Hello everyone and thank you for joining us and welcome to WSFS Financial Corporation First Quarter Earnings Call. After today's prepared remarks, we'll host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star one again. I'd now like to turn the call over to your host for today, Mr. David Berg, Chief Financial Officer. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you very much. Good afternoon, and thank you, everyone, for joining our first quarter 2026 earnings call. Our earnings release and earnings release supplement, which we will refer to on today's call, can be found in the investor relations section of our company website. With me on this call is Roger Levinson, Chairman, President, and CO. Prior to reviewing our financial results, I would like to read our safe harbor statement. Our discussion today will include information about our management's view of our future expectations, plans, and prospects that constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from historical results or those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K and our most recent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as well as other documents we periodically follow with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All comments made during today's call are subject to the Safe Harbor Statement. I will now turn to our financial results. WSFIS had a strong start to 2026, continuing to demonstrate the strength of our franchise and diverse business model. Our first quarter results included a core EPS of $1.68, core ROA of 1.65%, and core return on tangible common equity of 20.7%, which are all up versus the prior quarter and prior year. On a year-over-year basis, core net income increased 35% and core PPNR increased 10%, resulting in core EPS growth of 49% and tangible book value per share growth of 15%. These results include the previously disclosed loan recovery of $15.7 million, Excluding this recovery, core EPS was $1.45, which is up 28% year-over-year, and core ROA was 1.43%, which is up 14 basis points year-over-year. Core results for the first quarter exclude two items related to the sales of real estate properties as we continue to optimize our office footprint and bring more associates together in fewer locations. These items resulted in a $2.2 million negative impact to net income and four cent impact to eps net interest margin of 3.83 was flat link quarter while absorbing the interest rate cuts that occurred in the fourth quarter we continue to successfully reprice our deposits and this margin reflects a reduction of 12 basis points in total client deposit costs to 1.33 percent our interest bearing deposit beta was 46 percent for the quarter an increase relative to the prior quarter core fee revenue which represents nearly a third of total revenue grew 11 percent year over year this was driven by broad-based growth across our fee businesses and led by wealth and trust which grew 25 year over year within institutional services corporate trust which performs trustee and agency services for mortgage-backed and asset-backed securizations, and global capital markets, which performs trustee and agency services for distressed debt and bankruptcies, were each up over 40% year-over-year as we continue to win new mandates and capture market share. The Bryn Mawr Trust Company of Delaware, our personal trust business, also delivered very strong year-over-year growth growth of 27% driven by continued new account and client growth. In addition to Wealth & Trust, we also had other businesses that delivered strong double digit growth including capital markets within our commercial division and mortgage banking. Cash Connect fees declined quarter to quarter due to the impact of interest rate cuts and lower volumes, but the business delivered a strong profit margin of 15% more than doubling its profit margin year over year. Client deposits increased 5% link order, driven by growth in commercial and trust. While some deposits in both of these businesses are transactional and may be short-term, we continue to see solid momentum. On a year-over-year basis, our deposits are up over 9% driven by growth across trust, commercial, and private wealth management. Importantly, non-interest deposits grew 14% link order and now represent 34% of our total deposits, up from 29% in the first quarter of last year. Gross loans were up slightly link quarter. In commercial, strong momentum in C&I lending was partially offset by elevated payoffs in commercial mortgages. Annualized C&I growth was 7% link quarter, driven by robust fundings. We also saw strong momentum in small business banking, which had annualized growth of 11% link quarter. In consumer, despite seasonal trends, we continue to see solid originations in residential mortgage, which were up over 70% year over year. Residential mortgage and WSFIS originated consumer loans at annualized growth of 3% link quarter and are up 14% year over year. Turning to asset quality, we saw a meaningful improvement across delinquencies and problem assets. Delinquencies are down 32% year-over-year and problem assets are down 26% year-over-year. Non-performing assets which are down 25% year-over-year increased link quarter driven by two loans, a CNI loan and a multi-family loan, both of which are well secured. Net recoveries for the quarter were $3.5 million as the previously disclosed $15.7 million recovery more than offset the charge-offs. Excluding the impact of this recovery, net charge-offs were $12.2 million, which is a 19% decrease from the prior quarter. During the quarter, we continued to execute on our capital return framework and returned $94 million of capital, including $85 million in buybacks, which equates to 2.5% of our outstanding shares. Since the beginning of 2025, WSFIS has repurchased approximately 12% of our outstanding shares. In addition, the Board approved an 18% increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.20 per share, along with an additional share repurchase authorization of 15% of our outstanding shares as of quarter end. This brings our total authorization to 19% of outstanding shares, reflecting our intention to continue to execute on our capital return framework and maintain an elevated level of buybacks in line with the previously communicated targets and framework. As shown on slide 11 of the supplement, we updated our annual outlook for net charge-offs as a result of the recovery. Our new outlook is now 25 to 35 basis points for the year, down from the previous outlook of 35 to 45 basis points. As part of our typical process, we will provide an updated full-year outlook when we present our 2Q results in July. We're pleased with these results to start the year, and we remain committed to delivering high performance. We will now open the line for questions. We'll now begin the question

and answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and follow-up questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 to raise your hand. Withdraw your question, press star one again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you're muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Russell Gunther at Stevens. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon, guys. Good afternoon. I'd like to ask. Hey, Roger. Hey, David. i'd like to start on the deposit growth please and if we could touch on just the the overall sustainability um would love to get some incremental color in terms of the wealth and trust vertical maybe just parsing the drivers of growth here between you know the impact of market share gains versus the comment some of this is you know short-term and transactional in nature

yep sure russell um happy to address that thanks for the question uh so you know as you know as you saw our deposit growth was very strong this quarter. And as we noted in our remarks, we did have some elevated transactional deposits at the end of the quarter. And those were both in commercial and trust. Having said that, we do feel like we continue to have momentum across these businesses and continue to have momentum in our deposit growth. Certainly would not take this quarter and extrapolate it out in terms of the growth rate for the year we're very pleased with the results but but not something that we feel is sustainable even though we feel like we're we're strategically well positioned when you look at our you know for example when you look at the trust business and by the way two-thirds of the growth was really driven in trust you can think about it in one-third in commercial of those deposits and when you think about our trust business, it is a combination of both strong growth in the market, as well as our ability to take share and grow faster than the market. So we are benefiting from strong market growth there, but in addition, continue to take share on top of that. I would also add, Russell, that... Sure. Yeah, I would just add one comment. I think it's worth calling out that we are seeing more deposit competition for sure really across all the businesses. That's in commercial and consumer. And so that pressure is going to continue to be there. But again, we feel like we're well positioned competitively. Excellent. Thank you for that. And then my

second question would just be to kind of parse your original 2026 guide where you have three rate cuts embedded in there, the environment looking more like probably none. And so could you just maybe sensitize to that or walk us through some of the puts and takes? Obviously, a bit of an asset sensitive position on the margin, maybe cash connect overall profitability diminishes a bit. But what impact does removing those three cuts have on that ROA target of 140 plus or minus?

Yep. Yeah. So one is, as I mentioned, when we come out in July, as you know, the rates have been very volatile and the expectations have changed a lot. and, you know, we'll see what happens in the back half of the year. When we update our outlook, we will certainly provide kind of a more clear picture. Clearly, you know, the March cut didn't happen. And as you noted, we are asset sensitive, so that does provide a little bit of a tailwind for us. What we had said in the past, you know, what I had said is that generally kind of about two basis points per rate cut across the year was the cost to us of the rate cut. And so I would expect the same the other way. But I think it is important to note, and I'll come back to my question on competition, we are seeing more deposit competition really across the board, more pricing competition. And that's both in commercial and consumer across businesses. So I think that's definitely something that's in the market. We have a number of promotional products out there as we continue to try to grow clients and win market share. And so putting that all together, we do have a bit of a tailwind because of not having the cuts, but there are also other puts and takes there. And so putting that all together, I think the current rate where we're at is probably a good place to be. The other thing I would note is just, as always in the first quarter, just because of the technical nature of the seasonality, just the name is always

a bit higher. Okay, understood. Thank you guys for taking my questions. Thanks Russell.

The next question comes from Janet Lee at TD Cohen. Your line is open. Good afternoon.

Hi, good afternoon. So the commercial, the total loan growth was on a period and basis was muted, but it looks like the commentaries around CNI utilization and pipelines are pretty strong, and a lot of that growth seems to have been offset by some CRE payoffs and partnership consumer loans. So as we think about the loan growth in the coming quarters, how should we think about the cadence of partnership consumer loan runoffs? as well as the paydown impact? Should we see a pickup in loan growth?

