TriLinc Global Impact Fund LLC 10-Q for FY2025 Q3
TriLinc Global Impact Fund LLC (TRLC)
About this 10-Q
TriLinc Global Impact Fund LLC filed this 10-Q on November 14, 2025, covering the quarter ended September 30, 2025 (FY2025 Q3).
Headline figures
Quarter ended September 30, 2025, as reported in this filing, compared with the same period a year earlier where the filing states it.
- Net loss
- $11.06M
- compared with net income of $3.54M a year earlier
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
For the Quarterly Period Ended
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
(Address of principal executive offices)
(
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | |
| Emerging growth company | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
| None | None | None |
As of November 14, 2025, the Company had outstanding
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| As of | ||||||||
| September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (Unaudited) | ||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Investments owned, at fair value (amortized cost of $ and $, respectively) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Cash | ||||||||
| Interest receivable | ||||||||
| Other assets | ||||||||
| Total assets | ||||||||
| LIABILITIES | ||||||||
| Management fee payable | ||||||||
| Repurchase obligation (see Note 5) | ||||||||
| Accrued distribution and other fees | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses | ||||||||
| Due to affiliates | ||||||||
| Interest payable | ||||||||
| Other payable | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 5) | ||||||||
| NET ASSETS | $ | $ | ||||||
| ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: | ||||||||
| Net capital on Class A units | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net capital on Class C units | ||||||||
| Net capital on Class I units | ||||||||
| Net capital on Class W units | ||||||||
| Net capital on Class Y units | ||||||||
| Net capital on Class Z units | ||||||||
| Offering costs | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net assets (equivalent to $ and $, respectively per unit based on total units outstanding of and , respectively) (see Note 2) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net assets, Class A (units outstanding of and , respectively) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net assets, Class C (units outstanding of and , respectively) | ||||||||
| Net assets, Class I (units outstanding of and , respectively) | ||||||||
| Net assets, Class W (units outstanding of and , respectively) | ||||||||
| Net assets, Class Y (units outstanding of and , respectively) | ||||||||
| Net assets, Class Z (units outstanding of and , respectively) | ||||||||
| NET ASSETS | $ | $ | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| For the Three Months Ended |
For the Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
| September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||
| 2025 |
2024 |
2025 |
2024 |
|||||||||||||
| INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest income |
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Payment-in-kind interest income |
||||||||||||||||
| Fee income |
||||||||||||||||
| Other income |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest from cash |
||||||||||||||||
| Total investment income |
||||||||||||||||
| EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
| Asset management fees |
||||||||||||||||
| Professional fees |
||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
||||||||||||||||
| Board of managers fees |
||||||||||||||||
| Total expenses |
||||||||||||||||
| NET INVESTMENT (LOSS) INCOME |
( |
) | ||||||||||||||
| Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||||||||||
| Net realized losses on investments |
( |
) | ||||||||||||||
| NET CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | ( |
) | $ | $ | ( |
) | $ | ||||||||
| NET INVESTMENT (LOSS) INCOME PER UNIT - BASIC AND DILUTED |
$ | ( |
) | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| (LOSS) EARNINGS PER UNIT - BASIC AND DILUTED |
$ | ( |
) | $ | $ | ( |
) | $ | ||||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED |
||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(Unaudited)
| For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
| September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||
| 2025 |
2024 |
|||||||
| (DECREASE) INCREASE FROM OPERATIONS |
||||||||
| Net investment income |
$ | $ | ||||||
| Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments |
( |
) | ||||||
| Net realized losses on investments |
( |
) | ||||||
| Net (decrease) increase from operations |
( |
) | ||||||
| DECREASE FROM DISTRIBUTIONS |
||||||||
| Distributions to Class A unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| Distributions to Class C unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| Distributions to Class I unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| Distributions to Class W unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| Distributions to Class Y unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| Distributions to Class Z unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| Net decrease from distributions |
( |
) | ||||||
| DECREASE FROM CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS |
||||||||
| Change in accrual of distribution and other fees |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||
| Net decrease from capital transactions |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||
| NET CHANGE IN NET ASSETS |
( |
) | ||||||
| Net assets at beginning of period |
||||||||
| Net assets at end of period |
$ | $ | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| For the Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
| September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||
| 2025 |
2024 |
|||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
| NET CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | ( |
) | $ | ||||
| ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
| Proceeds from disposition and paydowns of investments |
||||||||
| Payment-in-kind interest |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||
| Net change in unrealized depreciation (appreciation) on investments |
( |
) | ||||||
| Net realized loss on investments |
||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
| Increase in interest receivable |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||
| Decrease in other assets |
||||||||
| Increase in management fee payable |
||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses |
( |
) | ||||||
| Increase in due to affiliates |
||||||||
| Increase in interest payables |
||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in other payables |
( |
) | ||||||
| NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
( |
) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
| Distributions paid to unitholders |
( |
) | ||||||
| NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
( |
) | ||||||
| TOTAL DECREASE IN CASH |
( |
) | ( |
) | ||||
| Cash at beginning of period |
||||||||
| Cash at end of period |
$ | $ | ||||||
| Supplemental non-cash information |
||||||||
| Paid-in-kind interest capitalized into investments |
$ | $ | ||||||
| Change in accrual of distribution and other fees |
$ | $ | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
As of September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
| Investment Type / Country | Portfolio Company | Sector | Description | Interest | Fees (2) | Maturity (3) | Principal Amount | Participation % (4) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | % of Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Secured Term Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ecuador | Grupo Surpapel (5),(6), (12) |
|
|
| % |
| $ | % | $ | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | Limas Commodities House Limited (5), (6), (12) | Coal and Other Minerals and Ores | Resource Trader | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia | PT Citra Labuantirta (5), (18) | Chocolate and Cocoa Products |
| 8.0% Cash / 5.0% Redemption | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Malaysia | Vikudha Malaysia Sdn Bhd (5), (6) | Chemicals and Allied Products | Wholesale Distributor | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | Blue Arrow Biojet Holdings, LLC (8) | Refuse Systems |
| 20.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | Triton Metallics Pte Ltd. (5), (6) |
|
| 6.0% Cash/7.50% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Senior Secured Term Loans | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Secured Term Loan Participations (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Botswana | Ecsponent Holdings Limited (5), (6), (13) | Short-Term Business Credit | SME Financier | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Dock Brasil Engenharia E Servicos S.A. (5), (8) |
|
| 14% Cash / 3% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cabo Verde | TRG Cape Verde Holdings Ltd |
|
| 10.0% Cash/3.5% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kenya | Multiple ICD (Kenya) Limited (5), (6), (12) |
|
| 12.35% Cash / 4.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Namibia | Trustco Group Holdings Ltd. (5), (6), (12) |
|
| 8.50% Cash/4.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | Cevher International B.V. Netherlands (5), (6), (8) |
| Wheel Manufacturer |
| % | N/A | (16) | % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigeria | Maritime One Limited (5) | Towing and Tugboat Service | Marine Logistics Provider | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Romania | Lidas SRL (5), (9), (12) | Retail Bakeries | Frozen Bakery Products Manufacturer |
| % | N/A | (16) | % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uganda | Agilis Partners Holding LLC (5), (15) | Corn |
| 12.80% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uganda | Agilis Partners (5), (15) |
|
| 3.50% Cash/8.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Senior Secured Term Loan Participations | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Secured Trade Finance Participations (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Compania Argentina de Granos S.A. (5), (6), (13) | Soybeans | Agriculture Distributor | N/A | % |
| N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Sancor Cooperativas Unidas Ltda (5), (6), (12) | Dairy Farms | Dairy Co-Operative | % | % |
| N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cameroon | Producam SA (5), (6), (14) |
|
| 9.50%, 6.0% | (17) | % |
| % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ecuador | Worldwide Investments and Representations Winrep S.A. and Vannapack S.A. (5), (6), (12) | Frozen Fish and Seafood | Seafood Processing Company II | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Senior Secured Trade Finance Participations | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Investments (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | IIG TOF B.V. (5), (6), (13) | Other | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | 0.0 | % | N/A | N/A | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chile | Itelecom Holding Chile SPA (5), (6), (13) | Electric Services | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | 0.0 | % | N/A | 100 | % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Algodonera Avellaneda S.A. (5), (6), (13) | Cotton Ginning | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | 0.0 | % | N/A | N/A | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Frigorifico Regional Industrias Alimentarias, S.A., Sucursal Uruguay (5), (6), (13) | Beef Cattle, Except Feedlots | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | 0.0 | % | N/A | N/A | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigeria | Equity Participation in Cocoa Transaction A (10) | Other | Profit sharing rights on cocoa distribution | N/A | 0.0 | % | N/A | N/A | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Usivale Industria E Commercio Ltda | Other | Installment under Judicial Recovery | N/A | 0.0 | % |
| % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peru | TriLinc Peru S.A.C. | Other | Real estate property | N/A | 0.0 | % | N/A | N/A | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other investments | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible Notes (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Qintess Tecnologia e Participacoes Ltda, Series A (11) | Computer Related Services |
| 3.94% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Qintess Tecnologia e Participacoes Ltda, Series B (11) | Computer Related Services |
| 12.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total convertible notes | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Warrants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | Blue Arrow Biojet Holdings, LLC (7) | Refuse Systems | Waste to Fuels Processor | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Investments | $ | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
| 1 | Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 4 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Company’s investments. |
| 2 | Fees may include upfront, origination, commitment, facility and/or other fees that the borrower must contractually pay to the Company. Fees, if any, are typically received in connection with term loan transactions and are rarely applicable to trade finance transactions. |
| 3 | Trade finance borrowers may be granted flexibility with respect to repayment relative to the stated maturity date to accommodate specific contracts and/or business cycle characteristics. This flexibility in each case is agreed upon between the Company and the sub-advisor and between the sub-advisor and the borrower. |
| 4 | Percentage of the Company’s participation in total borrowings outstanding under sub-advisor provided financing facility. The participation percentages are calculated based on the global outstanding balance for the facility. |
| 5 | Watch List investment (i.e., an investment with any significant changes in the credit and collection risk). |
| 6 | Investment on non-accrual status. |
| 7 | The Company holds equity warrants, which upon exercise would entitle the Company to equity interests equivalent to |
| 8 | The Company is negotiating with the borrower to amend the loan term and to extend the maturity date. |
| 9 | Lidas SRL is the operating company for the investment. The participation is in a senior security term loan to Cristal Project SRL, which is guaranteed by Lidas SRL. |
| 10 | Courtyard Farms Limited and Alfa Systems and Commodity Company Limited are the original borrowers of this investment. The borrowers were not able to meet scheduled debt repayments, and the Company entered into a settlement agreement for the outstanding amount. The borrowers' inventory serves as collateral, which the Company plans to trade through a local agent. The settlement dates for Courtyard Farms Limited and Alfa Systems and Commodity Company Limited were July 31, 2024 and October 16, 2024, respectively. |
| 11 | Class A and Class B convertible notes were issued to the Company through a restructuring in August 2023. |
| 12 | Investment is in default. |
|
13
| Investment is in bankruptcy. |
|
14
| Investment is in arbitration. |
| 15 | Investment is undergoing a restructuring. |
| 16 | The borrower is required to repay the loan upon request. |
| 17 | The interest rate is |
| 18 | Another creditor filed a Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (“PKPU”) claim in Indonesia (which is comparable to a U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing). The Company has filed a claim in connection with that PKPU proceeding, but there is not certainty regarding the outcome of the Company’s claim. |
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2024
| Investment Type /Country | Portfolio Company | Sector | Description | Interest | Fees (2) | Maturity (3) | Principal Amount | Participation % (4) | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | % of Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Secured Term Loans (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ecuador | Grupo Surpapel |
|
|
| % |
| $ | % | $ | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | Limas Commodities House Limited (5), (6), (12) | Coal and Other Minerals and Ores | Resource Trader | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indonesia | PT Citra Labuantirta (15) | Chocolate and Cocoa Products |
| PIK 12.5% | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Malaysia | Vikudha Malaysia Sdn Bhd (5), (6) | Chemicals and Allied Products | Wholesale Distributor | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | Blue Arrow Biojet Holdings, LLC (8) | Refuse Systems |
| 20.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Singapore | Triton Metallics Pte Ltd. (5), (6) |
|
| 6.0% Cash/7.50% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Senior Secured Term Loans | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Secured Term Loan Participations (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Botswana | Ecsponent Holdings Limited (5), (6), (13) | Short-Term Business Credit | SME Financier | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Dock Brasil Engenharia E Servicos S.A. (8) |
|
| 14% Cash / 3% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cabo Verde | TRG Cape Verde Holdings Ltd |
|
| 10.0% Cash/3.5% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kenya | Multiple ICD (Kenya) Limited (5), (6), (12) |
|
| 12.7% Cash / 4.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Namibia | Trustco Group Holdings Ltd. (5), (6), (12) |
|
| 8.50% Cash/4.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | Cevher International B.V. Netherlands (5), (8) |
| Wheel Manufacturer |
| % | N/A | (16) | % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigeria | Maritime One Limited (5) | Towing and Tugboat Service | Marine Logistics Provider | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Romania | Lidas SRL (9) |
| Frozen Bakery Products Manufacturer | 18.5% Cash | % | N/A | (16) | % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uganda | Agilis Partners Holding LLC (5), (15) | Corn |
| 12.80% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uganda | Agilis Partners (5), (15) |
|
| 3.50% Cash/8.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Senior Secured Term Loan Participations | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Secured Trade Finance Participations (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Compania Argentina de Granos S.A. (5), (6), (13) | Soybeans | Agriculture Distributor | N/A | % |
| N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Sancor Cooperativas Unidas Ltda (5), (6), (12) | Dairy Farms | Dairy Co-Operative | % | % |
| N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cameroon | Producam SA (5), (6), (14) |
|
| 9.50%, 6.0% | (17) | % |
| % | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ecuador | Worldwide Investments and Representations Winrep S.A. and Vannapack S.A. (5), (6), (12) | Frozen Fish and Seafood | Seafood Processing Company II | % | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Senior Secured Trade Finance Participations | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Investments (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| N/A | IIG TOF B.V. (5), (6), (13) | Other | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chile | Itelecom Holding Chile SPA (5), (6), (13) | Electric Services | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Algodonera Avellaneda S.A. (5), (6), (13) | Cotton Ginning | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Argentina | Frigorifico Regional Industrias Alimentarias, S.A., Sucursal Uruguay (5), (6), (13) | Beef Cattle, Except Feedlots | Claim in Bankruptcy | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nigeria | Equity Participation in Cocoa Transaction (10) | Other | Profit sharing rights on cocoa distribution | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Usivale Industria E Commercio Ltda | Other | Installment under Judicial Recovery | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peru | TriLinc Peru S.A.C. | Other | Real estate property | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total other investments | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible Notes (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Qintess Tecnologia e Participacoes Ltda, Series A (11) | Computer Related Services |
| 4.49% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | Qintess Tecnologia e Participacoes Ltda, Series B (5), (11) | Computer Related Services |
| 12.0% PIK | % |
| % | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total convertible notes | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Warrants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mexico | Blue Arrow Biojet Holdings, LLC (7) | Refuse Systems | Waste to Fuels Processor | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Investments | $ | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
| 1 | Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 4 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Company’s investments. |
| 2 | Fees may include upfront, origination, commitment, facility and/or other fees that the borrower must contractually pay to the Company. Fees, if any, are typically received in connection with term loan transactions and are rarely applicable to trade finance transactions. |
| 3 | Trade finance borrowers may be granted flexibility with respect to repayment relative to the stated maturity date to accommodate specific contracts and/or business cycle characteristics. This flexibility in each case is agreed upon between the Company and the sub-advisor and between the sub-advisor and the borrower. |
| 4 | Percentage of the Company’s participation in total borrowings outstanding under sub-advisor provided financing facility. The participation percentages are calculated based on the global outstanding balance for the facility. |
| 5 | Watch List investment (i.e., an investment with any significant changes in the credit and collection risk). |
| 6 | Investment on non-accrual status. |
| 7 | The Company holds equity warrants, which upon exercise would entitle the Company to equity interests equivalent to |
| 8 | The Company is negotiating with the borrower to amend the loan term and to extend the maturity date. |
| 9 | Lidas SRL is the operating company for the investment. The participation is in a senior security term loan to Cristal Project SRL, which is guaranteed by Lidas SRL. |
| 10 | Courtyard Farms Limited and Alfa Systems and Commodity Company Limited are the original borrowers of this investment. The borrowers were not able to meet scheduled debt repayments, and the Company entered into a settlement agreement for the outstanding amount. The borrowers' inventory serves as collateral, which the Company plans to trade through a local agent. The settlement dates for Courtyard Farms Limited and Alfa Systems and Commodity Company Limited were July 31, 2024 and October 16, 2024, respectively. |
| 11 | Class A and Class B convertible notes were issued to the Company through a restructuring in August 2023. |
| 12 | Investment is in default. |
|
13
| Investment is in bankruptcy. |
|
14
| Investment is in arbitration. |
| 15 | Investment is undergoing a restructuring. |
| 16 | The borrower is required to repay the loan upon request. |
| 17 | The interest rate is |
TRILINC GLOBAL IMPACT FUND, LLC
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and Operations of the Company
TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC (the “Company”) was organized as a Delaware limited liability company on April 30, and formally commenced operations on June 11, 2013. As a result of the Company's LLC structure, the Company's unitholders have limited legal and financial liability for the obligations or debts of the Company. The Company makes impact investments in Small and Medium Enterprises, known as SMEs, which the Company defines as those businesses having less than
TriLinc Global, LLC (the “Sponsor”) is the sponsor of the Company and employs staff who operate both the Advisor and the Company. The Sponsor owns
In May 2012, the Advisor purchased
Although the Company was organized and intends to conduct its business in a manner so that it is not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the consolidated financial statements are prepared using the specialized accounting principles of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services — Investment Companies ("ASC 946"). Overall, the Company’s management believes the use of investment company accounting makes the Company’s financial statements more useful to investors and other financial statement users since it allows a more appropriate basis of comparison to other entities with similar objectives.
