Good day, and welcome to the Unisys Corporation Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Courtney Holben, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. This is Courtney Holben, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you for joining us. Yesterday afternoon, Unisys released its third quarter 2020 financial results. I'm joined this morning to discuss those results by Peter Altabef, our Chairman and CEO; and Mike Thompson, our CFO. Before we begin, I'd like to cover a few details. First, today's conference call and the Q&A session are being webcast via the Unisys investor website. Second, you can find the earnings press release and the presentation slides that we will be using this morning to guide our discussion as well as other information relating to our third quarter performance on our investor website, which we encourage you to visit. Third, today's presentation, which is complementary to the earnings press release, includes some non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP measures have been reconciled to the related GAAP measures, and we've provided reconciliations within the presentation. Although appropriate under generally accepted accounting principles, the company's results reflect charges that the company believes are not indicative of its ongoing operations and that can make its profitability and liquidity results difficult to compare to prior periods, anticipated future periods or to its competitors' results. These items consist of pension, debt exchange and debt extinguishment, cost reduction and other expense. Management believes each of these items can distort the visibility of trends associated with the company's ongoing performance. Management also believes that the evaluation of the company's financial performance can be enhanced by use of supplemental presentation of its results that exclude the impact of these items in order to enhance consistency and comparativeness with prior or future period results. The following measures are often provided and utilized by the company's management, analysts and investors to enhance comparability of year-over-year results as well as to compare results to other companies in our industry: non-GAAP operating profit, non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, free cash flow and adjusted free cash flow, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA and constant currency. In addition, this quarter, we will be continuing to report non-GAAP adjusted revenue and related measures as a result of certain revenue relating to reimbursements from the company's check processing JV partners for restructuring expenses included as part of the company's restructuring program. For more information regarding these adjustments, please see our earnings release and our Form 10-Q. From time to time, Unisys may provide specific guidance or color regarding its expected future financial performance. Such information is effective only on the date given. Unisys generally will not update, reaffirm or otherwise comment on any such information, except as Unisys deems necessary and then only in a manner that complies with Regulation FD. And finally, I'd like to remind you that all forward-looking statements made during this conference call are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from our expectations. These factors are discussed more fully in the earnings release and in the company's SEC filings. Copies of those SEC reports are available from the SEC and along with other materials I mentioned earlier on the Unisys Investor website. And now I'd like to turn the call over to Peter.

