Good morning, and welcome to the Perella Weinberg Partners Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. During today's discussion, all callers will be placed in listen-only mode, and following management's prepared remarks, the conference call will be open for questions from the research community. This conference call is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Taylor Reinhardt, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and welcome to our third quarter 2021 earnings call. Joining me today are Peter Weinberg, Chief Executive Officer; and Gary Barancik, Chief Financial Officer. A replay of this call will be available through the Investors’ page of the Company’s website approximately two hours following the conclusion of this live broadcast through November 18, 2021. For those who listen to the rebroadcast of this presentation, we remind you that the remarks made herein are as of today, November 4, 2021, and have not been updated subsequent to the initial earnings call. Before we begin, I’d like to note that this call may contain forward-looking statements, including PWP’s expectations of future financial and business performance and conditions and industry outlook. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and are not guarantees of future events or performance. Please refer to PWP’s most recent SEC filings for a discussion of certain of these risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations, and the firm undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. During the call, there will also be a discussion of some metrics which are non-GAAP financial measures that management believes are relevant in assessing the financial performance of the business. PWP has reconciled these items to the most comparable GAAP measures in the press release filed with today’s Form 8-K, which can be found on the Company’s website. I will now turn the call over to Peter Weinberg to discuss our results.

Thank you, Taylor. Good morning, and thank you all for joining us for our third quarter 2021 earnings call. Before I get into our results, I would like to share a few overall observations that set the tone for our quarter. First of all, our markets continue to be as active as I’ve ever seen them. The activity is sourced by continued macroeconomic and structural factors, the increasing attraction of the independent advisory model to clients, and what we are calling a 'liquidity super-cycle', the enormous amounts of capital across our financial system that will support the velocity of activity for some time. Second, Perella Weinberg Partners is a growth company. We see very clear opportunities to grow the size and scope of the firm into industry subsectors and products in which we do not now participate; and both clients and talented professionals around the world are embracing our platform as a place to hire and work, respectively. Third, as of this past Monday, our firm is back-to-the-office. And while our team performed extremely well together remotely, achieving record results for the firm, we will certainly benefit from more in-person interaction amongst our people. The office will be the center of our work life while allowing more flexibility to our people than pre-pandemic. Now, on to our financial performance. I am pleased to report that our firm recorded revenues for the quarter of $177 million and revenues for the nine months ending September 30th of $603 million, a 44% increase and an 83% increase versus the respective prior periods in 2020. Both of these revenue amounts were records for their respective periods. Commensurate with the market, we saw healthy M&A and financing advice fee realizations across our platform driven by very active levels of strategic dialogue and transaction flow, while fees from restructuring and liability management contracted to pre-pandemic levels. Diving a bit deeper on our M&A activity, we experienced strong results across our industry coverage universe with particularly robust activity in the healthcare, energy, and industrials sectors. The activity was driven by an array of clients, spanning from large-cap corporates to mid-cap emerging growth companies and was reflective of a balance of both buy and sell side transactions. These drivers of activity are in line with what we are seeing in the market, where large-cap companies are both considering how to be proactive coming out of the crisis and evaluating how they might use M&A to anticipate or respond to changes in their end markets, notably by investing in growth and technology transformation. Separately, emerging companies are seeking to grow their scale, raise capital, or are grappling with interest from larger companies. Furthermore, private and public financing markets are robust, and the private equity community has experienced record activity, showing again its importance to the strategic landscape across every sector. Activity in the restructuring and liability management market continues but has dropped significantly relative to the peak levels seen in 2020. The activity has been tempered by low interest rates, the wide availability of capital, and the impact of government stimulus. It is possible that we will continue to see such dynamics through the medium term until some technical factors begin to turn. Despite the decline in restructuring and liability management activity both across the market and on our platform, we continue to believe that liability management services will contribute meaningfully to our business over the long-term, largely driven by the cyclicality of the market and expanded balance sheets resulting from the pandemic. Our restructuring and liability management pipeline for 2022 is healthy. From a geographic perspective, we generated record results in our European business for the first nine months of 2021. While we do not look at our business on a regional basis, we believe our significant presence and attractive branding position in Europe differentiates us when compared to advisory peers, and our strong performance is commensurate with that differentiation. We are well-positioned to take advantage of the recent acceleration of activity in that region, and we continue to invest behind the business to support future growth. Although third quarter revenues did not reach the record levels of the second quarter, where we experienced an unusually high level of completions and fee realizations by historic standards, we nonetheless saw a continued heightened level of strategic dialogue and transaction flow. While we recognize that revenue results can fluctuate quarter-over-quarter and that numerous macroeconomic factors could affect the trajectory of the currently favorable M&A and financing environment, we have yet to see any sign of a slowdown in dialogue with our clients. Across market participants, activity is healthy, and the overall mindset of business leaders is quite positive. Our backlog at the end of Q3 remained extremely strong and was close to an all-time high. We continue to add talent at all levels to support our strategic growth. As of September 30th, we had 58 advisory partners, and year-to-date we have added 9 partners. This figure does not reflect an additional partner who has agreed to join the firm in 2021, and our recruiting pipeline remains strong. Our 10 new partners, including 3 internal promotions, bring significant expertise in tech and fintech broadly, as well as financial institutions, industrials, and healthcare both in the U.S. and Europe. We are focused on further strengthening our partner base with individuals who will help expand our coverage and expertise from a sector, product, and geography standpoint as well as those who we deem collaborative and franchise-enhancing. In a busy environment, the market for talent is certainly more challenging. We are confident that our platform and collaborative culture along with being a growth company with momentum will continue to attract exceptional professionals. We are encouraged by the level of interest that we are seeing and feel confident in our ability to successfully attract individuals who fit our strategic needs and our culture. To wrap up, we feel very good about the momentum we continued to experience in the third quarter. We are well-positioned to take advantage of the currently favorable environment, and we will continue to invest behind our simple, clear, client-centric model to support future growth opportunities. We remain committed to providing trusted and high-quality strategic and financial advice to our clients and delivering long-term value to shareholders. On that note, Gary, I will turn it over to you.

