Executive readout · one minute
Call research workspace
Read the call alongside every captured source. Transcript, audio stay in one workspace.
Earnings call · FY2026 Q2
Executive readout · one minute
Read the call alongside every captured source. Transcript, audio stay in one workspace.
Management tone
Positive
Net tone +45 · low hedging
Research coverage
2 live sources
Switch sources without leaving this page or losing your listening position.
Open the source you need; every reader stays inside this workspace.
Listen and read together
The spoken word highlights as audio plays. Select any word to seek to that moment.
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us and welcome to the Science School second quarter 2026 Results Analyst School. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star 1 again. I will now hand the conference over to Sharif Bakra, Chief Communications Officer and Head of Investor Relations at Science School. Please go ahead.
Hello, everyone, and welcome to ScienceCo's second quarter 2026 earnings call. I'm Sharif Bakra, Chief Communications Officer and Head of Investor Relations. And I'm pleased to be joined today in Brussels by our CEO, Mike Redosich, and our CFO, Christopher Davis. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded and will be accessible for replay on the Investor Relations section of our website later today at scienceco.com forward slash investors. I'd also like to remind you that during this call, we'll be making forward-looking statements regarding our future business and financial performance that are subject to risks and uncertainties. The slides related to this presentation, along with today's press release, are also available to download from our website. Turning to today's agenda, Mike will begin with an overview of the quarter. Chris will then go into more details on our financials before turning the call back to Mike, who will discuss our updated outlook for the balance of the year. We'll then be happy to take your questions. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Mike.
Thank you, Sharif, and good morning and good afternoon to everyone joining us today. During our last earnings call, I spoke about our focus on moving quickly from diagnosis to action in order to accelerate Science Code's value creation. Since then, I've been very encouraged by the progress we have made and the pace at which we are translating our strategic and operational priorities into tangible actions that are strengthening both our near-term performance and our longer-term growth trajectory. The sense of urgency across the organization to close the gap between our potential and our performance is beginning to show in our results. We returned to year-over-year growth in the second quarter, an important milestone that reflects the momentum we are building. Looking ahead, we expect this positive momentum to continue through the second half of the year as reflected in our updated outlook. Turning to the highlights of the quarter on slide 5, in the second quarter we delivered 5% year-over-year growth in both volumes and net sales despite a dynamic operating environment. This performance was driven primarily by strong volume growth in our core material segment, with performance and care also contributing to growth. Composite materials delivered an outstanding quarter, with sales increasing 18% year-over-year. In specialty polymers, the improved momentum we have seen since the beginning of the year continued, resulting in a return to year-over-year growth. The improved performance in specialty polymers was broad-based, led by strong growth in semiconductors, driven by improving end-market demand, and continued share gains with key customers. We also delivered strong volume growth in automotive, particularly in battery-related applications, as well as in construction and broader industrial markets. Within performance and care, healthy volume growth continued in our mining business with technology solutions, as well as in our industrial applications and home and personal care within Novcare. These gains more than offset weaker demand in agro following an exceptionally strong second quarter last year, as well as lower volumes in coatings reflecting softer demand in North America. Turning to profitability, we expanded our gross margin by 100 basis points to 34%, driven by top-line growth, the strength of our differentiated value proposition, and our continued focus on improving gross margin performance. Underlying EBITDA of €311 million exceeded our expectations despite temporary cost headwinds. This reflects the improving momentum we are seeing across the business, which we expect to continue into the second half of the year. From a strategic perspective, the most significant update since last quarter's call was the launch of the Strategic Review of Performance and Care, which we announced toward the end If you recall my first earnings call in February, I spoke about setting a clear strategic direction for ScienceGo, with a singular focus on accelerating value creation. Since then, together with the board, we have undertaken a comprehensive strategic assessment of the company's long-term direction, defining where we will focus, where we will prioritize our investments, and how we will optimize our portfolio to deliver sustained innovation leadership, above-market growth, and superior financial performance. The outcome of that assessment is a clear strategic intention, to