8-K
NexMetals Mining Corp. (NEXM)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
Pursuant
to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Dateof Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 8, 2024
PREMIUM
NICKEL RESOURCES LTD.
(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ontario,Canada
(Stateor other jurisdiction of incorporation)
| 000-14740 | N/A |
|---|---|
| (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| Suite 3400, One First Canadian Place<br><br> <br>P.O. Box 130<br><br> <br>Toronto, Ontario, Canada | M5X 1A4 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(604)770-4334
(Registrant’stelephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Formername or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
| ☐ | Written<br> communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---|
| ☐ | Soliciting<br> material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement<br> communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| ☐ | Pre-commencement<br> communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
| Item 7.01 | Regulation FD Disclosure. |
|---|
On August 8, 2024, Premium Nickel Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing the matters disclosed in this Current Report on Form 8-K, which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
CautionaryStatements to Investors on Reserves and Resources
The news release furnished herewith uses the terms “mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” as such terms are defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which establishes standards for all public disclosure a Canadian issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects.
On October 31, 2018, the SEC adopted new mining disclosure rules (“S-K 1300”) that are more closely aligned with current industry and global regulatory practices and standards, including NI 43-101, with which we comply because we are also a “reporting issuer” under Canadian securities laws. While S-K 1300 is more closely aligned with NI 43-101 than the prior mining disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, there are some differences. Accordingly, there is no assurance any mineral resources that the Company may report as “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” under NI 43-101 will be the same as the reserve or resource estimates prepared under S-K 1300. Investors should not assume that any part or all of indicated mineral resources or inferred mineral resources will ever be converted into a higher category of mineral resources or into mineral reserves. Mineralization described using these terms has a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence and feasibility than mineralization that has been characterized as reserves. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to assume that any “indicated mineral resources”, or “inferred mineral resources” on the Company’s projects are or will be economically or legally mineable. Further, “inferred resources” have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Therefore, investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the inferred resources exist. In accordance with Canadian rules, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” cannot form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies, except in limited circumstances where permitted under NI 43-101.
In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in Item 7.01 is being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings or other documents filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
| Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|---|
(d)Exhibits
| Exhibit<br><br> <br>No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 99.1 | Press<br> Release dated August 8, 2024* |
| 104 | Cover<br> Page Interactive Data File (embedded within Inline XBRL document). |
*Furnished herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| PREMIUM NICKEL RESOURCES LTD.<br><br> <br>(Registrant) | |
|---|---|
| By: | /s/ Timothy H. Moran |
| Timothy<br> H. Moran | |
| Chief<br> Legal Officer |
Date: August 19, 2024
Exhibit 99.1

PREMIUMNICKEL RESOURCES LTD. ANNOUNCES ITS INITIAL MINERAL
RESOURCEESTIMATE OF 27.7 MT FOR THE SELEBI MINES IN BOTSWANA
SelebiMain Deposit
InferredMineral Resource Estimate of 18.89 million tonnes at 3.51% CuEq or 1.70% NiEq.
| ○ | Contained<br> metal Inferred - 165,000 tonnes nickel and 319,000 tonnes copper. |
|---|
SelebiNorth Deposit
IndicatedMineral Resource Estimate of 3.00 million tonnes at 2.92% CuEq or 1.42% NiEq.
| ○ | Contained<br> metal Indicated - 29,000 tonnes nickel and 27,000 tonnes copper. |
|---|
InferredMineral Resource Estimate of 5.83 million tonnes at 3.11% CuEq or 1.51% NiEq.
| ○ | Contained<br> metal Inferred - 62,000 tonnes nickel and 52,000 tonnes copper. |
|---|
Toronto,Ontario, August 8, 2024 – Premium Nickel Resources Ltd. (TSXV: PNRL) (“PNRL” or the “Company”) is pleased to report an initial Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) with an effective date of June 30, 2024, prepared in accordance with CIM (2014) Definitions Standards incorporated in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), on its past-producing nickel-copper sulphide (“Ni-Cu “) Selebi Main deposit and its Selebi North deposit (together, the “Selebi Mines”) in Botswana. The completed NI 43-101 Technical Report, once finalized, will be filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) under PNRL’s issuer profile within 45 days of the date of this news release.
