AMOD 10-Q
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
File Number:
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ||
| Emerging growth company |
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
As of August 14, 2026, shares of Class A common stock, par value $ per share (“common stock”), were issued and outstanding.
ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2026
Table of Contents
| i |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
| June 30, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||
| Cash | $ | $ | ||||||
| Royalty receivable | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ||||||||
| Employee advance | ||||||||
| Franchise tax receivable | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment, net | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued liabilities | ||||||||
| Accrued liabilities payable to related party | ||||||||
| Accrued interest payable to related party | ||||||||
| Financing payable | ||||||||
| Convertible notes payable, net of discount | ||||||||
| Convertible notes payable - related party, net of discount | ||||||||
| Derivative liability | ||||||||
| Warrant liability | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Mezzanine equity | ||||||||
| Series C preferred stock, $ par value, shares authorized, and shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively | ||||||||
| Stockholders’ deficit | ||||||||
| Class A common stock, $ par value, shares authorized, and shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders’ deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and stockholders’ deficit | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
| 1 |
ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
| For the Three Months Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | |||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Professional fees | ||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Other income (expenses) | ||||||||||||||||
| Patent infringement income | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of earnout shares liability | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Shareholder settlement expense | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on settlement of debt | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Total other income (expense) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Loss before income tax expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Loss per share, class A common stock – basic and diluted | $ | ) | $ | ) | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||||||
| Weighted average number of shares of class A common stock – basic and diluted | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
| 2 |
ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit
(Unaudited)
| Common Stock ($0.0001 Par) | Additional | Accumulated | Total Stockholders’ | |||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Paid-in Capital | Deficit | Deficit | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2025 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for settlement of accounts payable | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of note payable | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued from the at-the-market offering | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2026 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued from the at-the-market offering | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for pre-paid purchase agreement | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of preferred series C shares | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2026 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Common Stock ($0.0001 Par) | Additional | Accumulated | Total Stockholders’ | |||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Paid-in Capital | Deficit | Deficit | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2024 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, March 31, 2025 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for services | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for financing incentive | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of note payable | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of preferred series C shares | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss for the period | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, June 30, 2025 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
| 3 |
ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount | ||||||||
| Shares issued for services | ||||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrant liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of earnout shares liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | ||||||||
| Change in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Franchise tax receivable | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Employee advance | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | ||||||||
| Accrued expenses - related party | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accrued interest payable - related party | ||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from notes payable to related party | ||||||||
| Repayment of notes payable to related party | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from convertible notes payable | ||||||||
| Repayment of convertible notes payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Repayment of financing payable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from sale of common stock | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | ||||||||
| Net change in cash | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash at beginning of period | ||||||||
| Cash at end of period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | $ | ||||||
| Cash paid for taxes | $ | $ | ||||||
| Supplemental non-cash information | ||||||||
| Common shares issued as financing incentive | $ | $ | ||||||
| Common shares issued from conversion of preferred series C shares | $ | $ | ||||||
| Recognition of derivative liability | $ | $ | ||||||
| Shares issued for pre-paid purchase applied directly against additional paid-in capital | $ | $ | ||||||
| Common shares issued from settlement of accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Common shares issued from conversion of convertible notes payable | $ | $ | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
| 4 |
ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2026
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Company Background
Alpha Modus, Corp. was incorporated in the State of Florida on July 11, 2014. On December 13, 2024, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” or “Alpha Modus”), a Delaware corporation then known as “Insight Acquisition Corp.” and which was then a blank check company, acquired Alpha Modus, Corp. in the business combination described below, and changed its name to “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.” Following the business combination, the Company’s operations became those of Alpha Modus, Corp.
On August 11, 2025, the Company incorporated a new wholly owned subsidiary, Alpha Modus Financial Services, LLC in the State of North Carolina.
Nature of Operations
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc., through its operating subsidiaries, is a technology and intellectual property company focused on the development, protection, licensing, and commercialization of data-driven systems designed to enhance consumer engagement and decision-making within physical retail environments. The Company was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Cornelius, North Carolina.
Alpha Modus’ core strategy centers on the creation, licensing and enforcement of a proprietary patent portfolio covering systems and methods for real-time monitoring, analysis, and response to consumer behavior at or near the point of purchase. The Company’s technology is designed to convert previously unstructured consumer interaction data into actionable insights using advanced analytics and artificial intelligence. These insights may be used to support personalized marketing, dynamic digital engagement, smart planograms, inventory management, and enhanced in-store customer assistance.
Business Combination
On December 13, 2024, the parties to a Business Combination Agreement, including the Company and Alpha Modus, Corp., consummated a business combination (the “Business Combination”) pursuant to which Alpha Modus, Corp. was acquired by the Company, the pre-closing owners of Alpha Modus, Corp. were issued a majority of the capital stock of the Company, and the business of Alpha Modus, Corp. prior to closing became the business of the Company following closing. Immediately upon the consummation of the Business Combination, Alpha Modus, Corp. (“Alpha Modus”) became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and the Company changed its name to “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.,” (“Holdings”). In accordance with ASC 805, in a business combination, one of the combining entities shall be identified as the accounting acquirer. Management evaluated ASC 805-10-55-11 through 55-15 to make this determination. Management assessed the various criteria to identify the accounting acquirer; form of consideration, relative voting rights, large minority interest, composition of the governing body, composition of management, terms of the exchange of equity interests and relative size. Management determined that Alpha Modus would be the accounting acquirer, based on the voting rights after the combination, large minority interest, composition of board and management and relative size. Management evaluated which entity constituted a business based on the assets acquired and liabilities assumed along with the inputs and processes of the entities. Management determined that Alpha Modus constituted a business and that the substance of the transaction was a recapitalization of Alpha Modus, often referred to as a reverse recapitalization. Accordingly, the Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Under this method of accounting, Holdings was treated as the acquired company for financial reporting purposes. The net assets of Holdings were stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. Operations prior to the Business Combination were those of Alpha Modus. All periods prior to the Business Combination have been retrospectively adjusted using the exchange ratio in the Business Combination for the equivalent number of shares outstanding immediately after the closing to effect the reverse recapitalization.
| 5 |
In the Business Combination, the Company issued shares of common stock and shares of Series C Preferred Stock to Legacy Alpha Modus’ shareholders as merger consideration in the Business Combination, and the Company issued shares of common stock to various parties as required by the Business Combination Agreement. Immediately following the Business Combination there were shares of the Company’s common stock (all Class A common stock) issued and outstanding, and shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Risks and Uncertainties
On
August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IR Act”) was signed into federal law. The IR Act provides for,
among other things, a new U.S. federal
Any share redemption or other share repurchase that occurs after December 31, 2022, in connection with a Business Combination, extension vote or otherwise, may be subject to the excise tax. Whether and to what extent the Company would be subject to the excise tax in connection with a Business Combination, extension vote or otherwise will depend on a number of factors, including (i) the fair market value of the redemptions and repurchases in connection with the Business Combination, extension or otherwise, (ii) the structure of a Business Combination, (iii) the nature and amount of any “PIPE” or other equity issuances in connection with a Business Combination (or otherwise issued not in connection with a Business Combination but issued within the same taxable year of a Business Combination) and (iv) the content of regulations and other guidance from the Treasury.
