Good afternoon. Thank you for attending today's Garden Health Q4 2024 earnings call. My name is Tamia, and I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. I will now pass the conference over to your host, Zarek Khurshid, VP of Investor Relations. You may proceed.

Thank you. Earlier today, Garden Health released financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024. Joining me today from Garden are Helmiel Tukey, Co-CEO, Amir Ali Talasaz, Co-CEO, and Mike Bell, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that during this call, management will be making forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated. This call will also include a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, which are adjusted to exclude certain specified items. Additional information regarding material risks and uncertainties, as well as the non-GAAP financial reconciliation to most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are available in the press release GARDEN issued today, as well as in our 10-K and other filings with the SEC. GARDEN disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise financial projections and forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. The information in this conference call is accurate only as of the live podcast. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Helmy.

Thanks, Eric. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our fourth quarter and full year 2024 earnings call. Starting on slide three, 2024 was an outstanding year for Gardent. I'm so proud of our team for their hard work and execution on delivering on a number of key milestones across our portfolio. In oncology, we made significant strides in both therapy selection and MRD. We completed a major upgrade of our flagship Garden360 test onto our new smart liquid biopsy platform, all while generating record revenue, increasing test volumes, and expanding the profitability of our therapy selection business. And we continued growing reveal volumes and generating evidence for our MRD business, positioning us well for an inflection this year. In screening, we received FDA approval and Medicare coverage for S.H.I.E.L.D., our screening blood test for CRC, opening up an enormous market for early detection of cancer. Our team fired on all cylinders in 2024, and I'm even more excited for what's to come in 2025 in terms of product innovation, accelerated volume growth, and most importantly, the impact we will have on cancer patients around the world. As we typically do, I would like to start our call today with a story that highlights the importance of our tests and how they can work together synergistically to improve patient outcomes. In 2021, a 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer. After completing standard of care therapy, she was tested for germline predisposition and was negative. Her oncologist then used imaging to monitor for recurrence. Unfortunately, after some time, imaging identified lung nodules. To get more information on whether Whether or not these nodules were indeed metastatic, her oncologist ordered a non-invasive GARDEN Reveal test. The test came back positive for CTDNA and was automatically reflexed to a GARDEN360 test. GARDEN360 identified a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation. The nodules were also confirmed to be metastatic triple negative breast cancer and the patient is being considered for a PARP inhibitor. GARDEN Reveal was crucial in confirming her cancer recurrence and the ability to effortlessly reflex to Garden360 helped our oncologist move quickly to determine the next steps in her treatment. Turning to top-line performance in Slide 4, we had an excellent finish through the year with SPEU4 revenue growing 30% year-over-year to $202 million, bringing our total full-year revenue to $739 million, an increase of 31% year-over-year. Turning to Slide 5, this performance was driven by incredibly strong clinical revenue, which which grew 34% year-over-year, supported by ASP and reimbursement tail lens. Total oncology clinical volumes in the fourth quarter increased 24% year-over-year, bringing our total clinical volume growth to 20% for the full year 2024. This was largely driven by GARDEN360, which saw double-digit volume growth in 2024. Turning now to slide 6 to take a closer look at the reimbursement tail lens supporting therapy selection. We saw significant ASP improvement over the course of the year. At our investor day in September of 2023, we stated our goal was to reach an ASP of $3,000 for Garden360 by 2028. We achieved this goal roughly four years ahead of Target due to a number of reimbursement wins, including the increase of our Garden360 LVT Medicare rate from $3,500 to $5,000. We also saw significant improvements in both the amounts we have been paid for our tests and the speed at which we have been paid by commercial payers. In addition to Windsor Garden 360, tissue Medicare pricing increased from $3,100 to $3,500 effective January 1st of this year, creating another important tailwind for our therapy selection business. Looking ahead this year, there are additional opportunities from state biomarker laws and continued commercial coverage expansion to further improve the ASP for our therapy selection products. Moving on to slide seven. Last July, we transitioned our Garden360 LDT onto our smart liquid biopsy platform, representing the most significant upgrade to our flagship precision oncology product. The upgraded test, called Garden360 Liquid, reinforces Garden360's leading position in liquid CGP. Garden360 Liquid expands a number of genes by nearly tenfold, including all guideline-recommended genomic markers for solid tumors and improve the sensitivity for tumor burden detection by a factor of 10. Garden360 Liquid is resonating incredibly well and is helping to drive greater depth of ordering and increase testing frequency as physicians experience the capabilities of the upgraded platform firsthand. Importantly, we have a rich pipeline of additional features leveraging a smart platform which we believe will generate a limitless number of differentiated applications these apps will allow garden 360 liquid to help identify more patients for existing therapies that are undetectable by current cgp tests detect harmful adverse effects of chemotherapy and provide detailed phenotypic information about the tumor such as histology subtype and much much more given the positive fraction we are seeing from garden 360 liquid we expect to continue to see an acceleration in GARDEN 360 volume growth in 2025. Turning to slide 8 with our major product upgrades, growing use cases in both early and late stage settings, and opportunities for international expansion, I am more confident than ever that the therapy selection portion of our oncology business will continue to see very strong growth over the next few years. Now shifting gears to reveal in slide 9, where we are the leader in tissue-free MRD. We were thrilled that Gardens Reveal, which runs on our smart liquid biopsy platform, recently received Medicare coverage for CRC surveillance testing after curative intent treatment for stages 1 through 4. Medicare reimbursement for Reveal is $1,644 per test, consistent with fire expectations. Utilizing CT DNA testing in the surveillance setting alongside standard of care monitoring, such as CT scans and CEA testing, has the potential to identify molecular recurrence of CRC ahead of traditional imaging. Now REVEAL will be more widely available to patients that support oncologists in making more informed therapeutic decisions. We are encouraged to see the recent NCCM guideline updates related to MRD. The changes are beginning to reflect what we are seeing in clinical practice and represent an increasing recognition of the value of ctDNA testing and recurrence monitoring. The NCCM guideline updates only further reinforce our view of the attractiveness of the opportunity, as well as of our commercial strategy. Turning to slide 10, beyond CRC surveillance, we have an extensive pipeline of clinical courts to further support validity and utility for Gardner Veal. We recently submitted data for publication supporting potential Medicare reimbursement for coverage in breast cancer and therapy monitoring. Looking ahead, we have a number of ongoing clinical validity studies for additional cancers, and we look forward to sharing updates on their progress throughout the year. Moving on to slide 11, during the course of 2024, we made critical progress to reduce the cause for reveal and achieve more than a 50% reduction exiting the year. This reduction will save tens of millions of dollars in 2025 and was largely supported by the transition to our smart liquid biopsy platform. This is an incredible accomplishment and is a testament to our team's ability to execute well. Turning to slide 12, Reveal is on track to reach an important inflection point in 2025. As a reminder, despite very strong demand, we had been managing Reveal volumes ahead of Medicare reimbursement in order to manage our cash burn. Now with CRC surveillance reimbursement in place, improving ASP, and achieving a meaningful reduction to our COGS, making the test gross margin positive, we will be leveraging our robust commercial channel in oncology to push ahead with a reveal to meet the market demand for a tissue-free MRD test. This long-awaited milestone unlocks a key commercial market for us this year, and our team is focused on executing at a high level.

