Good morning. The Roper Technologies Conference call will now begin. Today's call is being recorded. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing star zero. I would now like to turn the call over to Zach Moxley, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you all for joining us as we discuss the first quarter 2026 financial results for Roper Technologies. Joining me on the call this morning are Neil Hun, President and Chief Executive Officer, Jason Conley, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Brandon Cross, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, and Shannon O'Callaghan, Senior Vice President of Finance. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing information for today's call. We have prepared slides to accompany today's call, and now if you'll please turn to page two. We begin with our safe harbor statement. During the course of today's call, we will make forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties as described on this page in our press release and in our SEC filings. You should listen to today's call in the context of that information. Now please turn to page three. Today we will discuss our results primarily on an adjusted, non-GAAP, and continuing operations basis. The difference between our GAAP results and adjusted results consists of the following items. Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and financial impacts associated with our minority investment in Indicor. Reconciliations can be found in our press release and in the appendix of this presentation on our website. And now if you'll please turn to page four, I'll hand the call over to Neil. After our prepared remarks, we'll take questions from our telephone participants.

Thank you, Zach, and thanks to having me turn to page four, you'll see the topics we will cover today. Our Q1 enterprise performance, then Jason will walk through the enterprise financials, our balance sheet, and provide an update on our share repurchase program. Then we'll discuss our segment highlights and outlook and introduce our Q2 and increased full-year 2026 guidance. Finally, we'll close with a few summary points before opening the call for questions. Next slide, please. To turn to page 5, I want to highlight three takeaways for today's call. We're at a strong start to 2026 and are raising our full-year depth guidance. Our Q1 results exceeded expectations across every key metric. Total revenue grew 11%. Organic revenue grew 6%. EBITDA grew 8%. Free cash flow grew 11%. And depth was $5.16. Importantly, enterprise growth retention remains strong, consistently in the mid-90s area. On that foundation, enterprise software bookings are also strong, core up low double digits on a TTM basis. This continues the momentum from our last call and bolsters our confidence for the balance of the year. On the back of this quarter's performance, we're raising our full year depth guidance to a range of 2180 to 2205, up 50 cents at the midpoint, and more on this later. Second, we're continuing to accelerate AI velocity across the portfolio. In Q1, AI innovation continue to broaden across our businesses, move deeper into core products, and increasingly show up in both product roadmaps and customer conversations. Businesses like Central Reach, Construct Connect, Vertifor, iPipeline, Adderant, DAT, SubSplash, and SoftWriters all released meaningful new AI-enabled product capabilities during the quarter. The signal from our own portfolio that AI can be a meaningful growth driver in vertical software keeps getting clearer by the day. On the AI accelerator team at Roper, as a reminder, this is a central strike team that partners directly with our operating companies to accelerate AI product development and capture reusable patterns for deployment across the portfolio. The team is ramping quickly. The team's first partnership was with Vertifor, helping deliver AI agents unveiled at their customer conference last week. The portfolio impact we envision when we invested in this team, and we expect the pace of partnerships with our operating companies to accelerate throughout the year. take away centers on capital deployment. Since November last year, we've repurchased 6 million shares for $2.2 billion, including 4.9 million shares for $1.7 billion year-to-date in 2026. Importantly, our board authorized an additional $3 billion of repurchase capacity, giving us $3.8 billion of remaining authorization and north of $5 billion of total capital deployment capacity over the next 12 months. Our approach remains unchanged. We're disciplined and unbiased between acquisitions and opportunistic buybacks, focusing on driving the best risk-adjusted long-term cash flow compounding per share for shareholders. High-quality strategic opportunities where we're developing deep relationships and real conviction with long-term buyers. Before I turn it to Jason, one theme you'll hear throughout today's call. Organizational velocity across our portfolio continues to build. The investments we've made over the past two years in leadership, in modern engineering practices, and demonstrating meaningful results. Our businesses are releasing innovation faster, executing sharper, and moving with more confidence. And that's what gives us conviction in the balance of the year and beyond. So with that, Jason, let me turn the call over to

you. Thanks, Neil, and good morning, everyone. I'll take you through our first quarter financial performance starting on slide six. As you heard, we delivered a strong first quarter, finishing well above the high end of our depth guidance range and ahead of expectations on organic growth. Of $2.1 billion was up 11%, with organic growth of 6% and acquisitions contributing 5%. Importantly, recurring software revenue growth across our software segments was again strong at 7%, which continues to be the best indicator of business health and durability. EBITDA of $797 million was up 8% over prior year. EBITDA margin was 38.1. Our core EBITDA margin was down 70 basis points in the quarter, driven by lower gross margins in our TEP segment due to mix of more consumables at NDI and Marathon, coupled with higher input costs at Neptune. Core EBITDA margin in our software segments expanded 40 basis points, which includes continued investment in $1.16 was above our guidance range of $4.95 to $5 and up 8% over prior year. The upside was driven by the combination of stronger organic growth, a lower tax rate, and the benefit of lower share count resulting from our net purchasing activity in Q1. Free cash flow of $562 million was up 11% over prior year. On a trailing 12-month basis, free cash flow is now at $2.5 billion and has compounded at a 19% kegger over the last three years, or 15%, excluding the impact of Section 174. We continue to view free cash flow per share as the most important metric in evaluating our progress. And on that basis, we were up 15% versus the prior year, given the combination of growing cash flow and a declining share count. Relatedly, and for modeling purposes, we exited Q1 with 102.4 million shares outstanding. Now, if you turn with me to slide 7, I'll walk through our financial position and capital employment update. We exited Q1 at 3.1 times net debt to EBITDA, which is up modestly from 2.9 times at year end, given the $1.5 billion we deployed toward share repurchases in the quarter. We have $383 million of cash and $2 billion drawn on our $3.5 billion. Importantly, we close on a new five-year $3.5 billion revolving credit facility during the quarter, which provides ample liquidity and improved pricing and terms. This also enhances our cost of capital strategic advantage in the face of an increasingly constrained private credit market that other market participants looking to make acquisitions will be facing. Even after significant repurchase activity in Q1, we maintain over $5 billion of annualized capacity for capital deployment, which speaks to the strength of Roper's cash generation engine. Neil highlighted the share repurchase activity in the opening. To put it in perspective, our cumulative $6 million of share repurchases is about 6% of shares outstanding and brings us back to a share count we have not seen since 2017. Additionally, our board approved expanding our share repurchase authorization by another $3 billion, which provides capital employment flexibility and reflects continued confidence in our vertical market software position, enhanced capabilities, and execution velocity to capture the AI opportunities in front of us. On M&A, the pipeline of high-quality opportunities remains very attractive. We believe the structural dynamics in the PE-backed software market and a constrained private credit market continue to create a compelling environment for robots. Inactive and disciplined, performance and outlook.