Yeah, so I'll start off. So, yeah, exactly as you summarized it, I think we saw we're very happy and pleased with the fundings and the momentum that we have on the C&I side of the commercial business. And I'll touch on both commercial and consumer. we especially you know we if you look at it across the last two quarters we had annualized growth in CNI of seven percent this quarter last quarter we had annualized growth of 15 percent and when you look at the fundings across both of those quarters they've been really strong and up materially over where they were a year ago so we feel good about the CNI momentum And as you know, C&I is really our primary product with respect to commercial lending. That's what we want to lead with. That's the product that also delivers our deposit growth and the broader relationship as well as transactional activity. And so that is the product that we're very focused on. So when you look across the two quarters, we had good momentum. We had increased line utilization in both quarters, which is a good indication of client and the pipeline is pretty healthy we are contending with with a higher rate of payoffs in commercial real estate some of that has also helped our decline in problem assets some of them have lower yields and and so you know we were happy to see those run off but but it's it's something that we will have to contend with as we're dealing with we are dealing with a bit of an elevated maturity pipeline with respect to commercial real estate and And what I would add also with commercial real estate is we are, as we've said before, we are primarily a recourse lender. And so we're very selective in how we do commercial real estate and the type of clients that we do business with. And so we really focus on accretive growth and not just growth for growth's sake. So I think this is a pattern. The pattern that you're seeing this quarter is we were pleased with the momentum. You know, there's certainly pockets where we'd like to see a little bit more growth, but overall, you know, we feel good about the momentum. And, you know, for example, small business, which had an uneven year last year, also had a very solid quarter, 11% annualized growth. And so we feel good about that where we are.

Yeah, this is Roger, Jen. i would just add to i think over time on the consumer side you know we the spring portfolio will continue to roll off consistent with what you saw you know this quarter it may be impacted by rate cuts a little bit for so there's a little bit of refi risk in that but that's sort of i think a pretty good going rate of attrition there i think our goal is and some the progress that you've seen in our home lending business is to offset as much as possible of that growth and hopefully over time overcome that with our home lending products that you know that we have and then the commercial business will you know operate exactly you know as David as David has said we're obviously taking a very hard look at those maturing loans along the criteria that David outlined, much of that is acquired loans, and we want to make sure that to the extent we're going to extend those loans or refinance those loans, they fit our overall criteria from an asset quality and return standpoint. So that's just a little bit of kind of longer picture of what you should see. C&I should be the primary driver, and then hopefully the growth of the home lending to offset the continued runoff of spring.

Got it. That's very helpful. And not to put words in your mouth, but if I were to interpret your prior commentary on net interest margin earlier, with no rate cuts, your earning asset yields would obviously benefit more, but you're expecting deposit costs to go up versus the 133 level in the first quarter. So that mitigates, that results in flattish NIM from here. Is that the right way to

think about it? Yeah, Janet, I wouldn't say necessarily go up. The way I would think about it is, as you know, with the rate cuts, we would have repricing in our loans and so our yields have been coming down, which we've been offsetting with our deposit decreases. So in the absence of the rate cuts, we would see the stabilization in the loan yields. So on the deposit pricing side, we've had good repricing, but what I was suggesting with my earlier comments is we have seen more price competition come into the market. And when you look at our deposit prices, whether that's the CD that we have, for example, a flagship CD is a 3%, our money market product is also at 3%, we're definitely far away from the high point in the market. And we've seen many competitors who did not move in the last rate cut and some competitors that have held or increased their pricing in some of these products. So I think there's definitely more deposit competition in the market. We still have a little bit of a repricing tailwind from some of the maturing CDs that we have. But because our CDs have been shorter end, shorter term, a lot of that repricing is already behind us. And so that's why, you know, really, you know, I said kind of the NIM environment, they're puts and takes, but the NIM environment, our NIM should be more or less stable. Other than that, some of that first quarter seasonality with day count. Got it. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Christopher Maranac at Brian Capital LLC. Your line is open.

Thanks. Good afternoon. I wanted to ask about the capital plans and curious if the regulatory changes that may be happening this year kind of would cause you to revisit that again as you continue to execute the authorization quarter to quarter.