Turning to slide 13.

We had a very strong year for biopharma, with 2024 revenue growing 31% year-over-year. This was fueled by our growing number of biopharma partnerships, now above 180, and the growing mix of our smart liquid biopsy platform, which now represents more than 50% of reported samples and new contracts. Our smart liquid biopsy products offer improved performance as well as key applications such as novel biomarker discovery and signature development. This offering was a major growth catalyst in 2024 and is supporting strategic partnerships with top 20 global biopharma companies. Looking more closely at some of the recent highlights within our biopharma and data business on slide 14, We recently announced a collaboration with Borenger-Ingelheim to develop a companion diagnostic for the detection of specific mutations in advanced lung cancer, and we have a robust pipeline of other companion diagnostic partnerships positioning us well for this year. Moving on to data, in early January, we announced a collaboration with Concert AI to create a differentiated data-as-a-service platform that integrates comprehensive patient EMR records with both genomic and epigenomic tumor profiling data. This platform augments garden and form with insights from Concert AI's national database of 5.5 million clinical records and are profiling data across more than 60 tumor types. This combined real-world evidence platform will help to accelerate cancer therapy research and development for biopharma partners. Our mission is to conquer cancer with data, and this collaboration brings us one step closer to achieving this goal. With that, I will now turn the call over to Amir Ali for an update on screening.