To assist the Company in achieving its investment objective, the Company makes investments via wholly owned subsidiaries (each a “Subsidiary” and collectively, the “Subsidiaries”), all of which are Cayman Islands exempted companies. The Subsidiaries own all of the Company’s investments. As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s Subsidiaries are as follows:
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Asia, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Latin America, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Trade Finance, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – African Trade Finance, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Africa, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Latin America II, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – African Trade Finance II, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Latin America III, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Asia II, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Asia III, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Asia IV, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – African Trade Finance III, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Europe, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Cayman Master (formerly known as TriLinc Global Impact Fund - North America, Ltd.) |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Africa Latin America, Ltd. |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund - Africa Latin America Trade Finance, Ltd |
| ● | TriLinc Global Impact Fund – Cayman, Ltd. |
Through September 30, 2025, the Company has made, through its Subsidiaries, loans in a number of countries located in South America, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Company’s financial information is prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company follows the accounting and reporting guidance in ASC 946. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are based on management's knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may differ from these estimates.
Cash
Cash consists of demand deposits at a financial institution located in the U.S. Such deposits may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. The Company considers the credit risk of this financial institution to be remote and has not experienced and does not expect to experience any losses in any such accounts. The Company limits its credit risk by selecting financial institutions considered to be highly creditworthy.
Revenue Recognition
The Company records interest income on an accrual basis to the extent that the Company expects to collect such amounts. Following the initial accrual of interest income, the receivable balances are adjusted to have such balances reflect their net realizable value at each reporting date. The Company determines the net realizable value using the same methodologies used to determine the fair value of investments. Structuring, upfront and similar fees are recorded as a discount on investments purchased and are accreted into interest income, on a straight-line basis, which the Company has determined not to be materially different from the effective yield method.
The Company records prepayment penalties for loans and debt securities paid back to the Company prior to the maturity date as income upon receipt.
The Company generally places loans on non-accrual status when there is a reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected when they become due. Non-accrual loans are generally restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in the Company’s judgment, is likely to remain current over the remainder of the term.
Valuation of Investments
The Company carries all of its investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. Fair value is the price that would be received when selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The fair value measurement guidance establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide disclosures on fair value measurements according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the observability of the inputs used to determine fair values. Investments carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
| ● | Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. |
| ● | Level 2 — Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable. |
| ● | Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and where there is little, if any, market activity at the measurement date. The inputs for the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation and is based upon management’s assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
These investments include debt and equity investments in private companies or assets valued using the income or liquidation approach and may involve pricing models whose inputs require significant judgment or estimation because of the absence of any meaningful current market data for identical or similar investments. The inputs in these valuations may include, but are not limited to, capitalization and discount rates and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples. The information may also include pricing information or broker quotes, which include a disclaimer that the broker would not be held to such a price in an actual transaction. Certain investments may be valued based upon a collateral approach, which uses estimated value of underlying collateral and includes adjustments deemed necessary for estimates of costs to obtain control and liquidate available collateral. The non-binding nature of consensus pricing and/or quotes accompanied by disclaimer would result in classification as Level 3 information, assuming no additional corroborating evidence.
The inputs used in the determination of fair value may require significant judgment or estimation.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at those quotations. Most of the Company’s investments are loans to private companies, which are not actively traded in any market and for which quotations are not available. For those investments for which market quotations are not readily available, or when such market quotations are deemed by the Advisor not to represent fair value, the Company’s board of managers has approved a multi-step valuation process to be followed each fiscal quarter, as described below:
| 1. | Each investment is valued by the Advisor on a quarterly basis; |
| 2. | Materiality is assessed quarterly on all investments to determine whether an independent review is appropriate. When deemed appropriate, the Advisor engages a third-party valuation firm to conduct an independent review of the reasonableness of the Advisor’s internal estimates of fair value on all term loans and trade finance Watch List investments, and to provide an opinion of whether they concur with the Advisor’s analysis. The independent assessment occurs on a discretionary basis based on qualifications that takes into account both quantitative thresholds and qualitative considerations, as determined by the Advisor. The analysis performed by the independent valuation firm is based upon data and assumptions provided to it by the Company and received from third party sources, which the independent valuation firm relies upon as being accurate without independent verification. The results of the analyses performed by the independent valuation firm are among the factors taken into consideration by the Company and its management in making its determination with respect to the fair value of such investments, but are not determinative. The Company and its management are solely and ultimately responsible for determining the fair value of the Company’s investments in good faith; |
| 3. | The audit committee of the Company’s board of managers reviews and discusses the preliminary valuation prepared by the Advisor and any report rendered by the independent valuation firm; and |
| 4. | The board of managers discusses the valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in the Company’s portfolio in good faith based on the inputs which include but are not limited to, inputs of the Advisor, the independent valuation firm and the audit committee. The Company and its board of managers are solely and ultimately responsible for the determination, in good faith, of the fair value of each investment. |
Below is a description of factors that the Company’s board of managers may consider when valuing the Company’s investments.
Any potential valuation adjustments are subject to a materiality threshold as determined by the Advisor. Due to the fact that all non-Watch List investments are performing loans, with no macroeconomic indicator or other event observed that would reasonably be expected to have a material impact on the underlying performance or collateral value of the investment, most of these investments have a fair value that does not deviate materially from amortized cost. If, pursuant to the Company's quarterly review, the Company determines that one or more material valuation adjustments are appropriate, then the Company adjusts the fair value. Historically, in most cases when these adjustments have resulted in a fair value that is materially less than the investment’s amortized cost, the Company has determined to place it on the Watch List. Fixed income investments are typically valued utilizing an income approach, collateral based approach, or a combination of these approaches (and any others, as appropriate). The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, interest and principal payments) to a single present value amount (Discounted Cash Flow or “DCF”) calculated based on an appropriate discount rate. The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. For Watch List investments, the Company predominantly uses the income approach, but may also use a collateral based approach (also known as a liquidation or net recovery approach), or a hybrid approach consisting of the income approach and the collateral based approach. The collateral based approach uses estimates of the collateral value of the borrower’s assets using an expected recovery model. When using the collateral based approach, the Company determines the fair value of the remaining assets, discounted to reflect the anticipated amount of time to recovery and the uncertainty of recovery. The Company also may make further adjustments to account for anticipated costs of recovery, including legal fees and expenses. In following a given approach, the types of factors that the Company may take into account in valuing the Company’s investments include, as applicable:
| ● | Macro-economic factors that are relevant to the investment or the underlying borrower |
| ● | Industry factors that are relevant to the investment or the underlying borrower |
| ● | Historical and projected financial performance of the borrower based on most recent financial statements |
| ● | Borrower draw requests and payment track record |
| ● | Loan covenants, duration and drivers |
| ● | Performance and condition of the collateral (nature, type and value) that supports the investment |
| ● | Sub-Advisor recommendation as to possible impairment or reserve, including updates and feedback |
| ● | For participations, the Company’s ownership percentage of the overall facility |
| ● | Key inputs and assumptions that are believed to be most appropriate for the investment and the approach utilized |
| ● | Applicable global interest rates |
| ● | Impact of investments placed on non-accrual status |
With respect to warrants and other equity investments, as well as certain fixed income investments, the Company may also look to private merger and acquisition statistics, public trading multiples discounted for illiquidity and other factors, valuations implied by third-party investments in the portfolio companies, option pricing models or industry practices in determining fair value. The Company may also consider the size and scope of a portfolio company and its specific strengths and weaknesses, as well as any other factors the Company deems relevant in measuring the fair values of the Company’s investments.
Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments
The Company measures net realized gains or losses as the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale on investments and the amortized cost basis of the investment including unamortized upfront fees and prepayment penalties. Realized gains or losses on the disposition of an investment are calculated using the specific identification method, utilizing the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized but considering unamortized upfront fees. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.
Payment-in-Kind Interest
The Company has investments that contain payment-in-kind ("PIK") interest provisions. For loans with contractual PIK interest, any interest will be added to the principal balance of such investments and be recorded as interest income, if the valuation indicates that such interest is collectible. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company earned PIK interest of $
Distribution and Ongoing Dealer Manager and Service Fees
The Company pays a distribution fee equal to
The Company accounts for the distribution fees as a charge to equity at the time each Class C unit was sold in the Offering and recorded a corresponding liability for the estimated amount to be paid in future periods. The Company accounts for the ongoing dealer manager fees and service fees paid in connection with the sale of Class I and Class W units in the private placement in the same manner. At September 30, 2025, the estimated unpaid distribution fees for Class C units amounted to $
Income Taxes
The Company is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, the Company allocates all income or loss to its unitholders according to their respective percentage of ownership, and is generally not subject to tax at the entity level. Therefore, no provision for federal or state income taxes has been included in these financial statements.
The Company may be subject to withholding taxes on income and capital gains imposed by certain countries in which the Company invests. The withholding tax on income is netted against the income accrued or received. Any reclaimable taxes are recorded as income. The withholding tax on realized or unrealized gain is recorded as a liability.
The Company follows the guidance for uncertainty in income taxes included in ASC 740, Income Taxes. This guidance requires the Company to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including the resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position.
As of September 30, 2025,
Unitholders are individually responsible for reporting income or loss, to the extent required by the federal and state income tax laws and regulations, based upon their respective share of the Company’s income and expense as reported for income tax purposes.
Calculation of Net Asset Value
The Company’s net asset value is calculated on a quarterly basis. As of September 30, 2025, the Company has six classes of units: Class A units, Class C units, Class I units, Class W units, Class Y units and Class Z units. All units participate in the income and expenses of the Company on a pro-rata basis based on the number of units outstanding. Under GAAP, pursuant to SEC guidance, the Company records liabilities for (i) ongoing fees that the Company currently owes to the dealer manager under the terms of the dealer manager agreement and (ii) for an estimate of the fees that the Company may pay to the dealer manager in future periods. As of September 30, 2025, under GAAP, the Company has recorded a liability in the amount of $
The Company is not required to determine its net asset value per unit under GAAP and therefore, its determination of net asset value per unit for Class C units, Class I units and Class W units varies from GAAP. The Company does not deduct the liability for estimated future distribution fees in its calculation of net asset value per unit for Class C units. Further, the Company does not deduct the liability for estimated future dealer manager fees in its calculation of the net asset value per unit for Class I units and Class W units. Likewise, the Company does not deduct the liability for estimated future service fees in its calculation of the net asset value per unit for Class W units. The Company believes this approach is consistent with the industry standard and appropriate since the Company intends for the net asset value to reflect the estimated value on the date that the Company determines its net asset value.
Accordingly, the Company believes that its estimated net asset value at any given time should not include consideration of any estimated future distribution, ongoing dealer manager or service fees that may become payable after such date. As a result, as of September 30, 2025, each of the Class A, Class C, Class I, Class W, Class Y and Class Z units have the same net asset value per unit of approximately $
Concentration Risk
As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, interest receivable reported on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities totaled $
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, total interest income, which includes both cash and PIK interest, was $
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, total interest income, which includes both cash and PIK interest, was $
Net Income (Loss) per Unit
Basic net income (loss) per unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of members’ units outstanding during the period. Diluted net income or loss per unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of members’ units and members’ unit equivalents outstanding during the period. The Company did have any potentially dilutive units outstanding at September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Organization and Offering Costs
The Sponsor has incurred organization and offering costs on behalf of the Company. Organization and offering costs incurred in connection with the Offering were reimbursable to the Sponsor to the extent the aggregate of selling commissions, dealer manager fees and other organization and offering costs did not exceed
Segment Reporting
The Company has determined that it qualifies as a single reporting segment, as it follows a single investment activity and strategy. Additionally, the segment income and expenses are reported as total investment income and expenses on a consolidated basis in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") is the Chief Executive Officer, who also serves as the President.
The CODM regularly assesses performance of the single reporting segment and decides how to allocate resources and make operating decisions based on the net changes in net asset value, which consists of net increases or decreases from operations and other capital transactions, including distributions, unit issuances, and unit repurchases as listed in the accompanying consolidated statement of changes in net assets.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), and in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date, which will be effective for annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2026. ASU 2024-03 will require the Company to provide more detailed information about the types of expenses in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating and believes that the adoption of ASU 2024-03 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Risk Factors
As an externally-managed company, the Company is largely dependent on the efforts of the Advisor, the sub-advisors and other service providers and has been dependent on the Sponsor for financial support in prior periods.
The Company’s sub-advisors are responsible for locating, performing due diligence and closing on suitable acquisitions based on their access to local markets, local market knowledge for quality deal flow and extensive local private credit experience. However, because the sub-advisors are separate companies from the Advisor, the Company is subject to the risk that one or more of its sub-advisors will be ineffective or materially underperform. The Company’s ability to achieve its investment objectives and to pay distributions to unitholders will be dependent upon the performance of its sub-advisors in the identification, performance of due diligence on and acquisition of investments, the determination of any financing arrangements, and the management of the Company’s projects and assets. The Company is subject to the risk that the Company’s sub-advisors may fail to perform according to the Company’s expectations, or the due diligence conducted by the sub-advisors may fail to reveal all material risks of the Company’s investments, which could result in the Company being materially adversely affected.
The Company is subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Global economies and capital markets can and have experienced significant volatility, which has increased the risks associated with investments in collateralized private debt instruments. Investment in the Company carries risk and there are no guarantees that the Company’s investment objectives will be achieved. The Company relies on the ability of the Advisor and the ability of the sub-advisors’ investment professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from these investments, which primarily are made in, with or through private companies. If the Company is unable to uncover all material information about these companies or is provided incorrect or inadequate information about these companies from the Company’s subadvisors, the Company may not make a fully informed investment decision, and the Company may lose money on its investments. The International Investment Group L.L.C. (“IIG”) was the sub-advisor with respect to of the
The Company’s investments consist of loans, loan participations and trade finance participations that are illiquid and non-traded, making purchase or sale of such financial instruments at desired prices or in desired quantities difficult. Furthermore, the sale of any such investments may be possible only at substantial discounts, and it may be extremely difficult to value any such investments accurately.
The value of the Company’s investments in loans may be detrimentally affected to the extent, among other things, that a borrower defaults on its obligations, there is insufficient collateral securing the loan and/or there are extensive legal and other costs incurred in collecting on a defaulted loan, observable secondary or primary market yields for similar instruments issued by comparable companies increase materially or risk premiums required in the market between smaller companies, such as the Company’s borrowers, and those for which market yields are observable increase materially. The majority of the Company’s investments are in the form of participation interests, in financing facilities originated by one of the Company’s sub-advisors. Accordingly, the Company’s counterparty for investments in participation interests generally will be the respective sub-advisor or its affiliate. In these instances, the Company will not have a contract with the underlying borrower and therefore, in the event of default, will not have the ability to directly seek recovery against the collateral and instead will have to seek recovery through the Company’s sub-advisor counterparty, which increases the risk of full recovery. Fortunately, most supply side conditions normalized in 2023, providing some economic relief to borrower companies. However, as noted in prior quarters, the combination of pandemic period effects, in many cases, had devastating and long-lasting impacts on the businesses, financial condition and results of operations of several borrower companies. The U.S. government has recently imposed, and may further increase, tariffs on certain countries and commodities. In response, some non-U.S. countries have imposed or may impose retaliatory tariffs. These actions and the resulting uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policies may adversely affect global economic conditions and the stability of financial markets. Although we are continuing to monitor the economic effects of such actions, as well as opportunities to mitigate their related impacts, costs and other effects associated with the tariffs remain uncertain.
