Thank you, Danielle. Welcome to Par Pacific's first quarter earnings conference call. Joining me today are Will Monteleone, President and Chief Executive Officer; Richard Creamer, EVP of Refining and Logistics; and Shawn Flores, SVP and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, note that our comments today may include forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements are subject to change and are not guarantees of future performance or events. They are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and we disclaim any obligation to update or revise them. I refer you to our investor presentation on our website and our filings with the SEC for non-GAAP reconciliations and additional information. I'll now turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Will Monteleone.

Thank you, Ashimi, and good morning, everyone. Before discussing quarterly results, I want to thank Bill Pate for his many contributions to Par Pacific's success over the last 10 years. Bill has been a terrific partner and a guiding force in the company's formation and strategic direction. I'm grateful for his leadership and honored to build upon our strong foundation as a leading conventional and renewable fuel provider to the Western United States. Moving on to quarterly results. Our first quarter adjusted EBITDA was $95 million and adjusted net income was $0.69 per share. Our Retail and Logistics business units delivered stable earnings contributions, while strong operational execution in the refining segment positions us to increase production during the profitable summer driving season. Billings refinery is in the process of restarting, further improving our summer operating position. Richard will provide more details. Global product inventories are presently low, well balanced. Supply-side support appears limited. Incremental Chinese exports are expected to be flat to down year-over-year and national policies remain focused on adequate local market supply, both transportation fuels and petrochemicals. In addition, we see refined product freight costs remaining elevated, inflating the cost arbitrage between markets and highlighting the benefits of local manufacturing. This is likely to become a larger factor as we enter the summer driving season and marginal supply will need to stretch further to solve for marginal demand. Our retail brands continue to build momentum with same-store fuel and merchandise sales growth of 6% and 5%, respectively. The retail team is focused on growing food service gross margin, rolling out core systems to better manage in-store costs and building a pipeline model in new-to-industry sites. Our relatively young brands continue to be well received in the local markets we serve, as demonstrated by the above trend growth rates. Progress continues on our renewable fuel initiatives. In Hawaii, the $90 million renewable hydrotreater project is tracking on time and on budget and the renewable fuel cogeneration project with Hawaiian Electric is progressing towards the potential power purchase agreement. In Tacoma, we are pivoting from the larger SAS and green hydrogen project to assess lower capital high return opportunities. Our balance sheet remains well positioned. Thus far this year, we further reduced our cost of debt capital and repurchased more than $70 million of our stock at attractive prices. With more than $575 million of liquidity, our balance sheet remains strong, allowing us to both opportunistically repurchase our stock and pursue our strategic objectives. Looking forward, we are focused on safe and reliable operations, crisp project execution, and thoughtful capital allocation. We are committed to managing risks and also position our enterprise to generate strong returns through the cycle.

Thank you, Will. Turning to the Refining segment. First quarter combined throughput was 181,000 barrels per day, reflecting winter seasonality and maintenance activities. In Hawaii, throughput was 79,000 barrels per day and production costs were $4.89 per barrel. The crude rate was reduced for 10 days in March as we resolved the filling issue in our crude vacuum power. We have restored operations and demonstrated a return to full crude capability. For Billings, first quarter throughput was 53,000 barrels per day despite seasonality; crude rates were elevated as we built inventory ahead of the second quarter turnaround. First quarter production costs were $12.44 per barrel, elevated by approximately $5 million due to increased electricity costs and pre-turnaround related OpEx. Billings crude and reformer blocks have been in turnaround since early April. The turnaround has progressed to plan and is on schedule and on budget. We are currently in the beginning stages of start-up operations. Shifting to Wyoming, refinery availability has been excellent. Throughput was a first quarter record of 17,000 barrels per day and production costs were $7.86 per barrel. Finally, in Washington, first quarter throughput was 31,000 barrels per day and production costs were $6.07 per barrel, elevated by approximately $1 million due to a 15-day planned March maintenance event. The refinery is back to full rates and operating well in the second quarter. Looking ahead, each of our assets are positioned to optimize throughput heading into the summer season. For the second quarter, we expect Hawaii throughput between 81,000 and 84,000 barrels per day, Wyoming between 18,000 and 20,000 barrels per day, Washington between 39,000 and 41,000 barrels per day and Billings between 34,000 and 38,000 barrels per day, reflecting the second quarter turnaround activities.