position ScienceCo as a pure-play specialty materials and advanced technologies company with greater exposure to structurally attractive end markets, including aerospace and defense, electronics, health care, energy, and advanced mobility. Since announcing the strategic review, we have been moving with urgency. including the appointment of advisors to evaluate a full range of strategic options with a clear focus on maximizing long-term value for all stakeholders, and we will continue to provide updates on our progress as appropriate. Slide 6 provides a high-level overview of Science Code's portfolio across our three business segments. As you can see, Materials is our largest and highest margin segment, generating more than 70% of our underlying EBITDA. Between specialty polymers and composite materials, we believe we have two of the most distinctive and attractive businesses in the industry. Their leadership positions are built on differentiated innovation, deep application expertise, strong customer partnerships, and exposure to highly attractive end markets. Starting on the left, since the beginning of the year, one of my top priorities has been to improve the performance of specialty polymers, our largest and highest margin business within materials. This is where we identified the greatest gap between the business's potential and its performance, making it our single largest organic opportunity to create value. In addition to strengthening the leadership team, we have undertaken a comprehensive diagnostic supported by external experts to identify the actions needed to translate the business's outstanding fundamentals and strong competitive advantages into faster growth, sustained pricing leadership, and strong margin delivery. I am encouraged by the progress we have made. While returning to year-over-year growth in the second quarter was an important milestone, we still see significant additional opportunity to accelerate our growth trajectory, improve how we bring innovation to market, win new business, and further strengthen our customer partnerships. Importantly, we have substantial available capacity across the business, enabling us to drive meaningful top-line growth without significant incremental capital investment. Over time, this should translate into stronger cash flow generation and higher returns. Turning to composite materials, this is our fastest-growing business driven by technology leadership, strong underlying demand across both commercial aerospace and defense applications, and the breadth of our customer relationships and platform exposure. As a reminder, aerospace is our largest end market and a key growth platform for ScienceCo, representing more than 20% of group net sales and approximately 35% of materials net sales. As Rodrigo Elizondo, President of Composite Materials, highlighted on our last earnings call, the majority of our business is secured through long-term contracts and supported by extensive qualification databases that are integral to the certification of many of the world's most advanced aircraft programs. To put this in perspective, the breadth of our technologies and product portfolio gives us presence on virtually every major aerospace platform, from legacy aircraft to the latest next-generation programs. As a trusted advanced materials partner to OEMs and suppliers, we provide the differentiated materials and application expertise that support today's production platforms while enabling the next generation of aerospace programs that will ramp over the coming decade. We also continue to strengthen our position in the defense and space markets, providing an additional avenue for growth while further diversifying our portfolio. At the recent Farnborough International Air Show, I had the opportunity to meet with customers and partners from across the aerospace and defense industry. Whether discussing advanced air mobility, next-generation commercial aircraft, or future defense programs, the message was consistent. Our advanced materials are increasingly critical to enabling their innovation and growth. These discussions also reinforce the importance of our collaborative approach, working alongside customers and our partners across the value chain to shape the future of the industry. This is also evident through our commercial successes. For example, our new multi-year agreement with Airbus, covering our range of composite and adhesives across commercial, defense, and helicopter programs. Turning to performance and care, as a reminder, we are a global leader in surface chemistry solutions and specialty mining reagents, serving the consumer care, agro-coatings, and mining end markets. Within this segment, Novcare is a global leader in formulation technologies with a strong track record of innovation and successfully scaling differentiated solutions into high-value market niches. Technology Solutions is a leading provider of specialty mining reagents and technical service that enable the efficient extraction of critical metals, such as copper. Our deep application expertise and on-site technical support create strong customer partnerships and help drive long-term growth. These are terrific businesses, which I led for a number of years, which have a different financial profile, length of innovation cycles, investment requirements, and growth levers to materials. Finally, on other solutions or Aroma, where I previously mentioned that we would aim to have an update around