Skip to main content
FOXA $62.17 -0.18%
FOXA logo
FOXA · Fox Corp
Track FOXA — free
$62.17 -0.11 (-0.18%)
Market Cap
$26.47B
Shares
419.65M
Volume · Oct 5 1.21M Avg daily vol (3M) 5.06M
All webcasts

Conference · 2026-09-09

Fox Corp (FOXA) September 2026 Conference Transcript

Concluded Sep 9, 2026 Audio replay
Sep 9, 2026 32:56 29 turns
Period
2026-09-09
Runtime
32:56
Sources
2 artifacts

Listen and read together

Transcript & audio

The spoken word highlights as audio plays. Select any word to seek to that moment.

32:56 Audio
Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to the Fox Fireside Chat at the Goldman Sachs Communicopia and Technology Conference. My name is Mike Ng, and I cover Fox and Media Cable Telecom here at Goldman. As a disclaimer, we won't be discussing the pending Roku transaction. With that out of the way, I have the wonderful privilege of introducing John Nalen, who's the president and COO at Fox. First and foremost, thank you so much for being here, John. It's an absolute pleasure.

Thanks, Mike. Thanks for having us all.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Great. To kick things off, you know, we can talk a little bit about a big picture strategy question. You know, Fox is entering fiscal 27 off of what has been a record year in fiscal 26, the launch of Fox 1, 2B reaching profitability, incredible underlying momentum at Fox News, the World Cup. So to kick things off, I was just wondering if you could talk about your key strategic priorities as we go into next year.

So maybe if I can do it in the lens of what we achieve in 26 and what we're looking forward to in 27. And despite your admonition, I will comment on Roku. But looking at 26, you're right. It was a record year across the board. We grew EBITDA 8%, hit $3.9 billion. We talked about strategic priorities. We launched Fox One, had an incredible World Cup. The news cycle was extraordinarily active. The entertainment division, we don't talk a lot about, had great rating success. And 2B, another strategic priority, ended the year with 35% top-line growth in the fourth quarter, 35%. I mean, that is very significant. AS WE LOOK INTO 27, OUR FISCAL YEAR JUST BEGAN, I REALLY DON'T SEE THE UNDERLYING TRENDS FOR GROWTH HAVING CHANGED MUCH. IF YOU LOOK AT SOME OF THE INDICATORS, FROM AN AD SALES PERSECTIVE, OUR UPFRONT WAS THE HIGHEST RECORD UPFRONT WE EVER HAD, DOUBLE-DIGIT GAINS IN VOLUME ACROSS THE BOARD, PRICING it was really just a superb outcome in subs I'm more constructive than most about where I think some subs are headed and where we are and the addition of Fox one has clearly been helpful in that regard the new cycle is going to continue to be active to be has started before the first quarter really on the pace with how it ended the fourth so incredible top-line growth once again and of course we have the midterm elections that's going to be an important element for Fox into fiscal 27. But I would be remiss if I didn't at least comment on the top strategic priority that we've got ahead of us which is closing the acquisition of Roku. This is going to be a transformational transaction for Fox. We've we announced this morning that that DOJ has made a second request which was entirely expected we announced the transaction a few months ago we said it would close in the first half of 27 we're not changing that at all the calendar 27 we're not changing that at all this was exactly as we expected and it's going to take two companies that are have their own growth profiles and we think Roku now is it a real inflection point for growth put them together and achieve both cost and revenue synergies on top, which is just going to end up as a superb transaction for the Fox and the Roku shareholders. So I think Fox 1, 2B, Latin America, all strategic priorities as we look forward, but clearly getting the $22 billion Roku transaction done is done, integrated, and affecting all the growth strategies as well, the real top priority for us.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Great. That's all very clear. I wanted to ask about some of the comments you made last quarter as it relates to the NFL. You said that Fox's current agreement with the NFL currently remains unchanged through the 2029-30 season, which ended, I think, some speculation about a very early renewal. As that formal opt-out window before the 2030 season approaches over the next couple of years, how do you assess Fox's position as a preferred partner for the NFL given the reach of the broadcast network, the local stations, and the digital platforms?

