Good morning, and welcome to the Evolution Petroleum First Quarter and Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Release Conference Call. All participants are in listen-only mode. Please also note that today's event is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Brandi Hurtson, Investor Relations Manager. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Welcome to Evolution Petroleum's Fiscal Q1 2026 Earnings Call. I'm joined by Kelly Lloyd, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mark Bunch, Chief Operating Officer, and Ryan Stash, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer. We released our fiscal first quarter 2026 financial results after the market closed yesterday. Please refer to our earnings press release for additional information containing these results. You can access our earnings release in the Investors section of our website. Please note that any statements and information provided in today's call speak only as of today's date, November 12, 2025, and any time-sensitive information may not be accurate at a later date. Our discussion today will contain forward-looking statements of management's beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. These forward-looking statements are subject to the risks, assumptions, and uncertainties as described in our SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from those expected. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. During today's call, we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income. Reconciliations of these measures to the closest comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release. Kelly will begin today's call with opening comments. Mark will provide an update on our properties and plans as they relate to our ongoing strategy of maximizing shareholder returns. Ryan will then provide a brief overview of our fiscal quarter highlights. After our prepared remarks, the management team will be available to answer any questions. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. If you wish to listen to a webcast replay of today's call, it will be available on the Investors section of our website. With that, I will turn the call over to Kelly.

Thank you, Brandy, and good morning, everybody. We entered fiscal 2026 in a solid position, building on the momentum we carried through last year. Our first quarter reflected continued execution across a broad and diversified portfolio, underscoring the resiliency of our business model through commodity price cycles. Total revenue was $21.3 million, a modest decline from the prior year period, driven primarily by lower realized oil and NGL prices, partially offset by a 43% increase in natural gas pricing. Even in a softer pricing environment, our assets performed in line with expectations, generating positive earnings and meaningful cash flow. From a strategic standpoint, this was an important quarter for Evolution. We closed our first acquisition consisting only of minerals and royalties in the scoop stack, expanding our exposure to high-quality, long-lived reserves while maintaining the capital-like profile that defines our portfolio. The structure of this transaction allows us to participate in future development in over 650 gross locations across a highly active basin that we are very familiar with given our other assets in the region. With minimal operating expenses and no future capital commitments presents us with meaningful upside. We are maintaining a strong financial foundation with ample liquidity and low leverage supported by the credit facility expansion completed at the end of fiscal 25. That flexibility continues to position us well to pursue accretive opportunities while maintaining a consistent return of capital to shareholders through our regular dividend. To that end, yesterday we declared our 49th consecutive quarterly cash dividend and our 14th consecutive cash dividend of 12 cents per share for the fiscal second quarter. As for the macro outlook and how it will affect evolution, we'll start with crude oil. It's in the middle of a tug-of-war between OPEC plus trying to appease the U.S. by keeping prices lower and depleting sovereign wealth funds. When will we begin filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? Will the ceasefires hold? With global supply and demand so close to being in balance, there are a lot of questions as to when and where the next marginal barrel will be needed. With the futures market at or near all-time net short levels at present, the herd has spoken and pushed crude to around $60 per barrel. A couple of points here. First, I don't think anybody would argue with this, but at $60 a barrel, CapEx budgets are beginning to be reduced, which will lead to, at some point, prices needing to move higher to spur enough drilling to meet demand. Second, with the speculative net short position, any geopolitical catalyst can quickly trigger a short covering rally. With our resilient portfolio, whether the upswing in the cycle occurs in the next few quarters or next few years, Evolution and its shareholders will be there to reap the rewards. As for natural gas, the electrification of everything, everywhere, and ongoing carbon intensity reduction efforts along with growing exports create a rapidly growing demand environment set to persist for at least the next decade. Weather remains all important, however, with an estimated 20 to 30 BCF per day of coming demand over the next decade or so off of a current 105-ish BCF per day supply base, there is a reason the futures curves for natural gas currently range from the high 3s to the high 4s for as far out as they trade. Of note, our natural gas revenues were up 38% over the year-ago quarter, and Henry Hub only averaged 303 for the quarter whereas the calendar 2026 strip is currently over $4 turning back to our assets we were encouraged this quarter by the continued operational consistency across our portfolio each of our assets delivered steady results during the quarter reflecting the quality of our fields in the strong relationships we maintain with our operating partners Importantly, we have flexibility across our asset base to adjust development activity based on market conditions, which allows us to balance near-term returns with long-term value creation. We expand drilling when prices are high and acquire assets when prices are low, all while benefiting from our low-decline producing reserves to maintain strong cash flows throughout the cycle. Our strategy remains consistent. operate efficiently, allocate capital prudently, and return capital to shareholders while maintaining financial strength. We remain focused on generating sustainable free cash flow that supports our regular dividend and positions us to take advantage of attractive acquisition opportunities as they arise. That discipline has been a cornerstone of evolution success for more than a decade, and it will continue to guide our decisions in fiscal 2026 and beyond. With that, I'll hand it over to Mark for more details on the assets.

