Greetings, and welcome to Leggett & Platt's First Quarter 2021 Earnings Call and Webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ms. Susan McCoy, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, Ms. McCoy. You may begin.

Thanks, Donna. Good morning and thank you for taking part in Leggett & Platt's first quarter conference call. We are conducting the call from different locations again this quarter. Please bear with us if you experience minor delays or mixed audio quality. On the call today are Karl Glassman, Chairman and CEO; Mitch Dolloff, President and COO; Jeff Tate, Executive Vice President and CFO; Steve Henderson, EVP and President of the Specialized Products and Furniture, Flooring and Textile Products segments; Cassie Branscum, Senior Director of IR; and Tarah Sherwood, Director of IR. The agenda for our call this morning is as follows. Karl will start with a summary of the main points we made in yesterday's press release and comment on some recent activities. Mitch will discuss operating results and demand trends, and Jeff will cover financial details and address our updated outlook for 2021. This call is being recorded for Leggett & Platt and is copyrighted material. This call may not be transcribed, recorded or broadcast without our express permission. A replay is available from the IR portion of Leggett's website. We posted to the Investor Relations portion of the website yesterday's press release and a set of PowerPoint slides that contain summary financial information, along with segment details. Those documents supplement the information we discuss on this call, including non-GAAP reconciliations. As we reported yesterday, we changed the accounting methodology used for valuing our domestic steel-related inventories from LIFO to FIFO. The effects of the change in accounting methodology have been retrospectively applied to all prior periods presented in the press release and PowerPoint slides. Recast financial information for prior periods can be found in the Form 8-K we filed yesterday. I need to remind you that remarks today concerning future expectations, events, objectives, strategies, trends, or results constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results or events may differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties, and the company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements. For a summary of these risk factors and additional information, please refer to yesterday's press release and the sections in our most recent 10-K entitled, Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements. I'll now turn the call over to Karl.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today. We had a very strong start to 2021. Yesterday, we reported first quarter sales increased 10% to $1.15 billion. Organic sales grew 11% from a combination of raw material-related price increases, higher volume, and currency benefit. Volume grew 4% with continued strong demand in residential end-markets, growth in Automotive, and modest recovery in Hydraulic Cylinders, partially offset by sales declines in Aerospace. Divestitures net of acquisitions reduced sales 1%. EBIT was a first quarter record of $128 million. EBIT increased $49 million in the quarter versus the first quarter of 2020, primarily due to volume growth, lower fixed cost, and the non-recurrence of 2020's $8 million impairment charge related to a note receivable, and a $4 million charge to write off stock associated with a prior year divestiture. EBIT margin increased 360 basis points, to 11.1%, and increased 240 basis points versus adjusted first quarter 2020 EBIT margin of 8.7%. First quarter EBITDA margin was 15.1%, compared to 2020's first quarter adjusted EBITDA margin of 13.2%. Earnings per share were a first quarter record of $0.64. First quarter 2020 EPS was $0.33, including a $0.07 per share reduction from the non-reoccurring items mentioned. Excluding these charges, first quarter EPS increased $0.24 or 60% versus first quarter 2020 adjusted EPS of $0.40. These improvements occurred versus a first quarter of 2020 that was heavily impacted in the final two weeks by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to first quarter 2019, sales were down slightly, but EBIT, EBIT margin, and EPS improved significantly. We also reported yesterday that our Board of Directors increased our second quarter dividend to $0.42 per share, a $0.02 per share or 5% increase versus the first quarter of 2020. This marks our 50th year of consecutive annual dividend increases and places us amongst 31 other companies with at least 50 years of consecutive annual dividend increases known as 'Dividend Kings.' At Friday's closing price of $49.67, the current yield is 3.2%, which is one of the higher yields among the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. I also wanted to update you on some recent activities. In mid-April, we issued our Inaugural Sustainability Report. We believe that reporting on environmental, social and governance issues is critical for our stakeholders' growing need for information. And we are pleased to begin this vital initiative. We strive to advance sustainable solutions for our customers to achieve the highest standards of ethical conduct, to demonstrate strong environmental stewardship and safety performance, to enable a culture of inclusion, diversity, and equity, and employee development at all levels of the company, and to embrace our supply chain responsibilities. In late April, the U.S. mattress industry's antidumping petition on imported mattress from seven countries and countervailing duty petition on Chinese imported mattress came to a successful conclusion with the International Trade Commission making an affirmative final determination that the U.S. mattress industry has been materially injured by these imported mattresses sold at prices that violate U.S. trade laws. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mitch.