the middle of the year, we are continuing to make progress and are in active discussions with a number of interested parties. Before turning the call over to Chris, I wanted to briefly go through the pillars I set out in February, transparency, execution excellence, innovation leadership, and disciplined capital deployment and comment on the progress we are making from a transparency perspective we remain committed to being open about what is working what is not and the actions we are taking to improve performance that is included strengthening our leadership team and proactively launching the strategic review of our performance and care business the same philosophy guides how i lead internally. We have increased the frequency and quality of dialogue across the organization to better understand where we can move faster, serve our customers more effectively, and accelerate growth. Turning to commercial execution, we are operating at a very different pace than we were at the start of the year, with a sharper focus on creating new growth opportunities while expanding our share of wallet with existing customers. Within specialty polymers, I am encouraged by the commercial progress we have made, particularly in the share gains in ultra-pure water piping for semiconductor manufacturing, where demand remains strong and in under-the-hood applications in automotive, where our high-performance specialty polymers continue to replace metal. We also secured a long-term extension of our partnership with Sealed Air to develop high-performance, high-barrier food packaging solutions. In composite materials, I referenced our new multi-year agreement with Airbus. This builds on the long-term agreement we announced earlier this year with Boeing and further reinforces our position as a trusted partner to the world's leading aerospace manufacturers. We look forward to supporting their growth for many years to come. Turning to innovation, our most important competitive advantage and a key driver of sustainable growth. Alongside the more structural objectives we have established to increase our vitality index and shorten the time from innovation to commercialization, we continue to bring differentiated solutions to the market across both materials and performance and care. Within specialty polymers, we are scaling the commercialization of our next generation Diophan Super B high-performance polymer for pharmaceutical packaging. It delivers superior protection against oxygen and moisture while enabling smaller, more sustainable packaging formats. In performance and care, we recently launched a new soil-release polymer for liquid laundry detergents that combines outstanding cleaning performance with energy savings by enabling effective washing in shorter and colder cycles. Finally, turning to capital allocation, our priority remains clear. doing more with less by maximizing returns from our existing asset base before committing capital to new capacity. Where compelling organic growth opportunities exist, we will continue to evaluate them with discipline against all other capital allocation alternatives. A good example is the expansion of our Harbor-to-Grace facility in Maryland, which will strengthen our U.S. manufacturing footprint to support growing customer demand in the aerospace market while delivering attractive returns. With that, I'll turn the call over to Chris and I'll return later to discuss our outlook for the balance of the year.
Thank you, Mark. Good morning and good afternoon to everyone on the call. The second quarter of 2026 showed selective areas of strength while the broader industrial recovery remains uneven. Demand was particularly encouraging in semiconductors, batteries, automotive, and composite materials, even though dynamics differ by end market and position in the value chain. Encouragingly, we are seeing early signs of improving momentum in several of these markets that give us confidence in the underlying direction of the business. Turning to slide nine, reflecting the second quarter financial results. As Mark mentioned, the second quarter marked a clear improvement in our underlying performance as we returned to organic sales growth. Net sales for the quarter was 1.6 billion euro on the back of broad-based volume gains across our portfolio. Sequentially, sales have increased 11%, supported by higher volumes and improved mix in both specialty polymers and composite materials. I will walk through the key drivers of performance across our business segments in a later slide. As we have previously mentioned, we remain committed to defending our gross margins, as this reflects how we manage both our sales and cost of goods sold. Our pricing discipline remains central to how we manage the business. Combined with disciplined cost management, it continues to support the resilience in our gross margins. Gross profit increased to €528 million for the quarter, resulting in a gross margin of 34%, A sequential improvement of 230 basis points, driven by stronger volumes in specialty polymers and technology solutions. EBITDA of €311 million for the quarter increased 24% sequentially, reflecting stronger performance improvement across all businesses, most notably specialty polymers, which saw stronger volumes in semiconductor and automotive applications. EBITDA was lower largely due to year-over-year increased variable compensation costs along with incremental costs in specialty polymers to support commercial execution