Hello, and thank you for standing by. My name is Mel, and I will be your conference operator for today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Tidewater Inc. First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, please press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to West Gotcher. Go ahead.

Thank you, Mel. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Tidewater Inc.’s First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. I am joined on the call this morning by our President and CEO, Quintin V. Kneen; our Chief Financial Officer, Samuel R. Rubio; and our Chief Operating Officer, Piers Middleton. During today’s call, we will make certain statements that are forward-looking and refer to our plans and expectations. There are risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the company’s actual performance to be materially different from that stated or implied by any comments that we are making during today’s conference call. Please refer to our most recent Form 10-Ks and Form 10-Q for additional details on these factors. These documents are available on our website at tdw.com or through the SEC at sec.gov. Information presented on this call speaks only as of today, 05/05/2026. Therefore, you are advised that any time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate at the time of any replay. Also during the call, we will present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures can be found in our earnings release, located on our website at tdw.com. I will now turn the call over to Quintin.

Thank you, West. Good morning, and welcome to Tidewater Inc.’s First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. I will start the call today with the quarter’s highlights and then talk about capital allocation and what we are seeing on vessel supply and demand. West will walk through our financial outlook and what we are thinking about for 2026 guidance. Piers will cover the global market and operations, and Sam will close with the consolidated financial results. Each of us will touch on the impact from Operation Epic Fury. Starting with the first quarter, revenue and gross margin were both ahead of what we expected. Revenue was $326.2 million, driven mainly by higher utilization and stronger day rates. Gross margin was just under 49%, up slightly quarter over quarter and over three percentage points above our internal plan. Utilization benefited from strong uptime with less downtime for repairs and fewer dry-dock days than we expected. Overall, I am really pleased with the operational execution and with the returns we are seeing from the fleet investments we have made over the past few years. Before I get into more detail on the financials, I want to touch on Operation Epic Fury, what it meant for the quarter, and what we are watching going forward. As I said on last quarter’s call, we had not seen any disruption to our business at the outset, and we expected that any cost impact—especially insurance and fuel—would be immaterial. And so far that has held to be true. Our vessels in the Middle East continue to operate normally, and utilization and revenue in the first quarter—specifically March, the first full month after the operation began—came in above our forecast. We did see some higher costs, mainly in crew along with insurance and fuel. The biggest item has been the incremental hazard pay for our crews. Insurance and fuel have been a smaller piece. Sam will share more detail in his remarks. Looking ahead, we are seeing pent-up demand in the region, and we believe activity could rebound above what we expected just a quarter ago once the conflict is resolved. In the first quarter, we generated $34 million of free cash flow. The step down sequentially was related to less cash flow from working capital and relatively higher dry-dock spend. Just as a reminder, in the fourth quarter we collected a sizable past-due receivable from PEMEX, which drove the working capital change, and Q4 is typically our lightest dry-dock quarter, whereas Q1 is usually our heaviest as we get vessels ready for a busier working season as the weather improves. That drove the dry-dock change. Importantly, nothing has changed in how we are thinking about free cash flow for the year, and the first quarter is tracking with our expectations for 2026. As we discussed previously, during the first quarter we announced our agreement to acquire Wilson Sons Ultratug Offshore—22 PSVs focused exclusively on the offshore market in Brazil—for $500 million. We have already started the pre-integration work using the playbook we built through prior acquisitions. The Wilson team has been well organized and is highly capable, and we are making good progress getting ready to bring the business onto the Tidewater Inc. platform. On approvals, things are moving as expected and we still anticipate closing by the end of the second quarter. We did not repurchase any shares in the first quarter because we plan to fund the equity portion of the Wilson transaction with cash on hand, and we are still waiting for consents to transfer the existing Wilson debt. We still have $500 million authorized under the program, which represents about 12% of the shares outstanding as of yesterday’s close. Even as we work towards closing and integrating Wilson, we are still in a good position to look at