Good morning and welcome to Skyline Champion Corporation’s First Quarter Fiscal 2023 Earnings Call. The company issued an earnings press release yesterday after the close. I would like to remind everyone that yesterday’s press release and statements made during this call include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company’s expectations and projections. Such risks and uncertainties include the factors set forth in the earnings release and in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, during today’s call, the company will discuss non-GAAP measures, which it believes can be useful in evaluating its performance. A reconciliation of these measures can be found in the earnings release. I would now like to turn the call over to Mark Yost, Skyline Champion’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you for joining our earnings call, and good morning, everyone. Joining me on the call is Laurie Hough, EVP and CFO. Today, I will briefly talk about our first quarter highlights, then provide an update on activity so far in our second quarter and wrap up with thoughts about the balance of the year. Following a very strong fourth quarter and an excellent year, we are pleased to report that Fiscal 2023 is off to a strong start. During the first quarter, we grew net sales by 42% and adjusted EBITDA by 159%, expanding margins by more than 1,000 basis points. Our solid performance continues to be driven by initiatives focused on increasing production levels through improved operations and added capacity to satisfy the demand for our products. During the quarter, we continued our progress with these efforts in addition to the production of disaster relief housing for FEMA, pricing tailwinds, and disciplined cost management. Production volumes were up again on a year-over-year basis as our focus on product rationalization is leading to increased output, which allowed us to reduce backlogs on a sequential basis. The team's ability to produce more quality homes during the quarter was also due to the production ramp of our Navasota, Texas plant. We expect output at this plant to increase for the remainder of the year as it reaches optimal run rates. The operations team far surpassed expectations in the production of FEMA disaster relief units this quarter. During this quarter, we produced almost 90% of the $200 million order, which was more efficient than we had anticipated. Many of these units were in finished goods at the end of June awaiting shipment or acceptance by FEMA. As a result, during the quarter, we recorded approximately $83 million worth of revenue from the disaster relief units. Nearly all the remaining balance is expected to be recognized in the September quarter. In total, we delivered 6,813 homes in the U.S., an improvement of 7% from the prior year and up 4% sequentially. With the inclusion of our recent maintenance acquisition into our capacity calculation, our capacity utilization remained at 72% for the quarter, compared to 72% in the sequential March quarter, as higher production levels were offset by FEMA product mix and the inclusion of the idle facility in Laurinburg, North Carolina. Speaking of the Manis acquisition, we closed on the asset purchase of Manis custom builders in mid-May, and the integration activities are well underway. This investment in a two-plant manufacturing campus and one retail sales center in North Carolina allows us to expand our manufacturing footprint and build upon our efforts to streamline our product offerings in the Southeast of the U.S., a region that’s seeing strong growth as a result of key secular trends in demographics and home buying in that region. We saw stable gross order rates during the quarter with sequential orders remaining flat after adjusting for the FEMA units. We saw orders moderate at our independent retailers during the quarter, but we see healthy demand across other key sales channels, specifically the community REITs, the build to rent channel, and increasing builder developers. In terms of cancellations, we saw minimal activity at the end consumer level as the need for affordable housing is only growing stronger, especially as apartment rental rates continue to rise, and we continue to convert more traditional site-built buyers to our more affordable housing solutions, a trend that should continue in this economic climate. As we anticipated on our last call, we did see dealers starting to right-size the number of display models at their sales center to control floor plan financing interest expense as interest rates rise. We expect this to continue through the end of the September quarter. Customer traffic and quoting activity in the first quarter was down about 20% year-over-year at retailers, but the quality of buyers remains strong and pull-through order rates at retailers are up versus last year. Backlog at the end of June was down $264 million to $1.4 billion compared to the March quarter, while the year-over-year increase in backlog was the result of home orders at higher pricing levels. Our improved production capabilities, the production of almost 90% of the FEMA disaster relief housing, and our enhanced footprint led to a sequential decline in lead times, which at the end of June was 28 weeks compared to 35 weeks at the end of the March quarter. We are confident that we will continue to see increases in production levels with the goal of reducing backlogs to pre-pandemic levels of 4 weeks to 12 weeks. Getting lead times back to our historical levels helps the homebuyer lock in pricing and financing, as well as benefits our direct sales channels to better meet the needs of our end customers. From an industry standpoint, demand remains healthy as rising rental rates, higher interest rates, and inflationary pressures are intensifying the need for affordable housing. The current environment has increased the awareness of our housing solutions and our investments in enhancing the buyer experience have allowed us to convert more traditional site-built buyers and expand our market share. To further increase awareness, in June, we brought two homes to the innovative housing showcase in Washington D.C. to promote the value of factory-built housing to policymakers, the media, and homebuyers. Our homes were very well received. Interactions like this allow us to promote the need for expanded zoning access and financing for our housing solutions more effectively. During the quarter, we saw improvement in the supply chain and labor availability. These signs of improvement are encouraging indicators of our production levels and our ability to deliver additional output. In the near term, we continue to expect headwinds in pending supply chain disruptions emerging around Labor Day and ongoing transportation challenges with the availability of drivers. As we look forward, market conditions remain healthy with the historically low affordable housing supply, favorable demographics, and population migration. With rising interest rates and inflation, we are seeing traditional site-built homebuyers moving into our more value-oriented factory-built home solutions. Focusing on the longer term, it is becoming more evident every day that the antiquated system of traditional homebuilding is not sufficient to meet the needs of today's customers. Due to the early successes we have seen in both manufacturing technology and consumer digital access, we will be ramping up our investments in these areas to make homes more affordable and attainable for our customers. A focal point of these investments in 2023 and into 2024 will be enhancing the customer buying experience. In June, we entered into an agreement with Alta Cima and acquired 12 of its factory expo home centers located at our manufacturing facilities across the country. This acquisition emphasizes our commitment to elevating the customer experience directly with those consumers as Alta Cima derives the majority of its leads through a variety of digital marketing campaigns. In summary, we remain optimistic about the opportunities in the current environment that presents itself and we are increasingly confident in the runway for long-term growth as our strategic initiatives and operational improvements continue to enhance Skyline Champion's product offering and ability to gain share. I will now turn the call over to Laurie to discuss our quarterly financials in more detail.

Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin by reviewing our financial results for the first quarter followed by a discussion of our balance sheet and cash flows. I will also briefly discuss our near-term expectations. During the first quarter, net sales increased by 42% to $726 million compared to the same quarter last year. We saw revenue growth of $204 million in the U.S. factory-built housing segment during the quarter, which was driven by an increase in the number of homes sold and an increase in average selling price. The increase in the number of homes sold was 7% or 441 units for a total of 6,813 homes compared to the same quarter last year. U.S. volume increases were attributable to shipments from the Navasota, Texas plant and streamlining of our core product offerings. FEMA unit sales during the quarter totaled $83 million. We produced almost 90% of the $200 million delivery disaster relief order during the quarter and will recognize the majority of this revenue in the September quarter as the units are shipped and accepted by FEMA. The average selling price per U.S. homes sold increased by 35% to $97,000 due to price increases to offset inflation brought on by rising material, labor, and transportation costs. In addition to price increases, FEMA sales this quarter drove about a third of the ASP increases as these units have more specifications than our typical homes. On a sequential basis, revenue in the U.S. factory-built segment increased 14% in the first quarter of fiscal 2023 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022. This increase was driven by an 11% increase in average selling price per home and a 4% increase in the number of homes sold. The sequential volume growth during the quarter was driven by an increase in production levels and, as Mark mentioned earlier in the call, would have been higher had we seen more favorable timing of shipments as our finished goods inventory increased by $54 million. We expect this to even out in the September quarter as FEMA units produced are shipped and recognized as revenue. Canadian revenue increased 19% to $45 million compared to the first quarter of last year, driven by a 30% increase in the average home selling price, partially offset by a 9% decline in the number of homes sold. The higher average home selling price in Canada of $128,000 was driven by price increases enacted in response to inflationary pressures on our input costs. The decline in volume was caused by the timing of home shipments reflected in increased finished goods. Production volumes at our Canadian plants were consistent with prior year levels. During the quarter, we saw a shift in our product mix in Canada to more multi-section products, which led to a sequential decline in units sold. Consolidated gross profit increased to $229 million in the first quarter, up 106% versus the prior year quarter due to higher volumes in average selling prices, while also benefiting from the higher-priced FEMA units and lower lumber costs. Performance during the quarter also reflects our ability to maintain the structural margin profile across our core products on a sequential basis, reflecting the returns on our investment in operations and footprint. Our U.S. housing segment gross margins were 31.7% of segment net sales, up 1,010 basis points from the first quarter last year. The improved operating efficiencies and higher prices on FEMA unit sales helped to increase gross margin this quarter in addition to strong demand and pricing, and continued product standardization, which all led to increased production and leverage of fixed costs. SG&A in the first quarter increased to $72 million from $54 million in the same period last year, primarily due to higher variable compensation driven by higher revenue and profitability. The increase in SG&A also reflects additional investment in capacity and ongoing investments to enhance the customer buying experience. The online customer buying experience remains a key initiative and we expect incremental investments to continue through fiscal 2023 and into 2024. Net income for the first quarter was $117 million or $2.04 per diluted share compared to net income of $43 million or earnings of $0.75 per diluted share during the same period last year. The increase in EPS was driven by higher sales and improved operating efficiencies resulting in improved profitability. The company's effective tax rate for the quarter was 25.7% versus an effective tax rate of 24.6% for the year-ago quarter. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $163 million, an increase of 159% over the same period a year ago. The adjusted EBITDA margin expanded by more than a thousand basis points to 22.4%, due to gross margin improvement and leverage of fixed costs. In the near term, we continue to be confident in our ability to navigate the current economic environment because of the structural improvements we've made to our operations and our product offerings, as well as our ability to pull on cost levers such as price adjustments and raw material substitution. As we move through fiscal 2023, we do believe that margins will normalize back to fiscal 2022 levels after the one-time effect of FEMA subsides. In addition to anticipated headwinds to our product mix and margin as consumers seeking relief on rising monthly payments will move to homes with fewer options. As of July 2, 2022, we had $464 million of cash and cash equivalents and long-term borrowings of $12 million with no maturities until 2029. We generated $47 million of operating cash flows for the quarter, an increase of $16 million compared to the prior year period. The increase in operating cash flows is primarily due to the increase in net income, which was partially offset by an increase in inventory, accounts receivable, and capitalized cloud computing costs. We expect the inventory and accounts receivable increases to normalize somewhat by the end of the September quarter. We remain focused on executing our operational initiatives and given our favorable liquidity position, plan to utilize our cash to reinvest in the business to support strategic long-term growth. I'll now turn the call back to Mark for some closing remarks.