Thank you, Courtney, and good morning, and thank you for joining us to discuss our third quarter financial results. We continue to hope that you, your families and friends are safe and healthy. Our financial results improved significantly versus the second quarter, and we took meaningful steps to improve our pension structure. While keeping a sharp focus on near-term goals, we have also been enhancing the productivity of our operations and focusing on higher-margin, higher-growth segments of the market to drive the business going forward. In addition to our overall operational productivity enhancements, we are pleased to see that the recovery from COVID-related impacts continued in the third quarter. The combination of these factors helped drive significant sequential improvement in our key financial metrics and year-over-year non-GAAP operating profit margin expansion, which Mike will go through in more detail. One element of the financial results that I will highlight is that our Services non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin increased 520 basis points sequentially and has increased 830 basis points since the end of the first quarter this year. This has largely been driven by effectively removing negative synergies following the sale of our U.S. federal business and has also been helped by our ongoing efforts around workforce planning. We are utilizing predictive analytics and near real-time data to optimize the efficiency of our workforce, including through improved labor supply and demand management and skill gap resolution. While these efforts are in early stages, we are pleased to see the improvement to date with the total Services cost of labor as a percentage of Services revenue down 320 basis points year-over-year in the third quarter and down 250 basis points sequentially. Moving to revenue in the quarter. Factors contributing to our sequential revenue improvement include the increase in monthly tickets in our field services business from approximately 70% of their pre-COVID levels in June to approximately 80% in September. Volumes on the two large BPO contracts that we referenced last quarter increased from 38% and 80% of their pre-COVID monthly levels in June to 57% and 91%, respectively, in September. Within travel and transportation, our global average daily waybill count increased from 51% of its pre-COVID monthly volumes in June to 68% in September. We also saw an increase in sales with Services total contract value signings increasing 4.3% sequentially in the quarter. We have taken significant steps to improve our pension structure and liquidity since the second quarter, including with the notes offering we just priced. Mike will provide more detail on this but the progress enhances both our financial and operational flexibility. We have been making improvements to the business to drive efficiencies over time, including the workforce management efforts I noted as well as increasing the implementation of automation and artificial intelligence and enhancing collaboration tools to increase associate productivity. We also saw sales momentum, with our pipeline increasing over 20% sequentially as a result of increased unsolicited bids to help clients solve their business challenges. This is also a higher quality pipeline, as we have been more rigorous in prequalifying opportunities, and we have enhanced sales training efforts through the implementation of boot camps and investment in more sophisticated training platforms to aid our new digital selling approach. As a result, our year-to-date win rate was up significantly relative to win rates in the last two years. Within digital workplace services, as we discussed last quarter, we are shifting our focus to higher growth, higher-margin segments of the market, such as end-user experience. InteliServe, which is our artificial intelligence and advanced analytics powered platform, helped differentiate us within digital workplace services. IntelliServe uses cloud-based mobile-centric solutions to improve end-user experience and productivity, while supporting workforce optimization and reducing IT costs. As an example of how InteliServe can help clients transform their digital workplace strategy, during the third quarter, we signed a contract with DJO Global, Inc., a provider of intelligent medical devices and services. InteliServe will enable omnichannel and service desk support to help provide a more affordable and effective experience for DJO's customers. Within cloud and infrastructure, we are prioritizing our cloud efforts enhanced by CloudForte, which offers a comprehensive set of cloud services across applications and infrastructure with embedded governance and security to accelerate digital transformation for our clients. During the quarter, we signed a new scope contract with the State of North Dakota. As part of this contract, Unisys will be providing CloudForte services related to the Microsoft Azure GovCloud to support that state's unemployment insurance agency. With respect to ClearPath Forward, while we report license revenue in our Technology segment and ClearPath Forward Services revenue in our Services segment, we think about this business as a franchise with the Services inherently linked to the Technology. We continue to innovate this platform and enhance our offerings. During the quarter, we announced the general availability of ClearPath Forward for Microsoft Azure. This offering provides our clients with the ability to utilize secure high-intensity computing in a public cloud environment. This solution creates the opportunity for clients to increase volumes processed by ClearPath Forward systems and to increase their usage of related Unisys services and solutions, such as Unisys CloudForte hybrid and multi-cloud services, Stealth and Stealth services. The new work with the State of North Dakota is an example of the power of leveraging ClearPath Forward for Azure with other Unisys services, such as CloudForte. ClearPath Forward Services represents an ongoing opportunity for growth, including application development, modernization and managed services. We believe all these initiatives will help us maintain our very high ClearPath Forward client retention rate. I have spoken in recent quarters about our ongoing commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion. This quarter, I want to highlight our focus on ESG matters, while environmental, social and governance activities have been important to us for years. During the third quarter, we published our first sustainability report, which is available on our website. Among the targets and accomplishments highlighted in the report, we note that in 2006, we announced a goal of a 75% reduction in our absolute greenhouse gas emissions from Scope 1 and Scope 2 sources by 2026. We are currently 96% of the way to achieving this goal, and we'll do so years ahead of schedule. We have achieved a 99% reduction of our hazardous waste generation over the last 20 years with 0 hazardous waste generated across our U.S. operations in 2019. We also recognize the need to expand the impact of our ESG efforts, so we have announced a target of having 75% of our key suppliers disclose their ESG targets and committed actions. Before turning the next section of the call over to Mike, I would like to thank all of our associates for coming together to support each other and our clients this year. As examples, our field services technicians put themselves on the front line, even during the height of the initial wave of COVID-19 to serve our clients. And our sales executives have quickly adapted strategies to achieve success in a more virtual world. We are truly grateful for our associates' commitment to Unisys, our clients and our investors. I am proud of our progress since our last call, and we look forward to continuing to execute in the fourth quarter. Mike, over to you.

