Good morning. My name is Mandeep, and I'll be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the TD SYNNEX First Quarter Fiscal 2024 Earnings Call. Today's call is being recorded and all lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. At this time for opening remarks, I would like to pass the call over to Liz Morali, Head of Investor Relations. Liz, you may begin.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's call. With me today are Rich Hume, our CEO, and Marshall Witt, our CFO. Before we continue, let me remind you that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal Securities Laws, including predictions, estimates, projections, or other statements about future events, including statements about demand, cash flow, our debt structure, and shareholder return, as well as our expectations for future fiscal periods. Actual results may differ materially from those mentioned in these forward-looking statements as a result of risks and uncertainties discussed in today's earnings release, in the Form 8-K we filed today and in the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K and our other reports and filings with the SEC. We do not intend to update any forward-looking statements. Also during this call, we will reference certain non-GAAP financial information. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP results are included in our earnings press release and the related form 8-K available on our Investor Relations website ir.tdsynnex.com. This conference call is the property of TD SYNNEX and may not be recorded or rebroadcast without our permission. I'll now turn the call over to Rich. Rich?

Thank you, Liz. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We had a strong start to the fiscal year with an improving IT spending environment, generating record margins, EPS at the upper end of our expectations, healthy free cash flow, and continued strong capital returns to shareholders. Across the organization, we are poised to capitalize on a stabilizing demand environment for our core business while continuing to advance our strategy to expand our capabilities in strategic technology areas. Importantly, we believe that the IT spending environment will continue to improve throughout the year and we believe we will return to positive year-over-year gross billings growth next quarter, bolstered in part by the introduction and growth of infrastructure, components, and services to support escalating AI-enabled workloads and applications. We remain committed to returning excess free cash flow beyond dividends and M&A to shareholders via share repurchases, while also managing our leverage ratio. And today, we announced that our Board of Directors has approved a new additional $2 billion share repurchase authorization. For our first fiscal quarter, revenue and gross billings were largely in line with our guidance ranges with the backdrop of a recovering market and continued progress on our strategic portfolio diversification and global line card expansion efforts. From a regional perspective, trends in our markets played out as we had expected. In the Americas, we saw improving year-over-year trends in PCs and a record quarter in Latin America. Europe similarly experienced positive momentum in the PC market but faced challenging year-over-year comparisons in advanced solutions given last year's record performance. Asia-Pacific, Japan, continued to experience year-over-year growth in constant currency fueled by strength in Advanced Solutions across multiple countries, including emerging markets. Looking at our results by technology. Within Endpoint Solutions, as anticipated, we saw slight growth on a year-over-year basis in PCs. We anticipate seeing continued improvement in the PC market as 2024 progresses, aligned with what several OEMs and industry participants have described as a second-half weighted spending pattern. We believe this will be driven by several factors, including the new mid-year launches of AI-enabled PCs, more customary refresh cycles associated with aged devices and operating system upgrades. This should also drive increased demand for some of our other PC adjacent categories like peripherals and endpoint software. Strength in the PC market was offset by softness in demand for mobile devices and some components which weighed down our results overall in Endpoint Solutions. Consistent with expectations, Advanced Solutions' year-over-year comparisons were challenged given the elevated demand and backlog drawdown dynamics we saw in the first half of 2023. Regardless, we had a solid quarter in Advanced Solutions. In addition, we see the beginnings of AI offerings emerging in the portfolio. As an example, we had a very successful launch of Microsoft Copilot, where we enabled more than 2,000 partners with our launch campaign. Overall, we are well-positioned to take advantage of the fast-growing AI market. Our strategic vendor partnerships and enablement programs are helping us to create industry-leading aggregated solutions and serve as a destination for AI solutions in the channel. Momentum is clearly evident in building in this area. Last month, we announced an expanded collaboration with NVIDIA in North America where we are distributing their full line of products, including GPUs, helping users and partners to access AI-augmented applications, model training, and development, professional graphics, engineering, and digital twin applications. We were also honored to be recognized last week by the NVIDIA Partner Network as the Distribution Partner of the Year in the Americas and look forward to our continued partnership. Additionally, we showcased our next generation AI lifecycle solutions from Hyve at NVIDIA's GTC AI Conference in San Jose last week. These products are tailored to the demands of AI datacenters, hybrid cloud, and edge deployments and include the design of liquid-cooled servers and racks. Beyond these accomplishments, we continue to execute on our goals to expand in the strategic technology areas and increase the value we bring to our partners. In our strategic technology areas, we experienced solid year-over-year growth in data, AI, IoT, cloud, and security. Including Hyve, these technologies represented 23% of our total gross billings in Q1. Underpinning these strong results are a multitude of programs and offerings designed to help our partners. To highlight a couple. First, we launched TD SYNNEX Cloud Labs as a solution aimed at accelerating the go-to-market process for our vendors. This virtualized environment facilitates proof-of-concept demonstrations that are flexible, scalable, and cost-efficient. This helps our vendors to bring solutions to market faster and more effectively. Second, we continue to invest in our StreamOne platform, adding several new application programming interfaces or APIs, and launched new Professional Services Automation or PSA connectors, particularly used by managed service providers and which provide an increased ease and synchronization of products, customers, and order changes. We believe now more than ever that our organization is well positioned across both our core and strategic technology portfolios. The challenging market environment over the past year has provided us an opportunity to showcase the strength and resilience of our business model, portfolio, and capabilities. Despite the headwinds in the market, we've pivoted to areas of growth and improved our business and margin mix towards strategic technologies and have generated significant free cash flow, the majority of which we have returned to shareholders. We believe we have emerged even stronger from this period of market volatility and look forward to capitalizing on an improving IT spending environment, which we believe will allow us to deliver revenue growth, increased earnings per share, and significant free cash flow generation, driving strong returns for our shareholders. I will now pass it over to Marshall so that he can provide additional details on our financial performance and outlook.