Thank you, Richard. First quarter adjusted EBITDA and adjusted earnings were $95 million and $42 million or $0.69 per share. The refining segment reported adjusted EBITDA of $81 million compared to $107 million in the fourth quarter of last year. In Hawaii, the Singapore Index averaged $18.67 per barrel and our land accrue differential was $6.60, resulting in a combined index of approximately $12 per barrel. Hawaii margin capture was 116%, reflecting the benefits of elevated clean product freight and strong commercial execution. Looking ahead to the second quarter, we expect our Hawaii crude differentials to land between $5 and $5.50 per barrel, and we have continued our product crack hedging framework with approximately 26% of our second quarter sales hedged at $20 per barrel. In Billings, our Gulf Coast index averaged $21.34 per barrel, margin capture was 65%, reflecting seasonally soft market conditions. Upper Rockies, gasoline and diesel cracks relative to the Gulf Coast have rebounded quarter-to-date, improving by approximately $9 and $16 per barrel, respectively. The second quarter Billings turnaround is expected to impact gross margin by $4 to $5 per barrel, and we expect operating costs to remain flat relative to the first quarter. In Wyoming, captured to the Gulf Coast index was 70%, reflecting similar seasonal dynamics as Billings. Lower Rockies markets were particularly weak during the first quarter, reflecting strong refinery utilizations and softer demand in January. Rapid City gasoline spreads to the Gulf Coast have improved $10 per barrel quarter-to-date, and we are well positioned ahead of the peak summer season. Lastly, in Washington, the PNW Index averaged $20.48 per barrel during the first quarter. Margin capture was 30%, including an approximate $2 per barrel impact from the planned refinery outage. Looking to Q2, our PNW index has improved $7.50 per barrel quarter-to-date, driven by expanding gasoline margins in the region. The Logistics segment reported adjusted EBITDA of $28 million in the first quarter compared to $24 million in the fourth quarter, reflecting strong system utilization and lower operating costs. Our retail segment reported adjusted EBITDA of $14 million in the first quarter compared to $17 million in the fourth quarter. Same-store sales growth was partially offset by softer retail fuel margins due to rising wholesale prices. Corporate expenses and adjusted EBITDA were $29 million in the first quarter compared to $26 million in the fourth quarter. First quarter expenses included $5 million related to advancing our renewable development activities. With our pivot from the larger SAF and green hydrogen project in Tacoma, we expect our renewable spending to reduce to $2 million to $3 million per quarter for the remainder of the year. Cash provided by operations in the first quarter totaled $83 million, excluding a $44 million working capital outflow related to an increase in trade receivables and $13 million in turnaround expenditures. Cash used in investing activities totaled $23 million, primarily related to CapEx. Total liquidity as of March 31 was $575 million made up of $228 million in cash and $347 million in availability. We further reduced our cost of debt capital with the recent refinancing activities. In April, we repriced our $545 million term loan, reducing annual interest expense by $3 million. In March, we expanded the capacity of our asset-based loan from $900 million to $1.4 billion as we plan to refinance our existing Hawaii intermediation for a combination of borrowings under the ABL and a smaller crude oil intermediation. The shift towards ABL financing in Hawaii is expected to reduce working capital costs by $10 million annually with Hawaii gross margin improving by approximately $20 million per year, partially offset by a $10 million increase in annual interest costs. Lastly, we've continued our opportunistic approach to share repurchases with $32 million during the first quarter and $73 million year-to-date at an average price of $34 per share. The strong balance sheet heading into the summer driving season, we are well positioned to pursue our strategic growth objectives while opportunistically repurchasing our common stock at attractive prices.

Great. Maybe if I could start, congratulations on the continued strong performance in Hawaii. Can you talk about what you're seeing in Asian markets, including the impact of clean tanker rates on Hawaii margins and any outlook from here in terms of how you see things progressing over the course of the year.

Sure, Ryan. Thanks for your comments. It's Will. So I think the key things that we're watching on the Singapore margins, and we continue to see it trade really in sympathy with Northwest Europe. Ultimately, barrels need to clear or arbitrage from Asia to Europe. And so I think at the current time, that's the biggest factor. Ultimately, inventories are still on the lower side. And I think as we approach the summer driving season, you're going to see large refining incentives to produce gasoline which is going to ultimately compete with diesel. On the freight side, again, I think the biggest factor is ultimately the disruption in trade flows, both of Russian refined product exports as well as the need for refined product that is produced in the Middle East and India that needs to take much longer routes to get to Europe. So I think ultimately, this comes down to fuel politics. I don't see anything readily on the horizon that suggests a change here. And so ultimately, I think we're in for a period of elevated refined product freight rates until we see stability. So again, I think that gives us some optimism on overall refined product cracks, both in Northwest Europe as well as in Singapore.