Thanks, Elmi. Turning to slide 15, our goal has always been to identify and catch many cancer types early when they are most treatable. We developed our SHIELD assay as a platform capable of multi-cancer detection across a range of indications. We selected CRC as our first indication for SHIELD given it has an established regulatory and reimbursement pathway. We've made incredible progress in 2024 with S.H.I.E.L.D., becoming the first FDA-approved on Medicare-covered blood tests for primary CRC screening. Turning to slide 16, upon our FDA approval, S.H.I.E.L.D. was covered for 45 million Medicare beneficiaries at average risk of CRC. We are very pleased that S.H.I.E.L.D. was recognized as an important new class of CRC screening and received a favorable Medicare price of $920. We recently received a unique PLA code for S.H.I.E.L.D. and expect that upon securing advanced diagnostic laboratory tests or ADLT status designation for S.H.I.E.L.D., the Medicare rate will increase to an even more favorable price of $1,495. Moving on to slide 17. In early August, just a few days after FDA approval, we were thrilled to launch our SHIELD IVD assay. We are seeing outstanding reception from physicians and patients and are excited that thousands of patients have been screened using our test. We are looking forward to scaling our impact quickly. Our strategy is to focus on the covered patient population to drive a high mix of covered, pre-immersible tests. We delivered $4.1 million of SHIELD testing revenue in Q4, driven by a majority of samples coming from covered Medicare beneficiaries. In addition, I am happy to report that in our first full quarter of lunch, we achieved gross margin break-even for SHIELD with COGS and ASP of approximately $600. With the current rate of improvement, we are expecting S.H.I.E.L.D. to be gross margin positive in its first full year post-launch much sooner than we originally anticipated. This gives us flexibility to reinvest in our commercial infrastructure in 2025 while we maintain our annual screening cash burn target of $200 million. Turning now to slide 18, while we are focused on our scale-up in the U.S., we are exploring some strategic international interest in our screening platform. Recently, we were excited to announce that the Abu Dhabi Department of Health selected SHIELD to be a part of their screening program. Currently, the overall compliance to colorectal cancer screening in the region with the current screening modalities including slit and colonoscopy is less than 10 percent and the majority of colorectal cancers are getting diagnosed at later stages. The introduction of a non-invasive blood test as a more pleasant option may encourage greater participation in screening and boost early detection of QRC. This program, initially in its first year, aims to screen approximately 10,000 patients in Abu Dhabi and the surrounding regions in UAE and may scale to approximately 100,000 annual tests in the later phases. Moving on to slide 19. We recently announced that SHIELD has been selected through a highly complicated process by NIH for the Vanguard Multi-Cancer Detection or MCD study. NIH's decision to select SHIELD recognizes GARDEN as a leader in the field of MCD and validates our technology. The MCD test needed to detect the presence of disease across a variety of cancer types with good sensitivity especially for the detection of early stage cancers as well as accurately predict the cancer site of origin. We are pleased to announce that the performance data of SHIELD MCD in approximately 800 patients and across 10 cancer types will be presented in a scientific conference in the second quarter of 2025. Looking ahead, We are excited about our upcoming milestones in 2025, including presentation of our multi-cancer data, the potential inclusion of S.H.I.E.L.D. in American Cancer Society or ACS guidelines, and securing ADLT status, which enables improved ASP. We are also planning to upgrade our CRC screening test with S.H.I.E.L.D. V2. With that, I will now turn the call over to Mike for more detail on our financials.

