Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for attending today's Healthcare Realty First Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. My name is Jacquita. I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for question-and-answer towards the end. I would now like to pass the conference over to your host, Kris Douglas, Chief Financial Officer with Healthcare Realty Trust. Kris, please go ahead.

Thank you for joining us today for Healthcare Realty's first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. A reminder that, except for the historical information contained within the matters discussed in this call, may contain forward-looking statements that involve estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties. These risks are more specifically discussed in the company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2021, and a Form 10-Q filed with the SEC for the quarter ended March 31, 2022. These forward-looking statements represent the company's judgment as of the date of this call. The company disclaims any obligation to update this forward-looking material. The matters discussed in this call may also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures such as funds from operations or FFO; normalized FFO; FFO per share; normalized FFO per share; funds available for distribution or FAD; net operating income, NOI; EBITDA; and adjusted EBITDA. A reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures may be found in the company's earnings release for the first quarter ended March 31, 2022. The company's earnings press release, supplemental information and Form 10-Q are available on the company's website. I'll now turn the call over to Todd.

Thank you Kris and thank you everyone for joining us today. I'll start with a few comments about our solid operating results for the first quarter. Secondly, I'll provide some updates on our pending strategic combination with HTA. Finally, I'll touch on the process and expected timeline between now and closing the HTA transaction. For the first quarter, we're pleased to report both strong internal growth and robust external investment. Same-store NOI growth of 2.9% was driven by healthy top line growth. Strong leasing interest across the portfolio drove positive sequential absorption of more than 40 basis points. Based on constructive provider sentiment, we expect steady absorption gains in the coming quarters. $340 million of year-to-date acquisitions gives us a head start to 2022. Our acquisition cap rate is in line with guidance and well above our disposition cap rate, resulting in accretive capital recycling. Additionally, we're seeing accelerated development activity. Our $1.6 billion embedded development pipeline is expanding with multiple sizable projects slated to start later this year. Strong demand for space is driving portfolio occupancy gains and increased interest in development, which bolsters our strong outlook for 2022. Now turning to the HTA transaction, I'll first touch on the unsolicited offer we described in the merger proxy and in our press release earlier today. After receiving the proposal from Party F on March 28th, our Board thoroughly reviewed it with our advisors. The Board unanimously rejected the proposal in writing. In mid-April, we received a second letter from Party F acknowledging our response and reiterating interest at the same terms. The Board did not respond to this letter. Then on Tuesday this week, shortly after the Wall Street Journal article, we received another letter from Party F reiterating interest at the same terms as the March 28th proposal. So we've now received three letters from Party F expressing interest at the same terms. We can only interpret these letters as an opportunistic and disruptive distraction. The Board has unanimously rejected the unsolicited proposal and continues to believe that the strategic combination with HTA offers a superior value and is in the best interest of the company's shareholders. Looking ahead, we remain focused on our pending combination with HTA. Earlier today, we published an updated presentation on the transaction, which can be found on our Investor page. We've made tremendous progress in the last 60 days and we're even more excited about the combination since our announcement in February. This is a game-changing transaction that positions Healthcare Realty as the leading pure-play MOB REIT. Operating at scale gives us tremendous efficiencies. But the ultimate benefit here, which you can see on page 6 of our updated presentation, is accelerated growth. The combination with HTA will enable us to shift into a higher gear, moving from average annual FAD per share growth of 4.5% over the last three years to a range of 5% to 7% going forward. In a few minutes, Rob will more fully describe how our combined cluster strategy will accelerate our growth. With regards to the $1.1 billion special cash dividend for HTA shareholders, I'm pleased to report that we've lined up $1.6 billion in proceeds at cap rates of around 4.8% through a combination of JV and asset sales. We've received letters of intent and are in advanced discussions with multiple parties. We expect a portion of the asset sales to close prior to the merger vote, already having been approved by HTA. These proceeds will be held by HTA to fund the special cash dividend just before close, and we expect the balance to close on or around the closing of the merger. We consider these initial efforts to address funding needs for the completion of the transaction as Phase 1. Based on the strong demand of Phase 1, we're initiating the next phase to further align the combined portfolio through the sale or JV of an additional $500 million. Similar to Phase I, we expect to transact at portfolio sizes where we can generate premiums relative to single asset pricing. We'll use the proceeds to match fund attractive higher-yielding developments and accretive individual asset acquisitions. The Board has recently authorized a $500 million stock repurchase program. This gives us another choice where we can reinvest proceeds accretively, from Phase 1 or Phase 2 by repurchasing our own stock, if the price is materially discounted. Finally, I'd like to touch on our ongoing transaction process and expected timeline. We have secured commitments for a new credit facility, which Kris will cover in a few minutes. We also intend to preserve HTA's UPREIT status, which gives us a modern operating structure with a tax-advantaged currency for future acquisitions. We filed our preliminary proxy on Monday, which we expect to become effective in early June, assuming no material comments from the SEC. The shareholder vote is likely to occur in early to mid-July followed shortly thereafter by the closing of the transaction. Before I turn it over to Rob, I want to underscore my confidence in this strategic combination. We're making great progress studying both companies' processes, technology, and teams, and we're well positioned to implement our integration plan following the closing. I'm excited about our ability to deliver to shareholders this rare combination of sector-leading scale, increased stability, and accelerated growth. I'll now turn it over to Rob, who will provide an update on our investment activity and some more color on our growth strategy.

