Spire Global, Inc. Q3 FY2025 Earnings Call

Thank you. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining Spire's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Our earnings press release and related SEC filings are posted on the company's IR website. A replay of today's call will also be made available. With me on the call today is Theresa Condor, CEO; and Ali Engel, CFO. As a reminder, our commentary today will include non-GAAP items. Reconciliations between our GAAP and non-GAAP results as well as our guidance can be found in our earnings press release, which can be found on our IR website. Some of our comments today contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. In particular, our expectations around our future results of operations and financial condition are uncertain and subject to change. Should any of these expectations fail to materialize or should our assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual company results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. A description of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions and other factors that could affect our financial results is included in our SEC filings. With that, let me hand the call over to Theresa.

For more than a decade, Spire has been a steadfast champion of safety and security. We protect businesses and people by delivering critical weather intelligence and aviation insights that spot potential navigation hazards before they become problems. We empower nations with radio frequency data, turning raw signals into actionable intelligence. Through our proven scalable space infrastructure, Spire provides global invisible intelligence from orbit, capturing RF signals, atmospheric conditions and operational behavior data. This continuous space-based awareness provides hundreds of organizations and governments a real-time view of activity across Earth's environment, operations and infrastructure, enabling them to act faster, act safer and act with greater confidence. Today, Spire operates a satellite constellation of over 100 payloads. Our antennas cover every spot on earth approximately every 12 minutes. We serve data and analytics applications to hundreds of customers across 45 countries and collect millions of RF signals and atmospheric measurements every day. Spire closed the third quarter on the back of sizable commercial and government contract wins with triple-digit growth on multiple repeat contract awards in our core areas of weather and security. These awards reflect demand translating into signed long-term programs. We head into 2026 buoyed by unmistakable market opportunity even as we have navigated recent timing variability inherent in government procurement and delivery. Heightened security imperatives, larger budget allocations, accelerated procurement cycles and clear expectations for commercial partnerships have created a fertile environment for a well-established company like Spire, one that can deliver operational capability today while iterating rapidly toward tomorrow's needs. Our 2025 satellite manufacturing ramp-up proved we can scale with confidence. Satellite manufacturing throughput doubled per year while maintaining flat headcount. Our on-orbit data production is expected to increase tenfold for crucial RFGL products and threefold in our daily RO profiles. This step change in capacity cements Spire's role as a true dual-use solution provider driven by European, especially German demand. We have cost-effectively installed a world-class satellite manufacturing facility in Germany which will provide us with backup resilience and additional manufacturing capacity of up to 100 satellites per year once fully qualified and operational in Q1. We have selected KPMG as our new audit partner and we are confident that Spire is positioned to operate as a regular reporting public company going forward. In September, Spire secured its largest radio application contract from NOAA, an award three times the size of last year's in annual sounding volume and a greater than 40% improvement in price per sounding versus historical benchmarks. The agency also awarded Spire a contract for ocean surface winds derived from our GNSS-R data, supporting operational forecasting missions. Across Europe, demand for our weather data suite remains robust. We renewed our radio application agreement with EUMETSAT, sold GNSS-R data to the European Space Agency and sold data to a leading European weather agency in support of improved forecast accuracy. As the region advances its process of catching up with the U.S. in terms of commercial data use, Spire is uniquely positioned to continue as the key commercial partner based on its strong European operations. Looking ahead to 2026, we anticipate an even deeper partnership with NOAA across our product categories, buoyed by the agency's ongoing dialogue with commercial providers about their expanding strategic role in satellite-based weather observations. This expectation is supported by the overarching directive of the current U.S. administration towards more commercial partnerships and less government ownership. Spire's momentum is further supported by the upcoming launch of our microwave sounding satellite next month, which addresses a multibillion-dollar global atmospheric sounding need. Microwave sounders are among the most impactful satellite observations for forecasting models worldwide, especially because they can see inside clouds and provide temperature and moisture profiles crucial for accurate forecasting. Microwave soundings currently provide up to 40% of forecast accuracy benefit and are used by all global forecasting agencies around the world. However, the combination of the legacy government instrument retirements, administrative changes in data sharing, and delays in new instruments have sparked global concerns about the consistency and completeness of microwave data sets, particularly for critical applications such as hurricane intensity monitoring. This further opens the door to efficient and effective private sector participation in the multibillion-dollar global observing system. As geopolitical dynamics evolve, weather intelligence is also gaining heightened relevance for defense. Germany has recently published a space security strategy that underscores the strategic value of weather observations alongside traditional intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance domains. Demonstrating this trend, Spire recently won a contract award for high-resolution weather insights to support military applications. Further illustrating the link between global security and citizen safety, Spire signed a contract to deliver soil moisture data across Ethiopia's Somali region, covering hundreds of thousands of square kilometers in partnership with the international organization for migration. We have also won a coveted contract for high-resolution soil moisture insights from a brand-name commercial smart agriculture customer in the U.S. Spire's expanding partnership with Deloitte and the accompanying contract to fill multiple satellite clusters equipped with Deloitte's