Good morning and welcome to CNA’s discussion of its 2022 First Quarter Financial Results. CNA’s first quarter earnings release, presentation and financial supplement were released this morning and are available via its website wwe.cna.com. Speaking today will be Dino Robusto, CNA’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Scott Lindquist, CNA’s Chief Financial Officer. Following their prepared remarks, we will be opening the line for questions. Today’s call may include forward-looking statements and references to non-GAAP financial measures. Any forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the statements made during the call. Information concerning those risks is contained in the earnings release and CNA’s most recent SEC filings. In addition, the forward-looking statements speak only as of today, Monday, May 2, 2022. CNA expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements made during the call. Regarding non-GAAP measures reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures and other information have been provided in the financial supplement. The call is being recorded on webcast during the next week. The call may be assessed on CNA’s website. If you’re reading a transcript of this call, please note that the transcript may not be reviewed for accuracy. Thus it may contain transcription errors that could materially alter the intended meaning of the statements. With that I will now turn the conference over to CNA’s Chairman and CEO Dino Robusto. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Cecilia, and good morning, all. We started off the year strong with increased underlying PNC profitability, lower catastrophe losses, and good production results. But before we begin with the details, I wanted to acknowledge the unconscionable loss of life and devastation in Ukraine. Our hearts reach out to the displaced and suffering. Turning back to the quarter. Core income was up 20%, to $316 million despite lower investment income from limited partnerships and common stock. In the first quarter, the combined ratio was 91.9%, 6.2 points lower than the first quarter of 2021 and our best quarterly combined ratio since the third quarter of 2016. Pre-tax catastrophe losses were only $19 million, or 1.0% of the combined ratio. The PNC underlying combined ratio was 91.4%, a 0.5 improvement over the first quarter of 2021. The expense ratio of 31% was lower by 0.5, and the underlying loss ratio of 60.1% was the same as the prior year quarter. As I mentioned in prior quarters, the property quota share treaty that we purchased in June of last year lowered the premium mix between property business and our other classes. Since our property business has a lower underlying loss ratio, its mix effect increased the overall PNC underlying loss ratio. In the first quarter, this mix effect on PNC overall was 0.3 points. So we actually recognized a 0.3-point margin improvement in the quarter after adjusting for the mix. There was margin improvement in specialty and international and accounting for the mix effect, which for commercial is 0.7 points. The underlying loss ratio and commercial was consistent with the prior year’s quarter. Our PNC's prior period development was favorable by 0.5 points on the combined ratio, similar to the first quarter of 2021. Now turning to production. Gross written premium excluding our captive business grew by 8% in the first quarter, and net written premium grew by 4%. Excluding currency fluctuations, the growth was 9% and 5%, respectively. The impact of the property reinsurance structure change from June of last year also had the effect of widening the spread between gross and net written premium growth. New business grew by 14% this quarter to $451 million. Retention was 83% this quarter and was up 2 full points in each specialty and commercial compared to last quarter. Exposure changed by plus 2% this quarter. The overall written rate increase was 7% in the quarter, down one point from last quarter. While generally showing a moderating trend in aggregate, the movement varied in different parts of our portfolio. In commercial, the rate increase at plus 5% remained the same as it was in the fourth quarter of 2021. Excluding workers' compensation, the commercial rate increase was plus 7%, also consistent with the last quarter. Specialty achieved rate increases of 9% in the quarter. This is down two points from the fourth quarter, but about half of this decline is due to the seasonality mix of business. As our affinity programs, a larger percentage of specialty premiums are in the first quarter compared to the remainder of the year, and these profitable programs have low single-digit rate increases. The international rate increase of 9% moderated from the double-digit highs but remains strong. We will continue to feel the earned rate, which in the quarter was plus 13% for international. The overall earned rate for PNC in total was plus 9% this quarter and still represents a meaningful gap above our loss cost trends, which now are between 5.5% and 6% in