Jushi Holdings Inc PRE 14A, filed Apr 24, 2026

Jushi Holdings Inc. (JUSH)

PRE 14A 2026-04-24 For: 2026-04-24

View Original

Added on October 22, 2026

Search and read filings like this one from Claude or ChatGPT with the SEC filings MCP server →


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND VOTING			7
Proxy Materials			7
How You Can Vote			12
Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations			14
Description of the Company's Voting Securities			16
Notice-and-Access			16
Obtaining Additional Information			16
OVERVIEW OF PROPOSALS TO BE VOTED ON			18
PROPOSAL 1: SETTING OF THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS THAT CONSTITUTES THE BOARD			18
PROPOSAL 2: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			18
PROPOSAL 3: APPOINTMENT AND REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS			23
PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF ARRANGEMENT			25
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			72
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			74
Audit Committee			74
Compensation Committee			75
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee			76
Board Oversight of Enterprise Risk			76
Board Leadership			77
Corporate Governance Principles and Code of Ethics			77
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			77
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			78
Biographical Information			78
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			78
2025 Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives			78
2025 Executive Compensation Program			78
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION			84
OTHER MATTERS			86
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN MATTERS TO BE ACTED ON AT THE MEETING			86
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE			86
APPENDIX A: ARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION			A-1
APPENDIX B: PLAN OF ARRANGEMENT			B-1
APPENDIX C: SECTIONS 237 TO 247 OF THE BCBCA			C-1
APPENDIX D: INTERIM ORDER			D-1
APPENDIX E: NOTICE OF HEARING AND PETITION			E-1
APPENDIX F: BC NOTICE OF ARTICLES			F-1


	Year Ended December 31,
	2025		2024
Audit Fees (1)	$	889,000	$	1,199,000
Audit Related Fees (2)	343,000		364,000
Tax Fees (3)	—		—
All Other Fees (4)	—		141,000
Total Fees	$	1,232,000	$	1,704,000