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC and has a year-end of December 31st.
Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in this filing and the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2026.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its two wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
| 6 |
Liquidity and Going Concern
We
have incurred recurring losses since inception and expect to continue to incur losses since the Company does not have any revenue stream.
On June 30, 2026, we had $
Cash and Cash Equivalent
Cash
is comprised of cash balances. The Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less when
purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash is held at major financial institutions and is subject to credit risk to the extent that those
balances exceed applicable Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance amounts of $
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash accounts in a financial institution,
which, at times, may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation coverage limit of $
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. The more significant accounting estimates included in these consolidated financial statements are the determination of the fair value of the warrant liabilities, earnout shares and sponsor earnout shares, preferred series C stock and excise tax payable. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under the FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” equals or approximates the carrying amounts represented in the consolidated balance sheets, except for the derivative liabilities (see Note 10).
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for sale of an asset or paid for transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). These tiers consist of:
| ● | Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments in active markets; |
| 7 |
| ● | Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and | |
| ● | Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. |
In some circumstances, the inputs used to measure fair value might be categorized within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In those instances, the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Derivative Liabilities
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants and the forward purchase agreement, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.
The warrants issued in the Initial Public Offering (the “Public Warrants”) and the Private Placement Warrants are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“ASC 820”), the Company recognizes the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the carrying value of the instruments to fair value at each reporting period for so long as they are outstanding. At the date of the merger, the initial fair value of the Public Warrants issued in connection with the Public Offering and the fair value of the Private Placement Warrants have been estimated using a Black-Scholes model. Subsequently, the fair value of the Public Warrants issued in connection with the Public Offering and the fair value of the Private Placement Warrants have been estimated using this same Black-Scholes model. Derivative warrant liabilities are classified as current liabilities due to the provision allowing the holders to exercise the warrants at any time (See note 8 for more details on warrants).
The company earnout shares and sponsor earnout shares (“earnout shares”) as defined in the business combination agreement are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“ASC 820”), the Company recognizes the earnout shares instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the carrying value of the instruments to fair value at each reporting period for so long as they are outstanding. At the date of the merger, the initial fair value of the earnout shares have been estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Subsequently, the fair value of the earnout shares have been estimated using this same Monte Carlo simulation model. Derivative earnout shares liabilities are classified as current liabilities (See note 9 for more details on earnout shares).
The pre-paid purchases are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“ASC 820”), the Company recognizes the pre-paid purchases as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the carrying value of the instruments to fair value at each reporting period for so long as they are outstanding. The fair value of the pre-paid purchases has been estimated using a binomial model. Derivative warrant liabilities are classified as current liabilities (See note 7 for more details on warrants).
Net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the year as defined by FASB, ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) calculations are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. The Company has and dilutive shares of common stock derived from the convertible notes and the series C preferred stock as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
| 8 |
The calculation of diluted net loss does not consider the effect of the warrants underlying the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering and the private placement warrants to purchase an aggregate of shares of Class A common stock and the earnout shares and sponsor earnout shares as defined in the business combination agreement an aggregate of shares of Class A common stock in the calculation of diluted (loss) income per share, because their exercise is contingent upon future events and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method.
| For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| Numerator | June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | ||||||
| Net Loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjusted Net Loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Denominator | Shares | Shares | ||||||
| Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding during Period | ||||||||
| Dilutive Shares | ||||||||
| Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding during Period | ||||||||
| Diluted Net Loss per Share | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
| Numerator | June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | ||||||
| Net Loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjusted Net Loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Denominator | Shares | Shares | ||||||
| Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding during Period | ||||||||
| Dilutive Shares | ||||||||
| Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding during Period | ||||||||
| Diluted Net Loss per Share | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and loss carryforwards and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income (loss) in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rules on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in operations in the year of change. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is “more likely-than-not” that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Tax benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized only if it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to sustain a position taken on an income tax return. The Company has no liability for uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. Interest and penalties in any, related to unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized as interest expense. The Company does not have any accrued interest or penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits, nor was any significant interest expense recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
| 9 |
Stock-Based Compensation
For stock-based transactions, compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, based on the estimated fair value on the grant date of the award.
Notes Payable
The Company issued various notes payable to related parties. These notes payable included original issue discounts and debt issuance costs.
Original issue discounts. The Company accounts for the original issue discounts in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 835-30, Interest and Imputation of Interest, which requires the Company to record the discount as a contra-liability and amortize it over the term of the underlying note using the interest method.
Debt issuance costs. The Company accounts for debt issuance costs in accordance with ASC No. 470-20, Debt, which requires the Company to recognize a contra-liability for costs incurred with the issuance of debt instruments. These contra-liabilities are amortized over the term of the underlying note payable using the interest method.
Related Parties
In accordance with ASC 850 “Related Party Disclosure”, a party is considered to be related to the Company if the party directly or indirectly or through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal with if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Series C Preferred Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company amended and restated its charter to include the designation of a Series C Preferred Stock. The Amended and Restated Charter authorizes the issuance of shares of preferred stock, shares of which have been designated as Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and shares of which will be undesignated. Based on the characteristics and rights of the Series C Preferred Stock, the Company is reporting it as Mezzanine Equity (Temporary Equity) on its consolidated balance sheets. These shares were valued at the date of issuance using a Monte Carlo Simulation model. The Company determined that subsequent changes to the carrying value of the series C preferred shares will not be recognized until Redemption becomes probable of occurring. Alpha Modus shall be obligated to pay holders the Liquidation Value to redeem the Series C Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of a Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined below) or Trigger Event (as defined below). “Deemed Liquidation Event” generally means (a) a merger or consolidation where Alpha Modus or a subsidiary is a party to the merger and Alpha Modus issues shares of stock (except for domicile mergers and mergers not constituting a change of control); (b) Alpha Modus issues convertible or equity securities that senior to the Series C Preferred Stock in any respect; (c) a holder does not receive conversion shares upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock within 5 trading days due to the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of Alpha Modus; (d) trading of the common stock is halted or suspended for 10 or more consecutive trading days due to the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of Alpha Modus; or (e) a sale or other disposition of substantially all the assets of Alpha Modus that is not approved by the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock. See Note 11 – Mezzanine Equity and Note 12 – Stockholders’ Equity for further details.
| 10 |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Accounting Standards: Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements, except as noted below.