Thanks, Kelly. Good morning, everyone. I will focus my remarks on key operational highlights from the quarter and encourage listeners to review our earnings press release and filings for additional details across our asset base. Starting with the scoop stack, three wells were turned to sales and two additional wells remain in progress from prior periods. Additionally, we have seen current drilling activity on 12 gross wells from our newly acquired mineral anchorage. At Chavarou, operations remain stable. We continue to build optimization efforts, including converting electric submersible pumps to rod lift on five of our seven wells, which should help lower our future operating costs. No new drilling occurred during the quarter, and permitting continues for the next development pad, with timing of drilling contingent on oil prices. In the Williston Basin, we continue to see horizontal drilling activity moving towards our approximately 40,000 net acres, and we are very excited to see what may come out of this. At Delhi, we continue to recycle CO2 with no new capital activity. Delhi production was impacted this quarter because of downtime related to an unscheduled turbine repair and higher summer temperatures, which reduce CO2 activity in the field. The turbine has been repaired, and temperatures are already cooler. At Jonah, production increased in Fiscal Q1 as the field worked off prior pipeline imbalance volumes from Fiscal Q4 2025. With imbalance corrections substantially completed by October, sales volumes have now returned to expected levels. Turning to the Barnett Shale, field performance remained consistent with expectations. production was stable, supported by targeted workovers and higher realized gas prices versus a year-ago quarter. At Hamilton Dome, lease operating expenses normalized in fiscal Q1 following elevated workover activity in prior periods. A slower pace of workovers is expected during the fall and winter months with efforts focused on maintaining key wells. Finally, at Tex-Mex, integration efforts progressed where we did see some higher operating costs resulting from the transition to the new operator, which is accounted for in the acquisition and is customary. The new operator performed repair and maintenance work on several existing wells and identified candidates for further reactivation as part of a broader field optimization plan. Ongoing activity remains focused on restoring production, evaluating future opportunities across the acquired acreage, consistent with our expectations at the time of the acquisition last fiscal year. All said, we expect production to increase and operating costs per barrel to decrease moving forward. Overall, our assets continue to perform as expected, and we remain disciplined in allocating capital for the highest return opportunities while maintaining operational flexibility. Over to you, Ryan.