Thanks, Jason. As we turn to page 9, let's review our application software segment. Revenue for the quarter grew 12% in total, and organic revenue growth was 5%. EBITDA grew 13%, EBITDA margins were 42%, and core margins improved 50 basis points year-over-year. The quality growth here is notable. Recurring and reoccurring revenue, about 85% of the segment, grew in the mid-single-digit plus range, while non-recurring was essentially flat. At a segment level, three themes stand out for the quarter. Gross retention remains strong consistently in the mid-90s area. On that foundation, enterprise bookings are also strong in the quarter, consistent with the momentum we described in our January call and supportive of our confidence for the balance of the year. Fast transitions continue to advance meaningfully. Several of our larger businesses made real progress on ground-to-cloud conversions and on bringing new cloud-native products to market. And third, AI progress continued to build. The signal is shifting from product investment to product shipping, and you'll see this clearly in the three company highlights to follow. first revenue growth and a new q1 bookings record strength was broad-based with particularly strong sas momentum on sierra onyx and vi global within vi global continued the rollout of a strident ai platform and completed a record number of sierra cloud migrations in the quarter simply put adder is winning in the legal market and doing so from position of strength Second, Vertifor delivered a solid quarter, steady mid-single-digit revenue growth with EBITDA ahead of revenue. Recurring revenue continued to build across agency, MGA, and carrier, with MGA again leading on double-digit growth driven by strong bookings and high retention. At their Accelerate user conference in Las Vegas, Vertifor unveiled its new Velocity AI platform, along with a suite of AI agents embedded across the product portfolio, from reference connect and reconciliation to submission processing and email agent automation. AI is a meaningful TAM expansion opportunity for Vertifor, and they're quickly moving to capture it. The Roper AI Accelerator team had its first impact, which continues to execute ahead of our deal model. Recurring software revenue grew well north of 20% with margins expanding, demonstrating the operating leverage in this business as it continues to be one of our strongest AI proof points, 5 to 10 minutes to about 30 seconds, giving clinicians back roughly 8 autism learners. BCBAs are saving 140 plus hours a year on report authoring and review, and daily claim generation is 6 times faster. AI and AI influence bookings were 75% of new business in the quarter, up from 0 two years This is a textbook example of how the AI right to win we believe exists across our portfolio. Century sits inside mission-critical workflows, has proprietary data, and is translating that advantage into real growing AI revenue. Prior to turning to the outlook for this section, I'll provide an update on Dell Tech and the GovCon market. Importantly, Dell Tech grew recurring revenue in the mid-single-digit plus range in the quarter, driven by strong private sector demand, partially upset by continued softness in GovCon enterprise. SAS remains strong with ground-to-cloud conversions trending positively. Consistent with January, we're still waiting for the GovCon inflection. This is not new. We continue to work through the tail of last year's disruption to federal procurement agency organizations and broader budget uncertainty, which is delaying decision-making, particularly on large enterprise perpetual deals. Remain encouraged. The one big beautiful bill is a meaningful positive for defense and government contracting spend, but a benefit reaches us only after our customers win awards and invest in systems, and that takes a bit of time. Consistent with January, we are not baking into our guidance any GovCon inflection or any OPPB benefit, and rather we'll adjust as conditions warrant. Turning to our outlook for application software, we expect organic growth for the balance of the year to be in the mid-single digit plus range, lowering Q2 on some non-recurring timing, improving in the back half with centuries turning organic and easing non-recurring comps. Please turn this to page 10, and our network software segment was 14%, and organic revenue grew 5% in the quarter. The quality growth mirrored application software. Organic recurring grew mid-single digit plus. non-recurring decline mid-singles as customers move to our cloud offerings, and bookings remain strong here. EBITDA margins were 50.7% down 460 basis points year over year, while core margins held steady down just 20 basis points. The gap reflects two dynamics, our acquisition of subsplash with a lower but steadily improving margin profile, and our ongoing investment in DAT, particularly Convoy. Similar themes playing out here that we described in application software. Bookings were strong, and grocery retention remained high across our network businesses, together giving us improved visibility into the balance of the year. And second, AI progress is tangible and shipping to customers today. This is in this segment. It's executing well against a mixed freight backdrop. Our pool expansion continues, and adoption of our digital freight marketplace solutions remain strong. Our top rates are up 20% to 30% year-over-year, and the carrier side of our ecosystem grew in Q1 for the first time in several years, real green shoots, particularly in the second half of the quarter. That said, a sharp diesel spike compressed carrier margins late in the quarter, and our guidance continues to assume no meaningful freight market recovery. Our early-stage investment convoy inside DAT represents a material TAM expansion opportunity. Today, DAT is a subscription-based, two-sided network. Brokers and carriers pay to access the largest freight marketplace in North America. DAT is evolving into a full, end-to-end, agentic, and ML-powered marketplace, participating in the workflow and the economics of the transaction itself, a meaningfully larger and more valuable business over time. The innovation that enables this transformation exists and is working in the market, and we continue to enhance and extend the tech. In the most recent quarter, DAT's RateView AI agent moved into live production, replacing manual rate lookups with instant conversational lane rate guidance, free-form emails and chat messages directly into bookable loads, eliminating manual data entry, and LoadLink's voice-to-post is enabling hands-free load posting. The AI work at DAT is not theoretical. It's shipping and production and delivering incredible value to customers today. Turning to ConstructConnect, another strong quarter with recurring