Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today to discuss One Stop Systems Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter and Year Ended December 31, 2022. With us today are the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, David Raun; and Chief Financial Officer, John Morrison, as well as the Company’s newly appointed Chief Product Officer, Jim Ison. Following their remarks, we will open the call to your questions. Then before we conclude this call, I will provide some important questions regarding the forward-looking statements made by management during the call. I would like to remind everyone that the call will be recorded and made available for replay in the Investors section of the Company’s website. Now, I would like to turn the conference over to OSS President and CEO, David Raun. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Lara, and good afternoon, everyone. It’s good to be here with you. I’m pleased to report that revenue for OSS in the fourth quarter was up 2.7% over the previous year to $18.2 million and up 16.8% for the year to a record $72.4 million. Our adjusted EBITDA for the year was also a record at $5.2 million driven by increased sales and our continued controls on spending. Overall, gross margin for the year was 28.2% due to strong sales of lower margin products, and a midyear temporary reduction in sales to our largest military customer during a successful re-qualification effort. Having completed this re-certification process, these higher margin shipments have now returned to normal. In 2023, we expect a reduction in low-margin media and entertainment business to be replaced with higher margin military product sales. If you’ve been following along with us, you are aware of the AI Transportable strategy that we put in place in 2021. For those less familiar, OSS designs and manufactures innovative edge computing modules and systems or AI Transportable applications, including on-location AI data capture, storage, training and large-scale inference. These products include ruggedized servers, compute accelerators, flash storage arrays, and data recording software. We take the latest high-performance, commercially available products normally only used in state-of-the-art, environmentally controlled data centers and bring them into these challenging, traditionally embedded edge markets. We are pleased with the progress this past year executing on this strategy, which leverages our unique strengths to enable AI and autonomous capabilities in anything that moves, delivering the absolute highest performance without compromise in rugged compact form factors in these harsh environments. Earlier in the year, we announced that we partnered with three key autonomous truck companies, utilizing our Centauri and SDS product lines. This resulted in two of these truck companies rising into the top 10 list for the year. Later in 2022, we announced additional wins, including the deployment of our storage products in vehicles of one of the nation’s largest cellular carriers. In parallel to these quicker-to-market industrial applications, our primary pursuit is that of AI Transportable opportunities within the military theater. The Army, Navy, Marines, and the Air Force are all deploying autonomous and/or AI capabilities. Although budgets might hold off on funding another $10 billion aircraft carrier, we have been advised that demand for the absolute highest performance in compute systems—high performance storage and compute systems to assure technical and analytical superiority is a top priority for the Pentagon, creating new opportunities and tailwinds for OSS. Having started 2022 with just a few significant military customers, we are now engaged at various levels with 8 of the top 10 largest military prime contractors in the U.S. Several of these expanded engagements have led to multiple bids by the primes to the DOD using our products. During this process, we also work directly with several branches of the military, providing us more visibility into programs, developing relationships with decision makers, and in several cases, we are now in the enviable position of having influence on product specifications for RFQs. Driving this process is our innovative product called Rigel, our new well-positioned sales representatives, our military advisory board added in 2022, and the strengthening of our internal team. When we initially introduced our flagship product, Rigel, the most compact supercomputer in the world, we received pushback from the DOD as it did not conform to the entrenched, slower, VPX standard that the military had embraced for years. Recognized for our innovation and market disruptive solutions, we eventually gained traction as decision makers realized they could not achieve elevated performance levels staying with the old standard. Although most would have followed the VPX crowd, we stuck to our strategy and it is now paying off. Armed with the validation of our military AI Transportable strategy, we elected to make some strategic changes to accelerate growth and increase shareholder value. In February of this year, we announced a reorganization, relocating resources to higher margin opportunities, which previously supported low-margin business. We also made some changes in senior management. For example, I asked Jim, who’s on the call today, to assume the role of Chief Product Officer. Jim is extremely talented and innovative in this regard, and he’s responsible to make sure we continue to design and develop market-leading products for our target customers and drive clear market leadership. Additionally, we have initiated a search for a new VP of sales, as well as two additional salespeople for our military markets. Consistent with our military product strategy and to accelerate company growth around these expanding opportunities, the Board and I decided it was time to begin the search for my successor. For this end, we hired a well-known national search firm, and we have some very talented candidates with solid experience and deep connections throughout the DOD and the ecosystems that support them. As a member of the Board and a significant shareholder myself, I plan to stay fully engaged, driving our exciting vision with the team and facilitating a smooth transition. As a Board, we are taking the necessary time to make sure we hire the best candidate, and we currently expect that this transition will be complete by mid-year. I have told the Board I will be flexible on the timing, and they have my full support while I am in the CEO role and on the Board. I am proud of what we’ve accomplished over the past three years, particularly in financial stability, product leadership, and customer development. Prior to my role as CEO, I was an independent director on the Board of OSS. In February of 2020, based on my public technology company CEO background, and just prior to the COVID outbreak, I accepted the CEO job on an interim basis upon release of the Founder CEO. Although it was not my initial intent to seek the full-time CEO role, after seeing a great opportunity taking shape and working with the team, I put my hat in the ring to take OSS to the next level. In June of 2020, we removed the interim part of my CEO title. I believe the Company is positioned well to improve shareholder value. The Company’s future is bright and the Company is poised to accelerate growth and valuation under the right leadership. I look forward to supporting the team and my successor as a member of the OSS Board. I’d ask John to comment on the financials and Jim to remark on customer wins and opportunities after which I will provide additional color and thoughts about 2023 and the future of the Company. John?