So take the NFL as just a wide question. Our relationship with the NFL couldn't be stronger. And I put that to rest by, if you look at during the offseason, we acquired two new windows coming into the 27 season. Week 10, we got a game from Munich to form a triple header on Fox that we haven't seen in a decade. Week 15, we've got a Saturday game that's brand new to us. But as importantly, beginning Sunday, we will be the broadcaster of record for the NFL in Mexico for the next three seasons. So we bring mutual relationship for the NFL by using our platform, Fox News, not only the broadcast network, which is obvious, But to bring Fox News, the local television stations, and Tubi to the plate for promoting the NFL and for promoting Fox as well, NFL, is a real asset for us. But our relationship with the NFL couldn't be stronger. It's one that's been, you look, the last 30 years, we've produced over 100 games a season every season for the NFL. My expectation is that's going to continue for the foreseeable future.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

And maybe just zooming out a little bit and asking about, you know, broader sports rights and the broader sports rights portfolio, you know, Fox has been very disciplined in their approach to acquiring sports rights, anchoring around the NFL, but also the MLB, Big Ten, NASCAR, other major events. You know, with the big technology companies, the streamers, continuing to compete aggressively for some of those premium sports rights, you know, how do you assess the completeness of Fox's rights portfolio today? How are you thinking about perhaps things that may be coming up as an example, perhaps the World Cup?

So our rights portfolio is really strong. If you look, it's anchored by a foundational group of rights. The NFL, college football, Major League Baseball, IndyCar, which is recent to our portfolio, and NASCAR. We have a bunch of other sports around it, but those are the core elements of the rights portfolio. If you look at the timing of those rights, the NFL, we have firm until the 2029 season. baseball through the 28th season and then if you take college football and the motor sports we go to the mid-30s in the portfolio as far as expirations. So you asked earlier about strategic priorities. Clearly the renewal of these rights with baseball coming up as the earliest is going to be a key aspect of the entirety of Fox to renew what are core rights to us. As far as the World Cup, clearly, and a shout out to our sports group, we had an incredible World Cup spanning our Q4 and our current Q1. The next set of rights will come up for two cycles, the 30 cycle in Iberia and the 34 cycle in Saudi. And, of course, we're interested in being the broadcaster in America for the World Cup. but to the point in your question we're disciplined about how we look at these sports rights overall and we need to get a return so we'll see how that how the bidding for those rights go but look if we can perform as well or close to as well as we did with the World Cup this year in the next two cycles we'd be pleased to be the broadcaster for it very clear if I could please pivot to Fox one you know it launched as a direct consumer product aimed at cord cutters and cord nevers with I think the company talking about very minimal

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

cannibalization of the traditional ecosystem and that was by design you know what are some of the underlying engagement trends retention trends that you're seeing in Fox one right now you know how are you structuring carriage agreements and distribution agreements to make sure that Fox 1 continues to be additive to the overall affiliate fee revenue pool?

So zooming out a bit on Fox 1, the promise of Fox 1 to our pay TV distributors was and is that we're not going to compete with you. We're pleased for the pay TV to be our major distribution arm, pay TV system, whether that's digital or MVP D and as a result we're not going to do anything to encourage people to leave pay TV and come over to box one and what you've seen is through the promotion and marketing that we've done for Fox one they've all been it's all been addressed toward the cord cutters cordless community in fact the stats we know very clearly. 97% of Fox1 acquisitions are from subscribers that do not have a PayTV subscription. Only 3% have some neutrality to us having moved from PayTV over to Fox1. Very small. So, you know, as we look at Fox1, what we said early on is we expect in the three to five years three to five million subscribers we're not at all reducing or changing that outlook but I can say that the trends on Fox one are above our expectations and what was clearly a benefit to us was the World Cup we had a number of good number of customer acquisitions coming into the World Cup we've lost some of those coming out of the World Cup which is as expected But as college football, NFL, and postseason baseball season comes about, those are great opportunities for us on both customer acquisition and bringing back customers that have left the platform. So it really will be probably through the end of this football season that we'll be able to get a full sense of the cycle of how Fox One performs on a year-in, year-out basis. But I would say we're also very pleased with the engagement level outside of sports that Fox One subscribers have onto Fox News as well. So in those times, which is clearly every time except the weekend, we see a high level of engagement of Fox Sports subscribers onto Fox News Channel. And that just helps with the retention side of it. Right. Super interesting.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Could I ask about the go-to-market and bundling strategy for Fox One? You know, you have the ESPN bundle.

