Nvr Inc DEF 14A, filed Mar 17, 2026
Nvr Inc (NVR)
DEF 14A
2026-03-17
For: 2026-05-07
View Original
Added on
June 12, 2026
About this DEF 14A
Nvr Inc filed this DEF 14A on March 17, 2026.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant X Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |||||||
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||||||
| X | Definitive Proxy Statement | |||||||
| ☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |||||||
| ☐ | Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 | |||||||
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
| X | No fee required. | |||||||||||||
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||||||||||||
| ☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||||||||||||
NVR, INC.
11700 Plaza America Drive
Suite 500
Reston, VA 20190
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held on Thursday, May 7, 2026
11:00 A.M. Eastern Time
NVR, Inc. will hold its Annual Meeting of Shareholders at 11:00 A.M. (Eastern Time) on Thursday, May 7, 2026. We will hold the meeting at our corporate headquarters located at 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, Virginia 20190.
We are holding the meeting for the following purposes:
1. To elect eleven directors from the nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement;
2. To ratify the appointment of the accounting firm of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor for the year ending December 31, 2026;
3. To vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve compensation paid to certain executive officers;
4. To vote on a shareholder proposal to reduce the ownership threshold required to call a special meeting, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting;
5. To vote on a shareholder proposal to disclose greenhouse gas emissions, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
6. To transact other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.
The above items are fully described in the attached Proxy Statement. We have not received notice of any other matters that may properly be presented at the meeting.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 4, 2026 will be entitled to vote at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote before the Annual Meeting. Most shareholders will have a choice of voting through the Internet, by telephone or, if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, by completing a proxy card and returning it promptly in the accompanying envelope. You are invited to attend the meeting in person. If you do attend the meeting, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.
| By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||||||||
| James M. Sack | ||||||||
| Secretary and General Counsel | ||||||||
| March 17, 2026 | ||||||||
Table of Contents
| Page | ||||||||||||||
| I. | ||||||||||||||
| II. | ||||||||||||||
| III. | ||||||||||||||
| IV. | ||||||||||||||
| V. | ||||||||||||||
| VI. | ||||||||||||||
VII. | ||||||||||||||
VIII. | ||||||||||||||
IX. | ||||||||||||||
NVR, INC.
11700 Plaza America Drive
Suite 500
Reston, VA 20190
Proxy Statement
This Proxy Statement, proxy card and the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2025 are being distributed to our shareholders on or about March 17, 2026 in connection with the solicitation on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of NVR, Inc. ("NVR"), a Virginia corporation, of proxies for use at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 7, 2026, at our corporate headquarters located at 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, Virginia 20190, at 11:00 A.M., Eastern Time.
We bear the cost of proxy solicitation, including expenses in connection with preparing and distributing the proxy solicitation materials. We may reimburse brokers or persons holding shares in their names or in the names of their nominees for their expenses in sending proxies and proxy materials to beneficial owners. In addition to solicitation electronically and by mail, certain of our officers, directors and regular employees, who will receive no extra compensation for their services, may solicit proxies. We have retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in the solicitation of brokers, bank nominees and institutional holders for a fee of approximately $9,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses.
All voting rights are vested exclusively in the holders of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”). Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 4, 2026 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders include holders (the “Participants”) owning stock in our Profit Sharing Trust Plan and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (together, the “Plans”).
If you plan to attend the meeting in person, you must send written notice of your intention to attend to James M. Sack, Secretary at our corporate headquarters address by May 1, 2026. Attendance at the meeting is limited to shareholders, who may be "record holders" who own shares directly in their names, or who may hold shares through banks, brokerages, or other intermediaries. Attendees must provide photo identification and evidence of ownership as of the Record Date, such as a letter from the bank, broker, or other intermediary confirming ownership, or the relevant portion of a bank or brokerage firm account statement. An attendee that is the authorized representative of an entity that is a beneficial holder must present a letter from the entity certifying the beneficial ownership of the entity and status as an authorized representative. If you do not follow these instructions, you may not gain attendance to the meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote before the Annual Meeting. We strongly encourage all of our shareholders to vote electronically at www.proxyvote.com or provide voting instructions to their broker, bank, trustee or other nominee to ensure that their shares are voted at the Annual Meeting. Further instructions on how to vote are included on the proxy card. The persons named in the proxy card will vote shares of Common Stock represented by all valid proxies in accordance with the instructions contained thereon. In the absence of instructions, shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted:
•FOR the election of the eleven director nominees named in this Proxy Statement;
•FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor for 2026;
•FOR the approval of the compensation paid to certain executive officers;
•AGAINST the shareholder proposals referenced in this Proxy Statement, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
•in the discretion of the named proxies with respect to any other matters presented at the Annual Meeting.
You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the Annual Meeting by entering a new electronic or telephone vote (until the cut-off date set forth on the proxy notice). You also may revoke your proxy by delivering a later-dated proxy. If you are a beneficial owner, you must contact your nominee to change your vote or obtain a legal proxy to vote your shares at the meeting.
If a shareholder holds shares in a brokerage account or through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) prohibit the nominee from voting the shareholder’s shares on any proposal to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, other than "routine" matters such as the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor, unless the nominee has received an instruction from the shareholder regarding how the shares should be voted. Any shares for which an instruction has not been received will result in a “broker non-vote” on the proposal for which no instruction was provided.
1
For a quorum to exist at the Annual Meeting, holders of shares representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on each matter must be present in person or by proxy. Shares voted “abstain” or represented by a broker non-vote on a matter will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of establishing a quorum. For a director to be deemed elected, the director must receive a majority of votes cast “for” and “against” the director's election. Similarly for other proposals, the proposal must receive a majority of votes cast “for” and “against” the proposal. For these proposals, therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the result of the vote.
The proxy card also should be used by Participants to instruct the trustee of the Plans how to vote shares of Common Stock held on their behalf. The trustee is required under the trust agreement to establish procedures to ensure that the instructions received from Participants are held in confidence and not divulged, released or otherwise utilized in a manner that might influence the Participants’ free exercise of their voting rights. Proxy cards representing shares held by Participants must be voted by May 1, 2026 either electronically or returned to the tabulator using the enclosed return envelope. Proxy cards should not be returned to NVR. If shares are owned through the Plans and the Participant does not submit voting instructions by May 1, 2026, the trustee of the Plans will vote such shares in the same proportion as the voting instructions received from other Participants.
As of the Record Date, we had a total of 2,778,119 shares of Common Stock outstanding, each share of which is entitled to one vote. The presence, either in person or by proxy, of persons entitled to vote a majority of the outstanding Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Under our Restated Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, holders of Common Stock are not entitled to vote such shares on a cumulative basis, including with respect to the voting for directors.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on May 7, 2026:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 are available at www.proxyvote.com.
2
Company Overview
Who We Are
We are one of the largest homebuilders in the United States. We operate in thirty-seven metropolitan areas in sixteen states and Washington, D.C. Our homebuilding operations include the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings under three trade names: Ryan Homes, NVHomes and Heartland Homes. Our Ryan Homes product is marketed primarily to first-time and first-time move-up buyers. Our NVHomes and Heartland Homes products are marketed primarily to move-up and luxury buyers. In addition to selling and building homes, we provide a number of mortgage and title-related services through our wholly owned subsidiary, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”). Through operations in each of our homebuilding markets, NVRM originates mortgage loans exclusively for our homebuyers. NVRM sells the mortgage loans it closes into the secondary markets.
2025 Corporate Sustainability Highlights
Our Board believes that corporate responsibility and business sustainability go hand in hand at NVR. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) is responsible for setting our sustainability strategy and overseeing the mitigation of sustainability risks as part of our strong governance framework. The Nominating Committee received briefings on sustainability matters from our management team during each of its five meetings in 2025. Topics discussed during 2025 included shareholder feedback and priorities related to sustainability matters, regulatory proposals, monitoring of sustainability industry developments, our Employer Information Report Data ("EEO-1") and our Responsible Building Policy and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board ("SASB") Disclosures. The EEO-1 report and our Responsible Building Policy and SASB Disclosures are both available on our website at www.nvrinc.com.
NVR has four sustainability priorities: continuing our strong commitment to our people, minimizing the impact of our operations on the environment, building sustainable communities and managing risk.
3
People
Safety: Our employees are our most important asset, and the safety of our employees is our first priority. Our concern for safety goes beyond our employees, extending to our customers and trade partners. Construction presents a demanding environment and we strive to ensure that all of our employees, customers and trade partners go home safely every single day.
We use a method of construction called panelization. Panelization allows for the building of large portions of our homes in eleven centralized production facilities. These facilities promote safety by panelizing our homes in a controlled environment and reducing environmental concerns, the time our trade partners need to construct our homes and exposures to hazards. We provide ongoing training and employ strict safe building practices. Production facility employees receive extensive safety training. All new hires undergo a two-day safety orientation and a 1-2 week on the job training with a safety focus, followed by additional training at 30, 60 and 90 days. Each department holds weekly safety meetings highlighting various aspects of their job, ranging from personal protective equipment to safe material handling. Over the last ten years, our production facilities maintained a safety incident rate approximately 23% lower than the industry average.
We maintain robust safety and training programs to ensure that safety is an integral part of our onsite construction process. We perform frequent construction site inspections to ensure our safety processes and procedures are being followed. We conduct quarterly unannounced safety audits at all of our homebuilding divisions. The audits assess compliance with OSHA standards and company safety policies. The results of these audits are reviewed by our senior management team, and division management is responsible for updating safety processes and procedures as needed based on the results. We maintain a rigorous enforcement program to hold our management and trade partners accountable for non-compliant actions. We also engage directly with our trade partners to ensure they have input regarding the safety of their employees on our construction sites.
Safety and security considerations extend beyond the construction site. We maintain security standards for each of our office locations and model homes, including alarm/security systems, 24/7 monitoring for all model homes and semi-annual security audits for all offices, model homes and production facilities.
Development & Advancement: We provide advancement opportunities for our employees by offering training and development that aligns with each employee’s responsibilities and career path. Managers provide frequent performance coaching through a
4
formal process to develop our employees and enhance our succession planning. The substantial majority of our leadership fulfillments are from within our workforce, and all of our employees are NVR shareholders through our Employee Stock Ownership Program. We believe this focus provides both long-term success and continuity to our operations and growth for our employees. Our results in this area are demonstrated by the tenure of our executives and our regional and division leaders.
Inclusive Culture: We are committed to continually developing an inclusive culture that attracts a talented workforce and enables them to contribute to the success of the company by emphasizing their unique perspectives and backgrounds. Our culture prioritizes creating opportunities for growth, being part of a team and operating with the highest level of integrity. In addition, our leadership works to create a safe and ethical workplace that offers all employees opportunities to learn, grow and develop. The differing perspectives that emerge from our culture allows us to make the appropriate merit-based decisions. Pursuant to these priorities, we report our annual EEO-1 data on our website.
Mobility Among Our Employees: A core tenet to our growth strategy is leveraging our experienced employee base when expanding to new markets. Employees with experience executing our business model in established markets drive business execution and develop our culture in expansion markets. The relocation of our experienced employees has allowed us to establish a new market presence more quickly. Additionally, mobility drives career advancement opportunities for our employees.
Environmentally Responsible Building
Sourcing & Design: Our centralized production facilities enable us to have significant control over the sourcing of raw materials. For example, lumber is one of our most important raw materials, and centralization allows us to purchase a significant amount of lumber from sustainable forests. Currently, more than 75% of our lumber spending is from companies who participate in the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or similar certified sustainable forests. We also strive to sustainably source intermediate and finished goods for our homes. For example, the cabinets we install in our homes are “Green-Approved” certified by the National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB) Research Center and certified by the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association under its Environmental Stewardship Program.
We also use materials in our homes that promote greater resource efficiency. For instance, the floor, wall and roof sheathing that we use is engineered lumber, not plywood, which allows us to use the entire tree. Additionally, much of the waste that we create from our raw lumber is recycled.
Production facilities: We produce large portions of our homes in our centralized production facilities, including wall panels, roof trusses and stairs, which allows us to reduce waste, effectively recycle materials, and improve accuracy and consistency in our construction. Our production processes use computer-driven saws that maximize the use of raw lumber to fabricate roof trusses and wall panels, resulting in an extremely low waste factor. We use advanced framing techniques recommended for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building certification and use highly-sophisticated material takeoff and sourcing techniques to reduce waste. Our framing waste factor is within the LEED-H and NAHB Green Guidelines.
We also strategically locate our production facilities in close proximity to our communities to reduce freight, road congestion and fuel consumption and minimize air pollution. We currently have eleven such production facilities. We believe this is a clear indication of our commitment to environmentally friendly production. We continually update our production processes to enhance vertical integration, which results in significantly fewer shipments to our job sites, reduced fuel usage and emissions.
Recycling: We recycle materials in our production processes whenever possible. We recycle cardboard, metal, concrete and wooden pallets as part of our recycling program, which significantly reduces the amount of materials that end up going to landfills. We optimize our lumber cuts to minimize lumber scrap and work with lumber recyclers to repurpose our lumber scrap.
Responsibility: We are responsible stewards of the land we control; no run-off or by-product discharge is created from our processes at our production facilities. We utilize an extensive storm water management system and have implemented erosion and sediment controls on all of our construction sites to manage storm water run-off. We also perform quarterly unannounced environmental audits at construction sites in which we assess compliance with company policies and federal, state and local clean water standards. The results of the audits are reviewed by our senior management team and division management is responsible for updating environmental processes and procedures as needed based on the results. We maintain a rigorous enforcement program to hold our management and our trade partners accountable for non-compliant actions. We actively monitor the regulatory environment with respect to environmental and climate disclosures and proactively prepare for compliance with emerging requirements.
5
Sustainable Communities
Energy Efficient & Affordable Homes: We design our homes under our BuiltSmart program, which has been designed to highlight the quality, livability and energy efficiency that goes into our home designs. Our building practices and standards result in a lower long-term carbon footprint for our homes and communities. Our homes use resources as efficiently as possible while providing durable structures that will last for generations. We believe that building our homes to use less energy, water and other natural resources is an important way we can have a lasting sustainability impact.
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, more than half of all energy consumed in the types of homes we build is used to heat and cool. We reduce our homes’ energy demand through the use of air and moisture infiltration systems, high-efficiency windows, engineered air handling systems to minimize imbalance and loss, and the use of insulation that meets or exceeds local building requirements. We then deliver heating and cooling with high-efficiency heating and air conditioning systems and install programmable thermostats in each home to help homeowners reduce their energy usage.
We also install integrated LED light fixtures and bulbs that are at least 75% more energy efficient than traditional lighting, and create less waste due to a lifespan that is up to 25 times longer than a traditional light bulb.
All of our homes are tested using the RESNET standard for energy efficiency by an independent third-party. For 2025, 100% of our homes built were more energy efficient than a standard new home (as defined by the Home Energy Rating System, or HERS), and were on average over 40% more efficient than the standard new home.
Reduce Water Needs: We use high-efficiency tankless water heaters in many of our homes to provide on-demand hot water, resulting in a significant energy use reduction for homeowners. We use faucets and shower heads that are certified to the EPA WaterSense program, reducing the consumption of water by at least 20%, and we install landscaping using native plants and materials to reduce the need for extra irrigation.
Home Ownership: Since 1948, our passion and purpose has been to build beautiful places people love to call home, and we have built more than 600,000 homes in that time. We bring the dream of affordable home ownership to first time buyers, move-up buyers, empty nesters and active adults, and are a leading builder in diverse areas in our footprint. We build homes in thirty-seven metropolitan areas in sixteen states and included in those areas are a number of traditionally underserved markets. In addition, we actively support low and moderate income households through state and local affordable housing initiatives. Our mortgage banking operations lending practices are conducted in accordance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Fair Housing Act, and approximately half of our FHA loans closed in 2025 were made in underserved markets. We know that engaging and supporting our communities throughout the building process and beyond enhances the long term sustainability and value creation of our business.
Risk Management
Strategy: Two of the key differentiators that contribute to our success are our market concentration strategy and our lot acquisition strategy. We focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve. This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets, which we believe contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.
With respect to our lot acquisition strategy, we generally do not engage in direct land ownership or land development. Instead, we typically acquire finished building lots from various third party land developers pursuant to fixed price finished lot purchase agreements (“LPAs”) that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the LPAs. The deposits required under the LPAs are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and typically range up to 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We believe that our lot acquisition strategy avoids the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. In this way, we operate in a much less capital intensive manner than most other homebuilders.
