Good day. And welcome to the EFSC Earnings Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. And at this time, I’d like to turn the conference over to Jim Lally, President and CEO. Please go ahead, sir.

Well, thank you, Catherine, and good morning. I welcome everyone to our Fourth Quarter Earnings Call. I appreciate all of you taking time to listen, and joining me this morning is Keene Turner, our company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer; and Scott Goodman, President of Enterprise Bank & Trust. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone on the call that a copy of the release and accompanying presentation can be found on our website. The presentation and earnings release were furnished on SEC Form 8-K yesterday. Please refer to slide two of the presentation titled Forward-Looking Statements and our most recent 10-K and 10-Q for reasons why actual results may vary from any forward-looking statements that we may make this morning. Please turn to slide three for our financial highlights of the fourth quarter. 2021 was another outstanding year for EFSC. We were especially proud of our fourth quarter performance. We earned net income of $51 million or $1.33 per diluted share. This compared favorably to our earnings per share for the linked and prior year quarters, on both reported and as adjusted for merger and impairment charges. Our return metrics were equally impressive, as we posted return on average assets of 1.52% and pre-provision net revenue of 1.89%. Our pre-provision net revenue set a quarterly record at $63 million, increasing $7 million from the third quarter. I would expect this momentum to continue into 2022 as our variable rate loan portfolio and strong non-interest-bearing deposit base have us well positioned, should we experience expected interest rate increases. This, coupled with our solid loan production momentum that we’ve experienced for the last several quarters, should provide for continued strong performance. Keene will provide much more details on these results in addition to our results for all of 2021. How these results came about is what I’d like to call your attention to. Over the last several years, we have intentionally focused on building a diversified revenue stream oriented towards our commercial banking heritage. Our strategy has been to diversify through both geography and types of businesses. The acquisitions of Seacoast in 2020 and First Choice in 2021 further illustrate this, as we added several new national business lines, along with growing markets of Los Angeles, Orange County, and San Diego, complementing the more established markets in St. Louis, Kansas City, and Phoenix. One final comment I would like to make relative to how we are doing this relates to our branch-light model. At year-end, our average deposit for our 50 branches was over $200 million. This will continue to serve us well amid wage and other inflationary trends. With First Choice fully integrated, we now have a balance sheet that bolsters total loans of $9 billion and total deposits of $11.3 billion, yielding a loan-to-deposit ratio of 80%. More importantly, though, when you dig into this further, approximately 50% of our loan portfolio is oriented towards either our commercial and industrial loans, owner-occupied commercial real estate, and specialty businesses, while our non-interest-bearing deposits to total deposits remained at 40% when compared to the linked quarter. This illustrates the value of the differentiated model that we continue to build. Furthermore, looking back five years when our loan-to-deposit ratio was close to 100%, our return on tangible common equity was close to 12%. At 12/31/21, we have significantly improved our return on tangible common equity while also significantly enhancing our funding profile with a loan-to-deposit ratio of 80%. What we continue to build represents a company that’s a much stronger earner than we previously were while, at the same time, lowering our overall risk profile. Scott will provide much more detail on the various regions, businesses, and product lines, and the production and subsequent growth that we are seeing. Our focus is on the long-term. We teach and reward a consultative sales process that is simple and repeatable, and our relationship managers and sales leaders know that the greatest success comes from relationships that choose us for our expertise and quick, consistent responses. We’re focused on the right businesses for us, not just any business. Credit quality remains strong as evidenced by the statistics listed on this page. But please know that we do not take this for granted. Our teams have used the current credit environment to improve on already very sound credit metrics. Efficient capital management is our goal. Keene will spend more time on the many positive moves that we made in this area during the quarter. I will just comment that this part of our balance sheet is situated extremely well and has us well positioned for the growth that we expect in the years to come, whether from organic or through acquisitions, we are positioned well for both. During the fourth quarter, we successfully completed our core systems integration of First Choice and have made significant progress in our cultural and sales process integration as well. We have been successful in newer markets when we combine talent from legacy markets with our new associates and merge the enterprise know-how with local market knowledge. I’m very excited about what we can do in these markets in 2022, with results of this integration likely showing up in our numbers in the second half of the year. This acquisition has provided us with significant financial benefit, as we crossed a $10 billion mark, and has given us a wonderful platform in terrific markets and further diversifies our revenue base. Moving on to slide four, you will see the list of items that we are particularly focused on in 2022. We have our teams keenly focused on their loan, deposit, and net new relationship goals for 2022. As Scott will comment, our production throughout the company has been solid and we expect this to continue. Our SBA team had a record production year in 2021. We expect this level of achievement to continue, but expect some pressure with respect to refinancing of the existing portfolio. We have a team additionally focused on stemming this tide by preemptively addressing this where it makes sense. We will continue to invest in talent for current and new specialty businesses, along with bolstering our teams in higher growth markets. Like with past new markets tax credit allocations, we will leverage this to garner new relationships. We have found this especially true when we enter new markets where use of this program is now prolific. This is a significant differentiator for us. We should also see new market penetration for our affordable housing business as well. Finally, Omicron has delayed our fully implemented hybrid strategy, but we look forward to rolling this out later in the first quarter or early second. With that, I will now turn the call over to Scott Goodman. Scott?

