Greetings. Welcome to the Vitesse Energy First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode and instructions for the question-and-answer session will be provided later. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to the Director of Investor Relations and Business Development at Vitesse, Ben Messier. Thank you. You may begin.

Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining. Today, we will be discussing our first quarter 2026 results. Our 10-Q and earnings release were released yesterday after market close and an updated investor presentation can be found on the Vitesse website. I'm joined this morning by our CEO and President, Jamie Benard; our CFO, Jimmy Henderson; and Brian Cree, our former President, who is with us in a senior adviser capacity. Before we begin, please be reminded that this call may contain estimates, projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements are subject to several risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties can cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations. Please review our earnings release and risk factors discussed in our filings with the SEC for additional information. In addition, today's discussion may reference non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, please reference our 10-Q and earnings release. Now I will turn the call over to Vitesse's CEO and President, Jamie Benard.

Thank you, Ben. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. It's a privilege to begin my tenure as CEO and President of Vitesse as of last Friday. I want to thank the group for their hard work getting us to where we are today, and I look forward to building on the strong foundation already in place. I want to thank Brian Cree, in particular, for his commitment to ensuring a seamless handoff and for his continued partnership as a senior adviser through this transition. Vitesse's primary objective of returning capital to stockholders has not changed. Our Board reaffirmed that commitment last week in declaring our second quarter cash dividend at an annualized rate of $1.75 per share. Our fundamental strategy remains consistent, disciplined capital allocation towards high rate of return opportunities. This includes organic development of our long-duration asset base, purchases of near-term development opportunities and accretive acquisitions. We will continue to maintain a conservative balance sheet and hedge at prices that support our dividend. The Powder River Basin acquisition that closed in early April is a good example of that strategy in action. It is accretive in all key financial metrics and funded with equity to preserve balance sheet flexibility. You should expect more of the same discipline going forward. I'll now turn the call over to Brian Cree to provide more detail on our results and operations.

Good morning, everyone, and thanks, Jamie. I've been fortunate to serve as President of Vitesse over the past 13 years. We've accomplished a great deal together. I'm most proud of the strength of our team and the culture we've built. Jamie, you're in good hands, and I look forward to working alongside you through this transition. Production for the first quarter averaged 15,962 barrels of oil equivalent per day, up 7% year-over-year and above our internal expectations. Oil production contributed 89% of total oil and natural gas revenue in the quarter. These results do not yet include any contribution from the Powder River Basin acquisition, which closed in early April. This acquisition is anticipated to add an average of 1,400 net barrels of oil equivalent per day over the remainder of 2026 and was closed without issue for 1.9 million shares of Vitesse common stock. Our underlying asset continues to be developed at a consistent and robust pace. As of March 31, 2026, we had 19.9 net wells in our development pipeline, including 6.2 net wells that were either drilling or completing and another 13.7 net locations that have been permitted for development. As we previously discussed, three- and four-mile development continues to increase across the Williston Basin. For Vitesse, 72% of our year-to-date AFEs have been for these extended laterals and drilling activity continues to progress further into areas where we hold concentrated acreage positions. As of last week, 67% of the 28 rigs drilling in the Williston were on Vitesse acreage. With the continued hostilities in the Middle East, we have opportunistically layered on additional oil hedges through the end of 2028 at levels supportive to our dividend. For the remainder of 2026, we have approximately 73% of our oil production hedged through swaps and collars with a weighted average floor of $64.68 and ceiling of $67.20 per barrel. We have approximately 50% of our 2026 natural gas production hedged through collars with a weighted average floor of $3.73 and ceiling of $4.91 per MMBtu. Both percentages of hedged oil and natural gas volumes are based on the midpoint of our annual guidance. Thank you for your time. Now I'll hand the call over to our CFO, Jimmy Henderson.