Capital Allocation: Our strategy described above is the key driver of our strong balance sheet that, over the long-term, maximizes shareholder value in a cyclical industry. We were the only publicly traded homebuilder that remained profitable through the 2006-2011 housing downturn, the most severe since the Great Depression of the 1930s. That outperformance in a recessionary period was a direct result of our strategy. In 2025, we continued our robust share repurchase program by repurchasing over $1.8 billion of outstanding stock, while maintaining a strong balance sheet with a net cash balance of $975 million at December 31, 2025. Our strong balance sheet enables us to weather future business disruptions and take advantage of opportunities that may arise from future economic and homebuilding market volatility.
Corporate Governance: We are committed to having sound corporate governance principles and practices. Having and acting on that commitment is essential to the long term sustainability of our business and to maintaining our integrity in the
6
marketplace. We have a robust Code of Ethics and Standards of Business Conduct (the "Code") published on our website that applies to all employees and our Board, and is designed to, among other things, promote honest and ethical conduct, avoid conflicts of interest and ensure compliance with laws and regulations. All employees are required to acknowledge the Code upon joining NVR and annually thereafter.
Our Board actively oversees our strong corporate governance framework. During 2025, our Board met formally five times and was actively engaged in overseeing key business risks. We have three female independent directors on our Board, and have a broad diversity of backgrounds and perspectives within our boardroom, enhanced further by two strong director appointments in 2025. Our Board and management actively consider board refreshment and we have a robust board self-evaluation process. These practices help us strike the right balance between long-term understanding of our business, business experience, tenure and fresh external perspectives.
Sustainability is an Ongoing NVR Priority
We are committed to our priorities of people, environmentally responsible building, sustainable communities and risk management. The actions we have described here are a small part of what we do every day to fulfill our corporate responsibility and enhance our business sustainability. These important topics will continue to evolve, and so will our active approach to addressing these topics as part of our strong governance framework.
We believe profitability and sustainability go hand-in-hand; we are more profitable because we operate sustainably, and we are more sustainable because we operate profitably. While the examples we provide in this proxy are focused on current and recent practices, the fundamentals of our sustainable strategy have been the very underpinning of our long-term success. The 72,828% return our shareholders have enjoyed over the last 30 years is a testament to the success of our strategy.
Election of Directors
(Proposal No. 1)
Director Nominees
Our Restated Articles of Incorporation state that the number of directors on our Board will be no less than seven and no more than thirteen, as established from time to time by Board resolution. Our Board has set the size of the Board at eleven members. We strive to strike the right balance on our Board between long-term understanding of our business, the quality of business experience, a high level of demonstrated accomplishment and fresh external perspectives.
The following persons have been nominated by the Board to be elected to hold office for a one-year term ending at the 2027 Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified:
| Name | Age | Year First Elected or Appointed | Independent | Other Public Company Boards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | 70 | 2022 | No | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| C. E. Andrews | 74 | 2008 | Yes | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sallie B. Bailey | 66 | 2020 | Yes | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. DeVito | 61 | 2025 | Yes | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alfred E. Festa | 66 | 2008 | Yes | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alexandra A. Jung | 55 | 2018 | Yes | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mel Martinez | 79 | 2012 | Yes | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
George R. Oliver | 65 | 2025 | Yes | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| David A. Preiser | 68 | 1993 | Yes | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Grady Rosier | 77 | 2008 | Yes | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Susan Williamson Ross | 64 | 2016 | Yes | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other than Messrs. DeVito and Oliver, who were initially recommended to the Board by a third-party search firm and appointed to the Board in July and October 2025, respectively, all of the director nominees are current directors standing for re-election. Each nominee has consented to serve as one of our directors if elected. Our Board does not contemplate that any of its proposed nominees listed above will be unwilling to serve or become unavailable for any reason, but if any such circumstance should occur before the Annual Meeting, proxies may be voted for another nominee selected by the Board.
7
Biographical Information for Our Directors and Director Nominees
The biographies below describe the skills, attributes and experience of our directors and director nominees who were considered by the Board and Nominating Committee.
Paul C. Saville has been Executive Chairman of our Board since May 4, 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Saville served as President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR from July 1, 2005 through May 3, 2022. Mr. Saville has been employed by NVR since 1981.
The Board believes that Mr. Saville is highly qualified to serve on the Board based on his extensive NVR and homebuilding industry and real estate experience, his executive leadership experience, his brand marketing expertise, his financial expertise, his mergers and acquisitions experience, his turn-around/restructuring experience and his public company board experience.
C. E. Andrews has been a director since May 6, 2008. Mr. Andrews served as Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of MorganFranklin Consulting, LLC from May 2013 through March 2017, and served on its Board of Directors from May 2013 through June 2019. From June 2009 until February 2012, Mr. Andrews was the president of RSM McGladrey Business Services, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Andrews served as the president of SLM Corporation and spent approximately 30 years at Arthur Andersen. Mr. Andrews serves on the board of Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation.
The Board believes that Mr. Andrews is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience, his financial and accounting expertise, his restructuring experience and his public company board experience.
Sallie B. Bailey has been a director since February 21, 2020. Ms. Bailey was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation from December 2011 until July 2018. From January 2007 until July 2010, Ms. Bailey was the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ferro Corporation and before that, Ms. Bailey served in various senior management roles at The Timken Company, lastly as Senior Vice President and Controller. Ms. Bailey serves on the board of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Within the last five years, Ms. Bailey previously served on the board of the Azek Company.
The Board believes that Ms. Bailey is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on her executive leadership experience, her financial and accounting expertise and her public company board experience.
Michael J. DeVito was appointed as a director on July 1, 2025. Mr. DeVito was the Chief Executive Officer and an Executive Director of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") from 2021 to 2024. Prior to working for Freddie Mac, Mr. DeVito worked for twenty-four years at Wells Fargo & Company ("Wells Fargo") in various home lending senior management positions of increasing responsibility. The last position Mr. DeVito held at Wells Fargo was Executive Vice President and Head of Home Lending.
The Board believes that Mr. DeVito is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience, his financial expertise, his brand marketing expertise, his knowledge of capital markets and his mortgage industry experience.
Alfred E. Festa has been a director since December 1, 2008. Mr. Festa was Chairman of W. R. Grace & Co (“Grace”) from January 2008 through November 2019. He joined Grace as President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2003 and was Chief Executive Officer from June 2005 through November 2018. Before Grace, Mr. Festa was a partner in Morgenthaler Private Equity Partners, a venture/buyout firm focused on mid-market industrial build-ups. Mr. Festa serves on the board of Owens Corning, Inc.
The Board believes that Mr. Festa is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience, his public company board experience, his financial expertise, his brand marketing expertise, his mergers and acquisitions experience, and his restructuring experience.
Alexandra A. Jung has been a director since December 3, 2018. Ms. Jung is a co-founder and Managing Partner of Amateras Capital, an investment firm focused on private credit and equity investments. She is also a Partner and Head of Private Debt at AEA Investors, L.P. From 2009 through April 2020, Ms. Jung was at Oak Hill Advisors ("Oak Hill"), a leading alternative investment firm with over $50 billion of assets under management. Ms. Jung was a partner at Oak Hill from 2012 through April 2019 when she became a senior advisor. Prior to joining Oak Hill, Ms. Jung was a Managing Director at Greywolf Capital Management, where she was responsible for investments in credit, private equity and special situations. Previously, she managed investments in credit, distressed debt and equity as part of Goldman Sachs’ European Special Situations Group. In November 2025, Ms. Jung was appointed to the board of Wyndham Hotels & Resorts.
The Board believes that Ms. Jung is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on her executive leadership experience, her financial expertise, her knowledge of capital markets, her mergers and acquisitions experience, her restructuring experience and her public company board experience.
8
Mel Martinez has been a director since December 1, 2012. Mr. Martinez was Chairman of the South East and Latin America for JPMorgan Chase & Co. ("JPMorgan") from August 2010 through March 1, 2023. Prior to joining JPMorgan, Mr. Martinez was a partner in the law firm DLA Piper from September 2009 to July 2010. Mr. Martinez served as a United States Senator from Florida from January 2005 to September 2009 and served as the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development before that. Within the last five years, Mr. Martinez served on the board of Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation.
The Board believes that Mr. Martinez is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience, his housing industry experience, his government and housing regulatory expertise, and his public company board experience.
George R. Oliver was appointed as a director on October 1, 2025. Mr. Oliver previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Controls International plc from 2017 to July 2025. Mr. Oliver was the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Tyco International Ltd., prior to its merger with Johnson Controls, from 2012 to 2016. In addition, Mr. Oliver served in operational leadership roles of increasing responsibility at General Electric. Mr. Oliver serves on the board of RTX Corporation.
The Board believes that Mr. Oliver is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience, his mergers and acquisitions experience, his brand marketing expertise, his financial expertise and his public company board experience.
David A. Preiser has been a director since September 30, 1993. Mr. Preiser is currently Vice-Chairman of Houlihan Lokey, Inc. He served as Co-President of Houlihan Lokey, Inc. from 2013 to 2024 and a member of its board of directors from 2001 until 2024. Since January 1, 2005 until 2024, Mr. Preiser also served as Chairman of Houlihan Lokey– Europe, pursuant to which he led Houlihan Lokey’s European investment banking activities, including Houlihan Lokey’s European restructuring business. Mr. Preiser is also active in Houlihan Lokey’s investment banking, real estate and financial restructuring activities in the United States and throughout the world.
The Board believes that Mr. Preiser is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience, his financial expertise, his knowledge of capital markets, his mergers and acquisitions experience, his public company board experience, and his turn-around/restructuring experience.
W. Grady Rosier has been a director since December 1, 2008. Mr. Rosier served as the President and CEO of McLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), a supply chain services company, from 1995 through August 2020. Before that, Mr. Rosier held various senior management roles at McLane. Within the last five years, Mr. Rosier served on the board of NuStar Energy L.P.
The Board believes that Mr. Rosier is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on his executive leadership experience and his public company board experience.
Susan Williamson Ross has been a director since July 28, 2016. Ms. Ross has been the President of the privately-held majority investor in Clark Construction Group, Shirley Contracting and several other construction, development and real estate businesses since January 2016. She became the President and Chief Executive Officer in December 2020. She has been employed by Clark Construction Group since December 1986 in various positions, including Chief Administrative Officer from July 2004 to 2020 and Executive Vice President from January 2008 to the present.
The Board believes that Ms. Ross is highly qualified to serve on our Board based on her executive leadership experience, her construction and real estate development experience and her public company board experience.
Majority Vote Standard
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board expects a director to tender his or her resignation if he or she fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election. Under these guidelines, the Board shall nominate for re-election as a director and fill director vacancies and new directorships only with candidates who agree to tender their resignation if they fail to receive the required number of votes for re-election.
If a director fails to be re-elected by a majority of votes cast, the Nominating Committee shall promptly consider the resignation offer of any such director and recommend to the Board whether to accept the tendered resignation or reject it. The Board shall take action with respect to the Nominating Committee's recommendation no later than 90 days following the submission of any such resignation offer. Following the Board's action regarding the Nominating Committee's recommendation, we will promptly file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) which shall detail the Board's decision regarding a tendered resignation. This report shall include an explanation of the process by which the Board's decision was reached and the reasons for the Board's decision.
9
To the extent that one or more directors’ resignations are accepted by the Board, the Nominating Committee will recommend to the Board whether to fill the vacancy or vacancies or to reduce the size of the Board.
The Board expects that any director who tenders his or her resignation pursuant to this policy will not participate in the Nominating Committee recommendation or Board action regarding whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. If, however, a majority of the members of the Nominating Committee fails to receive the required number of votes for re-election in the election, the independent directors who did not fail to receive the required number of votes for re-election shall form a committee amongst themselves for the purposes of evaluating the tendered resignations and recommending to the Board whether to accept or reject them.
Required Vote
Each director shall be elected by a majority of the votes cast in the election at the Annual Meeting, assuming that a quorum is present. A majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted "for" a director must exceed the number of shares voted "against" that director. Unless marked otherwise, proxies received will be voted FOR the election of the nominees designated above. Shareholders may abstain from voting for any particular nominee by so indicating in the space provided on the accompanying proxy card. An abstention will not be counted as a vote cast “for” or “against” a director’s election.
10
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS
We are committed to having sound corporate governance principles and practices. Having and acting on that commitment is essential to running our business efficiently and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. Our primary corporate governance documents, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and all of our Board Committee Charters, are available to the public on our website.
The following are highlights of our Corporate Governance practices:
•Separate Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions
•Annual elections for all directors
•Majority voting standard for uncontested elections
•Ten of the eleven director nominees are independent
•Independent lead director
•Shareholder proxy access
•Shareholder right to call a special meeting
•Annual Board and Committee evaluations
•Robust NVR stock ownership requirements for named executive officers and directors
•Robust pre-clearance process for trading NVR stock during open trading windows
•Prohibition against short sales, hedging or pledging of NVR stock by named executive officers and directors
•Prohibition against named executive officers and directors owning NVR debt
•No poison pill or other anti-takeover provisions
•Independent compensation consultant
Board Leadership Structure, Committee Composition and Role in Risk Oversight
Board Leadership Structure
Separate Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Executive Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”)
We seek to maintain an appropriate balance between management and our Board. In 2005, we separated the roles of the Chairman and the CEO. Currently, Mr. Saville serves as Chairman, and Eugene J. Bredow serves as CEO. Our CEO is not a Board member. Our Board believes that this structure provides a bridge between management and the Board, as Mr. Saville is well-positioned to bring key business issues and shareholder interests to the Board's attention, given his in-depth understanding of our business. Mr. Saville continues to provide strategic direction in this role while Mr. Bredow provides operational direction. This structure also helps ensure accountability for the actions and strategic direction of NVR.
While the Board retains the discretion to combine the roles of Chairman and CEO, as from time to time it may be in our best interests, we expect that the roles of Chairman and CEO will remain separated for the foreseeable future. Our separate Chairman and CEO roles allow us to effectively manage the business and we believe the structure is a key driver in maintaining our sound corporate governance principles. All of our Board members other than our Chairman are independent.
Independent Lead Director
Our Board has an independent lead director who provides independent oversight of senior management and Board matters. We believe having an independent lead director is an important governance practice given that our Board’s Chairman, Mr. Saville, is not independent. The selection of an independent lead director is meant to facilitate, and not to inhibit, communication among the directors or between any of them, our Chairman and our CEO. Accordingly, directors are encouraged to continue to communicate among themselves and directly with the Chairman and the CEO. Our independent lead director position rotates annually among the chairs of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees. We believe rotating the role of independent lead director is beneficial to our Board and our shareholders because it provides a fresh perspective to the role on an annual basis.
11
The independent lead director's role is critical to ensure the Board is able to carry out its responsibilities effectively and independently of management. The authority and responsibilities of the independent lead director include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Presides over meetings of our independent directors and provides feedback to the Chairman and the CEO, as needed, following such meetings;
•Presides over meetings of our Board if the Chairman is not present; and
•Communicates with shareholders where appropriate.
Mr. Andrews, the Chair of our Audit Committee, currently serves as our independent lead director. After the 2026 Annual Meeting, we expect to appoint Ms. Ross, the chair of the Compensation Committee as our independent lead director, to serve in such role until the 2027 Annual Meeting. The Board believes that this leadership structure optimizes the roles of Chairman, CEO and independent lead director and provides the Company with sound corporate governance in the management of its business.
Director Attendance at Meetings
Our Board holds regular meetings at least quarterly. During 2025, the Board met five times.
Our Board requires that our directors attend each Board and Committee meeting in person, unless personal circumstances affecting a director make such attendance impractical or inappropriate. Each of our current Board members attended 100% of the Board meetings and the meetings of Committees of which he or she was a member during 2025.
Our Board also requires that all current directors and all nominees for election to our Board attend in person our annual meetings of shareholders, unless personal circumstances affecting such director or director nominee make such attendance impractical or inappropriate. Each of our then-serving directors attended the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person.
Executive Sessions of the Board
Our independent directors met twice during 2025 in executive session without the presence of management. Our independent lead director chaired these executive sessions.
Our Audit Committee meets in executive sessions at each Audit Committee meeting, separately with (1) our external auditor, (2) the Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance and (3) the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. The Chair of the Audit Committee chaired these executive sessions.
Board Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board as a whole oversees our business risks and operational performance through regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings, as well as through frequent and informal communications between management and the Board. Our Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but directly oversees risk management, as well as through standing committees that address risk inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, a primary function of our Board as set forth in the Company’s corporate governance guidelines is to review assessments of, and management’s plans with respect to, significant risks facing the Company, and our Audit Committee monitors the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management and discusses the same periodically with management.
