AMH DEF 14A
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH)
DEF 14A
2026-03-27
For: 2026-05-14
View Original
Added on
June 12, 2026
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.)
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
o | Definitive Additional Materials |
o | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
x | No fee required. |
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
o | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
A Message from Our Chairperson
Fellow shareholders:
2025 was another strong year for your company. Our occupancy
for the full year was in the high 90s, our core FFO per share
grew 5.4% for the full year, and our resident satisfaction
numbers have never been higher. Our experienced senior
management team performed exceptionally well in a demanding
environment and remains focused on executing our long-term
strategy in 2026 and beyond.
Our portfolio.
We own and manage just over 61,000 homes in the United
States in more than 30 diverse markets. We started building
homes for our own account in 2017. We are one of the only
companies in our industry with in-house capabilities to buy, build,
and manage the homes that we own.
Along the way, we have sold a considerable number of homes
that we had purchased earlier and reinvested those proceeds
into our development program. This has benefited our portfolio
by reducing its average age and making the homes we own
easier to manage and maintain.
Our residents are primarily growing families who value the
stability and quality of professionally managed homes. Our
average resident tenure is over 3 years, and we consistently
achieve the highest resident satisfaction scores amongst our
competitors in virtually every market we are in. That says a lot
about the strength of our platform and the care of our team
members.
The outlook.
The fundamentals for our business remain strong.
Nationally, there is broad consensus that demand for quality
housing significantly exceeds the supply, and many people find
that professionally managed rentals meet their needs
exceptionally well. The professional single-family rental (SFR)
business is still relatively young, so as more and more prospects
and families become aware of the benefits, the market should
continue to expand over time.
Locally, new supply came online in certain areas of our markets
during 2025, which moderated rental rate growth. We believe
pricing dynamics should normalize as this supply is absorbed.
While professional SFR providers represent a small segment of
the overall housing market, we are proud of our work and
impact. The U.S. needs more homes of every kind, owned and
rented, and AMH is actively building new homes to help alleviate
the national shortage.
In 2026, AMH remains focused on supporting renters by adding
new supply and different options to satisfy their need for quality
housing, while protecting the interests of our shareholders who
make that work possible.
The stock.
It is always prudent to approach discussions of stock price with
caution, because market dynamics are inherently unpredictable.
While technology and artificial intelligence investments currently
dominate investor attention, we offer something compelling, too:
an advantaged yield from an asset class that has shown
attractive long-term appreciation over time. Our disciplined
approach to capital allocation has delivered strong results.
Our business is profitable and generates significant cash flow
from the rents that we collect. We also generate significant
amounts of cash from selective home sales during the year. We
use those proceeds to cover the expenses of running the
business, to service our loans, and to develop or acquire new
homes and communities for rent. During 2025, we sold 1,827
homes for net proceeds of over $570 million. We always want to
maintain a strong investment grade rating, so we are disciplined
with our spending.
We are committed to our new home development activity and
can adjust the pace of growth based on economic and capital
market conditions. Recently, we moderated growth to free up
capital to repurchase our shares. We acquired 8.4 million shares
at an average price of $31.65 per share during the fourth quarter
of 2025 and first quarter of 2026 for a total cost of $265 million.
This is a great complement to the long-term value that our
development program creates.
As stewards of your investment in AMH, we continue to focus on
the fundamentals that create long-term value by growing the
company and showing consistent growth in core FFO per share.
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on May 14,
2026, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific time, virtually or by proxy. You can
vote your shares electronically and submit questions by visiting
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMH2026. Your vote is
important. The enclosed proxy card provides details on how to
vote your shares online, by telephone, or by mail.
Thank you for your support of AMH.
Sincerely,
Matthew J. Hart
Chairperson of the Board
March 27, 2026
A Message from Our Chief
Executive Officer
Fellow shareholders:
Housing remains one of the most important and complex sectors
in the U.S. economy today. Nationally, demand for quality
housing continues to exceed supply, making affordability a
central challenge for families. Addressing this imbalance
requires sustained investment, and AMH is committed to being
part of that solution. Our strategy has always been centered on
meeting the country’s growing need for more and better housing
options.
Who we're here for.
Since 1965, roughly one-third of U.S. households have been
renters. That hasn't changed in six decades, because renting is
a genuine choice and, for millions of families, an essential one.
Our residents include first responders, teachers, and healthcare
workers who should be able to live in the communities they
serve.
For many of them, renting a home isn't a fallback. It's the right
option for where they are in life. Today, renting is more affordable
than owning a home in all 100 of the largest U.S. metro areas. In
fact, more than 40% of single-family renters report they would
not qualify for a mortgage or be able to afford the monthly
payment at current mortgage rates. Rental housing isn't keeping
people from homeownership. In many cases, it's what makes
stability possible while they work toward it.
And for those who are ready to buy, we provide an important
steppingstone to help them get there. Our internal surveys show
that purchasing a home is the number one reason residents
move out of our portfolio. In 2025, we estimate that over 5,000
households, or approximately 30% of all move-outs, left AMH to
purchase a house. We think that's something to be proud of.
How we contribute value.
In our early years, we renovated existing homes and helped
stabilize neighborhoods as the U.S. economy recovered from
the global financial crisis. When housing starts slowed and
shortages deepened, we made a strategic decision in 2017 to
launch our ground-up development program. Since then, we’ve
added over 14,000 newly built homes across the country.
While professional housing providers like AMH own less than
0.5% of all single-family houses in the U.S., our impact is a net
positive one. Contributing new supply and greater choice leads
to healthier, more balanced housing markets. We see this in
states with some of the highest concentration of institutional
activity, like Arizona, Florida, Georgia, and Texas, where
individual ownership rates have increased.
Our purpose today is simple and enduring: to build and manage
high-quality homes, provide excellent service that makes people
feel at home, and offer residents another way to access
attractive neighborhoods.
Where we're going.
As we enter 2026, we do so with equal parts momentum and
restraint, and a clear sight line to what matters most: expanding
housing choice. Our operating system and development platform
remain central to this goal. But equally important is the culture
behind our performance.
AMH was built intentionally, with a commitment to excellence,
accountability, and long-term stewardship. Every day, our teams
earn trust through how we operate and serve residents and
communities. That culture remains a defining strength of our
company.
While the market and broader economic forces will continue to
evolve, our approach remains consistent: focus on the
fundamentals and lead responsibly. This steady foundation
positions AMH to continue creating long-term value for the
people who rely on us. With the platform we’ve built and the
team behind it, we are confident in the path ahead.
Thank you for your continued support.
Bryan Smith
Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2026
2026 Proxy Statement
Notice of the 2026 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders
Date and Time Thursday, May 14, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time | Virtual Location Visit: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMH2026 | |||
Items of Business
1 | To elect as trustees the ten nominees named in the attached proxy statement to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; |
2 | To ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026; |
3 | To hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve our named executive officer compensation; and |
4 | To consider and act upon any other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Recommendations of the Board
The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the trustee nominees named in the attached proxy
statement, “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP and “FOR” approval, on an advisory basis, of our named
executive officer compensation. Detailed information concerning these proposals is included in the accompanying proxy statement.
Proxy Materials
The notice of meeting, proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available free of charge at: https://investors.amh.com/
financials/annual-reports. The proxy statement and accompanying proxy card are being sent or made available to you on or about
March 27, 2026.
Record Date
You are entitled to vote at the meeting if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 20, 2026 of our Class A or
Class B common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share.
Voting
Your vote is very important. To ensure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting, please vote over the Internet, by
telephone or by mail as instructed on the proxy card or voting instruction form you receive. You may revoke a proxy at any time prior to
its exercise at the meeting by following the instructions in the accompanying proxy statement.
By Order of the Board of Trustees,
Sara Vogt-Lowell
Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Legal Officer
March 27, 2026
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting on May 14, 2026: This Proxy Statement and
our 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on the company’s website www.amh.com under “Investor Relations.”
2026 Proxy Statement
Table of Contents
2026 Proxy Statement | 1
2025 Business Highlights
In 2025, we remained focused on delivering long-term value by expanding our portfolio of
high-quality homes.
2,322 | new homes built through AMH development program |
222nd | new community opened |
37th | top U.S. homebuilder in 2025 by Builder100 |
61,479 | homes in our portfolio in 24 states |
96.0% | same-home average occupancy achieved |
And we maintained strong financial results year over year, through which we delivered
value to you, our investors, as well.
Increased same-home average monthly realized rent by | Increased total revenues YOY by | ||
3.7% | 7.0% | ||
Achieved Core FFO* per share growth YOY by | Grew Core NOI* for total portfolio YOY by | ||
5.4% | 7.9% | ||
Attractively recycled capital through our asset management and disposition program | Increased quarterly distribution YOY by | ||
$573M | 15% |
6.7% Compounded Annual Growth
* See pages 9, 13, 14, 27 to 28 and 31 to 33 of Exhibit 99.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 19, 2026 and pages 13 and
31 to 33 of Exhibit 99.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2024 for information regarding Core FFO and Core NOI,
which are non-GAAP performance measures.
2 | AMH
Annual Meeting Information
This proxy statement contains important information regarding the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”).
Specifically, it identifies the proposals on which you are being asked to vote, provides information that you may find useful in
determining how to vote, and describes voting procedures. This proxy statement is being sent or made available to you on or about
March 27, 2026.
Proxy Materials
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available free of charge at:
https://investors.amh.com/financials/annual-reports.
Meeting Information
Date and Time
Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time.
Virtual Location
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMH2026
To be admitted, you must enter the control number found on your proxy card or voting instruction form.
Record Date
You are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 20, 2026 (the
“Record Date”) of our Class A or Class B common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per share.
Voting
Your vote is very important. To ensure your representation at the meeting, please vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail as
instructed on the proxy card or voting instruction form you receive. You may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the
Annual Meeting by following the instructions in the accompanying proxy statement.
How to Cast Your Vote
Virtually
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMH2026
You may vote your shares virtually at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, we recommend that
you submit the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction form or vote via the Internet or by telephone by the applicable deadline
so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.
Internet
www.proxyvote.com
You may vote your shares through the Internet by signing on to the website identified on the proxy card or voting instruction form and
following the procedures described on the website. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day
before the Annual Meeting. If you vote through the Internet, you should not return any proxy card.
Mail
Return your proxy in the postage-paid envelope provided.
If you choose to vote by mail, simply complete the accompanying proxy card or voting instruction form, date and sign it, and return it in
the pre-addressed postage-paid envelope provided.
Telephone
1-800-690-6903
You may vote your shares by telephone by following the voting instructions on the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form,
respectively. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Annual Meeting.