Thank you, Karl, and good morning everyone. We are pleased with our first quarter operating performance despite some difficult supply chain disruptions. Many of these disruptions, notably in chemicals, semiconductors, labor, and transportation are ongoing and may create continued volatility in both supply and cost. Demand for home-related products and autos remained strong, and we are seeing modest recovery in hydraulic cylinders, work furniture, and aerospace. Sales in our Bedding product segment were up 9% versus the first quarter of 2020. Sales benefited from raw material-related selling price increases of 9% from inflation in steel, chemicals, and non-woven fabric, and positive currency impact of 1%. Volume grew 2% from strength in ECS, European Spring and U.S. Spring. Prior year divestitures reduced sales by 3%. Overall mattress production in the industry was constrained throughout the quarter due to chemical shortages that restricted foam supply. Our supply of non-woven fabric, additional staffing, and additional machine capacity allowed us to alleviate the backlog associated with our Comfort Core innersprings. In the first quarter, we added over half of our planned 25% capacity expansion through a combination of labor and additional production equipment. We will continue to add staffing and equipment as we move through the next two quarters. Supply of the primary chemicals used in our specialty foam operations: TDI, MDI, polyol were significantly restricted by producers after severe winter storms in February. Supply improved through April, and we expect to return to January allocation levels of roughly 75% by the end of May. We anticipate chemical allocations will continue to improve but may persist throughout the remainder of the year. Sales in our Specialized Product segment increased 10% in the first quarter with 6% from currency benefit, 3% from volume growth, and 1% from acquisitions. Growth in automotive and hydraulic cylinders was partially offset by sales declines in aerospace. In our Automotive Business, volume for the quarter was up 14%. Industry production has been and continues to be impacted by semiconductor shortages. We anticipate these shortages to continue through the year. End-market demand in hydraulic cylinders began to improve in late 2020, and we expect that trend to continue throughout 2021. We expect the aerospace industry to remain challenged over the next few years, given the disruption in air travel and resulting buildup of aircraft and supply chain inventories. In our aerospace business, we've seen sequential sales improvement, driven primarily by improved demand for fabricated duct assemblies, where demand is near pre-COVID levels. Demand for welded and seamless tube products remains challenged as customers continue to deplete inventories. Sales in our Furniture, Flooring and Textile Products segment were up 12% in the first quarter, driven by 8% volume growth, raw material-related price increases of 3%, and a currency benefit of 1%. We continue to see strong demand in Home Furniture, Geo Components, and fabric converting. In Flooring Products, residential end-market demand continues to be strong while hospitality demand remains low. While recovery in Work Furniture lags the other businesses in the segment, sales continue to improve sequentially. The fixed cost actions we took last year reduced our first quarter costs by approximately $20 million. As we move through the year, we will continue to focus on controlling our costs by keeping our variable cost structure aligned with demand levels and only adding fixed costs as necessary to support higher volumes and future growth opportunities.