Further, our Bylaws and each of the various Board Committee Charters provide additional detail regarding the areas, duties and functions for which the Board or a Board Committee provides specific oversight of specified areas of risk. That oversight includes a variety of operational and regulatory matters, including, among other things:
•Approval of the annual business plan and the periodic review of our actual performance in comparison to the approved plan;
•Review and analysis of our operational and financial performance compared to our competitors;
•Review of our five year business plan;
•Our land acquisition process;
•Approval of short-term and long-term management incentive compensation plans;
•Review of succession planning throughout our organization for key management positions;
12
•Oversight of our information security program, designed to enhance business continuity, protect confidential information and implement best practices to mitigate cybersecurity risks;
•Oversight of our sustainability strategy;
•Review of our response to new laws, rules or regulations; and
•Direct oversight of our internal audit function and our whistleblower hotline.
Discussions in Board meetings are enhanced by direct lines of communication for Board members with members of the management team responsible for various compliance matters, risk mitigation and strategy. Among other management team members, we have our Senior Vice President of Human Resources (also our Chief Ethics Officer), Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Information Security Officer and General Counsel. Each of these management team members directly communicate with the Board on various matters regarding risk management when and where appropriate.
Specifically:
•Our Senior Vice President of Human Resources regularly communicates with the Chair of the Compensation Committee on compensation matters and succession planning;
•Our Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer communicate directly with members of the Audit Committee and Board on cybersecurity and AI matters;
•Our Chief Accounting Officer communicates directly with members of the Audit Committee on emerging accounting and disclosure topics and matters; and
•Our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance communicates with members of our Audit Committee on internal control matters and with members of our Board on governance matters.
We believe regular communications between management and members of the Board outside of Board meetings are an important aspect of our compliance strategy and sound risk oversight practices. Below is a discussion of how the Board oversees certain of our more significant business risks.
Land Acquisition
Our continued success is contingent upon our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots on which to build. With this as a critical aspect of our continued success, management and the Board believe the full Board should be closely involved in our land acquisition strategy. The full Board, therefore, has retained direct oversight responsibility for our land acquisition process, rather than delegating such process to a Board committee. We expend substantial monetary resources to place deposits under lot purchase contracts, typically ranging up to 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. Our lot acquisition policy is a Board-approved policy that requires Board approval of:
•Lot purchase contracts above certain parameters, measured by the aggregate size of the deposit or investment;
•Contracts to acquire raw land above certain parameters, measured by aggregate size of the investment;
•Joint venture investments above certain parameters, measured by aggregate size of the investment; and
•Related-party lot purchase contracts regardless of aggregate size of the investment.
Liquidity
In a cyclical industry, it is imperative that we focus on our liquidity needs throughout the various stages of the cycle, while maintaining a prudent and efficient capital structure. Accordingly, our full Board has retained the lead role in ensuring that management prudently manages our cash, through the following:
•A Board-approved investment policy that specifies the types of investments allowed for our excess cash;
•Pre-approval of stock repurchases and debt repurchases;
•Pre-approval of capital transactions for the issuance of long-term debt or equity; and
•A Board review of our short-term and long-term cash needs in connection with its reviews of our quarterly forecasts and our annual and five year business plans.
13
Financial Reporting, Internal Control and Regulatory Matters
Our Audit Committee takes the lead role in overseeing risks as enumerated within its Committee Charter, including the following:
•Our Internal Audit function performs a primary role in risk management. Our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance reports directly to the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee formally approves the annual internal audit budget and staffing.
•The Audit Committee approves the annual internal audit plan, which is prepared using a comprehensive risk-based approach. Each year, our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance presents our risk assessment to the Audit Committee. The annual risk assessment includes detailed discussions with senior management focused on operational and internal control risks. As part of this process, management consults with outside advisors where appropriate to provide insights into evolving and emerging risks. We present to the Audit Committee the results of this risk assessment along with a detailed summary of our risk mitigation strategies for each risk.
•On a quarterly basis, our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance reviews with the Audit Committee the results of all internal audits of controls over accounting, operations, information technology and cybersecurity.
•Our Audit Committee reviews our cybersecurity processes, including ongoing initiatives, current threats and our response readiness. In 2025, our Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer presented updates on our cybersecurity initiatives quarterly; twice to our Audit Committee and twice to our full Board.
•On a quarterly basis, our Vice President of Internal Audit and Corporate Governance and our external auditor each have a private session with the Audit Committee without the presence of management.
•Management reports to the Audit Committee any governmental regulatory reviews or audits conducted on our operations, including mortgage regulatory matters and SEC comment letters. The Audit Committee also obtains a report from management at the conclusion of any such review.
•The Audit Committee monitors compliance with our Code of Ethics and Standards of Business Conduct.
Board Independence
Our Board has established director independence standards to assist us in determining director independence, which standards meet the independence requirements of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. Our independence standards are included within our Corporate Governance Guidelines available on our website. Our Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination. As required by the rules of the NYSE, for a director to be considered independent under our independence standards, our Board must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with us (other than as a director), directly or indirectly.
Our Board has affirmatively determined that our directors and director nominees, other than Mr. Saville, are independent pursuant to our independence standards. Mr. Saville, our Executive Chairman, has been determined by our Board not to be independent.
When our Board analyzed the independence of its members, it considered relevant transactions, relationships and arrangements, including those specified in the NYSE listing standards and our independence guidelines. The Board considered that certain directors serve as directors or employees of other companies with which we engage in ordinary course of business transactions. In accordance with our independence standards, the Board determined none of these relationships constitute material relationships that would impair the independence of these directors.
14
Board Committees
Our Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, and Executive Committee. The members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and the SEC. Each Committee operates pursuant to a written Committee Charter adopted by our Board and available on our website at www.nvrinc.com. Board members serving on our Committees are shown in the table below.
| Name | Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Nominating Committee | Executive Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. E. Andrews (L) | Chair | Member | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sallie B. Bailey | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. DeVito | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alfred E. Festa | Member | Chair | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alexandra A. Jung | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mel Martinez | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
George R. Oliver | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| David A. Preiser | Member | Member | Member | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Grady Rosier | Member | Member | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Susan Williamson Ross | Chair | Member | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Meetings in 2025 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (L) - Independent lead director | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit Committee
All members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. Our Board has determined that Mr. Andrews and Ms. Bailey qualify as audit committee financial experts as defined within Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). All members of the Audit Committee satisfy the independence standards specified in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.
The Audit Committee assists our Board in oversight and monitoring of:
•The integrity of our accounting and financial reporting processes;
•Our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
•Our independent external auditor’s qualifications and independence;
•Oversight of our cybersecurity processes, including systems to collect and store confidential information;
•Our policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management; and
•The performance of our internal audit function and our independent external auditors.
The Audit Committee performs the following functions:
•Appoints, evaluates and determines the compensation of our independent external auditor, including annually considering rotation of our independent external auditor;
•Discusses the scope and results of the audit with our independent external auditor and reviews our interim and year end operating results with management and our independent external auditor;
•Oversees our internal audit department;
•Maintains written procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints on accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, as well as for the confidential, anonymous submissions by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
15
•Reviews substantiated complaints received from internal and external sources regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters;
•Reviews our cybersecurity processes, including ongoing initiatives, current threats and our response readiness;
•Reviews reports from management regarding significant accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing, legal, cybersecurity and regulatory matters;
•Functions as a qualified legal compliance committee under Part 205 of the rules of the SEC; and
•Prepares the Audit Committee Report for inclusion in our proxy statement.
The Audit Committee has the authority and available funding to engage any independent legal counsel and any accounting or other expert advisors, as our Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee performs the following functions:
•Reviews and determines all compensation of our Executive Chairman and CEO and, based in part on the recommendation of the CEO, of our other executive officers;
•Obtains advice and assistance from compensation consultants that it determines to be necessary to carry out its duties;
•Periodically reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of our directors;
•Administers and interprets incentive compensation and equity plans for our employees (except as otherwise described below);
•Makes recommendations to our Board about succession planning for our CEO, and in conjunction with the CEO, is actively engaged in succession planning for other key positions;
•Reviews and approves any employment agreements, or amendments thereto, with our executive officers; and
•Assists in preparing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and prepares our Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in our annual meeting proxy statement in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
The Compensation Committee may delegate to a senior executive officer of NVR the authority to grant equity awards to employees other than executive officers, within limits prescribed by the full Board. The Compensation Committee delegated authority to two of the following roles acting jointly: Our Executive Chairman, CEO, Chief Financial Officer or Senior Vice President of Human Resources, to grant equity awards to new and existing employees (other than executive officers) during 2025. At least one of these approvals must be the Executive Chairman or CEO. Management is required to report any equity awards granted pursuant to this delegated authority to the Compensation Committee at its next scheduled meeting after the delegated authority is exercised.
The Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to one or more members of the Compensation Committee. Any person to whom authority is delegated must report any actions taken by him or her to the full Compensation Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. During 2025, the Compensation Committee did not delegate any of its authority to any individual member.
The Compensation Committee has the authority and available funding to retain any compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other expert adviser to assist in the evaluation of directors and executive officers' compensation, as our Compensation Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties.
Compensation Consultants
For a description of the role of the compensation consultant during 2025, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Compensation Determination Process below.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Ms. Ross and Messrs. DeVito, Martinez, Preiser and Rosier were members of the Compensation Committee during 2025. Mr. Martinez served as a member from May 6, 2025 through July 1, 2025. During 2025, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that had one or more executive officers serving as a
16
member of our Board or our Compensation Committee. Thus, there were no interlocks with other companies within the meaning of Item 407(e)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K during 2025.
Nominating Committee
The Nominating Committee performs the following functions:
•Identifies individuals qualified to become Board members;
•Recommends that our Board select the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders;
•Recommends Board committee structure and makeup;
•Oversees and makes recommendations regarding corporate governance matters, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines;
•Sets our strategy with respect to sustainability matters and recommends policies, practices and disclosures that conform to our strategy; and
•Manages the Board’s annual evaluation process.
The Nominating Committee also has the sole authority and available funding to obtain advice and assistance from executive search firms, and internal or outside legal, accounting or other expert advisors that it determines necessary to carry out its duties.
Criteria for Nomination to the Board of Directors
The Nominating Committee will consider shareholder nominees that are submitted in accordance with the procedures and meet the qualifications as described in our Policies and Procedures for the Consideration of Board of Director Candidates available on our website. These policies and procedures include minimum qualifications for director nominees and the process for identifying and evaluating director nominees, including nominees submitted by our shareholders.
The Nominating Committee has a stated goal of selecting director nominees who:
•have high personal and professional integrity;
•have demonstrated a high level of business accomplishment, exceptional ability and judgment; and
•who will be effective in serving the long-term interests of NVR and our shareholders, and who otherwise meet the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In selecting director nominees, the Committee will assess the nominee’s independence status relative to the Company, and will consider the level of the nominee’s accomplishments and qualifications in the areas of skills, education, knowledge, perspective, broad business judgment and leadership, relevant industry or regulatory affairs knowledge, business creativity, strategy and vision, experience, age and diversity of perspectives and backgrounds, all in the context of the perceived needs of the Board at that time.
Ideal candidates will have extensive executive leadership experience and will encourage and challenge our management team to operate the business in a manner that maximizes long term shareholder value and leads to high customer satisfaction, a diverse and inclusive workforce, a safe work environment for all employees, and sustainable communities.
Attributes that the Nominating Committee seeks to have represented on the Board include, but are not limited to, executive leadership experience, a high level of demonstrated accomplishment in their field, financial expertise, homebuilding/construction/real estate experience, public board experience, cybersecurity expertise, brand marketing expertise, mergers and acquisitions expertise, turnaround/restructuring experience, and government/regulatory expertise.
Proxy Access
Our Bylaws allow eligible shareholders to propose director nominees for inclusion in the proxy statement in addition to the nominees proposed by the Board. The proxy access bylaw permits shareholders owning 3% or more of our common stock for at least three years, to nominate up to 20% of our Board. The number of shareholders who may aggregate their shares to meet the 3% ownership threshold is limited to 20. The shareholder(s) and nominees(s) must also satisfy the other requirements in our Bylaws.
17
Executive Committee
The Executive Committee was established pursuant to our Bylaws to have such powers, authority and responsibilities as may be determined by a majority of our Board. The Executive Committee has never met, nor has our Board ever delegated any powers, authority or responsibilities to the Executive Committee. Our Board intends to continue the practice of considering corporate matters outside the scope of our other existing Board committees at the full Board level.
Annual Board and Committee Evaluations
Annual Board Evaluations
The members of the Board conduct an annual evaluation to assess the Board's effectiveness and performance. The results are reviewed by the Board, which considers the results and any ways in which Board effectiveness may be enhanced.
Annual Committee Evaluations
The members of each committee conduct an annual evaluation to assess each committee's compliance with its charter, effectiveness and performance. The results are reviewed by the members of the applicable committee, which considers the results and any ways in which the committee's effectiveness may be enhanced.
Communications with the Board of Directors
Our Policies and Procedures Regarding Communications with the NVR, Inc. Board of Directors, the Independent Lead Director and the Non-Management Directors as a Group are available on our website.
Shareholders and other interested parties may contact an individual director by mail at the following address: 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20190. All mail received will be opened and screened by our management. We generally will not forward to directors a shareholder or interested party communication that is unrelated to the duties of the Board, including junk mail, mass mailings, customer complaints, surveys and business solicitation.
Role of Shareholder Engagement in Corporate Governance
We have an extensive history of conducting shareholder outreach. In recent years, our engagement with shareholders encompassed a variety of topics including greenhouse gas emissions, diversity disclosures, executive officer and director compensation, shareholder rights and director tenure.
We value the feedback we receive from our shareholders and we consider such feedback in evaluating our corporate governance and compensation policies. We believe our proactive engagement with shareholders and our responsiveness to feedback in these key areas demonstrate our strong desire to align our sound corporate governance principles with the best interests of our shareholders.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Person Transactions
We have a policy that requires that all related person (as defined by Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K) transactions be considered, reviewed and approved or ratified by the disinterested, independent members of our Board, regardless of the type of transaction or amount involved. Under this policy, the related person must notify the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of any proposed transaction with a related person. The CFO must seek approval of the disinterested, independent members of the Board for any related person transaction. The disinterested, independent directors must review the material facts before determining whether to approve or ratify the transaction. This requirement is set forth in Section 7.05 of our Bylaws, available on our website, Sections 1 and 4 of our Code of Ethics, available on our website, and our Human Resources Policies and Procedures and Financial Policies and Procedures.
There were no related person transactions during 2025 that met the disclosure requirements set forth in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.
18
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following tables set forth certain information as to the beneficial ownership of Common Stock by each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock as of the dates indicated, and by each director, director nominee and named executive officer and by all directors and executive officers as a group as of March 4, 2026. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the owner has sole voting and investment power with respect thereto.
Certain Beneficial Owners
| Name and Address of Holder | Number of Shares | Percent of Class | |||||||||||||||
| The Vanguard Group | 352,425 | (1) | 12.7 | % | |||||||||||||
| 100 Vanguard Blvd. | |||||||||||||||||
| Malvern, PA 19355 | |||||||||||||||||
| BlackRock, Inc. | 311,908 | (2) | 11.2 | % | |||||||||||||
| 55 East 52nd Street | |||||||||||||||||
| New York, NY 10055 | |||||||||||||||||
(1)As reported within a Schedule 13G/A filed February 13, 2024, the entity has shared power to vote or direct the vote for 3,923 shares, sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 339,160 shares and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 13,265 shares.
(2)As reported within a Schedule 13G/A filed September 10, 2024, the entity has sole power to vote or direct the vote for 289,006 shares and the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 311,908 shares.
19
Directors and Management
| Name | Number of Shares | Vested Options Issued Under Equity Incentive Plans (1) | Percent of Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | 177,651 | (2) | 63,750 | 6.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| C. E. Andrews | 2,061 | 1,287 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sallie B. Bailey | 1,207 | 1,107 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael J. DeVito | 14 | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alfred E. Festa | 1,460 | 1,287 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alexandra A. Jung | 1,292 | 1,217 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mel Martinez | 603 | 412 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
George R. Oliver | — | — | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| David A. Preiser | 741 | 537 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Grady Rosier | 2,879 | 1,287 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Susan Williamson Ross | 1,911 | 1,525 | * | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | 22,844 | (3) | 19,950 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | 36,128 | (4) | 20,924 | 1.3% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | 767 | (5) | 500 | * | ||||||||||||||||||||||
All directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group (14 persons) | 249,558 | 113,783 | 8.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| * Less than 1%. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)These amounts are included in the Number of Shares.