(1) “Audit Fees” includes the aggregate fees billed for the audit of the annual consolidated US GAAP financial statements.
(2) “Audit Related Fees” includes the aggregate fees billed for the review of interim unaudited consolidated US GAAP financial statements, comfort letters, consents, and reviews of securities filings.
(3) “Tax fees” includes the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4) “All other fees” includes fees related to the Registration Statements on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus filed in Canada.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Quorum of Shareholders	Under the NRS, unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws, a quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of stockholders is a majority of the voting power entitled to vote at the meeting whether present in person or by proxy. Shares represented at a meeting of stockholders by proxy count towards a quorum even if the proxy does not have the authority to vote on any matter. The Bylaws state that quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of stockholders is five percent (5%) of the voting power of the Corporation’s capital stock, represented in person or by proxy (regardless of whether the proxy has authority to vote on any matter).	The BCBCA provides that the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is the quorum established by the articles of the company. If no quorum is established by the articles, the quorum is two shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting whether present or by proxy. If the number of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting is less than the quorum applicable to the company, then all of the shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting, whether present personally or by proxy, will constitute quorum. In accordance with the BC Articles, subject to the special rights and restrictions attached to the shares of any class or series of shares, the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is two persons who are, or who represent by proxy, shareholders who, in the aggregate, hold at least 5% of the issued shares entitled to be voted at the meeting.
Required Vote Generally	Under the NRS, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide for different proportions, action by the stockholders on a matter, other than the election of directors, is approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the action exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the action. Unless provided otherwise in the articles of incorporation or bylaws, directors are elected at the annual meeting of stockholders by plurality vote, or if no annual meeting is held, at a special meeting called and held for that purpose. The Bylaws provide that, unless the articles of incorporation, bylaws, or Nevada law provide for a different proportion, action by the stockholders on a matter, other than the election of directors, is approved if the number of votes cast in favor of the action exceeds the number of votes cast in opposition to the action and that directors will be elected by a plurality vote.	Under the BCBCA, an ordinary resolution, meaning a resolution passed by a simple majority of the votes cast by shareholders voting shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings, is required to pass most matters at a shareholders’ meeting. Under the BCBCA, directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast by the shareholders voting shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings, or passed, after being submitted to all of the shareholders holding shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings, by being consented to in writing by shareholders holding shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings who, in the aggregate, hold shares carrying at least a special majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the resolution.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Required Vote for Mergers, Conversions, Exchanges and Sale of Assets	Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the NRS requires approval of the board of directors and at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares entitled to vote for a merger or a sale of all of the assets of the corporation. So long as the surviving corporation is organized in Nevada, the NRS does not generally require a stockholder vote of the surviving corporation in a merger (unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation) if: (1) the existing articles of incorporation are not amended; (2) each share of stock of the surviving corporation outstanding immediately before the merger is identical after the merger; (3) the number of voting shares issued and issuable as a result of the merger will not exceed 20% of the total number of voting shares of the surviving corporation outstanding immediately before the merger; and (4) the number of participating shares, meaning shares entitling their holders to participate without limitation in distributions, issued and issuable as a result of the merger will not exceed 20% of the total number of participating shares outstanding immediately before the merger. Although the NRS requires stockholder approval only for the sale of all of a corporation’s assets, the practice is to interpret this statute to mean the sale of “all or substantially all” assets. It is likely that many sales of less than all of the assets of a corporation would therefore require stockholder approval under Nevada law. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws do not contain any specific provisions that depart from the provisions of the NRS described above.	Certain extraordinary corporate actions such as certain amalgamations, arrangements, continuances, sales of substantially all the undertaking of a company other than in the ordinary course of business, and certain other extraordinary corporate actions such as liquidations or dissolution require, among other things, authorizations by special resolution, meaning, among other things, a resolution approved by not less than a special majority, which is set out in the BC Articles as two-thirds of the votes cast at a general meeting called for the purpose of considering the special resolution, or a resolution passed by being consented to in writing by all of the shareholders holding shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Amendments to the BC Notice of Articles and BC Articles and the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws	Under the NRS, every amendment to the articles of incorporation must be made in the following manner: ● The proposed amendment must be approved by the board of directors and submitted to the stockholders for approval. ● The proposed amendment requires the approval of stockholders representing at least a majority of the voting power of the corporation, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series (as described below), or as otherwise required by the articles of incorporation. If any proposed amendment would adversely alter or change any preference or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must also be approved by the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series adversely affected by such amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof. The amendment does not have to be approved by the vote of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series whose preference or rights are adversely affected by the amendment if the articles of incorporation specifically deny the right to vote on such an amendment. Different series of the same class of shares do not constitute different classes of shares for the purpose of voting by classes except when the series is adversely affected by an amendment in a different manner than other series of the same class. The NRS provides that, unless otherwise prohibited by any bylaw adopted by the stockholders, the board of directors may adopt, amend or repeal any bylaw, including any bylaw adopted by the stockholders. The NRS also provides that the articles of incorporation may grant the authority to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws exclusively to the board of directors. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws specifically provide that the Bylaws may be amended exclusively by the Board.	Under the BCBCA, an alteration to the articles or notice of articles of a company may require a resolution to be passed by: (i) the type of resolution specified by the BCBCA; (ii) if not specified by the BCBCA, the type of resolution specified by the articles; or (iii) if neither contain such a provision, a special resolution, which as set out in the BC Articles, is a resolution that, among other things, is passed by at least two-thirds of the votes cast on the resolution. The BCBCA does allow certain capital alterations and alterations to the articles and notice of articles to be approved by an ordinary resolution (simple majority) of shareholders or by the directors, subject to the articles of the company. The Company currently has provisions in the BC Articles that permit alterations to the Notice of Articles, BC Articles and share structure in some circumstances by directors resolution, subject to any further requirements under the BCBCA and the BC Articles, including, inter alia, to: ● create one or more classes or series of shares or, if none of the shares of a class or series of shares are allotted or issued, eliminate that class or series of shares; ● increase, reduce or eliminate the maximum number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue out of any class or series of shares or establish a maximum number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue out of any class or series of shares for which no maximum is established; ● subdivide or consolidate all or any of its unissued, or fully paid issued, shares; ● change all or any of its unissued, or fully paid issued, shares with par value into shares without par value or any of its unissued shares without par value into shares with par value; ● alter the identifying name of any of its shares, or ● otherwise alter its authorized share structure when required or permitted to do so by the BCBCA; The BC Articles also provide that, if the BCBCA does not specify the type of resolution and the BC Articles do not specify another type of resolution, the Company may by ordinary resolution alter the BC Articles. The BCBCA also provides that a right or special right attached to issued shares must not be prejudiced or interfered with or under the memorandum, notice of articles or articles unless the shareholders holding shares of the class or series of shares to which the right or special right is attached consent by a special separate resolution of those shareholders.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Size of Board; Director Qualifications	Under the NRS, a director must be a natural person that is at least 18 years of age. Under the NRS, a corporation must have at least one director, and may provide in its articles of incorporation or in its bylaws for a fixed number of directors or a variable number of directors, and may otherwise provide for the manner in which the number of directors may be increased or decreased. The Bylaws provide that the number of directors shall be at least one (1) and no more than nine (9).	Under the BC Articles, the size of the board is determined by ordinary resolution, provided that it is not less than three directors if the company is a public company. Under the BCBCA, an individual is not qualified to become or act as a director of a company if that individual is (a) under the age of 18 years, (b) found by a court, in Canada or elsewhere, to be incapable of managing the individual’s own affairs, unless a court, in Canada or elsewhere, subsequently finds otherwise, (b.1) a person in respect of whom a certificate of incapability is issued under the Adult Guardianship Act, unless the certificate is subsequently cancelled under section 37 (4) of that act, (c) an undischarged bankrupt, or (d) convicted in or out of British Columbia of an offence in connection with the promotion, formation or management of a corporation or unincorporated business, or of an offence involving fraud, unless (i) the court orders otherwise, (ii) 5 years have elapsed since the last to occur of (A) the expiration of the period set for suspension of the passing of sentence without a sentence having been passed, (B) the imposition of a fine, (C) the conclusion of the term of any imprisonment, and (D) the conclusion of the term of any probation imposed, or (iii) a pardon was granted or issued, or a record suspension was ordered, under the Criminal Records Act (Canada) and the pardon or record suspension, as the case may be, has not been revoked or ceased to have effect. A director who ceases to be qualified to act as a director of a company must promptly resign.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Removal of Directors	Under the NRS, stockholders may remove a director before the expiration of the director’s term of office by a vote representing not less than two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding stock. The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain this two-thirds threshold. The articles of incorporation may provide for a voting threshold higher than two-thirds, but not lower. Furthermore, the NRS does not make a distinction between removal for cause and removal without cause.	Under the BCBCA, a company may remove a director before the expiration of the director’s term of office by a special resolution, or, if the articles provide that a director may be removed by a resolution of the shareholders entitled to vote at general meetings passed by less than a special majority or may be removed by some other method, by the resolution or method specified. Further, if the shareholders holding shares of a class or series of shares of a company have the exclusive right to elect or appoint one or more directors, a director so elected or appointed may only be removed by a special resolution passed by at least two-thirds of the votes cast by those shareholders, or, if the articles provide, by some other method or resolution specified therein. Under the BC Articles, the Company may remove any director before the expiration of his or her term of office by special resolution. In that event, the shareholders may elect, or appoint by ordinary resolution, a director to fill the resulting vacancy. If the shareholders do not elect or appoint a director to fill the resulting vacancy contemporaneously with the removal, then the directors may appoint or the shareholders may elect, or appoint by ordinary resolution, a director to fill that vacancy. The directors may remove any director before the expiration of his or her term of office if the director is convicted of an indictable offence, or if the director ceases to be qualified to act as a director of a company and does not promptly resign, and the directors may appoint a director to fill the resulting vacancy.
Board Vacancies	Under the NRS, all vacancies, including those caused by an increase in the number of directors, may be filled by a majority of the remaining directors, even if less than a quorum, unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation. The Articles of Incorporation provide that all vacancies, including those caused by an increase in the number of directors, shall be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, even if they constitute less than a quorum and not by the stockholders of the Company. The Bylaws provide that all vacancies, including those caused by an increase in the number of directors, may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, even if they constitute less than a quorum.	Under the BCBCA, unless the articles of a company provide otherwise, if a vacancy occurs among the directors, such vacancy may be filled by the shareholders at the shareholders’ meeting, if any, at which the director is removed, or, otherwise by the shareholders or by the remaining directors. Unless the articles of a company provide otherwise, a casual vacancy among directors may be filled by the remaining directors. Unless the articles of a company provide otherwise, if the shareholders holding shares of a class or series of shares have the exclusive right to elect or appoint one or more directors, a vacancy that occurs as a result of the removal of a director may be filled by those shareholders at the shareholders’ meeting, if any, at which the director is removed, or, otherwise, by those shareholders or remaining directors elected or appointed by those shareholders. If there are no directors in office, (a) an individual may be empowered by the shareholders, incorporators or subscribers, as the case may be, to call a meeting of the shareholders, incorporators or subscribers, as the case may be, for the election or appointment of directors, and appoint as directors, to hold office until the vacancies are filled at that meeting, the number of individuals that will constitute a quorum, or (b) there may be appointed, by a unanimous resolution of the shareholders, not more than the number of directors who, under the articles, may be elected or appointed at an annual general meeting, unless the articles of a company provide otherwise.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Liability of Directors; Fiduciary Duties; Limitation of Directors’ Liability	Fiduciary duties of directors and officers are codified in the NRS. Nevada law requires that directors and officers of Nevada corporations exercise their powers in good faith, on an informed basis and with a view to the interests of the corporation. The NRS also provides that directors and officers are presumed to act in good faith, on an informed basis and with a view to the interests of the corporation in making business decisions. In performing such duties, directors and officers may exercise their business judgment through reliance on information, opinions, reports, financial statements and other financial data prepared or presented by corporate directors, officers or employees who are reasonably believed to be reliable and competent. Reliance may also be extended to legal counsel, public accountants, advisers, bankers or other persons reasonably believed to be competent, and to the work of a committee (on which the particular director or officer does not serve) if the committee was established and empowered by the corporation’s board of directors, and if the committee’s work was within its designated authority and was about matters on which the committee was reasonably believed to merit confidence. However, directors and officers may not rely on such information, opinions, reports, books of account or similar statements if they have knowledge concerning the matter in question that would make such reliance unwarranted. Under the NRS, unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise, neither a director nor an officer of a Nevada corporation is personally liable to the corporation, its stockholders or its creditors as a result of any act or failure to act, unless the presumption of the business judgment rule is rebutted and it is proven that the director or officer breached his or her fiduciary duty and such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or knowing violation of law. The NRS does not distinguish as to, or exclude, breaches of the duty of loyalty or instances where the director has received an improper personal benefit. The Articles of Incorporation provide that the liability of directors and officers is eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the NRS. Under the NRS, a transaction between a corporation and one or more of its directors or officers who has an interest in the transaction, is not void or voidable solely for that reason, if: (a) the interest is disclosed to the board of directors or a committee thereof, and the disinterested directors or committee members approve the transaction in good faith; (b) the interest is disclosed to the stockholders of the corporation, and the stockholders holding a majority of the voting power approve or ratify the transaction in good faith; (c) the interest is not known to the interested director or officer at the time the transaction is brought before the board of directors for action; or (d) the transaction is fair to the corporation at the time it is authorized or approved.	Under the BCBCA, the statutory duties of directors and officers provide that every director and officer must act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company, exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a reasonably prudent individual would exercise in comparable circumstances, act in accordance with the BCBCA and the regulations, and subject to the foregoing, act in accordance with the articles of the company. Under the BCBCA, directors of a company who vote for or consent to a resolution authorizing the company to. among other things,: (i) carry on a business or exercise a power contrary to its articles as a result of which the company has paid compensation to any person; (ii) pay a commission or allow a discount contrary to the BCBCA; (iii) pay a dividend or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire shares contrary to the BCBCA, or (iv) make or give an indemnity to a party contrary to the BCBCA, are jointly and severally liable to restore to the company any amount paid or distributed as a result and not otherwise recovered by the company. A director is not liable for any such amount if the director has relied, in good faith, on (i) financial statements represented by an officer of the company or in the written report of the auditor of the company to fairly reflect the financial position of the company; (ii) the written report of a lawyer, accountant, engineer, appraiser or other person whose profession lends credibility to a statement made by that person; (iii) a statement of fact represented to the director by an officer of the company to be correct; or (iv) any record, information or representation that the court considers provides reasonable grounds for the actions of the director, whether or not the record, information or representation was forged, fraudulently made or inaccurate.