Good morning. This is Austin Neri, a member of the Investor Relations team for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. And, I would like to welcome everyone to the Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that all participants will be in listen-only mode until the end of the call, when we will open up the line for questions. Before we begin today’s call, I would like to remind our listeners that today’s remarks may include forward-looking statements. These statements represent the company’s belief regarding future events that, by their nature, are uncertain and outside of the company’s control. The company’s actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from what is indicated in those forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time-to-time in the company’s SEC filings. This audio cast is copyrighted material of Goldman Sachs BDC Inc. and may not be duplicated, reproduced or rebroadcast without our consent. Yesterday, after the market closed, the company issued an earnings press release and posted a supplemental earnings presentation, both of which can be found on the homepage of our website at www.goldmansachsbdc.com, under the Investor Resources section, and which include reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. These documents should be reviewed in conjunction with the company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed yesterday with the SEC. This conference call is being recorded today, Friday, November 8, 2024, for replay purposes. I’ll now turn the call over to Alex Chi, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs BDC Inc.

Thank you, Austin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our third quarter 2024 earnings conference call. I’m here today with David Miller, our Co-Chief Executive Officer; Tucker Greene, our Chief Operating Officer; and Stanley Matuszewski, our Chief Financial Officer. I’ll begin the call by providing a brief overview of our third quarter results and then discuss the current market environment in more detail. I’ll then turn the call over to David and Tucker to describe our portfolio activity and performance before handing it off to Stan, to take us through our financial results. And then finally, we’ll open the line for Q&A. With that, let’s get to our third quarter results. Our net investment income per share for the quarter was $0.58 and net asset value per share was $13.54, a decrease of approximately 1% relative to the second quarter NAV. This was largely due to net realized and unrealized losses in the quarter. As we announced after market close yesterday, our Board declared a fourth quarter dividend of $0.45 per share payable to shareholders of record as of December 31, 2024. This marks the company’s 39th consecutive quarter of a $0.45 per share dividend, totaling $17.55 per share since our IPO, excluding the special dividends we paid in 2021 following the merger with MMLC. Now, with respect to broader market conditions, M&A continued to recover in the third quarter with growth of 17.5% year-over-year in sponsor M&A volumes. We noted earlier in the year that we anticipated a rebound in sponsor M&A driven by the $1.4 trillion of private equity dry powder and the DPI pressure that private equity firms were facing to return capital to LP investors. We saw these factors drive higher activity in the second and third quarters. Although we expect the fourth quarter to be somewhat muted as market participants took a pause given the election, we anticipate that this dynamic will continue to enhance M&A volumes in 2025. GSBD has certainly benefited from this overall trend, which was further enhanced by our platform capabilities. Our third quarter gross originations more than doubled year-over-year and is the second largest deployment quarter since the integration of GSBD into the broader Goldman Sachs private credit platform, with the highest being this past second quarter of 2024. We continue to originate new investments with sound credit fundamentals and low LTVs. Finally, our sales and repayments activity increased 45% from the prior quarter, totaling $329 million. We’re focused on harvesting older vintage investments and recycling into new originations. To that end, 72% of our repayments were from 2021 and older vintages. Our recycling efforts are enhanced by our proactive portfolio management and the breadth of our private credit platform to consistently originate new and attractive investment opportunities. With that, let me turn it over to my Co-CEO, David Miller.

Thanks, Alex. During the quarter, we originated approximately $376.6 million in 34 new investment commitments comprised of 15 new and 19 existing portfolio companies. As Alex mentioned, this was indeed the second highest level of quarterly originations for GSBD since the integration of our platform in early 2022. 98.1% of our originations were in first lien loans, which continues to reflect our bias at primarily maintaining exposure to investments that are higher up in the capital structure. Sales and repayment activity totaled $329.1 million, primarily driven by the repayment and refinancing of our investments in 10 portfolio companies. During the quarter, we also selectively sold names in the portfolio, with the majority at or above their mark when we received an attractive bid and sought to rotate out of legacy names, all with a focus on recycling the book into new originations. As the portfolio continues to turn over, we will lean into our position within the Goldman Sachs ecosystem for what we believe should be a rebound in M&A activity volumes into 2025. Turning to portfolio composition, as of September 30, 2024, total investments in our portfolio were $3.44 billion at fair value, comprised of 97.6% in senior secured loans, including 91.6% first lien, 4.7% in first lien last out unit tranche, 1.3% in second lien debt, a negligible amount of unsecured debt, and 1.9% in a combination of preferred and common stock. With that, let me turn it over to our Chief Operating Officer, Tucker Greene, to discuss new investments this quarter and our overall credit quality.