In addition, as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, all but one of the Company’s investments were denominated in U.S. dollars. If the U.S. dollar rises, it may become more difficult for borrowers to make loan payments if the borrowers are operating in markets where the local currencies are depreciating relative the U.S. dollar.
In addition, certain of the Company’s investments in loans contain a PIK interest provision. These investments may expose the Company to higher risks, including an increased risk of potential loss because PIK interest results in an increase in the size of the outstanding loan balance. The Company may also be exposed to the risk that it may be more difficult to value the investments because the continuing accrual of interest requires continuing subjective judgments about the collectability of the deferred payments and the value of the underlying collateral. To the extent the loan is structured as a PIK interest-only loan, the probability and magnitude of a loss on the Company’s investment may increase.
At September 30, 2025, the Company’s largest loan by value was $
Note 3. Investments
As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s investments consisted of the following:
| Percentage | ||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | of Total Investments | ||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans | $ | $ | % | |||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations | % | |||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations | % | |||||||||||
| Convertible notes | % | |||||||||||
| Other investments | % | |||||||||||
| Equity warrants | % | |||||||||||
| Total investments | $ | % | ||||||||||
As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s investments consisted of the following:
| Percentage | ||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | of Total Investments | ||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans | $ | $ | % | |||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations | % | |||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations | % | |||||||||||
| Convertible notes | % | |||||||||||
| Other investments | % | |||||||||||
| Equity warrants | % | |||||||||||
| Total investments | $ | $ | % | |||||||||
Participations
Some of the Company’s investments are in the form of participation interests in financing facilities (“Participations”). Certain of the Company's Participations are interests in financing facilities originated by one of the Company’s sub-advisors. Participations may be interests in one specific loan or trade finance transaction, several loans or trade finance transactions under a facility, or may be interests in an entire facility. The Company’s rights under Participations include, without limitation, all corresponding rights in payments, collateral, guaranties, and any other security interests obtained by the respective sub-advisor in the underlying financing facilities.
As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, Participations with sub-advisors represented the following as a percentage of Net Assets:
| As of September 30, 2025 | As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair | Percentage | Fair | Percentage | |||||||||||||
| Sub-advisor | Value | of Total | Value | of Total | ||||||||||||
| CEECAT Capital Limited & CCL Investments SARL | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| Origin Capital Limited | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Scipion Capital, Ltd. | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| TRG Management LP | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
Interest Receivable
Depending on the specific terms of the Company’s investments, interest earned by the Company is payable either monthly, quarterly, or, in the case of most trade finance investments, at maturity. As such, some of the Company's trade finance investments have up to a year or more of accrued interest receivable as of September 30, 2025. In addition, certain of the Company’s investments in term loans accrue deferred interest, which is not payable until the maturity of the loans. Lastly, certain of the Company's investments have PIK interest, which is accrued as interest receivable and capitalized on a regular basis based on the terms of the agreements. As a result, a significant portion of the Company's interest receivable balance may not be received in cash in the short term. The Company’s interest receivable balances at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are recorded at net realizable value.
Trade Finance
Trade finance encompasses a variety of lending structures that support the export, import or sale of goods between producers and buyers in various countries and across various jurisdictions. The strategy is most prevalent in the financing of commodities. The Company’s Participations in trade finance positions typically fall into two broad categories: pre-export financing and receivable/inventory financing. Pre-export financing represents advances to borrowers based on proven orders from buyers. Receivable/inventory financing represents advances on borrowers’ eligible receivable and inventory balances. For trade finance, the structure and terms of the facility underlying the Company’s Participations vary according to the nature of the transaction being financed. The structure can take the form of a revolver with multiple draw requests and maturity of up to year based on collateral and performance requirements. The structure can also be specific to the individual transaction being financed, which typically have shorter durations of
| ● | nature of the goods or transaction being financed, |
| ● | the terms associated with the sale and repayment of the goods, |
| ● | the execution risk associated with producing, storing and shipment of the goods, |
| ● | the financial and performance profile of both the borrower and end buyer(s), |
| ● | the underlying advance rate and subsequent Loan to Value (“LTV”) associated with lending against the goods that serve to secure the facility or transaction, |
| ● | collateral and financial controls (collection accounts and inventory possession), |
| ● | third party inspections and insurance, and |
| ● | the region, country or jurisdiction in which the financing is being completed. |
Collateral varies by transaction, but is typically raw or finished goods inventory, and/or receivables. In the case of pre-export finance, the transaction is secured by purchase orders from buyers or offtake contracts, which are agreements between a buyer and seller to purchase/sell a future product.
Terms depend on the nature of the facility or transaction being financed. As such, they depend on the credit profile of the underlying financing, as well as the speed and detail associated with the request for financing. Interest can be paid as often as monthly or quarterly on revolving facilities (one year in duration) or at maturity when dealing with specific transactions with shorter duration, which is the case for the majority of the Company’s trade finance positions. At times, settlement can be delayed due to documentation, shipment, transportation or port clearing issues, delays associated with the end buyer or off-taker assuming possession, possible changes to contract or offtake terms, and the aggregation of settlement of multiple individual transactions. Conversely, at times payments are made ahead of schedule, as transactions either clear faster than expected, borrowers decide to prepay or pay down ahead of schedule, counterparties clear multiple individual transactions in one settlement, or less expensive financing is secured by the borrower.
On occasion, the Company may receive notice from the respective sub-advisor that a borrower or counterparty to a financing facility underlying one of the Company’s Participations intends to pay ahead of schedule or in one lump sum (settling multiple draw requests all at once). Depending on timing and the ability to redeploy these funds, combined with projected inflows of capital, these outsize payments can negatively impact the Company’s performance. In these situations, the credit profile of the borrower, and the transaction in general, is reviewed with the sub-advisor and a request may be made to either stagger payments, where at all possible, or request that payment only be made at the end of that specific financial quarter. These requests or accommodations, which happen very rarely, will only be made where the Company has strong comfort in and around the credit profile of the transaction or borrower.
Short Term Investments
Short term investments are defined by the Company as investments that generally meet the standard underwriting guidelines for trade finance and term loan transactions and that also have the following characteristics: (1) maturity of less than one year, and (2) loans to borrowers to whom, at the time of funding, the Company does not expect to re-lend. Impact data is not tracked for short term investments.
Warrants
Certain investments, including loans and participations, may carry equity warrants, which allow the Company to buy shares of the portfolio company at a given price, which the Company may exercise at its discretion during the life of the portfolio company. The Company’s goal is to ultimately dispose of such equity interests and realize gains upon the disposition of such interests. However, these warrants and equity interests are generally illiquid and it may be difficult for the Company to dispose of them. In addition, the Company expects that any warrants or other return enhancements received when the Company makes or invests in loans may require several years to appreciate in value and may not appreciate at all.
The industry composition of the Company’s portfolio, at fair value as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, was as follows:
| As of September 30, 2025 | As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair | Percentage | Fair | Percentage | |||||||||||||
| Industry | Value | of Total | Value | of Total | ||||||||||||
| Beef Cattle, Except Feedlots | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| Boatbuilding and Repairing | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Chemicals and Allied Products | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Chocolate and Cocoa Products | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Coal and Other Minerals and Ores | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Computer Related Services | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Corn | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Corrugated and Solid Fiber Boxes | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Cotton Ginning | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Dairy Farms | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Electric Services | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Freight Transportation Arrangement | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Frozen Fish and Seafood | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Hotels and Motels | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Land Subdividers and Developers | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Refuse Systems | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Retail Bakeries | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Short-Term Business Credit | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Soybeans | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Towing and Tugboat Service | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Other | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
The table below shows the portfolio composition by geographic classification at fair value as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
| As of September 30, 2025 | As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Fair | Percentage | Fair | Percentage | |||||||||||||
| Country | Value | of Total | Value | of Total | ||||||||||||
| Argentina (1) | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| Botswana | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Brazil | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Cabo Verde | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Cameroon | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Chile | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Ecuador | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Indonesia | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Kenya | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Malaysia | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Mexico | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Namibia | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Nigeria | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Peru | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Romania | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Singapore | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Uganda | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| N/A | % | % | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||
| (1) | All of the Company’s investments in Argentina are Participations in trade finance facilities originated by IIG TOF B.V. |
Note 4. Fair Value Measurements
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s investments by the fair value hierarchy levels required under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement ("ASC 820") as of September 30, 2025:
| Fair | ||||||||||||||||
| Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations | ||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations | ||||||||||||||||
| Convertible notes | ||||||||||||||||
| Other investments | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s investments by the fair value hierarchy levels required under ASC 820 as of December 31, 2024:
| Fair | ||||||||||||||||
| Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations | ||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations | ||||||||||||||||
| Convertible notes | ||||||||||||||||
| Other investments | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
The fair value of the repurchase obligation as of September 30, 2025, is $
The following is a reconciliation of activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, of investments classified as Level 3:
| Fair Value at December 31, 2024 | Purchases | Proceeds from disposition and paydowns of investments | Reclassifications | Capitalized payment-in-kind interest income | Net change in | Net realized gains (losses) | Fair Value at September 30, 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | )(1) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity warrants | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||
(1) The total amount pertains to the repurchase obligation (see Note 5. Contingencies and Related Parties for additional information) and the reversion to the original contractual terms of the debt agreement for a specific investment following a failure to reach an agreement on the investment's restructuring.
The following is a reconciliation of activity for the year ended December 31, 2024, of investments classified as Level 3:
| Fair Value at December 31, 2023 | Purchases | Proceeds from disposition and paydowns of investments | Reclassifications | Capitalized payment-in-kind interest income | Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | Net realized gains (losses) | Fair Value at December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Convertible notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other investments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity warrants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and net change in unrealized appreciation for the year ended December 31, 2024 reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations attributable to the Company’s Level 3 assets still held at period end were approximately ,032,000 and $
As of September 30, 2025, all of the Company’s portfolio investments utilized Level 3 inputs. The following table presents the quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements of the Company’s investments as of September 30, 2025:
| Fair value | Valuation technique | Unobservable input | Range (weighted average) (4) | ||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations (1) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Senior secured term loans (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Senior secured term loans (3) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations (1) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Senior secured term loan participations (3) | $ | A hybrid of the collateral based approach and the income approach (DCF) |
|
| |||||
| Other investments (1) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Other investments (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Convertible notes (2) | $ | Income approach (DCF) |
|
| |||||
| Equity warrants | $ | Option Pricing Method |
|
| |||||
| (1) | The Company used a collateral based approach for the following Watch List investments: MICD, Trustco, Sancor, WinRep, IIG TOF B.V., Itelecom, Algodonera, and Frigorifico. |
| (2) | The Company used the income approach for the following Watch List investments: Grupo Surpapel, Limas, Triton, Dock Brasil, Cevher, Maritime One, Lidas, Agilis Partners, Agilis Partners Holding, CAGSA, and Producam. |
| (3) | The Company used a hybrid of the collateral or the conversion approach and the income approach for the following Watch List investments: PT Citra, Vikudha, and Ecsponent using additional unobservable inputs including recovery rates ranging from |
| (4) | The inputs were weighted based on the fair value of the investments included in the range. |
| (5) | Represents estimated period from September 30, 2025 to receipt date of final payment for investments under the income approach or estimated period from September 30, 2025 to collection date of proceeds from liquidation of collateral for investments under the liquidation approach. |
As of December 31, 2024, all of the Company’s portfolio investments utilized Level 3 inputs. The following table presents the quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements of the Company’s investments as of December 31, 2024:
| Fair value | Valuation technique | Unobservable input | Range (weighted average) | ||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations (1) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Senior secured term loans (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Senior secured term loans (3) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations (1) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations (2) | $ |
|
|
| |||||
| Senior secured term loan participations (3) | $ | A hybrid of the collateral based approach and the income approach (DCF) |
|
| |||||
| Other investments (1) |
|
|
| ||||||
| Other investments (2) | $ | Income approach (DCF) |
|
| |||||
| Convertible notes (2) | $ | Income approach (DCF) |
|
| |||||
| Equity warrants | $ | Option Pricing Method |
|
| |||||
| (1) | The Company used a collateral based approach for the following Watch List investments: MICD, Trustco, Sancor, WinRep, IIG TOF B.V., Itelecom, Algodonera, and Frigorifico. |
| (2) | The Company used the income approach for the following Watch List investments: Limas, Triton, Cevher, Maritime One, Agilis Partners, Agilis Partners Holding, CAGSA, Producam, Usivale and Qintess. |
| (3) | The Company used a hybrid of the collateral or the conversion approach and the income approach for the following Watch List investments: Vikudha and Ecsponent using additional unobservable inputs including recovery rates ranging from |
| (4) | The inputs were weighted based on the fair value of the investments included in the range. |
| (5) | Represents estimated period from December 31, 2024 to receipt date of final payment for investments under the income approach or estimated period from December 31, 2024 to collection date of proceeds from liquidation of collateral for investments under the liquidation approach. |
The significant unobservable Level 3 inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments are market yields used to discount the estimated future cash flows expected to be received from the underlying investments, which include both future principal and interest payments. Significant increases in market yields would result in significantly lower fair value measurements. In addition, a significant decrease in future cash flows is expected to be received from the underlying investments due to a projected decrease in results of operations and cash flows from the underlying investments, would result in significantly lower fair value measurements.
For additional information concerning of the country-specific risk concentrations for the Company’s investments, refer to the Consolidated Schedule of Investments and Note 3.
Note 5. Contingencies and Related Parties
Agreements
Advisory Agreement
The current term of the Advisory Agreement between the Company and the Advisor, (the “Advisory Agreement”) ends on March 31, 2026, subject to an unlimited number of -year renewals upon mutual consent of the Company and the Advisor.
Asset management fees payable to the Advisor are remitted quarterly in arrears and are equal to
If certain financial goals are reached by the Company, the Company is required to pay the Advisor an incentive fee that is comprised of two parts: (i) a subordinated fee on net investment income and (ii) an incentive fee on capital gains. The subordinated incentive fee on income is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears and is based upon the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding quarter. No subordinated incentive fee is earned by the Advisor in any calendar quarter in which the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the quarterly preferred return rate of
An incentive fee on capital gains will be earned on investments sold and shall be determined and payable to the Advisor in arrears as of the end of each calendar year. The incentive fee on capital gains is equal to
Repurchase Agreement
On October 31, 2022, the Company entered into a transaction with an unrelated financial institution, whereby it sold a $
Related Party Transactions
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Advisor earned $
On February 7, 2025, the Company sold a portion of its investment in TriLinc Peru S.A.C., for a sale price of $
As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, amounts due to affiliates on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities totaled $
Note 6. Unit Capital
As of September 30, 2025, the Company had six classes of units: Class A, Class C, Class I, Class W, Class Y and Class Z units. The unit classes have been sold with different upfront sales commissions and dealer manager fees as well as different ongoing distribution fees, dealer manager fees and/or service fees with respect to certain classes of units, including a distribution fee with respect to Class C units, an ongoing dealer manager fee with respect to Class I and Class W units, and an ongoing service fee with respect to Class W units. As of September 30, 2025, the Company recorded a liability in the aggregate amount of $
| Units | Units Issued | Units Issued | Units | Units | Units | |||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding | under Private | under Distribution | Exchanged | Repurchased | Outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||
| as of | Placement | Reinvestment Plan | as of | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | During | During | During | During | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | the Period | the Period | the Period | the Period | 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Class A units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class C units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class I units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class W units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class Y units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class Z units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025,
Beginning June 11, 2014, the Company commenced a unit repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may conduct quarterly unit repurchases of up to
The unit repurchase program includes numerous restrictions, including a -year holding period, that limit the ability of the Company’s unitholders to sell their units. Unless the Company’s board of managers determines otherwise, the Company will limit the number of units to be repurchased during any calendar year to the number of units that can be repurchased with the proceeds the Company receives from the sale of units under the Company’s DRP. At the sole discretion of the Company’s board of managers, the Company may also use cash on hand, cash available from borrowings and cash from the repayment or liquidation of investments as of the end of the applicable quarter to repurchase units.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025,
As of September 30, 2024, the Company recorded a liability in the aggregate amount of $
| Units | Units Issued | Units Issued | Units | Units | Units | |||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding | under Private | under Distribution | Exchanged | Repurchased | Outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||
| as of | Placement | Reinvestment Plan | as of | |||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | During | During | During | During | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | the Period | the Period | the Period | the Period | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Class A units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class C units | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class I units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class W units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class Y units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class Z units | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024,
Note 7. Distributions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, distributions were made.