Thank you, Peter. As Peter mentioned, we generated $177 million of revenues for the third quarter, an increase of 44% over the prior-year period. Our revenues for the nine months ended September 30 were $603 million, an increase of 83% from the prior year. We continue to see high levels of activity across our business, which translated into strong, diversified revenue results for both the three-month and nine-month periods. The increase in revenues can be attributed to both an increase in the number of advisory transaction completions and the average fee size per client, particularly in mergers and acquisitions advice, as compared to the prior year periods. The increase in third quarter 2021 M&A and financial advisory revenue was partially offset by a reduction in restructuring and liability management fees as compared to the prior year. On the expense side, in the third quarter, we accrued adjusted compensation expense at 64% of revenues, in line with our previously communicated medium-term guidance. This is 500 basis points lower than our adjusted compensation ratio for the third quarter of 2020 when we operated as a private partnership. Our adjusted non-compensation expense for the third quarter was $33.1 million, compared with $28.8 million for the same period a year ago. As a percentage of revenues, our adjusted non-compensation expense was 19% for the third quarter, down from 23% in the same period last year. The overall dollar increase in non-compensation expenses on an adjusted basis was primarily driven by an increase in professional fees related to consulting and recruiting, increased public company costs including D&O insurance, and a modest increase in travel and related expenses as pandemic-related travel restrictions ease. As discussed on our last earnings call and as seen in our Q3 results, we expect that adjusted non-compensation expense for the second half of 2021 will be at a higher level than the first half of the year. For the second half of 2021, we expect that our adjusted non-comp expenses are likely to be approximately 25% to 30% higher than the $54.5 million recorded in the first half of the year. This is due to several factors including increased public company costs including D&O insurance and temporarily higher legal and tax professional fees to support our transition to a public company, timing related to certain IT projects and professional development expenses as well as some modest assumed increase in travel. As we look beyond 2021, I want to call two other non-compensation items to your attention. First, 2020 and 2021 year-to-date adjusted non-compensation expenses benefited from low levels of travel and entertainment expenses due to the effects of the pandemic. We have begun to see a modest increase in business travel and expect that this trend will continue. While we expect that the experience during the pandemic will allow us to continue to conduct much of our business remotely or virtually, we are a client-focused business and anticipate that business travel will again be a meaningful portion of our non-compensation spend, albeit not quite at the levels per banker that we saw in 2019 and earlier. Second, our leases for our London and New York headquarters expire in December of 2022 and September of 2023, respectively, and given our significant projected growth, we anticipate expanding our square footage meaningfully in both locations. Although we expect that free rent and tenant improvement allowances will mitigate capital expenditure requirements, for GAAP accounting purposes we expect some period of non-cash overlap between lease expenses recorded on our existing and new leases. Although we are not able to quantify these amounts at the current time, we will provide an update on subsequent earnings calls. We are excited to have the opportunity to reimagine how we work and collaborate in a new work environment and we feel fortunate that due to the timing of our lease expirations, we are able to do so in the near future with our two largest offices. Technology has become a much more important component of how we interact with our colleagues and our clients and designing our space in the post-pandemic environment will allow us to create efficient, effective, and highly productive workspaces. Adjusted net income totaled $29 million for the third quarter and $122 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. Our adjusted if-converted net income for the third quarter was $24 million and presents our results as if all partnership units had converted to shares of Common Stock. Adjusted diluted, if-converted, net income per Class A share was $0.26 for the three months ended September 30, 2021. And finally, turning to the balance sheet, as of September 30, 2021 we had $415.8 million of cash and cash equivalents, no debt, and an undrawn revolving credit facility. The Board has declared a Class A Common Stock dividend of $0.07 payable on December 17, 2021 to holders of record as of December 3, 2021. Over time, we expect to return excess cash flow to shareholders through a combination of share repurchases to moderate dilution and dividends. With that, we’ll now turn the call back to the operator to open the line for questions.

