Good morning. My name is Paul, and I will be your conference facilitator. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Please note today’s call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Chris Petta, with Investor Relations for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. Please go ahead. Thank you and good morning everyone.

Thank you for joining our call to discuss Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.’s fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results. With me on the call this morning are Jack Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer; Steve Alpart, our Chief Investment Officer and Co-Head of Originations; Blake Johnson, our Chief Financial Officer; Peter Morale, our Chief Development Officer and Co-Head of Originations; and Ethan Leibowitz, our Chief Operating Officer. After my introductory comments, Jack will provide a brief recap of conditions and review our current business activities. Steve will discuss our portfolio and Blake will highlight key items from our financial results. The press release, financial tables, and earnings supplemental associated with today’s call were filed yesterday with the SEC and are available in the Investor Relations section of our website. We expect to file our Form 10-Ks in the coming weeks. I would like to remind you that remarks made by management during this call and the supporting slides may include forward-looking statements, which are uncertain and outside of the company’s control. Forward-looking statements reflect our views regarding future events and are subject to uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Please see our filings with the SEC for a discussion of some of the risks that could affect results. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements. We also refer to certain non-GAAP measures on this call. This information is not intended to be considered in isolation or a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release and slides, which are available on our website. I will now turn the call over to Jack.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. We would like to welcome you and thank you for joining us for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.’s fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings call. 2025 was a constructive year for the commercial real estate industry after pausing briefly in the spring due to macro uncertainty, quickly resumed with heightened deal activity and spread compression throughout the balance of the year. During the fourth quarter, we saw greater capital availability for a broader array of properties, including certain office properties, as well as improving fundamentals across many markets and most property types. Lending volume has expanded and also extended to a wider range of property types and markets. This greater liquidity in the market has benefited the CMBS market and strengthened CLO issuance. Larger commercial banks have become more active, notably for warehouse financing, and regional banks are beginning to return to the market as well. Against this backdrop of available capital in the market, there continues to be a shortfall of actionable deals, which is one of the key factors contributing to the spread tightening we have been seeing over the last several quarters. For Granite Point, with the long-awaited market improvement, 2025 was an impactful year, as we achieved some of our key objectives. These included five loan resolutions, seven full loan repayments, and one REO property sale, as well as a reduction in our cost of debt. The market momentum experienced in 2025 has continued into early 2026, and sets the stage for this year to be potentially a stronger year for the industry, with forecasted growth in transaction activity across property types, increased liquidity from traditional lenders, a robust securitization market, and an increasingly constructive backdrop for asset resolution activity. In 2026, we will continue to make progress reducing our higher-cost debt and moving along our asset resolutions, which will continue to help reduce the risk within our portfolio and improve our net interest spread. This month, we repaid a substantial amount of additional higher-cost debt, resulting in a reduction in the cost of our repurchase facilities by roughly 60 basis points and an estimated annual savings of $0.10 per share. With respect to our two REO assets, we are investing capital where we believe it will maximize our outcome and then we will seek to exit and extract capital. Post quarter end, we also have received two full loan repayments of $174,000,000 combined. Turning to originations, as we said last quarter, we expect to begin to regrow our portfolio this year, and to start that process in 2026. The exact timing and volume of originations will be driven by the pace of loan repayments and asset resolutions, as well as market conditions and idiosyncratic factors. While the timing and volume is uncertain, reallocating capital in our portfolio and recycling into new originations remains one of our highest priorities.

