QPRC 10-K
Quest Patent Research Corp (QPRC)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
For the fiscal year ended:
OR
For the transition period from ___ to ___
Commission File Number
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| | ||
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
| Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ |
| Smaller reporting company | |
| Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
State the aggregate market
value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter: $
As of March 30,
2023, the registrant had
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As used in this annual report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and words of like import, and the “Company” refers to Quest Patent Research Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
i
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contain “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, all of which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “plans,” “will,” “forecasts,” “projects,” “intends,” “estimates,” and other words of similar meaning. One can identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements are likely to address our growth strategy, financial results and product and development programs. One must carefully consider any such statement and should understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements. These factors may include inaccurate assumptions and a broad variety of other risks and uncertainties, including some that are known and some that are not. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed, and actual future results may vary materially.
These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, include, and are not limited to:
| ● | Our ability to generate revenue from our intellectual property rights, including our ability to license our intellectual property rights and our ability to be successful in any litigation which we may commence in order to seek to monetize our intellectual property rights; |
| ● | Our ability or perceived ability to obtain necessary financing for operations and for the monetization of our intellectual property rights; |
| ● | Our ability to remain current with respect to our obligations under patent purchase agreements, the failure of which could result in a default under our agreement with QPRC Finance LLC (“QFL”) and/or QPRC Finance III LLC (“QF3”) or, even if the failure does not result in a default, it may affect the willingness of QF3 to make advances to us under the funding agreement; |
| ● | Our ability to generate sufficient proceeds from our intellectual property rights to enable us to realize any cash flow after payments to our funding sources, including QFL and QF3 under our financing agreements with QFL and QF3, our restructured agreement with Intelligent Partners, LLC (“Intelligent Partners”), and payments due to counsel, as well as payment obligations to sellers of intellectual property rights that we acquire; |
| ● | Our ability to identify intellectual property for innovative technologies for which there is a significant potential market which QFL or QF3 is willing to fund and to find other funding sources if QFL and QF3 are not willing to fund the acquisition of the intellectual property and our ability to negotiate terms for the acquisition such intellectual property on terms which QFL or QF3 is willing to fund; |
| ● | Our ability or perceived ability to obtain necessary financing for operations; |
| ● | The effect of any adverse decision in any action which one of our subsidiaries may commence, including the award of legal fees in favor of a defendant, which may result in the bankruptcy of the subsidiary; |
| ● | The effects on our business, financial conditions and ownership of proprietary rights in the event of any default under our agreements with QFL, QF3 or Intelligent Partners; |
| ● | The effect of legislation and court decisions on the ability to generate revenue from patent and other intellectual property rights as well as the market’s perception of the effects of such legislation or court decisions on our business; |
| ● | Our ability to reduce the cost of litigation through contingent fees with counsel; |
| ● | The results or anticipated results of litigation by or against us, including any actions or motions by defendants seeking legal fees or any other recovery from us in the event that a court decision is against us or otherwise does not uphold our intellectual property rights; |
| ● | The effects on us in the event that any party against which we commence litigation obtains a judgement against one of our subsidiaries and seeks to foreclose on the intellectual property owned by the subsidiary which may result in a default under our agreements with QFL and QF3. |
ii
| ● | The anticipated or actual results of our operations; |
| ● | Events or conditions relating to the enforcement of intellectual property rights generally; |
| ● | The development of a market for our common stock; |
| ● | Our ability to retain our key executive officers and identify, hire and retain additional key employees; |
| ● | Any discrepancy between anticipated or projected results and actual results of our operations; |
| ● | The market’s perception or our ability to continue to make our filings with the SEC in a timely manner and for our stock to continue to be traded on the OTCQB; |
| ● | Actions by third parties to either sell or purchase stock in quantities which would have a significant effect on our stock price; and |
| ● | The sale or the market’s perception of the possible sale by QFL or Intelligent Partners of the shares of common stock which we have registered pursuant to the Securities Act; |
| ● | Any damages we may be required to pay in the event that we do not keep the registration statement covering shares to be sold by owned by Intelligent Partners or issuable upon warrants held by QFL current and effective without their ability to sell pursuant to Rule 144 or our ability to continue to have our stock traded on the OTCQB; |
| ● | The effect of pandemics or other major outbreaks of disease or civil disruptions or other events which have the effect of reducing court schedules which results in courts giving a lower priority to legal action such as those we file and the ability or willingness of defendants to reach a settlement on our claims, and impairment in the financial condition or bankruptcy of defendants and potential defendants in action which we commenced or may commence; |
| ● | The effect of Russian invasion of Ukraine or any other international conflicts and the sanctions which have been imposed and which may be imposed, and the resulting economic conditions may affect our ability to acquire and monetize intellectual property; and |
| ● | Other matters not within our control. |
In addition, factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in particular, the risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as those discussed in other documents we file with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on industry and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. We have not reviewed or included data from all sources. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
iii
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We are an intellectual property asset management company. Our principal operations include the acquisition, licensing and enforcement of intellectual property rights that are either owned or controlled by us or one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We currently own, control or manage fifteen intellectual property portfolios, which principally consist of patent rights. As part of our intellectual property asset management activities and in the ordinary course of our business, it has been necessary for us or the intellectual property owner who we represent to initiate, and it is likely to continue to be necessary to initiate, patent infringement lawsuits and engage in patent infringement litigation. We anticipate that our primary source of revenue will come from the grant of licenses to use our intellectual property, including primarily licenses granted as part of the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits.
Intellectual property monetization includes the generation of revenue and proceeds from the licensing of patents, patented technologies and other intellectual property rights. Patent litigation is often, and for us has been, a necessary element of intellectual property monetization where a patent owner, or a representative of the patent owner, seeks to protect its patent rights against the unlicensed manufacture, sale, and use of the owner’s patent rights or products which incorporate the owner’s patent rights. In general, we seek to monetize the bundle of rights granted by the patents through structured licensing and when necessary, enforcement of those rights through litigation, although to date all of our patent license revenues have resulted from litigation. To date all of our revenue from the licensing of our patents has resulted from litigation commenced by us.
We intend to develop our business by acquiring intellectual property rights, either in the form of ownership of or an exclusive license to the underlying intellectual property. Our goal is to enter into agreements with inventors of innovative technologies for which there may be a significant market for products which use or incorporate the intellectual property. We seek to purchase all of, or interests in, intellectual property in exchange for cash, securities of our company, the formation or a joint venture or separate subsidiary in which the owner has an equity interest, and/or interests in the monetization of those assets. Our revenue from this aspect of our business can be generated through licensing and, when necessary, which is typically the case, litigation. We engage in due diligence and a principled risk underwriting process to evaluate the merits and potential value of any acquisition, partnership or joint venture. We seek to structure the terms of our acquisitions in a manner that will achieve the highest risk-adjusted returns possible, in the context of our financial condition. In connection with the acquisition of intellectual property portfolios, we have granted the party providing the financing an interest in any recovery we have with respect to the intellectual property purchased with the financing, and we expect that we will have to continue to grant such interests until and unless we have generated sufficient cash from licensing our intellectual property to enable us to acquire additional intellectual property portfolios without outside financing. However, we cannot assure you that we will ever generate sufficient revenues to enable us to purchase additional intellectual property without third-party financing.
We employ a due diligence process before completing the acquisition of an intellectual property interest. We begin with an investment thesis supporting the potential transaction and then proceed to test the thesis through an examination of the critical drivers of the value of the underlying intellectual property asset. Such an examination focuses on areas such as title and inventorship issues, the quality of the drafting and prosecution of the intellectual property assets, legal risks inherent in licensing programs generally, the applicability of the invention to the relevant marketplace and other issues such as the effects of venue and other procedural issues. If we require financing to acquire intellectual property, we will have to satisfy our financing sources, which may be QFL or QF3, that we have the ability to monetize the intellectual property. However, our financial position may affect our ability to conduct adequate due diligence with respect to intellectual property rights or to acquire valuable intellectual property. This due diligence effort is conducted by our chief executive officer, who is our only full-time employee.
1
It has been necessary to commence litigation in order to obtain a recovery for past infringement of, or to license the use of, our intellectual property rights. Intellectual property litigation is very expensive, with no certainty of any recovery. To the extent possible we seek to engage counsel on a contingent fee or partial contingent fee basis, which significantly reduces our litigation cost, but which also reduces the value of the recovery to us. We do not have the resources to enable us to fund the cost of litigation. To the extent that we cannot secure counsel on a contingent basis and cannot fund litigation ourselves, which, considering our financial position, is likely to be the case, we may enter into an agreement with a third-party, which may be an independent third-party, such as QFL or QF3, to finance the cost of litigation. In view of our limited cash and our working capital deficiency, we are not able to institute any monetization program that may require litigation unless we engage counsel on a fully contingent basis, or we obtain funding from third-party funding sources. In these cases, counsel may be afforded a greater participation in the recovery and the third-party that funds the litigation would be entitled to participate in any recovery.
Reverse Split, Change in Authorized Common Stock
On July 27, 2022, we amended our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to (i) decrease the number of authorized shares of common stock from 10,000,000,000 shares to 30,000,000 shares and (ii) effect a one-for-100 reverse split whereby each share of common stock became and was converted into 0.01 share of such common stock, with fractional shares being rounded up to the next higher whole number of shares. All share and per share information in this Form 10-K has been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse split and change in authorized common stock.
Recent Development
Agreements with QPRC Finance III LLC (“QF3”)
On March 12, 2023, we and our newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Harbor Island Dynamic LLC (“Harbor”), entered into a series of agreements, all dated March 12, 2023, with QF3, a non-affiliated party, including a prepaid forward purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), a patent security agreement (the “Patent Security Agreement” together with the Security Agreement, the Patent Security Agreement, and the Purchase Agreement, the “Investment Documents”). The descriptions below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K relating to our agreements with QF3 are summaries only and are qualified in their entirety by reference to those agreements which are filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K.
| (i) | Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, QF3 agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (a) up to $4,000,000 for operating expenses; (b) $3,300,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the purchase of a patent portfolio from Tower Semiconductor Ltd.; and (c) up to an additional $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize. In return we transferred to QF3 a right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. The terms of the Purchase Agreement are described under “QF3 Purchase Agreement.” |
| (ii) | On March 17, 2023, we used $3,300,000 of proceeds from the QF3 financing as the cash payment portion of the purchase of a ten-patent portfolio (the “HID Portfolio”) from Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (“Tower”). |
| (iii) | Pursuant to the Security Agreement, our obligations under the Purchase Agreement with QF3 are secured by: (a) the value of anything received from the monetization of the intellectual property rights covered by the Security Agreement; (b) the patents (as defined in the Security Agreement); (c) all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing (a) and (b); and (d) proceeds (including, without limitation, cash proceeds and insurance proceeds) and products of the foregoing (a)-(c). |
| (iv) | Pursuant to the Patent Security Agreement, we and Harbor granted QF3 a first priority continuing security interest in and lien upon Collateral covered by the Security Agreement. The Patent Security Agreement is the instrument that is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and other government agencies to perfect QF3’s security interest in the Collateral. |
2
QF3 Purchase Agreement
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, QF3 agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (a) up to $4,000,000 for operating expenses; (b) $3,300,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the purchase of a patent portfolio from Tower and (c) up to an additional $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we would intend to monetize. In return we transferred to QF3 the right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. After QF3 has a negotiated rate of return, we and QF3 shall share net proceeds equally until QF3 shall have achieved its Investment Return (as defined therein). Thereafter, we shall retain 100% of all net proceeds. Except in an Event of Default, as defined therein, all payments by us to QF3 pursuant to the Purchase Agreement are non-recourse and shall be paid only if and after net proceeds from monetization of the patent rights owned or acquire by us are received or are to be received.
Events of Default include any breach of the Investment Documents, including non-payment, material misrepresentation, security interest compromise, criminal indictment or felony conviction of one or our officers or directors, our current chief executive no longer serving as our chief executive or as a director, the occurrence of any Event of Default under the Restructure Agreement with Intelligent Partners, as defined therein, and our insolvency. In addition to all rights and remedies available under law and the Investment Documents, upon and Event of Default, QF3 may: (i) declare the Investment Return immediately due and payable, (ii) except in the event of our insolvency, declare an amount equal to the aggregate amount of the capital provided pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, plus a late charge, immediately due and payable, or (iii) cease making capital available to us.
Under the agreement, QF3 may terminate capital advances other than in an Event of Default by giving written notice to us in which case QF3’s interest in Net Proceeds shall be an amount equal to the greater of (i) the capital advanced to us plus interest at the prime rate, on the one hand, and (ii) Net Proceeds received by QF3 prior to the date of such termination.
Grant of Security Interests
Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Patent Security Agreement, payment of our obligations under the Purchase Agreement with QF3 are secured by (a) the value of anything received from the monetization of the intellectual property rights covered by the Security Agreement; (b) the patents (as defined in the Security Agreement); (c) all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing (a) and (b); and (d) proceeds (including, without limitation, cash proceeds and insurance proceeds) and products of the foregoing (a)-(c).
Intercreditor Agreement
In connection with the agreements with QF3, we, Harbor, Quest Licensing Corporation (“QLC”), Quest NetTech Corporation (“NetTech”), Mariner IC Inc. (“Mariner”), Semcon IP Inc. (“Semcon”), IC Kinetics Inc. (“IC”), CXT Systems Inc. (“CXT”), M-Red Inc. (“MRED”), and Audio Messaging Inc. (“AMI”), collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) entered into an intercreditor agreement with QF3 and Intelligent Partners which provides for the priority of QF3 in the collateral under the Investment Documents.
Agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners
Set forth below is a discussion of agreements which we entered into in February 2021with QFL to provide us with a financing facility, funds to make a payment due to Intelligent Partners and for working capital and an agreement with Intelligent Partners to restructure our loan agreement and related agreements. The agreement with Intelligent Partners restated our agreements with United Wireless Holdings, Inc. (“United Wireless”) which had been assigned to Intelligent Partners, an affiliate of United Wireless. QF3 and QFK are related to each other. The descriptions below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K relating to our agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners are summaries only and are qualified in their entirety by reference to those agreements which were filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K.
3
Agreements with QFL
On February 22, 2021, we entered into a series of agreements which we entered into in February 2021 with QFL, including a prepaid forward purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), a subsidiary security agreement (the “Subsidiary Security Agreement”), a subsidiary guaranty (the “Subsidiary Guarantee”), a warrant issue agreement (the “Warrant Issue Agreement”), a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) and a board observation rights agreement (the “Board Observation Rights Agreement” together with the Security Agreement, the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Security Agreement, Warrant Issuance Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement and the Purchase Agreement, the “Investment Documents”) pursuant to which, at the closing held contemporaneously with the execution of the agreements:
| (i) | Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, QFL agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (a) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize; (b) up to $2,000,000 for operating expenses; and (iii) $1,750,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners. In return we transferred to QFL a right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. During 2021 we requested and received $1,000,000 for working capital. The terms of the Purchase Agreement are described under “Purchase Agreement.” |
| (ii) | We used $1,750,000 of proceeds from the QFL financing as the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners as transferee of United Wireless pursuant to a restructure agreement (the “Restructure Agreement”) between us and Intelligent Partners executed contemporaneously with the closing of the Investment Documents with QFL. The payment was made directly from QFL to Intelligent Partners. The terms of the Restructure Agreement are described under “Restructure Agreement.” |
| (iii) | Pursuant to the Security Agreement, our obligations under the Purchase Agreement with QFL are secured by: (a) the proceeds (as defined in the Purchase Agreement); (b) the patents (as defined in the Purchase Agreement; (c) all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing (a) and (b); and (d) proceeds (including, without limitation, cash proceeds and insurance proceeds) and products of the foregoing (a)-(c). |
| (iv) | Pursuant to the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Guarantors–guaranteed our obligations to QFL under the Purchase Agreement. |
| (v) | Pursuant to the Subsidiary Security Agreement, the Subsidiary Guarantors grant QFL a security interest in the proceeds from the future monetization of their respective patent portfolios. |
| (vi) | Pursuant to the Warrant Issue Agreement, we granted QFL ten-year warrants to purchase a total of up to 962,463 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.54 per share which may be exercised from February 19, 2021 through February 18, 2031 on a cash or cashless basis. Exercisability of the Warrant is limited if, upon exercise, the holder would beneficially own more than 4.99% (the “Maximum Percentage”) of our common stock, except that by written notice to us, the holder may change the Maximum Percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99% provided any such change will not be effective until the 61st day following notice to us. The Warrant also contains certain minimum ownership percentage antidilution rights pursuant to which the aggregate number of shares of common stock purchasable upon the initial exercise of the Warrant shall not be less than 10% of the aggregate number of outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company (determined on a fully diluted basis). A portion of any gain from sale of the shares, net of taxes and costs of exercise, realized prior to the completion of all monetization activities shall be credited against the total return due to QFL pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. |
4
| (vii) | We agreed to take all commercially reasonable steps necessary to regain compliance with the OTCQB eligibility standards as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 12 months from the closing date. We regained such compliance on May 7, 2021, at which time the common stock recommenced trading on the OTCQB. |
| (viii) | We granted QFL certain registration rights with respect to the 962,463 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant. |
| (ix) | Commencing six months from the closing date, if the shares owned by QFL cannot be sold pursuant to a registration statement and cannot be sold pursuant to Rule 144 without the Company being in compliance with the current public information requirements of Rule 144, if the Company is not in compliance with the current public information requirements, the Company is required to pay damages to QFL. |
| (x) | Pursuant to the Board Observation Rights Agreement, until the later of the date on which QFL or its affiliates (i) have received the entirety of their Investment Return (as defined in Purchase Agreement), and (ii) no longer hold any Securities (the “Observation Period”), we granted QFL the right, exercisable at any time during the Observation Period, to appoint a representative to attend meetings (including, without limitation, telephonic or other electronic meetings) of the Board or any committee thereof, including executive sessions, in an observer capacity. |
Purchase Agreement
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, QFL agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (i) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize; (ii) up to $2,000,000 for operating expenses from which we may, at our discretion, draw up to $200,000 per calendar quarter; and (iii) $1,750,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners. In return we transferred to QFL the right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. After QFL has a negotiated rate of return, we and QFL shall share net proceeds equally until QFL shall have achieved its Investment Return (as defined therein). Thereafter, we shall retain 100% of all net proceeds. Except in an Event of Default, as defined therein, all payments by the Company to QFL pursuant to the Purchase Agreement are non-recourse and shall be paid only if and after net proceeds from monetization of the patent rights owned or acquire by the Company are received, or to be received.
Events of Default include any breach of the Investment Documents, including non-payment, material misrepresentation, security interest compromise, criminal indictment or felony conviction of one or our officers or directors, our current chief executive no longer serving as our chief executive or as a director, the occurrence of any Event of Default under the Restructure Agreement with Intelligent Partners, as defined therein, and our insolvency. In addition to all rights and remedies available under law and the Investment Documents, upon and Event of Default, QFL may: (i) declare the Investment Return immediately due and payable, (ii) except in the event of our insolvency, declare an amount equal to the aggregate amount of the capital provided pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, plus a late charge, immediately due and payable, or (iii) cease making capital available to us.
Under the agreement, QFL may terminate capital advances other than in an Event of Default by giving written notice to us in which case QFL’s interest in Net Proceeds shall be an amount equal to the greater of (i) the capital advanced to the Company plus interest at the prime rate, on the one hand, and (ii) Net Proceeds received by the QFL prior to the date of such termination.
5
Grant of Security Interests
Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Subsidiary Security Agreement, payment of the obligations of the Company under the Purchase Agreement with QFL are secured by (i) the Proceeds (as defined in the Purchase Agreement); (ii) the Patents; (iii) all General Intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing; (iv) Proceeds (including, without limitation, Cash Proceeds and insurance proceeds) and products of the foregoing and (v) the proceeds realized by the relative patent portfolios of the Subsidiary Guarantors. The security interest in proceeds from the CXT and M-RED patents granted to QFL is junior to the security interest held by the affiliates of Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC (collectively “Intellectual Ventures”) granted to secure the obligations of CXT and MRED pursuant to their patent purchase agreements relating to the purchase of intellectual property from Intellectual Ventures.
Registration Rights Agreement
Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, we filed a registration statement with the SEC covering 500,000 of the 962,463 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant. We are also required to file additional Registration Statements (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) on the date 60 days after the date that we receive written notice from any Investor (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) that 60% of the Registrable Securities held by all Investors registered under the immediately preceding registration statement have been sold. The Registration Rights Agreement provides for us to pay damages in the event that we do not meet the required deadlines.
Intercreditor Agreement
In connection with the agreements with QFL and the agreements with Intelligent Partners described below, we and our Subsidiaries entered into an intercreditor agreement with QFL and Intelligent Partners which sets forth the priority of QFL in the collateral under the Investment Documents.
Agreements with Intelligent Partners
Securities Purchase Agreement and Related Agreements with United Wireless
We, together with certain of our subsidiaries, and United Wireless, entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 22, 2015 (the “SPA”) and related Transaction Documents, as defined therein, pursuant to which the Company sold 500,000 shares (the “Shares”) of our common stock, par value $0.00003 per share (the “Common Stock”) at $5.00 per share, or an aggregate of $250,000; we issued our 10% secured convertible promissory notes due September 30, 2020 to United, and granted United an option (the “2015 Purchase Option”) to purchase up to an additional 500,000 shares of Common Stock in three tranches at the prices as set forth therein. The 2015 Purchase Option expired unexercised on September 30, 2020. The Shares are currently owned by Andrew C. Fitton (“Fitton”) and Michael Carper (“Carper”) and United Wireless subsequently transferred its note and assigned all of its remaining rights under the agreements to Intelligent Partners, which is an affiliate of United Wireless and is owned by Fitton and Carper. Our agreements with United Wireless, also included various monetization proceeds agreements, which we refer to as MPAs, pursuant to which we granted to Intelligent Partners, as the assignee of United Wireless, rights to the monetization proceeds from revenue generated from certain of our intellectual property, a security agreement and a registration rights agreement.
6
At September 30, 2020, promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $4,672,810 were outstanding. The notes became due by their terms on September 30, 2020, and we did not make any payment on account of principal of and interest on the notes. As a result, Intelligent Partners had the right to declare a default under the Notes, and, if Intelligent Partners had taken such action, it would have been necessary for us to seek protection under the Bankruptcy Act. Subsequent to September 30, 2020, we engaged in negotiations with Intelligent Partners in parallel with our negotiations with QFL, with a view to restructuring our obligations under the United Wireless agreements, including the Notes, so that we no longer had any obligations under the Notes or the SPA. These negotiations resulted in the Restructure Agreement, described below, which provided for the payment to Intelligent Partners of $1,750,000 from the proceeds from our agreements with QFL. We also made interest payments totaling $117,780 between September 30, 2020 and February 22, 2021, the date we signed the Restructure Agreement with Intelligent Partners. One of QFL’s requirements to provide us with a funding facility was the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners so that we no longer had any debt obligations to Intelligent Partners. Neither QFL nor any other financing source, would provide us with funding while Intelligent Partners had a right to call a default under our notes to Intelligent Partners. As part of the restructure of our agreements with Intelligent Partners, we amended the existing MPAs and granted Intelligent Partners certain rights in the monetization proceeds from any new intellectual property we acquire, as describe below. Under these MPAs, Intelligent Partners participates in the monetization proceeds we receive with respect to new patents after QFL has received its negotiated rate of return.
On or prior to the date of the Restructure Agreement, Intelligent Partners transferred to Fitton and Carper $250,000 of the Notes (the “Transferred Note”), thereby reducing the principal amount of the Notes held by Intelligent Partners to $4,422,810.
On February 22, 2021, we and Intelligent Partners agreed to extinguish the Note and Transferred Note, and terminate or amend and restate the SPA and Transaction Documents, pursuant to a series of agreements including: a Restructure Agreement (the “Restructure Agreement”), a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), an Option Grant (the “Option Grant”), an Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement (the “Pledge Agreement”), an Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), a Board Observation Agreement (the “Board Observation Agreement”), a MPA-NA Security Interest Agreement (the “MPA-NA Security Interest Agreement”), an Amended and Restated Patent Proceeds Security Agreement (the “Patent Proceeds Security Agreement”, an Amended and Restated MPA-CP (the “MPA-CP”), an Amended and Restated MPA-CXT (the “MPA-CXT”), a MPA-MR (the “MPA-MR”), a MPA-AMI (the “MPA-AMI,” and together with the MPA-CP, MPA-CXT and MPA-MR, each a Restructure MPA and together the Restructure MPAs) and a MPA-NA (the “MPA-NA”).
| (i) | Pursuant to the Restructure Agreement, we paid Intelligent Partners $1,750,000 at closing, which we received from QFL and which QFL paid directly to Intelligent Partners, and recognized a further non-interest bearing total monetization proceeds obligation (the “TMPO”) of $2,805,000, which shall, from and after the Restructure Date, be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by (a) payments to Intelligent Partners pursuant to the restructure agreement, the Restructure MPAs and the MPA-NA and (b) any election by the Intelligent Partners to pay the Exercise Price of the Restructure Option, in whole or part, by means of a reduction in the then outstanding TMPO. Further details regarding the TMPO are provided under “TMPO”; |
| (ii) | Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, we issued to Fitton and Carper, as holders of the Transferred Note, a total of 462,963 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.54 per share, which purchase price was paid by the conversion and in full satisfaction of the Transferred Note (the “Conversion Shares”). |
| (iii) | Pursuant to the Option Grant, we granted Intelligent Partners an option to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.54 per share which vests immediately and may be exercised through February 9, 2026. |
| (iv) | Pursuant to the restructured monetization proceeds agreement, Intelligent Partners has a right to receive 60% of the net monetization proceeds from the patents currently owned by the Subsidiary Guarantors. The agreement has no termination provisions, so Intelligent Partners will be entitled to its percentage interest as long as revenue is generated from the intellectual property covered by the agreement. |
7
| (v) | Pursuant to the Subsidiary Security Agreement, our obligations under our agreements with Intelligent Partners, including its obligations under the Restructure Agreement and the Restructure MPAs are secured by a security interest in the net proceeds realized from the future monetization of the patents currently owned by the eight subsidiaries named above. |
| (vi) | Pursuant to the MPA-NA-Security Interest Agreement, our obligations under the MPA-NA are secured by a security interest in net proceeds realized from the future monetization of new patents acquired until the TMPO is satisfied, provided Intelligent Partners’ secured interest shall be limited to its entitlement in Net Proceeds under the MPA-NA. After satisfaction of the TMPO the security interest in proceeds from new assets shall terminate. |
| (vii) | We granted Intelligent Partners, Andrew Fitton and Michael Carper certain registration rights with respect to (i) the 500,000 Shares currently owned by Fitton and Carper, which shares are included in the registration statement that we filed; (ii) the 462,963 Conversion Shares being issued to Fitton and Carper, and (iii) the 500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Restructure Option; |
| (viii) | Commencing six months from the closing date, if the shares owned by Intelligent Partners cannot be sold pursuant to a registration statement and cannot be sold pursuant to Rule 144 without the Company being in compliance with the current public information requirements of Rule 144, if the Company is not in compliance with the current public information requirements, the Company is required to pay damages to Intelligent Partners. |
| (ix) | Pursuant to the Board Observation Rights Agreement, until the TMPO has been satisfied (the “Observation Period”), we granted Intelligent Partners the option and right, exercisable at any time during the Observation Period, to appoint a representative to attend meetings of the Board or any committee thereof, including executive sessions, in an observer capacity. |
Events of Default include (i) a Change of Control of the Company (ii) any uncured default on payment due to Intelligent Partners in an amount totaling in excess of $275,000, which is not the subject of a Dispute or other formal dispute resolution proceeding initiated in good faith pursuant to this Agreement or other Restructure Documents (iii) the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code by Company or any of its material subsidiaries, (iv) the filing of an involuntary petition for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code against the Company, which is not stayed or dismissed within sixty (60) days of such filing, except for an involuntary petition for relief filed solely by Intelligent Partners, or any Affiliate or member of Intelligent Partners, or (v) acceleration of an obligation in excess of $1 million dollars to another provider of financing following a final determination by arbitration or other judicial proceeding that such obligation is due and owing.