Thank you, Todd. Our year-to-date acquisition activity has been robust. We invested $341 million at a blended cap rate of 5.1% across 17 MOBs and eight transactions. The majority of these are located in target markets and aligned with leading health systems, such as Kaiser and Sutter in San Francisco, Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles, and CommonSpirit in Houston. Two-thirds of these are in clusters consistent with our acquisitions in 2021. A proportion of this activity, totaling $101 million, was purchased through our joint venture with Teachers. Over 50% of this investment was off-campus, in line with our strategy to utilize the joint venture to balance risk while retaining operational synergies and cluster benefits. Our success this year reflects our ability to build the highest quality portfolio through selective acquisitions by leveraging our direct sourcing channels. Dispositions were also an accretive source of funds for our investment activities. Year-to-date, they have contributed $110 million at a blended cap rate of 4.2%. We realized a positive rotation of 90 basis points between the average sale cap rate and our average acquisition cap rate of 5.1%. Our acquisition pipeline continues to expand and shape our bright outlook for the remainder of this year. With almost half of the top end of our guidance completed by the end of April, we are on pace to achieve acquisition volumes similar to 2021. Development and redevelopment activity is accelerating. We're investing $44 million in a 106,000 square foot development in Nashville. The project is supported by a recent expansion of the hospital, with 50% of the building already leased for a hospital-sponsored comprehensive women's services program. We are seeing strong leasing interest from independent physician groups and expect to complete this project in the second half of 2023. In addition, we have four redevelopments totaling $53 million underway. We view redevelopment as an attractive way to generate incremental returns of 8% to 11% in our existing markets. Our prospective development pipeline continues to grow as hospitals and healthcare providers expand their care footprints. We are in advanced planning stages on a handful of large-scale developments totaling over $300 million. Most of these are within existing clusters in Atlanta, Dallas, Denver, and Los Angeles, and all of them are on or adjacent to leading hospitals. Expected returns continue to be 100 to 200 basis points above comparable acquisition cap rates. A few of these developments, totaling over $100 million, are likely to start in 2022. Now, I'd like to touch on a few points that I'm excited about, as we work on our strategic combination with HTA. Together, our portfolios and resources provide a broader foundation to accelerate growth in the coming years. Combining the companies establishes a long runway to increase the size and number of new hospital-centric clusters that drive value for our shareholders. First, I'll outline the opportunity to form more clusters. Specifically, HR has 38 properties, where we only have one building on or adjacent to campus. HTA has 72 of these non-clustered properties. Together, our opportunity set to apply our direct sourcing model and leverage deep relationships to form these new clusters nearly triples. This represents over $7 billion in new investment, or about five years' worth of acquisition work. Additionally, we see an enormous opportunity to expand existing clusters around hospitals where we already own multiple properties. The combined portfolio will average just over three buildings per hospital-centric cluster. As we've been doing with our own portfolio, we can increase this average. Increasing the portfolio average by just one building across more than 210 hospital-centric clusters represents another $6 billion of investment opportunity. This math outlined in our transaction update on page seven. Hospital-centric clusters will serve as the bedrock of growth in the coming years. By increasing both the size and number of clusters, we can offer more solutions to health systems and providers in support of their outpatient strategies, to increase market share and expand their care footprint, improve the patient experience, and recruit and retain physicians. A good example of this is Seattle. In 2012 we had one cluster with two buildings. Today we have seven clusters, with an average of almost four buildings per cluster. As we address the space needs of our growing health system partners, our shareholders will not only benefit from investing in more buildings but also from occupancy gains and rent growth across the portfolio. Specifically, for every 50 basis points in occupancy gain, we realize an increase of 100 basis points in our FAD per share growth. For every 10 basis points increase in our average escalator, we realize an increase of 20 basis points in our FAD per share growth. Through our combination with HTA, we are better positioned to create scale around more hospital campuses. The benefits of scale will accrue to our shareholders through increased acquisition and development sourcing, as well as long-term occupancy gains and rent growth, which combined can accelerate our bottom line growth by 100 to 200 basis points. Now I'll turn it over to Kris.