Thanks, Amir Ali. Turning to slide 20, I'll now discuss some select financial highlights for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2024. I'll refer to year-over-year growth rates, unless otherwise noted. Fourth quarter's total revenue grew 30% to $202 million, primarily driven by precision on cold year revenue, which also increased 30% to $185 million. Precision oncology revenue from clinical tests increased 35% to $146 million. Clinical test volume grew 24% to a record 57,300 tests in Q4 2024, and was primarily driven by Garden360, which grew sequentially in the mid-single digits. We continue to see a very strong uptake of our upgraded Garden360 liquid, which we launched in our smart liquid biopsy platform at the start of Q3. We also saw a continued strong growth of revealing tissue during the fourth quarter of 2024. Garden360 ASP in the fourth quarter of 2024 was approximately $3,000. As we have seen throughout the year, we also had very strong commercial payer collections in the fourth quarter, which led to an active period revenue upside of approximately $8 million above our expectations. Once again, our biopharma business performed incredibly well in the fourth quarter with precision on cold year revenue from biopharma tests totaling 39 million dollars increasing 15 percent this strong growth was fueled by another record quarter of tests in the fourth quarter 11 50 which was up 16 percent finally development services another revenue totaled 17.2 million dollars in q4 2024 and includes 4.1 million dollars screening revenue generated from the 6,400 shield tests that we reported in the quarter. For the full year 2024, total revenue grew 31% to $739 million, with growth again being primarily driven by precision oncology revenue, which increased 34% to $688 million. Precision oncology revenue from clinical tests increased 34% to $543 million. Clinical test volume in 2024 was 206,700, which represents growth of 20%. As Helmy mentioned, clinical volume growth was largely driven by an increase in Garnet 360 test volume, which grew double digits in 2024. We saw continued strong growth of Reveal throughout the year, which, despite us managing volumes ahead of medical surveillance reimbursement, was our fastest-growing clinical test in 2024. Finally, tissue also grew strongly throughout 2024. Clinical test revenue growth was also driven by a significant improvement to our Garden 360 ASP, which increased from approximately $2,750 in the fourth quarter of 2023 to approximately $3,000 in the second half of 2024. In addition to this tailwind, the significant improvement in reimbursement trends throughout the year led us to collect more cash for our tests than we had previously accrued for, which resulted in out-of-period revenue upsides throughout the year. For the full year 2024, revenue recorded for tests performed in prior years was approximately $35 million. Of this $35 million, approximately $13 million was consistent with our expectations based on historical experience and payment trends. However, the remaining $22 million was the result of better-than-expected cash collections, and we view this as a non-recurring out-of-period revenue upside for 2024. Turning to biopharma, as mentioned earlier, our biopharma business performed incredibly well during 2024, with precision-on-cold-year revenue from biopharma tests circling $145 million, increasing 31%, and biopharma test volume growing 35% to 40,500 tests during the full year 2024. Finally, development services and other revenues totaled $51.1 million for the full year 2024 and includes $5.1 million of screening revenues generated from shield tests that were reported between the IVD launch at the start of August and the end of the year. Moving on to slide 21, our non-GAAP gross margin continued to be very strong and was 63% in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to 61% in the fourth quarter of 2023. We also saw an improvement on an annual basis with 2024 non-GAAP gross margin of 62% compared to 61% in 2023. Excluding screening, non-GAAP gross margin of 64% for both the fourth quarter and full year 2024, an improvement from 63% in the prior year period and above the full year guidance range of 61% to 63% that we provided on our Q3 earnings call. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $215 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, an increase of 17% and $757 million for the full year 2024, an increase of 4%. Our full-year non-GAAP operating expense was above our guidance range of $720 to $730 million due to a couple of one-time items in the fourth quarter of 2024. Firstly, we incurred significant litigation expense related to the November false advertising trial for which the jury unanimously found in favour of Garden Health on all its claims and awarded us $293 million. Secondly, in Q4 we increased the full year accrual for the 2024 company bonus plan in line with the board approved payout level, which reflects a successful year with respect to bonus performance components such as top and bottom line financial measures the FDA approval shield and the launch of new products as a result of our increased revenue gross profit and operating leverage both our adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow improved year over year in full year 2024. Adjusted EBITDA loss was 258 million dollars for the full year 2024 an improvement of 86 million dollars compared to a loss of 344 million in 2023. We continued to be focused on cash and materially reduced our burn in 2024. Free cash flow burn of $275 million for the full year 2024 was in line with the guidance we provided on our Q3 earnings call and represents an improvement of $70 million compared to $345 million in 2023. I'm also pleased to report that our core therapy selection business was free cash flow positive in 2024 and that we successfully managed our cash burden for screening to be in line with our guidance target of approximately $175 million. Turning to the balance sheet on slide 22, we ended the year with approximately $944 million in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable debt securities. Earlier this month, we successfully completed a private convertible debt exchange where we extended the maturity on $600 million of convertible debt with favorable terms, which we believe helps to mitigate potential balance sheet risk, while at the same time provides greater optionality to optimize our capital structure in the future. The $600 million of new convertible debt is now due in 2031 and comes with a 1.25% annual coupon and a 35% conversion premium, which represents a conversion price of $62.22. As a result of the transaction, our total debt was reduced from $1.15 billion to $1.09 billion, of which $491 million is our zero-coupon convertible debt, which is due in November 2027. We also structured a concurrent stock repurchase of $45 million to help mitigate dilution. Following these transactions, our pro forma cash position was approximately $887 million. We continue to expect that we will reach cash flow break even in 2028, with cumulative free cash outflow of $450 to $550 million over the next three years. Turning to slide 23. Before discussing our outlook and assumptions for 2025, we want to take a moment to preview how we intend to present our revenue going forward. rather than splitting revenue into precision oncology and development services another we're changing the presentation to better reflect our different business lines and to provide parity on the performance of shield as such for 2025 we'll start to break out revenue into four components which are shown in the slide with 2023 and 2024 full year numbers in summary the new revenue components are oncology, which represents clinical therapy selection and MRD testing revenue, which we previously reported as clinical testing revenue within the precision oncology line. Biopharma and data, which represents the total revenue we generate from our biopharma customers, namely biopharma sample testing revenue that we previously reported in precision oncology, as well as biopharma companion diagnostic and data services revenue that we previously reported as development services licensing another which was previously reported as other revenue and finally screening which will represent shield testing revenue moving to slide 24 for our outlook and assumptions for full year 2025 we expect full year 2025 revenue to be in the range of 850 to 860 million dollars representing growth of approximately 15 to 16 percent compared to 2024. Excluding the 22 million dollar non-recurring out of period upside in 2024, this range implies total revenue growth of 19 to 20 percent in 2025. Now breaking down the key assumptions in our revenue guidance. We expect oncology revenue to grow approximately 15 percent year over year in 2025. Again, excluding the non-recurring out a period upside in 2024 this represents oncology revenue growth of approximately 20 percent given the positive traction we're seeing from our launch of garden 360 ldt of smart liquid biopsy our recent medicare crc surveillance coverage for reveal and the upgrades we're making to our tissue test we expect volumes across all oncology clinical products to accelerate in 2025 and total oncology clinical volume growth to be approximately 25%. We expect our biopharma business to continue to perform well in 2025 and are forecasting low double-digit growth for biopharma and data revenue. Finally, although it's still very early into the launch, we want to provide some initial guidance for screening revenue, which we expect to be in the range of $25 to $30 million, driven by $45,000 to $50,000 shield tests. We expect this full-year volume to be significantly back-end loaded due to the time it will take to ramp up the productivity of newly hired reps throughout the year. Also, our guidance does not include any ASP impacts from receiving ADLT designation. We continue to expect this to occur in 2025, and we'll update our guidance accordingly at the appropriate time. We've made great progress in reducing our COGS over the last few months, with both revealing shields reaching gross margin break even. In 2025, we're confident that we can deliver full year non-GAAP gross margins in the range of 62 to 63%, despite the impact of changes in product mix that we expect during the year. We expect total non-GAAP operating expenses to be in the range of 815 to $825 million, representing an 8 to 9% increase compared to 2024. We'll continue to gain significant operating leverage during 2025 and expect r d and gna expenses to be relatively flat compared to 2024 with the increase in operating expense coming mainly from investments in screening sales and marketing as we continue to ramp up our commercial efforts to shield lastly we continue to be committed to reducing our cash burn each year in order to reach company-wide cash flow breakeven in 2028 for full year 2025 we expect free cash flow burn between the range of 225 to 235 million dollars an improvement compared to 275 million for 2024. our burn in 2025 will consist of approximately 200 million dollars related to screening as we scale our shield business and maximize our first mover advantage significantly excluding screening we expect the remainder of the business to burn approximately 25 to 35 million dollars during the year and to reach cash flow breakeven in the fourth quarter of 2025. Finally turning to slide 25 we have a rich pipeline of catalysts across our business segments and are excited about the opportunities ahead with that we will now open the call to questions Thank you.