2026 Proxy Statement | 3
As summarized below, there are distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially: | (i) vote your shares by delivering the enclosed voting instruction form in the pre-addressed postage-paid envelope provided or (ii) contact the person responsible for your account to ensure that a voting instruction form is submitted on your behalf. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone or by mail as indicated on your voting instruction form. It is critical that you promptly give instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. You may vote your shares at the virtual meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from your brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. | |
•Shareholder of Record—If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As the shareholder of record, you can submit your voting instructions by Internet, telephone or mail as described on the enclosed proxy card. | ||
•Beneficial Owner—If your shares are held through a broker or bank in “street name” as of the close of business on the Record Date, you can either: |
Unanimous Recommendations of the Board
1 | Election of the Ten Trustee Nominees Named in this Proxy Statement | BOARD RECOMMENDATION | FOR |
2 | Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2026 | BOARD RECOMMENDATION | FOR |
3 | Advisory Vote to Approve our Named Executive Officer Compensation | BOARD RECOMMENDATION | FOR |
These proposals are discussed in more detail in this proxy statement and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. We will also consider any other matters properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. |
4 | AMH
Virtual Meeting Matters
The Annual Meeting will be held in virtual-only format. You will be
able to attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting, vote
your shares electronically and submit your questions during the
meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/
AMH2026.
The Annual Meeting will begin with a pre-recorded presentation,
followed by a live webcast of the formal business of the Annual
Meeting and a Q&A session.
Accessing the Meeting
To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you must enter the control
number found on your proxy card or voting instruction form. If
your common shares are held through a broker or bank in “street
name” as of the close of business on the Record Date, you may
vote your shares at the virtual meeting only if you obtain a legal
proxy from your brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee.
Casting Your Vote
You may vote your shares virtually at the Annual Meeting. To
vote at the virtual Annual Meeting, you must re-enter the control
number found on your proxy card or voting instruction form.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, we
recommend that you submit the accompanying proxy card or
voting instruction form or vote via the Internet or by telephone by
the applicable deadline so that your vote will be counted if you
later decide not to attend the virtual Annual Meeting.
Live, Online Q&A
As part of the Annual Meeting, we will hold a live, online Q&A
session, where shareholders of our Class A or Class B common
shares at the close of business on the Record Date will be
allowed to ask questions. You may submit questions in real time
during the Annual Meeting. We intend to answer all questions
submitted before or during the Annual Meeting which are
pertinent to the company and the Annual Meeting matters, as
time permits. Consistent with our prior virtual and in-person
annual meetings, all questions submitted will be generally
addressed in the order received, and we limit each shareholder
to one question in order to allow us to answer questions from as
many shareholders as possible.
If there are matters raised of individual concern to a shareholder,
or if a question posed was not otherwise answered, we provide
an opportunity for shareholders to contact us separately after the
Annual Meeting through the company’s website, www.amh.com
under “Investor Relations.”
Technical Assistance
If you encounter any difficulties accessing or participating in the
virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number
that will be posted on the Annual Meeting Website log-in page.
2026 Proxy Statement | 5
6 | AMH | AMH 2025 Prox2025 Pro
Board
Recommendation
Our Board unanimously
recommends that you
vote "FOR" all ten nominees
for trustee for
a one-year term.
2026 Proxy Statement | 7
Who We Are
Our Board currently consists of eleven members. Ten of the
current trustees are considered “independent” and all members
of our Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, and Human Capital and Compensation Committee
are independent. Our Chairperson of the Board, Matthew Hart, is
an independent trustee. Pursuant to our Trustee Retirement
Policy, which provides that no trustee will be nominated for
election to the Board unless he or she will be 75 or younger on
the first day of the new Board term, David Goldberg will retire
from our Board as of the Annual Meeting.
Our Board believes its members collectively have the
experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills to continue to
effectively oversee the management of the company, including a
high degree of personal and professional integrity, an ability to
exercise sound business judgment on a broad range of issues,
sufficient experience and background to appreciate the issues
facing the company, a willingness to devote the necessary time
to Board duties, a commitment to representing the best interest
of the company and a dedication to enhancing shareholder
value. The Board regularly monitors and evaluates its
composition to ensure that it continues to support the success of
our long-term strategy.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of
the ten nominees proposed by the Board.
Nominee | Age | Principal Occupation | Trustee Since | Current Committees | ||||
Matthew Hart * | 74 | Chairperson of the Board, AMH Retired President and Chief Operating Officer, Hilton Hotels Corporation | 2012 | |||||
Bryan Smith | 52 | Chief Executive Officer, AMH | 2025 | |||||
Douglas Benham * | 69 | President and Chief Executive Officer, DNB Advisors, LLC | 2016 | •Human Capital and Compensation (Chair) •Nominating and Corporate Governance | ||||
Jack Corrigan * | 65 | Retired Chief Investment Officer, AMH | 2012 | |||||
Tamara Gustavson * | 64 | Real Estate Investor Philanthropist | 2016 | |||||
Michelle Kerrick * | 63 | Former West Region Market Leader and Managing Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP | 2020 | • Audit (Chair) | ||||
Lynn Swann * | 74 | Director for Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 2020 | • Audit • Nominating and Corporate Governance | ||||
Winifred Webb * | 68 | Founder, Kestrel Advisors Former Senior Executive, Ticketmaster and The Walt Disney Company | 2019 | •Human Capital and Compensation •Nominating and Corporate Governance | ||||
Jay Willoughby * | 67 | Chief Investment Officer, TIFF Investment Management | 2019 | •Audit •Human Capital and Compensation | ||||
Matthew Zaist * | 51 | President and Chief Executive Officer, Risewell Homes | 2020 | •Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) •Human Capital and Compensation |
*Denotes “independent” member of the Board.
8 | AMH | AMH 2025 Prox2025 Pro
Biographical Information About Our Trustee Nominees
Set forth below is biographical information for each of the trustee nominees, including a list of the specific qualifications that were
considered for membership on our Board. Each nominee has consented to be named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.
Please see the "Executive Officers" section below for the biographical information of Bryan Smith.
Matthew Hart Age: 74 Trustee since: 2012 (Chairperson since 2023) Independent | Chairperson of the Board, AMH Retired President and Chief Operating Officer, Hilton Hotels Corporation | |||
Mr. Hart brings to our Board deep management, operational, executive compensation, corporate governance, and real estate industry experience from his executive roles at a number of publicly traded real estate and consumer companies. His experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify him to serve as Chairperson of the Board. | ||||
Background •Hilton Hotels Corporation, President and Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (1996-2007) •Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS), Senior Vice President and Treasurer •Host Marriott Corp., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer •Marriott Corporation, Senior Vice President and Treasurer •Bankers Trust Company, Vice President, Corporate Lending Public Directorships •American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL) (since 2013) •Air Lease Corp. (NYSE: AL) (since 2010) | Education •B.A., Vanderbilt University •M.B.A., Columbia University Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •REIT •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Human Capital Management •Corporate Governance •Risk Assessment & Management •Investor Relations •Public Company Board •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Audit Committee •Cybersecurity •Capital Markets | |||
2026 Proxy Statement | 9
Douglas Benham Age: 69 Trustee since: 2016 Independent Committees •Human Capital and Compensation (Chair) •Nominating and Corporate Governance | President and Chief Executive Officer, DNB Advisors, LLC | |||
Mr. Benham has extensive management, corporate governance, executive and employee compensation, and consumer products experience as a leader of restaurant businesses. His experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify him to serve as chair of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee, as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •DNB Advisors, LLC, President and Chief Executive Officer (since 2006) •Bob Evans Farms, LLC, Executive Chair of the Board •Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc., President and Chief Executive Officer •RTM Restaurant Group, Inc., Chief Financial Officer | Education •B.A., University of West Florida Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •REIT •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Human Capital Management •Corporate Governance •Sustainability •Risk Assessment & Management •Investor Relations •Public Company Board •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Audit Committee •Capital Markets •Philanthropic Activities | |||
Jack Corrigan Age: 65 Trustee since: 2012 Independent | Retired Chief Investment Officer, AMH | |||
Mr. Corrigan has deep expertise in the residential and commercial real estate sectors, managing large-scale property portfolios, and he was the architect of our AMH Development homebuilding arm. His experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify him to serve as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •AMH, Chief Investment Officer (2012-2022), Chief Operating Officer (2012-2019) •American Homes 4 Rent Advisor, LLC (our former manager), Chief Operating Officer •A&H Property and Investments, Chief Executive Officer •PS Business Parks Inc. (formerly NYSE: PSB), Chief Financial Officer •LaRue, Corrigan & McCormick, Partner •Storage Equities, Inc., Controller •Arthur Young & Company | Education •B.S., Loyola Marymount University Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •REIT •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Risk Assessment & Management •Investor Relations •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Capital Markets •Human Capital Management •Consumer Experience | |||
10 | AMH
Tamara Gustavson Age: 64 Trustee since: 2016 Independent | Real Estate Investor Philanthropist | |||
Ms. Gustavson brings to our Board expertise in management, public relations, corporate governance, and industry experience from her leadership roles at publicly traded real estate companies as both an executive and board member. Her experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify her to serve as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •American Commercial Equities, Member (since 2005) •Public Storage (NYSE: PSA), Senior Vice President- Administration Public Directorships •Public Storage (NYSE: PSA) (since 2008) | Education •B.S., University of Southern California Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •REIT •Human Capital Management •Corporate Governance •Public Company Board •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Philanthropic Activities | |||
Michelle Kerrick Age: 63 Trustee since: 2020 Independent Committees •Audit (Chair) | Former West Region Market Leader and Managing Partner Deloitte & Touche LLP | |||
Ms. Kerrick has deep expertise in finance and accounting, risk management, and corporate governance developed over a 35-year career with a leading public accounting firm. She also brings corporate governance expertise from her service at two other publicly traded companies. Ms. Kerrick qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under SEC rules. Her experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify her to serve as chair of our Audit Committee and as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •Deloitte & Touche LLP, West Region Market Leader (2019 and 2020), Managing Partner – Los Angeles (2010-2020), other positions (1985-2010) Public Directorships •The Beauty Health Company (NASDAQ: SKIN) (since 2021) •LDH Growth Corp I (NASDAQ: LDHA) (2021-2023) | Education •B.S., Northern Arizona University Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •REIT •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Human Capital Management •Corporate Governance •Risk Assessment & Management •Technology •Public Company Board •Audit Committee | |||
2026 Proxy Statement | 11
Lynn Swann Age: 74 Trustee since: 2020 Independent Committees •Audit •Nominating and Corporate Governance | Director for Apollo Global Management, Inc. | |||
Mr. Swann is an experienced public company director of a leading asset manager and previously of a water technology company, which allow him to contribute valuable perspectives on corporate governance, risk management, technology, and sustainability matters. His experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify him to serve as a member of our Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •Swann, Inc., President (since 1976) Public Directorships •Apollo Global Management, Inc. (NYSE: APO) (since 2022) •Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL) (2023-2024) •Evoqua Water Technologies (formerly NYSE: AQUA) (2018-2023) | Education •B.A., University of Southern California Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Finance •Human Capital Management •Corporate Governance •Sustainability •Public Company Board •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Audit Committee •Government Affairs/Regulatory •Philanthropic Activities | |||
Winifred Webb Age: 68 Trustee since: 2019 Independent Committees •Human Capital and Compensation •Nominating and Corporate Governance | Founder, Kestrel Advisors Former Senior Executive, Ticketmaster and The Walt Disney Company | |||