aggregate. Recall that during the third quarter of last year, we spoke about how we raised our long-run loss cost trend assumptions in property in response to the economic inflation we were seeing at the time. That put our overall loss cost trend assumptions above 5%. In the last six months, the rate of economic inflation in the U.S. accelerated. As the courts have started to reopen and slowly clear the backlog in their dockets, social inflation, which we consistently contend was merely obfuscated by the pandemic rather than extinguished, also remains an inflationary factor. With a 3 to 3.5 point gap between 9 points of earned rate and our loss cost trends, we have continued to reflect a small portion of this implied margin. This quarter we did so by 0.3 points. For the full year of 2021, we recognized about 0.6 points of margin improvement in the underlying loss ratio, excluding the impacts of COVID in the prior year. We continue to remain prudent in reacting to margin improvement in our portfolio because economic and social inflationary pressures may continue to increase or persist longer than anticipated, making it difficult to know at this time how our actual margin will materialize over time. If we have been too conservative, we will benefit from the margin later on, all else being equal. Now, let me provide a little more detail on our three business units. The combined ratio for specialty was 88.7% in the first quarter, which is the seventh consecutive quarter below 90%. The underlying combined ratio was 90%, consistent with last year. The underlying loss ratio improved by 0.5 points to 58.9. As earned rates are exceeding loss cost trends, the expense ratio of 30.9 is up slightly from the first quarter of 2021. Gross written premiums excluding captives grew by 8% in the first quarter, and net written premium growth was 4%. Specialty growth was negatively impacted by approximately 3 points this quarter due to the continuation of non-renewals in parts of our healthcare portfolio that I previously discussed. Despite that, retention still improved 2 points this quarter to 85%, and new business was up 41%. Turning to commercial, the combined ratio was 94.5% in the quarter, including 1.8 points of catastrophe; this is the lowest quarterly combined ratio since 2008. The underlying combined ratio was 92.7%. The underlying loss ratio of 61.5 was 0.7 points higher than the prior year quarter. However, as I mentioned earlier, it is consistent year-over-year, adjusting for the mixed impact of the property reinsurance program we purchased last June. The expense ratio improved by 0.7 points to 30.7% in the first quarter. Commercial gross written premium excluding captives grew by 9% in the quarter, and net written premium growth was 4%. Earned rates for commercial continue to remain strong at plus 7% in the quarter and plus 9% excluding workers' compensation. Based on the moderation of written rates we’ve been experiencing, commercial earned rates excluding workers' comp we believe will remain at or above loss cost trends for the remainder of 2022. Additionally, some portion of the exposure increase, which for commercial was 3% in the quarter, could have a comparable benefit to margin as rate increases do. Even if we assume only a quarter of the exposure increase affects rate or roughly 0.5 points, it is still quite meaningful in offsetting some of the long-run loss costs trend increases this quarter. We are experiencing mid-single-digit exposure changes in lines of insurance with inflation-sensitive exposure bases, like workers' compensation and general liability. We are also seeing exposure increases in property more consistently, with insurance-to-value adjustments reflecting the current inflationary environment. Commercial retention was up 2 points this quarter at 85% and was higher than any quarter since prior to the pandemic. For international, the combined ratio was 92.4% this quarter. This is the best combined ratio since 2016. The line combined ratio was 91.2%, reflecting 2.8 points of improvement from the prior year quarter. The underlying loss ratio was 58.6% including a full point of margin improvement compared to last year, and the expense ratio of 32.6% is down almost 2 points. In terms of the Russia-Ukraine war, our insurance exposure in Ukraine and Russia is small, and any impacts to our portfolio are expected to be de minimis. International gross written premiums grew 6% or 9% excluding currency fluctuation, and net written premiums grew 7% or 11% excluding currency effects. Retention of 73% for international this quarter was lower due to some targeted non-renewals in January where we couldn’t secure appropriate terms and conditions in the market. Retention quickly improved to 80% for February and March. Now, as I mentioned last quarter, Scott Lindquist joined CNA early this year and formally transitioned into the CFO role in February. Larry Hefner is also with us for his last call, and he will be available for the Q&A portion of our call today. With that, I will turn it over to Scott.