Thank you, Jim, and good morning, everybody. As you’ll see on slide five, loans at the end of the year totaled just over $9 billion, representing a 24.8% increase from the prior year. The growth was most heavily impacted by the addition of the legacy First Choice book in Q3, as well as well-diversified organic growth across core business lines net of a reduction in PPP balances. Slide six reflects the full-year performance of the legacy core books for which we posted annual growth of $554 million or 8.5%. Most notably, we experienced strong performance across the board in our specialty line, while the commercial and industrial business was bolstered through the addition of new relationships and a modest rebound in usage of revolving lines. For the quarter, which is detailed on slide number seven, we achieved net growth of $68 million before the impact of PPP balances. Our focus sales process continues to produce healthy deal flow, the total originations up over 30% from the prior quarter. Commercial and industrial balances grew as we onboard new clients and as our businesses become more actively engaged in using revolving lines of credit. While still below pre-pandemic levels, our line draws rose steadily throughout the quarter, with an average usage up roughly 2%. Specialized lending units had another robust quarter, growing by $143 million or 22% annualized. Sponsor finance had a record quarter, closing over $100 million in new commitments with 20 different companies and posting net growth of $53 million. As I’ve mentioned in prior calls this year, the deal flow in this unit is at an all-time high. Despite elevated competition, our long tenure in the sector and deep sponsor relationships have allowed us to take advantage of the active private equity markets while also remaining selective to maintain our return and our quality standards. The SBA team has also continued its stellar performance in Q4 as a top 10 SBA originator, with growth of $41 million or 13.6% annualized. Despite some elevated payoffs from more competitive conventional loan options, deal flow is solid and we also remain active in recruiting new talent. Rounding out the specialties for Q4, both life insurance premium finance and tax credit teams continued their steady growth trajectories. Life insurance premium posted a seasonally strong $21 million increase, resulting in $60 million or 11.2% growth for the year. Tax credit also executed well, with $25 million of quarterly growth, pushing the total to $104 million or 27.2% for the year. The popularity of affordable housing and the continued adoption of these programs by more states will provide a solid pipeline in this business looking forward. Commercial real estate originations remained strong, with net growth in the category moderated by the impact of payoffs and pay-downs generally from refinances into permanent market structures and the sale of assets. Disbursements in the construction portfolio on existing projects were improved as supply chain issues eased somewhat, but the net decline in these categories was more materially impacted by a decision to reduce certain loan types within the California market, which I’ll touch on in more detail. Turning now to the markets, which is on slide number eight, and break out the portfolios by business unit. St. Louis represents the largest commercial and industrial book and was the beneficiary of improved line usage as well as generated significant new loan originations in the quarter. New commitments were more than double the prior quarter and included several new relationships, asset purchases, and new real estate acquisition and tax credit-based fund lines. Arizona and Kansas City loan books also grew in the quarter, as construction fundings