You have some other early partnerships. you know you have a partnership with Amazon who's playing a role in distribution you know what do you look for in bundling or distribution partners and how do you evaluate the next set of partners to help grow the business so let me take them in turn bundling versus distribution partners or channel stores really so from a bundling standpoint we have a limited number of bundles right now for Fox 1 led by the ESPN bundle and if you look at the customer acquisitions that we've had for Fox 1 if I look at the totality very few have come from a bundle product and that was a bit of a education for us but what what seems to be happening is Fox 1 subscribers are self-bundling they're They're taking Fox and then picking and choosing the other products that they want to complete, whether it's Paramount Plus, Peacock, Netflix, whatever it is that they're bundling on. So it's not a bundle offering that is attracting people to what is the ultimate skinny bundle, which is Fox One. That's not the case in channel stores from a customer acquisition standpoint. Because, as I referred to earlier, the whole promotion and marketing of Fox 1 is digitally centered, it's not surprising that we get a very high percentage of customer acquisitions from digital channel stores, Amazon and Roku being the top two. So, again, if I look at the profile of customer acquisitions in Fox 1, I'd see a much heavier profile of acquisitions coming from digital channel stores than I will from bundles. I would say, you know, one comment overall on the distribution world is we were seeing in the pay TV universe, up until the last quarter, six to six and a half percent declines in subs. But that is meaningfully offset by the additions that have come from non-paid TV from Fox 1. So as I said earlier, I'm more constructive than most on subs. And I think just the traction we're getting on Fox 1 is what gives me that confidence.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

That's very clear and very sensible once you lay it out like that. Maybe shifting gears to Fox News. Fox News channel absolutely continues to lead cable news and ratings, but the digital commentary, podcasting, those types of mediums are also rapidly growing. How is Fox News media approaching digital distribution across YouTube, social platforms, streaming to capture those younger audiences while preserving the linear network leadership and the anchors of the economics of the overall business?

Well, you're right that the flagship brand of Fox News Media are the linear channels, Fox News and Fox Business in particular. That's the core of it. But for many years, the team at Fox News Media has been looking for adjacencies to what we do in the linear channel. And that started with products like Fox Nation, Fox Weather, the channels on Sirius, which are some of the top channels that SiriusXM has, so that we've added to Fox News Media's both revenue stream and engagement levels by that. More recently, Fox News has leaned in very heavily on the digital and social side, very heavily, such that now on YouTube, Fox News is the number one news brand. It just is by and far. And it's not the channel. It's basically clips that we take from shows and segments that are heavily curated, that are put onto YouTube that hopefully create a bit of a flywheel of engagement back to other products inside of Fox. Facebook, TikTok, and X, Fox News is also the number one brand, news brand. So this more recent phenomenon by Fox News of really leaning into digital is paid off such that the brand is elevated above all other news brands in the digital and social space.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

You know, we'd love to talk a little bit about the linear business, and perhaps we can start with how, you know, Fox feels about upcoming affiliate renewals, you know, carriage renewals. You know, as you enter into fiscal 27, you have a larger renewal weighted towards the broadcast stations.

You know, how do you think about Fox's ability to sustain favorable terms as you head into these carriage negotiations you know how does the breadth of the business you know strengthen your negotiation leverage here yeah so distribution look we I've always said we have a very simple business in our top line half of our revenue is advertising half of our revenue is distribution so it's not it's not that complex it is complex under the hood but it's not that complex when you when you look at the business overall so from a distribution portfolio standpoint in the fourth quarter we grew revenue about 5% grew revenue 5% distribution which is different than some of our peers and that will oscillate quarter by quarter depending upon renewals but for when we look at all of 27 our expectation is we will have growth both at cable and broadcast in the distribution revenue across the whole year I'm pleased that a week ago we completed one you you said we're heavily weighted toward broadcast a week ago we completed the multi-year renewal with Nextar with no drama we have pending distribution renewals going on and hopefully end up in the same place where we come to conferences and tell you that we've completed them and there's no drama behind that but it's the distribution business for us because of the power of the Fox channels in particular broadcast and Fox News it's it comes out of mutual partnership meaning as opposed to leverage it's much more about we need our distributors and given the Fox product they need our product so we look for a sensible outcome to these negotiations and so far that's worked out.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

To that point, you know, one of the things that we've been hearing is that the pay TV operators have been kind of more so focused on packaging than just, you know, driving or, you know, than just having it be a broader discussion around rates.