In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2024-03, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses,” which requires companies to disclose disaggregated amounts relating to (a) inventory purchases; (b) employee compensation; (c) depreciation; (d) intangible asset amortization; and (e) depreciation, depletion, and amortization. Further, this guidance will require companies to include certain amounts that are already required to be disclosed under current U.S. GAAP in the same disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements, disclose a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively and disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. The standard is intended to benefit investors by providing more detailed expense disclosures that would be useful in making capital allocation decisions. This guidance is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 but early adoption is permitted. ASU 2024-03 should be applied on a prospective basis, but retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
NOTE 3 - PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following at:
| June 30, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Prepaid stock-based compensation | ||||||||
| Payroll tax holding account | ||||||||
| Vendor deposits | ||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | ||||||
Prepaid
stock-based compensation consisted of stock issuances for 2 consulting agreements that are being amortized over the life of the agreements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company reported $
NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On
August 18, 2025, the Company renegotiated the notes with JanBella. All notes were in default. In the new agreement, JanBella elected
to retain the default penalties and interest on the notes and elected to forgive the default status and extend the notes to
On
July 10, 2025, the Company and The Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust entered into an unsecured Promissory Note for $
| 11 |
On
September 16, 2025, the Company and The Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust entered into an unsecured Promissory Note for $
The
Company’s CEO, William Alessi, paid various expenses on his credit cards on behalf of the Company. The Company reimburses Mr. Alessi
for these charges. As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, there was a balance due of $
During
the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company’s CEO, William Alessi, had made advances to the Company in the amount of $
Private Placement Warrants
Simultaneously
with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company consummated the Private Placement of
Each
Private Placement Warrant is exercisable for one whole share of Class A common stock at a price of $
The Sponsor, the underwriters and the Company’s officers and directors agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Private Placement Warrants until 30 days after the completion of the initial Business Combination.
NOTE 5 –CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
Loeb & Loeb, LLP Convertible Note
On
December 13, 2024, the Company entered into an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note for $
The maturity date (the “Maturity Date”) of this promissory note is the earlier of (i) 12 months from the issue date referenced above (the “Issue Date”), or (ii) the date that is 10 business days following the date that the Issuer repays Streeterville Capital, LLC (the “Lender”) in full, and the Maturity Date is the date upon which the Principal Sum, as well as any unpaid interest and other fees hereunder, shall be due and payable.
Interest;
Monthly Payment; Additional Payments. Interest shall not accrue on the Principal Sum except as set forth elsewhere herein. The Issuer
shall make monthly payments of $
| 12 |
Conversion.
If the Issuer is no longer subject to the Lender’s variable rate transaction prohibition or the Lender has consented to conversion
of this promissory note as set forth herein, the Holder shall have the right, at its election, to convert all or part of the outstanding
and unpaid Principal Sum, as well as any other fees pursuant to the terms hereof but not including interest, into shares of fully paid
and non-assessable shares of the Issuer’s common stock, $ par value per share (the “Conversion Shares”) as per
the following conversion formula: number of shares receivable upon conversion equals the dollar conversion amount divided by the Conversion
Price (as defined hereinafter). The “Conversion Price” shall equal
Registration Rights. Provided this Note has become convertible, the Issuer represents, warrants and agrees that with respect to the Conversion Shares, the Holder will have registration rights identical to the registration rights provided to Insight Acquisition Sponsor LLC in the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 13, 2023, including, but not limited to the following: (i) two demand registrations of the sale of the Conversion Shares at the Company’s expense, and (ii) unlimited “piggyback” registration rights for a period of five (5) years after the Issue Date at the Company’s expense. The Company shall execute and deliver the Joinder Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A. In the event the registration statement covering the Conversion Shares is not effective within 120 days of the Issue Date, then the principal amount due the Note will increase by one and one-half percent (1.5%) and will continue to increase by one and one-half percent (1.5%) for each thirty (30) day period such registration statement is not declared effective.
On
February 20, 2026, the Company issued shares of common stock pursuant to conversion notice for $
Other Convertible Notes
On
October 16, 2025, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $
On
October 31, 2025, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $
| 13 |
On
December 30, 2025, the Company issued an unsecured convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $
NOTE 6 – FINANCING PAYABLE
On
December 16, 2025, the Company entered into a financing arrangement for an insurance policy. The Company financed $
NOTE 7 – STREETERVILLE CAPITAL, LLC PRE-PAID PURCHASES
Effective
June 30, 2026, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Streeterville Capital,
LLC (the “Investor” or “Streeterville”), pursuant to which the Company would sell and the Investor would
purchase (i) one or more Secured Pre-Paid Purchases (each a “Pre-Paid Purchase,” and collectively the “Pre-Paid
Purchases”) in the aggregate purchase amount of up to $
The SPA includes customary representations, warranties and covenants by the Company and customary closing conditions. The SPA prohibits the Company, while any Pre-Paid Purchase is outstanding, from issuing any (i) debt securities other than trade payables in the ordinary course of business, or (ii) any variable rate equity securities. The SPA also prohibits the Company from making any payments to William Alessi, the Company’s CEO, or any of his affiliates, with respect to any debt obligations owed by the Company to any of those affiliated debtholders. The SPA prohibits the issuance to the Investor under any Pre-Paid Purchase of a number of Common Shares in excess of the amount that would be permitted under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d) without shareholder approval (the “Exchange Cap”), and requires the Company to obtain shareholder approval to issue to the Investor an amount of Common Shares in excess of the Exchange Cap (the “Shareholder Approval”) prior to the initial closing. The Shareholder Approval was received by the Company on June 30, 2026. The SPA also requires the Company to, within 30 days of the initial closing, file (i) a Schedule 14C information statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding the Shareholder Approval, and (ii) a registration statement with the SEC registering the Pre-Delivery Shares and all other Common Shares that may be purchased by the Investor pursuant to any Pre-Paid Purchase.
| 14 |
Each
Pre-Paid Purchase will be issued in substantially the same form as the Initial Pre-Paid Purchase (defined below), matures 18 months following
the date the purchase price for such Pre-Paid Purchase is delivered to the Company (the “Purchase Price Date”), includes
an
Each Pre-Paid Purchase is secured by a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”) by and between the Investor and the Company and its subsidiaries, granting the Investor first priority security interests in all assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, including Alpha Modus, Corp.’s intellectual property pursuant to a separate intellectual property security agreement (the “IP Security Agreement”). Additionally, each of the Company’s subsidiaries are guarantors of the Company’s obligations under each Pre-Paid Purchase pursuant to a guaranty (the “Guaranty”). William Alessi, his entity, Janbella Group, LLC, the trusts deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Alessi, and Chris Chumas (the Company’s CSO) (each a “Capital Party” and collectively the “Capital Parties”), are required to execute a subordination and voting agreement (the “Subordination Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) all of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ indebtedness and obligations to each Capital Party will be subordinated to Investor, (ii) all security interests of any Capital Party will be subordinate to Investor’s security interests, (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries will not make any payments to any Capital Party (except for non-discretionary compensation owed to them pursuant to employment agreements with the Company), (iv) none of the Capital Parties will accelerate any subordinated debt or equity, (v) and no Capital Party will convert, exchange, or transfer their shares of Company stock until such time as the Investor has been fully paid and all financing agreements between the Investor and the Company are terminated. The Subordination Agreement also requires Chris Chumas to convert the shares of Series C Preferred Stock of the Company beneficially owned by him prior to June 29, 2026, into Common Shares (the “Chumas Common Shares”) within 30 days of the Purchase Price Date, and the SPA requires Chris Chumas to complete that conversion of preferred shares into the Chumas Common Shares prior to the initial closing.
