Good afternoon, and welcome to the MannKind Corporation First Quarter 2026 Financial Results Earnings Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded on 05/06/2026 and will be available for replay on the MannKind Corporation website shortly after this call for approximately 90 days. This call will contain forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from these expectations. For further information on the company's risk factors, please see the Form 10-Q for the period ended 03/31/2026, the earnings release, and the slides prepared for this presentation. Joining us today from MannKind Corporation are Chief Executive Officer, Michael E. Castagna, and Chief Financial Officer, Christopher B. Prentiss. I would now like to turn the conference over to Michael E. Castagna. Please go ahead, sir.

Thanks, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us for our Q1 2026 earnings call. Here is today's agenda, and I will start with some opening remarks. In the first quarter, we continued to execute our strategy to evolve MannKind Corporation into a diversified company positioned to deliver sustained long-term growth. The company is fundamentally different than it was even a few years ago, and we are excited about the near-term milestones that will further advance the company's evolution. Today, we will discuss the recent positive developments with United Therapeutics and articulate our growth plans that we expect will drive significant shareholder value over the coming years. Let's begin with our announcement earlier today that MNKD-1501 has been unveiled as ralinepag DPI, which United Therapeutics optioned back in August. Our formulation team has been moving ralinepag DPI forward expeditiously, and we recently received a $5 million payment to prioritize the continued rapid advancement of this program. We have the potential to receive up to $35 million in development milestones plus a 10% royalty on net sales. Of those milestones, we expect about $15 million to be earned over the next 12 months. This expanded collaboration is significant for a few reasons. First, it deepens an already productive partnership with United Therapeutics. Second, ralinepag DPI has the potential to be used across pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and progressive pulmonary fibrosis, collectively impacting more than 250 thousand patients and representing a substantial opportunity to improve outcomes across these conditions. Third, it continues to validate our unique Technosphere platform. In addition to ralinepag DPI, we have also confirmed MannKind Corporation as the sole manufacturer of Tyvaso DPI under a supply agreement that includes contractual minimums. This provides us with a solid foundation as we continue to scale our Danbury, Connecticut facility for our own pipeline, including a manufacturing buildout to support the growth of FURO6 ReadyFlow. Now let's move on to Q1 performance. We delivered quarterly revenues of $90 million, a 15% increase over the prior year, as this now includes the addition of FURO6. Q1 was a challenging quarter for several reasons. Number one is structural. Each year, Q1 typically declines relative to Q4 due to annual deductible resets. As patients face higher out-of-pocket costs at the start of the year, we see both fewer fills and lower doses per prescription. For FURO6, doses per prescription were down roughly 20% in Q1 compared to Q4. Number two is transitional. As we prepared for our upcoming launches of Afrezza Pediatrics and the FURO6 ReadyFlow auto-injector, we reorganized field teams, leading to customer disruptions in Q1 as we did not want to disrupt the field in Q4 or the upcoming next two quarters given the potential launches. Additionally, we reallocated marketing resources away from Afrezza adult, which slowed the growth year over year as we thought it would be more prudent to shift these investments toward the pediatric Afrezza launch and FURO6 nephrology opportunity. We have made the adjustments, and the field teams in place today are talented, highly experienced in their therapeutic areas, and have the right resources to deliver quarterly growth over the balance of the year. Number three, as we prepare for the launch in Q3 of the auto-injector, we want to ensure an efficient conversion. We transitioned our inventory levels to minimize volatility and inventory stocking of the current on-body infuser at the specialty pharmacies. As this adjustment is now behind us, we expect future product outflows to better reflect underlying prescriber demand, which will help us accelerate the transition upon FDA approval. When you put these three things together, Q1 came in lighter on the revenue side, but even so, the underlying indicators were more encouraging than the top line may suggest. We saw growth in both overall writers and repeat writers of FURO6, hitting a record number of prescribers in Q1, and demand momentum improved as the quarter progressed. Doses dispensed are up nearly 60% through April compared to the same period last year. Chris will walk through the quarter in more detail. We are confident the underlying business is moving in the right direction, and we remain on track to meet our full-year 2026 FURO6 revenue target of $110 million to $120 million. Now let's walk through the Q1 highlights. The FDA approved the updated Afrezza label, which now provides clear starting dose guidance. That is an important enabler for the pediatric launch as this was the dosing used for the pivotal trial. We have also completed our launch buildout for Afrezza Pediatrics ahead of the May 29 PDUFA date. We completed the pilot phase enrollment in our Inhale First pediatric trial evaluating Afrezza in youth with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. That is the long-term goal I have talked about for years. Additionally, we settled the convertible notes, which strengthens the balance sheet. Finally, on the SC Pharma integration, we are now approximately seven months post-close, and I am very pleased with how the integration has progressed. For most functions, integration is substantially complete, and we have identified synergies that exceeded our $20 million annual target we previously set. I want to thank both teams for the way they came together. These integrations are always challenging, and ours is going exceptionally well. Now I will take a step back to talk about strategic evolution because this tells a really important story. Until 2022, we were essentially a single-product company with Afrezza. Since then, United Therapeutics and Tyvaso DPI specifically have played a critical role in funding our transformation, including enabling the SC Pharma acquisition last year. With that acquisition, we added FURO6, which brought an incredible team with deep