(2)Includes 3,261 vested shares held by the NVR, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in trust, 4,557 shares held as a discretionary investment in the NVR, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and 105,883 vested shares held in a Deferred Compensation Rabbi Trust. Excludes 777 shares held in a Deferred Compensation Plan which are not distributable until six months subsequent to separation of service.
(3)Includes 166 vested shares held by the NVR, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in trust and 500 shares held in a trust for the benefit of his adult children.
(4)Includes 1,039 vested shares held by the NVR, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in trust and 373 shares held as a discretionary investment in the NVR, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan.
(5)Includes 26 vested shares held by the NVR, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan in trust and 33 shares held as a discretionary investment in the NVR, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such stock with the SEC and the national securities exchange upon which our shares are publicly traded. Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports filed with the SEC and written representations from our directors and executive officers, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders were timely met during 2025, except that a Form 4 was filed late for Mr. Preiser on December 19, 2025 with respect to a gift of 35 shares on December 12, 2025.
20
THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE “SOLICITING MATERIAL” OR TO BE “FILED” WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN ANY DOCUMENT SO FILED.
Report of the Audit Committee
Our management has primary responsibility for preparing our financial statements and establishing financial reporting systems and internal controls. Management also has the responsibility of reporting on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our independent external auditor, KPMG LLP, is responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of our audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
1.The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting with management, and reviewed and discussed KPMG LLP’s audit opinions with KPMG LLP;
2.The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC;
3.The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence; and
4.Based on the reviews and discussions referred to in paragraphs (1) through (3) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, for filing with the SEC.
The undersigned, constituting all of the members of the Audit Committee, have submitted this report to the Board of Directors.
C.E. Andrews (Chair), Sallie B. Bailey, Alfred E. Festa and Alexandra A. Jung
21
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") describes our executive compensation philosophy and program for our named executive officers in 2025. Our "homebuilding peer group" referred to throughout this CD&A is defined later in the "Compensation Determination Process" section.
Executive Summary
Homebuilding is a cyclical business with long project life cycles. As such, our executive compensation program is structured to focus our executives on long-term performance, not short-term quarterly or annual performance. Key features of our compensation program include:
Compensation designed for the business. The key principle of our compensation philosophy is pay for performance, and our executive compensation program is designed to focus our executives on long-term total shareholder return ("TSR"). Our program is a significant tool in long-term retention of our executive officers and key employees. Our program isn’t structured like most other companies, and we believe that is a significant competitive advantage.
Compensation program is shareholder aligned. We have structured our program to create long-term alignment with our shareholders through moderate cash compensation, significant long-term equity incentives in the form of stock options and robust stock ownership requirements. By issuing stock options rather than restricted stock units, the executives realize no value unless the stock price increases between the grant date and the vesting date. We believe this provides 100% alignment with our shareholders, as 100% of our long-term equity compensation is tied to TSR.
Consistent compensation philosophy. For over 30 years, our compensation philosophy has remained consistent and has focused our management team on long term TSR. Our performance clearly demonstrates the success of our compensation practices, with a 30 year TSR of 72,828%, compared to the S&P 500 Index TSR of 1,818% during that period.
Executive compensation program is simple in design. The compensation program for our executive officers includes three components: base salary, annual performance-based cash bonus, and long-term equity-based compensation tied to TSR. Our annual performance-based cash bonus is limited to a maximum of 100% of base salary. No other company among our homebuilding peer group limits their annual bonus opportunity to 100% of base salary for the Executive Chairman, CEO or CFO. As a result, our target total cash compensation for the CEO and CFO is below the 25th percentile of our homebuilding peer group.
Executive compensation is lower than the average of our homebuilding peer group. Although we have some of the strongest financial results in our homebuilding peer group, the total compensation for our Executive Chairman, CEO and CFO is well below the median of our homebuilding peer group.
Long-term equity compensation is tied to TSR. Our use of stock options with long-term vesting results in 100% of our equity compensation being at risk and tied to long-term TSR. We have the highest percentage of compensation tied to TSR among the homebuilding peer group.
Independent compensation consultant. Our Compensation Committee utilizes an independent compensation consultant in evaluating the targeted annual compensation for our named executive officers.
Annual incentives in 2025 were paid at 20% of target. We did not achieve our targets for pre-tax profit (80% of the incentive opportunity) and number of new orders net of cancellations (20% of the incentive opportunity). Our executive officers therefore earned just 20% of their maximum annual bonus, which is capped at 100% of base salary.
No equity grants to named executive officers in 2025. Consistent with our past practice of making periodic rather than annual equity grants, we did not grant equity to our named executive officers in 2025.
We continue to seek feedback from shareholders. Members of our board and management team seek to engage with shareholders each year on a variety of topics, including executive compensation.
22
Our Executives
Our named executive officers for 2025 were:
| Name | Age | Title | ||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | 70 | Executive Chairman of the Board | ||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | 56 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | 56 | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | 53 | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | ||||||||||||
Paul C. Saville was elected to the Board of Directors effective May 4, 2022, and the Board appointed Mr. Saville to serve as Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Saville served as President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR from July 1, 2005 until May 3, 2022. Mr. Saville has been employed by NVR since 1981.
Eugene J. Bredow has been President and Chief Executive Officer since May 4, 2022. Mr. Bredow served as President of NVR Mortgage from April 1, 2019 to May 3, 2022. Mr. Bredow served as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of NVR from March 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. Mr. Bredow served as Chief Accounting Officer from February 2016 until March 1, 2018. Mr. Bredow has been employed by NVR since 2004.
Daniel D. Malzahn has been Senior Vice President since February 2016, and continues to serve as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR, roles he has occupied since February 20, 2013. Mr. Malzahn has been employed by NVR since 1994.
Matthew B. Kelpy has been Chief Accounting Officer of NVR since March 1, 2018 and continues to serve as Vice President and Controller, roles he has occupied since joining NVR in 2017.
Roles and Responsibilities of our Executive Chairman and CEO
The following table summarizes the key roles and responsibilities of our Executive Chairman and our CEO.
| Paul C. Saville, Executive Chairman | Eugene J. Bredow, CEO | ||||
| Primary responsibilities include: | Primary responsibilities include: | ||||
| --providing strategic direction for the Company; | --leading the day-to-day implementation of our strategy; | ||||
| --providing perspective and direction to Mr. Bredow; and | --responsibility for oversight and financial performance of our operations; and | ||||
| --leading the Board in overseeing key risk areas. | --direct oversight of the CFO and the leaders of the Company's key operating functions. | ||||
Company Performance Overview
Our 2025 financial results reflect the strength of our business model and our focus on increasing shareholder value:
•Net income and EPS of $1.3 billion and $436.55, respectively;
•Revenues of over $10 billion in 2025;
•New Orders of 20,410 units in 2025; and
•We returned approximately $1.8 billion of cash to our shareholders during 2025 through repurchases of approximately 243,000 shares of Common Stock, which represented approximately 8% of our shares outstanding as of December 31, 2024.
Our business philosophy has been to develop and operate a business model to maximize long-term shareholder value in a cyclical industry. Our goal is to deliver industry leading rates of return and growth in earnings per share. We have led the homebuilding peer group in the following key financial metrics as of December 31, 2025:
| 1 Year | Rank vs Peers | 5 Years | Rank vs Peers | 10 Years | Rank vs Peers | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average Annual Return on Capital | 26% | 1st | 30% | 1st | 29% | 1st | |||||||||||||||||
| Average Annual Return on Equity | 33% | 1st | 41% | 1st | 40% | 1st | |||||||||||||||||
| Average Annual Pre-tax Return on Revenue | 17% | 1st | 19% | 2nd | 17% | 2nd | |||||||||||||||||
On a 20-year basis, our TSR of 939% was the highest in the homebuilding peer group and over five times the 181% TSR for the Dow Jones US Homebuilder Index, as illustrated below. Taylor Morrison is not included in the 20 year TSR table as their IPO was completed in 2013.
23
On a 10-year basis, our TSR of 344% was fifth highest in the homebuilding peer group and exceeded the 341% TSR for the Dow Jones US Homebuilder Index as illustrated below.
We believe our strong long-term results relative to our homebuilding peer group are due to:
•Our business model and strategy, which is designed to limit risk and maximize return on capital in a cyclical industry;
24
•Our highly skilled, long-tenured and motivated management team that is extremely disciplined in executing our more capital efficient business model; and
•100% of our long-term equity compensation being tied to TSR.
Additionally, these key aspects of our strategy are well ingrained in our corporate culture, which includes:
•Strong alignment between management incentives (at all levels, not just executive officers) and long-term TSR;
•Stability and long-term retention of our management team; and
•Generation of cash flow through all points in the homebuilding cycle.
Compensation Policies and Practices
Our compensation program is designed to provide appropriate performance-based incentives to ensure alignment with our shareholders and to avoid compensation practices that do not promote the interests of our shareholders.
What We Do
•Pay for Performance - We tie pay to performance by making the majority of compensation “at risk” and linking it to shareholders’ interests. Approximately 60% of total executive officer target compensation is tied to maximizing long-term TSR, which is the highest proportion among our homebuilding peer group.
•Total Compensation - Although we have some of the strongest financial results in our homebuilding peer group, the total compensation for our CEO is below the 25th percentile of our homebuilding peer group.
•Annual Bonuses - Our annual bonuses are performance-based and limited to a maximum of 100% of base salary. We are the only company among our homebuilding peer group with such a cap. As a result, our CEO's target total cash compensation is below the 25th percentile of our homebuilding peer group.
•Long-Term Equity-Based Compensation - 100% of our named executive officers’ equity-based compensation is in the form of stock options with long-term vesting, resulting in 100% of our equity compensation being at-risk and tied to TSR. 50% of our stock option grants are subject to attainment of a return on capital performance condition, and there is no opportunity to earn more than 100% of the target number of options granted, even if our return on capital significantly outperforms the peer group.
•Periodic Equity Grants - We typically make periodic, not annual, grants of long-term stock options. Our last periodic grant was made in 2022.
•Stock Options at Market Price - We only grant stock options with an exercise price equal to 100% of the fair market value of our stock on the grant date.
•Share Ownership Requirements - We have robust NVR share ownership requirements.
•Double Trigger Change in Control Provisions - Our equity agreements and employment agreements include double trigger change in control provisions for post-employment benefits and equity awards.
•Equity Clawback Provision and Compensation Recovery Policy - Our equity agreements have a clawback provision, and we have a compensation recovery policy covering incentive compensation to our executive officers that emphasizes integrity and accountability in financial reporting.
•Non-Competition Provision - Our equity agreements and employment agreements have a non-competition provision.
•Share Repurchase Program - We mitigate the potential dilutive effect of equity awards through our robust share repurchase program.
•Independent Compensation Consultant - Our Compensation Committee utilizes an independent compensation consultant.
What We Don’t Do
•Discretionary Cash Awards - We do not award any discretionary cash compensation.
•Reprice Stock Options - We do not reprice stock options.
•Below Market Stock Options - We do not grant stock options having an exercise price below 100% of fair market value.
25
•Evergreen Provisions - Our equity plans do not have evergreen provisions.
•Hedging and Pledging - We do not permit short sales, hedging or pledging of NVR stock by named executive officers or directors.
•Excise Tax Gross-Ups - We do not provide any excise tax gross-ups.
•Perquisites - Other than personal digital protection services, we do not provide perquisites.
•Supplemental Executive Benefits - We do not provide defined benefit or supplemental executive retirement, health or insurance plans.
•Accelerate Vesting of Equity - We do not accelerate vesting of equity granted to our executive officers in the event of termination of employment, except in certain change in control instances (described further in the "Change of Control and Post-Employment Payments" section below).
•Vesting of Equity Post-Termination - We do not permit our executive officers to continue to vest in their equity awards post-termination.
Say on Pay Results
In 2025, 95% of the shares voted were cast in favor of the 2024 compensation of our named executive officers. While the vote is advisory in nature, the Compensation Committee views the vote as confirmation that our shareholders generally believe that the compensation of our named executive officers is appropriately aligned with their performance and NVR's financial performance as well as the interests of our shareholders.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Homebuilding is a cyclical business with long project life cycles. As such, our executive compensation program is structured to focus our executives on long-term performance, not short-term quarterly or annual performance. Our executive compensation program is designed to:
•Motivate and retain highly qualified and experienced executives;
•Provide performance-based incentives; and
•Strongly align our compensation practices with long-term creation of shareholder value.
We have structured our executive compensation to create long-term alignment with our shareholders through the following:
•Moderate target cash compensation;
•Annual cash incentive bonus limited to a maximum of 100% of base salary;
•Significant long-term equity incentives;
•Use of stock options, which creates maximum alignment with shareholders and results in 100% of equity compensation being "at risk" and tied to TSR; and
•Robust NVR share ownership requirements.
Our compensation philosophy has been consistent for over 30 years.
The compensation program for our named executive officers includes the following three components:
26
| Compensation Component | Type of Pay | Key Characteristics | Purpose | ||||||||
| Base Salary | Fixed | Annual adjustments based on individual performance and relative to peer group market salaries, effective April 1st of each year. | Attracts, retains and rewards our named executive officers by providing a fixed source of income to reward experience, skills and performance relative to the market value of the position. | ||||||||
| Annual Cash Bonus | Performance | Maximum opportunity is limited to a maximum of 100% of base salary, based on NVR's performance against pre-established performance goals. | Aligns the named executive officers with shareholders by focusing the named executive officers on the attainment of annual goals that we believe are necessary to achieve our five-year business plan. | ||||||||
| Long-Term Equity-Based Compensation | Performance | Typically issued periodically, not annually. Issued as stock options, with 50% of the grant subject to a three year performance period. Options issued in May 2022 vest 25% on each of December 31, 2024, 2025, 2026 and 2027. | Aligns the named executive officers with shareholders by tying 100% of equity compensation to long-term TSR. Increases retention by providing the opportunity for wealth creation through the long vesting period. Also, protects our interests through a non-competition provision in the equity grant agreements. | ||||||||
We prefer the use of stock options with long-term vesting (instead of restricted share units) for the following reasons:
•We believe stock options with long-term vesting align the long-term interests of our named executive officers with our shareholders by tying equity compensation to long-term TSR;
•We believe stock options are inherently performance-based since the recipient does not realize value unless the stock price appreciates above the grant price; and
•Since the stock price must increase between grant date and vesting date and 50% of the vesting for our stock option grants are subject to NVR's return on capital performance, 100% of our performance-based equity is "at risk."
If the stock price decreases between the grant date and vesting date, our named executive officers would still realize value if we issued restricted share units. By issuing stock options, the executives receive no value unless the stock price increases between the grant date and the vesting date. We believe this provides 100% alignment with our shareholders.
Compensation Determination Process
Roles of Our Executive Chairman and CEO
Mr. Saville makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the amount of each component of compensation paid to Mr. Bredow. Mr. Bredow makes these recommendations for the other executive officers. These recommendations are partially based on compensation information for comparable positions within our homebuilding peer group (defined below), internal comparisons and their assessment of each officer’s overall performance during the prior year. Mr. Saville and Mr. Bredow provide written materials supporting these recommendations for review at Compensation Committee meetings, and also attend those meetings at the Committee’s request. Typically, these executives attend all regularly-scheduled Compensation Committee meetings, but they are excused as appropriate, including for discussions regarding their own compensation.
Role of Our Board, Including the Executive Chairman of the Board
The Compensation Committee considers the following when determining the compensation paid to Mr. Saville and Mr. Bredow:
•Compensation information for executive chairs and chief executive officers in our homebuilding peer group and our relative percentile ranking;
•Our financial and operating performance compared to information publicly available on our industry peers;
•Our overall financial strength;
27
•Mr. Saville's and Mr. Bredow's performance during the year;
•Their overall experience and tenure in their respective positions; and
•For Mr. Bredow, the recommendation from Mr. Saville.
Mr. Saville and Mr. Bredow are not present during discussion or voting by the Compensation Committee regarding each of their respective compensation elements. The Compensation Committee has the final authority to determine the compensation of our named executive officers, and exercises such authority regardless of what recommendations are made or information is provided by Mr. Saville or Mr. Bredow.
Role of Compensation Consultant
In 2025, the Compensation Committee engaged Mercer Consulting to assist the Compensation Committee in evaluating the targeted annual compensation for our named executive officers. Mercer Consulting’s analysis included a comparative analysis of the named executive officer base pay, annual incentive opportunities and long-term incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Mercer Consulting pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would impair Mercer Consulting’s independence.
