Greetings, and welcome to the Orion Engineered Carbons Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Wendy Wilson, Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Thank you, Ms. Wilson. You may begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Orion Engineered Carbons conference call to discuss our third quarter 2020 financial results. I'm Wendy Wilson, Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. With us today are Corning Painter, Chief Executive Officer; and Lorin Crenshaw, Chief Financial Officer. We issued our earnings press release after the market closed yesterday and have posted a slide presentation to the Investor Relations portion of our website. We will be referencing this presentation during the call. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that some of our comments made on today's call are forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties as described in the company's filings with the SEC. Actual results may differ materially from those described during the call. In addition, all forward-looking statements are made as of today, November 6, and the company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements based on new circumstances or revised expectations. Also, non-GAAP financial measures discussed during this call are reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in the table attached to our press release. I will now turn the call over to Corning Painter.

Thank you, Wendy, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to our third quarter earnings conference call. I don't want to let this moment pass without thanking our people for their dedication and flexibility during the second quarter downturn and subsequent demand surge. Most importantly, they have kept up COVID-19 safety protocols, and we have had no workplace transmission of the disease. Thank you for your focus, flexibility, and dedication. I'd also like to specifically congratulate the employees involved with the various upgrades of our facility in Borger, Texas. The upgrade of the cogeneration facilities at that site allows us to run the plant without drawing power from the grid while still providing excess energy back to the regional grid for use in the local area. On today's call, Lorin and I will cover the third quarter results and also devote time to pricing negotiations for 2021, our operational response to COVID-19, select leading indicators of recovery that may affect the business and examples of initiatives that we have undertaken to emerge stronger. As always, we will be happy to take your questions at the conclusion of our comments. Turning to Slide 3. Third quarter demand for carbon black recovered rather well versus the historic low experienced during the second quarter. In most months since April, we have seen rubber carbon black demand improve across all geographies, and specialty carbon black has recently improved as well. While we cannot predict the future course of the pandemic, our year-to-date financial results demonstrate our ability to withstand its ups and downs. From a financial perspective, we reported adjusted EBITDA of $55 million, down 19.2% year-over-year and more than triple second quarter levels sequentially, reflecting the substantial operating leverage we expected the business to deliver as the economy recovered. Also note that on a year-to-date basis, our business has required only a moderate level of funding for operations, approximately $40 million despite the severe economic downturn, reflecting the underlying strength of our business and financial wherewithal. Slide 4 lists some of the actions we have taken in the face of COVID-19. We've used a variation of this slide before, so I'm just going to speak to the new developments. Starting with people. As I said earlier, we continue to have no workplace transmission to the best of our knowledge. We continue to offer work-from-home policies for office workers in areas where COVID-19 levels remain high. Our people had to deal with Hurricanes Laura and Delta as well, and we have assisted employees with items such as generators. Moving to production. Managing demand surge has been critical over the past few months. Product mix and order patterns shifted abruptly to the upside during the quarter, requiring our teams to adjust production to meet demand and ensure that as many customer orders as possible were filled. We operated at strong utilization rates in every geography in October, up sharply from the mid-40s in April and similar to the high 70 rates we experienced in July. We continue to use downtime to execute select projects to improve facilities and uptime. Moving to customers. We're staying very close to our customers to keep them supplied in the face of what has been very large swings in demand, deviations from forecasts and transportation challenges. We are well into our 2021 pricing negotiations; and while specific information is commercially sensitive, as one might imagine, there are a wide range of demand scenarios between our customers as they have different views of what 2021 will bring. What is unchanged, in my view, is that the long-term underlying drivers for higher carbon black pricing remain intact, particularly for North America. Communities and ESG. I mentioned the upgrade at the Borger plant earlier. We also accelerated EPA-related work at Ivanhoe as the COVID-19 situation there improved. In addition, we provided financial support in South Africa to teach students environmental and sustainability best practices. Both initiatives support our ongoing ESG efforts aimed at operating sustainably and being a trusted community citizen. With an eye to the long-term