So I wanted to ask you about packaging and skinny bundles and, you know, how you think that might impact the your business for you guys so we've we've always given our distributors the flexibility to innovate and and to experiment with with different packages and it's only recently last couple of years that the distributors have leaned forward with skinny bundles into the market and for us the ones that matter the most of the news and sports packages and that Fox is distributed mostly on those I would say that if I still look at our pay TV distribution and subscriber count skinny bundles are a very small piece of the remits and partially that's because they've just started but second I think it may be because of pricing the skin if you take the news and sports skinny bundle for YouTube TV, for example, it's $72. The full package is $83. So that same $11 gap is on DirecTV's news and sports against full package. So I think the gap in pricing is still not enough to drive subscribers out of the larger bundle into the skinny package, which is why we continue to see the kind of growth we see at YouTube TV is all at the full bundle package. So, you know, we encourage skinny bundles because it's hard to imagine a skinny bundle that doesn't have Fox News and Fox Sports inside of it, but up until now, and maybe that will, you know, a year from now when we talk about this at the conference, that will change, it's not been a particularly big part of our business.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Why don't we switch gears and talk a little bit about Tubi? You know, Fox has been very early, very front-footed on, you know, free ad-supported TV, though, you know, I would certainly acknowledge that a lot of the consumption on 2B happens on demand. You know, the asset business reached a very important profitability milestone last fiscal year, $1.5 billion of annual revenue, over 110 million monthly active users. How do you think about the long-term growth prospects for 2B, the operating margin trajectory of the business? And if you could just touch on the connected TV industry as a whole, which seems like it's just becoming a little bit more competitive.

So, as I said earlier, 2B is a top strategic priority for us. We had in Tubi fourth quarter growth, 35%, as I said. First quarter is pacing around the same level of growth. What we see as we go forward in Tubi is a top line that's accelerating faster, much faster than the cost component of the business. So the leverage we're getting out of the business from top line to its contribution to EBITDA gets more and more significant. If you look at what happened in 2025, we posted a $200 million EBITDA investment into Tubi, and it was profitable in 2026, 2027, and 2028. We'll see that leverage in the business really coming in, such that we expect that maturity, and this business is still nascent, 20% to 25% EBITDA margins coming out of the business. And again, it's the leverage where the cost of the business doesn't require a pace of investment in it that the top line achieves on its own. So Tubi is an important part. Now, your point on connected TV and connected TV advertising is clearly we're seeing there's a lot of inventory in the market, and that impacts pricing. But we've been very efficient at Tubi to hold pricing. We haven't had pricing gains, but we haven't had rollbacks either because we're very disciplined about the pricing of the Tubi product to the advertisers that come to the platform. but more and more inventory is going to come to that market. We just have to continue the discipline that we have.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

And if we could just talk about the advertising market more broadly, as you mentioned early on, the upfront cycle was a very strong one, double-digit volume growth across sports news, 2B, excuse me, 2B, and eight of the ten track categories have shown growth. as we move through fiscal 27 how is the scatter market doing are there any differences as you just work through the verticals of sports news general entertainment 2B so writ large as I said up front was just superb for us the categories

you mentioned 8 of the top 10 particularly we saw in technology which had a lot of AI spending, telecom, entertainment that had a lot of wagering spending, and of course, as you'd expect, pharma had a lot of volume coming out of it. Those would be the top four of the top ten coming out of it. If I looked at our own verticals, sports, I'm sure you've heard this from other peer companies today, just the sports market is red hot. NFL college football, postseason baseball for us has just been very strong. News, while we don't participate very heavily in the up front, just as an indicator, scatter pricing for news national is 50% above where up front was a year ago. Entertainment is posting about high single digit percentage increases in scatter above last year's up The reason I say last year's up front is the up front we just booked is just commencing at that point. And then 2B has continued its growth as well. The place that we'll probably talk about it, but the place that it's all about one category right now is in our local business, and that's the midterm elections and heavy political spending. and that's really the, it crowds out the story of the rest of the market because there's so much going on in the local political side.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

