Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Today's conference call will begin momentarily. Until that time, your lines will again be placed on a music hold. Thank you for your patience. For standing by, my name is Jordan, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Cincinnati Financial fourth quarter and full year earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you'd like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. I'd now like to turn the call over to Dennis McDaniel, Investor Relations Officer. Please go ahead.

Hello, this is Dennis McDaniel at Cincinnati Financial. Thank you for joining us for our fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings conference call. Late yesterday, we issued a news release on our results, along with our supplemental financial package, including our year-end investment portfolio. To find copies of any of these documents, please visit our investor website, investors.senfin.com. The shortest route to the information is the quarterly results section near the middle of the investor overview page. On this call, you'll first hear from President and Chief Executive Officer Steve Sprague and then from Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Mike Sewell. After their prepared remarks, investors participating on the call may ask questions. At that time, some responses may be made by others in the room with us, including Executive Chairman Steve Johnston, Chief Investment Officer Steve Soloria, and Cincinnati Insurances Chief Claims Officer Mark Shambo, and Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance Andy Schnell. Please note that some of the matters to be discussed today are forward-looking. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. With respect to these risks and uncertainties, we direct your attention to our news release and to our various filings with the SEC. Also, our reconciliation of non-GAAP measures was provided with the news release. Statutory accounting data is prepared in accordance with statutory accounting rules and therefore is not reconciled to GAAP. Now I'll turn over the call to Steve.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today to hear more about our results. We had another excellent quarter of operating performance that again demonstrated the resilience of our proven operating model and the long-term strategy that drives our insurance business. Investment results were also part of that excellent performance, including investment income growth and another quarter with net investment gains. Operating performance was very strong for the fourth quarter and boosted full-year results enough to outperform last year in several key areas. despite starting 2025 with the largest catastrophe loss in our company's history. Net income of $2.4 billion for full year 2025 was 4% higher than 2024. Fourth quarter net income of $676 million rose 67% and included recognition of $145 million on an after-tax basis for the increase in fair value of equity securities still held. Non-GAAP operating income for the quarter increased 7% to $531 million. For full year 2025, it was up 5% from a year ago. Our fourth quarter 2025 property casualty combined ratio was an outstanding 85.2%. It lowered the full year combined ratio to 94.9%, near the midpoint of our long-term average target range. The full-year ratio was 1.5 percentage points higher than last year, driven by an increase of 1.6 points in the catastrophe loss ratio. On a current accident-year basis measured at 12 months before catastrophe losses, the combined ratio improved by 0.4 percentage points. The loss and loss expense portion would have improved slightly if not for the unfavorable effect of 0.3 points from reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Consolidated property casualty net written premiums continued to grow, but at a slower pace, 5% for the quarter. That reflects our pricing discipline in the insurance marketplace as our underwriters carefully consider risks on a policy-by-policy basis and use pricing precision tools to segment those risks as part of their underwriting decisions. Estimated average renewal price increases for most lines of business during the fourth quarter were lower than the third quarter of 2025, but still at a level we believe was healthy. Our standard and excess and surplus commercial lines business averaged increases in the mid-single-digit percentage range. Our personal line segment included homeowner in the low double-digit range and personal auto in the high single-digit range. We believe our relationships with independent agencies are as strong as ever and that they will continue to trust us with their high-quality new business. The fourth quarter 2025 decrease in new business written premiums was driven by our personal line segment that had unusually large amounts the past two years. However, the $92 million for the quarter was still 62% more than the average of the three years prior to 2023. Policy retention rates in 2025 were similar to 2024. Our commercial line segment was down slightly, but still in the upper 80 percent range. Our personal line segment was also down slightly, but still in the low to mid 90 percent range. Performance by insurance segment is the next area I'll highlight, focusing on full year 2025 results compared with 2024. But first, I'll note that all operating units had an excellent fourth quarter profitability, each with combined ratios below 90%. Commercial Lines' 91.1% combined ratio for the year improved by 2.1 percentage points, including a decrease of 1.9 points in the catastrophe loss ratio. Its net written premiums grew 7%. Personal Lines' 103.6% combined ratio for 2025 increased by 6.1 percentage points, including an increase of 7.1 points in the catastrophe loss ratio. Its net written premiums grew 14%. Excess and surplus lines, 88.4 percent combined ratio for the year improved by 5.6 percentage points, including a decrease of one point in the catastrophe loss ratio. Its net written premiums grew 11%. Both Cincinnati RE and Cincinnati Global produced strong results and again demonstrated the benefits of diversifying risk to improve income stability. Cincinnati RE's combined ratio for the year was 95.9%. Its 1% decrease in net written premiums reflects changing reinsurance market conditions. Since Ant Global's combined ratio for 2025 was 79.2%, with premium growth of 10%, benefiting from product expansion. Our life insurance subsidiary increased annual net income by 16% and grew term life insurance earned premiums by 3%. Moving on to our reinsurance seeded programs. On January 1st of this year, we again renewed each of our primary property casualty treaties that transfer part of our risk to reinsurers. For our per-risk treaties, terms and conditions for 2026 are fairly similar to 2025, other than an average premium rate decrease of approximately 7%. The primary objective of our property catastrophe treaty is to protect our balance sheet. The treaty's main change this year is increasing the top of the program to $2 billion, compared with $1.8 billion effective July 1, 2025. Should we experience a 2026 catastrophe event totaling $2 billion in losses, we'll retain $523 million, compared with $803 million for an event of that magnitude during the second half of last year. We expect 2026 seeded premiums for these treaties in total to be approximately $204 million, with the increase from the actual $192 million in 2025 driven by additional coverage and subject premium growth. As usual, I'll conclude my prepared remarks with the value creation ratio. Our 18.8% full-year 2025 VCR exceeded our five-year annual average target range of 10% to 13%. On a full-year basis, net income before investment gains or losses contributed 9.1%. Higher overall valuation of our investment portfolio and other items contributed 9.7%. Now, Chief Financial Officer Mike Sewell will highlight investment results and other important points about our financial performance.