horizon, we became the partner in the EU-supported BlackCycle project that was launched in September. The project, coordinated by Michelin, is a consortium involving 13 organizations and is a unique European public/private partnership. It aims to demonstrate the technical, environmental, and economic viability of circular processes to produce new tires from end-of-life tires. You'll hear more from us on this project in the future. Now turning to Slide 5. I'd like to share a few thoughts on the current pace and shape of global demand. This slide shows the demand pattern around the world in the third quarter. As you can see, on a year-over-year basis, our Rubber Carbon Black business has recovered sharply since April. As a reminder, back in April, rubber volumes were down year-over-year in the high 60s percent range in the Americas and EMEA and 30% in APAC. You may recall at the time of our second quarter call in July, I expressed the point of view that July could prove to be the strongest month of the quarter. I'm happy to report that demand held up well throughout the quarter with volumes coming in at levels that were roughly 90% of 2019 levels, quite a strong result. Our Specialty Carbon Black business, as expected, given the nature of its end markets, initially lagged rubber. However, ultimately, this business not only recovered nicely but delivered an even stronger quarter than rubber volume-wise, with third quarter volumes coming in at 97% of 2019 levels. Importantly, we did this without sacrificing pricing, as Lorin will show you later. As a reminder of where this business has come from, in April, specialty volumes were down year-over-year in the range of 38% to 8%, depending on the geography. So overall, we are quite pleased to see this business come on so quickly in the still evolving recovery. Slide 6 is a slide we began providing when the crisis began. It breaks down our business by end market and provides investors with our sense of where each market falls on the spectrum in terms of leading, coincident, or lagging from an economic recovery standpoint. Now that the recovery has commenced, we can see that things are playing out, by and large, as expected. With that said, recent public policy actions in Europe are a reminder of the risk that industry faces through the balance of the quarter and going into 2021. From a replacement tire perspective, which makes up roughly 60% of our rubber business, we have seen a sharp bounce off the bottom driven by a combination of rising passenger car mobility, which you can see in various metrics and relatively high demand for trucking, as confirmed by improving measures of truckload freight trends. Globally, volumes remain below 2019 level and may not return to those levels for another 12 to 18 months or more, according to the forecast that we track. However, demand has clearly picked up significantly from the April trough. Shifting gears from the replacement side of the rubber business to the original equipment side, which makes up 40% of rubber volumes and 15% of our specialty volumes. This market also picked up sharply in recent months. Global light vehicle sales have shown a classic V-shaped rebound through August according to LMC Automotive. This trend is quite encouraging but tempered by the fact that it is impossible to know the impact of temporary factors such as pent-up demand and inventory replenishment following the second quarter lockdown phase. Overall, we were encouraged by both the degree and speed of improvement in our business results, which imply that inventory levels across the supply chain entering the third quarter were quite lean. We continue to assess how the pandemic may impact our business in the short and longer term. If there's another set of shelter-at-home lockdowns, our business will suffer, no question. But we have shown that we can weather a lockdown, and when that passes, people are going to drive. And I believe we would see a strong rebound all over again. For the time being, people are most comfortable riding in their cars, not on planes or public transportation. It's also clear that delivery trucks need to run even during a lockdown. It's also likely that there's going to be more working from home in the future, cutting down on commuting. However, time will tell, again, we think a greater share of commuting will be done in cars than public transportation. So it's impossible to know exactly how things will play out, but what we're seeing on the ground in terms of current demand is promising. Within the 85% of our specialty business that does not go into automotive at this stage, it appears the impact of the recent downturn is proving to be more cyclical than secular, as evidenced by this quarter's performance and sharp recovery. Overall, specialty is well-positioned to recover as the broader economy rebounds. Given the breadth of our specialty end markets, a leading indicator for this business is Manufacturing Purchasing Manager Indices, which JPMorgan and IHS, amongst others, produce. Such PMI indices have shown a sharp recovery from April levels, corresponding with the trend that we have seen in our specialty business. As recently as September, they remained in positive territory, which has historically correlated with an expansionary economic environment and is a positive indicator for our specialty business. Now turning to our third quarter results in greater detail. As you can see on Slide 7, adjusted EBITDA declined by approximately $13 million, primarily reflecting the impact of lower rubber and specialty volumes, lower feedstock prices, and mix offsetting price. And with that, at this time, I'll turn the call over to Lorin.