Thanks, Dino and good morning, everyone. Based on our 20% increase in core income, our core ROE of 10.3% is up from 8.8% in the first quarter a year ago. Our PNC operations produced a core income of $321 million, which is a 22% increase compared to Q1, 2021. A key contributor to the strong result was our pre-tax underlying underwriting income of $165 million. In addition, our catastrophe losses were relatively modest at $19 million pre-tax compared to $125 million pre-tax last year in the first quarter. Our Q1 expense ratio of 31% is in line with the expectations that were set out in last quarter’s call and is 1.5 points lower than Q1, 2021. While we continue to make investments in technology, analytics, and talent, we are beginning to incur more TNE as we emerge from the pandemic, but lower acquisition costs in commercial and the higher effect of higher net earned premiums have more than offset these higher costs. I want to note that there will be a certain amount of variability quarter-to-quarter, however, we believe an expense ratio of 31% is a reasonable run rate. For the first quarter overall, PNC net prior period development impact on the combined ratio was 0.5 points favorable compared to 0.6 points favorable in the prior year quarter. Favorable development in our specialty segment was driven by surety and warranty for more recent accident years, somewhat offset by medical malpractice. Our corporate and other segment produced core losses of $28 million in the first quarter, which compares to a $36 million core loss in Q1, 2021. Prior quarter results include a $12 million after-tax loss on a loss portfolio transfer of certain legacy excess workers' compensation reserves. For licensed group, we had core income of $23 million for Q1, 2022, which was $13 million lower than last year’s Q1, primarily from lower investment income and higher expenses. While we are on the topic of the group, I’d like to comment on the approaching change in GAAP accounting methodology related to long-duration targeted improvements that will apply to our long-term care business, which we have set forth on pages 17 and 18 of our earnings presentation. We will adopt this new accounting guidance effective January 1, 2023 and will apply it as of January 1, 2021. Two years of adjusted financial results will therefore be included in our 2023 financial statements. As we noted in last quarter’s call, this change in accounting has no impact on the underlying economics of CNA’s business. This change in accounting requires entities to update discount rate assumptions on a quarterly basis using an upper-medium-grade fixed-income instrument yield. This new accounting also requires cash flow assumptions, which include morbidity and persistency to be reviewed, and if there is a change, updated on at least an annual basis. The effective changes and discount rate assumptions will be recorded on the other comprehensive income component of stockholders' equity. While the effect of changes in cash flow assumptions will be recorded in the company’s results of operations. The most significant impact at the transition date will be the effect of updating the discount rate assumptions to reflect a single A yield rather than using the expected yield from our investment strategy. This adjustment will be partially offset by the de-recognition of shadow adjustments associated with long-term care reserves. As you can see on page 18 of the earnings presentation, we estimate the net impact of these changes will be a $2.2 billion to $2.5 billion decrease of stockholders' equity as of the transition date of January 1, 2021. As I mentioned, we will be adjusting our quarterly results from Q1, 2021 through Q4, 2022 when we implement the accounting change in 2023. In a rising interest rate environment like we’ve seen over the past 15 months, as the corporate single-A rates increase, the impact of the adoption decreases. For example, assuming March 31, 2022 interest rates were in place on January 1, 2021, we estimate the transition impact would have been significantly lower, to a decrease of $1 billion to $1.3 billion of stockholders' equity as corporate single-A rates are substantially higher at March 31, 2022 than at January 1, 2021. I do want to emphasize that this accounting pronouncement applies only to GAAP basis financial statements and has zero impact on the underlying economics of CNA’s business. This change has no impact on statutory earnings, capital, or risk-based capital metrics and has no impact on the dividend capacity of our insurance underwriting subsidiaries. As such, this accounting change is viewed by us and the industry as non-economic as none of the underlying fundamentals of the business are changed by it. Turning to investments, total pre-tax net investment income was $448 million in the first quarter compared to $504 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease was driven by our limited partnership and common stock returns which generated $8 million of income in the current quarter compared to $61 million in the prior year quarter. As a reminder, private equity funds, which represent about 70% of our LP portfolio, primarily report to us on a three-month or greater lag. So our results this quarter are primarily reflective of performance from Q4, 2021. Hedge funds were down for the quarter directionally in line with markets and reflect mixed results from managers. Hedge funds, which now represent about 30% of our LP portfolio, predominantly report results on a real-time basis. Our fixed income portfolio continues to provide consistent net investment income, slightly higher than the last few quarters and the prior year quarter. We continue to benefit from a higher invested asset base driven by strong operating cash flows. As a point of reference, our average book value has increased $1.4 billion from the prior quarter, and while our average portfolio yields are lower relative to the prior year quarter, I am pleased to say that in this current rising interest rate environment, we are now achieving significantly higher yields on reinvestment relative to the last several years. In fact, as of last week, reinvestment rates are on average 50 basis points higher compared to those we achieved in the past first quarter. We will take advantage of this as our bond portfolio matures, which is roughly on average 7% each year, and as we put a significant portion of operating cash flows to work. While the rising rate environment positively impacts the outlook for investment income from a balance sheet perspective, it has reduced our net unrealized investment gain position to $1 billion at quarter end. This is down from $4.4 billion at the end of the fourth quarter 2021. I would like to note that interest rate-driven fluctuations in market values do not impact how we manage our investment portfolio, as we generally hold our fixed income securities to maturity. Notwithstanding the decrease in our net unrealized gain position, our balance sheet continues to be very solid. At quarter end, stockholders' equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income was $12.1 billion or $44.67 per share, an increase of 2% from year-end after adjusting for dividends. Stockholders' equity including AOCI, which reflects the reduction in net unrealized investment gains during the quarter, was $10.8 billion or $39.87 per share. We continue to maintain a conservative capital structure, a leverage ratio of 20%, and continue to sustain capital above target levels in support of our ratings. First quarter operating cash flow was strong once again at $645 million and was a result of solid underwriting and investment results. In addition to strong operating cash flow, we continue to maintain liquidity in the form of cash and short-term investments, and together they provide ample liquidity to meet obligations and withstand significant business variability. Finally, we are pleased to announce our regular quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share, which will be payable on June 2, to shareholders of record on May 16. With that, I will turn it back to Dino.