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Indemnification of Officers and Directors; Insurance	The NRS includes a statutory mechanism that permits a corporation to indemnify any director or officer who is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138 or acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation (and, in the case of a criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful). Under the discretionary indemnification regime of the NRS, unless ordered by a court or advanced pursuant to NRS 78.751(2), the corporation, through its stockholders, directors or independent legal counsel, must determine that the indemnification is proper. Under the NRS, a corporation shall indemnify any person who is a director, officer, employee or agent to the extent that the person is successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, including, without limitation, an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, or any claim, issue or matter therein, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with defending the action, including, without limitation, attorney’s fees. Unless otherwise restricted by the articles of incorporation, the bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation, the corporation may advance expenses to officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that the director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified by the corporation. The indemnification available pursuant to the statutory mechanisms provided under the NRS, as described above, does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, but, unless ordered by a court, indemnification may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer finally adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of any appeals taken therefrom, to be liable for intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law, and such misconduct, fraud or violation was material to the cause of action. The Bylaws provide for indemnification of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law. The NRS grants authority to the corporation to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of a director or officer, and a former director and officer. Under the NRS, a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance or make other financial arrangements on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise for any liability asserted against the person and liability and expenses incurred by the person in his or her capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation has the authority to indemnify such a person against such liability and expenses.	Under the BCBCA, a current or former director or officer of the company, a current or former director or officer who acts or has acted for an affiliate of the company or at the company’s request as a director or officer of another company, or at the request of the company, is or was, or holds or held a position equivalent to that of, a director or officer of a partnership, trust, joint venture or other unincorporated entity, may be indemnified by the company in respect of all judgments, penalties or fines awarded or imposed in, or an amount paid in settlement of, and all costs, charges and expenses (including legal and other fees) actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with, any legal proceeding or investigative action such person is a party by reason of being or having been in such director or officer, or equivalent position if, among other things, (i) the person acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company; and (ii) in the case of an eligible proceeding other than a civil proceeding, the person had reasonable grounds for believing that this conduct in respect of which the proceeding was brought was lawful. Under the BCBCA, a company may purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of a director or officer, former director and officer or current or former director and officer who acted as a director or officer of an affiliate or at the company’s request as director or officer against any liability that may be incurred by reason of the eligible party being or having been a director or officer of, or holding or having held a position equivalent to that of a director or officer of, the company or an associated corporation.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Shareholder Consent in Lieu of Meeting	The NRS provides that, unless the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent is signed by at least a majority of the voting power of the corporation, or a different proportion of voting power if otherwise required. The Bylaws provide that stockholders may not act by written consent.	Under the BCBCA, a written consent resolution by shareholders is deemed to be valid and effective as if it had been passed at a meeting of shareholders as long as it satisfies all of the requirements of the BCBCA and the regulations and articles of the company.
Calling of Shareholder Meetings	Under the NRS, unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation or the bylaws, the entire board of directors, any two directors, or the president may call special meetings of the stockholders. The Articles of Incorporation provide that a special meeting of the stockholders may be called only by the Board, Chair of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer. The Bylaws provide that a special meeting of the stockholders may be called only by the Chair of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer, and that a special meeting will be called by the Secretary upon the written request of the Chair of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or a majority of the Board of Directors. Stockholders have no right to request or call a special meeting of the stockholders.	Under the BC Articles, directors may call meetings of shareholders. The BCBCA provides that shareholders may requisition a general meeting provided the requisition is made by shareholders holding at least 1/20 of the issued shares of the company that carry the right to vote at general meetings. If a general meeting is validly requisitioned in accordance with the BCBCA, the directors must call a general meeting to transact the business specified in the requisition, to be held within four months after the date the requisition is received by the company, regardless of the articles of such company.
Location of Shareholder Meetings	Under the NRS, a stockholders meeting may be held within or outside of Nevada, at a physical location or in whole or in part by remote communication. Under the Bylaws, the Board may determine to hold a meeting of stockholders by means of remote communication, including videoconferencing, teleconferencing or other electronic communications or available technology authorized by and in accordance with the NRS.	Under the BCBCA, a general meeting of a company must be held in British Columbia or may be held at a location outside British Columbia if (i) a location outside of British Columbia is provided for in the company’s articles, (ii) the articles do not restrict the company from approving a location outside of British Columbia and the location is approved by the resolution required by the articles for that purpose (if no resolution is required by the articles for that purposes, approved by ordinary resolution), or (iii) the location for the meeting is approved by the Registrar of Companies of British Columbia before the meeting is held. If the meeting is a partially electronic meeting, the foregoing applies to the location where persons attend the meeting in person. If the meeting is a fully electronic meeting, the foregoing does not apply to the meeting. The BC Articles permit meetings of shareholders to be held anywhere in the world as determined by the directors.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Shareholder Inspection Rights	Under the NRS, any person who has been a stockholder of record of a corporation for at least six months immediately preceding the demand, or any person holding, or authorized in writing by the holders of, at least 5% of all of the corporation’s outstanding shares, upon at least five days’ written notice, may demand the right to inspect, in person or by agent or attorney, during usual business hours (i) the articles of incorporation and all amendments thereto, (ii) the bylaws and all amendments thereto and (iii) a stock ledger or a duplicate stock ledger, revised annually, containing the alphabetically arranged names of all persons who are record stockholders of the corporation, showing their places of residence, if known, and the number of shares held by them respectively. A Nevada corporation is not required to keep a list of beneficial owners who are not also record stockholders. A Nevada corporation may require a stockholder to furnish the corporation with an affidavit that such inspection is not for any purpose other than the business of the corporation. In addition, the NRS grants certain stockholders the right to inspect, make copies of and audit the books of account and financial statements of a corporation for any purpose related to the requesting stockholders’ interest in the corporation as a stockholder. The right to inspect the books of account and financial statements of a corporation, to make copies of records and to conduct an audit of such records is granted only to a stockholder of record who owns at least 15% of the issued and outstanding shares of a Nevada corporation, or who has been authorized in writing by the holders of at least 15% of such shares. However, this right does not apply with respect to any corporation that furnishes to its stockholders a detailed annual financial statement or any corporation that has filed during the preceding 12 months all reports required to be filed pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.	Under the BCBCA, current shareholders of a company are entitled to inspect, without charge, certain records of the company, including the company’s constating documents (including the company’s articles, notice of articles and certificate of incorporation, continuation or amalgamation, as applicable); any orders made by the court under the BCBCA, the Registrar or the executive director under the Securities Act (British Columbia); the company’s central securities register and register of directors; consents to act and resignations of directors; any report of an inspector appointed by the court; the minutes of every meeting of shareholders; each consent resolution of shareholders; every audited financial statement of the company and its subsidiaries, whether or not consolidated; certain disclosures of disclosable interests of directors and senior officers; and, if the company is an amalgamated company, the equivalent records for each predecessor company. Former shareholders have the same rights of inspection as do current shareholders, but only to those records that relate to the period when that person was a shareholder.
Shareholder Proposals	The NRS does not contain specific provisions regarding stockholder proposals. The Bylaws include an advance notice provision requiring that stockholders who wish to nominate directors or propose other business at an annual meeting of stockholders, or to nominate directors at a special meeting of stockholders, must provide timely notice in proper written form to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices. To be timely, notice must generally be delivered not earlier than the 120th day and not later than the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting. If the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary date, or if no meeting was held the prior year, the notice must be received no later than the (i) 120th day, and not later than the 90th day, prior to such annual meeting or (ii) 10th day following the public announcement of the meeting date. Stockholder notices under the advance notice provisions must comply with the informational and procedural requirements set forth in the Bylaws, including detailed disclosures about the proposing stockholder, any beneficial owners or control persons, and any related agreements or arrangements. The Bylaws also require compliance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, where applicable.	The BCBCA provides a mechanism whereby qualified shareholders of public companies holding at least 1/100 of the issued shares that carry the right to vote at general meetings or have a fair market value in excess of $2,000, can have specific matters submitted for consideration at the next annual general meeting of the company, rather than relying on the directors or management of the company to put the matter before the shareholders. A “qualified shareholder” is a person who is a registered owner or beneficial owner of one or more shares of the company that carry the right to vote at general meetings and has been a registered owner or beneficial owner of one or more such shares for an uninterrupted period of at least two years before the date of the signing of the proposal. However, a person is not a “qualified shareholder” if, within two years before the date of the signing of the proposal, the person failed to present at an annual general meeting an earlier proposal that the person had submitted to the company and that the company had responded to by complying with the proposal process.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Payment of Dividends and Distributions	The NRS provides that no distribution (including dividends on, or redemption or purchases of, shares of capital stock or distributions of indebtedness) may be made if, after giving effect to such distribution (i) the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or (ii) except as otherwise specifically permitted by the articles of incorporation, the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed at the time of a dissolution to satisfy the preferential rights of preferred stockholders, which is known as the balance sheet test. Directors may consider financial statements prepared on the basis of accounting practices that are reasonable under the circumstances, a fair valuation, including but not limited to unrealized appreciation and depreciation, and any other method that is reasonable under the circumstances. The Articles of Incorporation eliminate the Company’s requirement to comply with the described balance sheet test with respect to any distribution.	Under the BCBCA, a company may declare a dividend, subject to its charter or an enactment that provides otherwise, out of the profits, capital or otherwise by issuing shares or warrants by way of dividend, or in property, including in money. A dividend in money or property may not be declared or paid if there are reasonable grounds for believing that (i) the company is insolvent, or (ii) the payment of the dividend would render the company insolvent.
Rights of Dissent and Appraisal	Under the NRS, a stockholder is entitled to dissent from, and obtain payment for, the fair value of the stockholder’s shares in the event of (i) accordance of full voting rights under certain circumstances in connection with certain acquisitions of a controlling interest in the corporation, (ii) consummation of a plan of merger, if approval by the stockholders is required for the merger, regardless of whether the stockholder is entitled to vote on the merger or if the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent, or if the domestic corporation is a constituent entity, (iii) consummation of a plan of conversion to which the corporation is a party, (iv) consummation of a plan of exchange in which the corporation is a party, (v) any corporate action taken pursuant to a vote of the stockholders, if the articles of incorporation, bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors provides that voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for their shares, or (vi) any corporate action to which the stockholder would be obligated, as a result of such action, to accept money or scrip rather than receive a fraction of a share in exchange for the cancellation of all the stockholder’s outstanding shares, except where the stockholder would not be entitled to receive such payment pursuant to the applicable provisions of the NRS. Holders of covered securities (generally those that are listed on a national securities exchange) or shares traded in an organized market and held by at least 2,000 stockholders of record with a market value of at least $20,000,000 or issued by an open end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act are generally not entitled to dissenter’s rights. However, this exception is not available if (i) the articles of incorporation of the corporation provide that such exception is not available, (ii) the resolution of the board of directors approving the plan of merger, conversion or exchange expressly provides otherwise or (iii) the holders of the class or series of stock are required by the terms of the corporate action to accept anything except cash, shares of stock or other securities that satisfy the standards set forth above at the time of the effectiveness of the corporate action or any combination thereof.	Under the BCBCA, registered shareholders have the right to dissent from certain corporate acts, including certain amendments to the articles of incorporation, the adoption or approval of an amalgamation agreement, the approval of certain arrangements, the continuance of the company into a jurisdiction other than British Columbia, a sale, lease or other disposition by the company of all or substantially all of its undertaking, any other resolution, if dissent is authorized by the resolution and any court order that permits dissent. Subject to fulfilling all of the requirements of the BCBCA in respect of the shareholder’s right to dissent, the company and the dissenting shareholder may agree on the amount of the payout value of the dissent shares and the company must then promptly purchase the dissenting shareholder’s shares at fair value, unless there are grounds for believing that the company is insolvent or the payment would render the company insolvent. A dissenting shareholder who has not entered into an agreement with the company (or the company itself) may apply to the court and the court may determine the payout value of the dissent shares.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Oppression Remedy	Although the NRS imposes fiduciary duties upon directors, officers and controlling stockholders, the NRS does not contain an “oppression remedy” as under the BCBCA.	The BCBCA contains an oppression remedy that enables the court to make any interim or final order it considers appropriate, if satisfied upon application by a complainant (being a shareholder of the company or any other person whom the court considers to be an appropriate person) that (i) the affairs of the company are being or have been conducted, or that the powers of the directors are being or have been exercised, in a manner oppressive to one or more of the shareholders; or (ii) that some act of the company has been done or is threatened, or that some resolution of the shareholders or of the shareholders holding shares of a class or series of shares has been passed or is proposed, that is unfairly prejudicial to one or more of the shareholders, and that the application was brought by the shareholder in a timely manner.
Derivative Action	The NRS grants stockholders a derivative cause of action where the corporation refuses to enforce rights, which it may properly assert if the plaintiff was a stockholder at the time of the event or the plaintiff’s share thereafter devolved on the plaintiff by operation of law. The complaint must also set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure from the board of directors and, if necessary, from the stockholders, such action as the plaintiff desires, and the reasons for the plaintiff’s failure to obtain such action or the reasons for not making such effort. In any such action, at any time within 30 days after service of summons upon the corporation or any defendant who is an officer or director of the corporation or held such office at the time of the acts complained of, the corporation or such defendant may move the court for an order, upon notice and hearing, requiring the plaintiff to furnish security as hereinafter provided. Such motion must be based upon one or more of the following grounds: (a) there is no reasonable possibility that the prosecution of the cause of action alleged in the complaint against the moving party will benefit the corporation or its security holders or (b) the moving party, if other than the corporation, did not participate in the event complained of in any capacity.	Under the BCBCA, a complainant (being a shareholder or director of a company or any other person whom the court considers to be an appropriate person) may, with leave of the court, prosecute a civil, criminal, quasi-criminal, administrative or regulatory action or proceeding in the name and on behalf of the company to enforce a right, duty, or obligation owed to the company that could be enforced by the company itself; or to obtain damages for any breach of any such right, duty, or obligation, whether the right, duty, or obligation arises under the BCBCA or otherwise. A complainant may also, with leave of the court, defend, in the name and on behalf of a company, a legal proceeding brought against the company.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Business Combinations	The NRS imposes a two-year moratorium on a business combination with an interested stockholder that is extended up to four years if certain conditions are not met. First, an interested stockholder is generally defined as a beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power. Second, the two-year moratorium can be lifted only by, and will remain in place for up to four years unless, (i) advance approval by the board of directors of the combination, or the transaction by which such person first becomes an interested stockholder, (ii) approval of the combination by the board of directors and 60% of the corporation’s voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder, its affiliates and associates, or (iii) the combination meets specified fair value requirements. These statutes do not apply to any combination of a corporation and an interested stockholder after the expiration of four years after the person first became an interested stockholder. The combinations statutes in Nevada apply only to Nevada corporations with 200 or more stockholders of record. Companies are entitled to opt out of the business combination provisions. Any opt-out of the business combinations provisions of the NRS must be contained in the original articles of incorporation, or an amendment to the articles of incorporation approved by a majority of the outstanding voting power not then beneficially owned by interested stockholders or their affiliates and associates, but the amendment would not be effective until 18 months after the vote of the stockholders to approve the amendment, and would not apply to any combination with a person who first became an interested stockholder on or before the effective date of the amendment. These statutes would also not apply if the articles were amended to elect not to be governed by these statutes before the corporation first became a resident domestic corporation. The Articles of Incorporation expressly provide that the Company has elected not to be governed by the combinations with interested stockholders provisions of the NRS.	The BCBCA does not contain an exact corresponding provision. Certain matters as take-over bids, issuer bids, going-private transactions, business combinations and transactions with directors, officers, significant shareholders and other related parties to which the Company is a party may be subject to Canadian provincial securities legislation and administrative policies and rules of the Canadian securities administrators. Such legislation, administrative policies and rules may impose board and/or shareholder approval requirements on public companies separate and apart from the BCBCA.