ramped up and new commercial real estate opportunities were originated. Examples of new deals in these markets include the acquisition and development of new multifamily projects, expanded owner-occupied real estate for a large car dealership, and acquisition of new Class A office and industrial properties under long-term leases. The reduction in the New Mexico loan book mainly reflects the runoff of some of the legacy commercial real estate transactions, which were part of the LANB acquired book, and a slower ramp-up of newer commercial real estate and commercial and industrial relationship-based originations which will be more consistent with our organic growth model. We have successfully transitioned a significant portion of this portfolio over to our business banking team, which enables us to better service and cross-sell these smaller businesses with a more efficient cost base. Also important to note within this market and a key driver of our entrance into New Mexico through the LANB deal, we continue to nurture a large, low-cost, and well-diversified deposit base here, which has performed well and is growing, evidenced by more than $50 million of increased savings balances during Q4. In California, during the fourth quarter, as you heard from Jim, our sales team has been primarily focused on supporting the smooth conversion process, including frequent communication with the client base and thorough training on our workflow and sales systems. In the loan book, commercial and industrial balances net of PPP were up over $15 million in the quarter. The net decline is primarily attributable to the construction and residential real estate categories, as we have opted to de-emphasize the speculative construction and residential fix-and-flip type loans. Generally, these loans have a shorter duration and a higher risk profile that are also requiring higher administrative and support costs. There are, however, strong opportunities for us to further leverage the existing client base, through deepening credit relationships with larger borrowers and by offering more medium-term credit structures to extend the bridge in commercial construction loans, which is something generally not offered by First Choice. Looking ahead, our focus is also on expanding the talent base in this market. We recently announced the promotion of an experienced commercial leader and long-term employee of our company who will relocate to lead the commercial teams in Orange County and LA. Additionally, we’re transplanting products and client service expertise into the market through the assignment of Enterprise experienced treasury management officers. Externally, our early recruiting efforts are also promising with recent new hires of a senior vice president, commercial and industrial producer, a commercial and industrial portfolio manager, and a treasury management sales associate. Moving now to deposits, accounts continue to grow in the quarter, with lending balances up $516 million or 4.77%, 19% annualized. Quarterly average core balances were up across the board in all of our geographic markets, with the largest growth in low-cost checking and transaction account types. Most notably, within the California market, average deposit balances were up nearly 20% in the quarter. Specialty deposits, which are highlighted on slide number nine, also performed well in the quarter with growth across each of the primary verticals. These balances, which are generally comprised of non-interest-bearing accounts, now represent 20% of the overall deposit portfolio. Account activity also remains well positioned with new accounts outpacing closed accounts at a lower average cost. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Keene Turner. Keene?