Thanks, Rob. We've had a productive start to the year, defined by strong portfolio performance and consistent earnings growth. Normalized FFO per share grew 3.6% year-over-year to $0.43. Sequential quarterly FFO growth was primarily driven by a $2.4 million contribution from net investment activity. This was partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in G&A. The change in G&A was the result of approximately $900,000 of typical first quarter-only expenses such as 401(k) match and HSA contributions. Another $800,000 is from stock-based compensation due to our new forward-looking equity incentive plan we discussed last quarter. Lastly, a $400,000 increase in cash incentive compensation resulted from improved leasing and same-store performance. For this quarter, same-store NOI increased 2.9%, consistent with our long-term historical norm. I'm also pleased to report that our occupancy continues to build. Sequentially, same-store average occupancy increased 40 basis points to 89.2%, which is an acceleration from the 20 basis points of sequential absorption we generated last quarter. Year-over-year occupancy increased 20 basis points and the expense reimbursement grew 7.9%, which drove 4.3% same-store revenue growth over the first quarter of 2021. Revenue drivers were once again strong. Contractual escalators were 2.94% for the same-store portfolio and cash leasing spreads were 3.4% for the quarter. As Rob mentioned, health systems and physician groups continued to demonstrate the need for additional outpatient space to support increased patient demand. This was evidenced in our portfolio by a record number of property tours in the first quarter. Given this backdrop, we are optimistic about our ability to continue to accelerate our revenue growth drivers as well as translate occupancy gains into stronger same-store growth. Regarding our balance sheet and liquidity, as Todd mentioned, we are looking at expanded asset sales and JVs to accretively fund investment activity. We are also in the process of recasting the bank credit facilities for the combined company to increase liquidity and extend maturities. We have commitments for a new and expanded $1.5 billion revolving credit facility and $1.5 billion of term loans. This includes $650 million of new term loans, which will be used to repay outstanding on our existing revolver and pay transaction costs. When the HTA transaction closes, we expect to have full capacity under the expanded revolver. Separately, we structured a new $1.25 billion asset sale term loan that can be used to backstop the timing of the asset sales and joint ventures that will fund the HTA special dividend. This asset sale term loan will replace the existing JPMorgan bridge facility and be much more cost-effective for any funding. We already received commitments for the new bank facilities and expect to have the documentation fully executed by mid-May. This morning, we posted new transaction update slides, including additional financial information on the HTA strategic combination. Slide 4 of the deck includes the sources and uses table, while slide 3 is an accretion bridge walking through the approximately 2% accretion to 2023 FAD. This analysis takes into account the original $1.1 billion joint venture and asset sales, together with the cash G&A savings. What is not shown in this analysis are the benefits from the additional growth drivers, including those outlined on slide 6 that can accelerate our annual per share growth by 100 to 200 basis points. Before we go on to Q&A, I want to leave you with a couple of key takeaways regarding our pending strategic combination. On the capital front, we've made substantial progress on our new credit facilities, as well as structuring for our JV and asset sales. Operationally, we are poised for accelerated growth through expanded investment volume, positive occupancy gain, and higher rent growth. Operator, we're now ready to open the line for questions.