Great, as we consider cash usage, you repurchased a significant number of shares this quarter, likely exceeding our expectations. Could you discuss the factors behind that pace and your approach to shareholder returns moving forward? Additionally, what are your overall strategic priorities regarding cash usage in the medium term?

Sure. So I think ultimately, the share price cadence or the share repurchase cadence is really driven by an opportunistic approach on our forward outlook, liquidity, the share price, and our view of fundamental value. I think you'll see us continue to be opportunistic in that approach. In periods where you see share price weakness, we will be more aggressive. In periods of improving conditions or improving price, we'll probably buy less stock. So again, I think we'll continue to be opportunistic, and we're share price sensitive. I think broadly, as we think about capital allocation, we've strengthened our balance sheet to the point where we've got a lot of flexibility looking ahead. The question really is how do we want to invest in growth. We look at share repurchases as really just another opportunity to invest in our own company, and we approach it dynamically. In addition, I think we continue to want to pursue our strategic growth objectives, which include everything from C-store development, investing in our refineries to improve reliability, investing in renewables, and then strategic acquisitions to the extent that they fit and are attractively priced. All that to say, we know from past M&A experiences that carrying some excess liquidity allows us to be less reliant on capital markets, and it ultimately drives enhanced shareholder returns. So again, we weigh all those things against the opportunity to repurchase our stock at attractive prices. That's really how we think about our capital allocation framework.

Great. So your same-store retail both volumes as well as merchandise revenue were quite impressive. How much would you attribute this to your exposure to some unique markets, say, in Hawaii versus how much would you attribute to your individual efforts in retail?

Sure, Matthew, it's Will. It's a good question. I think really, this comes down to a mix of both our positioning in Hawaii, but also some strength we're seeing in our Nomnom brand that's relatively new. So it's a balanced contribution across the board. In-store, I think we're really just scratching the surface. We've got a relatively new leadership team on the retail side that's really driving some impressive in-store trends. I would attribute some of this to a lower base. In the past, we've really been strong on the fuel side, and I think you're seeing us focus on the store. I think that's beginning to yield results.

Sounds good. And then the follow-up is on M&A. Could you talk about the current landscape and your overall interest in acquiring either additional refineries or more retail stations? And then I guess on the flip side, is Par open to being acquired? And if so, what does that mean for your considerable NOL position?

Sure, Matthew. As we mentioned previously, our strategic focus continues to be on PADD 4 and the upper tier of PADD 5 regarding refining and logistics. For a transaction to be competitive with our alternatives, it must be an exceptional opportunity with significant synergies with our existing operations. Therefore, our strategic focus remains unchanged in this respect. Regarding our net operating loss, we estimate it to be around $900 million in gross value. This remains a valuable asset that will protect our taxable income for the coming years. Any future mergers and acquisitions where we're either acquiring or where the target is focused on maximizing shareholder value must take into account this NOL as an asset when evaluating future opportunities and the fundamental value of our business. While it wouldn't be appropriate to discuss whether we would be a target, our emphasis is firmly on enhancing shareholder value.

Ashimi, is that better?

Yes.

Okay. Great. So the first question is just on Asia. Margins have certainly softened up out there, and a lot of that seems like we're nearing run cut levels in the region? Would love your perspective on how you see the Asian market playing out? And then how do you see Hawaii base trending relative to Asia as we get our way into the summer?

Sure. Thanks, Neil. I tend to agree with your assessment that as we're approaching a Singapore crack or 3-1-2 of $12, you look at the secondary products out there like naphtha and fuel oil. The simpler refiners in Asia are approaching negative gross margin levels. From that perspective, supply side support exists. Our view is the marginal barrel still needs to clear from Asia to Europe as you approach the summer. You'll ultimately see that trend re-emerge. Given where the freight market is, it's quite expensive. You're going to see products continue to flow in that direction. As for Hawaii, the marginal barrel is still imported, and freight is a major factor. We think about the Hawaii basis and our local capture rates; refined product freight and trends remain elevated. We've continued to see refined product freight cost trade between $8 and $10 per barrel range, consistent with where they've been over the last several quarters.

Yes. And the follow-up is just maybe spending a little more time on the Rockies. I think you did allude to the fact it was a softer start for the quarter, but things seem to be moving in the right direction in the region. So just your perspective on how much of that was transient and what we should carry into 2Q.

Sure. Yes. I think Shawn referenced this. We saw some strong utilization rates for the PADD 4 refining complex in the first quarter. It's really the first time in a while that's been the case. And we saw, I'd say, steady improvement with what was a substantial trough in January and steady improvement as we move through the first quarter. The steady upward trends continued into April and May, signaling a little bit of rebalancing that was happening. So again, I'd really point to some of the weakness as being a January-specific event.