Thanks, David. As of September 30, 2024, the company held investments in 167 portfolio companies operating across 41 different industries. The weighted average yield of our investment portfolio at amortized cost at the end of the third quarter was 10.9% compared to 11% from the prior quarter. The weighted average yield of our total debt and income producing investments at amortized cost at the end of the third quarter was 11.8% compared to 12.3% at the end of Q2. The weighted average net debt to EBITDA of the companies in our investment portfolio increased slightly to 6.3 times during the third quarter, compared to 6.1 times during the second quarter. Importantly, our portfolio companies have both topline growth and EBITDA growth quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year on a weighted average basis. At the same time, the current weighted average interest coverage of the companies in our investment portfolio at quarter end increased to 1.7x in the third quarter compared to 1.5x during the second quarter. Finally, turning to asset quality. During the quarter, there were changes to accrual status for two portfolio companies. Pluralsight was restructured, and one first lien position remained on non-accrual status, while another first lien position was restored to accrual status. Additionally, we exited Zodiac Intermediate, also known as Zipari, which had previously been on non-accrual status through a sale of the company. As of September 30, 2024, investments on non-accrual status decreased to 2.2% of the total investment portfolio at fair value from 3.4% as of June 30, 2024, and to 4.5% of the total investment portfolio at amortized cost from 7.6% as of June 30, 2024. I’ll now turn the call over to Stan Matuszewski to walk through our financial results.

Thank you, Tucker. We ended the third quarter of 2024 with total portfolio investments at fair value of $3.4 billion, outstanding debt of $1.9 billion, and net assets of $1.6 billion. Our ending net debt to equity ratio as of the end of the third quarter was 1.16 times, which continues to be below our target leverage of 1.25 times. At quarter end, approximately 66.7% of the company’s total principal amount of debt outstanding was in unsecured debt, and we had $1.1 billion of capacity available under our secured revolving credit facility. Before continuing to the income statement, as a reminder, in addition to GAAP financial measures, we will also reference certain non-GAAP or adjusted measures. This is intended to make our financial results easier to compare to results prior to our October 2020 merger with Goldman Sachs Middle Market Lending Corp. These non-GAAP measures remove the purchase discount amortization impact from our financial results. For the third quarter, GAAP and adjusted after tax net investment income were $68.2 million and $67.2 million respectively, compared to $67 million and $65.2 million respectively, in the prior quarter. On a per share basis, GAAP net investment income was $0.58. Excluding the impact of asset acquisition accounting in connection with the merger with MMLC, adjusted net investment income for the quarter was $0.57 per share, equating to an annualized net investment income yield on book value of 16.8%. Total investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2024, and June 30, 2024, was $110.4 million and $108.6 million respectively. The increase in total investment income was primarily due to the incremental deployment during Q2 and Q3. We also note that we saw PIK as a percent of total recurring investment income decrease to 9% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024, from 11% in the second quarter of 2024. Distributions during the quarter remained consistent at $0.45 per share. Our spillover taxable income is approximately $158.8 million or $1.36 on a per share basis. With that, I’ll turn it back to Alex for closing remarks.

Thanks, Stan, and thanks, everyone, for joining our earnings call. We’re excited about our pipeline prospects and remain focused on turning over the portfolio into new attractive opportunities using the full breadth of the Goldman Sachs platform. With that, let’s open the line for Q&A.

Thank you. We will take our first question from Mark Hughes with Truist.

Yes. Thank you. Good morning.

Good morning.

Alex, you had spoken about your recycling effort. How much more opportunity do you have there to recycle and improve the portfolio?