Thanks, Mark. Good morning, everybody. As Brandy mentioned earlier, we released our earnings yesterday, which contains more information on our results. For today, I'd like to go through our financial highlights. For the first fiscal quarter of 2026, total revenue was $21.3 million compared to $21.9 million in the same period last year and up from fiscal Q4. The modest decline year-over-year was driven primarily by lower realized oil and NGL prices, down 14% and 8% respectively, partially offset by a 43% increase in natural gas prices. The quarter's revenue mix was 60% oil, 28% natural gas, and 12% NGLs, and our average realized price was $31.63 per BOE. Net income for the quarter was $0.8 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, compared to $2.1 million, or $0.06 per share in the year-ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA was $7.3 million, compared to $8.1 million last year, reflecting the impact of lower oil and NGL prices and higher lease operating costs at our Tex-Mex asset, as previously discussed. Cash provided by operating activities increased to $7.8 million for the quarter compared to $7.6 million last year, and capital expenditures incurred for drilling and completion activities were $1.9 million. At September 30, 2025, cash and cash equivalents totaled $0.7 million. We had $53 million of borrowings and $0.8 million in letters of credit outstanding under a revolving credit facility, resulting in total liquidity of approximately $11.9 million, including cash and cash equivalents. The reduction in net working capital this quarter is related to the integration of two recent acquisitions, and we expect this to improve over the coming months. During the quarter, we return $4.1 million to shareholders through our consistent $0.12 per share quarterly dividend, marking the 49th consecutive quarterly dividend and 14th consecutive at the current rate. To date, Evolution has returned approximately $139 million, or $4.17 per share, back to stockholders' income and stock dividends. On the hedging front, we have continued to add hedges to maintain compliance with our credit facility covenants and protect cash flow for our shareholder return program. Overall, our strong asset base and financial position continue to support both the dividend and our ability to pursue accretive acquisitions that enhance long-term shareholder value. I'll now hand it back over to Kelly for closing comments.

Thanks, Ryan. As we progress with Fiscal 26, we're encouraged by the continued consistency of our operations and the strength of our asset base. We'll continue to return meaningful capital to shareholders through our dividend program, Maintaining our policy of setting the dividend at a level that we view to be sustainable for multiple years. We believe evolution is well positioned for both the year ahead and many years to come, and we remain steadfast in executing on our strategy to deliver long-term shareholder value creation through disciplined capital management, strategic acquisitions, and conservative cost management, all to ensure the strength and continuity of our quarterly cash dividend through all market environments. Listen, we've been doing this for many years, and we continue to do this for 2026 and beyond. With that, I'll turn it over to the operator to begin our Q&A session.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star, then one on your touchstone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star, then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question comes from Jeff Cramp with Nordland Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. I wanted to start at TexMax. It sounds like the results from the quarter probably understate the potential of that asset in the quarters ahead. So I was just kind of wondering if you guys have – is there a way to quantify, I guess, what a normalized LOE would be for that asset and what kind of upside you guys are maybe expecting from some of the optimization workover activities that you and the operator have identified so far?

Okay. Yeah, Jeff, I'll take that one in. And, you know, now when we bought this, we expected that there was going to be extra costs and stuff going forward up front. And just to get it up to where we wanted it to be, we agreed with the new operator about that. But we also had a little hiccup in the road, and the transition time between transferring operators took a little longer. So we had some production that dropped down that they weren't able to get back online. We've actually started doing that now. So, really, with the production being brought back up to where we expect it to be, and we've also seen the costs, the baseline costs dropping with the new operator taking over control, we expect the lifting costs to get back to a more reasonable level. It's not going to stay at 47. And, you know, we will probably have a little bit higher workover costs here going forward, but it's not going to be excessive. And so far, the three workovers that the new operator's done, they've done for, you know, significantly under budget. So we're really pretty happy with the way the asset's going. You know, I kind of look at this asset as, you know, on a going-forward basis, kind of locks – I think of it a lot of as it looks a lot like the lifting costs for, like, Williston or something like that. That's how I kind of look at it. But right now, I don't know what I could – I can't give you more guidance than that on what I think it would do just because we haven't really seen enough going forward with the new operator.

And just to dive in on that with one more follow-up, is – do you think you get some of that production benefit in the current fiscal quarter we're in, or what's kind of the cadence of when some of these can flow through into production results?

Once the operator took over and got control, the new operator took over and got control, they've already done three of seven that they've already proposed to us, and they're going to have some more they're going to be proposing. So, yeah, I expect the line share of that will be back this quarter.

But maybe not the full effect for the whole quarter, right, but as we progress through the quarter. That's correct, Kelly.

Understood. That's really helpful. And for my follow-up, I'll ask the obligatory M&A question and just kind of get an update from you guys on deal flow. And I guess it's, you know, it's an interesting time with the dichotomy of gas versus oil prices. And I'm just kind of wondering if you guys are seeing any major delta in terms of bid-ask spreads for oil-weighted deals versus gas-weighted deals and how you guys balance your focus.