Thanks, Corning. Now turning to Slide 8. Volumes were down 7.6% year-over-year but rose 51% sequentially on higher demand in both segments and across all regions. Against this backdrop, adjusted EBITDA more than tripled to $55 million. Basic EPS came in at $0.15 per share, and adjusted EPS was $0.32 per share. Contribution margin declined 12.7% year-over-year, primarily driven by lower volume but increased 59% sequentially. Overall, each division showed strong operating leverage with incremental margins adjusted for the impact of FX and oil on revenue and profitability in line with or better than expected with specialty exceeding the mid-40s plus range due to mix and rubber in the low to mid-30s range. Slide 9 explains the drivers behind contribution margin, adjusted EBITDA, and net income in greater detail. Starting at the upper left-hand side, contribution margin declined 12.7% year-over-year as lower volume, the impact of lower oil prices on margin and unfavorable mix in specialty partially offset base price improvement in both segments. Adjusted EBITDA fell 19.2% year-over-year to $55 million, reflecting the decline in contribution margin. Lower costs cushioned the impact somewhat, driven by a favorable VAT settlement and lower discretionary spending. Finally, we recorded net income for the quarter of $9 million, down year-over-year, largely due to lower adjusted EBITDA. Slide 10 details the year-to-date sources and uses of cash. As expected, working capital rose during the quarter, primarily driven by higher accounts receivables resulting from a sharp sequential sales increase. Notably, this surge-driven working capital increase was the primary factor preventing us from showing positive free cash flow for the quarter. Overall, as Corning noted earlier, from a cash flow perspective, we are pleased that, on a year-to-date basis, despite the severe second quarter downturn and continuing to advance our EPA investments, our business is only required a moderate amount of funding, approximately $40 million year-to-date, with the rest of our borrowings to date, $34 million, simply reflecting elective actions taken to strategically bolster our cash position. All in all, we have come through the first part of this economic storm in a strong financial position. Finally, our EPA investments continue to advance our sustainability strategy while also creating a barrier to entry in North America. We expect these investments will continue at levels around the current run rate through 2022, temporarily diminishing our free cash flow before declining in 2023, resulting in higher free cash flow conversion at that time, all else being equal. Slide 11 summarizes our leverage and liquidity profile at quarter end. Liquidity available at any leverage level was $316 million at quarter end. And as a result of our success at converting a significant portion of our revolver to ancillary capacity, we can now borrow 100% of the EUR 250 million commitment amount under our revolver at any adjusted EBITDA level without our leverage covenant being in play. Overall, the strong state of our liquidity and the absence of any debt maturities until 2024 give us great confidence in our ability to continue successfully navigating through this downturn. Moving to Slide 12. Specialty volumes fell 2.6% year-over-year and rose 18.8% sequentially. Volumes were down across most end markets with Asia Pacific and Europe performing somewhat better than the Americas. From a profitability perspective, gross profit per ton declined 7.8%, almost entirely due to lower volumes but rose 29% sequentially. Similarly, adjusted EBITDA declined 9.2% year-over-year but rose 61% sequentially, reflecting strong operating leverage and incremental margins. The next slide brings out the major year-over-year drivers of adjusted EBITDA, which were lower volume with mix offsetting price. Turning to Slide 14. Rubber volumes were down 9.1% year-on-year and were up 65.9% sequentially. Geographically, volumes were down in our tire business across all regions, particularly in North America and Asia. In our MRG business, volumes rose in China and were down in all other regions. From a profitability perspective, gross profit per ton declined 19.3% but more than doubled sequentially. The year-over-year decrease reflected lower volumes, while the strong sequential profit recovery was driven by incremental margins adjusted for the impact of oil and FX on revenue and profitability, in line with expectations, demonstrating good operating leverage. Slide 15 shows the development of adjusted EBITDA with sharply lower volumes and feedstock prices, the primary drivers of a decline. With that, I will turn the call back over to Corning.