Thank you, Peter, and good morning, everyone. In my discussions today, I'll refer to both GAAP and non-GAAP results. As a reminder, reconciliations of those metrics are available on our earnings material. Likewise, information related to discontinued operations is available on our website. As Peter has already highlighted, our financial results improved significantly on a sequential basis relative to the second quarter, including being free cash flow positive for the quarter. We also took steps to significantly improve the pension structure, and our full year expectations for revenue and profitability are unchanged. We were able to accomplish this while also streamlining operations to enhance our margin profile and focusing on higher-margin, higher growth market segments. I'll begin by noting that we were ahead of consensus on all major financial metrics for the quarter. Our non-GAAP adjusted revenue increased 12.8% sequentially relative to the second quarter to $495.1 million. This was driven by both improvements in Services and Technology revenue. Services non-GAAP adjusted revenue increased 7.6% sequentially to $425.9 million. This improvement was driven by increased volumes in the businesses that were most impacted by COVID as well as growth in our cloud business, which was particularly strong in the public sector. Services backlog ended the quarter at $3.3 billion. We expect the sequential improvement in Services TCV, that Peter mentioned, to continue into the fourth quarter and expect backlog to be higher in the fourth quarter as a result. Technology revenue was also significantly higher sequentially and ahead of internal expectations, up 61.7% versus the second quarter to $69.2 million. The two ClearPath Forward contracts that were delayed from Q2 were signed in the third quarter, which contributed to the sequential improvement in revenue, though technology revenue would have been up sequentially, even excluding these contracts. Last quarter, we noted that we expected technology revenue to be split approximately 30% and 70% between the third and fourth quarter. Given that Technology revenue was slightly stronger than expected in Q3, this split is now more likely to be approximately 40% and 60%. Moving to profitability. Non-GAAP operating profit margin expanded 50 basis points year-over-year and 830 basis points sequentially to 8.5%, again, driven by improvements in both Services and Technology margins. Services non-GAAP adjusted gross margin increased 200 basis points year-over-year and 350 basis points sequentially to 19%, and the Services non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin increased 250 basis points year-over-year and 520 basis points sequentially to 4.8%. These improvements were driven by the flow-through of higher revenue as well as additional savings from effectively removing negative synergies earlier in the year following the U.S. federal sale and the workforce management efforts that Peter outlined. Technology margins were up significantly on a sequential basis, with Technology gross margin up 17.7 points sequentially and technology operating profit margins up 30.9 points sequentially. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 350 basis points sequentially to 14.9%, driven by many of the factors I've already noted with respect to revenue and operating profit. We continue to be pleased with our associate productivity in our remote work environment. And as Peter noted, we're proud of the work our associates did during the quarter to drive progress. Despite the significant sequential improvement in non-GAAP adjusted revenue, it was still down year-over-year, but consistent with our previously discussed expectations. The year-over-year decline was driven largely by lower volumes in both field services and our check processing JV within BPO. As a reminder, we noted coming into the year that our ClearPath Forward renewal schedule was expected to be lighter in 2020, and that also contributed to the year-over-year decline in non-GAAP adjusted revenue. Technology margins were down year-over-year because of the flow-through impact of the lighter renewal schedule on revenue against a relatively fixed cost base. Our full year expectations for revenue and non-GAAP operating profit margin remain unchanged relative to the end of the second quarter. Our models continue to indicate a 10% year-over-year revenue decline and 5.2% to 6.7% range for non-GAAP operating profit margin for the full year 2020. All of these forward-looking indicators are based on our current visibility and should spikes in the virus result in material negative economic consequences, our actual results may differ from our expectations. We had previously discussed a one-time noncash charge of $20 million related to our EMEA optimization plan, which we now expect to incur in the fourth quarter instead of in the third quarter. Our previously mentioned facilities rationalization is also on track, and we anticipate a fourth quarter charge of $5 million to $10 million. The resulting run rate savings from the charges taken in the third quarter and the fourth quarter is expected to be between $20 million and $30 million exiting 2021. Moving now to pension and liquidity. We're very pleased with the progress we were able to make on both of these fronts since our last call. Our recent notes offering will allow us to significantly reduce the pension deficit and our remaining required pension cash contributions. Pro forma for contributing the net proceeds from the notes as well as up to $285 million from cash on the balance sheet, we will have effectively pre-funded substantially all the expected future contributions to the U.S. pension plan. Given that we upsized the recent notes offerings and based on the current calculations for future payment, we may not need to contribute the full remaining $285 million I've just highlighted, as we do not want to be in a position where we have funded more than our required contributions. Pro forma for the contribution of the note proceeds, we will have contributed just under $800 million to the U.S. pension plan in 2020, thereby dramatically reducing the deficit. The notes offerings was a roughly leverage-neutral transaction given that the net proceeds were used to reduce the pension deficit. As a result, pro forma net leverage is 3x LTM adjusted EBITDA as of September 30. Also with respect to pension, I'd like to update you on our pension liability reduction strategy. As a reminder, I mentioned on the second quarter earnings call that we were planning to remove approximately $1 billion in gross pension liabilities by the end of the first quarter 2021. This program is on track, and during the third quarter, we notified a group of planned participants of our offer to make bulk lump sum payments. We expect this bulk lump sum offer to remove between $200 million and $350 million of gross pension liabilities from our U.S. pension obligation, and we anticipate this process to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter. U.S. GAAP requires that a proportional settlement charge accompanies the removal of significant pension liabilities. The charge represents unrecognized actuarial gains and losses currently sitting in accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI, in the equity section of our balance sheet. To that end, we anticipate a $150 million one-time noncash settlement charge to be associated with this portion of our liability reduction to be recognized in the fourth quarter. In the first quarter of 2021, we expect to remove an additional $750 million of gross pension liabilities with approximately $250 million coming from the U.S. pension and approximately $500 million coming from foreign pensions. This corresponding one-time noncash settlement charge associated with the liability removal of these plans is expected to be approximately $250 million and would be recognized in the first quarter of 2021. Both of these charges are equity neutral and will reduce future pension expense. With respect to liquidity, our cash flow this quarter was strong. Cash from operations increased $48.6 million year-over-year and $80.5 million sequentially to a total of $66.3 million. We were also free cash flow positive for the third quarter with $34.3 million of free cash flow, an increase of $48.6 million year-over-year and $83.9 million sequentially. Adjusted free cash flow increased $38.5 million year-over-year and $89.5 million sequentially to $52.4 million. As a result, we ended the third quarter with a strong liquidity position. We paid down the $59 million previously outstanding on the revolver with cash from operations. And after doing so, we had an ending cash balance for the quarter of $774 million, down less than $10 million versus the end of the second quarter. Given the issuance of the notes and contributions towards the pension, we have limited near-term cash requirements outside of normal operational funding. In conjunction with the recent notes offering, we've also obtained commitments to renew and extend our asset-backed lending facility, or ABL, at the size of $145 million with a new maturity date of 2025. As in the second quarter, we had no negative impact on cash collections due to COVID-19 and continue to be in line with historic norms. CapEx was roughly flat year-over-year at $32 million, and we're reducing our overall CapEx target for 2020 to $140 million, down from $150 million. Overall, we're very pleased with the progress we've made during the third quarter, and we remain focused on continuing our strong execution in the fourth quarter to achieve our full year goals. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Peter.