We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If for any reason at all you would like to remove that question, please press star followed by two. Again, to ask a question, please press star one. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question only. The first comes from Puneet Souda with Leering Partners. You may proceed.

Yeah, hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. First one on screening, and I'll try to wrap one on reveal as well. Shield guide of $25 to $30 million was well ahead of us, and I believe the street as well. I appreciate the second half loaded, but could you talk about the Salesforce expansion that you expect is going to contribute here for the second half? Any other drivers and the feedback that you're getting from the field that gives you confidence in this $30 million on the upper end? And maybe what are you contemplating for the lower end? And on Reveal, congrats on the surveillance coverage, but can you square the NCCN? Unfortunately, NCCN recommended against surveillance, so could you balance those two? I know it's still early days in this market. How do you expect the adoption and Reveal to go as a result of that?

Thank you, Puneet. Maybe I start with the SHIELD question and then I give it to tell me about Reveal. So we continue to be very pleased with what we are hearing in the field, physician response, patient response. Now connecting it to our guidance, I make a few points. One is, you know, we launched a test back in August with 50 reps in the field. We increased it to 100 as we ended the last year, 2024. The vast majority of the people we added, you know, they came late, very late in 2024, in fact, and it's going to take them some time to contribute in productivity. As a result, we are, we believe that actually our ramp rate is going to be more back-ended. The other thing to consider is this is our first full year of launch so you know obviously in the launch years you know this kind of growth is always when you look at it just numerically it's more backhanded too in terms of total number of reps that we are going to have we mentioned our investor date fall of 23 that we are planning to have about maybe 150 people in the field by end of 2025. some stuff went better than what we expected mainly the medicare pricing as a result we will have maybe a little bit more people in the field but again you know a bunch of these newly hired attributes meaningfully

killed like three six months after their hire date maybe i'll leave it like that and give it to tell me for review thank you um yeah good question we actually were um fairly encouraged when we saw the update in mccm guidelines um i think on the whole um it's actually a step forward in terms of recognizing the value of ctdna testing uh really in the sort of adjuvant setting and this is not too dissimilar from the sort of cadence we saw with NCCM guidelines for 360 in terms of liquid biopsy testing. The guidelines tend to be a little bit behind where clinical practice is, but I think, you know, all in all, we're encouraged in terms of this moving in the right direction, and we're very confident given the utility we see with surveillance testing as a whole and especially with Reveal that we'll get to the right place in the coming years from a guideline perspective.

Thank you. The next question comes from Bill Bonilla with Craig Hallam Capital Group. You may proceed.

Hey, guys. Thanks for the call. Another one on S.H.I.E.L.D. I'm just curious if you are having any kinds of preliminary discussions with, you know, payers outside of Medicare, commercial payers about S.H.I.E.L.D. I mean, obviously, the thinking has been, well, you have to wait on USPSTF and whatnot, but I wasn't sure if there was activity you might be trying to accomplish ahead of that.

Yeah, Bill, you know, we are in very kind of early conversation with some, mainly in terms of like, you know, having advisory boards, getting some initial feedback from them. We are planning to ramp up some of those engagements after we go into guidelines and, you know, right after ACS guideline inclusion that we are optimistic hopefully it could happen in 2025. We will ramp up those activities.

Thank you. The next question comes from Ticho Peterson with Jeffries. You may proceed.

Hey, thanks. A couple on SHIELD. So you're guiding for ASPs to move a little bit lower here, 580 at the midpoint versus 625 in the fourth quarter. Is that just Medicare fee-for-service dynamics or is that, you know, Abu Dhabi and maybe, you know, subsidized samples? And, you know, can you maybe just confirm whether the SHIELD volume guide includes Abu Dhabi. And then any risk to ADLT status? And then lastly, just ACS guidelines. Do you expect that in the second quarter? And how do you think about the lift that could come? I assume that's not baked into the guide.