Homebuilding Peer Group
We use a peer group of our major public-company homebuilding peers when analyzing the compensation of our named executive officers. The companies in the peer group were selected based on being national homebuilding companies and their annual revenues. The peer group is currently comprised of the following companies (the “homebuilding peer group”):
| D. R. Horton, Inc. | Meritage Homes Corporation | ||||
| KB Home | PulteGroup, Inc. | ||||
| Lennar Corporation | Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | ||||
| Toll Brothers, Inc. | |||||
Determining the Size of Equity Awards
When issuing periodic grants under our equity plans to our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee, with assistance from its independent compensation consultant, determines the amount of the awards as follows:
•The Compensation Committee establishes a dollar value of the total targeted annual compensation to be awarded by position;
•After determining the salary and maximum annual bonus opportunity components for a particular year, these amounts are subtracted from the total targeted compensation for that year to derive the fair value that we want to transfer to the executive in the form of an equity award for the year;
•When making a block grant to cover multiple years, we multiply the equity award value for a single year by the number of years that the block grant covers to determine the total value of the block grant; and
•On the date of grant, we divide that total equity award fair value dollar amount by the per share fair value, calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, to determine the number of stock options to award.
Although we consider this approach to sizing equity awards to be a reasoned approach based on a widely accepted option-pricing model, the ultimate value of an equity award is determined only when it is exercised or vests, as applicable. We do not consider realized or realizable gains from prior equity grants when setting new grant amounts. We do not believe that it is a fair practice to offset current compensation by realized or unrealized equity gains several years after the equity has been issued. Depending on our future stock price, any equity grant ultimately may be worthless, or conversely, worth much more than the fair value initially estimated. Gains in excess of our initial estimate mean that similar gains were realized by all holders of our Common Stock over the same time period. We believe that limiting potential upside on equity gains does not provide an appropriate incentive for our named executive officers when focusing on long-term results, as our compensation philosophy dictates.
28
Elements of Compensation
Approximately 80% of compensation is at risk for our named executive officers:
Base Salary
In 2025, the Compensation Committee took the following actions regarding the base salaries of the named executive officers:
•Mr. Saville’s base salary was increased by 4.2%, from $2,400,000 to $2,500,000 effective April 1, 2025. In making the decision to increase Mr. Saville's base salary, the Compensation Committee reviewed competitive market data for Executive Chairs in the homebuilding peer group and considered Mr. Saville's active role providing strategic direction as Executive Chairman.
•Mr. Bredow's base salary was increased by 20.0% from $1,250,000 to $1,500,000 effective April 1, 2025. In making the decision to increase Mr. Bredow's base salary, the Compensation Committee considered the recommendation of Mr. Saville, Mr. Bredow's performance as CEO and competitive market data for the CEOs in the homebuilding peer group. Following the salary increase, Mr. Bredow's total target cash compensation remained below the 25th percentile of CEOs within the homebuilding peer group.
•Upon the recommendation of Mr. Bredow, the Compensation Committee increased the base salaries for the remaining named executive officers effective April 1, 2025. Mr. Bredow’s recommendations were based on the job performance of each named executive officer and consideration of competitive market data for comparable roles within the homebuilding peer group. Following the salary increase, Mr. Malzahn's total target cash compensation remained below the 25th percentile of CFOs within the homebuilding peer group.
Annual base salaries for 2024 and 2025 for the named executive officers were as follows:
| 2024 Salary | 2025 Salary | |||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | $ | 2,400,000 | $ | 2,500,000 | ||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | ||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | $ | 730,000 | $ | 775,000 | ||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | $ | 396,900 | $ | 412,800 | ||||||||||
29
Annual Cash Bonus
General
The objective of the annual cash bonus is to focus the named executive officers on the attainment of annual goals that we believe are necessary to achieve our five-year business plan. These annual goals are consistent with the current year's portion of our five-year business plan. The annual incentive is based 100% on NVR's performance. The named executive officers’ annual incentive opportunity is limited to a maximum of 100% of base salary, regardless of whether the goals are exceeded, consistent with our overall compensation philosophy of limiting short-term cash compensation in favor of equity-based long-term incentive opportunities. Thus, the maximum amount of bonus is earned once the preset performance targets based on the annual business plan are attained. The annual bonus is payable in cash.
We are the only company among our homebuilding peer group to limit the annual cash bonus to 100% of base salary for Executive Chairs, CEOs and CFOs.
The Compensation Committee has never exercised discretion to award bonuses in amounts higher than the amount calculated by our actual results relative to the preset performance target and attainment ranges.
2025 Annual Bonus
For 2025, the Compensation Committee maintained the same annual bonus performance metrics used in 2024 for our named executive officers. The annual bonus opportunity in 2025 for the named executive officers was weighted based 80% upon our consolidated pre-tax profit (before consolidated annual bonus and stock-based compensation expense but after all other charges) and 20% on the number of new orders (net of cancellations) that we generated compared to our 2025 annual business plan. We believe that these measures provide a proper balance of focusing on current profitability while providing for longer-term growth.
The named executive officers were to begin earning the consolidated pre-tax profit portion of their annual bonus award once the annual business plan was at least 80% attained (the “threshold”). The full amount of the consolidated pre-tax profit portion of their annual bonus award was to be earned ratably from 80% up to 100% achievement of the annual business plan. They were to begin earning the new orders portion of their annual bonus award once the annual business plan was at least 85% attained. The full amount of the new orders portion of their annual bonus award was to be earned ratably from 85% up to 100% achievement of the annual business plan.
The following is a summary of the specific performance targets established under the 2025 annual bonus plan and the actual results:
| Performance Measure | Threshold | Target and Maximum | Actual | Maximum Bonus Opportunity | Percentage of Maximum Bonus Opportunity Earned | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated Pre-Tax Profit (in thousands) | $ | 1,787,096 | $ | 2,233,870 | $ | 1,898,451 | 80% | 24.9% | |||||||||
| New Orders (net of cancellations) | 20,400 | 24,000 | 20,410 | 20% | 0.3% | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Bonus Opportunity Earned | 20% | ||||||||||||||||
Under our annual bonus plan, the target bonus amount is the same as the maximum bonus amount. Based on our 2025 results, each of our named executive officers earned 20% of their maximum bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary, as follows:
2025 Maximum Bonus Opportunity | 2025 Bonus Earned | |||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | $ | 2,475,000 | $ | 494,875 | ||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | $ | 1,437,500 | $ | 287,427 | ||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | $ | 763,750 | $ | 152,711 | ||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | $ | 408,825 | $ | 81,744 | ||||||||||
Equity-Based Compensation
30
2025 Equity Grant Activity
During 2025, we did not issue any periodic equity-based compensation to our executive officers.
Equity Plan Features
We do not have a formal policy regarding the timing of equity issuance. Our longstanding historical practice has been to issue periodic equity grants every four years in May. These grants have historically occurred after the filing of our first quarter 10-Q in an open trading window under our insider trading policy. In an open trading window, we have determined that there is no material nonpublic information available to our executive officers or Board members. This determination is communicated to our Board members each quarter. The Compensation Committee has not granted, nor does it intend to grant, equity awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information. Similarly, we have not timed, nor do we intend to time, the release of material nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.
Our equity plans reflect the following corporate governance best practices:
•No evergreen provisions;
•No re-pricing of stock options without shareholder approval (NVR has never repriced options);
•No discounted stock options;
•No reload features;
•Double trigger change of control provision in the equity agreements for the accelerated vesting of equity;
•No accelerated vesting of equity upon termination of employment (other than as described above); and
•No continued vesting of equity post-termination.
Clawback/Forfeiture
Under the terms of the equity agreements, we may recapture from our named executive officers gains from stock option exercises if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws. A named executive officer must reimburse us for any gains during the 12 month period following the first public filing with the SEC that contained such material noncompliance. The named executive officer must have knowingly engaged in the misconduct, been grossly negligent in engaging in the misconduct, knowingly failed to prevent the misconduct or been grossly negligent in failing to prevent the misconduct.
Under the terms of our compensation recovery policy, subject to certain exceptions, reasonably promptly following an accounting restatement, we shall recover incentive compensation earned by our executive officers that exceeds the amount of incentive compensation that would have been earned by our executive officers after taking into account the accounting restatement. This compensation recovery policy applies to our annual cash bonus and our performance-based equity awards.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We have adopted robust stock ownership guidelines to strengthen long-term alignment between our executive officers (and other members of senior management) and our shareholders. These guidelines require the executive officers to acquire and continuously hold shares with a total fair market value ranging from four to eight times their annual base salaries depending on position. The multiple of salary that our executive officers are required to hold in shares of stock is higher than many other companies. These guidelines are subject to transition provisions discussed further below.
The stock ownership requirement for each of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2025 was as follows:
| Name | Base Salary | Factor | Dollar Holding Requirement | |||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | $ | 2,500,000 | 8 | $ | 20,000,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | $ | 1,500,000 | 8 | $ | 12,000,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | $ | 775,000 | 6 | $ | 4,650,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | $ | 412,800 | 4 | $ | 1,651,200 | |||||||||||||||
Only those shares owned by the named executive officer in their personal accounts, the NVR Profit Sharing Trust, the NVR Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and the Deferred Compensation Plan count towards the stock ownership requirement.
All of our executive officers are currently in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.
31
Transition Provisions
Under our stock ownership guidelines, any executive officer who does not meet the requirement must retain 100% of the net common stock received upon vesting of restricted share units, and 50% of the net common stock received from option exercises until the stock ownership requirement is attained. “Net common stock received” means the common stock received after the payment of the exercise price, if any, and the taxes withheld related to the option exercise or restricted share unit vesting.
Trading of NVR Stock
Our Board has adopted an insider trading policy that prohibits all employees and directors from executing any transaction in our securities while in possession of material nonpublic information about the Company. Although this insider trading policy does not apply to the Company itself, it is the Company's policy to comply with all applicable securities and state laws when engaging in transactions in its own securities. We have a robust pre-clearance process; whereby each executive officer and director must obtain written pre-clearance from our Chief Accounting Officer before executing any transaction in our stock during open trading windows.
Our insider trading policy also contains provisions that prohibit directors, executive officers and members of senior management from pledging our equity securities or hedging our equity securities in any way, including through covered calls, collars, or other types of derivative securities. Directors and executive officers also are prohibited from engaging in short sales of our securities.
Personal Benefits
Other than personal digital protection services, our named executive officers are entitled to and eligible only for the same personal benefits for which all of our employees are eligible.
Deferred Compensation Arrangements
We have two deferred compensation plans that:
•Encourage ownership of our Common Stock in furtherance of our compensation philosophy;
•Enable our named executive officers, and other members of management, to acquire shares of our Common Stock on a pre-tax basis in order to more quickly meet, and maintain compliance with, the stock ownership requirements described above; and
•Established a vehicle whereby, prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017, named executive officers could defer the receipt of salary and bonus that otherwise would have been nondeductible for company tax purposes into a period where we would realize a tax deduction for the amounts paid (see Tax Deductibility of Compensation discussion below).
Our deferred compensation plans are structured as follows:
•Amounts deferred are invested in a fixed number of shares of our Common Stock, which is purchased on the open market at fair market value;
•We own the shares of Common Stock in a Rabbi Trust, which makes payment of our obligations under the deferred compensation plans risk-free for NVR – the cost of the plans does not increase as the value of the Common Stock increases;
•Our Common Stock is the only investment choice;
•All amounts placed in the deferred compensation plan are amounts already earned by the named executive officer;
•We do not make employer contributions to the deferred compensation accounts;
•Earnings on deferred amounts solely represent the change in the market value of the shares of our Common Stock held in the account;
•We do not provide for a minimum return or guarantee a minimum payout amount;
•Amounts deferred are “at risk” investments for the named executive officer; and
•Amounts deferred cannot be distributed to the named executive officer until the named executive officer’s termination of service or, under one of the two plans, six months after termination.
32
The market value of our named executive officers’ deferred compensation accounts is not considered when setting their current compensation. The Compensation Committee reached this conclusion after considering the following points:
•The compensation deferred was reviewed and analyzed based on the above-described compensation philosophy and policies at the time the compensation was earned in prior years and was fully earned at that time;
•If the executive officer had elected to receive a payout of the compensation at the time it was earned rather than electing the deferral, we would not have any knowledge of, and therefore would not consider, the executive officer’s investment experience related to that compensation when considering the amount by which we should compensate the executive officer in the current year;
•The change in the deferred compensation balance is solely attributable to the change in the market value of our Common Stock since the dates of deferral;
•We do not consider shares of Common Stock owned by an executive officer outside of the deferred compensation plans when setting current compensation; and
•If the amounts had been paid to the executive officer when earned and not deferred until separation of service, we would have lost a substantial tax benefit that we will now expect to receive as a result of the deferral.
Thus, we do not believe it is appropriate to consider the value of an executive officer’s deferred compensation account in making current compensation decisions. See the 2025 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and accompanying narrative below for additional information on our deferred compensation plans.
Change of Control and Post-Employment Payments
Messrs. Saville, Bredow and Malzahn are each party to an employment agreement with us pursuant to which the officer is entitled to post-employment payments upon certain termination events, including termination following a change in control. We have not entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kelpy. Accordingly, he is employed on an at-will basis and is not entitled to post-employment benefits upon termination, other than rights contained in his equity agreements. Generally, we do not believe that we should pay our named executive officers, or any other employee, any incremental compensation upon termination when the termination is either by choice or due to conduct that is potentially detrimental to NVR. Thus, we do not provide any of our named executive officers any incremental post-employment benefits, other than any amounts already earned and accrued at the date of termination, if the termination is voluntary (unless due to a change in control of NVR, retirement or “with good reason”) or for “Cause.”
We do not provide tax “gross ups” to our named executive officers in connection with any change in control or post-employment payment.
Change of Control Provisions
The change of control provision in each applicable named executive officer’s equity agreement or employment agreement for the payment of the post-employment benefit is a double trigger, meaning that the change of control must be coupled with the officer’s termination from service within a certain period of time after the change of control to trigger a payment or accelerated right. A double trigger for the post-employment benefit payment was selected because, unless the named executive officer’s employment is terminated after the change in control, the acquiring entity will continue to pay the named executive officer's salary and annual bonus. See the Narrative Disclosures of Termination and Change of Control Payments discussion below for additional information on these post-employment payments.
The change of control provisions in the deferred compensation plans are single trigger, meaning that the change of control event alone triggers either a payment or an acceleration of certain rights. This reflects our intent that the named executive officers have the ability to vote those shares upon any proposed transaction since the amounts are already vested, and to ensure that the named executive officers receive deferred compensation they earned prior to the change of control. See the Narrative Disclosures of Termination and Change of Control Payments discussion below for additional information on these post-employment payments.
Payments Upon Death, Disability, Retirement and Other Employment Terminations
Each of the employment agreements provides for a post-employment benefit of two months’ salary and two months’ pro-rated annual bonus upon the named executive officer’s death or disability. This amount reflects what we believe to be a modest transition for the executive or the executive's family for events that are sudden and beyond the executive’s control.
We provide a post-employment benefit of 100% of annual base salary and any accrued pro-rated annual bonus (to the extent that performance targets are achieved for that year) upon the named executive officer's retirement. We consider the 100%
33
payment a reward for length of service given that we do not provide our executives defined benefit or supplemental executive retirement plans.
With respect to a termination without cause, voluntary termination with good reason or voluntary termination within one year after a change in control (requires a change in control and a material diminution in authority, duties or responsibilities), we provide Messrs. Saville and Bredow a post-employment benefit of 200% of base salary and any accrued pro-rated annual bonus (assuming that 100% of the target bonus would have been paid for that year). For Mr. Malzahn, we provide a post-employment benefit of 100% of base salary and any accrued pro-rated annual bonus (assuming that 100% of the target bonus would have been paid for that year) for termination without cause, voluntary termination with good reason or voluntary termination within one year after a change in control (requires a change in control and a material diminution in authority, duties or responsibilities). These amounts reflect our belief that it is difficult for executive officers to find comparable employment opportunities in a short period of time, particularly after experiencing a termination that was beyond their control.