Thank you, Steve. Thanks to all of you for joining us today. Investment income was a significant contributor to higher net income and improved operating results, rising 9% for the fourth quarter and 14% for the full year 2025, compared with the same periods of last year. Bond interest income grew 10% for the fourth quarter, and net purchases of fixed maturity securities totaled $1.6 billion for the full year 2025. The fourth quarter pre-tax average yield of 4.92% for the fixed maturity portfolio was similar to last year. The average pre-tax yield for the total of purchased taxable and tax-exempt bonds during 2025 was 5.6%. Dividend income for the quarter matched last year, even without the repeat of a $6 million special dividend from December 2024. Net purchases of equity securities totaled $74 million for the year. Valuation changes in aggregate for the fourth quarter and the year were favorable for both the equity portfolio and our bond portfolio. Before tax effects, the fourth quarter net gain was $181 million for the equity portfolio and $24 million for the bond portfolio. At the end of the fourth quarter, the total investment portfolio net appreciated value was approximately $8.4 billion. The equity portfolio was in a net gain position of $8.5 billion, while the fixed maturity portfolio was in a net loss position of $181 million. Cash flow from successful insurance and investment activities continued to fuel investment income. Cash flow from operating activities for full year, 2025, was $3.1 billion, up 17%. Regarding expense management, our strategy continues to seek a good balance between controlling expenses and investing in our business. Our fourth quarter 2025 property casualty underwriting expense ratio decreased by 0.2 percentage points as an increase in agency profit-sharing commissions was offset by growth in earned premiums outpacing growth in other expenses. Turning to loss reserves, our approach remains consistent and aims for net amounts and the upper half of the actuarially estimated range of net loss and loss expense reserves. As we do each quarter, we consider new information, such as paid losses and case reserves. Then, we update the estimated ultimate losses and loss expenses by accident year and line of business. During 2025, our net addition to property casualty loss and loss expense reserves was $1.3 billion, including $1.1 billion for the IB&R portion. For current accident year loss-loss expenses before catastrophe effects and measured at 12 months, several of our major lines of businesses had 2025 ratios better than 2024. The main exception was commercial casualty, rising 4.2 percentage points. That reflects ongoing uncertainty, including potential negative effects of legal system abuse we and others in the industry have noted in recent years. We remain confident with our pricing and risk selection for this line of business. For prior accident years, we experienced $196 million of property casualty net favorable reserve development during 2025 that benefited the combined ratio by 2.0 percentage points. On an all-lines basis by accident year, net reserves developed during 2025 included a favorable $275 million for 2024, favorable $8 million for 2023, and an unfavorable $87 million in aggregate for accident years prior to 2023. As usual, I'll conclude with capital management highlights. For the full year 2025, we returned capital to shareholders totaling $730 million, including $525 million of dividends paid and $205 million of share repurchases. We repurchased approximately 1.4 million shares at an average price of $151 per share, including 651,000 shares during the fourth quarter at $157 per share. We continue to believe our financial flexibility and our financial strength are both in an excellent position. Parent company cash and marketable securities at quarter end was $5.6 billion. Debt to total capital remained under 10%. Our quarter end book value was a record high $102.35 per share with $15.9 billion of GAAP consolidated shareholders' equity, providing plenty of capacity for profitable growth of our insurance operations. Now, I'll turn the call back over to Steve.