The following table summarizes the distributions for the nine months ended September 30, 2024:
| Daily Rate | Cash | Distributions | Total | |||||||||||||||
| Date Paid | Date Authorized | Per Unit | Distributions | Reinvested | Declared | |||||||||||||
| February 21, 2024 | | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| March 27, 2024 | | $ | ||||||||||||||||
| Total for 2024 | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
Note 8. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:
| Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Per unit data (1): | ||||||||
| Net asset value at beginning of period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net investment income | ||||||||
| Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net realized losses on investments | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations | ( | ) | ||||||
| Distributions | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net change in accrued distribution and other fees | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net (decrease) increase in net assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net asset value at end of period (2) | $ | $ | ||||||
| Total return based on net asset value (4) | - | % | % | |||||
| Net assets at end of period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Units Outstanding at end of period | ||||||||
| Ratio/Supplemental data (annualized) (3): | ||||||||
| Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | % | % | ||||||
| Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | % | % | ||||||
| 1 | The per unit data was derived by using the weighted average units outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, which were |
| 2 | For financial statement reporting purposes under GAAP, as of September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded a liability in the amount of $ |
| 3 | The Company’s net investment income and expense ratios have been annualized assuming consistent results over a full fiscal year, however, this may not be indicative of actual results over a full fiscal year. |
| 4 | Total return does not assume the reinvestment of distributions paid and is not annualized. |
Note 9. Subsequent Events
The Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events through November 14, 2025, the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements included herein. There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in the Form 10-Q or would be required to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Except as otherwise specified, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company,” refer to TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC.
Forward Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:
| ● |
our future operating results; |
| ● |
our ability to purchase or make investments in a timely manner; |
| ● |
our business prospects and the prospects of our borrowers; |
| ● |
the economic, social and/or environmental impact of the investments that we expect to make; |
| ● |
our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties; |
| ● |
our ability to make distributions to our unitholders; |
| ● |
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the companies in which we invest; |
| ● |
the availability of cash flow from operating activities for distributions and payment of operating expenses; |
| ● |
the performance of our Advisor, our sub-advisors and our Sponsor; |
| ● |
our dependence on our Advisor and our dependence on and the availability of the financial resources of our Sponsor; |
| ● |
the ability of our borrowers to make required payments; |
| ● |
our Advisor’s ability to attract and retain sufficient personnel to support our growth and operations; |
| ● |
the lack of a public trading market for our units; |
| ● |
the outcome and costs associated with our ongoing proceedings related to the recovery of amounts with respect to certain of our Watch List investments; |
| ● |
our ability to borrow funds; |
| ● |
our expected financings and investments; |
| ● |
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; |
| ● |
performance of our investments relative to our expectations and the impact on our actual return on invested equity, as well as the cash provided by these investments; |
| ● |
any failure in our Advisor’s or sub-advisors’ due diligence to identify all relevant facts in our underwriting process or otherwise; |
| ● |
the ability of our sub-advisors and borrowers to achieve their objectives; |
| ● |
the effectiveness of our portfolio management techniques and strategies; |
| ● |
failure to maintain effective internal controls; and |
| ● |
the loss of our exemption from the definition of an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. |
We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason.
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. We have based the forward-looking statements included in this report on information available to us on the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we may file in the future with the SEC.
Overview
We make impact investments in SMEs that provide the opportunity to achieve both competitive financial returns and positive measurable impact. We were organized as a Delaware limited liability company on April 30, 2012. We have operated and intend to continue to operate our business in a manner that will permit us to maintain our exemption from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. We have used the proceeds raised from the issuance of units to invest in SMEs through local market sub-advisors in a diversified portfolio of financial assets, including direct loans, loan participations, convertible debt instruments, trade finance, structured credit and preferred and common equity investments. A substantial portion of our assets consists of collateralized private debt instruments, which we believe offer opportunities for competitive risk-adjusted returns and income generation. We are externally managed and advised by TriLinc Advisors, LLC, or the Advisor. The Advisor is an investment advisor registered with the SEC.
Our business strategy is to generate competitive financial returns and positive economic, social and environmental impact by providing financing to SMEs, which we define as those business having less than 500 employees, primarily in developing economies. To a lesser extent, we may also make impact investments in companies that may not meet our technical definition of SMEs due to a larger number of employees but that also provide the opportunity to achieve both competitive financial returns and positive measurable impact. We generally expect that such investments will have similar investment characteristics as SMEs as defined by us. Our style of investment is referred to as impact investing, which J.P. Morgan Global Research and Rockefeller Foundation in a 2010 report called “an emerging alternative asset class” and defined as investing with the intent to create positive impact beyond financial return. We believe it is possible to generate competitive financial returns while creating positive, measurable impact. We measure the economic, social and environmental impact of our investments using industry-standard metrics, including the Impact Reporting and Investment Standards. Through our investments in SMEs, we intend to enable job creation and stimulate economic growth.
We commenced the Offering on February 25, 2013. Pursuant to the Offering, we were offering on a continuous basis up to $1.5 billion in units of our limited liability company interest, consisting of up to $1.25 billion of units in the primary offering consisting of Class A and Class C units at initial offering prices of $10.00 and $9.576 per unit, respectively, and Class I units at $9.025 per unit, and up to $250 million of units pursuant to our DRP. In May 2012, the Advisor purchased 22,161 Class A units for aggregate gross proceeds of $200,000. On June 11, 2013, we satisfied the minimum offering requirement of $2,000,000 when the Sponsor purchased 321,330 Class A units for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,900,000 and we commenced operations. The Offering terminated on March 31, 2017. Through the termination of the Offering, we raised approximately $361,776,000 in gross proceeds, including approximately $13,338,000 raised through our DRP.
For the period from April 1, 2017 to November 29, 2024, the Company raised an additional $99,753,000 pursuant to a private placement offering. The Company’s private placement offering terminated on November 29, 2024. Upon termination of the Offering, we registered $75 million in Class A, Class C and Class I units to continue to be offered pursuant to our DRP to the investors who purchased units in the Offering. Units issued pursuant to our DRP are offered at the price equal to the net asset value per unit of each class of units, as most recently disclosed by the Company in a public filing with the SEC at the time of reinvestment. Our DRP was amended, effective May 25, 2020, to allow holders of all classes of units other than Class Z units to participate, including holders who purchased units in our private placements. The offering must be registered or exempt from registration in every state in which we offer or sell units. If the offering is not exempt from registration, the required registration generally is for a period of one year. Therefore, we may have to stop selling units in any state in which the registration is not renewed annually and the offering is not otherwise exempt from registration.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we did not issue any units through the DRP. As of September 30, 2025, $21,439,000 in units remained available for sale pursuant to the DRP, which was temporarily suspended effective April 1, 2023. The suspension of the DRP was lifted effective April 24, 2024. In addition, the Company's unit repurchase program was suspended effective April 1, 2023. On August 9, 2024, the Company's board of managers approved the reopening of the unit repurchase program, effective September 1, 2024, solely with respect to repurchase requests submitted in connection with the death or disability of a unitholder, subject to the other terms and limitations of the unit repurchase program. Due to the terms and limitations of the unit repurchase program, no units have been repurchased since the program was reopened in September 2024.
From our inception through September 30, 2025, we issued an aggregate of 56,404,318 of our units, including 8,179,306 units issued under our DRP, for gross proceeds of approximately $515,089,000 including approximately $66,897,000 reinvested under our DRP (before dealer manager fees of approximately $4,801,000 and selling commissions of $16,862,000), for net proceeds of $493,427,000. We have not issued any units since the first quarter of 2023.
Outlook
Over the last three years, the global economy weathered tighter monetary policy triggered by high inflation better than most economists originally forecasted, particularly the United States. However, growth expectations were modestly revised downward during the three months ended September 30, 2025. Many of the Company’s borrowers experienced significant negative effects during the 2020 - 2022 period, due to higher operating costs and supply chain issues that began in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which were further exacerbated by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Fortunately, most supply side conditions normalized in 2023, providing some economic relief to borrower companies. However, the combination of pandemic period effects, in many cases, had devastating and long-lasting impacts on the businesses, financial condition and results of operations of several borrower companies. Together, these factors have made it more difficult for borrowers to repay their obligations to the Company in a timely manner or at all, resulting in the Company experiencing inconsistent cash flows. The Company believes that the central issue driving results is the fact that many borrower companies continue to struggle to recover from the compound impact of approximately three years of economic hardship stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022, while current macroeconomic conditions are not strong enough for borrower companies to achieve a rapid and significant recovery in operating performance. The U.S. government has recently imposed, and may in the future increase, tariffs on specific countries and commodities. In response, certain non-U.S. countries, and others in the future, may impose retaliatory tariffs. The foregoing has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and certain other countries with respect to trade policies, treaties and new and increased tariffs. These developments, or the continued uncertainty relating to U.S. trade policies, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. As of September 30, 2025, no material direct effects on the Company's borrowers have been observed, as many announced tariffs remained suspended through the end of the third quarter of 2025. The Company’s NAV per unit decreased by approximately $0.16 as of September 30, 2025, compared to the NAV per unit as of December 31, 2024. The decrease in net asset value per unit resulted from a combination of global economic uncertainty due to potential U.S. tariffs and retaliatory trade measures, along with the Company’s strategic liquidation of certain investments to mitigate prevailing liquidity challenges. While inflation trends eased in many developed economies, the persistence of core inflation and uncertainty around monetary policy timing contributed to a fragmented global outlook. In developing economies, macroeconomic conditions varied widely, with some regions benefitting from earlier monetary easing and others still constrained by weak external demand.
As a result of the inconsistent cash flows generated from the Company’s existing portfolio, the Company has experienced decreased liquidity, which, among other things, may continue to impact the Company’s ability to pay distributions to its unitholders or meet other Company obligations. Additionally, due to an event of default triggered under the Company’s credit facilities as a result of the resignation of the Company’s former independent registered public accounting firm in February 2023, which rendered the Company unable to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company entered into a Waiver and Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2023, pursuant to which the Company agreed to accelerate its repayment of the $18 million outstanding under the credit facilities. Pursuant to the terms of the Waiver and Agreement, the Company repaid the amounts outstanding under the credit facilities in full on August 31, 2023. Accordingly, the Company expects that in the near term it will experience additional significant constraints on its liquidity. As a result, with the exception of special distributions paid to unitholders in February 2024 and March 2024, the Company did not pay monthly distributions for periods subsequent to June 2023 and anticipates that it may not be able to pay regular monthly distributions in the coming quarters. In addition, the Company’s unit repurchase program, which was suspended effective April 1, 2023, has been reinstated, but only with respect to repurchase requests made in connection with the death or disability of a unitholder. Our NAV per unit as of September 30, 2025 is higher than it would have been if the Company had continued to pay regular monthly distributions during the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
The Company intends to continue pursuing multiple strategies in order to address its liquidity needs, which may include the sale of all or a portion of certain investments, seeking to obtain new credit facilities and the pursuit of additional financing transactions as needed to supplement cash flows. For example, during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company sold a portion of its investment in TriLinc Peru S.A.C. to TriLinc Global Impact Fund II, Master, Ltd., an entity whose advisor is under common ownership with the Company's Advisor, for a sale price of $1.0 million.
Investments
Our investment objectives are to provide our unitholders current income, capital preservation, and modest capital appreciation. These objectives are achieved primarily through SME trade finance and term loan financing, while employing rigorous risk-mitigation and due diligence practices, and transparently measuring and reporting the economic, social and environmental impacts of our investments. The majority of our investments are senior and other collateralized loans to SMEs with established, profitable businesses in developing economies. To a lesser extent, we may also make investments in financing to companies that may not meet our technical definition of SMEs due, for example, to the companies having a larger number of employees, but that also provide the opportunity to achieve both competitive financial returns and positive measurable impact. Furthermore, we may also make investments in developed economies, including the United States. With the sub-advisors that our Advisor has contracted with to assist the Advisor in implementing the Company’s investment program, we expect to provide growth capital financing generally ranging in size from $5-20 million per transaction for direct SME loans and $500,000 to $15 million for trade finance transactions. We seek to protect and grow investor capital by: (1) targeting countries with favorable economic growth and investor protections; (2) partnering with sub-advisors with significant experience in local markets; (3) focusing on creditworthy lending targets who have at least 3-year operating histories and demonstrated cash flows enabling loan repayment; (4) making primarily debt investments, backed by collateral and borrower guarantees; (5) employing best practices in our due diligence and risk mitigation processes; and (6) monitoring our portfolio on an ongoing basis. By providing additional liquidity to growing small businesses, we believe we support both economic growth and the expansion of the global middle class.
Investments will continue to be primarily credit facilities and participations in credit facilities to developing economy SMEs, including trade finance and term loans, through the Advisor’s team of professional sub-advisors with a local presence in the markets where they invest. As of September 30, 2025, some of our investments were in the form of participations, and we expect that some of our future investments will continue to be in the form of participations. We typically provide financing that is collateralized, has a short to medium-term maturity and is self-liquidating through the repayment of principal. Our counterparty for certain participations is the respective sub-advisor or its affiliate that originates the loan in which we are participating. In such case, we will not have a contract with the underlying borrower and therefore, in the event of default, we will not have the ability to directly seek recovery against the collateral and instead will have to seek recovery through our sub-advisor counterparty, which increases the risk of full recovery.
Certain investments, including loans and participations, may carry equity warrants on borrowers, which allow us to buy shares of the portfolio company at a given price, which we will exercise at our discretion during the life of the portfolio company. Our goal is to ultimately dispose of such equity interests and realize gains upon the disposition of such interests. However, these warrants and equity interests are illiquid and it may be difficult for the Company to dispose of them. In addition, we expect that any warrants or other return enhancements received when we make or invest in loans may require several years to appreciate in value and may not appreciate at all.
Floating Interest Rates
As of September 30, 2025, 3.0% of the fair value of the Company’s total investments bore interest at floating rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), serving as an alternative rate designated by the Company following the discontinuation of LIBOR, which was phased out completely in June 2023. In July 2023, the Company's legacy loans transitioned from LIBOR to Synthetic LIBOR, which was in effect until September 30, 2024. The Company's legacy loans have transitioned to SOFR following the complete phase-out of LIBOR as of September 30, 2024.
The discontinuation of both LIBOR and Synthetic LIBOR and the use of alternative rates, such as SOFR, could result in interest rate decreases on our debt, which could adversely affect our cash flow, operating results and ability to make distributions to our unitholders at expected levels or at all.
Revenues
Since we anticipate that the majority of our assets will continue to consist of trade finance instruments and term loans, we expect that the majority of our revenue will continue to be generated in the form of interest income. Our senior and subordinated debt investments may bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. Interest on debt securities is generally payable monthly, quarterly or semi-annually. In some cases, some of our investments provide for deferred interest payments or PIK interest. The principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest generally is due at the maturity date. In addition, we generate revenue in the form of acquisition and other fees in connection with some transactions. Original issue discounts and market discounts or premiums are capitalized, and we accrete or amortize such amounts as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt securities as interest income. Dividend income, if any, will be recognized on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses include the payment of asset management fees and expenses reimbursable to our Advisor under the Advisory Agreement. We bear all other costs and expenses of our operations and transactions.
Portfolio and Investment Activity
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company did not make any investments. Additionally, the Company received proceeds from repayments and dispositions of investment principal of approximately $5.9 million.
At September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company’s investment portfolio included 28 companies, and the fair value of our portfolio was comprised of the following:
| As of September 30, 2025 |
As of December 31, 2024 |
|||||||||||||||
| Investments |
Percentage of |
Investments |
Percentage of |
|||||||||||||
| at |
Total |
at |
Total |
|||||||||||||
| Fair Value |
Investments |
Fair Value |
Investments |
|||||||||||||
| Senior secured term loans |
$ | 122,738,010 | 47.2 | % | $ | 121,679,322 | 45.3 | % | ||||||||
| Senior secured term loan participations |
69,926,169 | 26.9 | % | 78,156,693 | 29.1 | % | ||||||||||
| Senior secured trade finance participations |
27,338,133 | 10.5 | % | 27,665,139 | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||
| Convertible notes |
28,257,284 | 10.9 | % | 25,387,189 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||||
| Other investments |
11,755,080 | 4.5 | % | 13,054,395 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||
| Equity warrants |
— | 0.0 | % | 2,466,534 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
| Total investments |
$ | 260,014,676 | 100.0 | % | $ | 268,409,272 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
As of September 30, 2025, the weighted average yields, based upon the cost of our portfolio, on trade finance participations, term loan participations, senior secured term loans and convertible notes were 8.0%, 13.5%, 16.0% and 11.8%, respectively, for a weighted average yield on investments of approximately 13.0% on our total portfolio.
As of December 31, 2024, the weighted average yields, based upon the cost of our portfolio, on trade finance participations, term loan participations, senior secured term loans, and convertible notes were 7.6%, 13.3%, 15.6%, and 11.8%, respectively, for a weighted average yield on investments of approximately 12.6% on our total portfolio.