Management of Compensation-Related Risk
We have designed our compensation program to avoid excessive risk-taking by placing the majority of our named executive officers’ compensation opportunity in periodic grants of equity with long-term vesting, limiting the annual bonus opportunity to 100% of base salary and having significant stock ownership requirements for our named executive officers. We do not believe any of our compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on NVR.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Through December 31, 2017, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limited the corporate deduction for compensation paid to the named executive officers (other than our CFO) to $1 million unless such compensation qualified as “performance-based compensation” or was paid after the executive officer ceased to be an executive officer. In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act") was enacted. The Act eliminated the "performance-based compensation" exception from Section 162(m) and limited the exception for certain compensation paid to a former executive officer after he or she ceased to be an executive officer. The Act includes a grandfathering provision for compensation pursuant to a written binding contract which was in effect on November 2, 2017, and which was not modified in any material respect after such date. We believe that outstanding balances in the deferred compensation plans as of November 2, 2017 are in compliance with the grandfathering provision of the Act, and thus will remain deductible as set forth in the grandfathering provision, to the extent they are considered "performance-based compensation" or otherwise would have been deductible under the rules applicable prior to the Act to compensation paid to executive officers after they ceased to be executive officers.
34
THE FOLLOWING REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE “SOLICITING MATERIAL” OR TO BE “FILED” WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN ANY DOCUMENT SO FILED.
Report of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee hereby reports as follows:
1. The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with NVR’s management; and
2. Based on the review and discussion referred to in paragraph 1, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our 2026 Proxy Statement and to be incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The undersigned, constituting all of the members of the Compensation Committee, have submitted this report to the Board of Directors.
Susan Williamson Ross (Chair), Michael J. DeVito, David A. Preiser and W. Grady Rosier
35
2025 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Equity Awards ($) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation ($)(1) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | 2025 | $ | 2,475,000 | $ | — | $ | 494,875 | $ | 23,300 | $ | 2,993,175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Chairman | 2024 | $ | 2,368,750 | $ | — | $ | 2,308,330 | $ | 14,200 | $ | 4,691,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| of the Board | 2023 | $ | 2,257,500 | $ | — | $ | 2,257,500 | $ | 13,200 | $ | 4,528,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | 2025 | $ | 1,437,500 | $ | — | $ | 287,427 | $ | 23,300 | $ | 1,748,227 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| President and Chief | 2024 | $ | 1,162,500 | $ | — | $ | 1,132,848 | $ | 14,200 | $ | 2,309,548 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Officer | 2023 | $ | 875,000 | $ | — | $ | 875,000 | $ | 13,200 | $ | 1,763,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | 2025 | $ | 763,750 | $ | — | $ | 152,711 | $ | 23,300 | $ | 939,761 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Vice President, Chief | 2024 | $ | 719,500 | $ | — | $ | 701,148 | $ | 14,200 | $ | 1,434,848 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Officer and Treasurer | 2023 | $ | 682,250 | $ | — | $ | 682,250 | $ | 13,200 | $ | 1,377,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | 2025 | $ | 408,825 | $ | — | $ | 81,744 | $ | 23,300 | $ | 513,869 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vice President and Chief | 2024 | $ | 392,175 | $ | — | $ | 382,172 | $ | 14,200 | $ | 788,547 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounting Officer | 2023 | $ | 374,750 | $ | — | $ | 374,750 | $ | 13,200 | $ | 762,700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1."All Other Compensation" includes amounts contributed to our employee stock ownership plan for the respective plan year, a matching contribution made to our 401(k) plan and personal digital protection services.
36
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2025
Option Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Award Type (a) | Grant Date | Ratable vesting on each of December 31, | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | T | 05/10/18 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 25,000 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 05/10/18 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 25,000 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| T | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 6,875 | 6,875 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 6,875 | 6,875 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | T | 05/10/18 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 6,800 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 05/10/18 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 6,800 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| T | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 3,175 | 3,175 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 3,175 | 3,175 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | T | 05/10/18 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 8,200 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 05/10/18 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 8,200 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| T | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 2,262 | 2,263 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| P | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 2,262 | 2,263 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | T | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 500 | 500 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
P | 05/04/22 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 500 | 500 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(a)"Award Type" refers to the type of stock option award. "T" represents time-based options where the vesting is based on continued service through the vesting dates in the column labeled "Ratable vesting on each of December 31." "P" represents performance options where the vesting is based on continued service through the vesting dates and NVR’s return on capital performance during the three year period ended December 31 of the first year listed in the column labeled "Ratable vesting on each of December 31." For performance-based options, the amount disclosed is based on the target number of options, which is the same as the maximum. See the Equity-Based Compensation section in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.
.
37
2025 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
| Option Awards | ||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | ||||||||||||
Matthew B. Kelpy | 600 | $ | 3,154,098 | |||||||||||
(1)The value realized is calculated based on the difference between the market price of Common Stock on the date of exercise and the respective exercise price, multiplied by the number of options exercised.
2025 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE
| Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) | Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last FY ($)(a) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plan 1 (b) | — | — | $ | (93,826,103) | — | $ | 772,180,366 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plan 2 (c) | — | — | $ | (688,299) | — | $ | 5,664,637 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a)Represents unrealized earnings (losses) in the market value of the Common Stock held in the officer’s deferred compensation account during 2025. We have never paid dividends.
(b)Mr. Saville deferred a total of $15,995,411 of earned compensation prior to 2004, all of which was previously reported in our proxy statements. This earned compensation has been “at risk” since the deferral prior to 2004. The growth in the balance is solely from the appreciation in our Common Stock since the dates of deferral.
(c)Mr. Saville deferred a total of $600,000 of earned compensation during 2006, all of which was previously reported in our proxy statements. The growth in the balance is solely from the appreciation in our Common Stock since the dates of deferral.
Narrative to the 2025 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table
We have two deferred compensation plans, which we refer to as Plan 1 and Plan 2 for purposes of this discussion. Plan 1, which we adopted on December 15, 1999, was closed for new contributions effective December 31, 2004. Each of the named executive officers, solely at their election, may defer 100% of any earned salary or bonus into Plan 2, which we adopted on December 15, 2005. Stock option gains are prohibited by law from being deferred.
Our deferred compensation plans are structured as follows:
•Amounts deferred are invested in a fixed number of shares of our Common Stock, which is purchased on the open market at fair market value;
•We own the shares of Common Stock in a Rabbi Trust, which makes the payment of our obligations under the deferred compensation plans risk-free for NVR – the cost of the plans does not increase as the value of the Common Stock increases;
•Our Common Stock is the only investment choice;
•All amounts placed in the deferred compensation plan are amounts already earned by the named executive officer;
•We do not make employer contributions to the deferred compensation accounts;
•Earnings on deferred amounts solely represent changes in the market value of the shares of our Common Stock held in the account;
38
•We do not provide for a minimum return or guarantee a minimum payout amount;
•Amounts deferred are “at risk” investments for the named executive officer; and
•Amounts deferred cannot be distributed to the named executive officer until the named executive officer’s termination of service. The deferral period expires for Plan 1 at the named executive officer’s termination of service, and expires for Plan 2 six months after the named executive officer’s termination of service in accordance with Code Section 409A.
See the Tax Deductibility of Compensation section in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis for further discussion of the tax deductibility of deferred compensation.
NARRATIVE DISCLOSURES OF TERMINATION AND CHANGE OF CONTROL PAYMENTS
Certain of our named executive officers are eligible to receive certain termination and/or change in control payments and acceleration rights under certain of the compensation arrangements that they hold with us. These payments and acceleration rights are provided under the applicable executive officers’ employment agreements, equity agreements and deferred compensation plan agreements.
Employment Agreements
As noted in the Change of Control and Post-Employment Payments section above, Messrs. Saville, Bredow and Malzahn are employed pursuant to employment agreements that expire on December 31, 2026 for Mr. Saville and December 31, 2030 for Messrs. Bredow and Malzahn. The agreements cover the additional payments that would be due to these individuals in certain termination scenarios. As mentioned above, we have not entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Kelpy. Accordingly, he is employed on an at-will basis and is not entitled to post-employment benefits upon termination, other than rights contained in his equity agreements. Summarized below are the post-employment payments due under the various termination scenarios pursuant to the employment agreements with Messrs. Saville, Bredow and Malzahn.
•Voluntary. The applicable named executive officer is not entitled to receive any unearned payments after the date of termination.
•Without cause. The named executive officer is entitled to receive, in a lump sum following six months from the date of termination, an amount equal to 200% (for Messrs. Saville and Bredow) or 100% (for Mr. Malzahn) of the named executive officer's then annual base salary, and any accrued pro-rated annual bonus based on the then annual base salary, assuming that 100% of the target bonus would have been paid for that year. In addition, we would provide the executive with up to $100,000 of outplacement services.
•Voluntary with good reason. The named executive officer is entitled to receive the termination payments and outplacement services described in the "Without cause" section above. “Good reason” means (a) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities; (b) a change in the executive’s reporting relationship; (c) a material change in the executive’s principal place of employment; (d) the failure of any successor of the Company to expressly in writing assume our obligations under the employment agreement; or (e) a material breach by us of any agreement between the executive and us.
•Retirement. Upon retirement, the named executive officer is entitled to receive, in a lump sum following six months from the date of retirement, an amount equal to 100% of the named executive officer's then annual base salary and any accrued pro-rated annual bonus based on the then annual base salary, to the extent that performance targets have been achieved and the annual bonus being paid at the same time that all of our other employees are paid their annual bonus.
•Death or Disability. The named executive officer is entitled to receive in a lump sum two months of the named executive officer's then annual base salary and accrued pro-rated annual bonus, assuming that the maximum of 100% of the annual bonus is earned for the period ending on the last calendar day of the second calendar month following the month in which the death or disability occurred.
•Cause. The applicable named executive officers are not entitled to receive any payments after the date of termination for cause. Termination for “cause” is a termination due to:
◦the executive being convicted of (a) a felony, (b) a willful or knowing violation of any federal or state securities law, or (c) a crime involving moral turpitude;
39
◦gross negligence or gross misconduct in connection with the performance of the executive’s duties as described within the employment agreement; or
◦the executive materially breaching any covenants contained in any agreement between the executive and us.
•Termination after a change in control. A "change of control" means (a) any person or group acquires 50% or more of the combined voting power of our voting stock, (b) substantially all of our assets are sold to another party, (c) we are liquidated or dissolved, or (d) we are merged or consolidated into another entity in which we are not the surviving entity. The post-employment payments due following a termination within one year after a "change of control" are summarized below:
◦Without cause within one year after a change in control. The named executive officer is entitled to receive the termination payments and outplacement services described in the "Without cause" section above, except that the annual bonus payout is based on 100% of base salary for the year. In addition, each equity agreement provides for the acceleration of vesting of all unvested equity if we experience a “change in control” and the named executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause within one year following the “change in control.” The accelerated vesting is based on a double trigger, meaning that the named executive officer’s employment needs to be terminated to receive the acceleration right. The “change in control” provisions within the named executive officers’ agreements are identical to the “change of control” provisions within the agreements for all other participants of the respective equity plans.
◦Voluntary within one year after a change in control. The named executive officer is entitled to receive the termination payments described in the "Without cause" section above if there is a "change of control" and there has been a material diminution in the executive's authority, duties or responsibilities, except that the annual bonus payout is based on 100% of base salary for the year.
•Voluntary termination upon the election or appointment, as applicable, of a new Chairman and/or Chief Executive Officer. The applicable named executive officer is not entitled to receive any unearned payments after the date of termination.
Conditions to Receipt of Payment
The covenants within the employment agreements have non-competition provisions, including the prohibition from:
•controlling or owning more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any residential homebuilding, mortgage financing or settlement services business that competes with us;
•being employed by or providing services to any person or entity that competes with us in the residential homebuilding, mortgage financing or settlement services business;
•inducing or attempting to induce any of our customers or potential customers;
•hiring or attempting to hire our employees; or
•utilizing the services of or trying to acquire land, goods or services from any of our developers or subcontractors.
The periods that the non-competition provisions cover are as follows:
•During the term of employment, the named executive officer is bound by the non-competition covenants at all times.
•For one year after termination, the named executive officer is bound by the non-competition covenants if the termination was voluntary, due to retirement, for cause or without cause.
•The named executive officer is not bound by the non-competition covenants after the executive’s termination if the termination was voluntary with good reason, voluntary within one year after a change in control or voluntary upon the election or appointment, as applicable, of a new Chairman and/or Chief Executive Officer.
40
The following table quantifies the potential payments to the named executive officers upon termination of employment or a change in control as of December 31, 2025.
| Name | Severance | Annual Incentive | Equity - Accelerated Vesting (1) | Outplacement Services | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 7,600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voluntary with Good Reason | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 7,600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retirement | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 500,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Death or Disability | $ | 416,667 | $ | 416,667 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 833,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 2,475,000 | $ | 38,737,050 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 46,312,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 2,475,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,475,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Eugene J. Bredow | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 4,600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voluntary with Good Reason | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 4,600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retirement | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 300,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Death or Disability | $ | 250,500 | $ | 250,500 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 501,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 1,437,500 | $ | 17,889,474 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 22,426,974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 1,437,500 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,437,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Daniel D. Malzahn | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause | $ | 775,000 | $ | 775,000 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 1,650,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voluntary with Good Reason | $ | 775,000 | $ | 775,000 | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | 1,650,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retirement | $ | 775,000 | $ | 155,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 930,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Death or Disability | $ | 129,167 | $ | 129,167 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 258,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | 775,000 | $ | 763,750 | $ | 12,750,828 | $ | 100,000 | $ | 14,389,578 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voluntary Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | 775,000 | $ | 763,750 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,538,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Matthew B. Kelpy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Without Cause Within One Year After a Change in Control | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,817,240 | $ | — | $ | 2,817,240 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Represents the intrinsic value of the acceleration of vesting of stock options that vest upon a change in control and termination of employment within one year of a change in control. Intrinsic value for the stock options is the difference between the exercise price of the stock option and the closing price of our Common Stock, which was $7,292.77 on December 31, 2025, the last trading day of the year.
Deferred Compensation Plans
Under the deferred compensation plans (see the 2025 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table above for more information on these plans), named executive officers receive their shares of Common Stock immediately if we experience a “change of control,” rather than receiving their shares of Common Stock at separation of service. The “change of control” provisions within the deferred compensation plans are equally applicable to all participants within the plans.
•Plan 1. Generally, the “change of control” provision is the same as the “change in control” provision set forth in our equity agreements, as summarized above.
•Plan 2. Generally, the “change of control” provision is triggered if (i) we experience any transaction resulting in any person or entity owning 50% or more of the total fair market value or total voting power of our shares, (ii) we
41
experience any transaction resulting in any person or entity acquiring 35% or more of the total fair market value or total voting power of our shares during a 12-month period, (iii) a majority of our Board is replaced during any 12-month period by new directors not endorsed by a majority of our Board who were on our board immediately preceding the new appointments or elections, or (iv) we sell to another entity our assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40% of the total gross fair market value of our total assets.
Assuming a change of control under the deferred compensation plans at December 31, 2025, the market value of the accelerated account balances is presented in the 2025 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table above.
Pay Ratio
Pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K and Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, presented below is the ratio of annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding our CEO). The ratio presented below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u).
In identifying our median employee, we calculated the total cash compensation paid to each of our employees for the 10-month period ended October 31, 2025. Total cash compensation for these purposes included base salary and wages, and, if applicable, bonus and commissions and was calculated using internal payroll records.
We selected the median employee based on approximately 6,900 active full-time and part-time employees of NVR and its subsidiaries as of October 31, 2025. We did not include the compensation of employees hired in 2025 who did not work the full year for purposes of this calculation.
The 2025 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K (“Item 402 Compensation”) for our CEO was $1,748,227. The 2025 Item 402 Compensation for our median employee was $88,431. The ratio of our CEO’s Item 402 Compensation to our median employee’s Item 402 Compensation for fiscal year 2025 is approximately 20 to 1.
Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
42
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
| Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Summary Compensation Table (SCT) Total For PEO 1 (Saville) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 1 (Saville) | SCT Total For PEO 2 (Bredow) | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO 2 (Bredow) | Average SCT Total for Non-PEO NEOs | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs | Total Shareholder Return | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return | Net Income (in thousands) | Annual Return on Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | (3) | (2) (3) | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Paul C. Saville was our principal executive officer (PEO) until May 4, 2022, when he was appointed Executive Chairman of the Board. Eugene J. Bredow has been our PEO since May 4, 2022.
(2) The dollar amounts included in this column represent the amount of "compensation actually paid" as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, and do not reflect the actual compensation earned by or paid to the applicable NEO during the applicable year, given that the substantial majority of this amount relates to unvested stock options which could not have been exercised during the period in which it is included in this measure.
