Wd 40 Co DEF 14A, filed Oct 31, 2025
Wd 40 Co (WDFC)
DEF 14A
2025-10-31
For: 2025-12-12
View Original
Added on
June 12, 2026
About this DEF 14A
Wd 40 Co filed this DEF 14A on October 31, 2025.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
| o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||||
| o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||||
| þ | Definitive Proxy Statement | ||||
| o | Definitive Additional Materials | ||||
| o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| þ | No fee required | ||||
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials | |||||
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 | |||||
9715 Businesspark Avenue
San Diego, California 92131
NOTICE OF 2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders:
The 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“annual meeting”) of WD-40 Company (“Company”) will be held solely via a live audio webcast at the following virtual location and for the following purposes:
| When: | Friday, December 12, 2025 at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time | |||||||
| Where: | http://meetnow.global/MWCX429 | |||||||
| Items of Business: | 1. | To elect a Board of Directors (“Board”) for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected and qualified; | ||||||
| 2. | To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation; | |||||||
| 3. | To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026; and | |||||||
| 4. | To consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting. | |||||||
| Who Can Vote: | Only the stockholders of record at the close of business on October 15, 2025 are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. This proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”), enclosed form of proxy, and the Company’s 2025 Annual Report (collectively, “proxy materials”) are first sent to stockholders on or about October 31, 2025. | |||||||
| Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting | To expand access to our stockholders, our annual meeting will be conducted virtually. You may attend and participate in the annual meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit your questions prior to and during the annual meeting by visiting: http://meetnow.global/MWCX429. There is no physical location for the annual meeting. Please see “How can I participate in the virtual annual meeting?” beginning on page 1 for information about how to attend and participate in the annual meeting. | |||||||
REVIEW YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:
VIA THE INTERNET Visit the website listed on your proxy card | BY MAIL Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope | ||||
BY TELEPHONE Call the telephone number on your proxy card | VIA LIVE VIRTUAL MEETING Attend the annual meeting at | ||||
http://meetnow.global/MWCX429 | |||||
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Phenix Q. Kiamilev
Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
San Diego, California
October 31, 2025 | |||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | |||||
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
We provide below highlights of certain information in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the complete Proxy Statement and 2025 Annual Report before you vote.
2025 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Date and Time: December 12, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time | Record Date: October 15, 2025 | ||||
Virtual Meeting Place: http://meetnow.global/MWCX429 | Meeting Webcast: Available on the Company’s investor relations website at http://investor.wd40company.com beginning at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on December 12, 2025 | ||||
VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
| Management Proposals: | Board Recommendations | Page | ||||||||||||
FOR all Director Nominees | ||||||||||||||
FOR | ||||||||||||||
FOR | ||||||||||||||
FAQS AND GENERAL INFORMATION
Q: Why am I receiving these proxy materials?
A: This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of the Company for use at its annual meeting to be held on Friday, December 12, 2025, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof.
At the annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders will consider and vote upon (i) the election of directors to the Board for the ensuing year; (ii) an advisory vote to approve compensation for our named executive officers (“NEOs”); and (iii) the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. Detailed information concerning these matters is set forth below. Management knows of no other business to come before the annual meeting.
Q: When and where will the annual meeting be held?
A: To provide expanded access to our stockholders, our annual meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders conducted solely via a live audio webcast, accessible at http://meetnow.global/MWCX429. Although no physical in-person meeting will be held, we designed the format of our annual meeting to ensure that our stockholders of record who attend the annual meeting will be afforded similar rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.
The annual meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Friday, December 12, 2025. Online access to the audio webcast will open 15 minutes prior to the start of the annual meeting. Stockholders are encouraged to access the annual meeting prior to the start time and allow ample time to log into the audio webcast and test their computer systems.
Q: How can I participate in the virtual annual meeting?
A:The annual meeting will be conducted solely by live audio webcast and utilize the latest technology to expand access, improve communication, and save costs for stockholders and the Company. Anyone may enter the annual meeting as a guest in listen-only mode by selecting “I am a Guest,” but only stockholders as of the record date and holders of valid proxies are entitled to vote or ask questions at the annual meeting. To participate in the annual meeting, you will
1
need to review the information included on the notice, proxy card or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Stockholders are encouraged to vote and submit proxies in advance of the annual meeting by internet, telephone or mail as early as possible.
Stockholders of Record
If you are a registered stockholder (that is, if you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the annual meeting. You can participate in the annual meeting by accessing http://meetnow.global/MWCX429. You will be able to attend the annual meeting online, ask a question and vote by following the instructions on the notice, proxy card, or the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you cannot locate your notice or proxy card and would still like to attend the annual meeting, you can join as a guest. Guest attendees will not be allowed to vote or submit questions at the annual meeting.
Beneficial Owners
If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you have several options to participate in the annual meeting.
If you would like to attend the annual meeting and do not want to ask questions or vote, you can simply join the annual meeting as a guest by accessing http://meetnow.global/MWCX429. Guest attendees will not be allowed to vote or submit questions at the annual meeting.
If you would like to attend the annual meeting, ask a question and/or vote, you have two options:
1)Most beneficial holders do not need to register in advance and will be able to fully participate using the control number received with their voting instruction form. Please note, however, that this option may not be available for every type of beneficial owner with a voting control number. The absence of this option shall not impact the validity of the annual meeting. Most beneficial holders can participate in the annual meeting by accessing http://meetnow.global/MWCX429, which enables them to attend the annual meeting online, ask a question and vote by following the instructions on the notice, proxy card, or the instructions that accompanied their proxy materials.
2)Beneficial owners may choose to register in advance of the annual meeting if they prefer to use this traditional, paper-based option. To register to participate in the annual meeting, submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your WD-40 Company (WDFC) holdings, along with your name and email address to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 2:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on December 6, 2025, using one of the following methods:
•Email: Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com.
•Mail: Send a copy of the email or correspondence from your broker, or include your legal proxy, to WD-40 Company Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001.
Upon receipt of your valid legal proxy, Computershare will provide you with a control number by email. You can attend and participate in the annual meeting by accessing http://meetnow.global/MWCX429 and entering the control number.
Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy using the methods described in the “Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials” sent to you, or by following the instructions at www.envisionreports.com/WDFC.
Our annual meeting procedures are intended to authenticate stockholders’ identities, allow stockholders to give their voting instructions, and confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly and comport with applicable legal requirements.
Q: What constitutes a quorum in order to hold and transact business at the annual meeting?
A: The close of business on October 15, 2025 is the record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. On the record date, the Company had 13,527,835 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding. Stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting will have one vote for each share so held on
2
the matters to be voted upon. If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” A majority of the outstanding shares will constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Broker non-votes are shares that are held of record by a bank or broker as to which the bank or broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner as to how the shares are to be voted.
Q: If I hold my shares through a broker, how do I vote?
A: If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote. It is important that you cast your vote if you want it to count in (i) the election of directors to the Board for the ensuing year, (ii) the advisory vote to approve compensation for our NEOs, and (iii) the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2026. Your broker will only be permitted to exercise its discretionary authority to vote on your behalf as to the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. You may have received a notice from the Company entitled “Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials” with voting instructions or you may have received these proxy materials with separate voting instructions. Follow the instructions to vote or to request further voting instructions as set forth on the proxy materials you have received.
Q: How will my vote be cast if I provide instructions or return my proxy and can I revoke my proxy?
A: If the enclosed form of proxy is properly executed and returned, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified thereon. If no specified instruction is given with respect to a particular matter on your proxy, your shares will be voted by the proxy holder as set forth on your proxy. A proxy may be revoked by attendance at the annual meeting or by filing a proxy bearing a later date with the Corporate Secretary of the Company.
Q: How are the proxies solicited and what is the cost?
A: The cost of soliciting proxies, if any, will be borne by the Company. Solicitations other than by mail may be made by telephone or in person by employees of the Company for which the expense will be nominal. We may also reimburse persons representing beneficial owners for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding such materials.
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Proxy Statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. Several banks and brokers with account holders that are our stockholders will be householding our proxy materials. A single Proxy Statement will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. If you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate Proxy Statement and Annual Report, please notify your bank or broker, direct your written request to investorrelations@wd40.com, Investor Relations, 9715 Businesspark Ave., San Diego, CA 92131 or contact Investor Relations by telephone at +1 (800) 448-9340. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker.
3
PROPOSALS
ITEM NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the annual meeting, the nine nominees named below under the heading, Director Nominees, will be presented for election as directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders when their successors may be elected or appointed. In the event any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the annual meeting, any proxy granted to vote for such nominee will be voted for a nominee designated by the present Board to fill such vacancy.
A nominee for election to the Board will be elected as a director if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election. Holders of common stock are not entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. Withheld votes and broker non-votes are not counted as votes in favor of any nominee.
If an incumbent director nominee fails to receive more votes for election as a director than votes against election, the incumbent director will continue to serve as a director until a successor is elected or appointed. However, pursuant to Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the Board, such director nominee will be expected to tender his or her resignation to the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee will promptly consider such resignation and present a recommendation to the Board to accept or reject such resignation for formal action to be taken within 90 days following the annual meeting.
Article III, Section 3.2 of the Bylaws of the Company (amended and restated on June 17, 2024) provides that, unless otherwise specified in the Certificate of Incorporation, the authorized number of directors of the Company shall not be less than seven nor more than 12 until changed by amendment duly adopted by the stockholders. Within the specified limits, the exact number of directors is to be fixed from time to time by a resolution duly adopted by the Board or by the stockholders. By resolution of the Board adopted on October 9, 2025, the authorized number of directors will be fixed at nine, upon the resignation of director, Trevor I. Mihalik, from the Company’s Board, effective December 12, 2025.
After serving over five years as a director on the Company’s Board, including serving as chair of the Finance Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance Committee and the Audit Committee, Mr. Mihalik provided notice to the Company in October 2025 of his decision not to stand for re-election. Mr. Mihalik will continue to serve on the Board and such committees until the annual meeting when his term expires.
DIRECTOR NOMINEES
| Director Nominees | Independent1 | Audit | Compensation and People | Corporate Governance | Finance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cynthia B. Burks | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel T. Carter | ü | Chair2 | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eric P. Etchart, Chairman of the Board | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lara L. Lee | ü | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Edward O. Magee, Jr. | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Graciela I. Monteagudo | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| David B. Pendarvis | ü | ü | ü | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anne G. Saunders | ü | ü | Chair | ü | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1The Board has determined that each director nominee (except for Mr. Brass):
(i)has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or indirectly through an immediate family member or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company), and
(ii)is an independent director as defined in the Marketplace Rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the “Nasdaq Rules”).
2The Board determined that Mr. Carter is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by regulations adopted by the SEC.
4
STEVEN A. BRASS, CEO AND PRESIDENT | ||||||||
Director since: March 2022 | ||||||||
Age: 59 | ||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | |||||||
Mr. Brass was appointed CEO, effective 8/2022 and continues to serve as President, a position that he has held since 2019. He joined the Company in 1991 as International Area Manager at the Company’s U.K. subsidiary and has since held several management positions including Country Manager in Germany, Director of Continental Europe, European Sales Director, and European Commercial Director. From 2016 until 2019, Mr. Brass served as Division President, Americas, and from 2019 to 8/2022, as COO. | As CEO and President of the Company, combined with his leadership experience in the Company’s Americas and EIMEA trading blocs, Mr. Brass offers the Board a broad and deep Company-based perspective. In addition, his specific knowledge of the Company’s operations, coupled with his breadth of experience with international markets and our domestic market, provides the Board with valuable insight. | |||||||
| CYNTHIA B. BURKS | ||||||||
Independent Director since: December 2022 | Committees: | |||||||
Age: 59 | ▪ Audit Committee, member | |||||||
| ▪ Compensation and People Committee, member | ||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | |||||||
Ms. Burks serves as the managing member of Excel Advising, LLC, which was formed in 11/2022 and offers executive coaching and human resources consulting services. From 2019 to 2022, Ms. Burks was SVP and chief people and culture officer at Genentech, Inc. (formerly NYSE: DNA). From 2011 to 2019, she held various human resource management roles at Genentech-affiliated companies, including VP, human resources. Ms. Burks has also held human resource and organizational development positions in industries including media, consumer goods and technology. | Ms. Burks has earned certifications in the areas of corporate directorship, executive compensation, and climate. Ms. Burks’ extensive knowledge of human capital strategy, including talent management, succession planning, compensation strategy, designing culture to increase competitive advantage, diversity, equity and inclusion, and organizational design, enhances the Board’s management oversight capabilities. | |||||||
Other Public Company Boards: | Other Boards (Highlights): | |||||||
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (NYSE: INSP), since 8/2022 | Current: | |||||||
▪ Organization and Compensation Committee, member | ||||||||
Sellars Absorbent Materials, Inc. (manufacturer of absorbents made with recycled fibers), since 8/2022 | ||||||||
Cityblock (provider of comprehensive healthcare to underserved communities), since 7/2025 ▪ Talent and Compensation Committee, chair | ||||||||
Previous: | ||||||||
Genentech Foundation (non-profit), 2020 - 2022 | ||||||||
Torch (educational software company), 2021 - 2025 | ||||||||
5
DANIEL T. CARTER | ||||||||
Independent Director since: 2016 | Committees: | |||||||
Age: 69 | ▪ Audit Committee, chair | |||||||
▪ Corporate Governance Committee, member | ||||||||
▪ Finance Committee, member | ||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | |||||||
Mr. Carter served as EVP and CFO of BevMo! from 2009 until his retirement in 2016. He also served as CFO of the following companies: Semtek, Inc. (2008 to 2009); Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. (1998 to 2007); and Advanced Marketing Services (1997 to 1998). From 1986 to 1997, he was employed by Price Club and its follow-on entities, serving as SVP for PriceCostco and CFO for Price Enterprises. Mr. Carter began his career as an auditor with Ernst & Young LLP. | Mr. Carter is recognized as a NACD Certified Director and as a NACD Board Leadership Fellow. Mr. Carter is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) in California, and the Board has designated Mr. Carter as a financial expert who is expected to continue to serve on our Audit Committee. He has earned Harvard’s Corporate Director Certificate and Carnegie-Mellon’s CERT Certificate in Cyber-Risk Oversight. Mr. Carter’s financial expertise, considerable knowledge of the retail industry, and financial experience provide the Board with a breadth of relevant skills and experience. | |||||||
Other Board(s): | ||||||||
Chosen Foods, LLC (1/2018 - 8/2021) | ||||||||
ERIC P. ETCHART, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD | |||||||||||
Independent Director since: 2016 | Committees: | ||||||||||
Age: 69 | ▪ Corporate Governance Committee, member | ||||||||||
▪ Finance Committee, member | |||||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | ||||||||||
Mr. Etchart has served as the Company’s non-executive Chairman of the Board since December 2024. Prior to joining the Company’s Board, Mr. Etchart served as SVP of The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (NYSE: MTW) from 2007 until his retirement in 1/2016. He served as SVP, business development, from 2015 to 2016 and as president and general manager of the Manitowoc Crane Group from 2007 to 2015. From 1983 to 2007, Mr. Etchart held various sales, marketing and management positions at subsidiaries and predecessor companies of MTW. | Mr. Etchart is a French national and has held management positions in China, Singapore, Italy, France and the U.S. He is recognized as a NACD Board Leadership Fellow and has earned certifications in Climate Leadership and ESG Leadership. These certifications focus on climate risk and related business strategy, board-related fiduciary obligations, climate-related government regulations, reporting and disclosure requirements, investor engagement, learning how to identify opportunities and overcome challenges related to setting, executing against and measuring ESG goals. Mr. Etchart’s breadth of international finance, marketing, board and management experience provides important perspective to the Board. His commitment to the highest standards of board leadership, with an emphasis on ESG, demonstrates the Board’s continued commitment to good governance. | ||||||||||