Registration Rights Agreement
Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, we granted Intelligent Partners, Andrew Fitton and Michael Carper certain registration rights with respect to (i) the 500,000 Shares currently owned by Fitton and Carper; (ii) the 462,963 Conversion Shares issued to Fitton and Carper, and (iii) the 500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Restructure Option. We filed the registration statement with the SEC covering the 500,000 Shares owned by Fitton and Carper, and the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.
8
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on our Business
Although we do not manufacture or sell products, the COVID-19 pandemic and the work shutdown imposed in the United States and other countries to limit the spread of the virus had a negative impact on our business. Our revenue is generated almost exclusively from license fees generated from litigation seeking damages for infringement of our intellectual property rights. The work shutdown affected the court system, and during much of 2020 and part of 2021 courts operated on a reduced schedule, and some courts may still have a backlog as a result of the pandemic. As a result, deadlines are likely to be postponed which may give defendants an incentive to delay negotiations or offer a lower amount than they might otherwise accept. In addition, the effect of the COVID-19 and the public response may have adversely affected the financial condition and prospects of defendants and potential defendants, which made it less likely that they would be willing to settle our claim.
Purchase of Intellectual Property from Intellectual Ventures Entities
On October 22, 2015, pursuant to an agreement with an effective date of July 8, 2015, as amended, between us and Intellectual Ventures Assets 16, LLC (“IV16”), we purchased three groups of patents from IV16 for a purchase price of $3,000,000, which was paid in three annual installments of $1,000,000 from the proceeds of our loans from United Wireless. The patent portfolios which we acquired from IV16 are the anchor structure portfolio, the power management/bus control portfolio and the diode on chip portfolio, which are described under “Business – Our Intellectual Property Portfolios.”
On January 26, 2018, Photonic Imaging Solutions Inc. (“PIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with Intellectual Ventures Assets 64 LLC (“IV 64”) pursuant to which PIS advanced $10,000 to IV 64 at closing and IV 64 assigned to PIS all right, title, and interest in a portfolio of eleven United States patents and sixteen foreign patents (the “CMOS Portfolio”). Under the agreement, PIS will distribute 70% of the first $1,500,000 of revenue, as defined in the agreement, 30% of the next $1,500,000 of revenue and 50% of revenue over $3,000,000 to IV 64; with the $10,000 advance being treated as an advance against the first distributions of net proceeds payable to IV 64. PIS’ obligations under the monetization proceeds agreement are secured by a security interest in the proceeds (from litigation or otherwise) from the portfolio. The patent portfolio which we acquired from IV 64 is the CMOS portfolio which is described under “Business – Our Intellectual Property Portfolios.”
On July 28, 2017, CXT, a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with Intellectual Ventures Assets 34 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 37 LLC (“IV 34/37”) pursuant to which CTX paid IV 34/37 $25,000 and IV34/37 transferred to CXT all right, title and interest in a portfolio of thirteen United States patents (the “CXT Portfolio”). Under the agreement, CXT will distribute 50% of net proceeds, as defined, to IV 34/37, as long as we generate revenue from the CXT Portfolio. The $25,000 payment to IV 34/37 was made from a loan from United Wireless and was paid by United Wireless directly to IV 34/37. The agreement with IV 34/37, as amended on January 26, 2018, provides that if, on December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020, cumulative distributions to IV 34/37 total less than $100,000, $375,000 and $975,000, respectively, CXT shall pay the difference between such cumulative amounts and the amount paid to IV 34/37 within ten days after the applicable date. The $25,000 advance is treated as an advance against distributions of net proceeds payable to IV 34/37. The useful lives of the patents, at the date of acquisition, was 5-6 years. Neither we nor any affiliate of CXT has guaranteed the minimum payments. On December 31, 2021 the parties amended the agreement to provide that CXT will distribute 65% of net proceeds, as defined, to IV 34/37, as long as we generate revenue from the CXT Portfolio and that if, on December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019, cumulative distributions to IV 34/37 total less than $100,000 and $375,000, respectively, CXT shall pay the difference between such cumulative amounts and the amount paid to IV 34/37 within ten days after the applicable date. As of December 31, 2021 cumulative distributions to IV 34/37 totaled $375,000. CXT’s obligations under the agreement with IV 34/37 are secured by a security interest in the proceeds (from litigation or otherwise) from the CXT Portfolio. The patent portfolio which we acquired from IV 34/37 is the CXT portfolio which is described under “Business – Our Intellectual Property Portfolios.”
9
On January 26, 2018, CXT entered into an agreement with Intellectual Ventures Assets 62 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 71 LLC “(IV 62/71”) pursuant to which CXT advanced IV 62/71 $10,000 at closing and IV 62/71 assigned to CXT all right, title, and interest in a portfolio of sixteen United States patents and three pending applications. Under the agreement, as amended on December 31, 2021, CXT will distribute 65% of net proceeds, as defined, to IV 62/71, as long as we generate net proceeds from this portfolio. The initial $10,000 advance is treated as an advance toward our future distributions of net proceeds payable to IV 62/71. CXT’s obligations under the agreement are secured by a security interest in the proceeds (from litigation or otherwise) from the CXT Portfolio. In March 2021, we made a payment to IV 62/71 in the amount of $64,238. We agreed to modify the monetization proceeds agreement between CXT and United Wireless to include the patents acquired from IV 62/71. The monetization proceeds amendment was further amended by the MPA-CXT Agreement in connection with the restructure of our agreements with Intelligent Partners.
On March 15, 2019, M-RED Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement with Intellectual Ventures Assets 113 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 108 LLC (“IV 113/108”) pursuant to which M-RED paid IV 113/108 $75,000 and IV 113/108 transferred to M-RED all right, title and interest in a portfolio of sixty United States patents and eight foreign patents (the “M-RED Portfolio”). Under the agreement, M-RED will distribute 50% of net proceeds, as defined, to IV 113/108, as long as we generate revenue from the M-RED Portfolio. The agreement with IV 113/108 provides that if, on September 30, 2020, September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2022, cumulative distributions to IV 113/108 total less than $450,000, $975,000 and $1,575,000, respectively, M-RED shall pay the difference between such cumulative amounts and the amount paid to IV 113/108 within ten days after the applicable date. The $75,000 advance is treated as an advance against the first distributions of net proceeds payable to IV 113/108. On September 30, 2020 cumulative distributions to IV 113/108 totaled less than $450,000 and M-RED did not pay the difference to IV 113/108 within ten days. On December 31, 2021 the parties amended the agreement to provide that M-RED will distribute 100% of undistributed net proceeds, as defined, resulting from agreements signed prior to December 31, 2021 and 65% of net proceeds thereafter to IV 113/108, as long as we generate revenue from the M-RED Portfolio and that if, on December 31, 2021 cumulative distributions to IV 113/108 total less than $302,114, M-RED shall pay the difference between such cumulative amounts and the amount paid to IV 113/108 within ten days after the applicable date. As of December 31, 2021 cumulative distributions to IV 113/108 totaled $302,114. The useful lives of the patents, at the date of acquisition, was approximately nine years. Neither we nor any affiliate of M-RED has guaranteed the minimum payments. M-RED’s obligations under the agreement with IV 113/108 are secured by a security interest in the proceeds (from litigation or otherwise) from the M-RED Portfolio. The patent portfolio which we acquired from IV 113/108 is the M-RED portfolio which is described under “Business – Our Intellectual Property Portfolios.” Pursuant to the MPA-MR, Intelligent Partners is entitled to receive 60% of the net proceeds as defined in the agreement.
On January 27, 2022, we acquired, via assignment from Intellectual Ventures Assets 181 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 174 LLC, all right title and interest to four patent portfolios consisting of fifteen United States patents and three foreign patents for a purchase price of $1,060,000. The Company requested and received a capital advance in the amount of the $1,060,000 purchase price from the facility with QFL. The patents were assigned to our wholly owned subsidiaries Tyche Licensing LLC (“Tyche”) and Deepwell IP LLC (“DIP”).
A default under the agreements with the Intellectual Ventures affiliates could result in a default under our agreements with QFL and QF3, and, even if QFL or QF3 does not declare a default, QFL or QF3 may be reluctant to finance our intellectual property acquisition if we are in default under any of our patent acquisition agreements with Intellectual Venture affiliates. Further, it may be necessary for any defaulting subsidiary to seek protection under the Bankruptcy Act if we are not able to enter into modification agreements with the Intellectual Ventures affiliates.
Our Organization
We were incorporated in Delaware on July 17, 1987 under the name Phase Out of America. On September 21, 1997, we changed our name to Quest Products Corporation, and, on June 6, 2007, we changed our name to Quest Patent Research Corporation. We have been engaged in the intellectual property monetization business since 2008. Our executive principal office is located at 411 Theodore Fremd Ave., Suite 206S, Rye, New York 10580-1411, telephone (888) 743-7577. Our website is www.qprc.com. Information contained on or derived from our website, or any other website does not constitute a part of this annual report.
10
Our Intellectual Property Portfolios
Mobile Data
The real-time mobile data portfolio relates to the automatic update of information delivered to a mobile device without the need for a manual refreshing. The portfolio is comprised of U.S. Patent No. 7,194,468 “Apparatus and Method for Supplying Information” and all related patents, patent applications, and all continuations, continuations-in-part, divisions, extensions, renewals, reissues and re-examinations relating to all inventions thereof (the “Mobile Data Portfolio”).
Through December 31, 2022, we had not generated any revenue from the Mobile Data Portfolio and we do not anticipate allocating further resources to monetization of the Mobile Data Portfolio.
Flexible Packaging – Turtle PakTM
In March 2008, we entered into an agreement with Emerging Technologies Trust whereby our majority-owned subsidiary, Quest Packaging Solutions Corporation, acquired the exclusive license to make, use, sell, offer for sale or sublicense the intellectual property of Emerging Technologies Trust (the “Turtle Pak™ Portfolio”). The Turtle Pak portfolio relates to a cost effective, high-protection packaging system recommended for fragile items weighing less than ten pounds. The intellectual property consists of two U.S. patents, U.S. Patent No. RE36,412 and U.S. Patent No. 6,490,844, and the Turtle Pak trademark. Turtle Pak™ brand packaging is suited for such uses as electrical and electronic components, medical, dental, and diagnostic equipment, instrumentation products, and control components. Turtle Pak™ brand packaging materials are 100% curbside recyclable.
As the exclusive licensee and manager of the manufacture and sale of licensed product, we coordinate the manufacture and sale of licensed products to end users; we contract for the manufacture and assembly of the product components, and we coordinate order receipt, fulfillment and invoicing. We did not generate revenues from the TurtlePak™ product for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Universal Financial Data System
The invention describes a universal financial data system which allows its holder to use the device to access one or more accounts stored in the memory of the device as a cash payment substitute as well as to keep track of financial and transaction records and data, such as transaction receipts, in a highly portable package, such as a cellular device (the “Financial Data Portfolio”). The inventive universal data system is capable of supporting multiple accounts of various types, including but not limited to credit card accounts, checking/debit accounts, and loyalty accounts. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Wynn Technologies Inc., acquired US Patent No. 5,859,419, from the owner, Sol Wynn. In January 2001, we filed a reissue application for the patent, and the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued patent RE38,137. This reissued patent, which contains 35 separate claims, replaces the original patent, which had seven claims. In February 2011, we entered into a new agreement with Sol Li (formerly Sol Wynn), pursuant to which we issued to Mr. Li a 35% interest in Wynn Technologies and warrants to purchase up to 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.1 per share. These warrants expired unexercised. We also agreed that Mr. Li would receive 40% of the net licensing revenues generated by Wynn Technologies with respect to this patent, which is the only patent owned by Wynn Technologies. On December 17, 2018, Wynn Technologies, Inc. granted an exclusive license to the Financial Data Portfolio, including the right to enforce, to our wholly owned subsidiary, Quest NetTech. Under the agreement, Quest NetTech receives 100% of the net proceeds, as defined by the agreement. On April 11, 2019 Quest NetTech Corporation merged with Wynn Technologies, Inc. with Quest NetTech Corporation being the surviving entity with Mr. Li having a 35% interest. On April 12, 2019, Quest NetTech brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Apple, Inc. The case was dismissed in May 2020.
We did not generate revenue from the Financial Data Portfolio in 2022 and 2021, and we do not anticipate allocating further resources to monetization of the Financial Data Portfolio.
11
Rich Media
The rich media portfolio is directed to methods, systems, and processes that permit typical Internet users to design rich-media production content (i.e., rich-media applications), such as websites. The portfolio consists of U.S. Patent No. 7,000,180, “Methods, Systems, and Processes for the Design and Creation of Rich Media Applications via the Internet” and all related patents, patent applications, corresponding foreign patents and foreign patent applications and foreign counterparts, and all continuations, continuations-in-part, divisions, extensions, renewals, reissues and re-examinations relating to all inventions thereof (the “Rich Media Portfolio”). In July 2008, we entered into a consulting and licensing program management agreement with Balthaser Online, Inc., the patent owner, pursuant to which we performed services related to the establishment and management of a licensing program to evaluate and analyze the relevant market and to obtain licenses for the Rich Media Portfolio in exchange for management fees as well as an irrevocable entitlement to a distribution of 15% of all proceeds generated by the Rich Media Portfolio for the remaining life of the portfolio regardless of whether those proceeds are derived from litigation, settlement, licensing or otherwise. Our 15% distribution right is subject to reduction to 7.5% in the event that we refuse or are unable to perform the services detailed in the agreement.
Through December 31, 2022, we had not generated any revenue from the rich media patents.
Anchor Structure Portfolio
This portfolio, which we acquired from IV16 in October 2015 and transferred to our subsidiary, Mariner IC Inc., consists of two United States patents which relate to technology for incorporating metal structures in the corners and edges of semiconductor dies to prevent cracking from stresses.
In March 2016, we entered into a funding agreement whereby a third-party agreed to provide funds to us to enable us to implement a structured licensing program, including litigation, if necessary, for the Anchor Structure Portfolio and engaged counsel on a partial contingency basis in connection with a proposed patent infringement action relating to the Anchor Structure Portfolio. Under the funding agreement, the third-party received an interest in the proceeds from the settlements relating to this portfolio in 2019. The funding agreement was terminated in 2021.
We did not generate license fees from the Anchor Structure Portfolio in 2022 or 2021, and we do not anticipate allocating further resources to monetization of the Anchor Structure Portfolio.
Power Management/Bus Control Portfolio
This portfolio, which is the second portfolio which we acquired from IV16 and transferred to a newly-formed subsidiary, Semcon IP Inc., consists of four United States patents that cover fundamental technology for adjusting the processor clock and voltage to save power based on the operating characteristics of the processor and one United States patent that relates to coordinating direct bus communications between subsystems in an assigned channel.
We did not generate revenue from the Power Management/Bus Control Portfolio in 2022 or 2021, and we do not anticipate allocating further resources to its monetization.
Diode on Chip Portfolio
This portfolio, which is the third portfolio which we acquired from IV16 and transferred to a newly-formed subsidiary, IC Kinetics Inc., consists of three United States patents and one pending continuation application which cover technology relating to on-chip temperature measurement for semiconductors. As of December 31, 2022, we had not generated any revenue from the Diode on Chip portfolio.
12
CXT Portfolio
This portfolio consists of thirty United States patents which cover technology relating to systems and methods of operating an accessible information database which provides for inventory evaluation, filtering according to preferences, alternative product recommendations, and access to a database of consumer feedback/evaluation.
In April 2018 CXT brought a patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Academy Ltd., In May 2018 CXT brought patent infringement suits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Conn’s, Inc., Fossil Group, Inc., JC Penney Company, Inc., and Tailored Brands, Inc. In May 2019, CXT brought patent infringement actions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Hallmark.com, LLC, Retail Concepts, Inc. and CC Filson Co. In August 2019, CXT brought patent infringement suits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Neiman Marcus Group Ltd., General Nutrition Corporation and Steve Madden, Ltd.
In March 2021 CXT brought patent infringement suits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Advanced Auto Parts, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, The Sherwin-Williams Company, V.F. Corporation and IKEA North America Services, LLC. In July 2021, HCL Technologies Limited (“HCL”), as the world’ supplier of WebSphere Commerce products and citing CXT’s patent infringement suits against users of HCL’s WebSphere Commerce products, brought an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas seeking a declaratory judgment that HCL’s WebSphere Commerce products do not infringe CXT’s patents and that CXT’s patents are invalid.
The actions against Conn’s, Inc., Academy Ltd., Fossil Group, Inc., JC Penney Company, Inc., Tailored Brands, Inc., Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., Hallmark, Retail Concepts, CC Filson, General Nutrition, Steve Madden, Ltd. and Neiman Marcus Group Ltd. were resolved in 2020.
In 2021, the HCL matter was settled and dismissed by mutual agreement pursuant to which HCL took a license to the CXT Portfolio and the actions against Advanced Auto Parts, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, The Sherwin-Williams Company, V.F. Corporation and IKEA North America Services, LLC were resolved. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes revenue from the resolution of these matters. We did not generate revenue from the CXT Portfolio in 2022, and we do not anticipate allocating further resources to monetization of the CXT Portfolio.
CMOS Portfolio
This portfolio consists of eleven United States patents and sixteen foreign patents which cover technology relating to digital image sensor technology systems and methods which PIS acquired on January 26, 2018.
We did not generate revenue from the CMOS Portfolio in 2022 or 2021, and we do not anticipate allocating further resources to its monetization.
M-RED Portfolio
This portfolio consists of sixty United States patents and eight foreign patents which cover technology relating to processor and power management which M-RED acquired on March 15, 2019.
On April 29, 2019, M-RED brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against MediaTek Inc. and Acer Inc. On July 16, 2019, M-Red Inc. brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Panasonic Corporation. As of December 31, 2020, all actions were settled and dismissed and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 incudes revenue from settlements.
In March 2021, M-RED brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Nintendo Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Xiaomi Corporation et. al. In April 2021, the case against Nintendo Co., Ltd. was dismissed without prejudice. In August 2021, M-Red Inc. brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. In September 2021, M-RED Inc. brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against ASRock Inc., Biostar Microtech International Corp., Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. and Micro-Star International Co. Ltd.
The actions against Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, ASRock Inc., and Micro-Star International Co. Ltd. were resolved in 2021 and our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes revenue from any related settlements. The actions against Xiaomi Corporation et. al., OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Biostar Microtech International Corp., and Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. were resolved in 2022 and our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes revenue from any related settlements. We do not anticipate allocating further resources to monetization of the M-RED Portfolio.
13
Audio Messaging Portfolio
This portfolio consists of five issued United States patents and one pending application which generally relate to systems and methods for associating an audio clip with an object which our wholly-owned subsidiary, Audio Messaging Inc. (“AMI”), acquired in May of 2020. Pursuant to an unsecured non-recourse funding agreement, a third-party agreed to provide acquisition funding in the amount of $95,000 for the acquisition. Under the funding agreement, the third-party funder is entitled to a priority return of funds advanced from net proceeds, as defined, recovered until the funder has received $190,000. The Company has no other obligation to the third-party and has no liability to the funder in the event that the Company does not generate net proceeds.
On October 8, 2021, AMI brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against ZTE Corporation, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. and Beijing Xiaomi Software Co., Ltd. Those actions were resolved in 2022, and our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes revenue from related settlements.
Peregrin Portfolio
Acquired in February 2021 by our wholly owned subsidiary, Peregrin Licensing LLC (“PLL”), this portfolio consists of eight issued United States patents which generally relate to systems and methods for processing inbound and outbound communications, such as, for example, determining the location of a caller and routing the inbound communication to an entity in the caller’s location (the “Peregrin Portfolio”). PLL acquired the portfolio pursuant to an agreement with Peter K. Trzyna (“PKT”) whereby PKT assigned us all right, title, and interest in a portfolio of eight United States patents, we paid PKT $350,000 at closing and agreed that upon the realization of gross proceeds from the Peregrin Portfolio we shall make subsequent installment payment or payments in the aggregate amount of $93,900. Thereafter, PKT is entitled to a percentage of any gross proceeds realized.
In July 2021, PLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Bank of America Corporation, Discover Financial Services, U.S. Bank N.A. and Wells Fargo & Co. All actions were resolved in 2021 and our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes revenue from any related settlements. We did not generate revenue from the Peregrin Portfolio in 2022.
Taasera Portfolio
Acquired by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Taasera Licensing LLC (“TLL”), this portfolio consists of 29 United States patents and 2 foreign patents which generally relate to the field of network security (the “Taasera Portfolio”). In June 2021 seven patents were acquired via assignment from Taasera, Inc. for the purchase price of $250,000. In August 2021 acquired a portfolio of network security patents from Daedalus Blue LLC (“DBL”) consisting of 22 United States patents and 2 foreign patents. Original assignees of the patents acquired from DBL include International Business Machines Corporation, Internet Security Systems, Inc. and Fiberlink Communications Corporation (“Fiberlink”). ISS and Fiberlink were acquired by IBM in 2006 and 2013, respectively. In September 2019, IBM divested over 500 United States patent assets, as well as a number of foreign counterparts in Asia, Europe, and elsewhere, to Daedalus Group, and affiliate of DBL. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, DBL is entitled to a portion of the net proceeds from monetization of the TLL portfolio.
In November 2021, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Trend Micro Incorporated. In March 2022, Trend Micro, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL in the U.S. District for the Western District of Texas seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents in suit. In February 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, TLL voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, the action against Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL and the Company in the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents in suit. In May 2022, Trend Micro Inc. filed a motion with the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to have the pending actions consolidated into a centralized multidistrict litigation for pretrial proceedings. In August 2022, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all actions in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas. In October 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Fortinet, inc., Crowdstrike, Inc. et.al., and Musarubra US, LLC.
14
Soundstreak Portfolio
Acquired through our acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Soundstreak Texas LLC (“STX”) in August 2021 for a purchase price consisting of 50% of the net proceeds resulting from monetization of the patent portfolio, this patent portfolio consists of three United States patents and one pending patent application which generally relate to streaming data (including audio or video) while also storing higher quality versions of the same data locally. The patented technology has applications in the professional recording industry, digital audio/video industries, the drone/remote capture industry, the teleconferencing industry, and more.
In August 2021, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Yamaha Corporation and Steinberg Media Technologies GMBH. In September 2021, STX brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Sony Group Corporation, Panasonic Corporation, Olympus Corporation and Nikon Corporation. In March 2022, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Parrot SA, Delair SAS, Drone Volt, SA, EHang Holdings Limited and Flyability SA.
The actions against Sony Group Corporation, Panasonic Corporation, Olympus Corporation and Nikon Corporation were resolved in 2021 and our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes revenue from any related settlements. The matters against Yamaha Corporation, Steinberg Media Technologies GMBH, Parrot SA, Drone Volt, SA, Flyability SA and Delair SAS were resolved in 2022 and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes revenue from any related settlements.
Multimodal Media Portfolio
Acquired by our wholly owned subsidiary, Multimodal Media LLC (“MML”), the Multimodal Media portfolio consists of fifteen United States patents and one pending application which generally relate to systems and methods of recording and sending interactive messages and voice messages using mobile devices, as well as completing a communication after an incomplete call (the “Multimodal Media Portfolio”). MML advanced $642,000 at closing pursuant to an agreement, as amended, with Aawaaz Inc. (“AI”). Under the agreement, MML retains an amount equal to the purchase price plus any fees incurred out of net proceeds, as defined in the agreement, after which AI is entitled to a percentage of further net proceeds realized, if any.
The Multimodal Media Portfolio was originally developed by Kirusa, Inc., a communications software development company founded in 2001 by Inderpal Mumick together with other technocrats with a dream of connecting people through the power of voice. Heralded by the invention of Voice SMS, Kirusa, Inc. was born with a vision to revolutionize the experiences users derived from their mobile phones.
In November 2021, MML brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against ZTE Corporation and Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. In November 2022, MML brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al and TCL Technology Group Corporation et al.
LS Cloud Storage Portfolio
Acquired through our acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of LS Cloud Storage Technologies LLC (“LSC”) in November 2021, the LS Cloud Portfolio consists of four United States patents which generally relate to data sharing using distributed cache.
In March 2022, LSC brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Microsoft Corporation, Google LLC, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. et.al. In November 2022, Google LLC filed a petition before the patent trial and appeal board for inter partes review of US Patent No. 10,154,092.
15
Tyche Portfolio
Acquired in January 2022, the Tyche portfolio consists of two United States patents and related assets relating generally to symmetric inducting devices incorporated in integrated circuits and in particular to an integrated circuit having symmetric inducting device with a ground shield.
In May 2022, Tyche brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against MediaTek Inc., Realtek Semiconductor Corporation, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Infineon Technologies AG and STMicroelectronics NV et. al. In May 2022, Tyche voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, the action against STMicroelectronics NV et .al. In May 2022, STMicroelectronics, Inc. filed an action for declaratory judgement of non-infringement in the U.S. District for the Northern District of Texas, the action was dismissed without prejudice in July 2022. In September 2022, the action against Texas Instruments Incorporated was dismissed with prejudice. As of December 31, 2022 the actions against MediaTek Inc. and Infineon Technologies AG were stayed pending settlement.
Deepwell Portfolio
Acquired in January 2022, the Deepwell portfolio consists of 12 United States patents and related assets (“Deepwell Portfolio”). Certain of the patents relate generally to the manufacture and operation of integrated circuits. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention relate to: 1) selectively coupling Voltage feeds to body bias Voltage in an integrated circuit device; 2) routing body-bias voltage to the MOSFETS (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors). Certain other patents in the portfolio relate generally to method and system for conservatively managing store capacity available to a processor issuing stores including but not limited to the utilization of a counter mechanism, whereas the counter mechanism is incremented or decremented based on the occurrence of particular events
EDI Portfolio
In July 2022, EDI acquired, via assignment from Edward D. Ioli Trust, all right title and interest to a portfolio of five United States patents and related applications relating to a system and method for controlling vehicles and for providing assistance to operated vehicles (“EDI Portfolio”) for a purchase price consisting of 50% of the net proceeds resulting from monetization of the EDI Portfolio.
HPE Portfolio
Acquired in July 2022 pursuant to an agreement with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, the HPE portfolio consists of eight United States Patents across five patent families which relate generally to systems and methods around hardware, software and system security and capabilities (“HPE Portfolio”). We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of $350,000, which was used to make payment of the purchase price pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement.