revenue up double digits and continued breakout from Boost, their AI-based takeoff solution launches this quarter. Most importantly, ConstructConnect has now moved its entire product and engineering organization into agentic coding processes and tools, shipping four times the features versus a year ago. Broadening this across the portfolio to drive multifold product velocity gains is a key priority and an exciting one to return to year-over-year revenue growth in Q1. With Nuke closing the quarter, net retention returned above 100% for the first time since the 2023 Actors and Writers strikes, And our recent grip tape acquisition extends Foundry's leadership into AI orchestration across the visual effects and animation pipeline, enabling studios to securely coordinate multiple AI models and agents in their production and post-production workflows. We enabled order entry product last week, a meaningful workflow enhancement for long-term care pharmacies, and subsplash really giving ministry customers the ability to generate custom-dated insights through natural language prompts, a key unlock for this customer constituency. Turning to our outlet for network software, we expect organic growth for the balance of the year to be in the mid-single-digit plus range. A couple of quick call-outs. Subsplash turns organic in Q4, and margins will reflect continued investment in our freight platform acquisitions to the balance of the year. Now, please turn to page 11, and let's review our technology-abled product segment. Revenue here grew 9% in total and 7% organic, significantly better than expected, driven by strength at NDI and Verathon. 0.6% down 260 basis points year-over-year, reflecting two dynamics. At Neptune, principally bronze ingot inflation. And second, a mixed shift at both NDI and Verathon towards faster-growing consumables, which carry lower gross margins but more durable, reoccurring revenue profiles. Another record quarter driven by exceptional demand for their electromagnetic tracking solutions across cardiac, neurological, and orthopedic precision measurement applications. The EP market in particular is a strong multi-year growth vector for NDI. Procedure volumes continue to grow, meaning OEMs are introducing new tracking-enabled catheter platforms, and NDI has a unique right to win at the sensor layer. Great job by Dave and the entire team at NDI. Turning to Neptune, revenue declined low single digits in the quarter, which was better than expected, driven by strong execution from Don and the entire team in TALICY. The market dynamics were largely as expected, with lower mechanical meter volumes partially offset by strong static meter growth. Importantly, Neptune's cloud-based software adoption continues to scale nicely, though off a small base. Consistent with our Q4 commentary, we're not underwriting a Neptune recovery in our 2026 guidance and will continue to monitor underlying demand. We're bringing out the segment varied by strong B-Flex and Goliath scope demand and we're optimistic about new product launches planned for the balance of the year. Turning to our TEP outlook, we expect organic growth for the balance of the year to be in the mid-single-digit range, lower in the second quarter as we face a tougher Q2 comp. We expect net raw material pressure to continue in the second quarter and improving in the back half of the year. With that, please turn this to page 13. for our Q2 and full-year 2026 guidance. Specifically, we're raising our full-year 2026 DEPS guidance to 2180 to 2205, up from 2130 to 2155, a $0.50 increase at the midpoint, which passes through our Q1 beat and the impact of our already executed share buyback. We're maintaining our full-year total revenue growth guidance of approximately 8% and organic revenue growth of 5% to 6%. For the full year, we continue to assume a tax rate in the 21% area and a bit below that in Q2. For Q2, we're establishing our adjusted depth guidance of 525 to 530. To reiterate key assumptions from our segment commentary, full year guidance assumes no meaningful improvement at Deltec's GovCon market or DAT's freight market and modest top line weakness at Neptune versus a year ago. Capital deployment, we're entering the balance of 2026 with meaningful optionality. We have $5 billion of firepower available over the next 12 months and $3.8 billion of remaining share purchase authorization, giving us substantial flexibility to act opportunistically. Discipline and unbiased between acquisitions and opportunistic buybacks based on what drives the highest and most durable cash flow for share compounding. Now, please turn it to page 14, and then we'll open it up. We're going to start to 2026 with 11% revenue growth, 6% organic revenue, and 11% free cash flow growth. Retention and bookings remain strong and position as well heading into the balance of the year. Based on this, we've raised our full-year depth guidance by 50 cents at the midpoint. ...across the portfolio. Central Reach, Construct Connect, Vertifor, DAT, Adderance, and others continue to move AI deeper into their products and increasingly into customer activity. and our AI accelerator team continues to build velocity across the portfolio. Finally, on capital deployment, as we discussed earlier, our board's authorization of an additional $3 billion of share repurchase capacity gives us $3.8 billion of remaining authorization. Alongside that, we have $5 billion of capital deployment firepower available over the next 12 months supporting our targeted M&A pipeline. We remain disciplined and unbiased between acquisitions and opportunistic buybacks based on what drives the highest and most durable cash flow per share compounding. Some additional color on the M&A market. A quarter ago, our pipeline was at record levels. Shortly after our call, the broader public software evaluation drawdown caused sellers to pause most active processes. The activity to pick back up, timing of which is still to be determined. Opportunities are likely to emerge, and we're in an advantaged position to capitalize on this. Being a high-conviction acquirer of vertical market software businesses with deep proprietary modes where AI accelerates growth. The signal on that thesis from our own portfolio is becoming clearer and clearer. So in closing, the ingredients for accelerated cash flow per share compounding are coming together. Our portfolio is the strongest it has ever been. Our organizational velocity is accelerating. AI is both TAM expanding and growth enabling, and we're excited to see our product work translate into higher growth. Our capital employment capacity and flexibility are significant differentiators, and our discipline is unchanged. This is how we compete and win, and how we continue to compound for our shareholders.