and operational improvement, which are not expected to be incurred beyond 2026. Excluding the above target element of variable compensation expenses, our underlying operating performance continued to improve and our EBITDA margin would have been approximately 200 basis points higher than the 20% we reported this quarter. Operating cash flow was 131 million euro in the quarter, a 111 million euro increase compared to the prior year, bringing the year-to-date operating cash flow to €213 million. The improvement reflects our continued discipline in working capital management, along with no separation costs compared to the prior comparable period of 2025. For 2026, we continue to expect operating cash flow of approximately €700 million, Euro, driven by the non-repeat in subsequent quarters of the annual variable compensation cash outflow in the second quarter and absence of separation costs. Turning to operating performance by segment on slide 10 and starting with materials. Compared to the prior year, organic sales increased 7%, driven by volume growth in composite materials and a return to growth in specialty polymers. Specialty polymers delivered a 2% year-on-year organic sales growth. The improvement was driven by broad-based volume gains across the automotive, industrial and building applications, while electronics also returned to year-on-year volume growth, as the semiconductor market showed early signs of recovery. This growth was partially offset by lower volumes in the healthcare and food and packaging end markets. In automotive Technoflon, one of our high performance heat resistant sealing solutions for under the hood applications, delivered strong growth in batteries. Momentum remained strong, driven by robust demand for separator coatings and NMC binders across Asia, as well as new program winds. Higher volumes in industrial and building were driven by robust demand for our high-performance polymer solutions used in advanced piping systems. Composite materials delivered its strongest quarter on record since the inception of ScienceCo, with organic sales increasing 18% year-on-year. Growth was driven by civil aerospace, supported by the Boeing recovery and higher build rates across key commercial aircraft programs. Sales growth in space and defense reflect the continued execution of our disciplined commercial strategy. The combination of specialty polymers returning to growth and another record performance in composite materials resulted in our materials segment delivering an underlying EBITDA of 266 million euro. This is aligned with the prior year, despite the previously mentioned higher variable remuneration and increased costs to drive growth and operational efficiencies. This translated into an EBITDA margin of 28%. Turning to performance and care, organic sales were stable year on year as continued strength in mining within technology solutions offset lower volumes in NovaCare. Within NovaCare, growth in home and personal care and in industrial applications was offset by softer demand in agro, reflecting lower volumes from a key customer and continued product rationalization in Latin America. Building remained challenging, although market conditions showed early signs of stabilisation. Technology solutions continued to benefit from strong mining activity with healthy reagent demand supported by favourable copper pricing. The net result is that performance and care delivered EBITDA of €92 million in the quarter, down 7% year-on-year, but up 12% sequentially, and delivered an EBITDA margin of 18%. Within the other solutions segment, EBITDA was 8 million euro for the quarter, with an EBITDA margin of 11%. Importantly, at a ScienceCo group level, sales and EBITDA increased 11% and 24% respectively, compared to the first quarter of 2026, driven by improved performance across all business units. The net effect of what I've just described is reflected on slide 11. Moving to EBITDA for the quarter. Underlying EBITDA of 311 million euro declined by 6% year-on-year, driven by lower underlying EBITDA in specialty polymers and Novocare, partially offset by higher EBITDA in composite materials. The decrease in EBITDA for specialty polymers was driven by selective pricing action in certain end markets as well as an increase in costs to drive an improvement in business performance partially offset by volume recovery in automotive, battery, industrial, building and a return in semiconductor demand. This was offset by improved performance from the composite materials segment, driven by stronger volume growth across all applications, as well as improved margins. The net result is underlying EBITDA in materials is flat on an organic basis, compared to the second quarter of 2025. Performance and care delivered resilient results, with EBITDA 7 million euro below the prior year on an organic basis, reflecting lower volumes and higher fixed costs in Novocare. Other solutions was up 2 million euro compared to the prior year period. Corporate costs have increased by 15 million euro in the quarter, primarily due to the reload of variable incentives. This is expected to continue through the remainder of the year. Turning to capital expenditure on slide 12, our total capital expenditure for the quarter was 95 million euro, down 16% year-on-year, including capital expenditure for the new ERP program. As we have previously stated, we will leverage our existing spare capacities to meet future volume growth, which requires no