On June 29, 2026, Chris Chumas and his IRA each converted their shares of Series C Preferred Stock of the Company into Common Shares as required by the SPA and Subordination Agreement described above (converting shares of Series C Preferred Stock in the aggregate into Common Shares—the Chumas Common Shares).
On
June 30, 2026, the Company sold to the Investor (i) an initial Pre-Paid Purchase in the original principal amount of $
| 15 |
NOTE 8 – WARRANTS
As
of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company has
Public Warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares. No fractional Public Warrants will be issued upon separation of the Units and only whole Public Warrants will trade. The Public Warrants will become exercisable 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination; provided that the Company has an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available (or the Company permits holders to exercise their Public Warrants on a cashless basis and such cashless exercise is exempt from registration under the Securities Act). The Company agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days after the closing of the initial Business Combination, the Company will use its best efforts to file with the SEC and have an effective registration statement covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and to maintain a current prospectus relating to those shares of Class A common stock until the warrants expire or are redeemed. If a registration statement covering the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective by the 60th business day after the closing of the initial Business Combination, warrant holders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when the Company will have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption. Notwithstanding the above, if the Company’s shares of Class A common stock are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, the Company may, at its option, require holders of Public Warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event the Company so elect, it will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, and in the event the Company does not so elect, it will use its best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available.
The
warrants have an exercise price of $
The Private Placement Warrants are identical to the Public Warrants, except that the Private Placement Warrants and the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants will not be transferable, assignable or salable until the completion of a Business Combination, subject to certain limited exceptions. Additionally, except as set forth below, the Private Placement Warrants will be non-redeemable so long as they are held by the Sponsor, the underwriters or their permitted transferees. If the Private Placement Warrants are held by someone other than the Sponsor, the underwriters or their permitted transferees, the Private Placement Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants.
Redemption of warrants. Once the warrants become exercisable, the Company may redeem the outstanding warrants for cash (except as described herein with respect to the Private Placement Warrants):
| ● | in whole and not in part; | |
| ● | at
a price of $ | |
| ● | upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption; and | |
| ● | if,
and only if, the closing price of Class A common stock equals or exceeds $ |
| 16 |
The stockholders of Alpha Modus, Corp. may be issued up to additional shares of Company common stock (the “Earnout Shares”). The Earnout Shares will be earned and issued in one-third (1/3) increments (of approximately shares) if, for any twenty (20) trading days within any thirty (30)-consecutive trading day period beginning at least 180 days after the Closing and on or prior to the 5-year anniversary of the Closing, the VWAP of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $ per share, $ per share and $ per share (as equitably adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, recapitalizations and the like after the Closing), respectively, with all remaining Earnout Shares earned and issued upon certain changes of control of the Company at or prior to the 5-year anniversary of the Closing.
Additionally, at the Closing, the Company’s sponsor, Insight Acquisition Sponsor LLC (the “Sponsor”) was required to deposit shares of Company common stock into escrow (the “Sponsor Earnout Shares”), and the Sponsor Earnout Shares will be released to the Sponsor according to the same milestones and timelines applicable to the Earnout Shares described above (earned and issued in one-third (1/3) increments of approximately shares).
“Closing Share Price” means, for any security as of any date(s), the dollar volume-weighted average price for such security on the principal securities exchange or securities market on which such security is then traded during the period beginning at 9:30:01 a.m., New York time, and ending at 4:00:00 p.m., New York time, as reported by Bloomberg through its “HP” function (set to weighted average) or, if the foregoing does not apply, the dollar volume-weighted average price of such security in the over-the-counter market on the electronic bulletin board for such security during the period beginning at 9:30:01 a.m., New York time and ending at 4:00:00 p.m., New York time, as reported by Bloomberg, or, if no dollar volume-weighted average price is reported for such security by Bloomberg for such hours, the average of the highest closing bid price and the lowest closing ask price of any of the market makers for such security as reported by OTC Markets Group Inc. If the Closing Share Price cannot be calculated for such security on such date(s) on any of the foregoing bases, the Closing Share Price of such security on such date(s) shall be the fair market value per share on such date(s) as reasonably determined by the Company.
If the condition for more than one Milestone is achieved, the Company Earnout Shares to be issued in connection with such Milestone shall be cumulative with any Company Earnout Shares earned prior to such time and the Escrowed Sponsor Shares to be released from escrow to Sponsor shall be cumulative with any Escrowed Sponsor Shares released prior to such time in connection with the achievement of any other Milestone; provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, the Company Earnout Shares in respect of each Milestone will be issued and earned only once and the aggregate Company Earnout Shares issued shall in no event exceed shares of Class A Common Stock.
If, at or following the 5-year anniversary of the Closing Date, the $ Share Price Milestone, $ Share Price Milestone and/or the $ Share Price Milestone have not occurred, none of the Earnout Shares that related to that particular Milestone shall be issued, and the Escrowed Sponsor Shares that have not been released from escrow to Sponsor shall automatically without further action be forfeited and deemed cancelled.
In the event that after the Closing and prior the 5-year anniversary of the Closing Date, there is a Change of Control, the $ Share Price Milestone, $ Share Price Milestone, and/or the $ Share Price Milestone, as applicable, shall be deemed to have occurred to the extent any such Milestone has not been achieved prior to the date of such Change of Control. For purposes hereof, a “Change of Control” means the occurrence in a single transaction or as a result of a series of related transactions, of one or more of the following events:
| a) | any person or any group of persons acting together which would constitute a “group” for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act or any successor provisions thereto (a “Group”) (excluding a corporation or other entity owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of IAC) (x) is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than 50% of the combined voting power of then outstanding voting securities or (y) has or acquires control of the Board; |
| 17 |
| b) | a merger, consolidation, reorganization or similar business combination transaction involving the Company, and, immediately after the consummation of such transaction or series of transactions, either (x) the Board immediately prior to the merger or consolidation does not constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the company surviving the merger or, if the surviving company is a Subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof, or (y) the voting securities of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation do not continue to represent or are not converted into more than 50% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the person resulting from such transaction or series of transactions or, if the surviving company is a Subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof; or | |
| c) | the sale, lease or other disposition, directly or indirectly, by the Company of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than such sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to an entity at least a majority of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by stockholders of the Company. |
If the Company shall, at any time or from time to time, after the date hereof effect a subdivision, stock split, stock dividend, reorganization, combination, recapitalization or similar transaction affecting the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock, the number of Earnout Shares issuable hereunder (and the number of Escrowed Sponsor Shares to be released), and the stock price targets set forth above shall be equitably adjusted for such subdivision, stock split, stock dividend, reorganization, combination, recapitalization or similar transaction. Any adjustment under this paragraph shall become effective at the close of business on the date the subdivision or combination becomes effective (which shall be the “ex” date, if any, with respect to any such event).