Competition
We encounter and expect to continue to encounter competition in the areas of intellectual property acquisitions for the sake of licensure from both private and publicly traded companies that engage in intellectual property monetization activities. Such competitors and potential competitors include companies seeking to acquire the same intellectual property assets and intellectual property rights that we may seek to acquire. Entities such as Acacia Research Corporation, Document Security Systems, Inc., Intellectual Ventures, Quarterhill Inc., MOSAID Technologies Inc., VirnetX Holding Corporation, Network-1 Security Solutions, Interdigital, Inc., IPValue Management Inc., Pendrell Corporation, Inventergy Global, Inc., Netlist Inc., Parkervision Inc., Walker Innovation, Inc., Daedalus Group LLC, Netlist Inc. and others derive all or a substantial portion of their revenue from intellectual property monetization activities, and we expect more entities to enter the market. Most of our competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial resources and personnel than we have.
We also compete with venture capital firms, strategic corporate buyers and various industry leaders for intellectual property and technology acquisitions and licensing opportunities. Many of these competitors have more financial and human resources than our company. In seeking to obtain intellectual property assets or intellectual property rights, we seek to both demonstrate our understanding of the intellectual property that we are seeking to acquire or license and our ability to monetize their intellectual property rights. Our weak cash position and history of losses, together with our low stock price, may impair our ability to negotiate successfully with the intellectual property owners.
Other companies may develop competing technologies that offer better or less expensive alternatives to intellectual property rights that we may acquire and/or license. Many potential competitors may have significantly greater resources than we do. The development of technological advances or entirely different approaches could render certain of the technologies owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries obsolete and/or uneconomical.
16
Intellectual Property Rights
We have fifteen intellectual property portfolios: financial data, mobile data, Turtle Pak, anchor structure, power management/bus control, diode on chip, rich media, CXT, CMOS, M-RED, Audio Messaging, Peregrin, Taasera, Soundstreak, Multmodal Media, LS Cloud, Tyyche, Deepwell, EDI and HPE. The following table sets forth information concerning our patents and other intellectual property. Each patent or other intellectual property right listed in the table below that has been granted is publicly accessible on the Internet website of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office at www.uspto.gov. In the table below, the anchor structure portfolio is referred to as Mariner, the power management/bus control portfolio is referred to as Semcom, the diode on chip portfolio is referred to as IC, the Audio Messaging portfolio is referred to as AMI, the Peregrin portfolio is referred to as PLL, the Taasera portfolio is referred to as TLL, the Soundstreak portfolio is referred to as STX, the Multimodal Media portfolio is referred to as MML, the LS Cloud portfolio is referred to as LSC, the Tyche portfolio is referred to as Tyche, the Deepwell portfolio is referred to as DIP, the EDI portfolio is referred to as EDI, and the HPE portfolio is referred to as HPE.
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| Financial | US Patent | RE38,137 | Programmable multiple company credit card system | 1/11/2001 | 6/10/2003 | 9/28/2015 | ||||||
| Mobile | US Patent | 7,194,468 | Apparatus and method for supplying information | 4/13/2000 | 3/20/2007 | 4/13/2020 | ||||||
| Mobile | US Patent | 9,288,605 | Apparatus and method for supplying information | 11/12/2009 | 3/15/2016 | 4/13/2020 | ||||||
| Mobile Dat | US Patent | 9,913,068 | Apparatus and method for supplying information | 3/15/2013 | 3/6/2018 | 7/20/2021 | ||||||
| Mobile Data | US Application | 15/877,820 | Apparatus and method for supplying information | 43123 | 5/31/2018 | N/A | ||||||
| Turtle Pak | US Patent | 6,490,844 | Film wrap packaging apparatus and method | 6/21/2001 | 12/10/2002 | 7/10/2021 | ||||||
| Turtle Pak | US Trademark | 74709827 | Turtle pak - design plus words, letters, and/or numbers | 8/1/1995 | 6/4/1996 | N/A | ||||||
| Mariner | US Patent | 5,650,666 | Method and apparatus for preventing cracks in semiconductor die | 11/22/1995 | 7/22/1997 | 11/22/2015 | ||||||
| Mariner | US Patent | 5,846,874 | Method and apparatus for preventing cracks in semiconductor die | 2/28/1997 | 12/8/1998 | 11/22/2015 | ||||||
| Semcon | US Patent | 7,100,061 | Adaptive power control | 1/18/2000 | 8/29/2006 | 1/18/2020 | ||||||
| Semcon | US Patent | 7,596,708 | Adaptive power control | 4/25/2006 | 9/29/2009 | 1/18/2020 | ||||||
| Semcon | US Patent | 8,566,627 | Adaptive power control | 7/14/2009 | 10/22/2013 | 1/18/2020 | ||||||
| Semcon | US Patent | 8,806,247 | Adaptive power control | 12/21/2012 | 8/12/2014 | 1/18/2020 | ||||||
| Semcon | PCT Application | PCT/US2001/001684 | Adaptive power control | 1/16/2001 | 7/26/2001 | N/A |
17
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| Semcon | Reexam Certificate | 7,100,061C1 | Adaptive power control | 6/13/2007 | 8/04/2009 | N/A | ||||||
| Semcon | US Patent | 5,978,876 | System and method for controlling communications between subsystems | 4/14/1997 | 11/02/1999 | 4/14/2017 | ||||||
| IC | US Patent | 7,118,273 | System for on-chip temperature measurement in integrated circuits | 4/10/2003 | 10/10/2006 | 4/10/2023 | ||||||
| IC | US Patent | 7,108,420 | System for on-chip temperature measurement in integrated circuits | 10/07/2004 | 9/19/2006 | 4/10/2023 | ||||||
| IC | US Patent | 9,222,843 | System for on-chip temperature measurement in integrated circuits | 9/23/2011 | 12/29/2015 | 4/10/2023 | ||||||
| IC | US Application | 16/537,200 | System for on-chip temperature measurement in integrated circuits | 8/09/2019 | 11/28/2019 | N/A | ||||||
| Rich Media | Patent Proceeds Interest | 7,000,180 | Methods, systems, and processes for the design and creation of rich media applications via the internet | 2/09/2001 | 2/14/2006 | 10/16/2023 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,103,568 | Online product exchange system | 2/23/2004 | 9/05/2006 | 8/08/2015 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,933,806 | Online product exchange system with price-sorted matching products | 9/11/2006 | 4/26/2011 | 8/08/2015 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 8,024,226 | Product exchange system | 11/06/2006 | 4/26/2011 | 8/08/2015 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 5,983,220 | Supporting intuitive decision in complex multi-attributive domains using fuzzy, hierarchial expert models | 11/14/1996 | 11/09/1999 | 11/14/2016 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,463,431 | Database evaluation system supporting their intuitive decision in complex multi-attributive domains using fuzzy, hierarchial expert models | 6/25/1999 | 10/08/2002 | 11/14/2016 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 5,940,807 | Automated and independently accessible inventory information exchange system | 5/28/1997 | 8/17/1999 | 5/23/2017 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,081,789 | Automated and independently accessible inventory information exchange system | 1/08/1999 | 6/27/2000 | 5/23/2017 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,601,043 | Automated and independently accessible inventory information exchange system | 6/26/2000 | 7/29/2003 | 5/23/2017 |
18
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,011,537 | System for delivering and simultaneously displaying primary and secondary information, and for displaying only the secondary information during interstitial space | 1/27/1998 | 1/04/2000 | 1/27/2018 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,133,835 | Online exchange market system with a buyer auction and a seller auction | 10/30/1995 | 11/07/2006 | 5/27/2018 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,412,012 | System, method, and article of manufacture for making a compatibility aware recommendation to a user | 12/23/1998 | 6/25/2002 | 12/23/2018 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,493,703 | System and method for implementing intelligent online community message board | 5/11/1999 | 12/10/2002 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,571,234 | System and method for managing online message board | 5/11/1999 | 5/27/2003 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,721,748 | Online content provider system and method | 5/13/2002 | 4/13/2004 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,778,982 | Online content provider system and method | 2/20/2003 | 8/17/2004 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 6,804,675 | Online content provider system and method | 3/17/2003 | 10/12/2004 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,159,011 | System and method for managing an online messaging board | 8/16/2004 | 1/02/2007 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,162,471 | Content query system and method | 8/16/2004 | 1/9/2007 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | RE43,835 | Online content tabulating system and method | 2/22/2007 | 11/27/2012 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | RE45,661 | Online content tabulating system and method | 11/20/2012 | 9/1/2015 | 5/11/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,065,494 | Electronic customer service and rating system and method | 6/25/1999 | 6/20/2006 | 6/25/2019 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,340,411 | System and method for generating, capturing, and managing customer lead information over a computer network | 10/20/2003 | 3/4/2008 | 8/2/2021 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 8,260,806 | Storage, management and distribution of consumer information | 6/29/2007 | 9/4/2012 | 10/17/2021 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,487,130 | Consumer-controlled limited and constrained access to a centrally stored information account | 1/6/2006 | 2/3/2009 | 11/7/2021 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,016,877 | Consumer-controlled limited and constrained access to a centrally stored information account | 11/7/2001 | 3/21/2006 | 2/22/2023 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,257,581 | Storage, management and distribution of consumer information | 8/6/2001 | 8/14/2007 | 6/2/2023 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,467,141 | Branding and revenue sharing models for facilitating storage, management and distribution of consumer information | 8/20/2001 | 12/16/2008 | 7/28/2023 |
19
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 7,016,875 | Single sign-on for access to a central data repository | 10/9/2001 | 3/21/2006 | 8/19/2023 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 8,566,248 | Initiation of an information transaction over a network via a wireless device | 11/20/2001 | 10/22/2013 | 6/17/2026 | ||||||
| CXT | US Patent | 9,928,508 | Single sign-on for access to a central data repository | 01/06/2006 | 03/27/2018 | 12/20/2022 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,624,404 | CMOS image sensor having enhanced photosensitivity and method for fabricating the same | 11/26/2001 | 9/23/2003 | 12/30/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Korean Patent | KR10-0303774 | Method for fabricating cmos image sensor | 12/30/1998 | 7/13/2001 | 12/30/2018 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,348,361 | CMOS image sensor having enhanced photosensitivity and method for fabricating the same | 12/30/1999 | 02/19/2002 | 12/30/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,184,055 | CMOS image sensor with equivalent potential diode and method for fabricating the same | 02/26/1999 | 02/06/2001 | 02/26/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Chinese Patent | CNZL99105588.8 | Complementary mos image sensor and making method thereof | 02/28/1999 | 10/13/2004 | 02/27/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Chinese Patent | CNZL200310104488.4 | Image sensing device and its manufacturing method | 02/28/1999 | 03/26/2008 | 02/27/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | German Patent | DE19908457.2 | Photodiode used in cmos image sensing device | 02/26/1999 | 11/28/2013 | 02/26/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | French Patent | FR2775541 | Photodiode for use in a cmos image sensor and method for fabricating the same | 03/01/1999 | 08/02/2002 | 03/01/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | French Patent | FR2779870 | Photodiodes for image sensors | 03/01/1999 | 05/13/2005 | 03/01/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | United Kingdom Patent | GB2334817 | Photodiode for use in a cmos image sensor and method for fabricating the same | 03/01/1999 | 07/01/2003 | 03/01/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | United Kingdom Patent | GB2383900 | CMOS image sensor and method for fabricating the same | 03/01/1999 | 08/20/2003 | 03/01/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Japanese Patent | JP4390896 | CMOS image sensor and manufacture thereof | 03/01/1999 | 10/16/2009 | 03/01/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Korean Patent | KR10-0278285 | CMOS image sensor and manufacturing method thereof | 02/24/1999 | 10/18/2000 | 02/24/2019 |
20
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| CMOS | Taiwanese Patent | TWI141677 | CMOS image sensor with equivalent potential diode | 03/22/1999 | 10/01/2001 | 03/21/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,180,969 | CMOS image sensor with equivalent potential diode | 02/26/1999 | 01/30/2001 | 02/26/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,563,187 | CMOS image sensor integrated together with memory device | 06/29/1999 | 05/13/2003 | 06/29/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,949,388 | CMOS image sensor integrated together with memory device | 05/12/2003 | 09/27/2005 | 11/09/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Korean Patent | KR10-0464955 | CMOS image sensor integrated with memory device | 06/29/1998 | 12/24/2004 | 06/29/2018 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,627,929 | Solid state ccd image sensor having a light shielding layer | 06/13/2001 | 09/30/2003 | 10/13/2018 | ||||||
| CMOS | Korean Patent | KR10-0263473 | Solid state image device and fabrication method thereof | 02/16/1998 | 05/17/2000 | 02/16/2018 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,300,157 | Solid state image sensor and method for fabricating the same | 10/13/1998 | 10/09/2001 | 10/13/2018 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 7,113,203 | Method and system for single-chip camera | 05/07/2002 | 09/26/2006 | 05/13/2022 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,706,550 | Photodiode having a plurality of PN junctions and image sensor having the same | 10/16/2002 | 3/16/2004 | 02/26/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Japanese Patent | JP4139931 | Pinned photodiode of image sensor, and its manufacture | 06/28/1999 | 6/20/2008 | 06/28/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | Korean Patent | KR10-0275123 | Pinned photodiode of image sensor and manufacturing method thereof | 06/29/1998 | 9/19/2000 | 06/29/2018 | ||||||
| CMOS | Taiwanese Patent | TWI133257 | Photodiode having a plurality of PN junctions and image sensor having the same | 06/30/1999 | 5/28/2001 | 06/29/2019 | ||||||
| CMOS | US Patent | 6,489,643 | Photodiode having a plurality of PN junctions and image sensor having the same | 06/28/1999 | 12/03/2002 | 06/28/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,853,259 | Ring oscillator dynamic adjustments for auto calibration | 08/15/2001 | 2/08/2005 | 08/15/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 7,068,557 | Ring oscillator dynamic adjustments for auto calibration | 01/25/2005 | 6/27/2006 | 08/15/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 7,209,401 | Ring oscillator dynamic adjustments for auto calibration | 05/02/2006 | 4/24/2007 | 08/15/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,221,682 | Method and apparatus for evaluating a known good die using both wire bond and flip-chip interconnects | 05/28/1999 | 4/24/2001 | 05/28/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | RE43,607 | Method and apparatus for evaluating a known good die using both wire bond and flip-chip interconnects | 05/31/2007 | 8/28/2012 | 12/31/2019 |
21
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,177,843 | Oscillator circuit controlled by programmable logic | 05/26/1999 | 1/23/2001 | 05/26/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,628,171 | Method, architecture and circuit for controlling and/or operating an oscillator | 01/23/2001 | 9/30/2003 | 05/26/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,831,690 | Electrical sensing apparatus and method utilizing an array of transducer elements | 12/07/1999 | 12/14/2004 | 12/07/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 7,511,754 | Electrical sensing apparatus and method utilizing an array of transducer elements | 10/26/2004 | 3/31/2009 | 02/07/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,498,399 | Low dielectric-constant dielectric for etchstop in dual damascene backend of integrated circuits | 09/08/1999 | 12/24/2002 | 09/08/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,744,311 | Switching amplifier with voltage-multiplying output stage | 04/23/2002 | 6/01/2004 | 04/23/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,646,465 | Programmable Logic Device Including Bi-Directional Shift Register | 02/07/2002 | 11/11/2003 | 02/07/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,721,310 | Multiport non-blocking high capacity atm and packet switch | 11/02/2001 | 4/13/2004 | 11/02/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,456,183 | Inductor for Integrated Circuit | 02/24/2000 | 9/24/2002 | 02/24/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,838,970 | Inductor for Integrated Circuit | 07/26/2002 | 1/04/2005 | 09/30/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,459,135 | Monolithic Integrated Circuit Incorporating An Inductive Component And Process For Fabricating Such An Integrated Circuit | 03/15/2000 | 10/01/2002 | 03/15/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,388,322 | Article comprising a mechanically compliant bump | 01/17/2001 | 5/14/2002 | 01/17/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,458,411 | Method of making a mechanically compliant bump | 10/05/2001 | 10/01/2002 | 01/17/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,506,648 | Method of fabricating a high-power RF field effect transistor with reduced hot electron injection and resulting structure | 09/02/1998 | 1/14/2003 | 06/27/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,735,422 | Calibrated DC compensation system for a wireless communication device configured in a zero intermediate frequency architecture | 10/02/2000 | 5/11/2004 | 10/02/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,674,998 | System and method for detecting and correcting phase error between differential signals | 12/21/2000 | 1/06/2004 | 10/02/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,891,440 | Quadrature oscillator with phase error correction | 12/21/2000 | 1/06/2004 | 08/08/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,763,228 | Precision automatic gain control circuit | 12/21/2001 | 7/13/2004 | 10/03/2021 |
22
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,748,200 | Automatic gain control system and method for a ZIF architecture | 04/04/2003 | 6/08/2004 | 10/02/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | RE42,799 | Packet acquisition and channel tracking for a wireless communication device configured in a zero intermediate frequency architecture | 06/27/2008 | 10/04/2011 | 01/22/2023 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,560,448 | DC compensation system for a wireless communication device configured in a zero intermediate frequency architecture | 10/02/2000 | 5/06/2003 | 08/29/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,448,910 | Method and apparatus for convolution encoding and viterbi decoding of data that utilize a configurable processor to configure a plurality of re-configurable processing elements | 03/26/2001 | 9/10/2002 | 03/26/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 7,127,588 | Apparatus and method for an improved performance VLIW processor | 12/05/2000 | 10/24/2006 | 03/17/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,757,752 | Micro Controller Development System | 01/14/2002 | 6/29/2004 | 01/14/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,509,646 | Apparatus For Reducing An Electrical Noise Inside A Ball Grid Array Package | 05/22/2000 | 1/21/2003 | 05/22/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,365,970 | Bond Pad Structure And Its Method Of Fabricating | 12/10/1999 | 4/02/2002 | 12/10/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,912,601 | Method of programming PLDs using a wireless link | 06/28/2000 | 6/28/2005 | 05/11/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,496,054 | Control signal generator for an overvoltage-tolerant interface circuit on a low voltage process | 05/09/2001 | 12/17/2002 | 05/09/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,194,279 | Fabrication method for gate spacer | 06/28/1999 | 2/27/2001 | 06/28/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,281,554 | Electrostatic discharge protection circuit | 03/20/2000 | 8/28/2001 | 03/20/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,657,263 | MOS transistors having dual gates and self-aligned interconnect contact windows | 06/28/2001 | 12/02/2003 | 03/24/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,461,908 | Method of manufacturing a semiconductor device | 04/10/2001 | 10/08/2002 | 04/10/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,737,995 | Clock and data recovery with a feedback loop to adjust the slice level of an input sampling circuit | 04/10/2002 | 5/18/2004 | 04/18/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,747,522 | Digitally controlled crystal oscillator with integrated coarse and fine control | 05/03/2002 | 6/08/2004 | 05/17/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,275,116 | Method, circuit and/or architecture to improve the frequency range of a voltage-controlled oscillator | 06/08/1999 | 8/14/2001 | 06/08/2019 |
23
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,608,763 | Stacking system and method | 09/15/2000 | 8/19/2003 | 05/24/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,404,043 | Panel stacking of BGA devices to form three-dimensional modules | 06/21/2000 | 6/11/2002 | 06/21/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,472,735 | Three-dimensional memory stacking using anisotropic epoxy interconnections | 04/05/2001 | 10/29/2002 | 06/27/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,544,815 | Panel stacking of BGA devices to form three-dimensional modules | 08/06/2001 | 4/08/2003 | 06/21/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,566,746 | Panel stacking of BGA devices to form three-dimensional modules | 12/14/2001 | 5/20/2003 | 06/21/2020 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,878,571 | Panel stacking of BGA devices to form three-dimensional modules | 12/11/2002 | 4/12/2005 | 04/30/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,627,984 | Chip stack with differing chip package types | 07/24/2001 | 9/30/2003 | 07/24/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,908,792 | Chip stack with differing chip package types | 10/03/2002 | 6/21/2005 | 02/21/2022 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,205,524 | Multimedia arbiter and method using fixed round-robin slots for real-time agents and a timed priority slot for non-real-time agents | 09/16/1998 | 3/20/2001 | 09/16/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,157,978 | Multimedia round-robin arbitration with phantom slots for super-priority real-time agent | 01/06/1999 | 12/05/2000 | 09/16/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,117,750 | Process for obtaining a layer of single-crystal germanium or silicon on a substrate of single-crystal silicon or germanium, respectively | 12/21/1998 | 9/12/2000 | 12/21/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,429,098 | Process for obtaining a layer of single-crystal germanium or silicon on a substrate of single-crystal silicon or germanium, respectively, and multilayer products obtained | 09/11/2000 | 8/06/2002 | 12/21/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,134,176 | Disabling a defective element in an integrated circuit device having redundant elements | 11/24/1998 | 10/17/2000 | 11/24/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,366,998 | Reconfigurable functional units for implementing a hybrid vliw-simd programming model | 10/14/1998 | 4/02/2002 | 10/14/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,401,217 | Method For Error Recognition In A Processor System | 07/22/1998 | 6/04/2002 | 07/22/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,169,028 | Method for fabricating metal interconnected structure | 01/26/1999 | 1/02/2001 | 01/26/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,190,981 | Method for fabricating metal oxide semiconductor | 02/03/1999 | 2/20/2001 | 02/03/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,130,823 | Stackable ball grid array module and method | 02/01/1999 | 10/10/2000 | 02/01/2019 |
24
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,208,004 | Semiconductor device with high-temperature-stable gate electrode for sub-micron applications and fabrication thereof | 08/19/1998 | 3/27/2001 | 08/19/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | US Patent | 6,479,362 | Semiconductor device with high-temperature-stable gate electrode for sub-micron applications and fabrication thereof | 02/14/2001 | 11/12/2002 | 08/19/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | Korean Patent | KR10-0796825 | Method of manufacturing a semiconductor device | 04/03/2001 | 6/24/2009 | 04/03/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | British Patent | GB0930382 | Process for obtaining a layer of single crystal germanium or silicon on single crystal silicon or germanium substrate respectively, and multilayer products thus obtained | 12/09/1998 | 8/21/2002 | 12/09/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | Italian Patent | IT0930382 | Process for obtaining a layer of single crystal germanium or silicon on single crystal silicon or germanium substrate respectively, and multilayer products thus obtained | 12/09/1998 | 8/21/2002 | 12/09/2018 | ||||||
| M-RED | Korean Patent | KR10-0633947 | Method of fabricating a high power rf field effect transistor with reduced hot electron injection and resulting structure | 08/17/1999 | 10/04/2006 | 08/17/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | French Patent | FR2791470 | Monolithic Integrated Circuit Comprising An Inductor And A Method Of Fabricating The Same | 03/23/1999 | 6/01/2001 | 03/23/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | French Patent | FR2790328 | Inductive Component, Integrated Transformer, In Particular For A Radio Frequency Circuit, And Associated Integrated Circuit With Such Inductive Component Or Integrated Transformer | 02/26/1999 | 4/20/2001 | 02/26/2019 | ||||||
| M-RED | Japanese Patent | JP4846167 | Method of manufacturing a semiconductor device | 04/03/2001 | 10/21/2011 | 04/03/2021 | ||||||
| M-RED | Japanese Patent | JP5051939 | Electric sensor device, method for generating electric signal from array of converter element | 12/05/2000 | 8/03/2012 | 12/05/2020 | ||||||
| AMI | US Patent | 8,280,014 | System and method for associating audio clips with objects | 11/29/2006 | 10/02/2012 | 11/08/2030 | ||||||
| AMI | US Patent | 9,088,667 | System and method for associating audio clips with objects | 09/06/2012 | 7/21/2015 | 06/30/2027 | ||||||
| AMI | US Patent | 10,033,876 | System and method for associating audio clips with objects | 06/02/2015 | 7/24/2018 | 11/29/2026 | ||||||
| AMI | US Patent | 10,348,909 | System and method for associating audio clips with objects | 06/18/2018 | 7/09/2019 | 11/29/2026 | ||||||
| AMI | US Patent | 10,938,995 | System and method for associating audio clips with objects | 05/23/2019 | 3/02/2021 | 11/29/2026 |
25
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| AMI | US Patent Application | 17/162,354 | System and method for associating audio clips with objects | 01/29/2021 | 5/20/2021 | N/A | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 7,761,371 | Analyzing a credit counseling agency | 07/19/2007 | 7/20/2010 | 10/19/2020 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 7,827,097 | System for transferring an inbound communication to one of a plurality of credit-counseling agencies | 10/19/2000 | 11/02/2010 | 10/23/2024 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 7,860,785 | Communication system to automatically refer an inbound communication | 07/19/2007 | 12/28/2010 | 10/19/2020 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 8,209,257 | System for transferring an inbound communication to one of a plurality of credit-counseling agencies | 11/01/2010 | 6/26/2012 | 11/27/2020 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 8,725,630 | Method of processing a phone call | 06/25/2012 | 5/13/2014 | 10/19/2020 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 9,948,771 | Using an interactive voice response apparatus | 05/12/2014 | 4/17/2018 | 12/23/2022 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 10,230,840 | Method of using an apparatus processing phone call routing | 05/12/2014 | 3/12/2019 | 01/05/2022 | ||||||
| PLL | US Patent | 10,735,582 | Apparatus processing phone calls | 03/11/2019 | 8/04/2020 | 10/19/2020 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,327,441 | System and method for application attestation | 02/17/2012 | 12/04/2012 | 02/17/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,776,180 | Systems and methods for using reputation scores in network services and transactions to calculate security risks to computer systems and platforms | 07/27/2012 | 7/08/2014 | 08/22/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,850,517 | Runtime risk detection based on user, application, and system action sequence correlation | 01/15/2013 | 9/30/2014 | 01/15/2033 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,850,588 | Systems and methods for providing Mobile security based on dynamic Attestation | 07/27/2012 | 9/30/2014 | 08/11/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,990,948 | Systems and methods for orchestrating runtime operational integrity | 07/27/2012 | 3/24/2015 | 01/12/2033 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,027,125 | Systems and methods for network flow remediation based on risk correlation | 07/27/2012 | 5/05/2015 | 09/02/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,092,616 | Systems and methods for threat identification and remediation | 07/27/2012 | 7/28/2015 | 01/25/2033 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 7,565,549 | System and method for the managed security control of processes on a computer system | 07/03/2007 | 7/21/2009 | 01/03/2023 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 7,673,137 | System and method for the managed security control of processes on a computer system | 01/03/2003 | 3/02/2010 | 06/12/2028 |
26
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,150,958 | Methods, systems and computer program products for disseminating status information to users of computer resources | 05/05/2004 | 4/03/2012 | 09/06/2031 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,955,038 | Methods and systems for controlling access to computing resources based on known security vulnerabilities | 08/16/2012 | 2/10/2015 | 06/13/2026 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,608,997 | Methods and systems for controlling access to computing resources based on known security vulnerabilities | 02/10/2015 | 3/28/2017 | 06/13/2026 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,923,918 | Methods and systems for controlling access to computing resources based on known security vulnerabilities | 03/27/2017 | 3/20/2018 | 06/13/2026 | ||||||
| TLL | Korean Patent | 20,090,075,861 | On demand virus scan | 12/04/2007 | N/A | N/A | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,572,738 | On demand virus scan | 12/07/2006 | 10/29/2013 | 11/08/2030 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 6,842,796 | Information extraction from documents with regular expression matching | 07/03/2001 | 1/11/2005 | 05/28/2022 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 6,928,549 | Dynamic intrusion detection for computer systems | 07/09/2001 | 8/09/2005 | 08/29/2023 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,180,941 | Mechanisms for priority control in resource allocation | 12/04/2009 | 5/15/2012 | 10/27/2025 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,055,996 | Lightweight form pattern validation | 11/13/2003 | 11/08/2011 | 10/06/2027 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,086,835 | Rootkit detection | 06/04/2007 | 12/27/2011 | 06/19/2030 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,127,356 | System, method and program product for detecting unknown computer attacks | 08/27/2003 | 2/28/2012 | 12/11/2028 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,135,958 | Method, system, and apparatus for dynamically validating a data encryption operation | 11/22/2005 | 3/13/2012 | 09/05/2030 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,140,853 | Mutually excluded security managers | 07/01/2008 | 3/20/2012 | 12/31/2030 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,171,533 | Managing web single sign-on applications | 09/29/2008 | 5/01/2012 | 03/02/2031 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,819,419 | Method and system for dynamic encryption of a URL | 04/03/2003 | 8/26/2014 | 10/22/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,118,634 | Dynamic encryption of a universal resource locator | 07/02/2014 | 8/25/2015 | 04/03/2023 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,628,453 | Dynamic encryption of a universal resource locator | 06/10/2015 | 4/18/2017 | 04/03/2023 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,860,251 | Dynamic encryption of a universal resource locator | 01/30/2017 | 1/02/2018 | 04/03/2023 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 8,769,126 | Expanded membership access control in a collaborative environment | 06/24/2004 | 7/01/2014 | 07/03/2028 |