Yeah, thanks, Jeff. I'll take that. Yeah, we are seeing a number of attractive or potentially attractive deals that we're looking at. And it is kind of across both fronts, the gas being attractive because they're sort of trading on current terms, whereas we have some futures markets where we can lock in nice returns. And then on the oil side, they're also trading on futures terms, which, again, are pretty muted at the moment. And at least our group doesn't think for the next five years you're going to see oil prices at 60. We just don't think that's remotely sustainable to meet the demand that's going forward. So, yeah, we're seeing a lot of good stuff. I will say one of the things that's interesting on the acquisition front, we've been always opportunistic, and that's what we like to look at. I will say right now, you know, looking at the minerals deal we did, buying that at, you know, 3, 4, 3.5 times multiple, those are multiples that we consider really attractive for minerals with upside in inventory. So if minerals are going to be competitive with working interest buys, that's something we're going to continue to look at. So anyway, we're excited about what we're looking at going forward. Thanks for the question.

Thanks, Josh. Appreciate those details. I'll turn it back.

The next question comes from Jeff Robertson with Water Tower Research. Please go ahead. Thank you.

Mark, to follow up on the question around Tex-Mex, over the next several quarters, can you talk about the trajectory of workovers that will flow through the LOE line? And I think you said you thought, if I heard right, that that asset from an LOE standpoint point could normalize somewhere around the level of your Williston Basin properties. Is that correct?

The last thing you said there was the Williston Basin, yeah, that's kind of what I look at is where, because it's kind of similar type property. And then I think, I mean, right now I actually don't know if we'll be completely finished by the end of this quarter. I would suspect it may bleed over into the next. It's the same deal. It's going to be a process, just fixing things up. You know, we got a good deal on this thing for a reason. And we knew that we were going to have to do some work on it. And we, you know, I think over the course of time, it's going to turn into something

really valuable for us. But we, you know, Jeff, to follow up on that, this is Kelly, we do expect to see the numerator and the denominator move, right? So we're putting production back online

as we go too so yeah we had because the operator was was because of transition time act took a lot longer and honestly that was really a problem with the state it wasn't really a problem with the operator the the goalposts were kind of changed that's actually what kind of put us a little bit behind on keeping the production up was was it the off the new operator couldn't get on some of the wells and so now that they're back on them they are they are working really fast They've gotten a lot of stuff done faster than I actually expected. So, so far, we're excited about how things are going.

And then from a margin standpoint, can you just elaborate on what's going on at Delhi and how you think expenses there will trend over the next couple of quarters? I think you all are now just recycling CO2 rather than purchasing and injecting CO2.

Yeah, since we're not, you know, I think from a total cost basis, that's going to stay fairly consistent to where it has been. You know, we expect the production rates will come back up, which will help the lifting costs in dollars per BOE terms, just because we're going to be, you know, we're getting back into the cooler months, and so oil rates go up. and we also have had good run times from the NGL plants, you know, after we got the turbine fixed. So I think you'll see overall the cost for BOE to improve slightly.

Yeah, I mean, I think that's right, Jeff. Like, if you look on a total cost basis, right, sequential quarters, it was pretty flat, right? It was slightly down this quarter, but obviously production took ahead from some of the downtime in the summer weather. So, you know, a dollar per BOE basis, it should trend down a little bit, but you can see the overall cost gives me a relatively flat.

And lastly, are you having any conversations yet with the operators of some of your more significant properties on any plans that they have as they look into 2026 to maintain production levels?

Sorry, Jeff, you broke up a little bit. Could you repeat that, please?

Sure. Kelly, are you all having any conversations that you can talk about with the operators of some of your major properties, like the Barnett or like Jonah, as far as what they intend to do or what they might think about doing in 2026, just to try to maintain production levels?