NOTE 10 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following tables present information about the Company’s liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques that the Company utilized to determine such fair value:
The fair value of financial instruments on June 30, 2026 is summarized below:
| Description | Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-public warrants | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-private warrants | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-earnout shares | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-sponsor earnout shares | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-pre-paid purchases | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Mezzanine Equity: | ||||||||||||
| Series C preferred stock | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
The fair value of financial instruments on December 31, 2025 is summarized below:
| Description | Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-public warrants | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-private warrants | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-earnout shares | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities-sponsor earnout shares | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Total | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| Mezzanine Equity: | ||||||||||||
| Series C preferred stock | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||
| 18 |
The
initial and subsequent fair values of the Public Warrants issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering and the fair value
of the Private Placement Warrants have been estimated using a Black-Scholes model. The Company recognized a gain in the statement of
operations resulting from a decrease in the fair value of warrant liabilities of $
| June 30, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |||||||
| Exercise price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Stock price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Public warrant price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
| Dividend yield | % | % | ||||||
The initial fair value of the Company Earnout Shares and the fair value of the Sponsor Earnout Shares have been estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company recognized a gain in the statement of operations resulting from a decrease in the fair value of liabilities of approximately $ and $ and $ and $, respectively, presented as change in fair value of derivative earnout shares and sponsor earnout shares liabilities on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The following table provides quantitative information regarding Level 2 fair value measurements inputs at their measurement dates as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
| June 30, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |||||||
| Stock price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Risk-free rate | % | % | ||||||
| Dividend yield | % | % | ||||||
The
initial fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock has been estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model at the business combination
date of December 13, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized the fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock
of approximately $
The following table provides quantitative information regarding Level 2 fair value measurements inputs at the measurement date of December 13, 2024:
| December 13, 2024 | ||||
| Stock price | $ | |||
| Volatility | % | |||
| Risk-free rate | % | |||
| Dividend yield | % | |||
| 19 |
NOTE 11 – MEZZANINE EQUITY
Series C Preferred Stock
On December 13, 2024, as part of the business combination, the Company issued shares of series C preferred stock to Legacy Alpha Modus shareholders in exchange for the same number of Legacy Alpha Modus’ common stock. Management reviewed ASC 480, ASC 805, ASC 815, ASC 820 and ASC 825 to determine the proper treatment of the series C preferred shares. Management concluded that the series C preferred shares qualify as temporary equity under ASC 815; therefore, the Company will recognize the series C preferred shares within mezzanine equity in its balance sheet. In accordance with ASC 480, the series C preferred shares will be initially recorded and measured at fair value; however, when estimating the fair value of the series C preferred shares, the Company has followed the guidance in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement”. Because Redemption is contingent upon the occurrence of certain events that have not been met, subsequent changes to the carrying value of the series C preferred shares will not be recognized until Redemption becomes probable of occurring.
In the consolidated financial statements, the series C preferred shares are being presented as being issued in 2023 when a Legacy Alpha Modus shareholder converted Legacy Alpha Modus series B preferred shares in preparation for the pending business combination. The consolidated financial statements reflect the 10 shares of series B preferred stock converting into shares of series C preferred stock and shares of class A common stock.
On June 30, 2025, the Company issued shares of common stock for the conversion of shares of preferred series C stock. These shares carrying value was $, which was moved from mezzanine equity to shareholders’ equity.
On April 8, 2026, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with the family trust of the Company’s CEO, William Alessi, pursuant to which the trust would exchange an aggregate of shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Alessi as Mr. Alessi’s spouse is the trustee of the trust) for an aggregate of shares of Class A common stock. In the Exchange Agreement, the trust agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the shares of common stock to be received in the exchange until June 13, 2026 (except for permitted transfers to an affiliate). On or about June 5, 2026, the trust’s preferred shares were cancelled, and shares of Class A common stock were issued to the trust. These shares carrying value was $, which was moved from mezzanine equity to shareholders’ equity.
On April 8, 2026, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Chris Chumas, the Company’s Chief Sales Officer and Mainstar Trust, pursuant to which he and the trust would exchange an aggregate of shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Chumas as Mr. Chumas is the trustee of the trust) for an aggregate of shares of Class A common stock. In the Exchange Agreement, Mr. Chumas and the trust agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the shares of common stock to be received in the exchange until June 13, 2026 (except for permitted transfers to an affiliate). On or about June 26, 2026, Mr. Chumas’ and the trust’s preferred shares were cancelled, and shares of Class A common stock were issued to Mr. Chumas and the trust. These shares carrying value was $, which was moved from mezzanine equity to shareholders’ equity.
As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, there were and shares of series C preferred stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
NOTE 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
The Amended and Restated Charter authorizes the issuance of shares of preferred stock, shares of which have been designated as Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and shares of which will be undesignated (see Note 11 – Mezzanine Equity).
The Series C Preferred Stock has the following rights:
| I. | Ranking. The Series C Preferred Stock will rank senior to the IAC common stock and other classes of IAC preferred stock with respect to rights upon liquidation, winding up or dissolution. | |
| II. | Voting. Each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall entitle the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to the vote of IAC’s shareholders; |
| 20 |
| III. | Dividends. The Series C Preferred Stock shall be treated pari passu with the IAC common stock except that the dividends per share payable on the Series C Preferred Stock shall equal the dividend per share declared on each share of IAC common stock multiplied by $ (the “Face Value”) and divided by the applicable Conversion Price (as defined below). “Conversion Price” means a price per share equal to the lesser of either the Face Value, or |
| IV. | Liquidation. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of IAC, holders of Series C Preferred Stock shall be paid the Face Value per share, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends (the “Liquidation Value”). | |
| V. | Redemption. IAC shall be obligated to pay holders the Liquidation Value to redeem the Series C Preferred Stock upon the occurrence of a Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined below) or Trigger Event (as defined below). “Deemed Liquidation Event” generally means (a) a merger or consolidation where IAC or a subsidiary is a party to the merger and IAC issues shares of stock (except for domicile mergers and mergers not constituting a change of control); (b) IAC issues convertible or equity securities that senior to the Series C Preferred Stock in any respect; (c) a holder does not receive conversion shares upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock within 5 trading days due to the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of IAC; (d) trading of the common stock is halted or suspended for 10 or more consecutive trading days due to the occurrence of an event that is solely within the control of IAC; or (e) a sale or other disposition of substantially all the assets of IAC that is not approved by the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock. | |
| VI. | Conversion. Shares of Series C Preferred Stock are not convertible until 18 months following Closing of the Business Combination so long as a Trigger Event has not occurred. Beginning 18 months following Closing of the Business Combination, or following the occurrence of a Trigger Event, shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible at election of the holder at the then-applicable Conversion Price. |
Common Stock
Class A Common Stock -The Company is authorized to issue shares of Class A common stock with a par value of $ per share. As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, there were and shares of Class A common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
The Company enacted a reverse stock split of the Company’s
issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $ per share (the “Common Stock”), at a ratio of
On January 5, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 5, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
| 21 |
On January 5, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to two individuals for services rendered as a bonus for their diligence and efforts with the merger. These shares were valued of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 5, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On April 28, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to Streeterville Capital, LLC as a financing incentive in association with the note amendment entered into by
the lender and the Company. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock at $ per share. Streeterville
Capital, LLC paid $
On April 29, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on April 29, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On April 29, 2025, the Company issued shares of
Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $
On May 27, 2025, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with four family trusts of the Company’s CEO, William Alessi, pursuant to which the trusts would exchange an aggregate of shares of Series C Preferred Stock ( shares held in the name of The WRA 2023 Irrevocable Trust, shares held in the name of The Janet Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust, shares held in the name of The Isabella Alessi 2023 Irrevocable Trust, and shares held in the name of The Kim Alessi Richter Irrevocable Trust, all of which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Alessi as Mr. Alessi’s spouse is the trustee of each of the trusts) for an aggregate of shares of Class A common stock (with each of the trusts being issued shares of common stock). In the Exchange Agreement, each of the trusts agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer the shares of common stock to be received in the exchange until June 13, 2026 (except for permitted transfers to an affiliate). On or about June 30, 2025, the trusts’ preferred shares were cancelled, and shares of Class A common stock were issued to the trusts. These shares carrying value was $, which was moved from mezzanine equity to shareholders’ equity.