Thank you, David, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Today, we issued a press release with our results for the fourth quarter and the year ended December 31, 2022. The release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at onestopsystems.com. The following results are for the fourth quarter and are compared to the same year-ago quarter. As David mentioned, our consolidated revenue in Q4 was up 2.7% to $18.2 million. During the quarter, we saw media and entertainment customers fall short of their projections, resulting in approximately $1 million less revenue than anticipated. This customer is projected to account for less than 10% of our consolidated revenue in 2023. Our core OSS revenue decreased 1.8% to $11.3 million, representing 62% of our total quarterly revenue. Conversely, revenue from OSS Europe increased 10.8% to $6.9 million, which represents 38% of total quarterly revenue. However, excluding our lower margin media and entertainment business, our core OSS revenue increased 16.8% for the quarter. Overall, gross profit decreased $58,000 to $5 million, despite the company realizing improved margins over 30% as a result of starting to ship a greater mix of AI Transportable products. However, a fourth quarter increase in our allowance for realization of inventory associated with the company's transition to higher margin edge AI Transportable military products resulted in an overall gross margin of 27.3% compared to 28.3% in the same year-ago quarter. The gross margin for the core OSS business decreased 1.8 percentage points to 31.4% due to the recognition of additional allowances for inventory realization. OSS Europe’s gross margin percentage improved 1.1 percentage points to 20.5% compared to 19.4%. Overall, quarterly operating expenses decreased 9.4% to $4.6 million with operating expenses as a percentage of revenue decreasing to 25.3% compared to 28.7%. This decrease in operating expense was primarily due to decreases of $138,000 in general and administrative expenses, $239,000 in marketing and selling expenses, and $105,000 in R&D expense. Income from operations increased $424,000 to $353,000 compared to a loss from operations of $71,000 in the fourth quarter of 2021. Net loss on a GAAP basis was $3.3 million or $0.16 per share, increasing from a net loss of $386,000 or a loss of $0.02 per share in the same year-ago period. The loss in the fourth quarter of 2022 included a write-down of the net deferred tax assets of $3.9 million, which was attributable to allowances for the Company's ability to benefit from cumulative tax losses and R&D tax credits. On a non-GAAP basis, inclusive of the aforementioned write-down, the net loss was $2.7 million or $0.14 per share for the quarter, down from non-GAAP net income of $71,000 or $0.00 per share. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP metric, was $1.6 million or 8.9% of quarterly revenue, an increase from $996,000. The following results are for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the results for the year 2021. Revenue increased 16.8% to a record $72.4 million. This increase was primarily due to the growth of the edge AI Transportable and autonomous applications as well as our media and entertainment business. Core OSS business increased 12.5%, contributing $43.3 million of revenue with OSS Europe increasing 24%, contributing $29.1 million of revenue. OSS aggregate gross profit improved $758,000 to $20.4 million. Overall gross margin was 28.2% of revenue in 2022 compared to 31.7% in 2021. The reduction in margin was primarily attributable to four factors. Those factors are: a higher proportion of sales to our low-margin media and entertainment customer; deferment of approximately $3.3 million of higher margin sales of data and storage equipment; an increase in our allowance for realization of inventory; and an increase in the proportion of revenue derived from OSS Europe, which generally operates at a margin of approximately 22%. Gross margin for the core OSS business decreased to 32.7% as compared to 36.9% in 2021. OSS Europe’s gross margin decreased to 21.5%, due to higher transportation and material costs, as compared to 23.1% in 2021. Operating expenses increased 5.2% to $18.8 million, which increase is primarily due to an increase of $605,000 in marketing and selling expenses, resulting from additional marketing, trade shows, and travel. There was also an increase in R&D expenses of $711,000 for the development of new standard products for the AI Transportable market. These two increases were partially offset by a decrease of $379,000 in general and administrative expenses. Operating expense as a percentage of revenue improved to 26% compared to 28.9% in 2021. Income from operations decreased $179,000 to $1.6 million due to reduced gross margins with income before taxes decreasing $744,000 compared to the prior year. However, after giving effect to the prior year one-time PPP loan and interest forgiveness on a pro forma basis, there was a year-over-year increase of $770,000 in income before taxes. Net loss on a GAAP basis was $2.2 million or a loss of $0.11 per basic and diluted share. This was inclusive of the write-down of the net deferred assets of $3.9 million, which as I explained earlier, was attributable to allowances for the Company's ability to benefit from the cumulative tax losses and R&D tax credits. This was compared to 2021 when there was net income of $2.3 million or $0.12 per diluted share, which included the one-time benefit of $1.5 million or $0.08 per diluted share due to the forgiveness of the Company’s PPP loan and related interest. Non-GAAP net loss totaled $175,000 or a loss of $0.01 per basic and diluted share, which included the write-down for the deferred taxes as compared to non-GAAP net income of $3.1 million or $0.16 per diluted share in 2021. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, totaled $5.2 million or 7.1% of revenue compared to $4.9 million or 7.9% of revenue in 2021. For both 2021, both non-GAAP net income and adjusted EBITDA excluded the PPP loan and interest forgiveness. Now, let’s turn to our balance sheet. On December 31, 2022, cash and cash equivalents totaled $3.1 million with short-term investments of $10.1 million for a combined total of $13.2 million. This represents an increase of approximately $0.5 million compared to our balances as of September 30, 2022. We believe the current financial resources available to OSS provide us with the stability and flexibility to be responsive to changes in business demands, and particularly those that require investment in working capital to be successful. This completes our financial review for the quarter and the year. I would now like to turn the call over to our Chief Product Officer—congratulations, Jim—to Jim Ison.