The first question comes from the line of Rich Anderson with SMBC. You may proceed.

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Regarding the asset sales and the joint venture, I see you've mentioned some of the markets you’re targeting. Could you provide a bit more detail on the transactions? Does your existing relationship with Teachers play a role in this, or should we assume that all the assets are sourced from the HTA portfolio? Also, is there a common theme among the types of assets being targeted for sale that you can share with us today?

Sure. Good morning, Rich. Thanks for the question. Yes, in the transaction update, we provide some characteristics for the asset sales as well as joint venture assets. To answer your question about Teachers, we have not disclosed that yet. We're currently at the Letter of Intent phase, and we will share more information as we finalize agreements. Regarding the assets, as noted in the update, the asset sales generally include a higher percentage of off-campus properties, a higher percentage of single-tenant leases, tend to have longer lease terms, and slightly lower contractual rent escalators. They are great assets, but they do not necessarily fit into the strategy that Rob described for expanding and growing in our markets and clusters. The intention behind the asset sales is to focus on areas where we can effectively utilize our strengths and strategy. The joint venture will follow a similar approach to our collaboration with Teachers, while also including off-campus assets that can benefit the hospital-centric clusters mentioned by Rob, particularly in markets where we are aiming to build scale. Thus, we are leaning more towards off-campus assets that add value, while still aligning closely with our market and cluster strategy.

And primarily HTA owned assets, is that correct?

Yes, that was your other question. Yes, they're all currently HTA assets. That's correct.

Okay. Now for the $18 billion question. If you were to calculate a way to achieve Party F's Welltower's offer of 31.75, how would you suggest reaching that target for shareholders as a combined company with HTA instead of accepting the cash offer? Is there a mathematical framework that you can provide that shows how we can reach that goal within a reasonable timeframe, or are you relying on increased FAD growth that would be valued higher in the market, making 31.75 an achievable target in the near future? Thank you.

Sure. Thank you, Rich. Yes, obviously, we can't speculate exactly how the market will play out relative to our performance. But certainly, we have confidence that as we put the companies together, the portfolios together, and the teams together, we can drive that accelerated growth. We think through that combination you will see a path to drive value for shareholders that's far in excess of what you referred to as Party F's unsolicited proposal. So our view is clearly that we can exceed that. We view some of the indications that we've shown through these asset sales and joint venture transactions as clear marks as to where value lies and value we can create for shareholders. So that's really our focus obviously that we can accelerate growth and deliver that value to shareholders over a very reasonable time frame.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Rich.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Juan Sanabria with BMO Capital Markets. You may proceed.

Hi, good morning. I saw you kind of gave the updated accretion and have that nice looking graphic. But that 2% FAD accretion, does that change at all with the upsized joint venture/asset sales now of $1.7 billion gross, $1.6 billion net, given the original was $1.1 billion? Just curious on what the revised math is, or how you guys are thinking about that?

Yes, this is Kris. Good question. No what we showed here is just the base accretion that we had announced when we announced the transaction. It's the 2% that we had talked about. We do view the additional JV and asset sales over and above the $1.1 billion as being an accretive way to grow our portfolio moving forward and fund our acquisitions and development. If you assume that we're able to reinvest at the same kind of midpoint of our guidance range that we've given right now, call it kind of in the low 5s, 5.2, that additional $500 million adds about 30 basis points to your accretion.

And then just a quick follow-up to Rich's line of questioning. Were the assets that are being sold, or joint venture, any of those developments that maybe have lower occupancy that maybe skew the cap rates down? Or I guess part B of that same question would be: Are you seeing any sign cap rates expanding?