Thanks, Laurie. While the current economic environment has raised a level of caution with the consumer due to sustained inflation, rising interest rates, and global uncertainty, we believe Skyline Champion can continue to outperform the broader housing industry due to our affordable price points, strategic positioning, and core initiatives. The outlook for demand is supported by the channel opportunities with community REITs, build to rent, and the builder developers, as well as helping our retail partners adapt to different consumer demographic channels where we continue to make progress and remain excited about. In addition, the need for affordable housing continues to grow and we believe that the elevated cost of housing will drive more traditional site-built buyers into our homes. Before we open the lines for Q&A, I want to take a moment to thank our entire Skyline Champion team. They are absolutely amazing as our consistently strong performance is a result of our focus, hard work, and ability to increase output for our customers. And with that, operator, you may now open the lines for Q&A.

The first question comes from Greg Palm, Craig-Hallum Capital. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Hey Mark, hey Laurie, congrats on the good results here.

Thanks, Greg. Good morning.

I guess just starting with overall demand, I'm curious if you can go into a little bit more detail on what you're seeing by channel? And more importantly, the strength in community build for rent builder developer, what's your visibility into that demand continuing to stay at strong levels here?

Yes. I think those channels, Greg, are actually considerably strong. The community REITs continue to want more and more product. And so, really trying to find allocation for them is an important consideration. The build-to-rent channel is something that's emerging. We're actually going to be in Vegas the second week of September displaying a model at one of the largest Build to Rent Conferences to let Build to Rent developers see our homes. The builder developer channel continues to escalate. I think a lot of the small to mid-tier builders continue to be under pressure in today's market. And so, as we continue to get our speed to build down and other initiatives in place, we become more appealing to those various channels as well. Retail demand is still very good as well. The traffic at retail is down a little bit, about 20%, but the people who are coming in are actually buyers. So, the pull-through rate is actually up. So, many retailers are reporting sales traction that's equivalent to last year, maybe slightly down, but there's still very good demand at the retail level.

Okay. Good. That's helpful. As it relates to FEMA, so you mentioned that you completed 90% of the 200 million, so that equates to $180 million worth, but you only recognized 83 million of that in the quarter. So, does that mean you had left $100 million on the table? Can you confirm that? And it sounds like that all shifts into the September quarter, but how should we be thinking about the September quarter, sequentially just given that and everything else going on?