Other Public Company Boards: | Other Boards: | ||||||||||
Graco Inc. (NYSE: GGG), since 2010 ▪ Audit Committee, member ▪ Governance Committee, member Alamo Group Inc. (NYSE: ALG), since 2015 ▪ Compensation Committee, member ▪ Nominating / Corporate Governance Committee, chair | Previous: UPERIO Group, supplier of tower and self-erecting cranes, until 9/2025 ▪ ESG Committee, chair ▪ UPERIO, USA (subsidiary), director and officer | ||||||||||
6
LARA L. LEE | |||||||||||
Independent Director since: December 2020 | Committees: | ||||||||||
Age: 62 | ▪ Compensation and People Committee, member | ||||||||||
▪ Finance Committee, member | |||||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | ||||||||||
Ms. Lee operates Lara Lee Associates LLC dba Creative Renewal offering governance, consulting, and advisory services. From 2016 to 2018, Ms. Lee served as president of Orchard Supply Hardware, a former subsidiary of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW), and from 2013 to 2018, as an SVP of Lowe’s. From 2011 to 2013 she served as chief innovation and operating officer for Continuum, a global consultancy firm. She was also a partner at an innovation firm, Jump Associates, from 2007 to 2010. Ms. Lee’s prior experience included 15 years at Harley-Davidson Motor Company as division head, VP, business unit leader, and in various European and Asian strategy, marketing and business development roles. | Ms. Lee began her career with Ernst & Whinney (now Ernst & Young LLP) in Washington, D.C. and Singapore. Ms. Lee is a NACD Certified Director and earned an ESG certificate from Berkeley Law Executive Education. In 2025, the Corporate Directors Forum named Ms. Lee Director of the Year - Enhancement of Culture & Inclusion. Ms. Lee’s diverse international business and management experience, including expertise in retail, market development, strategic marketing (including digital, e-commerce and channel marketing), brand development, and innovation across industries and international markets, provides the Board with valuable insights. | ||||||||||
Other Public Company Boards: | Other Boards (Highlights): | ||||||||||
Previous: | Current: | ||||||||||
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (formerly NASDAQ: MBII; acquired by Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. now NASDAQ: BIOX), director, member of Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, and designated board ESG lead (11/2020 - 7/2022) | ▪ Independence Holdings LP GP, LLC, the parent company of Liberty Safe & Security Products, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of residential safes, since 10/2021 ▪ Rather Outdoors Corporation, a designer and wholesaler of fishing equipment in North America and Europe, since 2/2023; Compensation Committee member | ||||||||||
| Previous: | |||||||||||
▪ The Sill, Inc., an omnichannel specialty retailer of house plants and related products (11/2018 - 3/2024) | |||||||||||
▪ Organically Grown Company, a distributor of organic produce, board chair; Compensation. Culture and People Committee chair; and Governance Committee chair (8/2019 - 7/2021) | |||||||||||
| EDWARD O. MAGEE, JR. | ||||||||
| Independent Director since: June 2022 | Committees: | |||||||
Age: 59 | ▪ Audit Committee, member | |||||||
▪ Compensation and People Committee, member | ||||||||
| ▪ Finance Committee, member | ||||||||
7
| Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | |||||||
Mr. Magee has served as VP for Strategic Operations at Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee since 2/2023. He also holds two academic appointments: The first Executive-in-Residence and Professor of Practice, Business at Belmont’s Jack C. Massey College of Business and in 9/2024, COO of the Thomas F. Frist, Jr. College of Medicine. From 2/2020 to 12/2022, Mr. Magee served as EVP, operations at Fender Musical Instruments Corporation (“Fender”). Prior to Fender, he served as its SVP, operations from 2016 to 2020. Mr. Magee also served as VP of operations and distribution for Thomas & Betts Corporation (now ABB Ltd.; OTNMKTS: ABBNY) from 2014 to 2016 and in various management roles in vehicle operations at Harley-Davidson Motor Company from 2004 to 2014. | Prior to his executive experience, Mr. Magee served as a combat-decorated Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Marine Corps. Mr. Magee has earned certificates in corporate directorship, ESG, and cyber risk. In addition, Mr. Magee is an honoree of the 2025 NACD Directorship 100, an annual recognition of the leading corporate directors, and has been recognized by the Corporate Directors Forum as a 2024 Director of the Year - Emerging Board Leader, 2024 Savoy Magazine Most Influential Corporate Director, and 2025 Presidential Leadership Scholar. Mr. Magee is a member of the Digital Director’s Network. Mr. Magee’s extensive knowledge of manufacturing, sustainability, supply chain, and logistics as well as his wide-ranging experience building and developing global leadership teams that drive organizational culture change, enhance the Board’s management oversight capabilities. | |||||||
| Other Boards (including Non-Profit): | ||||||||
| Current: | Previous (Highlights): | |||||||
▪ NACD Nashville Chapter, Chair ▪ Smithsonian SITES | Affiliations Advisory Board | ▪ Fender Play Foundation™, co-president and executive director | |||||||
▪ Boys & Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee | ▪ Board of Visitors at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business | |||||||
| ▪ Advisory Board, Veteran Courage Project | ||||||||
GRACIELA I. MONTEAGUDO | ||||||||
Independent Director since: June 2020 | Committees: | |||||||
| Age: 59 | ▪ Compensation and People Committee, member | |||||||
▪ Corporate Governance Committee, member | ||||||||
▪ Finance Committee, member | ||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | |||||||
Ms. Monteagudo served as president and CEO of Lala U.S., Inc. from 2017 to 2018. From 2015 to 2017 she served as president, Americas and global marketing for Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and from 2012 to 2015 she held various leadership roles at Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. From 2008 through 2012, she held various leadership roles at Walmart Mexico, including SVP and business unit head for Sam’s Club stores in Mexico. Ms. Monteagudo has dual Mexican and American citizenship and has held senior management positions in both Latin America and the U.S. | Ms. Monteagudo is recognized as a NACD Certified Director and is an honoree of the 2022 NACD Directorship 100, an annual recognition of the leading corporate directors. She has also earned certifications in the areas of artificial intelligence, climate and ESG. Ms. Monteagudo’s significant board and leadership experience, including international business experience in Latin America, her extensive global and digital marketing, e-commerce, retail, and consumer goods expertise, offers the Board with valuable marketing and consumer products insight. | |||||||
8
Other Public Company Boards: | Other Boards: | |||||||
Current: | Previous (Highlights): | |||||||
ACCO Brands Corporation (NYSE: ACCO), since 8/2016 | ▪ Driscoll’s (a market leader of fresh berries), 3/2021 - 12/2021 | |||||||
▪ Nominating, Governance & Sustainability Committee, chair | ▪ The Juice Plus+ Company, LLC, 9/2019 - 7/2023 | |||||||
▪ Compensation & Human Capital Committee, member | ||||||||
iHeartMedia, Inc. (NASDAQ: IHRT), since 7/2021 | ||||||||
▪ Audit Committee, member | ||||||||
DAVID B. PENDARVIS | ||||||||||||||
Independent Director since: 2017 | Committees: | |||||||||||||
Age: 66 | ▪ Corporate Governance Committee, chair | |||||||||||||
▪ Audit Committee, member | ||||||||||||||
▪ Compensation and People Committee, member | ||||||||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | |||||||||||||
Until his retirement in 6/2023, Mr. Pendarvis had served as chief administrative officer of ResMed Inc. (NYSE and ASX: RMD) since 2011 and secretary since 2003. In 2017, he served as interim president, EMEA and Japan of RMD. He joined RMD in 2002 as global general counsel and has also served as VP of organizational development from 2005 to 2011. Before joining RMD, Mr. Pendarvis was a partner at Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP (presently, DLA Piper), a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and a law clerk to U.S. District Court Judge J. Lawrence Irving in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego. | Mr. Pendarvis earned an ESG certificate from Berkeley Law Executive Education. His expertise in corporate governance, compliance, intellectual property and worldwide legal affairs, and experience as general counsel with global responsibilities, including international executive management experience and focus on investor relations and corporate communications, provide the Board with valuable perspective for risk oversight. | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Boards: | Other Boards (including Non-Profit): | |||||||||||||
Previous: | Previous: | |||||||||||||
Sequenom, Inc. (NASDAQ: SQNM), from 2009 until its acquisition by Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (NYSE: LH) in 2016 | ▪ RMD’s subsidiaries, ended 6/2023 ▪ Corporate Directors Forum, 2010 - 2019 ▪ San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce, ended 5/2023 | |||||||||||||
9
ANNE G. SAUNDERS | |||||||||||
Independent Director since: March 2019 | Committees: | ||||||||||
Age: 64 | ▪ Compensation and People Committee, chair | ||||||||||
▪ Audit Committee, member | |||||||||||
▪ Corporate Governance Committee, member | |||||||||||
Experience (Highlights): | Qualifications (including Skills and Certifications): | ||||||||||
Ms. Saunders served as president, U.S., of nakedwines.com from 2016 through 2017. From 2014 through 2016, she was president, U.S. of FTD Companies, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTD), and from 2012 through 2014, she served as president of Redbox Automated Retail, LLC. From 1990 to 2012, Ms. Saunders held various senior executive level positions at Starbucks Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Knowledge Universe (presently KinderCare Education), eSociety and AT&T. | Ms. Saunders’ experience as a former senior P&L leader in multiple global consumer company divisions, and her deep functional expertise in marketing, e-commerce, and product innovation and development as well as her extensive public company board experience, provide valuable experience to the Board. | ||||||||||
Other Public Company Boards: | Other Boards: | ||||||||||
Previous: | Current: | ||||||||||
Bowflex Inc. (formerly NYSE BFX and formerly Nautilus, Inc., NYSE NLS), 2012 - 2024, chair since 8/2022 | Reser’s Fine Foods, since 2/2023 ▪ Compensation Committee, member | ||||||||||
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Inc. (TSX: SWP), 11/2017 - 5/2023 | |||||||||||
There are no material pending litigation or proceedings involving the Company’s director nominees.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors, director nominees or executive officers.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES SET FORTH ABOVE.
10
ITEM NO. 2
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(“SAY-ON-PAY”)
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and as a matter of good corporate governance, the Company’s stockholders are being asked to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), the executive compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that follow in this Proxy Statement. This vote is commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote.
At the Company’s annual meeting in 2011, 2017, and 2023, the Company’s stockholders were asked, by a non-binding advisory vote, to express their preference as to the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. The Board recommended annual Say-on-Pay voting, and the Company’s stockholders approved to have Say-on-Pay votes every year.
Since 2011, the Board has authorized annual advisory votes for the stockholders to consider and approve the compensation of the NEOs, and the next non-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the NEOs will be held at our 2026 annual meeting. The Say-on-Pay votes approving NEO compensation at each annual meeting held in 2011 through 2024 averaged 98% of the votes cast during this 14-year period.
The following resolution will be presented for approval by the Company’s stockholders at the 2025 annual meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of WD-40 Company (the “Company”) hereby approve the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and in the accompanying compensation tables and narrative disclosures.”
The advisory vote to approve executive compensation is a non-binding vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. This Proxy Statement contains a description of the compensation provided to the NEOs as required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.
Stockholders are encouraged to carefully consider the CD&A, accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement in considering this advisory vote. The Board believes that the compensation provided to the Company’s NEOs offers a competitive pay-for-performance package with a proper balance of short-term and long-term incentives aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.
This is an advisory vote and will not affect compensation previously paid or awarded to the NEOs. While a vote disapproving the NEOs’ executive compensation will not be binding on the Board or the Compensation and People Committee, such committee will consider the results of the advisory vote in making future executive compensation decisions.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal at the annual meeting is required to approve this advisory vote on executive compensation.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
11
ITEM NO. 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm (“auditor”) of the Company to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2026. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, the Audit Committee has determined that it is desirable to request ratification of this selection by the stockholders. Notwithstanding its selection, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a new auditor at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection.
A majority of the votes of the common stock present or represented at the annual meeting is required for approval. Broker non-votes will be voted in favor of approval. PwC acted as the Company’s auditor during the past fiscal year and, unless the Audit Committee appoints a new auditor, PwC will continue to act in such capacity during the current fiscal year. It is anticipated that a representative of PwC will attend the annual meeting, and such representative will have an opportunity to make a statement and be available to respond to appropriate questions.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING AUGUST 31, 2026.
12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information concerning those stockholders known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the common stock of the Company and, based on information furnished by them, such stockholders have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares, except as otherwise noted:
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership^ | Percent of Class† | ||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. 50 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 | 2,098,914 | 1 | 15.52 | % | ||||||||||
Vanguard Group, Inc. P.O. Box 2600 - V26 Valley Forge, PA 19482 | 1,625,030 | 3 | 12.01 | % | ||||||||||
^ Beneficial ownership information is based on reports as of June 30, 2025 filed on Form 13F with the SEC. Such information is unavailable as of October 15, 2025.
†Based on 13,527,835 shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on October 15, 2025.
1BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) reported that these shares are managed by 15 investment management subsidiaries and disclaims investment discretion over such shares. A summary of investment discretion and voting authority of shares reported for certain subsidiaries is as follows:
Investment Management Subsidiary | Investment Discretion | Voting Authority | ||||||||||||
| Sole | Sole | Shared | None | |||||||||||
BlackRock Fund Advisors | 1,456,271 | 1,456,271 | ||||||||||||
| BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. | 410,048 | 398,233 | 11,815 | |||||||||||
| BlackRock Advisors, LLC | 63,410 | 63,410 | ||||||||||||
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC | 46,389 | 37,229 | 9,160 | |||||||||||
BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Ltd | 36,352 | 36,352 | ||||||||||||
| Aperio Group, LLC | 34,223 | 28,146 | 6,076 | |||||||||||
BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. | 30,709 | 20,959 | 9,750 | |||||||||||
BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd | 8,735 | 3,495 | 5,240 | |||||||||||
7 other BlackRock subsidiaries (each holding fewer than 5,000 shares) | 12,777 | 9,018 | 3,759 | |||||||||||
2
Investment Management Subsidiary | Investment Discretion | Voting Authority | |||||||||||||||
| Sole | Shared | Sole | Shared | None | |||||||||||||
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 1,590,238 | 1,590,238 | |||||||||||||||
| Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co. | 13,251 | 13,251 | |||||||||||||||
| Vanguard Asset Management, Ltd. | 11,728 | 11,728 | |||||||||||||||
| Vanguard Global Advisers, LLC | 5,340 | 5,340 | |||||||||||||||
| Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. | 3,107 | 3,107 | |||||||||||||||
| Vanguard Personalized Indexing Management LLC | 1,366 | 1,125 | 241 | ||||||||||||||
13
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock, as of October 15, 2025, by (i) each current director (and/or director nominee) and NEO, and (ii) all current directors, NEOs, and other executive officers as a group:
Shares and Nature of Beneficial Ownership1 | |||||||||||
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Number | Percent of Class† | |||||||||
Steven A. Brass | 37,751 | 2 | * | ||||||||
Sara K. Hyzer | 6,723 | 3 | * | ||||||||
Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 5,454 | 4 | * | ||||||||
William B. Noble | 8,671 | 5 | * | ||||||||
Patricia Q. Olsem | 8,724 | 6 | * | ||||||||
| Cynthia B. Burks | 1,291 | 7 | * | ||||||||
| Daniel T. Carter | 6,205 | 7 | * | ||||||||
Eric P. Etchart | 7,870 | 8 | * | ||||||||
| Lara L. Lee | 1,891 | 7 | * | ||||||||
Edward O. Magee, Jr. | 2,001 | 9 | * | ||||||||
Trevor I. Mihalik | 4,172 | 10 | * | ||||||||
| Graciela I. Monteagudo | 2,261 | 7 | * | ||||||||
| David B. Pendarvis | 5,339 | 11 | * | ||||||||
| Anne G. Saunders | 2,751 | 7 | * | ||||||||
All current directors, NEOs, and other executive officer(s) of the Company, as a group (15 persons) | 105,888 | 12 | * | ||||||||
*Less than 1%.
†Based on 13,527,835 shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on October 15, 2025.
1All shares owned directly unless otherwise indicated.
2Mr. Brass’ total includes: (i) the right to receive 108 shares upon settlement of vested deferred performance units (“DPUs”) upon termination of employment, (ii) 13,189 unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”), none of which is subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025, (iii) 1,218 shares of restricted common stock, which may not be transferred or sold until termination of service as an employee of the Company, (iv) 3,883 shares of common stock to be issued on October 27, 2025 upon settlement of MSUs, and (v) 2,259 shares held in the WD-40 Company Profit Sharing / 401(k) Plan (“401(k) Plan”).
3Ms. Hyzer’s total includes: (i) 2,905 unvested RSUs, none of which is subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025, (ii) 71 shares of restricted common stock, which may not be transferred or sold until termination of service as an employee of the Company, (iii) 895 shares of common stock to be issued on October 27, 2025 upon settlement of MSUs,and (iv) 619 shares held in the 401(k) Plan.
4Mr. Lindeman’s total includes: (i) 1,514 unvested RSUs, none of which is subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025, (ii) 253 shares of restricted common stock, which may not be transferred or sold until termination of service as an employee of the Company, (iii) 821 shares of common stock to be issued on October 27, 2025 upon settlement of MSUs, and (iv) 697 shares held in the 401(k) Plan.
5Mr. Noble’s total includes: (i) the right to receive 280 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of employment, (ii) 479 unvested RSUs, none of which is subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025, (iii) 672 shares of common stock to be issued on October 27, 2025 upon settlement of MSUs, and (iv) 522 shares of restricted common stock, which may not be transferred or sold until termination of service as an employee of the Company.
6Ms. Olsem’s total includes: (i) the right to receive 89 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of employment, (ii) 1,842 unvested RSUs, none of which is subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025, (iii) 1,120 shares of common stock to be issued on October 27, 2025 upon settlement of MSUs,and (iv) 644 shares of restricted common stock, which may not be transferred or sold until termination of service as an employee of the Company. The 2007 Olsem Family Trust, which she shares investment discretion and voting authority with her spouse, holds beneficial ownership of 5,274 shares of the 8,724 shares reported above.
7Shares shown represent the right to receive all such shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company, and no shares vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025.
14
8Mr. Etchart’s total includes the right to receive 6,370 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company (of which 46 shares are subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025).
9Mr. Magee’s total includes the right to receive 1,945 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company (of which 14 shares are subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025).
10Mr. Mihalik’s total includes the right to receive 3,870 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company (of which 46 shares are subject to vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025).
11Mr. Pendarvis’ total includes the right to receive 5,011 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company, and no shares vesting within 60 days of October 15, 2025.
