Toll Brothers, Inc. Q4 FY2022 Earnings Call

Good morning, and welcome to the Toll Brothers Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. The company is planning to end the call at 9:30 when the market opens. During the Q&A, please limit yourself to one question and one follow up. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Douglas Yearley, CEO. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Jason. Good morning. Welcome, and thank you all for joining us. Before I begin, I ask you to read our statement on forward-looking information in our earnings release of last night and on our website. I caution you that many statements on this call are forward-looking based on assumptions about the economy, world events, housing and financial markets, interest rates, the availability of labor and materials, inflation and many other factors beyond our control that could significantly affect future results. With me today are Marty Connor, Chief Financial Officer; Rob Parahus, President and Chief Operating Officer; Fred Cooper, Senior VP of Finance and Investor Relations; Wendy Marlett, Chief Marketing Officer; and Gregg Ziegler, Senior VP and Treasurer. One person who is not with us today is Bob Toll. Bob passed away in early October at the age of 81 and this is the first time in the 56 years since Toll Brothers was founded back in 1967 that we look to a new year without him. About 500 of us gathered in November to honor Bob at our headquarters with thousands more watching on Zoom. The event was attended by national business and political leaders and by the first subcontractors who worked with Bob in the 1960s, '70s and '80s. Friends from the Philadelphia area he had known since childhood attended, along with dozens of his family members. It was a fitting tribute to a one-of-a-kind leader and a man who helped shape this industry for decades. Although he is no longer with us, Toll Brothers will always be Bob's company. We miss him very much. Turning to the business at hand. As Bob would insist, I'm pleased with our performance this year and extremely proud of the entire Toll Brothers team. In a year filled with supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, permitting delays, inflation, increasing mortgage rates and many other operational challenges, we delivered over 10,500 homes, the most in our history, and grew homebuilding revenues by over 15% to $9.7 billion. In the fourth quarter, we exceeded the midpoint of our deliveries and revenue guidance by 365 homes and $368 million, respectively, as we focus on converting our backlog as efficiently as possible. Our fourth quarter adjusted gross margin of 29%, a 310 basis point increase compared to last year, and we met our full year guidance of 27.5%, which was a 250 basis point improvement over fiscal 2021. We reduced SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue by 110 basis points in the fourth quarter and 80 basis points for the full year. Before taxes, we earned $1.7 billion in fiscal 2022. Net income was a record $1.3 billion or $10.90 per share diluted resulting in a return on beginning equity of 24.3%, a 720 basis point increase over fiscal year 2021. At fiscal year-end, our book value per share stood at $54.79 and our net debt-to-capital ratio was 23.4%. While we achieved record results in fiscal 2022, we are faced with a challenging market, primarily due to the dramatic increase in mortgage rates since March. Our net signed contracts were down 60% in units and 56% in dollars in the fourth quarter with no discernible change nearly halfway through our first quarter of '23. However, both web and foot traffic were only down 15% in Q4, suggesting that while many potential buyers are on the sidelines, they remain interested and may just be waiting for more clarity on the direction of mortgage rates and the overall economy before they transact. As we navigate this market, we are strategically balancing the delivery of our large high-margin backlog in fiscal year 2023 which is down just 7% in value from year-end 2021 with the generation of new sales for future deliveries. We continue to assess and adjust where necessary product offerings, price and incentive levels in each of our communities, taking into account local market dynamics, including elasticity of demand, the size of each community's backlog and the depth and quality of our landholdings in the market. We intend to continue making appropriate adjustments as fiscal year 2023 progresses. Fortunately, because of the size of our backlog and the strength of our projected '23 earnings, we are able to look beyond the immediate slowdown in demand and focus on positioning the company for success in fiscal year 2024. Let me take a moment to discuss our projected '23 results. With the year-end backlog of nearly 8,100 homes valued at $8.9 billion, and with a midpoint of 8,500 homes projected to be delivered, fiscal '23 is setting up to be another solid high-margin year. Our backlog is supported by substantial non-refundable down-payments averaging about $83,000 per home. Through our build-to-order model, our buyers choose their specific home site, structural options and design studio finishes that match their lifestyles and their tastes. As they customize their homes, they become both financially and emotionally invested. Additionally, with approximately 20% of our buyers paying all cash and the average LTV for those who obtained a mortgage at 71%, affordability is less of an issue for our buyers who tend to be wealthier with more disposable income. As a result, our backlog cancellation rate has been the lowest in the industry for decades, both through good and bad markets. During the fourth quarter, our cancellation rate as a percentage of backlog was 2.9%, just slightly above the average of 2.3% since 2010. I want to emphasize that the right metric to focus on for our business