Silent Shield cyber defense suite underscores the strategic relevance of our space services platform. While revenue recognition extends beyond 2025, satellite manufacturing, operational deployment, and backlog conversion are proceeding exactly as planned. The program contributes to the company's total deferred revenue backlog of over $200 million, representing multiple years of contracted activity and reinforcing the long-term financial strength of the business. It is also another demonstration of our ability to secure high-profile awards that amplify our go-to-market reach within the U.S. federal ecosystem. Spire was recently selected as an awardee on the U.S. government Missile Defense Agency's multi-award SHIELD IDIQ contract with a shared ceiling of $151 billion. This award positions us to compete for task orders under the Golden Dome initiative, a U.S. missile defense effort expected to award over tens of billions of dollars per year over the next decade. Winning in this highly contested selection process confirms our role as an industrial-based partner capable of delivering defense-grade space-based data, RF intelligence, and digital engineering expertise for today and tomorrow's national security requirements. The Secretary of War's rapid procurement guidelines explicitly reward innovative firms that can meet capability needs today. Our Boulder-based manufacturing facility and all U.S. workforce provide the domestic footprint and security posture required to respond quickly. While the U.S. government shutdown shifted a portion of anticipated revenue from 2025 into 2026, the underlying program funding and delivery commitments remain fully intact, and recent awards demonstrate that the U.S. defense market continues to expand. In Europe, urgency for commercial partnerships in defense has increased meaningfully compared to a year ago. Germany has announced a EUR 7 billion per year space defense budget over the next 5 years, totaling approximately $40 billion. Our ISO-ready clean room and fully vertically integrated facilities in Munich make Spire one of the very few companies local to Germany with end-to-end small satellite capabilities with German nationals as well as German-speaking executives. We are also the only one with deep in-space radio frequency expertise. The German Space Agency DLR, a current Spire partner and customer, will play a key role in procurement, accelerating engagement with commercial suppliers. This relationship will support our ongoing direct engagement with the military on their short-term requirements, capability needs, and procurement asks. The European Space Agency Ministerial Council concluded in November with the largest financial commitment in their history. Member states pledged EUR 22 billion in new subscriptions for the next 3 years, with Germany contributing EUR 5 billion, an increase of almost 50%. Under the European Space Agency's geo-return policy, German contributions are reserved for contracts with German companies such as Spire, reinforcing our strategic positioning within Europe's growing space defense ecosystem and the European Space Agency's largest contributor. The European Union's Space Shield initiative, slated to begin in 2026, and an increasing urgency among NATO members further underscore demand for sovereign and commercial space capabilities. Across national security strategies, core requirements such as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance are consistently highlighted, reinforcing the relevance of Spire's dual-use satellite data services. NATO countries have pledged to increase their defense budgets to 5% of GDP. Assuming 5% of that amount for space would unlock $17 billion to $32 billion per year in additional contracts. Spire's space reconnaissance portfolio is seeing heightened demand as agencies move beyond traditional telecom and imaging approaches to exploit the radio-frequency domain. Our pipeline includes multiyear sovereign programs with recurring data demand as well as requests for immediate data delivery using installed capacity. With government backing, we have begun collecting S-Band and X-Band maritime radar signals and expanding geolocation capabilities to serve our non-U.S. customer base. Spire is advancing technology by utilizing a single satellite and our small form factor LEMUR platform to gain insights that would traditionally take a larger platform or multiple satellites. Even as Spire emerges as a national security technology partner, our commercial business remains an important growth engine. Under new leadership, our weather and aviation businesses are increasingly integrated with commercial revenue growing at a double-digit rate year-over-year and strong customer retention. Spire continues to see interest from our energy and commodity-focused clients that are using our short-term high-resolution forecasts and our long-term subseasonal to seasonal forecasts. We are hearing consistent feedback from these customers that Spire's forecasts are ahead of other models, capturing critical weather signs earlier and translating them into real operational and financial impact. During the quarter, we were also awarded a commercial aviation contract in which the customer is utilizing Spire's ADS-B data to track aircraft movements and detect potential discrepancies, which may point to suspicious activities, including route divergence or aircraft operating with ADS-B switched off. Our engineering transformation efforts continue to deliver results, proving that we can deliver operational capabilities at scale. We process nearly twice as many satellites through the clean room this year while maintaining flat headcount and stricter quality controls by implementing design for manufacturability and lean manufacturing principles. We are meeting heightened government cybersecurity and cyber requirements and delivering the accompanying documentation while continuing to invest in this area. On-orbit checkout time has been reduced by roughly 50%, compressing the time between capital investment and revenue realization. We expect this to further improve and positively impact our results as we launch further satellites for our customers in 2026 at an expected cadence of every 3 months on average. While we encountered unexpected timing impacts from the U.S. government shutdown and actions in the back half of the year, I remain confident in Spire's technology advantage, expanding capacity and the clear demand for both government and commercial capabilities. I reiterate our commitment to long-term double-digit sustainable revenue growth. 2025 starts as a year of revenue timing normalization, not a change of growth trajectory, setting up 2026 nicely to reflect the full benefit of capacity, backlog, and demand already in place. I am excited about what lies ahead and the value we will continue to build for shareholders. I will now turn it over to Ali, who will share our financial results, reflecting some of the mentioned revenue timing and accounting effects and our strong backlog and remaining performance obligations which drive our confident growth outlook for 2026.