Yeah. So, Tyco, thanks for a great question. We are very pleased with the ASP that we printed for Q4. We just don't want to get ahead of our skis. That was really the first full quarter data that we had. And we want to be very thoughtful with the ASB is that we are a full year of the launch we are going to we are continuing to monitor our payer mix that would impact the ASB. I think again I emphasize that this bump of ADLT improved Medicare rates is not kind of embedded in our guide you know we are going to get to that point and then look at our payer mix at a time. Based on everything that we know we are very confidence about this ADLT process we know how it works it's just a matter of the mechanics of the timing it's a quarterly process when exactly it's going to get activated for us it's something that it's not very clear so we just want to make sure we de-risk it before we include that off-site to Abu Zabi very quickly it's not a dilutive for ASB so without going into more details of it we are very pleased with the engagement that thank you the next question comes from dan brennan with td

cowan you may proceed great thanks for uh thanks for the questions um i'm going to focus on reveal um could you help us think through kind of what's baked in for 25 um you know we we show you guys did like 35 000 tests in 24 maybe ramping like 55 and 25 i know you're not going to give us specifics but how do we think about what the impact of surveillance could be and then b when you think about the additional indications, breast and monitoring? Could you just give us some color about timelines of when we might hear back on that? Thank you.

On volumes, but as we said in the prepared remarks, we see acceleration across each of our product lines on oncology in terms of volume growth. And certainly, we're very pleased with how the sort of year has started, not just for reveal, but for all our products. That being said, in terms of, you know, kind of additional indications. As we said, we submitted data for publication for both breast and monitoring late last year. And as soon as those are published and accepted in respective journals, we'll be submitting that to MoldX. And so we think, you know, sometime second half of this year, the earliest we could see potential indication expansion.

Yeah, maybe I'll add, yeah, that's how we mentioned, you know, we expect poor reveal volume acceleration. You're right, Dan, you know, we're not breaking out the reveal volumes or the volumes across all of the clinical oncology lines. But yeah, we expect a reveal is going to accelerate. You know, it'll take some time and we think this will be more, you know, again, back end loaded for the acceleration increase during the year. And that's really because, you know, we're just sort of getting the field now ramped up to be very much focused on CRC. So, you know, we had our national sales meeting kick off just two or three weeks ago. You know, the team's very excited and energized to go out and sell Reveal CRC, but, you know, it's going to take time for that traction to take hold. But, yeah, we're looking very much forward to accelerating the volumes throughout the year.

Thank you. The following question comes from Subu Nimbing with Guggenheim. You may proceed.

Thank you for taking my question. Two questions. On Shield, the Shield COG reductions have already been impressive. Is it fair to assume that you're achieving the shield cost reduction via a similar approach like review? And what is embedded in the 2025 guide? And for review, what ASP is embedded in your guidance with respect to RAM, mix, ADLT timing? Thank you.

Yeah. So actually, a bunch of R&D activities that we are doing at Garden is highly leveraged, and especially for the platforms that are based on epigenomics mainly, there is a lot of synergy. So on Reveal, which is an LDT product, you guys have seen what we have achieved by reducing the cost through some of the improvements and technology stack and process improvements that we had. Shield is an IVD product, so implementing some of these changes takes a bit longer, but there is a bunch of synergy and cross-learning, cross-deployment that we are doing across both Shield and Reveal.

Yeah, and maybe I'll take the reveal ASP. Yeah, so of course we were very pleased to get the CRC's Medica, CRC surveillance Medica coverage at 1644 starting at the start of the year. So that's going to have a positive impact on ASP. You know, we ended 2024 with an ASP roughly between sort of $400 and $500, and so we're going to have an impact, a positive impact of the Medicare coverage. There is a big sort of mix impact in all of Reveal because we have CRC surveillance, CRC adjuvant, and then we have breast and lung, and then of course there's Medicare, medical advantage in commercial so there's a lot that we have to sort of deal with um from from a mixed perspective but yeah we would expect the ASP in our guide roughly to increase to something like 600 600 dollars um we haven't included any impact for ADLT uh in that 600 dollars where it's our intention to um to apply for ADLT rate and so similar to SHIELD. If and when we get that, we would expect an increase on the Medico rate, and we would change our guidance in line with receiving that.

Thank you. The next comes from Mark Massaro with BTIG. You may proceed.

Hey, guys. Thanks for the questions. Congrats on a strong 2024. The first one is for you, Helmi. I think about a year ago, there was probably an investor misconception that your G360 business was either saturating or about to go into diesel. But your prepared comments today, you indicated you plan to accelerate volumes across all your products this year. So I was curious if you could just give us some anecdotes about what you're seeing in the field with the upgraded G360 liquid product. And then one for Amirly, you know, I recognize that the majority of your revenue came from Medicare in Q4, but I would be curious about what level of interest you're seeing billed from the non-Medicare population and whether or not you think you'll be well-addressed to equip those orders when commercial payer coverage comes in.

Thanks, Mark. I appreciate the question. I can tell you at our national sales meeting, obviously I've been going to them every year. This is probably the most excited I've seen the team, given the sort of products we have out there, and Smart Liquid Biopsy with 360 and Reveal, and then some of the ones that we have upcoming, especially with tissue. And so we are seeing that momentum. We saw that momentum since we launched 360 and Smart Liquid Biopsy. It's been a really nice uptake from existing physicians and new physicians alike. And we really haven't even turned on a lot of the exciting features yet. And so we have extremely high confidence, just given how this year has started, how the last year ended, that 360 liquid will continue to do well. And there's a lot of room for growth over the next few years in this market. I outlined some of the growth drivers. It's not just sort of increased penetration. It's more applications going in sort of the long tail of tumor types that only really epigenomics can address, some of the new findings we have, as well as where the field is going in terms of testing patients at each progression. And so we are really at the sort of very early innings in terms of where liquid biopsy for therapy selections can grow.