Thank you, John, and good afternoon, everyone. In Q4, we added three new major program wins across three market segments, military, commercial aerospace, and autonomous commercial vehicles. The military win is for a new compact airborne storage server for the Navy that quickly and easily transports mission data to ground stations and to the cloud. The commercial aerospace win involves an upgrade to aircraft network systems used in satellite communications and in-flight entertainment. The autonomous vehicle win with a tier one OEM in Germany continues to highlight OSS’s strength in commercial data logging and storage applications in the U.S. and Europe. These wins brought our total new major program wins for the year to 19, which tops our 14 wins from 2021. Of the 19 wins, 13 were in the AI Transportable space, including 7 autonomous vehicles, 4 vehicle storage systems, and 2 military AI programs. We expect these new wins to generate approximately $10 million in 2023 and more in the following years. We added three new pending major programs during the fourth quarter. Two of the three opportunities are AI Transportable programs that include an agriculture AI solution and an autonomous vehicle data logging system. The third opportunity is for our latest Gen-5 acceleration systems. Our current pipeline of pending major programs totals 31, with 14 of these involving AI Transportable applications and 8 of those in military applications. Turning to products and certifications. Our Rigel Edge Supercomputer recently attained NVIDIA certified systems endorsement, simplifying our sales process. It is the only edge certified AI system using four of the most powerful PCI express Gen 4 HGX A100 GPUs. NVIDIA certified systems are tested and evaluated by NVIDIA engineers for peak performance, functionality, scalability, and security, providing extra confidence in our AI workflow performance. In addition, last year we received AS9100 certification for our aerospace-level quality system, as well as Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, otherwise known as CMMC 2.0, allowing us to qualify for a larger number of military AI programs and preparing us to potentially participate as a prime contractor to the U.S. government in the future. We anticipate additional wins with the DOD coming soon due to our unique high-performance product mix and corporate and product certifications. As many of you know, military contracts often move more slowly and cautiously, but the diligence and expertise of our teams are starting to pay off. So far in Q1 of this year, we have already won two of these military applications. This includes an anti-electronic warfare system for fighter jets, and the recently announced $1.3 million Army contract to deliver a rugged visualization solution. The visualization solution will be based on NVIDIA GPUs that are interconnected with an OSS design PCI express fabric with this enabling in-vehicle 360 degree situational awareness. On the marketing front, in Q4, we exhibited at the Association of the United States Army Annual Conference in Washington DC and at SC22, which is the annual international conference for high-performance computing, networking, storage, and analysis that was held in Dallas. We also attended the WEST Sea Services Conference in San Diego in Q1 of this year. At both SC22 and WEST, we teamed up with our partner TMGcore to demonstrate a technologically disruptive two-phase liquid immersion cooled version of our Rigel Edge Supercomputer. As the world’s first two-phase liquid immersion cooled supercomputer for AI Transportables, Rigel can now offer breakthrough levels of operating efficiency, compactness, and ruggedness in the TMGcore edge box. And as we like to say, it delivers performance without compromise. The DOD has expressed interest in this technology as it will allow for a higher density of Rigel systems deployed into government transportables, allowing Rigel to address more harsh environments such as outside of a pressurized area of an aircraft, and reduce their noise signature used in sensitive applications. With my recent transition from Chief Sales and Marketing Officer to Chief Product Officer, I look forward to leading the strategic direction of our technology, products, and customer adoption. Now with that, I’d like to turn the call back over to Dave.