And thank you all for joining our fourth quarter and full year earnings call. We ended the year with $1,800,000,000 in total loan portfolio commitments, inclusive of $1,700,000,000 in outstanding principal balance and about $77,000,000 of future fundings, which accounts for only about 4% of total commitments. Our loan portfolio remains diversified across regions and property types, and includes 43 investments with an average UPB of about $39,000,000 and a weighted average stabilized LTV of 65% at origination. As of December 31, our portfolio weighted average risk rating increased slightly to 2.9 from 2.8 at September 30. The realized loan portfolio yield for the fourth quarter was 6.7%, which, excluding non-accrual loans, would have been 8% or 1.3% higher. We had an active year of loan repayments totaling about $469,000,000 during 2025. During the year, we funded about $51,000,000 on existing loan commitments and other investments. During the fourth quarter, we had $45,000,000 of loan repayments and partial paydowns, including a full repayment of a $33,000,000 loan secured by a multifamily asset located in North Carolina. We had about $15,000,000 of future fundings and other investments, resulting in a net loan portfolio reduction of about $30,000,000 for the fourth quarter. Post quarter end, we have received two full loan repayments of $174,000,000. We will now provide some color on the risk-rated five loans. At December 31, we had four such loans with a total UPB of about $249,000,000. At quarter end, we downgraded a $53,000,000 loan collateralized by a 284-unit multifamily property in the Atlanta MSA from a risk rating of four to a rating of five. While we have seen a pickup in occupancy at the property, the local market remains soft and we are not seeing the return of the pricing power we had expected. We are reviewing resolution alternatives, which may include a property sale. We are monitoring the situation closely and expect to have more to share over the coming quarters. We discussed last quarter that we had a partial resolution on the Chicago loan with the sale of the upper floor office space to a developer for a residential conversion. After the sale, the remaining collateral securing the $76,000,000 loan is the retail space. The story is now cleaner and simpler, and we are continuing to work cooperatively with the borrower towards the ultimate resolution, which we expect will occur via a property sale in the near term. For the $27,000,000 Tempe hotel and retail loan, we are reviewing resolution alternatives there as well, which could involve a sale of the property. Regarding the $93,000,000 Minneapolis office loan, as previously disclosed, we anticipate a longer resolution timeline given the persistent local market challenges. Resolving these remaining five-rated loans remains a top priority.

Thank you, Steve. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Turning to our financial results. For the fourth quarter, we reported a GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders of $27,400,000, or negative $0.58 per basic common share, which includes a provision for credit losses of $14,400,000, or negative $0.30 per basic common share, and an impairment loss in the Miami Beach OREO asset of $6,800,000, or negative $0.14 per basic common share. Distributable loss for the quarter was $2,700,000, or negative $0.06 per basic common share. Our book value at December 31 was $7.29 per common share, a decline of $0.65 per share from Q3, largely from the provision for credit losses and impairment loss on REO. Our aggregate CECL reserve at December 31 was about $148,000,000, as compared to $134,000,000 last quarter. The roughly $15,000,000 increase in our CECL reserve was mainly due to an increase in our specific reserve on our collateral-dependent loans and worsening macroeconomic forecast in our CECL model relative to the prior quarter. Approximately 70% of our total allowance was allocated to individually assessed loans. As of quarter end, we had about $249,000,000 of principal balance on four loans with specific CECL reserves of around $105,000,000, representing 42% of the unpaid principal balance. We believe we are appropriately reserved and further resolutions should meaningfully reduce our total CECL reserve balance. Turning to liquidity and capitalization, we ended the quarter with about $66,000,000 of unrestricted cash. Our total leverage increased slightly relative to the prior quarter from 1.9 times to 2.0 times. As of a few days ago, we carried about $55,000,000 in cash.

Our funding mix remains well diversified and stable, and we continue to have very constructive relationships with our financing counterparties. We expect to expand our financing capacity once we return to originating new loans.

I will now ask the operator to open the line for questions.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. Our first question is from Douglas Harter with UBS.

Good morning. It is actually Marissa Lobo on for Doug today. Thanks for taking my questions. On origination, how are you thinking about the economics of new origination versus returning capital to shareholders, given the large discount to book value that you trade at?

Good morning, Marissa. This is Blake. Thank you for the question today. When we look at our portfolio and the discount to book, one of our main objectives over the years has been to continue resolving our loans and actually working on decreasing our leverage until we start originating again. We do plan on returning to originations later in the year, and that is our focus for 2026.