And regarding S.H.I.E.L.D. on the younger patient or commercial side, our experience during S.H.I.E.L.D. LVT when we didn't have proactive workflow adjustment to really focus on covered patient, we were experiencing that in fact the 65 and above was a minority of our ordering and workflow changes actually has worked that now vast, vast majority of our volume coming from this that market feedback and uh data that once the coverage get expanded huge demand and opportunity right now though we are just focused on reinversible covered case like medicare and some of for instance initiatives that we have internationally in abu dhabi i maybe take this opportunity there was earlier question i forgot to answer about what's the level of assumption of contribution of this abu zabi partnership you know that program in the first one year the expectation of the Department of Health there is to test about 10,000 patients. Having said that, since the program needs to go through the ramp logistics, we don't know exactly how quickly they're going to ramp. At this time, we are just assuming a fraction of those patients would get tested by SHIELD.

Thank you. The next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Citi. You may proceed.

Hey, guys. Thanks for having the questions. And Helmi, maybe one on reveal. I know before the reimbursement, you were holding back a little bit, kind of pursuing the volumes. Can you talk about just the change in strategy, how that will go? I know Mike mentioned maybe a little more of a second half ramp as we go through that. And then a quick one for Amir Ali, just on V2 for Shield. Can you just talk through what the expectations there should be on the catalyst set front for V2? Thank you, guys.

Yeah, as we have said before, we're sort of limiting in some ways how much we are servicing the demand that was out there from our sales team. And, you know, one of the big sort of kind of exciting initiatives we had at our national sales meeting this year was really training on Reveal, really getting the sales team sort of, you know, I think motivated. And they were very excited in terms of being able to now offer this product a lot more robustly and really accelerate our efforts there. So, yeah, there's a lot of room to grow, especially with tissue-free MRD. It's really the surveillance setting where you sort of get most of the juice out of the market and where most of the opportunity is. And that's not really been an area that we've been targeting, given the fact we didn't have reimbursement there. And so, yeah, the team is ready to go and, you know, very, very excited for what this means for our oncology business.

Regarding Shield B2, it's an active program for us right now. Stay tuned.

Thank you. The following comes from Dan Arias with Stifel. You may proceed.

Thanks, guys. Help me on MRD and maybe just piggybacking up your last comment there. the way that the field is evolving here as companies increasingly shooting for both tumor informed and tumor naive approaches as you think about your own portfolio and just the way to best serve the community how interested are you in that idea and having both and then just quickly and early i had someone ask for a clarification on tyco's question whether abu dhabi volumes are considered in the 45 to 50k outlook for test volumes thanks yeah i mean look we ultimately think that tissue-free MRD is going to be the largest portion of the market.

It's the simplest from a product market fit to use. It addresses the 12 million cancer survivors that are more than five years out of the 18 million in the market. But that doesn't mean that a tumor-informed product would at some point not be part of our portfolio as well. We have to listen to the market, understand what the needs are of our customers, and we'll continue to do that we you know obviously launched garden 360 tissue next a couple of years ago we have a major upgrade of that test this year and so we're going to continue to listen to the to zip through the needs of the market and adapt as as required about Abu Dhabi so you know they We're going to test 10,000 patients within the first year.

Having said that, since we don't have really visibility over how quickly they can ramp it up and if at all they can screen approximately 10,000 patients or not, at this time we are just assuming it's not a really material part of it.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from Teha Savant with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Hey, guys. Good evening. So just a quick follow-up there on one of Tycho's earlier questions. Is ACS guideline inclusion a second half 25 catalyst for you still, Amir Ali? And then with that Supreme Court case looming here, I know there's offsets via, you know, ACS states and the Medicare opportunities obviously insulated from that situation. But would the decision require any sort of rejigging on your commercial effort on S.H.I.E.L.D. or perhaps, you know, need, you know, in the past you've talked about this activation energy sort of phenomenon. Will that be sort of a bigger gating factor for you with that decision to go against USPSTS?

Okay, so maybe I start with ACS about some of this stuff. Maybe you need to clarify it a little bit more. So in terms of ACS, you know, we are pleased with the conversation that we continue to have with that team, and we are optimistic that they would consider SHIELD in the CRC guidance review that they started working on. So exact timing, we are not sure, but we are confident based on what we know it should be sometime in 2025. In terms of the Supreme case, you know, we are right now focused mainly on Medicare patient population and, you know, the covered patient population, which is not going to get impacted by that case. We are monitoring it actually very closely. It's kind of good for the field, the fact that Trump administration is continuing to kind of be on the opposite side and kind of work against the success of that law case. But we'll see what happens. There is a lot of business actually for us on Medicare to mind while we are waiting for building that pathway access for younger patient population in future. I'm not sure if I got the last question. Maybe we just move on.

Thank you. The following comes from Rachel Vassano with J.P. Morgan. You may proceed.