With that, operator, we will now go to our question and answer portion of the call. We request that our callers limit their questions to one main question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, you may do so by pressing the star key followed by the digit 1 on your touchtone telephone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press star, then the digit two. Again, we request that callers limit their question to one main question and one follow-up. Your first question comes from Dylan Becker with William Blair. Your line is now open.

Hey, gentlemen, really appreciate it. Nice job here. Maybe, Neil, starting for you, I think it was clear in your commentary, you kind of talked about the accelerating pace of innovation. and the right to win and TAM expansion, kind of TAM expansive nature of AI. But if we think about kind of the embeddability piece and monetization of the platform, I guess maybe how that layers in incremental conviction as well too, right? Is that something that can lower friction around adoption? Is that something that can increase kind of the likelihood of success and value alignment with customers? But maybe how the platform positioning and embeddability of agents maybe layers in kind of incremental confidence in that right to win around agents.

Yeah, I just want to make sure you're a little muted on that. I want to make sure I'm answering the right question.

Yeah, so the ability to kind of embed it into the existing platform, right, and kind of touch the value.

So a few things I'd start with on this. So it really starts with what sort of we talk about internally all the time about the AI, the product magic. You know, we're able to create products now across many, if not all, of our software businesses where when the customer sees in early betas and early trials, like, what the product can do, like, their eyes sort of pop out of their head. It's, like, truly, like, a magical experience. Like, I didn't know software could do that. Right, so that's what gets us, like, really excited. We just saw it last week, for instance, at the Vertifor customer conference, just sort of as an example. So in terms of monetization, generally, so that's one. Second is sort of on-stack AI embedded natively in workflows is a winning play, a huge incumbent

advantage, so is the second thing.

I think for us is there's not going to be a one-size-fits-all. There are some businesses today that already price on a consumption basis. Think like softwriters and pharmacy automation or what Convoy does at DAT. So I think those will be monetized on a consumption basis. Also, those customers' unit economics generally are driven on their own consumption, so it aligns with the customer unit economics. I think more broadly, though, the monetization is going to be one that sort of, as you allude in your question, balances adoption and long-term monetization. So I think that's going to not be largely consumption-based. Our customers very much are saying very clearly they need to be able to plan for and budget what the spend is going to be. So it will likely be some sort of a subscription with an overage based on utilization of the AI tools. I think that aligns nicely with adoption because then the customers are going to be focused on how to realize the magic value, if you will, and not be worried every time they press a button it costs money. But then when it gets fully adopted and it's, like, deeply embedded into workflows, we'll be able to sort of grow with that utilization. And I would just add that our center reach business is furthest along in this journey.

They've been out in the market with AI products for a year and a half or two years, and all of their AI is incremental. It's based on learners, which you could say is some form of consumption, right? It's not based on practitioners but learners. But that's been a – and, you know, customers are seeing real value, as Neil highlighted on the prepared remarks in terms of workflow efficiency and better revenue realization.

Very helpful. Thank you both. And maybe, Jason, kind of just sticking with you quickly as well, too, obviously kind of reiterating the full-year revenue guide, 5% to 6% organic. We just did 6% this year. We've got some mechanics kind of layering in and easier comps in the back half as well, too, but maybe kind of just give us a broader sense of how the start of the year kind of layers and conviction and maybe that kind of conservative view that we continue to take to the guidance framework here going forward?

Yeah, look, it's a strong start to the year. Very encouraged by what we've seen. But, you know, we're just one quarter in, so we want to sort of see how things play As Neil talked about, we have a couple, like you said, mechanical things in the second quarter, non-recurring in AS. We'll be a little bit more impacted than the first quarter. And then we're just, you know, in TEP, we're comping a high watermark in Q2, but that'll ease off in the second half. And then, as we've talked about, the second half will improve in software with Subslash and Central Reach turning organic. And then we have just some easing comps in AS. So all that just sort of, you know, blends into our, you know, sort of holding the range at this point. But we'll see how it plays out.

Great. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from Brent Thiel with Jeffries. Your line is now open.

Hi, this is Rhea on for Brentville. Thank you for taking the question. Neil, just curious to hear your thoughts on the private markets given ongoing volatility. Can you just tell us a little bit more about what you're seeing right now and if it's changed your outlook at all?

Talking about private markets on M&A, talking about?

Correct.

Yeah, sure. So as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, it's definitely been with the public market drawdown. It's gone from the busiest we've been in a long time to the least busy. We're still busy. We're still active. As I mentioned, it's more proprietary. It's certainly more targeted. But it's actually, we think, the M&A setup's actually improved a bit for us over the last 90 days in the context that the LP pressure that we've talked about now for a couple years continues to exist. That has not changed in any capacity. If anything, it's maybe increased over the course of the next 90 days. The other thing that's happened that's been, as everybody's widely reported, people understand, is now we've got the private credit dynamic that also is putting pressure on the asset class. So for us, we think the combination of those two is will likely service more quality assets in the processes, and we're a very advantaged buyer in that regard. But the timing is still to be determined. You know, we're modeling out what these maturities look like on the private credit side. There's not a meaningful maturity cliff this year, but if you're a private equity sponsor, seller, you want to think about divesting an asset well before maturity. So that's something that Janet and her team are sort of aligning up. So we think there's an opportunity here to get, you know, potentially, I should underscore potentially, to acquire, you know, AA plus assets at differentiated values, given the backdrop of the dynamics here. The timing of this is to be determined, but we'll stay active and process and prosecute the opportunities in front of us.