Okay. And on the CECL reserve build, how are you viewing the current reserve position and the likelihood for further reserve build? How are current macroeconomic assumptions factoring into that?

A very good question. Thank you. Yes. So as of year end, we go through our CECL process as in every quarter end. And when we went through the process, we updated the generator for the latest and greatest economic forecast in our truck model. So that includes change in assumptions, and the biggest driver for this quarter was a decrease in the CRE price index.

These forecasts can change going forward, so the general reserve could change. But as of right now, that is the most recent assumption as far as what our general should be.

Moving to the actual specific reserve, that is based on our collateral-dependent loans. So as of quarter end, we had four collateral-dependent loans. In each quarter end, we assess the fair value of the underlying collateral.

So absent any changes in collateral itself, we do believe we are appropriately reserved for those loans.

Okay. Thank you. Appreciate the answers.

Our next question is from Jade Rahmani with KBW. Thank you very much.

Do you have any views as to where book value per share may trough?

It is down quite sharply year over year and quarter over quarter.

Which clearly based on today’s stock performance, is a surprise. So can you just comment as to your expectations for the risk of future losses going forward?

Well, I will address that first and then turn it over to Steve to talk about credit migration. We believe that there is a risk that there will be upgrades and downgrades and future losses may be part of that. We have assessed that risk in our book today and that is embedded in the reserves. With respect to credit migration, maybe, Steve, you would speak to that. But I have been very clear over the quarters. I do not believe it is over in terms of workouts and delinquencies for the entire industry, and not for us. And there have been some surprises to us. We expect to have some upgrades and some downgrades.

I think Jack and Blake covered it pretty well. I mean, I would just say that we feel that the majority of the portfolio is performing well. We are working through these remaining loan resolutions, which are not entirely, but heavily in the office sector, and the impact of the rate hike that we went through. We are pleased with the progress we have had to date. We had a lot of resolutions in 2024. We had five more in 2025. We are in process on a couple more right now. We just talked about the Chicago deal where we had the partial resolution of the office space, and we are working on a full resolution, which involves the retail, which we think can get done in the near term. We did have two new fives during the quarter. So there is always a possibility that there could be more of that. But we also hope to have more resolutions, some upgrades, and we are happy to see that we are in a constructive environment in terms of capital, certainly debt, and increasingly equity. We think that will be helpful on further repayments and resolutions.

And just overall, when you look at the portfolio, clearly, the portfolio has a legacy vintage prior to the Fed rate hikes. So nearly every single loan in the portfolio is going to have probably some cost of capital issue when it is up for maturity. But then looking beyond that, multifamily was an area of downgrade this quarter, which was somewhat surprising. So can you comment on the vintage and the multifamily property type and what your expectations are there?

Sure. I think there are two related questions in there. So we are working through these loans, including these kind of older vintage loans. We have pretty good visibility on about a quarter of these loans, in terms of a near-term payoff where there is a process underway and we are expecting a loan repayment. I would say there is another, I call it 40% or so if I had to kind of take an estimate, where there is an upcoming maturity. We have communicated to the borrower that we expect an exit this year by the maturity date. And there may be a refi or a recap or sale process that is underway or expected. We cannot say that all those will get done, but we have some visibility on those that we think there is a process that there is an exit out of. And then there is another third or so, where there are a couple of 2027 and 2028 maturities. And then I would throw in the Minneapolis office deal that are a little bit further out. I would say we are kind of chipping away at it. And some have near-term visibility, some we are expecting and pushing on, and then a few will be 2027 and 2028. As far as your question on multifamily, we feel pretty good about the multifamily in our portfolio. We did have the credit migration on the Atlanta deal, and we have talked about certain markets that we are looking at. We have flagged the Atlanta market in the past. So, I would say that one for us has been a bit of an exception. It has some unique factors that we can discuss. But I think the overall trend line that we are seeing, including in the Sun Belt, is that the recovery that we were all expecting has been a little bit more sluggish, and you see that in the read-through on some of the public multifamily REITs. The spring leasing season last year was a little slower than expected. But the supply picture overall is improving. There has not been much pricing power for landlords. However, we believe that as we look at macro supply and demand, over the second half of this year and going forward, the trend line in multifamily appears fairly positive. There is a lot of liquidity in the asset class. The sentiment coming out of NMHC this year was very positive. Overall, on multifamily and in our book, we feel pretty good about it medium to long term.