Yeah, Chris, with respect to the buybacks, I guess I'll take you back to our framework that we laid out when we launched really the, when we updated our buyback framework at the beginning of last year. And we said that we will be on a multi-year glide path, returning capital towards a 12% CET1 target. And we said that we would approximately return about 100% of our net income, plus or minus. Some quarters a little bit more, some quarters a little bit less. And that's generally, when you look at the last five quarters, that's really generally where we've been. When we think about capital return in general, it's obviously our number one priority is to invest in the business. And we want to continue to grow the business. We feel good about our growth prospects, and we continue to invest in our businesses. And when we think about capital return, we look at a couple of different considerations there. One is the regulatory ratios, and the other ones are also rating agency ratios. So for example, we look at, in addition to CET1, we also look at TCE. We look at our AOCI volatility and rate volatility. And so we want to manage all of those factors to ensure that we have the right the right view on an excess capital in our glide path and so that's why you know those are really the drivers behind why we tend to stick around a hundred percent because of those factors you know we saw more interest rate volatility in the last quarter and you saw a little bit of pressure on our TCE and that's you know that's an example of the kind of things that we're we're carefully monitoring with respect to the capital changes we've Obviously, this is in common period, and so we'll see how the final rules shake out, but we feel like it will have some incremental capital to us on the regulatory side because of the risk weightings and changes to assets. Based on our preliminary modeling, maybe a 4% to 5% benefit to capital. But again, that's on the risk-weighted side, And, you know, we look at multiple capital ratios and multiple indicators, including our total capital to assets and those type of metrics. So we're going to weigh all of that, but that could potentially, you know, provide a little bit more capacity.

Great, Dave. That's very helpful. Thanks for walking me through all that. And I guess kind of a related question, I mean, as you sort of have the ability to be picky about the new loans that you do, have kind of your internal thresholds for return gone up over the past several quarters in terms of what would be acceptable versus not acceptable for a new credit?

I would say, Chris, no necessarily changes in our thresholds. You know, we do look at, I think what's really important to us is looking at the relationship pricing altogether rather than thinking about loans on a transactional level. And so we put all of that into the mix. The deposits are obviously a big part of that. Other fee activity are a big part of that. And we're certainly not the low price point in the market. And so we think about credit. We think about relationship pricing. And those are the

things that drive our hurdle. Great. Thanks again, Dave. And thank you for taking our questions

today. Thanks, Chris. Your next question comes from Manuel Navas at Piper Sandler.

Your line is open. Hey, good afternoon. On the corporate trust side and the global capital market side, those 40% great revenue quarters up year over year, is there some better way to track that? How should we think about that going forward? You said this is a great quarter. not all of them can be this great, but how should we think about those businesses over the course

of the whole year? Yeah, good afternoon, Manuel. So yeah, those two businesses are essentially what comprises our institutional services business. As you know, the corporate trust business really focuses on ABS and MBS securitizations. The capital markets business focuses on distressed debt and bankruptcies. And we saw good momentum across both businesses. We've been, there've been a couple of drivers behind that. You know, when you look at, we've been investing in headcount and technology, you know, across the businesses. And those businesses are very important, you know, referrals and relationships are very important those businesses and and we have developed over time uh unique product expertise across those businesses we have the ability to be innovative we can respond faster to clients uh and as we continue to do more work in those businesses you know our our reputation um has really spread and we continue to win other and new mandates um and so that's been you know that's been a great uh a great trend. In addition, the strength of our balance sheet and our credit ratings, and as you know, we have three strong investment grade ratings. Those are also very important support factors for our ability to do these deals, because clearly this is about our ability to be there for the long term, to be there as a trustee and a custodian of these assets. And the last point I would make is there have been strong market growth, particularly when you look at the asset-backed and mortgage-backed security market, the market growth there has been about 20% per year. And so we have been able to ride that market. We've been able to actually win share and grow in excess of that growth rate, as you can see from the numbers, but what we've benefited from that market growth. So certainly, we don't expect that market growth to continue at that rate. It may slow down to a more normalized growth rate, but we feel good about our ability

to continue to win share. Okay. I appreciate that. In terms of the loan growth potential, can you speak to customer sentiment beyond what's captured in the better pipeline that are up 35% and line utilization is up, but just kind of how are your footprint thinking about what's going on in the environment or is it seems like it's business as usual?

Hey, Manuel, it's Roger. So you can imagine been spending a fair bit of time out and about with our clients and prospects. And I would say generally that it's business as usual. I think, you know, this all this volatility, including what's going on right now, you know, overseas, I think it's kind of set in that there's going to be some volatility and that businesses are kind of moving on and they're investing and they're seeing opportunities to grow. as a general statement. I would say at the beginning of the year, some of our local businesses had some exposure to the weather. We had a pretty rough period of time there in the early part of the year, but businesses have kind of moved past that. And I'd say generally, optimisms at a pretty, you know, a pretty reasonable level at this point. And I think you see that in not only the fundings, but some of the comments on our pipeline and other things. So we feel, you know, good about that, supporting the overall C&I growth, you know, going forward.