Thanks, Mike. Before we get to Q&A, I want to share our efforts related to intelligent automation. As most of you have heard us say before, our vision is to be the best company serving independent agents. Strategies we undertake must ladder up to improving the experience for the independent agents we serve and their clients. We are embracing intelligent automation to improve processes across our technology ecosystem. Generative AI is certainly a part of it, but it's only one aspect. Our work began with improvements to our data architecture, giving us a rich understanding of our risks and how we could shape our entire insurance portfolio for the future. We use workflow tools in each insurance segment that organize data and automate certain activities in writing new business or in other transactions. That experience formed a deep pool of talented associates with the knowledge, skills, and desire to continue our journey into generative AI. Most importantly, these associates are also insurance experts. We've created an AI Center of Excellence, which is harnessing cloud provider large language models to create internal solutions that can then be easily replicated throughout our company for fast scalability. We have a number of projects completed and even more on the roadmap. Let me share an example. Using Generative AI, we created a proprietary chatbot that our commercial lines underwriters use to obtain reference information and find answers that assist with underwriting decisions. We are concentrating on using Gen.A.I. to gain efficiency that leads to meaningful productivity gains for our associates. We're optimizing their efforts, allowing them to add more value to our business, deepening relationships, sharing expertise, and focusing their energy on the most complex underwriting and claims decisions. As we continue to weave Gen.A.I. into our business, we expect to see additional impacts to our profitability and growth. As a reminder, with Mike and me today are Steve Johnston, Steve Soloria, Mark Shambo, and Andy Schnell. Jordan, please open the call for questions.

As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from Michael Phillips from Oppenheimer. Your line is live.

Thank you. Good morning, everybody. I guess I did want to start with the commercial casualty line. And Mike, I heard your comments on the uncertainty and the legal system of use. That's, you know, I think it's been pretty common for everybody for a while. I guess pricing seems to be getting softer for commercial casualty for the industry, maybe not necessarily for you, but at least for your peers. So I guess just as we think about 26 and your 2025 number of, I guess, 76, 8 or 77 percent, you know, how much confidence do you have in that number and not continuing to creep up from here or hopefully holding flat or maybe to improve it. Just confidence around that, given what is a bit of a softer market today than it was the last couple of years.

Yeah, Mike, Steve Spray, let me, I can start, and then if Mike wants to add some additional thoughts, you can as well, just to the softness and the pricing. I think we did see, just I'll speak to maybe overall commercial pricing there in the fourth quarter. We did see it start to get more competitive, pretty quickly in the fourth quarter on a package basis, all lines. Now, most of that was driven by commercial property, but I think, again, as a package company, the auto and the casualty kind of got drawn into that. I can understand somewhat the property softening, just given the results of the industry, and you can see Cincinnati's results as well. I just think there's lost cost headwind, particularly in casualty, as Mike mentioned, on the legal system abuse, commercial auto. So I think that the pricing is going to hold up. We're confident in the future. for 2026. We're confident that our rates, our pricing, are exceeding loss costs in all lines except for workers' compensation. The only other thing I might add there, Mike, and we talk about it in prior quarters, is if you look at the average rate increase for Cincinnati, I'll just speak to Cincinnati, it just doesn't tell the entire picture. Our underwriters, both on new and renewals have been executing now for years on using sophisticated tools they have to segment the business, the accounts we write, risk by risk. And when you get into a market like we're in, and you have commercial results like we have, 14 consecutive years of underwriting profit, it. I think it only stands to reason that the average net rate is going to be under pressure. We have fewer accounts that are underpriced or that need aggressive action. And then on the business that's most adequately priced, we're coaching our teams to make sure they do whatever they need to do to keep that business. And so sometimes when the market gets a little softer, we have to give up a little rate on that. But again, in my opening remarks, I said we're still confident in the risk selection and the overall pricing we think is very healthy in the commercial book, too.