Thank you, Jim. This year will be a pivotal one for OSS on multiple levels, as we focus on reducing our inventory, scaling back low-margin operations while boosting our high-margin AI Transportable business, showcasing more military capabilities, and bringing in new talent. Based on our current outlook, I expect our revenue to remain similar to last year's, but we should see a significant improvement in margins, leading to higher margin dollars due to a better mix. We anticipate growth in our industrial business, which includes autonomous trucks, cellular carrier trucks, agricultural equipment, and autonomous baggage equipment. Although we expect military AI Transportables to lead the growth with a target of a 40% increase in 2023, this growth will benefit from the return of our largest military customer following last year's certification delays, along with the addition of new business. Recently, OSS has announced several achievements in the defense sector, such as securing a $3 million defense order, extending our storage contract with the Navy, and successfully winning a direct collaboration with the Army. OSS has been contracted to design and deliver an essential capability for Army ground vehicles, which could be deployed in thousands of Strykers, Bradleys, and Abrams Tanks. This work has opened up numerous additional opportunities with both the Army and a major defense prime contractor. This contractor, with whom we previously had no relationship, approached us after bidding on the Army program and expressed interest in collaborating on other opportunities, utilizing our technology and expertise. For many years, OSS has provided storage solutions for the Navy's P-8 aircraft, totaling over $30 million in shipments. We believe that the contract extensions and future business will yield similar value. Our extended exclusive supplier agreement underscores our leadership in technology and our long history of providing robust storage solutions, including software for transportable applications in small, lightweight, and portable formats, particularly for secure, high-speed data recording. This program has led to several more opportunities with the same prime contractor. Unfortunately, until recently, we had not been able to replicate this level of engagement with another top 10 prime contractor. As I mentioned earlier regarding our strategy from 2021, we have made substantial progress within the defense industry and expect to share more achievements with investors throughout 2023. OSS is proud to be collaborating with various military organizations to enhance our country's defenses through strategic AI and autonomous capabilities. Just a year ago, we had no presence at one of the other top 10 prime contractors. Since then, we have had several meetings, including one attended by 80 individuals from both the contractor and the Department of Defense. I have attended three of these meetings and have been encouraged by the genuine interest in our products and capabilities. Although we have not yet secured a formal contract with this prospect, they are considering using Rigel, our SDS servers, and our storage platform for multiple Air Force aircraft. If we succeed with these current opportunities, they could generate more revenue than our largest military customer. They have praised the performance and compactness of Rigel, as well as our innovative roadmap that incorporates next-generation products from partners like NVIDIA and a path towards two-phase immersion technology. Additionally, we have included Rigel in our proposal to the Marines for a significant program upgrade after addressing the VPX military standard requirement. Senior management from this customer visited us in Escondido and expressed their intent to leverage Rigel and our roadmap as a scalable solution for all their aircraft proposals, including retrofitting existing aircraft and developing next-generation models. We believe our products, technological expertise, and skills are well-suited for AI and autonomous applications within the DOD. The programs we are involved with, which have yet to be announced, span a variety of applications across different aircraft, including surveillance, tankers, fighter jets, drones, and helicopters. On land, our work covers both manned and unmanned vehicles, detection systems, battlefield communications, command centers, and low-signature remote supercomputers. At sea, we see potential for autonomous ships, submarines, and amphibious vessels. While most of the opportunities I've outlined have not yet been awarded, we feel we are well-positioned to secure several of them while also pursuing new programs. I am frequently asked what distinguishes OSS from others in the market or what barriers exist to entry. Unlike many players in the fragmented market, our foundation is built on performance without compromise. Rather than offering lower performance embedded solutions, we provide cutting-edge technology typically used in advanced data centers. Our engineering development and manufacturing capabilities give us the flexibility to start from scratch to optimize for this market, utilizing the latest products to push the boundaries of thermodynamics, power density, and ruggedness, as well as integrating switch fabric skills with the latest high-speed PCI express and NVIDIA’s licensed NVLink protocols. We further enhance our products with software and take pride in building strong relationships with our customers. Looking ahead to the first quarter of 2023, we expect revenue to be approximately $16.6 million, with a greater emphasis on AI Transportable products as revenue from our lower-margin media and entertainment customer continues to decline. We anticipate that revenues will rise throughout the year as new programs come online, particularly in the military sector, which should boost margins. Our projections indicate that OSS may experience revenue growth of 25% to 30% beginning in 2024. We appreciate your ongoing support and the dedication of our teams. Now, I would like to open the call for questions. Lara?

