
|
Dilution gain on investment in associate |
5 | (723 | ) | - | |||
|
Reclassification of other comprehensive loss upon ownership dilution of investment in associate |
5 | (21 | ) | - | |||
|
Impairment reversal of investment in associate |
5 | - | (1,899 | ) | |||
|
Impairment reversal of mineral rights and properties |
8 | - | (7,279 | ) | |||
|
Income tax expense |
19 | 8,909 | 20,871 | ||||
|
Finance income |
18 | (4,023 | ) | (3,476 | ) | ||
|
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment |
7 | 461 | 401 | ||||
|
Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties |
8 | (1,477 | ) | - | |||
|
Share-based compensation |
2,669 | 1,896 | |||||
|
Reclamation expenditures |
(385 | ) | (187 | ) | |||
|
Income taxes paid |
(5,012 | ) | (18,225 | ) | |||
|
Interest received |
4,023 | 3,476 | |||||
|
Interest paid |
(162 | ) | (144 | ) | |||
|
Changes in non-cash operating working capital |
23 | 1,762 | 659 | ||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 77,246 | 70,351 | |||||
| Investing activities | |||||||
|
Mineral rights and properties |
|||||||
|
Capital expenditures |
(27,904 | ) | (28,049 | ) | |||
|
Proceeds on disposals |
8 | 6,146 | - | ||||
|
Plant and equipment |
|||||||
|
Additions |
(7,400 | ) | (6,258 | ) | |||
|
Proceeds on disposals |
7 | 10 | 31 | ||||
|
Reclamation deposits |
|||||||
|
Paid |
(1,727 | ) | (2,601 | ) | |||
|
Other investments |
|||||||
|
Acquisition |
6 | (7,851 | ) | (1,018 | ) | ||
|
Proceeds on disposals |
6 | 8,454 | - | ||||
|
Investment in associate |
5 | (7,030 | ) | (107 | ) | ||
|
Net (purchases) redemptions of short-term investments |
(33,606 | ) | 5,969 | ||||
|
Principal received on lease receivable |
10 | 118 | - | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (70,790 | ) | (32,033 | ) | |||
| Financing activities | |||||||
|
Related parties |
|||||||
|
Payments made |
15 | (1,436 | ) | (2,989 | ) | ||
|
Repayments received |
15 | 2,922 | - | ||||
|
Bank loan |
|||||||
|
Proceeds |
9 | - | 4,527 | ||||
|
Repayment |
9 | (4,369 | ) | - | |||
|
Principal payments on lease obligation |
10 | (503 | ) | - | |||
|
Non-controlling interests |
|||||||
|
Distribution |
14 | (3,259 | ) | (13,259 | ) | ||
|
Acquisition |
14 | - | (1,121 | ) | |||
|
Cash dividends distributed |
12 (c) | (4,287 | ) | (4,208 | ) | ||
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
8,001 | 1,852 | |||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | (2,931 | ) | (15,198 | ) | |||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (5,189 | ) | (4,878 | ) | |||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (1,664 | ) | 18,242 | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year | 67,441 | 49,199 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | |||
| Supplementary cash flow information | 23 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
7
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except numbers for share figures) |
| Share capital | Equity reserves | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated | Total equity attributable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of |
Share option |
other comprehensive |
Retained | to the equity holders of the | Non- controlling |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes | shares | Amount | reserve | Reserves | loss | earnings | Company | interests | equity | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, April 1, 2018 | 167,029,556 | $ | 228,729 | $ | 14,690 | $ | 25,409 | $ | (25,875 | ) | $ | 86,283 | $ | 329,236 | $ | 68,943 | $ | 398,179 | ||||||||||
| Options exercised | 2,812,496 | 2,540 | (688 | ) | - | - | - | 1,852 | - | 1,852 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | - | - | 1,896 | - | - | - | 1,896 | - | 1,896 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared | - | - | - | - | - | (4,208 | ) | (4,208 | ) | - | (4,208 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Distribution to non-controlling interests | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (13,259 | ) | (13,259 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Disposition of non-controlling interests upon wound-up of a subsidiary | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1,002 | ) | (1,002 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of non-controlling interest | - | - | - | - | - | (5,065 | ) | (5,065 | ) | 1,794 | (3,271 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive (loss) income | - | - | - | - | (15,989 | ) | 39,724 | 23,735 | 9,259 | 32,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | 169,842,052 | $ | 231,269 | $ | 15,898 | $ | 25,409 | $ | (41,864 | ) | $ | 116,734 | $ | 347,446 | $ | 65,735 | $ | 413,181 | ||||||||||
| Adjustment upon adoption of IFRS 16 | 2 (n) | - | - | - | - | 167 | (823 | ) | (656 | ) | - | (656 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Options exercised | 3,833,406 | 11,003 | (3,002 | ) | - | - | - | 8,001 | - | 8,001 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted share units vested | 141,376 | 527 | (527 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | - | - | 2,669 | - | - | - | 2,669 | - | 2,669 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared | 12 (c) | - | - | - | - | - | (4,287 | ) | (4,287 | ) | - | (4,287 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Distribution to non-controlling interests | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (3,259 | ) | (3,259 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Disposal of common shares held by associate | 5 | - | 1,127 | - | - | - | - | 1,127 | - | 1,127 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive (loss) income | - | - | - | - | (19,892 | ) | 34,274 | 14,382 | 7,814 | 22,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | 173,816,834 | $ | 243,926 | $ | 15,038 | $ | 25,409 | $ | (61,589 | ) | $ | 145,898 | $ | 368,682 | $ | 70,290 | $ | 438,972 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
8
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 1. | CORPORATE INFORMATION |
Silvercorp Metals Inc., along with its subsidiary companies (collectively the “Company”), is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and mining of mineral properties. The Company s producing mines and other current exploration and development projects are located in China.
The Company is a publicly listed company incorporated in the Province of British Columbia, Canada, with limited liability under the legislation of the Province of British Columbia. The Company s shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and NYSE American.
The head office, registered address and records office of the Company are located at 1066 West Hastings Street, Suite 1750, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 3X1.
| 2. | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
(a)Statement of Compliance
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The policies applied in these consolidated financial statements are based on IFRS in effect as of March 31, 2020.
These consolidated financial statements were authorized for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors dated on May 20, 2020.
(b)Basis of Consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly or partially owned subsidiaries.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which the Company obtains control up to the date of the disposition of control. Control is achieved when the Company has power over the subsidiary, is exposed or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the subsidiary; and has the ability to use its power to affect its returns.
For non-wholly-owned subsidiaries over which the Company has control, the net assets attributable to outside equity shareholders are presented as “non-controlling interests” in the equity section of the consolidated statements of financial position. Net income for the period that is attributable to the non-controlling interests is calculated based on the ownership of the non-controlling interest shareholders in the subsidiary. Adjustments to recognize the non-controlling interests’ share of changes to the subsidiary’s equity are made even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance. Changes in the Company s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are recorded as equity transactions. The carrying amount of non-controlling interests is adjusted to reflect the change in the non-controlling interests’ relative interests in the subsidiary and the difference between the adjustment to the carrying amount of non-controlling interest and the Company s share of proceeds received and/or consideration paid is recognized directly in equity and attributed to equity holders of the Company.
9
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
Balances, transactions, revenues and expenses between the Company and its subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation.
Details of the Company s significant subsidiaries which are consolidated are as follows:
| Proportion of ownership interest held | |||||
| Country of | March 31, | March 31, | |||
| Name of subsidiaries | Principal activity | incorporation | 2020 | 2019 | Mineral properties |
| Silvercorp Metals China Inc. | Holding company | Canada | 100% | 100% | |
| Silvercorp Metals (China) Inc. | Holding company | China | 100% | 100% | |
| 0875786 B.C. LTD. | Holding company | Canada | 100% | 100% | |
| Fortune Mining Limited | Holding company | BVI (i) | 100% | 100% | |
| Fortune Copper Limited | Holding company | BVI | 100% | 100% | |
| Fortune Gold Mining Limited | Holding company | BVI | 100% | 100% | |
| Victor Resources Ltd. | Holding company | BVI | 100% | 100% | |
| Yangtze Mining Ltd. | Holding company | BVI | 100% | 100% | |
| Victor Mining Ltd. | Holding company | BVI | 100% | 100% | |
| Yangtze Mining (H.K.) Ltd. | Holding company | Hong Kong | 100% | 100% | |
| Fortune Gold Mining (H.K.) Limited | Holding company | Hong Kong | 100% | 100% | |
| Wonder Success Limited | Holding company | Hong Kong | 100% | 100% | |
| Henan Huawei Mining Co. Ltd. ("Henan Huawei") | Mining | China | 80% | 80% | Ying Mining District |
| Henan Found Mining Co. Ltd. ("Henan Found") | Mining | China | 77.5% | 77.5% | |
| Songxian Gold Mining Co., Ltd. ("SX Gold") | Mining | China | 0.0% | 77.5% | XHP |
| Xinshao Yunxiang Mining Co., Ltd. ("Yunxiang") | Mining | China | 70% | 70% | BYP |
| Guangdong Found Mining Co. Ltd. (Guangdong Found") | Mining | China | 99% | 99% | GC |
| (i) British Virgin Islands ("BVI") | |||||
(c) Investments in Associates
An associate is an entity over which the Company has significant influence but not control and is not a subsidiary or joint venture. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the Company has between 20% and 50% of the voting rights, but can also arise when the Company has power to be actively involved and influential in financial and operating policy decisions of the entity even though Company has less than 20% of voting rights.
The Company accounts for its investments in associates using the equity method. Under the equity method, the Company s investment in an associate is initially recognized at cost and subsequently increased or decreased to recognize the Company s share of profit and loss of the associate and for impairment losses after the initial recognition date. The Company s share of an associate’s loss that are in excess of its investment are recognized only to the extent that the Company has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate. The Company s share of comprehensive income or losses attributable to shareholders of associates are recognized in comprehensive income during the period. The carrying amount of the Company s investments in associates also include any long-term debt interests which in substance form part of the Company s net investment. Distributions received from an associate are accounted for as a reduction in the carrying amount of the Company s investment.
At the end of each reporting period, the Company assesses whether there is any objective evidence that an investment in an associate is impaired. Objective evidence includes observable data indicating there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows of the associate’s operations. When there is objective evidence that an investment in an associate is impaired, the carrying amount is compared to its recoverable amount, being the higher of its fair value less cost to sell and value in use. An impairment loss is recognized if the recoverable amount is less than its carrying amount. When an impairment loss reverses in a subsequent period, the carrying amount of the investment is increased to the revised
10
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
estimate of recoverable amount to the extent that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had an impairment loss not been previously recognized. Impairment losses and reversal of impairment losses, if any, are recognized in net income in the period in which the relevant circumstances are identified.
Details of the Company s associate are as follows:
| Proportion of ownership interest held | ||||
| Country of | March 31, | March 31, | ||
| Name of associate | Principal activity | incorporation | 2020 | 2019 |
| New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) | Mining | Canada | 28.8% | 29.6% |
(d)Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, measured at acquisition date fair value and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Company elects whether it measures the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets. Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and included in general and administrative expenses.
When the Company acquires a business, it assesses the financial assets and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic circumstances and pertinent conditions as at the acquisition date.
If the business combination is achieved in stages, the acquisition date fair value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree is remeasured to fair value at the acquisition date through profit or loss.
(e) Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for each subsidiary of the Company is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. The functional currency of the head office, Canadian subsidiaries and all intermediate holding companies is the Canadian dollar (“CAD”). The functional currency of all Chinese subsidiaries is the Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”).
Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated into the functional currency using exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. Foreign currency non-monetary assets are translated using exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of net income.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars (“USD”). The financial position and results of the Company s entities are translated from functional currencies to USD as follows:
-
assets and liabilities are translated using exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date;
-
income and expenses are translated using average exchange rates prevailing during the period; and
-
all resulting exchange gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income.
11
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
The Company treats inter-company loan balances, which are not intended to be repaid in the foreseeable future, as part of its net investment. When a foreign entity is sold, the historical exchange differences plus the foreign exchange impact that arises on the transaction are recognized in the statement of income as part of the gain or loss on sale.
(f) Revenue Recognition
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized when control of the asset sold is transferred to customers and the Company satisfies its performance obligation. Revenue is allocated to each performance obligation. The Company considers the terms of the contract in determining the transfer price. The transaction price is based upon the amount the Company expects to receive in exchange for the transferring of the assets. In determining whether the Company has satisfied a performance obligation, it considers the indicators of the transfer of control, which include, but are not limited to, whether: the Company has a present right to payment; the customer has legal title to the asset; the Company has transferred physical possession of the asset to the customer; and the customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset. This generally occurs when the assets are loaded on the trucks arranged by the customer at the Company s milling facilities. In cases where the Company is responsible for the costs of shipping and certain other services after the date on which the control of the assets transferred to the customer, these other services are considered separate performance obligations and thus a portion of revenue earned under the contract is allocated and recognized as these performance obligations are satisfied.
Revenue from concentrate sales is typically recorded based on the Company s assay results for the quantity and quality of concentrate sold and the applicable commodity prices, such as silver, gold, lead and zinc, set on a specific quotation period, typical ranging from ten to fifteen days around shipment date, by reference to active and freely traded commodity market. Adjustments, if any, related to the final assay results for the quantity and quality of concentrate sold are not significant and do not constrain the recognition of revenue.
Smelter charges, including refining and treatment charges, are netted against revenue from metal concentrate sales.
(g)Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and held at banks and short-term money market investments that are readily convertible to cash with original terms of three months or less and exclude any restricted cash that is not available for use by the Company.
(h) Short-term Investments
Short-term investments consist of certificates of deposit and money market instruments, including cashable guaranteed investment certificates, bearer deposit notes and other financial assets with original terms of over three months but less than one year. Bonds traded on open markets are also included in short-term investments.
12
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
(i) Inventories
Inventories include concentrate inventories, direct smelting ore, stockpile ore and operating materials and supplies. The classification of inventory is determined by the stage at which the ore is in the production process. Material that does not contain a minimum quantity of metal to cover estimated processing expenses to recover the contained metal is not classified as inventory and is assigned no value.
Direct smelting ore and stockpiled ore are sampled for metal content and are valued at the lower of mining cost and net realizable value. Mining cost includes the cost of raw material, mining contractor cost, direct labour costs, depletion and depreciation, and applicable production overheads, based on normal operating capacity. Concentrate inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of concentrate inventories includes the mining cost for stockpiled ore milled, freight charges for shipping stockpile ore from mine sites to mill sites and milling cost. Milling cost includes cost of materials and supplies, direct labour costs, and applicable production overheads cost, based on normal operating capacity. Material and supplies are valued at the lower of cost, determined on a weighted average cost basis, and net realizable value.
Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sales.
(j) Plant and Equipment
Plant and equipment are initially recorded at cost, including all directly attributable costs to bring the assets to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Plant and equipment are subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis based on the nature and useful lives of the assets. The significant classes of plant and equipment and their estimated useful lives are as follows:
| Buildings | 20 years |
| Office equipment | 5 years |
| Machinery | 5-10 years |
| Motor vehicles | 5 years |
| Land use rights | 50 years |
| Leasehold improvements | 5 years |
Subsequent costs that meet the asset recognition criteria are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not extend the economic useful life of an asset are considered repairs and maintenance, which are accounted for as an expense recognized during the period.
Assets under construction are capitalized as construction-in-progress. The cost of construction-in-progress comprises of the asset’s purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. Construction-in-progress assets are transferred to other respective asset classes and are depreciated when they are completed and available for use.
Upon disposal or abandonment, the carrying amounts of plant and equipment are derecognized and any associated gain or loss is recognized in net income.
13
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
(k) Mineral Rights and Properties
Mineral rights and properties include the following capitalized payments and expenditures:
-
Acquisition costs which consist of payments for property rights and leases, including payments to acquire or renew an exploration or mining permit, and the estimated fair value of properties acquired as part of business combination or the acquisition of a group of assets.
-
Exploration and evaluation costs incurred on a specific property after an acquisition of a beneficial interest or option in the property. Exploration and evaluation expenditures on properties for which the Company does not have title or rights to are expensed when incurred. Exploration and evaluation activities involve the search for mineral resources, the determination of technical feasibility and the assessment of commercial viability of an identified resource.
-
Development costs incurred to construct a mine and bring it into commercial production. Proceeds from sales generate during this development and pre-production stage, if any, are deducted from the costs of the asset.
-
Expenditures incurred on producing properties that are expected to have future economic benefit, including to extend the life of the mine and to increase production by providing access to additional reserves, such as exploration tunneling that can increase or upgrade the mineral resources, and development tunneling, including to build shafts, drifts, ramps, and access corridors that enable to access ore underground.
-
Borrowing costs incurred that are directly attributed to the acquisition, construction and development of a qualifying mineral property.
-
Estimated of environmental rehabilitation and restoration costs.
Before commencement of commercial production, mineral rights and properties are carried at costs, less any accumulated impairment charges.
Upon commencement of commercial production, mineral rights and properties are carried at costs, less accumulated depletion and any accumulated impairment charges. Mineral rights and properties, other than the payments to renew mining permits (the “mine right fee”) are depleted over the mine’s estimated life using the units of production method calculated based on proven and probable reserves. Estimation of proven and probable reserves for each property is updated when relative information is available; the result will be prospectively applied to calculate depletion amounts for future periods. If commercial production commences prior to the determination of proven and probable reserves, depletion is calculated based on the mineable portion of measured and indicated resources. The mine right fee is depleted using the units of production method based on the mineral resources which were used to determine the mine right fee payable.
(l) Impairment and impairment reversals
At each reporting period, the Company reviews and evaluates its assets for impairment, or reversal of a previously recognized impairment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related
14
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
carrying amounts may not be recoverable or when there is an indication that impairment may have reversed.
When impairment indicators exist, an estimate of the recoverable amount is undertaken, being the higher of an asset’s fair value less cost of disposal (“FVLCTD”) and value in use (“VIU”). If the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statement of income during the period.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. The cash flows are based on best estimates of expected future cash flows from the continued use of the asset and its eventual disposal.
FVLCTD is best evidence if obtained from an active market or binding sale agreement. Where neither exists, the fair value is based the best estimates available to reflect the amount that could be received from an arm’s length transaction. Fair value of asset is generally determined as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continued use of the asset, including any expansion prospects.
Impairment is normally assessed at the level of cash-generating units (“CGU”), a CGU is identified as the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows which are independent of the cash inflows generated from other assets.
When there is an indication that an impairment loss recognized previously may no longer exist or has decreased, the recoverable amount is calculated. If the recoverable amount exceeds the carrying amount, the carrying value of the asset is increased to the recoverable amount. The increased carrying amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized as a gain in the consolidated statements of income in the period it is determined.
(m) Environmental Rehabilitation Provision
The mining, extraction and processing activities of the Company normally give rise to obligations for site closure or rehabilitation. Closure and decommissioning works can include facility decommissioning and dismantling; removal or treatment of waste materials; site and land rehabilitation. The extent of work required and the associated costs are dependent on the requirements of relevant authorities and the Company s environmental policies. Provisions for the cost of each closure and rehabilitation program are recognized at the time when environmental disturbance occurs. When the extent of disturbance increases over the life of an operation, the provision is increased accordingly. Costs included in the provision encompass all closure and decommissioning activity expected to occur progressively over the life of the operation and at the time of closure in connection with disturbances at the reporting date. Routine operating costs that may impact the ultimate closure and decommissioning activities, such as waste material handling conducted as an integral part of a mining or production process, are not included in the provision.
Costs arising from unforeseen circumstances, such as the contamination caused by unplanned discharges, are recognized as an expense and liability when the event gives rise to an obligation which is probable and
15
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
capable of reliable estimation. The timing of the actual closure and decommissioning expenditure is dependent upon a number of factors such as the life and nature of the asset, the operating license conditions, and the environment in which the mine operates. Expenditure may occur before and after closure and can continue for an extended period of time dependent on closure and decommissioning requirements.
Closure and decommissioning provisions are measured at the expected amount of future cash flows, discounted to their present value for each operation. Discount rates used are specific to the underlying obligation. Significant judgments and estimates are involved in forming expectations of future activities and the amount and timing of the associated cash flows. Those expectations are formed based on existing environmental and regulatory requirements which give rise to a constructive or legal obligation.
When provisions for closure and decommissioning are initially recognized, the corresponding cost is capitalized as an asset, representing part of the cost of acquiring the future economic benefits of the operation. The capitalized cost of closure and decommissioning activities is recognized in Mineral Rights and Properties and depleted accordingly. The value of the provision is progressively increased over time as the effect of discounting unwinds, creating an expense recognized in finance costs. Closure and decommissioning provisions are also adjusted for changes in estimates. Those adjustments are accounted for as a change in the corresponding capitalized cost, except where a reduction in the provision is greater than the undepreciated capitalized cost of the related assets, in which case the capitalized cost is reduced to nil and the remaining adjustment is recognized in the income statement. In the case of closed sites, changes to estimated costs are recognized immediately in the consolidated statements of income. Changes to the capitalized cost result in an adjustment to future depreciation and finance charges.
Adjustments to the estimated amount and timing of future closure and decommissioning cash flows are a normal occurrence in light of the significant judgments and estimates involved. The provision is reviewed at the end of each reporting period for changes to obligations, legislation or discount rates that impact estimated costs or lives of operations and adjusted to reflect current best estimate.
The cost of the related asset is adjusted for changes in the provision resulting from changes in the estimated cash flows or discount rate and the adjusted cost of the asset is depreciated prospectively.
(n)Leases
IFRS 16 - Leases (“IFRS 16”) was issued by the IASB and replaced IAS 17 - Leases (“IAS 17”) and IFRIC 4 - Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease (“IFRIC 4”). IFRS 16 applies a control model to the identification of leases, distinguishing between a lease and a non-lease component on the basis of whether the customer controls the specific asset. Control is considered to exist if the customer has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of an identified asset and the right to direct the use of that asset. For those contracts that are or contain a lease, IFRS 16 introduces significant changes to the accounting for such contracts, introducing a single, on-balance sheet accounting model that is similar to current finance lease accounting, with limited exceptions for short-term leases or leases of low value assets. Lessor accounting, apart from a specific exception in respect of sublease, remains similar to current accounting practice. The standard was effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019.
The Company applied IFRS 16 on April 1, 2019 retrospectively, with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard as an adjustment to retained earnings and no restatement of comparative
16
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
information. The Company has elected to apply the available exemptions as permitted by IFRS 16 to recognize a lease expense on a straight line basis for short term leases (lease term of 12 months or less) and low value assets. The Company has also elected to apply the practical expedient whereby leases whose term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application would be accounted for in the same way as short-term lease.
Policies applicable from April 1, 2019
Lease Definition
At inception of a contract, the Company assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. An identified asset may be implicitly or explicitly specified in a contract, but must be physically distinct, and must not have the ability for substitution by a lessor. A lessee has the right to control an identified asset if it obtains substantially all of its economic benefits and either predetermines or directs how and for what purposes the asset is used.
Measurement of Right of Use (“ROU”) Assets and Lease Obligations
At the commencement of a lease, the Company, if acting in capacity as a lessee, recognizes an ROU asset and a lease obligation. The ROU asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease obligation adjusted for any lease payments made at, or before, the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received.
The ROU asset is subsequently amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease, or the useful life of the asset determined on the same basis as the Company s plant and equipment. The ROU asset is periodically adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease obligation, and reduced by impairment losses, if any. If an ROU asset is subsequently leased to a third party (a “sublease”) and the sublease is classified as a finance lease, the carrying value of the ROU asset to the extent of the sublease is derecognized. Any difference between the ROU asset and the lease receivable arising from the sublease is recognized in profit or loss.
The lease obligation is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments remaining at the lease commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or the Company s incremental borrowing rate if the rate implicit in the lease cannot be determined. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease obligation, when applicable, may comprise of fixed payments, variable payments that depend on an index or rate, amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee and the exercise price under a purchase, extension or termination option that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise.
The lease obligation is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Company s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or if the Company changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option. When the lease obligation is remeasured, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the ROU asset.
Measurement of Lease Receivable
At the commencement of a lease, the Company, if acting in capacity as a lessor, will classify the lease as finance lease and recognize a lease receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease if it
17
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset or if the lease is a sublease, by reference to the ROU asset arising from the original lease (the “head lease”). A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset or the lease is a short-term lease. Cash received from an operating lease is included in other income in the Company s consolidated statement of income on a straight-line basis over the period the lease.
The lease receivable is initially measure at the present value of the lease payments remaining at the lease commencement date, discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease or the Company s incremental borrowing rate if the lease is a sublease. The lease receivable is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, and reduced by the amount received and impairment losses, if any.
Recognition Exemptions
The Company has elected not to recognize the ROU asset and lease obligations for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less or for leases of low-value assets. Payments associated with these leases are recognized as general and administrative expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term on the consolidated statement of income.
Adjustments upon Adoption
Upon adoption of IFRS 16 on April 1, 2019, the Company recognized lease receivable, ROU asset, and lease obligation of $447, $360, and $1,463, respectively, related to the Company s office lease agreement and sublease agreements. The Company also recognized cumulative adjustments to retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income of $(823) and $167, respectively.
(o)Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset, which necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale, are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset. All other borrowing costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. No borrowing costs were capitalized in the periods presented.
(p) Share-based Payments
The Company makes share-based awards, including restricted share units (“RSUs”), performance share units (“PSUs”), and stock options, to employees, officers, directors, and consultants.
For equity-settled awards, the fair value is charged to the consolidated statements of income and credited to equity, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, after adjusting for the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. The fair value of share units is determined based on quoted market price of our common shares at the date of grant. The fair value of the stock options granted to employees, officers, and directors is determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with market related input. The fair value of stock options granted to consultants is measured at the fair value of the services delivered unless that fair value cannot be estimated reliably, which then is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Stock options with graded vesting schedules are accounted for as separate grants with different vesting periods and fair values.
18
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
For cash-settled awards, the fair value is estimated based on the quoted market price of our common shares and are remeasured at each reporting period until the awards are vested. The fair value of these awards recognized as share-based compensation expenses in the consolidated statements of income over the vesting period, with a corresponding increase to accrued liabilities.