Thank you. Your first question comes from Devin Ryan from JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Hey, great. Good morning, Peter and Gary. First question here, I just want to talk a bit about the recruiting outlook. Obviously, I think you mentioned it was competitive but you've got some idiosyncratic tailwinds and there's a lot of white space for the firm right now. And I know the kind of the rough target is to add five external partners a year. You're already at seven for this year. How are you thinking about that five number going forward, just kind of the cross currents that you mentioned? Do you think you may be able to do a little bit better than that over the intermediate term, like you're doing in 2021? And then, Peter, you also mentioned some products and industries you're not in today. What are the priorities or what are maybe some of the near-term areas that you may enter through recruiting?

Good morning, Devin. We hired seven partners from outside the firm this year across various product areas, regions, and industry groups. As you mentioned, it's competitive to attract the best talent. We were successful in hiring this specific group due to business fit, culture, and fair compensation that was equitable for the partners while being appealing for the firm. We believe our competitive advantage in hiring partners is that they have the opportunity to generate more value on our platform compared to their previous firms. We're optimistic about continuing to hire partners at this rate moving forward. Regarding your question on future hires and product areas, we have a clear understanding of whom we want to recruit for specific positions. We are aware of individuals in the market and internally who could potentially take those partner roles. While we don't disclose specifics, a good indicator is the people we hired this year. We elevated many individuals in technology; 40% of our new partners were from technology and financial technology, along with healthcare, industrials, and roles in both the U.S. and Europe.

Okay. Terrific. I want to touch on Europe a bit here, I know you're having a record year there to date. European M&A broadly is recovering but is still well below kind of historical peaks if you go back over a decade to 2007 or so in that prior cycle. With the recovery that we're seeing in Europe, how do you think about maybe the productivity upside from here? You're having a lot of success, but is there a lot more upside to banker productivity or how would you frame kind of where we are in the European recovery from the Perella perspective?

I always start a conversation about Europe with the reference to the fact that we started in Europe 15 years ago, at the same time that we started in the U.S. because that's an important framework in which to evaluate the firm over there. As I said earlier, and as you referenced, we had a record year in Europe, but it's important to mention that this record applies also to productivity of the partners in Europe, matching USA metrics. We're serving our clients from our three bases in Europe, London, Paris, and Munich. Half of our partners that we hired this year or elevated are resident in Europe. And the forces really creating activity in Europe are very similar to those in the U.S. in terms of the liquidity available and the overall environment for mergers, and we're very optimistic about the business going forward.

Okay, great. If I could just squeeze one more in for Gary, a question that we get from our clients just around your quantification of excess capital. Clearly, your firm is capital-light and building capital. How would you guys kind of recommend us looking at that and quantifying that? And then capacity for potential buybacks and how you guys are thinking about the opportunity there as well?

Yes. Thanks, Devin. Look, I think that the messaging we gave in the past is still very much the case. We'll be looking at a mix of both repurchases, potentially specials, as well as our ordinary dividends as a means of returning capital. I think on the one hand, we probably have a bias towards excess cash repurchases because we do want to moderate the impact of dilution from share-based compensation, but also our Up-C structure, as you know, can create a need for occasional specials to balance out the cash between what's held at the public company. So, it'll be a mix. We're not anticipating any specials or repurchases for the balance of this quarter. But it is something we expect to turn to in the new year.