Sure. The honest answer there is that with prices where they are, They, you know, have told us they intend to do everything they can to keep production as high as they can. There's not a whole lot of levers they can pull, but, you know, prices, you know, we have seen in the past when prices get really low, they sort of, if oil goes down, they may let it stay down. Well, that won't be the case for the natural gas properties right now. Thank you.

Thank you. If you have a question, please press star, then one. The next question comes from Ron Aubrey with R.J. Aubrey Investments. Please go ahead.

Yeah, thanks, guys. Pretty much want to focus on natural gas. Looks like just revenues and production, healthy 5% quarter-and-quarter growth. And I'm just wondering, when you look at your hedging program for future natural gas production, what percent is that currently?

Yeah, so on a hedging basis, you know, because of our credit facility requirements, you know, we're over 50% hedged, actually closer to probably 70% hedged for the next year. But what we've done on the hedging programs, we try to maintain upside, right? So we've done a mix of, you know, collars and swaps, trying to lean more towards collars to range for the upside. So, you know, our floors are generally in the $350 to $360 range for next year. But, you know, on a lot of the ceilings for the colors, you've got almost $5, right, high force to $5. So, you know, we want to maintain that upside, but protecting the downside. And I think in the natural gas market, certainly we're a little more apt to hedge into the contango, right, gas curve versus the crude, right? On crude, we're trying to stay much more near-term as far as the crude because it's flat to back-rotated, generally, historically. So, you know, I'd say we're probably more hedged than typical on gas, but a lot of that is just because of the opportunity set, too, in the gas book.

Yeah, that's very helpful. And nice to see Jonah coming back to normal sales volumes, especially going into winter. What does the outlet look like for West Coast pricing as a premium to Henry Hub?

well it's it's kind of this kelly thanks for the question um it's always you know pretty variable but we you know the expectations are for that area to be normal which uh i don't know if normal is plus a buck 50 plus two bucks uh but we we've certainly seen higher than that um and in an awful winter we've seen less than that but i think everybody's expectation there now is is for you know, pretty healthy premium, so. Yeah, I mean, thanks for that. A lot of it's going to

depend on, obviously, you know, it goes without saying weather, right? I mean, some of the forecasts call for a colder west coast, but we'll just see. You know, the thing about the west coast is the storage levels are just not very abundant, so it doesn't take a lot of cold weather to get spikes there, but, you know, we're just going to have to wait and see for the weather, but we generally will expect a premium to Henry Hub in the winter, you know, barring a very warm winter. It should still be a premium to Henry Hub.

Yeah, you know, Ryan brings up a really good point. You can look at, oh, West Coast storage is full, it's high. Well, that is a matter of, you know, days of coverage. I mean, if you get the weather come in in any reasonable, normal, I'm not asking for extraordinary, any kind of normal way, they don't have near enough storage to cover their demand that would be drawn on a normalized weather basis. So, you know, you can see some pretty good movements there. And, again, that's why we intentionally wanted to get exposed to that market.

Fair enough. And one final question on Barnett. It looks like their production was relatively flat quarter by quarter, which is fine, but saw a pretty significant increase in their LOEs. Was that a one-off thing, or can you give you some color on that?

Yeah, the reason you saw the increase from consecutive quarters is because you probably forgot that we had an out-of-period adjustment due to an audit settlement with the operator, and that's what lowered it down below $9, and now it's back up to a normal run rate.

All right, fair enough. Thanks for all your answers and continue operating this company in a wonderful way.

Thank you very much. We appreciate the input.

The next question comes from Jeff Robertson with Water Tower Research. Please go ahead. Thanks, Ryan.

Ryan, is there any color you can share on the bank market as you all look at acquisition opportunities and availability for increase to the RBL if you were to need one?

Yeah. So, you know, the bank market still remains pretty healthy. In fact, you know, the conversations I've had with bankers, a lot of them are actually looking now to deploy capital again. You know, getting back more in an aggressive nature. I wouldn't call it ever going to see what we did a few years ago with those kind of terms and aggression. But, you know, terms are generally flat to a little better, right, for borrowers. And the market for the size facilities we're looking at is really healthy. You know, a lot of the regional banks and even some of the larger banks I'm hearing are getting a little bit more aggressive into the, you know, coming down to the oil and gas space. So I think people are seeking returns really on the bank side. So certainly we don't feel like we'd have an issue increasing the size of the facility if needed for the right acquisition.