Ms. Webb brings more than three decades of experience as a seasoned executive of several of the largest entertainment companies worldwide and a director of public companies with significant real estate interests. Her executive leadership and board experience encompasses expertise in human capital management, corporate governance, sustainability, and investor relations. Her experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify her to serve as a member of our Human Capital and Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •Kestrel Advisors, Founder (since 2013) •Tennenbaum Capital Partners, Managing Director •Ticketmaster Entertainment, Corporate Senior Vice President, Chief Communications & Investor Relations Officer •The Walt Disney Company, Corporate Senior Vice President of Investor Relations & Shareholder Services, Executive Director for The Walt Disney Company Foundation Public Directorships •AppFolio (NASDAQ: APPF) (since 2019) •Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ: WYNN) (since 2018) •ABM Industries (NYSE: ABM) (since 2014) | Education •B.A., Smith College (with honors) •M.B.A., Harvard University Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Corporate Governance •Sustainability •Risk Assessment & Management •Investor Relations •Technology •Public Company Board •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Audit Committee •Capital Markets •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Cybersecurity •Philanthropic Activities | |||
12 | AMH
Jay Willoughby Age: 67 Trustee since: 2019 Independent Committees •Audit •Human Capital and Compensation | Chief Investment Officer, TIFF Investment Management | |||
Mr. Willoughby is an accomplished investment manager and brings deep executive, finance, risk management, capital allocation, and sustainability experience to our Board. His experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify him to serve as a member of our Audit and Human Capital and Compensation Committees and as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •TIFF Investment Management, Chief Investment Officer (since 2015) •The Alaska Permanent Fund, Chief Investment Officer •Ironbound Capital Management, Co-Managing Partner •MLIM Equity Funds, Chief Investment Officer, Head of Research •Merrill Lynch Real Estate Fund, Senior Portfolio Manager | Education •B.A., Pomona College •M.B.A., Columbia University Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •REIT •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Corporate Governance •Sustainability •Risk Assessment & Management •Investor Relations •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Audit Committee •Financial Literacy •Capital Markets | |||
Matthew Zaist Age: 51 Trustee since: 2020 Independent Committees •Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) •Human Capital and Compensation | President and Chief Executive Officer, Risewell Homes | |||
Mr. Zaist is a seasoned chief executive of home builders with hands-on expertise in a critical part of our business. His responsibilities at the companies he has led have included oversight of financial statements, risk management, and executive compensation matters. His experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills qualify him to serve as chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a member of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee, and as a member of our Board. | ||||
Background •Risewell Homes (formerly The New Home Company), President and Chief Executive Officer (since 2021) •William Lyon Homes (formerly NYSE: WLH), President and Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer Public Directorships •William Lyon Homes (formerly NYSE: WLH) (2016-2020) | Education •B.S., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Qualification Highlights: •Executive Leadership •Real Estate Experience •Treasury/Capital Allocation •Human Capital Management •Corporate Governance •Risk Assessment & Management •Investor Relations •Capital Markets •Finance/Accounting/Auditing •Public Company Board •Public Company Senior Management Experience •Audit Committee •Sustainability •Technology | |||
2026 Proxy Statement | 13
Governance Framework
How We Are Selected, Elected, Evaluated and Refreshed
We believe that our trustees should satisfy a number of
qualifications, including demonstrated integrity, a record of
personal accomplishments, a commitment to participation in
Board activities, and other attributes. We also endeavor to have
a board that represents a range of qualifications, skills, and
depth of experience in areas that are relevant to and contribute
to the Board’s oversight of the company’s business.
The table below summarizes the key experience, qualifications,
and attributes for each trustee nominee and highlights the
balanced mix of experience, qualifications, and attributes of the
Board as a whole. This high-level summary is not intended to be
an exhaustive list of each trustee nominee’s skills or
contributions to the Board. No individual experience,
qualification, or attribute is solely dispositive of becoming a
member of the Board.
Matthew Hart | Bryan Smith | Douglas Benham | Jack Corrigan | Tamara Gustavson | Michelle Kerrick | Lynn Swann | Winifred Webb | Jay Willoughby | Matthew Zaist | Total | |
Real Estate | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | |
REITs | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 7 | |||
Corporate Governance | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | |
Investor Relations | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 7 | |||
Finance | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | |
Mergers | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 8 | ||
Public Company Board | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 8 | ||
Human Capital Management | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | |
Strategic Planning | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 8 | ||
Risk Management | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 10 |
Consumer Experience | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 7 | |||
Sustainability | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 6 | ||||
Technology | ● | ● | ● | ● | 4 | ||||||
Cybersecurity | ● | ● | ● | 3 |
14 | AMH
Board Composition. We believe that a board comprised of
trustees with a range of backgrounds, experiences,
perspectives, and viewpoints improves the dialogue and
decision-making in the boardroom and contributes to overall
board effectiveness.
Our Board currently consists of eleven members. Upon the
recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, our Board annually nominates trustees for election
or re-election to the Board to serve for a one-year term
beginning with the Annual Meeting or until their successors, if
any, are elected or appointed.
Other than Mr. Goldberg, who is retiring from the Board at the
end of the current term, each of our current trustees was
nominated by the Board upon the recommendation of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and no
trustee was nominated by a shareholder or subject to any
agreement with any third party.
Led by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
our Board continues to focus on facilitating a smooth transition
when trustees retire or leave the Board, as well as ensuring that
the composition of our Board is systematically refreshed to
maintain the desired mix of skills, experience, independence and
diverse backgrounds to support our strategic direction and
operating environment.
Among other aspects of the succession planning and
refreshment process, our Board:
•Identifies the collective mix of desired skills, experience,
knowledge, diverse backgrounds, and independence of our
Board taken as a whole, and identifies potential
opportunities for enhancement in these areas;
•Considers each current trustee’s experience, skills,
principal occupation, reputation, independence, committee
membership, and background;
•Engages third-party search firms to assist with identifying
and evaluating qualified candidates, as appropriate; and
•Considers the recommendations of Board members and
third parties to identify and evaluate potential trustee
candidates.
Additional information concerning the trustee nomination and
selection process is provided below in “Identifying and
Evaluating Nominees for Trustee.”
Board Tenure and Demographic Data. As of the Annual
Meeting:
•Tenure: Average tenure of our trustee nominees is 8.3
years, with 10% serving 0-4 years, 50% serving 5-9 years,
and 40% serving 9 or more years.
•Age: Average age of our trustee nominees is 65 years, with
20% under the age of 60, 60% between ages 60-69, and
20% aged 70 or older.
•Gender/racial diversity: 30% of the Board is female and
10% is racially diverse.
Trustee Independence. The Board evaluates the independence
of each trustee annually based on information supplied by
trustees and the company and on the recommendations of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The
company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a
majority of the trustees be independent in accordance with the
requirements of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”). Currently, our Board is approximately 91%
independent and, assuming our trustee nominees are elected,
90% of our trustees will be independent following the annual
meeting. To promote open discussion among non-management
trustees, our non-management and independent trustees devote
a portion of each regularly scheduled Board meeting to
executive sessions without members of management present. If
the group of non-management trustees includes trustees who
are not independent, at least one executive session convened
per year includes only independent trustees.
No trustee qualifies as independent unless the Board
affirmatively determines that the trustee has no material
relationship with the company and its management, based on all
relevant facts and circumstances, in accordance with NYSE
rules. Material relationships may include commercial, industrial,
consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, family, and other
business, professional, and personal relationships.
Following its annual review of each trustee’s independence in
February 2026, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee recommended to the Board and the Board
determined that (1) each member of the Board, other than Bryan
Smith, and (2) each member of the Audit Committee, the Human
Capital and Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee is independent pursuant to
the rules of the NYSE.
In addition, the Board has determined that:
•Each member of the Audit Committee meets the additional
independence requirements set forth in Section 10A(m)(3)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), and the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) thereunder; and
•Each member of the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee meets the NYSE’s heightened independence
requirements for compensation committee members.
Trustee Retirement Policy. To encourage refreshment of the
Board, the Board has adopted a mandatory retirement policy for
trustees. The policy provides in relevant part that no trustee will
be nominated for election to the Board unless he or she will be
75 or younger on the first day of such Board term. Pursuant to
this policy, Mr. Goldberg will retire from the Board as of the
Annual Meeting.
2026 Proxy Statement | 15
Board Orientation and Education. Each new non-
management trustee participates in an orientation program and
receives materials and briefings concerning our business,
strategy, industry, management, and corporate governance
policies and practices. We provide continuing education for all
trustees through Board materials and presentations, including
presentations by third-party experts, discussions with
management, and the opportunity to attend external Board
education programs. In addition, all Board members have the
opportunity to become a member of the National Association of
Corporate Directors and to access the many educational
resources of that organization.
Shareholder Recommendations. The policy of the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee to consider properly
submitted shareholder recommendations for candidates for
membership on the Board is described below under “Identifying
and Evaluating Nominees for Trustee.” Under this policy,
shareholder recommendations may only be submitted by a
shareholder entitled to submit shareholder proposals under the
SEC rules. Any shareholder recommendations proposed for
consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee should include the nominee’s name and
qualifications for Board membership, including the information
required under Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act and our
bylaws, and should be addressed to the Secretary at our
principal executive offices at AMH, 280 Pilot Road, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89119. Recommendations for consideration at the
Annual Meeting should be submitted within the time frame
described in this proxy statement under “Deadlines for receipt of
shareholder proposals.”
Trustee Qualifications. Members of the Board must have the
highest personal and professional integrity, have demonstrated
exceptional ability and judgment and be highly effective, in
conjunction with the other nominees to the Board, in serving the
long-term interests of the company and its shareholders. In
general, the Board seeks to add trustees who meet the
independence requirements of the NYSE rules. In addition,
trustee candidates must submit a completed trustee
questionnaire concerning matters related to independence
determination, qualification as an “audit committee financial
expert” and other proxy disclosure matters and must
satisfactorily complete a background investigation by a third-
party firm.
The Board has delegated to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee responsibility for recommending to the
Board new trustees for election and assessing the skills and
characteristics required of Board members in the context of the
current make-up of the Board. This assessment includes
trustees’ qualifications as independent, and may include
consideration of the following, all in the context of an
assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that time:
•experience, background, skills, and diversity;
•personal qualities and characteristics, accomplishments,
and reputation in the business community;
•knowledge and contacts in the communities in which the
company conducts business and in the company’s industry
or other industries relevant to the company’s business;
•ability and willingness to devote sufficient time to serve on
the Board and committees of the Board;
•knowledge and expertise in various areas deemed
appropriate by the Board; and
•how the individual’s skills, experience, and personality fit
with those of other trustees in maintaining an effective,
collegial and responsive Board.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the
Board have broad discretion to select trustee candidates who
they believe will best serve the Board, the company and its
shareholders. When recommending trustee nominees, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers
each nominee’s attendance record at our Board and committee
meetings, track record of engagement and contributions to our
Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
also considers each nominee's other commitments and
responsibilities, including employment and service on other
public company boards, with a view to confirming that such other
commitments and responsibilities will not adversely impact the
ability of the nominees to satisfy the significant commitments
required of our trustees. Refer to "How We Govern and are
Governed—Trustee Time Commitments" below for a discussion
of our policy regarding trustee service on other public company
boards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
also considers shareholder input regarding their views on trustee
engagement.
Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Trustee. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically
assesses the appropriate size of the Board and whether any
vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or
otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or
otherwise arise, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee will consider various potential candidates for trustee.
Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee through current Board
members, professional search firms, shareholders or other
persons. These candidates will be evaluated at meetings of the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and may be
considered at any point during the year.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will
consider properly submitted shareholder nominations of
candidates for the Board in the same manner as other
candidates. Following verification of the shareholder status of
persons proposing candidates, recommendations will be
aggregated and considered by the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee prior to the issuance of the proxy
statement for the annual meeting. If any materials are provided
by a shareholder in connection with the recommendation of a
trustee candidate, such materials are forwarded to the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also
review materials provided by professional search firms or other
parties in connection with a nominee who is not proposed by a
shareholder. In evaluating such nominations, the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a
balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board.
The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee will continue to consider additional qualified Board
candidates to best support the success of the company’s long-
term strategy.
16 | AMH
How We Are Organized
Our Board is led by the Chairperson, Matthew Hart, an
independent trustee.
Currently, the Board believes that having a separate Chairperson
and Chief Executive Officer serves the interests of the company
and its shareholders well. Our Board believes that this structure
encourages open dialogue and competing views, which
promotes strong checks and balances. Mr. Hart’s prior
experience as a former president, chief operating officer and
chief financial officer of several large public companies and his
extensive public company board service are particularly valuable
for his role as Chairperson. This structure also allows the Chief
Executive Officer to focus more specifically on overseeing the
company’s day-to-day operations and long-term strategic
planning. If in the future the Board, after considering facts and
circumstances at that time, appoints the Chief Executive Officer
as Chairperson of the Board, we will promptly publicly disclose
the appointment.
Our Board has three standing committees: the Audit Committee,
the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of
these committees consists of at least three members, each of
whom meets the applicable independence standards of the
NYSE. Matters put to a vote by any one of our three
independent committees of our Board must be approved by a
majority of the trustees on the committee who are present at a
meeting, in person or as otherwise permitted by our bylaws, at
which there is a quorum or by the unanimous written consent of
the trustees serving on the committee. Additionally, our Board
may from time to time establish other committees to facilitate the
Board’s oversight of management of the business and affairs of
the company.
Each of the standing committees operates pursuant to a written
charter which is reviewed and reassessed annually and that can
be viewed on our website at www.amh.com under “Investor
Relations.” A copy of each may be obtained by sending a written
request to the company’s Investor Relations Department at
AMH, 280 Pilot Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, or submitting
an information request under “Investor Relations” on the
company’s website.
Our three standing committees are described below, and the committee members and number of meetings held in 2025 are as follows:
Trustee | Audit Committee | Human Capital and Compensation Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
Douglas Benham | Chair | Member | |
Michelle Kerrick | Chair | ||
Lynn Swann | Member | Member | |
Winifred Webb | Member | Member | |
Jay Willoughby | Member | Member | |
Matthew Zaist | Member | Chair | |
Number of meetings in 2025: | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Audit Committee. Our Board has affirmatively determined that
each of the Audit Committee members meets the definition of
“independent trustee” for purposes of the NYSE rules and the
independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
Our Board has also determined that each member of our Audit
Committee is financially literate and that our Audit Committee
Chair Michelle Kerrick qualifies as an “audit committee financial
expert” under SEC rules and regulations. The Audit Committee’s
principal functions consist of overseeing:
•the integrity of our consolidated financial statements and
financial reporting process;
•our systems of disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting;
•our compliance with financial, legal, and regulatory
requirements;
•the engagement and the evaluation of the qualifications,
independence, and performance of our independent
registered public accounting firm;
•the review of all related party transactions in accordance
with our Related Party Transaction Policy;
•the performance of our internal audit functions; and
•our overall risk exposure and management, including with
respect to the company’s risk assessment, risk
management, and risk mitigation policies and programs.
2026 Proxy Statement | 17
Human Capital and Compensation Committee. The Human
Capital and Compensation Committee’s principal functions
consist of supporting the Board in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities relating to the following:
•reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate
goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive
Officer’s compensation, evaluating our Chief Executive
Officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives,
and determining and approving the remuneration of our
Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;
•reviewing and approving the compensation of our other
executive officers;
•reviewing our executive compensation policies and plans,
including the company’s clawback policies;
•implementing and administering our incentive and equity-
based compensation plans;
•reviewing and discussing with management the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) to be
included in the proxy statement and recommending to the
Board the inclusion of the CD&A in the company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K and annual proxy statement;
•producing a report on executive compensation to be
included in our annual proxy statement;
•together with management, reviewing management’s
annual assessment of potential risks related to
compensation policies and practices applicable to all
employees;
•overseeing the advisory shareholder votes on the
company’s executive compensation programs and policies
and the frequency of such votes;
•reviewing, evaluating, and recommending changes, if
appropriate, to the remuneration for trustees;
•reviewing and reporting to the Board on the company’s
programs and practices for talent development and
maintaining the continuity of capable management,
including but not limited to succession planning for the
Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives; and
•overseeing the company’s human capital programs and
policies, including with respect to pay fairness and
employee health, safety and well-being, employee retention
and development, and employee inclusion.
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may delegate
its authority to its members as it deems appropriate. However,
any delegate shall report any actions taken by such delegate to
the full Human Capital and Compensation Committee at its next
regularly scheduled meeting.
During 2025, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee
made all compensation decisions for our executive officers,
including the named executive officers (“NEOs”), as set forth in
the Summary Compensation Table below. For 2025, the Human
Capital and Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy
Consulting Group (“Semler Brossy”) to serve as its independent,
third-party compensation consultant. The Human Capital and
Compensation Committee considered Semler Brossy’s advice
on a range of compensation matters, including its assessment of
labor market conditions and its consideration of enhancements
to the 2026 compensation program, in each case as discussed
in more detail in “Executive Compensation” below.
Empowering a broad range of talent is a key priority for the
company, and the Board and the Human Capital and
Compensation Committee are actively engaged in overseeing
the company’s people and culture. We recognize employee
engagement as a critical factor to our success, and we are
committed to creating and maintaining a great place to work with
an inclusive culture, competitive benefits, and opportunities for
training and growth. The Human Capital and Compensation
Committee periodically reviews and reports to the Board on the
company’s programs for attracting, developing, and retaining key
employees, including management development programs,
technology and skills training programs, employee health and
well-being programs, and employee inclusion initiatives.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation. None of our current Human Capital and
Compensation Committee members is or was an officer or
employee, or former officer or employee, of the company. None
of our executive officers serve as a member of a board of
directors, board of trustees or compensation committee, or other
committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that
has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of
our Board or our Human Capital and Compensation Committee.
Oversight of Compensation Risks. In February 2026, the
Human Capital and Compensation Committee considered a
report from management concerning its review of potential risks
related to employee compensation policies and practices. During
its review, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee
discussed the report with senior management and discussed
management’s conclusion that the company’s compensation
policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on the company.
To prepare the report for the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee’s consideration, members of our senior management
team, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Administrative
Officer and Chief Legal Officer and the Executive Vice President
of Human Resources, reviewed each of the company’s
compensation programs, focusing on employee incentive
compensation plans. At the completion of the review,
management and the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee concluded that there is little motivation or opportunity
for employees to take undue risks to earn incentive
compensation awards, and that the incentive compensation
plans properly incentivize employees to achieve long-term goals
and do not create undue risks for the company.
18 | AMH
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s
principal functions consist of:
•identifying, evaluating, and recommending to the Board the
trustee nominees for each annual shareholder meeting or
to fill any vacancy on the Board;
•identifying individuals qualified to become members of the
Board and ensuring that the Board has the requisite
expertise;
•overseeing the company's policies and procedures with
respect to the consideration of trustee candidates
recommended or nominated by shareholders;
•developing and recommending to the Board for its approval
qualifications for trustee candidates and periodically
reviewing these qualifications with the Board;
•reviewing the committee structure of the Board and
recommending trustees to serve as members or chairs of
each committee of the Board;
•overseeing Board succession planning;
•developing and recommending to the Board a set of
corporate governance guidelines for the Board and
periodically reviewing such guidelines and recommending
changes to the Board for approval as necessary;
•considering and advising the Board on any other
governance issues that may arise from time to time;
•overseeing the annual self-evaluations of the Board and
management;
•overseeing our Board’s compliance with our Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics;
•overseeing management’s efforts and activities with respect
to our overall sustainability program; and
•overseeing the company’s political activities and
contributions, charitable contributions, and other public
policy matters.
How We Govern and Are Governed
Governance Highlights. We have structured our corporate
governance in a manner we believe closely aligns our interests
with those of our shareholders. Notable features of our corporate
governance include:
•Annual election of all trustees
•Majority voting for trustees in uncontested elections
•Independent Chairperson
•Regular executive sessions of non-management trustees
•Trustee retirement policy
•Shareholder voting power aligns with economic interest
•Anti-pledging, anti-hedging and anti-short sale policies
•Compensation clawback policy
•Double-trigger vesting for time-based equity awards
•Robust share ownership guidelines
Governance Documents. The framework of our corporate
governance is set forth in our charter and bylaws and in the
following documents:
•Corporate Governance Guidelines that outline the Board’s
overall governance practices
•Charters of the Audit, Human Capital and Compensation,
and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees
•The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to
trustees, officers and all employees
•Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
•Related Party Transaction Policy
•Share Ownership Policy
•Public Policy and Political Engagement Policy
•Policy on Inside Information and Insider Trading
•Executive Officer Performance-Based Compensation
Recovery Policy
The Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics are reviewed at least annually by
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which
considers whether to recommend any changes to the Board.
Each Board committee reviews its charter at least annually. The
company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Corporate
Governance Guidelines and the Board committee charters are
available on the company’s website, www.amh.com, under
“Investor Relations.” A copy of each may be obtained by sending
a written request to the company’s Investor Relations
Department at AMH, 280 Pilot Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119,
or submitting an information request under “Investor Relations”
on the company’s website. Our Policy on Inside Information and
Insider Trading is filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Any
amendments or waivers to the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics for trustees or executive officers may be made only by the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board
and will be disclosed on the company’s website or other
appropriate means in accordance with applicable SEC and
NYSE requirements.
Board Leadership. The Chairperson presides at meetings of all
non-management trustees in executive session without the
presence of management. These meetings are held on a regular
basis, generally before or after each regularly scheduled Board
meeting and at the request of any non-management trustee. In
addition, the independent trustees meet separately at least once
annually. These sessions are designed to encourage open
Board discussion of any matter of interest without our Chief
Executive Officer or any other members of management present.