cardiology experience. That has expanded our portfolio and our commercial infrastructure in a meaningful way. As we look at 2026 and beyond, we are now a diversified cardiometabolic and orphan lung company with multiple FDA-approved products, two near-term regulatory catalysts, and a potentially transformative pipeline opportunity with inhaled nintedanib DPI advancing into Phase 2. The United Therapeutics partnership will remain a reliable pillar of the business, providing stability and significant growth potential. It also gives us flexibility to advance the pipeline, reduce debt, and pursue business development opportunities. But the MannKind Corporation story is increasingly about the products and development candidates we own and the brands we are building for the long term. Turning to the major catalysts for 2026 and beyond, we have two regulatory catalysts and one clinical catalyst stacked up in a narrow window over the next three to four months. First is the Afrezza pediatric indication. If approved, Afrezza will be the first and only needle-free mealtime option for children and adolescents in more than a century and would address a long-standing unmet need with a highly differentiated value proposition. Importantly, this opportunity compounds over time as adolescents initiate therapy early and continue into adulthood, supporting durable long-term growth for the brand. Second is the FURO6 ReadyFlow auto-injector. If approved, this changes the administration profile for FURO6 from several hours to just seconds, which has real implications for patient convenience, training, and widespread adoption. It supports broader use and would significantly reduce our cost of goods. Third is the MNKD-201 nintedanib DPI program. There remains an urgent need for more effective therapies in IPF. Current options are limited by tolerability. Our lung-targeted delivery approach is designed to address those barriers, and we are on track to report Phase 1b top-line data in the third quarter, a key clinical de-risking step. In parallel, we are advancing MNKD-201 into a global Phase 2 trial this quarter. Each of these catalysts will be significant on its own. Having all three in a single calendar year is a powerful testament to our progress and execution over the last ten years. Together, these milestones strengthen our foundation and position us to potentially deliver meaningful growth in the years ahead. We have two near-term regulatory events, a growing commercial business, a strong revenue base from United Therapeutics, and a pipeline approaching important data milestones. Now let us go deeper on the upcoming commercial expansion opportunities for our products, starting with Afrezza. The pediatric opportunity is a well-defined new population entry point with the ability to expand across even broader populations over time. There are roughly 360 thousand people between 8 and 22 years old living with type 1 diabetes in the U.S., with about 30 thousand newly diagnosed each year. While our launch focus is type 1 in children and adolescents, when you look at the broader picture where Afrezza is already indicated, the long-term opportunity for inhaled insulin is significant with over 38 million patients that we are indicated for today. The pediatric opportunity is one of the most important for Afrezza since its initial approval, and our extensive research highlights why. Despite decades of technology and drug innovation in diabetes, A1c control is still not meeting goals, largely because of mealtime challenges that exist in the everyday life of patients. Afrezza is the solution. After more than a decade on the market, Afrezza is poised to finally live up to its potential. Managing mealtime insulin in children and adolescents often means multiple daily injections, rigid meal timing, and significant burden on both parents and caregivers. Afrezza directly addresses those challenges by eliminating mealtime injections through a novel route of administration, providing greater flexibility around meals, and easier timing for kids. When you think about what it means for a child with type 1 diabetes to not have to take a shot at lunch or wear a pump while playing sports, or count carbs at a birthday party or even forgo the cake, that is a really big deal to the average life of a child. This is a therapy backed by more than a decade of real-world data and now a completed Phase 3 pediatric trial. The American Diabetes Association now positions inhaled insulin as an equivalent option to multiple daily injections and insulin pumps including AID in their guidelines. This guideline support puts Afrezza on equal footing with the standards of care, a significant milestone that recently happened. The evidence base has never been stronger. Families and physicians continue to highlight the significant daily burden of diabetes management and are telling us that Afrezza has the potential to fundamentally change that experience. With peak share potential in the range of 23% to 37%, and each 10% share representing approximately $150 million in net revenue, the opportunity is significant and will continue to compound over the coming years. Pediatric represents a fundamentally different dynamic. As we look at our key areas at launch, we are continuing to be very disciplined. We are directly addressing the mealtime challenge for about 35% of patients who have real friction with insulin and mealtime today, compounded by the fact that 25% to 35% intentionally miss their mealtime injections or pump boluses. We are engaging consumers through highly targeted outreach—about 93% of families are motivated to speak to their HCP to request a change in the child's diabetes management, so patient requests matter. We are targeting roughly 60-plus prioritized academic medical centers with about 20 key account managers, where the highest-volume pediatric prescribers are. In parallel, the broader Afrezza sales team extends coverage by engaging community-based healthcare providers as well as these academic centers to ensure comprehensive reach and frequency at launch. We are enhancing the customer experience through ease of access, with commercial or Medicaid patients able to get on Afrezza for $35 or less. In parallel, we have engaged in a number of payer discussions to ensure formularies are positioned to support the pediatric launch, and we are seeing receptivity to expand access for children and adolescents as we approach approval. The pediatric approval for Afrezza offers the brand a new beginning—new patients, eager physicians, and a clear unmet need. If approved, we are ready to launch. Let us turn our attention to FURO6. As we look at the addressable opportunity, there are roughly 700 thousand fluid overload events we can address outside the hospital setting. There are