At each statement of financial position date prior to vesting, the cumulative expense representing the extent to which the vesting period has expired and management’s best estimate of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest is computed (after adjusting for non-market performance conditions). The movement in cumulative expense is recognized in the consolidated statements of income with a corresponding entry within equity. No expense is recognized for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition, which are treated as vested irrespective of whether or not the market condition is satisfied, provided that all other performance conditions are satisfied.
(q)Income Taxes
Current tax for each taxable entity is based on the local taxable income at the local statutory tax rate enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and includes adjustments to tax payable or recoverable in respect to previous periods.
Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are only offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off the amounts, and the Company intends to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities, and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, can be utilized, except:
-
where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
-
in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, deferred income tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized. Unrecognized deferred income tax assets are reassessed at the end of each reporting period and are recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will be available to allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
19
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
Deferred income tax relating to items recognized outside profit or loss is recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
(r) Earnings per Share
Earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if additional common shares are assumed to be issued under securities that entitle their holders to obtain common shares in the future. For stock options and warrants, the number of additional shares for inclusion in diluted earnings per share calculations is determined by the options and warrants, whose exercise price is less than the average market price of the Company s common shares, are assumed to be exercised and the proceeds are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price for the period. The incremental number of common shares issued under stock options, and repurchased from proceeds, is included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
(s) Financial Instruments
Initial recognition:
On initial recognition, all financial assets and financial liabilities are recorded at fair value adjusted for directly attributable transaction costs except for financial assets and liabilities classified as fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), in which case transaction costs are expensed as incurred.
Subsequent measurement of financial assets:
Subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on the classification of such assets.
| I. |
Non-equity instruments: |
IFRS 9 includes a single model that has only two classification categories for financial instruments other than equity instruments: amortized cost and fair value. To qualify for amortized cost accounting, the instrument must meet two criteria:
| i. |
The objective of the business model is to hold the financial asset for the collection of the contractual cash flows; and | |
| ii. |
All contractual cash flows represent only principal and interest on that principal. |
All other instruments are mandatorily measured at fair value.
| II. |
Equity instruments: |
At initial recognition, for equity instruments other than held for trading, the Company may make an irrevocable election to designate them, on instrument by instrument basis, as either FVTPL or fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVTOCI”).
Financial assets classified as amortized cost are measured at the amount of initial recognition minus principal repayments, plus the cumulative amortization using the effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount, adjusted for any impairment loss allowance. Amortization or interest income from the effective interest method is included in finance income.
20
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
Financial assets classified as FVTPL are measured at fair value with changes in fair values recognized in profit or loss. Equity investments designated as FVTOCI are measured at fair value with changes in fair values recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Dividends from that investment are recorded in profit or loss when the Company's right to receive payment of the dividend is established unless they represent a recovery of part of the cost of the investment.
Impairment of financial assets carried at amortized cost:
The Company recognizes a loss allowance for expected credit losses on its financial assets carried at amortized cost. The amount of expected credit losses is updated at each reporting period to reflect changes in credit risk since initial recognition of the respective financial instruments.
Subsequent measurement of financial liabilities:
Financial liabilities classified as amortized cost are measured at the amount of initial recognition minus principal repayments, plus the cumulative amortization using the effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount. Amortization or interest expense using the effective interest method is included in finance costs.
Financial liabilities classified as FVTPL are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized in profit or loss.
The Company classifies its financial instruments as follows:
-
Financial assets classified as FVTPL: cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments - money market instruments, and other investments - equity investments designated as FVTPL and warrants;
-
Financial assets classified as FVTOCI: other investments - equity investments designated as FVTOCI;
-
Financial assets classified as amortized cost: short-term investments - bonds, trade and other receivables and due from related parties;
-
Financial liabilities classified as amortized cost: accounts payable and accrued liabilities, dividends payable, bank loan, customer deposits and due to related parties.
Derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities:
A financial asset is derecognized when:
-
The rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; or
-
The Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’ arrangement; and either (a) the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) the Company has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
Gains and losses on derecognition of financial assets and liabilities classified as amortized cost are recognized in profit or loss when the instrument is derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process.
Gains and losses on derecognition of equity investments designated as FVTOCI (including any related foreign exchange component) are recognized in OCI. Amounts presented in OCI are not subsequently transferred to profit or loss.
A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. When an existing financial liability is replaced by another liability from the same lender on
21
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability. In this case, a new liability is recognized, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the statement of income.
Offsetting of financial instruments:
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the consolidated statement of financial position if and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle liabilities simultaneously.
Fair value of financial instruments:
The fair value of financial instruments that are traded in active markets at each reporting date is determined by reference to quoted market prices, without deduction for transaction costs. For financial instruments that are not traded in active markets, the fair value is determined using appropriate valuation techniques, such as using a recent arm’s length market transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties, discounted cash flow analysis, reference to the current fair value of another instrument that is substantially the same, or other valuation models.
(t) Government Assistance
Refundable mining exploration tax credits received from eligible mining exploration expenditures and other government grants received for project construction and development reduce the carrying amount of the related mineral rights and properties or plant and equipment assets. The depletion or depreciation of the related mineral rights and properties or plant and equipment assets is calculated based on the net amount.
Government subsidies as compensation for expenses already incurred are recognized in profit and loss during the period in which it becomes receivable.
(u) Significant Accounting Judgments and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Although these judgments and estimates are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and best knowledge of relevant facts and circumstances, actual results may differ from these estimates.
Areas where critical accounting judgments have the most significant effect on the consolidated financial statements include:
Capitalization of expenditures included in mineral rights and properties - management has determined that those capitalized expenditures, including exploration and evaluation expenditures and development costs incurred at producing properties, have potential future economic benefits and are potentially economically recoverable, subject to impairment analysis. Management uses several criteria in its assessments of economic recoverability and probability of future economic benefit, including geologic and metallurgic information, history of conversion of mineral deposits to proven and probable reserves, scoping and feasibility studies, accessible facilities, existing permits, whether to extend of the mine life,
22
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
increase future production, or to provide access to a component of an ore body that will be mined in a future period.
Indicators of Impairment and impairment reversal - Management applies significant judgement in assessing whether indicators of impairment or reserve impairment exist for an asset or group of assets which would necessitate impairment testing. Internal and external factors such as significant changes in the use of the asset, commodity prices, and interest rates are used in determining whether there are indicators.
The current outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in 20 days production interruption at the Company s mine sites in addition to the Company s normal operation break during the Chinese New Year. As of March 31, 2020 and the date of issuance of the financial statements, the mines are operating as normal. The Company assessed the impact of the production interruption and determined it would not have any long-term impact on the value of associated assets.
Income taxes - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on difference between the financial statements carrying values of assets and liabilities and their respective income tax based and loss carried forward. Withholding tax are determined based on the earnings of foreign subsidiary distributed to the Company.
The recognition of deferred tax assets and the determination of the ability of the Company to utilize tax loss carry-forwards to offset deferred tax liabilities requires management to exercise judgement and make certain assumptions about the future performance of the Company. Management is required to access whether it is “probable” that the Company will benefit from these prior losses and other deferred tax assets. Changes in economic conditions, metal prices, and other factors could result in revision to the estimates of the benefits to be realized or the timing of utilization of the losses.
Functional currency - The determination of an entity’s functional currency often requires significant judgement where the primary economic environment in which the entity operates may not be clear. This can have a significant impact on the consolidated results based the foreign currency translation method of the Company.
Contingencies - Contingencies can be either possible assets or liabilities arising from past events which, by their nature, will only be resolved when one or more future events not wholly within our control occur or fail to occur. The assessment of such contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal, tax or regulatory proceedings that are pending against us or unasserted claims, that may result in such proceedings or regulatory or government actions that may negatively impact our business or operations, we evaluate with our legal counsel the perceived merits of any legal, tax or regulatory proceedings, unasserted claims or actions. Also evaluated are the perceived merits of the nature and amount of relief sought or expected to be sought, when determining the amount, if any, to recognize as a contingent liability or assessing the impact on the carrying value of assets. Contingent assets or liabilities are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
Areas where critical accounting estimates have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements include:
23
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimates - Mineral reserves and mineral resources are estimated by qualified persons in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, “Standards of Disclosure form Mineral Projects”, issued by the Canadian Securities Administrators. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral reserves and mineral resources, including many factors beyond the Company s control. Such estimation is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any mineral reserve or mineral resource estimate is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and of the assumptions made and judgements used in engineering and geological interpretation. Changes in assumptions, including metal prices, production costs, recovery rate, and market conditions could result in mineral reserve and mineral resource estimate revision. Such change could impact depreciation and amortization rates, asset carrying value and the environmental and rehabilitation provision.
Impairment and reserve impairment of assets - Where an indicator of impairment and reserves impairment exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount is made, which is determined as the higher of FVLCTD and VIU.
The determination of FVLCTD and VIU requires management to make estimates and assumptions about expected production based on current estimates of recoverable metal, commodity prices, operating costs, taxes and export duties, inflation and foreign exchange, salvage value, future capital expenditures and discount rates. The estimates and assumptions are subject to risk and uncertainty; hence, there is the possibility that changes in circumstances will alter these projections, which may impact the recoverable amount of the assets. In such circumstances, some or all of the carrying value of the assets may be further impaired or the impairment charge reversed with the impact recorded in the consolidated statements of (loss) income.
Valuation of inventory - Stockpiled ore, direct smelting ore, and concentrate inventories are valued at the lower of average cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is calculated as the estimated price at the time of sale based on prevailing and forecast metal prices less estimated future production costs to convert the inventory into saleable form and associated selling costs. The determination of forecast sales price, recovery rates, grade, assumed contained metal in stockpiles and production and selling costs requires significant assumptions that may impact the stated value of our inventory and lead to changes in NRV. Material and supplies inventory In determining the value of material and supplies inventory, we make estimates of the amounts to be used and realizable value through disposals or sales. Changes in these estimates can result in a change in carrying amounts of inventory, as well as cost of sales.
Environmental rehabilitation provision and the timing of expenditures - Environmental rehabilitation costs are a consequence of exploration activities and mining. The cost estimates are updated annually during the life of a mine to reflect known developments, (e.g. revisions to cost estimates and to the estimated lives of operations), and are subject to review at regular intervals. Decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities are estimated bases on the Company s interpretation of current regulatory requirements, constructive obligations and are measured at the best estimates of expenditures required to settle the present obligation of decommissioning, restoration or similar liabilities that may occur over the life of the mine. The carrying amount is determined based on the net present value of estimated future cash expenditures for the settlement of decommissioning, restoration or similar liabilities that may occur over the life of the mine. Such estimates are subject to change based on change in laws and regulations and negotiations with regulatory authorities.
24
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 3. | SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
As at March 31, 2020, short-term investments consist of the following:
| Carrying value | Interest rates | Maturity | ||
| Bonds | $ | 23,313 | 6.00% - 13% | April 2, 2020 - June 27, 2024 |
| Money market instruments | 53,429 | |||
| $ | 76,742 |
As at March 31, 2019, short-term investments consist of the following:
| Carrying value | Interest rates | Maturity | ||
| Bonds | $ | 24,986 | 3.88% - 13% | April 28, 2019 - April 29, 2026 |
| Money market instruments | 22,850 | |||
| $ | 47,836 |
All bonds were purchased on open markets and are readily tradable.
| 4. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories consist of the following:
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||
| Direct smelting ore and stockpile ore | $ | 1,138 | $ | 1,794 | |
| Concentrate inventory | 4,368 | 5,201 | |||
| Total stockpile and concentrate | 5,506 | 6,995 | |||
| Material and supplies | 2,924 | 3,841 | |||
| $ | 8,430 | $ | 10,836 |
The amount of inventories recognized as expense during the year ended March 31, 2020 was $82,744 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $82,458).
| 5. | INVESTMENT IN AN ASSOCIATE |
New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) is a Canadian public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (symbol: NUAG). NUAG is a related party of the Company by way of two common directors and one officer, and the Company accounts for its investment in NUAG using the equity method as it is able to exercise significant influence over the financial and operating policies of NUAG.
On May 22, 2019, the Company exercised its warrants to acquire 1,500,000 common shares of NUAG for a total cost of $2,349. Pan American Silver Corp. also exercised its warrants to acquire 8,000,000 common shares of NUAG on the same day. As a result of the exercise of these warrants, the Company s ownership in NUAG was diluted from 29.8% to 28.9% and a dilution gain of $723 was recorded along with the reclassification gain of $21 from other comprehensive income to net income.
On October 25, 2019, the Company participated in an offering of common shares of NUAG underwritten by BMO Capital Markets and acquired an additional 1,247,606 common shares of NUAG for a cost of $3,820.
25
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
During the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company also acquired additional 502,600 common shares of NUAG from the public market (year ended March 31, 2019 - 65,400) for a total cost of $861 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $107).
As at March 31, 2020, the Company owned 42,596,506 common shares of NUAG (March 31, 2019 -39,346,300), representing an ownership interest of 28.8% (March 31, 2019 - 29.6%). The summary of the investment in NUAG common shares and its market value as at the respective balance sheet dates are as follows:
| Value of NUAG's | |||||||
| Number of | common shares per | ||||||
| shares | Amount | quoted market price | |||||
| Balance April 1, 2018 | 39,280,900 | $ | 38,001 | $ | 50,266 | ||
| Purchase from open market | 65,400 | 107 | |||||
| Share of net loss | (330 | ) | |||||
| Share of other comprehensive income | 398 | ||||||
| Impairment recovery | 1,899 | ||||||
| Foreign exchange impact | (1,372 | ) | |||||
| Balance March 31, 2019 | 39,346,300 | $ | 38,703 | $ | 69,783 | ||
| Purchase from open market | 502,600 | 861 | |||||
| Exercise of warrants | 1,500,000 | 2,349 | |||||
| Participation in public offering | 1,247,606 | 3,820 | |||||
| Share of net loss | (1,276 | ) | |||||
| Share of other comprehensive income | 1,077 | ||||||
| Dilution gain | 723 | ||||||
| Disposal of common shares held by the associate | 1,127 | ||||||
| Foreign exchange impact | (2,829 | ) | |||||
| Balance March 31, 2020 | 42,596,506 | $ | 44,555 | $ | 148,624 |
Summarized financial information for the Company’s investment in NUAG on a 100% basis is as follows:
| Years ended March 31, | ||||||
| 2020 | (1) | 2019 | (1) | |||
| Income from investments | $ | 494 | $ | 576 | ||
| General and administrative expense | (3,824 | ) | (2,286 | ) | ||
| Foreign exchange gain | 669 | 542 | ||||
| Impairment charge | (586 | ) | - | |||
| Other income | - | 7 | ||||
| Net loss of associate | $ | (3,247 | ) | $ | (1,161 | ) |
| Adjustments to net loss of associate | (1,170 | ) | 23 | |||
| Net loss of associate qualified for pick-up | $ | (4,417 | ) | $ | (1,138 | ) |
| Company's share of net loss | $ | (1,276 | ) | $ | (330 | ) |
26
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| March 31, 2020(1) | March 31, 2019(1) | ||||
| Current assets | $ | 29,012 | $ | 17,233 | |
| Non-current assets | 74,989 | 62,568 | |||
| Total assets | $ | 104,001 | $ | 79,801 | |
| Current liabilities | 1,409 | 675 | |||
| Long-term liabilities | - | 197 | |||
| Total liabilities | 1,409 | 872 | |||
| Net assets | $ | 102,592 | $ | 78,929 | |
| Company's share of net assets of associate | $ | 29,575 | $ | 23,371 |
(1)NUAG’s fiscal year-end is on June 30. NUAG’s quarterly financial results were used to compile the financial information that matched with the Company’s year-end on March 31.
| 6. | OTHER INVESTMENTS |
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||
| Equity investments designated as FVTOCI | |||||
|
Public companies |
$ | 6,633 | $ | 9,253 | |
|
Private companies |
2,117 | - | |||
| Total | $ | 8,750 | $ | 9,253 |
Investments in public companies represent equity interests of other publicly-trading mining companies that the Company has acquired through the open market or through private placements. These equity interests are for long-term investment purposes and consist of common shares and warrants.
The continuity of such investments is as follows:
| Accumulated fair value change | ||||||
| Fair value | included in OCI | |||||
| April 1, 2018 | $ | 6,132 | $ | (37,508 | ) | |
|
Change in fair value on equity investments designated as FVTOCI |
2,380 | 2,380 | ||||
|
Acquisition of equity investments |
1,018 | - | ||||
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
(277 | ) | - | |||
| March 31, 2019 | $ | 9,253 | $ | (35,128 | ) | |
|
Change in fair value on equity investments designated as FVTOCI |
249 | 249 | ||||
|
Acquisition of equity investments |
7,851 | - | ||||
|
Proceeds on disposal |
(8,454 | ) | - | |||
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
(149 | ) | - | |||
| March 31, 2020 | $ | 8,750 | $ | (34,879 | ) |
27
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 7. | PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
Plant and equipment consist of:
| Land use rights | Office | Motor | Construction | |||||||||||||||
| Cost | and building | equipment | Machinery | vehicles | in progress | Total | ||||||||||||
| Balance as at April 1, 2018 | $ | 105,165 | $ | 7,755 | $ | 29,413 | $ | 6,730 | $ | 3,602 | $ | 152,665 | ||||||
|
Additions |
1,586 | 553 | 2,266 | 792 | 2,750 | 7,947 | ||||||||||||
|
Disposals |
(316 | ) | (126 | ) | (505 | ) | (376 | ) | - | (1,323 | ) | |||||||
|
Reclassification of asset groups(1) |
189 | - | 145 | - | (334 | ) | - | |||||||||||
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
(6,596 | ) | (447 | ) | (1,867 | ) | (424 | ) | (228 | ) | (9,562 | ) | ||||||
| Balance as at March 31, 2019 | $ | 100,028 | $ | 7,735 | $ | 29,452 | $ | 6,722 | $ | 5,790 | $ | 149,727 | ||||||
|
Adjustment upon adoption of IFRS 16 |
360 | - | - | - | - | 360 | ||||||||||||
|
Additions |
1,736 | 1,060 | 1,082 | 681 | 3,618 | 8,177 | ||||||||||||
|
Disposals |
(6,932 | ) | (368 | ) | (3,265 | ) | (630 | ) | (52 | ) | (11,247 | ) | ||||||
|
Reclassification of asset groups(1) |
6,908 | - | 65 | - | (6,973 | ) | - | |||||||||||
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
(5,646 | ) | (417 | ) | (1,534 | ) | (357 | ) | (247 | ) | (8,201 | ) | ||||||
| Ending balance as at March 31, 2020 | $ | 96,454 | $ | 8,010 | $ | 25,800 | $ | 6,416 | $ | 2,136 | $ | 138,816 | ||||||
| Impairment, accumulated depreciation and amortization | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as at April 1, 2018 | $ | (50,016 | ) | $ | (5,312 | ) | $ | (20,723 | ) | $ | (5,345 | ) | $ | (58 | ) | $ | (81,454 | ) |
|
Disposals |
128 | 108 | 317 | 338 | - | 891 | ||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
(3,172 | ) | (500 | ) | (1,615 | ) | (347 | ) | - | (5,634 | ) | |||||||
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
3,131 | 295 | 1,320 | 337 | 4 | 5,087 | ||||||||||||
| Balance as at March 31, 2019 | $ | (49,929 | ) | $ | (5,409 | ) | $ | (20,701 | ) | $ | (5,017 | ) | $ | (54 | ) | $ | (81,110 | ) |
|
Disposals |
6,821 | 278 | 3,051 | 574 | 52 | 10,776 | ||||||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization |
(3,481 | ) | (527 | ) | (1,601 | ) | (384 | ) | - | (5,993 | ) | |||||||
|
Impact of foreign currency translation |
2,602 | 283 | 1,083 | 263 | 2 | 4,233 | ||||||||||||
| Ending balance as at March 31, 2020 | $ | (43,987 | ) | $ | (5,375 | ) | $ | (18,168 | ) | $ | (4,564 | ) | $ | - | $ | (72,094 | ) | |
| Carrying amounts | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as at March 31, 2019 | $ | 50,099 | $ | 2,326 | $ | 8,751 | $ | 1,705 | $ | 5,736 | $ | 68,617 | ||||||
| Ending balance as at March 31, 2020 | $ | 52,467 | $ | 2,635 | $ | 7,632 | $ | 1,852 | $ | 2,136 | $ | 66,722 | ||||||
(1) when an asset is available for use, it is reclassified from construction in progress to one of the appropriate plant and equipment categories.
| Carrying amounts as at March 31, 2020 | Ying Mining District | BYP | GC | Other | Total | ||||||
| Land use rights and building | $ | 35,476 | $ | 3,094 | $ | 11,762 | $ | 2,135 | $ | 52,467 | |
| Office equipment | 1,886 | 26 | 403 | 320 | 2,635 | ||||||
| Machinery | 5,734 | 258 | 1,640 | - | 7,632 | ||||||
| Motor vehicles | 1,598 | 22 | 232 | - | 1,852 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 419 | 493 | 1,224 | - | 2,136 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 45,113 | $ | 3,893 | $ | 15,261 | $ | 2,455 | $ | 66,722 | |
| Carrying amounts as at March 31, 2019 | Ying Mining District | BYP | GC | Other | Total | ||||||
| Land use rights and building | $ | 34,160 | $ | 2,158 | $ | 12,860 | $ | 921 | $ | 50,099 | |
| Office equipment | 1,800 | 35 | 214 | 277 | 2,326 | ||||||
| Machinery | 6,294 | 257 | 2,071 | 129 | 8,751 | ||||||
| Motor vehicles | 1,521 | 27 | 140 | 17 | 1,705 | ||||||
| Construction in progress | 3,825 | 1,842 | 69 | - | 5,736 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 47,600 | $ | 4,319 | $ | 15,354 | $ | 1,344 | $ | 68,617 |
During the year ended March 31, 2020, certain plant and equipment were disposed for proceeds of $10 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $31) and loss of $461 (year ended March 31, 2019 - loss of $401).
28
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 8. | MINERAL RIGHTS AND PROPERTIES |
Mineral rights and properties consist of:
| Producing and development properties | Exploration and evaluation properties | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Ying Mining District | BYP | GC | XHP | RZY | Total | |||||||||||||||
| Balance as at April 1, 2018 | $ | 277,734 | $ | 65,054 | $ | 113,244 | $ | 22,024 | $ | 180 | $ | 478,236 | |||||||||
|
Capitalized expenditures |
23,238 | 189 | 1,014 | 261 | - | 24,702 | |||||||||||||||
|
Mine right fees |
3,839 | - | - | - | - | 3,839 | |||||||||||||||
|
Environmental rehabiliation |
1,091 | 35 | (12 | ) | 8 | - | 1,122 | ||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currecy translation impact |
(17,449 | ) | (973 | ) | (7,085 | ) | (1,384 | ) | (6 | ) | (26,897 | ) | |||||||||
| Balance as at March 31, 2019 | $ | 288,453 | $ | 64,305 | $ | 107,161 | $ | 20,909 | $ | 174 | $ | 481,002 | |||||||||
|
Capitalized expenditures |
23,871 | 6 | 1,617 | - | - | 25,494 | |||||||||||||||
|
Mine right fees |
797 | - | - | - | - | 797 | |||||||||||||||
|
Environmental rehabiliation |
(4,299 | ) | 39 | 239 | - | - | (4,021 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Disposition |
- | - | - | (20,485 | ) | - | (20,485 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Foreign currecy translation impact |
(15,686 | ) | (778 | ) | (5,706 | ) | (424 | ) | (10 | ) | (22,604 | ) | |||||||||
| Ending balance as at March 31, 2020 | $ | 293,136 | $ | 63,572 | $ | 103,311 | $ | - | $ | 164 | $ | 460,183 | |||||||||
| Impairment and accumulated depletion | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as at April 1, 2018 | $ | (83,099 | ) | $ | (57,584 | ) | $ | (83,495 | ) | $ | (21,798 | ) | $ | (180 | ) | $ | (246,156 | ) | |||
|
Impairment reversal |
- | - | - | 7,279 | - | 7,279 | |||||||||||||||
|
Depletion |
(13,312 | ) | - | (2,209 | ) | - | - | (15,521 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Foreign currecy translation impact |
5,232 | 501 | 5,213 | 1,364 | 6 | 12,316 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance as at March 31, 2019 | $ | (91,179 | ) | $ | (57,083 | ) | $ | (80,491 | ) | $ | (13,155 | ) | $ | (174 | ) | $ | (242,082 | ) | |||
|
Depletion |
(14,282 | ) | - | (2,165 | ) | - | - | (16,447 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Disposition |
- | - | - | 12,888 | - | 12,888 | |||||||||||||||
|
Foreign currecy translation impact |
5,071 | 395 | 4,301 | 267 | 10 | 10,044 | |||||||||||||||
| Ending balance as at March 31, 2020 | $ | (100,390 | ) | $ | (56,688 | ) | $ | (78,355 | ) | $ | - | $ | (164 | ) | $ | (235,597 | ) | ||||
| Carrying amounts | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance as at March 31, 2019 | $ | 197,274 | $ | 7,222 | $ | 26,670 | $ | 7,754 | $ | - | $ | 238,920 | |||||||||
| Ending balance as at March 31, 2020 | $ | 192,746 | $ | 6,884 | $ | 24,956 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 224,586 | |||||||||
In April 2019, the Company’s subsidiary, Henan Found, entered into a purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) with an arm’s length private Chinese company to dispose the XHP project. Pursuant to the Agreement, Henan Found sold its 100% equity interest in SX Gold, the holding company of the XHP project, for $7.3 million (RMB¥50 million), and forgave the amount of $1.1 million (RMB¥7.5 million) SX Gold owed to Henan Found.
The transaction closed in July 2019 and the Company received partial payment of $6,146 (RMB¥42.5 million). The assets and liabilities disposed of are as follows:
| XHP | |||
| Total consideration per share transfer agreement (RMB ¥50 million) | $ | 7,330 | |
| Less: amounts owed to Henan Found | (1,112 | ) | |
| Net consideration | $ | 6,218 | |
| Prepaids and deposits | 124 | ||
| Inventories | 198 | ||
| Plant and equipment | 247 | ||
| Mineral rights and properties | 7,597 | ||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (2,211 | ) | |
| Deposits received | (925 | ) | |
| Environmental rehabilitation | (289 | ) | |
| Total assets and liabilities disposed of | $ | 4,741 | |
| Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties | $ | 1,477 |
29
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
A gain of $1,477 was recognized in gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties when the transaction completed.