is cancellations as a percentage of backlog. Cancellations as a percentage of current quarter sales is simply not as meaningful for a build-to-order company with a substantial backlog. The question should always be, what percentage of the homes that have been sold and are being built or cancelling. For us, that number has consistently been the lowest in the industry. Based on the strength of our backlog and including estimates for increased cancellations and incentivizing, we are projecting a fiscal 2023 adjusted gross margin of 27%. We expect to earn between $8 and $9 per share next year which would be our second best year ever and for our book value per share to increase to over $60 at fiscal year-end 2023. As I mentioned, because of our strong backlog and in an environment where potential buyers in many markets were on the sidelines, we chose not to aggressively chase the market down over the past six months. Also, because of our build-to-order model, we did not have to take dramatically lower prices to clear a large inventory of spec homes. Instead, we have taken a more patient and balanced approach. In recent quarters, our delivery times for to-be-built homes has been extended in some cases, up to 16 months, which was not acceptable to many buyers. Additionally, building costs have been elevated due to the spike in inflation over the past two years. In that environment, it did not make sense to aggressively drop prices. Thankfully, quota delivery times have started to come down as we work through our backlog and as trades free up capacity in this slower market. We are also beginning to see some building costs come down beyond just lumber, which continues to steadily drop. The opportunity to build faster and at a lower cost may be here. Extended delivery times for our to-be-built homes have also resulted in the market for our spec homes being stronger than normal. With elevated spec demand and as cycle times and costs come down, we plan to thoughtfully replenish our supply of specs in select markets to generate additional deliveries in late '23 and throughout 2024. Community count in '23 and '24 will also drive results. As part of our strategy, we are timing community openings to take advantage of better seasonal opportunities. We are positioning for the spring selling season, where there is typically more demand even in tougher times. We are going back to opening our new communities in perfect white glove condition with decorated model homes, reflecting the traditional way Toll has always done it. That did not occur as often during the market frenzy that followed the pandemic where we often opened early without roads or models. During COVID, you could sell out of the back of a station wagon with success. That is no longer the case. As an industry, we probably will not have a better sense of the depth and length of this downturn until we are further into the spring selling season in March and April and hopefully, after the Federal Reserve's work is done. We recognize that if market conditions do not improve, we will need to be more aggressive with price reductions to rebuild our backlog and turn our inventory. And we'd rather be doing that when cycle times and building costs are coming down and when more of our backlog has delivered than three or six months ago. Turning to our land strategy. We continue to assess all transactions, whether they involve new land opportunities or takedowns under existing options, using our rigorous underwriting standards that are focused on both margins and returns. Our existing attractive land portfolio allows us to be highly selective in this process and to walk away from or renegotiate deals that no longer meet our higher thresholds. Over the past three quarters, we have walked away from over 9,000 of our option lots and many additional deals have been deferred or restructured. This cost us $12 million in forfeited options and sunk development costs, $6 million of which was in the fourth quarter. At fiscal year-end, we owned approximately 37,700 lots and controlled about 38,300 through options. This is a 6,000 lot or 7.5% reduction in total lots in the fourth quarter alone. We continue to target an overall mix of 60% option and 40% owned over the longer term. Excluding the loss allocated to our backlog, 56% of total lots were controlled through options. Our existing land should allow us to grow community count 10% in fiscal year 2023. We also control enough land for further community count growth in 2024. As a reminder, we acquired much of the land for our planned fiscal year '23 community openings prior to 2021 before land prices started inflating. In fiscal '22, we spent approximately $2.2 billion on land acquisition and development. In light of current market conditions, we expect to significantly reduce the spend in '23, which should free up capital for other uses. With over $3 billion of liquidity at fiscal year-end and substantial operating cash flow projected in fiscal year 2023, we are in a strong position to pay down debt, buy back stock and opportunistically acquire control of land that may become more attractively priced, all while maintaining a conservative and low leverage balance sheet. In the fourth quarter, we repurchased $159 million of our common stock. Since the beginning of the fiscal year, we have repurchased approximately $543 million or 9% of our outstanding share count at the end of fiscal year 2021. We have also paid approximately $90 million in dividends in '22 and we retired $410 million of long-term debt. We expect debt reduction and share repurchases to remain an important part of our capital allocation priorities for the foreseeable future. We are planning to retire $400 million of our 4.375% bonds in mid-January when they become callable at par and we are targeting $100 million of share repurchases per quarter in fiscal year 2023.