	Subordinate Voting Shares
Name, Position and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number Beneficially Owned		% of Subordinate Voting Shares Beneficially Owned
James Cacioppo – Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Florida, U.S.	46,180,000	(1)	19.99%
Louis Jonathan Barack – President, Chief Revenue Officer and Corporate Secretary, Florida, U.S.	6,186,105	(2)	3.05%
Michelle Mosier – Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, Florida, U.S.	662,233	(3)	*
Benjamin Cross – Director, Connecticut, U.S.	499,080	(4)	*
Stephen Monroe – Director, New York, U.S.	492,636	(5)	*
Billy Wafford – Director, California, U.S.	327,235	(6)	*
Marina Hahn – Director, New York, U.S.	237,301	(7)	*
Denis Arsenault – Shareholder, Cheltenham, United Kingdom	23,380,182	(8)	10.85%
Marex Securities Products, Inc. – Shareholder, New York, U.S.	10,000,000	(9)	5.01%
All directors and executive officers as a group	54,584,590	(10)	23.13%


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Option Awards ($)	All Other Compensation ($)(1)	Total ($)
James Cacioppo Chief Executive Officer	2025	1,050,040	1,800,000(2)	—	19,405	2,869,445
	2024	850,032	1,619,051(3)	1,027,330(4)	54,793	3,551,206
Louis Jonathan Barack President, Chief Revenue Officer and Corporate Secretary	2025	450,017	360,000(5)	188,864(6)	35,545	1,034,426
	2024	414,599	265,333	215,160(7)	30,123	925,215
Michelle Mosier Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer	2025	425,016	212,500(8)	113,318(9)	18,765	769,599
	2024	414,599	165,833	112,341(10)	17,446	710,219