The Chairperson: (1) reviews the agendas for each Board
meeting and strategic planning session and may bring items
pertinent to the advisory and monitoring functions of the Board to
the full Board for review and/or decision; (2) in conjunction with
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, assists
in the recruitment and selection of new trustees; (3) evaluates,
along with the members of the Human Capital and
Compensation Committee, the performance of the Chief
Executive Officer; (4) consults with the Chief Executive Officer
as to hiring other executive officers, as well as strategic planning
and succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer; (5) is
regularly apprised of material shareholder inquiries and is
2026 Proxy Statement | 19
involved in responding to these inquiries as appropriate; (6) may,
along with other Board members, engage in communications
with shareholders and other stakeholders, including at our
annual meetings; (7) regularly engages with the Chief Executive
Officer, chairs of Board committees, and other members of the
Board regarding issues related to Board structure; and (8) when
necessary or appropriate, communicates with other non-
management and independent trustees and calls meetings of
the non-management and independent trustees.
Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance. The Board
meets at regularly scheduled intervals and may hold additional
special meetings as necessary or desirable in furtherance of its
oversight responsibilities. As described above, the non-
management trustees generally meet in executive session
without the presence of management as part of each regularly
scheduled Board meeting. The sessions are intended to
encourage open discussion of any matter of interest without the
Chief Executive Officer or any member of management present.
During 2025, the Board held four meetings and the Board
committees held twelve meetings. During 2025, all trustees
attended 75% or more of the meetings held by the Board and
committees of the Board on which each trustee served. Eleven
trustees attended the virtual 2025 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Trustees are encouraged, but not required, to
attend the Annual Meeting.
Trustee Time Commitments. Although the company
recognizes that there may be a benefit to the company as a
result of trustees broadening their experience by serving on
corporate boards, it is important that each trustee have the
requisite time to devote to the oversight of the company’s
business. For that reason, our Corporate Governance
Guidelines include restrictions on our trustees serving on other
public company boards. Unless otherwise approved by the
Board, a trustee who also serves as an executive officer of the
company may not serve on more than one public company
board in addition to the company’s Board. A trustee who also
serves as an executive officer of another public company may
not serve on another public company board other than the board
of the company for which they serve as an executive officer.
Trustees that are not executive officers of the company or
another public company may not serve on more than three
boards of other public companies in addition to the Board. In
recognition of the enhanced time commitments associated with
membership on a public company’s audit committee, no member
of the Audit Committee may serve simultaneously on audit
committees of more than two other public companies.
On an annual basis, when determining the recommended slate
of trustee nominees for the Annual Meeting, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee considers each nominee's
other commitments and responsibilities, including employment
and service on other public company boards, with a view to
confirming that such other commitments and responsibilities will
not adversely impact the ability of the nominees to satisfy the
significant commitments required of our trustees.
In addition, when a trustee's principal occupation or business
association changes, our Corporate Governance Guidelines
require that such trustee promptly informs the Board of such
change, and that the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee will consider such information. If it determines that
the change in the trustee's responsibilities or associations are
likely to impair the trustee's ability to effectively serve on the
Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or
the Board may ask the trustee to tender his or her resignation.
Board Responsibilities and Oversight of Risk Management.
The Board oversees the company’s risk management and has
delegated to the Audit Committee the responsibility to assist the
Board with oversight of the company’s overall risk profile,
including the company’s risk assessment, risk management and
risk mitigation policies and programs. The Audit Committee
regularly receives presentations (generally quarterly) from
management on areas of risk facing our business and the Audit
Committee, in turn, regularly reports to the Board on these
matters. Members of our legal and finance teams that have
primary responsibility for our public disclosures, including risk
disclosures, attend these meetings. The Audit Committee and
Board consider short-term, medium-term and long-term risks in
exercising their oversight responsibilities and consider the
immediacy of the risk in assessing mitigation strategies. The
Audit Committee and Board consult with outside advisors and
experts on risk matters when necessary.
In addition, the Board is further assisted in its risk oversight
responsibilities by the standing Board committees, which have
assigned areas of oversight responsibility for various matters as
described in the Board committee charters and as provided in
the NYSE rules. These oversight responsibilities are
summarized below.
Board
•Overall oversight of the risk management process
•Development of business strategy and major resource
allocation
•Leadership of management succession planning
•Business conduct and compliance oversight
•Receipt of regular reports from Board committees on
specific risk oversight responsibilities
20 | AMH
Board Committees
Audit Committee Oversight of Risk | Human Capital and Compensation Committee Oversight of Risk | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Oversight of Risk |
•Oversight of enterprise risk management activities, including the company’s risk assessment, risk management, and risk mitigation policies and programs •Oversight of accounting and financial reporting •Oversight of integrity of financial statements •Oversight of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements applicable to accounting and financial reporting processes •Oversight of the company’s policies and procedures with respect to cybersecurity risk management •Oversight of the performance of the internal audit function •Oversight of the effectiveness of internal controls •Oversight of registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance, and independence •Oversight of non-GAAP measures •Oversight of quantitative environmental and social measures in SEC periodic reports •Review of proposed swaps and equity and debt hedging transactions | •Oversight of compensation related risks and overall philosophy •Oversight of regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters •Oversight of the company’s human capital programs and policies, including with respect to pay fairness and employee well-being, employee retention and development, and employee inclusion | •Oversight of overall corporate governance leadership •Provides recommendations regarding Board and committee composition •Oversight of Board succession planning •Oversight of our overall sustainability program, including regulatory compliance, environmental sustainability, and corporate governance initiatives •Oversight of our political activities and contributions, charitable contributions, and other public policy matters •Oversight of the evaluation of the Board and management |
Management
•Identify material risks
•Implement appropriate risk management strategies
•Integrate risk management into our decision-making process
•Ensure that information with respect to material risks is transmitted to senior executives and the Board
2026 Proxy Statement | 21
Risk Areas
Strategic | Operational | Financial | Legal, Regulatory and Compliance | ||||
•Reputation •Market Dynamics •Acquisitions and Dispositions •Development •Climate Change | •Sales and Marketing •Service and Delivery •Information Systems and Cybersecurity •Infrastructure and Assets •Hazards and Weather •People | •Financial Reporting and Internal Controls •Capital Structure •Market •Liquidity and Credit •Tax •Insurance | •Compliance with Laws •Litigation •Environmental Management System •Social including human rights •Corporate Governance policies and practices | ||||
Management Succession Planning
The Board considers management succession planning as one
of its most important responsibilities. The Board periodically
evaluates succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer
role and other senior executive roles so as to facilitate smooth
transitions of leadership. The Board is assisted in these efforts
by the Chairperson, the Chief Executive Officer, and the Human
Capital and Compensation Committee. In accordance with its
charter, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee
reviews and reports to the Board on the company's programs
and practices for talent development and maintaining the
continuity of capable management.
Cybersecurity Risk
Given the critical nature of data privacy and cybersecurity, we
have developed strong risk management and oversight
procedures. The Audit Committee, which consists solely of
independent trustees, oversees cybersecurity risks, including
through quarterly updates from our Chief Technology Officer and
Vice President of Information Security, who leads our dedicated
cybersecurity team, and other members of our executive
leadership team. The Audit Committee and our Board also
conduct a full review of cybersecurity annually and consider
cybersecurity as part of our business strategy, financial planning
and capital allocation, particularly for IT procurement.
In recent years, we have been focused on ensuring we have
trustees with cybersecurity risk oversight experience as a part of
our Board. Currently three members of our Board have
information security experience, including Mr. Smith, through his
experience with cybersecurity oversight at the company, Ms.
Webb, who earned a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity
Oversight issued by the National Association of Corporate
Directors and Carnegie Mellon University, and Mr. Hart, who has
information security expertise from his prior executive
experience. See “Governance Framework—How We Are
Selected, Elected, Evaluated and Refreshed” above for more
information about our trustee nominees.
Please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2025 for more information on our processes and
procedures for addressing and managing cybersecurity risks.
Public Policy and Political Engagement
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
oversees the company’s public policy and political engagement
activities, including political contributions. In order to facilitate
informed decision-making and accountability with respect to the
company’s political and charitable contributions, the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a Public
Policy and Political Engagement Policy that applies to
contributions or expenditures of corporate funds to various
political entities (including political candidates and parties and
political action committees). The policy provides that political
contributions by the company must adhere to all applicable laws
and regulations and be made in a manner consistent with the
company’s core values and to enhance shareholder value,
without regard to the personal political preferences of company
officers or trustees. The policy requires that all such
expenditures be reported to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee. We also maintain a political action
committee (“PAC”) that is registered with the Federal Election
Commission. The PAC makes political contributions on a
bipartisan basis to political parties, political committees and
candidates that support policies and positions important to the
company. The contributions made by the PAC are not funded by
corporate funds but are fully funded by voluntary contributions
made by company leaders.
22 | AMH
How We Are Paid
Our Board has established a compensation program for our non-
management trustees that includes a mix of cash and equity
compensation. The Human Capital and Compensation
Committee, with the input and support of Semler Brossy, the
independent compensation consultant to the Human Capital and
Compensation Committee, annually evaluates the adequacy of
the trustee compensation program.
Retainers. Effective May 2025, the annual cash compensation
for non-management trustees consisted of the following
components:
•an annual cash retainer of $80,000;
•an additional annual cash retainer of $50,000 for the
Chairperson;
•an additional annual cash retainer of $30,000 to the chair of
the Audit Committee;
•an additional annual cash retainer of $25,000 to the chairs
of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
•an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 to the other
members of the Audit Committee; and
•an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000 to the other
members of the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee.
The company also reimburses non-management trustees for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance
of their duties as trustees, including without limitation, travel
expenses in connection with their attendance in-person at Board
and committee meetings. Trustees who are employees do not
receive any compensation for their services as trustees.
Equity Awards. On the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, each non-management trustee received an award
of restricted share units (“RSUs”) with a value of $170,000 as
determined by the closing price on the NYSE of the company’s
Class A common shares on the date of grant, except that the
Chairperson received an RSU award of $220,000. Awards for
new non-management trustees and the annual grants to non-
management trustees vest in full one year from the date of grant,
generally subject to the trustee's continuous service through the
vesting date.
Trustee Compensation Table. The following table presents
information relating to the total compensation of our non-
employee trustees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
The CEO's compensation earned as an employee is described
below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and
corresponding tabular disclosures.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) (1)(2) | All Other Compensation ($) (3) | Total ($) | ||||
Matthew Hart | 130,000 | 220,000 | — | 350,000 | ||||
Douglas Benham | 113,000 | 170,000 | — | 283,000 | ||||
Jack Corrigan | 80,000 | 170,000 | 24,052 | 274,052 | ||||
David Goldberg | 80,000 | 170,000 | — | 250,000 | ||||
Tamara Gustavson | 80,000 | 170,000 | — | 250,000 | ||||
Michelle Kerrick | 110,000 | 170,000 | — | 280,000 | ||||
Lynn Swann | 103,375 | 170,000 | — | 273,375 | ||||
Winifred Webb | 98,500 | 170,000 | — | 268,500 | ||||
Jay Willoughby | 103,375 | 170,000 | — | 273,375 | ||||
Matthew Zaist | 113,000 | 170,000 | — | 283,000 |
(1)RSU awards valued at the closing share price on the NYSE of $38.79 per share for Class A common shares on May 7, 2025, which was the date of
grant for all trustees. The value of the stock awards is computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.