Yeah, and I would just reiterate, we refinanced our five-year revolver this quarter at a very good cost of capital, sort of tightened up the spread a little bit. So shout-out to Shannon and Dave Baker for getting that done this quarter. Just a great job there. And, you know, just positions as well. We have a lot of balance sheet flexibility, and we'll be able to move quickly when the opportunities arise.

Got it. That's helpful. And then just on Dell Tech's government contracting business, Did you see any impact in the corridor at all from the war in the Middle East, and is it having any impact on your outlook for the remainder of the year?

Yeah, we asked that very specific question in our call down with DELTEC, and the short answer is, you know, very little, if any. There certainly is a sliver of the sort of aerospace defense subsector of government contractors that are focused on munitions and sort of war effort. So that's a small sliver of the population, of the broader, say, contractor population. So it had, you know, if in effect a minimally negative impact just in terms of those contractors are focused on the war effort and not on contracting for ERP software, but it wasn't material in the quarter.

Great. Thanks so much. Your next question comes from Joseph Brewerink with Baird. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you. I think all application software is facing this question around whether AI-related spending grabs an outsized wallet share and maybe the incumbents get squeezed along the way. I think the interesting thing about Roper is you have exposure to markets like legal and healthcare. I think those are the two biggest vertical AI adopters so far. And yet I think your respective software exposure there is still doing pretty well. What's your take on this topic, and have you seen any changes year-to-date, as we've also seen the big ARR numbers come through from the frontier model providers that make you more concerned in coming quarters?

The punchline on that, the TLDR is no. No is the budgetary spend that we sort of compete for. Double-click on that as the obvious answer, which is, and this is a personal opinion, that I think a lot of these surveys around IT spend are a little misleading because the whole point of the AI effort is we get to go monetize labor spend. So it's about a whole different bucket of opportunity to capture and provide value to the in-market. In the particular – across the whole platform, we're not seeing sort of an impact to us relative to allocation of budget, especially not in legal and healthcare. We've talked about Adderant, which is amazing in the quarter. has been an amazing few years here at Batteron.

Great. That's helpful. And then I heard enterprise bookings upload double digits over the trailing 12 months. I'm curious what they were in the quarter, and I think your definition excludes price. Maybe can you just comment on pricing power in the aggregate?

It was certainly above the double digits. We had an easier Q1 comp last year. I think the TTM is definitely the right way to think about it. Yeah, and then in terms, it does not include price. You're right. And price has held up very well. I think what we've said historically, we're very thoughtful across the portfolio about pricing and as part of our strategic plan work that we do is understanding that dynamic. And so we've continued to do that periodically over the last half decade or

Yeah. The only thing I'd add on pricing in addition to what Jason said is we actually think relative to what the market will bear on pricing, we have underutilized that lever in growth. And so it's not like a pan portfolio, go raise pricing. That's not how we operate at Roper. But as Jason said, it's like where you have earned the right with your product, your product value and your customer relationships to take a little bit more pricing, then we are doing that. But it's a very strategic, it's a very earned process. And we would hope that we would see a little bit, I don't know.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Terry Tillman with Truist. Your line is now open.

Yeah, thanks for taking my question and follow-up.

I wanted to build on the prior question on legal tech because, yeah,

it's in the media reports and some remarkable growth from some of these SaaS natives there. But I'm curious, though, Neil, you've called out Adderant, you know, a couple years of amazingness. And it does seem like it's like clockwork showing up in the segment level, slides every quarter on record this or that. How much more sustainability is there in terms of just the momentum in terms of getting folks to move to SaaS and just, you know, can this train keep going just on the momentum

with Adarin and then how to follow up? Sure. So it's Chris and the team there have done a great job. I mean, I'll give you a little bit, you know, a longer answer here. Adarin has been really good for a very long time for us, but to sort of keep it good, you know, it started with how do we just How do we just take it to our competitor and out-compete them in the marketplace? And that's how we went from 35%, 40% market share in large law to 60%, 65%. We just absolutely compete in one, and Chris and his predecessor, Dean, did a wonderful job in that sort of era of growth. Well, that era of growth, we could see, was going to end at some point, so we had to evolve. That's where he sort of said, okay, we have this install base of customers. How do we sell them more things? And so we then prosecuted both an organic and inorganic strategy to add the number of bolt-on products that we could or sort of integrated modules that we could sell to this large law customer base that made strategic sense. So we prosecuted or prosecuting that strategy. Then came along cloud, right? This was a constitution that did not want to move to the cloud. Then COVID happened. So we rapidly cloud-enabled the totality of the product set. and then we're now in the real still early innings, maybe third or fourth inning, maybe not even that late of moving this customer constituency to the cloud or that lift and shift. And now we have the tailwind of the AI benefit in terms of being able – so it's a multiple growth driver story, and I think there's quite a long way to go on this. But part of the benefit of owning any business for the long arc of time is you're always looking out horizon two and horizon three for what you have to build either organically or inorganically to sustain or improve growth rates.

Yep, yep, this is very helpful. And the follow-up is just what we're seeing, though, is with particularly not necessarily generative agentic. I mean, that's a pretty big lift and shift in change management, customers being comfortable having things still autonomous, and even getting it beyond kind of the experimental stage. So are you seeing with some of the businesses, you actually have to hire, you know, put in forward-deployed engineers or kind of change how you go to market or help the customers, and it does create some kind of incremental costs or just hand-holding. Just anything about how you help them consume this authentic stuff.