Thank you, Scott, and good morning, everyone. My comments start on slide 10, where we reported earnings per share of $1.33 for the quarter. Most importantly, on an adjusted basis, when excluding merger-related expenses, earnings per share were $1.37 per share, which was a $0.10 improvement from the linked third quarter. In addition to record net income, we also had operating income that drove a $0.20 per share sequential increase in earnings per share. Our fee income results were seasonally strong due to tax credit and fees from community development activities, and we also had the first full quarter of First Choice operations in both revenue and expenses. To that end, expenses reflect the combined entities and are in line with our expectations, with strong asset quality. On slide 11, net interest income was $102 million, a $5 million increase compared to the linked third quarter. This includes approximately $4.5 million from the full quarter impact of First Choice, along with higher earnings on loan growth, partially offset by PPP trends. In the quarter, deposit balances continued to grow with average deposit balances increasing $870 million, including nearly $500 million of demand deposit accounts. Balances increased across all of our markets and throughout our specialty lines during the quarter, providing additional core funding and flexibility in managing costs. As Scott highlighted, the growth is both a function of the underlying strong liquidity of our customers, as well as from new business development activities. Slide 12 depicts net interest margin trends, which indicates the strong deposit growth resulted in higher cash balances and was the largest driver of the 8-basis-point net interest margin decline in the quarter. With that said, the fundamentals of net interest margin were strong, as our overall loan yield was stable and our cost of funds declined modestly. Our balance sheet remains positioned to take advantage of higher interest rates in the future. We estimate that a 50-basis-point increase in interest rates will result in an additional 3% to 4% increase in net interest income dollars on an annual basis. The asset sensitivity is principally driven by our loan portfolio, of which 63% of loans are variable rate. More than half of those loans have interest rate floors and approximately 95% of those floors are currently priced at the floor. Our deposit portfolio is roughly 40% non-interest-bearing deposits and we have less than $500 million of total transaction accounts formerly tied to an index. Based on our current liquidity position and ability to generate low-cost funding through our specialty verticals, we believe our ability to control deposit costs is greatly enhanced versus prior interest rate cycles. Slide 13 depicts our asset quality position at the end of the year, which continues to show an overall level of non-performing loans and assets that has improved sequentially. Net charge-offs were $3.3 million or 14 basis points annualized, compared to $2 million or 8 basis points in the prior quarter. On slide 14, our expectation for overall credit losses in the portfolio continued to improve and resulted in a negative provision of $4 million for the fourth quarter. The allowance for credit losses totaled $145 million at the end of the quarter or represented 1.61% of total loans or 1.84% of unguaranteed loans. While our outlook has continued to improve, we believe there’s enough uncertainty in the economy and the effects of COVID variants, supply chain issues, and the masking effects of government stimulus to warrant continued strong coverage. On slide 15, fee income grew $5 million from the third quarter as we reported $23 million compared to $18 million in the third quarter. The increase was led primarily by fees on community development investments and seasonally strong tax credit income. The trends in deposit service charges are the result of a fee holiday we provide during core system conversion, in this case to First Choice customers. While tax credit income continues to be seasonal, our momentum in the space continues to be strong. Additionally, the fees earned on community development investments are not consistent sources of income on a quarterly basis, but we do expect to generate meaningful additional fees on our remaining investments this year. Turning to slide 16, non-interest expense was $64 million, including $2.3 million of merger-related expenses in the fourth quarter. Core operating expenses were $2.6 million higher in the fourth quarter at $61.5 million compared to $59 million in the third quarter. The drivers include a full quarter of First Choice operations, some deposit service charges expenses, as well as a write-off of the remaining debt issuance costs related to the redemption of our $50 million of subordinated debentures. We expect 2022 expenses will be approximately $250 million, with seasonal trends in the first quarter and then normal trends thereafter. In addition, we do not expect to incur any material merger costs related to the closing of First Choice. On slide 17, we demonstrated our capital metrics, and obviously, we were busy on the capital front in the fourth quarter, as we took action to further optimize our capital stack and to continue providing returns to shareholders. We redeemed $50 million of subordinated debentures, issued $75 million of preferred stock to increase both the quality and quantity of regulatory capital. Notwithstanding, we also continue to manage our outstanding shares by repurchasing nearly $30 million of common shares in the fourth quarter. For the year, we have repurchased 1.3 million shares totaling $61 million, and we’ve also increased our dividend for each of the last two quarters and announced another dividend increase for the first quarter of 2022 as we look to continue to return capital to our shareholders. In addition, with strong earnings, we have increased tangible book value for common shares by 3% sequentially and 11% for the year. Our strategic management of both the type and amount of capital helped us drive a return on tangible common equity of 19% in the fourth quarter. Our fourth-quarter results cap a busy but important year for our company on multiple fronts. We successfully completed the systems integration for both Seacoast and First Choice, while generating net income of $133 million and a return on tangible common equity of more than 18%, excluding merger-related and other non-recurring events. Adjusted for merger charges, branch impairment, and CECL double count, earnings per share for the full year was $4.97, compared to $3.21 in the prior year. We’ve finished the year strong and diversified business platform and sales culture that Jim discussed, along with the talent activity that Scott highlighted has us well-positioned for 2022. Thanks for joining the call today, and we’re going to now open the line for analyst questions. At this time, we’ll take analyst questions, please, operator.