Thank you, Mike. Operator, we're now ready to take comments and questions.

The first question today comes from Jon Tanwanteng of CJS Securities.

Very nice quarter, guys. It's clear you've done a lot of good work here. I wanted to ask about the sequential margin uptick, specifically in technology. You've got some pretty good operating margins there on only $70 million in revenue. As we look into Q4, where you have more renewals coming, can we see much of that drop to the bottom line the same way it did in Q3, or how should we think of the incremental as those renewals come in? And then I have a follow-up after that.

So, do you want to speak specifically to that? Jon, thanks for the question. I would say that in general, the technology revenue that comes in is all customized. These are specific clients with specific contracts, and so there are allocation issues that apply throughout. But there's a lot of very specific facts about each of these contracts. So it makes generalization about the profitability of specific contracts a little more difficult. But over to you, Mike.

Yes, Jon, as you know, the bulk of that is ClearPath Forward technology revenue. It's a relatively fixed base. And so we would expect the margin pull-through to be consistent with the third quarter, again, with the cost basis being relatively fixed and flat, the expectation on margin. The one variable that comes into play and probably not indigenous to what's coming through in the fourth quarter is the amount of third-party hardware that might end up being included in any given scenario. But in this case, I think the expectation is consistent with what happened in Q3.

Got it. That's helpful. And again, as we look to the fourth quarter, and I know you have your full year guidance out there. But with COVID ramping and hitting new highs in many regions of the world, how are you preparing for that, especially as it comes to the ability to visit sites and do your processing, call center work? Are you going to be impacted similar to the way you were impacting Q2? Or are you going to be able to mitigate that in some way?

Well, I'd say we're smarter than we were in Q2. I think the thing we did and many of the companies in our sector did really effectively in Q2 was to be able to move people out of contact centers out of main facilities where they're all working together, doing development work and have them work remotely. That dramatically decreased the spread of the virus within our team. What was harder to do in Q2 was really to stand up from a workforce planning standpoint, exactly how you would support all of your clients, exactly how you would do remote field service effectively. And so that did take a while to get a handle on. I would tell you, we now have that much more in hand. So I would expect more efficiencies if we get a strong second wave, if that's what you want to call it from what we experienced in the second quarter. The other thing to keep in mind about us as a company is the real strength of our diversity. So the U.S. accounts for about 41% of our revenue, EMEA is about 32%, Asia Pacific and Latin America, together about 37%. So from a standpoint of client demand, different countries are going to be affected in different ways. And I think we have a strength of diversity. In the same way, we have a strength of delivery because our people are spread so far around the world. So that's not going to make it perfect, but I do believe we're in a better position than we were in the second quarter.

Understood. And I'm sorry, going to squeeze one more in. Just as it relates to pension reform and stimulus, if that passes, is there a provision to pay the senior secured notes back?

The senior secured notes, Jon, are non-call three in a seven-year term, so certainly not immediately that would not happen.

Nice to see the rebound in the business. So I know, Peter, you mentioned some workforce efficiency metrics here upfront in some of your comments and sounds like there may be more progress there in terms of efficient staffing and optimization. Do you have a feel for kind of best practices or benchmarks out there relative to perhaps where you are? And how much more opportunity may be in front of you here?