		Option Awards(1)
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date
James Cacioppo(2)	12/09/2022(3)	3,000,000	0	$1.75	12/09/2032
	12/17/2023(4)	3,000,000	0	$0.55	12/17/2033
	09/13/2024(5)	5,385,000	0	$0.54	09/13/2034
	09/13/2024(6)	1,062,732	0	$0.65	09/13/2029
Louis Jonathan Barack	05/17/2023(7)	400,000	200,000	$0.48	05/17/2033
	12/17/2023(8)	666,666	333,334	$0.55	12/17/2033
	09/13/2024(9)	597,666	1,195,334	$0.54	09/13/2034
	12/11/2025(10)	0	500,000	$0.50	12/11/2035
Michelle Mosier	02/06/2023(11)	80,000	120,000	$0.61	02/06/2033
	12/17/2023(12)	200,000	100,000	$0.55	12/17/2033
	09/13/2024(13)	100,000	200,000	$0.54	09/13/2034
	12/11/2025(14)	0	300,000	$0.50	12/11/2035


(1)			All options were granted under the Company's 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. Awards may be subject to acceleration provisions as described in the “Employment Agreements, Severance and Change in Control Arrangements” Section below.
(2)			Certain options awarded to Mr. Cacioppo are unvested and cannot vest or be exercised by Mr. Cacioppo if such vesting and/or exercise would increase Mr. Cacioppo's beneficial ownership beyond 19.99%. The numbers set forth in this table are without regard to the foregoing provision.
(3)			Granted 3,000,000 options, 1/3 of which vested on January 1, 2023, 1/3 of which vested on January 1, 2024, and 1/3 of which vested on January 1, 2025.
(4)			Granted 3,000,000 options, 1/2 of which vested on January 1, 2024, and 1/2 of which vested on January 1, 2025.
(5)			Granted 5,385,000 options, 1/2 of which vested on September 13, 2024, and 1/2 of which vested on September 13, 2025.
(6)			Granted 1,062,732 options, which vested on January 1, 2025.
(7)			Granted 600,000 options, 1/3 of which vested on May 1, 2024, 1/3 of which vested on May 1, 2025 and 1/3 of which vests on May 1, 2026.
(8)			Granted 1,000,000 options, 1/3 of which vested on December 17, 2024, 1/3 of which vested on December 17, 2025, and 1/3 of which vests on December 17, 2026.
(9)			Granted 1,793,000 options, 1/3 of which vested on September 13, 2025, 1/3 of which vests on September 13, 2026, and 1/3 of which vests on September 13, 2027.
(10)			Granted 500,000 options, 1/3 of which vests on December 11, 2026, 1/3 of which vests on December 11, 2027, and 1/3 of which vests on December 11, 2028.
(11)			Granted 300,000 options, 1/5 of which vested on January 16, 2024, 1/5 of which vested on January 16, 2025, 1/5 of which vested on January 16, 2026, 1/5 of which vests on January 16, 2027, and 1/5 of which vests on January 16, 2028.
(12)			Granted 300,000 options, 1/3 of which vested on December 17, 2024, 1/3 of which vested on December 17, 2025, and 1/3 of which vests on December 17, 2026.
(13)			Granted 300,000 options, 1/3 of which vested on September 13, 2025, 1/3 of which vests on September 13, 2026, and 1/3 of which vests on September 13, 2027.
(14)			Granted 300,000 options, 1/3 of which vests on December 11, 2026, 1/3 of which vests on December 11, 2027, and 1/3 of which vests on December 11, 2028.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Control Share Acquisition Status	Pursuant to the “acquisition of controlling interest” or “control share” statutes contained in the NRS, any person who acquires a “controlling interest” in a corporation may not exercise voting rights on any control shares unless such voting rights are conferred by a majority vote of the disinterested stockholders of the issuing corporation at a special meeting of such stockholders held upon the request and at the expense of the acquiring person. The NRS provides that a “controlling interest” means the ownership of outstanding voting shares of an issuing corporation sufficient to enable the acquiring person, individually or in association with others, directly or indirectly, to exercise (i) one fifth or more but less than one third, (ii) one third or more but less than a majority or (iii) a majority or more of the voting power of the issuing corporation in the election of directors, and once an acquirer crosses one of these thresholds, shares which it acquired in the transaction taking it over the threshold and within the 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person acquired or offered to acquire a controlling interest become “control shares” to which the voting restrictions described above apply. In the event that the control shares are accorded full voting rights and the acquiring person acquires control shares with a majority or more of all the voting power, any stockholder, other than the acquiring person, who does not vote in favor of authorizing voting rights for the control shares is entitled to demand payment for the fair value of such person’s shares, and the corporation must comply with the demand. The NRS provides that the control share statutes of the NRS do not apply to any acquisition of a controlling interest in an issuing corporation if the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation in effect on the 10th day following the acquisition of a controlling interest by the acquiring person provide that the provisions of those sections do not apply to the corporation or to an acquisition of a controlling interest specifically by types of existing or future stockholders, whether or not identified. In addition, the controlling interest statutes apply as of a particular date only to a corporation that has 200 or more stockholders of record, at least 100 of whom have addresses in Nevada appearing on the corporation’s stock ledger at all times during the 90 days immediately preceding that date, and which does business directly or indirectly in Nevada. The NRS provides that the corporation may impose stricter requirements if it so desires. Corporations are entitled to opt out of the above controlling interest provisions of the NRS. The Bylaws expressly provide that the Company has elected not to be governed by the controlling interest provisions of the NRS.	The BCBCA does not contain a corresponding provision.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Fiduciary Duty of Controlling Stockholder; Controlling Stockholder Transactions	Pursuant to the NRS, no stockholder (other than a “controlling stockholder” as discussed below) has any fiduciary duty to the Company or any other stockholder, and each stockholder, regardless of such stockholder’s relative ownership of shares, is entitled to exercise or withhold the voting power of such shares in such stockholder’s personal interest and without regard to any other person or interest. A “controlling stockholder” is defined as a stockholder of a corporation having the voting power, by virtue of such stockholder’s relative beneficial ownership of shares or otherwise pursuant to the articles of incorporation, to elect at least a majority of the corporation’s directors. The only fiduciary duty of a controlling stockholder of a corporation, in such person’s capacity as a stockholder, is to refrain from exerting undue influence over any director or officer of the corporation with the purpose and proximate effect of inducing a breach of fiduciary duty by such director or officer, for which breach the director or officer is liable pursuant to the NRS as described above, and which breach: ● directly relates to the initiation, evaluation, negotiation, authorization or approval by the board of directors, or a committee thereof, of a contract or transaction to which the controlling stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates is a party or in which the controlling stockholder or any of its affiliates or associates has a material and nonspeculative financial interest; and ● results in material, nonspeculative and non-ratable financial benefit to the controlling stockholder, which benefit excludes, and results in a material and nonspeculative detriment to the other stockholders generally. However, the exercise or withholding of voting power by a controlling stockholder, or the indication or implication by a controlling stockholder as to whether or to what extent such voting power may be exercised or withheld, does not, by itself, constitute or indicate a breach of this limited fiduciary duty. A controlling stockholder is presumed to have not breached its fiduciary duty with respect to any contract or transaction if such contract or transaction is authorized or approved, or recommended to the board of directors, by a committee of the board consisting only of disinterested directors. Under the NRS, a “disinterested director” includes a director who (and whose affiliates or associates) neither has a material and nonspeculative financial interest in, nor is a party to, the contract or transaction, and would satisfy the independence standards, without regard to any financial literacy of financial expert qualifications, required to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors of a non-investment company issuer pursuant to the Exchange Act and the rules of the applicable securities exchange. A controlling stockholder is not individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders or creditors for any damages as a result of any act or failure to act in such person’s capacity as a stockholder unless the presumption described above is rebutted and it is proven that the stockholder’s act or failure to act constituted a breach of the stockholder’s fiduciary duty.	The BCBCA does not contain a corresponding provision.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Compulsory Acquisition Right	The NRS does not contain a similar provision. However, the NRS does permit a parent Nevada entity owning 90% of a subsidiary Nevada corporation to merge the subsidiary with and into the parent entity without a vote of the owners of either entity. Further, the NRS permits a parent Nevada entity owning 90% of a subsidiary Nevada corporation to merge the parent entity with and into the subsidiary without a vote of the stockholders of the subsidiary Nevada corporation. In addition, effective May 30, 2025, the NRS was amended to establish a restructuring merger process that allows a Nevada corporation to reorganize into a holding company structure without a stockholder vote, unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation. Under this provision, no vote of stockholders is required to authorize a restructuring merger if the plan of merger expressly permits or requires the merger to be effected under these provisions and the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the constituent corporation and the merger subsidiary are the only constituent entities in the restructuring merger; (ii) each share of stock of the constituent corporation is converted into shares of the holding corporation having the same voting powers, designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions and relative rights as the shares being converted, and such shares must be likewise registered and approved for trading on any applicable securities exchanges; (iii) the organizational documents of the holding corporation must contain only provisions identical to those of the constituent corporation (with limited exceptions including the holding corporation's name, and the required protective provisions described under (vi) below); (iv) the surviving company must become a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the holding corporation; (v) the directors and officers of the constituent corporation must be the only directors and officers of the holding corporation at the effective time; (vi) the organizational documents of the holding corporation and the surviving company must contain, for at least two years following the restructuring merger, certain provisions protecting stockholder approval rights with respect to subsequent mergers involving the surviving company, sales of substantially all assets of the surviving company, dispositions of a majority of the voting power of the surviving company, and dissolution of the surviving company; and (vii) the board of directors of the constituent corporation must determine in good faith that stockholders would not reasonably be expected to recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a result of the restructuring merger.	The BCBCA provides a right of compulsory acquisition for an offeror that acquires at least 90% of the target company’s shares or any class of shares pursuant to a take-over bid or issuer bid, other than securities held at the date of the bid by or on behalf of the offeror (i.e., an “acquiring person” under the BCBCA). Those shareholders who did not accept the offer may be compelled, on notice from the acquiring person, to sell their shares to the acquiring person at the same price and on the same terms offered, unless the court otherwise orders. If the acquiring person does not give that notice within one month after becoming entitled to do so, it must give notice to those shareholders that they may require the acquiring person to purchase their shares from them. A shareholder may apply to the court to set the price and terms of payment.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Blank Check Preferred Stock/ Shares	Under the NRS, a corporation may authorize one or more classes or series of preferred stock in its articles of incorporation, and the articles of incorporation may grant the board of directors the authority, without stockholder approval, to determine the rights, preferences, privileges, and limitations of a class or series of “blank check” preferred stock pursuant to board resolution and the filing of a certificate of designation with respect to such class or series. The Articles of Incorporation grant blank check authority to the board of directors of the Company to establish one or more series of preferred stock.	Under the BCBCA, the special rights or restrictions attached to a class of shares may provide that the class of shares includes or may include one or more series of shares and, may authorize the directors by resolution, but subject to the provisions of the articles and BCBCA, to determine the maximum number of shares of each series, create an identifying name for each series and attach special rights or restrictions to the shares of any of those series of shares or to alter any special rights or restrictions attached to those shares if the series of shares does not have shares outstanding. Under the BCBCA, each share of a series of shares must have the same special rights or restrictions as are attached to every other share of that series of shares and the special rights or restrictions attached to shares of a series of shares must be consistent with the special rights or restrictions attached to the class of shares of which the series of shares is part.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Authorized Capital	The total number of shares of all classes of stock that the Corporation is authorized to issue is 3,000,000,000 shares, divided into two classes as follows: (i) 2,000,000,000 shares of Nevada Common Stock and (ii) 1,000,000,000 shares of Nevada Preferred Stock. The number of authorized shares of the Nevada Common Stock or Nevada Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) with the approval of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of the stockholders of the Company entitled to vote thereon, and no vote of the holders of Nevada Common Stock or Nevada Preferred Stock voting separately as a class will be required therefor (and any such right otherwise provided by certain provisions of the NRS has been specifically denied by the Articles of Incorporation), unless a vote of any such holders is expressly required pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation including any certificate of designation establishing any series of Nevada Preferred Stock. The Board is expressly authorized in the Articles of Incorporation to provide for one or more series of Nevada Preferred Stock and, with respect to each such series, to fix the number of shares constituting such series and the designation of such series, the voting powers (if any) of such series, and the powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of such series.	The BC Notice of Articles provide that the authorized share structure of the Company consists of an unlimited number of Subordinate Voting Shares, an unlimited number of Multiple Voting Shares, an unlimited number of Super Voting Shares, and an unlimited number of Preferred Shares. The Preferred Shares may be issued in one or more series. Subject to the BCBCA, if none of the Preferred Shares of any particular series are issued, the Board may, among other things, determine the maximum number of shares of any of those series of Preferred Shares; create an identifying name by which the shares of any of those series of Preferred Shares may be identified, and attach special rights or restrictions to the shares of any of those series of Preferred Shares, including with respect to dividends, rights on dissolution, liquidation or winding up, or return of capital, redemption, or retraction, conversion or exchange, or voting rights. No Multiple Voting Shares, Super Voting Shares or Preferred Shares are currently outstanding.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Voting Rights	Each holder of record of Nevada Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Nevada Common Stock on all matters on which stockholders generally or holders of Nevada Common Stock as a separate class or series are entitled to vote (whether voting separately as a class or series, or together with any other classes or series of the Company’s capital stock); provided that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, holders of Nevada Common Stock have no voting power with respect to any amendment to the Articles of Incorporation that relates solely to the terms, number of shares, powers, designations, preferences or relative, participating, optional or other special rights (including, without limitation, voting rights), or to qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of one or more outstanding series of Nevada Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation or pursuant to the NRS. No holder of shares of Nevada Common Stock has the right to cumulative voting.	