Thank you, Theresa. Before walking through the financials, I want to anchor them to the operating momentum Theresa just described. The third quarter reflected strong bookings, growing backlog and expanding on-orbit capacity, offset by revenue timing impacts related to government delays. Importantly, these results do not reflect any change we see in underlying demand, customer commitments or program execution. I will be discussing non-GAAP financial measures unless otherwise stated. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results is included in our earnings release available on our Investor Relations website. As a reminder, Spire's third quarter 2024 results include our maritime business which was sold at the end of April 2025 and had contributed about $40 million of revenue in the prior 12 months. All year-over-year comparisons should be viewed in that context. GAAP revenue for the third quarter of 2025 was $12.7 million. Year-over-year, revenue declined primarily due to the absence of approximately $11.5 million of maritime revenue that was present in the third quarter of 2024 and is no longer part of the business. In addition, approximately $6 million to $8 million of revenue shifted out of the quarter due to the timing of milestone-based revenue recognition on an existing multiyear contract and the uncertainty of award for an Earth Observation data contract. First, revenue recognition timing on a multiyear contract reduced third quarter revenue by approximately $4 million to $5 million. This revenue remains fully contracted and is expected to be recognized in 2026 as we continue to execute and deliver program milestones. Second, we saw a third quarter impact from the uncertainty of the NASA Earth Observation data contract renewal with additional smaller short-duration opportunities also deferred. The NASA contract is a contract that Spire has successfully delivered for several years with very high customer satisfaction. Taken together, these timing effects shifted a meaningful portion of revenue out of the third quarter but did not reduce the overall value of contracted programs. Non-GAAP operating loss for the third quarter of 2025 was negative $13.9 million compared to negative $6.1 million in the third quarter of 2024. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $11.8 million compared to negative $3.1 million a year ago. These changes were primarily driven by lower revenue recognized in the quarter, as just mentioned, rather than an increasing cost structure of the business. Excluding the maritime business and certain one-time expenses, operating expenses in the third quarter were down year-over-year and sequentially, reflecting continued cost management. As revenue recognition normalizes, we expect improved absorption of fixed costs and a corresponding improvement in margins. Turning to the balance sheet. Spire utilized $20.4 million of free cash flow in the third quarter and ended the period with $96.8 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Cash usage in the quarter reflected revenue timing effects, working capital dynamics related to satellite manufacturing and elevated legal and professional fees. As of the end of the third quarter, our remaining performance obligations are over $200 million which is over three times the trailing-12 months revenue. Of this amount, we expect approximately $70 million to be recognized as revenue in 2026. This backlog reflects multiyear contracted programs, primarily with government and institutional customers and provides substantial revenue visibility as we move into 2026. For the full year 2025, we now expect revenue in the range of $70.5 million to $72.5 million, implying fourth quarter revenue of approximately $14.8 million to $16.8 million. Through November 30, 2025, we have already recognized approximately $10.5 million to $11.5 million of fourth quarter revenue. We anticipate full year non-GAAP operating loss of negative $54.7 million to negative $53.8 million and adjusted EBITDA of negative $42.2 million to negative $41.3 million. For non-GAAP loss per share, we expect a range of negative $1.98 to negative $1.95, assuming a basic weighted average share count of approximately 30.9 million shares. The company is in the process of completing its 2026 budget with a focus on becoming adjusted EBITDA and operating cash flow breakeven to positive by no later than Q4 2026. We are taking a comprehensive look at our cost base to align to our revenue expectations and the sale of the maritime business. More than $10 million of revenue has moved into 2026 due to government delays like the shutdown. This amount relates to programs that remain funded, contracted and operationally underway. With approximately $70 million of this revenue already sitting in remaining performance obligations to be recognized in 2026, our 2026 growth is supported by contracts already secured, expanding backlog and an increase in on-orbit capacity that is already deployed or scheduled to be deployed in the first quarter. Given revenue movement out of 2025, we now expect greater than 30% revenue growth in 2026 for the business, remaining after the maritime divestiture. As in prior years, we plan to provide more comprehensive guidance for 2026 during our earnings call in March. With that, I will turn the call back to the operator for questions.