Thanks, Doug. As you mentioned, we are pleased with our fourth quarter and full year results. Our deliveries, revenue, net income and earnings per share were all quarterly and full year records. We noticed a few analysts wrote overnight about our drop in average price per home in new contracts quarter-over-quarter. We want to point out that this is not reflective of an actual price drop, but rather the elevated average price from Q3 associated with our calculation methodology, which we described in detail last quarter. Turning to fiscal year '22's fourth quarter. We delivered 3,765 homes and generated revenues of $3.6 billion, which were up 12.7% in homes and 21.4% in dollars from a year ago. The average price of homes delivered was $951,000. Fourth quarter net income was $640.5 million or $5.63 per share diluted compared to $374.3 million and $3.02 per share diluted a year ago. Included in net income was an after-tax net benefit of approximately $105 million related to the settlement of a legal claim over a 2015 gas leak in California, including an offset for the $10 million we used to fund our new foundation. Adjusting for this net benefit, net income was $535 million or $4.71 per share, up 43% compared to last year's fourth quarter and still an all-time quarterly earnings record. For the full year, we earned $10.90 per share on a GAAP basis. Excluding the net benefits associated with the settlement and contribution, we earned $10 per share. As Doug mentioned, our fourth quarter adjusted gross margin was 29%, up 310 basis points compared to 25.9% in the fourth quarter of 2021. SG&A as a percentage of revenues was 7.7% in the quarter compared to 8.8% in the same quarter one year ago. The year-over-year reduction in SG&A percentage is primarily related to the leverage from increased revenues, but also to tighter cost controls as total SG&A expense only grew $6 million on $630 million in additional revenue, excluding the $10 million contribution we made to our charitable foundation with proceeds of the legal settlement. Joint venture, land sales and other income was $152.5 million during the fourth quarter, which includes an approximately $141 million benefit related to the legal settlement. That compares to $63.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021. Excluding the settlement, we exceeded our guidance on this line item by approximately $12 million. Write-offs totaled $22 million in the quarter. Approximately $6 million of this amount was related to walk away and predevelopment costs on option land that we decided not to pursue. The remainder was associated with anticipated losses on the pending sales of two wholly-owned city living land partials that we have decided not to build. Instead, we will sell. Both are under contract and in due diligence with buyers. We did not have any impairments on any of our traditional homebuilding land or operating communities. We continued to generate strong cash flow this year with $978 million of cash flow from operations. We ended the fiscal year with over $3 billion of liquidity, including $1.3 billion of cash and $1.8 billion available under our revolving bank credit facility. In fiscal year 2022, we invested $2.2 billion in land acquisition and land development and our spend dropped in each quarter as the year progressed. We also returned $633 million to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends and we reduced debt by approximately $410 million. Our net debt-to-capital ratio was 23.4% at fiscal year-end. As Doug mentioned, we are planning to further reduce our debt by repaying $400 million of senior notes due in April but callable at par in mid-January. After we repay these notes, we will have no significant maturities of our long-term debt until fiscal 2026. During the quarter, we transferred two New York City City Living projects into joint ventures as part of our capital efficiency initiatives. Results from our former City Living segment are now reported in the regions in which the projects are located, primarily the North for this and all future reporting periods. Prior periods reported in our earnings release have been reclassified and additional periods will be reclassified in our upcoming 10-K. Our forward guidance is subject to the usual caveats regarding forward-looking information. As Doug mentioned, the 8,098 homes in backlog at fiscal year-end gives us good visibility into next year. The contracts in backlog are supported by sizable non-refundable down payments, additional promissory notes, and as Doug laid out not to be minimized, the emotional attachment our buyers have to their new, highly personalized homes. However, given the unpredictability of the current demand environment, the volatility in mortgage rates, inflationary pressures and unclear global and macroeconomic conditions, I want to stress that our forward-looking projections, especially for the full year are subject to greater uncertainty than normal. With that said, we are projecting fiscal year 2023 first quarter deliveries of approximately 1,750 to 1,850 homes with an average delivery price of between $950,000 and $970,000. Consistent with normal seasonal patterns, first quarter deliveries are expected to be the low point of the year, with deliveries for the full fiscal year weighted to the second half. For full fiscal year 2023, we are projecting new home deliveries of between 8,000 and 9,000 homes with an average price between $965,000 and $985,000. We expect our adjusted gross margin in the first quarter of fiscal year 2023 and for the full year to be approximately 27%. We expect interest and cost of sales to be approximately 1.6% in the first quarter and 1.5% for the full year. This would represent a 20 basis point reduction in interest expense in cost of sales year-over-year as our leverage continues to decline. We project first quarter SG&A as a percentage of home sales revenues to be approximately 13.5% versus 13.4% one year ago. Included in first quarter SG&A is about $12 million of our annual accelerated stock compensation expense that should not recur in the remainder of the year. It was approximately $10 million last year. For the full year, we project SG&A as a percentage of home sales revenues to be approximately 11.3% and expect total dollar spend to be flat with 2022. Other income, income from unconsolidated entities and land sales gross profit is expected to be approximately $10 million in the first quarter and $125 million for the full year. Much of this full year income is projected from sales of our interest in certain stabilized apartment communities developed by Toll Brothers Apartment Living in joint venture with various partners. While the market for rental properties is currently being disrupted by the volatility in rates and economic uncertainty, we do project selling our interest in four of our joint ventures by the end of the fiscal year. We project the first quarter and full year tax rate of approximately 26%. Our weighted average share count is expected to be approximately 112.5 million for the first quarter and 110 million shares for the full 2023 year. This assumes we repurchased a targeted $100 million of common stock per quarter. Based on land we currently own or control, we expect to grow community count by 10% by the end of fiscal year 2023. Putting this all together, that works out to be between $8 and $9 per share for the full year which would move our book value to above $60 at fiscal year-end 2023.