Thanks, Lorin. Moving to Slide 16. We've reinstated our EBITDA guidance for the fourth quarter barring a further downturn in economic activity, and that could happen with rising COVID-19 infections. We expect adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $44 million to $54 million, which is roughly 10% lower sequentially. With that being said, our fourth quarter order book is constructive. The range of our guidance reflects the fact that, historically, December is hard to predict, especially in a year like this, and the fourth quarter is typically our weakness. It's also difficult to gauge the extent to which the recent decline in mobility data is reflecting normal seasonal declines as the summer ends or whether other factors are in play. Our 2020 capital forecast remains in the $140 million to $145 million range with the upper end of the range increasingly likely as we execute a variety of safety, reliability and productivity projects that will position us to emerge stronger heading into 2021, as noted in our previous earnings call. Our best estimate of the cost of the U.S. air quality investments remains $250 million, plus or minus 8%. As we've shared previously, we expect approximately 50% of this cost to have been spent between 2018 and the end of this year with the remaining 50% spread between 2021 and 2023. We completed our first EPA project in June at our Orange facility and remain focused on executing the work at our Ivanhoe facility as rapidly as supply issues and the physical distancing required to safely advance the work will allow. We continue to communicate our intentions and projects scheduled to the EPA on a monthly basis as we have done since we first declared force majeure. Turning to Slide 17. In closing, I'd like to highlight a few takeaways from the quarter. I'm pleased that we've been able to demonstrate the resilience of our business model during these extraordinary times. From the demand lows in the second quarter to the demand surge over the last several months, we've proven that we can operate with focus and agility to efficiently respond to dramatic economic changes. This period has been a time of great change for the global Orion team. Just before, we completed our first employee engagement survey with an amazing 91% participation. We've used this time to address a number of opportunities, including employee communications, training and development and work simplification. These initiatives are part of the substance behind our goal of emerging stronger. For example, we have stepped up video communications, introduced an e-learning platform, simplified processes, consolidated SKUs and reduced costs while maintaining momentum towards our sustainability objectives. One example is a dramatic simplification of our pricing approval process, where we're cutting the number of steps by more than half while improving and simplifying controls at the same time. Through the early weeks of the fourth quarter, demand in both our rubber and specialty segments continues to recover. For sure, there's still much uncertainty with COVID-19 and the global economic recovery, but our third quarter financial performance and its remarkable rebound from Q2 demonstrates our people's and our businesses' resilience, that we're on the right track, and that we will continue to show strong operating leverage if the global economy continues to recover.

Our first question comes from Jeff Zekauskas with JPMorgan.

Can you talk about some of the negative mix factors in the quarter? Your volumes were really not down very much year-over-year, but your EBITDA fell at a much greater rate. Can you more concisely describe why that's the case?

I'll take, Jeff, a couple of general comments and I'll let Lorin jump in. So one element on mix is in the rubber area, the issue between MRG and tire, MRG being only going into new cars and a little bit more attractive than rubber carbon black going into the tire market. So the relative strength of replacement tires right now relative to OEM production, even though OEM recovered, that's one thing that plays into mix for us.

And I would just add, that's right on a year-over-year basis. Sequentially, in terms of our incremental margins, once you back out the impact of oil on revenue and profit, specialty actually had better mix sequentially and was right in line with our mid-40s plus incremental margin. And rubber, again, sequentially, was right in line with our low 30s incremental margins. And so I think that's right.

And I guess, secondly, so miles driven has been touched by the recession and by COVID conditions. To what extent do you think that, that affects the growth rate of the tire market over a multiyear period?

Well, there's no question. If there's going to be less driving going forward over the long haul, then there's going to be less time wear, and that would have an impact on the market if that's what you mean.

Right. I was wondering if you guys had made an attempt to quantify that given current conditions or one can see a tendency, but one can't really do much more than that.

Yes. I think right now, I'm drawing conclusions from the current COVID-19 not being behind us. As I said in the script, I mean, I think there's going to be more working from home. I think there's going to be a stronger preference for cars over other modes of transportation. And I think we've just got to get a little bit of time to see where that balance is going to come out.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Leithead with Barclays.

If I look at Slide 6, it appears that rubber black is leading the recovery, while specialty is more in line with current economic factors. In terms of volumes this quarter, rubber is down around 9%, and specialty is down about 3%. Can you explain why specialty performed better than rubber in terms of volume this quarter, and also share insights on the demand trends you've observed in the specialty end markets?

Yes. So I think what we're trying to reflect is that we thought the first thing to bounce is where that green checkmark is in the replacement tire, and that is the first thing we saw bounce. And we did see Rubber Carbon Black come back sooner than we saw Specialty Carbon Black. It turned the corner sooner, let's say. But no question, Specialty Carbon Black has come back overall at this point to a higher level compared to last year, and that reflects just across a wide range of end markets. And in general, many of those have improved, even areas like pipe, which I've talked about before, although I suspect that a portion of that, let's say, oilfield services is going to still impact infrastructure and other activities, in other regions of the world, that continue to do well. Probably star areas in the specialty area would be anything related to food, food packaging, that kind of thing, in the current environment, with all the carryout, is quite strong. Things like ink for printed materials, that's an area of weakness in the market today.

Great. That's super helpful. And then, Corning, any early indications about how you're feeling about base pricing heading into next year? And relatedly, you've talked in the past about trying to improve or restructure the contracts in the industry. My guess is COVID got a little bit in the way this year of doing that. But do you still think that's achievable maybe in the next 2, 3 years?