27
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| TLL | European Patent | EP2727042 | Rules based actions for mobile device management | 07/02/2012 | 4/06/2016 | 07/02/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 9,071,518 | Rules based actions for mobile device management | 07/02/2012 | 6/30/2015 | 07/02/2032 | ||||||
| TLL | US Patent | 7,631,354 | System security agent authentication and alert distribution | 12/30/2004 | 7/06/2006 | 07/18/2027 | ||||||
| STX | US Patent | 7,592,532 | Method and Apparatus for Remote Voice-over or Music Production and Management | 09/27/2005 | 9/22/2009 | 04/25/2026 | ||||||
| STX | US Patent | 9,635,312 | Method and Apparatus for Remote Voice-over or Music Production and Management | 12/11/2015 | 4/25/2017 | 09/27/2025 | ||||||
| STX | US Patent | 10,726,822 | Method and Apparatus for Remote Digital Content Monitoring and Management | 04/24/2017 | 7/28/2020 | 09/27/2025 | ||||||
| STX | US Patent | 11,372,913 | Method and Apparatus for Remote Digital Content Monitoring and Management | 07/27/2020 | 6/28/2022 | 09/27/2025 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 7,725,116 | Techniques for combining voice with wireless text short message services | 11/25/2006 | 5/25/2010 | 09/17/2026 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 7,929,949 | Interactive multimodal messaging | 02/03/2009 | 4/19/2011 | 02/03/2029 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 8,107,978 | Addressing voice SMS messages | 03/27/2008 | 1/31/2012 | 03/27/2028 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 8,688,150 | Methods for identifying messages and communicating with users of a multimodal message service | 08/12/2005 | 4/01/2014 | 02/16/2029 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 9,185,227 | Sender driven call completion system | 12/12/2013 | 11/10/2015 | 12/12/2033 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 9,520,851 | Predictive automatic gain control in a media processing system | 03/12/2015 | 12/13/2016 | 06/09/2035 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 9,532,191 | Multi-modal transmission of early media notifications | 05/17/2013 | 12/27/2016 | 05/17/2033 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 9,686,324 | System and method for establishing communication links between mobile devices | 02/27/2014 | 6/20/2017 | 05/01/2034 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 10,552,030 | Multi-Gesture Media Recording System | 10/11/2013 | 2/04/2020 | 07/05/2035 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 10,884,609 | Multi-Gesture Media Recording System | 01/07/2020 | 1/05/2021 | 10/11/2033 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 11,294,562 | Multi-Gesture Media Recording System | 12/10/2020 | 4/05/2022 | 10/11/2033 | ||||||
| MML | US Application | 17/700,506 | Multi-gesture Media Recording System | 03/22/2022 | 7/07/2022 | N/A |
28
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 8,161,116 | Method and system for communicating a data file over a network | 05/24/2004 | 4/17/2012 | 08/28/2026 | ||||||
| MML | US Patent | 8,504,633 | Method and system for communicating a data file | 04/12/2012 | 8/06/2013 | 05/24/2024 | ||||||
| LSC | US Patent | 6,549,988 | Data storage system comprising a network of PCs and method using same | 01/22/1999 | 4/15/2013 | 01/22/2019 | ||||||
| LSC | US Patent | 8,225,002 | Data storage and data sharing in a network of heterogeneous computers | 03/05/2003 | 7/17/2012 | 01/22/2019 | ||||||
| LSC | US Patent | 9,811,463 | Apparatus Including an I/O Interface and a Network Interface and Related Method of Use | 02/23/2017 | 11/07/2017 | 01/22/2019 | ||||||
| LSC | US Patent | 10,154,092 | Data Sharing Using Distributed Cache in a Network of Heterogeneous Computers | 01/15/2016 | 12/11/2018 | 01/15/2016 | ||||||
| EDI | US Patent | 9,786,163 | Automated highway system | 04/05/2016 | 10/10/2017 | 10/10/2021 | ||||||
| EDI | US Patent | 10,026,310 | Automated highway system | 09/09/2016 | 7/17/2018 | 04/05/2036 | ||||||
| EDI | US Patent | 10,297,146 | Automated highway system | 07/16/2018 | 5/21/2019 | 04/05/2036 | ||||||
| EDI | US Patent | 10,796,566 | Automated highway system | 05/20/2019 | 10/06/2020 | 04/05/2036 | ||||||
| EDI | US Patent | 11,200,796 | Automated highway system | 10/05/2020 | 12/14/2021 | 04/05/2036 | ||||||
| EDI | US Application | 17/548,798 | Automated highway system | 12/13/2021 | 10/27/2022 | N/A | ||||||
| Tyche | US Patent | 6,900,087 | Symmetric inducting device for an integrated circuit having a ground shield | 08/21/2003 | 5/31/2005 | 10/14/2022 | ||||||
| Tyche | US Patent | 7,084,481 | Symmetric inducting device for an integrated circuit having a ground shield | 05/28/2004 | 8/01/2006 | 07/13/2022 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 6,936,898 | Diagonal deep well region for routing body-bias voltage for MOSFETS in surface well regions | 12/31/2002 | 8/30/2005 | 03/03/2023 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,098,512 | Layout patterns for deep well region to facilitate routing body-bias voltage | 10/10/2003 | 8/29/2006 | 03/14/2023 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,332,763 | Selective coupling of voltage feeds for body bias voltage in an integrated circuit device | 01/26/2004 | 2/19/2008 | 07/05/2023 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,211,478 | Diagonal deep well region for routing body-bias voltage for MOSFETS in surface well regions | 08/08/2005 | 5/01/2007 | 12/31/2022 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,645,664 | Layout pattern for deep well region to facilitate routing body-bias voltage | 06/08/2006 | 1/12/2010 | 12/21/2023 |
29
| Segment | Type | Number | Title | File Date | Issue / Publication Date | Expiration | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,323,367 | Diagonal deep well region for routing body-bias voltage for MOSFETS in surface well regions | 05/01/2007 | 1/29/2008 | 12/31/2022 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,608,897 | Sub-surface region with diagonal gap regions | 01/28/2008 | 10/27/2009 | 12/31/2022 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 9,251,865 | Selective coupling of voltage feeds for body bias voltage in an integrated circuit device | 02/11/2008 | 2/02/2016 | 07/05/2023 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 8,415,730 | Selective coupling of voltage feeds for body bias voltage in an integrated circuit device | 02/19/2008 | 4/09/2013 | 07/05/2023 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,149,851 | Method and system for conservatively managing store capacity available to a processor issuing stores | 08/21/2003 | 12/12/2006 | 10/17/2024 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | 7,606,979 | Method and system for conservatively managing store capacity available to a processor issuing stores | 12/12/2006 | 10/20/2009 | 08/21/2023 | ||||||
| DIP | US Patent | RE44,025 | Apparatus and method for integrated circuit power management | 07/18/2008 | 2/19/2013 | 09/09/2024 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 7,962,948 | VIDEO-ENABLED COMMUNITY BUILDING | 04/06/2001 | 6/14/2011 | 02/17/2026 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 8,230,497 | Method Of Identifying Software Vulnerabilities On A Computer System | 11/04/2002 | 7/24/2012 | 09/24/2031 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 7,353,539 | SIGNAL LEVEL PROPAGATION MECHANISM FOR DISTRIBUTION OF A PAYLOAD TO VULNERABLE SYSTEMS | 01/16/2003 | 4/01/2008 | 06/02/2025 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 7,647,327 | Method And System For Implementing Storage Strategies Of A File Autonomously Of A User | 09/24/2003 | 1/12/2010 | 02/04/2025 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 7,404,204 | System And Method For Authentication Via A Single Sign-on Server | 02/06/2004 | 7/22/2008 | 03/02/2026 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 7,426,633 | System And Method For Reflashing Disk Drive Firmware | 05/12/2005 | 9/16/2008 | 09/15/2026 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 8,027,333 | Ip-based Enhanced Emergency Services Using Intelligent Client Devices | 09/05/2008 | 9/27/2011 | 08/15/2024 | ||||||
| HPE | US Patent | 7,440,442 | Ip-based Enhanced Emergency Services Using Intelligent Client Devices | 10/21/2003 | 10/21/2008 | 11/24/2026 |
| * | Subject to any terminal disclaimer |
30
Research and Development
We did not incur research and development expenses during 2022 or 2021, since research and development are not part of our business.
Consulting Contracts
On February 22, 2021, we entered into advisory service agreement with three consultants pursuant to which they will provide services to us in connection with the development of our business. The agreements have a term of ten years and may be terminated by us for cause or upon the death or disability of the consultants.
Pursuant to the agreements with two of the consultants, the compensation payable to each of them consists of a restricted stock grant of 100,000 shares of Common Stock which vested in full immediately upon issuance and a ten-year option to purchase a total of 300,000 shares of Common Stock, which become exercisable cumulatively as follows:
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share becoming exercisable upon the commencement of trading of our common stock on the OTCQB which occurred on May 7, 2021. |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, becoming exercisable on the first day on which we file with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q which stockholders’ equity of at least $5,000,000, and |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share becoming exercisable on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. |
Pursuant to the agreement with the third consultant, the compensation payable to him consists of a restricted stock grant of 100,000 shares of Common Stock which immediately vests in full and a ten-year option to purchase 300,000 shares of Common Stock, which becomes exercisable cumulatively as follows:
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share which became exercisable on February 22, 2022, which was the first anniversary of the date of the agreement; |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share which became exercisable on February 22, 2023, which was the second anniversary of the date of the agreement; and |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share upon the third anniversary of the date of the agreement. |
Employees
As of March 31, 2023, we have no employees other than our chief executive officer, Mr. Jon Scahill. Our employee is not represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be good.
31
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information included in this annual report before making an investment decision with regard to our securities. The statements contained in this annual report include forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by forward-looking statements. The risks set forth below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties may exist that could also adversely affect our business, prospects or operations. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or a significant part of your investment.
Risks Relating to our Financial Conditions and Operations
We have a history of losses and are continuing to incur losses. During the period from 2008, when we changed our business to become an intellectual property management company, through December 31, 2022, we generated a cumulative loss of approximately $26.2 million on cumulative revenues of approximately $23.8 million, and our losses are continuing. Our total assets were approximately $1,227,000 at December 31, 2022, of which approximately $1,131,000 represented the book value of patents we acquired from AI in October of 2021. At December 31, 2022, we had a working capital deficiency of approximately $9,490,000. During 2021 and 2022 our business was impacted by our default under our loans to Intelligent Partners (as successor to United Wireless), with Intelligent Partners having the ability to declare a default on our notes in the principal amount of $4,672,810, with the possibility of our seeking protection under the Bankruptcy Act. As a result, we ceased our monetization activities, since no counsel would represent us on a contingent basis in view of the default and possible bankruptcy, and we devoted our efforts to negotiating the agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners. We resumed our monetization activities following in February 2021 after we entered into our agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners. However, the intellectual property monetization cycle is lengthy and may be unsuccessful. Monetization activities initiated may take several quarters, if not years, to generate revenues if ever. Most of the revenue for 2021 was generated pursuant to litigation which was commenced prior to 2021.
Our independent auditors have included a substantial doubt going concern explanatory paragraph in their report on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022. Because of our history of losses, deficiency in stockholders’ equity, working capital deficiency and the uncertainty of generating revenues in the future, our independent auditors have included a substantial doubt going concern explanatory paragraph in their report on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022.
We require significant funding in order to develop our business. Our business requires substantial funding to evaluate and acquire intellectual property rights and to develop and implement programs to monetize our intellectual property rights, including the prosecution of any litigation necessary to enable us to monetize our intellectual property rights. Our failure to develop and implement these programs could both jeopardize our relationships under our existing agreements and could inhibit our ability to generate new business, either through the acquisition of intellectual property rights or through exclusive management agreements. We cannot be profitable unless we are able to obtain the funding necessary to develop our business, including litigation to monetize our intellectual property. Although we have agreements with QFL and QF3 which provide a funding to acquire intellectual property rights, QFL or QF3 must approve any intellectual property we acquire and, if QFL or QF3 does not fund an intellectual property acquisition, we may not be able to acquire and monetize the intellectual property. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain necessary funding or to develop our business.
32
The terms of our agreements with QF3, QFL and Intelligent Partners may make it difficult for us to generate cash flow from our operations. We have an agreement with QFL pursuant to which QFL agreed to make available to us a financing facility of (i) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that the Company intends to monetize, of which we have received $2,653,000 as of March 15, 2023; (ii) up to $2,000,000 for operating expenses from which the Company may, at its discretion, draw up to $200,000 per calendar quarter, of which we have drawn down $2,000,000 as of March 15, 2023, and (iii) $1,750,000 which was used to fund the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners. We also have an agreement with QF3 pursuant to which QF3 agreed to make available to us a financing facility of (i) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that the Company intends to monetize: (ii) up to $4,000,000 for operating expenses from which the Company may, at its discretion, draw up to $500,000 per calendar quarter, of which we have drawn down $500,000 as of March 15, 2023, and (iii) $3,300,000 which was used to fund purchase of a patent portfolio from Tower Semiconductor Ltd. Pursuant to the QFL and QF3 agreements, QFL and QF3 receive all proceeds payable to us from the monetization of those patents which have been financed by QFL and QF3, respectively, until QFL and QF3 has received its negotiated rate of return, respectively, then we and QFL and QF3, respectively, share equally in the proceeds from monetization until QFL and QF3, respectively has received its investment return and thereafter we receive all of the net proceeds. Pursuant to our restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners, we have an obligation to pay TMPO totaling $2,805,000. Under our amended monetization proceeds agreements with Intelligent Partners, we pay Intelligent Partners 60% of the net monetization proceeds from associated intellectual property portfolios. Further, until we have paid Intelligent Partners a total of $2,805,000 under all of the monetization proceeds agreements, for net proceeds between $0 and $1,000,000 we are to pay Intelligent Partners 10% of the net proceeds realized from new assets acquired by us, provided, that, if, in any calendar quarter, our net proceeds realized exceed $1,000,000, Intelligent Partner’s entitlement for that quarter shall increase to 30% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of $1,000,000 but less than $3,000,000, and if in the same calendar quarter, net proceeds exceed $3,000,000, Intelligent Partners’ entitlement for that quarter shall increase to 50% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of $3,000,000. These payments come from our share of the proceeds after QFL and QF3 have recovered their negotiated rate of return, respectively. In these agreements, the monetization proceeds is determined after payment of contingent legal fees and certain other expenses, including payments due by us to as part of the purchase price for intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that, as a result of these provisions, that we will generate any meaningful cash flow from the intellectual property we acquire. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from our monetization activities, we may not be able to fund our operations or continue in business.
Our business may be impaired by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of the response to the pandemic. Although we do not manufacture or sell products, the COVID-19 pandemic and the work shutdown imposed in the United States and other countries to limit the spread of the virus had a negative impact on our business. Our revenue is generated almost exclusively from license fees generated from litigation seeking damages for infringement of our intellectual property rights. The work shutdown affected the court system and the courts operated on a reduced schedule and some courts may still have a backlog as a result of the pandemic. As a result, deadlines may be postponed which may give defendants an incentive to delay negotiations or offer a lower amount than they might otherwise accept. In addition, the effect of the COVID-19 and new variants and subvariants the public response may adversely affect the financial condition and prospects of defendants and potential defendants, which would make it less likely that they would be willing to settle our claim.
We are dependent upon our chief executive officer. We are dependent upon Jon Scahill, our chief executive officer and president and sole full-time employee, for all aspects of our business including locating, evaluating and negotiating and performing due diligence with respect to intellectual property rights from the owners, managing our intellectual property portfolios, engaging in licensing activities and monetizing the rights through licensing and managing and monitoring any litigation with respect to our intellectual property as well as defending any actions by potential licensees seeking a declaratory judgment that they do not infringe. The loss of Mr. Scahill would materially impair our ability to conduct our business. Although we have an employment agreement with Mr. Scahill, the employment agreement does not ensure that Mr. Scahill will remain with us.
Any equity funding we obtain may result in significant dilution to our stockholders. Because of our financial position, our continuing losses and our negative working capital from operations, we do not expect that we will be able to obtain any debt financing for our operations. Our stock price has generally been trading at a price which is less than $1.00 per share for more than the past two years. As a result, it will be very difficult for us to raise funds in the equity markets. However, in the event that we are able to raise funds in the equity market, the sale of shares would result in significant dilution to the present stockholders, and even a modest equity investment could result in the issuance of a very significant number of shares.
33
Risks Relating to Monetizing our Intellectual Property Rights
We may not be able to monetize our intellectual property portfolios. Although our business plan is to generate revenue from our intellectual property portfolios, we have not been successful in generating any significant positive cash flow from our portfolios, we have not generated any revenues from several of our intellectual property portfolios and we have ceased allocating resources toward the monetization of several of our portfolios. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate any significant revenue from our existing portfolios or that we will be able to acquire new intellectual property rights that will generate significant revenue.
If we are not successful in monetizing our portfolios, we may not be able to continue in business. Although we have ownership of some of our intellectual property, we also license the rights pursuant to agreements with the owners of the intellectual property. If we are not successful in generating revenue for those parties who have an interest in the results of our efforts, those parties may seek to renegotiate the terms of our agreements with them, which could both impair our ability to generate revenue from our intellectual property and make it more difficult for us to obtain rights to new intellectual property rights. If we continue to be unable to generate revenue from our existing intellectual property portfolios and any new portfolios we may acquire, we may be unable to continue in business.
If we are not successful in patent litigation, the defendants may seek to have the court award attorneys’ fees to them against us which could result in the bankruptcy of the plaintiff subsidiary and may result in a default under our agreements with QFL and QF3. The United States patent laws provide that “the court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.” Although the patents are owned by our subsidiaries and any judgment would be awarded against the subsidiaries, the subsidiaries have no assets other than the patent rights. Our funding sources for our patent litigation do not provide for the funding source to pay any judgment against us. Thus, if any defendants obtain a judgment against one of our subsidiaries, they may seek to enforce their judgment against the patents owned by the subsidiary or seek to put the subsidiary into bankruptcy and acquire the patents in the bankruptcy proceeding. As a result, it is possible that an adverse verdict in a petition for legal fees could result in the loss of the patents owned by the subsidiary and a default under our agreements with QFL and QF3.
Our inability to acquire intellectual property portfolios will impair our ability to generate revenue and develop our business. We do not have the personnel to develop patentable technology by ourselves. Thus, we need to depend on acquiring rights to intellectual property and intellectual property portfolios from third parties on an ongoing basis. In acquiring intellectual property rights, there are delays in (i) identifying the intellectual property which we may want to acquire, (ii) negotiating an agreement with the owner or holder of the intellectual property rights, and (iii) generating revenue from those intellectual property rights which we acquire. During these periods, we will continue to incur expenses with no assurance that we will generate revenue. We currently hold intellectual property portfolios from which we have not generated any revenue to date, and we cannot assure you that we will generate revenue from our existing intellectual property portfolios or any additional intellectual properties which we may acquire.
We may be unable to enforce our intellectual property rights unless we obtain third-party funding. Because of the expense of litigation and our lack of working capital, we may be unable to enforce our intellectual property rights unless we obtain the agreement of a third-party to provide funding in support of our litigation. We cannot assure you that QFL, QF3 or any other funding source provide us the any necessary funding, and the failure to obtain such funding may impair our ability to monetize our intellectual property portfolio or continue in business.
Because we need to rely on third-party funding sources to provide us with funds to enforce our intellectual property rights we are dependent upon the perception by potential funding sources of the value of our intellectual property. Because we do not have funds to pursue litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, we are dependent upon the valuation which potential funding sources, which currently is QFL and QF3, give to our intellectual property or any intellectual property we may acquire. In determining whether to provide funding for intellectual property litigation, the funding sources need to make an evaluation of the strength of our patents, the likelihood of success, the nature of the potential defendants and a determination as to whether there is a sufficient potential recovery to justify a significant investment in intellectual property litigation. Typically, such funding sources receive a percentage of the recovery after litigation expenses, and seek to generate a sufficient return on investment to justify the investment. Under our agreements with QFL and QF3, QFL and QF3 are allocated all of the net proceeds (after allowable expenses), respectively, until it has received a negotiated return. Unless QFL, QF3 or any other funding source believes that it will generate a sufficient return on investment, it will not fund litigation. If QFL or QF3 does not fund our acquisition or monetization of intellectual property we propose to acquire, we cannot assure you that we will be able to negotiate funding agreements with third-party funding sources on terms reasonably acceptable to us, if at all. Because of our financial condition, we may only be able to obtain funding on terms which are less favorable to us than we would otherwise be able to obtain.
34
Although we have funding agreements with QFL and QF3, there is no assurance that QFL or QF3 will provide funding for portfolios we are looking to acquire or that we will generate revenue from any funded litigation. Although the funding sources makes their evaluation as to the likelihood of success, patent litigation is very uncertain, and we cannot assure you that we will obtain litigation funding or that, if we obtain litigation funding, we will be successful or that any recovery we may obtain will generate any significant positive cash flow from operations for us.
Because QFL, QF3 and Intelligent Partners hold a security interest in almost all of our intellectual property and the proceeds from our intellectual property, we may not be able to raise funds through a debt financing. Pursuant to our agreements with QFL, QF3 and Intelligent Partners, we granted them a security interest in the stock of our subsidiaries that hold the intellectual property acquired from Intellectual Ventures and in the proceeds from the monetization of intellectual property acquired from Intellectual Ventures and our mobile data and financial data portfolios. The inability to grant a security interest in these assets to a new lender is likely to materially impair our ability to obtain debt financing for our operations, and may also impair our ability to obtain financing to acquire additional intellectual property rights.
Because of our financial condition and our having generated a loss from operations in 2022 and 2021 from our existing portfolios, we may not be able to obtain intellectual property rights to the most advanced technologies. In order to generate meaningful revenues from intellectual property rights, we need to be able to identify, negotiate rights to and offer technologies for which there is a developing market. Because of our financial condition and the terms under which we obtain financing for our litigation, we may be unable to negotiate rights to technology for which there which will be a strong developing market, or, if we are able to negotiate agreements for such intellectual property, the terms of our purchase or license may not be favorable to us. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire intellectual property rights to the technology for which there is a strong market demand.
Potential acquisitions may present risks, and we may be unable to achieve the financial or other goals intended at the time of any potential acquisition. Our ability to grow depends, in large part, on our ability to acquire interests in intellectual property, including patented technologies, patent portfolios, or companies holding such patented technologies and patent portfolios. Accordingly, we intend to engage in acquisitions to expand our intellectual property portfolios and we intend to continue to explore such acquisitions. Such acquisitions are subject to numerous risks, including the following:
| ● | our failure to have sufficient funding to enable us to make the acquisition, together with the terms on which such funding is available, if at all; |
| ● | our failure to have sufficient personal to satisfy the seller that we have the personnel to monetize the assets we propose to acquire; |
| ● | dilution to our stockholders to the extent that we use equity in connection with any acquisition; |
| ● | our inability to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to any potential acquisition, or if we are able to enter into such agreement, our inability to consummate the potential acquisition; |
| ● | difficulty integrating the operations, technology and personnel of the acquired entity; |
35
| ● | our inability to achieve the anticipated financial and other benefits of the specific acquisition; |
| ● | difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and monetization process; |
| ● | diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns, especially considering that we have only one full-time employee/officer who is responsible for performing due diligence, negotiating agreements, negotiating funding and implementing a monetization program; and |
| ● | our failure, in our due diligence process, to identify significant issues, including issues with respect to patented technologies and intellectual property portfolios, and other legal and financial contingencies. |
If we are unable to manage these risks and other risks effectively as part of any acquisition, our business could be adversely affected.
Our acquisition of intellectual property rights may be time consuming, complex and costly, which could adversely affect our operating results. Acquisitions of patent or other intellectual property assets, which are and will be critical to the development of our business, are often time consuming, complex and costly to consummate. We may utilize many different transaction structures in our acquisitions and the terms of such acquisition agreements tend to be heavily negotiated. As a result, we expect to incur significant operating expenses and may be required to raise capital during the negotiations even if the acquisition is ultimately not consummated. Even if we are able to acquire particular intellectual property assets, there is no guarantee that we will generate sufficient revenue related to those intellectual property assets to offset the acquisition costs. We may also identify intellectual property assets that cost more than we are prepared to spend with our own capital resources. We may incur significant costs to organize and negotiate a structured acquisition that does not ultimately result in an acquisition of any intellectual property assets or, if consummated, proves to be unprofitable for us. These higher costs could adversely affect our operating results.
If we acquire technologies that are in the early stages of market development, we may be unable to monetize the rights we acquire. We may acquire patents, technologies and other intellectual property rights that are in the early stages of adoption in the commercial, industrial and consumer markets. Demand for some of these technologies will likely be untested and may be subject to fluctuation based upon the rate at which companies may adopt our intellectual property in their products and services. As a result, there can be no assurance as to whether technologies we acquire or develop will have value that we can monetize. It may also be necessary for us to develop additional intellectual property and file new patent applications as the underlying commercial market evolves, as a result of which we may incur substantial costs with no assurance that we will ever be able to monetize our intellectual property.
Our intellectual property monetization cycle is lengthy and costly and may be unsuccessful. We expect to incur significant marketing, legal and sales expenses prior to entering into monetization events that generate revenue and cash flow from operations for us. We will also spend considerable resources educating potential licensees on the benefits of entering into an agreement with us that may include a non-exclusive license for future use of our intellectual property rights. Thus, we may incur significant losses in any particular period before any associated revenue stream begins. If our efforts to convince potential licensees of the benefits of a settlement arrangement are unsuccessful, we may need to continue with the litigation process or other enforcement action to protect our intellectual property rights and to realize revenue from those rights. We may also need to litigate to enforce the terms of existing agreements, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Enforcement proceedings are typically protracted and complex. The costs are typically substantial, and the outcomes are unpredictable. Enforcement actions will divert our managerial, technical, legal and financial resources from business operations.