Good morning, everyone. Before I get into the first quarter performance, I want to welcome Jamie to the team. I'm excited about the company's future and look forward to working together. With that, I want to highlight a few items from our financial results for the first quarter of 2026. Please refer to our earnings release and 10-Q, which were filed last night for any further details. As Brian mentioned, production for the quarter was right at 16,000 BOE per day with a 63% oil cut. For the quarter, adjusted EBITDA was $33.4 million and we had an adjusted net loss of $300,000. GAAP net loss was $42.3 million, driven by a $48.2 million unrealized hedge loss. As a reminder, this loss is due to forward prices as of March 31 and is a noncash item. These hedges allow us to lock in the underlying returns as our asset is developed where properties are acquired, which in turn support our dividend and our balance sheet. Free cash flow for the quarter was $12 million after $18.7 million of development capital expenditures net of divestitures. With the Powder River Basin acquisition contributing for the remainder of 2026 and our hedge book now extending through 2028, we remain very well positioned to support our $1.75 annualized dividend. As for the balance sheet, we ended the quarter with total debt of $144.5 million, putting net debt to our trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA at just 0.82x. In April, we amended our revolving credit facility, expanding availability by $25 million. The elected commitment amount and borrowing base now sit at $275 million with total liquidity before internal cash flows of roughly $130 million. Our previously issued guidance has not changed and incorporates the Powder River Basin acquisition as previously mentioned. We are optimistic that the development pace could increase in the current environment but at this time, our operators continue to be diligent as we've seen through the industry as a whole. In closing, I want to recognize the team's execution this quarter. Leadership transitions are important moments for any organization, but what ensures continuity is the strength of the people across the business. We are entering this next chapter from a position of strength, fully aligned on strategy and ready to execute. With that, let me now pass the call back to the operator for questions.

We will now open the call for questions. Please follow the operator's instructions to ask a question. The first question comes from the line of Jeff Grampp with Northland Capital Markets.

Jamie, curious for you with this being your first earnings call and welcome and congrats. If you could just lay out at a high level, kind of what's your vision for Vitesse over the coming years? And maybe what attracted you to the company and what you perhaps see as the main opportunities you're planning on spending time on as you kind of get up to speed and hit the ground running here with the company?

Sure. Thanks for the question. Well, what drew me to Vitesse is truly, it's alignment, alignment between my experience, my philosophy and the company strategy. I've spent most of my career across both operated and non-operated models and most recently with a very heavy focus in the Williston Basin. So I understand where value is created and where it's lost. That shaped a very disciplined approach to capital allocation. And Vitesse already embodies that discipline, strong returns, conservative balance sheet, clear commitment to returning capital to stockholders. That's a model I believe in. So this isn't about coming in to change direction. It's about leaning into a strategy that works and helping scale it very thoughtfully.

Great. I appreciate that. And for my follow-up, this market share, if you will, your percentage of rigs in the Bakken seems to be maintained at a super high clip. I think you guys had typically talked about being in kind of that 30% to 50% range. And I think this is the second quarter above 60%. Is this just kind of something that will ebb and flow? Do you guys see this as maybe something more fundamental changing in terms of operators focusing more on Vitesse acreage? Just wondering if there's anything to read there.

Yes, Jeff, this is Brian. I'll try to handle that one. Look, as we've talked about in the past, a lot of the development that's going on in the Williston right now is really focusing on the three-mile and four-mile development and where those development areas seem to be trending toward is just areas of the field where Vitesse has a larger acreage position. So I think that's what we're seeing. Obviously, it can always ebb and flow, it always will. This is a very high level for us at this point in time, but it is consistent with kind of what we've been seeing, which is that three- and four-mile development being in areas where Vitesse has a lot of acreage.

The next question comes from the line of Chris Baker with Evercore ISI.