Yes, Greg, I think that's exactly right. So, the production team this quarter was really about production, very efficient, very effective production this quarter, and the team did a great job in producing those FEMA units. We thought it would take two quarters to produce and they got 90% of it done this quarter. So, yes, we've got roughly a rounding $100 million, I would say $97 million if we want to be specific, millions of revenue that's been produced, but needs to – that will – once accepted by FEMA will be recognized into revenue at that point in time, which we expect a majority of that by the September quarter. The way I look at the September quarter is we will have that plus coming in. This quarter had $83 million, so we'll have a little step-up quarter-over-quarter in FEMA, but we also have our normalized July shutdown that takes a week out of our production for this quarter versus last. So, net-net, I'm assuming we should be relatively flat top line quarter-over-quarter going into the September quarter.

Okay, great. All right. I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks and good luck. Thanks.

Thanks, Greg.

Our next question comes from Matthew Bouley with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning everyone. Congrats on the results. Wanted to ask about the ASPs. I know you mentioned that, and you said a third of it in the quarter was due to the FEMA mix, but just at a higher level, just thinking about sort of affordability pressures to customers here? And I think, Laurie, you may have mentioned something along the lines of having levers like price adjustments. So, can you just sort of provide some outlook on ASPs here? Is there room for ASPs to actually move lower in this type of environment? How should we think about that over the next few quarters? Thanks.

Hi, Matt. Yes, next quarter because, as Mark mentioned, we're going to still see some FEMA units coming through, we're going to probably see sequential ASPs relatively flat in the second quarter versus the first quarter. And then, I think we're going to see them revert back to more normal levels. As I mentioned on the call last quarter, I do think that we're going to see consumers choose fewer options on their homes, which could impact mix and ASP. So, generally, I feel that in the second half of the year, we're going to see them revert back to more normal levels, like we saw possibly in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022 and then potentially decrease slightly because of the mix option, if that makes sense.

It does. Great. No, that's helpful. Thank you for that, Laurie. And second one on backlog and cancellation side. I know you mentioned dealers continuing to maybe de-stock a little due to the floor plan financing issue. I think last quarter you said there’s a second part of that too where you might have consumers actually failing to qualify as a result of the move in interest rates. I’m just looking for, I guess, a bit of an update on that and sort of how you're thinking about the stability of the backlog given this environment here? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Matt. The stability of the backlog is fairly good. I think the consumer cancellations in the backlog have been minimal. I mean, I don't even receive detailed reports on it because it's minor. The dealer cleanup, I think, will happen in a two-part sequence. Normally, when dealers are rightsizing their inventory, what they'll do first is cancel or pull back on the stock units that are in the backlog already. So, the ones that are kind of the replacement units coming up. That's kind of usually the first wave. And I think we'll probably be about two-thirds of the way through that. There'll be some minor cleanup, I think, going into the September quarter. Then the second wave of dealer cleanup is where they're going to actually reduce the models of inventory they have on their lots. That will actually show up probably instead of selling a consumer-built home; they'll sell their spec unit in their inventory levels. So, we'll see a cleanup of our orders, if you will, or slowdown in orders in that second wave. So, we see both of those, but the consumer demand has been very strong still. Quoting activity in the first part of the year was off 20%. In July, quoting activity is only down 10%. So, I think the overall consumer will still be there, but we will see that cleanup between what we saw in the first quarter and what will happen in the second quarter.

Got you. All right. Thanks, Mark. Thanks, Laurie.

Thank you, Matt.

Our next question comes from Mike Dahl with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Laurie, I wanted to follow up on margins, a two-part question. First, in the quarter, there were a few large drivers of the increase. I was wondering if you could help us ballpark the relative impacts of FEMA versus potentially some more favorable lumber purchasing dynamics and then just outright volume leverage? And then when you talk about normalizing down to 2022 levels in the second half of the year, 2022 levels were still extremely elevated compared to your historical margins and even your prior long-term targets. So, how do we think about what that means for what you're defining as normal and sustainability of that?