36
We may not be successful in obtaining judgments in our favor. We have commenced litigation seeking to monetize our intellectual property portfolios and it will be necessary for us to commence ligation in the future. All litigation is uncertain, and a number of the actions we commenced have been dismissed by the trial court. We cannot assure you that any litigation will be decided in our favor or that, if damages are awarded or a license is negotiated, that we will generate any significant revenue from the litigation or that any recovery may be allocated to counsel and third-party funding source which may result in little if any revenue to us.
Our financial condition may cause both intellectual property rights owners and potential licensees to believe that we do not have the financial resources to commence and prosecute litigation for infringement. Because of our financial condition, both intellectual property rights owners and potential licensees may believe that we do not have the ability to commence and prosecute sustained and expensive litigation to protect our intellection rights with the effect that (i) intellectual property rights owners may be reluctant to grant us rights to their intellectual property and (ii) potential licensees may be less inclined to pay for license rights from us or settle any litigation we may commence on terms which generate any meaningful monetization.
Any patents which may be issued to us pursuant to patent applications which we filed or may file may fail to give us necessary protection. We cannot be certain that patents will be issued as a result of any pending or future patent applications, or that any of our patents, once issued, will provide us with adequate protection from competing products. For example, issued patents may be circumvented or challenged, declared invalid or unenforceable, or narrowed in scope. In addition, since publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we will be the first to make additional new inventions or to file patent applications covering those inventions. It is also possible that others may have or may obtain issued patents that could prevent us from commercializing our products or require us to obtain licenses requiring the payment of significant fees or royalties in order to enable us to conduct our business. As to those patents that we may acquire, our continued rights will depend on meeting any obligations to the seller and we may be unable to do so. Our failure to obtain or maintain intellectual property rights for our inventions would lead to the loss of our investments in such activities, which would have a material adverse effect on us.
The provisions of Federal Declaratory Judgment Act may affect our ability to monetize our intellectual property. Under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, it is possible for a party who we consider to be infringing upon our intellectual property to commence an action against us seeking a declaratory judgment that such party is not infringing upon our intellectual property rights. In such a case, the plaintiff could choose the court in which to bring the action and we would be the defendant in the action. Common claims for declaratory judgment in patent cases are claims of non-infringement, patent invalidity and unenforceability. Although the commencement of an action requires a claim or controversy, a court may find a letter from us to the alleged infringer seeking a royalty for the use of our intellectual property rights to form the basis of a controversy. In such a case, the plaintiff, rather than we, would choose the court in which to bring the action and the timing of the action. In addition, when we commence an action as plaintiff, we may be able to enter into a contingent fee arrangement with counsel, it is possible that counsel may be less willing to accept such an arrangement if we are the defendant. Further, we would not have the opportunity of choosing against which party to bring the action. An adverse decision in a declaratory judgment action could significantly impair our ability to monetize the intellectual property rights which are the subject of the litigation. We have been a defendant in one declaratory judgment action, which resulted in a settlement. We cannot assure you that potential infringers will not be able to use the Declaratory Judgment Act to reduce our ability to monetize the patents that are the subject of the action.
A 2014 Supreme Court decision could significantly impair business method and software patents. In June 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in Alice v. CLS Bank, struck down patents covering a computer-implemented scheme for mitigating “settlement risk” by using a third-party intermediary, holding the patent claims to be ineligible as being drawn to a patent-ineligible abstract idea. The courts have been dealing for many years over what business methods are patentable. We cannot predict the extent to which the decision in Alice as well as prior Supreme Court decisions dealing with patents, will be interpreted by courts. To the extent that the Supreme Court decision in Alice gives businesses reason to believe that business model and software patents are not enforceable, it may become more difficult for us to monetize patents which are held to be within the ambit of the patents before the Supreme Court in Alice and for us to obtain counsel willing to represent us on a contingency basis. As a result, the decision in Alice could materially impair our ability to obtain patent rights and monetize those which we do obtain.
37
Legislation, regulations or rules related to obtaining patents or enforcing patents could significantly increase our operating costs and decrease our revenue. We may apply for patents and may spend a significant amount of resources to enforce those patents. If legislation, regulations or rules are implemented either by Congress, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or the courts that impact the patent application process, the patent enforcement process or the rights of patent holders, these changes could negatively affect our expenses and revenue. For example, new rules regarding the burden of proof in patent enforcement actions could significantly both increase the cost of our enforcement actions and make it more difficult to sign licenses without litigation, changes in standards or limitations on liability for patent infringement could negatively impact our revenue derived from such enforcement actions, and any rules requiring that the losing party pay legal fees of the prevailing party could also significantly increase the cost of our enforcement actions. United States patent laws were amended with the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the America Invents Act, which took effect on March 16, 2013. The America Invents Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law. In general, the legislation attempts to address issues surrounding the enforceability of patents and the increase in patent litigation by, among other things, establishing new procedures for patent litigation. For example, the America Invents Act changes the way that parties may be joined in patent infringement actions, increasing the likelihood that such actions will need to be brought against individual parties allegedly infringing by their respective individual actions or activities. The America Invents Act and its implementation increases the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement of our patented technologies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice has conducted reviews of the patent system to evaluate the impact of patent assertion entities on industries in which those patents relate. It is possible that the findings and recommendations of the Department of Justice could impact the ability to effectively license and enforce standards-essential patents and could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the enforcement of any such patented technologies.
Proposed legislation may affect our ability to conduct our business. There are presently pending or proposed a number of laws which, if enacted, may affect the ability of companies such as us to generate revenue from our intellectual property rights. Typically, these proposed laws cover legal actions brought by companies which do not manufacture products or supply services but seek to collect licensing fees based on their intellectual property rights and, if they are not able to enter into a license, to commence litigation. Although a number of such bills have been proposed in Congress, we do not know which, if any, bills will be enacted into law or what the provisions will be and, therefore, we cannot predict the effect, if any, that such laws, if passed by Congress and signed by the president, would provide. However, we cannot assure you that legislation will not be enacted which would impair our ability to operate by making it more difficult for us to commence litigation against a potential licensee or infringer. To the extent that an alleged infringer believes that we will not prevail in litigation, it would be more difficult to negotiate a license agreement without litigation.
The unpredictability of our revenues may harm our financial condition. Our revenues from licensing have typically been lump sum payments entered into at the time of the license, which is typically in connection with the settlement of litigation, and not from licenses that pay an ongoing royalty. Due to the nature of the licensing business and uncertainties regarding the amount and timing of the receipt of license and other fees from potential infringers, stemming primarily from uncertainties regarding the outcome of enforcement actions, rates of adoption of our patented technologies, the growth rates of potential licensees and certain other factors, our revenues, if any, may vary significantly from quarter to quarter, which could make our business difficult to manage, adversely affect our business and operating results, cause our quarterly results to fall below market expectations and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our success depends in part upon our ability to retain the qualified legal counsel to represent us in patent enforcement litigation. The success of our licensing business may depend upon our ability to retain the qualified legal counsel to prosecute patent infringement litigation. As our patent enforcement actions increase, it will become more difficult to find the preferred choice for legal counsel to handle all of our cases because many of these firms may have a conflict of interest that prevents their representation of us or because they are not willing to represent us on a contingent or partial contingent fee basis.
38
Our reliance on representations, warranties and opinions of third parties may expose us to certain material liabilities. From time to time, we rely upon the representations and warranties of third parties, including persons claiming ownership of intellectual property rights, and opinions of purported experts. In certain instances, we may not have the opportunity to independently investigate and verify the facts upon which such representations, warranties and opinions are made. By relying on these representation, warranties and opinions, we may be exposed to liability in connection with the licensing and enforcement of intellectual property and intellectual property rights which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
In connection with patent enforcement actions, counterclaims may be brought against us, and a court may rule against us in counterclaims which may expose us and our operating subsidiaries to material liabilities. In connection with patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may file counterclaims against us, or a court may rule that we have violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against us or our operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to the counterclaiming defendant, which could be material, and if we or our operating subsidiaries are required to pay such monetary sanctions, attorneys’ fees and/or expenses, such payment could materially harm our operating results, our financial position and our ability to continue in business.
Trial judges and juries may find it difficult to understand complex patent enforcement litigation, and as a result, we may need to appeal adverse decisions by lower courts in order to successfully enforce our patents. It is difficult to predict the outcome of patent enforcement litigation at the trial level. It is often difficult for juries and trial judges to understand complex, patented technologies, and, as a result, there is a higher rate of successful appeals in patent enforcement litigation than more standard business litigation. Regardless of whether we prevail in the trial court, appeals are expensive and time consuming, resulting in increased costs and delayed revenue, and attorneys may be less likely to represent us in an appeal on a contingency basis especially if we are seeking to appeal an adverse decision. Although we may diligently pursue enforcement litigation, we cannot predict the decisions made by juries and trial courts.
More patent applications are filed each year resulting in longer delays in getting patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We hold a number of pending patents and may file or acquire rights to additional patent applications. We have identified a trend of increasing patent applications each year, which we believe is resulting in longer delays in obtaining approval of pending patent applications. The application delays could cause delays in recognizing revenue, if any, from these patents and could cause us to miss opportunities to license patents before other competing technologies are developed or introduced into the market.
U.S. Federal courts are becoming more crowded, and, as a result, patent enforcement litigation is taking longer. Patent enforcement actions are almost exclusively prosecuted in federal district courts. In May 2017, the United States Supreme Court, in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Groups Brands, held that a corporate defendant may be sued either in its state of incorporation, or where it has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. To the extent that the Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland concentrates patent litigation in districts within states popular for business incorporation, such as the Federal District Court for the District of Delaware, such courts may become increasingly crowded. Federal trial courts that hear patent enforcement actions also hear criminal and other civil cases. Criminal cases always take priority over patent enforcement actions. As a result, it is difficult to predict the length of time it will take to complete any enforcement action. Moreover, we believe there is a trend in increasing numbers of civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings, and, as a result, we believe that the risk of delays in patent enforcement actions will have a significant effect on our business in the future unless this trend changes.
Any reductions in the funding of the United States Patent and Trademark Office could have an adverse impact on the cost of processing pending patent applications and the value of those pending patent applications. Our primary assets are our patent portfolios, including pending patent applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The value of our patent portfolios is dependent upon the issuance of patents in a timely manner, and any reductions in the funding of the United States Patent and Trademark Office could negatively impact the value of our assets. Further, reductions in funding from Congress could result in higher patent application filing and maintenance fees charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, causing an unexpected increase in our expenses.
39
The rapid development of technology may impair our ability to monetize intellectual property that we own. In order for us to generate revenue from our intellectual property, we need to offer intellectual property that is used in the manufacture or development of products. Rapid technological developments have reduced the market for products using less advanced technology. To the extent that technology develops in a manner in which our intellectual property is not a necessary element or to the extent that others design around our intellectual property, our ability to license our intellectual property portfolios or successfully prosecute litigation will be impaired. We cannot assure you that we will have rights to intellectual property for most advanced technology or that there will be a market for products which require our technology.
The intellectual property management business is highly competitive. A large number of other companies seek to obtain rights to new intellectual property and to market existing intellectual property. Most of these companies have significantly both greater resources that we have and industry contacts which place them in a better position to generate new business. Further, our financial position, our lack of executive personnel and our inability to generate revenue from our portfolio can be used against us by our competitors. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining intellectual property rights to new developing technologies.
As intellectual property enforcement litigation becomes more prevalent, it may become more difficult for us to voluntarily license our intellectual property. We believe that the more prevalent intellectual property enforcement actions become, the more difficult it will be for us to voluntarily license our intellectual property rights, and we generally have not been successful in negotiating licenses without litigation. As a result, we may need to increase the number of our intellectual property enforcement actions to cause infringing companies to license the intellectual property or pay damages for lost royalties.
Weak global economic conditions may cause potential licensees to delay entering into licensing agreements, which could prolong our litigation and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. Our business depends significantly on strong economic conditions that would encourage potential licensees to enter into license agreements for our intellectual property rights. The United States and world economies have recently experienced weak economic conditions and the recent Russian invasion in Ukraine has exacerbated these conditions, including those resulting from inflation and supply chain line issues. Uncertainty about global economic conditions poses a risk as businesses may postpone spending in response to tighter credit, negative financial news and declines in income or asset values. This response could have a material adverse effect on the willingness of parties infringing on our assets to enter into settlements or other revenue generating agreements voluntarily.
If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, we may not be able to monetize our intellectual property effectively. Our ability to monetize our intellectual property depends in part upon the strength of the intellectual property and intellectual property rights that we own or may hereafter acquire in our technologies, brands and content and our ability to protect such intellectual property rights. We rely on a combination of patent and intellectual property laws and agreements to establish and protect our patent, intellectual property and other proprietary rights. The efforts we take to protect our patents, intellectual property and other proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective at stopping unauthorized use of our patents, intellectual property and other proprietary rights. In addition, effective trademark, patent, copyright and trade secret protection may not be available or cost-effective in every country in which we have rights. There may be instances where we are not able to protect or utilize our patent and other intellectual property in a manner that maximizes competitive advantage. If we are unable to protect our patent assets and intellectual property and other proprietary rights from unauthorized use, the value of those assets may be reduced, which could negatively impact our business. Our inability to obtain appropriate protections for our intellectual property may also allow competitors to enter our markets and produce or sell the same or similar products as those covered by our intellectual property rights. In addition, protecting our intellectual property and intellectual property rights is expensive and diverts our critical and limited managerial resources. If any of the foregoing were to occur, or if we are otherwise unable to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, our business and financial results could be impaired. Commencing legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights is burdensome and expensive. In addition, our intellectual property rights could be at risk if we are unsuccessful in, or cannot afford to pursue, those proceedings. We also rely on trade secrets and contract law to protect some of our intellectual property rights. We will enter into confidentiality and invention agreements with our employees and consultants. Nevertheless, these agreements may not be honored and they may not effectively protect our right to our un-patented trade secrets and know-how. Moreover, others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and know-how.
40
Risks Concerning our Common Stock
If our stock price falls below $0.01 per share, our common stock may be delisted from OTCQB. On May 23, 2022, we received notice from OTC Markets Group, that, because the bid price for our common stock had closed below $0.01 per share for more than 30 consecutive days, we no longer met the Standards for Continued Eligibility under the OTC listing standards and, if this deficiency is not met by August 21, 2022, our stock would be removed from the OTCQB marketplace, in which event our common stock will be traded on the OTC Pink market. Our registration rights agreement with QFL provides that, in the event of a failure to comply with certain covenants, which includes the failure of our common stock to be traded on the OTCQB, in addition to any other remedies available to QFL, we are to pay to QFL an amount in cash equal to 2.0% of the aggregate value of QFL’s Registrable Securities, as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, whether or not included in such registration statement, on each of the following dates: (i) the initial day of a maintenance failure; (ii) on the 30th day after the date of such a failure and (iii) every 30th day thereafter (prorated for periods totaling less than 30 days) until such failure is cured. In July 2022, we amended our certificate of incorporation to effect a one-for-100 reverse split of our common stock. We subsequently received advice from OTC Markets Group that the deficiency had been cured. We had previously received a similar notice, and our common stock was taken off the OTCQB effective August 31, 2020, and it traded on the OTC Pink Market until May 7, 2021 when trading resumed on the OTCQB. We cannot assure you that we will continue to meet the requirements for continued listing on the OTCQB, including the maintenance of a bid price of at least $0.01 per share.
There is a limited market for our common stock, which may make it difficult for you to sell your stock. Our common stock trades on the OTCQB market under the symbol “QPRC.” The OTCQB market is not a national securities exchange and does not provide the benefits to stockholders which a national exchange provides. Furthermore, according to the OTC Markets website, the OTCQB “is for early-stage and developing U.S. and international companies. To be eligible, companies must be current in their reporting and undergo an annual verification and management certification process. Companies must meet $0.01 bid test and may not be in bankruptcy.” There is a limited trading market for our common stock and our common stock has frequently traded for less than $0.02. From August 28, 2020 to May 7, 2021 our common stock was delisted from the OTCQB and traded on the OTC Pink because our stock price fell below $0.01 per share for more than 30 consecutive trading days and on May 23, 2022, we received notice from the OTC Markets Group that our bid price was less than $0.01 for more than 30 consecutive trading days. As a result of the one-for-100 reverse split, which enabled our common stock to remain listed on the OTCQB, the number of shares in our public float declined by approximately 99%. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the liquidity of any markets that may develop for our common stock, the ability of holders of our common stock to sell our common stock, or the prices at which holders may be able to sell our common stock. Further, because of the thin float, the reported bid and asked prices may have little relationship to the price you would pay if you wanted to buy shares or the price you would receive if you wanted to sell shares.
Because our common stock is a penny stock, you may have difficulty selling our common stock in the secondary trading market. Our common stock fits the definition of a penny stock and therefore is subject to the rules adopted by the SEC regulating broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. The SEC rules may have the effect of reducing trading activity in our common stock making it more difficult for investors to purchase and sell their shares. The SEC’s rules require a broker or dealer proposing to effect a transaction in a penny stock to deliver the customer a risk disclosure document that provides certain information prescribed by the SEC, including, but not limited to, the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker or dealer must also disclose the aggregate amount of any compensation received or receivable by him in connection with such transaction prior to consummating the transaction. In addition, the SEC’s rules also require a broker or dealer to make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction before completion of the transaction. The existence of the SEC’s rules may result in a lower trading volume of our common stock and lower trading prices. Further, some broker-dealers will not process transactions in penny stocks. Many brokers do not trade in penny stocks and stocks that are not listed on a stock exchange.
Our lack of internal controls over financial reporting may affect the market for and price of our common stock. Our disclosure controls and our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective because of material weaknesses. Since we became engaged in the intellectual property management business in 2008, we have not had the financial resources or personnel to develop or implement systems that would provide us with the necessary information on a timely basis so as to be able to implement financial controls. Our continued poor financial condition together with the fact that we have one full time employee, who is both our chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer, makes it difficult for us to implement a system of internal controls over financial reporting, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to develop and implement the necessary controls. The absence of internal controls over financial reporting may inhibit investors from purchasing our shares and may make it more difficult for us to raise debt or equity financing.
41
Our lack of a full-time chief financial officer could affect our ability to develop financial controls, which could affect the market price for our common stock. We do not have a full-time chief financial officer. At present, our chief executive officer, who does not have an accounting background, is also acting as our chief financial officer. We do not anticipate that we will be able to hire a qualified chief financial officer unless our financial condition improves significantly. The lack of an experienced chief financial officer, together with our lack of internal controls, may impair our ability to raise money through a debt or equity financing, the market for our common stock and our ability to enter into agreements with owners of intellectual property rights.
Our stock price may be volatile and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value. As of the date of this annual report, there has only been limited trading activity in our common stock. There can be no assurance that any significant market will ever develop in our common stock. Because of the low public float and the absence of any significant trading volume, the reported prices may not reflect the price at which you would be able to sell shares if you want to sell any shares you own or buy shares if you wish to buy share. Further, stocks with a low public float may be more subject to manipulation than a stock that has a significant public float. The price may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following, in addition to the risks described above and general market and economic conditions:
| ● | our low stock price, which may result in a modest dollar purchase or sale of our common stock having a disproportionately large effect on the stock price; |
| ● | the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the response to the pandemic on the market both generally and on penny stocks; |
| ● | the market’s perception as to our ability to generate positive cash flow or earnings from our intellectual property portfolios; |
| ● | changes in our or securities analysts’ estimate of our financial performance; |
| ● | our ability or perceived ability to obtain necessary financing for operations and for the monetization of our intellectual property rights; |
| ● | the market’s perception of the effects of legislation or court decisions on our business; |
| ● | the market’s perception that a defendant may obtain a judgement against a subsidiary and foreclose on the intellectual property of the subsidiary, which may result in a default under our agreements with QFL and QF3 and, even if a default is not claimed, QFL or QF3 may not provide financing for us; |
| ● | the effects or perceived effects of the potential convertibility of convertible notes issued by us; |
| ● | the results or anticipated results of litigation by or against us; |
| ● | the anticipated or actual results of our operations; |
| ● | events or conditions relating to the enforcement of intellectual property rights generally; |
43
| ● | changes in market valuations of other intellectual property marketing companies; |
| ● | any discrepancy between anticipated or projected results and actual results of our operations; |
| ● | the market’s perception or our ability to continue to make our filings with the SEC in a timely manner; |
| ● | actions by third parties to either sell or purchase stock in quantities which would have a significant effect on our stock price; and |
| ● | other matters not within our control. |
Raising funds by issuing equity or convertible debt securities could dilute the value of the common stock and impose restrictions on our working capital. If we were to raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, either alone or in connection with a non-equity financing, the value of the then outstanding common stock could decline. If the additional equity securities were issued at a per share price less than the per share value of the outstanding shares, which is customary in the private placement of equity securities, the holders of the outstanding shares would suffer a dilution in value with the issuance of such additional shares. Because of the low price of our stock and our working capital deficiency, the dilution to our stockholders could be significant. We may have difficulty in raising funds through the sale of debt securities because of both our financial position, the lack of any collateral on which a lender may place a value, and the absence of any history of significant monetizing of our intellectual property rights. If we are able to raise funds from the sale of debt securities, the lenders may impose restrictions on our operations and may impair our working capital as we service any such debt obligations.
Because we have a classified board of directors, it may be more difficult for a third-party to obtain control of us. As a result of the approval by our stockholders of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is a classified board, which means that at each annual meeting, the stockholder will vote for only one-third of the board. A classified board of directors may make it more difficult for a third-party to gain control of us which may affect the opportunity of our stockholders to receive any potential benefit which could be available from a third-party seeking to obtain control over us.
We do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We do not own or lease any real property.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not Applicable
44
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information
Our common stock trades on the OTCQB market under the symbol QPRC. Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Stockholders of Record
As of March 31, 2023, we had 417 record holders of our common stock.
Transfer Agent
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, One State Street, 30th floor, New York, New York 10004-1561 is the transfer agent for our common stock.
Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends to date and do not anticipate or contemplate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. It is the present intention of management to utilize all available funds for the development of our business.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Agreements
The following table gives information concerning common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options granted to certain officers, directors and consultants under their respective individual compensation agreements with us as of December 31, 2022.
| Equity Compensation Agreements Information | ||||||||||||
| Plan category | Number
of securities to | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights ($) | Number
of securities | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | — | $ | — | — | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1) | 900,000 | — | 1,760,000 | |||||||||
| Total | 900,000 | $ | — | 1,760,000 | ||||||||
A summary of the status of our equity grants and changes is set forth below:
| (1) | On November 10, 2017, the board of directors adopted the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which we can issue up to 1,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to non-qualified stock options, restricted stock grants and other equity-based incentives. On February 19, 2021, the board of directors amended the Plan increasing the shares we can issue under the plan to 5,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to non-qualified stock options, restricted stock grants and other equity-based incentives, and the amendment to the Plan became effective upon the closing of the agreements with QFL, which was February 22, 2021. At December 31, 2022, 1,760,000 shares are available under the plan. |
45
In connection with the increase in the shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the plan, the board in 2021;
| ● | granted restricted stock grants for 100,000 shares, which vested immediately, to each of three consultants pursuant to agreements with the consultants; |
| ● | granted restricted stock grants for a total of 690,000 shares to our directors, Jon C. Scahill (490,000 shares), Timothy J. Scahill (100,000 shares) and Dr. William R. Carroll (100,000 shares) as compensation for services rendered; |
| ● | granted a restricted stock grant to Ryan T. Logue for 50,000 shares upon his acceptance of his appointment as a director; |
| ● | granted ten-year non-qualified stock options to purchase 300,000 shares to each of three consultants pursuant to agreements with the consultants, the options to vest as provided in their agreements; |
| ● | granted a ten-year non-qualified stock option to purchase 600,000 shares to Jon C. Scahill, which vest in installments as described under Item 11. Executive Compensation. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
We did not sell any unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2022 other than issuances that were reported in our SEC filings.
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated audited financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See “Forward-Looking Statements” and "Risk Factors." Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
Overview
Our principal operations include the development, acquisition, licensing and enforcement of intellectual property rights that are either owned or controlled by us or one of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We currently own, control or manage eighteen intellectual property portfolios, which principally consist of patent rights. As part of our intellectual property asset management activities and in the ordinary course of our business, it has been necessary for either us or the intellectual property owner who we represent to initiate, and it is likely to continue to be necessary to initiate patent infringement lawsuits and engage in patent infringement litigation. We anticipate that our primary source of revenue will come from the grant of licenses to use our intellectual property, including licenses granted as part of the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits.
Our business, like all businesses at the present time, are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the steps taken by states to seek to reduce the spread of the virus. Although we do not manufacture or sell products, the COVID-19 pandemic and the work shutdown imposed in the United States and other countries to limit the spread of the virus can have a negative impact on our business. Our revenue is generated almost exclusively from license fees generated from litigation seeking damages for infringement of our intellectual property rights. The work shutdown has affected the court system, with courts operating on a reduced schedule. As a result, patent infringement actions are likely to be lower priority items in allocation of court resources, with the effect that deadlines are likely to be postponed which delays may give defendants an incentive to delay negotiations or offer a lower amount than they might otherwise accept. These delays continue to have an effect on the court system as a result of the backlog that developed as a result of court closures. In addition, the effect of the COVID-19 and the public response may adversely affect the financial condition and prospects of defendants and potential defendants, which would make it less likely that they would be willing to settle our claim. A number of defendants and potential defendants have filed to take advantage of the Bankruptcy Act or have announced that they may consider such action. If any defendant filed for protection under the Bankruptcy Act, the action would be stayed and we may not be able to obtain a judgment or recover on any judgment.
46
The COVID-19 pandemic and the response to limit the spread of the infection may affect the financial condition of financing sources and the willingness of potential financing sources to provide funding for our litigation. In addition, these factors may affect a law firms’ ability and willingness to provide us with legal services on a contingent or partial contingent. The possibility that a defendant may seek protection under the Bankruptcy Act may make it less likely that a financing source would finance the litigation or that a law firm would work on a contingency or modified contingency basis. Further, as the population of the United States becomes vaccinated and restrictions that had been imposed to address the pandemic are lifted, we cannot assure you that our revenue will increase as a result of the reduction of such restrictions, including courts being open for longer hours and for in person hearings.
Further, to the extent that holders of intellectual property rights see these factors impacting our ability to generate revenue from their intellectual property, they may be reluctant to sell intellectual property to us on terms which are acceptable to us, if at all.
We seek to generate revenue from patent licensing fees relating to our intellectual property portfolio, which includes fees from the licensing of our intellectual property, primarily from litigation relating to enforcement of our intellectual property rights. All of the revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were from patent licensing fees pursuant to the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits, of which approximately 100% was paid to the patent seller, funding sources and legal counsel pursuant to our agreements with patent sellers, funding sources and legal counsel.
Because of the nature of our business transactions to date, we recognize revenues from licensing upon execution of a license agreement following settlement of litigation and not over the life of the patent. Thus, we would recognize revenue when we receive the license fee or settlement payment. Although we intend to seek to develop portfolios of intellectual property rights that provide us for a continuing stream of revenue, to date we have not been successful in doing so, and we do not anticipate that we will be able to generate any significant revenue from licenses that provide a continuing stream of revenue. Thus, to the extent that we continue to generate cash from single payment licenses, our revenue can, and is likely to, vary significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. Our gross profit from license fees reflects any royalties which we pay in connection with our license.