multiple intervention points along the patient journey. Since launch, we were historically targeting when fluid first presented at home and oral diuretics were not enough. We are moving to address the post-discharge setting; it can impact length of stay and 30-day readmissions. With the FURO6 ReadyFlow, we believe we can unlock several additional intervention points both earlier and later in the treatment paradigm, where FURO6 logistics can break this cycle of admissions and readmissions. Next, let us talk about the ReadyFlow auto-injector and why we are so excited about it. We consistently hear from HCPs that the current FURO6 on-body infuser, while effective, can be a barrier to adoption in certain patient segments. With the PDUFA date of July 26, if the ReadyFlow auto-injector is approved, it will reduce the administration time of FURO6 from five hours to just seconds. That could broaden use among prescribers who have been more selective with the current presentation. Our research also supports this: 65% of HCPs anticipate they would expand their FURO6 use with the ReadyFlow auto-injector. Patients are already familiar with the auto-injector delivery format through other therapies. It is a simple, reliable delivery system with minimal training required. It has comparable efficacy and safety to IV and the current on-body infuser. The auto-injector allows earlier intervention and enhances patient independence because there is less hesitancy to use it. Importantly, the ReadyFlow auto-injector would significantly reduce our cost of goods, which improves our margins and frees up capital to reinvest. On FURO6 ReadyFlow launch readiness, we are building from a position of strength. To support the launch, we have identified four key tactics. Number one, approximately 60% of FURO6 patients require prior authorizations today, so simplifying access and reducing friction in the onboarding process is critical to ensuring patients can start therapy without delay. Based on recent payer conversations, they are receptive to removing access hurdles given the overall cost benefits of FURO6 and reducing the number of patients going into the ER related to fluid overload. Number two, from an adoption standpoint, our market research is encouraging. Roughly 85% of existing FURO6 patients are expected to convert to the ReadyFlow auto-injector, reflecting strong confidence in the ReadyFlow profile. In addition, 65% of healthcare providers anticipate expanding their use as they have earlier and more productive intervention. Number three, we have a clear focus on accelerating time to patient start. We are exploring alternative distribution partners that will improve our ability to get FURO6 in the hands of the patient the same day. Lastly, we have deployed our key account manager team to deepen integrated delivery network relationships and get FURO6 integrated into hospital discharge protocols. That is where the post-discharge intervention opportunity lives. It is where we believe we can make the most meaningful difference in reducing hospital readmissions. We have prioritized more than 60 key accounts supported by the entire sales force, in addition to our newly established key account managers who completed training in March. This approach should drive consistent uptake and appropriate utilization, which we expect will accelerate in the second half. Taken together, these tactics position ReadyFlow for rapid adoption by accelerating patient starts, establishing earlier use in the treatment pathway, and ensuring focused, disciplined execution across the accounts that matter most. Moving on now to the nintedanib DPI, our MNKD-201 program. IPF is a devastating disease. These patients cough up to a thousand times per day, and with the poor tolerability of current treatments, their quality of life is significantly compromised. Eight out of ten patients die from this disease within five years, and many would rather forgo treatment than endure the side effects of today's standards of care. Our approach is to bypass the GI tract through targeted pulmonary delivery. The Technosphere platform is a proven platform. We have two FDA-approved products with less than a 3% discontinuation rate due to instances of cough and demonstrated safety and tolerability in patients with underlying lung disease. So when you combine a proven molecule like nintedanib with direct lung targeting and consider our Phase 1 volunteer observations showing no GI tolerability issues and our Phase 1b in actual IPF patients showing no discontinuations due to cough or serious adverse events in the first 12 patients, we have strong confidence in the potential to improve tolerability while maintaining or potentially enhancing efficacy. Onto our MNKD-201 program updates. We have completed enrollment of Cohort 1 in our Phase 1b INFLow study, which is in active IPF patients. Our top-line data are expected to be shared during Q3. That is a key de-risking point as we generate safety and tolerability data in these patients. Simultaneously, we are initiating enrollment in our global Phase 2 study now that we have received our first country approval. We are advancing both programs in parallel to accelerate data generation and development timelines. Here are the key things that differentiate MNKD-201: a two-second inhalation, a proven delivery platform with no cleaning required, and the potential to dramatically reduce side effects while meeting or beating the efficacy of oral nintedanib. Each step further de-risks a program that we believe has tremendous potential to target a disease with limited treatment options. Taken together, our inhaled nintedanib DPI program, along with United Therapeutics’ Tyvaso DPI and ralinepag DPI, gives us three differentiated shots on goal in IPF. Importantly, nintedanib DPI is not only well positioned to serve as the backbone of therapy, but also opens the door to combination use alongside other current and emerging IPF therapies, which is increasingly how we expect this market to evolve. Together, these programs reinforce the potential for inhaled delivery to improve tolerability and play a central role in redefining how IPF is treated. Before I turn it over to Chris, I want to highlight some of the key upcoming scientific conferences we will be at, including the Respiratory Innovation Summit where we have a small presentation at ATS, the American Diabetes Association where we have almost 10 presentations at the Scientific Sessions, and the American Association of Heart Failure Nurses in San Diego in late June. These are exciting times with lots of data dissemination and hopefully upcoming FDA approvals. I will now turn it over to Chris to review our first quarter 2026 financial results. Thanks, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone.