The holders of Subordinate Voting Shares are entitled to notice of and to attend any meetings of shareholders of the Company except a meeting of which only holders of another class or series of shares shall have the right to vote. Subordinate Voting Holders are entitled to one vote in respect of each Subordinate Voting Share held. The holders of Multiple Voting Shares are entitled to notice of any meetings of shareholders of the Company and shall be entitled to vote, together with holders of Subordinate Voting Shares, with respect to any question upon which holders of Subordinate Voting Shares have the right to vote. The holders of Multiple Voting Shares have the right to 10 votes for each Subordinate Voting Share into which such Multiple Voting Shares could then be converted (ignoring any conversion limitations set out in Section 26.7 of the Articles), which is equal to 10 votes per Multiple Voting Share. Except as provided by law and by the Articles, Multiple Voting Holders shall vote the Multiple Voting Shares together with the Subordinate Voting Holders and Super Voting Holders as a single class. The holders of Super Voting Shares are entitled to notice of any meetings of shareholders of the Company and shall be entitled to vote, together with holders of Subordinate Voting Shares with respect to any question upon which holders of Subordinate Voting Shares have the right to vote. The holders of Super Voting Shares have the right to 10 votes for each Subordinate Voting Share into which such Super Voting Shares could then be converted (ignoring any conversion limitations set out in Section 27.7 of the Articles), which is equal to 1,000 votes per Super Voting Share. Except as provided by law and by the Articles, Super Voting Holders shall vote the Super Voting Shares together with the Subordinate Voting Holders and Multiple Voting Holders as a single class.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Liquidation Rights	Under the Articles of Incorporation, the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of the Company and subject to the right, if any, of the holders of any outstanding series of Nevada Preferred Stock or any class or series of stock having a preference over or the right to participate with the Nevada Common Stock as to distributions upon dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the Company, the holders of all outstanding shares of Nevada Common Stock shall be entitled to receive the remaining assets of the Company available for distribution ratably in proportion to the number of shares held by each such stockholder.	Under the BC Articles, in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or in the event of any other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purposes of winding up its affairs, the holders of the Subordinate Voting Shares shall, subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of the Company ranking in priority to the Subordinate Voting Shares, be entitled to participate rateably along with all other holders of Multiple Voting Shares (on an as-converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis) and Super Voting Shares (on an as-converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis). Under the BC Articles, in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or in the event of any other distribution of assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs, the holders of the Multiple Voting Shares shall, subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of the Company ranking in priority to the Multiple Voting Shares, be entitled to participate rateably, on an as-converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis, along with all other holders of Subordinate Voting Shares and Super Voting Shares (on an as-converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis). Under the BC Articles, in the event of any Liquidation Event (as defined below), either voluntary or involuntary, the holders of Super Voting Shares shall, subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of the Company ranking in priority to Super Voting Shares, be entitled to receive the assets of the Company available for distribution to shareholders, distributed among the holders of Super Voting Shares on a pro rata basis based on the number of Super Voting Shares (on an as converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis, assuming conversion of all Super Voting Shares into Subordinate Voting Shares at the applicable Conversion Ratio (as defined below) and ignoring any limitations on conversion in the BC Articles) issued and outstanding on the record date. In the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other distribution of the assets of the Company among its shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs, the holders of the Preferred Shares will be entitled to preference over the Super Voting Shares, the Multiple Voting Shares, the Subordinate Voting Shares and any other shares ranking junior to the Preferred Shares with respect to the repayment of capital paid up on and the payment of unpaid dividends accrued on the Preferred Shares. “Liquidation Event” means (i) any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, including any event determined by the Board of Directors of the Company to constitute a Liquidity Event requiring the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company; (ii) the acquisition of the Company by another entity by means of any transaction or series of related transactions (including, without limitation, any reorganization, merger or consolidation but, excluding any transaction effected exclusively for the purpose of changing the domicile of the Company or determined by the Board of Directors of the Company not to constitute a Liquidation Event); (iii) a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; unless, in the case of (ii) or (iii), the Company’s shareholders of record as constituted immediately prior to such acquisition or sale will, immediately after such acquisition or sale (by virtue of securities issued as consideration for the Company’s acquisition or sale or otherwise) hold at least 50% of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity or the Board of Directors of the Company otherwise determines that such transaction does not constitute a Liquidation Event. “Conversion Ratio” means each Super Voting Share shall be convertible into 100 Subordinate Voting Shares, provided, however, the Conversion Ratio shall be subject to adjustment as set forth in the BC Articles.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Conversion of Shares	Shares of the Nevada Common Stock do not have conversion rights and the Articles of Incorporation do not currently contemplate conversion rights for the Nevada Preferred Stock. The conversion rights of any future series of Nevada Preferred Stock, other capital stock of the Company or any securities convertible into capital stock of the Company, will be set forth in the Articles of Incorporation including in any certificate of designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State or in another applicable agreement.	In the event that (1) an offer is made to purchase Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, and the offer is one which is required, pursuant to applicable securities legislation or the rules of a stock exchange, if any, on which the Subordinate Voting Shares are then listed, to be made to all or substantially all the holders of Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, in a province or territory of Canada to which the requirement applies, and (2) a concurrent equivalent offer is not made in respect of the Subordinate Voting Shares, then each Subordinate Voting Share shall become convertible at the option of the holder into Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, at the inverse of applicable Conversion Ratio (as defined in the BC Articles, as applicable) then in effect, at any time while the offer is in effect until one day after the time prescribed by applicable securities legislation for the offeror to take up and pay for such shares as are to be acquired pursuant to the offer. The conversion may only be exercised in respect of Subordinate Voting Shares for the purpose of depositing the resulting Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, under the offer, and for no other reason, and shall not provide holders of Subordinate Voting Shares any beneficial ownership of Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, but only in the consideration under the offer. In such event, the transfer agent for the Subordinate Voting Shares shall deposit under the offer the resulting Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, on behalf of the holder. If Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, resulting from the conversion and deposited pursuant to the offer are withdrawn by the holder or are not taken up by the offeror, or the offer is abandoned, withdrawn or terminated by the offeror or the offer otherwise expires without such Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, being taken up and paid for, the Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, resulting from the conversion will be automatically re-converted into Subordinate Voting Shares at the Conversion Ratio then in effect, shall be deemed to have never been outstanding, and a share certificate representing the Subordinate Voting Shares or electronic evidence of such Subordinate Voting Shares issued in a non-certificate manner will be sent to the holder by the transfer agent. In the event that the offeror takes up and pays for the Multiple Voting Shares or Super Voting Shares, as applicable, resulting from conversion, the transfer agent shall deliver to the holders thereof the consideration paid for such shares by the offeror.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Preemptive and Subscription Rights	Shares of the Nevada Common Stock do not have preemptive or subscription rights, and there are no redemption or sinking-fund provisions applicable to them.	The holders of Subordinate Voting Shares are not entitled to a right of first refusal to subscribe for, purchase or receive any part of any issue of Subordinate Voting Shares, bonds, debentures or other securities of the Company now or in the future. The holders of Multiple Voting Shares are not entitled to a right of first refusal to subscribe for, purchase or receive any part of any issue of Subordinate Voting Shares, bonds, debentures or other securities of the Company now or in the future. The holders of Super Voting Shares have no pre-emptive rights.
Directors	Under the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the number of directors are to be fixed exclusively by resolutions adopted by the Board. Pursuant to the Bylaws, the number of directors shall consist of at least one (1) individual and not more than nine (9) individuals. The Articles of Incorporation provide for a classified Board divided into three classes, with the directors in each class serving staggered three-year terms and with one class of directors being elected at each annual meeting of stockholders.	Under the BC Articles, the number of directors is set at the greater of three and the most recently set number of directors elected by ordinary resolution.
Meetings of Directors	Annual meetings of the Board may be held without notice. Regular meetings between annual meetings may be held at such times and places as designated by the Board. If the Board designates the time and place of a regular meeting by resolution, no further notice of such meeting shall be required. Special meetings of the Board may be called only by the Chair of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, or the Secretary, or upon the request of a majority of the Board. Regular or special meetings may be held at any place designated by the Board or, in the absence of such designation, as specified in the notice of the meeting, and/or by remote communication. Except as otherwise provided for regular meetings, notice of any meeting shall be delivered to each director at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.	Under the BC Articles directors may meet together for the conduct of business, adjourn and otherwise regulate their meetings as the directors think fit, and meetings of the directors held at regular intervals may be held at the place, at the time and on the notice, if any, as the directors may from time to time determine. A director may, and the secretary or an assistant secretary of the Company, if any, the request of a director must, call a meeting of the directors at any time. Other than for meetings held at regular intervals as determined by the directors, reasonable notice of each meeting of the directors, specifying the place, day and time of that meeting must be given to each of the directors. It is not necessary to give notice of a meeting of directors if (a) the meeting is to be held immediately following a meeting of shareholders at which that director was elected or appointed or is the meeting of the directors as which that director is appointed; or (b) the director has waived notice of the meeting.
Quorum for Director’s Meetings	The Bylaws provide that a majority of the directors in office is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.	Under the BC Articles, the quorum necessary for the transaction of the business of the directors may be set by the directors and, if not so set, is deemed to be set at two directors.
Quorum for Shareholder’s Meetings	Under the Bylaws, stockholders holding at least five percent (5%) of the voting power of the Company’s capital stock, represented in person or by proxy (regardless of whether the proxy has authority to vote on any matter), are necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting.	Under the BC Articles, subject to the special rights and restrictions attached to the shares of any class or series of shares, the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is two persons who are, or who represent by proxy, shareholders who, in the aggregate, hold at least 5% of the issued shares entitled to be voted at the meeting.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Attendance at Shareholders’ Meetings	The Bylaws provide that meetings of stockholders may be held within Nevada or outside of Nevada. A stockholder may participate in a meeting of stockholders through remote communication, including, without limitation, electronic communications, videoconferencing, teleconferencing or other similar method of communication by which all individuals participating in the meeting can hear each other and such participation shall constitute presence in person at the meeting.	The BC Articles permit meetings of shareholders to be held anywhere in the world as determined by the directors.
Advance Notice Provisions	The Bylaws include an advance notice provision requiring that stockholders who wish to nominate directors or propose other business at an annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate directors at a special meeting of stockholders must provide timely notice in proper written form to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive offices. To be timely, notice must generally be delivered not earlier than the 120th day and not later than the 90th day prior to the first anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting. If the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after such anniversary date, or if no meeting was held the prior year, the notice must be received no later than the (i) 120th day, and not later than the 90th day, prior to such annual meeting or (ii) 10th day following the public announcement of the meeting date. For special meetings called for the purpose of electing directors, notice of nominations must generally be received not earlier than the 120th day and not later than the 90th day prior to the meeting or the 10th day following public announcement of the meeting date. Stockholder notices under the advance notice provisions must comply with the informational and procedural requirements set forth in the Bylaws, including detailed disclosures about the nominating or proposing stockholder, any beneficial owners or control persons, and any related agreements or arrangements. The Bylaws also require compliance with Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, where applicable.	The BC Articles do not contain provisions relating to advance notice procedures required of shareholders in order to properly nominate directors. However, the BCBCA contains provisions relating to the ability of shareholders to bring forward specific matters submitted for consideration at the next annual general meeting by way of shareholder proposals as noted above.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Exclusive Forum Provision	The Bylaws provide that unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, and subject to applicable jurisdictional requirements, the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County of the State of Nevada (the “Eighth Judicial District Court”) (or, if the Eighth Judicial District Court lacks jurisdiction over such action or proceeding, then another court of the State of Nevada or, if no court of the State of Nevada has jurisdiction, then the United States District Court for the District of Nevada) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, or controlling stockholder of the Company in such capacity, (iii) any internal action (as defined in NRS 78.046), including any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of NRS Title 7, the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or any agreement entered into pursuant to NRS 78.365 or as to which the NRS confers jurisdiction on the district court of the State of Nevada, (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the Articles of Incorporation or the Bylaws, or (v) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine; provided that such exclusive forum provisions will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.	Under the BC Articles unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Supreme Court of the Province of British Columbia, Canada and the appellate Courts therefrom (collectively, the “Courts”) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of the Company to the Company, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Business Corporations Act or the notice of articles or articles of the Company (as either may be amended from time to time); or (iv) any action asserting a claim otherwise related to the relationships among the Company, its affiliates and their respective shareholders, directors and/or officers, but this paragraph (iv) does not include claims related to the business carried on by the Company or such affiliates. If any action the subject matter of which is within the scope of the preceding sentence is filed in a court other than a court located within the Province of British Columbia (a “Foreign Action”) in the name of any registered or beneficial shareholder, such registered or beneficial shareholder shall be deemed to have consented to (i) the personal jurisdiction of the Courts in connection with any action brought in any such Court to enforce the foregoing exclusive forum provision (an “Enforcement Action”), and (ii) having service of process made upon such registered or beneficial shareholder in such Enforcement Action by service upon such registered or beneficial shareholder’s counsel in the Foreign Action as agent of the shareholder.


