Executive readout · one minute
Webcast research workspace
Read the call alongside every captured source. Transcript, audio stay in one workspace.
Conference · 2026-03-25
Executive readout · one minute
Read the call alongside every captured source. Transcript, audio stay in one workspace.
Research coverage
2 live sources
Switch sources without leaving this page or losing your listening position.
Open the source you need; every reader stays inside this workspace.
Good morning, everyone. I'm Lisa Walter, biotech analyst here at RBC Capital Markets. Thanks for joining us at RBC's Ophthalmology Conference. This session, we have Alexandria Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of MiraGTX. Zandi, thanks so much for joining us today. How are you doing?
Well, I'm doing very well. Thank you for inviting me to speak today.
Well, it's a pleasure to host you this morning. Zandi, maybe just to kick things off, can you give us a big picture overview of the company and give us a sense of where things stand with the ophthalmology programs at MIRA?
Okay, that would be fine. We are quite a broad company in that we currently have three late stage programs that have come through this company. two are in the eye which are both for inherited retinal diseases and one is partnered with J&J one is partnered with Lilly and both are awaiting filing with global regulatory agencies for approval. We also have two late stage programs which are not in ophthalmology but large indications and not inherited disease. One is in xerostomia, two years after patients have been treated with radiation. So this is severe long-term xerostomia, an intractable and very unpleasant condition. And the second is in Parkinson's. Both of those are in a phase two and a phase three study that's in Parkinson's starting this year. In addition to that, we support our programs with our own internal manufacturing, which gives us very good costs of goods and speed with regulatory agencies. We have highly advanced optimization technology from capsids promoters and all sorts of different tools we can make to improve the potency of our vectors by up to three logs again reducing the dose that we need and we have a platform which and is now a mechanism for delivering any protein that can be encoded by transgene using small molecule oral inducers so one-time delivery of a um of the dna template and daily oral pills that can deliver you any antibody herceptin pcsk9 um any peptide ipo glp1 gip or combination of peptide which is extremely powerful today as we're starting to find hosts of smaller proteins and peptides that could be used as therapeutics if they could be delivered in their native form or in a form that allows them to be dosed effectively in the body without having to be made synthetically and long-acting outside the body first so that's the broad range of the company and one more thing I forgot to mention which is the entire company was built using only locally delivered small doses of AAV So that's how we got to our indications rather than large intravenous doses. The delivery of small local doses has an impact on safety, on the cost of goods, and is really one of the reasons that all of our programs so far are now late stage and has been successful, we think.
Got it. Well, definitely a lot to unpack, a lot going on at Mira at the moment. But I, you know, this is an ophthalmology conference. So I'm going to focus on those programs first. Maybe just on an inherited retinal disease. Zandeep, Mira has a lot of experience developing gene therapies for the IRDs. There's an XLRP program, LCA4, and you also recently launched a program for BBS10.
Can you maybe tell us broadly why inherited retinal diseases are attractive areas for clinical development and maybe also why gene therapies are well-positioned to succeed in these disease areas? so inherited retinal diseases obviously result from mutated genes and therefore intuitively one of the best ways to treat them like many inherited retinals many inherited diseases is to replace the gene and there is a long history of being able to safely deliver genes to the back of the eye using AAV and when you when I mentioned that at Mira we only use small doses locally delivered the eye is clearly a place where you only require very small very local gene delivery and it has the benefit of being able to actually look into the treated eye and be able to see the effect of what has happened in addition there are many many different endpoint measures of vision visual function retinal function that allow you to have quite a detailed look at the effect of your gene therapy so if you are focusing on small doses locally delivered and safety then the eye is a great place for inherited and also larger indications and that is one of the areas we focused on it's the only area actually we we actually look at inherited diseases our other areas of focus are outside inherited for large indications like Parkinson's like xerostomia and like pain and ALS and all those programs that are pre-clinical for us. One more thing about expertise in the eye, the inherited retinal disease space is a very small one. There are probably between 30 and I'm going to say 50 leading sites in the world with our KOLs who see probably over 80% of the known patients. and when we went into this area ophthalmology it was actually the foundation of the company we did a partnership with ucl and the moorfields eye hospital and the moorfields eye hospital is arguably the largest catchment hospital anywhere in the world for inherited retinal disease and one of the centers from which this expertise emanates so through that acquisition of the spin out from ucl more fields we gained relationships with those in the world who are most experienced with these diseases but both identifying them genotyping them and understanding the end points that will really show how the drugs have worked if they have. So that has been key in our success is that relationship and our deep connections with those thought leaders.