Thank you, Marty. We continue to believe that the long-term prospects for the housing market remain positive despite the recent market weakness. Demographic and migration trends continue in our favor. In addition, there continues to be a substantial shortage of homes in America as housing starts have not kept up with population growth for at least the past 15 years. We believe these fundamental drivers will support the housing market well into the future. Before I open the call to questions, I want to again thank the entire Toll Brothers team for another great year. We are now facing a tougher environment. But we've been through this before. We are executing on the right strategy for our company, and I am confident that our experienced teams will once again rise to the challenge and deliver another solid year for Toll Brothers in fiscal 2023 and beyond. With that, let me open it up for questions. Jason, it's all yours.

As a reminder, the company is planning to end the call at 9:30 when the market opens. Our first question comes from Michael Rehaut from JPMorgan.

First, I'd love to get your sense of current pricing. You guided for a 27% gross margin for fiscal '23, which was better than we were looking for and I think speaks to the strength of the backlog and your ability to maintain some margins in the backlog. Can you try and contrast that to current pricing and the amounts of discounts that you're currently offering or incentives, trying to think about real-time gross margins and pricing in today's backdrop?

Sure, Michael. So our guidance is 27%. And I think Marty clearly laid out some caution we have in '23 because of the current environment. If you look on paper at those 8,100 homes in backlog, the margin is higher than 27%. But we are putting a cushion on that because we do know that there will be what we think is some modest elevation of cancellations. We also have some additional homes that we need to sell to hit the $8,500 midpoint of the '23 delivery. And so we buffered it a bit when we've come in with our guide of 27% because of the current market conditions. In terms of where we are today, the average incentive nationwide on the next home sold is 8%. And remember, that's not coming off of zero. Even in the very good times through COVID, we always had an incentive in the range of 3% to 4%.

Yes, yes, $25,000.

$25,000.

Great. No, that's very helpful. I guess secondly, you noted the SG&A for fiscal '23 on a flat dollar spend, can you kind of walk through the puts and takes of that? And to the extent that revenues would be, let's say, less than expected. Where is your ability to flex there and conversely, if you're able to close more homes due to better cycle times, how should we think about the variable on the upside?