	Nevada	British Columbia
Dividends and Distributions	The Articles of Incorporation provide that the Company may make distributions to its stockholders ratably out of funds legally available for this purpose as determined by the Board. The Articles of Incorporation provide that the Company is allowed to make any distribution that otherwise would be prohibited by the NRS if the Company’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if the Company were to be dissolved immediately after the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon such dissolution of holders of shares of any class or series of the capital stock of the Company having preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.	The BC Articles contain provisions with respect to dividend payments and entitlement thereof, including manner of payment and settlement of difficulties in regard to the distribution of dividends. The holders of Subordinate Voting Shares shall, subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of the Company ranking in priority to the Subordinate Voting Shares, be entitled to receive as and when declared by the directors, dividends in cash or property of the Company. No dividend will be declared or paid on the Subordinate Voting Shares unless the Company simultaneously declares or pays, as applicable, equivalent dividends on the Multiple Voting Shares (on an as- converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis) and Super Voting Shares (on an as-converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis). The holders of Multiple Voting Shares shall, subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of the Company ranking in priority to the Multiple Voting Shares, have the right to receive dividends, out of any cash or other assets legally available therefor, pari passu (on an as converted basis, assuming conversion of all Multiple Voting Shares into Subordinate Voting Shares at the applicable Conversion Ratio (as defined herein) and ignoring any limitations on conversion under the BC Articles) as to dividends and any declaration or payment of any dividend on the Subordinate Voting Shares. No dividend will be declared or paid on the Multiple Voting Shares unless the Company simultaneously declares or pays, as applicable, equivalent dividends on the Subordinate Voting Shares and Super Voting Shares (on an as-converted to Subordinate Voting Share basis). The holders of Super Voting Shares shall, subject to the prior rights of the holders of any shares of the Company ranking in priority to the Super Voting Shares, have the right to receive dividends, out of any cash or other assets legally available therefor, pari passu (on an as converted basis, assuming conversion of all Super Voting Shares into Subordinate Voting Shares at the applicable Conversion Ratio and ignoring any limitations on conversion under the BC Articles) as to dividends and any declaration or payment of any dividend on the Subordinate Voting Shares. Holders of Preferred Shares will be entitled to preference with respect to payment of dividends over the Super Voting Shares, the Multiple Voting Shares, the Subordinate Voting Shares and any other shares ranking junior to the Preferred Shares with respect to payment of dividends.