Could you go into some detail on the pivot you called out at Tacoma on the renewable side? What's the new scope of the work? And is the green hydrogen project effectively off the table here?

John, it's Will. At a high level, we've spent significant effort scoping this project. Given the policy backdrop and where the renewables environment sits, we think that a larger capital kind of higher-risk project is more difficult to fund today and doesn't generate the types of returns we're seeking. I think I've talked about renewables in the past and our view on investing there. We believe the returns there need to be at or above what we think about investing in our conventional fuel business. That's really the backdrop for the change and the deferral of the green hydrogen project pairs with the SAF project. As we think about the scope of work, we're looking at the advantages we have in Tacoma logistically. We've got great rail access, significant tankage, deepwater capabilities, and ultimately, thinking about the right way to utilize our logistics assets so that we are prepared to either distribute and/or produce lower carbon fuels in the future.

That's helpful. And then on the intermediation facility in Hawaii, just so we understand, is the savings there just from less inventories being encompassed under the new deal given its crude only and some at the cost of carrying more inventories on your balance sheet? And should we think of this as a step towards eventually going to no intermediation agreement and reducing your finance costs even further? Or should we think of this as more of a necessity for your Hawaii business longer-term?

John, it's Shawn. I think the drivers of the savings that we called out of $10 million a year are really actual cost of the facility versus the ABL, not necessarily the fact that we're equity funding more inventory. In fact, we signal a big shift in the amount of inventory that we're equity funding. The right way to think about it is about 200 to 300 basis points of savings shifting from intermediation to ABL. On whether this is just a step towards funding our Hawaii business exclusively with ABLs, at this time, we see some benefits in intermediation financing as it relates to our crude. We have a complex supply chain with cargoes in the water. The intermediation facility provides a good solution there. Ultimately, we'll evaluate as our liquidity position improves whether it makes sense to shift completely towards ABL.

I want to ask about the upcoming Montana maintenance. Can you just remind us what the scope of work is? And then given it's your first maintenance event since acquiring the plant and you previously alluded to some eventual improvement in operations. Should we expect to see any of that after you come out of turnaround relative to where it was performing prior to the turnaround?

Sure, Jason. It's Will. When you mention the upcoming turnaround, I assume you mean the April activity we've referenced. This is largely, as Richard pointed out, on the crude unit, reformer, and several of the hydrotreaters that we have. As Richard referenced, we're moving toward restart activities. The intent of conducting this activity during this period was to position us to run at optimum and elevated rates during the summer season. Our plan is to push rates as we come out of the turnaround and into the third quarter. Our focus in Montana is to drive reliability, limit process safety risks, and optimize throughput. If we can do that, we have already demonstrated the mechanical availability to run the plant into the low 60s. That is our focus. It isn't easy to do, but we have a strong team, and that is our top priority.

Got it. And then can you just remind us on the balance sheet, what the target cash level is for you guys and/or overall liquidity?

Jason, it's Shawn. I think our minimum liquidity targets are really dynamic based on upcoming turnaround events and discretionary CapEx outlook and nondiscretionary CapEx. Historically, we signaled that our minimum liquidity was in the $200 million range, and it's safe to assume that this is higher given the expanded business. We've strengthened the balance sheet to a point where we have excess liquidity. From this point, any additional liquidity will be allocated toward our strategic growth objectives and creating shareholder value with share repurchases.

I think in your prepared remarks, you indicated that the Pacific Northwest crack has moved up, primarily driven by the strength of gasoline. I was just wondering if you could help us understand between the three regions where you're seeing in terms of relative product strength, where are you seeing gasoline the strongest or jet fuel the strongest or diesel vehicle strong. If you could just help us walk and understand how the dynamics of the three projects are looking in the three regions.

Sure, Manav. To start with Hawaii, it's really going to be driven by waterborne dynamics. We're seeing strength on the Asian gasoline market, particularly for Octane, and that will ripple through into our production plans. Broadly speaking, looking at the Pacific Northwest, we're seeing regional strength on the gasoline side. Some Northern California refineries that have converted to renewables production are bringing in significant imports, impacting the overall clearing price for gasoline. Conversely, diesel on the West Coast is weaker relative to historical conditions, seeing more exports out of the West Coast to rebalance the market as renewables are coming in. Shifting inland to the Rockies, it will remain hyperseasonal; strong demand for diesel will continue, with typical seasonal rebounds in gasoline demand. Overall, we're seeing good product demand across our system. Thank you all for joining us this morning. I believe the future of this enterprise is bright, and we are well positioned to grow our earnings as we enhance and optimize the business we have built over the last 10 years. Have a great day.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.