I appreciate that commentary. Is there any opportunity to add talent, any talent that you feel like you need to add to keep that lending trajectory going?

So we're always interested, as David said, in investing in the business and in the commercial business. In particular, that's all about adding talent. I think the bar for us, though, is very high. So we're looking at people who can move books of business, have deep relationships in the market and are culturally consistent with us across the commercial, you know, platform. just as a reminder, an example of that last year in the sort of right between the third and the fourth quarter, we hired the M&T market president for the greater Philly region, greater Philly and Delaware region, somebody we've known for a long period of time to join us. And, you know, that was a significant pickup for us. And I think that's indicative of the fact that very well-known individual, proven person in the marketplace could have gone wherever pretty much I think he wanted to go, and he chose WSFIS. And so I think that shows that we're kind of the, you know, the provider of choice for people who are at larger institutions who want to be part of something that has a balance sheet big enough to support, you know, larger customers with the product offering that at a bigger bank, but in a much more nimble service driven way. So I would expect that we will see more talent like that coming to us, you know, over time as it has

for, you know, as long as I can remember. Well, that's a great move. Well, thank you. Thank you

for the comments. Thank you. Analysts are more than welcome to rejoin the queue if they have any new questions uh next up we have charlie driscoll from kbw your line is now open hi guys

thanks for the question just this is charlie on for circling back on the you know the capital priority question with you know the possible regulatory relief um boosting capital and still meaningfully above your medium term c21 targets um and understanding you're already pretty aggressive on the buyback and with the premium valuation giving you optionality just wondering your updated thoughts on m a here if you're looking for you know more a more traditional

bank or something less traditional just anything there thank you so no update charlie uh on uh on that topic clearly we as we've talked about we'd love to find opportunities particularly in our fee businesses for investment, whether they're one-off talent or small acquisitions or potentially even something larger. I think our profile is growing in that space significantly, particularly the wealth and trust area. So we'll continue to look for those opportunities. In terms of whole bank, we think we have a great opportunity to execute on our strategic plan with the footprint that we have today focusing on this greater Philadelphia and Delaware region and a lot of headroom to grow and a very distracted large bank competitive set that being said if something came along that we think would be additive to that we would certainly consider it but the bar would be you know I think very high because we do think there's so much you know opportunity right in front of us but we always keep our eyes open for those kinds of situations but would also just reiterate we feel we can execute on our strategic plan by focus in the banking business by focusing on the organic growth opportunity right in front of us to take market share great thank you and then just on

credit broadly you you booked a big recovery in the quarter maybe any inside baseball you can give on that specific credit and any broader kind of commentary on, you know, what you're seeing in your portfolios or any areas you're more concerned about or looking at more carefully?

Yeah, Charlie, I would say, you know, on that specific credit, you know, generally we take a conservative posture with the way we look at our assets. This was, you know, as a reminder, this was a loan that was an acquired loan, not a loan that we originated and was kind of unique to our portfolio, but it was a loan to a fund that was invested in office real estate. We didn't have direct collateral. We didn't have direct recourse to the collateral. And so we saw no value in that and we took a full write-off. But there's a lot of liquidity in the market. And one indication of that liquidity was that the sponsor in this case was able to get a full refinancing of that loan, and we were able to get a full recovery. So I think that's an indication of kind of the liquidity that we see in the market for some of these assets. In terms of our overall portfolio, I think we feel good. As kind of outlined in our comments, there are always potentially uneven deals in commercial But generally, when you look at the trend over the last five quarters, we've been trending down pretty much in all of our indicators, and that makes us feel good about our portfolio. We gave you some disclosure around our NDFI portfolio, which is very small, about 3% of our assets, also very granular and distributed. We see no credit issues in that portfolio. There are almost no problem assets, no MPAs, charges or delinquencies there. And so we feel good about our portfolio overall. Again, there's always one or two credits that could be specific problems, but nothing systemic that we're seeing overall and something we continue to monitor closely.

Thanks for the call. I'll step back.

Thank you. And with no further questions in the queue, I would like to turn the conference back to David Berg.

Okay. Great. Well, thank you very much, everyone, for joining the call today. If you have any specific follow-up questions, please reach out to Andrew at Investor Relations or me. Have a great day.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.