Okay. Yes, Steve, thank you for all that. That's helpful. I appreciate the comments. Second question is on your tech investments, and you've talked about this for a while, and one of the benefits that you've talked about is more accurate pricing. I guess, Do you see those investments and the one comment of more accurate pricing, is that more applicable to you in personal lines versus commercial lines, or is it kind of the same? Do you apply that to both, and should it be applied to both? How do you think about that from the two sides of the fence there?

Yeah, we definitely apply it to both. You know, like I just mentioned, you know, our overall combined ratio as a company now, 14 consecutive years of underwriting profit. And for someone who's been here for 34 plus years and grew up as an underwriter, I can tell you, you know, we've always had this culture of continuous improvement. We've gotten better at risk selection. We've gotten better at loss control, loss mitigation. We've got better at claims management. But for my seat, that's always been linear. And the pricing sophistication and segmentation that we instituted back roughly 2011, 2012, that has been exponential in the improvement and the results of Cincinnati insurance. And it is in commercial lines, it's in personal lines, it runs through other areas of our business as well. It's probably been more pronounced in the improvement in commercial lines over the years, but the sophisticated pricing is probably even more important in middle market personal lines and specifically personal auto. So, you know, if you can see the ex-CAT accident year continuing to improve in personal lines, and that's heading in the right direction. And we need that, too. CAT has been – we've had a lot of volatility, a lot of variability around CAT, and we think there's still room for improvement across all lines of business, actually, but probably more importantly in personal lines. Thank you, Steve. Appreciate the help. Thank you, Mike.

Your next question comes from the line of Paul Newsome from Piper Sandler. Your line is live.

Good morning. Thanks for the call. You guys are well. I wanted to follow up a little bit on the commercial competition question that Mike asked. And maybe some thoughts. Is it still very much large versus small with the competition you're seeing in the fourth quarter incrementally changing towards still just the large folks? are we seeing it creeped out into smaller accounts over time? And similarly, I want to see if there's any sort of thoughts you had or observations you had related to the kind of source of that incremental competition. Is it, you know, is it just across the board or are we seeing some emergence of some folks that maybe aren't necessarily terribly disciplined, either carriers or MGAs or whoever?

Yeah, Paul, I would say, yes, it's still, it is still, I would say, leaning towards larger accounts. And then even there, I'd be saying more specifically towards large property. But like I mentioned, you know, it's gotten more competitive in the middle market space for sure. And I think that is what you're what you're seeing there, too. But let me let me maybe let me maybe put this in perspective a little bit, too, and see if this if this helps. If you look over the last three or four years, we were an unprecedented hard market, I'd say, for my for my career, particularly in personal lines. And with our financial strength, we were able to really help our agents continue to write business through that hard market and be there in a really dislocated market. Let me just give you a – I hate the tough comp thing because it sounds like an excuse, so that's not what I'm driving at here. 2024 was just an extraordinary year when it comes to new business, both for personal lines and commercial lines. And if you just look at 2025, over 2023, commercial lines, new business is up 31%. 25 over 23 for personal lines, new business, we're up 14%. 2025 over 2023 for ENS, up 30%. If you consolidate those three, 25 was up over 25% over 2023. So on an actual basis, we are still really pleased with the new business. We're able to write it at pricing that we feel is adequate and that it's healthy and that we're happy with. So a little bit of this softening is just coming off, you know, I'd say a pretty extraordinary hard market. And, again, we were able to grow through that because of the relationships we have with our agents, because of our financial strength. You know, Cincinnati Insurance Company, since 2018, on an all-lines basis, we've doubled net written premiums since 2018, from just a little over $5 billion to now over $10 billion in net written premium. Purcell lines more than doubled in the last four years. So that just kind of frames it, Paul, hopefully, the way we're looking at it, the way I'm looking at it, really strong growth for the company. I think this is a natural slowdown. And one thing I can promise you is we're going to maintain discipline through all cycles when it comes to risk selection and pricing. And I couldn't be more proud of the underwriters, both on the new business and on the renewal and the way they're executing with what I think are the most professional agents in the business.