Zandi, that's very helpful to know and understand.
And I don't think I appreciated how small the IRD spaces and uh you know how few kols uh there are out there i i think that's really helpful um well and and there's one other thing is that there are hundreds of irds right and the same doctor at the more fields will see patients with all of them so you don't have a kol for rp and a KOL a different KOL for LCA those physicians have seen or those leaders in those centers who run those centers have probably seen all of those IRDs and we work with Mike Michael Edes at the Moorfields and I believe he probably sees I think it's around 70 IRD patients a year sorry a week it's a lot and and that's both children and adults so those kols are very few relatively in the world with very concentrated uh knowledge of a vast array of these different diseases are they're real experts right so so sandy there's there's kind of some synergy i guess If you're working on one IRD, it almost makes sense to look at other indications as well.
Is that fair?
I think that's fair. And that's not only sort of academically, but also from clinical trial perspective. The phase three study with Johnson & Johnson was at 30 sites in Europe and the US. And that included those leaders through the relationships with Mike at the Moorfields and those very same physicians will be the physicians that treat and prescribe these multiple gene therapies. So from an academic all the way through to a development and commercialization, there is a lot of synergies between each of the different diseases.
Got it. That's really helpful. Sandy, I do want to talk about the XLRP program. I think many investors listening in are familiar with this. This is, of course, partnered with J&J, and we had the Phase 3 readout last year, and this really did show some promising trends. I'm just wondering if you can share any updates on this program.
This is owned by Johnson & Johnson. We sold it back to them, and we are the commercial manufacturer, and we agree. as do many of those KOLs, particularly the ones that were in the study, that the data that was presented was extremely promising and showed that in the eyes of these thought leaders and the FFB that this therapy was having a very positive impact on these patients' lives. And so we know that the data actually was meaningful. And we are waiting to hear J&J's strategy for getting that to patients.
Got it.
Maybe more broadly, were there any learnings from the XLRP pivotal study that you are taking with you and applying to your other inherited retinal disease programs? that's a interesting question there were many many learnings from all of the studies that we have done and many of those kols have done um that led to the phase three and those are things like the surgery technique had been developed through multiple studies that we the more fields mass thioneer had done that went into this phase three the steroid regimen and that was presented a few years ago when it went into the phase three almost obliterated you know the inflammation that had previously been seen in some of these studies so those sorts of logistical learnings actually supported the phase three in rpgr as well as the surgical training so i said there were 30 sites there were two surgeons trained at each site so we now have 60 plus surgeons fully trained who were involved in this study who are ready to deliver IRD therapies and as was presented there were virtually no surgical issues, safety issues in this study. So I think we have through the last decade learned how to safely and effectively deliver inherited retinal disease therapies to the back of the eye and that's applicable to any indication you you might want to do it was applicable to AIPL1 to the specials programs that we're now doing and any phase one phase three that may be done in the future got it well it certainly sounds like we've uh come a long way since Luxterna which gained approval in 2017.
So I do want to touch on your LCA4 program that has now been partnered with Lilly. Can you remind us where this program stands as well as the Lilly partnership?