Yeah, I think that the short answer is yes. I think we mentioned last quarter that this year is going to be just a massive learning year for us across the enterprise. I'll put in the commercialization bucket of these AI tools, of which FDEs are certainly a component. How do you position it? How do you sell it? How do you price it? How do you get it implemented? How do you get utilization pull through? How do you drive renewal rates high? I mean, that whole customer journey is going to be, across the portfolio, a huge set of learnings for us. We have, I'll spare you the details on inside the portfolios, but we have portfolios where businesses where the uptake's just been very natural. We haven't had to have the four deployed engineers, because when you press the magic button and you get productivity savings, immediately that productivity savings is taken and the customer's operation is something that they can go do tomorrow. In other cases, there's some trepidation. If I press this button, do I lose my job? And you've got to sort of go through the whole change management process of that. I think in almost every case, folks don't, our customers, they don't lose, it's not lose their job. It's how do you sort of do task replacement, task augmentation. They can go play offense inside their customer. They'll go compete when, but it's certainly sort of something you have to overcome in that regard. So, yeah, we do expect across a certain part of the portfolio to do some version of a forward deployed engineer.

Thanks a lot.

Final thing I'd say on that is I think it's kind of from an investment point of view. It's probably more of a reallocation or rebalancing of investment from customer support, customer service to FDE. So I don't know if it's like a huge cost increase. It's just a resource allocation dynamic.

Got it. Thanks.

Your next question comes from Joe Giordano with TD Cowan. Your line is now open.

Hey, guys.

Morning.

Morning. Just curious on your talk about, like, embeddability and subscription plus overage in the future. Like, I get the view of, like, I don't want our customers to think every time they click a button, it costs them money. I fully get that. If these things become embedded and, like, the efficiencies potentially require less people at your customers, like, how do you kind of judge the ROI of the investment necessary to kind of, am I saying, I don't know what I'm saying, to, like, kind of stay in the same place? Like, the product is getting better, but you're getting, like, the same kind of subscriptions. And it's, like, costing you more to maybe achieve that now than it did in the past. So how do you kind of evaluate the ROI on the required spend to kind of get to that place?

Yeah, I think it's – so these are very hard-dollar ROIs. I mean, we've said publicly, for instance, at DAT Convoy to manually broker a load. It's somewhere between $100 and $200 of labor to do that. You know, you use our load automation. it's somewhere in the, you know, $40 range, so it's a demonstrable hard dollar ROI. You know, similar things can be said at, you know, for instance, at Vertifor, one of the agentic tools they released last week, it's a reconciliation tool. The time and motion study is it's like 17 minutes per reconciliation. Our tool does it in 30 seconds. Then you do these, like, scores of these a day. So you can sort of see the time savings, and then you can get to a financial ROI. So these are pretty hard ROI and products, and the sales teams are taking that message to the market, to the customer base.

And I would just say that we're using local, smaller language models, maybe even older versions, so you're not consuming a lot of tokens when you're doing this activity. And you can continue to change the prompts to make it more efficient over time. And so, you know, even at Vertifor, we've taken that cost of goods down meaningfully in a matter of weeks. So I think it's still very accretive from a margin perspective.

Yeah, that's kind of what I'm getting at more of the ROI from Roper's standpoint. I get the ROI from the customers. It's more like if we're spending money to develop new AI tools that are then embedded in the product that we're already offering, Like, how is the ROI on the increased investment you need in 2026 versus the investment you needed, you know, in 2021 to get the same customer and keep the same customer happy?

Well, and I would just say on the development front, I mean, we're seeing demonstrable efficiencies, right, with the frontier models itself. So we're getting a lot more output and a lot more roadmap consumed. So, I mean, talk about just OPEX investment. You know, we're not assuming productivity, but we're taking that back into the roadmap. So I don't think it changes fundamentally, you know, our P&L structure and our margin profile.

Cool. Thanks, guys.

Joe, apologies for missing the thrust of your question.

No problem, Neil. Your next question comes from George Kuro Sawa with Citi. Your line is now open.

On the AI Strike team led by Shane and Eddie that you put together, you know, it sounded like they completed their listening tour last quarter and have now been, you know, put out into the field. It sounds like some early success at Vertifor. If you could just touch on, you know, how they ended up sort of stack ranking the opportunities that they see in front of them and then maybe the scope of their involvement and how much it's led to, you know, an improvement in velocity.

Yeah, so I'm delighted to double click into that. So just to remind everybody sort of the three objectives of this AI, this Roper sort of accelerator team, one, and first and foremost, is to sort of coach and teach, right? This is about enablement of our 21 software companies to do what they've already learned on their own relative to AI and genetic development and then do it even better. So that's number one. to shoulder and build. And then the third one is to where we can share some common runtime or routines on the AI front across the Roper companies where it makes sense. So that's sort of the goal and focus of this group. In terms of where we're allocating the team, this is very much an executive leadership team. It is basically size of prize, fork ranking, force ranking this. In terms of it is one of our largest opportunities, if not the largest opportunity we have from an agentic automation point of view. Six agents released last week at their Accelerate conference. That is just the very, very beginning. The model that, and then we, this quarter, we'll sort of broaden that from one engagement with one business. It's now six as the team grows. and we have now five additional businesses that are sort of in the early stages of partnering with. And the final thing is about speed. I mean, I think the unlock here is, at least I think Amy and the team at Vertifor would agree, is our team, the Roper team, sort of very much partnered. So you can imagine leadership resources on our team working hand-in-hand with engineers on the Vertifor team on how to do this AI development, one, because there's a little bit of art to this and not just science. Number two, there is a speed coefficient that our team brings given their history about sort of modern day, like current, very contemporary practices of agentic development and just the pace. And then there's just good old-fashioned change management. How do you sort of break bottlenecks and barriers that go fast and and we saw literally I know it's sort of an overused term but 10x kind of productivity gains partnering with Vertifor on some of this development in terms of speed and and quality so we're super encouraged it's very early days I don't want Shane to hear this and think they've manifested fully they've got a lot of work to do but could not have gone better in my view in the first six months okay that's great to hear and then

I wanted to ask kind of more broadly, when you look across the portfolio, it seems like AI commercialization is in sort of different stages. You've got businesses like Adderant, Central Reach that seem to be resounding successes. Others seem to be coming up right behind them. When you look across that landscape, any pattern matching in terms of why some of these businesses seem to be moving a little faster than others? Is it primarily customer driven or what would you attribute the, you know, the relative successes there too.