(2)As of December 31, 2025, each non-management trustee had the following aggregate number of options outstanding, all of which are fully vested
and exercisable: Ms. Gustavson held a total of 30,000; Mr. Benham held a total of 20,000; and Ms. Webb and Mr. Willoughby each held a total of
10,000. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, Mr. Hart held a total of 5,672 RSUs and all other non-management trustees each held a total of 4,383
RSUs, all of which vest in full on May 7, 2026.
(3)The amount reflected in this column represents premiums paid by the Company to provide the trustee with coverage under the Company's group
medical, dental, and vision plans.
2026 Proxy Statement | 23
Share Ownership Policy. Our share ownership policy approved
by the Board applies to each of our executive officers and
trustees and is intended to align their interests with the interests
of the company’s shareholders. Each non-management trustee
covered by the policy is expected to own Class A common
shares and equivalents (including Class A partnership units that
are convertible into Class A common shares and RSUs that are
only subject to time vesting) of the company with an aggregate
market value of five times the previous year annual cash retainer
(excluding any Board committee fees). Additionally, each non-
management trustee covered by the policy is expected to
establish an initial beneficial ownership position of Class A
common shares and equivalents within one year of his or her
appointment to the Board and to be in full compliance within five
years of becoming subject to the policy. Unvested performance-
based RSUs and shares underlying vested or unvested options
are not counted for purposes of the policy. For information
regarding requirements for executive officers, see “Executive
Officer Share Ownership and Other Compensation Policies—
Executive Officer Share Ownership Policy” below.
All of our trustees are in compliance with the policy. If a non-
management trustee is ever not in compliance with the policy
(other than solely as a result of decreases in Class A common
share market price), the non-management trustee must retain
100% of the Class A common shares and equivalents
beneficially owned and subsequently awarded by the company
(other than sales to cover withholding taxes owed in connection
with equity awards or option exercise costs) until the non-
management trustee is in compliance with the policy.
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has the
authority to administer and interpret, to monitor compliance with
and to make all determinations regarding the share ownership
policy.
How You Can Communicate With Us
We value and actively solicit feedback from our shareholders. During fiscal year 2025, management met with approximately 200
institutional investors at virtual conferences, non-deal roadshows, and industry calls.
We encourage all shareholders to contact our investor relations team with any questions or comments by:
•Website: Visit www.amh.com under "Investor Relations"
•Mail: Write to AMH, Attn: Investor Relations, 280 Pilot Road, Las Vegas, NV 89119
•Telephone: Call 855-794-2447
The Board also welcomes feedback from shareholders and other interested parties. We receive a large volume of correspondence
regarding a wide range of subjects each day, including correspondence relating to ordinary business operations. As a result, our
individual trustees are often not able to respond to all communications directly. Therefore, the Board has established a process for
managing communications to the Board and individual trustees. Any shareholder communication to the Board should be addressed to:
Board of Trustees, c/o Corporate Secretary, AMH, 280 Pilot Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119. Communications that are intended for a
specified individual trustee or group of trustees should be addressed to the trustee(s) c/o Corporate Secretary at the above address,
and all such communications received will be forwarded to the designated trustee(s).
24 | AMH
2026 Proxy Statement | 25
Board
Recommendation
The Board unanimously
recommends that you
vote "FOR" the ratification of
the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as
the company's independent
registered public accounting
firm for fiscal year 2026.
26 | AMH
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing the
company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Ernst
& Young LLP (“EY”) was first appointed as the company’s
independent registered public accounting firm in August 2016. In
February 2026, the Audit Committee re-appointed EY to serve as
the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026. The Board believes
that the selection of EY is in the best interest of the company
and its shareholders and recommends that shareholders ratify
the Audit Committee’s appointment of EY as the independent
registered public accounting firm.
Although we are not required to seek ratification of the
appointment of EY, the Board believes that doing so is a matter
of good corporate governance. Even if the appointment of EY is
ratified by the shareholders, the Audit Committee, in its
discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the
year if it determines that a change would be in the best interest
of the company and its shareholders. If shareholders do not
ratify the appointment of EY, the Audit Committee will reconsider
its selection but may determine to confirm the appointment.
Representatives from EY will be in attendance at the Annual
Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if
they desire to do so and will be available to respond to
appropriate questions.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table shows the fees billed to the company by EY for audit and other services provided for fiscal years 2025 and 2024:
2025 | 2024 | |
Audit fees (1) | $1,859,000 | $1,873,750 |
Audit-related fees (2) | 57,000 | – |
Tax fees | – | – |
All other fees | – | – |
Total | $1,916,000 | $1,873,750 |
(1)Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the integrated audit of the company’s annual financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the interim financial statements included in the company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
professional services related to the company’s registration statements, securities offerings and related SEC correspondence, and audits of certain of
the company’s subsidiaries and unconsolidated joint ventures.
(2)Audit-related fees include fees for attestation reports on sustainability metrics.
Auditor Independence: The Audit Committee has determined
that the provision of the services described above is compatible
with maintaining the independence of the company’s
independent registered public accounting firm.
Policy to Approve Services of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm: The Audit Committee has adopted an
Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy relating to
services performed by the company’s independent registered
public accounting firm. Pursuant to the Audit and Non-Audit
Services Pre-Approval Policy, all audit and permissible non-audit
services must be separately pre-approved by the Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee has delegated authority to its
Chairperson to specifically pre-approve engagements for the
performance of audit and permissible non-audit services, for
which the estimated cost for all such services shall not exceed
$200,000 prior to reporting such pre-approved engagements to
the Audit Committee.
The Chairperson must report all pre-approval decisions to the
Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting for review and
provide a description of the terms of the engagement, including:
•the type of services covered by the engagement;
•the dates the engagement is scheduled to commence and
terminate;
•the estimated fees payable by us pursuant to the
engagement;
•other material terms of the engagement; and
•such other information as the Audit Committee may
request.
Under this policy, the Audit Committee pre-approved all services
performed by EY during 2025, including those listed in the table
above.
2026 Proxy Statement | 27
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter that is
reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. A brief description of
the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in
this proxy statement under the caption “Governance Framework
—How We Are Organized—Audit Committee.” In addition to the
accounting and financial reporting matters addressed below, the
Audit Committee’s responsibilities include oversight of the
company’s risk management program.
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include appointing the
company’s independent registered public accounting firm, pre-
approving audit and non-audit services provided by the firm and
assisting the Board in providing oversight to the company’s
financial reporting process. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Audit Committee meets with the company’s
independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors
and management to review accounting, auditing, internal
controls and financial reporting matters.
Management is responsible for the company’s financial
statements, including the estimates and judgments on which
they are based, for maintaining effective internal controls over
financial reporting and for assessing the effectiveness of internal
controls over financial reporting. The independent registered
public accounting firm is responsible for performing an
independent audit of the company’s consolidated financial
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”) and for issuing a report thereon. It is not the Audit
Committee’s responsibility to plan or conduct audits or to
determine that the company’s financial statements and
disclosures are complete, accurate and in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and applicable laws,
rules and regulations. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to
monitor and oversee these processes and the Audit Committee
necessarily relies on the work and assurances of the company’s
management and of the company’s independent registered
public accounting firm.
As part of its oversight responsibilities related to the company’s
financial statements included in the company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the Audit Committee met with management and EY,
the company’s independent registered public accounting firm,
and reviewed and discussed with them the audited consolidated
financial statements. Management represented to the Audit
Committee that the company’s consolidated financial statements
were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The Audit Committee discussed with EY
the matters required to be discussed by the applicable
requirements of the PCAOB.
The Audit Committee also discussed with EY the overall scope
and plans for the annual audit, the results of their procedures,
including critical audit matters addressed during the audit,
examinations, their evaluation of the company’s internal controls
and the overall quality of the company’s financial reporting.
The company’s independent registered public accounting firm
also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and
the letter required by the applicable rules of the PCAOB, and the
Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered
public accounting firm that firm’s independence. In addition, the
Audit Committee has considered whether the independent
registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit
services to the company and its affiliates is compatible with the
firm’s independence.
The Audit Committee met with representatives of management,
internal audit, legal counsel and the company’s independent
registered public accounting firm on a regular basis throughout
the year to discuss the progress of management’s testing and
evaluation of the company’s system of internal control over
financial reporting in response to the applicable requirements of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC regulations. At
the conclusion of this process, the Audit Committee received
from management its assessment and report on the
effectiveness of the company’s internal controls over financial
reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee received from EY its
assessment of and opinion on the company’s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. The Audit
Committee reviewed and discussed the results of management’s
assessment and EY’s audit.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has
approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be
included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2025 for filing with the SEC. The Audit
Committee also approved the appointment of EY as the
company’s independent registered public accountants for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 and recommended that
the Board submit this appointment to the company’s
shareholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Michelle Kerrick, Chair
Lynn Swann
Jay Willoughby
28 | AMH
Principal Shareholders
Share Ownership of 5% or Greater Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares and common shares into which
units in American Homes 4 Rent, L.P., our operating partnership (“OP units”), may be exchangeable by each person known by us to be
the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common shares and OP units as of December 31, 2025.
Name and Address | Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Number of Common Shares and OP Units Beneficially Owned (2) | Percentage of All Common Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Percentage of All Common Shares and OP Units Beneficially Owned (2) | |||
The Vanguard Group (3) 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | 44,578,702 | 44,578,702 | 12.16% | 10.69% | |||
BlackRock, Inc. (4) 50 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 | 43,954,877 | 43,954,877 | 11.99% | 10.54% | |||
Tamara H. Gustavson (5) c/o Malibu Management 22917 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 300 Malibu, CA 90265 | 21,460,480 | 21,460,480 | 5.85% | 5.14% | |||
Norges Bank (The Central Bank of Norway) (6) Bankplassen 2 PO Box 1179 Sentrum NO 0107 Oslo Norway | 23,288,637 | 23,288,637 | 6.35% | 5.58% | |||
HF Investments 2010, LLC (7) c/o Malibu Management 22917 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 300 Malibu, CA 90265 | 6,645,581 | 54,765,472 | 1.81% | 13.13% |
(1)Assumes a total of 366,021,665 Class A and 635,075 Class B common shares are outstanding as of December 31, 2025. All Class B common
shares are held by HF Investments 2010, LLC (“HF LLC”).
(2)Assumes a total of 366,656,740 common shares and 50,476,980 OP units (which OP units may be redeemed for cash or, at our option, exchanged
for our Class A common shares) are outstanding as of December 31, 2025, excluding OP units held by the company.
(3)This information is as of December 31, 2023 and is based on the most recent Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2024 by The Vanguard Group
as investment advisor to report that it has shared voting power with respect to 453,424 Class A common shares, sole dispositive power with respect
to 43,859,880 Class A common shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 718,822 Class A common shares.