On May 29, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to Streeterville Capital, LLC pursuant to its partial conversion of the Note issued by the Company to Streeterville
Capital, LLC on or about December 13, 2024, described above. The lender converted $
On June 11, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to Streeterville Capital, LLC pursuant to its partial conversion of the Note issued by the Company to Streeterville
Capital, LLC on or about December 13, 2024, described above. The lender converted $
On July 1, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on July 1, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On July 10, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to Streeterville Capital, LLC pursuant to its partial conversion of the Note issued by the Company to Streeterville
Capital, LLC on or about December 13, 2024, described above. The lender converted $
On July 16, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to Streeterville Capital, LLC pursuant to its partial conversion of the Note issued by the Company to Streeterville
Capital, LLC on or about December 13, 2024, described above. The lender converted $
| 22 |
On July 17, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $
On July 17, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to two individuals for services rendered to the Company. These shares were valued of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on July 17, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On July 17, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to a noteholder for $
On July 23, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to Streeterville Capital, LLC pursuant to its partial conversion of the Note issued by the Company to Streeterville
Capital, LLC on or about December 13, 2024, described above. The lender converted $
On September 30, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on September 30, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On September 30, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $
On September 30, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rodney Sperry, in consideration of his $
On December 31, 2025, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2025 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On December 31, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $
On December 31, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rodney Sperry, in consideration of his $
On December 31, 2025, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s VP of Technology, Puneet Vij, in consideration of his $
On October 24, 2025, the
Company entered into consulting agreements with Rucus Holdings LLC (“Rucus”) and Leron Group LLC (“Leron”), pursuant
to which Rucus and Leron would provide marketing and sales services to the Company in connection with the rollout of the Company’s
financial services kiosks with a major US retailer, and the Company would issue Rucus shares of Class A common stock, and the Company
would issue Leron shares of Class A common stock. Such shares were issued to Rucus and Leron on January 20, 2026. These shares
were valued at $ on January 20, 2026 for a total value of $
| 23 |
On January 16, 2026, the
Form S-3 filed with the SEC by the Company was declared effective. The Company made an agreement with HC Wainwright & Co., LLC to
sell stock under the “At the Market” plan setforth in the Form S-3. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company
issued shares of Class A common stock for $
On January 20, 2026, the
Company issued shares of Class A common stock to Maxim Partners, LLC for the conversion of $
On February 20, 2026, the
Company issued shares of Class A common stock to Loeb & Loeb, LLP pursuant to its conversion of the Note issued by the Company
to Loeb & Loeb, LLP on December 13, 2024. The lender converted $
On February 27, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to two individuals for services rendered as a bonus for their diligence and efforts for the Company. These shares
were valued at $ on February 27, 2026 for a total value of $
On February 27, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to two individuals pursuant to two consulting agreements. These shares were valued at $ on February 27, 2026
for a total value of $
On March 31, 2026, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on March 31, 2026 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
On March 31, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $
On March 31, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rodney Sperry, in consideration of his $
On March 31, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s VP of Technology, Puneet Vij, in consideration of his $
On June 29, 2026, the Company entered into a subscription
agreement with Streeterville Capital, LLC (“Streeterville”), in which Streeterville agreed to purchase shares of Class
A common stock for $
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2026 at $ per share. The Company recognized $ in stock-based compensation expense.
| 24 |
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s VP of Technology, Puneet Vij, in consideration of his $
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued shares
of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rodney Sperry, in consideration of his $
Class B Common Stock - The Company is authorized to issue shares of Class B common stock with a par value of $ per share. As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, there were shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding.
Warrants
On October 16, 2025, the Company issued warrants to
purchase
On October 31, 2025, the Company issued warrants to
purchase
As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company
had
NOTE 13 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates as
| 25 |
The following table presents selected financial information with respect to the Company’s single operating segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:
| For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | |||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Professional fees | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||
| Operating loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Operating margin | - | % | - | % | ||||
| Other income (expenses) | ||||||||
| Patent infringement income | ||||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of earnout shares liability | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on settlement of debt | ( | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total other income (expense) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss before income tax expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax expense | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| For the Six Months Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, 2026 | June 30, 2025 | |||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | $ | $ | ||||||
| Professional fees | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||
| Operating loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Operating margin | - | % | - | % | ||||
| Other income (expenses) | ||||||||
| Patent infringement income | ||||||||
| Interest income | ||||||||
| Change in derivative liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair value of earnout shares liability | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Shareholder settlement expense | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on settlement of debt | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total other income (expense) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss before income tax expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax expense | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
The Company had $
| 26 |
NOTE 14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is subject, from time to time, to claims by third parties under various legal disputes. The defense of such claims, or any adverse outcome relating to any such claims, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.
Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s management and its legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company’s legal counsel evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the guarantee would be disclosed.
NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. The Company has determined that there are no other such events that warrant disclosure or recognition in the financial statements except as set forth below.