Thanks, Rich, and good morning to everyone on today's call. As Rich mentioned, we were encouraged to see an improving market environment with revenue and gross billings in line with our guided ranges. Additionally, our broad portfolio and progress on expanding in strategic technologies allowed us to further improve our profitability with strong margins, healthy free cash flow, EPS growth at the upper end of our expectations, and robust returns to shareholders. Moving to our fiscal first quarter performance. Fiscal Q1 total gross billings were $19.3 billion, down 5% year-over-year and in line with expectations, driven by a 7% decline in Endpoint Solutions and a 3% decline in Advanced Solutions. Net revenue was $14 billion, down 7.6% year-over-year. Gross to net revenue adjustments increased year-over-year due to the ongoing shift in our business mix and migration of a portion of Hyve's business to a consignment model. This negatively impacted our net revenue by 3% on a year-over-year basis, but improved our gross margins by 23 basis points. As we previously announced, starting this quarter, we are providing some enhanced data disclosures in our investor presentation. First, we are providing gross billings, net revenue, and gross profit for the technology categories of endpoint solutions, which includes PCs, mobile devices, printers, and peripherals, and Advanced Solutions, which includes cloud, servers, networking, storage, software, and hyperscale infrastructure via our Hyve business. In addition, we are providing gross billings for our strategic technologies which are cloud, security, data, AI, IoT, and hyperscale infrastructure. Strategic technologies are primarily found in Advanced Solutions, but some categories are split into both Endpoint and Advanced Solutions. For Q1, from a technology perspective, approximately 72% of Q1 gross billings were from hardware, 21% from software, and 7% from services. As Rich mentioned, we were encouraged to see year-over-year growth in PCs as the market continues to stabilize. Non-GAAP gross profit was $1 billion and non-GAAP gross margin was 7.2%, up 52 basis points year-over-year due to a more profitable product mix and continued expansion in strategic technology areas, which also have higher gross to net adjustments. Total adjusted SG&A expense was $581 million, up $13 million year-over-year as we continue to make balanced strategic investments supporting expected growth for the rest of fiscal '24. SG&A expense was down $11 million quarter-over-quarter. Non-GAAP operating income was $425 million and non-GAAP operating margin was 3.04%, representing a year-over-year improvement of 11 basis points. Interest expense and finance charges were $76 million, $10 million worse than our outlook due to higher-than-expected borrowings. The non-GAAP effective tax rate was approximately 23% and in line with our forecast. Total non-GAAP net income was $266 million and non-GAAP diluted EPS was $2.99, at the upper end of our guidance range, driven primarily by outperformance on margins due to improved mix. Now turning to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1 billion and debt of $4 billion. Our gross leverage ratio was 2.3 times and net leverage was 1.7 times, in line with our investment-grade credit rating. We are currently assessing our debt structure ahead of our upcoming $700 million senior note maturity in August of this year and our current intention is to refinance some or all of that debt prior to its maturity. Accounts receivable totaled $8.9 billion, down from $10.3 billion in the prior quarter, and inventories totaled $7.1 billion, down slightly from the prior quarter. For the first quarter, net working capital was $3.2 billion, down from $3.3 billion in quarter four, and the cash conversion cycle was 21 days, down two days from quarter four. Cash from operations in the quarter was $385 million and free cash flow was $344 million. We returned approximately 68% of free cash flow to shareholders in the quarter through $199 million of share repurchases and $36 million in dividend payments. As Rich mentioned, with our newly announced share repurchase authorization of $2 billion, we now have $2.2 billion authorized for further share repurchases. For the current quarter, our Board of Directors has approved a dividend of $0.40 per common share, representing a 14% increase on a year-over-year basis, which will be payable on April 26, 2024, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 12, 2024. Now moving to our outlook for fiscal second quarter. We expect non-GAAP gross billings of $18.4 billion to $19.6 billion, representing a growth of 1.5% on a year-over-year basis at the midpoint. We expect total revenue to be in the range of $13.3 billion to $14.9 billion, flat on a year-over-year basis at the midpoint. Our guidance is based on a euro to dollar exchange rate of 1.09. Non-GAAP net income is expected to be in the range of $219 million to $263 million and non-GAAP diluted EPS is expected to be in the range of $2.50 to $3.00 per diluted share based on weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 86.8 million. Our non-GAAP tax rate is expected to be approximately 23%. Interest expense is expected to be approximately $75 million and includes approximately $3 million of one-time interest expense and accelerated deferred cost associated with our anticipated debt refinancing. Looking forward to the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2024, we would expect interest expense of $70 million in quarter three and $75 million in quarter four. These estimates include the impact of our anticipated debt refinancing and expected working capital requirements. From a gross billings perspective, we continue to expect mid-to-high single-digit growth in the second half of the fiscal year, driven by further improvement in the market environment. We expect to generate approximately $1.2 billion of free cash flow for the fiscal year and remain committed to our medium-term capital allocation target of returning 50% of free cash flow to shareholders via both dividends and share repurchases while remaining opportunistic on buybacks depending on market conditions. In closing, our financial profile is strong and our resilient business model has enabled us to weather the volatile market conditions over the past several quarters while continuing to generate strong free cash flow and robust returns to shareholders. We are working closely with our OEMs and vendors across both traditional and emerging technology growth areas and are seeing the benefits of our efforts to deliver enhanced solutions to our customers, positioning us well to capitalize on improving market demand over the next several quarters. We are now ready to begin the Q&A portion of the call.