Yeah so this is an ultra rare unlike RPTR which is one of the commonest rps this is one of the rarest lcas it is caused by a mutation in aipl1 infants are born blind so they can hardly see a hand moving in front of their face and through our specials license which allows physicians to deliver a potential therapy to children um 11 children were treated under the age of four with this viral vector replacing the AIPL1 gene, and all 11 gained sight. Lilly have licensed this to commercialize and get it to patients globally. There was $75 million up front, plus additional milestones, $135 million, based on various global approvals and largely US approval and a PRV. Now, PRV has been extended. So we now know that approval in the US will give a PRV, even if it is in October and not September this year. So that is a decreased risk in one of those milestones and we work with Lily weekly and daily to help in supporting them as they file for various approvals with regulatory agencies globally and they're very focused on patient access to this particular drug for a very aggressive disease they've got a very strong large team working on this got it and thanks uh for reminding us about uh the the prv i think that's a very helpful
maybe let's talk about the bbs 10 program uh you just recently launched this can you share a little bit more more background um is this a subset of the bardi beetle syndrome population um can you share a little bit more detail maybe on the on the prevalence and and what your approach is here okay so i mentioned the specials license that a specials license is actually a manufacturing license and we have a commercial manufacturing facility in the uk with commercial license qc
in ireland so in addition to the commercial licenses for our facility we also have something called a specials license which allows us to manufacture for particular patients that a physician wants to treat because there's no other option even if the drug has not been in patients before so the bbs 10 program arose through um a patient advocacy group through parents a particular couple who had a bbs 10 child who supported mirror to design and make a bbs 10 viral vector to manufacture it and release it under our specials license for children who had bbs 10 to be treated by physicians in the uk um if they thought it was suitable so that's how the specials come about um and indeed we're looking currently we we have another request for specials from again a charitable organization and the same path can be followed so it's how AIPL1 got its data we have started treating the BBS 10 or physicians have started BBS 10 we can supply that and we are looking into the design and manufacture of another IRD treatment for for potentially supplying under a specials so it's a very unusual and sort of license and process and it's we're very willing to take you know on board some of these extremely rare damaging diseases and supply under under these conditions particularly when parents or or philanthropic groups come and request that from us.
Zandi, is the specials license just a program in the UK or is there a FDA equivalent as well?
So at the moment, there is no FDA equivalent. The specials license is related to manufacturing um and it's related to the physician being willing to use a drug that has never been in people before right um the system in the in the us let's just take out plausible mechanism for the moment allows patients to be treated without clinical data if they do not get to enroll, they're not appropriate for an ongoing clinical study. So the material has to be released to FDA requirements. It's slightly different, but there are mechanisms for getting material to patients in the U.S. who are not eligible for current studies. But it's a different situation. This is a U.K. license.
Got it. Got it. Understood.
But just one thing is in the AIPL1 case, the patients who were treated, these children who were blind, came from seven different countries. So you're not limited in who can be treated, but the physicians can only request material to be used in the UK that are manufactured de facto in the UK at our facility. got it so patients could uh travel to the uk to be treated but they don't have to be from the uk is that how to think about it that was the case for the aipl1 very rare and patients came from seven different countries all over the world even the u.s patients came from yeah and data that's
generated from the specials license uh you can use or can you use that to support a potential filing down the line uh with the fda or or ema or other other regulators an important question so that data um needs to be collected in a way that it can be presented appropriately to the FDA.
And this is physician led studies. And if you can present that data and verify that data, yes, it can be used to support global approvals.
Got it. Very, very helpful to understand that um any there's some other programs uh going on uh with mira that are ophthalmology related i you know see one uh for stargard wet amd dry amd uh can you share some additional background on these programs are they using similar approaches as the inherited retinal diseases or is this something a little bit different so we do have quite a deep pipeline um that has been developed over the years of inherited retinal disease programs that are moving towards IND.
And in that collaboration with Lilly, the deal with the AIPL1, they also took on two other gene therapies for other inherited retinal diseases, not as rare as AIPL1. uh one is literally ready for ind so those documents of being transported to lily one is pre-ind um we can manufacture and we do manufacture for aipl1 um that in the near term for lily and so yes we have ind ready and pre-ind ready programs we have a very deep uh part of and that involves organ use of organoids retinal organoids and this was actually the group that came from ucl who developed retinal organoids with the japanese many years ago and that allows us to do two things very effectively in our optimization number one very very good intravitreal capsids that came from a monkey screen and would then indicate what happens in humans but you have two ways of getting as close as possible uh sorry capsids that really do reflect what what is needed in the human secondly also using retinal organoids we have a very large promoter platform which is very powerful in the eye because we use retinal organoids and AI, and we have been able to develop strong, small, very strong, very cell-specific promoters for different cells in the eye. Why I mention both of those things is because Eli Lilly, who obviously have seen all the ophthalmology companies out there, also got the rights to use both our intravitreal capsids and our promoters in vectors addressing lily targets that's five targets and we don't know what they are lily will move them forward using um our capsids and our promoters from our our big 200 000 promoter library so we do have very strong technology all the way from, you know, the very building of a vector right out to phase three development.