Hi, Mike. Thanks for the questions. So, just addressing this quarter's margins. We aren't breaking out the impact by category. So, all I can tell you is to reiterate what Mark said that FEMA production went through the plants much more efficiently than we were expecting. So, that certainly helped with the consistency of product, and frankly, the production team's efforts to get the units through the production process more quickly. So that certainly helped gross margins. In the second half of the quarter, we started to see, because of the way we buy our lumber products, some favorability from the decrease in forest product pricing. Some of that is offset by higher labor and other material pricing. So, it's kind of a give and take on some of the above. We did see some benefit from lower forest product costs. To address your normalized margins going forward question, fiscal 2022 margins I think were in the 26.5% range for the full year. I do see, as consumers shift to less-optioned homes, that we're going to continue to see some margin pressure because those options generally have higher margins. So, as the mix between a base product and a base product plus options switches, in order for the end consumer to still target an affordable price point and a target monthly payment, they're going to have to back off on some of those more expensive options that generate higher margins.

It does. Thank you. And then, Mark, I guess I'm still not entirely clear on the moving pieces around orders. You kind of talked about down 20 in quoting activity at retail and then down 10 in July, the other channels holding steady. If I look at just – I know this isn't perfect looking at the backlog math, but the backlog math would suggest that orders are actually down pretty meaningfully in dollar terms on a year-on-year basis. Can you just help us and that's on a dollar basis so implied units, probably even lower. Can you give us a little bit more detailed walk on what order trends you've seen in aggregate across your business?

Sure, Mike. Let me start by discussing the backlog, as it really relates to production. To provide some context, last year was considered a strong year for homebuilding demand. We generated $2.2 billion in sales and saw our backlogs increase by $800 million, resulting in a total sales pace of $3 billion, which averages out to $750 million per quarter. In the current quarter, we sold $726 million and completed additional FEMA units from the backlog, adding approximately $100 million. This means we built and produced around $830 million this quarter, exceeding last year's order rates. It's important to factor in that our sales, along with the production of FEMA units—not yet recognized in revenue—amounted to roughly $830 million to $840 million for the quarter. This is a notable achievement. If you analyze the sales pace, you'll find that our order rates for this quarter, excluding the one-time FEMA order, align with the order rates we experienced in the fourth quarter of last year. Therefore, our sales order rates remained stable from quarter to quarter, aside from the one-time adjustment from the FEMA order. In summary, most of the decrease in backlog was primarily due to robust production during the quarter.

That's helpful. Just if I could, two quick follow-ups there. When you're saying flat versus 4Q, is that still in dollar terms? And then to clarify, I think you said, it seems like you imply that while you haven't shipped $100 million in remaining FEMA that is no longer reported in your $1.4 billion of backlog, is that correct?

That's correct. Even though we haven't yet realized the revenue, the product is produced, so it is no longer considered backlog. It has been excluded from backlog. Once produced, anything that is in finished goods or is ready for production or shipment is good to go. That amounts to roughly $100 million. I'm sorry, I missed part of your question.

The order pace flat versus 4Q, is that in dollar terms or units?

That is in unit terms.

Okay. Thank you both.

Thank you, Mike.

Our next question comes from Phil Ng with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, congrats on a really strong quarter and great execution from the team. Mark, I guess orders are trending somewhat differently between your retail channel versus REIT direct-to-builder and built-to-rent. Are there any noticeable mix differences, margin differences between the channels? And then how easy is it for you to pivot some of the production capacity to some of these different trends going forward?

Yes, Phil. Thank you. The pivot of product is easier than the pivots of geography. What I would say is what we're looking at today is that there's going to be a shift in where people buy and how people buy. Our traditional retail channel is selling more to traditional homebuyers, which is a little bit different customer demographic. So, we have to shift our product needs, shift our marketing materials, and shift our digital footprint to help drive that traffic to our retailers on a better basis to help them be even more successful. In addition, the REITs and other channels have different product needs. The margins across our profile are generally flat. What we try to do is determine margins for our products on what we call a margin per minute or margin per hour basis. So, if a product runs very slow through the production line versus one that runs twice as fast through the production line, we try to equally weight the margin of those products in that profile. That's why the FEMA production this quarter was so beneficial because we hadn't assumed a very slow production rate for those; it had a standard gross margin similar to other products, but we ran it much more efficiently, which gave much better margins.

Got you.

So, I think the product profile is meaningful. What we really need to look at is, I think there's shifts in geographic profiles. So, we'll have to monitor strong markets versus the markets that are slowing and balance our production facilities accordingly.