Our first question comes from Erik Rasmussen with Stifel.

Theresa, in your prepared remarks, it sounded like there's a lot of opportunities and a lot of development that's happened since our last update. But so far, it just doesn't seem like it's translating into the revenue opportunities. I mean, you're looking at, obviously, this year's has been challenged with some of the timing issues and then government shutdown. But what gives you the confidence that 30% is the right number for next year for growth? And what are some of the puts and takes that get you there? I mean obviously, you have $70 million of RPO covered for next year, but what gets you to even higher than that 30% growth rate?

Yes, Erik, thanks for that question. And thanks for recognizing that there's over $10 million that really shifted across the calendar year. And that the number that we're giving is in excess of 30%. We did have government shutdown stuff, but at the same time, the U.S. continues to push on things like the SHIELD IDIQ that came out in the U.S., there is great urgency to move fast and move forward with commercial companies. And of course, we talked quite a lot about Europe. As you know, I'm based in Europe, I'm involved directly myself in a lot of these conversations. You heard in the prepared remarks about the very large budgets that are coming out of Germany, both from the national side as well as the contributions to ESA, 2025 was really a resetting year for Spire. And I would say in Europe as well, it was the year that they started to get their budgets in order, understand their priorities, and start to look at some of the more obvious ways that they spend their money and 2026 is really where they start to make movement. Everyone we talk to over here has huge urgency and recognizes the importance of partnering with commercial entities. So I feel very good that we have a lot of momentum going into 2026 and that we're well positioned. You mentioned the remaining performance obligations. These are things that are contracted. These are things that are high manufacturing throughput and the really big increase in in-orbit capacity that we have mean that we can meet both all the existing demand as well as the new ones that we're expecting to come from that pipeline backlog that we have.