For a summary of our financials, please review our press release issued before this call and our Form 10-Q, which is now on file with the SEC. Let us start with FURO6. For Q1 2026, FURO6 net sales were $15.5 million. As a reminder, the acquisition closed on October 7, and only post-acquisition results are included in MannKind Corporation financials. Underneath the revenue number, the demand metrics for the brand remain strong. We had a record number of writers in the first quarter, and 75% of those writers are repeat writers, which is a really good signal. Doses dispensed grew 64% year over year, and our IDN business grew 97% year over year, reflecting the early traction of our key account manager team. If you look at 2025, approximately 14% of annual volumes were generated in Q1. If you apply this to our Q1 units dispensed, we remain on track to achieve our annual target and are reaffirming our 2026 FURO6 revenue range of $110 million to $120 million. Turning to Afrezza global sales, Q1 2026 net sales were $15.3 million, up 3% year over year. As we discussed earlier, we have shifted our marketing efforts toward our two anticipated launches this year and transitioned nephrology sales responsibility to the legacy Afrezza sales team. As expected with a new call point, this created some near-term disruption, which we expect to improve steadily over the remainder of 2026. Tyvaso DPI-related revenues provide a durable revenue base. Our collaboration services revenue is driven primarily by manufacturing revenue based on volumes sold through to United Therapeutics plus the recognition of deferred revenue. For the quarter, CNS revenue was $23.5 million compared to $29.4 million for the prior-year quarter. As we have noted previously, this revenue stream may fluctuate between periods depending on production scheduling at our Danbury facility across Afrezza, development programs, and Tyvaso DPI. However, it is important to note that the amendment to our Tyvaso DPI supply agreement we signed earlier this quarter established annual minimum quantities, effectively fixing our annual manufacturing revenue for Tyvaso DPI. As a result, period-to-period fluctuations are driven primarily by manufacturing planning and scheduling requirements, and to a lesser extent by the timing of revenue recognition from other collaboration activities. One such collaboration is our development of ralinepag DPI with United Therapeutics. We recently received $5 million to accelerate its development. We will begin to recognize this in Q2. An additional $35 million of development milestones remain, of which we expect to earn $15 million over the next 12 months. Q1 2026 royalties reflect year-over-year growth of 9% to $32.7 million. In 2026, royalty revenue will support key capital priorities including funding the March retirement of our senior convertible notes, our CVR obligations, and our pipeline programs. Turning to the bottom line, for Q1 2026, we reported a GAAP net loss of $16.6 million, or $0.05 per share. On a non-GAAP basis, we reported a net loss of $6.9 million, or $0.02 per share. For comparison, in Q1 2025, we reported GAAP net income of $13.2 million, or $0.04 per share, and non-GAAP net income of $21.6 million, or $0.07 per share. The year-over-year change reflects the planned increase in commercial spend associated with the potential FURO6 ReadyFlow auto-injector and Afrezza pediatrics launches, as well as the incremental cost structure associated with the SC Pharma acquisition, including amortization of acquired intangible assets, which is non-cash. For the full details on non-GAAP adjustments, please refer to our press release and 10-Q filing. On the expense side, R&D expenses increased over the prior-year period, driven by ongoing enrollment in the Phase 1b study and preparations to begin enrollment for the Phase 2 study of MNKD-201. We expect R&D spending to remain at this level as we advance the MNKD-201 program, as well as our pipeline programs such as our inhaled bumetanide program MNKD-701. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased compared to the prior-year quarter, primarily driven by the expanded commercial infrastructure supporting the anticipated pediatric Afrezza and ReadyFlow auto-injector launches, as well as the full-quarter impact of the SC Pharma commercial team and operating structure. Having two PDUFAs within months of each other is unusual for a company of our size and makes 2026 a deliberate investment year. We are investing to ensure both potential launches are properly supported across the field and in promotion, which is reflected in SG&A this quarter. Going forward, we will continue to evaluate commercial performance and adjust investment levels with discipline as we execute on these launches. Turning to our balance sheet, we ended Q1 with a solid liquidity position after settling the remaining balance of our senior convertible notes. We believe we have sufficient capital to support our planned commercial launches and continue advancing our pipeline. In addition, our credit facility provides financial flexibility if needed, and we remain focused on deploying capital in a manner that maximizes long-term value for our shareholders. Before I turn it back over to Mike, I want to mention that we will be at the Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference in New York in June. We look forward to engaging with many of you there. With that, I will turn the call back over to Mike.