In November 2019, the Company paid a mine right fee of $796 (RMB¥5.5 million) to the Chinese government for the additional mineral resources of HPG mine (part of the Ying Mining District).
In March 2019, the Company paid a mine right fee of $3,839 (RMB ¥25.7 million) to the Chinese government for the additional mineral resources of TLP and LM mine (part of the Ying Mining District).
| 9. | BANK LOAN |
| Total | |||
| Balance, April 1, 2018 | $ | - | |
| Addition | 4,527 | ||
| Interest accrued | 152 | ||
| Interest paid | (144 | ) | |
| Foreign exchange impact | (60 | ) | |
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | $ | 4,475 | |
| Interest accrued | 45 | ||
| Interest paid | (50 | ) | |
| Principal repayment | (4,369 | ) | |
| Foreign exchange impact | (101 | ) | |
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | $ | - |
On June 14, 2018, Henan Found borrowed a loan of $4,527 (RMB ¥30 million) bearing an interest rate of 4.35% from the Bank of China. The loan was fully repaid in June 2019. For the year ended March 31, 2020, interest of $45 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $152) was accrued and expensed through finance costs.
| 10. | LEASES |
The following table summarizes changes in the Company s lease receivable and lease obligation related to the Company s office lease and associated sublease.
| Lease Receivable | Lease Obligation | |||||
| Adjustment upon adoption of IFRS 16, April 1, 2019 | $ | 447 | $ | 1,463 | ||
|
Addition |
238 | 1,239 | ||||
|
Interest accrual |
27 | 112 | ||||
|
Interest received or paid |
(27 | ) | (112 | ) | ||
|
Principal repayment |
(118 | ) | (503 | ) | ||
|
Foreign exchange impact |
(33 | ) | (130 | ) | ||
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | $ | 534 | $ | 2,069 | ||
|
Less: current portion |
(186 | ) | (567 | ) | ||
| Non-current portion | $ | 348 | $ | 1,502 |
30
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company s undiscounted cash flows to their present value for its lease receivable and lease obligation:
| Lease Receivable | Lease Obligation | |||||
|
Within 1 year |
$ | 205 | $ | 613 | ||
|
Between 2 to 5 years |
368 | 1,629 | ||||
|
Over 5 years |
- | 38 | ||||
| Total undiscounted amount | $ | 573 | $ | 2,280 | ||
| Less future interest | (39 | ) | (211 | ) | ||
| Total discounted amount | $ | 534 | $ | 2,069 | ||
|
Less: current portion |
(186 | ) | (567 | ) | ||
| Non-current portion | $ | 348 | $ | 1,502 |
The lease receivable and lease obligation were discounted using an estimated incremental borrowing rate of 5%.
| 11. | ENVIRONMENTAL REHABILITATION |
The following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending obligations associated with the retirement of the properties:
| Total | |||
| Balance, April 1, 2018 | $ | 13,098 | |
|
Reclamation expenditures |
(187 | ) | |
|
Unwinding of discount of environmental rehabilitation |
479 | ||
|
Revision of provision |
1,122 | ||
|
Foreign exchange impact |
(824 | ) | |
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | $ | 13,688 | |
|
Reclamation expenditures |
(385 | ) | |
|
Unwinding of discount of environmental rehabilitation |
422 | ||
|
Revision of provision |
(4,021 | ) | |
|
Derecognition upon disposal of SX Gold |
(289 | ) | |
|
Foreign exchange impact |
(715 | ) | |
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | $ | 8,700 |
As at March 31, 2020, the total undiscounted amount of estimated cash flows required to settle the Company s environmental rehabilitation provision was $11,408 (March 31, 2019 - $19,413) over the next twenty-five years, which has been discounted using an average discount rate of 2.75% (March 31, 2019 -3.23%).
During the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company incurred actual reclamation expenditures of $385 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $187) and paid reclamation deposit of $1,727 (year ended March 31, 2019 -$2,601).
31
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 12. | SHARE CAPITAL |
(a) Authorized
Unlimited number of common shares without par value. All shares issued as at March 31, 2020 and 2019 were fully paid.
(b) Share-based compensation
The Company has a share-based compensation plan (the “Plan”) which consists of stock options, restricted share units (the “RSUs”) and performance share units (the “PSUs”). The Plan allows for the maximum number of common shares to be reserved for issuance on any share-based compensation to be a rolling 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares from time to time. Furthermore, no more than 3% of the reserve may be granted in the form of RSUs and PSUs.
For the year ended March 31, 2020, a total of $2,669 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $1,896) in share-based compensation expense was recognized and included in the general and administrative and exploration and business development expenses on the consolidated statements of income.
(i) Stock options
The following is a summary of option transactions:
| Weighted average | |||||
| exercise price per | |||||
| Number of shares | share CAD$ | ||||
| Balance, April 1, 2018 | 8,146,799 | $ | 2.15 | ||
| Option granted | 1,815,000 | 3.10 | |||
| Options exercised | (2,812,496 | ) | 0.87 | ||
| Options forfeited | (164,075 | ) | 3.34 | ||
| Options expired | (504,312 | ) | 3.27 | ||
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | 6,480,916 | $ | 2.86 | ||
| Options exercised | (3,833,406 | ) | 2.78 | ||
| Options forfeited | (123,750 | ) | 3.29 | ||
| Options expired | (100,000 | ) | 1.75 | ||
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | 2,423,760 | $ | 3.00 |
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 2020:
| Weighted average | Weighted | |||||||
| Number of options | remaining | Weighted average | Number of options | average | ||||
| Exercise price in | outstanding at | contractual life | exercise price in | exercisable at March | exercise price | |||
| CAD$ | March 31, 2020 | (Years) | CAD$ | 31, 2020 | in CAD$ | |||
| $ | 1.43 | 201,260 | 0.17 | $ | 1.43 | 201,260 | 1.43 | |
| $ | 2.60 | 565,000 | 1.63 | $ | 2.60 | 237,500 | 2.60 | |
| $ | 3.23 | 561,250 | 0.95 | $ | 3.23 | 561,250 | 3.23 | |
| $ | 3.36 | 402,500 | 0.51 | $ | 3.36 | 402,500 | 3.36 | |
| $ | 3.40 | 693,750 | 1.40 | $ | 3.40 | 441,250 | 3.40 | |
| $ | 1.43 - 3.40 | 2,423,760 | 1.10 | $ | 3.00 | 1,843,760 | $ | 3.02 |
32
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
Subsequent to March 31, 2020, a total of 61,250 options with exercise prices ranging from CAD$3.23 to CAD$3.40 were exercised.
(ii) RSUs
The following is a summary of RSUs transactions:
| Weighted average | |||||
| grant date closing | |||||
| Number of shares | price per share $CAD | ||||
| Balance, April 1, 2019 | - | $ | - | ||
|
Granted |
850,500 | 4.94 | |||
|
Cancelled |
(31,750 | ) | 4.94 | ||
|
Distributed |
(141,376 | ) | 4.94 | ||
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | 677,374 | $ | 4.94 |
During the year ended March 31, 2020, a total of 850,500 RSUs were granted to directors, officers, and employees of the Company at grant date closing price of CAD$4.94 per share subject to a vesting schedule over a two-year term with 25% of the RSUs vesting every six months from the date of grant.
Subsequent to March 31, 2020, a total of 7,625 RSUs were distributed.
(c) Cash dividends declared
During the year ended March 31, 2020, dividends of $4,287 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $4,028) were declared and paid.
(d) Normal course issuer bid
On March 17, 2020, the Company announced a normal course issuer bid (“NCIB”) which allows it to acquire up to 8,670,104 of its own common shares until March 18, 2021.
(e) Earnings per share (basic and diluted)
| For the years ended March 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Income | Shares | Per-Share | Income | Shares | Per-Share | ||||||||
| (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Amount | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Amount | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to equity holders of the Company | $ | 34,274 | $ | 39,724 | |||||||||
| Basic earnings per share | 34,274 | 171,713,263 | $ | 0.20 | 39,724 | 168,483,412 | $ | 0.24 | |||||
| Effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||
|
Stock options |
2,366,124 | 1,903,581 | |||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 34,274 | 174,079,387 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 39,724 | 170,386,993 | $ | 0.23 | |||
Anti-dilutive options that are not included in the diluted EPS calculation were nil for the year ended March 31, 2020 (year ended March 31, 2019 - 3,123,000).
33
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 13. | ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | |||||
| Change in fair value on equity investments designated as FVTOCI | $ | 34,879 | $ | 35,128 | ||
| Share of other comprehensive income in associate | (1,735 | ) | (679 | ) | ||
| Currency translation adjustment | 28,445 | 7,415 | ||||
| Balance, end of the year | $ | 61,589 | $ | 41,864 |
The change in fair value on equity investments designated as FVTOCI, share of other comprehensive income in associate, and currency translation adjustment are net of tax of $nil for all periods presented.
| 14. | NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS |
The continuity of non-controlling interests is summarized as follows:
| Henan | Henan | Guangdong | |||||||||||||
| Found | Huawei | Yunxiang | Found | Total | |||||||||||
| Balance, April 1, 2018 | $ | 62,047 | $ | 5,909 | $ | 3,532 | $ | (2,545 | ) | $ | 68,943 | ||||
| Share of net income (loss) | 11,444 | 892 | (365 | ) | 352 | 12,323 | |||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive (loss) income | (3,664 | ) | (204 | ) | (150 | ) | 954 | (3,064 | ) | ||||||
| Distributions | (11,565 | ) | (1,694 | ) | - | - | (13,259 | ) | |||||||
| Acquisition of non-controlling interest | - | - | - | 1,794 | 1,794 | ||||||||||
| Disposition | - | - | - | (1,002 | ) | (1,002 | ) | ||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | $ | 58,262 | $ | 4,903 | $ | 3,017 | $ | (447 | ) | $ | 65,735 | ||||
| Share of net income (loss) | 10,440 | 664 | (221 | ) | 46 | 10,929 | |||||||||
| Share of other comprehensive loss | (2,768 | ) | (209 | ) | (73 | ) | (65 | ) | (3,115 | ) | |||||
| Distributions | (2,603 | ) | (656 | ) | - | - | (3,259 | ) | |||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2020 | $ | 63,331 | $ | 4,702 | $ | 2,723 | $ | (466 | ) | $ | 70,290 |
As at March 31, 2020, non-controlling interests in Henan Found, Henan Huawei, Yunxiang, and Guangdong Found were 22.5%, 20%, 30%, and 1%, respectively.
Henan Non-ferrous Geology Minerals Ltd. (“Henan Non-ferrous”) is the 17.5% equity interest holder of Henan Found. During the year ended March 31, 2020, Henan Found declared and paid dividends of $2,025 (year ended March 31, 2019 - declared and paid dividends of $8,995) to Henan Non-ferrous.
Henan Xinxiangrong Mining Ltd. (“Henan Xinxiangrong”) is the 5% equity interest holder of Henan Found. During the year ended March 31, 2020, Henan Found declared and paid dividends of $578 (year ended March 31, 2019 - declared and paid dividends of $2,570) to Henan Xinxiangrong.
Henan Xinhui Mining Co., Ltd. (“Henan Xinhui”) is a 20% equity interest holder of Henan Huawei. For the year ended March 31, 2020, Henan Huawei declared and paid dividends of $656 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $1,694) to Henan Xinhui.
34
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 15. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements are as follows:
| Due from related parties | March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | |||
| NUAG (a) | $ | 94 | $ | 33 | |
| Henan Non-ferrous (b) | 1,425 | 2,989 | |||
| $ | 1,519 | $ | 3,022 |
| (a) |
The Company recovers costs for services rendered to NUAG and expenses incurred on behalf of NUAG pursuant to a services and administrative costs reallocation agreement. During the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company recovered $530 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $225), from NUAG for services rendered and expenses incurred on behalf of NUAG. The costs recovered from NUAG were recorded as a direct reduction of general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income. |
| (b) |
In March 2019, Henan Found advanced a loan of $2,989 (RMB¥20 million) to Henan Non-ferrous. The loan bears an interest rate of 4.35% per annum. In December 2019, the loan, including accumulated interest, of $2,922 (RMB¥20.7 million) was repaid. |
In January 2020, Henan Found advanced a loan of $1,426 (RMB¥10 million) to Henan Non-ferrous. The loan has a term of four months and bears an interest rate of 4.35% per annum.
The balances with related parties are unsecured.
(c) Compensation of key management personnel
The remuneration of directors and other members of key management personnel, who are those having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
| Years Ended March 31, | |||||
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Directors’ fees and bonus | $ | 293 | $ | 256 | |
| Salaries and bonus for key management personnel | 2,519 | 2,498 | |||
| Share-based compensation | 1,487 | 725 | |||
| $ | 4,299 | $ | 3,479 | ||
Share-based compensation was measured at grant date fair value (see note 12(b)).
35
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 16. | GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE |
General and administrative expenses consist of:
| Year ended March 31, 2020 | Year ended March 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate | Mines | Total | Corporate | Mines | Total | ||||||||||
| Amortization and depreciation | $ | 447 | $ | 1,511 | $ | 1,958 | $ | 162 | $ | 1,091 | $ | 1,253 | |||
| Office and administrative expenses | 2,304 | 2,881 | 5,185 | 2,741 | 3,160 | 5,901 | |||||||||
| Professional fees | 562 | 481 | 1,043 | 440 | 426 | 866 | |||||||||
| Salaries and benefits | 4,245 | 5,183 | 9,428 | 4,319 | 4,889 | 9,208 | |||||||||
| Share-based compensation | 2,536 | - | 2,536 | 1,813 | - | 1,813 | |||||||||
| $ | 10,094 | $ | 10,056 | $ | 20,150 | $ | 9,475 | $ | 9,566 | $ | 19,041 | ||||
| 17. | GOVERNMENT FEES AND OTHER TAXES |
Government fees and other taxes consist of:
| Year ended March 31, | |||||
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Government fees | $ | 210 | $ | 162 | |
| Other taxes | 1,905 | 2,537 | |||
| $ | 2,115 | $ | 2,699 | ||
Government fees refer to the environmental protection fees paid to the state and local Chinese government. Other taxes were composed of surtax on value-added tax, land usage levy, stamp duty and other miscellaneous levies, duties and taxes imposed by the state and local Chinese government.
| 18. | FINANCE ITEMS |
Finance items consist of:
| Year ended March 31, | |||||
| Finance income | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| Interest income | $ | 4,023 | $ | 3,476 | |
| Year ended March 31, | |||||
| Finance costs | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| Interest on bank loan | $ | 45 | $ | 152 | |
| Interest on lease obligation | 112 | - | |||
| Loss on disposal of bonds | 1,494 | - | |||
| Unwinding of discount of environmental rehabilitation provision | 422 | 479 | |||
| $ | 2,073 | $ | 631 | ||
36
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 19. | INCOME TAX |
(a) Income tax expense
The significant components of income tax expense recognized in the statements of income are as follows:
| Year ended March 31, | |||||
| Income tax expense | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| Current | $ | 5,613 | $ | 17,750 | |
| Deferred | 3,296 | 3,121 | |||
| $ | 8,909 | $ | 20,871 | ||
The reconciliation of the Canadian statutory income tax rates to the effective tax rate is as follows:
| Years ended March, 31 | ||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Canadian statutory tax rate | 27.00% | 27.00% | ||||
| Income before income taxes | $ | 54,112 | $ | 72,918 | ||
| Income tax expense computed at Canadian statutory rates | 14,610 | 19,688 | ||||
| Foreign tax rates different from statutory rate | (2,255 | ) | (1,707 | ) | ||
| Permanent items | 760 | (444 | ) | |||
| Withholding taxes | 2,782 | 5,153 | ||||
| Change in unrecognized deferred tax assets | (6,988 | ) | (1,819 | ) | ||
| Income tax expense | $ | 8,909 | $ | 20,871 | ||
(b) Deferred income tax
The continuity of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) is summarized as follows:
| Years ended March, 31 | ||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| Net deferred income tax liabilities, beginning of the year | $ | (34,334 | ) | $ | (33,310 | ) |
|
Deferred income tax expense recognized in net income for the year |
(3,296 | ) | (3,121 | ) | ||
|
Foreign exchange impact |
1,872 | 2,097 | ||||
| Net deferred income tax liabilities, end of the year | $ | (35,758 | ) | $ | (34,334 | ) |
37
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
The significant components of the Company s deferred income tax are as follows:
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | |||||
| Deferred income tax assets | ||||||
|
Plant and equipment |
$ | 1,001 | $ | 880 | ||
|
Environmental rehabilitation |
1,948 | 3,155 | ||||
|
Other deductible temporary difference |
519 | 454 | ||||
| Total deferred income tax assets | 3,468 | 4,489 | ||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | ||||||
|
Plant and equipment |
(1,258 | ) | (829 | ) | ||
|
Mineral rights and properties |
(37,601 | ) | (37,465 | ) | ||
|
Unrealized gain on investments |
(65 | ) | (365 | ) | ||
|
Other taxable temporary difference |
(302 | ) | (164 | ) | ||
| Total deferred income tax liabilities | (39,226 | ) | (38,823 | ) | ||
| Net deferred income tax liabilities | $ | (35,758 | ) | $ | (34,334 | ) |
Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that the realization of the related tax benefit through future taxable profits is probable. The ability to realize the tax benefits is dependent upon numerous factors, including the future profitability of operations in the jurisdictions in which the tax benefits arose. Deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses for which no deferred tax assets have been recognized are attributable to the following:
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||
| Non-capital loss carry forward | $ | 63,355 | $ | 77,620 | |
| Plant and equipment | 14,460 | 25,765 | |||
| Mineral rights and properties | 5,072 | 4,378 | |||
| Other deductible temporary difference | 11,819 | 12,225 | |||
| $ | 94,706 | $ | 119,988 |
38
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
As at March 31, 2020, the Company has the following net operating losses, expiring in various years to 2041 and available to offset future taxable income in Canada and China, respectively.
| Canada | China | Total | ||||
| 2021 | $ | - | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,073 |
| 2022 | - | 1,424 | 1,424 | |||
| 2023 | - | 1,031 | 1,031 | |||
| 2024 | - | 1,225 | 1,225 | |||
| 2027 | 1,171 | 1,876 | 3,047 | |||
| 2030 | 3,506 | - | 3,506 | |||
| 2031 | 6,004 | - | 6,004 | |||
| 2032 | 8,713 | - | 8,713 | |||
| 2033 | 8,967 | - | 8,967 | |||
| 2034 | 7,047 | - | 7,047 | |||
| 2035 | 6,400 | - | 6,400 | |||
| 2036 | 2,880 | - | 2,880 | |||
| 2037 | 516 | - | 516 | |||
| 2038 | 2,251 | - | 2,251 | |||
| 2039 | 2,543 | - | 2,543 | |||
| 2040 | 1,898 | - | 1,898 | |||
| 2041 | 4,830 | - | 4,830 | |||
| $ | 56,726 | $ | 6,629 | $ | 63,355 |
As at March 31, 2020, temporary differences of $173,020 (March 31, 2019 - $184,147) associated with the investments in subsidiaries have not been recognized as the Company is able to control the timing of the reversal of these differences which are not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future.
| 20. | CAPITAL DISCLOSURES |
The Company s objectives of capital management are intended to safeguard the entity’s ability to support the Company s normal operating requirement on an ongoing basis, continue the development and exploration of its mineral properties, and support any expansionary plans.
The capital of the Company consists of the items included in equity less cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Risk and capital management are primarily the responsibility of the Company s corporate finance function and is monitored by the Board of Directors. The Company manages the capital structure and makes adjustments depending on economic conditions. Funds have been primarily secured through profitable operations and issuances of equity capital. The Company invests all capital that is surplus to its immediate needs in short-term, liquid and highly rated financial instruments, such as cash and other short-term deposits, all held with major financial institutions. Significant risks are monitored and actions are taken, when necessary, according to the Company s approved policies.
In addition, the current outbreak of COVID-19 has caused significant disruption to the global economic conditions which may adversely impact the Company s results of operations. Moreover, COVID-19 has also negatively impacted on the stock markets, including the trading price of the Company s common shares, which could adversely impact the Company s ability to raise capital.
39
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 21. | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
The Company manages its exposure to financial risks, including liquidity risk, foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk in accordance with its risk management framework. The Company s Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Company s risk management framework and reviews the Company s policies on an ongoing basis.
(a)Fair value
The Company classifies its fair value measurements within a fair value hierarchy, which reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements as defined in IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement (“IFRS 13”).
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The following tables set forth the Company s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value level on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy as at March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 that are not otherwise disclosed. The assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
| Fair value as at March 31, 2020 | |||||||||
| Recurring measurements | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||
| Financial assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 65,777 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 65,777 | |
| Short-term investments - money market instruments | 53,430 | - | - | 53,430 | |||||
| Investments in public companies | 6,633 | - | - | 6,633 | |||||
| Investments in private company | - | - | 2,117 | 2,117 | |||||
| Fair value as at March 31, 2019 | |||||||||
| Recurring measurements | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||
| Financial assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 67,441 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 67,441 | |
| Short-term investments - money market instruments | 22,850 | - | - | 22,850 | |||||
| Investments in public companies | 9,253 | - | - | 9,253 | |||||
Fair value of the other financial instruments excluded from the table above approximates their carrying amount as at March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 during the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
40
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
(b)Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its short-term business requirements. The Company has in place a planning and budgeting process to help determine the funds required to support the Company s normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis and its expansion plans.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts that give rise to commitments for future minimum payments. The following summarizes the remaining contractual maturities of the Company s financial liabilities.
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||||||||
| Within a year | 2-5 years | Over 5 years | Total | Total | |||||||
| Bank loan | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,475 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 23,129 | - | - | 23,129 | 29,856 | ||||||
| Lease obligation | 567 | 1,464 | 38 | 2,069 | - | ||||||
| $ | 23,696 | $ | 1,464 | $ | 38 | $ | 25,198 | $ | 34,331 | ||
(c) Foreign exchange risk
The Company reports its financial statements in US dollars. The functional currency of the head office, Canadian subsidiaries and all intermediate holding companies is CAD and the functional currency of all Chinese subsidiaries is RMB. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk when the Company undertakes transactions and holds assets and liabilities in currencies other than its functional currencies. The Company currently does not engage in foreign exchange currency hedging. The Company's exposure to currency risk affect net income is summarized as follows:
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||
| Financial assets denominated in U.S. Dollars | $ | 60,534 | $ | 45,912 |
As at March 31, 2020, with other variables unchanged, a 10% strengthening (weakening) of the CAD against the USD would have decreased (increased) net income by approximately $6.1 million.
(d)Interest rate risk
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash equivalents, short term investments, and loan to one of the related parties. As at March 31, 2020, all of its interest-bearing cash equivalents and short term investments earn interest at market rates that are fixed to maturity or at variable interest rates with terms of less than one year. The loan to the related party bears an interest rate of 4.35% per annum, which approximates the prevailing commercial lending rates in China as of March 31, 2020. The Company monitors its exposure to changes in interest rates on cash equivalents, short term investments, and loan to the related party. Due to the short term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in interest rates would not have a significant impact on the Company s net income.
(e) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk primarily associated to accounts receivable, due from related parties, cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments. The carrying amount of assets included on the balance sheet represents the maximum credit exposure.
41
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
The Company undertakes credit evaluations on counterparties as necessary, requests deposits from customers prior to delivery, and has monitoring processes intended to mitigate credit risks. There were no amounts in trade or other receivables which were past due on March 31, 2020 (at March 31, 2019 - $nil) for which no provision is recognized.