12Total includes the rights of directors, NEOs, and other executive officer(s) to receive a total of 31,595 shares upon settlement of vested RSUs upon termination of service as a director of the Company, the rights of executive officers to receive a total of 477 shares upon settlement of vested DPUs upon termination of employment, the rights of certain directors to receive a total of 112 shares within 60 days of October 15, 2025 upon vesting of RSUs, and a total of 3,788 shares directly held by executive officers in the Company’s 401(k) Plan.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company’s stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of stock ownership and reports of changes in stock ownership. Reporting persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company during the last fiscal year and written representations that no other reports were required, except as described below, all Section 16(a) requirements were complied with by all persons required to report with respect to the Company’s equity securities during the last fiscal year.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We remain committed to managing the Company for the benefit of our stockholders and maintaining robust corporate governance practices. Accordingly, we maintain the following corporate governance practices, among others, to enhance the Company’s reputation for integrity and serving our stockholders responsibly:
•Annual election of all directors with majority voting requirement | • Corporate Governance Guidelines include an overboarding policy that limits directors from serving on more than a total of four public company boards | ||||
•Annual election of a non-employee director as Chair of the Board, who is separate from and independent of the CEO | •Executive sessions of independent directors held at each regularly scheduled board meeting | ||||
•Governance guidelines for independent director leadership and other best governance practices | •Annual consideration of succession planning for the Board, the CEO, and senior management | ||||
•Annual performance evaluations for board, committees and directors | •Company prohibits pledging and hedging of Company stock by directors, executive officers, and all other employees | ||||
•8 of 9 director nominees are independent, only the CEO and President is not independent; all Board committees are composed entirely of independent directors | •Equity received by directors must be held until board service ends | ||||
• Anonymous reporting via whistleblower hotline and quarterly reporting of any activity presented to the Audit Committee | • Cash and equity incentive compensation paid to executive officers are subject to clawback | ||||
15
BOARD LEADERSHIP AND RISK OVERSIGHT
Board Leadership
The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the Board’s leadership structure and makes its recommendation to the Board. Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for, under appropriate circumstances, the designation of the principal executive officer to serve as board chair and for the designation of a lead independent director to ensure the most effective board governance when the principal executive officer is also serving as board chair.
In 2022, the Board determined that board oversight of and attention to the Company’s current strategic initiatives are better served by having a chair, who is an independent director, provide primary leadership at meetings of the Board and for such chair to serve as a liaison between the Board and executive management. Furthermore, the Board believes that separation of the principal executive officer and the board chair position is currently more appropriate for the Company given the size of the Board and the continued need for the principal executive officer’s focus and flexibility to implement strategic directives and execute overall management responsibilities. As an independent director, the chair can provide leadership to the Board without perceived or actual conflicts associated with individual and collective interests of management.
Since our 2022 annual meeting, the Board has elected an independent chair to serve as its non-employee Chair to lead the Board and, following the 2025 annual meeting, the Board expects to do so again. However, the Board’s determination as to whether having an independent director serve as board chair is in the best interests of the Company remains subject to annual review.
Board Role in Risk Oversight
Risk oversight is undertaken by the Board as a whole, but various Board committees are charged with reviewing and reporting on business and management risks included within the purview of each committee’s responsibilities. The Compensation and People Committee (“Compensation Committee”) considers risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices, with particular focus on the annual cash incentive compensation and equity awards offered to the Company’s executive officers and the performance metrics to best align the interests of management with those of the Company. The Audit Committee considers risks associated with financial reporting and internal control, including ethics and compliance program risks and, as described in further detail below, cybersecurity risks. The Finance Committee considers risks associated with the Company’s financial management and investment activities, acquisition- and divestiture-related risks, and Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 plan oversight. The Finance Committee also reviews the appropriateness of the Company’s insurance programs. The Board or its committees, as part of their oversight, receive periodic reports from management employees having responsibility for the management of particular areas of risk, including risks related to systems integrity and disaster recovery of primary information technology systems, supply chain risks associated with disruptive events, ESG risk, sustainability efforts and progress, and risks associated with artificial intelligence, which may include ethical, legal, and operational risk. The CEO is responsible for overall risk management and provides input to the Board with respect to the Company’s enterprise risk management program and is responsive to the Board in carrying out its risk oversight role.
In addition to maintaining four standing committees (described in further detail below under “Board Committees”), the Board maintains an ESG Board Advisory Group to provide guidance to the Company on key ESG-related issues. This provisional working group was created in fiscal year 2024 and is composed of four directors (each with a diverse ESG background): Cynthia B. Burks, Lara L. Lee, Graciela I. Monteagudo, and David B. Pendarvis.
Compensation Risk Assessment
In addition to oversight of compensation-related risk by the Compensation Committee, the Company’s management has undertaken an annual assessment of the Company’s compensation policies and practices and strategic business initiatives to determine whether any of these policies or practices, as well as any compensation plan design features, including those applicable to the executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Based on this review, management has concluded that the Company’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This conclusion is based primarily on the fact that the incentives underlying the Company’s compensation plan design features provide balance among increased profitability, long-term growth, and longer-term stockholder returns and are aligned with best practices widely recognized and followed by other similar public companies. Management has discussed these findings with the Compensation Committee.
16
In addition, we have adopted a clawback policy that enables us to recover cash and equity incentive compensation from executive officers in the event of a restatement of our financial results. The clawback policy is available on our website at https://investor.wd40company.com/overview/default.aspx under Governance.
Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
Management is responsible for cybersecurity risk management, which is part of the Company’s enterprise risk management and business continuity processes. We regularly evaluate our cybersecurity risk profile as well as the status and activities of our cybersecurity program, which aligns to the industry-recognized Center for Internet Security or CIS framework. We employ a defense-in-depth strategy which involves multiple layers of security controls to help prevent and detect possible risks and employ measures to protect our systems from business disruption. Our cybersecurity program includes tools and activities to prevent, detect, and analyze current and emerging cybersecurity threats, as well as plans and strategies to address threats and incidents. We also engage with third-party service providers, who possess expertise in information technology (“IT”) and cybersecurity, to aid in the design, implementation, and management of our cybersecurity infrastructure and protocols. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer works with our Vice President of Global Information & Technology and regional IT members to lead our enterprise-wide information security program and manage our Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan. As a part of continuing education, employees are required to participate in cybersecurity awareness training at the commencement of their employment and annually thereafter. We reinforce this training with monthly phishing tests and cybersecurity newsletters to educate our employees on the latest cybersecurity threats and the most effective preventative measures. The Audit Committee oversees cybersecurity risk and mitigation strategies of the Company.
BOARD MEETINGS, COMMITTEES AND ANNUAL MEETING ATTENDANCE
The Board is charged by the stockholders with managing or directing the management of the business affairs and exercising the corporate power of the Company. The Board relies on the following standing committees to assist in carrying out the Board’s responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Finance Committee. Each of the committees has a written charter approved by the Board, and each committee reviews their respective charter annually. Committee charters can be found on the Company’s website at http://investor.wd40company.com/investors/corporate-governance/overview.
There were seven meetings of the Board during the last fiscal year. Each director serving for the full fiscal year attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and of all committees on which the director served. In addition, the Board holds an annual organizational meeting on the date of the annual meeting. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the annual meeting. At the last annual meeting, all current directors (and director nominees) were present.
EQUITY HOLDING REQUIREMENT FOR DIRECTORS
RSU awards to non-employee directors, including both non-elective grants and RSU awards granted pursuant to the annual elections of the directors to receive RSUs in lieu of all or part of their base annual fee, are not settled in shares of the Company’s common stock until termination of each director’s service as a director. The number of shares to be issued to each non-employee director upon termination of service is disclosed in the footnotes to the last table under the heading, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
INSIDER TRADING POLICY – PROHIBITED TRADING TRANSACTIONS
The Company’s insider trading policy requires pre-approval of all trading plans adopted pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act (“10b5-1 Trading Plan”). To avoid the potential for abuse, the Company’s policy with respect to such trading plans is that, once adopted, trading plans may not be changed or canceled without the General Counsel’s approval. Any approved change or cancellation of a trading plan adopted by an executive officer, director or
17
employee covered by the Company’s insider trading policy may result in the Company’s refusal to approve future trading plan requests for that person.
The insider trading policy also includes a prohibition on certain hedging and transactions involving the potential for abuse. Pursuant to the insider trading policy, executive officers, directors and covered employees may not engage in the following transactions involving the Company’s publicly traded securities:
•Short sale transactions | •Hedging transactions | ||||
•Transactions in options or derivatives | •Pledges or margin account borrowing | ||||
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
Stockholders and other interested parties may send communications to the Board by submitting a letter addressed to: WD-40 Company, Corporate Secretary, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, CA 92131.
The Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary to review and forward such communications to the Board Chair. The Board has also instructed the Corporate Secretary to exercise discretion, to not forward to the Board Chair any communication which is deemed to be of a commercial or frivolous nature or inappropriate for consideration by the Board. The Corporate Secretary may also forward the communication to another department within the Company to facilitate an appropriate response.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Compensation for non-employee directors is set by the Board upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee conducts a review of non-employee director compensation at least bi-annually, and in October 2024, such review included the 2023 - 2024 NACD Director Compensation Report and the 2024 Director Compensation Report published by FW Cook. For fiscal year 2025, non-employee directors who served through the Company’s fiscal year end received compensation for services as directors pursuant to the Directors’ Compensation Policy and Election Plan (the “Director Compensation Policy”) adopted by the Board on October 3, 2024. Pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy, non-employee directors received a base annual fee of $75,000. The Chair received additional annual compensation of $50,000.
Non-employee directors received additional cash compensation for service on various Board committees as follows:
Audit | Compensation | Corporate Governance | Finance | |||||||||||
| Chair | $20,000 | $14,000 | $11,000 | $12,000 | ||||||||||
| Member | $11,000 | $6,000 | $5,000 | $6,000 | ||||||||||
All such annual fees were paid in the first calendar quarter of 2025.
At the Company’s 2016 annual meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved the WD-40 Company 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (which was amended and restated effective December 12, 2023 upon stockholder approval at the 2023 annual meeting, the “A&R 2016 Stock Incentive Plan”) to authorize the issuance of stock-based compensation awards to employees as well as to directors. In addition to the fees set forth above, the Director Compensation Policy provides for an annual grant of restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards having a grant date value of approximately $110,000 to each non-employee director. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock. On December 12, 2024, each non-employee director elected at the 2024 annual meeting received a non-elective RSU award covering 405 shares of the Company’s common stock. Additional information regarding the RSU awards is provided in a footnote to the Director Compensation table below.
Each non-employee director may elect to receive an RSU award (“Elective RSUs”) in lieu of all or a portion of his or her base annual fee for service as a director. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to each such RSU award granted to the non-employee directors equaled the elective portion of his or her base annual fee payable in RSUs divided by the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant.
Pursuant to award agreements with non-employee directors, RSU awards are fully vested (except for Elective RSUs, which vest monthly over 12 months), entitled to dividend compensation equivalent to dividends declared and paid on the
18
Company’s common stock, and settled in shares of the Company’s common stock upon termination of the director’s service as a director of the Company.
The Company also maintains a Director Contributions Fund from which each incumbent non-employee director has the right each fiscal year to designate $7,000 in contributions to be made by the Company to properly qualified Section 501(c)(3) charitable organizations of the Internal Revenue Code.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE – FISCAL YEAR 2025
The following Director Compensation table provides information concerning compensation earned by each non-employee director for services rendered in fiscal year 2025. Amounts reported in the following table under Fees Earned or Paid in Cash for each director depend on the various committees that each director served as a member or as chair during the fiscal year and whether the director served as the chair of the Board.
Non-Employee Director1 | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)2 | Stock Awards ($)3 | All Other Compensation ($)4 | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cynthia B. Burks | $92,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $208,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel T. Carter | $106,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $222,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eric P. Etchart | $136,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $252,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lara L. Lee | $87,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $203,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Edward O. Magee, Jr. | $98,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $214,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trevor I. Mihalik | $103,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $219,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Graciela I. Monteagudo | $92,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $208,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| David B. Pendarvis | $103,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $219,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gregory A. Sandfort5 | $35,667 | $32,263 | $7,000 | $74,930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anne G. Saunders | $105,000 | $109,958 | $7,000 | $221,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Mr. Brass is not included in this table as he is an employee and does not receive compensation for his service as a director. Compensation for services he provides to the Company is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included in the Executive Compensation section of the Proxy.
2 Messrs. Carter and Pendarvis and Mses. Burks, Lee, Monteagudo, and Saunders elected to receive their fiscal year 2025 base annual fees of $75,000 in cash. Messrs. Etchart, Mihalik, and Sandfort elected to receive RSU awards in lieu of cash for their base annual fees pursuant to elections made as permitted under the Director Compensation Policy. Mr. Magee elected to receive his fiscal year 2025 base annual fee in cash (67%) and RSUs (33%). The number of shares underlying each director’s RSU award was rounded down to the nearest whole share.
3 Amounts reported under Stock Awards represent the grant date fair value for non-elective RSU awards granted pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy. On December 12, 2024, each director received a non-elective RSU award covering 405 shares of the Company’s common stock. The grant date fair value of approximately $110,000 equals the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, which was $271.50 multiplied by the number of shares underlying the RSU award. The number of shares underlying each director’s RSU award is rounded down to the nearest whole share. Outstanding RSUs held by each director as of October 15, 2025 are reported in footnotes to Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table.
4 Amounts represent charitable contributions made by the Company in fiscal year 2025 as designated by non-employee directors pursuant to the Company’s Director Contributions Fund.
5 Mr. Sandfort retired from the Board effective December 12, 2024 and, except for charitable contributions under All Other Compensation, his compensation was prorated and based on the Director Compensation Policy in effect when he was elected at the 2023 annual meeting.
The director compensation table above does not include reasonable out-of-pocket expenses (e.g., airfare, hotel, car rental, etc.) incurred by directors that the Company reimburses in connection with in-person attendance at Board and committee meetings, on-site visits to the Company’s offices and facilities, and continuing education such as conferences, coursework and speaking engagements. For fiscal year 2025, directors were subject to a limit of $5,000 for continuing education and $12,000 for continuing education-related travel.
19
BOARD COMMITTEES
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Members: Independent: Meetings held last FY: | David B. Pendarvis (Chair)1 Daniel T. Carter Eric P. Etchart Trevor I. Mihalik Graciela I. Monteagudo Gregory A. Sandfort2 Anne G. Saunders All 5 | Primary Responsibilities: • Provides counsel to the Board, including the size and operation of the Board and its standing committees • Serves as the nominating function of the Board, which includes reviewing and interviewing qualified candidates to serve on the Board • Oversees and recommends to the Board: - structure, composition, and rotation of the committees of the Board - trading guidelines for directors, officers and key employees - director compensation and benefits policies and practices • Manages annual board and committee evaluations and assesses the effectiveness of the Board and its committees • Reviews stockholder proposals and recommends responses to the Board • Reviews and considers developments in corporate governance to ensure that best practices are being followed | ||||||
1 Joined December 12, 2024
2 Until December 12, 2024
Board and Committee Self-Evaluation
The Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual process of self-evaluation conducted by each committee of the Board and for the Board as a whole, which includes a board evaluation, individual self-evaluations and peer evaluations. Directors are encouraged to share constructive feedback on topics including Board and committee dynamics, operations, and effectiveness.
Board Evaluation
The Company conducts an annual comprehensive board self-evaluation to assess the effectiveness of the Board, its committees, and members. The process is coordinated internally by our Corporate Governance Committee in partnership with the Board Chair. The following evaluations are collected via online questionnaire:
1.Audit Committee Self-Evaluation Questionnaire
2.Compensation Committee Self-Evaluation Questionnaire
3.Corporate Governance Committee Self-Evaluation Questionnaire
4.Finance Committee Self-Evaluation Questionnaire
5.Individual Director Evaluation Questionnaire
6.Board Self Evaluation Questionnaire
7.Peer Evaluation Questionnaire
The Company’s comprehensive evaluation process includes a peer-based, individual director evaluation, which provides each director with confidential feedback from fellow Board members. The inclusion of peer evaluations is intended to promote accountability, reinforce a culture of continuous improvement, and ensure that each director contributes effectively to the Board’s oversight responsibilities. Insights from the overall evaluation process also inform succession planning, committee composition, and ongoing director education.
Questionnaire responses are collected anonymously to foster and promote open and candid feedback. The Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with the Board Chair, reviews aggregated results to identify strengths, development opportunities, and areas for enhanced Board and committee performance.
20
Procedure
In advance of questionnaire deployment, all questionnaires are reviewed and updated by the Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with the Board Chair and committee chairs. Once the questionnaire responses are collected and analyzed, the Company’s Board (including the CEO) and General Counsel review and discuss the results and any actions to be taken. The purpose of these evaluations is to identify areas where the Board and committees and each of its directors can enhance their performance and effectiveness. Additionally, the evaluations assist in determining whether adjustments are necessary in terms of the Board and committee leadership, composition and expertise. Lastly, the evaluations assist in ensuring that our Board and committees are aligned with our Company values and adhere to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and committee charters.
Nomination Policies and Procedures
The Corporate Governance Committee acts in conjunction with the Board to ensure that a regular evaluation is conducted of succession plans, performance, independence, and of the qualifications and integrity of the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee also reviews the applicable skills and qualifications required of nominees for election as directors. The objective is to balance the composition of the Board to achieve a combination of individuals with different skills and experiences to meet the needs of the Board and support the Company’s strategy, and such skills and experiences are outlined more fully in the matrix below. The Board has not established any specific diversity criteria for the selection of nominees other than the general composition criteria noted below.
In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the director’s past attendance at meetings, results of evaluations, and the director’s participation in and anticipated future contributions to the Board. Directors who reach the age of 72 are expected to retire and provide advance notice to the Board to support effective succession planning. However, the Board may re-nominate any director for up to three additional years if the Board determines that relevant circumstances warrant continued service.