Okay, let's start with pricing. One important aspect of pricing is that this industry faced significant challenges this year during the downturn. I’m pleased to report that rubber carbon black pricing remained stable, with contracts holding firm. This is a positive indicator for us. Looking at our performance this year, a similar trend can be observed in specialty, although there are differences in contract structures. Regarding 2021, it's essential to remember that our customers are closely monitoring these discussions. The tire market customers we are currently engaging with have varied expectations about what 2021 will hold, reflecting the overall market uncertainty. This creates an interesting negotiating environment. Additionally, given the current market dynamics and the limitations on material storage, having capacity is valuable. The long-term factors that influence pricing in the carbon black sector remain intact. The U.S. rubber and tire manufacturing capacity continues to increase, as does carbon black production. We are still having discussions with several stakeholders about long-term agreements. While COVID-19 has complicated matters this year, we are maintaining dialogues. Until we finalize anything, it remains conjecture. However, I believe pursuing these agreements is sensible, and there are still parties in the industry interested in moving forward.

Next question comes from the line of Josh Spector with UBS.

Just coming back to specialty volumes, pretty impressive performance in the third quarter. Wonder if you could quantify how much of that may have benefited from restocking and how much of that was maybe more normalized demand. And maybe a related question around that is what are the volume scenarios that you're baking into your 4Q guidance around specialty.

So it is difficult to tease out, and we made some comments of that in our script. What's restocking? What was pent-up demand from when things were locked down? And that's hard to gauge. If we think about automotive, there was a hard stop in auto manufacturing for the period of time. Everybody wanted to burn through inventory. If you bought a car recently as I have, you can see there's very few cars on the lot right now, so they're still a little bit in catch-up mode. So I would say, I don't think we're necessarily seeing steady state at this point. Our guidance is based largely on the current forecast that we have from our customers, so taking that as the primary versus guessing where they are in their inventory and then with this kind of open question mark about what's December really going to look like. And I think our customers wouldn't claim to have a great deal of insight exactly what's going to happen in that market.

And Josh, I would just add that if you look at the midpoint of our fourth quarter guidance, I don't want to get into specialty versus rubber. But if you look at the midpoint and you just think about our typical EBITDA per metric ton, it implies that we're expecting about a 10%-ish sequential decline in volume, and that's true across both businesses generally speaking.

Okay. Fair enough. And I guess, if I look at rubber profitability for the quarter, EBITDA was around $160 per ton. If I assume oil is still kind of constant in the low to mid-40s and maybe some of the other pricing factors have removed that as well, is there anything I should add or remove to that when I start to look at maybe first half next year assuming volumes are still down 10%? So just trying to think if there's anything temporary within the quarter that we should remove or anything that we should add back into a more sustainable recovery.

I would say that once you make an assumption about oil prices for next year, which we've given some guidance on, the primary consideration is that we have achieved approximately $15 million in cost reductions this year, though only $3 million of those will be permanent. Therefore, you should expect an increase in selling and administrative costs for that difference, which will affect both businesses. This is the key point to keep in mind when thinking about 2021.

Maybe one more clarification around that. So the $15 million, can you clarify how much you maybe benefited this quarter versus last quarter?

Yes. I'm not prepared to break that $15 million down in terms of the impact this particular quarter. But as you look at 2021, yes, I'd just ask you to consider that.

Our next question comes from the line of Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities.

It's Pete Lukas for Jon. You guys have covered most of my questions. I guess just one on gross profit per ton. In either segment, do you think that we've reached a trough there? And if not, when would you expect to see recovery there?

Well, I mean, a lot of the impact has been volume. And so I think what you're really kind of getting at is are we seeing a trough or did we see in the prior quarter a trough on volume. I certainly hope so, and that's certainly how things look right now.

Our next question comes from the line of Chris Kapsch with Loop Capital Markets.

The tire industry wasn't the only sector affected by COVID; the refining industry has also faced challenges due to reduced miles driven and disruptions in gasoline and kerosene demand. I'm curious if this pressure on the refining sector has impacted your availability of feedstocks. Additionally, considering that the IMO 2020 regulations are no longer a primary focus, have there been any changes or opportunities regarding your sourcing differences for feedstock?

Yes. So I'd say the ability to source feedstock is really unchanged, so we have no problem with that. I think it's slightly commercially sensitive what exactly we experience in differentials. I'd like to hold on that.

I appreciate the details on the profitability metrics and their sequential differences. I'm curious about your cost accounting method. Is it FIFO? If it is, I understand that there could be some sequential impact on profitability metrics if you're selling inventories produced during periods of lower utilization rates. I'm wondering if that's affecting the margins, even though they improved nicely in the third quarter compared to the second quarter, due to your cost accounting approach.