Thank you. We’ll now take the first question from Jeff Rulis at D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning.

Good morning.

Can you discuss the loan growth and pay-downs, particularly in relation to what you experienced in Q4 with good origination production? Looking into 2022, considering the momentum in specialty finance, can you share any expectations on a net basis? Do you foresee payoffs slowing down, and how do you balance that against your production expectations? Thank you.

Sure. Happy to. Yeah. I think, first of all, our production, certainly the pipeline remains steady. I would expect to see continued growth in really most of the specialty lines. I think the increase in revolving usage is good to see. I think we’re seeing some of the larger companies tap into their lines; some of the smaller ones may be running through some of the PPP liquidity, and I think maybe a little bit of a moderation in supply chain. So that’s a good sign. I think, the payoffs, as you said, most highly concentrated within a commercial real estate area. And I think, potentially increasing rates could certainly help moderate that and level the playing field with, what I would call, the non-traditional bank structures, secondary market activity that we see certainly can also affect the velocity of sale of assets that we’ve seen as well. We’re well positioned with investors in that market. So some of the runoffs that we’ve seen, particularly in California that I mentioned, are more of the shorter-term fix-and-flip, construct-and-sell kind of activity. And more of what we’re originating is the longer-term hold investors where we can go deeper with them, we can do the construction loan, we can do the acquisition loan, but it’s more of a mini-perm structure. So, I think, if that trend continues, the net effect will be positive.

Okay. Fair enough. I have a few questions about the fee income. What was the fee waiver? Is that figure $0.5 million per quarter? What do you think you sacrificed in terms of the deposit service line? How does that recover in Q1? I'll leave it at that for now.

Yeah. Jeff, it’s probably $300,000 to $500,000 a quarter. It’s not a big number. But the reason we call it out is just because you do see that negative trend from 3Q to 4Q. But we do expect that to come back here in earnest in the first quarter.

And then as we get into the third quarter, if you could just remind us of the Durbin headwind, I think, is that about a $3 million annual impact?

Yeah. And I think, just overall for 2022, I think we believe that with some of the momentum we have, some of the sequential improvements from the deal leveraging with First Choice. I mean, we still can have a mid-single-digit overall growth rate for the year, but yeah, that sort of little over a $1 million a quarter starts to hit up in 2Q.

Okay. So closer to a $1 million being in. Okay. And lastly, just that the other income, so within miscellaneous, I think, you guys called out the servicing income was down, but the actual miscellaneous income up sort of doubled within the income statement there. What was the other figure in that that seemed larger than the normal run rate?

Jeff, I’m looking at the slide, I’ve got $1.3 million of miscellaneous in Q3 and $1.2 million in the fourth quarter. So everything’s fairly level. We had a little bit of decline in private equity and swap fees were up in the fourth quarter modestly, but really the big driver there is going to be the CDE exit.

Okay. That figure, could you detail that, that’s probably what it is, the $5 million, is that not occurring…

Yeah.

...and I guess. Go ahead.

I would say that the $5 million figure I mentioned earlier reflects strong CDE exits for the year. Looking ahead, we may not see that level of activity, but we anticipate around $2 million in the first quarter and possibly another $2 million in the fourth quarter of 2022. This means that the revenue from this line item will not completely disappear on an annual basis, but it will occur consistently on a quarterly basis, and the scale of it is unlikely to persist.

Okay. So just to wrap up that entire conference, again, mid-single-digit growth on total non-interest income is your expectation?