Details of the MRE are shown below along with accompanying tables (Tables 1 through 3) and visuals (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The updated corporate presentation is accessible by clicking here and can also be found on the Company’s website at www.premiumnickel.com. To view the 3D modeling, please visit the following link https://vrify.com/decks/16485.
KeyTakeaways
| ● | The<br> Selebi Main MRE tonnage is 67% larger than the Historic Resource (as defined herein). In<br> part, the increase in tonnes can be attributed to increased resource thickness in the southeast<br> portion of the deposit and the inclusion of a separate lower domain that was not classified<br> as part of the historic resources by the former operator. |
|---|---|
| ● | The<br> Selebi North MRE tonnage is 90% larger than the Historic Resource. In part, this increase<br> can be attributed to PNRL’S drilling success extending mineralization below the N2,<br> N3, and South Limb up to 400 metres beyond the limits of the historical mineral resource,<br> as well as extending the strike extent of the N3 mineralization and including a small number<br> of South Limb footwall zones. |
| --- | --- |
| ● | Borehole<br> electromagnetic surveys and drilling continue to demonstrate expansion potential down-dip<br> and down-plunge of existing resources. |
| --- | --- |
| ● | Drilling<br> is ongoing at both the Selebi Main and Selebi North deposits with the goal to re-classify<br> the Inferred resources to Indicated and to expand the resource. |
| --- | --- |
| ● | Bench<br> scale metallurgical testing and recovery estimates to be completed to a pre-feasibility standard<br> at XPS Expert Process Solutions in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. |
| --- | --- |
| ● | Cobalt,<br> a potentially valuable by-product has not been included in this initial MRE as cobalt analyses<br> are not consistently available throughout the deposit. Metallurgical studies currently underway<br> will determine payability of cobalt at the Selebi Mine. |
| --- | --- |
| 1 |
| --- |
KeithMorrison, CEO of PNRL, commented: “The Mineral Resource Estimate at the Selebi Mines is very promising. The results confirm a strong starting resource size and grade which we expect will expand as we continue our drilling program. Ongoing borehole electromagnetics and drilling continue to demonstrate that both deposits extend down dip and down plunge. The MRE also identifies good mineralization continuity, mineable widths and mining dilution characteristics. Importantly, the contained copper significantly exceeds nickel in the total combined contained metal in the two deposits 398,000 tonnes to 256,000 tonnes (1.55:1).
This initial Mineral Resource Estimate combined with further drilling could allow PNRL to advance to a Preliminary Feasibility Study (“PFS”) at the Selebi Mine, with a completion target of the end of H1 2025. We are currently finalizing arrangements for a consultant for this Preliminary Feasibility Study work. These resources are (i) high grade, (ii) permitted for mining, (iii) have key operational infrastructure (e.g. shafts, declines, and related equipment) already in place and (iv) are supported by a skilled workforce critical to the underground resource drilling program and later mining and processing plans. These attributes are a crucial and positive distinction between PNRL and other mining/development entities. We will continue to rapidly redevelop the Selebi Mine working towards a potential mine reopening in late 2027.
I want to thank our team for their safe and professional hard work on the Mineral Resource Estimate. It is a very positive step in the re-development of the Selebi Mines.”
The MRE shown in Table 1 was prepared by SLR Consulting Ltd. (“SLR”) using a Net Smelter Return (“NSR”) cut-off value of US$70/tonne and consensus metal pricing (Table 2).