Thank you, Chris. Let me close by summarizing why we believe MannKind Corporation is well positioned for the next phase of growth. Number one, as we look at the remainder of 2026, we are in the middle of a meaningful corporate transformation. Since 2022, we have evolved from a single-product company into one with multiple FDA-approved products and a more diversified growth profile. United Therapeutics revenue continues to provide a strong foundation while our revenue mix is shifting steadily toward MannKind-owned brands, with owned revenue moving from roughly 40% just prior to the SC acquisition to over 65% with the anticipated FDA approvals as we exit 2026. That represents a fundamentally different company than the one we experienced a few quarters ago. Number two is FURO6. We have a clear line of sight to achieving our $110 million to $120 million revenue range for 2026. The ReadyFlow auto-injector, pending its July 26 PDUFA date, represents a meaningful opportunity to extend and accelerate the brand's growth trajectory. The fact that 65% of healthcare providers indicate they would expand their use with the FURO6 ReadyFlow auto-injector reinforces our confidence in its potential. Number three is Afrezza. A pediatric approval would unlock a significant growth opportunity and represent the most important milestone since the approval of Afrezza in 2014. Pediatric demand indicators are strong, the value proposition is clear, and we are launch ready with disciplined, targeted investment. If approved, our team is ready to execute. Number four is our partnership with United Therapeutics. The Tyvaso DPI franchise continues to deliver durable economics with the potential for expansion into IPF, and ralinepag DPI extends the partnership into multiple indications, reinforcing both the strategic depth and long-term value of this relationship. Number five is nintedanib DPI. Completion of the Phase 1b in IPF patients—where we expect top-line data in Q3—and first patient enrollment in the global Phase 2 program this quarter represent important de-risking milestones and position this asset as the next meaningful pipeline value driver. When we put all these together—a durable revenue base from United Therapeutics, two near-term regulatory catalysts, and a pipeline with meaningful upside—our priorities are clear, our team is focused, and MannKind Corporation is poised to capitalize on some of the most fundamental and transformational moments in the history of the company. We will now open the call for questions.