That makes a lot of sense. A second question, different. Where are we in the process for sort of de-risking on the personalized side? You know, you mentioned California. I think it's maybe, I imagine it's a little bit broader than that, but where are we in that process? Are we kind of done? Are we a few quarters before all this works itself out? I know you can't really get out of some of those policies.

Yeah. Paul, we are well into the process. I wouldn't be able to give you a view on if we're a quarter or two or three or four away. I can just tell you, from my perspective, we're well into it. On the metrics we're using, we're exceeding the expectations that we have for ourselves at this point in the process. We had moratoriums on certain areas for new business. you know we we're you know we're working with the state of california and we'll continue to do that as uh as well but you know as far as lessons learned in california i think it really boils down to um it's just a new view of risk i think both for us and for the industry on what a really bad day can look like and aggregations and so that's where our focus has been terms, conditions, and pricing on our ENS homeowner business in California, whether it's post-loss or pre-loss, we still feel really good about where we are there.

Great. Appreciate the help, as always. Thank you, guys.

Thank you, Paul.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Zarensky from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is live.

Hey, great. Thanks. Thanks. In terms of the new reinsurance program that you detailed, should we embed a lower top-line impact in the income statement, maybe specifically on personal lines?

You know, this is Mike, and thanks for the question, Mike. You know, the CAT program is really applicable to both commercial and personal. So in 2025, you saw a huge benefit that the CAT program had on our personal line side. So, you know, I won't say maybe it matters on which one gets hit first, depending on what, you know, the CAT is, but we still have a reinstatement, one reinstatement, generally speaking, on the overall CAT program. So that would cover us for a second loss. But as Steve mentioned, if we do have a $2 billion loss this year compared to last year, that'd be 26 compared to 25, we would have a lower amount that we would be out in the current year with the improved coverage up to $2 billion. the only mike steve spray the only thing i might add is that uh as i said my my prepared remarks too is that the overall rate on that property cat program was down seven percent even with the additional coverage okay that's a good clarification then okay so we shouldn't be uh uh i shouldn't be

kind of impacting the uh the premium the cost for for that uh uh in the model okay uh that's good to hear about the upsides protection. Maybe switching gears to, you know, workers' comp, you know, the answer might just be, you know, you guys are booking really conservatively on an action-year basis, but, you know, if I just look at what you're booking at, it continues to increase year over year, obviously a lot of reserve releases, but is anything changing on comp that we should be aware of?

Yeah, I would say, let me start, and Steve, if you want to say it on, but, you know, as it relates to releasing out reserves, you know, it has been consistent. And, you know, I, you know, not that I'm surprised, but, you know, each year we have been having favorable development. You know, we have had the many years of favorable development. We did have 20 million of favorable development in the fourth quarter with 65 million for the year. You know, for the quarter, I would say the $20 million, it was spread really throughout, if you look back the last 10-plus years. The most favorable was 2024, 2023 accident years. That was $4 million and $3 million between those two. If you look at it on a year-to-date basis, the $65 million of favorable development primarily came from accident year 23, 22, and 2020. The other accident years were, even the most recent accident year on the year-to-date basis for 2024, that was a favorable $2 million of favorable development. So, you know, we continue to reserve the way we do conservatively, and, you know, we'll just, you know, I'll watch what our actuaries do.

Mike, I might just add on the kind of on the day-to-day business, underwriting and pricing of comp, we've made, that's another area we've made, you know, great strides over the last 15 years is our expertise. And then our appetite for comp, we just, right or wrong, you know, we just felt that the rate environment wasn't where we wanted it to be. So we've been cautious. We've been careful, conservative in comp. You know, it is, you can see, I think it's now roughly 200 and a little over 240 million of premium. So it has less impact on the overall commercialized book. But we stand ready to help our agents write work comp where we feel like we can get a risk-adjusted return. And I think the future will bode well for us on comp. You know, one of the other things is some of our biggest states, well, our biggest state, Ohio, is obviously a monopolistic state. We don't write workers' compensation here. And we're not, you know, we're not active for work comp in California. And some of our other larger states, Texas, they're a little more minimal as well. So that's just kind of a view from, say, the business side.