The floor is now open for your questions. Your first question comes from Adam Tindle with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Okay, thanks. Good morning. I wanted to start on the comments on PC optimism for the back half of the year, and maybe the question would be how that might manifest itself in results. I think if I was to look at the past couple of years, the earnings weighting from the first half to the second half tends to be like 48% first half, 52% second half. Wondering if this year might be a little bit north of that 52% in the back half, given that commentary in PCs. And then secondly, just an update on the cost optimization, I think you had identified $50 million a couple of quarters ago. Just update on the timing and what's reflected in results now. Thanks.

Hey, Adam, it's Marshall. Thank you for the question. In regards to the historical relation of first half, second half, and your observation of being 48%, 52%, I think that's still fairly reasonable for this year. It may be a little bit heavier in the second half based on how we're forecasting acceleration and growth related to ES and AS in the second half of the year. On cost optimization, on the $50 million, that did translate and take care of itself through quarter one of '24. So we're able to capture that $50 million and it's embedded in our run rates going forward.

Got it. Okay. Maybe just a follow-up on the share repurchase authorization. You knew I would ask one on that. And congratulations on it. I think that $2 billion, if I went through my notes, is about double the last authorization. So could you just speak to the discussion on the size of the repurchase and how to think about timing of deployment, realize the long-term framework, but wonder if that allows you to be a little bit more opportunistic. Thanks.