significant additional capital expenditure. looking ahead we will continue to make disciplined investments where demand is strong returns are attractive and additional capacity is required this includes composite materials for example the capacity expansion in the u.s. that mark referenced where aerospace demand continues to support long-term growth and targeted capacity expansions and specialty polymers including the Spinetta and Shanshu plants to meet increasing demand from semiconductor fabrications as investment activity begins to recover. We will continue to carefully manage capital expenditure and cash to balance our shorter-term targets with longer-term value creation. Our capital expenditure guidance of approximately €450 million for the full year remains unchanged. Turning to our financial position on slide 13, I am pleased to report that we continue to have a strong balance sheet with our net debt at 2.1 billion euro, a gearing ratio of 25 percent, and a leverage ratio of 1.9 times. We continue to have strong levels of liquidity available, as demonstrated by the 1.5 billion euro of undrawn committed bank facilities and a further 700 million euro of cash on hand. net financing costs of 75 million euro were incurred in the quarter reflecting the payment of coupons on corporate bonds that occurs in the second quarter of the year bringing the year to date net financing costs to 78 million euro and this remains aligned with our full year outlook of approximately 130 million euro with that i'll turn the call back to mike thank you
Thank you, Chris. Turning to our outlook for 2026, taking into account current market visibility and the ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, we continue to expect a gradual year-over-year recovery in volumes through the remainder of the year. This is expected to support stronger growth in the second half, led by our material segment, and to a lesser extent, performance and care. As you will have seen in the morning's press release, we have updated our outlook for the full year. Based on our first-half performance and current order book visibility, we now expect low- to mid-single-digit year-over-year volume growth in 2026. This compares with our previous expectation of low-single-digit growth, with the improvement primarily driven by specialty polymers and, to a lesser extent, composite materials and technology solutions. Turning to EBITDA, we now expect full-year underlying EBITDA of at least 1.1 billion euro, compared to our previous guidance of approximately 1.1 billion euro. This reflects the improved volume outlook we have now for the balance of the year. Moving on to cash flow, our outlook for operating cash flow remains unchanged, reflecting the expected working capital investment required to support higher volumes in the second half. We also continue to expect capital expenditures of approximately €450 million for the year. In closing, I am encouraged by the momentum we have built since the beginning of the year. Both segments are contributing to our improved performance with particularly strong progress in specialty polymers and composite materials our focus remains on executing the changes needed to unlock science co's full potential accelerating growth improving operational performance and delivering stronger cash generation and returns over the long term with that we'd be happy to take your questions thank you thank you mike we'll now move to the q a session and i kindly invite you to limit yourself to one question and one follow-up and to rejoin the queue as necessary in order to allow more analysts to ask their questions operator can we please have our first
question we will now begin the question and answer session please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up if you would like to ask a question please press start one to raise your hand to withdraw your question press start one again we ask that you pick your headset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes on the line of Laurent Favre with BNP. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good afternoon. My question is regarding those comments, those encouraging comments on the semis side. I I understand that comps are also easy, so I'm wondering to what extent you're seeing actual underlying growth, and that's, I guess, partly for Q2, but more importantly, how you think about the second half and into 2027 for that important segment.
Hello, Laurent. Yeah, we are seeing some early momentum in the semiconductors as we enter the second half of the year, supported by an improving order book and strengthening demand that we're seeing across our Semicon customers. This is aligned with our earlier comments in 2026 when at that time, if you recall, we said that for semiconductors, while visibility remains challenging, we do expect to see gradual recovery in year-on-year volumes, resulting in stronger growth in the second half of the year. So as we look at it now, this is largely what we're seeing in the semiconductor space and the recovery is unfolding as expected in terms of structural growth drivers you know they remain intact and we believe our positioning available capacity customer engagement engagements are going to leave us very well placed to benefit as the market continues to recover here in 2026 and into 2027 thank you and on the follow-up I heard from Chris that the the approval for COMP weighed about 200 basis points, which I guess is about 30 million.