On July 30, 2026, Streeterville Capital, LLC issued
a Purchase Notice under the Initial Pre-Paid Purchase described above, pursuant to which the Company issued Streeterville shares
of Class A common stock for a $
On August 5, 2026, Streeterville Capital, LLC issued
a Purchase Notice under the Initial Pre-Paid Purchase described above, pursuant to which the Company issued Streeterville shares
of Class A common stock for an $
| 27 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
References to the “Company,” “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.,” “Alpha Modus,” “our,” “us” or “we” refer to Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking statements” for purposes of the federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management team’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “will,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
Company Background
The Company was a blank check company known as “Insight Acquisition Corp.” On December 13, 2024, the Company completed a business combination with Alpha Modus, Corp., a Florida corporation. At closing of the business combination, the Company’s name was changed to “Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.,” and the Company’s operations are now those of Alpha Modus, Corp.
Alpha Modus engages in creating, developing and licensing data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store digital experience at the point of decision. Alpha Modus, Corp., the Company’s operational subsidiary, was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Cornelius, North Carolina.
As technological innovation is at the core of the Company, Alpha Modus has developed comprehensive end-to-end patented solutions for retailers and consumer brands to bring innovation to consumers and enhance their experience at the point of sale. Some examples that the ‘571 patent family could potentially include use in the following:
| ● | targeted marketing campaigns; | |
| ● | actionable insights on consumer product packaging; | |
| ● | inventory control; | |
| ● | smart planograms; | |
| ● | in-store heatmapping of consumer traffic; | |
| ● | consumer behavior; and | |
| ● | staffing needs based on foot traffic in a retail location. |
| 28 |
The primary focus of Alpha Modus’ technology is to analyze consumer behavior and their interactions with retail products in real-time with the objective to provide brands and retailers the ability to achieve the following:
Enhance the Consumer’s In-Store Experience
| ● | Engage consumers with interactive output displays throughout brick-and-mortar retail stores to capture critical decision-making at the point of sale. | |
| ● | Cater to specific and immediate needs of the consumer. | |
| ● | Capture MAC address tracking data, user eye tracking, object identification of goods throughout the store. |
Manage Inventory and Create Smart Planograms
| ● | Assess the consumers product engagement and product tracking in real time. | |
| ● | Aid in inventory management and product placement throughout a store by creating smart planograms. |
Monetize Digital Insights
| ● | Curate tailored in-store marketing solutions. | |
| ● | Drive sales via engaging customers with digital experiences at the point of sale. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Basis of Presentation
Critical accounting policies are those that, in management’s view, are most important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of operations and most demanding on their calls on judgment, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to our financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report, we believe that the following accounting policies are those most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Derivative Liabilities
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants and the forward purchase agreement, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.
The company earnout shares and sponsor earnout shares (“earnout shares”) as defined in the business combination agreement are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“ASC 820”), the Company recognizes the earnout shares instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the carrying value of the instruments to fair value at each reporting period for so long as they are outstanding. At the date of the merger, the initial fair value of the earnout shares have been estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Subsequently, the fair value of the earnout shares have been estimated using this same Monte Carlo simulation model. Derivative earnout shares liabilities are classified as current liabilities (See note 9 for more details on earnout shares).
| 29 |
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Results of Operations
For the Three Months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the Three Months ended June 30, 2025
Revenue
Alpha Modus had $0 and $0 revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Alpha Modus had operating expenses of $2,560,210 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1,148,810 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an increase in professional fees and payroll expenses.
Other Income/Expenses
Alpha Modus had total other income of $411,150 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to total other expense of $1,638,252 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a decrease of $81,396 in interest expense, no loss in loss on settlement of debt (for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to a $598,324 loss on settlement of debt for the three months ended June 30, 2026), an increase of $1,506,043 in change in fair value of warrants liability and a decrease of $12,633 in change in fair value of business combination earnout shares liability.
Net Loss
Alpha Modus had a net loss of $2,149,060 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to a net loss of $2,787,062 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in net loss during the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the net loss during the three months ended June 30, 2025, was primarily due to the increase in change in fair value of warrants and decrease in loss on settlement of debt partially offset by the increase in professional fees described above.
For the Six Months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the Six Months ended June 30, 2025
Revenue
Alpha Modus had $0 and $0 revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Alpha Modus had operating expenses of $6,367,356 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $2,508,011 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an increase in professional fees, payroll expenses and increased costs of the kiosk system in development.
Other Income/Expenses
Alpha Modus had total other income of $197,465 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to total other expense of $587,132 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to patent infringement income of $325,000, an increase of $1,480,777 in change in fair value of warrants liability, the change in the loss on settlement of debt of $591,395 and the shareholder settlement expense of $150,000, partially offset by a decrease of $1,051,915 in change in fair value of business combination earnout shares liability, an increase of $286,926 in interest expense, and an increase of $110,632 in change in derivative liability for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the comparative period in 2025. The Company has generated income attributable to settlements of patent infringement and intellectual property enforcement matters. Under the current interpretation and application of GAAP, these proceeds are classified as “Other Income” rather than operating revenue within the consolidated statements of operations. Alpha Modus had $325,000 and $13,096 other income during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Net Loss
Alpha Modus had a net loss of $6,169,891 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to a net loss of $3,095,143 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in net loss during the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the net loss during the six months ended June 30, 2025, was primarily due to the increase in professional fees, payroll expenses and increased costs of the kiosk system in development, and interest expense described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2026, Alpha Modus had cash of $2,001,007. We do not have sufficient resources to execute all of our business plans. We expect to incur significant expenses during the next twelve months of operations, including expenses associated with being a public company. We estimate that these expenses will be comprised primarily of general expenses including overhead, legal and accounting fees. To maintain our plan of growth, we believe we will need to raise a minimum of an additional $2,500,000. These factors, along with the lack of current Company revenues, raise substantial doubt about Alpha Modus’ ability to continue as a going concern.
| 30 |
Net cash used in operating activities was $2,402,992 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1,115,337 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
We had net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026, of $119,797, compared to $7,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
We had net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2026, of $4,455,796, compared to $505,237 for the six months ended June 30, 2025.
We will have to raise funds to pay for our expenses. We may have to borrow money from shareholders or issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us. We currently have no arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources, except that we have entered into a Security Purchase Agreement with Streeterville Capital, LLC, pursuant to which we may or may not be able to raise additional capital. Our inability to raise funds for our operations in the future will have a severe negative impact on our ability to remain a viable company.
Emerging Growth Company Status
Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can choose not to take advantage of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, and any such election to not take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable.
The Company is an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act and has elected to take advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period for new or revised financial accounting standards. Following the consummation of the Business Combination, Alpha Modus expects to remain an emerging growth company at least through the end of the 2026 fiscal year and to continue to take advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period, although it may decide to early adopt such new or revised accounting standards to the extent permitted by such standards. This may make it difficult or impossible to compare Alpha Modus’ financial results with the financial results of another public company that is either not an emerging growth company or is an emerging growth company that has chosen not to take advantage of the extended transition period exemptions because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if, as an emerging growth company, we intend to rely on such exemptions, we are not required to, among other things: (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis); and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to median employee compensation.