The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates new Board nominees through a series of internal discussions, reviewing available information, and interviewing selected candidates. Generally, candidates for nomination to the Board have been identified and compiled in a database through director networking, professional organizations or suggestions from individual directors or employees. Historically, the Company has not employed a search firm or third party when seeking or evaluating candidates.
The Corporate Governance Committee considers director recruitment and succession planning for the Board at least annually. This review entails consideration of various factors that the Corporate Governance Committee believes to be relevant to ensure that the Board maintains a level of diversity in skills, qualifications and perspectives, including relevant experience that is appropriate for its oversight and governance responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Committee considers each director’s experience in senior leadership roles and as directors on other public company boards, including service on committees and as committee or board chairs, in addition to age and the tenure of each director on the Board. Beyond a baseline expectation that directors and director nominees will share the Company values and have demonstrated an ability to promote and sustain a strong corporate culture, the Board endeavors to ensure that the mix of skills among directors is aligned with corporate strategy and appropriate for the evolving business and competitive environment of the Company.
Refreshed Board Composition and Leadership (FY 2022 - 2025)
| Type of Change | Date of Change | Director | Position | ||||||||
| Board Composition Changes | |||||||||||
| + | March 2022 | Steven A. Brass | Director | ||||||||
| + | June 2022 | Edward O. Magee, Jr. | Director | ||||||||
| - | December 2022 | Gary O. Ridge | Director | ||||||||
| + | December 2022 | Cynthia B. Burks | Director | ||||||||
| - | June 2024 | Melissa Claussen | Director | ||||||||
| - | December 2024 | Gregory A. Sandfort | Director | ||||||||
21
| Board and Committee Leadership Changes | |||||||||||
| - | December 2022 | Gary O. Ridge | Chair of the Board | ||||||||
| - | December 2022 | Gregory A. Sandfort | Lead Independent Director | ||||||||
| + | December 2022 | Gregory A. Sandfort | Chair of the Board | ||||||||
| - | December 2024 | Eric P. Etchart | Chair, Corporate Governance | ||||||||
| + | December 2024 | David B. Pendarvis | Chair, Corporate Governance | ||||||||
| - | December 2024 | Gregory A. Sandfort | Chair of the Board | ||||||||
| + | December 2024 | Eric P. Etchart | Chair of the Board | ||||||||
Continuing Education and Certifications
The Company maintains a corporate membership to the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”) for the benefit of its directors. NACD membership includes access to nationwide networking, resources on emerging issues and trends, online and in-person instruction. In addition, to emphasize the importance of continuing education, directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attending continuing education programs and conferences and acquiring certain certifications to assist them in remaining abreast of developments in critical issues relating to the operation of public company boards, including environmental, social, and corporate governance. Three directors have earned NACD Directorship Certification, three directors are recognized as NACD Board Leadership Fellows, and two directors are included on NACD Directorship 100™. In addition, various directors completed coursework to strengthen their knowledge and earned certificates as follows:
Skills and Experience
The following list of specific skills are among the areas of expertise and experience that the Corporate Governance Committee believes will best serve the Company. The list is updated from time to time and each director’s expertise in these areas is graded on a scale to assess the level of competence that is available to the Board as a whole. The table below presents those areas in which the Board has determined that individual directors have a deep or knowledgeable level of expertise and does not reflect areas in which directors have general experience or familiarity. A particular director may possess other skills, experience, qualifications or attributes even though they are not indicated below. This information is used to assist the Board in ensuring a composition of skills and experience to oversee effectively the Company’s strategy, risk management, and emerging areas of focus, all of which will guide the Board in identifying the desired skills and experience of future nominees.
22
| DIRECTOR NOMINEES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE | Steven A. Brass | Cynthia B. Burks | Daniel T. Carter | Eric P. Etchart | Lara L. Lee | Edward O. Magee, Jr. | Graciela I. Monteagudo | David B. Pendarvis | Anne G. Saunders | ||||||||||||||||||||
Brand Mgmt. or Building; Omni-Channel Marketing; Digital | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer / Retail Markets | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cybersecurity & Technology | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance & Accounting | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Human Capital & Talent Mgmt. | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Innovation | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International / Global Business | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Leadership (Public Company Senior Executive) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Legal & Corporate Governance | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operations | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sustainability | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional information on each director’s qualifications is included in their respective biographies shown under Director Nominees on page 4.
CURRENT BOARD COMPOSITION
The Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders under the same criteria as other candidates described above. Nominations may be submitted by letter addressed to: WD-40 Company Corporate Governance Committee, Attn: Corporate Secretary, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, California 92131. Nominations by stockholders must be submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Company’s Bylaws, including submission of such nominations within the time required for submission of stockholder proposals as set forth below under the heading, Stockholder Proposals or Director Nominations for our 2026 Annual Meeting.
23
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Members: Independent (under Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act): | Daniel T. Carter (Chair) Cynthia B. Burks Lara L. Lee1 Edward O. Magee, Jr. Trevor I. Mihalik David B. Pendarvis Anne G. Saunders2 All | Primary Responsibilities of Committee: Provides oversight of the following: •integrity of financial statements and disclosures •integrity of audits, reviews and reporting controls •direct management of independent auditor •internal audit •ethics and compliance, including Company’s Code of Conduct and “whistleblower” hotline •risk management of financial reporting and internal controls •cybersecurity risks •management’s earnings guidance | ||||||
| Meetings held last FY: | 4 | |||||||
1 Until December 12, 2024
2 Joined December 12, 2024
The Board has determined that Mr. Carter and Mr. Mihalik are each an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC regulations and that each member satisfies the requirements for service on the Audit Committee under Rule 5605(c)(2) of the Nasdaq Rules.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Members: Independent: Meetings held last FY: | Trevor I. Mihalik (Chair) Daniel T. Carter Eric P. Etchart Lara L. Lee1 Edward O. Magee, Jr. Graciela I. Monteagudo Gregory A. Sandfort2 All 4 | Primary Responsibilities of Committee: • Reviews and advises the Board with respect to: - Acquisitions and divestitures - Investment policy - Capital and debt structure - Cash and liquidity, including capital expenditures - Dividend policy - Interest rates and foreign exchange - Tax planning - Appropriateness of insurable business risks • Reviews the Company’s annual business plan and long-term financial strategies, objectives and strategic initiatives | ||||||
1 Joined December 12, 2024
2 Until December 12, 2024
24
COMPENSATION AND PEOPLE COMMITTEE
Members: Independent (and “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act): Meetings held last FY: | Anne G. Saunders (Chair) Cynthia B. Burks Lara L. Lee Edward O. Magee, Jr.1 Graciela I. Monteagudo1 David B. Pendarvis Gregory A. Sandfort2 All 6 | Primary Responsibilities of Committee: • Reviews the Company’s overall compensation programs and strategies • Establishes and administers executive compensation programs, including short-term and long-term incentive compensation and setting performance metrics and clawback provisions for such incentive compensation • Conducts an annual review of and approves the goals and objectives relevant to CEO’s compensation, including a performance evaluation in light of such goals and objectives to determine and approve the CEO’s compensation • Reviews strategies related to human capital and talent management, including recruiting, development and retention, severance arrangements (as applicable), and management succession • Reviews the foregoing strategies and programs for consistency with the Company’s compensation philosophy, business strategy, competitive practices, culture, and the requirements of applicable regulatory authorities • Reviews stockholder voting results on “Say-on-Pay” and feedback received regarding executive compensation matters | ||||||
1 Joined December 12, 2024
2 Until December 12, 2024
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2025, there were no compensation committee interlock relationships with respect to the Company’s executive officers, members of the Board and/or the Compensation Committee as described in Item 407(e)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE ISSUES
The Company believes that taking an integrated approach to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues supports sustainable growth, creates long-term value, and protects the interests of our stakeholders. Our Board holds ultimate oversight authority and has demonstrated ongoing commitment to the Company’s performance relative to ESG issues.
Guided by our core value, Do the Right Thing, we continue to evolve in response to changing societal expectations. This is especially evident in our ESG efforts, where we aim to create value for all stakeholders through responsible business practices.
The Company’s sustainability efforts began in fiscal year 2018 with the formation of a cross-functional Project Team focused on environmental impact, product sustainability, and cultural foundations. In fiscal year 2022, this work was elevated through the creation of the ESG Squad and Sustainability Committee, enhancing senior leadership’s role in ESG decision-making and accountability.
In fiscal year 2024, the Board established an ESG Board Advisory Group that meets on an ad hoc basis. This provisional working group composed of four members of our Board with diverse ESG backgrounds was created to provide guidance to the Company on key ESG-related issues. The ESG Board Advisory Group collaborates with the management-led Sustainability Committee to help shape the Company’s sustainable innovation strategy and strengthen its social initiatives.
The Company published its third ESG report in November 2024, summarizing progress over fiscal years 2023 and 2024 and outlining its strategy for fiscal years 2025 and 2026. The report is available under the “Sustainability” section of our website, https://investor.wd40company.com/investors/esg/default.aspx. Information on our website, including our ESG report, is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
25
INFORMATION REGARDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the names, ages, and current titles of the Company’s executive officers as of August 31, 2025:
Name | Age | Title | ||||||||||||
Steven A. Brass | 59 | President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”); Director | ||||||||||||
Sara K. Hyzer | 47 | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) | ||||||||||||
Phenix Q. Kiamilev | 46 | Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 62 | Vice President, Chief People, Culture and Capability Officer (“Chief People Officer”) | ||||||||||||
William B. Noble | 67 | Group Managing Director | ||||||||||||
Patricia Q. Olsem | 58 | Division President, Americas | ||||||||||||
Mr. Brass joined the Company in 1991 as International Area Manager at the Company’s U.K. subsidiary, WD-40 Company Limited, and has since held several management positions including Country Manager in Germany, Director of Continental Europe, European Sales Director, and European Commercial Director. He then served as Division President, Americas of the Company, from 2016 until 2019, when he was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer. In March 2022, Mr. Brass was appointed to the Board and, effective September 1, 2022, Mr. Brass serves as CEO and President.
Ms. Hyzer joined the Company in August 2021 as Vice President, Global Finance Strategy. She was then named Vice President, Finance, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer, effective November 1, 2022. In connection with her promotion, she assumed the responsibility for global information technology strategy, and in January 2023, she relinquished the title and responsibility of Treasurer. Before joining the Company, Ms. Hyzer served over 20 years at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, during the last six years of which she served as an audit partner for publicly traded and privately held companies in industries, including consumer products and life sciences. Ms. Hyzer is a Certified Public Accountant in California (Inactive).
Ms. Kiamilev joined the Company in May 2021 as Vice President, Legal, was appointed General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in December 2021, and appointed Chief Compliance Officer in April 2025. From 2019 to 2021, Ms. Kiamilev served as Vice President, Legal, and General Counsel of Kyriba Corp. and held other legal roles from 2014 to 2019. Ms. Kiamilev also served as in-house counsel for Active Network, LLC after practicing law at Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP (currently Dentons US LLP). Ms. Kiamilev is a licensed attorney in the State of California.
Mr. Lindeman serves as the Company’s chief human resources officer. He joined the Company in 2016 and has held management positions within the Company’s EIMEA segment, including director of human resources, information technology, supply chain and finance. In December 2020, he was named Vice President, Global Organizational Development of the Company. He was then promoted to his current position, Chief People, Culture and Capability Officer, in November 2022. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lindeman worked as the senior director of talent and engagement for San Diego International Airport from 2006 to 2016.
Mr. Noble joined the Company’s Australian subsidiary, WD-40 (Australia) Pty. Limited, in 1993 as International Marketing Manager for the Asia Region. He was then promoted to Managing Director, EMEA and appointed as a Director of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary, WD-40 Company Limited, in 1996. Effective November 1, 2022, Mr. Noble was promoted to Group Managing Director. Effective December 31, 2025, Mr. Noble will retire after 32 years of service with the Company.
Ms. Olsem joined the Company in 2005 and has held various senior management positions including, Vice President Americas Innovation Development Group, Senior Vice President Marketing and Innovation of the Americas, and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the U.S. She was promoted to her current position as Division President, Americas in 2019.
All executive officers hold office at the discretion of the Board. There are no family relationships between any executive officer and any member of the Board. There are no pending litigation or proceedings involving the Company’s officers.
26
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) addresses the philosophy, policies, programs, processes, and decisions of the Compensation Committee with respect to compensation for the Company’s Named Executive Officers (the “NEOs”). During fiscal year 2025, the Company’s NEOs were as follows:
•Steven A. Brass, President and CEO
•Sara K. Hyzer, Vice President, Finance, and CFO
•Jeffrey G. Lindeman, Vice President, Chief People Officer
•William B. Noble, Group Managing Director*
•Patricia Q. Olsem, Division President, Americas
* All NEOs are employees of the Company, except for Mr. Noble, who is an employee of WD-40 Company Limited, a wholly owned United Kingdom (“U.K.”) subsidiary of the Company.
Our Executive Compensation Programs Incorporate Strong Governance Features
•No Employment Agreements with Executive Officers (except as required in the U.K.) | •Executive Officers are Subject to Stock Ownership Guidelines | |||||||
•No Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans for Executive Officers | •Executive Officers are Prohibited from Hedging or Pledging Company Stock | |||||||
•Long-Term Incentive Awards are Subject to Double-Trigger Vesting upon Change of Control | •No Backdating or Re-Pricing of Equity Awards | |||||||
•Annual and Long-Term Incentive Programs Provide a Balanced Mix of Goals for Profitability, Growth and Total Stockholder Return Performance | •Financial Goals for Performance-Based Equity Awards Never Reset | |||||||
• Incentive-based Compensation subject to Clawback | •Independent Compensation Consultant Retained by the Compensation Committee of the Board | |||||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The compensation structure for the NEOs is composed of three principal elements:
| Base Salary | Annual Cash and Equity Incentives: | Long-Term Equity Incentives: | ||||||
| ▪ Growth Reward Program (“GRP”) | ▪ Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) | |||||||
| ▪ Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) | ▪ Market Share Units (“MSUs”) | |||||||
Annual incentives are measured based on performance each fiscal year (with GRP payable in cash and PSUs payable in restricted stock) whereas long-term incentives involve a three-year time horizon. RSUs are retention-related equity that vest over three years, and MSUs are long-term, performance-related equity that may vest in three years, depending on the Company’s stock performance. The design of this compensation structure results in a significant portion of NEO-realized compensation being directly tied to Company performance, which is measured predominantly by financial performance and total stockholder return (“TSR”).
Annual Incentive Compensation Overview
GRP
In fiscal year 2024, the Company approved changes to GRP to incorporate additional key global company objectives, including global adjusted net sales and other company-wide strategic performance measures. The details of GRP are described more fully under GRP Design.
To measure NEO performance, the Company used the following measures for fiscal year 2025 GRP (which measures remain unchanged from fiscal year 2024):
27
| GRP Measure | GRP Calculation Description | ||||
1. Adjusted Net Sales (Global and Regional)* | Tranche 1 of GRP Calculation | ||||
| 2. Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP (Global and Regional)* | |||||
3. Strategic Performance Measures | |||||
4. Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP | Tranche 2 of GRP Calculation | ||||
* “Global” is defined as the financial metric computed on a consolidated basis, while “Regional” is defined as the financial metric computed for each of the Company’s relevant reporting segments, either the Americas, EIMEA or Asia Pacific.
The measures are calculated in accordance with Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 of GRP Calculations:
▪ Tranche 1 of GRP Calculation is accrued based on the first 3 measures shown above:
♦ “Adjusted Net Sales” is defined as net sales translated using budgeted exchange rates.**
♦ “Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP” is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation (in operating departments), amortization, which includes amortization of definite-lived intangible assets and cloud computing amortization, and generally excludes non-routine items, all translated using budgeted exchange rates and calculated prior to any GRP compensation expense or PSU expense.**
♦ Strategic performance measures are further discussed in Growth Reward Program
▪ Tranche 2 of GRP Calculation is accrued based on the 4th measure shown above:
“Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP” is a measure used for Tranche 2 of GRP Calculation and based on U.S. Dollar (“USD”) reported results, defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation (in operating departments), amortization, which includes amortization of definite-lived intangible assets and cloud computing amortization, and generally excludes non-routine items, all using actual exchange rates, calculated after GRP compensation expense is computed for Tranche 1 of GRP Calculation and prior to GRP compensation expense related to Tranche 2 of GRP Calculation and PSU expense.**
** Before the beginning of fiscal year 2025, the Company had announced its intent to divest the homecare and cleaning product portfolios in the Americas and EIMEA segments. Accordingly, the Company excluded the financial impact of these product portfolios in its results for fiscal year 2025 for these measures when setting target and maximum GRP opportunities. On a global basis, these product portfolios represented less than 4% of consolidated net sales and less than 5% of our Global Adjusted EBITDA measures, if included.
PSU Awards
In addition to the GRP, the Company continued to grant PSUs, which are intended to incentivize and reward NEOs for achieving current fiscal year EBITDA above the maximum EBITDA-based metrics used for GRP. Similar to GRP, PSUs represent another short-term incentive to focus on exceptional EBITDA growth and further strengthens the pay-for-performance orientation of the Company’s compensation program. Fiscal year 2025 PSU metrics and performance achieved are shown below under Fiscal Year 2025 PSU Attainment by NEO.
PSU awards were established by reference to each NEO’s annual GRP opportunity, which is based on a multiple of fiscal year 2025 base salary ranging from 1x to 2x, and fiscal year 2025 maximum percentage GRP opportunity. The share equivalent value of PSUs awarded to each NEO as of the date of grant equals 100% of the NEO’s target GRP opportunity.