(f) Equity price risk
The Company holds certain marketable securities that will fluctuate in value as a result of trading on Canadian financial markets. As the Company s marketable securities holdings are mainly in mining companies, the value will also fluctuate based on commodity prices. Based upon the Company s portfolio as at March 31, 2020, a 10% increase (decrease) in the market price of the securities held, ignoring any foreign currency effects, would have resulted in an increase (decrease) to comprehensive income of approximately $663.
| 22. | SEGMENTED INFORMATION |
The Company’s operating segments are components of the Company where discrete financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Company s Chief Executive Officer who is the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). The operating segments are determined based on the Company s management and internal reporting structure. Operating segments are summarized as follows:
| Operating Segments | Subsidiaries Included in the Segment | Properties Included in the Segment |
| Mining | ||
|
Henan Luoning |
Henan Found and Henan Huawei | Ying Mining District |
|
Hunan |
Yunxiang | BYP |
|
Guangdong |
Guangdong Found | GC |
|
Other |
SX Gold | XHP |
| Administrative | ||
|
Vancouver |
Silvercorp Metals Inc. and holding companies | |
|
Beijing |
Silvercorp Metals (China) Inc. |
42
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
(a) Segmented information for assets and liabilities are as follows:
| March 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mining | Administrative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Henan | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of financial position items: | Luoning | Hunan | Guangdong | Other | Beijing | Vancouver | |||||||||||||||||
| Current assets | $ | 80,160 | $ | 1,467 | $ | 3,665 | $ | - | $ | 4,289 | $ | 68,598 | $ | 158,179 | |||||||||
| Plant and equipment | 45,113 | 3,893 | 15,261 | - | 862 | 1,593 | 66,722 | ||||||||||||||||
| Mineral rights and properties | 192,746 | 6,884 | 24,956 | - | - | - | 224,586 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment in an associate | - | - | - | - | - | 44,555 | 44,555 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other investments | 2,117 | - | - | - | - | 6,633 | 8,750 | ||||||||||||||||
| Reclamation deposits | 5,043 | - | 4,180 | - | - | 7 | 9,230 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term prepaids and deposits | 205 | 99 | 86 | - | - | - | 390 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term portion of lease receivable | - | - | - | - | - | 348 | 348 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 325,384 | $ | 12,343 | $ | 48,148 | $ | - | $ | 5,151 | $ | 121,734 | $ | 512,760 | |||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 19,495 | $ | 1,322 | $ | 3,154 | $ | - | $ | 625 | $ | 3,232 | $ | 27,828 | |||||||||
| Long-term portion of lease obligation | - | - | - | - | - | 1,502 | 1,502 | ||||||||||||||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 34,761 | 997 | - | - | - | - | 35,758 | ||||||||||||||||
| Environmental rehabilitation | 6,775 | 1,015 | 910 | - | - | - | 8,700 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 61,031 | $ | 3,334 | $ | 4,064 | $ | - | $ | 625 | $ | 4,734 | $ | 73,788 | |||||||||
| March 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mining | Administrative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Henan | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of financial position items: | Luoning | Hunan | Guangdong | Other | Beijing | Vancouver | |||||||||||||||||
| Current assets | $ | 66,992 | $ | 1,540 | $ | 11,870 | $ | 529 | $ | 5,435 | $ | 48,495 | $ | 134,861 | |||||||||
| Plant and equipment | 47,600 | 4,319 | 15,354 | 255 | 932 | 157 | 68,617 | ||||||||||||||||
| Mineral rights and properties | 197,274 | 7,222 | 26,670 | 7,754 | - | - | 238,920 | ||||||||||||||||
| Investment in an associate | - | - | - | - | - | 38,703 | 38,703 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other investments | - | - | - | - | - | 9,253 | 9,253 | ||||||||||||||||
| Reclamation deposits | 5,330 | - | 2,616 | - | - | 7 | 7,953 | ||||||||||||||||
| Long-term prepaids and deposits | 369 | 104 | 170 | 126 | - | - | 769 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 317,565 | $ | 13,185 | $ | 56,680 | $ | 8,664 | $ | 6,367 | $ | 96,615 | $ | 499,076 | |||||||||
| Current liabilities | $ | 27,000 | $ | 1,391 | $ | 4,036 | $ | 2,548 | $ | 1,102 | $ | 1,796 | $ | 37,873 | |||||||||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 33,337 | 997 | - | - | - | - | 34,334 | ||||||||||||||||
| Environmental rehabilitation | 11,623 | 998 | 774 | 293 | - | - | 13,688 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 71,960 | $ | 3,386 | $ | 4,810 | $ | 2,841 | $ | 1,102 | $ | 1,796 | $ | 85,895 | |||||||||
43
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
(b) Segmented information for operating results are as follows:
| Year ended March 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mining | Administrative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Henan | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of income: | Luoning | Hunan(1) | Guangdong | Other | Beijing | Vancouver | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 131,434 | $ | - | $ | 27,395 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 158,829 | |||||||||
| Costs of mine operations | (77,337 | ) | (403 | ) | (21,689 | ) | - | (26 | ) | - | (99,455 | ) | |||||||||||
| Income from mine operations | 54,097 | (403 | ) | 5,706 | - | (26 | ) | - | 59,374 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating income (expenses) | 333 | (134 | ) | (178 | ) | (60 | ) | (1,590 | ) | (5,583 | ) | (7,212 | ) | ||||||||||
| Finance items, net | 1,366 | (147 | ) | 136 | - | 133 | 462 | 1,950 | |||||||||||||||
| Income tax expenses | (5,013 | ) | (53 | ) | (1,060 | ) | - | (1 | ) | (2,782 | ) | (8,909 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 50,783 | $ | (737 | ) | $ | 4,604 | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (1,484 | ) | $ | (7,903 | ) | $ | 45,203 | |||||
| Attributable to: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | 39,679 | (516 | ) | 4,558 | (60 | ) | (1,484 | ) | (7,903 | ) | 34,274 | ||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | 11,104 | (221 | ) | 46 | - | - | - | 10,929 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 50,783 | $ | (737 | ) | $ | 4,604 | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (1,484 | ) | $ | (7,903 | ) | $ | 45,203 | |||||
| (1) Hunan’s BYP project was placed on care and maintenance in August 2014; | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mining | Administrative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Henan | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of income: | Luoning | Hunan | Guangdong | Other | Beijing | Vancouver | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales | $ | 141,483 | $ | - | $ | 29,036 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 170,519 | |||||||||
| Costs of mine operations | (76,276 | ) | (855 | ) | (21,566 | ) | (854 | ) | (36 | ) | - | (99,587 | ) | ||||||||||
| Income from mine operations | 65,207 | (855 | ) | 7,470 | (854 | ) | (36 | ) | - | 70,932 | |||||||||||||
| Operating (expenses) income | (858 | ) | (106 | ) | (344 | ) | 44 | (1,555 | ) | (7,218 | ) | (10,037 | ) | ||||||||||
| Impairment recovery, net | - | - | - | 7,279 | - | 1,899 | 9,178 | ||||||||||||||||
| Finance items, net | 1,131 | (127 | ) | 51 | (11 | ) | 145 | 1,656 | 2,845 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax expenses | (15,588 | ) | (128 | ) | - | - | (2 | ) | (5,153 | ) | (20,871 | ) | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 49,892 | $ | (1,216 | ) | $ | 7,177 | $ | 6,458 | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | (8,816 | ) | $ | 52,047 | ||||||
| Attributable to: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity holders of the Company | 39,008 | (851 | ) | 6,825 | 5,006 | (1,448 | ) | (8,816 | ) | 39,724 | |||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | 10,884 | (365 | ) | 352 | 1,452 | - | - | 12,323 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 49,892 | $ | (1,216 | ) | $ | 7,177 | $ | 6,458 | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | (8,816 | ) | $ | 52,047 | ||||||
44
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
(c) Sales by metal
The sales generated for the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were all earned in China and are comprised of:
| Year ended March 31, 2020 | |||||||
| Henan Luoning | Guangdong | Total | |||||
| Silver (Ag) | $ | 77,617 | $ | 7,255 | $ | 84,872 | |
| Gold (Au) | 3,911 | - | 3,911 | ||||
| Lead (Pb) | 43,312 | 8,654 | 51,966 | ||||
| Zinc (Zn) | 4,911 | 10,869 | 15,780 | ||||
| Other | 1,683 | 617 | 2,300 | ||||
| $ | 131,434 | $ | 27,395 | $ | 158,829 | ||
| Year ended March 31, 2019 | |||||||
| Henan Luoning | Guangdong | Total | |||||
| Silver (Ag) | $ | 74,702 | $ | 5,952 | $ | 80,654 | |
| Gold (Au) | 3,642 | - | 3,642 | ||||
| Lead (Pb) | 55,739 | 8,372 | 64,111 | ||||
| Zinc (Zn) | 6,305 | 14,349 | 20,654 | ||||
| Other | 1,095 | 363 | 1,458 | ||||
| $ | 141,483 | $ | 29,036 | $ | 170,519 | ||
(d) Major customers
For the year ended March 31, 2020, five major customers (year ended March 31, 2019 - four) accounted for 11%, 12%, 16%, 19%, and 22%, respectively (year ended March 31, 2019 - 12%, 13%, 15%, and 26%, respectively) and collectively 81% (year ended March 31, 2019 - 67%) of the total sales of the Company as reported across the Henan Luoning and Guangdong segments.
| 23. | SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||
| Cash on hand and at bank | $ | 65,251 | $ | 67,215 | |
| Bank term deposits and GICs | 526 | 226 | |||
| Total cash and cash equivalents | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 |
| Changes in non-cash operating working capital: | Years Ended March 31, | |||||
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||
|
Trade and other receivables |
$ | 330 | $ | 169 | ||
|
Inventories |
1,798 | (606 | ) | |||
|
Prepaids and deposits |
184 | 500 | ||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(1,616 | ) | 3,962 | |||
|
Deposits received |
1,236 | (3,343 | ) | |||
|
Due from a related party |
(170 | ) | (23 | ) | ||
| $ | 1,762 | $ | 659 | |||
45
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share data, unless otherwise stated) |
| 24. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
On April 27, 2020, the Company announced that it entered into a definitive agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) whereby the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Guyana Goldfields Inc. (TSX: GUY) (“Guyana Goldfields”) by way of a court approved plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “Transaction”).
Under the terms of the Transaction, each holder of Guyana Goldfields shares will have the option to receive, for each Guyana Goldfields share held, CAD$0.60 in cash or 0.1195 of a Silvercorp common share (valued at CAD$0.60 based on the volume weighted average price for Silvercorp common shares for the 20 trading days ended April 24, 2020), subject to a maximum cash consideration of approximately $23.4 million (CAD$33.2 million). If all Guyana Goldfields shareholders elect to receive cash, consideration for each share will consist of CAD$0.20 in cash and 0.0796 of a Silvercorp common share (valued at CAD$0.40 based on the volume weighted average price for Silvercorp common shares for the 20 trading days ended April 24, 2020). Assuming the maximum cash consideration, existing Guyana Goldfields shareholders will own 7.1% of Silvercorp’s pro forma basic shares outstanding following the Transaction. The consideration of CAD$0.60 per share represents a 71% premium to the 20-day volume weighted average price of Guyana Goldfields as of the close of trading on April 24, 2020.
Concurrently with entering into the Arrangement Agreement, the Company and Guyana Goldfields have also entered into a loan agreement, whereby the Company will lend Guyana Goldfields up to US$15 million with an interest rate of 12% per annum (or, on the occurrence of certain triggering events, 14% per annum) to fund Guyana Goldfields’ expected liquidity shortfall between the signing of the Arrangement Agreement and the closing of the Transaction.
On May 18, 2020, the Company announced that it has entered into an amending agreement (the “Amending Agreement”) to the Arrangement Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Amending Agreement, each holder of Guyana Goldfields shares will receive, for each Guyana Goldfields share held, C$0.25 in cash and 0.1849 of a Silvercorp common share, for total consideration of C$1.30 per share (based on the volume weighted average price for Silvercorp common shares for the 5 trading days ended May 14, 2020). The terms of the Amending Agreement were agreed to following receipt by Guyana Goldfields of an unsolicited all-cash proposal from a third party to acquire Guyana Goldfields
After accounting for Silvercorp’s current share position in Guyana Goldfields, cash consideration of C$0.25 per Guyana Goldfields share implies a total cash component of approximately $27.8 million (C$39.5 million). Share consideration of C$1.05 per Guyana Goldfields share implies a total share component of 29.2 million shares after accounting for Silvercorp’s existing position, resulting in existing Guyana Goldfields shareholders owning 14.4% of Silvercorp’s pro forma basic shares outstanding following the Transaction.
Commensurate with the increase in consideration, valuing Guyana Goldfields at approximately C$227 million, the Amending Agreement provides for an increase in the termination fee to C$9.0 million, which is to be paid by Guyana Goldfields to Silvercorp if the Arrangement Agreement is terminated in the event Guyana Goldfields’s board accepts a superior proposal. Other than as described herein, the terms of the Transaction remain unamended, including the terms of the interim loan facility.
The Transaction will be effected by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporation Act and will be subject to the approval of 662/3% of votes cast by shareholders of Guyana Goldfields at a special meeting of Guyana Goldfields shareholders scheduled for June 29, 2020. In addition to shareholder and court approvals, the Transaction is subject to applicable regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of certain other closing conditions customary in transactions of this nature.
46
SILVERCORP METALS INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Year Ended March 31, 2020
(Expressed in thousands of US dollars, except per share figures or otherwise stated)
Table of Contents
| 1. | Core Business and Strategy | 2 |
| 2. | Fiscal Year 2020 Highlights | 2 |
| 3. | Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2020 Highlights | 3 |
| 4. | Operating Performance | 4 |
| 5. | Outlook | 13 |
| 6. | Investment in New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) | 14 |
| 7. | Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results | 15 |
| 8. | Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2020 Financial Results | 18 |
| 9. | Liquidity and Capital Resources | 20 |
| 10. | Financial Instruments and Related Risks | 22 |
| 11. | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements | 24 |
| 12. | Transactions with Related Parties | 24 |
| 13. | Alternative Performance (Non-IFRS) Measures | 25 |
| 14. | Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments, and Estimates | 29 |
| 15. | New Accounting Standards | 29 |
| 16. | Other MD&A Requirements | 31 |
| 17. | Outstanding Share Data | 31 |
| 18. | Risks and Uncertainties | 31 |
| 19. | Corporate Governance, Safety, Environment ad Social Responsibility | 36 |
| 20. | Subsequent Event | 37 |
| 21. | Disclosure Controls and Procedures | 38 |
| 22. | Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting | 38 |
| 23. | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting | 39 |
| 24. | Directors and Officers | 39 |
| Forward Looking Statements | 39 | |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the significant factors that have affected Silvercorp Metals Inc. and its subsidiaries’ (“Silvercorp” or the “Company”) performance and such factors that may affect its future performance. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2020 and the related notes contained therein. The Company reports its financial position, financial performance and cash flow in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Silvercorp’s significant accounting policies are set out in Note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2020. This MD&A refers to various alternative performance (non-IFRS) measures, such as total and cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, all-in & all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, cash flow from operations per share, production cost per tonne, all-in sustaining production costs per tonne, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share. Non-IFRS measures do not have standardized meanings under IFRS. Accordingly, non-IFRS measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. To facilitate a better understanding of these measures as calculated by the Company, additional information has been provided in this MD&A. Please refer to section 13, “Alternative Performance (Non-IFRS) Measures” of this MD&A for detailed descriptions and reconciliations. Figures may not add due to rounding.
This MD&A is prepared as of May 20, 2020 and expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share, per share, unit cost, and production data, or unless otherwise stated.
| 1. | Core Business and Strategy |
Silvercorp is a profitable Canadian mining company currently producing silver, gold, lead, and zinc metals in concentrates from mines in China. The Company’s goal is to continuously create healthy returns to shareholders through efficient management, organic growth and the acquisition of profitable projects. Silvercorp balances profitability, social and environmental relationships, employees’ wellbeing, and sustainable development. Silvercorp operates several silver-lead-zinc mines at the Ying Mining District in Henan Province, China and the GC silver-lead-zinc mine in Guangdong Province, China. The Company’s common shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and NYSE American.
| 2. | Fiscal Year 2020 Highlights |
Silvercorp’s operations in China are usually suspended for two weeks for the Chinese New Year holiday. During the 2020 holiday season , the operations in China were shut down for an extra month due to the COVID-19 situation in China at that time, as the Company reported in the news released on January 29, February 18, and March 12, 2020. The operations were ramped up to full capacity in March 2020 with no employee infection and are in full compliance with government measures implemented to prevent the spread of the virus. Despite the extended shutdown during the three months ended March 31, 2020 (“Q4 Fiscal 2020”), the Company was able to achieve its full year production surpassing its guidance for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 (“Fiscal 2020”). The operational results of Fiscal 2020 are highlighted below:
-
Silver, lead and zinc production surpassed annual guidance by 3%, 3% and 17%;
-
Ore mined down 2% to 885,830 tonnes compared to the prior year;
-
Sold approximately 6.3 million ounces of silver, 3,300 ounces of gold, 65.3 million pounds of lead, and 25.4 million pounds of zinc, representing a decrease of 2% and 6% in silver and gold sold and an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold compared to the prior year;
-
Revenue of $158.8 million, down 7% compared to $170.5 million in the prior year;
-
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of $34.3 million, or $0.20 per share compared to $39.7 million, or $0.23 per share in the prior year. Excluding the impairment reversal of $9.2 million recorded in Fiscal 2019, the net income to equity shareholders in Fiscal 2020 was up 6%
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 2 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
- compared to the adjusted net income to equity shareholders1 of $32.2 million, or $0.19 per share, in the prior year. In Fiscal 2020, the Company’s consolidated financial results were impacted by, among others, operations in China being suspended for an extra month in Q4 Fiscal 2020 due to COVID-19;
-
Cash cost per ounce of silver1, net of by-product credits, of negative $1.91 compared to negative $4.29 in the prior year;
-
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver1, net of by-product credits, of $6.86, compared to $3.52 in the prior year;
-
Cash flow from operations of $77.2 million, up 10% compared to $70.4 million in the prior year;
-
Paid $4.3 million of dividends to the Company’s shareholders, compared to $4.2 million in the prior year;
-
Invested $7.0 million in New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) to maintain the Company’s ownership interest at 28.8%; and
-
Strong balance sheet with 142.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, an increase of $27.2 million or 24% compared to $115.3 million as at March 31, 2019.
| 3. | Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2020 Highlights |
-
Ore mined down 34% to 106,595 tonnes compared to the prior year quarter;
-
Sold approximately 0.8 million ounces of silver, 500 ounces of gold, 9.7 million pounds of lead, and 3.1 million pounds of zinc, down 39%, 29%, 24%, and 58% respectively, compared to approximately 1.3 million ounces of silver, 700 ounces of gold, 12.7 million pounds of lead, and 7.3 million pounds of zinc in the prior year quarter.
-
Revenue of $18.9 million, down 46% compared to $35.0 million in the prior year quarter;
-
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of $3.2 million, or $0.02 per share, compared to the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders of $4.6 million or $0.03 per share, in the prior year quarter. In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the Company’s consolidated financial results were impacted mainly by the decrease in metal prices and operations in China being suspended for an extra month due to COVID-19.
-
Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, of negative $0.85 compared to negative $3.97 in the prior year quarter;
-
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, of $15.17, compared to $4.49 in the prior year quarter; and
-
Cash flow from operations of $6.3 million, compared to $8.3 million in the prior year quarter.
| 1 Alternative performance (Non-IFRS) measure. Please refer to section 13 for reconciliation. | ||
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 3 | |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| 4. | Operating Performance |
(a) Consolidated operating performance
The following table summarizes consolidated operational information for the three months and the year ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:
| Consolidated | Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | |||||||||||
| Production Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Mine Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 106,595 | 161,400 | -34 | % | 885,830 | 906,794 | -2 | % | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 102,431 | 159,904 | -36 | % | 892,215 | 908,846 | -2 | % | ||||||||
| Head Grades | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) | 231 | 250 | -8 | % | 240 | 240 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3 | % | 3.7 | 3.5 | 6 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 1.8 | 1.7 | 7 | % | 1.7 | 1.6 | 5 | % | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (%) | 93.4 | 93.6 | 0 | % | 93.5 | 93.8 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 94.8 | 95.3 | 0 | % | 94.8 | 94.9 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 80.3 | 77.7 | 3 | % | 77.8 | 72.8 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Cost Data | ||||||||||||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 75.91 | 80.22 | -5 | % | 76.25 | 74.98 | 2 | % | |||||||
| Cash mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 53.26 | 57.55 | -7 | % | 54.90 | 55.35 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore mined ($) | 22.65 | 22.67 | 0 | % | 21.35 | 19.63 | 9 | % | ||||||||
| + | Unit shipping costs ($) | 2.57 | 2.72 | -6 | % | 2.65 | 2.88 | -8 | % | |||||||
| + | Milling costs per tonne of ore milled ($) | 15.67 | 17.58 | -11 | % | 13.17 | 13.99 | -6 | % | |||||||
| Cash milling costs per tonne of ore milled ($) | 13.10 | 14.53 | -10 | % | 11.36 | 11.69 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore milled ($) | 2.57 | 3.05 | -16 | % | 1.81 | 2.30 | -21 | % | ||||||||
| + | Cash production cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 68.93 | 74.80 | -8 | % | 68.91 | 69.92 | -1 | % | |||||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 188.57 | 138.01 | 37 | % | 125.29 | 119.48 | 5 | % | |||||||
| + | Cash cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | (0.85 | ) | (3.97 | ) | 79 | % | (1.91 | ) | (4.29 | ) | 55 | % | |||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 15.17 | 4.49 | 238 | % | 6.86 | 3.52 | 95 | % | |||||||
| Concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||
| Lead concentrate (tonne) | 2,520 | 3,248 | -22 | % | 2,520 | 3,248 | -22 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc concentrate (tonne) | 370 | 368 | 1 | % | 370 | 368 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Sales Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Metal Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of ounces) | 800 | 1,314 | -39 | % | 6,257 | 6,390 | -2 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of ounces) | 0.5 | 0.7 | -29 | % | 3.3 | 3.5 | -6 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of pounds) | 9,654 | 12,670 | -24 | % | 65,344 | 64,788 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of pounds) | 3,059 | 7,338 | -58 | % | 25,401 | 22,716 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of $) | 9,834 | 16,732 | -41 | % | 84,872 | 80,654 | 5 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of $) | 625 | 759 | -18 | % | 3,911 | 3,642 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of $) | 6,454 | 11,420 | -43 | % | 51,966 | 64,111 | -19 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of $) | 1,546 | 5,529 | -72 | % | 15,780 | 20,654 | -24 | % | ||||||||
| Other (in thousands of $) | 401 | 512 | -22 | % | 2,300 | 1,458 | 58 | % | ||||||||
| 18,860 | 34,952 | -46 | % | 158,829 | 170,519 | -7 | % | |||||||||
| Average Selling Price, Net of Value Added Tax and Smelter Charges | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver ($ per ounce) | 12.29 | 12.73 | -3 | % | 13.56 | 12.62 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Gold ($ per ounce) | 1,250 | 1,084 | 15 | % | 1,185 | 1,041 | 14 | % | ||||||||
| Lead ($ per pound) | 0.67 | 0.90 | -26 | % | 0.80 | 0.99 | -19 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound) | 0.51 | 0.75 | -32 | % | 0.62 | 0.91 | -32 | % | ||||||||
+ Alternative performa nce (Non-IFRS) measures, see section 13 for reconciliation.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 4 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
(i) Mine and Mill Production
In Fiscal 2020, on a consolidated basis, the Company mined 885,830 tonnes of ore, a decrease of 2% or 20,964 tonnes, compared to 906,794 tonnes in Fiscal 2019. Ore milled in Fiscal 2020 was 892,215 tonnes, a decrease of 2% or 16,631 tonnes compared to 908,846 tonnes in Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the Company mined 106,595 tonnes of ore, a decrease of 34%, compared to 161,400 tonnes in the three months ended March 31, 2019 (“Q4 Fiscal 2019”). Ore milled in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was 102,431 tonnes, a decrease of 36% compared to 159,904 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
The decrease in production was mainly due to an extra month’s operational shutdown due to COVID-19 in Q4 Fiscal 2020 as discussed earlier. The operations were ramped up to full capacity in March 2020, and total ore mined in March 2020 was 75,199 tonnes, representing approximately 95% of full production in normal operations.
(ii) Metal Sales
In Fiscal 2020, the Company sold approximately 6.3 million ounces of silver, 3,300 ounces of gold, 65.3 million pounds of lead, and 25.4 million pounds of zinc, representing a decrease of 2% and 6% in silver and gold sold and an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold, respectively, compared to 6.4 million ounces of silver, 3,500 ounces of gold, 64.8 million pounds of lead, and 22.7 million pounds of zinc in Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the Company sold approximately 0.8 million ounces of silver, 500 ounces of gold, 9.7 million pounds of lead, and 3.1 million pounds of zinc, down 39%, 29%, 24%, and 58%, respectively, compared to approximately 1.3 million ounces of silver, 700 ounces of gold, 12.7 million pounds of lead, and 7.3 million pounds of zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
(iii) Per Tonne Production Costs1
In Fiscal 2020, the consolidated total mining cost and cash mining cost were $76.25 and $54.90 per tonne, up 2% and down 1%, respectively, compared to $74.98 and $55.35 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. The decrease in the cash mining cost was mainly due to a decrease of 5% in mining preparation costs, offset by an increase of 3% in direct mining contractors’ cost.
The consolidated total milling cost and cash milling cost were $13.17 and $11.36 per tonne, down 6% and 3%, respectively, compared to $13.99 and $11.69 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. The improvement in the cash milling cost was mainly due to a decrease of 4% in utility costs and 6% in raw material costs.
The consolidated cash production cost per tonne of ore processed in Fiscal 2020 was $68.91, a decrease of 1% compared to $69.92 in Fiscal 2019 and 4% below the Company’s annual guidance. The consolidated all-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed was $125.29, an increase of 5% compared to $119.48 in Fiscal 2019, but in line with the Company’s annual guidance.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the consolidated total mining cost and cash mining cost were $75.91 and $53.26 per tonne, down 5% and 7%, respectively, compared to $80.22 and $57.55 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The consolidated total milling cost and cash milling cost in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $15.67 and $13.10 per tonne, down 11% and 10%, respectively, compared to $17.58 and $14.53 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The consolidated all-in sustaining production cost per tonne was $188.57, up 37%, compared to $138.01 in Q4 Fiscal 2019.The increase was mainly due to lower production resulting in higher per tonne fixed cost allocation. The all-in sustaining production cost in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $19.6 million, a decrease of $2.6 million, compared to $22.2 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
| 1 Alternative Performance (Non-IFRS) measure. Please refer to section 13 for reconciliation. | ||
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 5 | |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
(iv) Costs per Ounce of Silver, Net of By-Product Credits
In Fiscal 2020, the consolidated cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was negative $1.91, compared to negative $4.29 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $15.9 million in by-product credits. The decrease in by-product credits was mainly due to a decrease of 19% and 32%, respectively, in net realized selling prices for lead and zinc, partially offset by an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold. Sales from lead and zinc in Fiscal 2020 amounted to $67.7 million, a decrease of $17.1 million, compared to $84.8 million in Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the consolidated cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was negative $0.85, compared to negative $3.97 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $9.2 million in by-product credits.
In Fiscal 2020, the consolidated all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was $6.86, compared to $3.52 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to the increase in the cash cost per ounce of silver as discussed above and an increase of $4.7 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the consolidated all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, was $15.17, compared to $4.49 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to i) a decrease of $9.2 million in by-product credits; ii) less silver sold resulting in a higher per ounce cost, and partially offset by iii) a decrease of $2.2 million in all-in sustaining production cost.