And to follow up with that, one of the reasons, Jeff, that we redid our RBL before the end of the year was to add other partners and have it be, you know, very syndicatable. So if something was highly accretive and would work out great for us that it needed some bank piece to it, we were well set up to be there for it. Thank you, Keller.

Yeah, thanks, Jeff. The next question comes from Bo Frat with Alliance Global Partners. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Just a couple of cleanup questions. What did the minerals acquisition add in the quarter, and then is there another step up in the coming quarter as far as was it in for the full quarter?

Hey, Bo, this is Kelly. I appreciate the question. Yeah, no, it was only for a couple months of the quarter, so a little less than two months of the quarter. So, absolutely, we do expect that we'll see a full benefit of that coming in this quarter, and it's really in line with what we said in the press release. Volumes are coming in good, so are revenues.

Okay, great. And then when I sort of look at ScoopStack up a little bit, Tex-Mex should, you know, be up a little bit. Delhi should be up a little bit for the next quarter. But would you take a stab at the full year, you know, production guidance? I think with all the puts and takes, I'm looking at sort of a flat year from a production standpoint, fiscal 26 versus fiscal 25.

five. Any comments on that would be helpful? Yeah, I mean, obviously, you know, we kind of haven't provided guidance just, you know, on a yearly basis on production, really, frankly, just because of the control factor. But to your point, I mean, you know, there are going to be puts and takes, and some of it's going to be on development, right, in ScoopStack. You know, we are seeing good activity on our asset, but with the delays in reporting, especially on the royalty side, it's hard to get a good feel for where the direction of production. You obviously also have Chavarou and the timing of those wells, which we are getting, you know, we're getting permits and obviously continuing to monitor those. But like a flattish outlook is probably not, you know, that's not a bad assumption. But ultimately, it's hard for us to really provide guidance until we see some of the activity levels, like I said, in Scoop staff.

that's helpful color um and then when when i look at the capex side you know 3.8 million in the first quarter is that you know i know that there's you know some uncontrollables in that number but would 15 million for the year be a reasonable target no actually we you know we put out kind

of our in our year end we said kind of four to six was our guidance range for for 2026 and actually We can look offline, but we only reported about $2 million in capital for the first quarter, and some of that's a little bit loaded in the front for some of the work we had to do on the wells out in Chavarue to convert some of the pumps. So I still think $4 to $6 for a range still makes sense, all things considered for actually this upcoming fiscal year.

Okay, so about half of that was spent in the first quarter, the September quarter, right? About a third of it, yeah.

Yeah, about a third. And that was mainly because of the five pump jacks we put in at Chevrolet replacing the ESPs.

Okay, and then since you mentioned Chevrolet a couple times, any early read on what's going to happen with Chevrolet considering the pivot by the operator?

become more of a Rockies flair? Sure. You know, we've had brief discussions with them, and for everything that we're told, you know, business as usual. So we have a really good relationship with them. And look, so far, that's what we've been told, business as usual. And we both agree on timing and when to start things. And I think we mentioned this last quarter, But we don't believe that, you know, $60-ish per barrel we're in a rush to go out and start drilling wells right now there.

Yeah, I was just looking at more from a strategic standpoint for Pudebco.

Yeah, if something changes for them, we've got plenty of ways that we can all work together on that as well. But, yeah, again, from what they're telling us so far, it's business as usual.

So great. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the contents back over to Kelly Lloyd for any closing remarks.

I appreciate that. Thank you. Listen, we want to thank everybody for taking the time and showing the interest and asking your questions. We really appreciate it. But just in summary, we're really excited about fiscal 26 and beyond, where our portfolio is and the outlook going forward. It's going just as we expected. So we're excited going forward and happy to have you all along with us. Thank you.

Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.