PSU awards provide for the vesting of restricted stock, based on level of achievement and up to the total shares granted. Restricted stock issued upon vesting of the PSUs are subject to a restrictive endorsement that prohibits their sale before termination of employment. PSU awards that vest are settled on the third business day following the Company’s public release of its annual earnings for each fiscal year. The Company withholds shares to cover required withholding taxes due to the settlement of vested PSU awards and issues restricted stock, net of shares withheld, which have a value as of the settlement date equal to the required tax withholding obligation.
28
Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Compensation Overview
LTI compensation is equity-based and consists of RSUs and MSUs, consistent with prior years. Retention-related equity compensation to NEOs includes RSU awards that typically vest annually over a period of three years after grant, subject to earlier vesting upon the effective date of retirement under certain conditions. Performance-based MSU awards to NEOs promote performance and retention over a longer-term horizon. Depending on the performance of the Company’s stock price against a three-year market return-based measurement period, NEOs may earn MSUs with a three-year vesting cliff (or pro-rata vesting at the end of the applicable measurement period in the event of earlier retirement under certain conditions).
The foregoing compensation structure elements are described in greater detail in subsequent sections in this CD&A.
How The Compensation Committee Sets Pay Opportunities
As part of the framework for overall NEO compensation and assessment of compensation for each NEO that takes into account individual and Company performance, the Compensation Committee also considers actual and target levels of compensation, short-term and long-term performance periods, labor market data, and peer group executive compensation. The Compensation Committee seeks to align individual NEO performance incentives with short-term and long-term Company objectives. The Compensation Committee assesses the effectiveness of the established framework for NEO compensation by reviewing each principal element of NEO compensation as well as total compensation in the aggregate. The Compensation Committee considers measures of Company performance over multi-year periods, specifically including regional and global measures based on the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP, and relative Company performance compared to an established peer group of companies and a comparable market index. The Compensation Committee also considers the relative achievement of longer-term strategic objectives for which each NEO is accountable. Information regarding NEO strategic objectives is provided in the Executive Officer Compensation Decisions for Fiscal Year 2025 section below under the heading, Base Salary: Process.
FISCAL YEAR 2025 COMPENSATION DECISIONS
Compensation decisions for fiscal year 2025 were made in October 2024 based on individual and Company performance during fiscal year 2024 and a market survey conducted by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, ClearBridge Compensation Group, LLC (“ClearBridge”).
The following is a summary of decisions made by the Compensation Committee for NEO compensation for fiscal year 2025:
•Base salary increases from fiscal year 2024 base salary amounts for NEOs ranged from 3% to 10% and averaged 6%. The base salary increase for each NEO was determined based on individual factors (e.g., role, performance/contributions) and respective market benchmarks, with fiscal year 2025 salaries within the market ranges reviewed by the Compensation Committee.
•Our annual cash incentive plan or GRP in which NEOs participate is described below under the heading, Growth Reward Program. Under GRP, Global and Regional goals related to EBITDA, net sales, and strategic performance measures were established shortly after the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company’s performance as measured against these goals is described in detail below.
•In addition to cash, as part of overall annual incentive compensation, the Company granted a maximum of 5,686 PSUs (total) to NEOs. See further details in the table under the heading, Fiscal Year 2025 PSU Attainment by NEO.
•In October 2024, in addition to PSUs, the NEOs received the following long-term stock-based awards:
•RSU awards providing for the issuance of a total of 8,907 shares of the Company’s common stock to be earned by continued employment by the Company over a vesting period of three years, subject to earlier vesting upon the effective date of retirement under certain conditions.1 These awards serve a retention purpose together with an incentive to maximize long-term stockholder value through share price appreciation.
1 For a more complete description of the RSU awards, refer to the Executive Officer Compensation Decisions section below under Restricted Stock Unit or RSU Awards.
29
•MSU awards subject to performance vesting covering a target number of shares of the Company’s common stock totaling 8,907 shares. If the Company’s TSR over the three-year measurement period matches the return for the Russell 2000 Index, as published by Russell Investments (“Index”), the target number of shares of the Company’s common stock would vest and be issued to the NEOs. The actual number of shares to be issued to the NEOs will be from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares depending upon the Company’s TSR compared to the return for the Index.2
•Equity awards for fiscal year 2025 varied among the NEOs based on labor market compensation practices specific to the region of employment, relative achievement of individual performance measures and goals established for each NEO, individual market data based on role and responsibilities, as well as Company performance for fiscal year 2025 in areas over which each NEO had direct influence.
The Compensation Committee considered the results of advisory Say-on-Pay votes in its decision-making for executive compensation of the NEOs and concluded that no significant changes in executive compensation decisions and policies are warranted due to Say-on-Pay vote outcomes, which are provided below for each year that stockholders voted.
For additional details on Say-on-Pay results, please refer to Item No. 2 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (“Say-on-Pay”) above.
GOVERNANCE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The Compensation Committee’s primary purpose is to establish compensation and benefit arrangements for our CEO, other NEOs, and executive officers of the Company, on behalf of the Board. The Compensation Committee is responsible for developing and reviewing the Company’s overall executive compensation strategy, with support from management and consultants. As noted earlier, for fiscal year 2025 executive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee engaged ClearBridge, an independent compensation consulting firm. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for administering the Company’s equity compensation plans.
The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a charter that outlines its responsibilities, including evaluating the performance and approving annual compensation and benefits for the Company’s executive officers. A copy of the
2 For a more complete description of the MSU awards, refer to the Executive Officer Compensation Decisions section below under Market Share Unit or MSU Awards.
30
Compensation and People Committee Charter (“Compensation Charter”), which is reviewed annually, can be found on the Company’s website at http://investor.wd40company.com in the “Corporate Governance” section.
PROCESS FOR EVALUATING EXECUTIVE OFFICER PERFORMANCE AND COMPENSATION
In setting compensation for NEOs, the Compensation Committee receives input from the CEO concerning each of the other NEOs and a report of the Company’s financial results for the past fiscal year relative to the Company’s performance measures. The CEO makes recommendations regarding base salary and incentive compensation for each of the other NEOs. The Compensation Committee considers the input, results, recommendations and other factors in making its final determination as to each NEO’s compensation, including ClearBridge’s specific pay recommendation for the CEO and other executive officers.
The Compensation Committee also works with the Company’s Human Resources function in carrying out its responsibilities, and the Vice President, Chief People, Culture and Capability Officer serves as management’s primary liaison with the Compensation Committee. From time to time, the Compensation Committee will also direct management to work with ClearBridge in providing proposals, program design, and compensation recommendations. ClearBridge provides advice and information relating to executive compensation and benefits each year. For fiscal year 2025, ClearBridge assisted the Compensation Committee in the evaluation of executive base salary, cash incentives, equity incentive design and award levels. ClearBridge reports directly to the Compensation Committee and provides no services to management. In October 2025, the Compensation Committee assessed the independence of ClearBridge based on SEC rules, the independence factors established by the NASDAQ, and other factors. As a result of its assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that ClearBridge’s work raised no conflict of interest currently or during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2025.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND FRAMEWORK
COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES
The Company’s compensation program for executive officers is designed to achieve five primary objectives:
1.Attract, motivate, reward and retain high performing executives;
2.Align the interests and compensation of executives with the value created for stockholders;
3.Create a sense of motivation among executives to achieve both short- and long-term Company objectives;
4.Create a direct, meaningful link between business and team performance and individual accomplishment and rewards; and
5.Ensure our compensation programs are appropriately competitive in the relevant labor markets.
TARGET PAY POSITION / MIX OF PAY
The Company’s compensation program consists primarily of base salary, annual cash and equity incentives, and long-term oriented equity awards. The Compensation Committee considers multiple factors when establishing target total compensation opportunities for executive officers (including base salary, target cash incentive compensation, and RSU and MSU equity awards). Specifically, compensation is determined considering internal factors (including, but not limited to, individual performance, complexity of job function, length of time within the position and anticipated contribution) as well as external market data. When using external market data, the Compensation Committee does not target a specific pay positioning. Instead, the Compensation Committee reviews the full range of market data, with the market 50th percentile of total compensation as one reference point. The Compensation Committee then assesses internal factors for each executive officer, which results in final total target pay levels above or below the market 50th percentile, depending on the Compensation Committee’s individual assessment. Based on recent market analysis, executive officer target pay levels generally fall between the 25th and the 50th percentiles on average, with variability by individual. Actual compensation will vary from target based on the Company’s incentive compensation plan designs, which consider the Company’s performance. This approach is consistent with the Compensation Committee’s historic approach to assessing market data and setting target pay levels (i.e., considering a holistic assessment of relevant internal and external considerations, on an individual case-by-case basis).
The mix of pay for executive officers is intended to provide significant incentives to drive overall Company performance and increased stockholder value. This mix consists of Salary as reported in the Summary Compensation Table under Executive Compensation below, RSUs and target values for MSUs (collectively, “Stock Awards”) as reported in the table in footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table, target non-equity incentive plan compensation amounts as reported in
31
the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under Executive Compensation below, and when applicable, bonus. The total of these targeted compensation amounts for NEOs is referred to as “Target Compensation Opportunity.” In the charts below, the Target Compensation Opportunity for the CEO, and for all other NEOs in the aggregate, has been divided between elements of compensation that are considered at-risk (MSUs, tied to longer term relative stockholder return, and GRP, tied to current fiscal year financial performance), and those elements that are not performance-based and not considered at-risk (Salary and RSUs). Approximately 53% of the CEO’s Target Compensation Opportunity for fiscal year 2025 was at-risk while approximately 44% of the Target Compensation Opportunity for fiscal year 2025 for the other NEOs was at-risk. Target Compensation Opportunity and the pie charts below exclude PSUs because PSUs granted to NEOs only vest if the associated financial EBITDA measure is achieved at its maximum level, as discussed under Fiscal Year 2025 PSU Attainment by NEO. In prior years, the Company had presented total or maximum compensation opportunity that included PSUs as a component of at-risk compensation, which would have represented 72% of total compensation at-risk (of which 9% was attributable to PSUs) for the CEO and 65% and 12%, respectively, for other NEOs.
CEO Target Compensation Opportunity
Other NEOs Target Compensation Opportunity
PEER GROUP AND MARKET DATA
Before making fiscal year 2025 compensation decisions in October 2024, the Compensation Committee examined the executive compensation practices of a peer group of 12 publicly traded companies to assess the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation. Peer group companies were selected from a list of U.S. headquartered companies having net sales, earnings, and market capitalization reasonably comparable to the Company and doing business in the
32
specialty chemical industry or selling branded consumer products globally (with a focus on companies that sell through multiple channels).
The 12 peer group companies used in the analysis for fiscal year 2025 compensation decisions were as follows:
•American Vanguard Corporation | •Olaplex Holdings, Inc. | ||||
•Balchem Corporation | •Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. | ||||
•Beyond Meat, Inc. | •Sensient Technologies Corporation | ||||
•e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | •The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | ||||
•Hawkins, Inc. | •XPEL, Inc. | ||||
•Ingevity Corporation | •YETI Holdings, Inc. | ||||
Two companies, Chase Corporation and Livent Corporation, were removed from last fiscal year’s peer group because they are no longer publicly traded companies as a result of being acquired and taken private or being merged into a new company with another company.
In addition to peer group data, the Compensation Committee considered general industry company survey data provided by Korn Ferry, a global management consulting firm, to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices. The Compensation Committee applied these data sources to establish the market median level of compensation for each executive officer position, which the Compensation Committee considered as one factor in making executive compensation decisions for fiscal 2025.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025
BASE SALARY: PROCESS
Base salaries for executive officers, including NEOs, are approved by the Compensation Committee effective for the beginning of each fiscal year. In setting base salaries, the Compensation Committee normally considers the base salary range prepared by its independent compensation consultant based on each NEO’s job responsibilities and the market data. Base salary adjustments, if any, are based on factors such as individual performance, position, current pay relative to the market, future anticipated contribution and the Company’s merit increase budget. Assessment of individual performance follows a rigorous evaluation process, including self-evaluation and the establishment of annual goals for each executive officer and an assessment of the achievement thereof. Individual performance elements considered in this process included individual and Company performance goals and achievements in such areas as growth, leadership, sustainability, earnings and governance for Mr. Brass; governance and cybersecurity risk, financial compliance, forecasting and financial reporting for Ms. Hyzer; business unit performance, teamwork, execution and growth for Mr. Noble and Ms. Olsem; and global human resources (including maintaining a highly engaged workforce, a performance and values-based organizational culture, and as an attractive employer of choice) and coordination of global strategy for supply chain and quality for Mr. Lindeman.
BASE SALARY: FISCAL YEAR 2025
In October 2024, base salary increases for executive officers for fiscal year 2025 were approved as follows: a 3% increase from fiscal year 2024 for all executive officers, except for Mr. Brass and Ms. Hyzer, each of whom received a 10% increase to recognize their leadership and the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2024, and Mr. Lindeman, who received a 5% increase to recognize the successful execution of the global supply chain and quality strategy under his leadership, including strengthening the Company’s organizational culture and employee engagement in fiscal year 2024.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION: FISCAL YEAR 2025
Growth Reward Program (“GRP”):
GRP Design
The Company uses its GRP to align executive officer compensation to the Company’s financial performance and achievement of strategic goals and to incentivize and reward personal performance. Prior to fiscal year 2024, GRP focused entirely on EBITDA-based performance goals. For fiscal year 2025 and 2024, the Company followed its current GRP design and enhanced GRP alignment with the Company’s business and compensation objectives, which include the following:
33
•Alignment with Our Strategic Framework: Furthering alignment of GRP and the Company’s long-term strategic goals.
•Recognition of Sustainable Growth: Measuring and rewarding growth and achievement over time and acknowledging the long-term impact of employee contributions.
•Enhanced Clarity: Enhance visibility into how employee actions and behaviors align with our strategic framework.
•Incentivizing Top- and Bottom-Line Performance: Placing further incentive and focus on growth, while maintaining strong focus on profitability.
Given these objectives, the Company utilized the GRP performance metrics below to motivate, incentivize and reward for additional key company objectives, while maintaining a significant focus on Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP, and also maintaining the flexibility to modify GRP payments based on Compensation Committee assessments of other individual and Company factors as the Compensation Committee deems relevant. The GRP design for fiscal year 2025 was based on the following metrics (with metrics and weightings unchanged from fiscal year 2024):
NEOs: Brass, Hyzer, and Lindeman | GRP % | NEO: Noble and Olsem | GRP % | |||||||||||
Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP | 35% | Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP | 35% | |||||||||||
| Global Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP | 15% | Regional Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP | 15% | |||||||||||
Global Adjusted Net Sales | 35% | Regional Adjusted Net Sales | 35% | |||||||||||
| Strategic Performance Measures | 15% | Strategic Performance Measures | 15% | |||||||||||
The fiscal year 2025 performance metrics align with the Company’s stated business and compensation objectives as follows:
•Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP: Continuing to recognize its significance in our growth journey measured globally.
•Adjusted Net Sales: Emphasizing the importance of sales generation measured two ways, both global and tied to area of influence.
•Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP: Tied to area of influence, adjusting for impacts of foreign currency which are outside of those individuals’ control.
•Strategic Performance Measures: Focusing on multi-year/longer-term initiatives and outcomes crucial for developing the capabilities necessary to achieve our long-term strategy.
2025 GRP Opportunity by NEO
Each NEO has an individual GRP opportunity that is set based on an assessment of internal factors (e.g., role, individual performance, etc.) as well as the results of peer group market studies. Depending upon actual GRP performance, the target and maximum annual GRP opportunities for each NEO for fiscal year 2025 are as follows:
34
Named Executive Officer | Target Annual Opportunity as % of Salary | Maximum Annual Opportunity as % of Salary | ||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 100% | 200% | ||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | 55% | 110% | ||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 50% | 100% | ||||||
| William B. Noble | 55% | 110% | ||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 55% | 110% | ||||||
Target and maximum payouts for NEOs for the fiscal year 2025 GRP are disclosed below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2025.
GRP Financial Performance Goals, Weightings and Results
Each year the Company develops an operating plan which supports its long-term financial and growth goals and is consistent with its strategic plans and imperatives. The annual operating plan is submitted to the Board for alignment and approval in the first fiscal quarter of each new fiscal year. All of the GRP financial performance goals are components assessed by the Board to be the most critical required outcomes which support achievement of the approved operating plan. Consistent with its pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, the Board aligns NEO variable compensation opportunity with achievement of these performance goals.
The following table sets forth the fiscal year 2025 GRP performance measure payout weightings and the minimum and maximum goals for the performance measures applicable to each of the NEOs. The financial goals are set based on earnings growth and sales growth over the prior fiscal year to maintain a strong pay-for-performance orientation.
| Steven A. Brass | Minimum Goal | Maximum Goal | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | FY 2025 | FY 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Measure1 | Jeffrey G. Lindeman | William B. Noble2 | Patricia Q. Olsem | ($ thousands) | ($ thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted Net Sales | 35% | N/A | N/A | $ | 567,800 | $ | 634,943 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP | 15% | N/A | N/A | $ | 112,634 | $ | 129,191 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted Net Sales (EIMEA) | N/A | 35% | N/A | $ | 212,337 | $ | 236,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP (EIMEA) | N/A | 15% | N/A | $ | 54,357 | $ | 61,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted Net Sales (Americas) | N/A | N/A | 35% | $ | 267,803 | $ | 297,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP (Americas) | N/A | N/A | 15% | $ | 69,621 | $ | 78,022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP | 35% | 35% | 35% | $ | 100,092 | $ | 109,513 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Strategic Performance Measures | 15% | 15% | 15% | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Financial performance measures are defined under the heading, GRP.