additional M&A opportunities. Our balance sheet remains strong and we continue to expect net leverage to be less than one times at closing. Liquidity is solid, and after issuing our unsecured notes last summer we have good visibility into the cost of debt capital should we decide to use it for an acquisition. Our preference is still to use cash, but we will consider using stock if the right fleet is available at the right value. With the GulfMark, Swire SOF segment, and now Wilson acquisitions, we have built a meaningful presence in essentially every major offshore basin. These have largely been newer, higher-specification fleets, and they have helped reestablish Tidewater Inc. as the leading OSV provider globally. We have also successfully reentered Brazil, which we have talked about as a priority market. From here, we will stay focused on fleets and geographies where our platform gives us an edge and where bringing additional vessels onboard can create outsized value. We continue to benefit from our scale and high-specification PSVs and anchor handlers, two of the most in-demand vessel classes in the global OSV fleet. When we look out over the next couple of years, we see the market tightening in late 2026 and into 2027 and 2028. That should set up for meaningful day-rate improvements over that time. If day rates move up the way we expect over the coming years, that will flow through to higher earnings and cash flow generation. If we do not see value-accretive acquisitions, we will look for other ways to put that excess cash to work. Our share repurchase philosophy has not changed. We will be opportunistic and disciplined, and more broadly, we do not think it makes sense to build and sit on a large cash balance for an extended period. As we move through to the Wilson closing and into a period of higher free cash flow, we will stick with the same capital allocation framework that is core to how we run the business. In practice, this means we will continue to weigh the relative merits of M&A versus share repurchase. We continue to view buybacks as an attractive way to return capital to shareholders. Turning to the outlook, while the Middle East conflict is still ongoing, what we have seen so far could be a positive for the offshore vessel market over time. Energy security became a key theme since the conflict in Ukraine, and the Middle East conflict has added another layer—an increased focus on sovereign energy independence, particularly in the Eastern Hemisphere. So far, at least 500 million barrels of oil have been lost, and there is still no clear sign when recent production losses will be reversed. The longer that goes on, the bigger the need becomes to replace those inventories, and historically, crude prices have had a strong relationship with inventory levels. Continued depletion should provide longer-term price support. Put together, the inventory drawdown and the heightened awareness of geopolitical risks suggest oil prices may have a higher floor than before the Middle East conflict began, which supports additional offshore projects. Stepping back, we think the trend towards offshore development supports a structural improvement in demand for offshore activity and for offshore vessels. We see this as a long-term dynamic, and it is additive to the demand we have been seeing already. Recent comments from offshore drillers point to a meaningful increase in fixtures and a high level of drilling unit utilization. We view the expected pickup in offshore drilling as a strong positive for our business. We support a range of offshore applications, but drilling activity typically has the biggest impact on vessel demand. Offshore vessel activity has been building year to date, and as it continues to pick up, the pressure on available supply creates an opportunity for higher utilization and higher day rates. On the supply side, the global fleet has stayed essentially flat over the past few years. A handful of vessels are expected to deliver late in this year and into early 2027, but we view those additions as relatively small in the context of the overall market. As supply tightens further, we can see a path to day-rate increases of roughly $3,000 to $4,000 per day per year for the entire fleet, moving the fleet back towards earning its cost of capital. We are excited about the drilling outlook, but we also expect other drivers of vessel demand—especially production and EPCI-related support—to remain strong. Production work has stayed robust and helped offset some of the relative drilling softness early in 2026. Looking ahead, we continue to like the outlook for both, given the strength we are seeing in both subsea and EPCI backlog, as well as continued momentum in FPSO orders. Over the longer term, more drilling in less developed regions should drive additional infrastructure work, which supports sustained demand across these categories. We are pleased with how the first quarter came together. While we still have some uncertainty in the Middle East until the conflict is resolved, we are increasingly optimistic about the outlook for the business. We will stay disciplined on capital and continue to look for value-accretive ways to deploy it, and we expect the opportunity set and our ability to capitalize on it to improve over the next 18 months. With that, let me turn it back over to West.