(1)			This number represents all options and other awards outstanding under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, and includes both vested and unvested options. The Company does not have any warrants outstanding under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2)			The weighted-average exercise price information is comprised of the exercise prices of all outstanding stock options issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company does not have any warrants outstanding under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had 3,000,000 restricted stock awards outstanding, each of which was issued with a price per share of $0.50. The value of the restricted stock awards was not included in this calculation.
(3)			The number of shares that are available for issuance under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan cannot exceed 15% of the number of outstanding subordinate voting shares, plus an additional 2% of the number of outstanding subordinate voting shares that may be issued as inducement to employees and officers not previously employed by the Company and who were not previously an insider of the Company.


Name	Fees earned or paid in cash ($)(1)	Option awards ($)(2)(3)	Total ($)
Billy Wafford	100,000	37,773	137,773
Benjamin Cross	70,000	37,773	107,773
Marina Hahn	70,000	37,773	107,773
Stephen Monroe	90,000	37,773	127,773


(1)			Represents amount earned or paid for service as a director during fiscal year 2025.
(2)			The reported amounts reflect the grant date fair value of stock options awarded to each non-employee director during fiscal year 2025 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
(3)			As of December 31, 2025, each non-employee director held the following aggregate number of outstanding option awards (including both vested and unvested options): (1) Billy Wafford – 427,235; (2) Benjamin Cross – 360,000; (3) Marina Hahn – 320,000; (4) Stephen Monroe – 438,952.



Signature of Lawyer for the Petitioner, Jushi Holdings Inc.
MARK PONTIN


			No. ___________ Vancouver Registry
			IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA JUSHI HOLDINGS INC. PETITIONER RE: IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 288 OF THE BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT, S.B.C. 2002, C. 57
			ORDER MADE AFTER APPLICATION
			FASKEN MARTINEAU DuMOULIN LLP Barristers and Solicitors 550 Burrard Street, Suite 2900 Vancouver, BC, V6C 0A3 +1 604 631 3131 Counsel: Mark Pontin


(1)			The ADDRESS FOR DELIVERY is: Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP 2900 - 550 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 0A3 Fax number for delivery is: n/a E-mail address for service is: n/a
(2)			The name and office address of the Petitioner’s Solicitor is: Mark Pontin Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP 2900 - 550 Burrard Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 0A3 Telephone: 604 631 3131. (Reference: 346669.00001/15283)


To be completed by the court only:
Order made
☐ in the terms requested in paragraphs ………… of Part 1 of this Petition
☐ with the following variations and additional terms:
Date:
..…………………………………..………Signature of ☐ Judge ☐ Associate Judge