I mean, that's a natural segue. Talk a little bit about your expectations around, you know, this midterm political cycle. You know, how are you positioning the local stations, Fox News' digital assets to be, to capture the local spend on political this year?

Yeah, it's going to be a big year. The most recent market soundings we've gotten is that nationally there'll be something about $11.5, $11.6 billion of spend, which will be a record for midterm elections. The two beneficiaries at our company are the television stations and 2B. It's not national spend like it would be in the presidential election because it's not a national campaign, so those two are the most significant. There's significant races in our markets in the Senate. In the House, nine of 16 of the battleground races are in our markets. there's 36 governor races going on so it just has to be in your market almost right whether it's directly or tangentially and then besides the campaigns there's a significant amount of issues money that's out there most notably for us is in california with the wealth tax down ballot issue that's on there just by reference we did a touch over 400 million revenue for the presidential election, and in 22, which was pure midterm, we did $260 million off of what was then a record.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Now, I don't have the comparable $11.6 billion to what it would be back then, but every indication I have is we'll have a record midterm book through both, and importantly, through both the local station to be because back in 22 to be would have not been a very significant participant in the midterms for us on capital allocation Fox returned two billion dollars to shareholders through buybacks in fiscal 26 while also raising the dividend how do you balance the leveraging sustaining the pace of repurchases dividend growth and funding investments in direct-to-consumer

streaming you know how should we think about the leverage path and you know the timeline back to your target leverage over time and target capital structure so the the elephant in the room on the capital allocation is the fact that we've got a 22 billion dollar acquisition to make which is largest acquisition we've ever done and that's Roku the and it is really smartly crafted from a capital allocation standpoint, the way that acquisition is done, because you've got two businesses that are highly cash generative. And while we'll start at closing at about a net 2.8 times leverage, the deleveraging that occurs is rapid, such that it doesn't at all interfere with the rest of our capital allocation program so we're continuing the buyback level at the billion billion and a half dollars unabated but we are not interrupting it for this acquisition and we're we have a healthy capital structure to do it inside of that the dividend program will continue and to the extent we need to make incremental investments into our business we're able to do that but we peaked our investments 18 months ago. When I look at the 2B, Fox 1, Latin America, the peak level of those investments are behind us. So the cash flow characteristics that come from this business and the rapid deleveraging give us a ton of flexibility around capital allocation.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

In the last few minutes we have here to close out, Fox has established itself as a live news and sports leader scale to be launched Fox one you know maybe going back to where we started you know over the next 24 to 36 months maybe talk about some of the you know milestones and you know things that you plan to execute against achieve you know the vision of what the company should be so clearly we have a number of if I started the top line and the number of renewals ahead of us so achieving those successfully for both parties is vitally important continuing the strength in the advertising book that we have and

luckily we're in sectors that are less affected by by issues going on in the advertising market than than others we clearly have some rights renewals that are going to be important over that horizon. And obviously closing on the acquisition of Roku, achieving the synergies, both revenue and cost will be clear, clear milestones for us as we look ahead. Overall, you should take away that the management team at Fox is incredibly focused on not only existing business but the opportunity ahead of us with Roku we've got really significant momentum in both of those businesses now we we haven't been inside the hood of Roku but we know our business intimately we know we've got incredible momentum in that business and I think you know the last part we have is is not cockiness but confidence in our ability to deliver on on the growth plans of both businesses. And I think that's a real hallmark of the management team and of Fox Corporation.

Mike Ng Analyst — Goldman Sachs

Well, John, thank you so much for participating in the conference. It's been an absolute privilege to have you on stage here with us. Thanks, Mike, appreciate it.

Full-screen source Call document