Great. And then maybe just staying with one of the 2 items. With NASA, the Earth Observation contract that was around $7 million. I think last year, you signed in August timeframe an extension, do you expect that to actually happen? Was it just because of the government shutdown? Or is there something else that's going on that maybe could put that at jeopardy of not being renewed?

Yes. And I think there's a lot of stuff going on at NASA right now in addition to everything that happened with the U.S. government shutdown. And as you saw from the short-term extensions, there is a great desire to have access to those data sets with everything that happens in the U.S., it is true that that did not sign. It doesn't mean that it's not signing; it means that there is a delay while all of this process happens at NASA. And that's really, I think, the only thing that we can say right now. We don't believe that it's lost; it is not yet signed.

Okay. And then maybe just your cash balance. I remember our last update, you were targeting around $100 million exiting this year. Now you're below that through Q3; how should we think about cash going forward? Is it really just tied to now the revenue and revenue growth and you passed a lot of the impacts of professional fees and everything else that was driving up a lot of near-term spending?

I will begin by stating that we expect to close the year with a substantial amount of cash on our balance sheet. This is largely due to billings coming in and some timing mismatches regarding how everything unfolds. Additionally, we have incurred several one-time legal and accounting fees throughout the year. Ali, would you like to provide more detailed insights?

Sure. Thanks, Theresa. Erik, yes, I mean, we definitely finished the balance sheet strong with just under $100 million in cash. We remain debt-free, so we feel very good about our balance sheet. And so I do think we'll end the year with a strong cash balance and take that into 2026. We do have, as Theresa mentioned, timing issues on payment collections for contracts versus when we execute the work, as well as some continued need for spending around particularly legal fees.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

I apologize if I'm repeating myself; I was briefly disconnected from the call. Looking at the previous guidance compared to the current guidance midpoints, we are reducing our expectations for the second half by approximately $19 million. Can you provide some rough estimates on how that reduction breaks down?

You want me to take it, Theresa?

Go ahead. Go ahead.

Yes, I would estimate that there are about $6 million to $8 million related to a percent complete contract. Additionally, there are several million associated with the Earth Observation contract. Moreover, we likely lost another $6 million to $8 million due to the possibility of contracts not being signed because of the government shutdown, which was unusually lengthy and occurred at a critical time at the end of the year for us.

And the only thing I want to add, if I can, Jeff, just to think about it, is that more than $10 million of this was stuff that has gotten pushed from a timing perspective into 2026. That takes us a bit below the low end of the guidance, just to set the context there.

Could you clarify the percentage of completion? I believe you mentioned that $7 million is related to that. What exactly happened?

And I can take that, Ali. So I think, Jeff, as you know, we work across quite a number of these large programs with government that are on these new accounting rules with the percent completion. And a lot of that requires interaction with our government customers and partners through that process. And, of course, we are impacted by the timing of those interactions with those government partners, especially under the way that we do the accounting here. So this is something that shifted in time across the calendar year. So again, the contracts are in implementation. It's just the timing of it that has moved around.

You received the significant WildFireSat award, and I believe you saw a bit of that in Q2, but it should increase in Q3. Additionally, there was a major NOAA upsell. Are both of these still aligning with your expectations from 90 days ago?

They're both still tracking and the team is deeply involved in delivering on both of them. And the WildFireSat one, of course, we've talked about it contributing significantly to revenue in 2026 and in 2027 as we complete implementation.