Table1: Selebi Mines Mineral Resource Estimate — June 30, 2024
| Deposit | Classification | Tonnage<br> <br>Mt | Ni<br> <br>% | Cu<br> <br>% | NiEq*<br> <br>% | CuEq**<br> <br>% | Ni<br> <br>Kt | Cu<br> <br>Kt | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selebi North | Indicated | 3.00 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 1.42 | 2.92 | 29.5 | 27.1 | |||||||
| Total Indicated | 3.00 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 1.42 | 2.92 | 29.5 | 27.1 | ||||||||
| Selebi Main | Inferred | 18.89 | 0.88 | 1.69 | 1.70 | 3.51 | 165 | 319 | |||||||
| Selebi North | Inferred | 5.83 | 1.07 | 0.90 | 1.51 | 3.11 | 62.4 | 52.5 | |||||||
| Total Inferred | 24.7 | 0.92 | 1.50 | 1.65 | 3.40 | 227 | 371 |
*NiEq% calculated using the formula Ni%+Cu%*(50.24/103.67) using metal prices and recoveries listed below in Notes
**CuEq%calculated using the formula Cu%+ Ni%*(103.67/50.24) using metal prices and recoveries listed below in Notes
Notes:
| 1. | CIM<br> (2014) definitions were followed for mineral resources. |
|---|---|
| 2. | Mineral<br> resources are estimated at a NSR value of $70/t. |
| --- | --- |
| 3. | Mineral<br> resources are estimated using long-term prices of US$10.50/lb Ni and US$4.75/lb Cu and a<br> US$: BWP exchange rate of 1.00:13.23. |
| --- | --- |
| 4. | Mineral<br> resources are estimated using nickel and copper recoveries of 72.0% and 92.4% respectively,<br> derived from metallurgical studies which consider a conceptual bulk concentrate scenario. |
| --- | --- |
| 5. | Bulk<br> density has been estimated and averages 3.39 t/m^3^ at Selebi Main and 3.60 t/m^3^at Selebi North. |
| --- | --- |
| 6. | Mineral<br> resources are reported within conceptual underground reporting shapes considering a minimum<br> thickness of 1.5 metres. |
| --- | --- |
| 7. | There<br> are no mineral reserves. |
| --- | --- |
| 8. | Mineral<br> resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
| --- | --- |
| 9. | Totals<br> may not add or multiply accurately due to rounding. |
| --- | --- |
| 2 |
| --- |
Drilling
At Selebi Main, the Company drilled a total of 15,074 metres in 12 surface drill holes and 2 wedges, and 740 metres in the extensions of two historical holes. Historical drilling, including 28,488 metres in 31 surface drill holes, and 11 wedges and 8,400 metres in 219 underground delineation drill holes, were combined with the Company drilling for a total drill hole database of 52,702 metres in 277 holes which support the new MRE at the Selebi Main deposit.
Similarly, at Selebi North, included in the MRE were a total of 29,984 metres in 82 underground holes drilled by the Company, historical surface drilling (24,504 metres in 21 holes and 9 wedges) and historical delineation drilling (20,638 metres in 354 holes) for a total drilling database of 75,126 metres in 466 holes. In addition, the database also included samples from 704 channels over 2,791 metres.
Ongoing underground drilling at Selebi North, totaling 18,042 meters across 33 completed holes with 3 more in progress as of August 6, 2024, is not included in the MRE. This new drilling is a combination of infill and exploration drilling to follow the extension of the mineralization down dip and down plunge. New assay results not captured in the MRE will be published as they are received and verified by the Company.
MineralResource Estimate
All mineral resource domains at Selebi Main were defined within Seequent’s Leapfrog Geo software, and sub-block model estimates were completed within Leapfrog Edge software using drilling and assays results as of June 30, 2024. All Mineral Resource domains at Selebi North were defined within Leapfrog Geo software and sub-block model estimates were completed within Resource Modeling Solutions Platform (RMSP) and Leapfrog Edge software. Underground constraining shapes were optimized using Deswik stope optimizer software.
At Selebi Main, un-composited density measurements and one-meter composites of uncapped nickel and capped copper sample grades from underground and surface drillholes were estimated into an oriented sub-blocked model using a multi-pass inverse distance squared (ID2) interpolation approach and mined out areas were depleted where needed to represent in situ material.
At Selebi North, one-metre composites of capped nickel, copper, and density sample grades from channels and underground and surface drill holes were estimated into a sub-blocked model using a multi-pass ordinary kriging (OK) interpolation approach in unfolded space in the main domain and using a multi-pass inverse distance weighted (ID2) interpolation approach and dynamic anisotropy (no unfolding) in the footwall domains.
The Selebi North Mineral Resources were estimated using a sub-block model defining one principal domain and three small footwall domains representing mineralization extension below 150 metre elevation (approximately 750 metres below surface), where adjacent and below (mostly below) existing historical mine workings. The estimate uses all information available as of June 30, 2024.
| 3 |
| --- |
Domain orientation and morphology have been informed by underground mapping, channel sampling, and surface and underground drilling completed by historical operators as well as by PNRL. The structures mimic the mined-out areas with respect to orientation and form and have been confirmed to continue down plunge through drill core observations and downhole geophysics.