Yes, Joe, that's a great question, and thank you for waking up so early this morning. We stood up what was effectively a brand-new reimagined workforce management system in January. New team leading it, new processes. So that team has had to get up and running and on the go during most of the COVID situation. So as I say, when we look at the savings that we were able to pull through this calendar year in some of our operations is really two buckets. One is getting rid of the negative synergies, if you will, from downsizing with the sale of the U.S. Federal Group. That is effectively done on a run rate basis. There's about less than 20% more to go in the fourth quarter, and it's all been identified. So the second part of that productivity is through workforce planning. That has been the smaller part in 2020. We actually expect that to accelerate in 2021. So we think the bigger savings with respect to that are ahead of us and not behind us. And workforce planning is actually only one of three, what I would call, big internal housekeeping jobs we have done during COVID-19. So obviously, we've put in place that workforce planning system. That involves not only advanced training but matching of skills and labor and cost. It means not going through a turnstile of how do you hire people for specific jobs and then what happens if you don't need them anymore. But really taking that workforce and retraining that workforce, so you get out of this endless cycle of people moving in and out of the company. We think that's very productive for them and very productive for us. But in addition to workforce planning, we have two other, what I would call, inside baseball initiatives going on of substance. One of them is a brand-new ERP system, which doesn't sound exciting but is exciting. Ours is about 20 years old. Mike can talk about it. We actually have two systems running concurrently. And everybody on this call knows the benefit of a real effective ERP system. In particular, we expect that to increase our net cash flow, and Mike can get into more detail on that. And finally, over the course of this year, we have been standing up a very significant brand-new digital sales platform, which I alluded to in my comments. And that is dramatically accelerating our ability for the sales team to work with clients and prospects. And as you've seen from my remarks, that is just beginning. But it's already having an effect with a really dramatic increase in our win rate. So more to come on all three of those initiatives next year. We expect them to be more powerful next year than this year. But we like what we're seeing in all three. Mike, do you want to speak to the ERP system and the effects of that for a minute?

Sure. Really, I'd like to tie to first, Peter, into your comment about workforce management. Joe, when we look at our total cost of labor, we're seeing that come down dramatically across the board. Right? So it's not only managing our internal workforce and the flow of resources, but it's managing any outsourced component of that, that we have. So our total cost of labor is really being helped by that. And as you know, with the geographical footprint that we have and being diverse, we want to be nimble, and we want to ensure that we've got the right people in the right place, and that's been really helpful to us. And to Peter's point, we expect '21 to continue that momentum and continue to drive that internal cost of labor down. Maybe specifically to the ERP, and as you can imagine, it's a vast project that encompasses many aspects of our business. But one thing in particular, and specifically, as we talk about working capital improvements, within ERP would be the new billing system component of that. The allowance for on-demand and real-time billing in a web-based environment is going to help significantly. And we'd be looking for a significant DSO reductions out of that, which, by in turn, would obviously reduce our working capital profile a bit because we're now aligning on the AR side of the coin, consistent with the AP side of the coin. And our goal here is to get to a point that we're using minimum working capital in the context of our free cash flow. So a lot of good things in the pipeline from an operational perspective, and we feel pretty good about the direction and where we're going right now.

That's great. Maybe we just kind of focus again on that last point, Peter mentioned as well on the digital initiatives. I mean, if you kind of look across the enterprise and software sales and the macro and the digital transformation efforts underway are just really kind of amazing, the pace that they're going right now. It does sound like you're tapping into that with this kind of unsolicited bid opportunity. Can you kind of expand on that relative to the offerings that you're seeing in these situations? And do you think the product set needs to expand to kind of exploit what you're seeing across enterprise customers?