Yes. So, we had a very strong quarter of sales and repayments. As you’ve heard, it’s the largest quarter we’ve had in over a year. So, we were able to have full exits in at least four portfolio companies, all of which were originated in 2021 or earlier. So, we feel good about the pace of repayments and recycling. And, just given also the very strong quarter of originations we had, and just the outlook we also have for just M&A that’s coming, we feel good about the shift in the portfolio. We also added a net 12 new names as you saw, which further diversified the portfolio.

Understood. How about the re-pricing activity? How much have you seen in the portfolio? How much more can we expect perhaps?

Well, we saw a pretty decent wave, just across the industry as we saw spreads compress. But in the quarter, we saw spreads stabilize. And so, just the level of re-pricing activity also came down versus the flurry that we saw earlier in the year. There may still be some room to go. But having said that, we would expect the pace of re-pricing to slow down.

Yes. And then, anything, your view, the vibe immediately following the election last couple of days, as it pertains to potential deal activity? Do you feel like there’s more energy in the air, less? Just sort of curious here, subjective impressions?

Look. The market obviously has been pretty exciting post-election. We’ve all been circling it up and talking to our bankers within Goldman Sachs and just other participants in the industry. And again, people feel quite energetic and optimistic about the level of M&A, particularly from the sponsor community, that’s going to come in 2025. So, I think just broadly speaking, there just continues to be optimism.

Thank you.

Thank you.

We will take our next question from Derek Hewett with Bank of America Securities.

Good morning. I have a question on credit, specifically on looking at Slide 7. And, it shows that Risk Rated 3 and 4 totals increased, despite kind of what we saw with the meaningful reduction in non-accruals. So, could you provide some additional color on kind of where you were seeing that negative credit migration? And then, were there any specific sectors where you saw that decline?

I mean, really, if you look at the aggregate of our Risk Rating 3 and 4 buckets, it ticked up around 1% period-over-period, and it’s really due to one name that had some underperformance that continued throughout the quarter that we thought prudent to reassign to a Risk Rating 3.

Okay.

It’s occasional.

Okay. And, could you provide the sector that it was in?

It was in the business services sector.

Okay. Thank you.

Yes. So, it was not related to ARR or healthcare.

Okay, understood. Thank you.

Thank you.

We will take our next question from Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

Hi, guys. First on the pipeline. I mean, you point to being optimistic about that in 2025 now and Q4 being muted. Should we expect the '25 to be unusual? I mean, is it going to be a relatively strong Q1, i.e. an early '25? Because it feels that maybe we’re waiting for the election and it’s going to happen early in '25. Instead, or is it going to be normal, like, but still the first half is going to be soft and yes, seasonally soft?

It’s a really good question, Robert. Thanks for the question, and thanks for joining again. And so, look, we’re absolutely optimistic about overall M&A volumes in 2025. Having said that, private credit, as you know, deployment is highly correlated to sponsor M&A activity. If you look at the cycle of how these processes play out, we would expect that there are going to be any opportunities that pop up in the first quarter. But having said that, it takes a little bit of time for these companies to actually transact, get to a deal, and then to fund. So, if we had to guess, we would expect our team to be very busy assessing new opportunities in the first quarter. But in terms of actual deployment, it’s likely going to be the second quarter or later when you start to see a real tick up in activity.

Got it. Thank you. And then on the recycling, you’re recycling the '21s and older. So, the question is really about adverse selection, right? Should I now, when I look at your portfolio by vintage, be more concerned about the remaining older assets because those haven’t been it’s harder to get rid of a more tricky asset than it is a good asset. So, is there or how are you dealing with the adverse selection risk in the recycling and concentration of risk in the older vintages on some of those assets, if that’s going to occur?

Yes. No, I mean, look. In the last couple of quarters, we saw a very healthy activity of that. I think we’ll continue to see that play out over the next 12 months from now. I’m not too concerned with the adverse selection issue as we continue to address it. Look. I mean, as you know, some of these private equity firms have paid pretty high multiples of these way back when. We’re continuing to see nice topline as well as EBITDA growth in the portfolio. They’ll kind of earn their way into those valuations, and then you should see some M&A activity. Either those companies will sell or get refinanced as they earn into some of those higher valuations.

Got it. Thank you.

Thank you, Robert.

We do not have any further questions. I would like to turn the call back to Alex Chi for closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for joining our call. And, we look forward to speaking with you at the end of next quarter.

Goodbye. This concludes today’s call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.