In addition to standard database validation techniques, wireframe and block model validation procedures including wireframe to block volume confirmation, statistical comparisons with composite and nearest neighbour estimates, swath plots, visual reviews in 3D, longitudinal, cross section and plan views, as well as cross software reporting confirmation, were completed. In addition to SLR’s internal peer and senior review processes, PNRL’s technical team have reviewed the MRE.
Blocks were classified following CIM Definitions (2014) as Indicated and Inferred using drill hole spacing based criterion. Inferred mineral resources at Selebi Main were defined where drill hole spacings of up to approximately 200 metres was achieved. Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources at Selebi North were defined where drill hole spacings of up to approximately 50 metres and 150 metres were achieved, respectively, modified in some areas to reflect geological and grade uncertainty. At both deposits, Mineral Resources are reported within conceptual underground reporting shapes (resource panels) defined using a minimum thickness of 1.5 metres and a NSR cut-off value of US$70/t. All blocks within the resource panels have been included within the Mineral Resource estimate. Mined-out areas were depleted where needed to represent in-situ material, and resource panels in the crown pillar area at Selebi North were excluded from the estimate.
NSRand Mineral Resources Cut-off Value
NSR values have been estimated for an operating scenario that includes production of a bulk nickel-copper sulphide concentrate for both the Selebi Main and Selebi North deposits. Metal prices are based on long-term forecasts from banks, financial institutions and other sources. The metal prices and other input parameters used in development of a unit NSR value for each block are provided in Table 2.
Table2: NSR Value Calculation
| Commodity | Metal Prices (/lb) | Net<br> Metallurgical<br> Recovery (%) | Refining Cost (/lb) | Transport Cost/wmt<br> (Bulk Con) | Treatment Cost/dmt<br> (Bulk Con) | Royalty | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nickel | 72.0 | % | US$ | 150 | US$ | 220 | 2.00 | % | ||||
| Copper | 94.4 | % | US$ | 150 | US$ | 220 | 2.00 | % |
All values are in US Dollars.
For the purpose of mineral resource reporting, underground constraining shapes were developed using the Deswik Stope Optimizer (DSO) based on an NSR cut-off value of US$70/tonne. Parameters used to calculate the cut-off grade are given in Table 3.
| 4 |
| --- |
Table3: The cut-off parameters, based on previous study work
| Parameter | Unit | Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mining (Underground) | US$/t milled | $ | 48.00 |
| Processing | US$/t milled | $ | 20.00 |
| G&A | US$/t milled | $ | 4.92 |
| Total Unit Operating Cost | US$/t milled | $ | 67.94 |
QualityControl
The underground drilling program is being carried out through an agreement with Forage Fusion Drilling Ltd. of Hawkesbury, Ontario, Canada, who have provided three Zinex U-5 drills for purchase and training of local operators. Drill core samples are BQTK (40.7 mm diameter). All samples are ½ core cut by a diamond saw on site. Half of the core is retained for reference purposes. Samples are generally 1.0 to 1.5 metre intervals or less at the discretion of the site geologists. Sample preparation and lab analysis was completed at ALS Chemex in Johannesburg, South Africa. Commercially prepared blank samples and certified Cu/Ni sulphide analytical control standards with a range of grades are inserted in every batch of 20 samples or a minimum of one set per sample batch. Analyses for Ni, Cu and Co are completed using a peroxide fusion preparation and ICP-AES finish (ME-ICP81).
QualifiedPersons
The mineral resource estimate described in this news release was reviewed and approved by Valerie Wilson, M.Sc., P.Geo. (Ontario) SLR Consulting Ltd. Principal Resource Geologist, who is independent of PNRL and a “qualified person” for purposes of NI 43-101.
Verification included a site visit to inspect mineralization in underground workings, active drilling, mineralized core, logging, density measurement procedures and sampling procedures, and a review of the control sample results used to assess laboratory assay quality. In addition, 100% of samples collected by PNRL have been verified against independently accessed assay certificates and a random selection of historical database results have been compared against original paper and digital records.
The scientific and technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by Sharon Taylor, Vice President Exploration of the Company, who is a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.
| 5 |
| --- |
HistoricResource Estimate
The historical mineral resource estimate referenced herein (the “Historical Resource”) was calculated for the Selebi North, Selebi Main, Phikwe South and Southeast Extension deposits in accordance with the South African Mineral Resource Committee (SAMREC), in 2016, and does not comply with NI 43-101. PNRL is not treating the historical mineral estimates as current mineral resource estimates. To that end, the Historical Resource is considered to be historical in nature and should not be relied upon as a current mineral resource estimate. In addition, the Historical Resource has been superseded by the MRE reported herein.