For all periods presented, the amounts deducted from the Summary Compensation Table consisted of the grant-date fair value of equity awards granted in the respective year. The amounts added to the Summary Compensation Table totals consisted of the fair value as of the end of the year of equity grants made in that year, the change in Black-Scholes fair value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years and the change in Black-Scholes fair value of equity awards vesting in the year presented. These amounts for our PEO in each of the respective years are presented in the table below:
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Summary Compensation Table (SCT) Total For PEO | Grant date FV reported in the SCT | FV as of end of year of all unvested awards granted during year | Change in FV of awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested | Change in FV of awards granted in prior years that vested during year | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO | ||||||||||||||
2025 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 - Bredow | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||
| 2022 - Saville | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | |||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
The average of these amounts for the Non-PEO NEOs is presented in the table below:
| Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Average SCT Total for Non-PEO NEOs | Grant date FV reported in the SCT | FV as of end of year of all unvested awards granted during year | Change in FV of awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested | Change in FV of awards granted in prior years that vested during year | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs | ||||||||||||||
2025 | $ | $ | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | |||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | $ | ( | $ | $ | ( | $ | ( | $ | ( | ||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||
(3) In 2025, 2024 and 2023, the non-PEO NEOs were Paul C. Saville, Daniel D. Malzahn and Matthew B. Kelpy. In 2022, the non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Malzahn, Kelpy and Paul W. Praylo. In 2021, the non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Malzahn, Bredow, Kelpy and Praylo.
(4) The peer group total shareholder return presented represents the cumulative total shareholder return of the Dow Jones US Home Construction Index since December 31, 2020 through each of the following period ends.
43
The Relationships Between "Compensation Actually Paid" (1) and NVR Measures of Financial Performance
Background
Homebuilding is a cyclical business with long project life cycles. Our executive compensation program is structured to focus our executives on long-term performance, not short-term quarterly or annual performance. For over 30 years, our compensation philosophy has remained consistent and has focused our management team on long-term maximization of shareholder value, as demonstrated by our 30 year total shareholder return of 72,828%, compared to the S&P 500 Index total shareholder return of 1,818% during the same period.
In our 1996 proxy statement, when our stock price was under $10 per share, we stated that our executive compensation philosophy “includes performance based compensation which effectively aligns the interests of management with those of the Company’s shareholders. The total compensation package is structured to effectively achieve the mutually beneficial goals of retaining experienced senior executives and aligning senior executive compensation with the creation of long-term shareholder value.” That compensation philosophy remains in place today. The consistency in our compensation philosophy is clear, and so is the alignment with shareholders, as demonstrated by the December 31, 2025 closing price of $7,292.77 per share. This compensation philosophy has also achieved the goal of retaining experienced senior executives, as the average NVR experience of our senior executives is 21 years.
Approximately 85% of our named executive officers' compensation is at risk, and the substantial majority of our named executive officers’ compensation is in the form of stock options with long-term vesting. Our periodic option grants to named executive officers do not begin to vest until the end of the third year following the grant date, and vest 25% each year from that point until the end of the sixth year following the grant date. This vesting schedule is substantially longer than that of our peer group and most companies. 50% of the vesting for our stock option grants is subject to a performance metric, NVR's return on capital relative to our peer group.
The most significant driver of "compensation actually paid" to our PEO and other NEOs is the change in our stock price from the grant date to the vesting date. We believe this relationship benefits shareholders by motivating our executives to drive long-term increases in shareholder value. Given our long term vesting schedule, grants made in 2022 impact the 2025 "compensation actually paid" presented in the table above. As a result, "compensation actually paid" in each individual year presented will be highly variable as it is almost entirely driven by the change in the Black-Scholes value of stock options from the beginning of the year to the end of the year.
Our compensation for all of our executive officers is simple, consisting of:
a.moderate target cash compensation (base salary and an annual incentive bonus capped at 100% of base salary);
b.significant long-term equity incentives in the form of stock options granted periodically; and
c.the same personal benefits for which all of our employees are eligible.
Accordingly, our PEO’s "compensation actually paid" is highly correlated to that of the remaining NEOs. In periods where our stock price performs strongly, our PEO and the remaining NEOs will each have higher "compensation actually paid" (as defined in Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K). In periods where our stock price declines, our PEO and the remaining NEOs will have lower "compensation actually paid." We believe this provides 100% alignment between the interests of our named executive officers and our shareholders.
Relationship between "compensation actually paid" and our cumulative TSR
The relationship between "compensation actually paid" and our TSR is simple. "Compensation actually paid" to all of our NEOs is highly correlated to our TSR over the vesting period of our equity grants. For example, in 2025, the "compensation actually paid" to our PEO and the remaining NEOs was negative, driven by the decrease in the Black-Scholes fair value of stock options.
Our long-term vesting and the use of stock options ensures that our NEOs’ long-term interests are aligned with our shareholders’ interests. Our NEOs must drive long-term shareholder value to realize the substantial majority of their compensation. That alignment is demonstrated by the change in our share price over the long-term.
(1) The "compensation actually paid" presented in this section is as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, and does not reflect the actual compensation earned by or paid to the applicable NEO during the applicable year, given that the substantial majority of this amount relates to unvested stock options which could not have been exercised during the period in which it is included in this measure.
44
Relationship between "compensation actually paid" and net income and return on capital
The other two measures presented in our pay versus performance table are net income and return on capital. We believe that long-term shareholder value is driven in large part by growth in net income. Over the five year period, our net income grew and our return on capital metric was the highest in our peer group. Our goal is to deliver industry leading rates of return and growth in net income (and earnings per share) over the long term, and we believe by focusing on this long-term net income growth, we will maximize shareholder value.
The return on capital metric (over a three year performance period) represents our performance metric for vesting of performance-based options, and requires us to outperform the peer group. 50% of each option grant to our NEOs is subject to the return on capital performance condition, and this component of NEO compensation only vests at the target level if our three year return on capital is in the top 25% of our peer group. We believe return on capital is an important metric for us and our shareholders due to the capital intensive nature of the homebuilding business.
"Compensation actually paid" in any given year does not correlate strongly with the changes in net income or return on capital due to the cyclical nature of the homebuilding industry, and the fact that the substantial majority of compensation is in the form of long-term stock options. Our "compensation actually paid" has been higher in years where our share price performed well, and lower in years where our share price declined.
Relationship between our TSR and the peer group TSR for the three most recently completed fiscal years
The peer group TSR in the current year represents the cumulative shareholder return of the Dow Jones US Home Construction Index from December 31, 2020 through and including the last day of each applicable fiscal year presented in the table. During the last five fiscal years, our TSR performance lagged the peer group TSR.
We believe our lot acquisition strategy avoids the risks associated with land ownership and development, which historically has resulted in significant outperformance relative to the peer group during cyclical downturns. With the overall cumulative strength of the homebuilding industry during the last five years, our TSR performance has lagged our peer group compared to measurement periods which include a cyclical downturn (like the 2006-2011 housing downturn, where we were the only publicly traded homebuilder that remained profitable). Over the long term, our strategy is the key driver of our strong balance sheet, which over the long term maximizes shareholder value in our cyclical industry, as demonstrated by our 20 year TSR leading the peer group.
Most important financial performance measures to link "compensation actually paid" to our company performance during the last fiscal year
During 2025, the most important financial performance measures to link "compensation actually paid" to our company performance were:
•Total Shareholder Return
•Consolidated Pre-Tax Profit
•New Orders
•Return on Capital
•Return on Equity
•Diluted Earnings Per Share
45
2025 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(b) | Option Awards ($) (c) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| Paul C. Saville (a) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
| C. E. Andrews | $ | 103,000 | $ | — | $ | 103,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Sallie B. Bailey | $ | 83,000 | $ | — | $ | 83,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Michael J. DeVito | $ | 41,500 | $ | 813,813 | $ | 855,313 | ||||||||||||||
| Thomas Eckert (d) | $ | 29,050 | $ | 29,050 | ||||||||||||||||
| Alfred E. Festa | $ | 106,000 | $ | — | $ | 106,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Alexandra A. Jung | $ | 83,000 | $ | — | $ | 83,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Mel Martinez | $ | 83,000 | $ | — | $ | 83,000 | ||||||||||||||
| George R. Oliver | $ | 20,750 | $ | 812,981 | $ | 833,731 | ||||||||||||||
| David A. Preiser | $ | 91,000 | $ | — | $ | 91,000 | ||||||||||||||
| W. Grady Rosier | $ | 83,000 | $ | — | $ | 83,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Susan Williamson Ross | $ | 106,000 | $ | — | $ | 106,000 | ||||||||||||||
(a)Our Executive Chairman Mr. Saville is also one of our named executive officers and receives no additional compensation for his service as a director. His compensation as a named executive officer is disclosed above in the Summary Compensation Table.
(b)During 2025, directors were paid the following compensation:
| Annual Board Retainer | $75,000 | ||||
| Annual Committee Retainer (excludes Executive Committee) | $8,000 | ||||
| Annual Audit Committee Chair Fee | $20,000 | ||||
| Annual Compensation Committee Chair Fee | $15,000 | ||||
| Annual Nominating Committee Chair Fee | $15,000 | ||||
Reasonable incidental travel and out-of-pocket business expenses are reimbursed as incurred in accordance with the policies to which all of our named executive officers and employees are subject.
(c)Mr.DeVito and Mr. Oliver were appointed to the Board effective July 1, 2025 and October 1, 2025, respectively. The option award amount disclosed represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock option grants made on those dates in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The stock options will vest in 25% increments on December 31, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030. The vesting for the stock options is based solely on continued service as a Director.
(d)Mr. Eckert was a director through the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting, and did not stand for reelection.
46
Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table
We compensate non-employee directors for their service on our Board with a combination of cash and periodic equity awards, the amounts of which are commensurate with their role and involvement. In 2025, no changes were made to our director cash compensation and no equity awards were made, except for grants to new directors. The grants to Messrs. DeVito and Oliver are intended to be 4-year grants and the $812,000 target value of such grants was consistent with the value of the 2022 grants made to our then-serving directors.
Based on the competitive market data provided by Aon Consulting in 2022, NVR's total director compensation was around the 75th percentile of the general industry, with a higher weighting of compensation in long-term equity compensation. We believe that weighting the compensation of our directors heavily towards long-term equity compensation serves to further align the interests of our directors and shareholders.
The following table sets forth the outstanding stock option awards for our directors at December 31, 2025, excluding Mr. Saville’s outstanding awards, which are disclosed in the Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2025 table for the named executive officers:
| Option Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Grant Date (a) | Ratable vesting on each of December 31, | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C.E. Andrews | 05/10/2018 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 1,000 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sallie B. Bailey | 02/21/2020 | 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | 820 | — | $ | 4,037.77 | 02/20/30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael J. DeVito | 07/01/2025 | 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030 | — | 342 | $ | 7,385.66 | 06/30/35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alfred E. Festa | 05/10/2018 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 1,000 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alexandra A. Jung | 12/03/2018 | 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 | 930 | — | $ | 2,450.00 | 12/02/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mel Martinez | 05/10/2018 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 125 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| George R. Oliver | 10/01/2025 | 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030 | — | 338 | $ | 8,034.66 | 09/30/35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| David A. Preiser | 05/10/2018 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 250 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W. Grady Rosier | 05/10/2018 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 1,000 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Susan Williamson Ross | 07/28/2016 | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 | 858 | — | $ | 1,700.00 | 07/27/26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/10/2018 | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 | 1,000 | — | $ | 3,022.99 | 05/09/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 05/04/2022 | 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 | 287 | 287 | $ | 4,475.53 | 05/03/32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a)The vesting for all unexercisable options in the table is based on continued service through the vesting dates.
Stock Ownership Requirements
To further align the interests of our Board with our shareholders, we have stock ownership requirements for our directors. The members of our Board are required to acquire and continuously hold a specified minimum level of our Common Stock. Under our stock ownership requirements, Board members must acquire and hold Common Stock with a total fair market value equal to
47
five times their $75,000 annual retainer fee, which is $375,000. Board members must satisfy the stock ownership requirement within three years of first becoming subject to the stock ownership requirement, and at a minimum, have satisfied one-third of the requirement after one year, and two-thirds of the requirement after two years. All members of our Board are in compliance with our stock ownership requirement.
48
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
(Proposal No. 2)
At the Annual Meeting, our Board will recommend shareholder ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent auditor for 2026. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that continued retention of KPMG LLP serves the best interests of NVR and its shareholders. KPMG LLP has served as our independent auditor since 1987. The Audit Committee annually considers rotation of the audit firm and is directly involved in the selection of the lead engagement partner. If the appointment is not ratified, the Board will consider whether it should select another independent auditor. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the meeting to respond to shareholders' questions and will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire.
Fees paid or incurred for KPMG LLP during the years ended December 31:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
| Audit fees: | ||||||||||||||
| Integrated audit of financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting and quarterly reviews | $ | 1,030,000 | $ | 975,000 | ||||||||||
| Reimbursable expenses | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||||||||||
| Total audit fees | 1,037,500 | 982,500 | ||||||||||||
| Audit-related fees | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Tax fees | — | — | ||||||||||||
| All other fees | 12,000 | 7,500 | ||||||||||||
| Total fees | $ | 1,049,500 | $ | 990,000 | ||||||||||
The Audit Committee has a pre-approval policy subject to annual review that evaluates what types of audit and non-audit services (permitted by law) that, subject to certain limits, can be pre-approved by the Audit Committee and will grant pre-approval, if applicable, pursuant to an Audit Committee resolution. For 2025 and 2024, under separate authorizations applicable to each respective year, the Audit Committee delegated to our Chairman of the Audit Committee, CEO and CFO, together or separately, the authority, subject to individual cost limits, to engage KPMG LLP to provide the following pre-approved services:
•Accounting guidance and technical assistance for the implementation of newly issued accounting pronouncements and standards;
•Accounting guidance and technical assistance related to the application of existing accounting pronouncements and standards to our transactions; and
•SEC registration statement comfort letters and consents.
The aggregate amount for all pre-approved services may not exceed 50% of the annual audit fee. The Audit Committee Chairman, the CEO and CFO must report any such audit-related or non-audit services to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. There were no fees pre-approved in 2025 or 2024 under this delegated authority.
Fees incurred during 2025 and 2024 were pre-approved directly by our Audit Committee. The other fees paid to KPMG in 2025 and 2024 relate to an annual subscription to KPMG's executive education custom learning portal.
Required Vote
The number of votes cast for the proposal must exceed the number of votes cast against the proposal for approval of the proposal.
49
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
(Proposal No. 3)
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our shareholders an opportunity to indicate whether they support our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This non-binding advisory vote, commonly referred to as “say on pay,” is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but instead relates to the compensation paid to the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the tabular disclosures regarding named executive officer compensation, and the narrative disclosure accompanying the tabular presentations. These disclosures allow our shareholders to view the trends in our executive compensation program and the application of our compensation philosophies for the years presented. We are currently holding “say on pay” advisory votes on an annual basis.
We actively monitor our executive compensation practices in light of the industries in which we operate and the marketplace for talent in which we compete. We are focused on compensating our named executive officers fairly and in a manner that incentivizes high levels of performance while providing us the tools to attract and retain the best talent. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement, we believe that our executive compensation program properly links executive compensation to our performance and aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders. Specifically:
•We evaluate our executive compensation relative to our peer group. Our actual target total compensation for our Executive Chairman approximates the 25th percentile of the homebuilding peer group and for our CEO is below the 25th percentile of the homebuilding peer group.
•We limit the annual cash bonus opportunity of our named executive officers to 100% of their base salary, and have not provided any opportunity to exceed that amount for short-term quarterly or annual performance in excess of our business plan. We are the only company among the homebuilding peer group to limit the annual cash bonus for the Executive Chairman, CEO and CFO to 100% of base salary.
•Our CEO target total cash compensation is below the 25th percentile of our peers.
•We place a substantial portion of compensation to our executive officers at risk in the form of stock options that vest over a long-term period.
•We typically issue equity grants every four years, including performance-based stock options, to our named executive officers that vest over a long period of time. Our last grant to our executive officers occurred in 2022.
•Our named executive officers must achieve and maintain a designated robust level of ownership in NVR stock.
Accordingly, the Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
“Resolved, that the compensation paid to NVR’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the related footnotes and narrative disclosures, is hereby APPROVED.”
Required Vote
Although this vote is advisory and is not binding on NVR, the Compensation Committee of the Board will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. For the advisory resolution to be approved, the number of votes cast "FOR" the resolution must exceed the votes cast "AGAINST" the resolution.
50
The Company expects a proposal to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting by John Chevedden of 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California, who beneficially owned 1 share of the Company's common stock as of November 15, 2025. We have copied the text of the proposal (including shareholder-supplied graphic and emphasis) and the shareholder's supporting statement as it was provided by the shareholder. THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING "AGAINST" THIS PROPOSAL.