Got it. I mean, Mark, it sounds like your orders have held up quite well. Certainly, a testament to maybe the value proposition on affordability with your product, but certainly investors are nervous about a potential slowdown in housing, certainly your retail side of things. Assuming if there is an air pocket call next calendar year, the trends that you're seeing in the backlog and orders you're seeing in the other channels, i.e. direct-to-builder and REIT, do you think that's enough to offset some of the potential weakness down the road, appreciating some of your mix profile and how you're set up there?

I do, with the caveat of geography. I think some of the build-for-rent and builder-developer opportunities and others are probably more developed in certain areas of the country and certain geographies. So, we've got to balance that mix. But I think I hear people say that there's a softening of demand for housing. There's not a softening of demand for housing. There is a softening of demand for very expensive housing, which is what they are subject to today. I think the demand for affordable housing is actually quite strong. People have substitution options. Do they go to apartments? Do they go to build a house? Do they go to buy a used home? Those trade-offs are very difficult for people to manage in today's environment. So, I don't know that there's a slowdown necessarily in demand. Obviously, people have other financial impacts in their lives today and they're getting squeezed on many fronts, but I think affordable housing will move through the cycle. If anything, the slowdown in building activity is actually, I think, creating a longer, more durable runway to be candid because the supply shortage exists. If there is a slowdown in production to supply that supply shortage, then that means we'll extend the runway of demand. That's how I see that. Obviously, we have to manage the short term and it's very volatile today, but I think the long-term outlook is quite good and we've got a healthy backlog to help see us through as well.

Got you. That's great. And then just one last one if I could sneak it in for Laurie. You talked about how consumers may be taking fewer options, and there could be a mix impact. Certainly, that will have a drag on margins potentially, but when we think about price cost in the last few years in a very inflationary backdrop, you guys have managed that exceptionally well and demonstrated really strong pricing power. In a potentially slowing backdrop—and appreciating Mark, you haven't seen the slowdown yet—but in a slower demand backdrop, your level of confidence to get priced to offset inflation, especially in that retail channel? Thanks a lot, guys.

Yes, you know Phil, we have made some structural changes to our products, which impact our production. I think that's why primarily even in the down cycle we will be able to maintain margins similar to what we saw in fiscal 2022. So, the streamlining of our product offerings has helped establish margins even in a down environment. That being said, depending on the severity of a down market, the leverage of fixed costs will need to be managed closely.

Our next question comes from Daniel Moore with CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. It's Peter Lukas for Dan. You guys covered a lot. Just two quick ones for me. Last quarter, you inked an agreement with your first Top 100 builder developer. Just wondering how other conversions are progressing, if there's anything you can add there?

Yes. I mean, the pipeline for builder-developer activity is quite good. The conversion rate of them obviously is timing dependent, but I would say overall builders in today's environment are probably more eager than they were three months ago or six months ago. It's very helpful and beneficial. The more we can get our production up and our backlogs down, the closer we can time our production for delivery to the build-to-rent channel or the builder-developer channel, for the REIT channel and frankly for the end consumer so that they don't have as much interest rate risk and inflationary risk, and they know what they're getting within weeks. I think the more certainty and the higher conversions will be. We're really focused on increasing output to help lower our backlog time so that we can deliver faster. I think that'll help and aid in the conversion because if a builder knows we can supply them in weeks for their subdivision that dramatically changes the economics and their return on invested capital for their projects.

Helpful, thanks. And last one for me, just kind of a bigger picture question. In terms of state, local, and national codes and restrictions changing for MHI, what are the most significant shifts or changes that you're currently seeing?

I would say zoning regulatory barriers are coming down. The ADU market is starting to open up in many cities and locations across the country. The need for affordable housing is becoming more pronounced. As a result, there is more and more focus on state and local regulators to free up zoning for affordable housing because their constituents want it, and it's needed, especially for good workforce housing. The State of Florida has done some great things recently, for instance, in lowering the sales tax on MH units and launching homes for heroes program for workforce housing for citizens in their state. I think you'll see more and more initiatives like that that create incentives for workforce housing for heroes, such as firefighters, police, medical professionals, teachers, and childcare workers. Those are the people who really need housing, along with first-time homebuyers. I think more state and local incentives are popping up along with deregulation.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Peter.

Our next question comes from Jay McCanless with Wedbush. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So, the first one I had with some of these new sales channels that you have, whether it's build around, etc. Where now is retail sales or the retail channel as a percentage of total sales for you guys?