Yeah. And again, that’s going to be principally driven by, call it, a 15% to 20% expansion of the tax credit business that continues to have strong momentum, and we see some good progress here at the end of the year, and we should have a strong start to 2022 with that business.

Appreciate it. Thanks.

Thanks, Jeff.

We will now take the next question from Andrew Liesch at Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Andrew.

Here are some questions on the residential real estate, the construction and fix-and-flip here? So is the decline in the residential book, is that fix-and-flip loans or is that just other mortgages that maybe you would have acquired in California?

No. Those are more of the fix-and-flips. There are a lot of residential coastal properties that were coming to First Choice for.

Got it. Okay. With the focus on that product, how much further do you think this portfolio could decline?

Yeah. I mean, I think, you may see some near-term pressure still. But, I think, as we continue to originate and I’m happy with what I see on the originations that we’re putting on the books, as well as deepening the relationships with a lot of those clients that are not doing those fix-and-flips. I think it’s going to moderate. But short-term, I think, there could still be some pressure.

Hey, Andrew. Just put some perspective there.

Yeah.

Just some perspective, that book was around $150 million when we acquired it, so you’re pretty much halfway through it…

Okay.

...don’t expect.

Okay. Very helpful there. And then just how is the rest of the integration in California going with respect to generating new loan growth, sounds like you’re bringing on someone new to lead that market. I guess, I just wonder what’s been the tone from customers and the lenders that you’ve picked up there?

Tone is extremely positive. If you have a conversation with a client or a business owner in California, it’s the same kinds of conversations we’re having in other markets. So, I’m very confident that our model is resonating here. I think clients are really pleased to hear that we have maybe a little bit bigger checkbook, we have a broader product line and are very willing to continue to explore those things with us. I think the other thing is just talent as well. I talked about some of the talent that we added. And I’ve been pleasantly surprised with the strong interest in our model by those external candidates because I think this provides an opportunity to reinvest some of those resources that we have available. And I think the disruption here with deals like the Union and U.S. Bank, Bank of the West-BMO, a few others also kind of leveled the playing field for us as a new name on the market and gets people talking that otherwise would not be in place. So, I feel very confident about continuing to bring on new talent.

Got it. Thank you for taking the questions. I’ll get back. Appreciate it.

We will now take the next question from Damon DelMonte at KBW. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning, guys. Hope everybody is doing well today. Just I was looking to get a little bit more color on the bullet regarding the strategic approach to the participations. Could you talk a little bit more about that, please?

I can…

Yeah.

I can take that.

Okay. Go ahead.

Yeah. I think, as we’ve grown, maybe back up a minute, in the past we may have let relationship managers help source other banks within their markets to do larger deals, and that’s not a real efficient strategy and it’s not a real repeatable strategy. So as we’ve grown and entered new markets and moved up market a little bit, doing business with larger companies, really centralizing that in an area that can do that legwork for those RMs, but also centralize it so that we’re able to find partners that can go across markets, go into some of the specialties with us, and then we can develop that relationship at that bank level, which a lot of times runs through a participation desk or a syndication desk through the credit side because what we weren’t necessarily getting in the cases where we were selling credit is an opportunity to buy back. And so this also leverages that relationship to where those that we sell to we can also buy back from with companies that have similar credit cultures with us.

Got it. Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks. And how big is the participation book today and how big do you envision that getting over time?

I don’t know. Keene, if you can help me there. I can tell you…

Damon, rough numbers, I’m going to say that we buy a $0.5 billion and we sell over a $1 billion. So there’s a pretty big imbalance, but not a lot in terms of what’s bought versus what’s sold. And again, they’re club deals and deals where people are out there, in-house lending and things like that with banks that are covered in your likely coverage, community bank coverage universe. So, I think that what Scott’s referring to is the strategy to try to equal out that imbalance. Back in the days when we were 100% loan-to-deposit, we were just trying to sell loans to the small local banks to try to be able to do it. And now recognizing we’ve got some more expansion, some more power, we’re looking at peers who are similarly situated and then the same boat and just trying to make sure that it’s a two-way street when we look at originating and managing the credits.