Helpful. And lastly, just going back to the commercial lines, competitive environment, you know, I guess if we think about your comments about, you know, casualty is still an issue for the industry in terms of inflation there, property is you know well priced. I guess if if you all had a crystal ball for the industry if you don't want to speak to Cincy would you expect pricing to continue moderating just a tad from the property side or I don't know if you guys willing to go on record there you know we can you know we can see that You guys might not be playing full offense right now based on the kind of agency appointments and top-line growth. But just curious if you feel the competitive environment, the rate of change on pricing is kind of moderated and we kind of are in stable-ish territory.

Yeah, Mike, let me make sure. I'm glad you mentioned this, but make sure we are playing full offense. We always are. We've got such a winning strategy and model that's been proven over time. we are we're on full offense we're adding more products whether it be on the standard side for commercial and personal our small business platform our ens company continues to grow we're adding product out of lloyd's for to to help our agents write more business with us as well we're adding agencies across the country the high quality agencies that will continue so we'll continue to play offense but playing offense winning offense is not going to be in um pulling back on risk selection or probably even worse cutting rate that's that's not going to be part of the equation so we're going to have to along with i think the best agents in the like i said in the country we can't always come down to a price we've got to be able to convey value that we think we bring as a company that I know our agents bring in their communities. And that's where we're going to, that's where we're going to win. And, you know, if price becomes more and more of an equation, then we just have to get, we're going to have to get more at bats and kind of weed through all that. As far as looking forward on competition, I, you know, I said it kind of early on here, just with the headwinds on loss costs, primarily around casualty, general liability, umbrella, management liability has been under pressure, commercial auto, I just don't see that market, that's my opinion, I don't see that market getting, you know, continuing to have pressure on pricing. I just don't think it makes sense. Now, it may go there, and I think it will have an impact on us because if it gets to a point where, again, on a risk-by-risk basis, if we don't feel we can get a risk-adjusted return, we're going to turn away from those in the short term because we're playing a long game here.

Thank you, Mike.

As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question, you can press star plus one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Greg Peters from Raymond James. Your line is live.

Hey, good afternoon. This is Mitch on behalf of Greg. Thanks for taking my questions. So you mentioned in an earlier response that you expect commercial auto pricing to hold up. Can you give us an update on where commercial auto renewal pricing was in the quarter? and based on current claims, how much additional rate you believe might be required to sustain underwriting margins in 2026? Thanks.

Yeah, thanks, Mitch. Commercial auto rate for the fourth quarter was up mid-single digits. We think it on a, you know, pricing is prospective looking forward. We think that we're confident that our commercial auto pricing is exceeding loss costs. One thing that I think is a little unique with us, Mitch, and I mentioned earlier too, is we are a package rider. And so we do not, you know, Monoline Auto is not a big product for Cincinnati Insurance Company. We're also not a heavy transportation rider, long haul trucking risks. It's not to say we don't have one or two in our portfolio, but that is not a focus of ours. So I think our commercial auto over the last, I'll say, seven, eight years has been a little more predictable and a little more, you know, as of year-end 2025, commercial auto, even with some ads in accident year 2025, on a calendar year basis, we were slightly profitable in commercial auto. So, you know, for us, I feel good about commercial auto. And again, it's part of the package.

Great. Thank you. Turning over to the investment portfolio, you mentioned reinvestment yields are running about 70 basis points above the bulk yield. How are you guys expecting that to translate into net investment income growth in 2026, considering the declining rate environment.

Thanks, Mitch. This is Steve Soloria. We're thinking that, you know, the longer rate, longer maturity rates are going to kind of hold steady from where they are. So we're expecting to be able to put money to work there pretty consistently. The insurance side's given us a lot of cash to work with. But from a market standpoint, the Fed seems to be kind of cautious on what they're going to do on the short end. So we think on the long end, we'll continue to get yields in the ballpark of where we've been right now. So we're pretty comfortable that we'll see solid growth going into 2026 and beyond.

Thank you. That concludes our question and answer session. I'll now turn the call over to Steve Spray, CEO, for closing remarks.

Thank you, Jordan. And thank you all for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again on our first quarter 2026 call.

That concludes today's meeting. You may now disconnect.