(v) Exploration and Development
In Fiscal 2020, on a consolidated basis, approximately 108,156 metres or $3.5 million worth of diamond drilling (Fiscal 2019 – 100,682 metres or $3.1 million) and 38,403 metres or $10.3 million worth of preparation tunnelling (Fiscal 2019 – 38,500 metres or $10.6 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs. In addition, approximately 73,567 metres or $26.3 million worth of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps and declines (Fiscal 2019 – 67,027 metres or $24.2 million) were completed and capitalized.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, on a consolidated basis, approximately 14,612 metres or $0.5 million worth of diamond drilling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 8,947 metres or $0.6 million) and 2,163 metres or $0.7 million worth of preparation tunnelling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 6,427 metres or $1.9 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs. In addition, approximately 9,830 metres or $4.3 million worth of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps and declines (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 10,992 metres or $4.2 million) were completed and capitalized.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 6 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
(b) Individual Mine Performance
(i) Ying Mining District
The following table summarize the operational information at the Ying Mining District for the three months and the year ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. The Ying Mining District is the Company’s primary source of production, and consists of several mines, including the SGX, HPG, TLP, LME, LMW, and HZG mines.
| Ying Mining District | Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | |||||||||||
| Production Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Mine Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 69,379 | 111,032 | -38 | % | 598,197 | 622,576 | -4 | % | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 69,188 | 107,039 | -35 | % | 601,605 | 619,851 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Head Grades | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) | 297 | 324 | -8 | % | 309 | 311 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 4.6 | 4.5 | 3 | % | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 10 | % | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (%) | 95.3 | 95.5 | 0 | % | 96.0 | 95.8 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 95.7 | 96.1 | 0 | % | 95.9 | 95.7 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 67.7 | 63.7 | 6 | % | 63.2 | 54.1 | 17 | % | ||||||||
| Cost Data | ||||||||||||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 97.79 | 93.86 | 4 | % | 90.61 | 88.19 | 3 | % | |||||||
| Cash mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 68.10 | 65.24 | 4 | % | 63.00 | 63.39 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore mined ($) | 29.69 | 28.62 | 4 | % | 27.61 | 24.80 | 11 | % | ||||||||
| + | Unit shipping costs ($) | 3.96 | 3.97 | 0 | % | 3.92 | 4.22 | -7 | % | |||||||
| + | Milling costs per tonne of ore milled ($) | 14.31 | 15.55 | -8 | % | 12.03 | 12.58 | -4 | % | |||||||
| Cash milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 11.53 | 12.57 | -8 | % | 10.16 | 10.43 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore milled ($) | 2.78 | 2.98 | -7 | % | 1.87 | 2.15 | -13 | % | ||||||||
| + | Cash production cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 83.59 | 81.78 | 2 | % | 77.08 | 78.04 | -1 | % | |||||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 195.78 | 141.63 | 38 | % | 132.52 | 126.93 | 4 | % | |||||||
| + | Cash cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 0.30 | (3.02 | ) | 110 | % | (1.18 | ) | (3.35 | ) | 65 | % | ||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 11.86 | 3.28 | 262 | % | 5.49 | 2.60 | 111 | % | |||||||
| Concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||
| Lead concentrate (tonne) | 2,475 | 3,150 | -21 | % | 2,475 | 3,150 | -21 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc concentrate (tonne) | 280 | 250 | 12 | % | 280 | 250 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Sales Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Metal Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of ounces) | 711 | 1,141 | -38 | % | 5,558 | 5,764 | -4 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of ounces) | 0.5 | 0.7 | -29 | % | 3.3 | 3.5 | -6 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of pounds) | 8,322 | 10,310 | -19 | % | 54,459 | 56,138 | -3 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of pounds) | 865 | 2,464 | -65 | % | 7,264 | 6,626 | 10 | % | ||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of $) | 8,968 | 15,137 | -41 | % | 77,617 | 74,702 | 4 | % | ||||||||
| Gold (in thousands of $) | 625 | 759 | -18 | % | 3,911 | 3,642 | 7 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of $) | 5,562 | 9,318 | -40 | % | 43,312 | 55,739 | -22 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of $) | 452 | 2,028 | -78 | % | 4,911 | 6,305 | -22 | % | ||||||||
| Other (in thousands of $) | 74 | 344 | -78 | % | 1,683 | 1,095 | 54 | % | ||||||||
| 15,681 | 27,586 | -43 | % | 131,434 | 141,483 | -7 | % | |||||||||
| Average Selling Price, Net of Value Added Tax and Smelter Charges | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver ($ per ounce) | 12.61 | 13.27 | -5 | % | 13.96 | 12.96 | 8 | % | ||||||||
| Gold ($ per ounce) | 1,250 | 1,084 | 15 | % | 1,185 | 1,041 | 14 | % | ||||||||
| Lead ($ per pound) | 0.67 | 0.90 | -26 | % | 0.80 | 0.99 | -19 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound) | 0.52 | 0.82 | -37 | % | 0.68 | 0.95 | -28 | % | ||||||||
+ Alternative Performance (Non-IFRS) measures, see section 13 for reconciliation
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 7 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Fiscal 2020 vs. Fiscal 2019
In Fiscal 2020, the total ore mined at the Ying Mining District was 598,197 tonnes, a decrease of 4% or 24,379 tonnes, compared to 622,576 tonnes mined in Fiscal 2019. Ore milled was 601,605 tonnes, a decrease of 3% or 18,246 tonnes, compared to 619,851 tonnes in Fiscal 2019.
Head grades of ore milled at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 were 309 grams per tonne (“g/t”) for silver, 4.6% for lead, and 0.9% for zinc, compared to 311 g/t for silver, 4.4% for lead, and 0.9% for zinc in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the Ying Mining District sold approximately 5.6 million ounces of silver, 3,300 ounces of gold, and 54.5 million pounds of lead, down 4%, 6%, and 3%, respectively, compared to 5.8 million ounces of silver, 3,500 ounces of gold, and 56.1 million pounds of lead in Fiscal 2019 while zinc sold was 7.3 million pounds in Fiscal 2020, up 10% compared to 6.6 million pounds in Fiscal 2019.
Total mining cost and cash mining cost per tonne at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 were $90.61 and $63.00 per tonne, respectively, compared to $88.19 and $63.39 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. Total milling cost and cash milling cost per tonne at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 were $12.03 and $10.16, down by 4% and 3%, respectively, compared to $12.58 and $10.43, respectively, in Fiscal 2019.
Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne of ore processed at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020 was $77.08, down 1% compared to $78.04 in Fiscal 2019. The all-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed was $132.52, up 4%, compared to 126.93 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $2.9 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020, was negative $1.18 compared to negative $3.35 in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $13.0 million in by-product credits.
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the Ying Mining District in Fiscal 2020, was $5.49 compared to $2.60 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to the increase in cash cost per ounce of silver as discussed above and an increase of $2.9 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Fiscal 2020, approximately 85,643 metres or $2.5 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Fiscal 2019 – 75,955 metres or $1.8 million) and 19,088 metres or $5.7 million worth of preparation tunnelling (Fiscal 2019 – 18,656 metres or $5.4 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the Ying Mining District. In addition, approximately 70,240 metres or $23.9 million worth of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps and declines (Fiscal 2019 – 65,653 metres or $23.2 million) were completed and capitalized.
Q4 Fiscal 2020 vs. Q4 Fiscal 2019
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, a total of 69,379 tonnes of ore were mined at the Ying Mining District, a decrease of 38% or 41,653 tonnes, compared to 111,032 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Ore milled was 69,188 tonnes, a decrease of 35% or 37,851 tonnes, compared to 107,039 tonnes in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Average head grades of ore processed were 297 g/t for silver, 4.6% for lead, and 1.0% for zinc compared to 324 g/t for silver, 4.5% for lead, and 0.9% for zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Metals sold were approximately 0.7 million ounces of silver, 500 ounces of gold, 8.3 million pounds of lead, and 0.9 million pounds of zinc, compared to 1.1 million ounces of silver, 700 ounces of gold, 10.3 million pounds of lead, and 2.5 million pounds of zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the cash mining cost at the Ying Mining District was $68.1 per tonne, up 4% compared to $65.24 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The cash milling cost was $11.53 per tonne, down 8% compared to $12.57 in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 8 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne of ore processed at the Ying Mining District in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $83.59, up 2% compared to $81.78 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The all-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed was $195.78, up 38%, compared to 141.63 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to lower production output resulting in a higher per tonne fixed cost allocation. The all-in sustaining production cost at the Ying Mining District was $13.6 million, a decrease of $1.9 million, compared to $15.4 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, the cash cost per ounce of silver and all in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the Ying Mining District were $0.30 and $11.86, respectively, compared to negative $3.02 and $3.28 in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, approximately 12,412 metres or $0.4 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 6,083 metres or $0.3 million) and 1,810 metres or $0.6 million worth of preparation tunnelling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 3,061 metres or $1.0 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the Ying Mining District. In addition, approximately 7,979 metres or $2.9 million worth of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps, and declines (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 10,730 metres or $4.0 million) were completed and capitalized.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 9 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
(ii) GC Mine
The following table summarizes the operational information at the GC Mine for the three months and the year ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:
| GC Mine | Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | |||||||||||
| Production Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Mine Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Ore Mined (tonne) | 37,216 | 50,368 | -26 | % | 287,633 | 284,218 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Ore Milled (tonne) | 33,243 | 52,865 | -37 | % | 290,610 | 288,995 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Head Grades | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) | 94 | 101 | -7 | % | 97 | 86 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1 | % | 1.9 | 1.5 | 27 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 3.5 | 3.3 | 7 | % | 3.3 | 3.0 | 10 | % | ||||||||
| Recovery Rates | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (%) * | 80.7 | 81.3 | -1 | % | 77.4 | 78.4 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (%) | 90.4 | 91.5 | -1 | % | 89.3 | 90.4 | -1 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (%) | 87.7 | 85.7 | 2 | % | 86.0 | 84.9 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Cost Data | ||||||||||||||||
| + | Mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 35.09 | 50.13 | -30 | % | 46.40 | 46.04 | 1 | % | |||||||
| Cash mining cost per tonne of ore mined ($) | 25.58 | 40.58 | -37 | % | 38.06 | 37.73 | 1 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore mined ($) | 9.51 | 9.55 | 0 | % | 8.34 | 8.31 | 0 | % | ||||||||
| + | Milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 18.50 | 21.70 | -15 | % | 15.52 | 17.01 | -9 | % | |||||||
| Cash milling cost per tonne of ore milled ($) | 16.36 | 18.52 | -12 | % | 13.85 | 14.39 | -4 | % | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charges per tonne of ore milled ($) | 2.14 | 3.18 | -33 | % | 1.67 | 2.62 | -36 | % | ||||||||
| + | Cash production cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 41.94 | 59.10 | -29 | % | 51.91 | 52.12 | 0 | % | |||||||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per tonne of ore processed ($) | 88.18 | 72.11 | 22 | % | 69.33 | 63.59 | 9 | % | |||||||
| + | Cash cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | (10.03 | ) | (10.23 | ) | 2 | % | (7.65 | ) | (12.97 | ) | 41 | % | |||
| + | All-in sustaining cost per ounce of Silver, net of by-product credits ($) | 8.31 | (4.97 | ) | 267 | % | 0.77 | (6.28 | ) | 112 | % | |||||
| Concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||
| Lead concentrate (tonne) | 45 | 98 | -54 | % | 45 | 98 | -54 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc concentrate (tonne) | 90 | 118 | -24 | % | 90 | 118 | -24 | % | ||||||||
| Sales Data | ||||||||||||||||
| Metal Sales | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of ounces) | 89 | 173 | -49 | % | 699 | 626 | 12 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of pounds) | 1,332 | 2,360 | -44 | % | 10,885 | 8,650 | 26 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of pounds) | 2,194 | 4,874 | -55 | % | 18,137 | 16,090 | 13 | % | ||||||||
| Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver (in thousands of $) | 866 | 1,595 | -46 | % | 7,255 | 5,952 | 22 | % | ||||||||
| Lead (in thousands of $) | 892 | 2,102 | -58 | % | 8,654 | 8,372 | 3 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc (in thousands of $) | 1,094 | 3,501 | -69 | % | 10,869 | 14,349 | -24 | % | ||||||||
| Other (in thousands of $) | 327 | 168 | 95 | % | 617 | 363 | 70 | % | ||||||||
| 3,179 | 7,366 | -57 | % | 27,395 | 29,036 | -6 | % | |||||||||
| Average Selling Price, Net of Value Added Tax and Smelter Charges | ||||||||||||||||
| Silver ($ per ounce) ** | 9.73 | 9.22 | 6 | % | 10.38 | 9.51 | 9 | % | ||||||||
| Lead ($ per pound) | 0.67 | 0.89 | -25 | % | 0.80 | 0.97 | -18 | % | ||||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound) | 0.50 | 0.72 | -31 | % | 0.60 | 0.89 | -33 | % | ||||||||
* Silver recovery includes silver recovered in lead concentrate and silver recovered in zinc concentrate.
** Silver in zinc concentrate is subjected to higher smelter and refining charges which lowers the net silver selling price.
+ Alternative Performance (Non-IFRS) measures, see section 13 for reconciliation
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 10 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Fiscal 2020 vs. Fiscal 2019
In Fiscal 2020, the total ore mined at the GC Mine was 287,633 tonnes, an increase of 1% or 3,415 tonnes, compared to 284,218 tonnes in Fiscal 2019, while ore milled was 290,610 tonnes, an increase of 1% or 1,615 tonnes, compared to 288,995 tonnes in Fiscal 2019.
Average head grades of ore processed at the GC Mine were 97 g/t for silver, 1.9% for lead, and 3.3% for zinc compared to 86 g/t for silver, 1.5% for lead, and 3.0% for zinc in the prior year. Recovery rates for ore processed at the GC Mine were 77.4% for silver, 89.3% for lead, and 86.0% for zinc, compared to 78.4% for silver, 90.4% for lead, and 84.9% for zinc in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the GC Mine sold 699,000 ounces of silver, 10.9 million pounds of lead, and 18.1 million pounds of zinc, up 12%, 26%, and 13%, respectively, compared to 626,000 ounces of silver, 8.7 million pounds of lead, and 16.1 million pounds of zinc in Fiscal 2019.
Total mining cost and cash mining cost at the GC Mine in Fiscal 2020 were $46.40 and $38.06 per tonne, respectively, a slight increase of 1% compared to $46.04 and $37.73 per tonne, respectively, in Fiscal 2019. Total milling cost and cash milling cost per tonne at the GC Mine were $15.52 and $13.85, respectively, down 9% and 4%, compared to $17.01 and $14.39, respectively, in Fiscal 2019.
Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne of ore processed at the GC Mine in Fiscal 2020 was $51.91, a slight decrease compared to $52.12 in Fiscal 2019. All-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed was $69.33, up 9%, compared to $63.59 in Fiscal 2019.The increase was mainly due to an increase of $1.3 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the GC Mine, was negative $7.65 compared to negative $12.97 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to a decrease of $2.9 million in byproduct credits resulting from a decrease of 18% and 33%, respectively, in the net realized selling prices for lead and zinc, offset by an increase of 26% and 13%, respectively, in lead and zinc sold.
All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, at the GC Mine in Fiscal 2020 was $0.77 compared to negative $6.28 in the prior year. The increase was mainly due to i) the increase in cash cost per ounce of silver as discussed above, ii) an increase of $0.8 million in general and administrative expenses, and iii) an increase of $1.3 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Fiscal 2020, approximately 22,513 metres or $1.0 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Fiscal 2019 – 24,727 metres or $1.3 million) and 19,315 metres or $4.6 million worth of tunnelling (Fiscal 2019 – 19,844 metres or $5.2 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the GC Mine. In addition, approximately 3,327 metres or $2.4 million of horizontal tunnels, raises, ramps, and declines (Fiscal 2019 – 1,374 metres or $1.0 million) were completed and capitalized.
Q4 Fiscal 2020 vs. Q4 Fiscal 2019
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, a total of 37,216 tonnes of ore were mined and 33,243 tonnes were milled at the GC Mine, down 26% and 37%, respectively, compared to 50,368 tonnes mined and 52,865 tonnes milled in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Average head grades of ore milled were 94 g/t for silver, 1.8% for lead, and 3.5% for zinc compared to 101 g/t for silver, 1.8% for lead, and 3.3% for zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Metals sold were approximately 89,000 ounces of silver, 1.3 million pounds of lead, and 2.2 million pounds of zinc, down 49%, 44%, and 55%, respectively, compared to 173,000 ounces of silver, 2.4 million pounds of lead, and 4.9 million pounds of zinc in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
The cash mining cost at the GC Mine was $25.58 per tonne, down 37% compared to $40.58 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in tunneling expensed as mining preparation costs. The cash milling cost was $16.36 per tonne, down 12% compared to $18.52 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Correspondingly, the cash production cost per tonne decreased by 29% to $41.94 from
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 11 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
$59.10 in Q4 Fiscal 2019, while the all-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed increased by 22% to $88.18 from $72.11 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase in all-in sustaining production cost was mainly due to less production output resulting in a higher per tonne fixed cost allocation.
Cash cost per ounce of silver and all-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by product credits, at the GC Mine, in Q4 Fiscal 2020, were negative $10.03 and $8.31, respectively, compared to negative $10.23 and negative $4.97 in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to i) a decrease of $3.5 million in by-product credits, ii) an increase of $0.5 million in general and administrative expenses, and iii) an increase of $0.6 million in sustaining capital expenditures.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, approximately 2,200 metres or $0.1 million worth of underground diamond drilling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 2,864 metres or $0.3 million) and 353 metres or $0.1 million of tunnelling (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 3,366 metres or $0.9 million) were completed and expensed as mining preparation costs at the GC Mine. In addition, approximately 1,851 metres or $1.4 million of horizontal tunnels, raise, and declines (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – 262 metres or $0.2 million) were completed and capitalized.
(iii) BYP Mine
The BYP Mine was placed on care and maintenance in August 2014 due to required capital upgrades to sustain ongoing production and the market environment. The Company is carrying out activities to apply for a new mining license, but the process has taken longer than expected. No guarantee can be given that the new mining licenses for the BYP Mine will be issued, or if they are issued, that they will be issued under reasonable operational and/or financial terms, or in a timely manner, or that the Company will be in a position to comply with all conditions that are imposed. An updated National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the BYP Mine, with an effective date of April 30, 2019, was completed by RPM Global Asia Limited and filed under the Company’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.
(iv) XHP Project
Activities at the XHP project, a development stage project, were suspended in Fiscal 2014. In April 2019, Henan Found, the Company’s 77.5% owned subsidiary, entered into a share transfer agreement (the “Agreement”) with an arm’s length private Chinese company to dispose of the XHP project. Pursuant to the Agreement, Henan Found sold its 100% equity interest in SX Gold, the holding company of the XHP project, for $7.3 million (RMB ¥50 million), and forgave the amount of $1.1 million (RMB ¥7.5 million) SX Gold owes to Henan Found. The transaction completed and a gain of $1.5 million was recognized in Q1 Fiscal 2020. As of the date of this MD&A, Henan Found has received partial payments of $6.1 million (RMB ¥42.5 million) for the sale.
(c) Comparison of Fiscal 2020 Results with Fiscal 2020 Guidance
The following table provides a comparison of Fiscal 2020 results to the Fiscal 2020 production guidance provided in February 2019:
| Ying Mining District | GC Mine | Consolidated | ||||
|
Actual |
Guidance |
Actual |
Guidance |
Actual |
Guidance | |
| Ore milled (tonne) |
601,605 |
630,000 |
290,610 |
270,000 |
892,215 |
900,000 |
| Head Grades | ||||||
| Silver (gram/tonne) |
309 |
290 |
97 |
96 |
||
| Lead (%) |
4.6 |
4.3 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
||
| Zinc (%) |
0.9 |
0.9 |
3.3 |
3.1 |
||
| Metal Production* | ||||||
| Silver ('000 Oz) |
5,592 |
5,500 |
699 |
600 |
6,291 |
6,100 |
| Lead ( million pounds) |
56.4 |
56.2 |
10.9 |
8.9 |
67.4 |
65.1 |
| Zinc (million pounds) |
7.3 |
6.3 |
18.2 |
15.5 |
25.6 |
21.8 |
| Costs | ||||||
| Cash production cost ($/tonne of ore) |
77.08 |
78.20 |
51.91 |
56.70 |
68.91 |
72.00 |
| All-in sustaining production cost ($/tonne of ore) |
132.52 |
130.20 |
69.33 |
77.40 |
125.29 |
125.50 |
| *Metal production is estimated based on the head grades of ore processed and metal recoveries. | ||||||
On consolidated basis, ore production was slightly below the annual guidance due to the interruption
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 12 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
arising from COVID-19 in Q4 Fiscal 2020. However, silver, lead, and zinc production surpassed the annual guidance by 3%, 3%, and 17% respectively. The cash production cost per tonne of ore processed was 4% below the annual guidance while the all-in sustaining production cost per tonne was in line with the annual guidance.
At the Ying Mining District, silver and zinc production surpassed the annual guidance by 2% and 16%, respectively, while lead production was in line with the annual guidance. The higher silver production was mainly due to the increase in head grades offset by lower ore production achieved, and higher zinc production was mainly due to an improvement in recovery rates. The cash production cost per tonne of ore processed was 1% below the annual guidance, while the all-in sustaining production cost was 2% over the annual guidance.
At the GC Mine, silver, lead and zinc production surpassed the annual guidance by 16%, 23% and 18%, respectively, due to an increase of 8% in ore production and an improvement in head grades. Per tonne cash production cost and all-in sustaining production cost were 8% and 10% lower than the annual guidance.
| 5. | Outlook |
(a) Fiscal 2021 Production and Cash Cost Guidance
The Company reiterates its Fiscal 2021 production guidance previously announced in the Company’s news release dated February 6, 2020. The Company continues to expect production of approximately 930,000 -970,000 tonnes of ore, yielding 6.2 million to 6.5 million ounces of silver, 66.1 million to 68.5 million pounds of lead, and 24.5 million to 26.7 million pounds of zinc. Fiscal 2021 production guidance represents an increase of approximately 2% to 7% in silver production, 2% to 5% in lead production, and 12% to 22% in zinc production compared to the prior year’s guidance (Fiscal 2020 Guidance). However, the Company may reduce or defer certain discretionary capital expenditures as a cost-saving measure.
The following summarizes the Company’s production and cash cost guidance in Fiscal 2021.
|
Ore processed |
Silver |
Lead |
Zinc | |
|
(tonnes) |
(g/t) |
(%) |
(%) | |
| Ying Mining District |
640,000 - 660,000 |
292 |
4.3 |
0.9 |
| GC Mine |
290,000 - 310,000 |
96 |
1.7 |
3.3 |
| Consolidated |
930,000 - 970,000 |
|
Silver |
Lead |
Zinc |
Cash cost* |
AISC* | |
|
(Moz) |
(Mlbs) |
(Mlbs) |
($/t) |
($/t) | |
| Ying Mining District |
5.6 - 5.8 |
56.6 - 58.0 |
7.0 - 8.0 |
74.7 - 82.5 |
133.5 - 140.5 |
| GC Mine |
0.6 - 0.7 |
9.5 - 10.5 |
17.5 - 18.7 |
52.2 - 57.5 |
78.5 - 82.9 |
| Consolidated |
6.2 - 6.5 |
66.1 - 68.5 |
24.5 - 26.7 |
66.6-73.6 |
122.6 - 135.5 |
(b) Exploration
The Company intends to carry out 105,000 metres (Ying: 79,300 m and GC: 25700 m) of diamond drilling for in-fill drilling to upgrade resource category and drill along strike, down-dip, up-dip and sideway to expand resource base. There are signs of gold mineralization potential along some of the sub-horizontal structures that were overprinted by the silver veins currently being mined at the Ying Mining District and the Company plans to carry out additional drilling to test these sub-horizontal structures. .
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 13 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| 6. | Investment in New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) |
New Pacific Metals Corp. (“NUAG”) is a Canadian public company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (symbol: NUAG). NUAG is a related party of the Company by way of two common directors and one officer, and the Company accounts for its investment in NUAG using the equity method as it is able to exercise significant influence over the financial and operating policies of NUAG.
On May 22, 2019, the Company exercised its warrants to acquire 1,500,000 common shares of NUAG for a total cost of $2.3 million. Pan American Silver Corp. also exercised its warrants to acquire 8,000,000 common shares of NUAG on the same day. As a result of the exercise of these warrants, the Company’s ownership in NUAG was diluted from 29.8% to 28.9% and a dilution gain of $0.7 million was recorded along with the reclassification of gain of $21 from other comprehensive income to net income.
On October 25, 2019, the Company participated in an offering of common shares of NUAG underwritten by BMO Capital Markets and acquired an additional 1,247,606 common shares of NUAG for a cost of $3.8 million.
During the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company also acquired additional 502,600 common shares of NUAG from the public market (year ended March 31, 2019 – 65,400) for a total cost of $0.9 million (year ended March 31, 2019 - $0.1 million).