Okay. I remember that you mentioned the number was 27. You launched many satellites during the Transporter missions 12, 13, and 14 earlier this year. From what I understand, a lot of the revenue recognition is based on when the satellites are launched, accepted, and operational. Were there any issues with the functionality, performance, or client acceptance of the satellites launched in those Transporter missions?

The satellites are functioning well, and we are successfully collecting data. Customers are receiving that data. We recently had another launch, which was the last Transporter mission at the end of November. Our satellite bus and technology have all been quickly validated. I mentioned in my prepared comments that in the latter half of the year, we notably improved the speed at which we can check out and transition things once they are in orbit. I must say, I am very pleased with how that process has progressed this year. I believe we have done an excellent job.

I would add that T15 was postponed by about 8 weeks. Part of that was due to the government shutdown affecting their ability to launch. As a result, it went up later than we had anticipated.

Yes, I understand. I have a couple of brief questions, Ali, regarding the costs. In relation to the expenses projected in the Q4 outlook, what do you consider to be unusual? I know there are some ongoing issues, and it seems there is finally progress in operating the company without lingering financial concerns. Could you clarify the unusual expenses that remain in the Q4 outlook that we should know about?

Yes. It's primarily legal fees related to kind of non-operating matters. Some professional services fees around continuing to utilize EY as a support partner on some of our technical matters and severance as we continue to work through certain business realignment post-maritime. So those are kind of the categories, Jeff, that we consider for these unusual items.

And are you able to put a number around that basket?

For the fourth quarter? I don't think it's significantly different than the third quarter.

Well, I guess what I'm wondering is, I'm just trying to work on the '26 model. I'm just curious about which of those items will continue into the upcoming year, particularly in Q1 and beyond, and which ones you believe will no longer be relevant.

They should definitely decrease in 2026.

Okay. All right. And then just lastly then on the pipeline. We've seen, especially in some of these space services contracts from some of the sort of the new space names, an incredible flow of massive 8-, 9-figure deals that are out there, sovereigns, et cetera. I think you referenced you've got good relations in Germany. I know you've got them elsewhere. Would you maybe take a second and just talk about what I would call some of the mega deals in the pipeline? Are they there? How many? How late stage? Any qualification quantification would be great when you start thinking about like 8 and 9-figure deals and what you're seeing out there?

Yes. I think the first comment that I want to make is that you have started to see some of these come out, and they generally focus on the first areas where everyone is familiar when it comes to either talking about telecom or talking about imaging, and that's the first place everyone knows when they start looking at satellites and sovereign capabilities. And then we see all of the RF come next. And we've really seen a big uptick even over the past 6 months in all of these types of government customers being interested in and appreciating the role that RF also has to play. I mean, it's all the things that we've talked about in the other calls and other conversations. So what we are seeing, and I mentioned it briefly in the comments as well, is that there is a lot of interest in those types of sovereign capabilities specifically for RF. And there is interest in direct data acquisition of installed capacity, and they often piggyback on each other. And I expect that we see movement on all of these conversations happening in 2026. They're all gearing up to start making movements and putting money down.

Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Steinhardt with Canaccord Genuity.

Great. This is Andrew on for Austin. Just my first question here on the MDA SHIELD program selection. Of the 19 work areas mentioned in the RFP, which specifically was Spire selected as a potential provider for? And I guess since the MDA cut over 1,400 companies from the proposal list, can you detail what the selection process was like?

I have to admit that I am not the expert deep in the details of that IDIQ SHIELD contract win that we have. We have a federal team that is focused on that. And I feel very good that we're in all the right conversations there. But I cannot directly myself detail in which all of the work areas. Ali, do you know that? But I think you would have to come back to you with that type of detail after checking with our federal team.

Yes. Ben and I were just caucusing, we don't have the detail in front of us. Apologies for that, Andrew.

No, no worries. Would you be able to discuss the SHIELD program? Specifically, could you quantify what portion of the $151 billion total contracting vehicle could apply to Spire?