Sure. So on your question one, the average occupancy in those portfolios is actually pretty strong. I think it's over 90%. So, no developments with low occupancy included. So I think that answers that. Sorry, your second question?

Are there any indications of cap rate expansion due to the changes in interest rates based on your current discussions? I'm uncertain about the timing of the $1.7 billion discussions. What is your outlook on cap rates moving forward?

Sure. These conversations, as you can imagine, are very current and may have started back in February but have obviously continued. We continue to see strength in those conversations and a lot of depth to continue that. As we mentioned, we're looking at initiating Phase 2 of these asset sales or joint ventures more of those to really play into what we're seeing. Obviously, we can't speak to everybody's view on cap rates. At all times in markets you have different views. You're going to find people that may have a different view. But we're finding plenty of depth. Lots of parties, in addition to the ones we've already announced these with, are very interested at these cap rates. So we're very optimistic and bullish that there's depth here in those cap rates.

Thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Steven Valiquette with Barclays. You may proceed.

Great. Thanks. Good afternoon, everybody. So one of the common themes across a lot of the healthcare REIT earnings calls this quarter related to the medical office segment. It's just that macro inflationary trends are just allowing for greater rent escalators and new leases and also in the renewals. Just wondering if you're able to also speak to that investment dynamic, what you're seeing within your portfolio and your re-leasing etc., just in relation to the ability to push those higher? Thanks.

Sure. Good question. I would say marginally yes we are seeing some signs of uplift in terms of being able to push rents a bit as inflation increases. Obviously, it's not the hotel business or some other shorter duration business where you can see it all move super quickly. We're talking about leases that are five years or so on average. So it's a little different, but we are seeing some signs. I think Kris referred to a record level of interest in tours. So we're seeing a lot of demand. The real common thread is obviously replacement cost. We're seeing clear signs as we price out developments, TI projects of inflation in terms of build-out costs, replacement costs. Ultimately, the driver that will lift rents. We've seen that cycle play out over time. Construction inflation has always run a bit ahead of sort of the broader inflation metrics, and it generally causes that lift in rents. We are seeing some signs of it. I would say it's medical office, so it's not going to immediately pop the way it may in some other sectors. But we think long-term we can drive growth that's in line or ahead of long-term inflation rates.

Okay. Clear. That's it for me. Thanks.

Thanks, Steve.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of an analyst.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe a two-part question for me, thanks a lot for the color. I guess explaining NAREIT and HR and HTA is a combined entity. So, I guess, presumably, in the Board deliberations, you guys obviously weighed the NAREIT or lack thereof of Party F. So, to the extent possible could you talk about the deficiencies I guess the Board saw in that offer? What drove that side of the decision? And maybe what it might take to improve that offer, if at all? The second part is, I've assumed that in this process you kind of canvassed your shareholder base vis-à-vis the two-thirds vote hurdle. I was wondering if maybe you could talk about that a little bit and how you feel about shareholder approval of the HTA deal. Those are the two for me. Thanks.

Sure. Thanks for the question. I guess, first, we obviously put out the results of our Board's deliberations and they unanimously rejected the Party F proposal. So that's really all we can say there. Obviously, we're not going to get into the details and speculate where that could go, or what Party F may, or may not do, or where prices might be. So we're just going to steer clear of that. The Board will always review, seriously and thoroughly with advisors and management, as well as input from any unsolicited proposals at any time. That's a given. So that's where we stand. That's what we've done to date. In terms of canvassing shareholders, we've absolutely engaged with a lot of shareholders and have had lots of positive conversations.

Got it. Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

Thanks.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Austin Wurschmidt with KeyBanc. You may proceed.

I was wondering what the conversations have been like with the tenants regarding the strategic combination? How do they feel about the larger size and concentration within the portfolio? Also, if there are any purchase options available, do you think there's a greater risk that they might exercise those in the future?

It's too early to provide a definitive answer. There's certainly some curiosity and questions that may arise from our property managers and various managers within the company. However, there's also a lot of excitement about collaborating with both companies. So far, we haven't observed anything that raises alarms or concerns regarding any purchase rights. In the proxy, you'll notice we've identified nearly $1 billion of potential in the portfolios. Our perspective is that the likelihood of execution is lower, which is always a consideration. In this market, we expect that likelihood to decrease even further. While we anticipate some activity, we don't believe it poses a significant risk.