As at March 31, 2020, the Company owned 42,596,506 common shares of NUAG (March 31, 2019 –39,346,300), representing an ownership interest of 28.8% (March 31, 2019 – 29.6%). The summary of the investment in NUAG common shares and its market value as at the respective balance sheet dates are as follows:
| Value of NUAG's | ||||||||
| Number of | common shares per | |||||||
| shares | Amount | quoted market price | ||||||
| Balance April 1, 2018 | 39,280,900 | $ | 38,001 | $ | 50,266 | |||
| Purchase from open market | 65,400 | 107 | ||||||
| Share of net loss | (330 | ) | ||||||
| Share of other comprehensive income | 398 | |||||||
| Impairment recovery | 1,899 | |||||||
| Foreign exchange impact | (1,372 | ) | ||||||
| Balance March 31, 2019 | 39,346,300 | $ | 38,703 | $ | 69,783 | |||
| Purchase from open market | 502,600 | 861 | ||||||
| Exercise of warrants | 1,500,000 | 2,349 | ||||||
| Participation in public offering | 1,247,606 | 3,820 | ||||||
| Share of net loss | (1,276 | ) | ||||||
| Share of other comprehensive income | 1,077 | |||||||
| Dilution gain | 723 | |||||||
| Disposal of common shares held by the associate | 1,127 | |||||||
| Foreign exchange impact | (2,829 | ) | ||||||
| Balance March 31, 2020 | 42,596,506 | $ | 44,555 | $ | 148,624 |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 14 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Summarized financial information for the Company's investment in NUAG on a 100% basis is as follows:
| Years ended March 31, | ||||||
| 2020 | (1) | 2019 | (1) | |||
| Income from investments | $ | 494 | $ | 576 | ||
| General and administrative expense | (3,824 | ) | (2,286 | ) | ||
| Foreign exchange gain | 669 | 542 | ||||
| Impairment charge | (586 | ) | - | |||
| Other income | - | 7 | ||||
| Net loss of associate | $ | (3,247 | ) | $ | (1,161 | ) |
| Adjustments to net loss of associate | (1,170 | ) | 23 | |||
| Net loss of associate qualified for pick-up | $ | (4,417 | ) | $ | (1,138 | ) |
| Company's share of net loss | $ | (1,276 | ) | $ | (330 | ) |
| March 31, 2020(1) | March 31, 2019(1) | |||||
| Current assets | $ | 29,012 | $ | 17,233 | ||
| Non-current assets | 74,989 | 62,568 | ||||
| Total assets | $ | 104,001 | $ | 79,801 | ||
| Current liabilities | 1,409 | 675 | ||||
| Long-term liabilities | - | 197 | ||||
| Total liabilities | 1,409 | 872 | ||||
| Net assets | $ | 102,592 | $ | 78,929 | ||
| Company's share of net assets of associate | $ | 29,575 | $ | 23,371 | ||
(1)NUAG's fiscal year-end is on June 30. NUAG's quarterly financial results were used to compile the financial information that matched with the Company's year-end on March 31.
| 7. | Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results |
| (a) Selected Annual Information |
| Fiscal 2020 | Fiscal 2019 | Fiscal 2018 | |||||||
| Sales | $ | 158,829 | $ | 170,519 | $ | 170,039 | |||
| Income from mine operations | 59,374 | 70,932 | 75,077 | ||||||
| Expenses and foreign exchange | (9,412 | ) | (10,037 | ) | (9,508 | ) | |||
| Impairment reversal | - | 9,178 | 4,714 | ||||||
| Dilution gain on investment in associate | 723 | - | 822 | ||||||
| Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties | 1,477 | - | 4,320 | ||||||
| Finance item | 1,950 | 2,845 | 2,390 | ||||||
| Net income | 45,203 | 52,047 | 58,896 | ||||||
| Net income attributable to the equity holders of the | |||||||||
| Company | 34,274 | 39,724 | 46,994 | ||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.28 | ||||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.27 | ||||||
| Cash dividend declared | 4,287 | 4,208 | 3,362 | ||||||
| Cash dividend declared per share | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.020 | ||||||
| Total Assets | 512,760 | 499,076 | 476,894 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 73,788 | 85,895 | 78,717 |
Financial results including sales, gross profit, net income, basic earnings per share, and diluted earnings per share are heavily influenced by changes in commodity prices, particularly, silver and lead prices. Prior years’ financial information was reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. The reclassification has no impact on the Company’s financial position and financial performance.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 15 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
(b) Financial Results – Fiscal 2020 compared to Fiscal 2019
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of the Company in Fiscal 2020 was $34.3 million or $0.20 per share, compared to $39.7 million or $0.23 per share in Fiscal 2019. Excluding the impairment reversal of $9.2 million recorded in Fiscal 2019, the net income attributable to equity shareholders in Fiscal 2020 was up 6% compared to the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders of $32.2 million, or $0.19 per share, in Fiscal 2019.
In Fiscal 2020, the Company’s consolidated financial results were mainly impacted by i) operations in China being suspended for an extra month in Q4 Fiscal 2020 due to COVID-19; ii) an increase of 1% and 12% in lead and zinc sold, offset by a 2% decrease in silver sold, respectively; iii) an increase of 7% in the realized selling price for silver, offset by a decrease of 19% and 32% in the realized selling prices for lead and zinc, respectively; and iv) an increase of $2.7 million in foreign exchange gain arising from the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar.
Revenue in Fiscal 2020 was $158.8 million, down $11.7 million compared to $170.5 million in Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in the realized selling prices for lead and zinc. Revenue from silver and gold was $84.9 million and $3.9 million, up 5% and 7%, respectively, compared to $80.7 million and $3.6 million in Fiscal 2019, while revenue from lead and zinc was $52.0 million and $15.8 million, down 19% and 24%, compared to $64.1 and 20.7 million in Fiscal 2019.
Fluctuation in sales revenue is mainly dependent on metal sales and realized metal prices. The net realized selling price is calculated using the Shanghai Metal Exchange (“SME”) price, less smelter charges, recovery, and value added tax (“VAT”). The metal prices quoted on the SME, excluding gold, include VAT. Effective April 1, 2019, the rate of VAT on purchase and sales of goods applicable to the Company was lowered to 13% from 16%. The following table is a comparison among the Company’s net realized prices, prices quoted on SME, and prices quoted on London Metal Exchange (“LME”):
| Silver (in US$/ounce) | Gold (in US$/ounce) | Lead (in US$/pound) | Zinc (in US$/pound) | |||||||||||||
| F2020 | F2019 | F2020 | F2019 | F2020 | F2019 | F2020 | F2019 | |||||||||
| Net realized selling prices | $ | 13.56 | $ | 12.62 | $ | 1,185 | $ | 1,041 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.99 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.91 |
| SME | $ | 17.64 | $ | 16.57 | $ | 1,472 | $ | 1,269 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.23 | $ | 1.52 |
| LME | $ | 16.53 | $ | 15.80 | $ | 1,468 | $ | 1,262 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.24 |
Production costs expensed in Fiscal 2020 were $62.0 million, a slight decrease compared to $62.5 million in Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to less metals sold and a slight improvement in per tonne production costs. The production costs expensed represent approximately 900,000 tonnes of ore processed and expensed at a cost of $68.91 per tonne, compared to approximately 893,000 tonnes at $69.92 per tonne in Fiscal 2019.
Mineral resource taxes in Fiscal 2020 were $4.5 million, compared to $4.9 million in Fiscal 2019, and the decrease was mainly due to lower revenue achieved.
Government fees and other taxes in Fiscal 2020 were $2.1 million, compared to $2.7 million in Fiscal 2019. Government fees and other taxes are comprised of environmental protection fees, surtaxes on VAT, land usage levies, stamp duties and other miscellaneous levies, duties and taxes imposed by the state and local Chinese governments.
Income from mine operations in Fiscal 2020 was $59.4 million, or 37% of revenue, compared to $70.9 million or 42% of revenue in Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in the realized selling prices for lead and zinc. Income from mine operations at the Ying Mining District was $54.1 million or 41% of revenue, compared to $65.2 million or 46% of revenue in Fiscal 2019. Income from mine operations at the GC Mine was $5.7 million or 21% of revenue, compared to $7.5 million or 26% of revenue in Fiscal 2019.
General and administrative expenses in Fiscal 2020 were $20.2 million, an increase of $1.1 million or 6% compared to $19.0 million in Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $0.7 million
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 16 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
in share-based compensation expenses and an increase of $0.7 million in amortization and depreciation expenses. General and administrative expenses include corporate administrative expenses of $10.1 million (Fiscal 2019 - $9.5 million) and mine administrative expenses of $10.1 million (Fiscal 2019 - $9.6 million). Items included in general and administrative expenses are as follows:
| Year ended March 31, 2020 | Year ended March 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate | Mines | Total | Corporate | Mines | Total | ||||||||||
| Amortization and depreciation | $ | 447 | $ | 1,511 | $ | 1,958 | $ | 162 | $ | 1,091 | $ | 1,253 | |||
| Office and administrative expenses | 2,304 | 2,881 | 5,185 | 2,741 | 3,160 | 5,901 | |||||||||
| Professional Fees | 562 | 481 | 1,043 | 440 | 426 | 866 | |||||||||
| Salaries and benefits | 4,245 | 5,183 | 9,428 | 4,319 | 4,889 | 9,208 | |||||||||
| Share-based compensation | 2,536 | - | 2,536 | 1,813 | - | 1,813 | |||||||||
| $ | 10,094 | $ | 10,056 | $ | 20,150 | $ | 9,475 | $ | 9,566 | $ | 19,041 | ||||
Property evaluation and business development expenses in Fiscal 2020 were $0.7 million, compared to $0.4 million in Fiscal 2019. Property evaluation and business development expenses were previously included as a part of general and administrative expenses, but was reclassified and presented separately to track the expenditures the Company incurred in project evaluation and business development activities.
Foreign exchange gain in Fiscal 2020 was $4.1 million compared to $1.4 million in Fiscal 2019. The foreign exchange gain is mainly driven by the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar.
Loss on disposal of plant and equipment in Fiscal 2020 was $0.5 million compared to $0.4 million in Fiscal 2019. The loss was related to the disposal of obsolete equipment.
Share of loss in an associate in Fiscal 2020 was $1.3 million, compared to $0.3 million in Fiscal 2019. Share of loss in an associate represents the Company’s equity pickup in NUAG.
Dilution gain on investment in an associate in Fiscal 2020 was $0.7 million (Fiscal 2019 - $nil). In Fiscal 2020, the Company’s equity interest in NUAG was diluted to 28.8% from 29.8%.
Impairment reversal of investment in associate in Fiscal 2020 was $nil, compared to $1.9 million in Fiscal 2019, which related to the Company’s investment in NUAG.
Impairment reversal of mineral rights and properties in Fiscal 2020 was $nil compared to $7.3 million in Fiscal 2019. Non-current assets are tested for impairment, or reversal of previous impairment charges, when events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, or previous impairment charges against assets are recoverable. Based on the Company’s assessment with respect to possible indicators, neither impairment nor reversal of previous impairment to its mineral rights and properties was required as of March 31, 2020. In Fiscal 2019, the carrying amount of the XHP project was remeasured to its recoverable amount, being its fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”). XHP project was disposed to a third party in Fiscal 2020, and a gain of $1.5 million was recorded.
Finance income in Fiscal 2020 was $4.0 million compared to $3.5 million in Fiscal 2019. The Company invests in short-term investments which include term deposits, money market instrument, and bonds.
Finance costs in Fiscal 2020 were $2.1 million compared to $0.6 million in Fiscal 2019. Items included in finance costs are summarized below:
| Year ended March 31, | |||||
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Interest on bank loan | $ | 45 | $ | 152 | |
| Interest on lease obligation | 112 | - | |||
| Loss on disposal of bonds | 1,494 | - | |||
| Unwinding of discount of envionmental rehabilitation provision | 422 | 479 | |||
| $ | 2,073 | $ | 631 | ||
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 17 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Income tax expenses in Fiscal 2020 were $8.9 million, compared to $20.9 million in Fiscal 2019. The income tax expense recorded in Fiscal 2020 included a current income tax expense of $5.6 million (Fiscal 2019 - $17.8 million) and a deferred income tax expense of $3.3 million (Fiscal 2019 - $3.1 million). The current income tax included $2.8 million of withholding tax (Fiscal 2019 - $5.2 million), which was paid at a rate of 10% on dividends and interest distributed out of China. The decrease in income tax expenses was mainly due to the tax benefit realized arising from the disposal of the XHP project and less income from mine operations.
| 8. | Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2020 Financial Results |
(a) Summary of Quarterly Results
The tables below set out selected quarterly results for the past eight quarters:
| Mar 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Sep 30, 2019 | Jun 30, 2019 | |||||||||
| Sales | $ | 18,859 | $ | 44,508 | $ | 49,886 | $ | 45,576 | ||||
| Income from mine operations | 3,204 | 15,769 | 22,668 | 17,732 | ||||||||
| Expenses and foreign exchange | 1,338 | (4,326 | ) | (2,550 | ) | (3,873 | ) | |||||
| Dilution gain on investment in associate | - | - | - | 723 | ||||||||
| Gain on disposal of mineral rights and properties | - | - | - | 1,477 | ||||||||
| Finance items | (474 | ) | 988 | 682 | 754 | |||||||
| Net income | 3,525 | 8,716 | 15,661 | 17,301 | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to equity holders of the Company | 3,163 | 6,283 | 12,221 | 12,607 | ||||||||
| Basic earnings per share | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||
| Cash dividend declared | - | 2,162 | 2,125 | |||||||||
| Cash dividend declared per share | - | 0.0125 | 0.0125 | |||||||||
| Mar 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Sep 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2018 | |||||||||
| Sales | $ | 34,952 | $ | 42,351 | $ | 48,091 | $ | 45,125 | ||||
| Income from mine operations | 13,562 | 15,967 | 19,485 | 21,919 | ||||||||
| Expenses and foreign exchange | (4,029 | ) | (796 | ) | (3,308 | ) | (1,905 | ) | ||||
| Impairment reversal | 9,178 | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Dilution gain on investment in associate | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| Finance items | 706 | 815 | 663 | 661 | ||||||||
| Net income | 15,941 | 10,853 | 11,077 | 14,176 | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to equity holders of the Company | 12,107 | 8,660 | 8,037 | 10,920 | ||||||||
| Basic earnings per share | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 | ||||||||
| Diluted earnings per share | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | ||||||||
| Cash dividend declared | - | 2,112 | - | 2,096 | ||||||||
| Cash dividend declared per share | - | 0.0125 | - | 0.0125 |
Financial results including sales, income from mine operations, net income, basic earnings per share, and diluted earnings per share are heavily influenced by changes in commodity prices, particularly, the silver price. Prior quarters’ financial information was reclassified to conform with the current quarter’s presentation. The reclassification has no impact on the Company’s financial position and financial performance.
(b) Financial Results – Q4 Fiscal 2020 compared to Q4 Fiscal 2019
Net income attributable to equity shareholders of the Company in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $3.2 million, or $0.02 per share, compared to $12.1 million, or $0.07 per share in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Excluding the impairment reversal of $9.2 million recorded in Q4 Fiscal 2019, the adjusted net income attributable to equity shareholders was $4.6 million or $0.03 per share in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Compared to the prior year quarter, the Company’s consolidated financial results in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were mainly impacted by the following: i) operations in China being suspended for an extra month due to COVID-19; ii) a decrease of 3%, 26%, and 32% in the net realized selling price of silver, lead and zinc; and iii) a foreign exchange gain of $5.4 million recorded arising from the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 18 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $18.9 million, down 46%, compared to $35.0 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to lower production and the decrease in net realized selling prices. Revenue from silver and gold was $9.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, compared to $16.7 million and $0.8 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019, while revenue from base metals was $8.4 million, compared to $17.5 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Production costs expensed in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $8.3 million, compared to $13.0 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to less metal sold in the current quarter. The production costs expensed in Q4 Fiscal 2019 represent approximately 121,000 tonnes of ore processed and expensed at a cost of $68.93 per tonne, compared to 174,000 tonnes at a cost of $74.80 per tonne in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Income from mine operations in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $3.2 million or 17% of revenue, compared to $13.6 million or 39% of revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in metal sold and the realized selling prices. Income from mine operations at the Ying Mining District was $3.1 million or 20% of revenue, compared to $12.2 million or 44% of revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Income from mine operations at the GC Mine was $0.2 million or 7% of revenue, compared to $1.7 million or 24% of revenue in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
General and administrative expenses in Q4 Fiscal were $6.0 million, an increase of $1.0 million or 22%, compared to $4.9 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $1.1 million in mines’ general and administrative expenses as mining and milling labour and administrative costs during the suspension period in February 2020 were not charged to production costs. General and administrative expenses include corporate administrative expenses of $2.6 million (Q4 Fiscal 2019 -$2.6 million) and mines’ administrative expense of $3.4 million (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $2.3 million). Items included in general and administrative expenses are as follows:
| Three months ended March 31, 2020 | Three months ended March 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Corporate | Mines | Total | Corporate | Mines | Total | ||||||||||
| Amortization and depreciation | $ | 122 | $ | 713 | $ | 835 | $ | 43 | $ | 297 | $ | 340 | |||
| Office and administrative expenses | 517 | 816 | 1,333 | 663 | 645 | 1,308 | |||||||||
| Professional Fees | 229 | 69 | 298 | 294 | 65 | 359 | |||||||||
| Salaries and benefits | 1,011 | 1,770 | 2,781 | 1,180 | 1,270 | 2,450 | |||||||||
| Share-based compensation | 711 | - | 711 | 443 | - | 443 | |||||||||
| $ | 2,590 | $ | 3,368 | $ | 5,958 | $ | 2,623 | $ | 2,277 | $ | 4,900 | ||||
Property evaluation and business development expenses in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $0.3 million, compared to $0.1 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
Foreign exchange gain in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $5.4 million, compared to a loss of $1.0 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The foreign exchange gain or loss is mainly driven by the fluctuation of the RMB and US dollar against the functional currency of the entities.
Share of loss in an associate in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $0.4 million (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $0.1 million), representing the Company’s equity pickup in NUAG.
Impairment reversal of investment in associate in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $nil, compared to $1.9 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019, which related to the Company’s investment in NUAG.
Impairment reversal of mineral rights and properties in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $nil, compared to $7.3 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. In Q4 Fiscal 2019, the carrying amount of the XHP project was remeasured to its recoverable amount, being its fair value less costs of disposal (“FVLCD”). In Fiscal 2020, XHP project was disposed to a third party and a gain of $1.5 million was recorded.
Finance income in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $1.2 million compared to $0.9 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 19 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Finance costs in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $1.6 million compared to $0.2 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. Items included in finance costs are summarized below:
| Three months ended March 31, | |||||
| Finance costs | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| Interest on bank loan | $ | - | $ | 48 | |
| Interest on lease obligation | 28 | - | |||
| Loss on disposal of bonds | 1,494 | - | |||
| Unwinding of discount of environmental rehabilitation provision | 106 | 120 | |||
| $ | 1,628 | $ | 168 | ||
Income tax expenses in Q4 Fiscal 2020 were $0.5 million, compared to $3.5 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019.The decrease was mainly due to less income from mine operations. The income tax expenses recorded in Q4 Fiscal 2020 included a current income tax expense of $0.1 million (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $2.4 million) and a deferred income tax expense of $0.4 million (Q4 Fiscal 2019 – $1.1 million).
| 9. | Liquidity and Capital Resources |
| As at | March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | Changes | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | $ | (1,664 | ) | ||
| Short-term investment | 76,742 | 47,836 | 28,906 | ||||||
| $ | 142,519 | $ | 115,277 | $ | 27,242 | ||||
| Working capital | $ | 130,351 | $ | 96,988 | $ | 33,363 |
| Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | Changes | 2020 | 2019 | Changes | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flow | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 6,278 | $ | 8,344 | $ | (2,066 | ) | $ | 77,246 | $ | 70,351 | $ | 6,895 | ||||||
|
Cash provided (used) in investing activities |
2,936 | (3,456 | ) | 6,392 | (70,790 | ) | (32,033 | ) | (38,757 | ) | |||||||||
|
Cash provided (used) in financing activities |
(563 | ) | (6,113 | ) | 5,550 | (2,931 | ) | (15,198 | ) | 12,267 | |||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 8,651 | (1,225 | ) | 9,876 | 3,525 | 23,120 | (19,595 | ) | |||||||||||
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (4,768 | ) | 528 | (5,296 | ) | (5,189 | ) | (4,878 | ) | (311 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period | 61,894 | 68,138 | (6,244 | ) | 67,441 | 49,199 | 18,242 | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | $ | (1,664 | ) | $ | 65,777 | $ | 67,441 | $ | (1,664 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as at March 31, 2020 were $142.5 million, an increase of $27.2 million or 24%, compared to $115.3 million as at March 31, 2019. The increase was mainly due to the increase in cash flow from operations.
Working capital as at March 31, 2020 was $130.4 million, an increase of $33.4 million or 34%, compared to $97.0 million as at March 31, 2019.
Cash flow provided by operating activities in Fiscal 2020 was $77.2 million, up $6.9 million or 10% compared to $70.4 million in Fiscal 2019. The increase was due to
-
$75.4 million cash flow from operating activities before changes in non-cash operating working capital movement, up $6.0 million or 8%, compared to $69.7 million in Fiscal 2019; and offset by
-
$1.8 million cash flow from changes of non-cash working capital movement, compared to $0.7 million in Fiscal 2019.
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, cash flow provided by operating activities was $6.3 million compared to $8.3 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019. The decrease was mainly due to less operating earnings in Q4 Fiscal 2020. Before changes in non-cash operating working capital, cash flows provided by operating activities in the current quarter were $9.2 million, a decrease of $0.8 million, compared to $10.0 million in the prior year quarter.
Cash flow used in investing activities in Fiscal 2020 was $70.8 million, compared to $32.0 million in
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 20 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Fiscal 2019, and comprised primarily of:
-
$27.1 million payment for capitalized mineral exploration and development expenditures (Fiscal 2019 - $24.2 million);
-
$0.8 million payment for a mineral right fee (Fiscal 2019 - $3.8 million);
-
$7.4 million payment for the acquisition of plant and equipment (Fiscal 2019 - $6.3 million);
-
$7.0 million investment in associate (Fiscal 2019 - $0.1 million);
-
$1.7 million payment for reclamation deposits (Fiscal 2019 - $2.6 million);
-
$7.9 million for the acquisition of other investments (Fiscal 2019 - $1.0 million); and
-
$33.6 million payment for net purchase of short-term investments; offset by
-
$6.1 million cash received from the disposal of XHP project (Fiscal 2019 - $nil); and
-
$8.5 million proceeds from disposal of other investments (Fiscal 2019 - $nil).
In Q4 Fiscal 2020, cash flow from investing activities was $2.9 million, compared to $3.5 million cash flows used in investing activities in Q4 Fiscal 2019, and comprised primarily of:
-
$6.0 million payment for capitalized mineral exploration and development expenditure (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $4.8 million);
-
$nil payment for a mineral right fee (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $3.8 million),
-
$1.2 million for the acquisition of plant and equipment (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $1.9 million),
-
$0.2 million payment for reclamation deposits (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $2.3 million), and
-
$4.0 million for the acquisition of other investments (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $1.0 million), offset by
-
$2.3 million proceeds from disposal of other investments (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $nil); and
-
$11.9 million proceeds from the net redemption of short-term investments (Fiscal 2019 – $10.6 million).
Cash flow used in financing activities in Fiscal 2020 was $2.9 million, compared to $15.2 million in Fiscal 2019, and comprised mostly of:
-
$4.4 million repayment to a bank loan (Fiscal 2019 - $4.5 million proceeds received);
-
$0.5 million lease payment (Fiscal 2019 - $nil);
-
$3.3 million in distributions to non-controlling shareholders (Fiscal 2019 - $13.3 million);
-
$4.3 million of dividends distributed to equity shareholders of the Company (Fiscal 2019 - $4.2 million);
-
$nil for the acquisition of non-controlling interests (Fiscal 2019 - $1.1 million); offset by
-
$1.5 million net repayment received from the non-controlling shareholder of Henan Found (Fiscal 2019 - $3.0 million loaned to the non-controlling shareholder); and
-
$8.0 million proceeds from the issuance of common shares of the Company arising from stock options exercised (Fiscal 2019 - $1.9 million).
Cash flow used in financing activities in Q4 Fiscal 2020 was $0.6 million, compared to $6.1 million in Q4 Fiscal 2019, and comprised primarily of:
-
$1.4 million advance to the non-controlling shareholder of Henan Found (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $3.0 million);
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 21 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
-
$0.1 million lease payment (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $nil); offset by
-
$1.0 million proceeds from the issuance of common shares of the Company arising from stock options exercised (Q4 Fiscal 2019 - $0.2 million).
Available sources of funding
The Company does not have unlimited resources and its future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, among others, cash flow from operations. To the extent that its existing resources and the funds generated by future income are insufficient to fund the Company’s operations, the Company may need to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of current shareholders will be reduced, and such equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of the Company’s common shares. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available or that, if available, can be obtained on terms favourable to the Company and its shareholders. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may be required to delay, limit or eliminate some or all of its proposed operations. The Company believes it has sufficient capital to meet its cash needs for the next 12 months, including the cost of compliance with continuing reporting requirements.
| 10. | Financial Instruments and Related Risks |
The Company manages its exposure to financial risks, including liquidity risk, foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk in accordance with its risk management framework. The Company’s Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Company’s risk management framework and reviews the Company’s policies on an ongoing basis.
(a) Fair value
The Company classifies its fair value measurements within a fair value hierarchy, which reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements as defined in IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement (“IFRS 13”).
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value level on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy as at March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 that are not otherwise disclosed. The assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 22 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| Fair value as at March 31, 2020 | |||||||||
| Recurring measurements | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||
| Financial assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 65,777 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 65,777 | |
| Short-term investments - money market instruments | 53,430 | - | - | 53,430 | |||||
| Investments in public companies | 6,633 | - | - | 6,633 | |||||
| Investments in private company | - | - | 2,117 | 2,117 | |||||
| Fair value as at March 31, 2019 | |||||||||
| Recurring measurements | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||
| Financial assets | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 67,441 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 67,441 | |
| Short-term investments - money market instruments | 22,850 | - | - | 22,850 | |||||
| Investments in public companies | 9,253 | - | - | 9,253 | |||||
Fair value of the other financial instruments excluded from the table above approximates their carrying amount as at March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 during the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
(b) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its short-term business requirements. The Company has in place a planning and budgeting process to help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an ongoing basis and its expansion plans.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contracts that give rise to commitments for future minimum payments. The following summarizes the remaining contractual maturities of the Company’s financial liabilities.
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||||||||
| Within a year | 2-5 years | Over 5 years | Total | Total | |||||||
| Bank loan | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4,475 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 23,129 | - | - | 23,129 | 29,856 | ||||||
| Lease obligation | 567 | 1,464 | 38 | 2,069 | - | ||||||
| $ | 23,696 | $ | 1,464 | $ | 38 | $ | 25,198 | $ | 34,331 | ||
(c) Foreign exchange risk
The Company reports its financial statements in US dollars. The functional currency of the head office, Canadian subsidiaries and all intermediate holding companies is CAD and the functional currency of all Chinese subsidiaries is RMB. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk when the Company undertakes transactions and holds assets and liabilities in currencies other than its functional currencies. The Company currently does not engage in foreign exchange currency hedging. The Company's exposure to currency risk affect net income is summarized as follows:
| March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | ||||
| Financial assets denominated in U.S. Dollars | $ | 60,534 | $ | 45,912 |
As at March 31, 2020, with other variables unchanged, a 10% strengthening (weakening) of the CAD against the USD would have decreased (increased) net income by approximately $6.1 million.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 23 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
(d) Interest rate risk
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash equivalents, short term investments, and loan to a related party. As at March 31, 2020, all of its interest-bearing cash equivalents and short term investments earn interest at market rates that are fixed to maturity or at variable interest rates with terms of less than one year. The loan to the related party bears an interest rate of 4.35% per annum, which approximates the prevailing commercial lending rates in China as of March 31, 2020. The Company monitors its exposure to changes in interest rates on cash equivalents, short term investments, and loans to the related party. Due to the short term nature of these financial instruments, fluctuations in interest rates would not have a significant impact on the Company’s net income.