Thanks, Scott. Before opening the call to the Q&A session, I have a few additional comments. We are bullish about 2022. The market conditions are excellent when you consider that rates are up over 30% on a cumulative basis since the beginning of 2019, and we are benefiting from the compounding impacts of progressively better terms and conditions over that same time period, including higher deductibles, coverage restrictions, and limit re-profiling. Our new business pricing as well as terms and conditions track similar to renewals, so our new business rates are up substantially on a cumulative basis as well. We believe these favorable conditions afford us the opportunity to continue to grow our portfolio through new business and strong retention. A lot of the rate increases peaked in the fourth quarter of 2020 and have moderated at a measured pace of about 1 point per quarter to 7% in the first quarter of 2022. With written rate increases still in excess of long-run loss cost trends and earned rates at 9%, this should portend positive margins persisting through 2022. Of course, there could be further upward pressure on loss cost trends. However, the market has behaved rationally to prior increases in loss cost trends that have either accelerated precipitously or persisted at elevated levels for a protracted period of time, and we would anticipate the market pricing behavior would continue to react accordingly if loss cost trends accelerate further. With that, we will be happy to take your questions.

Thank you. We will now take a first question from Joshua Shanker from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thank you for taking my question. I appreciate the color on the alternative investment performance and about the hedge funds. A couple of questions. One is, can we break it up into limited partnerships and hedge funds? Limited partnerships for peers had a fairly good return in Q4. Does that portend that the hedge fund performance in Q1 was offset? Do we need to be concerned? Because in Q2, we’re going to see obviously the Q1 marks for limited partnerships. Do you have any sort of color on how we should be anticipating that one quarter ahead?