Your first question comes from Scott Searle from Roth Capital. Please go ahead.

Guys, I appreciate all the color, a lot of color in there. So, I’ll cut through to a couple of things quickly, but first on the mundane front, just from a gross margin standpoint, John, I want to go back and clarify a couple things in the fourth quarter. Even with the decline in Disguise contribution, it sounds like that we didn’t have a lot of the higher end military product revenue that was going through re-certification. Is that correct? And could you quantify the allowances? And then as we look into the first quarter here, how much of a recovery in gross margin do we see or because of seasonality and absorption issues, it’s still a little bit of headwinds until we ramp up through the course of this year?

So, we saw a little over 2.5% on margin erosion as a result of the additional allowances that we recorded. It basically tied directly to our media—more of our business that we are leaving, which is our lower margin business as we move into the more profitable military business. And we did a detailed analysis of our inventory and took a look at the realization of that and based upon that, we booked the digital adjustments for slow moving or obsolete inventory.

I think—also, Scott, I’d just add that during the fourth quarter, although we had seen the military start to rebound, it has not rebounded as far as it will—as far as like the current quarter. In addition to that, although our media and entertainment customer was down and lower than expected, it was still a significant number and you’ll see quite a bit further drop moving forward, which is built into the 16.6 number…

Got it. David, it sounds like Disguise is rolling off pretty quickly. I think the number that you said was less than 10% of revenue contribution in 2023. Just want to clarify that. And then also, I think you talked about the military AI Transportable is growing 40% this year. I was wondering if you could calibrate us what it was in ‘22. I guess you’re including some of the Raytheon into that as well, or it’s not clear to me. I just want to know what numbers I’m working off of.

Yes, Raytheon is part of that. And basically the military portion of the business is growing from—from an overall company, it’s growing from about 20% to 30% year-to-year. If you look at just the OSS classic, it’s going from something like in the 30s to over half of about 55% of the business during that period of time. On the media and entertainment customer front, yes, it’s fallen off faster than we projected when we were visiting back in November. And so, we are just moving forward. And fortunately, the hard work we’ve been doing on the military front is starting to pay off for us.

Got you. And then, to dive in on the outlook, the pipeline is really building on the military front in a very short period of time. It seems like it’s accelerating. I’m surprised to see that you are so comfortable talking about 25% to 30% growth in 2024. I just want to confirm that in terms of total revenues, because it implies you are basically back talking about $90 million in sales. And then if I was to strip out Bressner, if I was to strip out Disguise, it looks like you are growing into 2024, 60% to 70% on the core OSS business. Am I doing that correctly? Am I looking at it from a proper standpoint?

No. So, what we basically—what we are trying to communicate is that 2023 as far as overall revenue compared to ‘21 is approximately flattish, let’s call it, but we are replacing the low-margin media business with military AI Transportable business. So, I mean that—and we are seeing growth out of Bressner. So, did I answer your question? If not, please let me know.

No, I’m sorry, Dave. I was talking about ‘24 and you said one of the things. So ‘23 revenue is comparable to ‘22 or is it comparable to ‘21?

‘22 is—I’m sorry, ‘23 is comparable to ‘22. Sorry if I said that wrong...

Yes. Okay. No, perfect.

Yes. And 24, it’s hard to know exactly, but that is what we’ve been striving for, and the activity is so broad on the military spectrum right now, if we do what we think we are going to do in addition to things we’ve already closed, that’s our expectation. We will update you more on that as the year progresses.

Okay. Big numbers. Just two more questions and I’ll get back in the queue. So then looking at that growth into 2024, obviously, there’s a tremendous amount of far along design activity and discussions. You talked a little bit about the pipelines. You talked about some contracts. But I was wondering if there is some sort of number otherwise that you could quantify to help us understand the magnitude of some of this opportunity as we look out two or three years. And then also on the Rigel side, I was wondering who you are bidding against. Who’s on the shortlist in terms of the competition that you’re coming up against with Rigel? Thanks.