2 EIMEA amounts have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2025 of 1.309 per GBP.
35
The following table sets forth the fiscal year 2025 performance and percentage achievement for each GRP performance measure applicable to each NEO.
Performance Measure1 | Actual FY 2025 ($ thousands) | % Achievement of Target Annual Opportunity | % Achievement of Maximum Annual Opportunity | |||||||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted Net Sales | $ | 602,522 | 80.2% | 40.1% | ||||||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP | $ | 121,322 | 152.2% | 76.1% | ||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted Net Sales (EIMEA) | $ | 226,416 | 84.4% | 42.2% | ||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP (EIMEA) | $ | 61,857 | 200.0% | 100.0% | ||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted Net Sales (Americas) | $ | 282,949 | 84.6% | 42.3% | ||||||||||||||||
| Regional Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP (Americas) | $ | 71,467 | 113.2% | 56.6% | ||||||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP | $ | 107,927 | 166.4% | 83.2% | ||||||||||||||||
| Strategic Performance Measures | See below | 174.0% | 87.0% | |||||||||||||||||
1 Financial performance measures are defined under the heading, GRP.
2 EIMEA amounts have been converted from Great Britain pounds sterling (“GBP”) at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2025 of 1.309 per GBP.
Strategic Performance Measures
For fiscal year 2025, 15% of the GRP is tied to Strategic Performance Measures. The measures are a mix of qualitative and quantitative measures that focus on executing our long-term strategy, improving our operating performance, and aligning individual initiatives with Company performance, which varies by NEO. The Strategic Performance Measures were specifically adopted to align with our Four-by-Four Strategic Framework, which is based on the following pillars:
36
In the context of our Four-by-Four Strategic Framework, each NEO was measured against certain strategic initiatives aligned with their ability and potential to drive long-term financial, strategic, and/or operational performance. The categories of initiatives for our NEOs’ Strategic Performance Measures for fiscal year 2025 were as follows:
•Increase global gross margin, aligned with Four-by-Four Strategic Framework, to recover business model
•New geographic business expansion to enable future, long-term growth
•Establishing the Company’s Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) strategy and framework
•Cultivating a strong global talent pipeline and ensuring a seamless leadership succession plan to effectively meet future business needs
•Drive organizational growth and efficiency through the successful management of key business and technological initiatives
The Strategic Performance Measures were determined by management and the Board to be initiatives critical to long-term financial growth, which could be objectively measured.
Fiscal Year 2025 GRP Attainment by NEO
The Compensation Committee reviewed the Company’s fiscal year 2025 performance and certified the relative attainment of each GRP performance measure and relative achievement of Strategic Performance Measures, and further assessed whether individual contributions, overall Company performance, finances, expenditures and strategic considerations warranted adjustment to a GRP amount. As a result of this assessment, the Compensation Committee determined that an downward adjustment to the CEO’s fiscal year 2025 GRP payment was warranted while determining that the GRP amounts to be paid to other NEOs would directly align with the attainment of the GRP performance measures and Strategic Performance Measures. On October 3, 2025, the Compensation Committee approved payment of the following GRP amounts to NEOs for fiscal year 2025 performance:
| Named Executive Officer | Title | FY 2025 Annual Target Opportunity (As % of Salary) | FY 2025 Actual Incentive Compensation (As % of Annual Target Opportunity) | FY 2025 Annual Maximum Opportunity (As % of Salary) | FY 2025 Actual Incentive Compensation (As % of Annual Maximum Opportunity) | FY 2025 Incentive Compensation Paid ($) | ||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | CEO | 100% | 34% | 200% | 17% | $219,693 | ||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | CFO | 55% | 140% | 110% | 70% | $257,841 | ||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | Chief People Officer | 50% | 138% | 100% | 69% | $220,563 | ||||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | Group Managing Director | 55% | 148% | 110% | 74% | $301,870 | ||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | Division President, Americas | 55% | 134% | 110% | 67% | $282,388 | ||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2025 PSU Attainment by NEO
The Company granted PSUs tied to established Global Adjusted EBITDA performance targets for fiscal year 2025, as outlined below:
Global Adjusted EBITDA1 | Applicable Percentage | |||||||
≥ $110,148,000 | 100% | |||||||
| $104,207,000 | 5% | |||||||
< $104,207,000 | 0% | |||||||
1 Global Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of PSU achievement is calculated after both tranches of fiscal year GRP compensation expense are accrued. If Global Adjusted EBITDA exceeds the performance target set at 5%, then the Applicable Percentage is determined on a straight-line basis from the implied zero percentage achievement level of $103,894,000 to the maximum 100% Applicable Percentage achievement level.
The Company achieved $103,552,000 in Global Adjusted EBITDA after GRP compensation expense was accrued, which resulted in an Applicable Percentage of 0% for fiscal year 2025. Accordingly, none of the PSU awards granted to the NEOs in October 2024 as shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards – Fiscal Year 2025 table below in the Executive Compensation section vested.
37
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE (“LTI”) COMPENSATION
Equity compensation is a critical component of the Company’s efforts to attract and retain executives and key employees, encourage employee ownership in the Company, link pay with performance and align the interests of executive officers with those of stockholders. To provide appropriately directed incentives to our executive officers, the Company grants awards of RSUs and MSUs. Equity awards for fiscal year 2025 were granted to NEOs in October 2024, pursuant to the Company’s A&R 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, and were allocated equally between RSUs and MSUs (50% of target grant value for each NEO).
The RSU and MSU awards to our CEO were, consistent with past practice, larger than the awards to the other NEOs in recognition of his higher level of responsibility for overall Company performance and based upon market data that supports a higher level of equity compensation for our CEO. The specific number of RSUs awarded and Target Number of shares covered by MSU awards were determined for each NEO based on an assessment of the NEO’s achievement of individual performance goals as well as Company performance for fiscal year 2024 in areas over which the NEO had particular influence.
The principal attributes and benefits of equity awards for executive officers are as follows:
•RSU awards provide for annual vesting over three years from the grant date, subject to earlier vesting upon the effective date of retirement under certain conditions.
•MSU awards provide for performance-based vesting tied to the Company’s TSR over a performance measurement period of three fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year in which the awards are granted and ending on August 31st of the third year. The change in the value of the Company’s common stock assumes the reinvestment of dividends and compares the Company’s TSR against the Index.
•RSU and MSU awards provide for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting.
•The Company believes an equal mix of the number of RSUs and MSUs (at target) is appropriate in order to balance direct alignment with stockholders, incentivize out performance on a relative basis vs. the market, encourage long-term stock ownership, and promote executive retention.
The Board recognizes the potentially dilutive impact of equity awards. Accordingly, the Company’s equity award practices are designed to balance the impact of dilution and the Company’s need to remain competitive by recruiting, retaining, and providing incentives for high-performing employees.
Restricted Stock Unit or RSU Awards
RSU awards provide for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting provided that the employee remains employed with the Company on the applicable vesting date (except for termination of employment due to death or disability or, upon certain conditions, vesting upon retirement as noted below). Except as otherwise noted, RSU awards vest annually over three years from the grant date, with approximately 1/3 vesting on each of the vesting dates. The vesting date each year is the third business day following the Company’s public release of its annual earnings for the fiscal year, but not later than November 15.
Award Agreements provide that for employees who retire from the Company after reaching age 65, or employees who retire from the Company after reaching age 55 and have been employed by the Company for at least 10 years, unvested RSUs will vest upon the effective date of retirement, provided at least one-year prior written notice of retirement is given by the employee.
Payment of required withholding taxes due to the vesting of RSU awards is covered through withholding of shares by the Company. The Company issues a net number of RSU shares after withholding shares having a value as of the vesting date, or as of the date of issuance in the case of death, disability or retirement, equal to the required tax withholding obligation.
Market Share Unit or MSU Awards
MSU awards provide for vesting over a performance measurement period of three fiscal years commencing with the fiscal year in which the MSU awards are granted (the “MSU Measurement Period”). The performance provisions of MSU awards
38
are based on relative TSR for the Company over the MSU Measurement Period compared to the total return of the Index. To compute the relative TSR for the Company compared to the return for the Index, dividends paid are treated as reinvested as of the ex-dividend date for each declared dividend.
The Applicable Percentage of the Target Number of shares is determined for NEOs based on the percentage point difference between the TSR for the Company compared to the return for the Index (the “Relative TSR”) as set forth in the table below:
Relative TSR (percentage point difference) | Applicable Percentage | |||||||
| ≥ 20% | 200% | |||||||
| 15% | 175% | |||||||
| 10% | 150% | |||||||
| 5% | 125% | |||||||
| Equal | 100% | |||||||
| -5% | 75% | |||||||
| -10% | 50% | |||||||
| < -10% | 0% | |||||||
The Applicable Percentage is determined on a straight-line sliding scale from the minimum 50% Applicable Percentage achievement level to the maximum 200% Applicable Percentage achievement level. To determine the TSR for the Company and the return for the Index, the beginning and ending values for each measure is determined by taking the average closing price on all market trading days within the 90 calendar days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year for the beginning of the MSU Measurement Period and all market trading days within the 90 calendar days prior to the end of the third fiscal year of the MSU Measurement Period.
Except as otherwise provided with respect to vesting upon death, disability or retirement, employees must remain employed with the Company until the date on which the Compensation Committee certifies achievement of the requisite performance provided for in the MSU Award Agreement. Payment of required withholding taxes due to the settlement of an MSU award, if any, is covered through withholding of shares by the Company. The Company issues a net number of MSU shares after withholding shares having a value on the Settlement Date equal to the required tax withholding obligation.
In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the A&R 2016 Stock Incentive Plan), the MSU Measurement Period will end as of the effective date of the Change in Control and the ending values for calculating the TSR for the Company and the return for the Index will be determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock and the value of the Index, respectively, immediately prior to the effective date of the Change in Control. The Applicable Percentage will be applied to a proportionate amount of the Target Number of MSUs based on the portion of the Measurement Period elapsed as of the effective date of the Change in Control. The NEO will receive RSUs for the portion of the Target Number of MSUs to which the Applicable Percentage is not applied. Those RSUs will time vest, subject to rights under the NEO’s Change of Control Severance Agreement, as of the Settlement Date.
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES
Except for Mr. Noble (an employee of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary), the NEOs are provided with standard health and welfare benefits and the opportunity to participate in the Company’s 401(k) Plan, similar to those generally offered to other Company employees. U.S.-based executive officers and other employees have the right to invest the Company’s contributions to the 401(k) Plan in shares of the Company’s common stock as an alternative to other investment choices available under the Plan. For Mr. Noble, the Company provides compensation in lieu of contributions to a local retirement program for which he is eligible due to unfavorable taxation applicable to such contributions.
The Company also provides leased vehicles or a vehicle allowance to its executive officers and private health insurance for Mr. Noble in excess of coverage available to other employees of the U.K. subsidiary. The costs associated with the perquisites and other personal benefits provided to the NEOs are included in the Summary Compensation Table below and separately identified for fiscal year 2025 in the footnote disclosure of such perquisites and other personal benefits.
The Compensation Committee considers the cost of the foregoing health and welfare benefits and perquisites in connection with its approval of the total compensation package for our NEOs. All such costs are considered appropriate in support of the Compensation Committee’s objective of attracting and retaining high caliber executive officers because they are
39
common forms of benefits and perquisites offered to executives, who expect and compare them to competing compensation packages.
POST-EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS
The Company has change of control severance agreements with each of the NEOs. The specific terms of the agreements are described below under the heading, Change of Control Severance Agreements. In establishing the terms and conditions of these agreements, consideration was given to including severance compensation in the event of termination of employment without cause (or for good reason) without regard to a change of control of the Company. No such provisions were included, and severance compensation is payable only following a “double-trigger”: termination of employment without “cause” or for “good reason” within two years following a “change of control” of the Company (as defined in these agreements).
The Compensation Committee believes that the change of control severance agreements help ensure the best interests of stockholders by fostering continuous employment of key management personnel. As is the case in many public companies, the possibility of an unsolicited change of control exists. The uncertainty among management that can arise from a possible change of control can result in the untimely departure or distraction of key executive officers. Reasonable change of control severance agreements reinforce continued attention and dedication of executive officers to their assigned duties and support the Compensation Committee’s objective of retaining high quality executives.
OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 10b5-1 TRADING PLANS AND INSIDER TRADING GUIDELINES
A description of the Company’s insider trading policies applicable to our executive officers is included above in this Proxy Statement under Insider Trading Policy – Prohibited Trading Transactions.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
The Board believes that the stock ownership guidelines serve to improve alignment of the interests of our executive officers and the Company’s stockholders. Effective October 2023, the Compensation Committee increased the guidelines for executive officer ownership of the Company’s common stock, and the multiple of current base salary for each position is shown in the table below. Under the guidelines, each executive officer will be expected to attain, within a period of five years from the later of: (i) hire date as an executive officer, (ii) date that employee becomes an executive officer, or (iii) date of change that requires higher ownership level, and to maintain thereafter, equity ownership in the Company at the following levels or higher:
Ownership Guidelines | Compliant as of | |||||||
Position | Multiple of Current Base Salary | 10/15/2025? | ||||||
| CEO | 6x | Yes | ||||||
| CFO | 3x | Yes | ||||||
| Other executive officers | 2x | Yes | ||||||
Compliance is determined using the current aggregate market value of (i) shares of the Company’s common stock owned, (ii) unvested RSUs, and (iii) if applicable, shares underlying vested equity awards.
CLAWBACK POLICY
On June 19, 2023, the Board, in accordance with the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted a clawback policy, which became effective October 2, 2023. The clawback policy applies to current and former executive officers of the Company as defined in Rule 10D‑1(d) under the Exchange Act and is administered by the Compensation Committee.
In the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement to correct the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under securities laws, including restatements that correct an error in previously issued financial statements (a) that is material to the previously issued financial statements or (b) that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period (each a “restatement”), the Company shall recover erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation from its officers.
40
The recovery of such compensation applies regardless of (i) whether an officer engaged in misconduct or otherwise caused or contributed to the requirement for a restatement, and (ii) whether or when the Company files restated financial statements.
TAX DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation payable in any tax year to certain covered executive officers. Section 162(m) generally provides that a company covered by the statute cannot deduct compensation paid to its most highly paid executive officers to the extent that such compensation exceeds $1 million per officer per taxable year.
While the Compensation Committee seeks to maximize the deductibility of compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes that it is important to maintain flexibility in administering compensation programs in a manner that provides total compensation to the executive officers that is in line with competitive practice, the Company’s compensation philosophy, and the interests of stockholders. Accordingly, we have not adopted a policy that all compensation must qualify as deductible for tax purposes and retain the ability to provide compensation that may not qualify as deductible under Section 162(m). Therefore, the Company presently pays some compensation to its executive officers that may not be deductible under Section 162(m), and it is anticipated that the Company will continue to do so.
ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS
We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”) for our stock-based compensation awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure the compensation expense for share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including restricted stock awards and performance-based awards, based on the grant date fair value of these awards. Depending upon the type of performance conditions applicable to performance-based awards, ASC Topic 718 may require the recording of compensation expense over the service period for the award (usually, the vesting period) based on the grant date value (such as for our MSUs) or compensation expense may be recorded based on the expected probability of vesting over the vesting period, subject to adjustment as such probability may vary from period to period (such as for our PSUs). This calculation is performed for accounting purposes and amounts reported in the compensation tables below are based on the compensation expense expected to be recorded over the vesting periods for the awards, determined as of the grant date for the awards. In the case of our MSUs, the grant date values fix the compensation expense to be recorded over the vesting period. These amounts are reported even though our executive officers may realize more or less value from their MSU awards depending upon the actual level of achievement of the applicable performance measure. In the case of our PSUs, no value is included in the Summary Compensation Table or in the table under Grants of Plan-Based Awards – Fiscal Year 2025 because ASC Topic 718 requires that we assess the probability of vesting of the PSUs as of the grant date. As of the grant date, we did not consider it probable that the PSUs would become vested even though it was possible that our executive officers would receive shares upon vesting of the PSUs following the end of the fiscal year upon achievement of the applicable performance measure.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES RELATED TO THE GRANT OF CERTAIN EQUITY AWARDS CLOSE IN TIME TO THE RELEASE OF NONPUBLIC INFORMATION
During fiscal 2025, we did not grant any stock options to our NEOs and accordingly, we have no information to disclose pursuant to Item 402(x)(2) of Regulation S-K.
41
COMPENSATION AND PEOPLE COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation and People Committee of WD-40 Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has reviewed and discussed with management of the Company the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2025, and, based upon that review and discussion, recommended to the Board that it be so included.
Compensation and People Committee
Anne G. Saunders (Chair)
Cynthia B. Burks
Lara L. Lee
Edward O. Magee, Jr.
Graciela I. Monteagudo
David B. Pendarvis
42
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As August 31, 2025, none of our executive officers has an employment agreement or other arrangement, whether written or unwritten, providing for a term of employment or compensation for services rendered other than under specific arrangements, plans or programs described herein.