Got it. Okay. That’s great. Thank you. And then, probably, for you Keene, as we think about the provision going forward, I mean, credit trends, obviously, are strong and a very solid base of loans. How do we think about the provision here over the coming quarters?

We previously mentioned that at the time of CECL adoption, we adopted around 130 basis points. The proportions for guaranteed and unguaranteed loans are slightly different. We believe that when the environment stabilizes and is similar to when we adopted CECL, we can expect a range of around 125 to 135 basis points. As we continue to renew and generate a significant amount of credit in relation to net growth, the balances should decrease. Depending on the growth we observe, there could be some negative provisions if growth is limited. However, if growth is substantial, or depending on its composition, we might see some provisions. Nevertheless, as long as asset quality remains strong, we expect continued downward pressure along with improvements in overall economic conditions and confidence in the recovery of segments previously considered distressed during the pandemic.

Got it. Okay. That’s all that I had. Thank you very much.

Thank you. We’ll now take the next question from David Long at Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

Good morning.

As you review your deposit fees, I appreciate the guidance for 2022 on non-interest income, particularly regarding deposit fees. Is there any consideration for changes to overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees? Why are we seeing many of your larger bank competitors modify how they charge for these products? Have you considered this, and do you have any plans for it in 2022?

David, we’re going to address that. I want to reassure you that the figure is under $2 million annually. From our standpoint, we'll examine it, but I don’t foresee us closely following the top 25 in that area. While consumer banking is important, it represents a relatively subdued segment of our business with $3 billion in balances, generating approximately $1.9 million in fees annually from overdraft and maintenance fees. We will continue to assess this and engage with our regulators, but I believe any impact from potential changes is limited to that amount or less.

Absolutely great. I appreciate your insights. Regarding cash, there is a significant amount of liquidity on your balance sheet. With rising rates, how aggressive do you want to be in reallocating that liquidity into securities in the short term until loan growth picks up significantly? Additionally, will that decision be influenced by the stability you anticipate in your rapidly growing deposit balances?

That's a good question, David. I would say that nothing we do regarding cash deployment or any adjustments to the balance sheet is considered aggressive. We focus on strategies that are influenced by the rate and operating environments. We have continued to grow the investment portfolio size as we believe it should be around 20% of our asset base, and we were previously below that target, mainly because both First Choice and Seacoast lacked proportionate sized portfolios. We will let that determine our overall investment direction. From my perspective, the optimism about rate increases alleviates some pressure to shift towards more securities. In the coming quarters, we will continue to expand the portfolio, but I don’t expect to significantly increase the amount moved to securities unless we see considerable cash build and business development occurs that might alter our plans. I believe we have a solid position being asset sensitive, and we want to avoid overwhelming ourselves or losing potential upside due to overextending our asset sensitivity. Therefore, for the foreseeable future, we will maintain a status quo of moving $30 million to $40 million a month into the investment portfolio while monitoring it against our overall cash levels.

Yeah. Sure. Cool. Thanks, Keene. Appreciate the color.

Welcome. Thanks, David.

We will now take the next question from Brian Martin at Janney. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

Hey. Just wanted to touch on maybe, I don’t know, maybe, Keene, just on the margin and just kind of your commentary on the asset sensitivity, just sounds like there’s some floors on the loan, so maybe there’s a little bit of a lag before you get the impact on the benefits of the asset sensitivity, but can you just give a little bit more color on just kind of your expectations on that?