It is generally necessary to commence litigation in order to obtain a recovery for past infringement of, or to license the use of, our intellectual property rights. Intellectual property litigation is very expensive, with no certainty of any recovery. To the extent possible we seek to engage counsel on a contingent fee or partial contingent fee basis, which significantly reduces our litigation cost, but which also reduces the value of the recovery to us. We do not have the resources to enable us to fund the cost of litigation. To the extent that we cannot fund litigation ourselves, we may enter into an agreement with a third-party funding source. Our agreements with the funding sources typically provide that the funding source pays the litigation costs and that the funding source receives a percentage of the recovery, thus reducing our recovery in connection with any settlement of the litigation. In view of our limited cash and our working capital deficiency, we are not able to institute any monetization program that may require litigation unless we engage counsel on a fully contingent basis, or we obtain funding from third-party funding sources. In these cases, counsel may be afforded a greater participation in the recovery and the third-party that funds the litigation would be entitled to participate in any recovery. To the extent that we have agreements with counsel and/or litigation funding sources pursuant to which payments made to them represent a portion of the gross recovery, and such payment is contingent upon a recovery, our revenue from litigation reflects the gross recovery from litigation as licensing fees, and payments to counsel and/or litigation funding sources are reflected as cost of revenue.
Because we were in default under our loans to Intelligent Partners (as successor to United Wireless), with Intelligent Partners having the ability to declare a default on our notes in the principal amount of $4,672,810, and with the possibility of our seeking protection under the Bankruptcy Act, we ceased our monetization activities, since no counsel would represent us on a contingent basis and no potential funding source would provide us with funding in view of the default and possible bankruptcy, and we devoted our efforts in negotiating the agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners. We resumed our monetization activities in February 2021 after we entered into our agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners. However, the intellectual property monetization cycle is lengthy and may ultimately be unsuccessful.
47
Agreements with QF3, QFL and Intelligent Partners
On March 12, 2023, we entered into a funding agreement with QF3.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with QF3, QF3 agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (a) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize; (b) up to $4,000,000 for operating expenses, of which the we have requested and received $500,000 as of March 31, 2023; and (iii) $3,300,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the purchase price of a patent portfolio acquired from Tower. In return we transferred to QF3 a right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. We used $3,300,000 proceeds from the QF3 financing as the cash payment portion of the purchase price of a portfolio acquired from Tower. Our obligations to QF3 are secured by the proceeds from the patents acquired with their funding, the patents and all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing and the proceeds and products of the foregoing. See Item 1. Business – Agreements with QPRC Finance III LLC (“QF3”) for a description of the agreements with QF3.
On February 22, 2021, we entered into a funding agreement with QFL and a restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with QFL, QFL agreed to make available to us a financing facility of: (a) up to $25,000,000 for the acquisition of mutually agreed patent rights that we intend to monetize, of which $2,653,000 has been advanced as of March 31, 2023; (b) up to $2,000,000 for operating expenses, of which the we have requested and received $2,000,000 as of March 31, 2023; and (iii) $1,750,000 to fund the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners. In return we transferred to QFL a right to receive a portion of net proceeds generated from the monetization of those patents. We used $1,750,000 of proceeds from the QFL financing as the cash payment portion of the restructure of our obligations to Intelligent Partners. Our obligations to QFL are secured by the proceeds from the patents acquired with their funding, the patents and all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing and the proceeds and products of the foregoing. We also granted QFL a ten-year warrant to purchase a total of up to 962,463 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of $0.54 per share which may be exercised through February 18, 2031 on a cash or cashless basis, subject to certain limitations on exercisability. See Item 1. Business – Agreements with QFL for a description of the agreements with QFL
Contemporaneously with the execution of the agreement with QFL, we entered into a restructure agreement with Intelligent Partners to eliminate any obligations we had with respect to the outstanding notes and the securities purchase agreement. As part of the restructure of our agreements with Intelligent Partners, we amended the existing MPAs and granted Intelligent Partners certain rights in the monetization proceeds from any new intellectual property we acquire. Under these MPAs, Intelligent Partners receives a 60% interest in the proceeds from our intellectual property owned by the eight Subsidiary Guarantors. Intelligent Partners also participates in the monetization proceeds from new intellectual property that we acquire until the total payments under all the monetization participation agreements equal $2,805,000, as follows: for net proceeds between $0 and $1,000,000, Intelligent Partners receives 10% of the net proceeds realized from new patents, except that if, in any calendar quarter, net proceeds realized by us exceed $1,000,000, Intelligent Partners’ entitlement for that quarter only shall increase to 30% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of $1,000,000 but less than $3,000,000. If in the same calendar quarter, net proceeds exceed $3,000,000, Intelligent Partners’ entitlement for that quarter only shall increase to 50% on the portion of net proceeds in excess of $3,000,000. The payments with respect to the new patents terminate once total payments to Intelligent Partners under all monetization participation agreements reach $2,805,000. The payments to Intellectual Partners with respect new patents are payable from the proceeds which are allocated to us under the QFL agreements, which start after QFL has received a negotiated rate of return. See Item 1 Business – Agreements for Intelligent Partners for a description of the agreements with Intellectual Partners.
Inventor Royalties, Contingent Litigation Funding Fees and Contingent Legal Expenses
In connection with the investment in certain patents and patent rights, certain of our operating subsidiaries executed agreements which grant to the former owners of the respective patents or patent rights, the right to receive inventor royalties based on future net revenues (as defined in the respective agreements) generated as a result of licensing and otherwise enforcing the respective patents or patent portfolios.
Our operating subsidiaries may engage third-party funding sources to provide funding for patent licensing and enforcement. The agreements with the third-party funding sources may provide that the funding source receives a portion of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments. In certain instances, these third-party funding sources are entitled to receive a significant percentage of any proceeds realized until the third-party funder has recouped agreed upon amounts based on formulas set forth in the underlying funding agreement, which may reduce or delay and proceeds due to us.
Our operating subsidiaries may retain the services of law firms in connection with their licensing and enforcement activities. These law firms may be retained on a contingent fee basis whereby the law firms are paid by the funding source on a scaled percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded based on how and when the fees, settlements or judgments are obtained. Depending on the amount of any recovery, it is possible that all the proceeds from a specific settlement may be paid to the funding source and legal counsel.
48
The economic terms of the inventor agreements, funding agreements and contingent legal fee arrangements associated with the patent portfolios owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries, if any, including royalty rates, proceeds sharing rates, contingent fee rates and other terms, vary across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by the operating subsidiaries. Inventor royalties, payments to non-controlling interests, payments to third-party funding providers and contingent legal fees expenses fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios with varying economic terms and obligations generating revenues each period. Inventor royalties, payments to third-party funding sources and contingent legal fees expenses will continue to fluctuate and may continue to vary significantly period to period, based primarily on these factors.
In December 2018, we entered into a funding agreement whereby a third-party agreed to provide funds to us to enable us to support our structured licensing programs for the CMOS and M-RED portfolios. Under the funding agreement, the third-party receives an interest in the proceeds from the programs, and we have no other obligation to the third-party. As of December 31, 2021, the third-party funding source advanced $150,000 for costs and expenses, and has no further obligation to provide additional funds. Under the terms of the funding agreement, the third-party funder is entitled to a priority return of funds advanced from net proceeds recovered. There are no pending actions.
In connection with any litigation seeking to enforce our intellectual property rights, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against us or its operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material, and if required to be paid by us or its operating subsidiaries, could materially harm our operating results and financial position. Since the operating subsidiaries do not have any assets other than the patents, and the Company does not have any available financial resources to pay any judgment which a defendant may obtain against a subsidiary, such a judgement may result in the bankruptcy of the subsidiary and/or the loss of the patents, which are the subsidiaries’ only assets.
At present, we are pursuing litigation with respect to several of our intellectual property portfolios. The actions are described in Item 1. Business. We cannot estimate when or whether we will receive any revenue from these litigations, or whether, in the event we do not prevail, the defendant will not obtain an award of legal fees against our plaintiff subsidiary which could result in the bankruptcy of the subsidiary and a default under our agreements with QFL and Intelligent Partners.
Restricted Stock Grants and Options
In February 2021, we issued restricted stock grants to consultants (300,000 shares) and to our officers and directors (740,000 shares) all of which vested immediately. The value of the shares is be reflected as non-cash compensation in 2021. Also in February 2021, we granted restricted stock options to consultants (900,000 shares) and to our chief executive officer (600,000 shares). With respect to two of the consultants and the chief executive officer the options become cumulatively exercisable as follows: 1/3rd at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, becoming exercisable upon the commencement of trading of the Common Stock on the OTCQB; 1/3rd at an exercise price of $3.00 per share becoming exercisable on the first day on which we file with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q with stockholders’ equity of at least $5,000,000; and 1/3rd at an exercise price of $5.00 per share on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. We will incur non-cash compensation with respect to the value of the options, based of Black-Scholes valuation, as the options become exercisable.
Effects of Possible Delisting of Common Stock on OTCQB
On May 23, 2022, we received notice from OTC Markets Group, that, because the bid price for our common stock had closed below $0.01 per share for more than 30 consecutive days, we no longer met the Standards for Continued Eligibility under the OTC listing standards and, if this deficiency is not met by August 21, 2022, our stock would be removed from the OTCQB marketplace, in which event our common stock will be traded on the OTC Pink market. Our registration rights agreement with QFL provides that, in the event of a failure to comply with certain covenants, which includes the failure of our common stock to be traded on the OTCQB, in addition to any other remedies available to QFL, we are to pay to QFL an amount in cash equal to 2.0% of the aggregate value of QFL’s Registrable Securities, as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, whether or not included in such registration statement, on each of the following dates: (i) the initial day of a maintenance failure; (ii) on the 30th day after the date of such a failure and (iii) every 30th day thereafter (prorated for periods totaling less than thirty (30) days) until such failure is cured. In July 2022, we amended our certificate of incorporation to effect a one-for-100 reverse split of our common stock. We subsequently received advice from OTC Markets Group that the deficiency had been cured. We had previously received a similar notice, and our common stock was taken off the OTCQB effective August 31, 2020, and it traded on the OTC Pink Market until May 7, 2021 when trading resumed on the OTCQB. We cannot assure you that we will continue to meet the requirements for continued listing on the OTCQB, including the maintenance of a bid price of at least $0.01 per share.
49
Portfolios
In August 2021, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Yamaha Corporation and Steinberg Media Technologies GMBH. In March 2022, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Parrot SA, Delair SAS, Drone Volt, SA, EHang Holdings Limited and Flyability SA. In July 2022, STX brought a patent infringement suit in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation et al As of December 31, 2022 the matter against FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation et al has been stayed pending settlement. The matters against Yamaha Corporation, Steinberg Media Technologies GMBH, Parrot SA, Drone Volt, SA, Delair SAS and Flyability SA have been resolved, and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes revenue from any related settlement.
In September 2021, M-RED Inc. brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Biostar Microtech International Corp. and Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. As of December 31, 2022, those matters have been resolved, and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes revenue from any related settlements.
In November 2021, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Trend Micro Incorporated. In March 2022, Trend Micro, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL in the U.S. District for the Western District of Texas seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents in suit. In February 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Checkpoint Software Technologies Ltd. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, TLL voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, the action against Palo Alto Networks, Inc. In March 2022, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. filed a complaint against TLL and the Company in the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York seeking declaratory judgement of non-infringement of the patents in suit. In May 2022, Trend Micro Inc. filed a motion with the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking to have the pending actions consolidated into a centralized multidistrict litigation for pretrial proceedings. In August 2022, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all actions in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas. In October 2022, TLL brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Fortinet, inc., Crowdstrike, Inc. et.al., and Musarubra US, LLC.
In March 2022, LSC brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against Microsoft Corporation, Google LLC, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. et.al. In November 2022, Google LLC filed a petition before the patent trial and appeal board for inter partes review of US Patent No. 10,154,092.
On January 27, 2022, the Company acquired, via assignment from Intellectual Ventures Assets 181 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 174 LLC, all right title and interest to four patent portfolios consisting of fifteen United States patents and three foreign patents for a purchase price of $1,060,000. The Company requested and received a capital advance in the amount of the $1,060,000 purchase price from the facility with QFL. The patents were assigned to our wholly owned subsidiaries Tyche Licensing LLC and Deepwell IP LLC. In May 2022, Tyche brought patent infringement suits in the U.S. District for the Eastern District of Texas against MediaTek Inc., Realtek Semiconductor Corporation, Texas Instruments Incorporated, Infineon Technologies AG and STMicroelectronics NV et. al. In May 2022, Tyche voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, the action against STMicroelectronics NV et .al. In May 2022, STMicroelectronics, Inc. filed an action for declaratory judgement of non-infringement in the U.S. District for the Northern District of Texas, the action was dismissed without prejudice in July 2022. In September 2022, the action against Texas Instruments Incorporated was dismissed with prejudice. As of December 31, 2022 the actions against MediaTek Inc. and Infineon Technologies AG have been stayed pending settlement discussions, which are pending.
In June 2022, MML and AI agreed to amend the Purchase Agreement to add two additional patent families for an additional $92,000. We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of $92,000, which we used to make payment to AI in August 2022 pursuant to the amendment to the Purchase Agreement.
In July 2022, EDI acquired, via assignment from Edward D. Ioli Trust, all right title and interest to a portfolio of five United States patents relating to a system and method for controlling vehicles and for providing assistance to operated vehicles (“EDI Portfolio”) for a purchase price consisting of 50% of the net proceeds resulting from monetization of the EDI Portfolio.
In July 2022, we entered into a purchase agreement with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company for the purchase of eight United States Patents for a purchase price of $350,000. We paid $35,000 upon execution of the agreement with the balance payable within 30 days. We requested and received a capital advance from QFL in the amount of $350,000, which was used to make payment of the balance in August 2022 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement.
50
Results of Operations
The years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Revenues (patent licensing fees) | $ | 451,194 | $ | 2,050,000 | ||||
| Cost of revenue (litigation and licensing expenses) | 303,671 | 1,314,928 | ||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 1,979,718 | 3,848,611 | ||||||
| Loss from operations | (1,832,195 | ) | (3,113,539 | ) | ||||
| Other income (expense) | ||||||||
| Gain on forgiveness of debt | — | 1,850,018 | ||||||
| Gain on settlement of accounts payable | — | 1,725,965 | ||||||
| Warrant expense | — | (1,154,905 | ) | |||||
| Change in fair market value of warrant liability | 1,490,759 | (481,282 | ) | |||||
| Loss on conversion of debt | — | (305,556 | ) | |||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | — | (730,378 | ) | |||||
| Loss on impairment of assets | — | (1,651,614 | ) | |||||
| Interest expense | (413,333 | ) | (291,702 | ) | ||||
| Total other income (expense) | 1,077,426 | (1,039,454 | ) | |||||
| Loss before income tax | (754,769 | ) | (4,152,993 | ) | ||||
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 1,253 | (1,806 | ) | |||||
| Net loss | $ | (753,516 | ) | $ | (4,154,799 | ) | ||
We generated revenues of approximately $451,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $2,050,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021. Our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022 was generated from licenses pursuant to the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits in the M-RED, AMI and STX portfolios. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 resulted from the licenses granted pursuant to the settlement of patent infringement lawsuits in the CXT Portfolio, the M-RED Portfolio, the Peregrin Portfolio and the Soundstreak Portfolio litigations. Cost of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was approximately $304,000 and $1,315,000, respectively. The timing and amount of our revenue is dependent upon the results of litigation seeking to enforce our intellectual property rights, and we cannot predict when or whether we will have a recovery and how much of the recovery will be received by us after payments to legal counsel, to our funding sources, to inventors/former patent owners and to Intelligent Partners who have an interest in our share of the recovery from certain patent portfolios after deducting payments due to counsel and the litigation funding source.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased by approximately $1,869,000, or approximately 49%, compared to the year ended December, 2021. Our principal expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 was amortization of intangible assets of approximately $910,000 and professional fees of $513,000. Our compensation expense includes stock-based compensation of approximately $117,000 and $1,916,000 for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Other income and expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 included a gain on change in fair value of warrant liability of approximately $1,491,000. We realized a loss on change in fair value of warrant liability of approximately $481,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The fair value of the warrant liability is affected by the price of our common stock, so the liability increases as the stock price goes up, resulting in an expense, and decreases as the stock price goes down resulting in income from change in warrant liability. Other expense also reflects interest expense of approximately $413,000 for the year ended December 31, 2022 and approximately $292,000 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in interest expense reflects the accrued interest payable on the principal amount of QFL facility. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we realized a gain on settlement of accounts payable of approximately $1,726,000 and a gain on forgiveness of debt of approximately $1,850,000. Other expense during year ended December 31, 2021 also included an approximately $730,000 loss on extinguishment of debt, an approximately $306,000 loss on conversion of debt, an approximately $1,652,000 loss on impairment of assets, and warrant expense of approximately $1,155,000.
51
We incurred income tax benefit (expense) of approximately $1,000 and $(2,000) for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
As a result of the foregoing, we realized a net loss of approximately $754,000, or $0.14 per share (basic and diluted), for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to net loss of approximately $4,155,000, or $0.81 per share (basic and diluted), for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2022, we had current assets of approximately $96,000, and current liabilities of approximately $9,586,000. Our current liabilities include funding liabilities of approximately $5,453,000 payable to QFL, a non-interest bearing total monetization proceeds obligation (the “TMPO”) to Intelligent Partners in the amount of approximately $2,797,000 under the Restructure Agreement, both of which are only payable from money generated from the monetization of intellectual property, loans payable of approximately $138,000, accounts payable and accrued liabilities of approximately $149,000, warrant liability of approximately $145,000, and accrued interest of approximately $905,000. As of December 31, 2022, we have an accumulated deficit of approximately $26,189,000 and a negative working capital of approximately $9,490,000. Other than salary and pension benefits to our chief executive officer, we do not contemplate any other material operating expense requiring cash in the near future other than normal general and administrative expenses, including expenses relating to our status as a public company filing reports with the SEC.
The following table shows the summary cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Cash flows used in operating activities | $ | (914,178 | ) | $ | (49,673 | ) | ||
| Cash flows used in investing activities | (1,502,000 | ) | (1,150,000 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities | 2,241,939 | 1,216,651 | ||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash | (174,239 | ) | 16,978 | |||||
| Cash at beginning of year | 264,840 | 247,862 | ||||||
| Cash at end of year | $ | 90,601 | $ | 264,840 | ||||
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in generating future revenues, in obtaining additional debt or equity financing or that such additional debt or equity financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all, or that we will be able to obtain any third-party funding the value of anything received from the monetization of the intellectual property rights covered by the Security Agreement; in connection with any of our intellectual property portfolios or that we will receive any of the proceeds of any litigation settlements after making all required payments to counsel and funding sources and payments to Intelligent Partners. We have no credit facilities. Although our agreements provide for QFL or QF3 to provide us with funding to acquire intellectual property rights, subject to QFL’s or QF3’s approval, it does not provide for financing the litigation necessary for the monetization of the intellectual property rights. We do not have any credit facilities or any arrangements for us to finance the litigation necessary to monetize our intellectual property rights other than contingent fee arrangements with counsel with respect to our pending litigation. If we do not secure contingent representation or obtain litigation financing, we may be unable to monetize our intellectual property.
We cannot predict the success of any pending or future litigation. Typically, our agreements with the funding sources provide that the funding sources will participate in any recovery which is generated. We believe that our financial condition, our history of losses and negative cash flow from operations, and our low stock price make it difficult for us to raise funds in the debt or equity markets.
As noted below, there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
52
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates including the allowance for doubtful accounts, income taxes and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with US GAAP and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X of the SEC, and present the financial statements of the Company and our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of patents which are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives or statutory lives whichever is shorter and are reviewed for impairment upon any triggering event that may impact the assets' ultimate recoverability as prescribed under the guidance related to impairment of long-lived assets. Costs incurred to acquire patents, including legal costs, are also capitalized as long-lived assets and amortized on a straight-line basis with the associated patent.
Patents include the cost of patents or patent rights (collectively “patents”) acquired from third-parties or acquired in connection with business combinations. Patent acquisition costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their remaining economic useful lives, ranging from one to ten years. Certain patent application and prosecution costs incurred to secure additional patent claims, that based on management’s estimates are deemed to be recoverable, are capitalized and amortized over the remaining estimated economic useful life of the related patent portfolio.
Warrant Liability
We reflect a warrant liability with respect to warrants for which the number of shares underlying the warrants is not fixed until the date of the initial exercise. The amount of the liability is determined at the end of each fiscal period and the period-to-period change in the amount of warrant liability is reflected as a gain or loss in warrant liability and is included under other income (expense).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing US GAAP that require the use of fair value measurements which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
In addition, FASB ASC 825-10-25 “Fair Value Option” was effective for January 1, 2008. ASC 825-10-25 expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
53
Stock-Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” which prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based payment transactions in which employee and non-employee services, are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights. Stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).
Long-Lived Assets
We review for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable, pursuant to guidance established in ASC 360-10-35-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. We recognize an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Under Topic 606, revenue is recognized when there is a contract which has commercial substance which is approved by both parties and identifies the rights of the parties and the payment terms. We adopted Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method, with no impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Patent Licensing Fees
Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised bundled intellectual property rights and other contractual performance obligations to licensees in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those intellectual property rights. Revenue contracts that provide promises to grant “the right” to use intellectual property rights as they exist at the point in time at which the intellectual property rights are granted, are accounted for as performance obligations satisfied at a point in time and revenue is recognized at the point in time that the applicable performance obligations are satisfied and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.
For the periods presented, revenue contracts executed by us primarily provided for the payment of contractually determined, one-time, paid-up license fees in consideration for the grant of certain intellectual property rights for patented technologies owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries. Intellectual property rights granted included the following, as applicable: (i) the grant of a non-exclusive, retroactive and future license to manufacture and/or sell products covered by patented technologies, (ii) a covenant-not-to-sue, (iii) the release of the licensee from certain claims, and (iv) the dismissal of any pending litigation. The intellectual property rights granted were perpetual in nature, extending until the legal expiration date of the related patents. The individual intellectual property rights are not accounted for as separate performance obligations, as (a) the nature of the promise, within the context of the contract, is to transfer combined items to which the promised intellectual property rights are inputs and (b) our promise to transfer each individual intellectual property right described above to the customer is not separately identifiable from other promises to transfer intellectual property rights in the contract.
54
Since the promised intellectual property rights are not individually distinct, we combined each individual IP right in the contract into a bundle of IP rights that is distinct, and accounted for all of the intellectual property rights promised in the contract as a single performance obligation. The intellectual property rights granted were “functional IP rights” that have significant standalone functionality. Our subsequent activities do not substantively change that functionality and do not significantly affect the utility of the IP to which the licensee has rights. Our subsidiaries have no further obligation with respect to the grant of intellectual property rights, including no express or implied obligation to maintain or upgrade the technology, or provide future support or services. The contracts provide for the grant (i.e. transfer of control) of the licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other significant deliverables upon execution of the contract. Licensees legally obtain control of the intellectual property rights upon execution of the contract. As such, the earnings process is complete and revenue is recognized upon the execution of the contract, when collectability is probable and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue contracts generally provide for payment of contractual amounts within 30-90 days of execution of the contract. Contractual payments made by licensees are generally non-refundable. We do not have any significant payment terms, as payment is received shortly after goods are delivered or services are provided, therefore there is no significant financing component or consideration payable to the customer in these transactions.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenues mainly includes expenses incurred in connection with our patent enforcement activities, such as legal fees, consulting costs, patent maintenance, royalty fees for acquired patents and other related expenses. Cost of revenue does not include expenses related to patent amortization, integration or support, as these are included in general and administrative expenses.
Commitments and Contingencies
In connection with the investment in certain patents and patent rights, certain of our operating subsidiaries may execute related agreements which grant to the inventors and/or former owners of the respective patents or patent rights, the right to receive a percentage of future net revenues (as defined in the respective agreements) generated as a result of licensing and otherwise enforcing the respective patents or patent portfolios.
Our operating subsidiaries may retain the services of law firms that specialize in patent licensing and enforcement and patent law in connection with their licensing and enforcement activities. These law firms may be retained on a contingent fee basis whereby such law firms are paid a percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded.
Our operating subsidiaries may engage with funding sources that specialize in providing financing for patent licensing and enforcement. These litigation finance firms may be engaged on a non-recourse basis whereby such litigation finance firms are paid a percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded in exchange for providing funding for legal fees and out of pocket expenses incurred as a result of the licensing and enforcement activities.
The economic terms of the inventor agreements, operating agreements, contingent legal fee arrangements and litigation financing agreements associated with the patent portfolios owned or controlled by our operating subsidiaries, if any, including royalty rates, contingent fee rates and other terms, vary across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by such operating subsidiaries and are included in cost of revenues as litigation and licensing expenses. Inventor/former owner royalties, payments to non-controlling interests, contingent legal fees expenses and litigation finance expenses fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios with varying economic terms and obligations generating revenues each period. Inventor/former owner royalties, contingent legal fees expenses and litigation finance expenses will continue to fluctuate and may continue to vary significantly period to period, based primarily on these factors.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that there are any recently issued, but not effective, accounting standards which, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on our financial statements.
55
Going Concern
We have an accumulated deficit of approximately $26,189,000 and negative working capital of approximately $9,490,000 as of December 31, 2022. Because of our continuing losses, our working capital deficiency, the uncertainty of future revenue, our obligations to QF3, QFL, Intelligent Partners, our low stock price and the absence of a trading market in our common stock, our ability to raise funds in the equity market or from lenders is severely impaired. These conditions, together with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the steps taken by the states to slow the spread of the virus and its effect on our business as well as any adverse consequences which would result from our failure to remain listed on the OTCQB, raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our revenue is generated almost exclusively from license fees generated from litigation seeking damages for infringement of our intellectual property rights. Although we may seek to raise funds and to obtain third-party funding for litigation to enforce its intellectual property rights, the availability of such funds is uncertain. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as stockholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements start on Page F-1.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
On June 7, 2021, MaloneBailey, LLP (“MaloneBailey”) advised us that it was resigning, effective June 7, 2021, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. During our two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period through the date of such resignation, there were no disagreements with MaloneBailey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MaloneBailey would have caused them to make reference thereto in connection with their report on the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Further, during such period, there were no reportable events of the type described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, except for the material weaknesses described in Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management’s Conclusions Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”), as defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2022, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Disclosure Controls evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer, who is the same person and our sole full-time employee. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, our chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer concluded that, due to our limited internal audit function and our very limited staff, our disclosure controls were not effective as of December 31, 2022, such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
56
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act. Our management is also required to assess and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”). Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. During our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, management identified material weaknesses related to (i) our internal audit functions (ii) inadequate levels of review of the financial statements and (iii) a lack of segregation of duties within accounting functions. Therefore, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2022.
Management has determined that our internal controls contain material weaknesses due to the absence of segregation of duties, as well as lack of qualified accounting personnel and excessive reliance on third-party consultants for accounting, financial reporting and related activities. The lack of any separation of duties, with the same person, who is our only full time employee, serving as both chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer, and who does not have an accounting background, makes it unlikely that we will be able to implement effective internal controls over financial reporting in the near future.
Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties is not possible. However, to the extent possible, we plan to implement procedures to assure that the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions will be performed by separate individuals if and when we have sufficient income to enable us to hire such individuals, and we cannot give any assurance that we will be able to hire such personnel. Since we became engaged in the intellectual property management business in 2008, we have not had the financial resources to develop or implement systems that would provide us with the necessary information on a timely basis so as to be able to implement financial controls. Our financial condition makes it difficult for us to implement a system of internal controls over financial reporting.
Until we generate significantly greater revenues and employ accounting personnel, it is doubtful that we will be able implement any system which provides us with any degree of internal controls over financial reporting. Due to the nature of this material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that misstatements which could be material to our annual or interim financial statements could not be prevented or detected.
A material weakness (within the meaning of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5) is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the period ended December 31, 2022, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
Not applicable.
57
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The following table presents information with respect to our officers and directors:
| Name | Age | Position(s) | ||
| Jon C. Scahill | 46 | Chief executive officer, president, acting chief financial officer, secretary and director | ||
| Timothy J. Scahill | 55 | Chief technology officer and director | ||
| Dr. William Ryall Carroll | 47 | Director | ||
| Ryan T. Logue | 42 | Director |
Prior to January 2016, our directors were elected to serve for a term of one year until our next annual meeting of the stockholders or unless he resigns earlier. On January 22, 2016, following approval by the stockholders, we amended and restated our certificate of incorporation. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board of directors. Our classified board of directors has three classes of directors – Class I directors, Class II directors and Class III directors. On July 27, 2022, the Company held its 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. At the meeting, the stockholders voted on the election of two Class I directors, one Class II director and one Class III director.
Jon C. Scahill, a Class I director, has been president and chief executive officer since January 2014 and a director since 2007. He was appointed secretary in April 2014. He also served as president and chief operating officer from May 2007 to December 2013. From December 2006 to May 2007, Mr. Scahill was founder and managing director of the Urban-Rigney Group, LLC, a private consultancy specializing in new business/new venture development, operations optimization, and strategic analysis. Prior to launching his consultancy business, Mr. Scahill held numerous positions in sales and marketing, technical management, and product development in the consumer products/flexible packaging arena. Mr. Scahill holds a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Rochester, an MBA in finance, strategy and operations from Rochester’s Simon Graduate School of Business and a JD from Pace Law School. Mr. Scahill is admitted to practice in New York, Florida and the District of Columbia, and he is a registered patent attorney admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Timothy J. Scahill, a Class II director, has a director since October 2014 and our chief technology officer since 2007. Mr. Scahill is also currently a managing partner of Managed Services Team LLC, an IT services provider. Prior to Managed Services Team, he was president of Layer 8 Group, Inc. from August 2005 to December 2012, at which time Layer 8 merged with Structured Technologies Inc. to form Managed Services Team LLC. In his roles he has taken the responsibility for business strategy, acquisition, execution, as well as financial management. His entrepreneurial acumen and proven record of successful management with sole discretionary responsibility, demonstrate the scope of his capability and his value to delivering results. He serves on the boards of the Upstate New York Technology Council, is an investor in Greater Rochester Enterprise, Pariemus Rochester and also serves on the Corporate Advisory Board for Habitat for Humanity. He is a member of Greater Rochester Enterprise and CEO Roundtable Chair.
Dr. William Ryall Carroll, a Class III director, has been a director since October 2014. Dr. Carroll has been associate professor and chairman of the marketing department at St. John’s University College of Business since July 2014. From September 2008 until June 2014, Dr. Carroll was an assistant professor in the marketing department of St. John’s University College of Business. Dr. Carroll is founder, chief executive officer and owner of Raiserve Inc., a web-based platform for monetizing non-profit programmatic work in the area of service formed in October 2014. Dr. Carroll’s research focuses on consumer behavior and behavioral decision theory. Dr. Carroll’s work has been published in top academic journals including the Journal of Advertising, Marketing Letters, as well in books such as Psycholinguistic Phenomena in Marketing Communications. In addition to his research Dr. Carroll has taught Marketing at the executive, graduate and undergraduate level across in the United States, Europe and Asia. Prior to pursuing his academic career, Dr. Carroll held various marketing positions at NOP Worldwide Marketing Research Company and Ralston Purina Company. Dr. Carroll earned his BA in Economics from the University of Rochester, his MS in Marketing Research from the University of Texas in Arlington, and his PhD from City University of New York – Baruch College.
58
Ryan T. Logue, a Class I director, is an investment advisory representative Lincoln Investment, a position he has held since 2019. Prior to joining Lincoln Investment, he spent 16 years with Morgan Stanley in the private wealth management department. Mr. Logue has spent the majority of his career focused on investing in both public and private opportunities department. Mr. Logue graduated with a BA from Colgate University and an MBA from Columbia University and has previously served on the board of the Columbia Alumni Association of Fairfield County.
Timothy J. Scahill and Jon C. Scahill are first cousins.
Director Independence
Dr. Carroll and Mr. Logue are “independent” directors based on the definition of independence in the listing standards of the NYSE.
Code of Ethics
We have not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, since we have been focusing our efforts on developing our business. We expect to adopt a code as we develop our business.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We do not have any committees of our board of directors.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires executive officers and directors of issuers whose securities are registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of the our common stock and other equity securities, on Form 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Because our common stock is not registered pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act, our officers, directors and 10% stockholders are not required to make such filings.
59
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, earned by or paid to our executive officers.
| Name & Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus Awards | Stock Awards | Options/ Warrant Awards | Non-Equity Plan Compensation | Nonqualified Deferred Earnings | All Other Compensation (3) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jon Scahill, | 2022 | $ | 300,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 61,000 | $ | 361,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| CEO and President | 2021 | $ | 300,000 | $ | — | $ | 588,000 | (1) | $ | 240,000 | (2) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 58,000 | $ | 1,186,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the value of 490,000 shares granted Mr. Scahill in 2021 |
| (2) | Represents the value of an option to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock |
| (3) | Represents the payments made by the Company under the SEP IRA adopted in March 2020 |
Employment Agreements
Pursuant to the restated employment agreement, dated November 30, 2014, we agreed to employ Jon C. Scahill as president and chief executive officer for a term of three years, commencing January 1, 2014, and continuing on a year-to-year basis unless terminated by either party on not less than 90 days’ notice prior to the expiration of the initial term or any one-year extension. The agreement provides for an annual salary of $252,000, which may be increased, but not decreased, by the board or the compensation committee. In March 2023, the board of directors increased Mr. Scahill’s annual salary to $600,000, effective January 1, 2016. Mr. Scahill is entitled to a bonus if we meet or exceed performance criteria established by the compensation committee. In August 2016, the board of directors approved annual bonus compensation to Mr. Scahill equal to 30% of the amount by which our consolidated income before income taxes exceeds $500,000, but, if we are subject to the limitation on deductibility of executive compensation pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the bonus cannot exceed the amount which would be deductible pursuant to Section 162(m). Mr. Scahill is also eligible to participate in any executive incentive plans which we may adopt. Pursuant to the agreement, we issued to Mr. Scahill warrants to purchase 600,000 shares, representing the warrants that had been previously covered in his prior employment agreement, but which had never been issued, and we issued to Mr. Scahill a restricted stock grant for 300,000 shares which vested on January 15, 2015. In the event that we terminate Mr. Scahill’s employment other than for cause or as a result of his death or disability, we will pay him severance equal to his salary for the balance of the term and, if he received a bonus for the previous year, an amount equal to that bonus, as well as continuation of his insurance benefits. Mr. Scahill also waived accrued compensation of $1,167,705, representing his accrued salary for periods prior to January 1, 2014. The restated employment agreement also includes mutual general releases between Mr. Scahill and us. In March 2020, the Company adopted a SEP IRA plan for its employees. Mr. Scahill is our only employee covered by the plan.
60
Pension Benefits
In March 2020, we adopted a SEP IRA plan for our employees pursuant to which we deposit into a SEP IRA account of each of our participating employees a percentage of the employee’s compensation, subject to statutory limitations on the amount of the contribution all as set forth in the IRS Form 5305-SEP presented to and reviewed by the directors of this Corporation. For the year ending December 31, 2022 the percentage was set at 20%. Mr. Scahill is our only employee covered by the plan.
2017 Equity Incentive Plan
On November 10, 2017, the board of directors adopted the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which 1,500,000 shares of common stock may be issued. In February 2021, the board amended the Plan to increase the number of shares subject to the plan to 5,000,000. Set forth below is a summary of the plan, as amended, but this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the plan, a copy of which is included as an exhibit to this annual report.
The plan provides for the grant of non-qualified options, stock grants and other equity-based incentives to employees, including officers, directors and consultants.
On February 19, 2021, the board of directors:
| ● | granted restricted stock grants for 100,000 shares, which vested in full immediately upon issuance, to each of three consultants pursuant to agreements with the consultants; |
| ● | granted restricted stock grants for a total of 690,000 shares, which vested in full immediately upon issuance, to our directors, Jon C. Scahill (490,000 shares), Timothy J. Scahill (100,000 shares) and Dr. William R. Carroll (100,000 shares) as compensation for services rendered; |
| ● | granted a restricted stock grant to Ryan T. Logue for 50,000 shares upon his acceptance of his appointment as a director; |
| ● | granted non-qualified ten-year stock options to purchase 300,000 shares to each of three consultants pursuant to agreements with the consultants, the options to vest as provided in their agreements. |
| ● | granted a non-qualified ten-year stock option to purchase 600,000 shares to Jon C. Scahill, which vest in installments as described under Item 11. Executive Compensation. |
The options granted to two of the consultants become exercisable as follows:
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share becoming exercisable upon the commencement of trading of the Common Stock on the OTCQB which occurred on May 7, 2021. |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, becoming exercisable on the first day on which the Company files with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q which stockholders’ equity of at least $5,000,000, and |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share becoming exercisable on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. |
61
The options granted the third consultant become exercisable as follows:
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share became exercisable on February 22, 2022, which was the first anniversary of the date of the agreement. |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share became exercisable on February 22, 2023, which was the second anniversary of the date of the agreement; and |
| ● | 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share will become exercisable on February 22, 2024, which will be the third anniversary of the date of the agreement. |
The options granted to Jon C. Scahill become exercisable as follows:
| ● | 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share becoming exercisable upon the commencement of trading of the Common Stock on the OTCQB, which occurred on May 7, 2021. |
| ● | 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, becoming exercisable on the first day on which the Company files with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q which stockholders’ equity of at least $5,000,000, and |
| ● | 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share becoming exercisable on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information as to the outstanding equity awards granted to and held by the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table as of December 31, 2022.
| Option awards | ||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable | Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable | Equity incentive plan awards: Number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options (#) | Option exercise price ($) | Option expiration date | |||||||||||||
| Jon Scahill | 200,000 | (1) | 200,000 | (2) | $ | 1.00 | 2/22/2031 | |||||||||||
| 200,000 | (3) | $ | 3.00 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents 200,000 shares granted to Mr. Scahill on February 22, 2021 at an exercise price of $1.00 per share becoming exercisable upon the commencement of trading of the Common Stock on the OTCQB. The Company regained such compliance on May 7, 2021, at which time the common stock recommenced trading on the OTCQB. |
| (2) | Represents 200,000 shares granted to Mr. Scahill on February 22, 2021 at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, becoming exercisable on the first day on which the Company files with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q which stockholders” equity of at least $5,000,000 |
| (3) | Represents 200,000 shares granted to Mr. Scahill on February 22, 2021 at an exercise price of $5.00 per share becoming exercisable on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange |
62
Directors’ Compensation
We do not have any agreements or formal plan for compensating our directors for their service in their capacity as directors, although our board has, and may in the future, award stock grants or options to purchase shares of common stock to our directors. None of our directors received compensation during 2022.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table provides information as to shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 30, 2023, by:
| ● | Each director; |
| ● | Each current officer named in the summary compensation table; |
| ● | Each person owning of record or known by us, based on information provided to us by the persons named below, at least 5% of our common stock; and |
| ● | All directors and officers as a group. |
For purposes of the following table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or sole or shared investment power with respect to a security, or any combination thereof, and the right to acquire such power (for example, through the exercise of warrants granted by us) within 60 days of March 30, 2023.
| Name and Address (1) of Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | % of Class | ||||||
| Jon C. Scahill | 1,600,000 | 28.9 | % | |||||
| Andrew C. Fitton (2) 300 Bowie St., Apt. 2803 Austin, TX 78703 | 1,174,074 | 22.0 | % | |||||
| Intelligent Partners, LLC (3) 300 Bowie St., Apt. 2803 Austin, TX 78703 | 500,000 | 8.6 | % | |||||
| Michael R. Carper (4) 13218 Tamayo Drive Austin, TX 78729 | 788,889 | 14.8 | % | |||||
| Dr. William Ryall Carroll | 154,846 | 2.9 | % | |||||
| Timothy J. Scahill | 151,050 | 2.8 | % | |||||
| Ryan T. Logue | 54,976 | 1.0 | % | |||||
| All officers and directors as a group (four individuals) | 1,960,873 | 35.4 | % | |||||
| (1) | The address of Jon C. Scahill, Dr. Carroll, Timothy J. Scahill and Ryan T. Logue is c/o Quest Patent Research Corporation, 411 Theodore Fremd Ave., Suite 206S, Rye, New York 10580-1411. |
| (2) | Represents (a) 674,074 shares owned by Mr. Fitton and (b) 500,000 shares issuable upon exercise of an option held by Intelligent Partners. |
| (3) | Represents 500,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options held by Intelligent Partners. Andrew C. Fitton and Michael R. Carper, as the members of Intelligent Partners, have the joint right to vote and dispose of the shares owned by Intelligent Partners. |
| (4) | Represents (a) 288,889 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Carper and (b) 500,000 shares issuable upon exercise of an option held by Intelligent Partners. |
63
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Related Transactions
In prior periods, we incurred interest expense on our 10% notes issued to United Wireless pursuant to the securities purchase agreement dated October 22, 2015 more fully described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. The notes were extinguished in February 2021, and we did not incur interest expense on the notes for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Reference is made to the discussion of our agreements with Intelligent Partners, Mr. Fitton and Mr. Carper under “Item 1. Business – Agreements with Intelligent Partners.”
Managed Services Team LLC, an entity for which Timothy Scahill, our chief technology officer and a director, is a managing partner, provides information technology services to us. We are obligated to pay for these services at usual and customary rates. The cost of these services was approximately $205 and $434 for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
During 2021, we contracted with a law firm more than 10% owned, but not controlled, by the father-in-law of the chief executive officer. The firm is engaged on a contingent fee basis and serves as escrow agent in connection with monetization of our patents in matters where the firm is serving as counsel to us. In connection with the engagement, we recorded patent service costs of approximately $85,000 and $763,000 for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 respectively. In prior periods, we engaged a firm at which the father-in-law of the chief executive was formerly a partner. Because his interest in the prior firm was less than 10%, the prior firm was not considered a related party in prior periods.
Director Independence
Dr. Carroll and Mr. Logue are “independent” directors based on the definition of independence in the listing standards of the NYSE.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following table sets forth the fees billed by our independent accountants, Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman P.A. (“RRBB”) and MaloneBailey for 2022 and 2021 for the categories of services indicated.
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Audit fees – MaloneBailey | $ | 8,000 | $ | 71,000 | ||||
| Audit fees – RRBB | 100,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
| Audit – related fees | — | — | ||||||
| Tax fees | — | — | ||||||
| All other fees – MaloneBailey | 8,000 | 6,500 | ||||||
Audit fees consist of fees related to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements.
All other fees relate to professional services rendered in connection with our registration statement.
Our policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Since we do not have an audit committee, the pre-approval is made by the board of directors. Our board approved all services that our independent accountants provided to us in the past two fiscal years.
64
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
65
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was filed by the Company on December 15, 2014. |
| (2) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed with the SEC on October 28, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (3) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2013, which was filed with the SEC on April 10, 2015. |
| (4) | Filed as exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1, which was filed with the SEC on February 3, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (5) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed with the SEC on January 26, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, which was filed by the Company on April 2, 2018. |
| (7) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 24, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was filed by the Company on April 15, 2021. |
| (9) | Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 16, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference. |
| (10) | Filed herewith |
◦
| † | Certain confidential information has been deleted from this Exhibit. |
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
66
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 31, 2023
| QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION | ||
| By: | /s/ Jon C. Scahill | |
| Jon C. Scahill | ||
| Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Jon C. Scahill as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ Jon C. Scahill | Director, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer, and President (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer) | March 31, 2023 | ||
| Jon C. Scahill | ||||
| /s/ Timothy J. Scahill | Director | March 31, 2023 | ||
| Timothy J. Scahill | ||||
| /s/ Dr. William Ryall Carroll | Director | March 31, 2023 | ||
| Dr. William Ryall Carroll | ||||
| /s/ Ryan T. Logue | Director | March 31, 2023 | ||
| Ryan T. Logue |
67
QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION
DECEMBER 31, 2022
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Quest Patent Research Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Quest Patent Research Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion is not modified with respect to that matter.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. We determined that there were no critical audit matters.
| /s/ | |
| We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021. | |
| March 31, 2023 | |
F-2
QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | ||||||
| Other current assets | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $ | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ||||||||
| Loans payable | ||||||||
| Funding liability | ||||||||
| Loan payable - related party | ||||||||
| Warrant liability | ||||||||
| Accrued interest | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| Non-current liabilities | ||||||||
| Loan payable – SBA | ||||||||
| Purchase price of patents | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 2) | ||||||||
| Stockholders’ deficit: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, par value $ | ||||||||
| Common stock, par value $ | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total Quest Patent Research Corporation stockholders’ deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Non-controlling interest in subsidiary | ||||||||
| Total stockholders’ deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | $ | $ | ||||||
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Revenues | ||||||||
| Patent licensing fees | $ | $ | ||||||
| Cost of revenue | ||||||||
| Litigation and licensing expenses | ||||||||
| Gross margin | ||||||||
| Operating expenses | ||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||
| Loss from operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Other income (expense) | ||||||||
| Gain on forgiveness of debt | ||||||||
| Gain on settlement of accounts payable | ||||||||
| Warrant expense | ( | ) | ||||||
| Change in fair market value of warrant liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on conversion of debt | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on impairment of assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total other income (expense) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss before income tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Income tax benefit (expense) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-In | Accumulated | Non-controlling Interest in | Total Stockholders’ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Subsidiaries | Deficit | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2020 | $ | | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||
| Restricted shares issued for services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option issued for debt extinguishment | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2021 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effect of reverse split | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balances as of December 31, 2022 | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
| Amortization of debt discount | ||||||||
| Change in fair market value of warrant liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Stock-based compensation | ||||||||
| Warrant expense | ||||||||
| Gain on settlement of accounts payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Gain on forgiveness of debt | ( | ) | ||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | ||||||||
| Loss on conversion of debt | ||||||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | ||||||||
| Loss on impairment of assets | ||||||||
| Bad debt expense | ||||||||
| Change in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts receivable | ||||||||
| Accrued interest | ||||||||
| Other current assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | ( | ) | ||||||
| Patents loan payable | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of patents | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Payments on loans - related party | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Payment on loan payable - third party | ( | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from funding liability | ||||||||
| Payment of funding liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Payment of purchase price of patents | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | ||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
| Shares issued for conversion of debt | $ | $ | ||||||
| Interest added to principal | $ | $ | ||||||
| Options granted for settlement of debt | $ | $ | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
| Income taxes | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
QUEST PATENT RESEARCH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
The Company is a Delaware corporation, incorporated on July 17, 1987 and has been engaged in the intellectual property monetization business since 2008.
As used herein, “we”, “us”, “our”, the “Company” refer to Quest Patent Research Corporation and its wholly and majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. All intellectual property acquisition, development, licensing and enforcement activities are conducted by the Company’s wholly and majority-owned and controlled operating subsidiaries.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Financial Statement Presentation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and present the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of:
Quest Patent Research Corporation (“The Company”)
Digital IP Advisors Inc. (“DIPA”) (wholly owned) (formerly Quest Licensing Corporation (NY))
Quest Licensing Corporation (DE) (“QLC”) (wholly owned)
Quest Packaging Solutions
Corporation (
Quest Nettech Corporation
(“NetTech”) (
Semcon IP, Inc. (“Semcon”) (wholly owned)
Mariner IC, Inc. (“Mariner”) (wholly owned)
IC Kinetics, Inc. (“IC”) (wholly owned)
CXT Systems, Inc. (“CXT”) (wholly owned)
Photonic Imaging Solutions Inc. (“PIS”) (wholly owned)
M-Red Inc. (“M-Red”) (wholly owned)
Audio Messaging Inc. (“AMI”) (wholly owned)
Peregrin Licensing LLC (“PLL”) (wholly owned)
Taasera Licensing LLC (“TLL”) (wholly owned)
Soundstreak Texas LLC (“STX”) (wholly owned)
Multimodal Media LLC (“MML”) (wholly owned)
LS Cloud Storage Technologies, LLC (“LSC”) (wholly owned)
Tyche Licensing LLC (“Tyche”) (wholly owned)
Deepwell IP LLC (“DIP”) (wholly owned)
EDI Licensing LLC (“EDI”) (wholly owned)
Koyo Licensing LLC (“Koyo”) (wholly owned)
In February 2022, the Company changed the name of Quest Licensing Corporation to Digital IP Advisors Incorporated.
Significant intercompany transaction and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
F-7
Reverse Split, Change in Authorized Common Stock
On July 27, 2022, the Company amended its amended
and restated certificate of incorporation. The amendment (i) decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable, which generally relate to licensed sales, are presented on the balance sheet net of estimated uncollectible amounts. The Company records an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts in an amount approximating anticipated losses. Individual uncollectible accounts are written off against the allowance when collection of the individual accounts appears doubtful. The Company did not record an allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of patents which are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives or statutory lives whichever is shorter and are reviewed for impairment upon any triggering event that may give rise to the asset’s ultimate recoverability as prescribed under the guidance related to impairment of long-lived assets. Costs incurred to acquire patents, including legal costs, are also capitalized as long-lived assets and amortized on a straight-line basis with the associated patent.
Patents include the cost of patents or patent
rights (hereinafter, collectively “patents”) acquired from third-parties or acquired in connection with business combinations.
Patent acquisition costs are amortized utilizing the straight-line method over their remaining economic useful lives, ranging from
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets
with a finite life, are reviewed for impairment in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, “Property,
Plant, and Equipment” whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable
through the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. Whenever any such
impairment exists, an impairment loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. In the event
that management decides to no longer allocate resources to a patent portfolio, an impairment loss equal to the remaining carrying value
of the asset is recorded. The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $
There were no impairments of long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2022.
F-8
Warrant Liability
The Company reflects a warrant liability with respect to warrants for which the number of shares underlying the warrants is not fixed until the date of the initial exercise. The amount of the liability is determined at the end of each fiscal period and the period-to-period change in the amount of warrant liability is reflected as a gain or loss in warrant liability and is included under other income (expense) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy is used which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. See Note 4 for information about our warrant liability.
The fair value hierarchy based on the three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.
The carrying value reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and short-term borrowings approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value since the related rates of interest approximate current market rates.
Commitments and Contingencies
In connection with the investment in certain patents and patent rights, certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries may execute related agreements which grant to the inventors and/or former owners of the respective patents or patent rights, the right to receive a percentage of future net revenues (as defined in the respective agreements) generated as a result of licensing and otherwise enforcing the respective patents or patent portfolios.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries may retain the services of law firms that specialize in patent licensing and enforcement and patent law in connection with their licensing and enforcement activities. These law firms may be retained on a contingent fee basis whereby such law firms are paid a percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries may engage with funding sources that provide financing for patent licensing and enforcement. These litigation finance firms may be engaged on a non-recourse basis whereby such litigation finance firms are paid a percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded in exchange for providing funding for legal fees and out of pocket expenses incurred as a result of the licensing and enforcement activities.
The economic terms of the inventor agreements, operating agreements, contingent legal fee arrangements and litigation financing agreements associated with the patent portfolios owned or controlled by the Company’s operating subsidiaries, if any, including royalty rates, contingent fee rates and other terms, vary across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by such operating subsidiaries and are included in cost of revenues as litigation and licensing expenses. Inventor/former owner royalties, payments to non-controlling interests, contingent legal fees expenses and litigation finance expenses fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios with varying economic terms and obligations generating revenues each period. Inventor/former owner royalties, contingent legal fees expenses and litigation finance expenses will continue to fluctuate and may continue to vary significantly period to period, based primarily on these factors.
F-9
Revenue Recognition
Patent Licensing Fees
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Under Topic 606, revenue is recognized when there is a contract which has commercial substance which is approved by both parties and identifies the rights of the parties and the payment terms.
For the periods presented, revenue contracts executed by the Company primarily provided for the payment of contractually determined, one-time, paid-up license fees in consideration for the grant of certain intellectual property rights for patented technologies owned or controlled by the Company’s operating subsidiaries as part of the settlement of litigation commenced by the Company’s subsidiaries. Intellectual property rights granted included the following, as applicable: (i) the grant of a non-exclusive, retroactive and future license to manufacture and/or sell products covered by patented technologies, (ii) a covenant-not-to-sue, (iii) the release of the licensee from certain claims, and (iv) the dismissal of any pending litigation. The intellectual property rights granted were perpetual in nature, extending until the legal expiration date of the related patents. The individual intellectual property rights are not accounted for as separate performance obligations, as (a) the nature of the promise, within the context of the contract, is to transfer combined items to which the promised intellectual property rights are inputs and (b) the Company’s promise to transfer each individual intellectual property right described above to the customer is not separately identifiable from other promises to transfer intellectual property rights in the contract.
Since the promised intellectual property rights are not individually distinct, the Company combined each individual IP right in the contract into a bundle of IP rights that is distinct, and accounted for all of the intellectual property rights promised in the contract as a single performance obligation. The intellectual property rights granted were “functional IP rights” that have significant standalone functionality. The Company’s subsequent activities do not substantively change that functionality and do not significantly affect the utility of the IP to which the licensee has rights. The Company’s subsidiaries have no further obligation with respect to the grant of intellectual property rights, including no express or implied obligation to maintain or upgrade the technology, or provide future support or services. The contracts provide for the grant (i.e., transfer of control) of the licenses, covenants-not-to-sue, releases, and other significant deliverables upon execution of the contract. Licensees legally obtain control of the intellectual property rights upon execution of the contract. As such, the earnings process is complete and revenue is recognized upon the execution of the contract, when collectability is probable and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue contracts generally provide for payment of contractual amounts within 30 to 90 days of execution of the contract. Contractual payments made by licensees are generally non-refundable. The Company does not have any significant payment terms, as payment is received shortly after goods are delivered or services are provided, therefore there is no significant financing component or consideration payable to the customer in these transactions.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues mainly includes expenses incurred in connection with our patent enforcement activities, such as legal fees, consulting costs, patent maintenance, royalty fees for acquired patents and other related expenses. Cost of revenue does not include expenses related to product development, patent amortization, integration or support, as these are included in general and administrative expenses.
F-10
Inventor Royalties, Litigation Funding Fees and Contingent Legal Expenses.