I just wanted to make sure I got that right and that that will continue in age two. So, I mean, is it right that your new guidance includes a step up of, I don't know, meet double digits, let's say absolute zero impact. And that next year, this impact should go away because I'm assuming that your incentives would be set against, I guess, a reset target or budget.
Yeah, I mean, the way you've calculated it is accurate. Our variable remuneration, both on short-term and long-term incentives in the current year is accrued in line with the performance of the business for 2026. In 2027, we will similarly accrue in line with the performance targets that are set for 2027, depending on the actual results at the time.
Okay, thank you. thank you Laurent your next question comes in the line of Sebastian Gray with Berenberg your line is now open please go ahead hello good afternoon and thank you for taking my question I have one on the relative profitability of composites and specialty polymers now because from what I understand spec polymers were still a little bit compressed on pricing in Q2 it wouldn't surprise me if composites is at all-time highs now in terms of margin Are we now talking about mid to high 20s for composites? How close are these two businesses together?
Yeah, let me take that one. I think as we've previously disclosed before, composite materials, which is exposed to a broad range of civil and defense customers and programs, has really strong underlying demand. The business has increased its EBITDA margin over the last five years from probably the low double digit to about to above 20 percent. and it remains in the low 20s as we've continued to hire resources to increase the operational output and performance of that business. Now, taking that into account, the margin for the materials segment is about 27.7% that we've disclosed, and that's in the second quarter of this year.
That's helpful. Thank you. And on the follow-up, if we talk about the longer-term portfolio structure, if Novcare and related businesses goes, What is the implication for the tax rate of the remaining group, given it's probably a bit more U.S. focused? Is it higher or is it too early to say?
Listen, I mean, the exact tax rate, as you'll appreciate, is impacted by the mix of profits in the countries in which they are generated. That said, on average, this can range between about 27% and 29% in any one year. But the way we look at it today, the sale of either Novocare or Aroma makes no material impact on the effective tax rate going forward and will really depend on the mix of profits and the countries of origin in the future.
That's helpful. Thank you. Thanks, Sebastian. Your next question comes from the line of Shitan Udashi with JP Morgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. I'll start with first on specialty polymers. If I look at your sales in second quarter, they were up 18% versus Q1. How much of this do you think is pre-buy? Because we've seen different level of pre-buy across different value chains. I'm just curious how much of your specialty polymer increase do you think is a pre-buy? And related to that, how much is pricing within that 18? And I'm asking this because if I look at year-on-year basis, your prices in specialty polymers were still negative. And I'm mindful that your raw material inflation will start to bite in Q3. So without pricing uplift, there could be a squeeze in margin. So are you able to raise prices to at least cover the inflation on cost? Second question, you know, just going back to the semis discussion, I was just reminding myself. Through last year, I think the message from the management was that you've seen a headwind of $40 million, $40 million from semiconductor de-stockings, which started, I think, in the second half of 2024. Where are we with recovering that headwind of $40 million? I mean, some would argue that given the strong growth we've seen in the underlying semiconductor market, you should actually see more than $40 million of earnings recovery from that end market. I'm just curious how much of that you've actually seen in Q2, and how much do you expect to see more in Q2, second half? And sorry, if I can squeeze last one, you know, there was a big increase in your admin costs in Q2 to 192 from 164 in Q1. And even last year, it was only 130. I'm just curious what is driving that. Maybe there's a bit of bonus, but just curious why such a big increase there.
Chris, you want to start on the last question, and then I'll cover the one on specialty polymers and semis?
Yeah, that's fun, Mark. When you look at the administrative costs on the face of the income statement, most of the increase is explained by the reload of the variable incentives, as mentioned in the financial section of my presentation, and also as mentioned by Laurent in his question. I think his numbers were reasonably accurate, as well as the incremental costs in specialty polymers to support the operational improvement. And then in composite materials, we continue to hire resources to increase the operational output and performance. The incremental costs in specialty polymers are not expected to recur beyond 2026. And this doesn't really detract from the ongoing savings programs where structural savings continue to be delivered. it. So as I said, I mean, the bulk of it relates to the reload. It'll continue for the remainder of the year, but whereas the incremental costs in specialty polymers, we expect that to not recur.