I appreciate the thoughts. One follow-up question is how you arrived at the $500 million in additional dispositions. How quickly do you think you can redeploy that capital, or how quickly can you ramp up development, as it seems like that is the intended use of the proceeds?

Sure. Obviously, we've been combing through the portfolios for quite some time in our due diligence going back to last year, as well as current. We continue to refine that analysis. It's really studying, as Rob articulated, the cluster approach and really where we can apply our resources in markets and in those clusters to really affect our strategy and this accelerated growth. It's really identifying properties that are great assets but just don't really fit with that strategy. So, that's how that's come about. I would say it's not a hard and fast number $500 million. But our view is there's certainly that kind of room there. We're seeing a lot of that come out of conversations we've had with some of these parties in what I call Phase 1, so continuations of those which are very encouraging. We think we can use that over time, there's no urgency there. We think throughout the back half of the year, after closing, we can match fund with other acquisitions. We mentioned too that we've authorized the share repurchase program, which gives us another accretive choice to put those proceeds to work.

I appreciate the time. Thank you.

Thanks, Austin.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Omotayo Okusanya with Credit Suisse. You may proceed.

Hi, good afternoon. I want to talk a little bit about the strategic combination and this viewpoint you guys have put out that you will be able to accelerate your FAD per share growth to about 5% to 7% once the acquisition is done. I guess the question for me is can HR on its own get to that level of FAD per share growth given some of these factors or drivers you're talking about multi-tenant occupancy increases, rent growth, redevelopment? Those are all things you guys are planning to accelerate anyway as a stand-alone entity. So, why do you need the deal to get to that number? It sounds like you may be able to get to that level of acceleration by yourselves.

Sure, Tayo. I understand your question. We've talked a lot about our own successes in this area. The key is that we have the opportunity to significantly expand where we already have a presence, particularly through hospital relationships and market presence. There are many initial opportunities to start building those clusters. Additionally, we plan to expand the clusters we currently have. We believe that combining with HTA greatly enhances our opportunity and allows us to progress much faster than we could on our own. This is what we aim for, and we think this partnership will speed up that process.

Okay, that's very helpful. And then one more if you could indulge me. So, the revenue synergies are not baked into any of your numbers. I think on the slide, you guys kind of talk about them theoretically and what they could be, and they make sense. But any sense in general from a quantification perspective, what that could do to potential FAD per share growth or what that could do to potential accretion from the deal kind of on a very high level if you get some of that for the next 15 months?

Yes, I mean I think what we're articulating, I think you're referring to is that page six where we layer in these four pieces that occupancy gains, rent growth, redevelopment expansion, as well as direct acquisition sourcing accelerating all of those things. We've kind of laid out how each of those increments can really drive that growth from that 4.5% level we've been at in the last three years up to this 5% to 7%. We absolutely think these are the achievable types of incremental upside that we can achieve through the combination. We've also shown how we've done that in Seattle, expanding both the size and number of clusters showing how that really is the model for growth and how it results in very solid performance within those portfolios. That's really how we look at doing that across more and more markets and through more and more clusters.

Got you. Thank you.

Thanks, Tayo.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of John Pawlowski with Green Street. You may proceed.

Thanks. Just one follow-up question on the asset sale. If you drill down on the weighted average 4.8% cap rate, is there a meaningful difference between the outright asset sales and the joint venture pool?

Pretty similar. Pretty tight range there, John.

Okay. Todd, could you talk a little bit about just spend a few minutes talking about the future Board of the combined HR and HTA to us? 13 directors. The size of the Board seems excessive. The three new HTA members joining. It's not clear that they're doing their job all that effectively at HTA. How are HR shareholders going to benefit from this new massive Board?