Well, we’re—I know we’ve been replacing people in some designs. So far in the designs customers I’ve been involved, we are not hearing competitors coming up because we are being told we are the only guy that has something at this level of performance. Jim, any additional comments you want to add?

So typically, what we are doing is—the military comes out with the traditional—we kind of mentioned it in the call, an opportunity that they think is good for their VPX and ablated architecture and everything the way they’ve been doing it before. When we get this back and we show them what we could do with Rigel, it totally changes their philosophy on how they approach the problem. So, instead of ablated architecture they use Rigel and it’s 10 times to 40 times more powerful than what they were considering before. And their eyes light up and they get their forward body lean, Dave likes to say. And the customers are like, okay, we want to change our spec to be like what you have. And that’s really the momentum that we’re building in these accounts. So, we’re not really—we take ourselves away from bidding head to head with VPX when we bring these in.

Great. I’ll get back in the queue. Thanks. And really excited to hear what’s going on as we look out into 2024. Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Martinuzzi from Lake Street.

Just a clarification, Dave, when you said the military, the 30% to 55%, was that 2022 to 2023? Just OSS classic excluding Bressner?

Yes. So, I gave you two sets of numbers, when you have the whole thing with including OSS Europe, then we’re going from 20% to about 30%. When you pull that out and just look at OSS classic, we’re going from the mid-30s to like 55% from ‘22 to ‘23.

Got it. I appreciate the clarification. The media and entertainment customer, what was that customer in 2022 as a percent of total revenue?

We’re looking up here? It was one of our top 10.

Over 20%. It’s in the—he’s looking, I’m just doing number that I have—22%, 23%. Yes. So, I think we’re on the same page.

25%.

Okay. And that 25%, you’re saying that becomes less than 10% in 2023?

That is correct.

Okay. All right. And then, as I look out to—you’ve given us a couple of numbers here for 2023, the revenue comp for Q1, you’re talking about at 16.6, that’d be a minus 3% revenue comp. You’re talking about roughly 0% for the year. So, how do we think about the out quarters—are they roughly kind of 0 to 2% in the out quarters, or is the front half of the year we’re expecting a contraction, and then really kind of growth in the back half, a better way to think about it?

I just kind of visualize it, kind of a steady step upward to get to approximately flat. And to give you a little more color on Q1, for example, if we were still doing the same kind of business levels, the higher business levels, the media and entertainment customer, we would have set a new record—all-time record for revenue for a quarter, and it would’ve been—for Q1 would be—and we’ve never ever had a big Q1. So, I think it kind of tells you that the rest of the business is pretty strong because the number’s pretty small for them. In Q1, the number is much lower than it was in Q4. And Q4 was lower than Q3.

Yes, that’s what I asked about the first question, or I guess it was my second question, where you’re kind of fighting at least a 15% headwind and still coming up flat is how I was—it's another way to frame that 25%...

Flat—assuming those things materialize we’re seeing additional margin points. So margin dollars should be up for the year.

Yes. And then, I don’t know if you’re willing to comment on it, but gross margin dollars up for the year. What about adjusted EBITDA? You finished out 2022 with adjusted EBITDA $5.2 million and a 7% adjusted EBITDA margin. What are we thinking about for 2023?

So, it’ll be very consistent with that which—we reported in 2022 as a result of some additional expenses that we’ll be incurring. It’s going to be flat right around $5 million.

And then, Dave, you said the CEO search is underway, got some good candidates, and we should think about kind of a mid-year hire. Is that correct?

Yes. It may happen sooner because we’ve got really good candidates we’re talking to right now, but that’s what internally we’re targeting, and I’m just staying flexible. So, if it’s quicker, fine; if it takes longer, I’m here.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Gomes from Noble Capital. Please go ahead.

I wanted to start, maybe you could just kind of walk us through a little bit more, I understand the military opportunity. But a year ago, Dave, we were all about autonomous trucks and how that market was the real one that we’re going after. And we’ve kind of made the big switch here now to the military. Just trying to get a better handle as to what caused that and what is now the plan on the autonomous truck side. Where do you see that business growing? I know you talked about two of the clients were the top 10 in revenues for 2022. How do you see that going into 2023?