Okay. Thank you, Chris, and hello, Shetan. Regarding your question around specialty polymers and pre-buy, I would say that no, there was no pre-buy, and I would say that pretty much across the company. Specifically in specialty polymers, the 18% quarter-on-quarter growth in net sales was largely driven by higher volumes with pricing in Q2 that remained overall flat compared to Q1. The sequential increase in specialty polymers volumes reflects stronger underlying demand. And as we noted, it's in particular in the electronics end market driven by Semicon, as well as, but to a lesser extent, what we're seeing in the automotive and industrial in chemicals and markets. It's really not driven by any temporary effects linked to conflict or precautionary stocking. When it comes to higher raw material prices resulting from the conflict, as previously mentioned, we implemented pricing actions, including surcharges at the start of the quarter of Q2, with the aim of offsetting any type of cost increases. So we don't expect that to be a significant driver one way or another as we sit here today. On your second question, which was with regards to semis, you know, just at a high level, electronics represents about 8% of our net sales. Approximately two-thirds of our electronic sales serves the semiconductor applications. Around a quarter is smart devices and the balance is electronic applications. As mentioned at the beginning of the year, our outlook for Semicon expects a gradual recovery in year-on-year volumes, resulting in stronger growth in the second half of the year. In Q2, Semicon was up double-digit year-on-year and then grew at a higher number, sequentially driven by a recovery in underlying demand and share gains. So for the balance of the year, we expect stronger year-on-year growth compared to H1 for semis. You know, I'm not going to comment specifically on margin levels, but specialty polymers is our highest margin business. And more broadly, as semiconductor demand continues to strengthen in H2 and the comparison in smart devices becomes easier, we expect electronics to become a more meaningful growth contributor over time.
Thank you, Chaton. Your next question comes from the line of Sebastia Afoi with Bernstein. Your line is now open. please go ahead.
Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. On the strategic review, what would be your framework for RUQG as you proceed to support materials? Thanks.
Thank you, Sebastian. You know, on the strategic review, you know, having assessed our long-term direction, capital allocation, our value creation priorities, our intention is to further sharpen our portfolio, as we mentioned, to become a purer place, especially in materials and advanced Technologies Company, as well as making sure that we're focusing on the technologies where we see the strongest long-term growth opportunities, like aerospace and defense, electronics, healthcare, energy. This will help us drive sustainable innovation-led differentiation. As a result, we are evaluating a range of strategic options for our performance and care segment with an emphasis on maximizing long-term value for our shareholders. We just mentioned that we appointed advisors and experts to help us with that process, and we'll provide an update next quarter.
And follow-up, thank you. How should we think about the third quarter EBITDA development in the context of strong Q2? Because consensus was forecasting sequential acceleration. Is this fair, do you think?
Sorry, Sebastian. Could you repeat the question?
Oh, sorry. Do you hear me?
Yes, I can hear you now.
Okay, so how should we – sorry for the follow-up – how should we think about Q3 EBITDA development in the context of a strong Q2? And because consensus was casting sequential acceleration versus Q2, is this fair, do you think?
From our side, quarterly performance can really be driven by the timing of shipments in any one quarter. At this stage, we remain committed to our full-year guidance of EBITDA at least 1.1 billion euro, with the third quarter expected to be broadly in line with the second quarter. Now, I need to caveat that we continue to operate in an uncertain geopolitical environment, which continues to limit our visibility.
Okay, thank you. That's our four.
Thank you, Sebastian. Your next question comes from the line of Tristan Lamart with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.
Hi, thanks for taking my questions. The first one is, thanks, Mike, for the additional detail and semis. I just wanted to dive a little bit more into that. And I'm wondering if you went back to historic levels in that semis business, what would the kind of incremental EBITDA be? Is that kind of more than 100 million? I'm basically just wondering if this is a game changer or whether it's more of a side story. And then kind of linked to that, how do you think that semis growth has phased? because I guess there's been changes in stock levels at your customers and the fab build out is increasing in pace. And the second question is, you gave a lot of numbers around automotive and batteries and specialty polymers. I'm just wondering if you could give a little bit more detail on kind of what our main takeaway should be there, because I guess pricing's down, volume's up. What are the main drivers for the business here as we kind of look forward? Thanks.