So Joe, that's a great question. It's not a simple question, but it's a great question. I'll begin by breaking it down into three subsets and then let Mike add his thoughts. Starting with your last comment about the product set, I have mentioned in the last two calls, including this one, that we are evolving into areas that offer higher margins and higher growth. Specifically, some of our business lines are more stable with growth opportunities while others have even higher growth potential. The more stable lines would include our ClearPath Forward family of solutions. We see opportunities to grow that through particular services on top of ClearPath Forward or related offerings like CloudForte. The new Microsoft Azure applicability for the MCP version of CloudForte is significant. We are dedicating a lot of time and effort to ensure that our core franchise remains viable and has growth opportunities. Our BPO business caters to a specific set of clients and capabilities. This leaves us with two other significant revenue areas: digital workplace services and cloud and infrastructure. Since April, we have been working with McKenzie to outline the future of digital workplace services, as well as the future of cloud and infrastructure. While we had some ideas about the direction and specifics, we now have a more comprehensive understanding than we did back in April. In terms of digital workplace services, our evolution from focusing just on end-user services to enhancing end-user experience will allow us to target a larger market, increase the value of our services, and potentially improve our margins. We are highly committed to the digital workplace services sector, which stands out as a major area of focus for us, especially as it is less prioritized by some of our competitors. Interestingly, this space is growing and becoming more profitable, even as some companies exit it for other markets. For us, it remains an attractive market, especially since we have a strong position within it. The second area where we are enhancing our capabilities is cloud and infrastructure, particularly with a strong focus on cloud, which is a rapidly growing and profitable market that many companies are targeting. Our approach, however, is distinct. In collaboration with McKenzie, we have developed a specific strategy for the cloud market, leveraging our well-received CloudForte capabilities. In this expansive market, the key question is how we differentiate ourselves and ensure success. We have identified specific segments in this market to concentrate on, including the public sector at the state and local level in the U.S. and governments around the world. As Mike mentioned, we have been successful in the public sector and expect to grow further in this area, which we find promising for several reasons. We are well-recognized in the public sector, and our capabilities are aligned with its needs. Every one of our cloud initiatives emphasizes cost savings, alongside increased capability, security, and flexibility. This cost-saving aspect is crucial for governments globally, aligning perfectly with their requirements. From a solution standpoint, those are the primary areas where we are modifying our offerings. Regarding unsolicited bids, we believe it's essential to focus on them. The pipeline we are receiving from TPAs has increased significantly. While we have a defined win rate for TPA work, the win rate for unsolicited bids is much higher, as we are more familiar with the clients and their needs, allowing us to tailor our responses more effectively. As we evaluate our overall win rate, I believe we are improving on the TPA bids simply due to better execution. However, the unsolicited bids continue to showcase a much higher win rate, which is reflected in our results. Mike, do you have anything to add?

Yes. So Joe, that was a very comprehensive answer from Peter. I think Joe likely received most of what he needed from that response. I would like to mention that new business from our perspective is up compared to last year. Peter highlighted the increase in our pipeline, which we are specifically seeing through higher deal counts. We attribute much of this to the nonsolicit bids, as Peter noted, where we can secure additional work without the need for a formal RFP process. Usually, this type of work also yields higher margins. Therefore, Joe, we feel quite optimistic about these factors. Our pipeline is consistently growing. I mentioned earlier that we expect our backlog to increase in Q4 and to be higher than what we achieved in Q3, with much of that driven by new business, new clients, and expanded project scopes.

Joe, our new business Services TCV, which includes new scope or new clients, increased by 71% compared to last year. While we need our signings to keep growing, this is a very positive number for us.

So I want to ask a little more about the improved win rate. Clearly, your new digital sales platform is part of the improved win rate story. Can you talk specifically, or you just give us some examples of how the digital sales platform is helping the win rate? And are there factors besides the new digital sales platform that are also helping on the win rate front?

Yes, Rod, thanks for the question. I think one of the requirements that clients are going to expect in the future, and we are just trying to stand in front of that and get a little ahead of that with our digital sales platform is transparency. I mean most clients at this point are doing most of their research on the web well before they talk to any of our sales people or marketing people. They know more about us than we do on a good day. And they want that same ability when it comes to pricing. So one of the things that our digital sales platform does is it gives them access to pricing information that we have never even thought to provide before. And frankly, we haven't been able to provide it before because it moves from being everything as being kind of a custom in a large model to something that is much more available from a P&Q standpoint. So that's what we've done. And then beyond what is even available from a website from a digital sales standpoint, the modeling itself has become so much cleaner that we can be very, very responsive as to pricing. It doesn't have to be this big black box, that's all that complicated. And as you move more to SaaS services, as you move more to service on demand, you have to have that approach. So as we have evolved into that approach, we find the clients like it. They not only like the fact that the pricing is perhaps more competitive, but they like the speed with which we can respond to them as well as the transparency of it. So it's a big deal for us. And I would say, if we look at the win rates so far in 2020, that digital sales platform is contributing to the win rate. But in addition to that, it is this higher mix of unsolicited opportunities, which is also contributing to the win rates. And I talked about that in response to Joe's question. We simply know more about those opportunities. One of the advantages of our company is the depth of our relationships with our clients. Our top 10 clients we've been with for an average of more than 22 years, and that includes clients that we have had only for the last 3 to 5 years. So for some of those clients, we go back even further. So we have a very, very in-depth understanding of their needs, and we can use that in-depth understanding to create unsolicited bids that we think are compelling. And more and more, they are compelling, and that's why the win rate is going up.