Okay, great. Thanks for the color. I’ll leave it there. Thank you guys.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Richard Ramsden from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Okay. Good morning, Peter and Gary. So, I wanted to ask a question on financial sponsors versus corporate activity, and I know there's a continuum between serving corporates and financial sponsors. But, if you take a step back and think about the contribution from financial sponsors to your franchise this year, would you consider it to be disproportionate relative to history? And perhaps you can touch on the sustainability and the risks that you see to the run rate in the sponsor business as we head into 2022. Thanks.

Sure. Good morning, Richard. A number of the sell-side analysts on the phone referenced a Dealogic calculation that said that 49% of our business touched financial sponsors, and we don't really look at it that way for reasons I'll explain in a second, but that number didn't shock me at all. Our coverage of sponsors is ubiquitous; every partner, industry coverage partners, product partners, and regional partners have engagement with sponsors directly. That's what sponsors want, and that's what we provide. I will say that sponsors are attracted to our deep relationships with large corporates around the world and when appropriate, we make those connections. And that's how we think about the sponsor business. It’s very much an integral part of our entire firm.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just more broadly. Can you just spend a couple of minutes, Peter, on what you think the biggest risks are to the run rate of activity? So, obviously interest rates, higher inflation, the robust antitrust enforcement that we're seeing, what type of impact do you think that will have on the environment as we head into next year? And I'm also curious, on the micro side, are you seeing any issues around lawyers and accountants hitting capacity constraints which is turning out the time it takes to get a deal closed? Thanks a lot.

Sure. On the macro side, there are always clouds on any horizon, and as you correctly state, we have no shortage of clouds today, all of the points that you mentioned: inflation, interest rates, certainly supply chain, labor shortages, tax policy, antitrust, etc. I would say that large multinational companies that we work with, and I think others, have shown that they have been very adaptive and resilient through many market dislocations over the past 5, 10, 15 years, and more so today than they ever have been. So, they're not wishing these risks away, but they include these risks and accommodate them in terms of how they think about corporate strategy and M&A. The one caveat I would make on the macro side is that companies and markets don't react well to shocks or spikes or significant changes versus market expectations, as you all know. And so, I think a very significant and sudden change in inflationary expectations, a very significant or sudden change in interest rates, I think would dislocate the markets and would also slow activity. I don't think that's likely but that's my view on how that might happen. With respect to micro, it's a very busy market and the whole ecosystem of the transactional world is very busy, but we’ve not felt any restraint or problem or unnecessary delays as it relates to working with lawyers and others across the system.

Okay. That's very helpful. Thanks a lot.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Chubak from Wolfe Research. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Peter. Good morning, Gary. I wanted to ask about the backlog, which you mentioned is near record levels at the end of Q3. Given the hiring you've done this year, I understand that those new hires may not be fully productive by 2022. How confident are you in your ability to grow revenues, especially considering some uncertainties ahead, while acknowledging that the fundamentals in the M&A space remain strong and, as you pointed out earlier, the discussions with both strategics and sponsors are very active?

Good morning, Steven. We are indeed very committed to growth as I mentioned earlier and as you correctly state. The reason for that is that our roadmap for growth is so clear. We have a clear line of sight to the different areas of the business in which we want to grow. I'll also add that we only have approximately 60 partners and don't feel a constraint in terms of hiring or on the clients that we work with and seek to work with. And so, I think that the backdrop is compelling in that regard. We do have approximately a quarter of our partners who’ve been at the firm for less than three years. And so, those partners are gaining in productivity and will continue to have that dynamic as we hire people going forward.

Okay, that’s great insight, Peter. I have a couple of follow-up questions for Gary. First, regarding the commentary on non-compensation expenses, I wanted to address the trajectory as we head into next year. You mentioned that T&E normalization could be a potential challenge, which is certainly not unique to your company. Could you provide some perspective or a rough estimate on the expenses related to going public? This would help us better understand the various factors impacting the growth outlook for non-comps next year.

Yes. I think I can't get too specific for you, Steven, but to give you an idea of some of the larger elements, I mentioned D&O costs before; this expense is elevated for us compared to our peers, not only because we are a public company but also due to going public through a transaction, and it's likely to stay that way for a few years. This is a significant part of it. The other expenses mentioned include some typical public company costs; we have additional personnel for financial reporting and increased audit and tax fees, which are more standard but higher compared to previous periods. Additionally, there are some shorter-term costs, around six to nine months after the business combination, related to legal and tax, as we needed extra support from outside advisors for various capital market transactions and our initial quarters. Those are primarily the main types of expenses.