Give Shareholders an Improved Ability to Call for a Special Shareholder Meeting
(Proposal No. 4)
Shareholders ask our Board of Directors to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting or the owners of the lowest percentage of shareholders, as governed by state law, the power to call a special shareholder meeting. Such a special shareholder meeting can be an online shareholder meeting.
It is especially important to enable 10% of NVR shares to call for a special shareholder meeting because NVR disqualifies all NVR shares owned for less than one continuous year from calling for a special shareholder meeting. Thus NVR has in effect a poison pill against any activist group that may wish to acquire a significant amount of NVR stock from ever doing so because the group would have to sit on its NVR shares for a full year with no hope of calling for a special shareholder meeting any earlier.
This means that if NVR fails to perform NVR directors and management have little incentive to improve because they have a poison pill against an activist group calling for a special shareholder meeting to improve NVR performance.
To guard against the NVR Board of Directors becoming complacent shareholders need an improved ability to call a special shareholder meeting to help the Board adopt new strategies when the need arises.
An improved shareholder right to call for a special shareholder meeting, as called for in this proposal, can help make shareholder engagement meaningful. A shareholder right to call for an online special shareholder meeting will help ensure that the NVR Board and management engages with shareholders in good faith because shareholders will have a viable Plan B by calling for an online special shareholder meeting.
Any argument that a special shareholder meeting is too cumbersome has little validity. In the vast majority of cases or in most cases, once a special meeting is called for by shareholders, the issues behind calling for a special shareholder meeting are soon resolved.
With the widespread use of online shareholder meetings it is much easier for a company to conduct a special shareholder meeting online in the unlikely event that a special shareholder meeting ultimately takes place and the NVR governing documents thus need to be updated accordingly.
Please vote yes:
Give Shareholders an Improved Ability to Call for a Special Shareholder Meeting - Proposal 4
51
Our Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 4
NVR is committed to having sound corporate governance principles and practices. Having and acting on that commitment is essential to running our business efficiently and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. The proposal submitted is substantially similar to last year's proposal submitted by the same proponent, which received support of less than 30% of our shareholders. Our Board has considered the proposal and believes that it is not in the best interests of our shareholders in light of the shareholder rights affirmed by our current bylaw, which provides shareholders holding no less than 25% of our capital stock with the right to call a special meeting of shareholders. The 25% special meeting ownership threshold is consistent with the predominant market practice.
Consequently, the Board UNANIMOUSLY recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons.
The 25% special meeting ownership threshold in our bylaws provides appropriate rights to our shareholders, while also providing a procedural safeguard against abuse, corporate waste and activist investors with short-term goals that the proposed 10% ownership threshold does not.
Our bylaws give shareholders holding no less than 25% of our capital stock continuously for at least one year the right to call a special meeting. We believe this strikes the appropriate balance between ensuring that our shareholders have the ability to call a special meeting to act on extraordinary and urgent matters, while at the same time protecting against a misuse of this right by a small number of shareholders whose interests may not be aligned with the remaining 75% of our shareholders. If shareholders holding just 10% of our capital stock have the ability to call a special meeting, as requested by the proposal, then a small number of shareholders could act together to call a special meeting. Enabling a few shareholders that together meet a lower ownership threshold to monopolize this right would result in outsized attention and resources being devoted to the special interests of a minority of shareholders. Furthermore, we believe that failure to aggregate sufficient stock ownership to reach the 25% ownership threshold is a strong indicator that sufficient interest among the majority of shareholders does not exist to call a special meeting.
Special meetings of shareholders can be disruptive to business operations, incur substantial expenses and harm long-term shareholder interests. The Board, management and employees must devote a significant amount of time and attention preparing for such meetings, which distracts them from their primary focus of maximizing long-term financial returns for shareholders and operating our business in the best interest of shareholders. In addition, with each special meeting of shareholders, we must incur significant expenses in order to prepare the disclosures required for such meetings, print and distribute materials, solicit proxies and tabulate votes. As a result, special meetings of shareholders should be limited to circumstances where a substantial number of shareholders believe a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary to justify calling a special meeting.
Our special meeting bylaw serves as a protective mechanism against activist investors with short-term goals. The proponent refers to the one-year holding requirement for shareholders to call a special meeting under NVR’s bylaws as a “poison pill.” This is inaccurate, as the term “poison pill” refers to a shareholder rights plan, which is very different from a holding period requirement, and misleading to investors. The one year holding requirement is a reasonable protection against misuse of the special meeting right by shareholders who are not long-term investors in NVR.
In addition, the one-year stock holding period included in our bylaws is consistent with the minimum holding period required by the SEC for shareholders to include a proposal in an issuer's proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. In adopting the holding requirements under Rule 14a-8, the SEC indicated that the holding period should be calibrated such that a shareholder has some meaningful “economic stake or investment interest” in a company before the shareholder may draw on company and shareholder resources and command the time and attention of other shareholders to consider and vote on the proposal. Our Board believes the SEC’s reasoning is equally applicable to the Company’s one-year holding requirement for shareholders requesting a special meeting.
Further, with a threshold at 10%, a small number of shareholders could use the special meeting right to advance special interest agendas, goals not widely shared by the shareholder base as a whole or apply short-term oriented pressure inconsistent with the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders. The 25% threshold in our bylaws ensures that a special meeting of shareholders may only be called by a shareholder or group of shareholders with a more substantial stake in our Company and who share interest in a common topic. This appropriately safeguards shareholder interests and prevents corporate waste, while at the same time ensuring that shareholders have the ability to call special meetings when appropriate.
52
The special meeting ownership threshold in our bylaws is consistent with market practice.
The 25% special meeting ownership threshold included in our bylaws is in line with market practice and in line with the expectations set forth in the proxy voting guidelines of our largest shareholders. Based on third-party survey data as of January 2026, within the S&P 500, 390 companies afford shareholders the right to call a special meeting of shareholders, and approximately half of these companies have adopted an ownership threshold of 25% or higher for allowing shareholders to call a special meeting. Our Board believes that the 25% ownership threshold is appropriate for NVR and in line with market practice.
Our existing governance policies provide shareholders with meaningful opportunities to engage with us.
We are committed to strong and effective corporate governance policies that provide sufficient avenues for shareholders to meaningfully engage with us. We regularly engage with key shareholders to discuss, among other items, governance issues to ensure that management and the Board understand and address issues that are important to our shareholders. Our existing governance policies provide shareholders with numerous avenues to address and discuss our business and governance policies with the Board, and demonstrate our responsiveness and willingness to engage with shareholders and provide them with a meaningful voice.
For these reasons, our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” this proposal.
53
The Company expects a proposal to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting by As You Sow of 11461 San Pablo Avenue, Suite 400, El Cerrito, California, acting on behalf of Amalgamated Bank's Longview Largecap 500 Index Fund of 275 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY and Portico Benefit Services of 7700 France Ave. Suite 350, Minneapolis, MN 55435, shareholders of NVR, Inc. Longview Largecap 500 Index Fund beneficially owned 277 shares of NVR stock on November 24, 2025 and Portico Benefit Services owned 60 shares of NVR stock on November 13, 2025. We have copied the text of the proposal and the shareholder's supporting statement as it was provided to us. THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING "AGAINST" THIS PROPOSAL.
Shareholder Proposed Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(Proposal No. 5)
WHEREAS: The home building industry is carbon-intensive, with emissions concentrated in the upstream production of building materials and the downstream energy use of homes, which accounts for about 20% of U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.[1] To reduce the magnitude of these emissions, the residential sector is increasingly the focus of climate-related regulations that require low-carbon energy sources and increased energy efficiency in newly built homes. Home customers, too, are demanding more energy efficient homes to reduce their energy costs, and investors continue to value companies with clear climate-related disclosures and low carbon transition plans.
NVR, a leading residential construction company operating across 16 states, has not set GHG reduction targets. It also fails to disclose its GHG emissions – information critical to determining the Company’s progress in reducing its exposure to climate-related risks and demonstrating its regulatory readiness and competitiveness with peers.
Rising State Regulations
Municipal and state governments are increasingly adopting climate-related building regulations, including restrictions on gas appliances in new homes.[2] Many states are also tightening their clean energy standards and emissions disclosure requirements. California’s first GHG disclosure requirements will go into effect in 2026.[3] In its SEC filings, NVR acknowledges that climate-related regulations are a potential material risk factor,[4] yet, it fails to provide emissions disclosure to assist investors in evaluating the Company’s climate risk and transition progress.
Competitors’ Disclosures Highlight NVR’s Disadvantage
NVR’s lack of emissions and transition planning disclosure also prevents investors from evaluating its performance against competitors. D.R. Horton reports operational emissions, while PulteGroup, Taylor Morrison Homes, and KB Home disclose both their operational and value chain emissions.[5] Additionally, while NVR states that it uses certain energy-efficient appliances and, in 2024 disclosed the average energy efficiency of its homes,[6] those homes lagged the energy efficiency scores of peers including PulteGroup, Taylor Morrison Homes, and KB Home.[7]
NVR’s lack of transparency denies investors the ability to adequately assess its climate-related risk and its ability to take advantage of market opportunities at a time when capital markets are increasingly demanding such information. By disclosing its year-on-year emissions, NVR can demonstrate its competitiveness, responsiveness to regulatory risk, and provide investors with confidence that the Company is prepared to thrive in a low-carbon economy.
BE IT RESOLVED: Shareholders request the Board issue a report, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary information, disclosing its greenhouse gas emissions.
[1] https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1922205117?utm_=
[2] https://buildingdecarb.org/zeb-ordinances
[3] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/california-corporate-greenhouse-gas-ghg-reporting-and-climate-related-financial
[4] https://nvri.gcs-web.com/static-files/92d90ad3-e063-4f95-9be7-44cd24a16bbb, p.8
54
[5] https://investor.drhorton.com/~/media/Files/D/D-R-Horton-IR/documents/fy23-dr-horton-inc-esg-report.pdf, p.79; https://s204.q4cdn.com/680895981/files/doc_downloads/2024/2024_Sustainability_Report_v-4.pdf, p.16; https://s27.q4cdn.com/448041563/files/doc_downloads/2025/07/9644-BMC-ESG-2024-051925-digital.pdf, p.51; https://s201.q4cdn.com/124745054/files/doc_downloads/2025/04/21/2024-Sustainability-Report_FINAL.pdf, p.53
[6] https://nvri.gcs-web.com/static-files/9d8e2a96-ce6f-440b-a245-60892ad2b323, p.9
[7] https://www.pulte.com/energy-star-builder; https://s27.q4cdn.com/448041563/files/doc_downloads/2025/07/9644-BMC-ESG-2024-05195-digital.pdf; https://investor.kbhome.com/environmental-social-and-governance-esg/environmental/default.aspx
55
Our Statement in Opposition to Proposal No. 5
NVR is committed to having sound corporate governance principles and practices. Having and acting on that commitment is essential to running our business efficiently and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. Our Board has considered the proposal and believes that it is not necessary or in the best interests of our shareholders. In all of our outreach to date with shareholders, none of our shareholders have yet articulated to us how they use GHG emission disclosures in making their investing decisions. Our Board also believes that the time and attention spent on such disclosures distracts from the primary focus of maximizing long-term financial returns for shareholders.
Consequently, the Board UNANIMOUSLY recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons.
The Company’s business model appropriately considers and evaluates environmental and climate risks.
We incorporate environmental and climate related considerations into all land investment decisions through a structured due diligence process. Each prospective acquisition undergoes a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment assessing historical, current, and planned future uses; a review of building code, zoning, and regulatory compliance; confirmation of compliance with local, state, and federal stormwater and floodplain regulations; and verification of water, sewer, and other utility availability. This approach supports responsible land stewardship and mitigates long term environmental and regulatory risk. See our sustainability disclosures earlier in this Proxy Statement for more information.
While management is responsible for the day-to-day assessment, management and mitigation of climate risk, the Board is responsible for oversight of the Company’s risk management framework on an enterprise-wide basis, including the oversight of climate risks. The Board believes that climate risks within the Company’s operations are being appropriately managed and monitored within the Company’s risk management framework.
Measuring greenhouse gas emissions of the Company’s activities in accordance with this proposal will be impractical, inaccurate and not an efficient use of shareholders’ investment in the Company.
We do not believe we can accurately and reliably calculate the greenhouse gas emissions associated with operating our business. The Company is not aware of any method by which GHG emissions can be reliably and accurately measured. The models that the Company is aware of require numerous inputs with a high degree of subjectivity, significantly more than the subjectivity in estimates that go into financial statement preparation.
The Board believes any forced effort to report GHG emissions would require highly subjective estimates that could expose the Company to disclosure liability risk and/or be so qualified and generalized as to be meaningless as an accurate or reliable measure. Further, our Board believes that the time and effort involved in preparing such estimates is an inefficient use of significant management time and corporate resources that would not be in the best interests of shareholders.
The Company complies with all current laws and regulations concerning climate disclosure that apply to it, including those of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The SEC in 2010 published interpretive guidance concerning disclosure of climate-related matters. The SEC stated that several elements of the regulatory disclosure framework may require disclosures relating to climate change, including disclosure of the material effects of compliance with laws and regulations, material pending legal proceedings, and material risk factors. The Company complies with all current laws and regulations concerning climate disclosures. We actively monitor the regulatory environment with respect to environmental and climate disclosures and proactively prepare for compliance with emerging requirements. The disclosure of GHG emissions is not a required climate disclosure, and through all of our outreach with significant shareholders, we have yet to have a shareholder articulate to us how they use GHG emission disclosures in making their investment decisions.
For these reasons, our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” this proposal.
56
Shareholder Proposals For the 2027 Annual Meeting
Shareholder proposals that are intended by a shareholder to be included in our proxy statement for our next annual shareholders meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the SEC must be received in the office of NVR's Secretary no later than November 17, 2026.
Shareholder proposals that are not submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8, but that one or more shareholders intend to propose for consideration at our next annual meeting, must be submitted to the office of NVR's Secretary no earlier than November 17, 2026 and no later than December 17, 2026 and must otherwise comply with the conditions set forth in Section 2.04 of our Bylaws (or, the case of director nominations, Section 3.03 of our Bylaws). Any shareholder proposal that is not submitted within the applicable time frame will not be eligible for presentation or consideration at the next annual meeting.
Our Bylaws permit shareholders owning 3% or more of our common stock for at least three years to nominate up to 20% of our Board and include these nominees in our proxy materials. The number of shareholders who may aggregate their shares to meet the 3% ownership threshold is limited to 20. The shareholder(s) and nominees(s) must also satisfy the other requirements in our Bylaws. Notice of proxy access for director nominees must be received no earlier than October 18, 2026 and no later than November 17, 2026. In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company's nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 8, 2027.
Householding Information
Under SEC rules, we deliver a single copy of our proxy materials to any household at which two or more shareholders reside. We believe this rule benefits everyone as it eliminates duplicate mailings that shareholders living at the same address receive, and it reduces our printing and mailing costs. This rule applies to any annual reports, proxy statements, proxy statements combined with a prospectus and information statements. If your household would like to receive duplicate rather than single mailings in the future, or if shareholders in your household received duplicate mailings and would like to receive a single mailing for the household, please mail, email or call our Investor Relations department at Investor Relations, NVR Inc., 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20190, ir@nvrinc.com, 703-956-4243. If you hold shares through a bank or broker, you may request information about duplicate mailings from your bank, broker or other intermediary. If a shareholder holds shares through more than one brokerage account or through a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, the shareholder may continue to receive some duplicate mailings.
Other Matters
Management knows of no other business to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting, other than those items listed in the notice of the Annual Meeting referred to herein. If any other business should properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment thereof, it is intended that the proxies will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the persons acting thereunder.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2025, including consolidated financial statements and other information, accompanies this Proxy Statement but does not form a part of the proxy soliciting material. A complete list of the shareholders of record entitled to vote at our Annual Meeting will be open and available for examination by any shareholder, for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at our offices at 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, Virginia 20190, from April 14, 2026 through May 1, 2026 and at the time and place of the Annual Meeting.
Copies of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, which we are required to file with the SEC will be provided in print without charge upon the written request of any shareholder. Such requests may be sent to Investor Relations, NVR, Inc., 11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500, Reston, Virginia 20190. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from our website at www.nvrinc.com, and the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
| By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||||||||
| James M. Sack | ||||||||
| Secretary and General Counsel | ||||||||
| Reston, Virginia | ||||||||
| March 17, 2026 | ||||||||
57
58
59