(4)This information is as of December 31, 2024 and is based on the most recent Schedule 13G/A filed on February 5, 2025 by BlackRock, Inc. to report
that it has sole voting power with respect to 41,153,356 Class A common shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 43,954,877 Class A
common shares.
(5)Includes 30,000 shares underlying stock options that have vested as of December 31, 2025. Does not include any shares held by (i) HF LLC which
is comprised of trusts established by B. Wayne Hughes, for certain of his heirs, including the children of Ms. Gustavson or (ii) other trusts formed by
B. Wayne Hughes for which Ms. Gustavson currently serves as trustee. These shares are reported separately in this table.
(6)This information is as of December 31, 2023 and is based on the most recent Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2024 by Norges Bank to report
that it has sole voting power with respect to 21,967,376 Class A common shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 21,967,376 Class A common
shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,321,261 Class A common shares.
(7)HF LLC is comprised of trusts established by B. Wayne Hughes for certain of his heirs. Malibu Management, Inc. is a corporation 50% owned by Ms.
Gustavson. Anita McIntyre, an officer and the sole manager of HF LLC, has voting and dispositive power over the common shares and OP units
directly owned by HF LLC and may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over such securities. Ms. Gustavson disclaims beneficial ownership of
all common shares and OP units owned by HF LLC. The HF LLC ownership interests disclaimed by Ms. Gustavson include:
(i)6,010,506 Class A common shares;
(ii)635,075 Class B common shares (for voting purposes, each Class B common share entitles the holder to 50 votes on all matters on which the
holders of Class A common shares are entitled to vote); and
(iii)48,119,891 Class A units issued by our operating partnership (“Class A units”).
2026 Proxy Statement | 29
Share Ownership of Trustees and Management
The following table sets forth information, as of March 1, 2026, regarding the beneficial ownership of our common shares and common
shares into which OP units may be exchangeable by (1) each of our executive officers, (2) each of our trustees and (3) all of our
executive officers and trustees as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each trustee and executive officer has sole voting and
investment power over his or her shares.
Name | Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Number of Common Shares and OP Units Beneficially Owned (2) | Percentage of All Common Shares Beneficially Owned (3) | Percentage of All Common Shares and OP Units Beneficially Owned (3) | |||
Matthew Hart | 55,330 | 55,330 | * | * | |||
Bryan Smith (4) | 203,640 | 203,640 | * | * | |||
Douglas Benham (4) | 57,835 | 70,043 | * | * | |||
Jack Corrigan | 175,190 | 875,190 | * | * | |||
David Goldberg | 57,036 | 597,102 | * | * | |||
Tamara Gustavson (4)(5) | 21,460,480 | 21,460,480 | 5.90% | 5.18% | |||
Michelle Kerrick | 18,509 | 18,509 | * | * | |||
Chris Lau (4) | 113,365 | 113,365 | * | * | |||
Lynn Swann | 31,527 | 31,527 | * | * | |||
Sara Vogt-Lowell | 94,995 | 94,995 | * | * | |||
Winifred Webb (4) | 32,213 | 32,213 | * | * | |||
Jay Willoughby (4) | 33,672 | 33,672 | * | * | |||
Matthew Zaist | 23,025 | 23,025 | * | * | |||
All trustees and executive officers as a group (13 persons) (4)(5) | 22,356,817 | 23,609,091 | 6.15% | 5.70% |
*Represents less than 1.0%
(1)Includes Class A common shares held of record or beneficially by members of the immediate family of executive officers and trustees of the
company.
(2)OP units may be redeemed for cash or, at our option, exchanged for our Class A common shares.
(3)Assumes 363,150,711 Class A common shares, 635,075 Class B common shares and 50,136,980 OP units are outstanding as of March 1, 2026,
excluding OP units held by the company.
(4)Includes the following vested stock options that have vested as of March 1, 2026: 30,000 for Mr. Smith and Ms. Gustavson, 20,000 for Mr. Benham,
10,000 for Ms. Webb and Mr. Willoughby and 2,500 for Mr. Lau.
(5)Does not include any shares held by HF LLC, which is comprised of trusts established by B. Wayne Hughes for certain of his heirs, including the
children of Ms. Gustavson. Ms. Gustavson disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares and units held by HF LLC. HF LLC ownership interests
include:
(i)6,010,506 Class A common shares;
(ii)635,075 Class B common shares issued (for voting purposes, each Class B common share entitles the holder to 50 votes on all matters on
which the holders of Class A common shares are entitled to vote); and
(iii)48,119,891 Class A units.
30 | AMH
Executive Officer Share Ownership
and Other Compensation Policies
Executive Officer Share Ownership
Policy
Our share ownership policy approved by the Board is intended
to align the interests of our executive officers and trustees with
the interests of the company’s shareholders. For information
regarding requirements for trustees, see “How We Are Paid—
Share Ownership Policy” above. The policy applies to the
company’s Chief Executive Officer and other Section 16
executive officers. Each person covered by the policy is
expected to own Class A common shares and equivalents
(including Class A partnership units that are convertible into
Class A common shares and unvested RSUs that are only
subject to time vesting) of the company with an aggregate
market value of:
•Six times the previous year annual base salary for the Chief
Executive Officer; and
•Three times the previous year annual base salary for the
other executive officers.
Unvested performance-based RSUs (“PSUs”) and shares
underlying vested or unvested options are not counted for
purposes of the policy.
All of our NEOs have met the ownership thresholds described
above and are in compliance with the policy. Each executive
officer covered by the policy is expected to establish an initial
beneficial ownership position of Class A common shares and
equivalents within one year of his or her appointment to the
position that results in the application of the policy and to be in
full compliance within five years of becoming subject to the
policy. Executive officers already subject to the policy that
become subject to increased ownership requirements as a result
of a promotion are expected to be in compliance with the
increased threshold by the fifth anniversary of the promotion.
If an executive officer is not in compliance with the policy (other
than solely as a result of decreases in Class A common share
market price), the executive officer must retain 100% of the
Class A common shares and equivalents beneficially owned and
subsequently awarded by the company (other than sales to
cover withholding taxes owed in connection with such equity
awards or option exercise costs) until the executive officer is in
compliance with the policy.
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has the
authority to administer and interpret, to monitor compliance with
and to make all determinations regarding the share ownership
policy.
Clawback Policy
The Executive Officer Performance-Based Compensation
Recovery Policy applies to our executive officers, our principal
accounting officer and any other employee who may from time to
time be deemed subject to the policy by the Human Capital and
Compensation Committee. The policy provides for mandatory
clawback in certain situations in compliance with SEC and NYSE
rules. Specifically, in the event the company’s financial results
are restated due to material noncompliance with any financial
reporting requirement, the company is required (except in limited
circumstances) to recover the amount of excess incentive
compensation received by any covered officer.
The clawback period covers the three completed fiscal years
preceding the date the company determines that the company is
required to prepare an accounting restatement. Excess incentive
compensation is any compensation that is granted, earned, or
vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial
reporting measure that was in excess of the amount that such
covered officer would have received taking into account the
restated financial results. The Human Capital and Compensation
Committee administers the policy which is available on the
Investor Relations section of our website and has been filed as
an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2025.
Policy on Inside Information and Insider
Trading
The Board has adopted the Policy on Inside Information and
Insider Trading that governs the purchase, sale, and/or other
disposition of the company’s securities by trustees, officers, and
employees. The policy is reasonably designed to promote
compliance with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and
NYSE listing standards. A copy of the policy was filed as Exhibit
19.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2025. Transactions by the company in its own
securities are monitored by internal and external legal counsel
for compliance with applicable securities laws.
2026 Proxy Statement | 31
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy
The anti-hedging provisions of our insider trading policy prohibit
trustees, officers and employees from directly or indirectly
engaging in hedging against future declines in the market value
of any securities of the company. This would cover the purchase
of financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward
contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds), or other
transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or
offset, any decrease in the market value of our securities.
Our insider trading policy also includes anti-pledging provisions,
which prohibit trustees, officers and employees from any pledge
of company securities, including holding company securities in a
margin account or otherwise pledging company securities as
collateral for a loan.
Waivers of these prohibitions are not permitted under the policy.
The objective of this policy is to further enhance alignment
between the interests of our trustees, officers and employees
and those of our shareholders.
32 | AMH
Executive Officers
Our Executive Officers
Set forth below is biographical information regarding each of our current executive officers. Our executive officers are
appointed annually by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board. There are no family relationships between any of the
executive officers, and there is no arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person
pursuant to which the executive officer was selected.
As used in this proxy statement, “CEO” refers to our Chief Executive Officer; “Chief Financial Officer” or “CFO” refers to our Chief
Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President; and “CAO/CLO” refers to our Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Legal
Officer.
Bryan Smith Age: 52 Trustee since: 2025 | Chief Executive Officer and Trustee | |||
Background •AMH, Chief Executive Officer (since 2025); Chief Operating Officer (2019-2024); Executive Vice President and President of Property Management (2015-2019); Senior Vice President and Director of Property Management (2012-2015) • American Homes 4 Rent Advisor, LLC (our former manager), Senior Vice President of Acquisitions • Tax Review Group, Partner •Watermark Group, Partner and CFO •Deloitte & Touche LLP, Senior | Education • B.A., University of California, Los Angeles •M.B.A., UCLA Anderson School of Management •Certified Public Accountant (inactive) | |||
Chris Lau Age: 44 | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President | |||
Background • AMH, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President (since 2024); Chief Financial Officer (2018-2024); Vice President, Senior Vice President and then Executive Vice President – Finance (2013-2018) • National Rental Home Council, Member and Former Chair of the Finance Committee (since 2018) • Deloitte & Touche LLP, Senior Manager, Real Estate M&A Advisory; Senior Manager, Real Estate Audit | Education •B.S., San Diego State University •Certified Public Accountant (inactive) | |||
Sara Vogt-Lowell Age: 50 | Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Legal Officer | |||
Background • AMH, Chief Administrative and Chief Legal Officer (since 2025); Chief Legal Officer (2012-2024) • American Homes 4 Rent Advisor, LLC (our former manager), Chief Legal Officer •Public Storage Canada and American Commercial Equities, General Counsel •Latham & Watkins LLP, Associate, Finance Department | Education • B.A., University of California, Los Angeles • J.D., University of California, Berkeley • Member of the California State Bar | |||
2026 Proxy Statement | 33
Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section explains the
objectives of our executive compensation programs, outlines the
elements of executive officer compensation and describes the
factors considered by the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee (as used in this section, the “Committee”) to
determine the amounts of compensation awarded to, earned by,
or paid to our NEOs for 2025 service.
Our Named Executive Officers
For 2025, our NEOs were:
Name | Title |
Bryan Smith | Chief Executive Officer and Trustee |
Chris Lau | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President |
Sara Vogt-Lowell | Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Legal Officer |
2025 Say-on-Pay Vote Results and
Shareholder Engagement
At our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 95% of the votes
cast by our shareholders were voted in support of our say-on-
pay proposal.