Mike, it's good to hear from you. I think SG&A is a significant focus of ours. Unfortunately, as an operating entity, we are not immune to the effects of inflation. And so we're pretty proud that we're able to keep the number flat year-over-year. Now that is on a lower expected revenue basis. So every day, we're working towards some initiatives to try and evaluate headcount and deal with some of these inflationary pressures. Our personnel are down around 6% in the last six months. Our open positions are down significantly over that same period of time. So we are doing a nice job of holding the line on headcount. We are facing an environment where we may need to turn the dial up a little bit on marketing spend and outside broker commissions. So we are working diligently to keep SG&A as low as we possibly can. Obviously, more revenue will help and less revenue will hurt in terms of the leverage. We've given you our best estimate of what we think it will be for 2023.

Our next question comes from Stephen Kim from Evercore ISI.

It was all super helpful, particularly the comment about the strategy around the spring selling season being a better time to get more aggressive on things. Just I guess, as a point of clarification, Bob Toll, I remember, talked about the spring selling season really begins in some places in January. And I guess I wanted to get some clarity on your incentive number there that you gave today about 8%. Obviously, I would assume that it's including everything, whether it be rate locks and rate buydowns and so just if you could clarify, is there anything that would be decremental to your gross margin that you're doing in the negotiation with the buyer that's not in that 8%. And then your order ASP, I think you said last quarter, like-for-like was like $1.15 million on average or something like that or like up 7%. Just wondering if this quarter's reported order ASP, you think is pretty much like-for-like or if it's a different number?

So I'll answer the first part. And then Marty, you can jump into the second part. Stephen, the 8% is all inclusive of whether it be price drops, incentive increases or closing cost assistance or mortgage buydowns or anything that we can think of and that you can think of is included within that 8%. And yes, Bob, you said talked about Super Bowl Sunday to Easter or the Super Bowl now in February. So it's a few weeks before Super Bowl Sunday, and it generally extends through late April is the heart of the traditional new home selling season. And as I mentioned, even in tougher times, we always expect more homes sold during that period than other times of the year. And so I think we strategically have made a good decision to work hard on delivering our backlog and protect it to incentivize where there is elasticity where the market is responding to incentives. But to really wait for delivery times to come down for building costs to start coming down and to focus on when it makes the most sense to be a bit more aggressive to go chase deals if we need to do that. And that is by each community, by each market and based, of course, upon the overall bigger macro market conditions and economies. And so that is the strategy in place. I also talked about layering in some additional spec build where appropriate in those markets that have better dynamics and to do that at a time when we can build those specs for a bit less to set up good results for 2024. Marty?

Yes. I think I'm going to default to it is a like-for-like analysis with the number you quoted of $1.150 million. But I would caution that like-for-like is very tough for us because we have differences in geographic mix quarter-over-quarter. And we have differences in our various segments of affordable luxury, active-adult and luxury. So it says like-for-like as we ever get.

Affordable luxury would be referred to as aff lux.

Great. Yes, I appreciate that. My second question relates to the impact of mortgage rates. You've mentioned that your buyers are not as sensitive to mortgage rates in terms of affordability. However, they are also quite knowledgeable. Currently, mortgage rates have been reported at 6.4%, which is down about 70 basis points in a short time. The spreads remain quite wide. It seems likely that we could see a significant decrease in mortgage rates in the next six months. So my question is, if that occurs, do you think your buyers would see a noticeable improvement in demand as they take advantage of it? Or are your buyers largely indifferent to rate changes regardless of whether they rise or fall?

I believe our buyers are quite attentive to interest rates. They are intelligent and affluent, focusing on market conditions. Back in August, I mentioned some positive signs when rates dipped below 6%, which gave us some optimism for a few weeks. However, that optimism faded as rates climbed into the low to mid-7s. Currently, rates are hovering around the mid-6s, and there have been slight encouraging signs recently as rates have decreased. Nonetheless, I hesitate to revisit the optimistic outlook we had in August since it's still too soon to determine if the drop from 7.25% to 6.5% will significantly boost demand. The timing in December makes it difficult to draw conclusions. We were caught off guard by earlier industry projections that didn't materialize. Yet, if rates can fall below 6% and into the 5% range, I believe that could really change the landscape. This situation applies to both first-time buyers and those interested in Toll Brothers. Our buyers tend to be wealthier, typically having more equity in their homes, especially if they are selling one. They also tend to have more cash for down payments and lower mortgage leverage. Overall, we have many positive factors working in our favor, but our buyers are certainly mindful of fluctuations in interest rates.

Yes, I think that as well. Thank you very much, Doug. However, could you clarify if they can lock the rate when they are purchasing up to the closing?