(e) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company is exposed to credit risk primarily associated to accounts receivable, due from related parties, cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments. The carrying amount of assets included on the balance sheet represents the maximum credit exposure.
The Company undertakes credit evaluations on counterparties as necessary, requests deposits from customers prior to delivery, and has monitoring processes intended to mitigate credit risks. There were no amounts in trade or other receivables which were past due on March 31, 2020 (at March 31, 2019 -$nil) for which no provision is recognized.
(f) Equity price risk
The Company holds certain marketable securities that will fluctuate in value as a result of trading on Canadian financial markets. As the Company’s marketable securities holdings are mainly in mining companies, the value will also fluctuate based on commodity prices. Based upon the Company’s portfolio as at March 31, 2020, a 10% increase (decrease) in the market price of the securities held, ignoring any foreign currency effects, would have resulted in an increase (decrease) to comprehensive income of approximately $663.
| 11. | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
| 12. | Transactions with Related Parties |
Related party transactions are made on terms agreed upon with the related parties. The balances with related parties are unsecured. Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere in this MD&A are as follows:
(i) Due from related parties
| Due from related parties | March 31, 2020 | March 31, 2019 | |||
| NUAG (a) | $ | 94 | $ | 33 | |
| Henan Non-ferrous (b) | 1,425 | 2,989 | |||
| $ | 1,519 | $ | 3,022 |
| (a) | The Company recovers costs for services rendered to NUAG and expenses incurred on behalf of NUAG pursuant to a services and administrative costs reallocation agreement. During the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company recovered $530 (year ended March 31, 2019 - $225), from NUAG for services rendered and expenses incurred on behalf of NUAG. The costs recovered from |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 24 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| NUAG were recorded as a direct reduction of general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income. | |
| (b) | In March 2019, Henan Found advanced a loan of $2,989 (RMB¥20 million) to Henan Non-ferrous. The loan bears an interest rate of 4.35% per annum. In December 2019, the loan, including accumulated interest, of $2,922 (RMB¥20.7 million) was repaid. |
| In January 2020, Henan Found advanced a loan of $1,426 (RMB¥10 million) to Henan Non-ferrous. The loan has a term of four months and bears an interest rate of 4.35% per annum. |
(ii) Compensation of key management personnel
The remuneration of directors and other members of key management personnel, who are those having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the entity, directly or indirectly, for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 were as follows:
| Years Ended March 31, | |||||
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||
| Directors' fees and bonus | $ | 293 | $ | 256 | |
| Salaries and bonus for key management personnel | 2,519 | 2,498 | |||
| Share-based compensation | 1,487 | 725 | |||
| $ | 4,299 | $ | 3,479 | ||
Share-based compensation was measured at grant date fair value.
| 13. | Alternative Performance (Non-IFRS) Measures |
The following alternative performance measures are used by the Company to manage and evaluate operating performance of the Company’s mines and are widely reported in the silver mining industry as benchmarks for performance, but do not have standardized meaning. Accordingly, it is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. To facilitate a better understanding of these measures, the following tables provide the reconciliation of these measures to the financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
(a) Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share
Adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share are non-IFRS measures that the Company considers to better reflect normalized earnings as it eliminates items that may be volatile from period to period, relate to positions that will settle in future periods. Certain items that become applicable in a period may be adjusted for, with the Company retroactively presenting comparable periods with an adjustment for such items and, conversely, items no longer applicable may be removed from the calculation. The Company adjusts certain items in the periods that they occurred but does not reverse or otherwise unwind the effect of such items in future periods. Neither adjusted net income nor adjusted earnings per share have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measure presented by other companies. The following table shows a reconciliation of adjusted net income and loss for three and twelve months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 to the net income for each period.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 25 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| Three months ended March 31, | Year ended March 31, | |||||||||||
| ('000s US$) | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
| Net income as reported for the period | $ | 3,525 | $ | 15,940 | $ | 45,203 | $ | 52,047 | ||||
|
Adjustment to impairment recovery of investment in associate |
- | (1,899 | ) | - | (1,899 | ) | ||||||
|
Adjustment to impairment recovery of mineral rights and properties |
- | (7,279 | ) | - | (7,279 | ) | ||||||
| Adjusted net income for the year | $ | 3,525 | $ | 6,762 | $ | 45,203 | $ | 42,869 | ||||
| Non-controlling interest as reported | 362 | 3,833 | 10,929 | 12,323 | ||||||||
|
Adjustments to non-controlling interest |
- | (1,637 | ) | (1,637 | ) | |||||||
| Adjusted non-controlling interest | 362 | 2,196 | 10,929 | 10,686 | ||||||||
| Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders | $ | 3,163 | $ | 4,566 | $ | 34,274 | $ | 32,183 | ||||
| Adjusted earnings per share attributable to the equity shareholders of the Company | ||||||||||||
| Basic adjusted earning per share | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.19 | ||||
| Diluted adjusted earning per share | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.19 | ||||
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 173,326,682 | 169,705,269 | 171,713,263 | 168,483,412 | ||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 175,381,704 | 170,645,002 | 174,079,387 | 170,386,993 | ||||||||
(b) Costs per Ounce of Silver
Cash cost and all-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits, are non-IFRS measures. The Company produces by-product metals incidentally to our silver mining activities. We have adopted the practice of calculating a performance measure with the net cost of producing an ounce of silver, our primary payable metal, after deducting revenues gained from incidental by-product production. This performance measure has been commonly used in the mining industry for many years and was developed as a relatively simple way of comparing the net production costs of the primary metal for a specific period against the prevailing market price of such metal.
Cash cost is calculated by deducting revenue from the sales of all metals other than silver and is calculated per ounce of silver sold.
AISC is an extension of the “cash cost” metric and provides a comprehensive measure of the Company’s operating performance and ability to generate cash flows. AISC has been calculated based on World Gold Council (“WGC”) guidance released in 2013 and undated in 2018. The WGC is not a regulatory organization and does not have the authority to develop accounting standards for disclosure requirements.
AISC is based on the Company’s cash costs, net of by-product sales, and further includes corporate general and administrative expense, government fee and other taxes, reclamation cost accretion, lease liability payments, and sustaining capital expenditures. Sustaining capital expenditures are those costs incurred to sustain and maintain existing assets at current productive capacity and constant planned levels of production output. Excluded are non-sustaining capital expenditures, which result in a material increase in the life of assets, materially increase resources or reserves, productive capacity, or future earning potential, or significant improvement in recovery or grade, or which do not relate to the current production activities. The Company believes that this measure represents the total sustainable costs of producing silver from current operations and provides additional information about the Company’s operational performance and ability to generate cash flows.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash cost and AISC per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 26 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| Year ended March 31, 2020 | Year ended March 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ounce and per ounce amount) | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production costs expensed as reported | A | $ | 47,236 | $ | 14,793 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 62,029 | $ | 47,496 | $ | 14,965 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 62,461 | |||||||||||
| By-product sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gold |
(3,911 | ) | - | - | - | (3,911 | ) | (3,642 | ) | - | - | - | (3,642 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Lead |
(43,312 | ) | (8,654 | ) | - | - | (51,966 | ) | (55,739 | ) | (8,372 | ) | - | - | (64,111 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Zinc |
(4,911 | ) | (10,869 | ) | - | - | (15,780 | ) | (6,305 | ) | (14,349 | ) | - | - | (20,654 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
(1,683 | ) | (617 | ) | - | - | (2,300 | ) | (1,095 | ) | (363 | ) | - | - | (1,458 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by-product sales | B | (53,817 | ) | (20,140 | ) | - | - | (73,957 | ) | (66,781 | ) | (23,084 | ) | - | - | (89,865 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Total cash cost, net of by-product credits | C=A-B | (6,581 | ) | (5,347 | ) | - | - | (11,928 | ) | (19,285 | ) | (8,119 | ) | - | - | (27,404 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
Add: Mineral resources tax |
3,718 | 822 | - | - | 4,540 | 3,993 | 871 | - | - | 4,864 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative |
6,849 | 2,738 | 469 | 10,094 | 20,150 | 5,950 | 1,969 | 1,647 | 9,475 | 19,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization included in general and administrative |
(753 | ) | (469 | ) | (289 | ) | (447 | ) | (1,958 | ) | (437 | ) | (314 | ) | (339 | ) | (162 | ) | (1,253 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Exploration and business development |
- | - | - | 679 | 679 | - | - | - | 386 | 386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Government fees and other taxes |
1,591 | 496 | 2 | 26 | 2,115 | 1,980 | 621 | 62 | 36 | 2,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclamation accretion |
366 | 24 | 32 | - | 422 | 400 | 32 | 47 | - | 479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease payment |
- | - | - | 503 | 503 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sustaining capital expenditures |
25,302 | 2,274 | - | 820 | 28,396 | 22,411 | 1,007 | - | 275 | 23,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining cost, net of by-product credits | F | 30,492 | 538 | 214 | 11,675 | 42,919 | 15,012 | (3,933 | ) | 1,417 | 10,010 | 22,505 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add: Non-sustaining capital expenditures |
6,008 | 812 | 88 | - | 6,908 | 9,766 | 495 | 609 | - | 10,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All-in cost, net of by-product credits | G | 36,500 | 1,350 | 302 | 11,675 | 49,827 | 24,778 | (3,438 | ) | 2,026 | 10,010 | 33,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Silver ounces sold ('000s) | H | 5,558 | 699 | - | - | 6,257 | 5,764 | 626 | - | - | 6,390 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits | (B+C)/H | $ | (1.18 | ) | $ | (7.65 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (1.91 | ) | $ | (3.35 | ) | $ | (12.97 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (4.29 | ) | |||||
| All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits | F/H | $ | 5.49 | $ | 0.77 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 6.86 | $ | 2.60 | $ | (6.28 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 3.52 | ||||||||||
| All-in cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits | G/H | $ | 6.57 | $ | 1.93 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 7.96 | $ | 4.30 | $ | (5.49 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 5.22 | ||||||||||
| By-product credits per ounce of silver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gold |
(0.70 | ) | - | - | - | (0.63 | ) | (0.63 | ) | - | - | - | (0.57 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Lead |
(7.79 | ) | (12.38 | ) | - | - | (8.31 | ) | (9.67 | ) | (13.37 | ) | - | - | (10.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Zinc |
(0.88 | ) | (15.55 | ) | - | - | (2.52 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (22.92 | ) | - | - | (3.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
(0.30 | ) | (0.88 | ) | - | - | (0.37 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.58 | ) | - | - | (0.23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by-product credits per ounce of silver | $ | (9.67 | ) | $ | (28.81 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (11.83 | ) | $ | (11.58 | ) | $ | (36.87 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (14.06 | ) | ||||||
| Three months ended March 31, 2020 | Three months ended March 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ounce and per ounce amount) | Ying Mining District | GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production costs expensed as reported | A | $ | 6,924 | $ | 1,420 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 8,344 | $ | 9,003 | 4,002 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 13,005 | ||||||||||||
| By-product sales | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gold |
(625 | ) | - | - | - | (625 | ) | (759 | ) | - | - | - | (759 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Lead |
(5,562 | ) | (892 | ) | - | - | (6,454 | ) | (9,318 | ) | (2,102 | ) | - | - | (11,420 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Zinc |
(452 | ) | (1,094 | ) | - | - | (1,546 | ) | (2,028 | ) | (3,501 | ) | - | - | (5,529 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
(74 | ) | (327 | ) | - | - | (401 | ) | (344 | ) | (168 | ) | - | - | (512 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by-product sales | B | (6,713 | ) | (2,313 | ) | - | - | (9,026 | ) | (12,449 | ) | (5,771 | ) | - | - | (18,220 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Total cash cost, net of by-product credits | C=A-B | 211 | (893 | ) | - | - | (682 | ) | (3,446 | ) | (1,769 | ) | - | - | (5,215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Add: Mineral resources tax |
463 | 96 | - | - | 559 | 782 | 220 | - | - | 1,002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General and administrative |
2,306 | 978 | 84 | 2,590 | 5,958 | 1,500 | 466 | 311 | 2,623 | 4,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization included in general and administrative |
(420 | ) | (228 | ) | (65 | ) | (122 | ) | (835 | ) | (111 | ) | (79 | ) | (107 | ) | (43 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Exploration and business development |
- | - | - | 274 | 274 | - | - | - | 111 | 111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Government fees and other taxes |
216 | 21 | - | 1 | 238 | 385 | 91 | 29 | - | 505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclamation accretion |
91 | 6 | 8 | - | 105 | 101 | 8 | 12 | - | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease payment |
- | - | - | 134 | 134 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sustaining capital expenditures |
5,569 | 760 | - | 52 | 6,381 | 4,531 | 202 | - | 77 | 4,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining cost, net of by-product credits | F | 8,436 | 740 | 27 | 2,929 | 12,132 | 3,742 | (860 | ) | 245 | 2,768 | 5,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add: Non-sustaining capital expenditures |
649 | 115 | 1 | - | 765 | 5,831 | 90 | 127 | - | 6,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All-in cost, net of by-product credits | G | 9,085 | 855 | 28 | 2,929 | 12,897 | 9,573 | (770 | ) | 372 | 2,768 | 11,942 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Silver ounces sold ('000s) | H | 711 | 89 | - | - | 800 | 1,141 | 173 | - | - | 1,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits | (B+C)/H | $ | 0.30 | $ | (10.03 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (0.85 | ) | $ | (3.02 | ) | (10.23 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (3.97 | ) | |||||||
| All-in sustaining cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits | F/H | $ | 11.86 | $ | 8.31 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 15.17 | $ | 3.28 | (4.97 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 4.49 | |||||||||||
| All-in cost per ounce of silver, net of by-product credits | G/H | $ | 12.78 | $ | 9.61 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 16.12 | $ | 8.39 | (4.45 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 9.09 | |||||||||||
| By-product credits per ounce of silver | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gold |
(0.88 | ) | - | - | - | (0.78 | ) | (0.67 | ) | - | - | - | (0.58 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Lead |
(7.82 | ) | (10.02 | ) | - | - | (8.07 | ) | (8.17 | ) | (12.15 | ) | - | - | (8.69 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Zinc |
(0.64 | ) | (12.29 | ) | - | - | (1.93 | ) | (1.78 | ) | (20.24 | ) | - | - | (4.21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
(0.10 | ) | (3.67 | ) | - | - | (0.50 | ) | (0.30 | ) | (0.97 | ) | - | - | (0.39 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by-product credits per ounce of silver | $ | (9.44 | ) | $ | 25.98 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (11.28 | ) | $ | (10.92 | ) | $ | (33.36 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (13.87 | ) | ||||||
(c) Costs per Tonne of Ore Processed
The Company uses cost per tonne of ore processed to manage and evaluate operating performance at each of its mines. Cost per tonne of ore processed is calculated based on total production costs on a sales basis, adjusted for changes in inventory, to arrive at total production costs that relate to ore production during the period. These total production costs are then further divided into mining cost, shipping cost, and milling cost. Cost per tonne of ore processed is the total of per tonne mining cost, per tonne shipping cost, and per tonne milling cost.
All-in sustaining production cost per tonne is an extension of the cash production cost per tonne and provides a comprehensive measure of the Company’s operating performance and ability to generate cash flows. All-in sustaining production cost per tonne is based on the Company’s cash production cost, and further includes corporate general and administrative expense, government fee and other taxes, reclamation cost accretion, lease liability payments, and sustaining capital expenditures. The Company believes that this measure represents the total sustainable costs of processing ore from current operations and provides additional information about the Company’s operational performance and ability to generate cash flows.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 27 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
The following table provides a reconciliation of production cost and all-in sustaining production cost per tonne of ore processed.
| Year ended March 31, 2020 | Year ended March 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ounce and per ounce amount) | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production costs expensed as reported | $ | 47,236 | $ | 14,793 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 62,029 | $ | 47,496 | $ | 14,965 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 62,461 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 17,835 | 2,880 | - | - | 20,715 | 16,857 | 3,140 | - | - | 19,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in stockpile and concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Less: stockpile and concentrate inventory - Beginning |
(5,947 | ) | (213 | ) | (834 | ) | - | (6,994 | ) | (5,353 | ) | (340 | ) | (891 | ) | - | (6,584 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Add: stockpile and concentrate inventory - Ending |
4,474 | 241 | 790 | - | 5,505 | 5,947 | 213 | 834 | - | 6,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment for foreign exchange movement |
191 | 156 | 44 | - | 391 | 322 | 20 | 57 | - | 399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1,282 | ) | 184 | - | - | (1,098 | ) | 916 | (107 | ) | - | - | 809 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total production cost | $ | 63,789 | $ | 17,857 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 81,646 | $ | 65,269 | $ | 17,998 | $ | - | $ | $ | 83,267 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charged to mining costs | A | 16,517 | 2,398 | - | - | 18,915 | 15,438 | 2,361 | - | - | 17,799 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charged to milling costs | B | 1,128 | 486 | - | - | 1,614 | 1,333 | 756 | - | - | 2,089 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-cash production cost | $ | 17,645 | $ | 2,884 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 20,529 | $ | 16,771 | $ | 3,117 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 19,888 | ||||||||||||
|
Cash mining cost |
C | 37,688 | 10,947 | - | - | 48,635 | 39,468 | 10,723 | - | - | 50,191 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shipping cost |
D | 2,346 | - | - | - | 2,346 | 2,565 | - | - | - | 2,565 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash milling cost |
E | 6,111 | 4,025 | - | - | 10,136 | 6,464 | 4,158 | - | - | 10,622 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash production cost | $ | 46,145 | $ | 14,972 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 61,117 | $ | 48,497 | $ | 14,881 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 63,378 | ||||||||||||
|
General and administrative |
6,849 | 2,738 | 469 | 10,094 | 20,150 | 5,950 | 1,969 | 1,647 | 9,475 | 19,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exploration and business development |
- | - | - | 679 | 679 | - | - | - | 386 | 386 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization included in general and administrative |
(753 | ) | (469 | ) | (289 | ) | (447 | ) | (1,958 | ) | (437 | ) | (314 | ) | (339 | ) | (162 | ) | (1,253 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Government fees and other taxes |
1,591 | 496 | 2 | 26 | 2,115 | 1,980 | 621 | 62 | 36 | 2,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclamation accretion |
366 | 24 | 32 | - | 422 | 400 | 32 | 47 | - | 479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease payment |
- | - | - | 503 | 503 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sustaining capital expenditures |
25,302 | 2,274 | - | 820 | 28,396 | 22,411 | 1,007 | - | 275 | 23,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining production cost | F | $ | 79,500 | $ | 20,035 | $ | 214 | $ | 11,675 | $ | 111,424 | $ | 78,801 | $ | 18,196 | $ | 1,417 | $ | 10,010 | $ | 108,423 | |||||||||||
|
Non-sustaining capital expenditures |
6,008 | 812 | 88 | - | 6,908 | 9,766 | 495 | 609 | $ | - | $ | 10,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| All in production cost | G | $ | 85,508 | $ | 20,847 | $ | 302 | $ | 11,675 | $ | 118,332 | $ | 88,567 | $ | 18,691 | $ | 2,026 | $ | 10,010 | $ | 119,293 | |||||||||||
|
Ore mined ('000s) |
H | 598.197 | 287.633 | - | - | 885.830 | 622.576 | 284.218 | - | 906.794 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore shipped ('000s) |
I | 598.327 | 287.633 | - | - | 885.960 | 607.134 | 284.218 | - | 891.352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore milled ('000s) |
J | 601.605 | 290.610 | - | - | 892.215 | 619.851 | 288.995 | - | 908.846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Per tonne Production cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash mining cost ($/tonne) |
K=A/H | 27.61 | 8.34 | - | - | 21.35 | 24.80 | 8.31 | - | - | 19.63 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash milling cost ($/tonne) |
L=B/J | 1.87 | 1.67 | - | - | 1.81 | 2.15 | 2.62 | - | - | 2.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash production cost ($/tonne) | M=K+L | $ | 29.48 | $ | 10.01 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 23.16 | $ | 26.95 | $ | 10.93 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 21.93 | |||||||||||
|
Cash mining cost ($/tonne) |
N=C/H | 63.00 | 38.06 | - | - | 54.90 | 63.39 | 37.73 | - | - | 55.35 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shipping costs ($/tonne) |
O=D/I | 3.92 | - | - | - | 2.65 | 4.22 | - | - | - | 2.88 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash milling costs ($/tonne) |
P=E/J | 10.16 | 13.85 | - | - | 11.36 | 10.43 | 14.39 | - | - | 11.69 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash production costs ($/tonne) | Q=N+O+P | $ | 77.08 | $ | 51.91 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 68.91 | $ | 78.04 | $ | 52.12 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 69.92 | |||||||||||
| All-in sustaining production costs ($/tonne) | P=(F-C-D-E)/J+Q | $ | 132.52 | $ | 69.33 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 125.29 | $ | 126.93 | $ | 63.59 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 119.48 | |||||||||||
| All in costs ($/tonne) | S=P+(G-F)/J | $ | 142.51 | $ | 72.13 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 133.04 | $ | 142.68 | $ | 65.30 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 131.44 | |||||||||||
| Three months ended March 31, 2020 | Three months ended March 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except ounce and per ounce amount) | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated | Ying Mining District |
GC | Other | Corporate | Consolidated> | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Production costs expensed as reported | $ | 6,924 | $ | 1,420 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 8,344 | $ | 9,003 | $ | 4,002 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 13,005 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization as reported | 2,712 | 434 | - | - | 3,146 | 3,749 | 852 | - | - | 4,601 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in stockpile and concentrate inventory | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Less: stockpile and concentrate inventory - Beginning |
(6,158 | ) | (322 | ) | (805 | ) | - | (7,285 | ) | (6,033 | ) | (1,358 | ) | (814 | ) | - | (8,205 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Add: stockpile and concentrate inventory - Ending |
4,474 | 241 | 790 | - | 5,505 | 5,947 | 213 | 834 | - | 6,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adjustment for foreign exchange movement |
95 | 148 | 15 | - | 258 | (145 | ) | (38 | ) | (20 | ) | - | (203 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1,589 | ) | 67 | - | - | (1,522 | ) | (231 | ) | (1,183 | ) | - | - | (1,414 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total production cost | $ | 8,047 | $ | 1,921 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 8,446 | $ | 12,521 | $ | 3,671 | $ | - | $ | 16,192 | ||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charged to mining costs | A | 2,060 | 354 | - | - | 2,414 | 3,178 | 481 | - | - | 3,659 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization charged to milling costs | B | 192 | 71 | - | - | 263 | 319 | 168 | - | - | 487 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-cash production cost | $ | 2,252 | $ | 425 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,677 | $ | 3,497 | $ | 649 | $ | - | $ | 4,146 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cash mining cost |
C | 4,725 | 952 | - | - | 5,677 | 7,244 | 2,044 | - | - | 9,288 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shipping cost |
D | 272 | - | - | - | 272 | 436 | - | - | - | 436 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash milling cost |
E | 798 | 544 | - | - | 1,342 | 1,345 | 979 | - | - | 2,324 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total cash production cost | $ | 5,795 | $ | 1,496 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 7,291 | $ | 9,025 | $ | 3,023 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 12,048 | ||||||||||||
|
General and administrative |
2,306 | 978 | 84 | 2,590 | 5,958 | 1,500 | 466 | 311 | 2,623 | 4,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exploration and business development |
- | - | - | 274 | 274 | - | - | - | 111 | 111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amortization included in general and administrative |
(420 | ) | (228 | ) | (65 | ) | (122 | ) | (835 | ) | (111 | ) | (79 | ) | (107 | ) | (43 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Government fees and other taxes |
216 | 21 | - | 1 | 238 | 385 | 91 | 29 | - | 505 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reclamation accretion |
91 | 6 | 8 | - | 105 | 101 | 8 | 12 | - | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lease payment |
- | - | - | 134 | 134 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sustaining capital expenditures |
5,569 | 760 | - | 52 | 6,381 | 4,531 | 202 | - | 77 | 4,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All-in sustaining production cost | F | $ | 13,557 | $ | 3,033 | $ | 27 | $ | 2,929 | $ | 19,546 | $ | 15,431 | $ | 3,711 | $ | 245 | $ | 2,768 | $ | 22,155 | |||||||||||
|
Non-sustaining capital expenditures |
649 | 115 | 1 | - | 765 | 5,831 | 90 | 127 | - | 6,048 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| All in production cost | G | $ | 14,206 | $ | 3,148 | $ | 28 | $ | 2,929 | $ | 20,311 | $ | 21,262 | $ | 3,801 | $ | 372 | $ | 2,768 | $ | 28,203 | |||||||||||
|
Ore mined ('000s) |
H | 69.379 | 37.216 | - | - | 106.595 | 111.032 | 50.368 | - | - | 161.400 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore shipped ('000s) |
I | 68.737 | 37.216 | - | - | 105.953 | 109.793 | 50.368 | - | - | 160.161 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ore milled ('000s) |
J | 69.188 | 33.243 | - | - | 102.431 | 107.039 | 52.865 | - | - | 159.904 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Per tonne Production cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash mining cost ($/tonne) |
K=A/H | 29.69 | 9.51 | - | - | 22.65 | 28.62 | 9.55 | - | - | 22.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Non-cash milling cost ($/tonne) |
L=B/J | 2.78 | 2.14 | - | - | 2.57 | 2.98 | 3.18 | - | - | 3.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash production cost ($/tonne) | M=K+L | $ | 32.47 | $ | 11.65 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 25.22 | $ | 31.60 | $ | 12.73 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 25.72 | |||||||||||
|
Cash mining cost ($/tonne) |
N=C/H | 68.10 | 25.58 | - | - | 53.26 | 65.24 | 40.58 | - | - | 57.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shipping costs ($/tonne) |
O=D/I | 3.96 | - | - | - | 2.57 | 3.97 | - | - | - | 2.72 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash milling costs ($/tonne) |
P=E/J | 11.53 | 16.36 | - | - | 13.10 | 12.57 | 18.52 | - | - | 14.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash production costs ($/tonne) | Q=N+O+P | $ | 83.59 | $ | 41.94 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 68.93 | $ | 81.78 | $ | 59.10 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 74.80 | |||||||||||
| All-in sustaining production costs ($/tonne) | P=(F-C-D-E)/J+Q | $ | 195.78 | $ | 88.18 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 188.57 | $ | 141.63 | $ | 72.11 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 138.01 | |||||||||||
| All in costs ($/tonne) | S=P+(G-F)/J | $ | 205.16 | $ | 91.63 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 196.04 | $ | 196.10 | $ | 73.82 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 175.83 | |||||||||||
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 28 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| 14. | Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments, and Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported on the consolidated financial statements. These critical accounting estimates represent management estimates and judgements that are uncertain and any changes in these estimates could materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management continuously reviews its estimates and assumptions using the most current information available. The Company’s critical accounting policies, judgements and estimates are described in Note 2 of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2020.
| 15. | New Accounting Standards |
| (a) | Adoption of new accounting standards |
IFRS 16 – Lease
IFRS 16 – Leases (“IFRS 16”) was issued by the IASB and will replace IAS 17 - Leases (“IAS 17”) and IFRIC 4 - Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease (“IFRIC 4”). IFRS 16 applies a control model to the identification of leases, distinguishing between a lease and a non-lease component on the basis of whether the customer controls the specific asset. Control is considered to exist if the customer has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of an identified asset and the right to direct the use of that asset. For those contracts that are or contain a lease, IFRS 16 introduces significant changes to the accounting for such contracts, introducing a single on-balance sheet accounting model that is similar to current finance lease accounting, with limited exceptions for short-term leases or leases of low value assets. Lessor accounting, apart from a specific exception in respect of sublease, remains similar to current accounting practice. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019.