Thank you. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please click on the Raise Hand button, which can be found on the black bar at the bottom of your screen. When it is your turn, you will receive a message on your screen from the host allowing you to talk. Then you will hear your name called. Please accept, unmute your audio, and ask your question. We will wait one moment to allow the queue to form. Our first question will come from Roanna Clarissa Ruiz with Leerink Partners. You may now unmute your audio and ask your question.

Great. Good afternoon, everyone. A couple from me. I will start off with ralinepag DPI and get a little bit more context. How long have you been working on it, and what additional formulation work do you think needs to be done from here to go from the oral ralinepag to an inhaled version? Any gating factors you might expect as you are working through this?

Thank you, Roanna. Before I start, I just want to apologize to everyone for the technical difficulties we had and the length of the call. We will get to Q&A, but I just want to apologize. On ralinepag DPI, we have been working on this since we announced the agreement back in August. It takes a while to onboard powders and API. All that has been moving very smoothly. We had a bunch of prototype powders; we have selected some leading ones, and they are moving forward. There is always some fine-tuning as you go through manufacturing, but overall we are moving full scale ahead on United Therapeutics’ timelines.

Okay, great. And then I wanted to ask about the nintedanib DPI program as well. Now you have a few different shots on goal in IPF, with ralinepag DPI, etc. How are you thinking about these products evolving in the landscape given their different active ingredients, and any physician feedback you have heard so far?

We believe there will be combination use going forward. We know the current orals have overlapping toxicities and the data in combination have not always looked that positive. But if you look at the TETON data 1 and 2, the combination of treprostinil and nintedanib looked very strong, and we know pirfenidone is a little bit weaker of an agent, so we see a bigger gap there. In general, I would see an evolution of a combination market. That is one of the reasons we are running a QID arm in our Phase 2, so that if you were on QID Tyvaso DPI or Tyvaso nebulizer, you could look at a QID nintedanib DPI as well. We are hoping to show in that trial whether using 4 mg twice a day or 2 mg four times a day, outcomes are comparable. If one is better, that is great and we will lead with that. That is one of the things we are exploring in Phase 2.

Great. Last one for me on FURO6. Any extra color on trends you saw in the quarter? You reiterated your guide, which is encouraging, but anything interesting you are watching for in the next couple of quarters in terms of underlying demand?

First, we know two competitors launched last October. We are keeping an eye on that, but not much activity—maybe 40 to 50 scripts since launch, so nothing of significance. We did hear anecdotal reports of people switching back; some had tried the nasal and may not have gotten the efficacy they wanted and went back to FURO6. That is an early indicator of patient or physician satisfaction for us, which makes us more confident as we go forward. On the FURO6 side, new prescribers looked great, nephrology picked up a lot in March as we closed out the quarter. We think the transition of the sales force caused a pretty big disruption in January and February. As they get relationships re-established, lunches on calendars, and dinner events now taking place, we think nephrology will continue to accelerate throughout the year. Overall, especially with the auto-injector, FURO6 should grow a lot faster in Q3 and Q4. Looking at volume, the percent of units that shipped in Q1 last year versus Q1 this year gets you close to our reported number. Q1 co-pay resets are a headwind; we heard the same from other companies. March and April pick back up, which gives us confidence for the rest of the year. We feel pretty good, and all the feedback and anecdotal evidence we hear for FURO6 is very positive.

Our next question comes from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, good evening, and thank you. I also wanted to ask about ralinepag DPI that was disclosed this morning. Going back to what you were saying a minute ago, how far along in the process are you, and what gives you confidence that you can actually formulate this as a DPI? I believe there is also discussion in the disclosure that once-daily is on the table. What is the confidence around that as well?

I cannot comment on the pharmacokinetics; I will defer to United Therapeutics and their modeling and all the work they have done and what they know about ralinepag. We will not know the real answer until we get into humans and see the pharmacology. Hypothetically, what they believe is probably the best we have today. In terms of my confidence, I feel pretty confident we have a lead powder that can go forward into animal and human trials now. The amount of powder we have to make for those things is not very significant, so that is ahead of schedule. United Therapeutics has done an excellent job moving this as quickly as humanly possible, and we are doing our best to keep up and stay ahead of them. Overall, there is a lot of energy to accelerate this as quickly as possible, and I think there will be good updates throughout this year and next year.

Excellent. On the two PDUFAs coming up—Afrezza pediatrics and FURO6—assuming both are approved, how soon after those approvals would you anticipate seeing the adoption curves impacted?