Yes. So Joe, thanks for this question. It’s a great question. And I understand why you’re asking it. What—I don’t think this is apparent to some people because of that great contrast is that when we launched AI Transportables in 2021, we said we were going after the military and industrial markets. I could even share with you the fact that originally we thought of only doing the military market because we thought it was the biggest opportunity, but then we said, you know, anything industrial is going to be quicker. So, let’s put the heaviest focus on military, but we’re just not going to be able to talk about it much for a while until things start to develop. Because it just takes longer. So that’s really what happened. And we pitched AI Transportables. We were making some progress. The truck guys came alive. We shared that with the marketplace as proof points. And now that we feel good about what’s going on in the military, we feel like we can talk more about that. So, then that brings, okay, where are the trucks? We still believe the trucks are the same place that the last couple calls. And how I communicate that it’s a good business, it ends up being in our top 10 kind of customers. We expect growth out of it. And it is something that at some point in time could be a very strong inflection point on revenue as things go into production. And our intent is to stay in that market and be a production solution. But at the same time, as we’ve said before, we did not want to bet the farm on it because of the higher risk-reward aspect of it. So, it’d be great if it happens. We’re going to try to make it happen. I think we will. But I think the building blocks of the Company as we layer in just dependable businesses that are going to build year after year, high margin, rack and stack them is going to be on the military side. And I believe that will drive a lot of the value of the company in my opinion.

Okay, great. Thank you for that. And then, just wanted to clarify. You talked that you are now engaged with 8 of the top 10 largest prime contractors in the military side. You mentioned something about if one of these programs hit, it could be equivalent to the P-8 program, which is let’s call it $30 million over a five-year period. Did I hear that correct? I mean, you are still talking about that same type of timeframe for the revenue?

Yes. I really was saying that just one of those primes and some of the stuff because it’s so broad. If we just close what we had, it would be a larger account. So, for example, I think the one I made that comment on, we have more activity today in the short period of time on more programs than we had at our biggest customer. So, it’s just a broader—we are hitting on more cylinders there than we do on our biggest account. But John, I don’t want to mislead anybody. It’s going to take some time to turn that into revenue and everything, but you are going to see some of it in 2023 as they do different funding or they buy a couple of this or whatever at high ASPs. And that’s part of the revenue growth during the year in addition to the clients we already have.

Okay. And then, one last one for me. You guys have always stated that the long-term margin objective was in that 35% to 40% range. Given kind of Disguise now falling off and hope for significant growth on the military side, which carries margins up to that 60% level, are you still targeting that 35% to 40% level? Is that something that maybe you will see creep up over time here?

We definitely believe it’s very doable. And part of the reason is the OSS classic business today when you remove the media and entertainment is in that kind of range.

Thanks for taking the questions.

Yes. The OSS classic business fluctuates when you pull out the media and entertainment somewhere between 35% and 45% on average. And we have contributors from customers anything from as high as 70% and we have other ones that are lower.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Kinstlinger from Alliance Global Partners. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. This is Shervin on for Brian. Thanks for taking my questions. Could you—I also had a question about autonomous trucking. Last quarter, you mentioned about multiple times in the prototype phase. I wonder, if over the last quarter had any more entered the prototype phase, and when or what does the next phase look like? When do you see—if you have any sort of visibility of when these customers will move into it and the impact it will have on your business from a revenue point of view?

Yes. The prototype phase is—it’s a long period of time. Fortunately, the ASPs are high. We may be introducing another account in—this quarter we are in right now. So there are more opportunities there. As far as a production part, depending on who you talk to, it could range anywhere from people’s belief that’s ‘24 to people’s belief that’s 2030, depending on how they look at it. But what I believe will happen is that they buy, say 25 of them at a time, they do all their work. I believe what’s going to happen next is the FedExes, the Amazons, all these companies that have planned to use autonomous trucks will want to start to work on the logistics of this. And so, they’ll say, hey, we want to buy 25—we want to get 25 trucks even though a man still has to be in there because we need to start working the logistics of it. And maybe they limit it to a hub, to another hub or something like that. And we believe that could generate business to increase the size of these accounts over time. It wouldn’t be that inflection point type revenue, but it would be nice growth for us.

All right. Thank you. Next question, in regards to Rigel. I remember last quarter you mentioned that you were in talks with the DOD to integrate Rigel into large airframe drones and land vehicles for combat. What has—has there been any progress in those specific instances? And in Rigel in general, when can we start to see meaningful revenue start to ramp? Do you guys have visibility there?

Well, we continue to get more activity on Rigel at new opportunities and the ones you mentioned are progressing. As far as revenue, we’ll ship revenue in 2023. But it’s—even the numbers I’m talking about, stuff, you’ve got our current customer and other ones layering in. It’s not tens of millions of dollars of Rigel or anything for this year, but it’s likely single digits of millions this year.

All right. Thank you. One last question that…

But just to add on to that, but that is where these things start to go, and deploy them into multiple vehicles and everything. That’s where the numbers start to add up pretty quick and is what has the possibility to grow—fuel that kind of growth rate in 2024 we’re talking about.