Hey, Joshua, it’s Scott. Thanks for the question. Yes, if you take a look at our limited partnerships, again, 70% are private equity. This quarter, results really reflected fourth quarter overall market performance. So yes, I would expect the second quarter private equity lag, limited partnerships to reflect the first quarter overall equity performance. And, of course, the hedge funds, those are real-time flow right through earnings real time. And then I would note, a $200 million of common stock mark-to-market is included in those results too that, of course, is real-time also.

Okay, have you, I mean, in real-time, have you seen any recovery on the hedge fund side from the Q1 marks?

I don’t know if I can really comment on that right at this point in time.

Okay, it’s totally fair. I realize this has had a huge influence on combined ratios, and the rate and loss cost trend don’t really explain the whole story. And you did explain that in the prepared remarks. But I don’t say right next to loss cost I think has been the main story in PNC over the last three years, right? Look at the commercial segments underlying 62 to loss ratio. It’s a good number, but it’s also the highest since Q2, 19. And it’s really higher than the annual averages from 2016 to 2020, and I’m scratching my head a little. I think about maybe it would be worthwhile, if you talk about when you came in 2015 what the business mix looks like in commercial, what it looks like today, and how that’s been affecting the loss ratio despite the fact that you’ve been getting a lot of rate next loss costs.

Okay, Joshua, I mean, I think we’re comfortable today with the portfolio. We’ve made a lot of different underwriting changes that we’ve talked about on many calls, whether it’s some of our catastrophe exposure, some of our property exposure here in the United States, etc. So we’re comfortable with the portfolio. I think when you take a look at the calendar year, the commercial loss ratio and combined ratio, as indicated, I think it’s amongst the best that we’ve seen since 2008. The underlying commercial loss ratio is consistent with the fourth quarter when you adjust for the property mix. The property mix did have the effect from the reinsurance that put pressure on the underlying loss ratio because we seeded more property premium away. But again, one of the reasons we purchased the reinsurance treaty and reduced a lot of our data exposure was to balance the book a little bit going forward. It represented about 20% in commercial and 20% property in our PNC overall and 80% is all the other casualty lines. It’s interesting if you were to look at the first quarter property growth, we still had some underwriting going on from catastrophe-exposed property. But if you take that aside, which is coming to the tail end, property was up actually above most of the other lines from a growth standpoint. And so I think we start to take advantage of that reinsurance treaty that had an adverse impact. So at the end of the day, we’re pleased with our commercial portfolio. We were pleased with how our PML to premium ratios have improved. We see it benefiting us from both an underlying standpoint and from a calendar standpoint, and the margin conversation is what it is. We’ve been prudent and we’re going to stay that way. If it’s been a little too prudent, then maybe we will benefit from it later on.

I appreciate the points. It’s helpful. Thank you.

We will now take our next question from Gary Ransom from Dowling & Partners. Please go ahead.

Yes, good morning. I wanted to ask a little bit more about inflation. And clearly, it’s affected many of the short-tail lines, the economic inflation that we’ve seen over the last year. But how do you think about how that might seep into the social inflation that might affect long-tail lines? Can you share your thoughts on that?

I mean, look, I think you could see it impact some of the social inflation correlation that we see from some of the inflationary pressures. I think, though, from, honestly, from a social inflation standpoint, what we’re looking at is as the courts open up, Gary, and the dockets get cleared up a little bit, it’ll be interesting to see if that accelerates. I think our early read is we’re clearly starting to see a little bit more attorney representation on certain claims, a little bit more pressure. But that’s really where we think social inflation has some pressure points that we're watching very closely.

Alright. Yes. Have the dockets actually cleared very much? I mean, I realize it’s opening.

No, it’s still early. It’s still early. It’s still early. So that’s why when we think about being prudent, we just need some additional time to really see what is going on with the social, legal toward inflation. It’s still early, but like I’ve always contended, it was just obfuscated by the pandemic rather than extinguished.

Another thing you mentioned in the comments in the press release is that the rates remain robust where they’re needed the most. So I assume there are some pockets where profitability is not back to where it needs to be. Can you tell us what some of those places are?