So I just want to start off maybe on a similar note, just in terms of the significant exposure you all have to rigs in the Bakken. Could you maybe just talk about what you guys have seen over the past quarter or two in terms of AFEs? And then you kind of touched on this earlier in terms of with higher prices at some point, likely to see an acceleration in activity. Just kind of curious as you guys think about service costs or the potential for service cost inflation in the back half of the year, sort of how you think that could maybe come together? And what sort of a reasonable outlook in terms of activity and what that could mean for service costs?

Chris, this is Brian. I'll start with that. As I mentioned over the last few quarters, a lot of our development activity has been focused on the extended laterals. And what we have seen over that last probably six-month period is that the operators are becoming much better, just as they have all along at bringing drilling costs down. So the three- and four-mile CapEx that we are seeing has continued to decline, especially in the last three-month period of time. The operators are just getting really good and efficient at drilling three- and four-mile laterals. Now what that means for cost on a go-forward basis. Obviously, with oil prices where they are, it's something we're going to continue to watch and it's going to really be a combination of what those operators do from a rig count standpoint. We have not really seen a lot of increased activity at this point in time. Our operators seem to be very disciplined about their approach to adding rigs. Clearly, in the field right now, there is a higher level of activity on workover rigs, maybe some increased frac crews. So it does appear that our operators are looking to try to bring back production as quickly as they can, wells that may have been off-line. They're trying to get them back online. But that being said, we have not seen an increase in the amount of rigs drilling. We've heard some comments that maybe there's a couple more rigs to be added in the next quarter, but we just haven't seen that big increase. And so certainly, there's going to be some costs that go up as a result of just what's been going on, fuel costs, whatnot. But in terms of where the larger costs of drilling and completion will occur is if the activity levels go up substantially.

That's great. And a follow-up, obviously, the dividend is pretty central for you all. I think the team obviously has evolved. But you did a good job last quarter of, I guess, resetting the outlook and really kind of reflecting, I think, what was a much different macro outlook at the start of the year. Since then, we've seen prices come up quite a bit. Again, to think that we're talking about incremental activity is certainly a big shift in the outlook. Just curious, as you guys think about the hedge program, opportunities for further sort of accretive M&A like the PRB deal and the dividend, just to kind of maybe wrap it all into, I think, some interrelated and interrelated topic. Does the change in the macro outlook influence how you think about hedging going forward? Obviously, it provides a good amount of downside protection, but much different outlook in terms of at least from our perspective, the opportunity to see a higher for longer type environment starts to establish itself.

Chris, I'll take a stab at that. There's a handful of questions embedded in that, that are all very germane to our strategy and what we think about on a daily basis. I think starting off with a core tenet of ours is the dividend. And we believe it's set at a level now that we're very comfortable with. We don't want to be super reactive to short-term volatility and near-term commodity prices. So we want to be very careful about setting that level, and we've always maintained that as a fixed dividend that we don't want to be moving up and down. So we'll continue to have that discussion quarter-by-quarter with our Board. Obviously, with our hedging position and our activity level coming into this year, it's set at a level that's supported by where we're at on both of those things. But we'll continue to evaluate it as we go through the year and into next year. Definitely — it all really comes back to sort of how you laid out capital allocation. We want to continue to invest in the company and do accretive transactions that create value for our shareholders for the long term. So we want to be able to have enough dry powder to invest in acquisitions, continue to fund drilling on our acreage. It's a very high return proposition. So we want to continue to do that. So really, it's the same as it's always been. The strategy of capital allocation is what we're all about, and we want to be able to do all those things in a measured way.

Next question comes from the line of Poe Fratt with Alliance Global Partners.

Jamie, I'm not that familiar with your background, but could you highlight sort of any notable experience that you have on the acquisition front? And then also highlight where you have experience outside of the Bakken as far as maybe that there might be some future direction in that way? And then if you could just sort of highlight — you talked pretty broadly about adding value, but can you be a little more specific on which prong of the strategy you think you can make the most impact on near term?