Okay, I'll start on the second question, and then maybe, Chris, you can handle the first one on semis. You know, the organic sales growth that you referenced was driven by higher volumes and slightly lower pricing in the automotive segment. Volume growth was pretty broad-based, but it was led by automotive, industrial, building applications. Specifically, the higher growth that we saw in automotive was driven by both batteries, as well as our broader automotive business as we continue to substitute metal with our high-performing polymers and sealants. In batteries, we had more than 20% year-on-year growth, and that was driven by robust demand for separator coatings and NMC binders across Asia as well as with new program wins. If you exclude batteries, we saw a mid-single-digit year-on-year growth in automotive, and we continue to drive market share gains and new customer wins. And by way of example, Technofon is one of our high-performing heat-resistant sealing solutions for under-the-hood applications. That's delivering very strong growth. So again, our growth is coming from share gains as well as driving innovation across the segment.
Yeah, listen, just from my side on the semiconductors, I think Mark answered it in one of the previous questions. So just for the risk of not repeating a lot of it, we're not going to really comment on the specific margin levels. But specialty polymers, as Mike said, is probably one of our highest margin businesses. Now, more broadly, as the semiconductor demand continues to strengthen in the second half, we do expect electronics to be, you know, the smart devices to become more meaningful as well as the electronic sector overall. But just to repeat a few of the stats that Mike gave is that electronics is approximately 8% of our net sales and approximately two-thirds of the electronics business is the semiconductor applications. So we do expect, you know, in quarter two, the semiconductors were up double-digit year on year. We are seeing a reduction in the stock levels that you spoke about, and that should have a recovery in our underlying business and market share gains.
That's helpful. Thanks a lot.
Thank you, Tristan. your final question comes from the line of katie richard with barclays your line is now open please go ahead hi thank you for taking my questions um just two from me please um so one i would just be interested to hear a comment on the incremental costs you've incurred in specialty polymers to support your execution what are the changes that you're making here and secondly i noticed that in the space and defense applications, you're seeing high single-digit growth year on year now. But if I remember correctly, the outlook at the beginning of the year was for flat. Could you talk us through the drivers of this and whether it's just a one-off order?
Sure. Thank you very much for the question, Katie. First on the incremental cost and specialty polymers, Q2 2026 performance really kind of reflects low double-digit incremental costs in the polymers business to support what I would say both commercial execution and operational improvements. And I think Chris mentioned it. These are not expected to recur beyond 2026. These incremental costs relate to actions announced at the start of the year to accelerate growth and enhance the efficiency of our specialty polymers business. and they include targeted commercial initiatives aimed at unlocking new sources of growth, increasing our share of wallet with existing customers, as well as changes in our operating model. Just to give you a little bit more detail, on the commercial side, these initiatives are to strengthen customer engagement, improve our commercial execution, accelerate new business wins, leveraging AI, for instance. And then on the operational side, the focus has really been on simplifying our processes, improving productivity, and identifying structural efficiency opportunities across the business. If I move to your next question, which is about space and defense, yeah, we had forecasted space and defense to be flat year on year, coming off a record year for 2025, if I'm not mistaken. And there's always some quarterly variability in the business. Use of defense assets is not accompanied by an immediate or direct increase in material sales. Rather, it relies on stockpiles and field readiness. But that said, we remain positive on the medium-term outlook, supported by continued strength in defense spending, again, while recognizing that quarterly growth rates can fluctuate.
Thank you.
Thank you, Katie. There are no further questions at this time. We have reached the end of the Q&A session. I will now turn a call back to Sharif Bhakra for final remarks.
Thank you very much, everyone. Thank you for your participation and questions. As usual, the Investor Relations team is available to answer any remaining questions and wishing you all a great day. Thank you very much.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.