They can secure a rate one year in advance, and the reduction in our delivery times makes this process easier. When we were quoting delivery times of 14 to 16 months in certain communities, it was challenging to secure a rate. To clarify, they can set a rate a year ahead, and it may decrease. They can also lock in a mortgage rate about 110 days before closing, but they have the option to purchase a cap for up to one year in advance.

It may not be very attractive from a pricing perspective to the consumer but it's available.

I believe that if a buyer wishes to purchase a build-to-order home from Toll with a 13-month delivery timeframe and they are currently unable to lock in a rate, especially if they have a home to sell, there may be increasing confidence in the next three to six months that interest rates will decline by the time they are ready to lock in a rate, potentially around seven, eight, or nine months from now. As those rates fall, it will likely become easier for them to sell their current home and secure a lower rate on the Toll home. Some buyers may already have this sentiment, and I expect it will grow as the Federal Reserve approaches the end of its current policies.

Our next question comes from Alan Ratner from Zelman & Associates.

Thank you for the detailed information provided so far. My first question is about the margin guidance. I appreciate the acknowledgment of uncertainties, but I would like to understand the trajectory you anticipate. It seems like the margins are expected to remain stable throughout the year, with the first quarter guidance being the same as that for the full year. Is there an expectation of cost relief that could offset the higher incentives and pricing pressures as the year progresses? Is this driven by mix? I'm trying to understand why you believe margins will remain stable in a current environment where pricing seems to be under pressure.

We haven't built in cost reductions in the backlog. We continue to maintain high, what we call, building cost reserves or contingencies in our underwriting. And as for, Marty, sequentially through the year?

I think the biggest factor in what would be perceived to be a declining margin environment that's offsetting that is the lumber pricing inherent in our deliveries as the year goes on. Lumber fell steadily over the last few quarters, and that will be reflective and supportive of a more flat margin for 2023.

You had that number just from the third quarter to the fourth quarter, lumber dropped $12,000 to $14,000 per house just in one quarter there.

Okay. So basically, to think about that incentive number you gave earlier at 8%. It's up probably 400 basis points, 500 basis points from nine months or so ago. A lot of that is being offset, at least as '23 progresses through lower lumber on a per loan basis.

I think if we need to point to one offsetting factor, it's the lumber.

We are noticing a decline in building costs and cycle times. The front-end trades, such as excavation, foundation work, framing, window installation, siding, roofing, rough mechanical, electrical plumbing, HVAC, and all the tasks performed before insulating a home and finishing it with drywall, are experiencing reduced activity due to fewer starts. These trades are now indicating they have some capacity available. As a builder, when you hear about available capacity, you recognize it as an opportunity to negotiate new prices. This negotiation process is happening at the front end and will likely influence the back end as the finishing trades also experience reduced activity.

Got it. That makes sense. Second question, this is just more of a strategic question or thought. You kind of maybe alluded to this a little bit, Doug. But I think it makes a lot of sense being willing to forego some sales in the near term with the backlog you have and kind of the seasonally slower time of the year. Just given your build-to-order model, though, how long are you willing to forgo sales or kind of give up some market share, recognizing it seems like you would be setting yourself up for a pretty big air pocket in '24 unless you're willing to meaningfully increase the mix of specs in your business in '24. Because if your build cycle, even if it improves to 12 months, you're not going to have an opportunity for a lot of sales unless you see a demand improvement through in the spring of next year. So how long are you willing to kind of give up that market share in the near term and maybe not be as aggressive on pricing? Or is the answer to that spec ship that you are willing to take higher?

Great question. We are fully aware of the situation and are strategically focused on 2024. We will take necessary steps to ensure homes are ready for delivery in 2024, which includes increasing spec builds at the beginning of the year. These will be ready by early to late 2024. Interestingly, in the last couple of quarters, our business has been about 75% build-to-order and 25% spec, with the spec side performing better and providing higher margins. Clients appreciate that they can lock in rates for quicker deliveries, which offers more financial certainty when purchasing a home. Our spec business has been strong, allowing us some pricing power, which gives us confidence moving forward. While we are not aiming for a 50-50 split, we may shift to a 30-70 ratio depending on market conditions and demand elasticity. We will closely monitor the market and adjust our approach accordingly, including potentially increasing incentives if necessary. We are not going to lose market share. We have the land to expand our company and expect a 10% growth in community count this year based on the land we manage. We have strategically delayed openings to align them with the more favorable spring season. We are actively building models and postponing openings that we would have launched during the pandemic, where it was challenging for buyers. Our goal is to ensure everything is perfect and ready at the right time of year. There are many moving parts, but due to our land holdings, ability to increase community count, and flexibility in spec building and market pricing, I am confident that our strategy is well positioned for a successful 2024.