And it’s also—if you take what Rigel has brought us into several of these opportunities that we’ve actually closed with other programs. So, the autonomous trucks, a lot of people saw Rigel first out and said that’s what we want. And we gave them that capability maybe with something like the SDS server. And even the Army opportunity that we had announced last—I guess it was this quarter, was something that started off because of the capabilities inside Rigel that they wanted slightly different. And we are doing the design based on that. So, Rigel is opening a lot of doors, even if it’s not producing its own revenue in those ranges that Dave was talking about yet as we close these deals.

That’s really good to hear. One last question in regards to your guidance for Q1, close to down 3% year-over-year is what I’m seeing. Is this just due to the faster drop off from Disguise or is there also a slower ramp of military demand that are working together to cause this drop-off? And then moving on from there, if there’s a steeper drop-off now from Disguise, which will mean a less steep drop-off later on in the year, should we expect revenue to be down for the first couple quarters, maybe flatten in the second, and then growth in the back half?

So, first of all, if you—what I tried to communicate earlier, if you looked at the first quarter of 2022 and first quarter of 2023, and you pulled out the media and entertainment business, you would see very solid growth of our other core business. So, because the media and entertainment numbers dropped so much and it’s not a big part of our number anymore. So, what we said is we think this quarter is where it’s at, and we think the next several quarters step up quarter-after-quarter. Am I answering your question?

Yes. But so—just to confirm, in terms of military demand ramping back up, is it going back up as you expected or are you still seeing longer delays? And I know you said that it’s typically a cautionary business, but the past three quarters and even fourth quarter now have been relatively weaker. And I know there’s going to be more strength, but you don’t see that strength teetering towards the back.

We’re having a good Q1 in military.

There are no further questions at this time. I’d now like to turn the call over back to Mr. David Raun for closing remarks.

Thank you, everybody, for joining us today. We’ve enjoyed sharing the latest progress at OSS with you today, and believe the Company’s strategy is solid and its future is bright. We look forward to speaking with you again in May, if not sooner. In the meantime, as always, feel free to reach out to John or myself at any time. And with that, let’s go ahead and wrap up the call.

Thank you, sir. Now, before we conclude today’s call, I would like to provide the Company’s safe harbor statement that includes important cautions regarding forward-looking statements made during today’s call. One Stop Systems cautions you that statements in the presentation that are not a description of historical facts are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the company’s current beliefs and expectations. Such forward-looking statements include, for example, those regarding the Company’s expectations for revenue growth generated by new products, future changes to its business objectives and design wins among other things. The inclusion of such forward-looking statements and others should not be regarded as a representation by OSS that any of its plans will be achieved. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the presentation due to the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, including, without limitation, that the market for our products is developing and may not develop as we expect, military conflicts, global pandemics and other disasters or public health concerns, including COVID-19 in regions of the world where we have operations, customers or source material or sell products may affect such market. Our operating results could be negatively impacted by inflationary pressures, supply chain constraints, increased interest rates or other economic conditions. Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, which would make our future operating results difficult to predict and could cause operating results to fall below expectations or guidance. If we are unable to offset anticipated future decreases in revenue in our media and entertainment space with other business, our operating financial results may be adversely affected. Our ability to successfully integrate the operation systems, technologies, product offerings and personnel with acquired companies, if any, may prove difficult and adversely affect our financial results. Our products are subject to competition, including competition from the customers to whom we may sell and competitive pressure from new and existing companies may harm our business sales, growth rates and market share. Our future success depends on our abilities to develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced products that meet the needs of our customers. The likelihood of our design proposals becoming design wins is uncertain and revenue may never be realized. Our products fulfill specialized needs and functions within the technology industry and such needs or functions may become unnecessary or the characteristics of such needs and functions may shift in such a way as to cause our products to no longer fulfill such needs or functions. New entrants into our market may harm our competitive position. We rely on the limited number of suppliers to support a manufacturer design process. And we cannot protect our proprietary design rights and intellectual property rights, our competitive position could be harmed or we could incur significant expenses to enforce our rights. Our international sales and operations subject us to additional risks that can adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. We may not be able to accurately report our financial results and other risks described in our prior press release and in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, including under the heading Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequent filings with the SEC. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of the conference call and we undertake no obligation to revise or update this information to reflect events or circumstances after this date hereof. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement, which is made under the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Before we end today’s conference, I would like to remind everyone that this call will be available for replay starting later this evening through April 6, 2023. Please refer to today’s press release for dial-in and replay instructions available via the Company’s website at ir.onestopsystems.com. Thank you for joining us today. This concludes our conference. You may now disconnect.