For fiscal year 2025, our executive officers received compensation benefits for services rendered in fiscal year 2025 as more fully described and reported in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement and in the compensation tables below. Total cash compensation for fiscal year 2025, comprised of annual salary and earned GRP, was 21% of total compensation for our CEO and 45% to 70% of total compensation for the other NEOs.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows information for the three fiscal years ended August 31, 2025, August 31, 2024, and August 31, 2023 concerning the compensation of our CEO, our CFO, and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO as of the end of fiscal year 2025 (collectively, “NEOs”):
| Name and Principal Position(s) | Year | Salary1 | Stock Awards2 | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation3 | All Other Compensation4 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 2025 | $ | 680,000 | $ | 3,242,147 | $ | 219,693 | $ | 125,059 | $ | 4,266,899 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CEO | 2024 | $ | 640,800 | $ | 2,073,161 | $ | 829,340 | $ | 116,873 | $ | 3,660,174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 1,394,168 | $ | 355,809 | $ | 108,676 | $ | 2,458,653 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sara K. Hyzer | 2025 | $ | 356,895 | $ | 648,209 | $ | 257,841 | $ | 107,019 | $ | 1,369,964 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CFO | 2024 | $ | 336,420 | $ | 521,784 | $ | 237,622 | $ | 103,828 | $ | 1,199,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 315,000 | $ | 321,417 | $ | 103,212 | $ | 96,672 | $ | 836,301 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 2025 | $ | 324,450 | $ | 350,815 | $ | 220,563 | $ | 104,648 | $ | 1,000,476 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief People Officer | 2024 | $ | 320,400 | $ | 353,415 | $ | 212,942 | $ | 99,400 | $ | 986,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 294,663 | $ | 89,595 | $ | 95,048 | $ | 779,306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William B. Noble5 | 2025 | $ | 380,255 | $ | 242,872 | $ | 301,870 | $ | 50,269 | $ | 975,266 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Group Managing Director | 2024 | $ | 355,224 | $ | 276,716 | $ | 348,696 | $ | 45,378 | $ | 1,026,014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 2025 | $ | 381,100 | $ | 421,309 | $ | 282,388 | $ | 120,678 | $ | 1,205,475 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Division President, Americas | 2024 | $ | 382,989 | $ | 460,166 | $ | 235,676 | $ | 119,835 | $ | 1,198,666 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 346,934 | $ | 402,050 | $ | 145,870 | $ | 109,852 | $ | 1,004,706 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Salary reported for fiscal years 2025 and 2023 reflects base salary. For fiscal year 2024, base salary paid to each NEOs was as follows: Mr. Brass - $618,000; Ms. Hyzer - $324,450; Mr. Lindeman - $309,000; Mr. Noble - $355,224 (281,946 GBP converted to USD at an average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2024 of 1.26 per GBP; and Ms. Olsem - $370,000. U.S.-based employees are paid bi-weekly, and during fiscal year 2024, there were 27 instead of the 26 traditional pay periods. Consequently, salary reported for each NEO (except for Mr. Noble) represents their respective base salary and an additional paycheck received during fiscal year 2024.
2Stock Awards for fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023 are reported at their grant date fair values. Grant date fair value assumptions and related information is set forth in Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under the subsection “Stock-based Compensation” and Note 16, Stock-based Compensation, to the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 27, 2025. Stock Awards consisting of MSUs awarded in fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023 are included based on the value of 100% of the target number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued upon achievement of the applicable performance measure. Stock Awards consisting of PSUs awarded for fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023 are reported as having no value under applicable disclosure rules and ASC Topic 718 due to the lack of any expected probability of vesting of the PSUs as of their respective grant dates, as discussed above in the CD&A section under the heading, Accounting Considerations. For achievement of the highest level of the applicable performance measure for the MSUs granted in fiscal year 2023, the NEOs would have received 200% of the target number of shares. MSU achievement based on performance during the 3-year measurement period ending on August 31, 2025 was 103.5%. Based on the level of achievement of the applicable performance measure for PSUs granted in fiscal year 2025, NEOs did not earn any of their respective target PSUs (and their PSUs were forfeited).
43
The following table sets forth the amounts that would have been included in Stock Awards for fiscal years 2025, 2024 and 2023 for each of the NEOs based on the grant date fair values and the maximum number of shares targeted to be received under MSU and PSU award agreements.
| Named Executive Officer | Year | RSUs | MSUs (Maximum) | PSUs (Maximum) | Total Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 2025 | $ | 1,460,211 | $ | 3,563,872 | $ | 670,720 | $ | 5,694,803 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 872,084 | $ | 2,203,957 | $ | 607,961 | $ | 3,684,002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 627,672 | $ | 1,532,992 | $ | 589,264 | $ | 2,749,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | 2025 | $ | 291,943 | $ | 712,532 | $ | 193,501 | $ | 1,197,976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 217,874 | $ | 550,618 | $ | 175,465 | $ | 943,957 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 144,706 | $ | 353,422 | $ | 170,160 | $ | 668,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 2025 | $ | 158,001 | $ | 385,627 | $ | 159,827 | 703,455 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 145,184 | $ | 366,914 | $ | 151,990 | $ | 664,088 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 132,661 | $ | 324,004 | $ | 147,188 | $ | 603,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | 2025 | $ | 109,386 | $ | 266,973 | $ | 198,276 | $ | 574,634 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 108,937 | $ | 275,309 | $ | 184,815 | $ | 569,061 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 108,571 | $ | 265,168 | $ | 193,642 | $ | 567,382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 2025 | $ | 189,751 | $ | 463,116 | $ | 206,569 | $ | 859,435 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 188,877 | $ | 477,334 | $ | 200,134 | $ | 866,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 181,008 | $ | 442,084 | $ | 187,346 | $ | 810,438 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3Amounts reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation represent annual cash incentive compensation payouts as described in CD&A section of this Proxy Statement under the heading, GRP. Threshold, target and maximum payouts for each of the NEOs for fiscal year 2025 are set forth below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2025.
4All Other Compensation for each of the NEOs includes the following items: (i) employer profit sharing and matching contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan, except for Mr. Noble, who received an In Lieu Benefit defined below (“Retirement Benefits”); (ii) dividend equivalent amounts paid to Messrs. Brass and Noble and Ms. Olsem for vested DPUs that will not be settled in shares until termination of employment (“Dividend Equivalents”); (iii) perquisites and benefits which include group life, medical, dental, vision, wellness and other insurance benefits (“Welfare Benefits”); (iv) a taxable payment made to Mr. Noble in lieu of a retirement plan contribution under the U.K. retirement benefit program that would, if contributed to the retirement plan, result in adverse tax consequences to Mr. Noble (“In Lieu Benefit”); and (v) vehicle allowance costs which include lease or depreciation expense, fuel, maintenance and insurance costs, except for Mr. Noble, who received a cash allowance and fuel (“Vehicle Allowance”).
The following table specifies the amounts included in All Other Compensation for fiscal year 2025 for each of the NEOs:
| Named Executive Officer | Retirement Benefits | Dividend Equivalents | Welfare Benefits | Vehicle Allowance | Total All Other Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | $ | 58,056 | $ | 400 | $ | 46,534 | $ | 20,069 | $ | 125,059 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | $ | 58,056 | $ | - | $ | 29,163 | $ | 19,800 | $ | 107,019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | $ | 58,056 | $ | - | $ | 28,384 | $ | 18,208 | $ | 104,648 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | $ | - | $ | 16,765 | $ | 13,654 | $ | 19,850 | $ | 50,269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | $ | 58,056 | $ | 329 | $ | 43,213 | $ | 19,080 | $ | 120,678 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5Mr. Noble was not an NEO for the fiscal year 2023. Accordingly, only his compensation for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2024 and 2025 are presented. As an employee of the Company’s U.K. subsidiary, he is paid and/or receives benefits in GBP, and amounts shown have been converted to USD at average annual exchange rate for fiscal year 2025 of 1.309 per GBP.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our NEOs for each of the fiscal years ended August 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021, and our financial performance for each such fiscal year. The tabular and narrative disclosures provided are intended to be calculated in a manner consistent with applicable SEC rules and may reflect reasonable estimates and assumptions where appropriate.
44
| Fiscal Year | Summary Compensation Table Total PEO(1) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(1)(2) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(1) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (1)(2) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | Net Income (in 000s)(4) | Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP (in 000s)(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholder Return (3) | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
1
Fiscal Year | Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) | Non-PEO NEOs | ||||||
| 2025 | Sara K. Hyzer, Jeffrey G. Lindeman, William B. Noble, and Patricia Q. Olsem | |||||||
| 2024 | Sara K. Hyzer, Jeffrey G. Lindeman, William B. Noble, and Patricia Q. Olsem | |||||||
| 2023 | Jay W. Rembolt, Sara K. Hyzer, Phenix Q. Kiamilev, Jeffrey G. Lindeman, and Patricia Q. Olsem | |||||||
| 2022 | Steven A. Brass, Jay W. Rembolt, Phenix Q. Kiamilev, and Patricia Q. Olsem | |||||||
| 2021 | Steven A. Brass, Jay W. Rembolt, William B. Noble, and Patricia Q. Olsem | |||||||
2 In calculating the “compensation actually paid” amounts reflected in these columns, the fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, of the equity award adjustments included in such calculations were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Time-vested RSU grant date fair values are calculated using the stock price as of the date of grant. In accordance with the relevant rules, the fair values were remeasured as of the end of each fiscal year and as of each vesting date, during the years displayed in the table, using the stock price as of fiscal year end and as of each vesting date, respectively. Performance-based market share unit (“MSU”) fair values are calculated based on the Monte-Carlo valuation model as of the date of grant. Adjustments have been made using performance-based market share unit fair values as of each measurement date using the stock price as of the measurement date and updated Monte-Carlo assumptions. Performance-vested restricted stock (“PSU”) fair values are valued at zero at each respective measurement date, given all outstanding PSUs were accrued at and estimated to be earned below threshold (i.e., all shares forfeited) as of each respective measurement date. We provide information regarding the assumptions used to calculate the valuation of the awards in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 27, 2025.
In the calculation of “Compensation Actually Paid” and presented in the table, the following amounts were deducted and added:
| Fiscal Year | Named Executive Officer | Summary Compensation Table | Grant Date Fair Value of Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | Year End Fair Value of Unvested Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | Change in Fair Value of Unvested Prior Year Awards | Change in Fair Value of Vested Prior Year Awards | Value of Awards Granted and Vested in Fiscal Year | Fair Value of Prior Year Awards Canceled as of Prior FYE | Total Equity Adjustments | Compensation Actually Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h)=(c)+(d)+(e)+(f)+(g) | = (a)-(b)+(h) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | PEO | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-PEO NEOs | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 The Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and the Company’s Peer Group TSR reflected in these columns for each applicable fiscal year is calculated based on a fixed investment of $100 at the applicable measurement point on the same cumulative basis as is used in Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K. The peer group used to determine the Company’s Peer Group TSR for each applicable fiscal year is the following published industry index, as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2025 pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K: Russell 2000® Index (“Russell 2000”). The Russell 2000 was chosen because we do not believe we can reasonably identify any other industry index or specific peer issuer that would offer a meaningful comparison.
4 Represents the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the year indicated.
5 We have selected Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP as our most important financial measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used to link “compensation actually paid” to our NEOs to Company performance for fiscal year 2025. Global Adjusted EBITDA is used by the Compensation Committee and the Company as part of its calculation to determine GRP earned and as the sole measure for determining the level of achievement for vesting of PSUs. See additional information in the CD&A section of the Proxy Statement, including for the definition of Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP.
45
Pay-versus-Performance Comparative Disclosure
The following tables reflect the relationships between compensation actually paid (“CAP” in the graphics below) to our PEO, and the average of compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs, to (i) our net income, (ii) our Global Adjusted EBITDA (both Pre-GRP and Post-GRP) for the fiscal years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 and (iii) the Company’s cumulative TSR and our peer group TSR for the same periods.
| Metric | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | ||||||||||||
| PEO CAP ($M) - Garry O. Ridge | $4.24 | $3.46 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| PEO CAP ($M) - Steven A. Brass | $0.00 | $0.00 | $2.72 | $4.97 | $1.48 | ||||||||||||
Average NEO CAP ($M) | $1.49 | $0.72 | $0.87 | $1.36 | $0.66 | ||||||||||||
Net Income (000s) | $70,229 | $67,329 | $65,993 | $69,644 | $90,994 | ||||||||||||
46
| Metric | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | ||||||||||||
| PEO CAP ($M) - Garry O. Ridge | $4.24 | $3.46 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| PEO CAP ($M) - Steven A. Brass | N/A | N/A | $2.72 | $4.97 | $1.48 | ||||||||||||
| Average NEO CAP ($M) | $1.49 | $0.72 | $0.87 | $1.36 | $0.66 | ||||||||||||
| Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP (000s) | $105,932 | $93,258 | $94,734 | $108,567 | $107,927 | ||||||||||||
| Metric | FY 2021 | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 | ||||||||||||
| PEO CAP ($M) - Garry O. Ridge | $4.24 | $3.46 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| PEO CAP ($M) - Steven A. Brass | N/A | N/A | $2.72 | $4.97 | $1.48 | ||||||||||||
| Average NEO CAP ($M) | $1.49 | $0.72 | $0.87 | $1.36 | $0.66 | ||||||||||||
| WDFC TSR | $118.59 | $95.05 | $109.96 | $136.49 | $114.01 | ||||||||||||
| Russell 2000 TSR | $145.58 | $118.07 | $121.63 | $141.98 | $151.51 | ||||||||||||
Pay-versus-Performance Tabular List
We believe the following list reflects the most important financial performance measures used by us to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs to company performance for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2025 (see descriptions of such measures in the CD&A section of the Proxy Statement):
•Adjusted EBITDA Pre-GRP (Global and Regional) ;
•Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP ;
•Adjusted Net Sales (Global and Regional) ;
•Strategic Performance Measures ; and
•Relative Total Shareholder Return
47
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS - FISCAL YEAR 2025
In addition to base salary and GRP for fiscal year 2025, NEOs were granted RSU, MSU and PSU awards under the Company’s A&R 2016 Stock Incentive Plan as shown in the table below. Descriptions of the RSU and MSU awards are provided above in the CD&A section under the heading, Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) Compensation Overview, and a description of PSU awards are provided under the heading, PSU Awards.
The table also provides threshold, target, and maximum payout information relating to the Company’s fiscal year 2025 GRP.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards1 | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units3 (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Options Awards4 ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 10/03/2024 | $ | 1 | $ | 680,000 | $ | 1,360,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (MSU) | 2,943 | 5,887 | 11,774 | $ | 1,781,936 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (RSU) | 5,887 | $ | 1,460,211 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (PSU) | 133 | 2,669 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | 10/03/2024 | $ | 1 | $ | 196,293 | $ | 392,585 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (MSU) | 588 | 1,177 | 2,354 | $ | 356,266 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (RSU) | 1,177 | $ | 291,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (PSU) | 38 | 770 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 10/03/2024 | $ | 1 | $ | 162,225 | $ | 324,450 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (MSU) | 318 | 637 | 1,274 | $ | 192,814 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (RSU) | 637 | $ | 158,001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (PSU) | 31 | 636 | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | 10/03/2024 | $ | 1 | $ | 209,140 | $ | 418,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (MSU) | 220 | 441 | 882 | $ | 133,486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (RSU) | 441 | $ | 109,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (PSU) | 39 | 789 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 10/03/2024 | $ | 1 | $ | 209,605 | $ | 419,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (MSU) | 382 | 765 | 1,530 | $ | 231,558 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (RSU) | 765 | $ | 189,751 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/03/2024 (PSU) | 41 | 822 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1The Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent Threshold, Target and Maximum payouts under the Company GRP awards payable for fiscal year 2025 performance. The Target amount represents 50% of the Maximum payout for each NEO. The Maximum amount represents the annual non-equity incentive compensation opportunity for each NEO that assumes full achievement of the GRP performance measures (as more fully discussed above in the CD&A section under the heading, GRP) and attainment by the Company of a level of Global Adjusted EBITDA Post-GRP sufficient to maximize GRP payouts.
48
2The Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent the Threshold, Target, and/or Maximum number of shares to be issued upon performance vesting of MSU and PSU awards as described in the CD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation. There is no applicable Target number of shares for PSU awards to be earned by the NEOs.
3All Other Stock Awards represent RSUs described in the CD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation.
4Information relating to the amounts disclosed as the Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards is included in footnote 1 to the Summary Compensation Table above.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2025 FISCAL YEAR END
The following table provides detailed information concerning the RSU and MSU awards that were not vested as of the fiscal year end, August 31, 2025, for each of the NEOs:
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)1 | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)2 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)3 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 10,091 | $ | 2,180,060 | 24,559 | $ | 5,305,726 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | 2,202 | $ | 475,720 | 5,473 | $ | 1,182,387 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 1,392 | $ | 300,728 | 3,577 | $ | 772,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | 1,025 | $ | 221,441 | 2,666 | $ | 575,963 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 1,764 | $ | 381,095 | 4,578 | $ | 989,031 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1Represents RSU awards to the NEOs that were not vested as of the fiscal year end.
2The Market Value of the shares or units that were not vested as of the fiscal year end is based on $216.04 per share or unit, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 2025.
3Represents the maximum number of shares to be issued with respect to MSU awards granted in fiscal years 2024 and 2025 to the NEOs that were not vested as of the fiscal year end. The maximum number of shares to be issued with respect to MSU awards equals the number of shares to be issued with respect to the MSU awards upon achievement of the highest level of achievement for such MSU awards as described above in the CD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation. MSU awards granted in fiscal year 2023 are included at 103.5% of the units granted on October 10, 2022 because such MSUs did not vest until after the fiscal year end (on October 9, 2025 when the Compensation Committee certified the level of performance achieved).