Zandi, very interesting work on the intravitreal capsids.
Can you maybe give us an idea about how these might be different versus what other folks have developed? um well we have for many years been looking at intravictual capsids as many people have and we have tested uh head to head with 7m8 which is gold standard right um many intravictual capsids from many private and otherwise other companies and um and meanwhile we did our own screen where we, first of all, it was a screen replacing different pieces of the capsid and screening in NHPs and then taking our best hits and testing them in human organoids as well and we did the same comparisons as we have done for other capsids intravitual capsids that we ended up not using and versus 7m8 so the data that we have we selected capsids that were looking superior in those assays so monkey and organoid to anything else that we'd seen and our gold standard was 7m8 so we you know we can infer only that these are very good intravitreal capsids And we can use them in our larger indications, wet AMD, dry AMD, glaucoma, et cetera. We actually did a screen for glaucoma-specific capsids. It's a whole other story for the front of the eye and promoters as well. But we'll just go with the intro for now.
Got it. Well, very interesting. It'd be very interesting to see a glaucoma-specific capsid as well. That would be a very novel innovation. It's ciliary body. Got it. Ciliary body. Got it. Got it. Maybe just in the couple of minutes we have left here, I do want to touch on some of the non-I programs. So, Zarostomy, can you maybe just briefly remind us where this program is right now and maybe what the opportunity is here in radiation-induced serostomia.
Thank you. And radiation-induced serostomia, this is not at the time of treatment. It is radiation-induced serostomia, which is durable after two years post-radiation treatment. It's very severe, and it's actually a rather large market. We have redone our market research, and this is a multi-billion dollar global and even US opportunity. The coverage and the pricing is strong, and the number of patients each year is high. So this is actually a very large market opportunity with a very low cost of goods. and a manageable price that we think we can get from you know we've got 90 to 90 plus percent coverage in our surveys at least and the study is a pivotal phase two that the FDA has agreed in writing is one that can support a BLA as a single study it is completing enrollment as we speak and we are targeting filing for approval in this quarter next year with the aim of actual approval by or around the end of next year to launch in 2028 got it thanks for that and we are almost out of time Zannie but um is there anything you you want to touch on with either uh the Parkinson's program that's partnered with a halogen AI or anything you want to flag with the uh the ribo switch program ribo switch is we are in multiple communications with the FDA to prepare for an IMD filing later this year for a program in leptin that we have very long-term data on we have three small molecules, GMP manufactured, ready for the clinic, one of which is going to be used in the leptin. In addition, we've talked about using this for pain in the past, and we have increasingly strong preclinical data in neuropathic pain. And as we are discovering or peptides short-acting molecules that are involved in cardiovascular metabolic blood pressure type systems in the body all of which are responsive we recognize that we have a mechanism for the first time for readily dosing the body with effective doses of peptides proteins and hormones which can't be taken out synthetically manufactured to be long-acting and put back so we're very excited as you know AI discovers all of this should be able to turn them into drugs very rapidly so we'll be in the clinic with our first this year pain is looking really good and the target generation through this is at the moment the only way that you can deliver many of these metabolic and longevity-related homeostatic proteins.
Got it. Thanks, Sandy. Well, I'm afraid we're officially out of time. Thanks so much for joining us today at our ophthalmology conference. It has truly been a pleasure to have you.
Well, thank you so much, and I will speak to you soon.
All right. Thanks so much.
0:05 to 32:48 · One card per analyst, follow-ups included. Each plays from its start, and the one being answered is marked.
Good morning, everyone. I'm Lisa Walter, biotech analyst here at RBC Capital Markets. Thanks for joining us at RBC's Ophthalmology Conference. This session, we have Alexandria Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of MiraGTX. Zandi, thanks so much for joining us today. How are you doing?
Alexandria Forbes: Well, I'm doing very well. Thank you for inviting me to speak today.