Retail sales is about 50%, give or take, of our total sales today.

And I mean do you expect that to go down over time or where is that relative to historical numbers? I mean that's probably—it's probably gone down a little bit versus historical. I would say we were probably closer to two-thirds retail, one-third community REITs and other channels a few years ago. I think it's come down a little bit in percentage terms. But again, Jay, we've grown so dramatically in scale that that's kind of misleading a little bit. The retail channel hasn't shrunk by any means; it's grown considerably. It's just not growing at the pace of some of these other channels. I think retail will still be very strong. I just foresee customers having more difficult time coming down with the down payment to buy a home in the future with other inflationary challenges affecting their pocketbooks. So, I think your rental channels will become more prevalent. I think customers or people who can get into homes for build to rent or even builder developers will see growth in those channels along with ADUs that are untapped sources for the future. So, I think retail is very strong. I just think that given the down payment, it'll slow down a little bit. Got it. Could you provide an update on the changes in channel rates? I understand they were lower for most of last year compared to traditional conforming mortgage rates.

Yes. I mean, they have come down. I would say they're probably moving today and locked up with traditional rates, but channel rates for good credit scores are probably about 6.5% for channel today. So, I think the spread is quite good versus traditional homebuyers and especially when you factor in the affordable price point that monthly payment is quite a strong benefit for the end consumer.

Got you. And then – and I apologize, I jumped on late – when I jumped on, Mark, you were talking about something in terms of logistics about having some driver shortages post Labor Day. Could you repeat those comments? What are you guys seeing in terms of logistics, whether it's your own trucking fleet or suppliers bringing stuff to your plants?

Yes. I would say the supply chain for trucking generally in kind of inbound transportation is actually improving a little bit. The outbound transportation, given the wide loads and other things that we have to transport, I think finding drivers for the heightened demand that we’ve seen is really the crux of the matter, right? We've dramatically grown as an industry overall. So, I think the new influx of drivers that are needed for that type of transport needs to grow as well. I think that is a little bit of a challenge that we've got to overcome. It's beneficial that we have our own trucking division that we're able to manage that probably fairly effectively or maybe better than others, I would assume, but it's definitely something the industry is faced with today overall. I think as far as supply chain, I still anticipate, kind of post Labor Day, starting to emerge around Labor Day, some HVAC shortages and other things starting to pop up due to supply chain constraints coming from China and some of the circuit boards and control panels and other materials, mainly in HVAC coming into September, October, November.

Got you. And then just one other question. I know historically the REITs have liked to buy single-section homes. What are you seeing in terms of preferences or home sizes from some of these newer build-to-rent and traditional builder channels? What type of product are they asking you guys to quote?

It probably depends on geography, but I would say not as many single sections. I would say double sections are probably more prevalent. I've noticed some of—they're targeting a little bit customer price point. They're targeting a first-time home buyer, very good FICO score, very good creditworthiness, someone that can afford to buy a site-built home, but they want something of value. They're choosing something that is probably a better value proposition for them and their other alternatives to spend their money on. I think a larger house that can be afforded by a first-time homebuyer with a dual income is what we're seeing in some of those channels.

Okay. That's great. Thank you for taking my questions.

Thanks, Jay. Our next question comes from Greg Palm with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Just a quick follow-up or two. Laurie, in terms of the streamlining of the product and some of the benefits that you've seen, the structural benefits you've seen over the last 18 months, there are still additional levers that you can pull there or is the majority of that sort of complete at this point?

Yes, Greg. There is definitely still more to be done with that initiative.

Okay. So, fair enough to say that there is still even some room for margin improvements that's specific to the streamlining of product ahead?

Yes.

And then just on the builder developer in terms of that top 100 win that you disclosed last quarter, have there been any orders to date? Anything in backlog? And maybe just remind us in terms of the ramp-up period associated with that?

Yes. No, those orders will probably start to enter backlog. I would say probably in the new calendar year. So that builder is getting their subdivisions ready. I would anticipate there's nothing in backlog today. Those are pending orders that will flow in probably sometime early during the March quarter of next year.

Okay. Sounds good. All right. Thanks. I'll leave it there.

Thanks, Greg. This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mark Yost for any closing remarks. Please go ahead. Thank you, Maria. Thanks everyone for participating in today's call. We appreciate the time and your continued interest in Skyline Champion. We look forward to updating you on our progress on our next call. Thank you. Take care and stay safe.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.