Yeah. Thinking about our medium-term cash flow objective of reaching $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion in free cash flow, and then looking at our capital strategy in terms of returns, about 50% of our free cash flow, we anticipate returning back to shareholders in the form of repurchases and dividends. So, Adam, if you think about what that looks like per year, it's around $500 million to $525 million. So thinking about the $2 billion authorization or reauthorization gives us adequate coverage for the next two years to three years; it does allow us to be opportunistic. And in Rich's prepared remarks, he did mention that in addition to our free cash flow and our M&A and our reinvestment back into business, our dividends and our mindfulness of leverage, if we find after that that we have discretionary free cash flow to put back into repurchases, we may choose to do so.

Our next question comes from the line of George Wang with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hey, how are you? Thanks for taking my question. I'd be remiss not to ask questions about AI. So two parts. Firstly, maybe you can double-click on the kind of AI datacenter-related build-out with the hyperscaler, specifically the Hyve segment. Maybe you can talk a little bit more on how that's progressing and what's sort of outlook going forward for the next few quarters on the Hyve segment.

Sure. This is Rich. Good morning. Thanks for the question. I'm going to go a little bit more broadly. So when we think about AI as an opportunity for our business, we would anticipate that it's going to be a positive in every segment, from the AI PC to a traditional infrastructure with infused AI capabilities, obviously to the software portfolio, which we're already seeing today with deployments of Microsoft Copilot as an example. And then certainly within our Hyve organization as well. As you know, we've had traditional datacenter deployments, but we do see a mighty shift, if you will, towards AI-oriented buildout. So we would anticipate that moving forward, a good part of the mix, and Hyve will shift into that AI sort of classification. So we're confident with regards to our organizational capabilities and really see it as a great opportunity as we move through the next five-plus years.

Okay, great. Just quick follow-up on the AI PC. You kind of alluded to shipment starting from mid-year. Just maybe you can give a little bit of color just in terms of your expectation for the ASP uplift associated with the AI PC also. How would you envision kind of the AI PC shipment to grow as a percentage of total kind of shipment within your portfolio? Maybe you can kind of give some color on those. Thank you.

Yeah, sure. So as we understand in the marketplace, the PC vendors will be emerging with their AI offerings at the mid of this year into the back half of this year. Certainly we would think that that sort of element alone will be a net up as it relates to the ASPs for the PC segment. We anticipate AI-enabled offerings to be more expensive from an ASP perspective. And then in the last quarter, I had talked about AI PCs maybe being a single-digit percentage of the market of the total PC market in the back half of this year versus total PC, but then growing quite mightily as we move through '25 and '26.

Okay, great. I would go back to the queue.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Cardoso with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hey gentlemen, thanks for the question. I guess just first one for me is just another quarter of gross margin expansion. Really impressive. I think it's seven now in a row on a sequential basis, and that's despite expectations for mix to be a bit of a headwind. Can you maybe just dig into that a little bit further around the margin outperformance, particularly, like, what was the surprise this quarter? And then as we look forward, particularly with PCs expected to recover, like, how should we think about the potential pressures there on the margin side for the remainder of the year, and like, what are the potential offsets that maybe we're not thinking of? And then maybe I'll just throw in a quick follow-up. Can we just get an update around the new large customer in Hyve? I think there was a delay last quarter. Just curious in terms of how that ramp is tracking and how we should think about the ramp and magnitude through the course of fiscal '24. Thanks for the questions. Bye.

Good morning, Joe. Thank you for your questions. Let me address them one at a time. When we consider our margin profile improvement over time, I’d like to share a few insights. Firstly, our management system ensures that our sales team is aligned on achieving profitability. The incentives and systems we have in place enable us to keep the entire organization focused on what matters. Secondly, as we continue to progress, we are shifting more towards products that yield higher margins. This shift naturally improves our margin profile. Marshall mentioned in his prepared remarks that this contributed 23 basis points to our performance last quarter. This is an important aspect because of the accounting implications, and it emphasizes the need for us to concentrate on gross billings moving forward, as we expect this trend to persist. We have a strong focus on strategic technologies, and a significant portion of that segment generates higher margins. Regarding your question about future expectations, we have benefitted from a heavier mix of Advanced Solutions which is reflected in our segmented results, showing a more attractive gross profit margin. We anticipate a portfolio remix over time, and, mathematically, this means we may trade off some margin as we lean more towards Endpoint Solutions in our portfolio. The guidance we provide going forward reflects this anticipated mix. Lastly, the new customer in Hyve is ramping up and performance is aligning with our expectations.

Joe, I just add a little bit of color to where we saw some goodness in the quarter. And you'll see this in our press release where we break down the regional results. Europe had quite a bit of strength in their operating income margin and operating income profile on a non-GAAP basis. You can see both Americas and Europe on a gross billing perspective were down about 5%. But the margin profile was quite strong. So there were some suppliers and partners that performed or outperformed our expectation. And then strategic technologies in general performed well in the quarter.

Got it. Thanks, Rich and Marshall. I appreciate you guys tackling all of that.

Our next question comes from the line of Matt Sheerin with Stifel. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you and good morning everyone. Rich, I wanted to follow up on the PC commentary. I'm hoping that you can help us understand which end markets are you seeing starting to see year-over-year strength and which ones are lagging. For instance, SMB versus public sector versus enterprise, and how you see that playing out. In the second part on the demand front, on the Advanced Solutions, I know you're up against tough comps last quarter. This quarter you had a lot of backlog that you worked down. And the concern is that this digestion period we're going to be in a tougher year-over-year, comes for the next couple of quarters or so. So how do you see that playing out as well? Thank you.

I'm going to go first. Hi, this is Marshall, Matt. Thanks for the questions. I'll handle the second question about demand and let Rich talk about the PC side of things. But on demand, you're right. We called out that quarter one was going to be a tough year-over-year comparison, specifically in Europe, as there was quite a bit of backlog that did play through. Quarter two, we start to see it lighten up a little bit. I think March might be the last big month, but April, May, I think we're going to see some better compares. So I think that the backlog is at profile. I think it's been there for a few months, maybe even a couple of quarters now. So the digestion is through that. And I would say the growth rates and how they manifest themselves going forward probably in Q2 and beyond will be less impacted by backlog. With that all said, I think as we start to see growth, I wouldn't be surprised to see some working capital needs as we get in front of some of the buys that we expect that we're going to need to ensure that our vendors and our customers are taken care of in the second half of the year.

Yeah. Matt, on the PC question, remember we had a very modest growth in Q1. As we think about quarters two, three, and four, we see that growth expanding as we had said in our previous dialogue. And I kind of see it as in all boats rising right now. When I think about the different dimensions of commercial, SMB, public sector, retail, there is no one area that is sort of outpacing the other in a significant way, but rather sort of a rising tide across the portfolio. Now, obviously that might change moving forward, but that's kind of what we're seeing right now.

Okay, very helpful. Thank you.

Thanks, Matt.

Our next question comes from the line of David Vogt with UBS. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks, Rich. Thanks, Marshall, for taking my question. You spent a lot of time on PCs. Maybe can we pivot to sort of the more AI-centric product categories going forward as well, server, storage, and networking. How are you seeing the demand environment today? Obviously a lot of companies have posted relatively soft results. And how do we think about that in the context of your second-half billings commentary regarding mid-single digits to double-digit growth? And then I just have a follow-up question. On the model, should we expect sort of the same dynamic from a margin spread perspective on these products if they are AI sort of centric or AI-enabled products versus where we are today from more of a traditional legacy datacenter footprint perspective? Thanks.

Sure. It's still early in the AI space, but I want to share some thoughts on emerging trends. Firstly, regarding Microsoft Copilot, during our launch week, we had over 2,000 partners involved, and that number has since more than doubled. The software category is definitely gaining momentum, and there is significant market excitement for AI software and particularly Copilot. Secondly, we've been recognized as NVIDIA's distribution partner of the year in the Americas, which highlights our role as a full-service distributor. We are starting to see an interesting components aspect emerge as well. Thirdly, from traditional OEMs focused on servers, we are noticing larger deployments than usual globally, indicating an increased demand for servers equipped with GPUs. Additionally, in our Hyve business serving hyperscalers, there will be a natural shift towards systems configured for AI rather than traditional data centers. All these developments are building up. At the same time, we need to ensure we clearly define our approach to AI and how we report specific sales figures, which we'll address in the next quarter or two. Lastly, historically, new technologies tend to enter the market with a higher margin profile than our usual average because OEMs and vendors aim to guide us towards what they consider strategically important. They typically support this by enhancing margin profiles, acknowledging that we will need to invest in skills and services that come with some additional costs. As it stands, we're still in the early stages of AI, and I can only discuss what we have observed in the past with new technologies, which helps shape our perspective.

Great, thanks. Very helpful.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Vincent Colicchio with Barrington Research. Please go ahead.

Yeah, Rich, most of my questions have been answered. Curious about your expectation for acquisition revenue synergies for the year. Has there been a change there?

Let me discuss the acquisition, and then Marshall will cover the revenue synergies shortly. From our perspective on acquisitions, we are actively exploring a diverse range of opportunities that interest us. We prefer options that can strengthen or speed up our strategic focus areas. As we've mentioned before, our market presence in Europe and Asia-Pacific, particularly Japan, is not as strong as it is in North America, making these regions appealing to us. We remain patient in searching for the right fit, which may sometimes be described as tuck-in acquisitions. However, we do see potential to enhance our portfolio in the future. Now, Marshall, it's your turn.

Regarding revenue synergies, there are a few points to consider. Cross-selling is in progress, and the common platform in North America for CIS is mostly completed, which is beneficial. It's challenging to quantify these impacts early in the process, but we are starting to notice that the total addressable market associated with our complementary vendors and customers is beginning to show benefits and gain traction. We're observing significant expansion among these complementary vendors, although it's still too early to pinpoint specific results. As we see market expansion with these vendors grow, we will highlight it when it becomes significant. Additionally, with our global presence, we are beginning to see complementary vendors from both organizations using this footprint to expand beyond what they had as separate entities.

Thanks for that. I have one more question. How quickly do you expect the expanded relationship with NVIDIA to develop?

It's really hard to tell. Obviously, it's an area that is very robust in the market. So we would intend, as we always do, to get our fair share, if not more. We'll feel really good about what we have to offer in terms of our capabilities and our specialization within those spaces. And we're optimistic that this is going to be a great market for the foreseeable future.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Ng with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon, Rich and Marshall. Thank you for the time. Just two for me. First, thank you for the new disclosures on Endpoint and Advance. My question was around the gross margins. Are the 5% and 9% a good way to think about the gross margins for those respective categories? Are there certain things that you would call out that might cause that gross margin to deviate? And do you have any qualitative color on the year-over-year performance on gross profit? And then I have a quick follow-up.

Hey Mike, this is Marshall. We're happy to provide these disclosures. Please remember that this is on a net basis, which means there's considerable netting in the AS portfolio and some in the ES portfolio. If we look at it on a gross basis, we're around a 6% gross margin for AS and 4% for ES. We aim to present gross relationships from a billing perspective because it eliminates the netting. Reflecting on the portfolio, especially in the first quarter, we were pleasantly surprised by the strength of our margins from a gross billing viewpoint, and we've shared some reasons for that. Moving forward, as we mentioned in our prepared remarks, ES shows signs of acceleration, which we expect to continue into Q2 and beyond. This may lead to some gross margin pressures or reductions of about 15 to 20 basis points compared to gross billing. I realize we are using gross and net terms frequently, but the takeaway is that Endpoint Solutions in Q2 is likely to see a mix shift that could slightly dampen our gross margin characteristics. Additionally, when assessing our margin profiles, we also consider our return on working capital. Both AS and ES support our investments, yielding healthy returns with different attributes. AS generally involves lighter inventory since much of it is drop shipped directly to the customer, while Endpoint tends to have heavier inventory on hand. We need to ensure that our working capital dynamics accommodate this. Overall, both models make sense, but we do anticipate a slight decline in our margin profile as we head into Q2 and the latter half of the year.

Great. Thank you, Marshall. That's very clear. And then as a quick follow-up, I also really appreciate the disclosures around billings by category. Any kind of high-level thoughts around long-term mix or mid-term mix of billings by product category? And just as a point of clarification, does the netting kind of solely fit in software and services or does it come through other categories as well? Thank you.

Yeah, I'll start so, broadly stating across the portfolio circle, everything has a little bit of netting AS corks has more than ES, but even ES has some netting to it. If you think about the categories that we've called out, software continues to show, we call it, decent at or better-than growth attributes. Services certainly is growing year-on-year. I'd say the rest of those categories is where we're seeing the decline. And I'll call it the supporting of the reduction in the year-on-year decline in revenue growth.

Our next question comes from the line of Ruplu Bhattacharya with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions and thank you for the additional disclosures on billings and margins by product category. My first question is on billings. Looks like for Endpoint Solutions, billings were down 7% year-on-year. Was this as per your expectations? If PCs improved, were other items in this category down meaningfully from a billing standpoint? And, Marshall, I think you had expected first half of '24 billings to be flat year-on-year. Looks like it's going to be down 1.5% to 2% year-on-year. So the question is, has anything changed on your expectation for full-year billings, and should we still expect netted-down items to impact 25%, 26% for the full year?

Hi, Ruplu. I'll address the second question first and then let Rich discuss the billings and the AS features. You're right, that's pretty close. We were still within our range of outcomes for the first quarter, but towards the lower end. With that outcome, considering what we guided, we were roughly about 2% below the midpoint of expectations, and if you apply that to the first quarter, we're about 2% below what we initially thought. If you carry that over to the first half, it's about a 1% to 2% overall decline in revenue, but still quite close to what we expected. So I wouldn't consider it any significant shift. Now it comes down to how the recovery unfolds. It's quite possible we could end up catching up to that. However, we still feel quite confident about the expectations for growth in the second half for ES and AS.

So, Ruplu, within the category, the other segments would be mobile, components, and peripherals, they were down. And I would tell you that relative to our expectation, some of the softness versus the midpoint manifested itself in mobile and components.

Thank you for that, Rich. You mentioned seeing increasing demand related to AI. My question is whether you believe spending on AI-related products, such as AI servers, could negatively affect sales of non-AI products. What are your thoughts on this? Do you see AI as a distinct category with separate spending, or do you think the overall spending remains constant and that one will impact the other? Thank you.

So, this is personal opinion and I need to characterize it as that AI will not be just the total increment up on the IT TAM. I believe that there are trade-offs that are made when new technologies emerge, budgets don't immediately increment to handle this new category. I think that there can be some trade-off, Ruplu, between AI infrastructure and other components of infrastructure. Cannibalization is a very strong word, so I wouldn't state that, but I'd leave it at logical trade-offs. Everybody needs to run their enterprises, and they need to make sure that they have an up-to-date and solid infrastructure to support that business. And then in addition to that, taking a look at new value props associated within their enterprises for AI productivity. And that's the way I would think about it.

Okay, thanks for all the details. Appreciate it.

Our next question comes from the line of Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital. Please go ahead.

Hey, yeah, thanks guys for taking the questions. I guess, Rich, what's your view or what do you see as the potential for the AI participation to foundationally impact the company's revenue growth rate in coming years? And can you even, I guess as a part of that context, speak to the potential for ASP mix-up from Hyve, since I think in a lot of cases those servers can be meaningfully more expensive than traditional cloud servers. But also, hearing your enthusiasm around the NVIDIA relationship, the GPU TAM for NVIDIA is pretty tremendous. Also, I would have thought maybe just the gen AI-enabled PC ASP uplift did impact you guys, but it sounds like you're working a handful of angles here sort of as well. So just would love your thoughts there. Thanks.

It’s still early to make a definitive judgment, but I agree with you, Ananda, regarding the AI category and its integration with traditional IT segments. It seems reasonable to conclude that the configurations will be more complex. The costs of certain GPUs currently on the market are significant. Typically, a configuration necessary for an AI server tends to be more advanced today. I believe the AI PC and AI infrastructure categories will contribute positively to the average selling price for some time. The same holds true for software; when comparing traditional software with AI-enabled versions, the average selling price for software is higher. As the entire AI category grows, it’s fair to say that in comparison to legacy products, it will certainly drive higher average selling prices.

That's great context. I'll leave it there. Appreciate it guys.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Keith Housum with Northcoast Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning everyone, and thank you for this opportunity. I also appreciate the details regarding Endpoint Devices and Advanced Solutions. Looking at the gross billing split, which is approximately 40-60 this quarter, could you provide some historical context? How has this typically ranged in the past as we consider the business? Has it generally been more of a 50-50 distribution, or is there a trend more towards where we currently are? Additionally, what can we expect in terms of trends over the next year or two?

Yeah, I'm going to offer a thought while Marshall in the background is calculating in his mind how to respond to your question. So, if you take a look at our balanced end-to-end portfolio where we show our different segments, when we were on this call about a year ago, we were talking about PCs being low 20%, right, of our portfolio. Now it sits at 16%. So there'll be some recovery in that particular category for sure as we move through time. And this is why, well, Marshall talks about sort of a bit of a remixing of the margin and the portfolio as we move to the back half of the year. My own personal speculation is that it's not going to sit at 16%. It probably is going to increment based on the recovery within that category. And so therefore, there will be some rebalancing of the Endpoint and Advanced in total. But, Marshall, maybe you can provide a…

Yeah, Keith, I just want to make sure the question was, how does AS and ES mix going forward?

Yeah, it's clear it’s 40-60. Historically, has it been 50-50? And can it go up? Is that 70-30? Or is it usually pretty range-bound?

Yeah, so it's definitely region-dependent. If you think about Americas, they tend to be a little bit more heavily weighted towards AS. Europe, a little bit more weighted towards ES. Again, that's kind of a historical commentary. APJ tends to be kind of down the middle. Sometimes they're a little bit more heavier weighted to AS. So it does depend on the region and it does depend on the trends but currently the mix is a little bit more in favor of AS today.

But we shouldn't expect ES to get to like 60%, even at the height of PCs.

It's really difficult to determine, Keith. Much depends on this acceleration and how we believe the second half will unfold. Our perspective is that we appreciate both aspects, and we recognize that our vendors and customers require both. We provide solutions in various ways to our entire customer base. So, it all matters.

If I could ask one more follow-up question. You mentioned that the IT market demand is stable and improving. While I don't want to overanalyze the terminology, that's part of what we do. As you look at the remainder of the year and discuss improving demand, what are two or three factors that give you confidence that the market is genuinely improving?

Well, I think first is if you take a look at our sequential sort of year-on-year declines they've been narrowing as we've moved through the last couple of quarters. That would be number one. Number two is obviously we are going to start to laugh on those tough compares where there was a lot of backlog rundown that propped up, AS last year and we got the rap on the PC category. So I would just say that the cycles sort of provide an opportunity or catch up. Third would be AI, as we talked earlier, is going to offer new demand in the market that hopefully will be able to take advantage of moving forward. And so those are some of the thoughts. I would tell you that there's still some volatility relative to our expectations and categories. Obviously, when we take a look at Q1, it was a little bit softer than we thought at the midpoint and gross billings and revenue came towards the lower end of our expectations. So I feel comfortable that the market is going to continue to improve moving forward, but I'm sure there'll be some shorts and longs along the way.

Great. Thank you.

Our final question comes from a line of Ashish Sabadra with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. Just to follow up on a few questions that were asked before around the demand. I was thinking about more from a spending environment, like, how much of the mid to high single digit gross billing growth in the back half of the year is contingent upon the IT spending increasing versus some of the company-specific dynamics, some of those which you laid out earlier in response to earlier questions, but also the headwind from the consignment model coming off possibly by the third quarter of this year. So, how much of it is potentially you winning a greater wallet share of the IT spend versus the IT spend actually improving as we get through the year? Thanks.

Yeah. So, first, again, I'm going to repeat a comment that I had stated earlier. As we think about our future and having potentially a larger percentage of our portfolio of things which are netted, gross billings are what we track and think about when we think about our productivity, et cetera. So that's an important feature. Second is, our stated strategy has always been to grow a little bit greater than the market. So, we would anticipate that as we move forward that we can maintain that sort of objective and hopefully be successful executing against it. So, the net of the question is we hope to outgrow the market to some degree in the back half of the year.

And I would just add to that, Ashish, to Rich's comment about gross billings being a really important data point for us, and your comment about confinement. We expect that gross versus net, which is highly correlated to our advanced solutions and strategic portfolio, will probably continue. And so with that, it's very difficult to gauge accurately where net revenue may play out. We certainly report to it, so it's a meaningful gap number, But the gross billings is why we continue to make that a focus point for us in terms of its growth rate and its relationship to SG&A and op income, et cetera.

Thank you.

I would now like to turn the call over to management for closing remarks.

Yeah, first, thanks for everyone joining today. We really appreciate your interest in TD SYNNEX. We're proud of the quarter that we had just delivered. And I want to say thank you to our coworkers across the world who really made it a reality. They are on the ground every day executing and are focused on making sure that they provide the best service to our primary stakeholders of customers and vendors. So thanks to all of our coworkers. And I wish you all a great day. Thank you.

That concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect. Have a nice day.