We will remain an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act until the earliest of (i) the last day of our first fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the IAC IPO, (ii) the last date of our fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, (iii) the date on we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under the rules of the SEC with at least $700.0 million of outstanding common equity held by non-affiliates, or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the previous three years.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information otherwise required under this item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period ended June 30, 2026, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that during the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2026.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management intends to remediate the identified material weakness by implementing a more timely reporting schedule and incorporating additional reviews of the financial statement support for future quarters.
| 31 |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of commercial operations in the normal course of business. As of the date hereof, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations except as set forth below.
On January 16, 2024, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against The Kroger Company alleging patent infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to the Company’s ‘571 patent portfolio encompassing retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumer’s in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2024-cv-00022), and the case has since been settled.
On November 12, 2024, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Brookshire Grocery Co. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2024-cv-00919), and the case has since been settled.
On December 17, 2024, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Wakefern Food Corporation and Shelf Nine LLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2024-cv-01056), and the case has since been settled.
On February 3, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Walgreen Co. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:2025-cv-00120), and the case has since been settled.
On April 15, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Optisigns, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Case No. 4:2025-cv-01727), and the case has since been settled.
On August 21, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Cooler Screens, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘672 patent, and ‘890 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Case No. 1:25-cv-10004), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On August 25, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00868), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On August 29, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against The Kroger Company alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘121 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, consumer behavior analysis to optimize product layout, inventory management, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00923), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
| 32 |
On September 4, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Creative Realities, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, 825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-009311), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
On September 10, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against MNTN, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, 890 patent, and ‘731 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case No. 1:25-cv-01466), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On September 12, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Allerin Tech Pvt. Ltd. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, consumer behavior analysis to optimize product layout, inventory management, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00947), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On September 18, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Mood Media LLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘825 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, and ‘731 patent, which encompass retail marketing, advertising data-driven, real-time shopper engagement, digital signage, autonomous retail optimization, consumer behavior analysis to optimize product layout, inventory management, and other technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case No. 1:25-cv-01527). In January 2026, Alpha Modus resolved its patent litigation against Mood Media LLC, and the matter was dismissed with prejudice. No claims remain pending between the parties.
On September 24, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against RetailNext Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘825 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘550 patent, and ‘890 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00977), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
On October 2, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Navori SA and meldCX Pty Ltd. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘731 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01000), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On October 3, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Sensormatic Electronics, LLC and Johnson Controls International, PLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘825 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘880 patent, which encompass retail marketing and advertising data-driven technologies to enhance consumers’ in-store experience at the point of decision. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01003), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
On October 8, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘550 patent, which encompass systems for real-time inventory management, customer assistance, personalized in-store advertising, dynamic store layout optimization, and behavioral data-driven retail engagement. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01026), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
| 33 |
On October 22, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against 7-Eleven, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘121 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass the capability to analyze consumer behavior and product interaction in real-time, which allows businesses to dynamically adjust their marketing strategies to meet the immediate needs of consumers at pivotal purchasing decision moments. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01060), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
On November 3, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Adroit Worldwide Media, Inc. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass systems that enable real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated frictionless-checkout experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 8:25-cv-02471), and the case has since been settled.
On November 12, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Atliq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, and ‘550 patent, which encompass the capability to analyze consumer behavior and product interaction in real-time, which allows businesses to dynamically adjust their marketing strategies to meet the immediate needs of consumers at pivotal purchasing decision moments. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01120), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On November 14, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Industria De Diseño Textil, S.A., and Zara USA, Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass the capability to analyze consumer behavior and product interaction in real-time, which allows businesses to dynamically adjust their marketing strategies to meet the immediate needs of consumers at pivotal purchasing decision moments. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01125), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On November 21, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against V-Count Global Holding Ltd., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘825 patent, ‘672 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘550 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass systems that enable real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated frictionless-checkout experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01145), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On November 21, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Stratacache, Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘120 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘550 patent, ‘731 patent, ‘121 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass systems that enable real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated frictionless-checkout experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Case No. 2:25-cv-11234), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
On December 1, 2025, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against H&M Fashion USA, Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘890 patent, ‘120 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘121 patent, which encompass methods and systems for monitoring shopper behavior, analyzing product interactions, optimizing product placement, managing inventory in real time, and enabling seamless in-store purchase experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-01182), and the case is in the claim construction and discovery stages.
On April 23, 2026, Alpha Modus filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Circle-K Stores Inc., alleging infringement of several Alpha Modus patents pertaining to its ‘571 patent, ‘890 patent, ‘880 patent, ‘731 patent, and ‘718 patent, which encompass methods and systems for monitoring shopper behavior, analyzing product interactions, optimizing product placement, managing inventory in real time, and enabling seamless in-store purchase experiences. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:25-cv-00335), and the case is in its initial pleading stage.
| 34 |
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in this Quarterly Report are any of the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2026, our registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on December 11, 2025, and our registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on January 7, 2026, and our registration statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on July 17, 2026. Any of these factors could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Additional risk factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business or results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities, Use of Proceeds, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company issued the following unregistered securities:
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued 5,974 shares of Class A common stock to each of the four non-employee directors for the quarterly issuance set out in the director agreements. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2026 at $4.26 per share. The Company recognized $101,143 in stock-based compensation expense.
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued 14,935 shares of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer, Thomas Gallagher, in consideration of his $62,500 quarterly fee pursuant to his employment agreement. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2026 at $4.26 per share. The Company recognized $63,213 in stock-based compensation expense.
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued 13,441 shares of Class A common stock to the Company’s VP of Technology, Puneet Vij, in consideration of his $56,250 quarterly fee pursuant to his employment agreement. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2026 at $4.26 per share. The Company recognized $56,892 in stock-based compensation expense.
On June 30, 2026, the Company issued 4,226 shares of Class A common stock to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rodney Sperry, in consideration of his $18,000 quarterly fee pursuant to his employment agreement. These shares were valued as of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2026 at $4.26 per share. The Company recognized $18,000 in stock-based compensation expense.
As disclosed above in Note 7, on June 30, 2026, the Company sold to the Investor the Pre-Delivery Shares.
The Company issued the foregoing securities pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as the shareholders were accredited and/or financially sophisticated and had adequate access, through business or other relationships, to information about the Company, and the sales did not involve a public offering of securities or any general solicitation.
| 35 |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, to the
Company’s knowledge, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f))
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
| 36 |
| ++ | Indicates a management or compensatory plan. |
| * | Filed or furnished herewith. |
| # | Certain exhibits and schedules to these exhibits have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the SEC upon its request. |
| 37 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| Dated: August 14, 2026 | ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC. | |
| By: | /s/ William Alessi | |
| Name: | William Alessi | |
| Title: |
Chief Executive Officer | |
| (Principal executive officer) | ||
| Dated: August 14, 2026 | ALPHA MODUS HOLDINGS, INC. | |
| By: | /s/ Rodney Sperry | |
| Name: | Rodney Sperry | |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |
| (Principal financial and accounting officer) | ||
| 38 |