Yes. We have not had that sort of dynamic. We did experience something of that sort during the teeth of the crisis earlier in the year, but that was not an impact on the quarter. The main drag from an absorption perspective was simply the fact that our utilization rates year-over-year were lower, although we did find, in terms of sales volumes in the 90s year-over-year, our operating rates were not in the 90s of 2019 levels. And so that was the main driver.

As you make progress on the EPA investments, will the implementation of scrubbing technology change your ability to source various feedstocks? Will you be able to take advantage of higher sulfur feedstocks since you can manage the SOx emissions from burning those feedstocks? Is this potentially an overlooked benefit of these investments?

Chris, I just want to acknowledge on that question, there's a lot of things in play including questions between ourselves and Evonik and all of that. So let me just say that, once you put in the abatement equipment, you're now tracked on what your actual emissions coming out of it are. And let me just leave the answer there, which I think gets to it.

Our next question comes from Kevin Hocevar with Northcoast Research.

I wanted to make sure I was understanding something correctly. Lorin, I think you just mentioned in the fourth quarter guidance, it seems to imply the midpoint kind of 10% quarter-over-quarter decline in volumes, and I think you mentioned that's kind of similar for both businesses. And then on one of the slides has mentioned that October utilization rates are up year-over-year versus the prior October. I think that's what that's saying on Slide 4, which seems to imply volumes might be up in October. So I guess I just want to make sure I'm understanding that right because, I guess, volumes down 10% sequentially would imply volumes down something year-over-year. And again, that October comment seems to imply that volumes are up unless you're building inventory or something. But curious if you could help me reconcile kind of what you're seeing in October versus what's implied in that guidance.

The key uncertainty for the next 60 days relates to our customers and their positioning decisions. One month alone doesn’t establish a trend. While October has shown strong performance, which could lead us towards the upper range of our guidance, the future remains uncertain. This is why we arrive at the midpoint.

Okay. I understand. You mentioned that Corning expects it will take another 12 to 18 months to return to 2019 demand levels. I'm curious about what this means for 2021. I assume volumes will increase significantly year-over-year, but it seems like they will still be lower than in 2019. This suggests we're not close to being within 5 percent of 2019 levels. Could you provide more insight into this comment and its implications for volumes over the next 12 months?

Yes. I think if you want independent data, you can refer to what the Notch data is indicating, which suggests that it is roughly comparable to 2019, along with various scenarios. Regarding forecasts from customers, as I mentioned earlier, those vary significantly among different customers. Therefore, there is a certain level of uncertainty about what is going to happen, but the volatility has certainly diminished considerably compared to earlier this year.

And I would also add that who knows what Notch is considering, but it's really important to have an assumption around will we have a safe, effective, widely distributed vaccine in 2021. And that's a key question that is difficult to know. But I'd just throw that out there.

I believe this adds to the overall commercial dynamic, as people are currently negotiating for reserve capacity. It's possible that at some point next year, perhaps halfway through the year or a quarter of the way through, we will have a vaccine available. When that happens, people will want the capacity because I anticipate we will see a significant recovery in the economy. This situation creates a very exciting and interesting time, and we are well-prepared to leverage this volatility and perform effectively in this environment.

Our next question comes from Laurence Alexander with Jefferies.

Could you discuss CapEx from a different perspective? How much could you grow the top line or increase volumes before you need to make your next significant investment in CapEx?

Well, that's an excellent question. And so our opportunities there is, number one, well, we've got about 1.1 million kt of capacity. So you can look at where sales come out and say, okay, there's an opportunity there and use the guidelines we've put in for how to look like that would turn out as an incremental margin for us. Beyond that, we clearly have the project underway in Ravenna. So that gets us some added capacity slated towards specialty with some differentiated rubber in that. And there's also the opportunity to, let's, repurpose a lot of the capacity that we have in there. Beyond that, though, you are looking at additional capacity.

And let me just add, Laurence. If you accept that 1.1 million is our maximum and you annualize what we're doing today, volume-wise, you get to about 840. And that would imply about 30% growth to our max utilization.

We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Painter for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you, again, everyone, for joining us today, and we appreciate your attention and your interest in Orion Engineered Carbons. Once again, thank you to the Orion team for their great performance in this quarter, working diligently to keep up with just surging demand from our customers. Thank you all. And to our shareholders, we appreciate your support and are doing our best for you. Thank you very much.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.