As Quintin mentioned, we did not repurchase any shares during the first quarter due to the pending Wilson acquisition. At the end of the first quarter, we retained our $500 million share repurchase authorization. As a reminder, under our outstanding bonds, we are unlimited in our ability to return capital to shareholders provided our net debt to EBITDA is less than 1.25x, pro forma for any share repurchase. Under our revolving credit facility, we are also unlimited in our ability to repurchase shares provided the net debt to EBITDA does not exceed one times. However, to the extent that we exceed one times net leverage, we still retain the flexibility to continue returns to shareholders, provided that free cash flow generation is in excess of cumulative returns to shareholders. We still anticipate being below one times net leverage, assuming a June 30 close of the Wilson acquisition. From a capital allocation perspective, we look to execute share repurchase transactions when suitable M&A targets are not available. We retain the option of evaluating M&A and share repurchases concurrently, but our financial policies and philosophies dictate our relative appetite to pursue both concurrently. Given that the offshore vessel market has stabilized at a healthy level, along with the constructive outlook for offshore vessel activity more broadly, the M&A landscape remains favorable and we will continue to evaluate additional inorganic opportunities to add to our platform. Turning to our leading-edge day rates, I will reference the data that was posted in our investor materials yesterday. Across the fleet, our weighted-average leading-edge day rate increased modestly in the first quarter compared to 2025. This is the first time since 2025 that our weighted-average term contract measure for new contracts has increased. Our largest class of PSVs saw average day rates increase sequentially, which we find encouraging given the relatively large number of contracts for these vessels and the geographic dispersion of the contracts. During the quarter, we entered into 18 term contracts with an average duration of 13 months, with two specific long-term contracts skewing the average. Excluding these contracts, the average duration of our new contracts during the quarter was seven months. Turning to our financial outlook, we are maintaining our full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $1.43 billion to $1.48 billion and a full-year gross margin range of 49% to 51%. Our guidance assumes that we close the Wilson acquisition at the end of the second quarter. Our view of the legacy Tidewater Inc. annual revenue and gross margin guidance has not changed from our initiation of guidance in November 2025. Our second-half expectation for the Wilson business remains unchanged. We expect our second-quarter revenue to be roughly flat with the first quarter, consistent with prior expectations, but expect our gross margin to decline by about 5 percentage points sequentially due to cost increases associated with Operation Epic Fury. However, we are in a position to seek rebills for about half of the conflict-related cost increases from our customers related to direct cost increases associated with crew wages, insurance costs, and G&A support, but we have not contemplated the recoupment of these costs in our guidance. Our forecast assumes a normalization of costs associated with the conflict in the Middle East by the end of 2026. To the extent the conflict-related cost pressure continues beyond the second quarter, we are similarly privileged to seek rebills from our customers on realized direct cost increases. Second-quarter guidance does not assume any impact from the Wilson acquisition. In summary, we are pleased to be able to maintain our full-year guidance given the impact from the conflict in the Middle East, with the possibility of recouping a good portion of the cost increase that we are absorbing in our current Q2 guidance. Our expectation remains that there is the potential for uplift to our full-year guidance depending on the strength of drilling activity picking up towards the end of the year. Looking to the remainder of 2026, first-quarter 2026 revenue plus firm backlog and options for the legacy Tidewater Inc. fleet represents $1.1 billion of revenue for the full year, representing approximately 84% of the midpoint of our legacy Tidewater Inc. 2026 revenue guidance. Approximately 69% of remaining available days for 2026 are captured in firm backlog and options. Our full-year revenue guidance assumes utilization of approximately 80% for the legacy Tidewater Inc. fleet, leaving us with 11% of capacity to be chartered if the market tightens quicker than we are anticipating. Our midsized anchor handlers and largest class of PSVs retain the most opportunity for incremental work, followed by our smaller and largest class of anchor handlers and midsized PSVs. Contract cover is higher in the earlier part of the year, with more opportunity available later in the year. The bigger risk to our backlog revenue is unanticipated downtime due to unplanned maintenance and incremental time spent on dry docks. With that, I will turn the call over to Piers for an overview of the commercial landscape.