Certainly. When merging two companies, it's common for the Board to grow. From our perspective, bringing in board members from HTA is beneficial due to their understanding of the portfolio and the team at HTA. We have already observed the advantages of this during our integration efforts. We also have a new candidate joining the Board who we believe will provide significant value. While we plan to eventually reduce the size of the Board, we recognize the importance of having some overlap with HTA members during this transition. We think this is valuable and have also ensured that members are placed in the right committees based on their skill sets. We see considerable advantages from this combined Board as we move forward.

Okay. I understand the Board will come down over time. But correct me if I'm wrong, the HTA board members have negotiated a nomination through 2025. So, is this shrinking going to come from legacy HR Directors? And so two years from now we're looking at a legacy HTA-heavy Board?

I don't want to comment specifically on individual Board members or who that would be. I think our view is there's a transition period here, and it would naturally through attrition whether it's through age or anybody's circumstances changing. We're not trying to signal the HR portion of the Board or looking at factions like that. We think it will be very natural and balanced going forward.

All right. Thank you for that.

Thanks, John.

The next question is a follow-up from the line of Juan Sanabria with BMO Capital Markets. You may proceed.

Hi. Thanks for letting me get back in the queue. Just a couple of quick follow-ups. On the buyback if authorized, would you guys feel comfortable if the situation presented itself to lever up to fund a buyback, particularly given the backdrop of the post-HTA merger in fact leveraging that transaction for you guys?

Certainly we wouldn't rule out anything, Juan. Obviously, we have some reciprocal operating covenants with us in HTA. So we would balance that with all the other things that are going on. A lot of really what we're designing here with this authorization is to think about how we use these excess proceeds from what we're calling the current Phase 1 joint ventures and asset sales but then really in Phase 2 that we're introducing. So it's really geared towards that. But certainly we're not going to rule out anything whether it requires some debt to do it. But really it's geared towards those excess proceeds.

I would add that the authorization we announced today, if applied to the combined company, would not significantly change our leverage level. If it occurs, it would be very measured and marginal.

Okay. And then, just a last one for me. With the news of the merger from an HTA perspective, have you seen any turnover that was not ultimately planned for with the synergies that causes any hesitance here, or what kind of retention payments do you have in place to keep those people that you want to? Any update on turnover as a result of the news?

Sure. Obviously, there may have been some small amount. I wouldn't say that we have a concerning level or anything. I think it's natural ordinary course. Plus some folks that maybe have made other decisions, but nothing of concern. Our view is both Boards, both management teams are very cognizant of what it may take to make sure that we retain the right people and keep everybody motivated and incentivized to really focus on the transaction closing but also the integration beyond that. So we're obviously not going to comment on specifics but certainly both very focused on that and aware of that. You can imagine we're spending a lot of time with the two management teams and various senior leaders across the companies to make sure those bases are covered. So, good question. It's certainly something we're very aware of and on top of.

That's it for me. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Rich Anderson with SMBC. You may proceed.

Just one follow-up for me. On the joint ventures/asset sale program, how much of that was an original thought? How much of that maybe was modified since the merger announcement since the approach from Party F and through conversations with investors that you altered it or grew it to a point that made some of your constituents a little bit more comfortable with the overall deal, or was this the plan all along from the very beginning? Thanks.

Sure. Good question, Rich. I think if you read the background of the merger, you'll see that at least the concept of JV and asset sales was always there going back further. Our Board deliberations were certainly there. We obviously knew we could do more than 1.1, but we wanted to be careful about over-promising under-delivering there. Clearly we put that in at a measured level that we thought was appropriate. Obviously, it was combined with negotiations that we were going through. I think our view was it was always something that we could expand. The success of what we've done so far has led us to expand that. Certainly if that gets more shareholders comfortable we like that outcome, but it also makes sense to us. It's an accretive move and a way to refine the portfolios to be more effective going forward. I wouldn't say any current events from Party F or otherwise have changed our view but certainly I think it helps.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you. Operator, Jacquita, I think we’re done with questions. We appreciate everybody's time today. We will see a lot of you and talk to a lot of you in the coming weeks certainly at NAREIT in a month or so. Thank you very much.

That concludes the Healthcare Realty first quarter 2022 earnings call. Thank you for your participation. You all may now disconnect your lines.