As of September 30, 2025, we had the following investments, listed by description of the underlying borrower (if applicable):
| Description |
Sector |
Industry Classification |
Country |
Interest |
Maturity (1) |
Principal Amount |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustainable Packaging Manufacturer |
(6) |
Corrugated and Solid Fiber Boxes |
Recycling |
Ecuador | 11.82% Cash / 2.2% PIK / 3% Default | 6/18/2025 | (2) |
$ | 5,966,448 | $ | 2,520,135 | ||||||||||||||||
| Resource Trader |
(6) |
Coal and Other Minerals and Ores |
Responsible Natural Resources Distribution |
Hong Kong |
11.50 | % | 6/30/2023 |
(2) |
22,219,565 | 14,551,857 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cocoa Processor |
(11) |
Chocolate and Cocoa Products |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Indonesia |
8.0% Cash / 5.0% Redemption |
12/31/2024 |
(2) |
15,000,000 | 12,949,836 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Wholesale Distributor |
(6) |
Chemicals and Allied Products |
Responsible Industrial Goods Distribution |
Malaysia |
12.00 | % | 6/30/2023 |
(2) |
18,484,703 | 6,086,148 | |||||||||||||||||
| Waste to Fuels Processor |
Refuse Systems |
Recycling |
Mexico | 20.0% PIK | 4/30/2025 |
67,300,794 | 67,300,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-Ferrous Metal Trader |
Coal and Other Minerals and Ores |
Responsible Natural Resources Distribution |
Singapore |
6.0% Cash/7.50% PIK |
8/18/2025 |
(2) |
21,799,281 | 19,329,240 | |||||||||||||||||||
| SME Financier |
(7) |
Short-Term Business Credit |
Inclusive Finance |
Botswana |
13.32 | % | 8/18/2023 |
(2) |
5,601,000 | 1,777,308 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ship Maintenance & Repair Service Provider |
Boatbuilding and Repairing |
Infrastructure Development |
Brazil | 14% Cash / 3% PIK | 6/28/2025 | (2) |
8,079,450 | 5,520,952 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Hospitality Service Provider |
Hotels and Motels |
Infrastructure Development |
Cabo Verde |
10.0% Cash/3.5% PIK |
12/31/2027 |
10,570,587 | 10,257,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Freight and Cargo Transporter |
(6) |
Freight Transportation Arrangement |
Responsible Logistics Management |
Kenya |
12.35% Cash / 4.0% PIK |
3/31/2023 |
(2) |
15,092,408 | 3,576,390 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Property Developer |
(6) |
Land Subdividers and Developers |
Infrastructure Development |
Namibia |
8.50% Cash/4.0% PIK |
8/15/2021 |
(2) |
18,717,631 | 17,541,297 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Wheel Manufacturer |
Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories |
Responsible Consumer Goods Production |
Netherlands | 8.0% Cash / 3.0% Default | N/A | (2), (9) |
8,275,000 | 7,857,276 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Marine Logistics Provider |
Towing and Tugboat Service |
Responsible Logistics Management |
Nigeria |
3.00 | % | 10/31/2026 |
(2) |
3,047,176 | 2,797,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Frozen Bakery Products Manufacturer |
(6) |
Retail Bakeries |
Responsible Consumer Goods Production |
Romania | 18.5% Cash | N/A | (2), (9) |
6,836,622 | 6,982,214 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Grain Processor G |
(5) |
Corn |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Uganda |
12.80% PIK |
12/31/2024 |
(2) |
828,540 | 596,051 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Grain Processor F |
(5) |
Corn |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Uganda |
3.50% Cash/8.0% PIK |
9/19/2025 |
(2) |
15,361,873 | 13,020,085 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agriculture Distributor |
(7) |
Soybeans |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Argentina |
N/A | 6/30/2018 |
(2) |
12,500,000 | 6,479,347 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dairy Co-Operative |
(6) |
Dairy Farms |
Sustainable Dairy Production |
Argentina |
10.67 | % | 7/29/2019 |
(2) |
5,802,296 | 4,383,964 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cocoa & Coffee Exporter |
(8) |
Chocolate and Cocoa Products |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Cameroon |
9.50%, 6.0% | (10) |
12/31/2024 |
(2) |
16,077,863 | 13,986,545 | |||||||||||||||||
| Seafood Processing Company II |
(6) |
Frozen Fish and Seafood |
Sustainable Aquaculture & Processing |
Ecuador |
11.75 | % | 10/25/2023 |
(2) |
4,424,931 | 2,488,277 | |||||||||||||||||
| Claim in Bankruptcy |
(7) |
Other |
Other |
N/A | N/A | N/A | (2) |
5,883,971 | 3,124,260 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Claim in Bankruptcy |
(7) |
Electric Services |
Technological Innovation |
Chile |
N/A | N/A | (2) |
1,277,194 | 791,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Claim in Bankruptcy |
(7) |
Cotton Ginning |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Argentina |
N/A | N/A | (2) |
4,935,048 | 1,792,698 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Claim in Bankruptcy |
(7) |
Beef Cattle, Except Feedlots |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Argentina |
N/A | N/A | (2) |
6,499,323 | 2,955,774 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Profit sharing rights on cocoa distribution |
Other |
Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
Nigeria |
N/A | N/A | 1,526,561 | 1,526,561 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Installment under Judicial Recovery |
Other |
Other |
Brazil | N/A | 12/15/2026 |
400,000 | 303,015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate property |
Other |
Other |
Peru |
N/A | N/A | 1,354,523 | 1,261,346 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IT Service Provider |
Computer Related Services |
Access to Technology |
Brazil | 3.94% PIK | 2/11/2027 |
373,291 | 659,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IT Service Provider |
Computer Related Services |
Access to Technology |
Brazil | 12.0% PIK | 8/11/2026 |
28,694,120 | 27,598,175 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Investments |
$ | 260,014,676 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 |
Trade finance borrowers may be granted flexibility with respect to repayment relative to the stated maturity date to accommodate specific contracts and/or business cycle characteristics. This flexibility in each case is agreed upon between the Company and the sub-advisor and between the sub-advisor and the borrower. |
| 2 |
See Watch List Investments section below for further information. |
| 3 |
This investment consists of a senior secured term loan and equity warrants in the borrower. |
| 4 | The Company is negotiating with the borrower to amend the loan term to extend the maturity date. |
| 5 | Investment is undergoing a restructuring. |
|
6
|
Investment is in default. |
|
7
|
Investment is in bankruptcy. |
|
8
|
Investment is in arbitration. |
|
9
|
The borrower is required to pay the loan upon request. |
|
10
|
The interest rate is 9.5% on the first and second trade finance participation, and 6.0% on the third trade finance participation. |
| 11 | Investment has been claimed in a bankruptcy proceeding. |
As of September 30, 2025, the composition of our investments at fair value based on the Company created industry classification was as follows:
| As of September 30, 2025 |
As of December 31, 2024 |
|||||||||||||||
| Fair |
Percentage |
Fair |
Percentage |
|||||||||||||
| Industry Classification |
Value |
of Total |
Value |
of Total |
||||||||||||
| Access to Technology |
28,257,284 | 10.9 | % | $ | 25,387,189 | 9.5 | % | |||||||||
| Inclusive Finance |
1,777,308 | 0.7 | % | 2,437,540 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
| Infrastructure Development |
33,319,815 | 12.8 | % | 36,247,697 | 13.5 | % | ||||||||||
| Recycling |
69,820,929 | 26.9 | % | 63,340,678 | 23.6 | % | ||||||||||
| Responsible Consumer Goods Production |
14,839,490 | 5.7 | % | 17,534,124 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||
| Responsible Industrial Goods Distribution |
6,086,148 | 2.3 | % | 6,531,441 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||
| Responsible Logistics Management |
6,373,420 | 2.5 | % | 9,173,378 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||
| Responsible Natural Resources Distribution |
33,881,097 | 13.0 | % | 34,408,977 | 12.8 | % | ||||||||||
| Sustainable Agriculture & Agroprocessing |
53,306,897 | 20.4 | % | 59,225,818 | 22.1 | % | ||||||||||
| Sustainable Aquaculture & Processing |
2,488,277 | 1.0 | % | 2,893,848 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||
| Sustainable Dairy Production |
4,383,964 | 1.7 | % | 4,528,841 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
| Technological Innovation |
791,426 | 0.3 | % | 970,393 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
| Other |
4,688,621 | 1.8 | % | 5,729,348 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 260,014,676 | 100.0 | % | $ | 268,409,272 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Concentration Limits
The Company is subject to the following concentration limits:
| ● |
Maximum 45% regional exposure |
| ● |
Maximum 20% country exposure |
| ● |
Maximum 5% individual investment exposure |
We may only make investments that do not cause us to exceed these limits on the date of investment. These limits are calculated as a percentage of the fair value of all investments and cash on the date of investment. As of September 30, 2025, the Company has made investments in compliance with all of the above concentration limits.
Watch List Investments
The Company monitors and reviews the performance of its investments and if the Company determines that there are any significant changes in the credit and collection risk of an investment, the investment will be placed on the Watch List. The Company places an investment on the Watch List when it believes the investment has material performance weakness driven by company-specific and macro events that may affect the timing of future cash flows. For all Watch List investments, the Company evaluates: (i) liquidation value of collateral; (ii) rights and remedies enforceable against the borrower; (iii) any credit insurance and/or guarantees; (iv) market, sector and macro events and (v) other relevant information (e.g., third party purchase of the borrower and potential or ongoing litigation). At September 30, 2025, 16 portfolio companies were on non-accrual status with an aggregate fair value of approximately $109,241,942 or 42.0% of the fair value of the Company’s total investments. At December 31, 2024, 14 portfolio companies were on non-accrual status with an aggregate fair value of approximately $100,342,070 or 37.4% of the fair value of the Company’s total investments. As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company had 22 and 19 Watch List investments, respectively, representing 58.1% and 57.2%, respectively, of the fair value of the Company's total investments.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s Watch List investments consisted of the following:
| Interest not accrued on Investments on Watch List status |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portfolio Company |
Principal Balance |
Fair Value |
Accrued Interest |
Sub-advisor |
Valuation Approach |
September 30, 2025 |
September 30, 2024 |
September 30, 2025 |
September 30, 2024 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trustco Group Holdings Ltd. (3) |
$ | 18,717,631 | $ | 17,541,297 | $ | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
$ | 674,943 | $ | 648,250 | $ | 1,983,055 | $ | 1,911,466 | |||||||||||||||||
| Maritime One Limited |
3,047,176 | 2,797,030 | 35,170 | N/A | Income approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compania Argentina de Granos S.A. (2), (3) |
12,500,000 | 6,479,347 | — | N/A | Income approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frigorifico Regional Industrias Alimentarias, S.A., Sucursal Uruguay (2), (3) |
6,499,323 | 2,955,774 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sancor Cooperativas Unidas Ltda (3) |
5,802,296 | 4,383,964 | 1,215,446 | N/A | Collateral based approach |
— | 158,216 | 311,272 | 471,208 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IIG TOF B.V. (2), (3) |
5,883,971 | 3,124,260 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Algodonera Avellaneda S.A. (1), (2), (3) |
4,935,048 | 1,792,698 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Triton Metallics Pte Ltd.(3) |
21,799,281 | 19,329,240 | 1,513,671 | N/A | Income approach |
817,688 | 678,423 | 2,211,976 | 1,979,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ecsponent Holdings Limited (1), (3) |
5,601,000 | 1,777,308 | — | Scipion |
Hybrid income/collateral based approach |
195,060 | 207,058 | 586,363 | 630,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Producam S.A. (3) |
16,077,863 | 13,986,545 | — | N/A | Income approach |
489,830 | 446,000 | 1,420,430 | 1,297,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Multiple ICD (Kenya) Limited (3) |
15,092,408 | 3,576,390 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
704,798 | 704,600 | 2,039,166 | 2,084,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agilis Partners Holding LLC (1) |
828,540 | 596,051 | — | Origin |
Income approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agilis Partners |
15,361,873 | 13,020,085 | 1,787,833 | Origin |
Income approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Itelecom Holding Chile SPA (1), (2), (3) |
1,277,194 | 791,426 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Limas Commodities House Limited (3) |
22,219,565 | 14,551,857 | — | N/A | Income approach |
895,807 | 798,548 | 2,584,627 | 2,311,978 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vikudha Malaysia Sdn Bhd (3) |
18,484,703 | 6,086,148 | — | N/A | Hybrid income/collateral based approach |
687,891 | 641,161 | 2,006,338 | 1,876,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cevher International B.V. Netherlands (3) |
8,275,000 | 7,857,276 | 4,064,922 | CCL |
Income approach |
556,073 | — | 1,664,437 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Worldwide Investments and Representations Winrep S.A. and Vannapack S.A. (3) |
4,424,931 | 2,488,277 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
132,871 | 132,871 | 394,280 | 395,725 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lidas SRL |
6,836,622 | 6,982,214 | 2,159,477 | N/A | Income approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PT Citra Labuantirta |
15,000,000 | 12,949,836 | 8,368,416 | N/A | Hybrid income/collateral based approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dock Brasil Engenharia E Servicos S.A. |
8,079,450 | 5,520,952 | — | TRG | Income approach |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grupo Surpapel (3) |
5,966,448 | 2,520,135 | — | Origin |
Income approach |
273,872 | — | 273,872 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Watchlist |
$ | 222,710,323 | $ | 151,108,110 | $ | 19,144,935 | $ | 5,428,833 | $ | 4,415,127 | $ | 15,475,816 | $ | 12,960,145 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1 |
Investments with a fair value equal to or less than 1.0% of the aggregate fair value of the Company's net assets as of September 30, 2025. Additional information regarding Watch List investments with a fair value equal to or greater than 1.0% of the aggregate fair value of the Company's net assets as of September 30, 2025 are presented below. |
| 2 |
Excludes interest not accrued with respect to investments which the Company may not legally accrue interest, such as those that are the subject of bankruptcy proceedings. |
| 3 |
Investments were on non-accrual status. |
As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s Watch List investments consisted of the following:
| Portfolio Company |
Principal Balance |
Fair Value |
Accrued Interest |
Sub-advisor |
Valuation Approach |
||||||||||||
| Trustco Group Holdings Ltd. (3) |
$ | 18,717,631 | $ | 16,540,160 | $ | — | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
|||||||||
| Maritime One Limited |
5,808,563 | 5,298,417 | 41,201 | N/A |
Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Compania Argentina de Granos S.A. (2), (3) |
12,500,000 | 5,723,296 | — | N/A |
Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Frigorifico Regional Industrias Alimentarias, S.A., Sucursal Uruguay (2), (3) |
6,499,323 | 2,955,774 | — | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Sancor Cooperativas Unidas Ltda (3) |
5,802,296 | 4,528,841 | 1,347,047 | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| IIG TOF B.V. (2), (3) |
5,924,697 | 3,164,987 | — | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Algodonera Avellaneda S.A. (1), (2), (3) |
4,935,048 | 1,792,698 | — | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Triton Metallics Pte Ltd. (3) |
21,799,281 | 19,329,238 | 1,513,671 | N/A |
Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Ecsponent Holdings Limited (1), (3) |
5,601,000 | 2,437,540 | — | Scipion |
Hybrid income/collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Producam S.A. (3) |
16,077,863 | 14,519,154 | — | Scipion |
Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Multiple ICD (Kenya) Limited (3) |
15,092,408 | 3,874,961 | — | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Agilis Partners Holding LLC (1) |
730,724 | 498,234 | 23,903 | Origin | Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Agilis Partners |
14,188,395 | 12,265,720 | 1,691,418 | Origin | Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Itelecom Holding Chile SPA (1), (2), (3) |
1,456,162 | 970,393 | 3,699 | N/A |
Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Limas Commodities House Limited (3) |
22,219,566 | 15,079,739 | — | N/A | Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Vikudha Malaysia Sdn Bhd (3) |
18,484,704 | 6,531,441 | — | N/A | Hybrid income/collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Qintess Tecnologia e Participacoes Ltda, Series B |
26,362,131 | 24,739,380 | — | TRG | Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Cevher International B.V. Netherlands |
8,275,000 | 10,397,895 | 3,819,407 | CCL | Income approach |
||||||||||||
| Worldwide Investments and Representations Winrep S.A. and Vannapack S.A. (3) |
4,424,931 | 2,893,848 | — | N/A | Collateral based approach |
||||||||||||
| Total Watchlist |
$ | 214,899,723 | $ | 153,541,716 | $ | 8,440,346 | |||||||||||
| 1 |
Investments with a fair value equal to or less than 1.0% of the aggregate fair value of the Company's net assets as of December 31, 2024. Additional information regarding Watch List investments with a fair value equal to or greater than 1.0% of the aggregate fair value of the Company's net assets as of December 31, 2024 are presented below. |
| 2 |
Excludes interest not accrued with respect to investments which the Company may not legally accrue interest, such as those that are the subject of bankruptcy proceedings. |
| 3 |
Investments were on non-accrual status. |
Investments through The International Investment Group L.L.C. (“IIG”) as the Sub-Advisor
IIG was the sub-advisor with respect to certain investments that the Company made in South America, including 5 of the 22 Watch List investments as of September 30, 2025. Since June 30, 2018, the Company has discovered, among other things, that IIG failed to provide the Company with complete and accurate information with respect to the investments for which IIG was the sub-advisor and, in 2017, sold the Company a $6 million participation in a loan to Nacadie (defined below) that did not exist. In November of 2019, the SEC charged IIG with fraud and revoked IIG’s registration. Shortly thereafter, IIG ceased all operations. A fund managed by IIG, which sold most of the participations to the Company, was placed into bankruptcy in January 2020. Subsequently, the Company filed a bankruptcy claim against the remaining assets of the estate.