On pediatrics, the approval should come the week before the American Diabetes Association meeting. If that timeline holds, it would be ideal because we have nine or 10 presentations and posters, as well as an evening event at ADA. That will be a good blast-off, not just for the U.S., but also internationally. We plan a staged rollout across the first 30, 60, 90 days to get into the top 10 to 15 institutions, set up best practices, and then expand. We are updating the reimbursement hub and leveraging the FURO6 hub model for a more white-glove service. We should see a little impact in Q2, but we will be watching Q3 and the summer closely. On the Inhale First trial, the first nine or 10 patients’ anecdotal feedback is really positive; first-insulin use in newly diagnosed children could be a game-changer if that continues. On FURO6, with a July 26 PDUFA, we expect launching in August. We would see a little impact in Q3 and a fuller impact in Q4. That one should go faster given the acute-use dynamic.

Our next question will come from Cantor Fitzgerald. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, this is Sam on for Olivia. Piggybacking on FURO6 questions, it is encouraging you are still confident hitting $110 million to $120 million in sales this year. Is that including both the on-body and the auto-injector? You mentioned weighting more toward Q3 and Q4. Is that due to the potential approval of the auto-injector, and do you expect the auto-injector to cannibalize the on-body infuser quickly?

The forecast for the year basically looks at how units came out in 2025 and proportionately how demand curves look today; they are consistent with 2025. The auto-injector is a small portion of that range, not the reason we expect to hit $110 million. The on-body infuser should be able to get us in that direction, and the auto-injector will bring it there faster. Timing of launch and speed of rollout will determine the incremental. One challenge in the first half is we do not have samples this year as we prepare for the auto-injector and manage inventory. We are gearing up to sample the auto-injector to drive faster adoption.

Our next question will come from Truist Securities. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, it is Dinesh on for Greg. Congrats on the progress. One on the ralinepag DPI update: can you remind us on the relative positioning of prostacyclins and treprostinil-based drugs in PAH—patient applicability and physician choice—and how that frames your view on commercial and royalty opportunities to MannKind Corporation via United Therapeutics?

It is a little early to speculate. United Therapeutics has Tyvaso DPI and Tyvaso nebulizer. Over the next two to three years, the major focus will be continued penetration, including IPF for the DPI scenario. Tyvaso should be a growth driver. As ralinepag launches, that probably goes earlier due to convenience, but that is United Therapeutics’ positioning and expertise. On IPF, you heard in United Therapeutics’ call that ralinepag DPI will be the predominant formulation in that development program, so we expect that to become the dominant driver overall for IPF.

Our next question will come from Brandon Richard Folkes with H.C. Wainwright. Please unmute your line and ask your question.

Thanks for taking my question. On Afrezza pediatrics, do you have to do anything on the contracting side post-label expansion, or does that fall into current coverage contracts? Secondly, how will you assess success of the pediatrics ramp early on, and what objectives would drive you to invest further versus keep investment where it is or pull back?

Because it will be the same SKUs, we do not have to add another SKU to contracts, so no fundamental updates there. We have presented to large PBMs and some regionals, and we are exploring freeing up prior authorizations and simplifying access for pediatrics. There is appetite to reduce friction for kids. We are making sure Medicaid access exists and the big three PBM commercial lives have access. It will not all happen July 1, but through the year and into January next year, we expect updated clinical guidelines at most payers to support Afrezza use—even in adults—because ADA guidelines put Afrezza equal to AID systems and multiple daily injections. Step edits that put Afrezza behind those are now against standards of care, so we expect payer criteria to update in a positive way heading into 2027. In terms of pediatric success, the key metrics are breadth and depth of prescribing rather than early revenue: number of prescribers, number of institutions initiating and repeating use, and patient referrals into our hub. We will share those in the quarters ahead. We will have access programs to ensure payer friction is not a reason to avoid prescribing. We have also decided our 20 key account managers will be supported with local coverage to help with reach and frequency at launch.

Next question will come from Yun Zhong with Wedbush. Please unmute your line and ask your question.

Hi, good afternoon. Questions on the MNKD-201 program. It is encouraging to hear good safety and tolerability with no discontinuations. Given you will enroll the first patient in Phase 2 in Q2 without waiting for Phase 1b top-line in Q3, do you plan to confirm anything else besides safety and tolerability from the Phase 1 study? Also, United Therapeutics discussed a bridging study for Tyvaso DPI for IPF starting with healthy volunteers and then patients. Do you expect any impact on patient enrollment and your overall program? Lastly, including ralinepag, there will likely be three DPI products for IPF. Do you envision patients taking different inhalations with the same DPI, or is co-formulation reasonable to improve convenience?

Several questions. On MNKD-201, we did a Phase 1a last year with healthy volunteers, particularly looking at cough-related incidents, FEV1, FVC, and GI side effects like diarrhea. We can confirm cough was not a major concern and GI side effects did not occur even at the highest doses, which gave us confidence. On FEV1 and FVC, there were no significant issues beyond expected variability. In the 1b study, we are in IPF patients, taking a stepwise approach to show you can dose a dry powder inhalation safely and effectively. After the first 12 patients at 2 mg TID (about 30 mg powder to deliver 6 mg nintedanib), tolerability, cough, and discontinuations presented no concerns. That cohort is now closed. The DSMB will meet next week, and hopefully post-meeting we will open Cohort 2. We are already screening and expect to enroll that faster and have top-line in Q3. That top-line will likely show that 8 mg BID versus 2 mg QID does not show a meaningful difference in tolerability or cough, which helps wrap up questions as we expand Phase 2. On Tyvaso DPI bridging, remember United Therapeutics is focused on Tyvaso DPI for the U.S. market in IPF. Our Phase 2 is, as of today, 100% ex-U.S. We are considering adding a few U.S. sites pending additional FDA steps. We have submitted the protocol to FDA and received comments, so we know what it would take. We are focused on accelerating European and other ex-U.S. enrollment, including Canada and Australia, to minimize any potential impact from Tyvaso’s IPF acceleration in the U.S. On co-formulation, our technology, given dose sizes and the common excipient, has potential for fixed-dose combinations. I have worked on fixed-dose combos previously. First we need to confirm dosing regimens are tolerable, which is the first step for any fixed-dose combo, and then you need two parties willing to come together. Stay tuned, but we are all moving in the same direction to help patients live longer, healthier lives versus today.

Our next question will come from Mizuho Financial Group. Please go ahead with your question.

Hello, this is Anthony Charles Petrone with Mizuho. (Question could not be transcribed due to technical difficulties.)

Our next question will come from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead with your question.

Good afternoon, Michael. On discharge protocols and integrating FURO6 into the 60 key accounts, can you walk us through the process to open those accounts or have changes made to discharge protocols, and how long they may take? And a second one on Afrezza: of the 60 priority accounts, what would they represent in terms of your targeted market share of 23% to 37%? Over 50%? Can you fine tune that?

They take time. If this were fast, we would be blowing out numbers now. Think six to 15 months, not three months. Every health system is different. I have met with several at the C-suite level, cardiac surgery, and discharge quality teams. Consistently, there are patient navigators responsible for 30-day readmissions. You need to engage quality, pharmacy, get local contracts set up, and get adoption into protocols—that all takes time. Cleveland Clinic is already doing it. Kaiser is running a large experiment in Northern California that looks promising. We expect trial results later this year looking at early discharge by a day or two, which is the type of data people want. Other clinics focus on ensuring patients leave with FURO6 so they are not coming back within 30 days. It is a hodgepodge of systems. As we find commonalities, we will get those across the finish line. Cleveland Clinic shares their protocol with other customers, which is great. On your Afrezza question, I would estimate roughly 75% to 80% of the target opportunity is concentrated in those key accounts. About 20% of patients fall in the community setting and 80% in the key account setting. It is very concentrated.

Final question comes from Mizuho Financial Group. Please go ahead and ask your question.

Thanks a lot. On FURO6 and the July 26 PDUFA date, are you expecting a panel meeting on the auto-injector? As a follow-up, FURO6 is moving from a hospital or infusion clinic five-hour infusion to under 10 seconds at home. What does that transition look like? How long to get adopted in the home, and what level of patient training is needed? It seems pretty seamless and a game-changer—just trying to frame the transition.

We do not expect a panel. We have had various information requests from FDA—nothing that looks like a showstopper. We believe we are on track for that PDUFA date and are working on labeling and manufacturing so we are ready when FDA gives the green light. On the transition, because it is an acute-use drug—every cycle is new—conversion can happen very quickly. Today, probably 90% of use is preventing people from going into the ER and about 10% is post-discharge within 30 days, roughly. The auto-injector should really help with hospital discharge because it is much easier. We are targeting more local distribution and same-day delivery to the patient, which is important when someone is suffering fluid overload. That is harder with the on-body infuser given higher COGS. We expect a quick transition overall. There will be a group who still prefer the on-body infuser, and we will make it available, but we believe the preponderance of growth will come from the auto-injector.

That concludes the question and answer portion of today's call. I will now hand the call back to Michael E. Castagna for closing remarks.

Thank you for joining our call today. Apologies again for the technical difficulties. We appreciate your continued support and look forward to keeping you updated as we execute on the multiple regulatory and clinical catalysts expected in the months ahead. These are exciting times. We have never been busier here at MannKind Corporation—stay tuned for updates as we go. Thank you.

That concludes today's call. You may now disconnect.