Thank you, Mitch, and good morning everyone. As we reported yesterday, and as Susan mentioned in her opening remarks, during the first quarter, we changed the accounting methodology for our domestic steel-related inventories, which represented roughly one third of our total inventories at the end of 2020. We transitioned from the last-in, first-out or LIFO cost method to the first-in, first-out or FIFO cost method. This change more closely resembles the physical flow of inventory, establishes a more consistent method of inventory valuation across our businesses and better aligns with how many of our diversified manufacturing peers report financial results. In addition, we believe this change will provide greater shareholder visibility into the company's year-to-year profitability. Over the past 15 years, LIFO has netted to only $9 million of expense to the company. While this average is less than $1 million annually, year-to-year changes have been significant at times. Changes in our portfolio and global growth have resulted in a smaller percentage of LIFO inventories over the last few years. We believe now it's the right time to make this change due to the combination of last year's low ending life inventory levels and historically low tax and interest rates. As a result of this accounting change, we expect to make tax payments of approximately $21 million based on current tax rates. The cash outlay will occur over the three-year period of 2021 through 2023, with approximately $11 million of that to be paid in 2021. Now, moving on to the first quarter performance, first quarter is typically our lowest cash flow quarter of the year with increased working capital driven by the normal cadence of our business. Consistent with that pattern, cash from operations was a negative $11 million in the first quarter, a decrease of $21 million versus $10 million in the same quarter of 2020. Higher earnings were more than offset by plant working capital investments to replenish inventories in certain businesses and inflation in the cost of those inventories. We ended the quarter with adjusted working capital as a percentage of annualized sales at 12%. Our balance sheet remains strong. We ended the quarter with net debt to trailing 12 months EBITDA of 2.46x and $1.4 billion of total liquidity. In addition, we brought back $24 million of offshore cash during the quarter. As announced yesterday we are increasing our 2021 sales and earnings per share guidance. 2021 sales are now expected to be $4.8 billion to $5 billion, or up 12% to 17% over 2020 resulting from mid to high single-digit volume growth, raw material-related price increases, and currency benefit. The increase versus prior guidance of $4.6 billion to $4.9 million reflects a combination of higher raw material-related price increases and modestly higher volume growth. We expect continued strong consumer demand for home-related products and global automotive. Along with improvements in supply chain constraints as we move through 2021, we also expect continued inflation in steel costs, and recovery of those higher costs through selling price increases. 2021 earnings per share are now expected to be in the range of $2.55 to $2.75, primarily reflecting higher volume and higher metal margin. This guidance also assumes fixed cost savings as a result of actions taken in 2020 to be approximately $70 million. Based upon this guidance framework, our 2021 full-year EBIT margin should be in the range of 11% to 11.5%. Earnings per share guidance assumes a full-year effective tax rate of 23%, depreciation and amortization to approximate $195 million, net interest expense of approximately $75 million, and fully diluted shares of 137 million. Additionally, we expect our full-year operating cash flow to approximate $500 million, capital expenditures to approximate $150 million, dividends of approximately $220 million, and debt repayment of at least $51 million. In closing, our primary financial focus in 2021 remains on generating cash, maintaining discipline in capital allocation, and reducing debt. With the de-leveraging progress made over the past year, we are in a strong position to capture both near and long-term growth opportunities that add capabilities or products to our existing businesses.

Thanks, Jeff. That concludes our prepared remarks. We thank you for your attention, and we'll be glad to answer your questions. Karl will direct our question-and-answer session as the group answers your questions. Donna, we're ready to begin the Q&A session.

Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. Our first question is coming from Bobby Griffin of Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everybody. Thank you for taking my questions, and hope everyone is doing well and staying safe. I guess first for me, I just want to circle up and maybe clean up a little in our model on the accounting change. Jeff or Karl, can you guys tell us what the impact was to EBIT for the quarter? If you would have still been under a LIFO, how would that impact the quarter from an EBIT perspective?

And good morning, Bobby. Jeff, why don't you go ahead and answer that one if you would, please?

Absolutely, Karl. Good morning, Bobby. Yes, Bobby, if we were still on LIFO, for the first quarter the approximate impact would have been $5 million. And on a full-year basis, for 2021, we were projecting in the range of $20 million.

Okay. Did that change affect the guidance being raised, or would it just be something that factors in later and not influence the decision to increase the numbers?

No, Bobby, it did not have any impact on our guidance. If you recall, the initial guidance that we brought out, in February, did not include any LIFO impact associated with it at that time. And so, therefore, moving forward, the numbers that we've shared today also do not have an impact.

All right, perfect. That's very helpful. And then I guess next for me, maybe Mitch or Karl, just I want to maybe connect a little bit of the U.S. spring sales up 2% versus some of the growth we've been seeing in the industry from some of the public peers. And understanding that not everybody is public and that 2% number doesn't include inflation for you guys or price increases. But maybe can you just walk us through kind of what you think the industry did and how your innerspring performed in connecting those two aspects together?

Yes, Bobby, as we said in our opening remarks, we're really pleased with the quarter. But in many respects it's a quarter of what could have been. And I mean that from the standpoint that you listen to what our public bedding and furniture customers have to say, and many of them have talked about the significant backlogs that they have, and diving down a little deeper, that many of them were not operating their plants, in many cases only half time during the first quarter because of the lack of availability of foam chemicals. So, while we don't have a backlog, per se, from the standpoint that our customers only order from us when they need it, our customers' backlogs are extreme. So said differently, our 2% unit growth in U.S. frame would have been a lot higher if our customers had commodity foam availability. And even in Home Furniture, you saw the commentary there that Home Furniture grew really well. Most of that growth was not in the United States. So, the chemical constraints are not a problem in Asia or in Europe. So you saw European frame grow dramatically. So, since the quarter ended, we've seen a significant uplift in our U.S. frame shipments as foams become more available. And I know that I probably just stole most of Mitch's thunder. But Mitch, do you have anything you want to add to that?

It's challenging to follow that, Karl, but I'll try my best, and good morning, Bobby. Karl is absolutely correct. The weather impacts we experienced in February affected our customers significantly, leading to a notable decline in demand. However, we used that time to rebuild our inventories, as we had been struggling to keep up before. This turned out to be somewhat positive. As we moved into April, we began to see a slight recovery in demand, which has continued in recent weeks. Our customers are reporting growing backlogs and anticipate a production rebound in May and June as their foam situation improves. Additionally, we performed better in the Comfort Core segment, while the open-coil segment was slightly lower. Both have shown recovery in the past few weeks. Karl is right that it was a challenging quarter, but the consumer outlook is strong, and I believe our outlook is also very strong.

Thank you. Before I rejoin the queue, I want to ask Karl and Mitch about the stronger flow-through of the business this quarter compared to other inflationary periods. Could you discuss some of the driving factors behind that? Is it due to cost reductions or better pricing realization in the businesses? I noticed that the contribution margin was at 35% this quarter, which is unusual during inflationary times like these.

Yes, Bobby, I think that you really hit it, that it's a testimony to the good work that our teams have done in terms of cost savings, and then with the recovery of demand, the disciplines around maintaining those cost input. So, our teams have done a wonderful job. The other side of that is that we're more efficient probably in passing through commodity inflation now than we have in the past. ECS passes through pretty quickly. And even on the U.S. framed side of it, only 60% of our business is protected by long-term supply agreements that have the 90-day lag. On the non-contract customers we pass through pretty quickly. So, in this time of hyperinflation, price recovery discipline or price pass-through efficiency has really been pretty high. So, it's a combination of all of those things. And lastly, to Mitch's point, that we’re picking up some overhead recovery in our U.S. frame business as we're putting ourselves in a position where we are in a strong inventory position. So, all the stars aligned. We're really kind of dressed up and ready to go, and really feel good about the future because of the strength of our customers' backlogs.

Thank you. Well, congrats on the strong quarter from a top line and operating perspective. And best of luck here for the remainder of the year.

Yes, thank you, Bobby.

Thank you, Bobby.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Susan Maklari of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. And let me add my congratulations to a great quarter.

Thank you, Susan.

My first question is, building on Bobby's question, can you talk to us a little bit about inflation? How that came together in the quarter? I know that in the guide, you kind of highlight better metal margins in there, can you just give us some sense of what's going on there and how to think about the timing, maybe as we move through the year, and then especially relating that back to the pricing power that you have seen to-date and how we should be thinking about price cost for this year?

Mitch, you want to try to unravel that?

Yes, feel free to jump into that, Karl. Yes, so for sure, we've seen scrapped inflation, rod inflation, I think an increase in the spread, I think the Q1 average spread was about 550 versus 450 last year and 515 versus prior-year. So I think that steel market demand is strong, we expect to see that inflation hold for a while. And as we just talked about, we've done a good job of passing that through. And of course, a large portion of our U.S. spring business is contractual, and we pass that through as well. On the chemical side, I think chemicals are up about 60%, from Q1 of '20. As Karl mentioned, we're able to pass that through more quickly and have been able to do so, the chemical supply remains constrained, I think we might see cost drop a little bit as supply improves, but I think they'll still be elevated over the prior year. So, I think that we are in an inflationary environment, probably some ups and downs along the way, but probably, anticipate that, it'll remain elevated here through most of the rest of the year.

Okay, but it sounds like from your commentary that you are capturing that price. And so as we think about moving through the quarters, it seems like you're fairly caught up and therefore price costs should be relatively speaking in line. Is that the way to think about it?

Susan, I think that's right. I think there's always a little bit of pass through as we move through rod wire and spring, but I think we are relatively current.

Okay, okay. Sorry, go ahead.

I was just going to add, we talked about the U.S. spring side, and EPS. But I think that also has history with steel inflation through home furniture and other places after following our restructuring and exiting some business, we're in a much better position to pass that along as well.

Yes, I mean your purchasing power this quarter certainly speaks to your ability to realize that for sure. So it's very well done. My next question is around thinking about the cadence of the margins. You had especially strong margins, in bedding and specializing really across all three segments, but those two, especially as we think about the normal seasonality in the business, moving to second and third quarters, and then even into fourth, can you talk to how you expect those margins to trend? And I guess, especially considering that there's some pretty, relatively speaking, more difficult comps that you have in the back half of the year for some of these, what's your ability to kind of comp against those?

Susan, I'll take a shot at that to begin with and then Karl and Jeff and Mitch, correct me where you need to. But Susan, if you think about what we've said relative to volume, we expect that supply chains, the supply chain constraints to improve as we move through second and third quarters. Keep in mind that our fourth quarter is typically our lowest sales quarter. And if you look at the, I think the pattern of sales versus 2019, I think you'll see some similarities as we move through the year. And so thinking about margin progression, you need to bear in mind, I think that cadence of sales and assume it's somewhat normal earnings leverage on those volume changes. And I'd say all together our first half sales because of some of the, albeit less intense but still ongoing pricing lag issues too because of that first half margins would be expected to be somewhat lower than we would anticipate in the second half.

Okay, that's helpful. Thank you. Good luck with everything guys.

Thanks, Susan.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Keith Hughes of Truist Securities. Please go ahead.

Thank you. My question is on automotive, had a strong volume in the quarter. I guess moving forward, are the numbers from auto just going to be all over the place, given some of the supply shortages and production things we hear about? Or are you going to say something more consistent, given your position in the industry?

Keith, good morning, I certainly want to give a shot at to our global automotive team, that they've done an outstanding job dealing with many of the issues that you spoke of and the uncertainty and the supply chain challenges, but Steve if you would want to wade into the answer.

Sure. Thanks, Karl. Good morning, Keith. Yes, I just like to echo your comments to the team, the auto team, Karl, they've done could have been at this for 15 months with more volatility than I've ever seen in my career, and they're doing a great job of managing through it, so thanks to them. In terms of the end-markets, we see the demand signals continuing to improve, there's a lot of economic indicators that are favorable. So positive GDP, unemployment is improving, low interest rates are continuing. There's government stimulus in the U.S. or auto specific incentives in Europe and new home construction remains strong in North America that drives truck sales. So we're also seeing historically low inventory levels, particularly in North America. And as lockdowns, our ease in travel picks up, we think the fleet segment will start to recover. So with China being up 75% in March, obviously against some easy comp, but 12 straight months again, that's positive. In March, the star in North America was $17 million, so that's the highest in three years. So momentum is good. And then on the other side, the semiconductor shortages definitely has impacted us in Q1 and well for the rest of this year. In terms of supplies, our team has done a great job of keeping us hold. So we have navigated through that, to this point that we think we're okay, going forward, but we know there's some challenges that could come there. But in terms of demand degradation, the industry thought the first quarter was the worst of it. And then there was a fire in mid-March at the massive chip factory in Japan. That tightened everything up even more, and added some of the Japanese OEMs to the list. They're back online in that facility and working to get back to full capacity. But that facility was really a part of the strategy to meet the MCU demand in the third quarter. So that's going to push it out of it. So at this point, we're expecting the second quarter to be at least as impacted as the first quarter with a little bit over 1.1 million units, we could begin to see improvement in the second half of the year, and get more towards supply, demand balance in terms of the chips. And then really, the industry recovery can happen after that. So all of that said, it's still very challenging to get a clear picture, and many of the things can impact the outlook. There's still resins, foam and the recent weather conditions that are also impacting it. So it's I guess the Ford CEO the other day, called the situation opaque and I think we would agree with his commentary in that regard.

Okay. Just shifting over to bedding, you talked a lot about the margins there. And the metal margin specifically, can you characterize, is the rod spreads there, is that what drove a larger portion of the margin gain? Or is it more than just the quick pass through of these prices on to your finished goods obviously, your bedding customers.

Keith, it's a combination of the two industry, macro industry, metal margins being wide is certainly a good thing for us, as we said, we expect that to continue because of really strong global sealed demand and a lack of scrap availability, so the steel manufacturers these certainly have some and their industry have some pricing power. So we're pretty bullish going forward. And as we said, pass through has been pretty quick with the guardrails of our contracts, so it's a combination of the two.

Okay. And I think you've said this earlier on your contracted customers at U.S. Spring, what is the pass through lag for those customers on inflation?

60 to 90 days.

60 to 90 days, okay. All right, thank you very much.

Thank you, Keith.

Thank you. Our next question is from Peter Keith of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Thank you, good morning everyone. And nice job in that sustainability report, looks like a lot of hard effort went into that. I did also just want to follow-up on betting. And I guess what, what sort of struck, Bobby and me by surprise here was the modeling off of 2019 on the adjusted numbers. So, bedding is still down on a two-year basis. But at the same time, the margin expansion has been the strongest within bedding relative to the other two segments. So, could you just kind of help unpack that a little bit for us and understand what's driving margin in a period when the sales have been down for I guess the last two years?

It's down because of this industry, from supply constraints that we spoke of earlier, not a Leggett endemic issue at all. The reason that the margins are up is simply a better mix of product, as we've been telling you and the rest of the investment community that have an expectation that we'll index to higher quality, higher content product going forward. So, Comfort Core being 62% of total, U.S. sales, Comfort Core with Quantum Edge being greater than 50% of Total Comfort Core. It's a content story, as Mitch said, Comfort Core greater than units opened, coil being down, the continued strength in bed in the box certainly helps our Comfort Core going forward is hybrid applications expand. So it's really a good story in bedding; happy to hear that our customers have more availability of foam supply.

Karl, and I would add similar on the ECS side, right with higher value products selling there as well.

Okay, that's a great answer. And I guess, to your point earlier, it's nice to make this accounting change to get a better picture of the underlying margin trends. So that's great to see. Maybe sticking on bedding, there is some questions that I'm getting out there. Is it possible for you to quantify what you think the drag was in the quarter or what the backlog might be to you that could show up in Q2?

Mitch, why don't you go ahead?

That is a tough one. As we've all said, we think that the end consumer demand hasn't declined, right? It's still out there. We don't see that backlog directly. And we haven't gotten very quantifiable insight into it. We do expect that we'll see our customer's production increase in May and June. And we're prepared to support that. And hopefully, we all get back in line and start reducing those backlogs. But I think there will be hopefully a fairly meaningful increase a bit of a surge here as if chemicals support it.

And the only point that we can direct you to is, Sleep Number and Tempur Sealy have both recently reported they both talked about record backlogs for Sealy and the Sealy level and Sleep Number as well. So there's such a high correlation. So we were confident that those backlogs are significant, but they're our customer's backlog. So it's tough for us to quantify.

Okay, fair enough. One last question I had and maybe would be for Jeff, is just on the leverage ratio. So it's coming down, at least in our model looks like you guys might be at two times by the end of the year. I guess it doesn't seem like a reasonable target. And therefore we could potentially start thinking about buyback resuming in 2022?

Good morning, Peter. Thank you for your question. We're making significant progress in our de-leveraging efforts, which you've likely observed over the past year and a half. Your projections for where we could end up by year-end seem quite realistic at this point. Regarding buybacks, we will adhere to the priorities we've established for our cash usage. In the near term, this will focus on funding our organic growth and maintaining our dividend commitment, while also continuing our de-leveraging efforts. We are actively seeking small M&A opportunities that align well with our portfolio. Should we find additional cash after fulfilling these priorities, it may be allocated for buybacks. However, at this moment, we are not in a position to identify buyback opportunities as we have other critical priorities to focus on.

Okay, that's very helpful. Thanks so much everyone and good luck.

Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this brings us to the end of our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back to over to Ms. McCoy for closing comments.

Well, we don't have anything else to add. But we appreciate your time today. And we look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your interest in Leggett & Platt. You may disconnect your lines at this time or log off the webcast, and have a wonderful day.