The SEC charged IIG with fraud on November 21, 2019 and revoked IIG's registration as an investment adviser on November 26, 2019. On March 30, 2020, the SEC obtained a final judgment on consent that enjoins IIG from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. On July 17, 2020, the SEC filed fraud charges against David Hu, one of IIG's co-founders, who was also charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York in a parallel criminal action. On January 28, 2021, David Hu pled guilty to one count of securities fraud, one count of wire fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud. On April 13, 2021, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced that Martin Silver, IIG's other co-founder, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit investment adviser fraud, securities fraud, and wire fraud, one count of securities fraud, and one count of wire fraud for his role in overvaluing and selling fake loans to investors so IIG could collect management and performance fees. Also on April 13, 2021, the SEC filed a civil complaint against Martin Silver, asserting several claims that involve allegations of a string of frauds perpetrated by Mr. Silver and others at IIG in order to keep IIG afloat. IIG has ceased operations and the Company does not expect to receive any further reporting from IIG with respect to its outstanding investments. The Company is taking necessary steps, including legal action in some cases, in order to ascertain as much information as possible regarding these investments.
Most of the outstanding investments for which IIG was the sub-advisor were purchased from IIG TOF B.V., a Dutch Limited Liability Company advised by IIG. On December 11, 2019, a subsidiary of the Company filed an application in Amsterdam District Court to declare IIG TOF B.V. bankrupt. As set forth in the application for the Declaration of Bankruptcy, the Company and other creditors believe they have multiple due and payable claims against IIG TOF B.V. which IIG TOF B.V. has acknowledged it is unable to pay. On January 21, 2020, the Amsterdam District Court declared IIG TOF B.V. bankrupt and appointed a Dutch law firm as liquidator. The Company is seeking recovery of amounts due and payable to the Company with respect to the Participations it acquired from IIG TOF B.V. There can be no assurances as to when or if the Company will recover the amounts to which the Company believes it is entitled. Additional information regarding Watch List investments for which IIG was the sub-advisor with a fair value equal to or greater than 1.0% of the Company's net assets as of September 30, 2025 is presented below.
Compania Argentina de Granos
Between October 2016 and February 2017, the Company purchased two Participations in a trade finance facility originated by IIG TOF B.V., with Compania Argentina de Granos (“CAGSA”), as borrower. The Company purchased the initial Participation in October 2016 for $10,000,000 and subsequently increased the Participation by another $2,500,000 in February 2017. This facility was collateralized by two export contracts. CAGSA, an Argentine company, is mainly engaged in the trading of grain and oilseed and the distribution and processing of food ingredients. Due to unfavorable weather conditions, CAGSA was unable to make delivery of toasted soybean meal under the terms of its export contracts. As a result, it failed to pay IIG its outstanding principal due on June 30, 2018.
IIG previously informed the Company that it had been in active discussions with CAGSA and other CAGSA lenders to protect its rights under the credit facility. Additionally, IIG had previously informed the Company that IIG is a member of the creditors committee, which would determine all financial and restructuring options of CAGSA, which may include additional equity infusions by the existing shareholders. In February 2019, CAGSA disclosed that it had reached a preliminary settlement with its creditors. The administrator of IIG TOF B.V.’s bankruptcy proceedings in the Netherlands notified the Company that the settlement discussions with CAGSA’s creditors had resumed and were close to being finalized. The administrator indicated that the terms of the settlement being discussed are different from the terms that had been part of the preliminary settlement that had been reached in February 2019. The settlement is expected to result in the assumption of the entirety of CAGSA’s debt by its parent company, Molinos Cañuelas (“MolCa”), with a portion to be repaid over a ten-year period and the remaining portion to be repaid over a period of up to ten years from the proceeds of the sale of 62.5% of the outstanding interests in MolCa, which are expected to be pledged to the unsecured creditors of CAGSA and MolCa as part of the proposed settlement. On September 27, 2021, MolCa and CAGSA filed for debt restructuring in the Argentinian bankruptcy court. On March 11, 2022, IIG TOF BV filed claims on behalf of the Company for the court to recognize the amounts due. The terms of the restructuring had been widely pre-approved by the creditors group prior to the filing. Since then, there have been several iterations of the settlement terms, with each set of terms representing slightly better terms for the lenders. The final restructuring proposal was submitted on December 31, 2024. On July 31, 2025, the court approved the restructuring plan. The Company received the first payment of the settlement proceeds as expected in early October 2025. Given the accelerated timing of the expected payments, an increase in fair value of approximately $997,000 was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Frigorifico Regional Industrias Alimentarias, S.A., Sucursal Uruguay and Algodonera Avellaneda S.A.
Between June 2016 and July 2016, the Company purchased two Participations in a trade finance facility originated by IIG TOF B.V., with Frigorifico Regional Industrias Alimentarias, S.A., Sucursal Uruguay (“FRIAR”), an Argentine company that produces, processes and exports beef, as the borrower. In June 2017, IIG called a technical event of default due to non-payment by FRIAR. In an effort to seek repayment from FRIAR, IIG filed the promissory notes for FRIAR in the commercial court in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
In March 2017, the Company purchased a Participation in a trade finance facility originated by IIG TOF B.V., with Algodonera Avellaneda S.A. (“Algodonera”) as the borrower for $6,000,000. The loan agreement states that Vicentin has guaranteed the payments to be made by Algodonera under the facility. Algodonera is an Argentinian vertically integrated cotton business. IIG informed the Company that in June 2017, IIG called a technical default on Algodonera under the facility due to nonpayment of interest and on Vicentin under the payment guarantee due to the breach of informational covenants. Thereafter, IIG made a filing against Vicentin and Algodonera in the commercial court in Buenos Aires, Argentina on July 4, 2017.
In August 2019, the Company was informed by IIG’s legal counsel that the commercial court proceedings with FRIAR and Algodonera had been terminated due to the parties having reached a settlement. The Company obtained evidence that the settlement proceeds for all participant holders had been placed in an escrow account with a New York law firm. In January 2022, the largest participant holder with respect to claims against the escrow account filed an action in New York district court to release these funds to all the participant holders. In August of 2023, the court awarded the Company $4.6 million in proceeds from the escrow account. As of September 30, 2025, the creditors are now working with the IIG TOF B.V. liquidator on further claims to satisfy the remaining debt owed.
Sancor Cooperativas Unidas Limitada
In April 2016, the Company purchased two Participations in a trade finance facility originated by IIG TOF B.V., with Sancor Cooperativas Unidas Limitada (“Sancor”), an Argentine company that distributes dairy products, as the borrower. IIG had worked with Sancor to restructure the existing loan and extended the maturity to July 29, 2019, with an annual renewal option. Since February 2019, Sancor has announced the sale of certain of its assets, which allowed it to make some payments to creditors and maintain operations, but the Company did not receive any payment as a result of those asset sales. As noted above, IIG has ceased operations and the Company has taken legal action in an attempt to recover amounts due. During the quarter ended December 31, 2020, the Company learned, in connection with certain court proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York regarding a fund advised by IIG, that funds had been received in a New York bank account controlled by an affiliate of IIG and that such funds may include prior debt service payments by Sancor related to the Company’s interests in the Sancor trade finance facility. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company was able to obtain control of the assets in the bank account and determined that they should primarily be allocated to outstanding interest. During the year ended December 31, 2021, Sancor was engaged in ongoing negotiations with its lenders regarding a debt restructuring, including discussions with the administrator of IIG TOF B.V.’s bankruptcy proceedings in the Netherlands. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company received interest payments of approximately $700,000 and principal payments of approximately $198,000 from the borrower. The Company is cooperating with the lenders group in seeking a default judgement in a court in Argentina to take control of the collateral in an effort to facilitate negotiation with Sancor on settlement of the debt. In July 2024, a joint liquidation agreement for the warrants was executed between Sancor and the creditor group, providing for the immediate liquidation of 70% of the warrants, the proceeds of which were to be transferred to the creditors, with the remaining warrants to be liquidated, deposited into an escrow account, and paid in four equal installments starting in September 2024. In August 2024, a deposit of approximately $500,000 was transferred to an Argentinean escrow agent to be held for 9 to 12 months on behalf of all creditors, with a currency hedge in place. While a partial payment of $150,000 was paid in September 2024, Sancor has not fulfilled its installment obligations as agreed per the joint liquidation agreement. In the aggregate, Sancor has paid only approximately $650,000 of the $2.2 million owed through 2024 to the escrow account in Argentina. As a result, counsel arranged for the auction of the warrants to be recommenced. However, in December 2024, Sancor requested to pause the auction process in exchange for an immediate payment of $80,000. In the interest of providing Sancor with further time to repay the debt, counsel to the lenders group agreed. Sancor deposited $40,000 into the escrow account in December 2024 and advised that a second payment of $40,000 would be forthcoming in 2-3 weeks. Payment was never received, so counsel to the lenders group once again began the process of auctioning the warrants. While the auction was expected to begin in the first half of 2025, in early February 2025, Sancor filed for concurso preventivo protection (equivalent to a U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing) in Argentina. In September 2025, the Argentine court granted an extension for the concurso deadlines, extending the exclusivity period to February 9, 2026. In June 2025, the Company, as part of the lenders group, filed claims in the concurso proceeding, and in August and September, Sancor filed objections to the claims. Counsel intends to meet in person with the judge and bankruptcy trustee in the immediate future. Due to the ongoing uncertainty as to the Company's ability to recover amounts due to it by Sancor, a decrease in fair value of approximately $144,000 was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
IIG Trade Opportunities Fund B.V. Receivable
In March 2017, the Company purchased a Participation from IIG TOF B.V. in what the Company at that time believed to be a trade finance facility originated by IIG TOF B.V., with Nacadie Commercial S.A. (“Nacadie”) as the borrower. The Company purchased the Participation in March 2017 for $6,000,000. In connection with the Company’s review of this investment during the third quarter of 2018, IIG informed the Company that IIG had misapplied the funds the Company had transmitted at the time the Company made this investment. As a result, IIG offered to refund the Company’s investment amount, including all accrued interest. However, IIG did not repay the Company for this Participation. As noted above, the Company knows that the Nacadie facility in which it purchased this Participation did not exist and the Company considers this asset to be a receivable from IIG TOF B.V. rather than a Participation in a trade finance facility.
As noted above, IIG TOF B.V. was declared bankrupt in the Netherlands, and the Company is seeking to recover amounts to which it is entitled through the bankruptcy proceedings. The Company has applied a discount to the fair value based on the risk created by the uncertainty of the ultimate resolution of the Company’s attempt to recover amounts to which it is entitled through the bankruptcy proceedings in the Netherlands. On July 25, 2024, the Company received $75,000 from the U.S. Attorney’s Office as part of a restitution settlement with David Hu and was notified that a restitution settlement with Martin Silver is still in process. On August 29, 2025, the Company received $40,726 from the U.S. Attorney’s Office as further recovery from the restitution settlement with David Hu. As of September 30, 2025, the creditors are now working with the IIG TOF B.V. liquidator on further claims to satisfy the remaining debt owed.
Investments through Scipion Capital, Ltd. (“Scipion”) as the Sub-Advisor
Producam SA
Between March 2018 and June 2018, the Company purchased three Participations totaling $15,986,369 in a trade finance facility with Producam SA (“Producam”), a Cameroon based cocoa and coffee exporter, as the borrower. Repayment on these Participations has been slower than originally anticipated due to short run cash flow pressure on Producam. The original sub-advisor for this facility was Africa Merchant Capital Group (“AMC”). In the third quarter of 2018, AMC informed the Company that the borrower misapplied the proceeds from the sale of certain of its inventory to finance its own cash flow needs rather than repay the facility. AMC then began working with the borrower to restructure the facility to recover amounts due. In April 2021, Scipion replaced AMC as the sub-advisor with respect to Producam and agreed to undertake efforts to liquidate the collateral underlying the facility in order to recover amounts due to the Company, and the restructuring process was finalized. Under the new agreement, the loan was restructured with the interest rate reduced from 17.5% to 9.5% for the cocoa facility and 6.0% for the coffee facility retroactively to January 1, 2019. As part of the restructure, the Company included a PIK component which increased the principal amount. The fair value of the investment decreased during the year ended December 31, 2021 due to collections from completed cocoa and coffee shipments being slower than anticipated. As all interest was capitalized as part of the amendment, no accrued interest remains outstanding as of the date of the new agreement. During the period from April 1, 2021 through April 14, 2021 (the date the loan was restructured), $49,014 of interest income was recognized. As of September 30, 2025, recovery is expected to come primarily from the legal claim filed in the UK courts against the collateral manager and its insurer. Due to ongoing delays, a decrease in fair value of approximately $532,000 was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Ecsponent Holdings, Ltd.
In December 2017, the Company made a $4.74 million investment in Ecsponent Holdings, Ltd. (“Ecsponent”) to finance SMEs and provide fee-based services to entrepreneurs based in Botswana through the borrower’s Business Credit Unit. Subsequently, during the third quarter of 2020, Ecsponent announced that its board of directors had launched a forensic investigation into the use of proceeds for various financial transactions executed by its former management, including the Company’s investment. The combination of misapplied financing transactions and significant poor performance by other business units of the group caused Ecsponent to seek deferment of its interest payments while it sought additional fund raising due to financial and liquidity challenges, which the Company granted in the fourth quarter of 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting economic environment delayed several of the borrower’s plans and initiatives.
Throughout the first three quarters of 2022, the Company worked closely with the CEO of the group of companies Ecsponent is a part of and several of its existing creditors as part of a potential restructuring. During the fourth quarter of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023, one of the key companies in the borrower’s group was placed into judicial management, which materially increased the risk of liquidation for itself and Ecsponent. The Company remains in close contact with Ecsponent’s CEO, the group’s creditors and judicial administrators in Botswana to reach an agreement, which the Company expects to progress in future quarters. During a conversation with Ecsponent’s CEO during the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company learned that Ecsponent will pursue a liquidation, in which case, the Company will make a creditor’s claim. As a result of the ongoing uncertainty regarding a portion of the payment expected to be covered through an insurance claim, a decrease in fair value of approximately $295,000 was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Investments through Origin Capital Ltd. (“Origin”) as the Sub-Advisor
Agilis Partners
In 2018, the Company originally provided financing totaling approximately $10,968,000 to Agilis Partners ("Agilis"), a Ugandan company engaged in the farming, storage, processing, and trading of maize, soybean, and sunflower seeds through Scipion. This financing was refinanced into a new loan through Origin in July 2021 as part of a broader financial restructuring. Repayment on the facility has been slower than originally anticipated due to ongoing liquidity challenges of the borrower, as well as record drought conditions in Uganda. The Company and Origin agreed to a deferral of Agilis’ March 2022 interest payment and are actively working with the borrower on solutions to increase working capital, manage other creditor relationships and improve the overall financial condition of the borrower. Origin, the borrower and the Company were in the late stages of finalizing a restructuring of the loans when a prospective investor owning two other farms in Uganda indicated an interest in merging his farms with Agilis. The restructuring plan now includes the merger of the farms and investor participation. It is expected that the final restructuring will close by the end of 2025, but there can be no assurance that it will close in that timeframe or at all. Similarly, there can be no assurance as to when the Company's investment in the facility will be repaid. Due to ongoing delays, a decrease in fair value of approximately $141,000 was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Surpapelcorp S.A. and Productora Cartonera S.A
In January 2020, the Company acquired a $10.0 million Participation in a term loan facility extended to Surpapelcorp S.A. and Productora Cartonera S.A. (“Surpapel”). Productora Cartonera S.A. is a well-established manufacturer of cardboard boxes, primarily serving food producers in Ecuador. Surpapelcorp S.A. operates one of Ecuador's largest paper mills and supplies Productora Cartonera with recycled paper rolls. In April 2020, the Company funded an additional $3.25 million under the same term loan.