Yeah. Brian, I actually think it’s pretty linear with the first increase. I mean, there’s a good portion that’s on the floor. So we’ve got $5.7 billion of variable interest rate loans; $2.5 billion have no floor. So we’ll start to see the benefit there, and I think also just deposit behavior. We expect that deposit re-pricing is less with initial increases. And then there’s just over $3 billion with a floor, $175 million of those are priced at or above the floor, so they’ll move. And then you’ve got another call it $125 million that are zero basis points to 25 basis points and then another almost $0.5 billion that are 25 basis points to 50 basis points. So there’s a pretty good chunk that if you got 25 basis points or 50 basis points, even when they’re at the floor start to move. But, again, I think, the important part is that you’ve got $2.5 billion that are moving right away, and call it, another $200 million that are going to move somewhere between zero basis point and 25 basis points. And again, I think, some of that’s just as much on the deposit side as it is on the asset side. And I think right now, with the level of cash we’ve got on the balance sheet to David’s question, interest rate increases based on what’s forecast are fairly linear in terms of the guidance. We gave you 50 basis points, but you could probably interpret that in 25-basis-point increments up and down; it would be pretty accurate as the way we see it today.

Got you. What was the annual increase for 50 basis points that you mentioned earlier, Keene?

Yeah. The 3% to 4% net interest income dollars, and that’s, call it, 10 basis points to 15 basis points of margin based on existing cash position.

Got you. Okay. And then how about just your expectation for that excess liquidity position, because that’s over and above the asset sensitivity, I mean, where do you see that playing out or deploying that excess liquidity kind of throughout the year, how does that impact kind of your outlook?

Our guidance accounts for various scenarios. Initially, if we consider a 100 basis points increase in the federal funds rate, we believe that with an increase of zero to 50 basis points, there won't be a significant amount of cash moving out. However, with an increase of 50 basis points or more, we anticipate, at least conservatively, that cash will likely move out. That said, this analysis is based on a static balance sheet. When we factor in the expected loan growth of around 8% or mid-to-high single digits, this growth begins from zero and is booked at favorable rates, contributing positively to our margin. This is why I stated that the relationship is generally linear. We pay significant attention to cash flow and the various components of deposits, but we believe there is a tipping point where cash outflows can be offset by loan originations or adjustments. Thus, the analysis shifts from static to dynamic, if that makes sense.

Yes, it does. I appreciate the assistance there. Going back to the fees, considering the volatility with those CDEs, year-over-year, are you looking at upper single-digit growth based on 2021’s levels, taking into account those additional fees and the Durbin effect?

Yeah. I would say it’s like mid-single-digit, Brian. I think it’s probably 5%, 6% overall…

Yeah.

...with robust growth in the tax credit line item, that’s 15% or so percent.

Okay. And I guess, just — maybe for Scott, just a deposit growth? I mean, do you guys expect this deposit growth has been stronger? I mean, I guess, do you anticipate that slowing some this year? Is that kind of in your expectations?

Yeah. I mean, certainly, we’ve been the beneficiary of excess liquidity. I think I wouldn’t expect the production as it relates to new business, new accounts to slow down. I think, particularly in the specialties, I think, we’ve done a good job and that was our primary interest in developing that line of business, as local continued to be low-cost steady quarter-over-quarter type growth businesses.

Okay. Perfect. And just last one from me, just maybe, Keene, on the tax rate, given kind of these investments. I guess, can you give some thought on how you’re thinking about the tax rate for 2022?

Yeah. I think the tax rates going to move up a little bit. It’s a function of profitability. I think we haven’t quite kept up as much on the tax credit investment side and the municipal side, despite that we’ve really tried to, but we’ve been disciplined in terms of duration on the portfolio principally with the municipal. So it’s going to tick up, call it, 1% to 1.5%, so 22%, 22.5%, something like that for 2022, depending on what you look at from a profitability perspective versus 2021. And also just some of that’s a little bit of a function of a few more assets in California with a higher state rate as well.

Yeah. Okay. Perfect. Thanks for taking the questions.

Of course. Thanks, Brian.

That concludes today’s questions-and-answers session. At this time, I’d like to turn the conference back to Mr. Jim Lally. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Catherine. I appreciate everyone’s interest in our company and for joining us this morning. We look forward to connecting with you again after the first quarter, if not sooner. Have a great day.

That concludes today’s call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.