Sure. Happy to address it. So on the M&A front, going back over the past years, I'd say it's north of $3 billion between the Permian Basin, the Marcellus, the Eagle Ford, both from the operated and the non-operated positions. It's where I've been focused. And then of late, the last two years, I've been leading an operated organization in — primarily in the Williston Basin as well as the Permian Basin. So as far as avenues to create value to be more specific, like we said, this isn't a change in direction. This is methodically adding value consistent with the existing strategy and with the experience in the Williston Basin and other basins as well, we're going to continue to look at all opportunities and start to hone in on what fits us best, and it's more about quality as opposed to quantity as far as opportunities come.

And then reading between the lines, so if AFEs continued at the same pace and you don't see a pickup, operators or other operators are sort of taking more of a wait-and-see attitude. How well positioned is the organization right now to move into the operated arena? How many locations do you have ready if you were to make that pivot?

Sure. We're in the middle of a comprehensive planning process for the reasons you just mentioned with permitting and it's four locations right now that we're contemplating. That said, we're not going to mobilize anything until we've done a very constant — the size of our inventory. We're going to measure twice and cut once. But as always, it comes down to capital discipline and how those opportunities compete against other activity throughout the portfolio. So it's nice to have that feather in our cap but it's still going to be competing against other activity.

Yes. Poe, let me just add to that is, obviously, one of the great things about the Lucero acquisition is it gave us that operated asset. It gave us that flexibility to allocate capital to either our operated properties or our non-operated properties. And our guidance for this year, the $50 million to $80 million of CapEx did not assume any operated development. So with oil prices in the $60s at the time that we set that budget and that guidance, it didn't really make sense to us to spend our capital on those operator development opportunities, and we wanted to hold those in our inventory. Obviously, now with the change in prices, it's something that, as Jamie said, we are planning for, we are looking at, we are preparing to be able to take advantage of the higher prices. But again, we're going to remain disciplined. We're going to look at everything that goes on over the next few months and analyze what other opportunities come before us. It's great to have that asset available for us to develop at the right time. The right time can be when we don't have as much CapEx coming in other areas or it can be when the rates of return are really high. And clearly, the rates of return on these properties are very strong, but we'll continue to evaluate what other operators bring our way in what we see in AFEs and then make that decision as the year goes.

Great. It sounds like, Brian, though, it's more of the 2027 impact to the production profile?

Yes. I think, Poe, if we drill these wells, it would likely be sometime in the fall. So by the time you drill and complete those, you get those online, it's much more impactful to 2027 than it would be to 2026.

Great. That's helpful. And then if you could just address looking outside the basin. Obviously, the Powder River acquisition is an example of that. But if you could look at more broadly, where else are you looking? I heard that Jamie mentioned the Marcellus and my sense is you wouldn't go into the Marcellus, but maybe correct me if I'm wrong there.

No, I think you have a pretty good understanding of that. We have looked at a lot more gas assets over the last year, 1.5 years than we had previously. But clearly, for us, there's a great pipeline of acquisition opportunities. What I think is most prevalent for us at this point in time is that several of the opportunities we're looking at are right in our core asset area. And that's a little different. We've always looked at all kinds of different basins, whether it be oil or gas. But right now, we're seeing a lot of good opportunities both in the Williston and the DJ, where we have the majority of our production and assets. And a couple in the Powder also where we just completed one. So it's kind of cool that we have the opportunity to look at things that are right in our backyard, but we will continue to look at other basins. And I think Jamie's experience coming in, in those other basins is something that we'll continue to try to leverage on.

Next question comes from the line of Noel Parks with Tuohy Brothers.

I was just wondering if — you mentioned a moment ago that there was — you're seeing a higher level of activity in workover rigs. And is there anything available that you consider where the main value would really consist mostly of refracs. I'm just wondering if anybody has put things on the market like that? And if so, how you might approach valuing something like that?