In the third quarter of 2024, Surpapel encountered significant challenges due to an ongoing energy crisis in Ecuador, driven by the country’s dependence on hydroelectric power amid severe drought conditions. As of late October 2024, government-mandated power outages of up to 14 hours per day had severely impacted the Surpapel's production capabilities and increased operational costs. Surpapel imported generators in order to service the company’s major relationship with Dole and had to delay production for lower margin customers, resulting in a short-term liquidity crunch. As a result, Surpapel asked for a six month deferral of two principal repayments due in December 2025 and June 2025. They also notified the lenders group that they have been soliciting bids for a potential sale of all or parts of the business. During the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company, along with the lenders group, began working with Surpapel on a proposed debt rescheduling plan. In April 2025, Surpapel management was removed by its shareholders, and the lenders group hired a Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO") to help manage the business and potentially advance the sale of the business. Prior to receiving the binding offer from the potential buyer, the lenders group met regularly with the CRO to evaluate potential solutions for repayment of the loan.
At the request of the Company’s syndicate, Surpapel engaged FTI Consulting to serve as financial advisor to support a potential sale process. During the three months ended September 30, 2025, Surpapel continued to experience liquidity constraints that limited its ability to operate at scale. As the lender group was not positioned to provide additional rescue financing, a sale of the senior secured debt was explored as an alternative path to recovery. An Ecuadorian packaging company emerged as the lead buyer and provided Surpapel with limited short-term working capital while it conducted its due diligence. The potential offer is to acquire the syndicated debt at a substantial discount. It is expected that the syndicate will accept the offer in support of liquidity objectives and certainty of proceeds at closing. The settlement was incorporated into the fair value for the three months ended September 30, 2025, resulting in a decrease in fair value of approximately $3.9 million.
Investments through CEECAT Capital Limited & CCL Investments SARL (“CCL”) as the Sub-Advisor
Cevher International B.V. Netherlands
In February 2019, the Company purchased a $8,275,000 Participation in a term loan facility with Cevher International B.V. Netherlands (“Cevher”), a Netherlands domiciled company which wholly owns Cevher Jant Sanayii A.S., a manufacturer of aluminum alloy wheels in Turkiye. In the beginning of 2024, Cevher encountered liquidity and operational challenges due to soaring inflation in Turkiye, which reached 68.5% in March 2024. This sharp rise in inflation led the aluminum workers' union, which includes Cevher factory employees, to impose substantial wage increases. A binding letter of intent was signed on June 29, 2025 for a strategic investor to acquire 49.9% of Cevher. In late September 2025, the Company was informed that Cevher’s strategic investor declined to proceed with a long-term restructuring plan and instead offered a short-term cash settlement at a discount. A term sheet was executed on September 30, 2025. The settlement was reflected in the fair value of the loan for the three months ended September 30, 2025, resulting in a fair value decrease of approximately $2.1 million.
Investments through TRG Management LP ("TRG") as the Sub-Advisor
Dock Brasil Engenharia E Serviços S.a.
In December 2018, the Company funded $5,500,000 as part of a $13,000,000 senior secured term loan facility to Dock Brasil Engenharia e Serviços S.A. (“Dock Brasil”). Dock Brasil is a privately held Brazilian company providing maintenance and repair services for offshore oil and gas vessels through its floating dock and shipyard facilities. The proceeds of the facility were used to finance shipyard construction and prepay existing debt. The loan is secured by a first-priority pledge over 100% of Dock Brasil’s shares, mortgages on its floating dock and shipyard assets, and assignments of rights related to Dock Brasil's federally leased waterfront property.
Following strong performance in 2023, primarily driven by a joint venture contract with a third-party shipyard, results deteriorated in 2024 as a result of the reduced revenues from the joint-venture contract, the impact of major flooding in the area and shipyard availability. Given the disruption to its joint venture revenue, Dock Brasil entered a series of repayment deferrals and capitalization agreements throughout 2024, supported by the Company and TRG.
In early 2025, Dock Brasil’s shareholders initiated a sale process led by BroadSpan Capital ("BroadSpan"). Although multiple bids were received, only two of the bids were considered by BroadSpan to be reasonable. After an initial bid from a leading publicly listed Brazilian offshore maritime services company, Dock Brasil countered and sought superior offers from the second bidder. Late in the third quarter of 2025, the Company learned that the second bidder withdrew from contention as a potential purchaser. The Company consented to the sale to the Brazilian offshore maritime services company to facilitate an orderly exit. In November 2025, the Company and Dock Brasil’s shareholders agreed to a settlement allocating $73 million Brazilian reais (approximately US$13.8 million based on the exchange rate on November 11, 2025) of the sale proceeds to the Company. As a result of this settlement, a decrease in fair value of approximately $4.3 million was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Other Investments
Trustco Group Holdings Ltd
In January 2017, the Company purchased a $15,000,000 Participation in a term loan facility with Trustco Group Holdings Ltd (“Trustco”), a Namibia based group operating a diversified set of business lines including property development, financial services (insurance, retail banking), education, and diamond mining. Repayment on this position has been slower than originally anticipated, largely due to a slowdown in the local real estate market. Helios actively worked with the borrower to restructure the facility, but as this proved challenging, Helios issued a notice of default and acceleration notice to Trustco along with launching initial legal proceedings on April 15, 2020. A demand was also made against Elisenheim as guarantor in respect of Trustco’s obligations to Helios as described below. In addition to recourse against Trustco, Helios has the benefit of a security interest in property owned by the guarantor. During the fourth quarter of 2021, an initial judgment was issued in Helios’ favor in the UK and Trustco appealed the court’s decision and the requirements to deposit the full outstanding balance into an escrow account. This appeal was dismissed in February 2022, and the Company's next step is to seek enforcement of the UK judgment in Namibia. On July 31, 2024, the local court ordered Trustco to pay Helios a total amount of 636,410.18 in Namibian dollars (approximately US$35,870) as payment for Helios to defend Trustco's legal action, which was ultimately dismissed. This will be applied toward incurred costs and future retainer for the advocate for work going forward. The Trustco enforcement proceeding hearing was held on March 18 and 19, 2025. Following the hearing, the judge indicated that a judgement was expected to be handed down by the end of July 2025. Subsequently, the judge postponed her judgement until September 19, 2025, to follow the Elisenheim hearing. On September 24, 2025, the judge granted Helios’ application to have the UK judgement recognized and enforced in Namibia. While counsel expects an appeal from Trustco, counsel is currently preparing a writ to execute a judgement to freeze certain Trustco assets.
A trial was held for the Elisenheim property case in Namibia from June 24, 2024 to July 5, 2024. The judge ruled in favor of the Company via Helios, and a hearing was set for July 14, 2024 during which the judge determined that the judge presiding over the case to enforce the UK judgement in Namibia should first rule on the referral relief. A case management meeting for the UK Trustco case was held on December 10, 2023, and a hearing was set for July 31, 2024 during which the judge gave Trustco time to determine if they will bring an application for leave. At a subsequent hearing held on November 28, 2024, the judge set trial dates from September 2 to September 12, 2025. Trustco submitted an application for dismissal of the Company’s claim, which was dismissed by the court, after which Trustco formally requested a postponement of the remainder of the trial and was granted postponement until January 2026. Counsel is currently preparing for the hearing. Due to the increase in value of the Namibian dollar as of September 30, 2025, an increase in fair value of approximately $530,000 was recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Maritime One Limited (formerly known as Helios Maritime I)
Between July 2015 and December 2017, the Company purchased six Participations totaling $15,300,000 in a term loan facility with Maritime One Limited (“Maritime”), a company setup for the purposes of on-lending to Starz Investment Company, Ltd., a Nigerian shipping and logistics company for the purpose of acquiring a handling tug vessel. Repayment on this position has been slower than originally anticipated due to delays in acquiring a long-term contract, which was further prolonged based on challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and the volatility in oil prices. The borrower has pledged a marine vessel as collateral in support of its repayment obligations under this facility.
The borrower received a term sheet subsequent to the fourth quarter of 2021 to support its performance against its obligations, which requires an $8 million payment in exchange for a partial forgiveness of debt ("Tranche 1") and restructured amortization profile ("Tranche 2"). An extension was granted to the borrower to meet this requirement and while the borrower was able to secure a loan facility from a local bank for the payment, it was funded in Naira, which is a difficult currency to convert to USD. As of June 30, 2023, approximately 3 billion Naira were converted and paid, completing Tranche 1 requirements. The Company began to service the remaining loan in Tranche 2 with a payment in September 2023. An agreement on the final terms of the full restructuring was reached in the fourth quarter of 2023. The borrower has continued servicing the debt since the restructuring was completed.
Worldwide Investments and Representations Winrep S.A. and Vannapack S.A.
In the beginning of 2023, the Company made investments through Working Capital Associates, LLP (“WCA”) in Worldwide Investments and Representations Winrep S.A. and Vannapack S.A. (“WinRep”), a frozen fish and seafood company located in Ecuador, comprised of three trade finance participations for an aggregate amount of $5,400,000.
In March 2023, WinRep started experiencing liquidity issues due to problems related to its main offtake market in China. The Company, through WCA, made several attempts to support WinRep through debt restructuring, which were rejected by WinRep. WinRep’s financial situation worsened, and the Company decided to sign a Loan Purchase and Elevation Agreement dated as of September 28, 2023, to take over direct responsibility of the loan from WCA. The Company is currently evaluating several recovery strategies, including the liquidation of the Ecuadorian trust holding the collateral, which primarily consists of a land parcel in Ecuador. Due to the recent instability in Ecuador, the value of the land has decreased. The instability in Ecuador has improved; however, real estate prices remain relatively low. During the second quarter of 2024, the Company engaged several brokers on a non-exclusive basis to begin marketing the property for sale. In June 2025, the Company filed a hecho relevante (relevant fact) notification with the Superintendencia de Compañías (Superintendent of Companies, or "SIC") to formally inform the authority about the existence of our defaulted debt, which WinRep failed to report in its financial statements used to raise bond financing. Our local counsel then met with the Intendente Nacional de Mercado de Valores (National Intendant of the Stock Market) to provide further context. At the intendant's request, our loan documentation with the borrower was submitted to the SIC as evidence of the Company's debt. During the third quarter of 2025, the SIC initiated an internal investigation and requested further information from the trustee regarding the debtors.
Triton Metallics Pte. Ltd.
In November 2019, the Company made an investment in Triton Metallics Pte. Ltd. (“Triton”) totaling $16,456,270 in a trade finance facility. Triton is a Singapore based diversified commodities trading company. TransAsia informed the Company in early 2020 that due to the COVID-19 pandemic there have been constrained trading volumes. As a result, TransAsia then began working with the borrower to restructure the facility, and a restructuring agreement was executed on August 17, 2020. The Company further amended the facility in June 2021, which reduced the interest rate from 11.5% to 6% PIK-only for a period of two years, in order to give Triton additional flexibility as it managed its business amidst the resurgence of the pandemic in Asia. The unpaid interest of $1,503,463 under the old trade finance facility has been capitalized and added to the outstanding principal balance as of the date of the new agreement. During the period of July 1, 2020 through August 16, 2020, $241,816 of interest income was recognized prior to the date the loan was restructured. During the three months ended September 30, 2025, the borrower was able to modestly increase its trading business; however, considering the extended timeline anticipated for business ramp-up, the borrower is not expected to be able to provide debt service for the next 12 months.
Vikudha Malaysia Sdn Bhd
In March 2017, the Company provided a $15,000,000 term loan facility to Vikudha Malaysia Sdn Bhd (“Vikudha”). Vikudha is a trading and manufacturing company, founded in 2007, principally involved in procurement of fast-moving consumer goods and agricultural related products. The borrower company had strong performance through year-end 2019 and then was significantly impacted by COVID-19 and was unable to meet scheduled debt repayments due to commence. The facility was successfully restructured in November 2020, and the borrower was able to service the debt until there was a resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Asia region and global supply chains continued to be disrupted. In June 2021, a six-month final maturity extension was granted to June 2023. During the second quarter of 2022, the local office of one of Vikudha’s local bank lenders filed a wind-up petition against the company’s Hong Kong-based parent company and loan guarantor. The Company issued a Reservation of Rights Letter to Vikudha in June 2022. Subsequently, in August 2022, the Company issued an Acceleration Notice to the borrower and Demand Notices to Corporate and Personal Guarantors. Once the wind-up petition was granted by the Hong Kong court, the Company also filed proof of debt forms at the Hong Kong Receiver office to ensure legal rights are protected. The borrower continues to provide updates on its efforts to repay the debt, including the recent launch of a trading business currently handling only modest shipments, which the borrower hopes to scale by 2026, and the borrower continues to seek additional equity and working capital as part of its efforts to rebuild its trading volumes. As a result of the delays in restarting its non-credit business and the modest volumes of its new trading business, the expected maturity has been extended.
In August 2017, the Company provided a $15,000,000 senior secured term loan facility to Limas Commodities House Limited (“Limas”), a Hong Kong-based company 100% owned by an Indonesian entrepreneur. Limas was established as a financing SPV for PT Limas Tunggal, an Indonesian resource trader, for the purpose of gaining better access to international banking and capital markets. As a resource trading company, demand for Limas’ products were significantly affected by the global pandemic, reflected in lower shipping volume in 2020 and early 2021. The Company’s sub-advisor provided $6 million of working capital to Limas, which secured additional collateral for the sub-advisor and the Company in the form of assignment of three claims won in Korean cases totaling $15,000,000. The collateral was assigned pro-rata, adding $13.4 million to the Company’s existing collateral pool. Due to the continued impact of COVID-19, in June 2020, the Company executed an extension of final maturity to June 2023. Subsequent to June 30, 2022, PT Limas Tunggal, the corporate guarantor of the Company’s facility, entered restructuring legal proceedings in Indonesia, and as a result, the Company issued an Acceleration Notice to the borrower and a Demand Notice to the Guarantor. The restructuring legal proceedings were concluded during the third quarter of 2022, resulting in an extension of the debt repayment period.
The borrower has progressed slowly towards materially ramping up its trading activity. Progress is expected to accelerate following the government's issuance of production quotas in the third quarter of 2025. Part of the collateral package for this loan are proceeds from the Korean cases, which continue to be delayed.
Lidas S.R.L.
In May 2021 and December 2022, the Company acquired participations of $3,735,195 and $2,000,000, respectively, in a term loan facility with Lidas S.R.L. (“Lidas”), a producer of frozen bread and pastries based in Tulcea, a city in Southeastern Romania. Lidas primarily operates a production line that is currently the second-largest producer of frozen bakery products in Romania. The company also owns and manages eleven supermarkets throughout Tulcea.
PT Citra Labuantirta
In early 2022, TAEL Partners, a Singapore-based private equity firm and PT Citra’s majority shareholder, assumed operational control to address liquidity constraints. PT Citra subsequently developed a revised business plan and resumed limited operations. The Company continued to work with PT Citra through 2023 and 2024 to finalize restructuring documentation, share-pledge agreements, and working-capital financing.
In September 2025, one of PT Citra’s suppliers filed a PKPU claim (Indonesia’s equivalent to a U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing), which was granted by the court. Subsequently, the Company filed a claim that was recognized by the court. PT Citra has appointed a financial advisor to prepare a restructuring plan for all creditors. As PT Citra’s largest creditor, the Company remains actively engaged in the process. As a result of the uncertainty introduced by the PKPU proceeding, a fair value decrease of approximately $3.4 million was recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Interest Receivable
Depending on the specific terms of our investments, interest earned by us is payable either monthly, quarterly, or, in the case of most trade finance investments, at maturity. As such, some of our investments have up to a year or more of accrued interest receivable as of September 30, 2025. In addition, certain of our investments in term loans accrue deferred interest, which is not payable until the maturity of the loans. Lastly, certain of the Company's investments have PIK interest, which is accrued as interest receivable and capitalized on a regular basis. As a result, a significant portion of the Company's interest receivable balance may not be received in cash in the short term. The Company's interest receivable balances at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are recorded at net realizable value.