Rod, it's Mike. I'll add two points to that. We've talked about the ongoing efforts to qualify the pipeline in recent quarters, and as that pipeline becomes more qualified, the conversion rates generally improve. Additionally, regarding Peter's earlier comments, we have invested significant time in refining our sales approach and training efforts. During the pandemic, we seized the opportunity to enhance our sales team's understanding of our platforms and offerings. The combination of unsolicited bids, comprehensive training, a better-informed team, a qualified pipeline, and our higher NPS scores from satisfied clients are all factors that are contributing to our increased win rate.

Great. And then the follow-up is, I'm very glad to hear about efforts to shift your mix into these higher-margin segments. It also seems that that's another effort that can help the win rate as you are very deliberate about the segments that are being targeted. As you pursue those efforts to shift the mix, to what extent might you see low-margin revenues as you make that shift?

Help me out a little bit, Rod. See low margin revenue?

Oh, yes. Yes, I meant to use the word seed. In other words, like, would you move away from certain contracts that are at a very low-margin in order to focus your efforts on higher-margin segments? Or do you plan to kind of keep the core low-margin work and then just add kind of higher-margin work on top of it? Is there a bit of an effort to sort of give up on low-margin contracts to make this shift to the higher-margin segments?

Yes, that's a great question, Rod. We have been moving away from lower-margin contracts for a few years now, and I expect this trend to accelerate in the coming years. What you’ve observed from us over the last nearly two years is that as we approach renewals, we very rarely walk away from a client. We look at our business carefully at renewal time and consider how it fits into our current portfolio and whether we are pricing it fairly. We will continue to engage with clients where we believe the pricing is not fair and where the work does not meet our target margin. This could happen at renewal time or even beforehand during an extension discussion. We are transparent about the value we provide and explain why certain pricing is unsustainable for us. Some clients understand and accept that changes are needed, while others might resist any adjustments to their current pricing. Both reactions are valid, but we will not be inclined to maintain those pricing levels indefinitely. As we shift to higher-margin work, some of our revenue will no longer align with our goals, and we will let those contracts go—not because of the nature of the work itself, but due to specific contract terms. Currently, we can align the work we do with our profit targets, so we don't need to abandon work simply because it’s deemed low-margin. However, we do have some contracts that are not structured in a way that makes sense for us. If they don’t make sense for us, we believe they won’t make sense for our clients either. Mike, would you like to add anything on that?

No, Peter, I think that's right. Rod, as you know, we've been looking at pruning that portfolio for many years. We do have contracts in that space that are 3 to 7 years in duration. And so there are a couple of those still lingering around. But to Peter's point, as they come up for natural renewal is when we're having those discussions. And at least for a good chunk of what we've seen to date, clients have been willing to work with us and actually increase that margin profile a bit to make it advantageous for both parties. So we'll continue that approach.

I guess one for Mike. As you look at your full year guidance for 2020 revenue and operating margins and an update on CapEx and then just given the nice improvement that we saw in free cash flow in the third quarter, could you just talk to sort of what that implies for free cash flow in the fourth quarter? Just in the broader context, given the guidance you provided for revenues and operating margins.

Sure. Thanks, Frank. I mentioned at the end of the second quarter earnings call that I anticipated the second half to be free cash flow positive. So the fact that Q3 was free cash flow positive aligns with that expectation, and also the anticipated CapEx being about $10 million lower supports it. Additionally, the increase in Technology revenue and profit in the fourth quarter is significant, as we are seeing a shift from 40-60 now for the third to fourth quarter. All these factors suggest a continuation of positive free cash flow. I expect Q4 to be stronger than Q3 regarding free cash flow for these reasons. While we don't provide specific guidance for that value, the rise in Technology revenue, along with profitability improvements and the $10 million savings related to CapEx contributing to free cash flow, give a strong indication of where we expect Q4 to land, as well as for the full year. Overall, we are optimistic about this trend and hope it will persist.

Great. And maybe just as a follow-up, as we roll it into 2021, you've obviously made a lot of progress on the liability side. And as I think about the progress you've made with the pension, as I think about the interest costs associated with the new debt and as we think about CapEx, working capital, some of those factors, how should we be thinking about some of those factors that build into free cash flow for 2021, if you have any early thoughts?