Understood. And just a final clean-up, just I was hoping for an update, Gary, on the lockups, when they're set to expire and maybe you could just speak to the comments around the buyback. Why not look to get a little bit more aggressive here given the constructive commentary that was cited on the call with regards to the outlook and the strength of your excess liquidity position as you noted in one of the earlier remarks?

I'll address the first part of your question regarding lockups. There are two main categories to discuss. The first category includes sponsor shares, which are either subject to a standard six-month lockup from the time of the transaction or, in some cases, to specific stock price targets. With the six-month anniversary coming up in late December, some of these shares will be released. Additionally, we have partnership units related to our legacy partners, which will also come out of lockup, not involving working partners but just legacy partners and certain founding investors. The total number of shares that might become available for exchange or sale at that anniversary is around 14 million to 15 million shares. This is within the six-month timeframe. The next significant milestone, aside from meeting certain price targets, will be at the one-year anniversary, when more units will become available. Regarding buybacks, we are indeed focused on that for next year, dependent on our Board's approval. We are not proceeding this quarter due to several factors, as we are still navigating through our first year as a public company, particularly concerning compensation. There are also considerations regarding the balance between special distributions and repurchases because of tax distribution needs, and we want to manage that prudently. That's why I say we expect to address buybacks next year rather than this quarter.

Helpful color. Thanks so much for taking my questions.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Brown from KBW. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you. Hey, Peter, Gary, how are you guys?

Good, Mike, thanks.

Good morning.

So, yes, I just wanted to follow up on the comments on the energy space. Obviously, that part of the market has been very strong, your Tudor, Pickering, Holt business is really well positioned for that. So, could you just talk a little bit more about the outlook for that segment of the M&A market? And is it fair to assume that activity could accelerate from here just given the high oil and energy prices, broadly?

Sure, Mike. With respect to our energy business, very much the focus of that business right now is energy transition, energy technology, and sustainability. And while hydrocarbons are not going away tomorrow, and of course, it's an enormous industry around the world, these are the themes that are very prominent in our client discussions. And I would say that those extend into each of the areas of the whole energy ecosystem, including upstream, midstream, downstream, and services companies.

Okay, great. And then, just two maybe quick cleanups for Gary. So, Gary, the tax rate that was used under the if-converted method was 31%, not sure if I missed it, but is that the right way to think about that going forward? Is that the tax rate we should be using in our adjusted EPS forecast here?

Yes, Michael, that's our best estimate for the year. I can't provide guidance for the long term, but that is our best view for the current year, and it’s slightly higher than we expected due to our revenues exceeding forecasts, which is resulting in some increased compensation expenses, some of which are not fully deductible under tax laws. I should also note that the non-GAAP tax rate is somewhat theoretical for several reasons. We are trying to model it on an if-converted basis, and for half of the year, we were a private company. Additionally, it excludes certain GAAP items that are currently leading to significant deductions. Therefore, for this year, our expected cash tax rate, as indicated by our GAAP numbers, will be much lower. The 31% reflects the best we can do based on non-GAAP assumptions, but it is important to point out that there will be a disconnect from cash taxes this year.

Okay. Yes, understand those. Those are very complicated puts and takes there, but appreciate the color. And then just maybe one last one, did the third quarter include any pull-forward from the fourth quarter, just due to the revenue recognition accounting rules? And if so, can you quantify that?

Sure. We had about $29 million of pull-forward from two deals, and that follows on from the second quarter, where there was $17 million from one transaction.

Okay, great. Very helpful. Thank you for taking my questions.

Sure thing.

Your next question comes from the line of Ken Worthington from JP Morgan. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good morning. Just really one for me, as we think about liability management and traditional restructuring. You indicated in the prepared remarks that both were down for the quarter, and this is sort of similar to the message we've heard from others on restructuring broadly. To what extent is liability management more resilient to good market conditions than is say traditional restructuring, and what part of the economic cycle would that resiliency likely to be most apparent?

Good morning, Ken. Yes. The capital markets advisory business within our firm is quite tied to the M&A business in the sense that it's part of the advice that we provide to clients. And so, I would say that, and that's been very much the case this year, but it's also very much a part of our dialogue with companies who are in financial distress. One of the things about our firm is that we don't manage the business by product area, but really more so by clients and client groups. And so, it's quite seamless actually, the dialogue that a client would have with a restructuring person, who might have expertise in an area that would be relevant to them, to a capital markets advisory person who would be closer to an actual transaction that may or may not be associated with a merger, and of course all of our industry bankers.

Great. Thank you very much.

And now, I would like to turn the call over to Taylor Reinhardt for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone for joining us. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to follow up with us.

And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.