I think it is probably, Jason, I'll give an opportunity if he wants to add anything. I think if there's a pattern match there, when you have, there's 21 software companies in the business, and while we want everyone to be, you know, going as fast as they possibly can, you have an array of where people are in their maturity. And where we're most advanced, we're able to sort of get the agentic skews into just in development first and to the market first, and sort of now the next wave of this, we talk a lot about SocialReach and Adderant and Convoy and DAT, they're the tip of the spear. Now we have like 10 or 12 companies, maybe a couple more, like just now, just getting to market with real agentic magic skews versus like chatbots and embedded sort of gen AI search inside of existing products where the value unlock is. And so we can, and we also take a little bit offline about sort of more deeper operational pattern recognition, but that's what I would say about the commercialization phase is who sort of had product ready first. That's right.

Yeah, and I think the benefit of being part of Roper, and we set our president summit a couple months ago, and we did an AI sort of showcase for those who are along, so it just helps with the learning acceleration, but I would agree with Neil that it's those that embrace and saw a true customer problem early on and then got after it a little sooner. But others are coming up the curve very quickly.

Thanks for taking the questions.

Your next question comes from Clark Jeffries with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Hello. Thank you for taking the question. You know, I just wanted to follow up on the comments around, you know, ground-to-cloud conversions, advancing meaningfully. I'd love to understand the impact of SaaS transitions broadly in the application software segment. you know is that contributing points of growth today you know you made the comment around 85% of the segment is in the mid single digit plus range and growth while nine recurring was essentially flat so I would just wanted to know if it's something that would be of increasing benefit or already playing out in that segment and then one follow up yeah happy to take the

question so just as you think about the percentage of you know two-thirds or so today so we have about a billion of maintenance, and we think that that will convert over, oh, say the next five to ten years or so, and that should convert at two to two and a half times lift from maintenance to SAS. And so today, we're kind of, if you think about, you know, the percentage that we have to go, we're sort of in the first or second inning of that journey. And so it does add, call it 50 to 100 basis points of growth a year, should for the next five to ten years. The only thing I'd add

is when we talked about this in the past Clark, we've also said we are very much pacing this ground to cloud conversion at our customers pacing. We're not like forcing it to them. I'll say with the advent of AI, I should have mentioned earlier on the monetization, another monetization method for AI is embedding the AI sort of features in the cloud product and that is a very compelling pull to make this transition go a little bit faster. So instead of eight to ten years maybe it's four to six. I don't know what the right number is, but we would expect to see that go a little bit faster. The other thing is we made a tremendous amount of investment over the last three years getting product enabled. You know, that was because we're going our customer pacing, there was an urgency to get product enabled. And now we are extraordinarily product enabled. So basically pretty feature parity, if not more so in the cloud product than on-prem. So I think the setup here is

a little bit better than it was a few years ago. Yeah. And I would just say it's mostly, and you You know, it's going to be Adderance a little further along, as you know, power plants in the early innings, but definitely much more cloud-enabled today than they were. And then when you think about those that are a little bit further behind, it's more health care, but that's, you know, our clinic-assist business and labs, that's just kind of the nature of that end market. And so we see the areas of Adderance and Power Plant being those that will be more near-term in terms of cloud migration.

Perfect. That all makes sense. And then, you know, one thing that kind of stood out to me was the margin impact in the application software segment. The margin impact of businesses owned for less than four quarters was actually positive year over year. Just wanted to unpack that. Is the takeaway here that even the earlier stage acquisitions last year are getting to margin parity quickly?

So in application software, it's our central reach business. And that business is, you know, it's a very, you know, the business has ample R&D investment. I think R&D's percent of revenue is like 20%, but they just have extremely strong incrementals. They're a very cloud-native platform, and so as they expand, they have very good incrementals there. And when we talk about the acquisitions in our network software segment, we've talked about the business convoy that we added on to DAT. It's a technology investment. We're super committed to that investment to automate the spot freight market over time. So that actually has a drag on margins. That plus our subsplash business, which is a lower margin, faster growing business that as they grow, they will scale margins. But you can see in our network segment, it does have a pretty meaningful drag on margins. Now over time, as Convoy continues to grow, that should be a tailwind as we go into the out years. but this year it's you know it is a little bit of a drag on margin perfect

thank you very much your next your next question comes from Josh Tilton with

Wolf Research your line is now open hey guys thanks for thanks for sneaking me in here and congrats on a really strong start to the year I will keep it to one given the hour but my question is just basically you know you're very clear that the guidance still doesn't assume a recovery at Deltec and DAT for the rest of the year. Can you just remind us the confidence that you have in the rest of the application network software business and kind of offsetting that weakness throughout the year?

I'd say just if we go through the segment, so with application software we feel good about sort of what's going to happen in the second half. We just talked about Central Reach just having a really strong start under our ownership and a lot of that's recurring and so that's just going to flow through in the second half. We've talked about being 80 basis points or so of accretion in the second half for that segment. We still feel good about that. And then in network, you know, DAT is, you know, looking good in the first quarter. We'll see sort of how things play out. Foundry will continue to be, you know, sort of getting better throughout the year. They had a great start to the year. And then Subslash, you know, turns organic in the fourth quarter, and that's for sure accreted to the segment. So, yeah, feel good about the rest of the business.