Honestly, I don't think I'm prepared to do that yet, and I'm not totally sure that anyone fully knows. I think the only thing that I can tell you is that we've already been having conversations with the right people post the award of that IDIQ contract. And I think it is just a testament to our strength and ability to really be a key partner in how this plays out. What we're doing with our Boulder manufacturing facility is really important. I think the investments we're making on the kind of cybersecurity and infrastructure resilience side are important. And I think it can also be some signaling as you start to see the European Space Shield effort that we're going to start to hear about next year as well.

Got you. I appreciate that. And I guess just a follow-up here. Could you provide an update on the SEC subpoena and how the response is going there?

There's really not much to share other than we're just continuing to work through the process, Andrew.

Our next question comes from the line of Chris Quilty with Quilty space.

Just wanted to get a clarification. I think you mentioned the impact of the government shutdown and sort of revenue shifting in '25, in '26, can you give us a sense of what the mix, the contribution mix of governments will be and probably at the end of '26 since a good portion of the growth next year, of the 30% growth that's coming from government on a pro forma basis?

Ali, perhaps you can address that while I provide a general overview. Chris, regarding the Earth Observation contract, it remains unsigned and has experienced delays. This contract normally generates around $7 million in monthly revenue as we deliver data. Additionally, the Transporter launch delay affects our revenue as we transition to operational status and begin data delivery. We also faced some contracts not being signed during the government shutdown. Overall, we expect over $10 million to shift from 2025 to 2026. While we are not offering specific guidance for 2026 at this time—that will come in March—we confidently anticipate more than 30% year-on-year revenue growth, with government contracts continuing to play a significant role. Ali, if you have any further details to share, please do so.

No, I think you covered the highlights, Theresa.

Okay. And maybe if I could reframe it in a different way. When you think about what types of applications. Which applications are going to be the biggest driver for '26? Is it more on weather programs? Is it on space services business? Is it radio frequency mapping or does some of the aircraft tracking you start to pick up just in terms of raw either revenue or EBITDA contribution?

Yes. I consider all of these areas to be incredibly important and key to our revenue growth. We mentioned the $70 million that is contracted and will soon be delivered and recognized as revenue. Although aviation has typically been our smallest business, it remains significant as we work on the EURIALO program, which generates revenue for us. In terms of weather, our relationship with NOAA continues to develop, and we see NOAA increasingly interested in commercial partnerships across various areas. I believe this relationship will remain crucial. On the civil front, I think Radio Frequency Geolocation will be a significant growth driver. This can come from the direct delivery of data sets utilizing our on-orbit capacity. Additionally, as we leverage our local manufacturing capabilities, we can start discussing sovereign capabilities, which may align more closely with the space services sector.

I understand. Earlier in the script, you mentioned that you effectively doubled production with the same workforce. In general terms, what factors contributed to this increase in efficiency? Was it due to outsourcing, vertical integration, or perhaps AI?

Yes. We talked about design for manufacturability and lean principles. A lot of it involved examining the flow of our processes, the timing of tests, and how we utilized time effectively. For instance, when satellites were in specific testing facilities, we considered the timing there as well as how engineers worked with manufacturing teams inside the clean room. This was about improving management and overall flow within the clean room. This process has started, and we've discussed scaling and efficiency from the beginning of the year. I'm really proud of our team for achieving this without incurring additional costs. However, I believe there's still potential to enhance efficiency within that system. There are several additional strategies that can aid us in continuing this progress in the future. What we accomplished this year involved basic lean manufacturing and a closer collaboration between the design teams and manufacturers.

Got you. And when you say operating cash flow positive exiting '26, do you see any change in the CapEx profile of the business? And when should we look at free cash flow?

Definitely, we see lower CapEx needs right now in our preliminary 2026 planning, and that's both Spire funded CapEx as well as customer-funded CapEx. And so we are obviously very focused on becoming operating and free cash flow positive. I think we've got to get over the operating cash flow first and then go from there. But we are seeing a lower level of projected spend right now where we're at in the 2026 planning process.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our Q&A session, and we'll conclude our call today. We thank you for your interest and participation. You may now disconnect your lines.