STOCK VESTED – FISCAL YEAR 2025
Equity awards to our executive officers are granted to satisfy goals for executive officer retention, to provide incentives for current and future performance, and to meet objectives for overall levels of compensation and pay mix. RSU, MSU and PSU awards were granted to the NEOs by the Compensation Committee in October 2024. All of the equity awards are set forth below in the table under the heading, Grants of Plan-Based Awards - Fiscal Year 2025. In establishing award levels for the NEOs for fiscal year 2025, the Compensation Committee placed emphasis on long-term retention goals and desired incentives for current and future contributions.
The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock acquired upon the vesting of RSU and MSU awards in the Company’s last fiscal year and the aggregate dollar value realized with respect to such vested RSU and
49
MSU awards. No shares of stock were issued with respect to PSU awards granted on October 3, 2024 that would have vested on August 31, 2025 had performance targets been attained.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officer | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting1 | Value Realized on Vesting2 | ||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 2,652 | $ | 699,783 | |||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | 747 | $ | 197,111 | |||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 643 | $ | 169,669 | |||||||||||
| William B. Noble | 504 | $ | 132,990 | |||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 1,182 | $ | 311,895 | |||||||||||
1The Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting represents shares of the Company’s common stock issued on October 22, 2024 upon vesting of RSU and MSU awards.
2The Value Realized on Vesting for the RSUs and MSUs on October 22, 2024 is calculated based on the number of vested RSU and MSU awards multiplied by the closing price of $263.87 for the Company’s common stock on such date.
Market Share Unit (MSUs) Award Vested for Three Fiscal Year Performance
On October 9, 2025, the Compensation Committee reviewed the performance measure applicable to MSU awards granted to the NEOs on October 10, 2022. The Compensation Committee assessed the Company’s relative TSR compared to the return for the Index for the performance Measurement Period ended August 31, 2025 to calculate the number of shares of the Company’s common stock for those MSU awards vesting, if any. The relative TSR compared to the return for the Index (as a percentage point difference) over the Measurement Period, which covers three fiscal years, was 0.7% higher. Based on the results and the table shown in the Market Share Unit or MSU Awards section above, the Compensation Committee certified that the Applicable Percentage of the Target Number of shares underlying the MSU awards granted in October 2022 was 103.5% for each of the NEOs.
Named Executive Officer | Target Number of MSUs (Granted October 2022) | Applicable Percentage | Shares Vested (October 2025) | ||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | 3,752 | 103.5% | 3,883 | ||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | 865 | 103.5% | 895 | ||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | 793 | 103.5% | 821 | ||||||||
| William B. Noble | 649 | 103.5% | 672 | ||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | 1,082 | 103.5% | 1,120 | ||||||||
50
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION – FISCAL YEAR 2025
The following table provides information concerning compensation received by the NEOs that is subject to deferral under applicable RSU and DPU award agreements:
| Named Executive Officer | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY1 ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE2 ($) | ||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | $5,054 | $23,332 | ||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | $— | $— | ||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | $— | $— | ||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | $198,947 | $918,386 | ||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | $4,165 | $19,228 | ||||||||||||
1The Aggregate Earnings in Last FY represents the increase in value from August 31, 2024 to August 31, 2025 of the shares underlying deferred settlement of RSUs and vested DPUs held by each NEO that will be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock following termination of employment as disclosed in footnotes to the table under the heading, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. The number of such deferred settlement of RSUs and vested DPUs for each NEO was multiplied by the difference in the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 2025 of $216.04 and on August 31, 2024 of $262.84, a decrease in value of $46.80 per share. Amounts shown are not included as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2025.
2The Aggregate Balance at Last FYE represents the value as of August 31, 2025 of the deferred settlement of RSUs and any vested DPUs held by each NEO as noted in these footnotes. The value for each deferred settlement of RSU and each vested DPU is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 2025, which was $216.04 per share. The underlying deferred settlement of RSUs and vested DPUs were included in prior disclosures for the NEOs to the extent that the NEOs were included in Summary Compensation Table disclosures for the years in which such awards were first granted to the NEOs.
CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
The Company entered into Change of Control Severance Agreements (“CoC Agreements”) with each of the NEOs. The CoC Agreements provide that each executive officer will receive certain severance benefits if his or her employment is terminated without “Cause” or if he or she resigns for “Good Reason,” as those terms are defined in the CoC Agreements, within two years after a “Change of Control” as defined in the CoC Agreements and summarized below. If the executive officer’s employment is terminated during the aforementioned two-year period by the Company without “Cause” or by the executive officer for “Good Reason”, the executive officer will be entitled to a lump sum payment (subject to limits provided by (a) reference to Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code which limits the deductibility of certain payments to executives upon a change in control or (b) alternative reduction order if such method would result in a greater economic benefit to the executive on an after-tax basis) of twice the executive officer’s base salary, calculated based on the greater of the executive officer’s then current annual base salary or a five-year average (or, if less, the number of full fiscal years during which the executive has been employed by the Company prior to the date of termination), plus twice the executive officer’s earned GRP, calculated based on the greater of the most recent annual earned GRP or a five-year average (or, if less, the number of full fiscal years during which the executive has been employed by the Company prior to the date of termination). Further, any of the executive officer’s outstanding equity incentive awards that are not then fully vested (with the exception of PSU awards), will be accelerated and vested in full following such termination of employment within such two-year period and the executive officer will be entitled to continuation of health and welfare benefits under the Company’s then existing benefit plans or equivalent benefits for a period of up to two years from the date of termination of employment. No employment rights or benefits other than the change of control severance benefits described in this paragraph are provided by the CoC Agreements.
For purposes of the CoC Agreements and subject to the express provisions and limitations contained therein, a “Change of Control” means a transaction or series of transactions by which a person or persons acting together acquire more than 30% of the Company’s outstanding shares; a change in a majority of the incumbent members of the Company’s Board as specified in the CoC Agreements, a reorganization, merger or consolidation as specified in the CoC Agreements or a sale of substantially all of the assets or complete liquidation of the Company. As specified more particularly in the CoC Agreements, a “Change of Control” does not include a reorganization, merger or consolidation or a sale or liquidation where a majority of the incumbent members of the Company’s Board continue in office and more than 60% of the successor company’s shares are owned by the Company’s pre-transaction stockholders.
51
The CoC Agreements have a term of two years, subject to automatic renewal for successive two-year periods unless notice of non-renewal is provided by the Company’s Board not less than six months prior to the end of the current term. The term of the CoC Agreements will be automatically extended for a term of two years following any “Change of Control.”
The following table sets forth the estimated amounts payable to each of the NEOs, pursuant to their respective CoC Agreements on the assumption that the employment of each NEO was terminated without “Cause” or otherwise for “Good Reason” effective as of the end of fiscal year 2025 following a “Change of Control” as provided for in the CoC Agreements. The table also includes the value, as of the end of the fiscal year, of all unvested RSU and MSU awards as of the end of fiscal year 2025.
| Named Executive Officer | Severance Pay1 | Welfare Benefits2 | Accelerated Vesting of RSUs and MSUs3 | Total Change of Control Severance Benefits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven A. Brass | $3,018,680 | $86,106 | $5,224,064 | $8,328,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sara K. Hyzer | $1,189,033 | $54,296 | $1,157,110 | $2,400,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jeffrey G. Lindeman | $1,074,784 | $52,988 | $769,751 | $1,897,523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| William B. Noble | $1,455,869 | $18,987 | $577,043 | $2,051,899 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patricia Q. Olsem | $1,233,553 | $82,106 | $988,383 | $2,304,042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1Severance Pay includes two times the base salary reported in footnote 1 of the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2025 plus two times Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation received for fiscal year 2023.
2Welfare Benefits includes an estimate of the Company’s cost to provide two years of continuation coverage under the Company’s welfare benefit plans, which does not include life insurance or long-term disability insurance. The estimate is based on the Company’s cost of such coverage for fiscal year 2025.
3Acceleration of vesting of RSU and MSU awards is governed by applicable provisions of the CoC Agreements and the RSU and MSU Award Agreements. The value included for accelerated vesting of RSU and MSU awards is based on $216.04, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on August 31, 2025. MSUs awarded are valued for this purpose based upon the Target Number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued with respect to the MSUs as described above in the CD&A section under the heading, Equity Compensation.
CEO PAY RATIO
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the SEC, the pay ratio of the total annual compensation of our CEO, Mr. Brass, to that of the Company’s “median employee” for fiscal year 2025 was approximately 38:1. To determine the CEO pay ratio, the total annual compensation for the median employee for fiscal year 2025 was calculated to be $113,343, which included the same elements of compensation required to be in the Summary Compensation Table, and was calculated in the same manner as the CEO’s total annual compensation, which was $4,266,899 for fiscal year 2025.
We identified the Company’s median employee from all employees of the Company (excluding the CEO) as of August 31, 2025. Employees included full-time, part-time and temporary employees and fixed term contract employees at such time. To identify the Company’s median employee in fiscal year 2025, we calculated total compensation for fiscal year 2025 for each employee other than the CEO by including salary or regular hourly wages paid in the fiscal year, annual cash incentive compensation paid during the fiscal year under the Company’s GRP, and the grant date value of RSUs and MSUs granted to employees in the fiscal year. Compensation paid to employees who were hired after the beginning of fiscal year 2025 or who terminated prior to the end of the fiscal year 2025 was not annualized. For employees who received compensation denominated in a foreign currency, such amounts were converted to USD using average annual exchange rates as of August 31, 2025.
As of August 31, 2025, the Company employed 714 employees located in 18 countries. The Company’s median employee is located in the U.S.
52
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain equity compensation plan information as of August 31, 2025:
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||
| Plan category | (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1 | 94,5072 | N/A | 973,514 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
| Total | 94,507 | N/A | 973,514 | ||||||||
1The 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, which authorizes the grant of 1,000,000 shares of common stock, was approved by our stockholders at our 2016 annual meeting. At the 2023 annual meeting, our stockholders approved to amend and restate the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan to authorize an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock for a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock.
2Represents shares of common stock subject to unvested 35,354 RSUs, vested 1,621 DPUs, and 40,839 MSU and 16,693 PSU awards assuming the issuance of shares based on target performance.
AUDIT-RELATED MATTERS
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC (“PwC”) for fiscal years 2025 and 2024:
2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
Audit fees1 | $ | 2,040,000 | $ | 2,182,502 | |||||||
Audit-related fees2 | 25,000 | 25,000 | |||||||||
Tax fees3 | 250,000 | 229,000 | |||||||||
All other fees4 | 2,000 | 2,000 | |||||||||
| Total fees | $ | 2,317,000 | $ | 2,438,502 | |||||||
1Professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements, the review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services normally provided by PwC in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
2Assurance and related services reasonably related to the audit and/or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements that are not reported under “Audit Fees”
3Tax return preparation, tax compliance, tax advice and/or tax planning services
4Access provided by PwC to its online research reference and disclosure checklist materials
The possible effect on the independence of the auditor is considered by the Audit Committee. There is no direct or indirect understanding or agreement that places a limit on current or future years’ audit fees or permissible non-audit products and services.
Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit products and services provided by the auditor. These products and services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services, software and other products or services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The auditor and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the auditor in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. All services described above received pre-approval pursuant to the aforementioned policies and procedures that were established to comply with SEC rules that require pre-approval of audit and non-audit services.
53
Related Party Transactions Review and Oversight
The Audit Committee has responsibility for review and oversight of related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. Related party transactions include any independent business dealings between the Company and related parties who consist of, or are related to, the Company’s executive officers, directors, director nominees and holders of more than 5% of the Company’s shares. Such transactions include business dealings with parties in which any related party has a material direct or indirect interest. The Audit Committee has adopted a written policy to provide for its review and oversight of related party transactions. Executive officers and directors are required to notify the Corporate Secretary of the Company of any proposed or existing related party transactions in which they have an interest. The Corporate Secretary and the Audit Committee also rely upon the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures adopted pursuant to Exchange Act rules for the purpose of ensuring that matters requiring disclosure, including transactions that may involve a related party or may otherwise involve the potential for conflicts of interests, are brought to the attention of management and the Audit Committee on a timely basis. Certain related party transactions do not require Audit Committee review and approval. Such transactions are considered pre-approved. Pre-approved transactions include:
•compensation arrangements approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board and expense reimbursements consistent with the Company’s expense reimbursement policy;
•transactions in which the related party’s interest is derived solely from the fact that he or she serves as a director of another corporation that is a party to the transaction;
•transactions in which the related party’s interest is derived solely from his or her ownership (combined with the ownership interests of all other related parties) of not more than a 5% beneficial interest (but excluding any interest as a general partner of a partnership) in an entity that is a party to the transaction; and
•transactions available to all employees of the Company generally.
If a related party transaction is proposed or if an existing transaction is identified, the Audit Committee has authority to disapprove, approve or ratify the transaction and to impose such restrictions or other limitations on the transaction as the Audit Committee may consider necessary to best assure that the interests of the Company are protected and that the related party involved is not in a position to receive an improper benefit. In making such determination, the Audit Committee considers such factors as it deems appropriate, including without limitation (i) the benefits to the Company of the transaction; (ii) the commercial reasonableness of the terms of the transaction; (iii) the dollar value of the transaction and its materiality to the Company and to the related party; (iv) the nature and extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction; (v) if applicable, the impact of the transaction on a non-employee director’s independence; and (vi) the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party participating in the transaction.
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2025, there were no transactions required to be reported pursuant to the requirements of Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.
54
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee provides assistance to the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the quality and integrity of the accounting, auditing, and reporting practices of the Company, including assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence criteria prescribed by applicable regulations and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for audit committee membership and is an “independent director” within the meaning of applicable NASDAQ listing standards.
Management is responsible for preparing the Company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”) and for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (“auditor”) is responsible for performing an integrated audit of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and expressing opinions as to whether the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and as to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2025. The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with management the audited financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the Company’s auditor the audited financial statements and the auditor’s attestation report regarding effectiveness of management’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also discussed with the auditor those matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, which provides that certain matters related to the conduct of the financial statement audit are to be communicated to the Audit Committee and under the applicable requirements of the SEC. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee met separately with management and separately with the Company’s auditor to discuss results of audit examinations and evaluations of internal controls.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation, and oversight of the Company’s auditor. In this regard, the Audit Committee discussed with the auditor its independence from management and the Company, including matters in written documents and a letter received from the auditor as required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence. In evaluating the auditor’s independence, the Audit Committee also considered whether the auditor’s provision of any non-audit services impaired or compromised its independence.
The Audit Committee considered several factors in selecting PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s auditor, including its independence and internal quality controls, the overall depth of talent, and its familiarity with the Company’s businesses and internal controls over financial reporting. Further, in conjunction with the mandated rotation of an auditor’s lead, concurring and/or relationship partner (each an “audit partner”), the Audit Committee and its chair oversee and are directly involved in the selection process for any change in audit partners.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its annual report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended August 31, 2025, and that PwC serve as the Company’s auditor for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2026.
Audit Committee
Daniel T. Carter, Chair
Cynthia B. Burks
Edward O. Magee, Jr.
Trevor I. Mihalik
David B. Pendarvis
Anne G. Saunders
55
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS OR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
FOR OUR 2026 ANNUAL MEETING
For a stockholder proposal otherwise satisfying the eligibility requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for our 2026 annual meeting, it must be received by us at our principal office, 9715 Businesspark Avenue, San Diego, CA 92131 on or before July 15, 2026.
For an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to nominate a director nominee for election at our 2026 annual meeting pursuant to the proxy access provision of our Bylaws, such eligible stockholder or group of stockholders must comply with the then current advance notice requirements in our Bylaws and deliver the proposal to our Corporate Secretary (i) no earlier than June 15, 2026 and (ii) no later than 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on July 15, 2026 in order for such proposal to be considered timely. In addition, our Bylaws require the eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to update and supplement such information as of specified dates.
In addition, if a stockholder desires to bring business (including director nominations) before our 2026 annual meeting that is not the subject of a proposal timely submitted for inclusion in our 2026 Proxy Statement, written notice of such business, as currently prescribed in our Bylaws, must be received by our Corporate Secretary between June 15, 2026 and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on July 15, 2026.
For additional requirements, a stockholder may refer to our current Bylaws, Article II, Section 2.14, “Notice of Stockholder Proposals,” Article II, Section 2.15, “Nomination of Directors,” and Article II, Section 2.17, “Proxy Access,” a copy of which may be obtained from our Corporate Secretary upon request and without charge or may be obtained by accessing our filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. See “Communications with the Board” for contact information. If we do not receive timely notice pursuant to our Bylaws, the proposal will be excluded from consideration at the annual meeting.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees for the 2026 annual meeting other than our nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than October 13, 2026, which is 60 days prior to the anniversary date of the annual meeting.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. When used in this Proxy Statement, the words “estimated,” “anticipated,” “expect,” “believe,” “project,” “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include discussions of strategy, plans or intentions of management. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about the Company, and future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Proxy Statement. While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Proxy Statement or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
56
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, which might incorporate future filings made by us under those statutes, the preceding Compensation and People Committee Report and Audit Committee Report will not be incorporated by reference into any of those prior filings, nor will any such reports be incorporated by reference into any future filings made by the Company under those statutes. In addition, information on our website, other than our Proxy Statement, Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and form of proxy, is not part of the proxy soliciting material and is not incorporated herein by reference.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Phenix Q. Kiamilev
Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
San Diego, California
October 31, 2025
57