Yes. During our roadshow for the offering, we provided some information on that topic. In general, our expectation is that without the voluntary pension contributions we plan to make in 2021, we would achieve free cash flow positivity for the year. It's important to note that this refers to free cash flow, not adjusted free cash flow. This is a significant milestone for us, and when discussing adjusted free cash flow, the impact of those pension contributions will be crucial. We've been consistently reducing our capital expenditures, hitting about $140 million at the end of the year compared to around $215 million a couple of years ago. We believe $140 million is a reasonable figure for modeling in 2021, and we are focused on cutting down capital spending for software as we progress in our public sector business and adopt a more capital-light strategy, which is also reducing our outsourcing costs. Typically, we advise that 3% to 5% of international revenues is a good benchmark for tax modeling purposes. Additionally, we need to consider interest expenses associated with the new debt. Another key factor is working capital. I mentioned earlier that we expect improvements in Days Sales Outstanding starting in Q1 next year as we implement our ERP, which we believe will positively impact free cash flow. All these factors are favorable for our current position. As we approach year-end and provide guidance during our fourth-quarter call, we will have more specifics to share, but this should give you a solid idea for your modeling.

Frank, I’d like to follow up on Mike's comments regarding your question about 2021 and also provide some insights beyond that timeframe. As we reflect on this calendar year and our capital structure changes, the sale of the federal unit necessitated the early closure of our 440s in long-term debt. However, this has significantly lowered our future pension contributions in the U.S. due to the payments we've already made. With the new offering we have priced, which is set to close this Thursday pending certain conditions, we will effectively substitute the 440s with a more cost-effective second layer of debt. This transition will further minimize our expected U.S. pension contributions over time. While there will still be some contributions, they will become negligible in the future. As someone who has been with the company for the past five years, and with Mike also being part of that timeframe, it's remarkable to think that we have reached a point where our expected U.S. pension contributions will be minimal going forward. We’re no longer as affected by fluctuations in interest rates or other variables tied to those contributions. This is a significant achievement for us, and I want to acknowledge our financial and legal teams for their efforts. From an operational perspective, we can now focus on utilizing our assets to grow the business rather than worrying about funding the U.S. pension contributions, which is a major shift.

The next question comes from Doug Thomas of JET Equity Partners.

I want to extend my heartfelt congratulations to you and your team for the outstanding work you've accomplished. It’s true that the pension issue was a distraction for five years, and now you can concentrate on growing the company. Everything you've mentioned is accurate. I'm interested to know if the company's performance improvements, which have coincided with the pension issue becoming less significant, are also affecting how your customers and potential customers perceive your current situation. Do you think this will aid your efforts to continue increasing revenue in the near future?

Thank you for the question, Doug. Over the past several years, we have effectively resolved the concerns surrounding our capital structure. This was a significant issue three to four years ago, but our actions during that time have transformed the situation. Now, from the perspective of clients and prospects, we have improved from having a relatively high debt-to-equity ratio to achieving one of the lowest in our industry. This financial enhancement has garnered attention and has played a vital role in our progress. I would say we have shifted this from a liability to a strength, which also enhances our capacity to invest in new solutions and propel the business forward. Mike, do you have any additional thoughts?

No, I think that's exactly right, Peter. And I guess, certainly, it will be a lot harder for our competitors in an RFP process to kind of point to our liquidity and say, "Hey, look, are you sure about this, right?" I mean, we've taken that aspect of it completely off the table. Net leverage ratio below industry averages, cash contributions behind us really puts us in a much stronger balance sheet position, and that can only help, Doug, in the context of dialogues externally. And I will say to you part of the reason for our minimum capital requirements around the world is really about strengthening the equity in certain jurisdictions where we do public sector work. You need to have a certain ratio in certain countries to really bid on that work. So we think from that perspective and from our ability to have cash to support outsourcing arrangements and go after some bigger public sector work that, frankly, we may have shied away from just because of the amount of cash that would have been required to put out on the upfront side of that work effort. Both of those constraints are lifted from us. So again, I think we feel pretty strongly that we're all in on driving top line and continuing to drive profitability.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Peter Altabef for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Elissa. And I do want to thank everyone for participating in the call this morning. As Mike mentioned, we are in the process of really standing up an almost continual dialogue with both our buy and sell-side analysts. And we think an important part of that will be a virtual analyst event which we are calendaring for January 12 next year, where we expect to take everyone through in more detail some of the things we have at store as well as kind of medium and long-term projections. So I do hope that everyone joins us on January 12. Our IR team, led by Courtney, will reach out to all of the people on this call. Make sure you have information about it as it becomes available. We'll also have continuing updates about that event from an information standpoint on our IR website. So with that, this may be the last one, or this is expected to be the last one of these calls in this calendar year, so I look forward to rejoining with each of you on January 12. And in the meantime, Courtney, Matt, our IR function, Mike, myself and the rest of our leadership team are always available to have conversations with you, and we look forward to those as well. On behalf of Mike, Courtney and the team. Thank you very much.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.