Perfect. Good afternoon, and thanks so much for taking the questions. So, I wanted to dig into ASP assumptions this year, specifically on G360. So, just given the traction that you saw throughout 2024, can you walk us through your assumptions embedded for 2025, and what are the levers this year that you can see for continued growth in ASP on that front for core therapy selection. Thanks.

Yeah, right, it's Mike. I'll take that one. Yeah, no, I think just to reiterate, we had a very, very impressive increase in our ASP and Gardner 360 in 2024. The main driver at the start of the year was increasing the Gardner 360 LDG rate from 3,500 to 5,000. And then throughout the year, we saw sort of the Medicare Advantage pull through, bringing them up to that rate. And so, yeah, Garden360 ASP went from $27.50 at Q423 to $3,000 in the back half of $24,000. And also, you know, on top of that, we had these out-of-period upsides just because we were receiving a lot more cash than we previously accrue for i think when we look at 2025 um you know definitely the three thousand dollar asp we believe is you know here to stay um and the opportunity for us over the next sort of 12 months and longer is really to focus on the commercial payers and expanding the coverage uh that we have for garden 360. so you know we've got very good coverage now all the national payers cover garden 360 but they don't cover every time that we run the test so you know some cover for the ldt version some for the cdx only and vice versa and in certain cases only for certain cancer types like lung or breast fda approved indications and so yeah that's that's really going to be the focus for us to expand coverage over time what's built into our into our guidance is really just the three thousand dollar uh asp for garden 360. so if we can accelerate the next uh the expansion of the coverage that'll be upside if we continue to get any more of these uh out of period upsides above our expectations then again that would be an incremental to our guidance um but yeah we're

fairly bullish about what we've got to with our garden 360 asps and and looking forward thank you the next question comes from kyle mixon with canaccord you may proceed hey guys thanks for the questions how many could you talk about the contribution from g360 tissue in 2025 and how important that's going to be longer term in the portfolio just um given that could expand your opportunity enhance your competitive position and maybe lengthen the runway for that that franchise in g360 and secondly merely could you um just clarify the volume of the shield this year in terms of demographics of patients and their insurance is that going different from the 24 thanks yeah i mean we've seen i think pretty strong growth from our tissue

franchise over the last few years since we launched it but this is going to be i think a significant upgrade for that test we think it'll be sort of bar none one of the most competitive offerings in this space from a capabilities point of view and one that it's really going to resonate with physicians. And so, yeah, we are expecting that this is a project that is going to be a very important pillar for our therapy selection business and a major contributor over the next couple of years. And, you know, I think it's really important to, as a sort of, you know, pillar of what physicians use when they're seeing a patient, really doing both tests up front and and then continuing to sort of monitor the patient with.

SHIB volume Q4 was vast majority from Medicare beneficiaries, and what we assume in 2025 is still majority of the volume would come from the targeted covered patients, meaning Medicare beneficiaries. So the commercial insurance, like younger patients, are minority.

Thank you. The next question comes from Mason Carrico with Stevens. You may proceed.

Hey, thanks. I'm sorry if this has been asked and jumping between a few tonight, but on the growth you're seeing for G360 in the U.S., could you just give us some insight into where exactly that incremental growth is coming from? Is it capturing an incremental share from competitors? Is it higher utilization in tumor types where penetration was lower, is it new accounts? Any color there would be helpful.

I would say it's, you know, largely from greater depth from existing accounts. As you know, we have a majority of U.S. oncologists order GARDEN 360 today, and so it's a lot more about getting greater depth. So some of it is sort of taking back share from, you know, some of the competitors out there, but it's also just greater utilization as well. There are still a lot of physicians that don't test all of their patients with a comprehensive genomic profiling test, and having a test like this that has capabilities that go beyond just a standard genomic test I think has been exciting, has been resonating with a lot of physicians, and we see a lot more of that to come as we roll out these applications, these apps.

Thank you. Our final question comes from Matt Sykes with Golden Facts. You may proceed.

Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe just quickly, Amarali, just on Salesforce expansion for Shield, you talked a little bit earlier in the call about maybe being a little bit bigger than what you originally expected. But, you know, a year or two ago, you talked about gating factors that you would consider at any given point in terms of building that out. Could you just maybe kind of walk through what those gating factors today are? Is it ACS guidelines, competitive launches in the future? Just how you're thinking about sizing that investment over this year and maybe in the 26th.

Yeah, everything that we are talking about in terms of shielding investment is gated by continued execution and continuing to believe this brand is gonna have a huge opportunity for us. That remains constant. The other part, which is constant, like what we mentioned now for some time, that our annual net burn is $500 million. So we are continuing to execute based on that financial discipline. So what's embedded there is continued execution on the commercial, showing that the volume is coming. The P&L unit economics makes sense, and the point I made earlier about commercial expansion was just based on the fact that unit economics is more favorable today than what we assumed a year and a half ago. Because of multiple reasons, the main factor, we didn't expect Medicare pricing to be $920 a year and a half ago, and what we are going to expect with ADLC is going to be $14.95 versus a year and a half ago, it was lower cash pay price. So this would give us some additional gross profit in the building, the commercial.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.