Yes. Quite frankly, Gary, to a large extent, but look, I mean, in commercial, we’re getting about nine points of rates. That’s good. It’s slightly above the loss cost trend but it’s going to have to sustain itself at 9% for a longer period of time before we see that line of business getting into what we consider a form of rate adequacy. In healthcare, we’re still seeing imports of our healthcare portfolio. We got double-digit rate increases and there too that’s required. International in the quarter still, UK, Europe double-digit. Canada is a little bit less, but it’s a lot more profitable. Cyber is not a big portion of the overall portfolio, but it deteriorated quickly with ransomware claims, and we’re still in and around almost triple-digit rate increases. So those are the lines that you would expect.

Alright, and then I just, you told that Ukraine was de minimis. But do you write any of those categories of lines that might be exposed over there and in the international book whether it’s credit risk? I am just trying to get a sense of the mix over there.

That’s fine. You may recall, Gary, one of the lines several years back when we started to re-underwrite our Lloyd’s syndicate was political risk and trade credit. So that run off, and we don’t anticipate whatever might be a tail on that is going to become any issue. It’s a small portion, very small portion, netted down on political violence that we all have through the syndicate, which we don’t expect is going to amount to anything based on all of our analysis. So no, we’re not a big writer of lines that are obviously getting affected in many of the ways you and your analyst colleagues have written about. We don’t play in those lines.

Great. Thank you very much for that, Dino.

We will now take your next question from Meyer Shields from KBW. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. Good morning. Dino can we get a little more color on the non-renewals in international in January? Is there a particular line of business that you’re finding less attractive?

Now in the last six months, both the economic inflation has increased. And, as I said, we’ll wait to see, right, as it’s court opens up. The dockets cleared, I think you’re still dealing with both inflationary pressure. So the way I think about it is to trigger maybe a little bit more, it’s sort of a peaking margin. I think we need to see some stability in the rate of acceleration of those loss cost trends. It could settle at a higher level, but like settle and be more stable. Until we’re faced with that kind of a trigger, we’re just going to remain prudent.

Okay, that’s perfect. That makes a lot of sense. Final question, if I can. I’m asking this because we’ve gotten somewhat different descriptions of this. Are you planning workers' compensation rate pressure to be a little worse in the first quarter of this year than the fourth quarter of last year?

Just to make sure I heard you right, Meyer, you are referring to the rates on workers' comp and how they moved from first quarter to the fourth quarter. Is that it? No, if you look at our rate movement on workers' comp over the course of the last four to five quarters. There’s been, there’s been a little bit of fluctuation up and down, but relatively the same at about low single digits. We haven’t seen any trend. Back then you recall Meyer, and I didn’t see an inflection point. It’s still playing out at the low single-digit rate.

Okay, fantastic. Thank you very much.

We will now take a follow-up question from Joshua Shanker from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you. I’m just looking for a little education on the fronting business with the cell phones. Obviously, growth continues to look good. Can you talk a little about, I mean, about your arrangements there, the relationships you have, how sticky they are, and whether as the 5G revolution takes place, that you’re going to be at the forefront of providing that service?

On the warranty business, as you know, Joshua, we have two components. We have the electronics and in particular the cell phones for which that is done through the captive and reinsured back 500%. This is why we always give you the growth ex-captive, and we do have a longer-term arrangement. It’s a function of how that sort of business grows. Then there’s a little bit of other electronics business that we also go after. And then, of course, there’s our auto warranty. All in all, the warranty business continues to be a focus for us. And on the issue of the 5G revolution, I’m going to leave it to those who are considerably more intelligent than I am on the technology.

Yes. So the important thing is I want to clarify your relationships have been locked in for the next three years?

Yes. well, they are longer-term, and I don’t know when the exact sort of end is coming up, but yes, they’re multiyear deals and have been for a long time, and we have excellent relationships with them.

That’s all I needed. Thank you.

As there are no further questions at this time, I would like to turn the call back to your speakers for any additional or closing remarks.

That’s great. Thank you, Cecilia, and thank you all. Talk to you next quarter.

Thank you. That concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. Ladies and gentlemen, you may now disconnect.