Thank you, West, and good morning, everyone. This quarter, I will talk a little about what we are seeing in each of our regions as we look out through the rest of the year and into 2026. Overall, the OSV market showed continued signs of improvement throughout the quarter, with sentiment starting to pick up in all regions where we operate, even those which could face some short-term challenges through 2025. Amid rising rig demand and offshore E&P activity, the long-term outlook for the OSV market remains strong, with the ongoing upturn in project investment expected to continue to drive additional incremental demand out to 2030, while the continued limitations in the supply of any significant growth in the global OSV fleet will further exacerbate the expected tightness in our market. Working through our various regions and starting with Europe, the North Sea OSV spot market strengthened throughout the quarter. In the PSV sector, spot rates strengthened significantly as the quarter progressed, with fixing activity remaining strong, helped by several PSVs leaving the region for warmer climates, a trend we do not see stopping in the short term. In the AHTS sector, supply constraints continued to drive rates higher, with spot rates in the largest classes of AHTS reaching record highs above $350,000 per day in Norway. In the Mediterranean, we continue to see strong activity, and with our global operating platform we were able to move two further vessels into the region to meet the increased demand that we mentioned on our last earnings call. Overall, we expect the Mediterranean region to be a strong market longer term, with several drilling campaigns and EPCI projects commencing in 2026. In Africa, even with the busier dry-dock schedule in the region, we had a good Q1 with a large increase in utilization across our West African and Angolan fleets, predominantly due to some overruns in drilling campaigns in both Namibia and Congo, as well as an uptick in EPCI work in Angola and Mozambique. Looking ahead, we do expect some slowdown in activity across the region in Q2, but are on track for a big pickup in activity from Q3 onwards, led by renewed drilling and EPCI activity in Nigeria, Namibia, Angola, Congo, and Mozambique. In the Middle East, as Quintin mentioned, we saw little disruption to our vessel activity in the region, with all our vessels remaining on hire throughout the quarter. However, we have seen a slowdown in new tendering activity as our customers assess the short-term impact of Operation Epic Fury on their plans. Looking ahead, low tendering activity is expected to persist in the near term due to the elevated risk, and while it is probably too early to predict with any accuracy long-term rate movements in the region, we do expect day rates in the shorter term to be impacted positively on the upside due to the lack of any new supply being able to enter the region. While the duration and trajectory of the conflict are still unclear, as Quintin mentioned, the ramifications of the conflict will likely have longer-term positive benefits to the OSV industry both in the Middle East and globally. In the Americas, as mentioned on our last call, we remain excited with the long-term outlook in Brazil, with the recent announcement that SBM agreed contracting terms with Petrobras for construction of two more FPSOs to be deployed offshore Brazil, with first production targeted for 2030. While there has been some short-term slowdown in OSV tendering activity in 2026, this is expected to pick back up again after elections are completed in Q4 of this year. In Mexico, PEMEX’s underlying financial pressures continue to weigh down sentiment; however, we are seeing some uptick in tendering activity from other oil companies in the country, which bodes well for 2027 and 2028. Lastly, in Asia Pacific, Taiwan, Indonesia, and Australia were the key drivers of demand in the current quarter, with several new contracts signed to support both drilling and EPCI activity that will kick off in Q2 and should go all the way through into 2027. Looking further out into 2027, we are also starting to see several of the other NOCs and IOCs in the broader region getting organized to increase drilling activities starting in 2026 all the way out to 2028, which bodes well for the region going forward. Overall, we are very pleased with how the market has continued to move in the right direction in Q1, and we fully expect that positive momentum to continue into the second half of the year. With that, I will hand it over to Sam.

Thank you, Piers, and good morning, everyone. I would now like to take you through our financial results, where my discussion will focus on the sequential quarterly comparisons of 2026 compared to 2025. In the first quarter, we reported net income of $6.1 million, or $0.02 per share. We generated $326.2 million in revenue compared to $336.8 million in the fourth quarter. We saw average day rates increase about 1% versus the fourth quarter but saw a slight decline in active utilization to 80.6% from 81.7% in Q4. The revenue decline was primarily due to a decrease in operating days, as there were two fewer days in the quarter, coupled with the lower utilization due to higher dry-dock days. Gross margin in the first quarter was $159.3 million compared to $164 million in the fourth quarter. Gross margin percentage in the first quarter was 48.8%, nicely above our Q1 expectation and slightly ahead of our Q4 margin of 48.7%. The increase in margin versus Q4 was primarily due to the decrease in operating costs. Operating costs for the first quarter were $166.9 million compared to $1.727 billion in Q4. The decrease in operating costs was due mainly to lower R&M costs and lower other operating expenses in addition to two fewer days in the quarter. While overall cost was lower, we did incur about $2.3 million of cost due to the Iran conflict, the majority of which was incurred in the Middle East. Costs directly impacted were higher insurance costs and higher crew wages in the form of hazard pay. Indirectly, we also saw fuel and travel costs increase due to the increase in the commodity price. Our EBITDA was $129.3 million in the first quarter compared to $143.1 million in the fourth quarter. For the first quarter, total G&A cost was $33.6 million, which is $5.4 million lower than Q4. The decrease was mostly due to lower professional fees due to a decrease in M&A transaction costs as well as costs associated with our Q4 internal vessel realignment. In addition, we saw a decrease in salaries and benefits due to adjustments made to our compensation expense. For 2026, exclusive of additional M&A costs, we expect Tidewater Inc. standalone G&A costs to be about $125 million. This includes an estimated $14 million of noncash stock compensation. Moreover, we expect to incur approximately $7 million in additional G&A costs in the second half of this year related to the Wilson acquisition. In the first quarter, we incurred $36.4 million in deferred dry-dock costs compared to $13.9 million in the fourth quarter. Q1 is typically a heavy dry-dock quarter, and this quarter was no exception, as we had 949 dry-dock days that affected utilization by about five percentage points. Dry-dock costs for 2026 are expected to be approximately $122 million. Additionally, we expect to incur approximately $16 million in dry-dock costs in the second half of the year related to the Wilson acquisition. In Q1, we incurred $14.9 million in capital expenditures related to vessel modifications and upgrades. For the full year 2026, we expect to incur approximately $51 million in capital expenditures. This amount includes a planned major upgrade to one of our Norwegian vessels. Absent this upgrade, our maintenance CapEx is expected to be approximately $36 million for 2026. In Q1, we spent $24.4 million related to two purchase options we have exercised for vessels we have been leasing. This amount is not reflected as CapEx spend, but is instead reflected in the financing section of our cash flow statement in Q1 as payments on finance leases. In addition, we expect to incur about $1 million in CapEx spend in the second half of the year related to the Wilson acquisition. We generated $34.4 million of free cash flow in Q1 compared to $151.2 million in Q4. The free cash flow decrease quarter over quarter was mainly attributable to higher deferred dry-dock and CapEx spend in Q1 and a large working capital benefit achieved in Q4 due to a significant increase in cash collections that did not repeat in Q1. In Q1, we sold two vessels for proceeds of $3.3 million, which is also lower than the Q4 sale proceeds of $5.3 million. Though the Q1 free cash flow amount was lower than Q4, it was higher than our internal estimate. As a reminder, following our debt refinancing, which was completed in Q3 2025, we only have small debt repayments that are related to the financing of recently constructed smaller crew transport vessels. We have no payments until 2030 on our new unsecured notes. Following the anticipated close of the Wilson acquisition, our debt maturity and repayment profile will change to accommodate the newly assumed Wilson debt. We conduct our business through five operating segments. In the first quarter, consolidated average day rates were 1% higher versus Q4, led by our Europe and Mediterranean day rates improving by 9% and our APAC segment increasing by 7%, partially offset by relatively small declines in each of our other regions. Total revenues were 3% lower compared to the fourth quarter, with decreases in the Americas, Africa, and Middle East, partially offset by increases in our APAC and Europe and Mediterranean regions. Regionally, gross margin increased by four percentage points in Africa, three percentage points in our APAC region, and one percentage point in the Middle East despite the conflict in Iran. Our Europe and Mediterranean region saw a decrease of two percentage points, and the Americas declined by four percentage points. The gross margin increase in our African region was primarily due to a five percentage point increase in utilization due to fewer idle days, offset by slightly higher repair and dry-dock days. This was offset somewhat by a decline in average day rates of 4%. Operating costs decreased by 15% due mainly to a decrease of four vessels operating in the area and two fewer operating days in the quarter. The gross margin increase in the APAC region was due to an increase in utilization due to fewer repair days and a 7% day-rate increase, partially offset by a small increase in operating costs as we had two vessels transferred into the area. The increase in Middle East gross margin was primarily due to a 5% decrease in operating costs. The decrease was primarily due to fewer operating days and lower R&M expense due to fewer DFR days, partially offset by higher costs related to the conflict. In the quarter, we did see a small drop in day rates and utilization. Utilization was down slightly quarter over quarter primarily due to higher idle days, partially offset by fewer dry-dock and repair days. Our Europe and Mediterranean region gross margin was two percentage points lower versus the prior quarter, but three percentage points higher than our expectation. Revenue was up 5.5% due to a 9% increase in day rates, partially offset by a seven percentage point decrease in utilization. We had a heavy dry-dock schedule in the quarter, and we mobilized vessels into the region, which contributed to the decrease in utilization. Dry docks represented a five percentage point decrease in utilization in Q1 compared to less than one percentage point in Q4. The increased revenue was partially offset by higher operating expenses related to higher salaries and travel and supplies and R&M due primarily to an average of four additional vessels operating in the region. Gross margin in our Americas segment decreased by four percentage points due mainly to a $12 million decrease in revenue caused by a four percentage point decline in utilization as well as a 3% decrease in average day rates. Utilization was affected by higher dry-dock and repair days. The revenue decrease was partially offset by a 10% decrease in operating cost versus Q4. The decrease was primarily due to transferring two vessels out of the region during Q1. As noted in our press release and as Quintin mentioned earlier on the call, we experienced additional operating costs in Q1 related to the impacts from Operation Epic Fury. We estimate ongoing additional crew wages in the form of hazard pay and insurance costs of about $1.6 million per month. In addition, we expect approximately $1.8 million of additional monthly costs related to fuel and travel expenses due to the higher global commodity prices. The fuel and travel expenses are estimates based on our forecasted activity and current commodity prices. These elevated costs related to the conflict will likely continue into the near future, though it is uncertain how long this geopolitical disruption may last. It is also widely expected that commodities markets will remain elevated beyond the immediate resolution of the conflict. In a scenario where the conflict extends and remains similar in nature to its current state, we estimate total operating cost increases of between $10 million and $11 million per quarter. We are currently working with our customers for reimbursement of wages and insurance costs that are provided for under our contracts, but as of now we have not included this in our guidance. When we look at our Q1 revenue, I am glad to announce that we did not experience any material reduction due to contract cancellations because of this conflict. As it relates to the Wilson acquisition, integration meetings are progressing as expected, and we expect the transaction to close by the end of the second quarter. We strongly believe that our increased presence in the Brazilian market is an important piece to our global strategy and are excited about our growth there. In summary, Q1 was another strong quarter from an operations and execution standpoint. We exceeded internal expectations for free cash flow, day rate, and utilization in what is typically a seasonally slow quarter, and industry fundamentals remain strong. Our balance sheet is in excellent condition, and we continue to be optimistic about the opportunities that lie ahead for Tidewater Inc. With that, I will turn it back over to Quintin.

Sam, thank you. We will now open the call for questions.

If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star then 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. Your first question comes from the line of Ben Summers of BTIG. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. You called out the anchor handler market being particularly tight in Q1, especially in the North Sea. Is this more of a regional development, or is this something you are seeing across the global fleet?

Yes. Hi, Ben. Thanks for the question. It is basically something that is happening in the North Sea where there tends to be a bit more of a spot market, but we are certainly seeing on the larger anchor-handling sizes that there has been some consolidation in that market, and that has driven some of that tightness. That has allowed some of our competitors to push day rates, which helps us as well. So long as we are all moving in the right direction, that is a positive thing. Generally, what we see is that the spot market in the North Sea tends to drive a lot of the noise elsewhere as well, so we expect that to have a trickle-down effect through the rest of the globe over the next few quarters. It is a positive sign on the largest classes of anchor handlers. If you see that in Norway, it tends to push through to other regions as well, and that is driven by increased towing of rigs but also on the subsea construction side—the big anchors needed for trenching and subsea support work as well. It plays into what we have been saying about the increase in EPCI work and also exploration starting to pick up again.

Awesome, thank you. Super helpful. On the broader picture, you talked about the long-term increased focus on energy security. Are there any specific basins you would call out as being specifically emphasized? Anything across the global fleet that could be specifically impacted by this longer-term trend?

Principally the smaller markets in Asia, I believe. I think you are going to see real strength growing over the next few years in Indonesia and Malaysia. Piers may have some other anecdotal information as well. I mean, I think it is across all, but it is primarily going to be in Asia.

We see a huge amount of demand coming out of that region, and we are already seeing it a little bit in Indonesia as well. It is going to have a kick into Africa as well in terms of more drilling and pulling more supply. I would not be surprised if we see it on the East Coast of Africa, and of course we have already seen some of the Western Mediterranean pick up in Libya and so forth.

So, yes, you are starting to see players that have not been in the market over the past five or six years really reaching out and trying to develop their resources.

Thank you for taking my questions, and congrats on all the progress.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Josh Jain of Daniel Energy Partners. Your line is open.

Thanks for taking my questions. Offshore rig companies have outlined pretty constructive outlooks for activity over the next 12 months. I know you are not going to guide 2027 dry docks, but is there any thought in bringing forward any of those when you can? Or is it reasonable to think the dry-dock schedule is going to be more friendly as we exit this year into 2027, and how are you positioning the company given the expected growth in the deepwater side?

We are not trying to bring any dry docks forward. We tend to plan out over a five-year period to help supply chain and procurement as well. We have a pretty well-set operation on that side and how we look at things. We might move one or two depending on how projects pan out, but at the moment we have a pretty good sightline in terms of where projects are rolling out over the next few years, both for our own technical team and for our commercial team in terms of what projects we are seeing and in which areas, and we try to line up our vessels and dry docks accordingly to that.

And then on the other one, with the Helix–Hornbeck merger, does this frame at all how you think about growing your business moving forward with respect to different service offerings? Or does additional M&A look more like Wilson and some of the other things that you have done over the last couple of years?

It does not change our view, because we have always had that expansive view of other service lines. It is certainly a lot easier for us to do that in our existing market. To the extent that we do reach out, it would be with a franchise that we feel is already well performing in that particular vertical. But no, it does not change anything. Glad to see it. More consolidation is better. I certainly cannot consolidate this industry by myself, so the more the merrier.

If I could sneak in one more. Given the number of rigs that were given multiyear extensions with Petrobras in the last 90 days, how does that frame your discussion for the Wilson acquisition? At the time of the deal, you talked about a number of assets that were in the process of being extended. Can you update us on those and how much more confident you are today than when you did the deal about that market?

Josh, overall positive. We went into this year with an election going on in Brazil, so we have seen a couple of tenders being pushed to the right. The understanding from the market is that Petrobras wants to make some decisions on longer-term commitments. Overall, Petrobras is positive. There are also the IOCs coming out as well in that region, even moving up the tender margin as well. We do not see any concerns in terms of future tendering—maybe there is a bit of movement to the right on some of them—but overall, nothing that concerns us at the moment. It is very positive in terms of what we are seeing on the rig side, and then the additional FPSOs are coming as well. There is a really good long-term story in Brazil that we think we are well placed to take advantage of once we get the Wilson acquisition into the business.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Jim Rollison of Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, and thanks for all the detail again this quarter. Quintin, last quarter you were pretty optimistic about how things were shaping up as we head into late this year, really into next year and beyond, and that has only gotten better with the oil macro situation that has come out of this Middle East conflict. It sounds like you are having some customer conversations that have picked up. Are they already trying to mobilize incremental activity at this stage, and how do you think that translates into the timing of your ability to start pushing day rates up?

It is always a bit of a guess, but the building activity that we are seeing from the rig companies, EPCI, and subsea contractors gives us a lot of confidence in our ability to push day rates up once the market tightens. We are a little bit later in the chartering process for those customers, so I think we are not going to be able to demonstrate that until later into 2026 and into 2027.

Got it. And then back to M&A. You have the Wilson deal closing, and there have been a couple of other chess pieces moved off the board since you announced that deal. Has the shift in the oil macro and the better environment outlook changed any of the dynamics of opportunities in terms of target acquisition pricing expectations at this point?

I think people are definitely getting more confident in the longer-term view of the industry, and that is helping. People are also beginning to appreciate the importance of consolidation—they see the benefits from the drillers and other subsectors. I have not seen any real price movements at this point, but if the industry continues to improve at a steady rate, we will certainly see that too.

Your next question comes from the line of Don Crist of Johnson Rice. Your line is open.

Sorry if this has already been addressed—I got on the call a little late. It is a busy morning. I just wanted to ask about the Far East. We are hearing some news reports of energy shortages and things like that. I know you had a bunch of boats working in Malaysia and Indonesia in the past that got sidelined for other reasons. What is the state of the Indonesian and Malaysia markets right now and your ability to put those big boats back to work? Is that coming sooner rather than later? Any thoughts around that?

Hi, Don. The market is pretty positive. We do not have a huge number of our biggest market-age-specific vessels there, but we do have a lot of big boats in the region, which will be working in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Australia, and then up in Taiwan. We are very positive. As we said earlier, with the energy security story, we are going to continue to see more investment in those countries. I think the governments have been shocked a little bit by what has happened with Operation Epic Fury. Longer term, we were already seeing it, but we expect to see the governments really doubling down in terms of pushing their NOCs and also the IOCs that operate in those countries to do more investment—more drilling, exploration, and getting production. We are busy down there at the moment, and we expect to continue to be busy as well. We have moved one or two ships already into the region this year. With our operating platform, we are able to do that. It is a positive story in Asia Pacific for us.

And M&A has been a big topic in Q4 and Q1, so you have not really done any stock buybacks. Quintin, are you leaning more towards stock buybacks as the M&A story goes to the background and you are able to buy some stock back here, or are you going to keep that optionality for the future?

I do not believe that the M&A opportunities are winding down. We have no issue returning money to shareholders, and share repurchases are our way to do it. But to the extent that we see more value in acquisitions by getting the right boats at the right price, then I would lean toward that.

That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back over to Quintin V. Kneen for closing remarks.

Thank you again for joining us today. We look forward to updating you again in August. Goodbye.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.