Our next question comes from Truman Patterson from Wolfe Research.

It's actually Paul Przybylski. I appreciate you guys giving the order incentives at 8%. I was wondering if you could combine that with your traditional market color and where incentives may be higher or lower than that average? And then also, if you could give us any color on your various business segments and how orders performed in the quarter.

Sure, Paul. I'm happy to provide that information. Interestingly, for the first time in a while, sales in the East are outperforming those in the West. We've discussed how many people are relocating south and west, but the West has seen a more significant price increase during COVID. For instance, markets like Boise and Phoenix, along with Reno and Vegas in Nevada, experienced price hikes of over 40% during that period. Despite the long-term positive outlook for these areas—due to factors like affordability, job growth, and lifestyle—historically, in such cycles, rapid increases often lead to quicker declines. As a result, the Western markets are currently softer and moving slower. We also have larger backlogs in the West because demand was so high during COVID. Therefore, we need to be cautious about managing that backlog and avoid aggressively pursuing lower prices, which is necessary given the inelasticity. In contrast, states like New Jersey, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Massachusetts, Michigan, Virginia, and all of Florida are currently our strongest performers. The active adult empty nester segment is performing the best, not just for those over 55 but including boomers moving down. This group typically pays with more cash, is less affected by interest rates due to the equity in their long-term homes, and generally has higher affluence, allowing them to make substantial cash offers and maintain lower mortgage amounts. The other two segments—affordable luxury and move-up luxury—are performing similarly, while City Living, especially in New York, is thriving. We have two buildings, one in Manhattan and one in Jersey City, that are doing exceptionally well in terms of sales.

They're all in JV.

They're all in JV that's going to come into the other income line, but we sold 80 units in Jersey City in six months at $1 million plus a unit. And we're about to open on the Upper West side of Manhattan with what we think is significant pent-up demand. So I haven't said that in a long time, but the City Living segment is doing very, very well, but it's very small and again, in joint venture.

Our next question comes from Mike Dahl from RBC Capital Markets.

Doug, following up on Alan's question and Steve's earlier comments about the strategy for evaluating the spring, could you provide more clarity on the key metrics you will monitor? Specifically, at what point do you determine that a pace isn't working in the spring, considering you averaged about 1.2 per month in the second half of your fiscal year? If you maintain that level at 1.2, will you aim to drive it back up towards 2 or another target? It would be helpful to hear more about the acceptable metrics you're considering.

Sure. There isn't a single metric we focus on, and we don't have a sales quota. We've always operated without a top-down approach, but we are aware of the importance of increasing sales if necessary. I apologize for being vague, but we evaluate each community individually. We hold meetings with both the sales and community teams, conduct thorough market analyses, and make pricing decisions based on that. We might also consider slight changes in our product offerings, like introducing smaller homes or adjusting features in existing ones. We analyze these factors weekly, but always with a local perspective. Therefore, I can't specify that if we reach one or two sales per month and aim for two, we'll implement significant changes across the entire company. Our actions will remain tailored to the specific market and community as we progress through the spring season.

Understood. Okay. From a more near-term perspective, given some of the earlier comments this quarter and the challenges faced, it seems like you ended the quarter closer to one sale per month. When you mention no discernible improvement, does that relate to the quarter-end pace? You were down 60% for the entire quarter, so are you indicating that you're still down about 60%? Could you provide more details on the current sales pace and what that comment is intended to convey?

The demand was fairly consistent throughout August, September, and October. Our remarks regarding November and early December pertain to the entire fourth quarter, so they shouldn't be interpreted in any other way. As I mentioned earlier, we will continue to respond by providing incentives where necessary. It's important to remember that we are still committed to return on equity, and we will maintain our focus on this. This commitment extends not only to future land acquisitions or renegotiating existing agreements but also to the necessity of managing inventory. We are concentrating on the reduction of building costs, shortening cycle times, and the crucial task of moving inventory.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.

Jason, thank you very much. Thanks, everyone for your interest and support and great questions. We are always here to help clarify any further questions you may have. And have a wonderful, wonderful holiday season, and we'll see you in the new year. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.