Well, clearly, refracs is something that we have always been high on and believe will be a needle mover in the Williston Basin over time. It's interesting when prices are lower, like they were in the $60s, you don't have as many companies completing wells. And right now, a lot of the refrac opportunities have been kind of in connection with additional development to where you go into a DSU that's got one or two wells that were drilled back in 2014 and 2015. And now there's four, five, six additional wells being drilled, a lot of times. What we've seen is the operators are refracing those wells. I think that will continue. We have not seen an uptick in refracs at this point in time like we have seen in the workover category. I think I heard the North Dakota Industrial Commission say the other day that they've seen about a 20% increase in workover rigs going on. I just think that, that is the quickest way to get production online to take advantage of the current prices. And I think, look, the industry is just trying to figure out what's going to happen in Iran and where those prices are going to be in three to six months. And again, the workover activity is the quickest way, along with just getting fracs done on any wells that have been drilled that were kind of DUCs. And so that's where we've seen the enhanced activity level so far.

Great. And I apologize if you've touched on this already. But I wonder if you could — for the transactions you see or reviewed or pursued, I was wondering if you can kind of maybe characterize what the types of sellers are that you see coming to the market? Sometimes, of course, higher prices does get a few people out of the other channels. And I guess I'm just wondering sort of maybe what sort of the pace and quality of deals is that you're reviewing these days?

Noel, it's Ben. It's always a mix. I would say right now about 80% of the transactions we're evaluating are private equity-backed portfolio companies that frankly, are trying to monetize it in the elevated price environment, which is why making acquisitions goes hand-in-hand with hedging to ensure that we can lock in whatever returns we underwrite. There are one or two larger public companies right now that are bringing assets to market that are in our wheelhouse. So I think that impacts kind of the cash-stock mix too; I'd say some PE-backed sellers are generally more open to taking shares, whereas a big public company probably wants cash. So we evaluate all of these things when making acquisitions. I mean the goal remains the same regardless of the seller. It's got to be accretive. It needs to keep our balance sheet conservative and it needs to be an attractive asset.

Great. And just a follow-up on that. I mean can you kind of give an idea of roughly what vintage of PE companies you're seeing selling kind of like roughly when they were started or raised their funds?

A lot of the assets we're evaluating right now we also evaluated last year in different forms. So I think they're PE-backed assets that are reaching the end of their fund life for the most part and are happy to see the higher prices to try to reach their internal hurdle rates that they need.

Next question comes from the line of Jeff Grampp with Northland Capital Markets.

Just had one follow-up. I'm seeing some commentary regarding some pretty interesting pricing dynamics going on in a lot of basins, Bakken specifically. Just kind of curious what you guys are seeing with respect to oil differentials and it's perhaps hard to forecast much beyond maybe a quarter or two. But just wondering how that might influence realizations for Q2 and in the near term.

Jeff, I'll take a shot at that. Yes, we're definitely seeing some cash prices that are better than what — better than WTI, frankly. Pretty evident when you look at the index that's pegged on the Dakota Access Pipeline; the DAPL differential has been positive here in the spring months of the year and early summer. So we do expect to see much improvement in our differentials that we realize for physical oil sales for at least the next few months. And obviously, that's a result of changing flows of light sweet oil around the world — a lot of Canadian oils being called to the West and being exported. That's reduced the flows down to the Midwest of the U.S. And so there's been a big call on oil coming out of the Bakken to meet the needs of refineries in the Midwest and even on down to the Gulf. So yes, at least for the short- to medium-term here, we are pretty optimistic about what differentials will be experiencing. And the great thing about that is that's unhedged. So it's incremental to the realized pricing that we're getting after hedging effects. So it looks like it could set up for a pretty interesting second and third quarter here.

Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor over to Jamie Benard for closing comments.

Thank you all for your time today. As mentioned, Vitesse's priorities remain returning capital to stockholders, disciplined capital allocation, pursuing accretive growth opportunities and maintaining a conservative balance sheet. So should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact Ben Messier directly. And we look forward to speaking with you at one of our investor events or on next quarter's earnings call.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.