Results of Operations
Consolidated operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows:
| Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2025 |
September 30, 2024 |
September 30, 2025 |
September 30, 2024 |
|||||||||||||
| Investment income |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest income |
$ | 888,020 | $ | 1,637,544 | $ | 4,902,067 | $ | 4,921,844 | ||||||||
| Payment-in-kind interest income |
1,693,407 | 4,822,398 | 11,360,303 | 13,518,778 | ||||||||||||
| Fee income |
20,419 | — | 28,498 | 485,906 | ||||||||||||
| Other Income |
13,922 | 73,470 | 51,626 | 147,788 | ||||||||||||
| Interest from cash |
37 | 158 | 461 | 2,247 | ||||||||||||
| Total investment income |
2,615,805 | 6,533,570 | 16,342,955 | 19,076,563 | ||||||||||||
| Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
| Asset management fees |
1,373,663 | 1,400,781 | 4,228,500 | 4,149,500 | ||||||||||||
| Professional fees |
1,338,967 | 1,555,970 | 4,383,438 | 5,165,500 | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses |
225,352 | 261,844 | 750,999 | 1,136,500 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expenses |
88,227 | — | 450,719 | — | ||||||||||||
| Board of managers fees |
64,375 | 64,375 | 193,125 | 193,125 | ||||||||||||
| Total expenses |
3,090,584 | 3,282,970 | 10,006,781 | 10,644,625 | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
$ | (474,779 | ) | $ | 3,250,600 | $ | 6,336,174 | $ | 8,431,938 | |||||||
| Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments |
(10,582,783 | ) | 287,405 | (14,032,422 | ) | 1,651,915 | ||||||||||
| Net realized losses on investments |
— | — | (73,871 | ) | — | |||||||||||
| NET CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ | (11,057,562 | ) | $ | 3,538,005 | $ | (7,770,119 | ) | $ | 10,083,853 | ||||||
Revenues
Three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, total investment income amounted to $2,615,805 and $6,533,570, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reclassification of income from certain investments in connection with the quarterly assessment of the net realizable value of interest receivable. This decrease was partially offset by the reclassification of PIK interest income to interest income, related to the reversion to the original contractual terms of the debt agreement for a particular investment, following the failure to reach an agreement on the restructuring of such investment and a proceeding being commenced in Indonesia that is akin to a U.S. Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding (the "Indonesian Proceeding"). PIK interest income decreased by $3,128,991 during the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. The decrease is mainly due to the reclassification of PIK interest income to interest income in connection with the Indonesian Proceeding. Additionally, fee income increased by $20,419 during the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, primarily due to a consent fee that was accrued in connection with the Indonesian Proceeding. Other income primarily consists of certain rental income, payments from legal settlements, and other miscellaneous sources, which are generally considered a minor component of our total investment income.
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, $80,796 or 3.1% of the investment loss was recorded primarily as a result of the reclassification of certain investments’ income in connection with the quarterly assessment of the net realizable value of interest receivable from loan and trade finance participations and $1,870,672 or 71.5% was earned from direct loans. In addition, we earned $37 in interest income on our cash balances.
During the three months ended September 30, 2024, $2,856,627 or 43.7% of the investment income was earned from loan and trade finance participations and $3,676,785 or 56.3% was earned from direct loans. In addition, we earned $158 in interest income on our cash balances.
Nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, total investment income amounted to $16,342,955 and $19,076,563, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to the reclassification of income from certain investments in connection with the quarterly assessment of the net realizable value of interest receivable. This decrease was partially offset by the following factors: (i) the expiration of a repurchase agreement, (ii) the application of default interest income related to a certain investment, and (iii) the reclassification of PIK interest income to interest income in connection with the Indonesian Proceeding. PIK interest income decreased by $2,158,475 over the same period, primarily due to the reclassification of PIK interest income to interest income in connection with the Indonesian Proceeding. Additionally, fee income decreased by $457,408 during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, mainly due to the completion of amortization related to certain deferred revenue. Other income primarily consists of certain rental income, payments from legal settlements, and other miscellaneous sources, which are generally considered a minor component of our total investment income.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, $3,404,705 or 20.8% of the investment income was earned from loan and trade finance participations and $10,542,874 or 64.5% was earned from direct loans. In addition, we earned $461 in interest income on our cash balances.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, $8,078,273 or 42.4% of the investment income was earned from loan and trade finance participations and $10,996,043 or 57.6% was earned from direct loans. In addition, we earned $2,247 in interest income on our cash balances.
Expenses
Three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
Total operating expenses, excluding the asset management and incentive fees, incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2025 decreased by $165,268 to $1,716,921 from $1,882,189 for the three months ended September 30, 2024. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower professional fees related to certain investments, reflecting efforts to minimize overall costs during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the asset management fees amounted to $1,373,663 and $1,400,781, respectively. The incentive fees for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 amounted to $0 and $0, respectively.
Nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
Total operating expenses, excluding the asset management and incentive fees, incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 decreased by $716,844 to $5,778,281 from $6,495,125 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. This decrease was primarily attributable to a lower reimbursement of consulting fees related to an ESG analysis to the Company's advisor, as well as reduced professional fees associated with certain investments, reflecting efforts to minimize overall costs during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the asset management fees amounted to $4,228,500 and $4,149,500, respectively. The incentive fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 amounted to $0 and $0, respectively.
Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments.
We measure net realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale of an investment and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, but considering unamortized upfront fees. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment fair market values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized. We recorded net realized losses of $73,871 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We recorded net change in unrealized depreciation of $14,032,422 and net change in unrealized appreciation of $1,651,915 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The net change in unrealized depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was primarily driven by increased uncertainty regarding the future cash flows of certain investments and the Company’s strategic liquidation of certain investments to mitigate prevailing liquidity challenges.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2025, we had $672 in cash. The Company is in the process of realizing liquidity from the settlement of certain investments and expects to receive several million dollars in cash in the near term. Based on current expectations, approximately $6.2 million is anticipated to be received by the end of 2025, and an additional $14.4 million of cash proceed is expected to be received by the end of the first quarter of 2026. Subsequent to September 30, 2025, the Company received approximately $255,000 in proceeds from one of these investments. In addition, the Company received an aggregate of approximately $1.7 million of regularly scheduled payments subsequent to September 30, 2025. The Company expects to fund the payment of past and current operating and other accrued expenses with these proceeds. We generate cash primarily from cash flows from interest, dividends and fees earned from our investments and principal repayments, proceeds from sales of our investments and from sales of promissory notes, proceeds from the issuance of notes payable, and proceeds from private placements of our units. We may also generate cash in the future from debt financing. We have been facing liquidity constraints, primarily due to our borrowers experiencing challenges in their ability to repay amounts owed to us in a timely manner or at all, as described above under "Outlook." Until we are able to accumulate more cash, our primary use of our limited cash will be the payment of our expenses. If we begin to have fewer liquidity constraints and our cash on hand materially increases, we expect any additional cash will be used to reinstate cash distributions to our unitholders (and the repurchase of units under our unit repurchase program to the extent of reinvested distributions), and to make loans, either directly or through participations. In addition, at such time, we would expect to once again maintain cash reserves from time to time for investment opportunities, working capital and distributions. While we currently anticipate payments on certain investments throughout the remainder of 2025, there can be no assurances that anticipated payments will be made when expected or at all. In February 2025, in order to increase liquidity to pay our expenses, we sold a portion of one of our investments to an affiliate for aggregate gross sale proceeds of $1.0 million. We may determine to execute additional sales of all or a portion of our interest in one or more investments to increase liquidity from time to time.
The following discussions provide additional detail regarding our cash flows.
Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities
Cash flows used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, decreased by $4.1 million compared to the same period in 2024. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in the proceeds from disposition and paydowns of investments, driven by delays in scheduled payments and the liquidation of certain investments through ongoing legal proceedings.
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, increased by approximately $4.2 million compared to the same period in 2024, primarily because no distributions were made for the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
Debt Financings and Financing Obligations
We may borrow additional funds to make investments. We have not decided to what extent going forward we will finance portfolio investments using debt or the specific form that any such financing would take, but we believe that obtaining financing is necessary for us to fully achieve our long-term goals. We have been, and still are, actively seeking further financing through both development banks and several commercial banks. Accordingly, we cannot predict with certainty what terms any such financing would have or the costs we would incur in connection with any such arrangement. On November 3, 2022, we entered into a transaction with an unrelated financial institution, whereby we sold a $5.0 million participation interest in one of our term loan positions and, as of March 31, 2023, we had agreed to repurchase the participation by October 2023 at a price equal to the sum of the original sales price plus accrued interest calculated at a simple 10% annualized rate. On March 21, 2023, the terms were amended. The repurchase date was extended to October 17, 2023, and the interest rate was increased to 11.5% per annum. The amendment also granted the buyer the right to elevate its position to a direct interest or sell the position to a third party. In October 2024, the agreement was further amended. The repurchase date was extended to June 18, 2025, subject to partial principal and interest payments. As of September 30, 2025, we had approximately $2.9 million in total debt outstanding, solely related to the repurchase obligation, resulting in a debt to equity ratio of 1.1%.
Company Strategy
Although the Company has a perpetual duration, it disclosed previously that if the Company did not consummate a liquidity event by August 25, 2021, it would commence an orderly liquidation of its assets unless a majority of the board of managers, including a majority of the independent managers, determined that liquidation is not in the best interests of the Company’s unitholders. Since then, the continuation of the Company’s operations has been regularly monitored and reviewed by the board of managers on a quarterly basis. The board of managers may, in its discretion, pursue a liquidation of the Company or one or more alternative transactions in the event it deems such action to be appropriate.
Distributions
We paid monthly distributions commencing with the month beginning July 1, 2013 until December 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we paid distributions to unitholders for the months of January through June 2023, but we did not pay the distributions on our regular cadence and instead paid some of the distributions months after the month to which the distributions related. We have not resumed the payment of regular monthly distributions, but paid special distributions to unitholders in February and March 2024.
From time to time, we may also pay interim distributions at the discretion of our board. Distributions are subject to the board of managers’ discretion and applicable legal restrictions and accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will make distributions at a specific rate or at all. Distributions are made on all classes of our units at the same time. The cash distributions received by our unitholders with respect to the Class C units, Class W units and certain Class I units, are and will continue to be lower than the cash distributions with respect to Class A and certain other Class I units because of the distribution fee relating to Class C units, the ongoing dealer manager fee relating to Class W units and Class I units issued pursuant to a private placement and the ongoing service fee relating to the Class W units, which are expenses specific to those classes of units. Amounts distributed to each class are allocated among the unitholders in such class in proportion to their units. Distributions are paid in cash or reinvested in units, for those unitholders participating in the DRP. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, no distributions were made.
Related Party Transactions
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company incurred $4,228,500, and $4,149,500, respectively, in asset management fees and $0 and $0, respectively, in incentive fees, both of which are paid to the Advisor.
On February 7, 2025, the Company sold a portion of its investment in TriLinc Peru S.A.C., for a sale price of $1.0 million to TriLinc Global Impact Fund II, Master, Ltd., an entity whose advisor is under common ownership with the Company’s Advisor. Following this sale, the Company no longer holds the majority participation interest in this investment. TriLinc Global Impact Fund II, Master, Ltd. became the majority participation interest holder. The Company recognized a realized loss of approximately $74,000 from the sale. As of September 30, 2025, the investment represented approximately 0.5% of the Company's total portfolio.
As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, amounts due to affiliates on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities totaled $451,455 and $240,100, respectively, reflecting that the Company is obligated to reimburse an affiliate of the Advisor for certain operating expenses of the Company that were initially paid by the affiliate.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP and pursuant to the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC, we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a significant impact on our net income/loss and affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and discuss our critical accounting policies and estimates with the audit committee of our board of managers. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies, estimates and judgments during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the critical accounting policies, estimates and judgments disclosed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Although these estimates are based on management's knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may differ from these estimates. In particular, economic conditions globally continue to remain challenging, particularly for advanced economies, largely due to inflation and a sustained period of high interest rates. Additionally, many of the Company’s borrowers were negatively affected by higher operating costs and supply chain issues that began in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which were further exacerbated by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Fortunately, most supply side conditions normalized in 2023 and have remained stable through September 30, 2025, providing some economic relief to borrower companies. However, as noted in prior quarters, the combination of pandemic period effects, in many cases, had devastating and long-lasting impacts on the businesses, financial condition and results of operations of several borrower companies. Together, these factors made it more difficult for some borrowers to repay their obligations to the Company in a timely manner or at all, resulting in the Company experiencing inconsistent cash flows. The Company believes that the central issue driving results is the legacy effect from borrower companies struggling to recover from the compound impact of approximately three years of economic hardship stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022. However, current macroeconomic conditions have significantly improved for most borrower companies, though improvement ultimately has been slow. Still, the Company has seen several borrowers improve, particularly in 2024 and into 2025, due in large part to the sustained improvement in supply side macroeconomic conditions over the last eleven quarters. The U.S. government has recently imposed, and may further increase, tariffs on certain countries and commodities. In response, some non-U.S. countries have imposed or may impose retaliatory tariffs. These actions and the resulting uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade and tariff policies, including ongoing dispute and negotiations with China, continue to be a critical near-term macroeconomic risk factor which could negatively affect the Company's borrowers. As of September 30, 2025, it was still too early to observe direct effects to the Company’s borrowers, other than general declines in business risk taking, capital investment, and some reduced availability of both debt and equity financing.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements and its expectation of their impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Subsequent Events
Please see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9. Subsequent Events."
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2025.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company was not a defendant in any material litigation.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2025 (“2024 Form 10-K”) which could materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or future results. The risks described in our 2024 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our 2024 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Unit Repurchase Program
Beginning June 11, 2014, we commenced a unit repurchase program pursuant to which we conduct quarterly unit repurchases of up to 5% of our weighted average number of outstanding units in any 12-month period to allow our unitholders, who have held our units for a minimum of one year, to sell their units back to us. Our unit repurchase program includes numerous restrictions, including a one-year holding period, that limit our unitholders’ ability to sell their units. Additionally, we have no obligation to repurchase units if the repurchase would violate the restrictions on distributions under federal law or Delaware law, and all units to be repurchased under the program must be fully transferable and not be subject to any liens or other encumbrances and free from any restrictions on transfer. Unless our board of managers determines otherwise, we will limit the number of units to be repurchased during any calendar year to the number of units we can repurchase with the proceeds we receive from the sale of units under our DRP. At the sole discretion of our board of managers, we may also use cash on hand, cash available from borrowings and cash from liquidation of investments as of the end of the applicable quarter to repurchase units.
On August 9, 2019, our board of managers amended and restated our unit repurchase program in order to amend the basis on which we will honor repurchase requests in the event repurchase requests exceed the existing limitations of the program. The amended and restated unit repurchase program took effect on September 30, 2019. Under the amended and restated unit repurchase program, if we cannot repurchase all units presented for repurchase in any quarter because of the limitations on repurchases set forth in the program, then we will honor repurchase requests in the following order of priority (unless our board of managers determines that we will not repurchase units in that quarter):
| ● |
first, we will repurchase units pursuant to repurchase requests made in connection with the death or disability of a unitholder (or on a pro rata basis among such requests if less than all of such death or disability requests can be satisfied); |
| ● |
second, we will repurchase units pursuant to any repurchase request that has been carried over from one or more previous quarterly periods where the value of the units that have not yet been repurchased pursuant to such request (with the value calculated as the number of units multiplied by the estimated net asset value per unit for units of that class, as most recently disclosed by us in a filing with the SEC) is less than $2,500 (or on a pro rata basis among such requests if less than all of such requests carried over from prior periods can be satisfied); and |
| ● |
third, we will repurchase units pursuant to all other repurchase requests on a pro rata basis. |
Unit repurchases are made on the last calendar day of the quarter at a price equal to the estimated net asset value per unit for each class of units, as most recently disclosed by us in a public filing with the SEC.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, no repurchase requests were fulfilled.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, of the Company's directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of the Company's securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement."
| Number |
Description |
|
| 3.1 |
||
| 3.2 |
||
| 4.1 |
||
| 4.2 | Fifth Amended and Restated Unit Repurchase Program. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024, filed with the SEC on August 13, 2024. | |
| 31.1* |
||
| 31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
| 32.1* |
||
| 101.INS |
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
|
| 101.SCH |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
| 101.CAL |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
| 101.DEF |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
| 101.LAB |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
| 101.PRE |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
| 104 |
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and included in Exhibit 101) |
* Filed herewith
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| TRILINC GLOBAL IMPACT FUND, LLC. |
||
| November 14, 2025 |
By: |
/s/ Gloria S. Nelund |
| Gloria S. Nelund |
||
| Chief Executive Officer |
||
| November 14, 2025 |
By: |
/s/ Kun Yong Park |
| Kun Yong Park |
||
| Chief Financial Officer |
||
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Gloria S. Nelund, certify that:
|
1) |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC (the “registrant”); |
|
2) |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3) |
Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4) |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5) |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 14, 2025
|
/s/ Gloria S. Nelund |
|
Gloria S. Nelund |
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Kun Yong Park, certify that:
|
1) |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC (the “registrant”); |
|
2) |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
3) |
Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
4) |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
5) |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 14, 2025
|
/s/ Kun Yong Park |
|
Kun Yong Park |
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2025, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gloria S. Nelund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
Dated: November 14, 2025 |
By |
/s/ Gloria S. Nelund |
|
Gloria S. Nelund |
||
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2025, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kun Yong Park, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
(2) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
Dated: November 14, 2025 |
By |
/s/ Kun Yong Park |
|
Kun Yong Park |
||
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |