Operator
ladies and gentlemen thank you for joining us and welcome to micron technologies fiscal third quarter 2026 financial conference call after today's prepared remarks we will host a question and answer session webcast viewers please note that you will be able to advance the slides as you view at your own pace i will now hand the conference over to satya kamar Corporate Vice President of Investor Relations and Treasury. Satya, please go ahead.
Thank you, and welcome to Micron Technologies' Fiscal Third Quarter 2026 Financial Conference Call. On the call with me today are Sanjay Mehrotra, our Chairman, President, and CEO, and Mark Murphy, our CFO. Today's call is being webcast from our Investor Relations site at investors.micron.com, including audio and slides. In addition, the press release detailing our quarterly results has been posted on the website along with the prepared remarks for this call. Today's discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our future financial and operating performance and our business model, as well as trends and expectations in our business, customers, market, industry, products, and regulatory and other matters. These statements are based on our current assumptions and we assume no obligation to update these statements. Please refer to our most recent financial reports on Form 10-K, Forms 10-Q, and other filings with the SEC for more information on the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ, particularly from expectations. Today's discussion of financial results is presented on a non-GAAP financial basis, measures unless otherwise specified. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures can be found on our website. I'll now turn the call over to Sanjay.
Sanjay Gupta- Thank you, Satya. MyFront delivered an exceptional fiscal Q3 with significant records in revenue, gross margin, and EPS, all exceeding the high end of our guidance. Demonstrating MyFront's position as a leader, enabling the AI era, our data center revenue exceeded $25 billion in fiscal Q3 on an annualized run rate of over $100 billion. Our data center SRG revenue exceeded $5 billion, more than doubling sequentially. DRAM and NAND industry demand continues to significantly exceed industry supply. We expect tight conditions to persist beyond calendar 2027 as a result of AI-driven demand across all segments, coupled with structural supply constraints. We are excited to announce that we have now signed 16 Strategic Customer Agreements, or SCAs, which we expect will fundamentally transform our business model. The memory industry has been structurally transformed by the proliferation of AI. We are only in the early innings of the significant innovation and productivity that can be unleashed in every part of the global economy over time. Data center-driven growth will be increasingly complemented by AI-enabled features in smartphones, high-end PCs, and new consumer devices, as well as in automotive, industrial applications, and robotics. Exciting possibilities enabled by robotics and humanoids, as well as fully autonomous vehicles, portend a robust long-term demand environment for memory and storage. With respect to supply, our customers are recognizing that supply shortages in memory and storage will take considerable time to improve. Even as we expect industry supply to improve gradually in 2028, we currently do not have line of sight as to when memory supply will be able to catch up with increasing demand. Memory industry supply growth is dependent on significant greenfield fab expansions. These greenfield projects are large, complex, and time-consuming. Further, the pace is constrained by several factors, including long lead time for fab construction across the world, shortage of workers with critical trade skills, complex regulations including permitting and the need for enhanced energy infrastructure meanwhile memory process technology which is among the most advanced to develop and manufacture in semiconductors is getting more complex with every new node technology transitions are driving slower bit growth over time wafer growth needs are significantly increasing clean room space and greenfield fab requirements, and HBM's growth and increasing trade ratio with every new generation further pressures non-HBM supply. In NAND, industry suppliers redirecting clean room space from NAND to DRAM, and overall limited clean room space constrained NAND bid supply growth. These factors taken together mean supply is structurally constrained in its growth and ability to meet industry demand, despite our comprehensive efforts to increase supply. AI systems are powered by GPU, ASIC, and CPU designs from an increasingly broad set of suppliers. However, they all share one important characteristic. AI system performance is architecturally dependent on memory subsystem performance and capacity. This has given rise to more complex memory hierarchy that is providing greater differentiation opportunities for micron than at any time in our history. It has also elevated the role of memory in the AI world to a strategic asset. Strong long-term demand growth, structurally constrained supply growth and memory's strategic importance have caused customers to recognize that their product roadmaps rely on access to advanced memory technology and dependable and committed long-term memory supply. Micron has been a pioneer in our industry in creating a new class of strategic customer agreements or SCAs with very robust terms. We are pleased to announce that we have completed 16 SCAs with customers across the data center, consumer, and auto market segments. These SCAs accelerate the transformation of our business model, enhance partnership in technology and innovation, and provide customers with contracted supply assurance. Typically, these agreements have a five-year term from calendar 2026 through the end of calendar 2030. Automotive agreements generally have a three-year term. The 16 signed agreements represent roughly 20 percent of our DRAM volume and a third of our NAND volume over this period. These SCAs include four very large customers and three medium-sized customers. The remaining agreements relate to smaller customers from the automotive industry and represent our commitment to the important sector. When completed, we expect approximately half or more of our company revenue to be under these SCAs with customers across end markets. Our customer value are U.S. supply plans, and this is reflected in our SCAs. These SCAs are structured as take-or-pay agreements with binding commitments to purchase specific volumes over this multi-year term the largest agreements generally have a ceiling price for existing products at the current cq2 market price and a floor price through the term of this agreement several fcas which account for a modest portion of the SCA related revenue include either fixed prices or have no price bans associated with them where pricing will be subject to market conditions. When all planned SCAs are executed agreements with either fixed prices or price ceilings at or close to current CQ2 market prices are expected to be approximately 40 percent of our revenue. For SCAs which do contain such price bands, pricing is designed to stay within this floor to ceiling level through the course of the term. This pricing visibility will help our SCA customers across market segments to better manage their business and grow their demands. For our SCAs with price bands, the floor price enables a very robust gross margin for Micron, well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle. 14 of the 16 SCAs that we have signed have a cumulative revenue at minimum price per our contract of approximately $100 billion over the remaining agreement term. They also strengthen our long-term financial performance, margins, and free cash flow expectations with higher visibility and improved stability in our business performance. Under the SCAs we have signed so far, we project to receive cash deposits and related financial commitments of $22 billion. dollars. This further demonstrates customer commitment to this new business model. Mark will provide additional details. Our SEAs with customers across data center to consumer devices to auto and industrial applications create a new paradigm for us to strengthen our customer relationships. They provide committed DRAM including HPM as appropriate and NAND supply to our customers over a multi-year time horizon. In a period of significant shortage, this supply visibility is extremely beneficial to our customers. The visibility enables our customers to leverage SCA supply to make progress on their strategic plans, drive growth, and enable their end consumers to benefit from their products and services. We are very appreciative of our customers who have worked with us through this period of tight supply with a strong collaborative spirit to create win-win outcomes for the long term for the entire ecosystem and end consumers. AI's insatiable appetite for memory bandwidth and capacity with low latency and low power is driving memory architectural choices, memory product mix shifts, and manufacturing process technology decisions all of which increase the complexity of memory and storage roadmap for the industry micron is building on its technology leadership our one gamma dram node and g9 nant node are both ramping well and on track to become the highest volume nodes in micron's history development of our next generation dram and nant nodes are also progressing well and are on track to begin volume production in the second half of calendar 2027. We are leveraging our leadership DRAM and NAND nodes across our product portfolio. HBM4 12 High Volume Ramp is tracking twice as fast as HBM3E 12 High, and we have already shipped over $1 billion in HBM4 revenue. We expect to reach mature yields on HBM-4-12 High significantly faster than HBM-3E-12 High. Please see our earnings press release for other highlights across our HBM, high-capacity DDR and LP server DRAM, data center SSD, PC, smartphone, and automotive product portfolios. We expect future memory demands will continue to skew towards higher performance and higher value products whose complexity carries higher cost per bit. Transitions like LP5 to LP6, DDR5 to DDR6, and newer generations of HVM all come with rising bit costs. This trend, along with the ramp of significant greenfield capacity in the years ahead, is It's projected to cause the blended DRAM cost per bit to rise from current levels. Our customer SEAs provide for appropriate price premiums for such new products to be negotiated in the future. Turning to our end markets, AI is driving unprecedented growth in data centers with industry data center DRAM and NAND bid shipments in calendar 2026 expected to more than double from two years ago. Agentic AI is a structurally reshaping data center infrastructure, extending beyond accelerator-only racks to include CPU racks for the agent control plane and program execution, and storage racks for rapidly expanding context store. We now expect calendar 2026 industry server units to grow high teens percent above our prior expectations of low double digits, driven by mid-teens growth in traditional servers and even stronger growth in servers with AI accelerators. We estimate that this increase in our server unit growth expectation is enabled by a modest reduction in average server DRAM content growth as customers focus on maximizing unit shipments amid a very tight allocation of memory. In NAND, AI context memory storage and HDD displacement opportunities are expanding the addressable market for SSDs. PC and smartphone industry revenue is expected to grow despite unit volume declines, reflecting resilient demand for high-end and devices at higher prices across end device categories. Agentec AI platforms, such as OpenClaw and NemoClaw, elevate the value of edge devices, enabling improved tokenomics, greater privacy and latency, and more efficient orchestration of AI between the cloud and edge. Over time, we expect the value of on-device AI, combined with pent-up unit replacement demands to drive memory demand growth in PCs and smartphones. In automotive, ADAS remains a powerful driver of content growth. L2 Plus and above vehicles, which feature progressively increasing levels of autonomy, have over five times the memory and storage content of an average vehicle. The mix of L2 Plus and above vehicles is more than doubling this year to over 20%, and is expected to exceed 40% by 2030. Average auto memory and storage content is expected to further increase as mix shifts towards higher levels of autonomy with progressively higher levels of content. In robotics, continued advances in simulation, foundation models, and integrated hardware and software stats are accelerating physical AI. This creates a growing, content-rich opportunity for high-bandwidth, low-powered memory and storage that powers real-time perception, inference, and control. Humanoid robots carry 10 times the amount of memory as an average L2-plus vehicle, and we expect a sustained, substantial, multi-decade memory demand cycle to begin in the latter part of this decade. Now turning to our market outlook. We now expect supply demand conditions for both DRAM and NAND to remain tight beyond calendar 2027. In DRAM, we expect industry DRAM bid shipments in calendar 2026 to grow in the low to mid-20s percentage range, slightly above our prior outlook. In NAND, we expect industry NAND bid shipments in calendar 2026 to grow approximately 20% unchanged from prior expectations. We expect Micron DRAM supply to grow approximately in line with the industry supply growth, while Micron NAND supply grows somewhat less than the industry supply growth in calendar 2026. Our SEAs provide enhanced visibility on our long-term demand and provide us greater confidence on our capex and R&D investments. We are focused on maximizing output from our fabs, including collaboration with our suppliers to accelerate tool acquisition, fab tool installation and ramps, and tool replacements and upgrades to improve productivity. Recently, we concluded a multi-year EUV supply agreement with ASML, supporting our increased adoption of EUV at the one delta node and future generations. We are also making good progress on expanding our global manufacturing footprint to increase supply over time. This includes our significant investments in U.S. leading-edge DLAM manufacturing with our ID.1 and ID.2 FABs in Idaho, whose construction is well underway, as well as the first of our New York FAB cluster, where we broke ground in January this year. ID.1 is on track for first wafer output in mid-calendar 2027 and ID.2 in late-calendar 2028. We recently launched first production starts of our OneAlpha DDR4 technology in our Manassas, Virginia fab, which will add to our capability to support the legacy product needs of our customers in auto, industrial, medical, aerospace and defense markets. In our newly acquired Tongluo site in Taiwan, we expect to support meaningful product shipments from the existing 300,000 square feet fab in mid-calendar 2027, about a quarter earlier than our prior expectations. Adding to the existing fab, we have begun construction of a similar size second clean room at this site. This clean room will support EUV equipment. Our construction activities and timelines are on track for our other facilities in Japan and Singapore. Complementing our advanced packaging capabilities in Taiwan, our Singapore site will become another center of excellence for advanced packaging. We expect this facility will contribute meaningfully to Micron's HVM packaging capacity beginning in the first half of calendar year 2027. As we make these investments, we will remain disciplined in our approach and will be responsive to the market environment to appropriately align our supply plans. I will now turn it over to Mark for our fiscal Q3 financial results and outlook.
Thank you, Sanjay, and good afternoon, everyone. Micron delivered exceptional fiscal Q3 results with revenue, gross margin, and EPS exceeding the high end of our guidance. Our results and today's outlook underscore the increasing value of memory in the AI era and the structural strength of our business. As mentioned, we have entered into 16 strategic customer agreements. For SCAs with defined price, either fixed or subject to floor and ceiling pricing, in accordance with the Revenue Accounting Standard, we are disclosing remaining performance obligations, RPO, starting this May quarter. year. RPO at the end of fiscal Q3 was over $5 billion. For the SCAs that we have entered into so far, including ones executed after the end of fiscal Q3, RPO is approximately $100 billion. RPO is determined based on minimum committed volumes and minimum pricing and reflects inherently conservative estimates. RPO is not indicative of the total revenue we expect to recognize in future periods. As such, we expect revenue to well exceed associated RPOs over the term of the agreements. As Sanjay mentioned, we project to receive cash deposits and related financial commitments of $22 billion under the SEAs we have signed so far. The overwhelming majority of these commitments, approximately $18 billion, will be in the form of cash deposits. When all targeted SCAs are completed, we expect to have substantially higher levels of SCA customer deposits and related commitments. These customer deposits will show up on our balance sheet more in fiscal Q4. The cash flows associated with customer deposits appear in financing-related cash flows and will not affect our free cash flow. This cash will be return to customers over time towards the latter half of the agreement term. We are excited with our progress inside these SCAs, which will strengthen our long-term financial performance and drive enduring, robust ROI for the company over time. Total fiscal Q3 revenue was $41.5 billion, up 74% sequentially and up 346% year-over-year, representing our fifth consecutive quarterly revenue record. The $17.6 billion sequential increase is the largest in our history, eclipsing last quarter's $10.2 billion record. Fiscal Q3 DRAM revenue was a record $31.3 billion, up 343% year-over-year, and represented 76% of total revenue. Sequentially, DRAM revenue increased 67%. BIT shipments were up low single-digit percentage range. Prices increased in the low 60s percentage range, driven by tight industry conditions and favorable mix. Fiscal Q3 NAND revenue was a record $9.9 billion, up 361% year-over-year and represented 24% of total revenue. Sequentially, NAND revenue increased 99%. BIT shipments increased in the mid-single-digit percentage range. Prices increased in the mid-80s percentage range, driven by tight NAND industry conditions and a favorable mix. The consolidated gross margin for fiscal Q3 was 84.9%, up 10 percentage points sequentially. This improvement was driven primarily by higher pricing and also benefited from continuing strong execution, and favorable mix. Fiscal Q3 gross margin more than doubled from a year ago and was a new company record. Now, turning to quarterly financial performance by business unit. Cloud memory business unit revenue was a record $13.8 billion and represented 33% of total company revenue. CMBU revenue was up 78% sequentially, driven by higher pricing and bid shipments. CMBU gross margins were 83%, up 9% sequentially, driven by higher pricing. Core data center business unit revenue was a record $11.5 billion and represented 28% of total company revenue. CDBU revenue was up 103% sequentially, driven by higher pricing and a favorable mix. CDBU gross margins were 87%, up 12 percentage points sequentially, driven by higher pricing. Mobile and client business unit revenue was a record $11.5 billion and represented 28% of total company revenue. MCBU revenue was up 49% sequentially, driven by higher pricing, partially offset by lower bit shipments. MCBU gross margins were 87%, up nine percentage points sequentially, driven primarily by higher pricing and helped by favorable mix. Automotive and embedded business unit revenue was a record $4.6 billion dollars and represented 11 percent of total company revenue. AEBU revenue was up 71 percent sequentially driven by higher pricing and higher bid shipments. AEBU gross margins were 79 percent up 11 percentage points sequentially driven by higher pricing and favorable mix. Operating expenses in fiscal Q3 were $1.5 billion, up $97 million quarter-over-quarter. The sequential increase was due to higher variable compensation expense from the strong performance of the business. We generated operating income of $33.7 billion in fiscal Q3, resulting in an operating margin of 81.2 percent, up 12 percentage points sequentially and 54 percentage points year over year. Fiscal Q3 taxes were $5.1 billion on an effective tax rate of 14.9 percent. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in fiscal Q3 was $25.11, up 106 percent sequentially. Turning to cash flow and capital expenditures, in fiscal Q3, operating cash flows were $25.4 billion. Capital expenditures were $7.1 billion, resulting in free cash flow of $18.3 billion. Fiscal Q3 free cash flow was a quarterly record for the company. Ending inventory for fiscal Q3 was $8.6 billion, with days of inventory at $120. DRAM inventories are very tight and below 120 days. We reached record levels of cash and investments of $30.2 billion at quarter end. During fiscal Q3, we reduced debt by $4.4 billion, including a cash tender offer that reduced senior notes by $4.3 billion. The weighted average maturity on our outstanding debt is April 2035. We closed the quarter with $5.7 billion of debt and a net cash balance of $24.4 billion. This fiscal year, we received upgrades from all three major credit rating agencies, including an upgrade to BBB+, on the strength of our technology and product position, financial outlook, and strong balance sheet. Our balance sheet has never been stronger, and we project it to strengthen further, even as we increase investment in technology and needed capacity. Now turning to guidance, we expect fiscal Q4 revenue to be a record $50 billion, plus or minus $1 billion, gross margin to be approximately 86%, and operating expenses to be approximately $1.65 billion. Based on a share count of approximately 1.15 billion shares, we expect EPS to be a record $31 per share, plus or minus a dollar. Our fiscal Q4 gross margin outlook reflects a meaningful moderation in the rate of price increases. We project operating expenses to increase by approximately $1 billion in fiscal 2027 as we expand R&D to support an unprecedented set of opportunities in memory and storage. We expect operating expense increases to be weighted to the second half. We expect a fiscal Q4 and fiscal 2026 tax rate of around 15%. Micron continues to invest in a disciplined manner across our global footprint to address customer demand. As a reminder, our CapEx is net of anticipated government incentives. In fiscal Q4, we project CAPEX of around $10 billion, bringing full-year fiscal 2026 capital spending to approximately $27 billion. We expect quarterly CAPEX in fiscal 2027 to be above fiscal Q4 levels, with more than half the increase year-over-year in fiscal 2027 from construction CapEx as we pull in cleanroom capacity required to address long-term demand. We forecast free cash flow to increase substantially again in fiscal Q4. From December 9, 2026, the second anniversary of the signature of our definitive CHIPS agreements, we intend to increase our capital return. Over time, we expect to return 100% of our excess cash to shareholders. Any impacts that may occur due to trade or geopolitical developments are not included in our guidance. I'll now turn it over to Sanjay to close.
Thank you, Mark. AI has elevated the value of memory. Micron is collaborating closely with our customers and suppliers across technology, product, manufacturing, and commercial teams in this tight industry environment. Strategic customer agreements are ushering in an exciting era for Micron. We expect these SCAs to significantly enhance the durability and predictability of Micron's strong financial performance, accelerating the transformation of our business model. I'm thankful to Micron's team members worldwide, whose relentless focus on execution on all fronts has positioned Micron as a leader in this new AI era, as we continue to advance our mission to accelerate intelligence to enrich life for all. We will now open for questions.
Operator
We will now begin the question and answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star 1 again. again. Your first question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri with UBS. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hi. Sanjay, so I think we're all trying to figure out how much is locked in in kind of a floor price scenario over the next five years. And there were two things you said. You said that 14 of the 16 SCAs have $100 billion in cumulative revenue. So that sort of says like $20 billion a year at like a floor price, which is way below the run rate that you just guided. So that says that not that much would be covered at a floor price. But then you also said that 40% of revenue will be moving inside of these SEAs. So can you maybe double click on all that and sort of help us in like a floor price scenario? Can you help us think about how much of revenue per year would be guaranteed?
As we indicated that under these SEAs that have been completed so far at the floor price the you know revenue is projected to be 100 billion dollars but again as Mark noted in his remarks I mean we expect revenue to be much higher than that note that at the floor price that our profitability levels at the gross margins and the floor prices are higher than peak margins at any time in the past. And so overall, about 20% of DRAM and about 30% of our NAND volume is covered in these SCAs so far. So that applies to about 25% of our revenue that you can project over the term of these agreements. So again, you know, RPO at the floor price is to be reported as an accounting measure, but we fully expect that the revenue will be much higher than that.
Got it. And then with respect to just how these layer in, Mark, like how much of the August quarter revenue, for example, will be flowing under an SCA? I'm just trying to figure out how to like layer that into the model. And when you get to like a full run rate where like by next fiscal Q4, will you be at sort of a full run rate of, you know, what's being covered under these SCAs? Can you help us sort of like feather that in?
Yeah, Tim. So you'll see a disclosure in the queue, which will disclose the next 12 months revenue associated with each set of agreements that have an RPO. So, for example, for those that closed within Q3, you'll see an RPO of 5 billion, over $5 billion, and you'll see a next 12 months associated with that of about $1.8 billion. And, yeah, that is because those are some of the smaller agreements that Sanjay mentioned, you know, automotive agreements. Now, in the fourth quarter, as Sanjay mentioned, you will see an RPO reported, on 14 of the 16 agreements. That is going to be about $100 billion. And there will be an associated next 12 months associated with those that will be disclosed in the K. So you will be able to see roughly how these are feathering in. And keep in mind this RPO number, you know, it is a minimally contractually enforceable amount for the intersection of volume and price. So you're looking, Tim, at a minimum number, and that's important to keep in mind. And we were clear that it doesn't reflect what we think will happen. And then also each quarter, you know, this RPO number will change. It will change based on contracts that are added in. It may change on additional volume commitments with the determined price. It will change based on shipments and how that RPO declines after that performance obligation is met. So you'll be getting a lot of additional reporting. This is all under ASC 606. I know it's something that we, you know, it's not a heavy standard typically in some of our reporting, but this this feature of of rpo you will see um i also want to emphasize as sanjay mentioned that even at the floor price and um eventually we anticipate about 40 of our revenue being being under this sort of rpo related commitments that even under the floor on the floor price we expect the margins to be significantly above prior peak margins.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Joseph Moore with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
I also wanted to ask about the LTAs. Can you talk about the role of the cash deposits? Should we think of that as being sort of an escrow collateral account where if people cancel, you would have access to cash? Like, if it's not revenue, like, sort of, what is the point of the deposit? And what is the relationship of those deposits with the RPO, if there is one?
Yeah. Joe, on the deposits, so, yeah, we mentioned that, you know, that we have 22 billion of deposits and financial commitments associated with the agreement signed to date as of this call um 18 billion approximately of that is cash deposits we'll receive those deposits um you know we received um you know about 500 million 400 hundred plus million in the third quarter will receive about another ten billion in the fourth quarter and you will get what you these will these will be seen cash deposits they'll be seen in financing cash flows they will not effect free cash flow they will be they are held by us during the performance commitments of the agreements and as those agreements are satisfied those deposits will be returned over time but heavily weighted to the back half of the agreements. The difference between the, you know, $22 billion and the $18, so roughly the $4 billion, $4 billion of others is letters for credit.
Okay. But what is the role? I mean, what happens to that cash? You know, it seems like they're putting a deposit and then they get the deposit back, you know, is what is the reason for them to commit that cash?
Is that something where there's a take or pay that that cash is related to you know it's not a prepayment just can you help us understand that yeah thanks joe it's it's not a prepayment it's a separate um commitment by the customers and a um and a reflection of the fact that we have a binding agreement and these are take or pay agreements and um and you know we hold the cash, and it's a reflection of our shared commitment to perform under these agreements. Now, this is good for Micron, of course, these agreements, in that we get visibility on our demand, it's committed volume, that we can be confident about making our investments, large capital investments, closer technology relationship. It's good for the customers because they have supply assurance. They have the leading technology. So in our view, it's a win-win. And, you know, very, very happy with the nature of the agreements and the impact they have on the business and indication of a transformed business model at Micron. very helpful thanks for all the disclosure on this it really helps a lot thanks your next question comes from the line of cj muse with canter fitzgerald your line is open please go ahead good afternoon thank you for taking the question maybe to just follow up on joe's question mark you know when you think about these cash deposits do you view that as fungible cash and used for
for capex and and i guess as part of that when you contemplate capital returns particularly you know, after December 14th kind of chips act end date, do you, will you include kind of that cash that you received in your gross cash thoughts and, and your thoughts around capital returns, or is that something given that you will have to return it eventually, uh, that would cause you to, to think, um, steady state, you, you'll need to hold more gross cash, all else equal.
Uh, CJ, it's unrestricted. But, but does it change your thoughts around, uh, gross cash that you need, that you feel comfortable holding um you know on your books not not in the near term i i think we you know we of course are going to have what we do is adequate liquidity to support the operation of the business uh that that would include over time uh returning the deposits as customers um and and micron perform on the contracts um and so that of course is important uh but um uh you know and then we would hold uh liquidity uh to satisfy what investments we believe are important for the business you know we've got a lot of um you know we've got large projects underway to provide supply, and also, you know, R&D programs. So, and, you know, and again, I'll emphasize that, you know, the customers, you know, as I mentioned earlier, they will get this return deposit back in the latter half of the agreement.
Perfect. And then maybe as a follow-up on HPM revenues, could you kind of share how you're thinking about uh both your market share and perhaps total revenues into calendar 26 and you know is there an expectation into calendar 27 that you can bridge uh margins there closer to uh what you're getting on d5 or is that a place that that will be um you know permanently below uh you know that d5 level thanks so much so with respect to hbm uh first of all very very pleased with our HBM4 product and Micron shipments already of HBM4 of over $1 billion.
HBM market share, we strategically are choosing it to be close to our DRAM share. And this is important because of the trade ratio of HBM. It consumes, as you know, a significant amount of wafers and puts pressure on non-HBM supply in the industry. So targeting our HBM share close to our DRAM share strategically enables us to supply our diversified end markets, customers across all end markets, data center, consumer, automotive, industrial, you know, the markets that need non-HVM supplies. Regarding your question on pricing for next year, we are really not commenting on pricing, but certainly HVM is a product where Micron has a strong leadership position. We have demonstrated tremendous success now with HVM3E8 high, HVM3E12 high, and now with HBM4 and a strong roadmap ahead of, you know, strong confidence in our ability to execute to that. And it is a high-priced product, you know, compared to non-HBM on a per-bit basis. And it is a product that is critically important for the entire AI ecosystem from data center to edge. So strategically, it is a very important product for us. and it is a product that does provide strong ROI as well.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Vivek Aria with Bank of America Securities. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Thanks for taking my question. For the first one, Sanjay, you mentioned, I think, four large and three medium-sized customer agreements, and I'm curious how many of them are related to the data center, Should we expect more data center-related announcements? And the $100 billion, does that align with the large and medium size, or does it align with the smaller-sized customers? I guess I'm still trying to figure out what is a typical SCA with a data center customer. Like, have you given enough breadcrumbs for us to figure out what a data center SCA looks like over the next few years?
So our large customers include, you know, data center and the large and medium customers that you mentioned, you know, and of course, including our smaller customers, they do go across data center consumer and automotive markets. And we have provided you color on the large agreements have, of course, you know, generally have a ceiling price, have a price band which has a floor as well as a ceiling. and the ceiling is established at the CQ2 price levels. And of course, you know that CQ2 price levels are reflected in our FQ3 results as well as FQ4 guidance. And they provide for unprecedented levels of profitability. And those price bands also provide for floor prices, where the gross margins are well above the peaks at any fast cycle in company's history. And the large agreements that we mentioned, you know, these are, you know, multi-year agreements and they provide us tremendous visibility to demand, customer commitments, and they, of course, come with the financial commitments, including cash deposits, that Mark elaborated on further, earlier.
Thanks. And from a follow-up, Mark, on gross margins, you know, 86 percent, does it kind of hang out here for a while? Is there a ceiling? And then as these SCAs start to kick in, should we assume some kind of normalization to between, you know, the mid-80s where you are now versus I think the prior peak was in the low 60s? So as, you know, as your long-term investors build their models for 27 28 etc should they be assuming a normalized gross margin range uh somewhere in the mid 70s right kind of the range between where you are today versus the prior peaks if you could just you know hold our hands on how to think about gross margins beyond this 86 percent of the near term and then longer term what is the right way to think about uh how these gross margins unfold thank you yeah so vivek we're we're not um we're not providing guidance beyond the fourth quarter, but we are at margin levels that, you know, as we've talked about before, incremental price yields less in gross margin
expansion. So while the, you know, but having said that, we do see, as we mentioned, we updated our view on market conditions that we expect the market to remain tight beyond 2027. You know, we also have, you know, we're at a point where memory is very much appreciated for the strategic asset that it is, the value that it brings to improving AI intelligence and, you know, more and higher performance memory is needed. And so, you know, our continued deployment of bits to, you know, data center and edge device higher performance applications is going to be helpful as price moderates and price growth moderates. And we move to, you know, optimize the placement of our bits with customers, including those that we do these, have done these SEAs with. And then also, as we've talked about, we will get additional volume starting mid-year materially, beginning mid-year 27, that will grow into 28. And, you know, we will have some startup costs there, but we will get, you know, absorption as those ramps occur. And so over time, you know, we'll get that operating leverage. You know, so I think we feel great about the trajectory of the business, Micron's technology position, world-class product portfolio. You can see we're operating very well, and all those are supportive of continuing to deliver a strong financial performance.
Operator
Your final question comes from the line of Krish Sankar with TD Cowan. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Yeah, thanks for doing my question. I told them, Sanjay or Mark, congrats on the great results. On the flow pricing for the LTAs, you said about the prior peak. You know, your prior peak growth margin is somewhere in the lower 60, 62% range. If I try to plug in what a 64 gigabyte server DRAM is, you know, I can get like a $700 price for it compared the $1,500 today, which kind of puts you at like $10 to $12 a gigabyte as the floor and a mid-$20 a gigabyte for the current price. Is that the range we should think about for these LTAs, i.e. low-teams to mid-$20 a gigabyte is kind of like the range of LTAs for the pricing?
So, Krish, we're not going to get into specific pricing discussions, but I just want to note again that I said that the gross margins at the floor will be well beyond the peaks that we experienced, the highs that we experienced in the past cycle, so well beyond those, right? But we are not going to obviously get into the specifics related to the pricing. Bottom line is, you know, these SCAs really help provide visibility, strength, and durability of demand for us. And they absolutely fundamentally accelerate our financial performance and financial, the business transformation here.
Got it. Very helpful, Sanjay. And just a quick follow-up. You kind of mentioned how DRAMBIT should grow low to mid-20s. non-probably in the 20% range this year, and clearly we are under-supplied in both. Is there a way to quantify what happens in 2027? Is there a way to say, is the under-supply going to be double what it is this year in 2027, or how do you think about the supply-demand imbalance in 2027?
You know, we see 2027 overall tight. We have said we see tightness continuing beyond 2027. you know, working hard to bring up a supply, but we have shared with you that it takes a long time to bring up the additional capacity that is needed to support the customer demand, the additional wafer capacity, and of course, technology transitions and the less bit gain that they give per note, as well as the HVM trade ratio put tremendous pressure on the overall supply growth as well. So supply, even in 2028, when supply begins to improve gradually, we see that the demand will continue to be on a robust trajectory as well, because these AI trends are very long-term trends. AI is still in very, very early innings. The whole token economics needs more memory here system AI system performance is really very much limited by memory capacity and memory performance memory bandwidth so you know the demand for memory is you know as the compute demand grows and our customers look at a tremendous transformation opportunity that is ahead of them this and continue to make investments like they have never made before to build this infrastructure. The demand trajectory is extremely strong. Memory is at the center of it and is a strategic asset, and access to memory supply is obviously a critical priority, as you can see in the multi-year agreements that our customers have concluded with us. I mean, those agreements reflect the confidence in the growth of the demand. So we are working hard to bring up supply, but BC tightness persisting beyond 2027.
Thanks, Ratsunjai. Really appreciate it.
Operator
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