In connection with the investment in certain patents and patent rights, certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries may execute related agreements which grant to the inventors and/or former owners of the respective patents or patent rights, the right to receive a percentage of future net revenues (as defined in the respective agreements) generated as a result of licensing and otherwise enforcing the respective patents or patent portfolios.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries may retain the services of law firms that specialize in patent licensing and enforcement and patent law in connection with their licensing and enforcement activities. These law firms may be retained on a contingent fee basis whereby such law firms are paid a percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries may engage with funding sources that specialize in providing financing for patent licensing and enforcement. These litigation finance firms may be engaged on a non-recourse basis whereby such litigation finance firms are paid a percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded in exchange for providing funding for legal fees and out of pocket expenses incurred as a result of the licensing and enforcement activities.
The economic terms of the inventor agreements,
operating agreements, contingent legal fee arrangements and litigation financing agreements associated with the patent portfolios owned
or controlled by the Company’s operating subsidiaries, if any, including royalty rates, contingent fee rates and other terms, vary
across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by such operating subsidiaries. Inventor/former owner royalties, payments to non-controlling
interests, contingent legal fees expenses and litigation finance expenses fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues
recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios
with varying economic terms and obligations generating revenues each period. Inventor/former owner royalties, contingent legal fees expenses
and litigation finance expenses will continue to fluctuate and may continue to vary significantly period to period, based primarily on
these factors. Revenue from
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future income tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or income tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
In evaluating the ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized. Management establishes a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be utilized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent on the generation of future taxable income, which must occur prior to the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards.
The Company also follows the guidance related to accounting for income tax uncertainties. In accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more likely than not threshold, the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. No liability for unrecognized tax benefits was recorded as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
F-11
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation pursuant to ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” which prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based payment transactions in which employee and non-employee services, are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or issuing or offering to issue shares, options and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights. Stock-based payments to employees and non-employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee or non-employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any such losses in these accounts.
Business Acquisitions
In August and November 2021, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of STX and LSC, respectively.
The acquisitions were accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 provides, among other things, that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the assets acquired are not a business, the reporting entity shall account for the transaction or other event as an asset acquisition which are accounted for using a cost accumulation and allocation model under which the cost of the acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Under ASC 805, the company concluded that the acquisitions did not constitute acquisition of a business and therefore were accounted for as asset acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805. See Note 11 for more information regarding the STX and LSC acquisitions.
Gain from Cancellation of Indebtedness
On July 23, 2021, the Company paid $
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company calculates net losses per share by
dividing losses allocated to the Company’s stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for
the period. Diluted weighted average shares is computed using basic weighted average shares plus any potentially dilutive securities outstanding
during the period using the treasury-stock-type method and the if-converted method, except when their effect is anti-dilutive. Because
the Company incurred losses in all periods covered by the financial statements the inclusion of diluted weighted average shares would
be anti-dilutive, and therefore, the diluted net loss per share is the same as the basic net loss per share. The Company’s potentially
dilutive securities include
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that there are any recently issued, but not effective, accounting standards which, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
F-12
Going Concern
As shown in the accompanying financial statements,
the Company has an accumulated deficit of approximately $
3. SHORT-TERM DEBT AND LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Short-Term Debt
Loans Payable
The loans payable represents demand loans made
by former officers and directors, who are third parties and stockholders, whose holdings were insignificant, at December 31, 2022
and 2021, in the amount of $
Funding Liability
The funding liability at December 31, 2022
and 2021 represents the principal amount of the Company’s obligations to QFL pursuant to a purchase agreement (“Purchase Agreement”)
dated February 22, 2021 between the Company and QFL, as described below. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had made total repayments
in the amount of approximately $
On February 22, 2021, the Company entered into a series of agreements, all dated February 19, 2021, with QFL, a non-affiliated party, including the “Purchase Agreement”, a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), a subsidiary security agreement (the “Subsidiary Security Agreement”), a subsidiary guaranty (the “Subsidiary Guaranty”), a warrant issue agreement (the “Warrant Issue Agreement”), a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) and a board observation rights agreement (the “Board Observation Rights Agreement” together with the Security Agreement, the Subsidiary Guaranty, the Subsidiary Security Agreement, Warrant Issuance Agreement, Registration Rights Agreement and the Purchase Agreement, the “Investment Documents”) pursuant to which, at the closing held contemporaneously with the execution of the agreements:
(i) Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement,
QFL agreed to make available to the Company a financing facility of: (a) up to $
F-13
(ii) The Company used $
(iii) Pursuant to the Security Agreement, the Company’s obligations under the Purchase Agreement with QFL are secured by: (a) the proceeds (as defined in the Purchase Agreement); (b) the patents (as defined in the Purchase Agreement; (c) all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing (a) and (b); and (d) proceeds (including, without limitation, cash proceeds and insurance proceeds) and products of the foregoing (a)-(c).
(iv) Pursuant to the Subsidiary Guaranty, eight of the Company’s subsidiaries – QLC, NetTech, Mariner, Semcon, IC, CXT, M-Red, and AMI, collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) guaranteed the Company’s obligations to QFL under the Purchase Agreement.
(v) Pursuant to the Subsidiary Security Agreement, the Subsidiary Guarantors granted QFL a security interest in the proceeds from the future monetization of their respective patent portfolios.
(vi) Pursuant to the Warrant Issue Agreement,
the Company granted QFL ten-year warrants to purchase a total of up to
(vii) The Company regained compliance with the OTCQB Eligibility Requirements on May 7, 2021, at which time the common stock recommenced trading on the OTCQB.
(viii) The Company granted QFL certain
registration rights with respect to the
(ix) Pursuant to the Board Observation Rights Agreement, until the later of the date on which QFL or its affiliates (i) have received the entirety of their Investment Return (as defined in Purchase Agreement), and (ii) no longer hold any Securities (the “Observation Period”), the Company granted QFL the right, exercisable at any time during the Observation Period, to appoint a representative to attend meetings (including, without limitation, telephonic or other electronic meetings) of the Board or any committee thereof, including executive sessions, in an observer capacity.
On February 26, 2021, the Company entered into
an agreement with Peter K. Trzyna (“PKT”) pursuant to which PKT assigned to the Company all right, title, and interest in
a portfolio of eight United States patents (the “Peregrin Portfolio”). Under the agreement, the Company paid PKT $
F-14
On May 20, 2021, TLL, entered into an agreement
with Taasera, Inc. to acquire all right, title, and interest in a portfolio of seven United States patents (the “Taasera Portfolio”)
for $
On October 15, 2021, MML, acquired all right,
title, and interest in a portfolio of nine United States patents (the “MML Portfolio”) for a purchase price of $
On January 27, 2022, the Company acquired, via
assignment from Intellectual Ventures Assets 181 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 174 LLC, all right title and interest to fifteen
United States patents and three foreign patents for a purchase price of $
In June 2022, MML and AI agreed to amend the Purchase
Agreement to add two additional patent families for an additional $
In July 2022, EDI acquired, via assignment from
Edward D. Ioli Trust, all right title and interest to a portfolio of five United States patents relating to a system and method for controlling
vehicles and for providing assistance to operated vehicles (“EDI Portfolio”) for a purchase price consisting of
In July 2022, the Company entered into a purchase
agreement with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company for the purchase of eight United States
Patents for a purchase price of $
The Company requested and received operating capital
advances in the amount of $
Loan Payable Related Party
The loan payable – related party at December 31,
2022 and 2021 represents the current amount of a non-interest bearing total monetization proceeds obligation (the “TMPO”)
to Intelligent Partners, LLC (“Intelligent Partners”) of $
F-15
On or prior to the date of the Restructure Agreement,
Intelligent Partners transferred to Andrew Fitton (“Fitton”) and Michael Carper (“Carper”) $
On February 22, 2021, the Company and Intelligent Partners agreed to extinguish the notes and Transferred Note, and terminate or amend and restate the SPA and Transaction Documents, pursuant to a series of agreements including: the Restructure Agreement, a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), an Option Grant (the “Option Grant”), an Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement (the “Pledge Agreement”), an Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), a Board Observation Agreement (the “Board Observation Agreement”), a MPA-NA Security Interest Agreement (the “MPA-NA Security Interest Agreement”), an Amended and Restated Patent Proceeds Security Agreement (the “Patent Proceeds Security Agreement”, an Amended and Restated MPA-CP (the “MPA-CP”), an Amended and Restated MPA-CXT (the “MPA-CXT”), a MPA-MR (the “MPA-MR”), a MPA-AMI (the “MPA-AMI,” and together with the MPA-CP, MPA-CXT and MPA-MR, each a Restructure MPA and together the Restructure MPAs) and a MPA-NA (the “MPA-NA”).
(i) Pursuant to the Restructure Agreement,
the Company paid Intelligent Partners $
(ii) Pursuant to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, the Company issued to Fitton and Carper, as holders of the Transferred Note, a total of
(iii) Pursuant to the Option Grant,
the Company granted Intelligent Partners an option to purchase a total of
(iv) Pursuant to the restructured monetization
proceeds agreement, Intelligent Partners has a right to receive
F-16
(vi) The Company granted Intelligent
Partners, Fitton and Carper certain registration rights with respect to (i) the
(vii) Pursuant to the Subsidiary Security Agreement, the Company’s obligations under its agreements with Intelligent Partners, including its obligations under the Restructure Agreement and the Restructure MPAs are secured by a security interest in the net proceeds realized from the future monetization of the patents currently owned by the eight subsidiaries named above.
(viii) Pursuant to the MPA-NA-Security Interest Agreement, our obligations under the MPA-NA are secured by a security interest in net proceeds realized from the future monetization of new patents acquired until the TMPO is satisfied, provided Intelligent Partners’ secured interest shall be limited to its entitlement in Net Proceeds under the MPA-NA. After satisfaction of the TMPO the security interest in proceeds from new assets shall terminate.
(ix) Pursuant to the Board Observation Rights Agreement, until the Total Monetization Proceeds Obligation has been satisfied (the “Observation Period”), the Company granted Intelligent Partners the option and right, exercisable at any time during the Observation Period, to appoint a representative to attend meetings of the Board or any committee thereof, including executive sessions, in an observer capacity. Intelligent Partners has no right to appoint a director to the board.
Events of Default include (i) a Change of Control
of the Company (ii) any uncured default on payment due to Intelligent Partners in an amount totaling in excess of $
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company
recognized a loss on extinguishment of the note of $
| Carrying amount as of the restructure date | $ | |||
| Less unamortized debt discount and issuance costs | ||||
| Net carrying amount | ||||
| Reacquisition price | ||||
| Cash payment via QFL | ( | ) | ||
| Conversion of transferred note | ( | ) | ||
| Fair value of option grant | ( | ) | ||
| TMPO undiscounted future cash flows | ( | ) | ||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | $ | ( | ) |
Because of the beneficial ownership percentage of its principals, Intelligent Partners is treated as a related party.
F-17
Long-Term Liabilities
Loan Payable – SBA
The loans payable – SBA balance at December 31,
2022 and 2021 of $
Purchase Price of Patents
The purchase price of patents balance at December 31,
2022 and 2021 of
The non-current portion of our obligations under
the unsecured non-recourse funding agreement with a third-party funder entered into in May 2020 whereby the third-party agreed to provide
acquisition funding in the amount of $
4. WARRANT LIABILITY
On February 22, 2021 the Company issued warrants
to purchase
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the aggregate
fair value of the outstanding warrant liability was approximately $
F-18
The Company estimated the fair value of the warrant liability using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following key assumptions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| As of | ||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Exercise price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | ||||||
| Expected dividends | % | % | ||||||
| Expected term | ||||||||
The following schedule summarizes the valuation of financial instruments at fair value in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| Fair Value Measurements as of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrant liability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of warrant liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
| Fair Value | ||||
| Fair value at grant date | $ | |||
| Change in fair value | ||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | ||||
| Gain on subsequent measurement | ( | ) | ||
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $ | |||
See Notes 3 and 5 for information on the warrant issuance.
5. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
On July 27, 2022, the Company amended its amended and restated certificate of incorporation following approval of the amendment by the stockholders at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.
The amendment (i) decreased the number of authorized
shares of common stock from
All historical share and per share amounts in these financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split and change in authorized common stock.
Amendment to the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan
On February 19, 2021, the board of directors amended
the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) increasing the shares the Company can issue under the Plan to
F-19
Issuance of Common Stock and Options
Issuances to Intelligent Partners
On February 22, 2021, pursuant to the Restructure
Agreement, Intelligent Partners and its controlling members (Fitton and Carper) agreed to extinguish the notes and Transferred Note, and
terminate or amend and restate the SPA and Transaction Documents and the Company: (i) issued to Fitton and Carper, as holders of the Transferred
Note, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement a total of
Consulting Agreements
On February 22, 2021, the Company entered into
advisory service agreement with three consultants pursuant to which they will provide services to the Company in connection with the development
of the Company’s business. The agreements have a term of
Pursuant to the agreements with two of the consultants,
the compensation payable to each of them consists of a restricted stock grant of
| a. |
| b. |
| c. |
F-20
Pursuant to the agreement with the third consultant,
the compensation payable to the consultant consists of a restricted stock grant of
| a. |
| b. |
| c. |
The Company recorded professional fees in the amount of $120,000 as a result the restricted stock grant to the third consultant. The Company determined the fair value of the options as of the grant date to be approximately $360,000 using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Variables used in the valuation include (1) discount rate of 1.37%; (2) term of 10 years; (3) computed volatility of 252% and (4) zero expected dividends. The Company recognized option expense of approximately $117,000 and $188,000 for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Compensatory Arrangements of Officers and Directors
On February 22, 2021,
(i) Granted restricted stock grants for services rendered and vesting in full upon grant, to:
| a. | Jon C. Scahill – 490,000 shares |
| b. | Timothy J. Scahill – 100,000 shares |
| c. | Dr. William R. Carroll - 100,000 shares |
(ii) Granted Jon Scahill a ten-year option (the “Option”) to purchase 600,000 shares of Common Stock which become exercisable cumulatively as follows:
| a. | 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share becoming exercisable upon the commencement of trading of the Common Stock on the OTCQB. |
| b. | 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, becoming exercisable on the first day on which the Company files with the SEC a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q which reports stockholders’ equity of at least $5,000,000, and |
| c. | 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.00 per share becoming exercisable on the date on which the Common Stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange |
(iii) Appointed Ryan T. Logue to the board of directors and granted Mr. Logue a restricted stock grant of 500,000 shares of common stock which vested upon his acceptance of his appointment as a director.
F-21
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock options and changes is set forth below:
| Number of Options (#) | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | |||||||||||||
| Balance - December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Expired | ||||||||||||||||
| Cancelled | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance - December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Expired | ||||||||||||||||
| Cancelled | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance - December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Options exercisable at end of period | ||||||||||||||||
The outstanding options do not have an intrinsic
value as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2021 the intrinsic value of the outstanding options was $
As of December 31, 2022, there was approximately
$
Issuance of Warrants
A summary of the status of the Company’s warrants and changes is set forth below:
| Number of Warrants (#) | Weighted Average Exercise Price ($) | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) | ||||||||||
| Balance - December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||
| Expired | ||||||||||||
| Cancelled | ||||||||||||
| Balance - December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||
| Expired | ||||||||||||
| Cancelled | ||||||||||||
| Balance - December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||
The outstanding warrants do not have an intrinsic
value as of December 31, 2022. The intrinsic value of the outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2021 was $
F-22
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets include patents purchased and are recorded based at their acquisition cost. Intangible assets consisted of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Patents | $ | $ | ||||||
| Disposal | ( | ) | ||||||
| Subtotal | ||||||||
| Less: accumulated amortization | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Net value of intangible assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| Weighted Average Amortization Period (Years) | ||||||||
Intangible assets are comprised of patents with estimated useful lives. The intangible assets at December 31, 2022 represent:
| ● | patents acquired in July 2017 pursuant to an obligation to pay 50% of net revenues to IV 34/37 (see Note 3); the useful lives of the patents, at the date of acquisition, was 5-6 years; these patents were disposed of as of December 31, 2021. |
| ● | patents (which were fully amortized at the date of acquisition) acquired in January 2018 pursuant to an agreement with to Intellectual Ventures Assets 62 LLC and Intellectual Ventures Assets 71 LLC “(IV 62/71”), pursuant to which CXT has an obligation to distribute 50% of net revenues to IV 62/71; |
| ● | patents (which were fully amortized at the date of acquisition) acquired in January 2018 by Photonic Imaging Solutions Inc. (“PIS”) from Intellectual Ventures Assets 64 LLC (“IV 64”) pursuant to which PIS is to pay IV 64 (a) 70% of the first $1,500,000 of net revenue, (b) 30% of the next $1,500,000 of net revenue and (c) 50% of net revenue in excess of $3,000,000; |
| ● | patents acquired in March 2019 pursuant to an obligation to pay 50% of net revenues to IV 113/108 (see Note 3); the useful lives of the patents, at the date of acquisition, was approximately 9 years, these patents were disposed of as of December 31, 2021. |
F-23
| ● | patents (which were fully amortized at the date of acquisition) acquired in May 2020 for a purchase price of $95,000 pursuant to an agreement with Texas Technology Ventures 2, LLP (“TTV”), pursuant to which of the Company retains the first $230,000 of net proceeds, as defined in the agreement, after which the company has an obligation to distribute 50% of net proceeds to TTV. |
| ● | patents (which were fully amortized at the date of acquisition) acquired in February 2021 pursuant to an agreement with PKT for a purchase price of $350,000, pursuant to which $350,000 was paid at closing, and upon the realization of gross proceeds, as defined in the agreement, the Company shall make a subsequent or payments in the aggregate amount of $93,900, representing reimbursement to PKT, as the prosecuting attorney, for legal fees associated with prosecution of the portfolio, such reimbursement shall be due and payable to PKT from time to time as gross proceeds are realized, if any, and paid to PKT along with and in proportion to reimbursement to other third parties of costs incurred in realizing gross proceeds. Thereafter, PKT is entitled to a percentage of gross proceeds realized, if any. |
| ● | patents (which were fully depreciated at the date of acquisition) acquired in May 2021 for a purchase price of $250,000. |
| ● | patents acquired in October 2021 from AI for a purchase price of $ |
| ● | patents acquired in January 2022 for a purchase price of $1,060,000, the useful lives of the patents, at the date of purchase, was approximately 1-2 years. |
| ● | patents acquired in July 2022 via assignment from AI for a purchase price of $92,000, the useful lives of the patents, at the date of purchase, was approximately 2-4 years. |
| ● | patents acquired July 2022 pursuant to an agreement with Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company for a purchase price of $350,000. The useful lives of the patents, at the date of purchase, was approximately 2-9 years. |
The Company amortizes the costs of intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. Costs incurred to acquire patents, including legal costs, are also capitalized as long-lived assets and amortized on a straight-line basis with the associated patent.
The Company assesses intangible assets for any
impairment to the carrying values. As of December 31, 2022, management concluded that there was no impairment to the intangible assets.
Amortization expense for patents was approximately
$
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2023 | $ | |||
| 2024 | ||||
| 2025 | ||||
| 2026 | ||||
| 2027 | ||||
| Thereafter | ||||
| Total | $ | |||
F-24
7. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
The following table reconciles equity attributable to the non-controlling interest related to Quest Packaging Solutions Corporation.
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest | ||||||||
| Balance, end of year | $ | $ | ||||||
8. INCOME TAXES
The Company uses the liability method, where deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting purposes. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately
$
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax
assets, Company’s management considers whether it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets will
be realized. The Company’s management considers all available evidence, both positive and negative, in making this assessment. Due to
the Company’s history of generating losses in recent years, and the lack of objectively verifiable evidence that it will be able to generate
taxable income in future years, the Company’s management has determined that a valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax
assets is necessary. The change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2022 is
The Company’s deferred tax assets consist of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Net operating loss carry forward | $ | $ | ||||||
| Intangible assets | ||||||||
| Valuation allowance | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Balance, end of year | $ | $ | ||||||
Tax (benefit) expense consisted primarily of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Federal | $ | $ | ||||||
| State | ( | ) | ||||||
| Foreign | ||||||||
| Deferred | ||||||||
| Total | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||
The reconciliation between the effective tax rate on loss before income taxes and the statutory rate for the year ended December 31, 2022 is as follows:
| Tax | Percentage | |||||||
| Book income before taxes | $ | ( | ) | % | ||||
| State taxes, net | % | |||||||
| Meals and entertainment | ( | )% | ||||||
| Warrant income | ( | ) | % | |||||
| Interest expense | ( | )% | ||||||
| Change in tax rate | ( | )% | ||||||
| Change in valuation allowance | ( | )% | ||||||
| Change in estimate for prior year taxes | ( | )% | ||||||
| Total | $ | ( | ) | |||||
| Effective tax rate | % | |||||||
F-25
The reconciliation between the effective tax rate on loss before income taxes and the statutory rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 is as follows:
| Tax | Percentage | |||||||
| Book income before taxes | $ | ( | ) | % | ||||
| State taxes, net | ( | ) | ||||||
| Tax exempt income - grant and/or SBA | ( | ) | ||||||
| Meals and entertainment | ( | ) | ||||||
| Warrant expense | ( | ) | ||||||
| Stock based compensation | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss on conversion of debt | ( | ) | ||||||
| Valuation allowance | ( | ) | ||||||
| Derivative valuation adjustment | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total | $ | |||||||
| Effective tax rate | ( | )% | ||||||
As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s management believes that it has adequately provided for its tax-related liabilities, and that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits is necessary. No significant change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits is expected within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits (if any) in tax expenses, as applicable. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had no accrual for the payment of interest and penalties.
The statute of limitations for assessment of income taxes is open for tax years ending December 31, 2019 and later.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has at various times entered into transactions with related parties, including officers, directors and major stockholders, wherein these parties have provided services, advanced or loaned money, or both, to the Company which was needed to support its daily operations. The Company discloses all related party transactions.
See Notes 3 and 5 in connection with the Restructure Agreement dated February 22, 2021 with Intelligent Partners. Because of its ownership percentage, Intelligent Partners is treated as a related party.
See Note 5 with respect to share-based compensation to officers and directors.
See Note 10 with respect to the employment agreement with the Company’s president and chief executive officer.
During the year ended December 31, 2021,
the Company contracted with an entity owned by the chief technology officer for the provision of information technology services to the
Company. In June 2022 the chief technology officer sold his interest in the entity. The cost of such services was approximately $
During the year ended December 31, 2021,
the Company contracted with a law firm more than
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Employment Agreements
F-26
SEP IRA Plan
Pursuant to the SEP IRA plan adopted by the Company
in March 2020, the Company deposited into a SEP IRA account of each of its participating employees a percentage of the employee’s
compensation, subject to statutory limitations on the amount of the contribution all as set forth in the IRS Form 5305-SEP. For the years
ending December 31, 2022 and 2021, the percentage was set at
Inventor Royalties, Contingent Litigation Funding Fees and Contingent Legal Expenses
In connection with the investment in certain patents and patent rights, certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries executed agreements which grant to the former owners of the respective patents or patent rights, the right to receive inventor royalties based on future net revenues (as defined in the respective agreements) generated as a result of licensing and otherwise enforcing the respective patents or patent portfolios.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries may engage third-party funding sources to provide funding for patent licensing and enforcement. The agreements with the third-party funding sources may provide that the funding source receive a portion of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments. In certain instances, these third-party funding sources are entitled to receive a significant percentage of any proceeds realized until the third-party funder has recouped agreed upon amounts based on formulas set forth in the underlying funding agreement, which may reduce or delay and proceeds due to the Company.
The Company’s operating subsidiaries may retain the services of law firms in connection with their licensing and enforcement activities. These law firms may be retained on a contingent fee basis whereby the law firms are paid on a scaled percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded based on how and when the fees, settlements or judgments are obtained.
Depending on the amount of any recovery, it is possible that all the proceeds from a specific settlement may be paid to the funding source and legal counsel.
The economic terms of the inventor agreements, funding agreements and contingent legal fee arrangements associated with the patent portfolios owned or controlled by the Company’s operating subsidiaries, if any, including royalty rates, proceeds sharing rates, contingent fee rates and other terms, vary across the patent portfolios owned or controlled by the operating subsidiaries. Inventor royalties, payments to noncontrolling interests, payments to third-party funding providers and contingent legal fees expenses fluctuate period to period, based on the amount of revenues recognized each period, the terms and conditions of revenue agreements executed each period and the mix of specific patent portfolios with varying economic terms and obligations generating revenues each period. Inventor royalties, payments to third-party funding sources and contingent legal fees expenses will continue to fluctuate and may continue to vary significantly period to period, based primarily on these factors.
Patent Enforcement and Other Litigation
Certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries are engaged in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights. In connection with these patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against the Company or its operating subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material, and if required to be paid by the Company or its operating subsidiaries, could materially impair the Company’s operating results and financial position and could result in a default under the Company’s obligations to QFL. Since the operating subsidiaries do not have any assets other than the patents, and the Company does not have any available financial resources to pay any judgment which a defendant may obtain against a subsidiary, such a judgment may result in the bankruptcy of the subsidiary and/or the loss of the patents, which are the subsidiaries’ only assets.
Effects of possible delisting of common stock on OTCQB
On May 23, 2022, the Company received notice from
OTC Markets Group, that, because the bid price for its common stock had closed below $
F-27
11. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On August 6, 2021 the Company acquired all of
the issued and outstanding equity interests of STX from Soundstreak, LLC in exchange for an obligation to coordinate and launch a structured
licensing program around the STX patent portfolio which consists of three United States patents and one United States patent application.
Soundstreak LLC is entitled to
On November 16, 2021 the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of LS Cloud Storage Technologies, LLC (“LSC”) in exchange for assuming ownership and management of the entity and bearing the transaction costs.
The acquisitions were accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). ASC 805 provides, among other things, that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute a business. If the assets acquired are not a business, the reporting entity shall account for the transaction or other event as an asset acquisition which are accounted for using a cost accumulation and allocation model under which the cost of the acquisition is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The STX and LSC were recorded as asset acquisitions.
The cost of the LSC asset acquisition was $
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Summary of Agreements with QPRC Finance III LLC (“QF3”)
On March 12, 2023, the Company and its newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Harbor Island Dynamic LLC (“Harbor”), entered into a series of agreements, all dated March 12, 2023, with QF3, a non-affiliated party, including a prepaid forward purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), a patent security agreement (the “Patent Security Agreement” together with the Security Agreement, the Patent Security Agreement, and the Purchase Agreement, the “Investment Documents”) pursuant to which, at the closing held contemporaneously with the execution of the agreements:
(i) Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement,
QF3 agreed to make available to the Company a financing facility of: (a) up to $
(ii) On March 17, 2023, the Company
used $
(iii) Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Patent Security Agreement, payment of our obligations under the Purchase Agreement with QF3 are secured by (a) the value of anything received from the monetization of the intellectual property rights covered by the Security Agreement; (b) the patents (as defined in the Security Agreement); (c) all general intangibles now or hereafter arising from or related to the foregoing (a) and (b); and (d) proceeds (including, without limitation, cash proceeds and insurance proceeds) and products of the foregoing (a)-(c).
In connection with the agreements with QF3 the Company, Harbor and the Subsidiary Guarantors entered into an intercreditor agreement with QF3 and Intelligent Partners which sets forth the priority of QF3 in the collateral under the Investment Documents.
F-28