The Company applied IFRS 16 on April 1, 2019 retrospectively, with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard as an adjustment to retained earnings and no restatement of comparative information. The Company has elected to apply the available exemptions as permitted by IFRS 16 to recognize a lease expense on a straight basis for short term leases (lease term of 12 months or less) and low value assets. The Company has also elected to apply the practical expedient whereby leases whose term ends within 12 months of the date of initial application would be accounted for in the same way as short-term lease.
Policy applicable from April 1, 2019
Lease Definition
At inception of a contract, the Company assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. An identified asset may be implicitly or explicitly specified in a contract, but must be physically distinct, and must not have the ability for substitution by a lessor. A lessee has the right to control an identified asset if it obtains substantially all of its economic benefits and either pre-determines or directs how and for what purposes the asset is used.
Measurement of Right of Use (“ROU”) Assets and Lease Obligations
At the commencement of a lease, the Company, if acting in capacity as a lessee, recognizes an ROU asset and a lease obligation. The ROU asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease obligation adjusted for any lease payments made at, or before, the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received.
The ROU asset is subsequently amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the lease, or the useful life of the asset determined on the same basis as the Company’s plant and equipment. The ROU asset is periodically adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease obligation,
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 29 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
and reduced by impairment losses, if any. If an ROU asset is subsequently leased to a third party (a “sublease”) and the sublease is classified as a finance lease, the carrying value of the ROU asset to the extent of the sublease is derecognized. Any difference between the ROU asset and the lease receivable arising from the sublease is recognized as profit or loss.
The lease obligation is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments remaining at the lease commencement date, discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease obligation, when applicable, may comprise of fixed payments, variable payments that depend on an index or rate, amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee and the exercise price under a purchase, extension or termination option that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise.
The lease obligation is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Company’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or if the Company changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option. When the lease obligation is remeasured, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the ROU asset.
Measurement of Lease Receivable
At the commencement of a lease, the Company, if acting in capacity as a lessor, will classify the lease as finance lease and recognize a lease receivable at an amount equal to the net investment in the lease if it transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset or if the lease is a sublease, by reference to the ROU asset arising from the original lease (the “head lease”). A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset or the lease is a short-term lease. Cash received from an operating lease is included in other income in the Company’s consolidated statement of income on a straight-line basis over the period the lease.
The lease receivable is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments remaining at the lease commencement date, discounting the interest rate implicated in the lease or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate if the lease is a sublease. The lease receivable is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, and reduced by the amount received and impairment losses, if any.
Recognition Exemptions
The Company has elected not to recognize the ROU asset and lease obligations for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less or for lease of low-value assets. Payments associated with these leases are recognized as general and administrative expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the Company’s consolidated statement of income.
Adjustments upon Adoption
Upon adoption of IFRS 16 on April 1, 2019, the Company recognized lease receivable, ROU asset, and lease obligation of $447, $360, and $1,463, respectively, related to the Company’s office lease agreement and sublease agreements. The Company also recognized cumulative adjustments to retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income of $(823) and $167, respectively.
| (b) | Accounting standards not yet effective |
New accounting standards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for the current period and have not been early adopted. These standards are not expected to have a material impact on the Company in the current or future reporting periods.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 30 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| 16. | Other MD&A Requirements |
Additional information relating to the Company:
(a) may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com;
(b) may be found at the Company’s website www.silvercorp.ca;
(c) may be found in the Company’s Annual Information Form; and,
(d) is also provided in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2020.
| 17. | Outstanding Share Data |
As at the date of this MD&A, the following securities were outstanding: (a) Share Capital Authorized - unlimited number of common shares without par value
Issued and outstanding – 173,885,709 common shares with a recorded value of $244.1 million Shares subject to escrow or pooling agreements - $nil.
(b) Options
As at the date of this MD&A, the outstanding options comprise the following:
|
Number of Options |
Exercise Price (CAD$) | Expiry Date |
|
201,260 |
$1.43 | 6/2/2020 |
|
565,000 |
$2.60 | 11/16/2021 |
|
526,250 |
$3.23 | 3/12/2021 |
|
402,500 |
$3.36 | 10/2/2020 |
|
667,500 |
$3.40 | 8/24/2021 |
|
2,362,510 |
(c) Restricted Share Units (RSUs)
Outstanding – 669,749 RSUs with grant date closing price of CAD$4.94 per share.
| 18. | Risks and Uncertainties |
The Company is exposed to many risks in conducting its business, including but not limited to: metal price risk as the Company derives its revenue from the sale of silver, lead, zinc, and gold; credit risk in the normal course of dealing with other companies and financial institutions; foreign exchange risk as the Company reports its financial statements in USD whereas the Company operates in jurisdictions that utilize other currencies; equity price risk and interest rate risk as the Company has investments in marketable securities that are traded in the open market or earn interest at market rates that are fixed to maturity or at variable interest rates; inherent risk of uncertainties in estimating mineral reserves and mineral resources; political risks; economic and social risks related to conducting business in foreign jurisdictions such as China; environmental risks; risks related to its relations with employees and local communities where the Company operates, and emerging risks relating to the spread of COVID-19, which has to date resulted in profound health and economic impacts globally and which presents future risks and uncertainties that are largely unknown at this time.
Management and the Board of Directors continuously assess risks that the Company is exposed to, and attempt to mitigate these risks where practical through a range of risk management strategies.
These and other risks are described in the Company’s Annual Information Form, NI 43-101 technical reports, Form 40-F, and Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and/or on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. Readers are encouraged to refer to these
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 31 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
documents for a more detailed description of some of the risks and uncertainties inherent to Silvercorp’s business.
-
COVID-19
The Company's business, operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by the outbreak of pandemics or other health crises, such as the outbreak of COVID-19 that was designated as a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. The international response to the spread of COVID-19 has led to significant restrictions on travel, temporary business closures, quarantines, global stock market volatility, and a general reduction in consumer activity. Such public health crises can result in operating, supply chain and project development delays and disruptions, global stock market and financial market volatility, declining trade and market sentiment, reduced movement of people and labour shortages, and travel and shipping disruption and shutdowns, including as a result of government regulation and prevention measures, or a fear of any of the foregoing, all of which could affect commodity prices, interest rates, credit risk and inflation. In addition, the current COVID-19 pandemic, and any future emergence and spread of similar pathogens could have an adverse impact on global economic conditions which may adversely impact the Company's operations, and the operations of suppliers, contractors and service providers.
The Company may experience business interruptions, including suspended (whether government mandated or otherwise) or reduced operations relating to COVID-19 and other such events outside of the Company's control, which could have a material adverse impact on its business, operations and operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
As at the date of this MD&A, the duration of the business disruptions internationally and related financial impact of COVID-19 cannot be reasonably estimated. It is unknown whether and how the Company may be affected if the pandemic persists for an extended period of time.
The Company's exposure to such public health crises also includes risks to employee health and safety. Should an employee, contractor, community member or visitor become infected with a serious illness that has the potential to spread rapidly, this could place the Company's workforce at risk.
-
Metal Price Risk
The Company’s sales prices for lead and zinc pounds are fixed against the Shanghai Metals Exchange as quoted at www.shmet.com; gold ounces are fixed against the Shanghai Gold Exchange as quoted at www.sge.com.cn and silver ounces are fixed against the Shanghai White Platinum & Silver Exchange as quoted at www.ex-silver.com.
The Company’s revenues, if any, are expected to be in large part derived from the mining and sale of silver, lead, zinc, and gold contained in metal concentrates. The prices of those commodities have fluctuated widely, particularly in recent years, and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control including international and regional economic and political conditions; expectations of inflation; currency exchange fluctuations; interest rates; global or regional supply and demand for jewellery and industrial products containing silver and other metals; sale of silver and other metals by central banks and other holders, speculators and producers of silver and other metals; availability and cost of metal substitutes; and increased production due to new mine developments and improved mining and production methods. The price of base and precious metals may have a significant influence on the market price of the Company’s shares and the value of its projects. The effect of these factors on the price of base and precious metals, and therefore the viability of the Company’s exploration projects and mining operations, cannot be accurately predicted.
If silver and other metals prices were to decline significantly or for an extended period of time, the Company may be unable to continue operations, develop its projects, or fulfil obligations under agreements with the Company’s joint venture partners or under its permits or licenses.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 32 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
-
Permits and licenses
All mineral resources and mineral reserves of the Company’s subsidiaries are owned by their respective governments, and mineral exploration and mining activities may only be conducted by entities that have obtained or renewed exploration or mining permits and licenses in accordance with the relevant mining laws and regulations. No guarantee can be given that the necessary exploration and mining permits and licenses will be issued to the Company or, if they are issued, that they will be renewed, or if renewed under reasonable operational and/or financial terms, or in a timely manner, or that the Company will be in a position to comply with all conditions that are imposed.
Nearly all mining projects require government approval. There can be no certainty that approvals necessary to develop and operate mines on the Company’s properties will be granted or renewed in a timely and/or economical manner, or at all.
-
Title to properties
With respect to the Company’s Chinese properties, while the Company has investigated title to all of its mineral claims and to the best of its knowledge, title to all of its properties is in good standing, the properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects. There may be valid challenges to the title of the Company’s properties which, if successful, could impair development and/or operations. The Company cannot give any assurance that title to its properties will not be challenged. Title insurance is generally not available for mineral properties and the Company’s ability to ensure that it has obtained secure claims to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. The Company’s mineral properties in China have not been surveyed, and the precise location and extent thereof may be in doubt.
-
Operations and political conditions
All the properties in which the Company has an interest are located in China, which has different regulatory and legal standards than those in North America. Even when the Company’s mineral properties are proven to host economic reserves of metals, factors such as political instability, terrorism, opposition and harassment from local miners, or governmental expropriation or regulation may prevent or restrict mining of any such deposits or repatriation of profits.
All the Company’s operations are located in China. These operations are subject to the risks normally associated with conducting business in China. Some of these risks are more prevalent in countries which are less developed or have emerging economies, including uncertain political and economic environments, as well as risks of war and civil disturbances or other risks which may limit or disrupt a project, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contractual rights or the taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation, risk of adverse changes in laws or policies, increases in foreign taxation or royalty obligations, license fees, permit fees, delays in obtaining or the inability to obtain necessary governmental permits, limitations on ownership and repatriation of earnings, and foreign exchange controls and currency devaluations.
In addition, the Company may face import and export regulations, including export restrictions, disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to similar laws, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends offshore, and risk of loss due to disease and other potential endemic health issues. Although the Company is not currently experiencing any significant or extraordinary problems in China arising from such risks, there can be no assurance that such problems will not arise in the future. The Company currently does not carry political risk insurance coverage.
The Company’s interests in its mineral properties are held through joint venture companies established under and governed by the laws of China. The Company’s joint venture partners in China include state-sector entities and, like other state-sector entities, their actions and priorities may be dictated by government policies instead of purely commercial considerations. Additionally, companies with a foreign ownership component operating in China may be required to work within a framework which is
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 33 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
different from that imposed on domestic Chinese companies. The Chinese government currently allows foreign investment in certain mining projects under central government guidelines. There can be no assurance that these guidelines will not change in the future.
-
Regulatory environment in China
The Company conducts its operations in China. The laws of China differ significantly from those of Canada and all such laws are subject to change. Mining is subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and production.
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in enforcement actions and may also include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws and regulations.
New laws and regulations, amendments to existing laws and regulations, administrative interpretation of existing laws and regulations, or more stringent enforcement of existing laws and regulations could have a material adverse impact on future cash flow, results of operations and the financial condition of the Company.
-
Environmental risks
The Company’s activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations governing environmental protection and employee health and safety, including environmental laws and regulations in China. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species, and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations.
There are also laws and regulations prescribing reclamation activities on some mining properties. Environmental legislation in many countries, including China, is evolving and the trend has been toward stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and increasing responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays on behalf of the Company and may cause material changes or delays in the Company’s intended activities. There can be no assurance that the Company has been or will be at all times in complete compliance with current and future environmental and health and safety laws and permits will not materially adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition. It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on some portion of the Company’s business, causing the Company to re-evaluate those activities at that time. The Company’s compliance with environmental laws and regulations entail uncertain cost.· Risks and hazards of mining operations Mining is inherently dangerous and the Company’s operations are subject to a number of risks and hazards including, without limitation:
| (i) | environmental hazards; | |
| (ii) | discharge of pollutants or hazardous chemicals; | |
| (iii) | industrial accidents; | |
| (iv) | failure of processing and mining equipment; | |
| (v) | labour disputes; | |
| (vi) | supply problems and delays; |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 34 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| (vii) | encountering unusual or unexpected geologic formations or other geological or grade problems; | |
| (viii) | encountering unanticipated ground or water conditions; | |
| (ix) | cave-ins, pit wall failures, flooding, rock bursts and fire; | |
| (x) | periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions; | |
| (xi) | equipment breakdown; | |
| (xii) | other unanticipated difficulties or interruptions in development, construction or production; | |
| (xiii) | other acts of God or unfavourable operating conditions; and | |
| (xiv) | health and safety risks associated with spread of COVID-19 pandemic, and any future emergence and spread of similar pathogens. |
Such risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or processing facilities, personal injury or death, loss of key employees, environmental damage, delays in mining, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Satisfying such liabilities may be very costly and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future cash flow, results of operations and financial condition.
-
Cybersecurity Risks
The Company is subject to cybersecurity risks including unauthorized access to privileged information, destroy data or disable, degrade or sabotage our systems, including through the introduction of computer viruses. Although we take steps to secure our configurations and manage our information system, including our computer systems, internet sites, emails and other telecommunications, and financial/geological data, there can be no assurance that measures we take to ensure the integrity of our systems will provide protection, especially because cyberattack techniques used change frequently or are not recognized until successful. The Company has not experienced any material cybersecurity incident in the past, but there can be no assurance that the Company would not experience in the future. If our systems are compromised, do not operate properly or are disable, we could suffer financial loss, disruption of business, loss of geology data which could affect our ability to conduct effective mine planning and accurate mineral resources estimates, loss of financial data which could affect our ability to provide accurate and timely financial reporting.
-
General Economic Conditions
General economic conditions may adversely affect our growth, profitability and ability to obtain financing. Events in global financial markets in the past several years have had a profound impact on the global economy. Many industries, including the silver and gold mining industry, have been and continue to be impacted by these market conditions. Some of the key impacts of the current financial market turmoil include contraction in credit markets resulting in a widening of credit risk, devaluations, high volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange and precious metal markets and a lack of market confidence and liquidity. A continued or worsened slowdown in the financial markets or other economic conditions, including but not limited to, consumer spending, employment rates, business conditions, inflation, fuel and energy costs, consumer debt levels, lack of available credit, the state of the financial markets, interest rates and tax rates, may adversely affect our growth, profitability and ability to obtain financing. A number of issues related to economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including:
| (i) | significant disruption to the global economic conditions caused by COVID-19 as discussed above; | |
| (ii) | contraction in credit markets could impact the cost and availability of financing and our overall liquidity; | |
| (iii) | the volatility of silver, gold and other metal prices would impact our revenues, profits, losses |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 35 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
| and cash flow; | ||
| (iv) | recessionary pressures could adversely impact demand for our production; | |
| (v) | volatile energy, commodity and consumables prices and currency exchange rates could impact our production costs; and | |
| (vi) | the devaluation and volatility of global stock markets could impact the valuation of our equity and other securities. |
| 19. | Corporate Governance, Safety, Environment ad Social Responsibility |
(a) Governance
Our Board oversees the direction and strategy of the business and the affairs of the Company. The Board is comprised of five directors, and as at March 31, 2020 and the date of this MD&A, four of them are independent, and one is female. The Board’s wealth of experience allows it to effectively oversee the development of corporate strategies and the key risks of the business, provide management with long-term direction, consider and approve major decisions, oversee the business generally and evaluate corporate performance. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, appointed by the Board, oversee the effective functioning of the Board and the implementation of governance best practices.
We believe that good corporate governance is essential to the effective performance of the Company and plays a significant role in protecting the interests of all stakeholders while helping to maximize value.
(b) Health, Safety, and Environment
The Company highly values ecological and environmental protection, as well as ensuring a safe workplace for all employees and contractors, at all of our sites. These corporate philosophies tie directly into the emphasis on efficient process design and management across all aspects of the operation. Significant, ongoing efforts are made to identify and minimize risks, as well as streamline the collection, monitoring and reporting of data. A social media platform that was developed in-house in 2014, the “Enterprise-Blog”, is an instrumental tool used to ensure all mandatory procedures are being performed. In addition, an on-line, real time, monitoring and GPS system was established to further the goal of creating an “intelligent mine”.
The Company has remained focused on sustainable development since its inception and is dedicated to fulfilling our environmental goals and responsibilities for the communities where it operates. Silvercorp is committed to building green mines and employing the latest design, construction and management practice to ensure our mining environment undergoes timely rehabilitation. In Fiscal 2020, the Company reforested more than 9.1 hectares through land reclamation and environmental restoration projects.
As part of our objective to minimize the impact our operations have on the environment, Silvercorp strives to reduce its energy and water consumption.
The Company is dedicated to minimizing the potential health and safety risks faced by employees and contractors. Training for new workers and ongoing training programs are a priory and Silvercorp continuously reviews and refines all standard procedures at our mines and milling facilities to identify any potential risks associated with each step of the operations.
Moreover, to response to health risks associated with the spread of COVID-19, the Company has implemented a number of health and safety measures designed to protect employees at its operations since Q4 Fiscal 2020.
(c) Social Responsibility and Economic Value
The Company is committed to creating sustainable value in the communities where our people work and live. Guided by research conducted by our local offices, the Company participates in, and
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 36 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
contributes to numerous community programs that typically center on education and health, nutrition, environmental awareness, local infrastructure and fostering additional economic activity. In addition to the taxes and fees paid to various levels of government in China, in Fiscal 2020, the Company:
-
promoted community health and alleviating poverty in the local community with an emphasis on children and seniors with periodic visits and subsidies;
-
donated $0.2 million to institutions in scholarship or education assistance programs to support children’s education at the local and national level;
-
donated $0.2 million to the local government in China as part of the Company’s effort to help address the impact from COVID-19; and
-
donated personal protective equipment, worth approximately $0.1 million, consisting of 17,000 3M N95 respirator masks, 100,000 pairs of medial gloves, 1,000 protective bodysuits, and 540 goggles, to Vancouver General Hospital and Vancouver Coastal Health as part of the Company’s effort to reduce the significant risks faced by front-line healthcare workers in Vancouver-area hospitals as they combat COVID-19.
| 20. | Subsequent Event |
On April 27, 2020, the Company announced that it entered into a definitive agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) whereby the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Guyana Goldfields Inc. (TSX: GUY) (“Guyana Goldfields”) by way of a court approved plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “Transaction”).
Under the terms of the Transaction, each holder of Guyana Goldfields shares will have the option to receive, for each Guyana Goldfields share held, CAD$0.60 in cash or 0.1195 of a Silvercorp common share (valued at CAD$0.60 based on the volume weighted average price for Silvercorp common shares for the 20 trading days ended April 24, 2020), subject to a maximum cash consideration of approximately $23.4 million (CAD$33.2 million). If all Guyana Goldfields shareholders elect to receive cash, consideration for each share will consist of CAD$0.20 in cash and 0.0796 of a Silvercorp common share (valued at CAD$0.40 based on the volume weighted average price for Silvercorp common shares for the 20 trading days ended April 24, 2020). Assuming the maximum cash consideration, existing Guyana Goldfields shareholders will own 7.1% of Silvercorp’s pro forma basic shares outstanding following the Transaction. The consideration of CAD$0.60 per share represents a 71% premium to the 20-day volume weighted average price of Guyana Goldfields as of the close of trading on April 24, 2020.
Concurrently with entering into the Arrangement Agreement, the Company and Guyana Goldfields have also entered into a loan agreement, whereby the Company will lend Guyana Goldfields up to US$15 million with an interest rate of 12% per annum (or, on the occurrence of certain triggering events, 14% per annum) to fund Guyana Goldfields’ expected liquidity shortfall between the signing of the Arrangement Agreement and the closing of the Transaction.
On May 18, 2020, the Company announced that it has entered into an amending agreement (the “Amending Agreement”) to the Arrangement Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Amending Agreement, each holder of Guyana Goldfields shares will receive, for each Guyana Goldfields share held, C$0.25 in cash and 0.1849 of a Silvercorp common share, for total consideration of C$1.30 per share (based on the volume weighted average price for Silvercorp common shares for the 5 trading days ended May 14, 2020). The terms of the Amending Agreement were agreed to following receipt by Guyana Goldfields of an unsolicited all-cash proposal from a third party to acquire Guyana Goldfields.
After accounting for Silvercorp’s current share position in Guyana Goldfields, cash consideration of C$0.25 per Guyana Goldfields share implies a total cash component of approximately $27.8 million (C$39.5 million). Share consideration of C$1.05 per Guyana Goldfields share implies a total share component of 29.2 million shares after accounting for Silvercorp’s existing position, resulting in existing
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 37 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
Guyana Goldfields shareholders owning 14.4% of Silvercorp’s pro forma basic shares outstanding following the Transaction.
Commensurate with the increase in consideration, valuing Guyana Goldfields at approximately C$227 million, the Amending Agreement provides for an increase in the termination fee to C$9.0 million, which is to be paid by Guyana Goldfields to Silvercorp if the Arrangement Agreement is terminated in the event Guyana Goldfields’s board accepts a superior proposal. Other than as described herein, the terms of the Transaction remain unamended, including the terms of the interim loan facility.
The Transaction will be effected by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporation Act and will be subject to the approval of 662/3% of votes cast by shareholders of Guyana Goldfields at a special meeting of Guyana Goldfields shareholders scheduled for June 29, 2020. In addition to shareholder and court approvals, the Transaction is subject to applicable regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of certain other closing conditions customary in transactions of this nature.
| 21. | Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information is gathered and reported to senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow for timely decision about public disclosure.
Management, including the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2020, as defined in the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian Securities Administration. The evaluation included documentation review, enquiries and other procedures considered by management to be appropriate in the circumstances. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in annual filings, interim filings, and other reports the Company filed or submitted under United States and Canadian securities legislation were recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in those rules.
| 22. | Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, and used the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) to evaluate, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, the effectiveness of internal controls. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes:
-
maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
-
providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
-
providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are made in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and
-
providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 38 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
COSO was effective as of March 31, 2020 and provided a reasonable assurance of the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and preparation of the financial statements.
No matter how well a system of internal control over financial reporting is designed, any system has inherent limitations. Even systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of the reliability of financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, controls may become inadequate in the future because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with the Company’s policies and procedures.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2020 has been audited by Deloitte LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, who has also issued a report on the internal controls over financial reporting included with our audited consolidated financial statements.
| 23. | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
| 24. | Directors and Officers |
As at the date of this MD&A, the Company’s directors and officers are as follows:
| Directors | Officers |
| Dr. Rui Feng, Director, Chairman | Rui Feng, Chief Executive Officer |
| Yikang Liu, Director | Derek Liu, Chief Financial Officer |
| Paul Simpson, Director | Yong-Jae Kim, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary |
| David Kong, Director | Lon Shaver, Vice President |
| Marina A. Katusa, Director |
Mr. Guoliang Ma, P.Geo., Manager of Exploration and Resources of the Company, is a Qualified Person for Silvercorp under NI 43-101 and has reviewed and given consent to the technical information contained in this MD&A.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain of the statements and information in this MD&A constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial securities laws. Any statements or information that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”, “assumes”, “intends”, “strategies”, “targets”, “goals”, “forecasts”, “objectives”, “budgets”, “schedules”, “potential” or variations thereof or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements or information. Forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things:
-
the price of silver and other metals;
-
estimates of the Company’s revenues and capital expenditures;
-
estimated ore production and grades from the Company’s mines in the Ying Mining District and the GC Mine ; and;
-
timing of receipt of permits and regulatory approvals.
Forward-looking statements or information are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 39 |
| SILVERCORP METALS INC. |
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis |
| For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 |
| (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data or unless otherwise stated) |
other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements or information, including, without limitation, risks relating to,
-
COVID – 19;
-
fluctuating commodity prices;
-
fluctuating currency exchange rates;
-
increasing labour cost;
-
exploration and development programs;
-
feasibility and engineering reports;
-
permits and licenses;
-
operations and political conditions;
-
regulatory environment in China and Canada;
-
environmental risks; and
-
risks and hazards of mining operations.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements or information. Forward-looking statements or information are statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and actual achievements of the Company or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements or information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in this MD&A under the heading “Risks and Uncertainties” and elsewhere. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, described or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.
The Company’s forward-looking statements and information are based on the assumptions, beliefs, expectations and opinions of management as of the date of this MD&A, and other than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements and information if circumstances or management’s assumptions, beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, or changes in any other events affecting such statements or information. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and information.
| Management’s Discussion and Analysis | Page 40 |