Thank you, Jay.

Our next question is from Christopher Muller with Citizens Capital.

Hey guys, thanks for taking the questions. So I guess starting on the portfolio, it has been shrinking as you guys have been focused on asset management. But it sounds like new originations starting up is still the expectation for later this year.

So I guess the question is, do you have a ballpark of where the portfolio size could trough and maybe kind of playing into that a little bit is, what do scheduled maturities look like in the first half of this year in addition to what you guys already disclosed?

Hey, Chris, it is Steve. Just high level, on the first part of your question, look, just given the near-term focus on repayments and resolutions, we do expect the portfolio to tick down through mid-2026 and then begin to restabilize and regrow in the latter part of the year. Ultimately, that will depend on the timing of repayments and resolutions relative to new originations, but it will get a little lower over the next few quarters and then begin to regrow.

Got it. And any visibility you guys have on scheduled maturities that may play into that?

Yeah. I mean, part of that is what I just mentioned to Jay that we do have visibility on certain loans that are coming up on maturity. As we kind of look out—I am kind of looking out into 2026 overall. Some of these will just pay off in the normal course. A couple will extend out of bright. That has happened on some loans recently. Then to the extent we have other loans that I mentioned are not up for maturity yet, but they are up in the third or fourth quarter. We are in—of that, we are having conversations with a number of borrowers that we have done previous extensions on, where they have done everything right, they put new money in. We are looking to get the portfolio turned. So we are having clear communications with borrowers about our expectations and if they cannot do it via a refi, they can do it via an equity recap or a sale. This has been kind of our playbook for managing the portfolio. We have extended out loans in win-win modification situations, but we feel like that was the playbook that allowed us to keep navigating this environment, and we are trying to move past that and get to just turning the portfolio.

Got it. And then just a quick clarifying one. Did I hear you guys correctly that there was one new five-rated loan in the quarter? I see the Georgia multifamily in the deck but, what was the other one if I heard that right?

There is one—there is one new five-rated loan.

Got it. So I just misunderstood. Thanks for taking the questions today.

It is the Georgia multifamily, correct. Thank you, Chris.

Our next question is from Gabe Hoggi with Raymond James. Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question.

I may have missed this before, but can you tell us what the two sectors were and any details around the repayments you received year-to-date thus far this year in 2026?

Well, hey, Steve. Maybe I can just lead in on that for a moment and I would say it was retail, multifamily, and importantly want to relate that to an earlier question. These were vintage loans from the COVID period and the higher interest rate period, and they paid off at par.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to hand the floor back over to Jack Taylor for any closing comments.

Yes. I just wanted to elaborate on something that was said earlier, which is, the portfolio will shrink as we said, but I think we have many tools to regrow the portfolio. Through our loan repayments and resolutions, releasing capital—our REO, which will extract capital. We will be repaying our higher-cost debt and then rebuilding with an originations team that has been intact from when we were originating at $1,500,000,000 to $2,000,000,000. We have a lot of tools to re-leverage our balance sheet internally through the assets as they move from lower-level assets, the vintage loans that are being carried at lower leverage, to the new loans that we add, and we will also move into CLOs and the like to source capital as we have done in the past successfully to bring our lower leverage of 1.7 closer back to our target leverage. And to start repairing our earnings. Thank you for your time. I just want to thank everybody for joining us for the call. I hope to speak to you next time with further positive resolutions.

This concludes today’s conference call. We thank you again for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.