AboutPremium Nickel Resources Ltd.
PNRL is a mineral exploration and development company that is focused on the redevelopment of the previously producing nickel, copper and cobalt resources mines owned by the Company in the Republic of Botswana.
PNRL is committed to governance through transparent accountability and open communication within our team and our stakeholders. Our skilled team has worked over 100 projects collectively, accumulating over 400 years of resource discoveries, mine development and mine re-engineering experience on projects like the Company’s Selebi and Selkirk mines. PNRL’s senior team members have on average more than 20 years of experience in every single aspect of mine discovery and development, from geology to operations.
ONBEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Keith Morrison
Director and Chief Executive Officer
Premium Nickel Resources Ltd.
Forfurther information about Premium Nickel Resources Ltd., please contact:
Jaclyn Ruptash
Vice President, Communications and Government and Investor Relations
+1 (604) 770-4334
| 6 |
| --- |
CautionaryNote Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:
This news release contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation based on expectations, estimates and projections as at the date of this news release. Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. For the purposes of this release, forward looking information includes, but is not limited to: the ability of the Company to implement its drilling, geoscience and metallurgical work on its properties and work plans generally; the implementation of the objectives, goals and future plans of the Company including the proposed advancement of the Selebi Mine as currently contemplated; the ability of exploration activities (including drill results) to accurately predict mineralization; management’s belief that the Selebi and Selebi North deposits may be connected at depth; the timing and ability of the Company to publish a prefeasibility study (by H1 2025 or at all); the timing and ability of the Company to publish the MRE technical report in accordance with NI 43-101; any discrepancies between the MRE technical report and the scientific and technical information in this news release; the timing to release of the remaining assay results; the ability of the Company to implement its drilling, geoscience and metallurgical work on its properties and work plans generally; the implementation of the objectives, goals and future plans of the Company including the proposed advancement of the Selebi Mine as currently contemplated; the ability of the Company to define additional or upgrade existing mineral resource estimates on the Selebi Mine in accordance with NI 43-101; the productivity rates for underground drilling at Selebi North; drilling results confirming the legacy fold pattern continues at depth; the effective targeting activities proposed by the Company; the ability to identify additional mineralization down plunge of existing workings and the ability of such findings to be used to complete a MRE and/or to support further economic studies; the ability and timing of advancing the underground drilling program at Selebi North as contemplated (if at all); the ability to expand the resource potential at the Selebi Mine; the results of the drill program on Selebi North and the timing and disclosures of the Company regarding same; the relationships between, and continuity of, the various deposits (if any); the benefits of the Company’s approach to exploration; management’s belief that the Historic Resource could be indicative of the presence of mineralization on the deposits; and the anticipated benefits of the Company’s approach to the resource development plan. These forward-looking statements, by their nature, require the Company to make certain assumptions and necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates; the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results; the ability of exploration results to predict mineralization, prefeasibility or the feasibility of mine production; delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals; uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future; changes in equity markets; inflation; fluctuations in commodity prices; delays in the development of projects; the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry; and those risks set out in the Company’s public disclosure record on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.com) under PNRL’s issuer profile. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.
Neitherthe TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) acceptsresponsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authorityhas approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
FollowUs
X (formally Twitter): https://twitter.com/PremiumNickel
Linked in: https://www.linkedin.com/company/premium-nickel-resources
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PremiumNickel
| 7 |
| --- |
Figure1. Long Section of the Selebi Main and Selebi North Mineral Resource Estimate as defined by wireframes of mineralized zones

LongSection Showing Modeled BHEM Plates

| 8 |
| --- |
Figure2. Selebi Main Initial MRE and Modeled BHEM Plates

| 9 |
| --- |
Figure3: Selebi North Initial MRE, PNRL and Historic Drill Hole Traces, Underground Infrastructure, Historic Resources and Modeled BHEM Plates

| 10 |
| --- |
Figure4: Location of Ongoing Selebi North Underground Drill and BHEM Programs

| 11 |
| --- |