Thank you, guys.

Your next question comes from Ken Wong with Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.

Hey, great. Like Josh, thanks for sneaking me in. Just one for me. It sounds like kind of the downtick in 2Q is just purely due to tough comps, but just wanted to kind of make sure and clarify any geopolitical macro dynamics that you guys baked into that assumption as well, given kind of the current situation that arose?

No, not at all. I mean, this is just like, you know, timing, really, in the AS segment. It's our non-recurring perpetual activity, and so that's squarely what it is. We need pure visibility to that. And then in TEP, you know, no, I think we're comping 9% quarter as a high watermark last year, so it's just sort of a comp in the second quarter in TEP. It'll get better in the second half, so nothing geopolitical at all. We're mostly U.S., as you know, so we don't see anything in the Middle East.

Okay, fantastic. Thanks a lot, guys.

Your next question comes from Julian Mitchell with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Hi, good morning. Thanks very much for the question. Maybe first off, just wanted to try and put a finer point on the full year guidance. So is it fair to say that the sort of core EBITDA guide is essentially unchanged and it's really a kind of share count-driven guide and maybe help us understand what the share count assumption is now at the sort of guidance midpoint. And I think the guide embeds no extra buybacks beyond today. Just wanted to check that.

That's correct. Yeah, so we had about a couple hundred million of share repurchase between. And so I think, as I mentioned, but the ending share count for Q1 is 102.4. And then you've got some, obviously, dilution to add on top of that. So that's what we're assuming. But, yeah, you're right. We've mainly flown through the first quarter beat and then the buyback activity for the balance of the year.

And the first quarter beat for us, Julian, was partially from our model operating and partially buyback.

That's helpful. And within the network business, you know, DAT has had a very tough sort of demand or macro backdrop, and it's been executing well within that. finally the last six months there's better signals in the freight markets in the US maybe sort of flesh out a little bit more what you're seeing in that business and and sort of what's dialed in for that transport link business in the US for the balance of the year please yeah so as we mentioned in the

call we're not in the guide there's not an assumption for improvement also I'll just double click a little bit on the prepared comment. So for the first time in, I'll look at Jason, in a couple, three years, we've had carrier, the carrier count side of the network increased, which is certainly a green shoot that we've been, we've been waiting quite a time. Now, we've had some headfakes on the headfakes intra-quarter on that number in the past, and so we're going to remain cautious. Also, the input cost, the diesel costs, you know, certainly not helpful. So carrier margins of profitability would be a little bit challenging. And so, but we're cautiously optimistic that there might be a freight recovery. You know, rejection rates got better. The rates got better, as we talked about, 20 or 30 percent better. So we'll see how it plays out, but we've underwritten no improvement in the outlook.

That's great. Thank you. Your next question comes from Dean Dre with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Thank you. This is Kenny Simons with Dean. I wanted to ask about Neptune business. So one of your peers has some meaningful project delays, disruption in the quarter for their water meter business. Have you seen anything similar in terms of the industry dynamic or even any market share changes during the quarter?

Yeah, I appreciate the question. So for us in our Neptune business, we would say largely no. We've not seen a project, any project delays. Now, as a backdrop on that, slightly different than the competitor you described. Now Neptune plays in the segments that are on the smaller municipalities. So we have never had a large amount of project-based work, generally speaking. So it's really not an apples-to-apples sort of question. The other part of this is we had pretty decent sort of short-cycle demand in the quarter. I think that's largely because we, and I'm not commenting about our competitor because we don't know their business the way they do, But we, Neptune did a good job managing channel inventory in 2025, and so the hope or expectation is we'll be able to ship closer to retail in 2026 on the short cycle side. I think we saw that play out at least early in the year in Q1.

Thank you. If I just have a follow-up, if you could unpack the cost pressure dynamics for the Neptune business or even at the overall TAP segment level, either in the magnitude or the timeline to offsetting those, that would be helpful as we kind of think about the segment incremental margins moving forward.

Sure, let me, I'll take a crack at this, but I definitely want to ask Jason to sort of correct and, and so on Neptune, it's, it's, it's really the, the ingot cost. And what we decided to do, I think Don and the team did a very sort of wise thing here. We did, you remember, 3Q, really July of last year, we pushed the sort of a, call it a tariff or a raw material sort of surcharge into the market. It really had a, a negative demand impact in the short run. The signal from the customer was, hey, we certainly appreciate, you know, we've got on board sort of global price inflation, but we'd rather do it through regular weight pricing versus surcharging. And so we will sort of – we expect, by the way, ingot cost – the baseline assumption we have is ingot cost is going to stay high. I mean, this is – with all the data centers and just the demand for copper, this is a derivative impact of that. So our baseline assumption is this input cost is going to stay high for a while, So it'll just be corrected or the margin will be captured through regular weight pricing, which takes a couple quarters to sort of work through backlog and get into the market. So we're taking a longer view on that. In terms of the balance of the segment, it's really, it's both Northern Digital and it's Verathon. These are businesses that are, you know, per our strategy, per the market opportunity, are becoming more reoccurring in nature, reoccurring consumables, which is a great thing about the predictability of growth and the absolute levels of growth in the businesses, but the consumables come with a lower GP percentage. So, GP dollars are going up, but GP percentages may be a little pressured on those two businesses. Now, they also do a very good job managing below GP to EBITDA or OP, where we don't think there'll be a lot of OP compression over a long arc of time because they do have natural leverage in the business. Those are of the Amex at play. Jason, Nathan, you want to amplify there? No, I think that you covered it.

Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. We will now return back to Zach Moxie for any closing remarks. Thanks everyone for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you during our next earnings call. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.