Over the course of 2025, the company maintained an ongoing
dialogue with a broad set of shareholders on diverse topics
including executive compensation, business operations and
strategy, financial results, capital allocation, corporate
governance and sustainability priorities. Members of
management and, in some instances, Mr. Zaist, chair of our
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a
member of the Committee, participated in these meetings.
Based on these discussions and the results of our 2025 say-on-
pay vote, we believe shareholders continue to broadly support
our compensation program. As such, no changes were made to
our compensation program as a result of the 2025 Say-on-Pay
vote.
2025 Compensation Overview
The 2025 compensation program for NEOs consisted of three
components: (i) an annual base salary; (ii) an annual cash
incentive based substantially on the achievement of pre-
determined performance criteria consisting of a corporate metric
and individual goals; and (iii) long-term equity incentives
designed to directly link executive compensation with
shareholder outcomes.
In 2025, the company increased base salaries of Mr. Smith by
13.3%, Mr. Lau by 7.9%, and Ms. Vogt-Lowell by 4.8%. The
base salary increases were based on each executive's
performance, the competitive positioning of their base salaries
relative to the market, and, in the case of Mr. Smith, reflected his
promotion to Chief Executive Officer.
The 2025 NEO annual cash incentive target levels as a
percentage of base salary were unchanged from 2024 for
Mr. Smith and Mr. Lau and increased for Ms. Vogt-Lowell from
125% to 150% of base salary.
In January 2025, Mr. Smith received an annual long-term equity
incentive award with a target value of $4,675,000, Mr. Lau
received an annual long-term equity incentive award with a
target value of $2,450,000, and Ms. Vogt-Lowell received an
annual long-term equity incentive award with a target value of
$1,375,000. Each of the annual long-term equity incentive
awards were comprised of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs. The
Committee continued its practice of awarding PSUs as part of
the equity compensation that is tied to the achievement of both
relative total shareholder return ("TSR") and absolute Core
Funds from Operations ("Core FFO") per share growth goals.
34 | AMH
Compensation Philosophy, Objectives and Governance
The primary goal of our executive compensation program is to align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders in a way
that allows us to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executive talent. The Committee oversees the compensation of our NEOs,
including setting base salaries, awarding annual cash incentives and granting equity awards. The following table highlights key
features of our executive compensation program that demonstrate our ongoing commitment to promoting shareholder interests through
sound compensation governance practices.
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | |||
✓ | DO require “double trigger” change in control benefits | ✘ | NO “single-trigger” change in control cash or equity payments | |
✓ | DO seek to align pay and performance with a balanced mix of company and individual performance criteria tied to operational and strategic objectives established at the beginning of the performance period by the Committee | ✘ | NO compensation or incentives that encourage risk-taking reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company | |
✓ | DO award a significant percentage of NEO total compensation in the form of equity which includes awards subject to multi-year, performance-based vesting based on relative TSR goals and absolute Core FFO per share growth goals | ✘ | NO tax gross-ups for any executive officers | |
✓ | DO have robust NEO share ownership guidelines, including six times base salary for CEO, and a requirement that each NEO establish an initial ownership position in company shares within one year of joining the company | ✘ | NO re-pricing or buyouts of underwater stock options without shareholder approval | |
✓ | DO have a robust mandatory compensation clawback policy for executive compensation covering both cash and equity incentives | ✘ | NO hedging or future pledging transactions by employees or trustees involving our securities | |
✓ | DO annually review a compensation risk assessment with the Committee | ✘ | NO guarantees of cash incentive compensation or of equity grants | |
✓ | DO provide caps within annual and long-term incentive plan awards | ✘ | NO long-term employment contracts with executive officers with contractual compensation amounts or specified increases in the future | |
✓ | DO engage an independent compensation consultant to advise the Committee | ✘ | NO excessive perquisites | |
2026 Proxy Statement | 35
The following chart depicts annual compensation for Mr. Smith and for the other NEOs in 2025 and reflects the split between (i) at-risk
compensation, consisting of RSUs, PSUs and annual cash incentive awards and (ii) compensation not tied to performance, consisting
of base salary, and further demonstrates our philosophy of aligning executive compensation with company performance and
shareholder interests. The amounts below include PSUs at their grant date fair values and annual cash incentive awards based on
actual achievement in 2025:
Elements of Executive Officer Compensation
Component | Form | Objective and Explanation | ||
Salary | Cash | •Base level compensation, rewards day-to-day performance and standard job duties •Reflects level of responsibilities and experience/tenure | ||
Performance- Based Annual Cash Incentive | Cash | •Designed to reward the achievement of specific, pre-established annual financial and operational objectives •2025 performance objectives consist of company and individual goals | ||
Equity Awards | Performance- based PSUs and service-based RSUs | • The target equity pay mix for our CEO and other NEOs in 2025 was 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs • Provide alignment of interests with shareholders • Multi-year vesting periods aid in retention • Performance-based PSUs tied to multi-year goals, with both absolute and relative performance measures that incorporate market outperformance, motivate executives to focus on sustained, long-term financial performance | ||
36 | AMH
2025 Compensation Decisions
Changes to Compensation of the CEO
As a result of his promotion to Chief Executive Officer and his
performance, and supported by the data and recommendations
provided by the Committee's independent compensation advisor,
the Committee increased Mr. Smith's compensation for 2025 in
connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. As
part of this annual compensation review process and in
connection with his promotion, Mr. Smith's base salary was
increased to $850,000 from $750,000, and his annual long-term
equity incentive award target was increased to $4,675,000 from
$2,076,800. These increases were made to be competitive with
the market for Chief Executive Officers among our peers (please
refer to "Benchmarking Peer Group" below for a discussion of
our compensation setting practices and our peer group).
Changes to Compensation of the other Named
Executive Officers
In consideration of each executive's performance, the
competitive positioning of their compensation relative to the
market, and the recommendations of Mr. Smith, effective
January 1, 2025, the Committee increased 2025 base salaries
for Mr. Lau to $700,000 and Ms. Vogt-Lowell to $550,000,
representing 7.9% and 4.8% increases, respectively. In
approving these salaries, the Committee considered the strong
performance of Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell in effectively
supporting the company's CEO transition in early 2025, each
NEO’s contributions to the company’s strategic plan, the relative
pay of each NEO compared to similar roles at competitors and
peer companies, the expanded responsibilities of each NEO as
a result of the succession plan, and the intense competition for
top talent in the real estate industry generally and in the single-
family home rental sector in particular. The 2025 annual cash
incentive target for Mr. Lau was unchanged from 2024 and
increased from 125% to 150% of base salary for Ms. Vogt-
Lowell. The 2025 annual equity award targets were 350% of
base salary for Mr. Lau and 250% of base salary for Ms. Vogt-
Lowell.
Performance-Based Incentive Bonuses—2025 Performance Metrics and Targets
The 2025 annual incentive plan targets established by the Committee were:
NEO | Title | Target % of Base Salary | ||
Bryan Smith | Chief Executive Officer and Trustee | 175% | ||
Chris Lau | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Executive Vice President | 150% | ||
Sara Vogt-Lowell | Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Legal Officer | 150% | ||
2025 performance-based incentive bonuses (the “Annual
Incentive Plan” or “AIP”) were based 70% on a corporate metric
and 30% on individual goals that were established for each NEO
by the Committee in the first quarter of 2025.
•Corporate Metric: In the first quarter of 2025, the
Committee set the corporate metric as Core FFO per share
growth. The Committee selected Core FFO as the
corporate metric because it is a commonly used measure of
real estate investment trust (“REIT”) performance by
investors and it is a metric used for compensation purposes
by the majority of our peer group.
•Individual Goals: The 2025 individual goals set for the
NEOs are described below under “2025 Performance-
Based Cash Incentive Awards.”
Growth in Core FFO
The target Core FFO goal for 2025 was $1.85 per common
share, a 4.4% increase over 2024 actual Core FFO per common
share. The threshold, target and maximum bonus payable at the
targets set by the Committee are set forth below. In the event the
result achieved was between target levels in the chart, the bonus
paid is adjusted accordingly through linear interpolation.
Funds from operations (FFO) attributable to common share and
unit holders is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate
in accordance with the definition approved by the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, which defines
FFO as net income or loss calculated in accordance with
GAAP, excluding gains and losses from sales or impairment of
real estate, plus real estate-related depreciation and
amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs
and depreciation of non-real estate assets), and after
adjustments for unconsolidated real estate joint ventures to
reflect FFO on the same basis. Core FFO attributable to
common share and unit holders is also a non-GAAP financial
measure that we use as a supplemental measure of our
performance. We compute this metric by adjusting FFO
attributable to common share and unit holders for (1) acquisition
and other transaction costs incurred with business combinations
and the acquisition or disposition of properties as well as
nonrecurring items unrelated to ongoing operations and
adjustments for investments in proptech venture capital funds
related to the pro rata equity pickup of realized and unrealized
gains and losses from their portfolio investments, (2) noncash
share-based compensation expense, (3) hurricane-related
charges, net, which result in material charges to our single-
family property portfolio, (4) gain or loss on early extinguishment
of debt and (5) the allocation of income to our perpetual
preferred shares in connection with their redemption. Core FFO
per share is our Core FFO divided by our weighted-average
common shares outstanding. See pages 13 and 31 to 33 of
Exhibit 99.2 to the company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
February 19, 2026 for additional information regarding Core FFO
for 2025.
2026 Proxy Statement | 37
Committee Assessment of Achievement of 2025 Goals
2025 Performance-Based Cash Incentive Awards
Corporate metric achievement (70% weighting)
The company achieved 2025 Core FFO per share of $1.8678, which was 1.0% above the target of $1.85. As a result, the Committee
determined that each NEO earned 106.4% of his or her target for the Core FFO per share component of the award.
Core FFO per share | |||||
Performance Achievement | Performance (% Target) | AIP Payout (% Target) | Core FFO per share | ||
Maximum | 115% | 200% | $2.1275 | ||
Target | 100% | 100% | $1.8500 | ||
Threshold | 85% | 0% | $1.5725 | ||
Actual | 101.0% | 106.4% | $1.8678 | ||
Individual goal achievement (30% weighting)
In addition to the achievement of the corporate metric, each
NEO was also assessed on individual goals which were
designed to support the company's strategic objectives. In the
first quarter of 2025, the Committee determined the NEOs 2025
goals would be (i) to drive strong operational performance and
resident satisfaction as measured against external reputation
metrics and to enhance strategic communications, (ii) to oversee
the company's sustainability initiatives as measured against a
third party rating, (iii) to support employee engagement and
team development as measured by employee survey data, and
(iv) to execute on individual development plans in connection
with external executive coaching.
In February 2026, the Committee reviewed the NEOs
achievement of these goals and determined that, based on his
and her achievement of the individual goals, each earned
100.5% of his or her target for the individual goal portion of the
2025 performance-based cash incentive awards.
The following table details the performance-based cash incentive award achieved for each NEO, as determined by the Committee:
Performance-Based Cash Incentive Award Achievement | Bryan Smith | Chris Lau | Sara Vogt-Lowell | |||
Core Funds from Operations (70% weighting) | 106.4% | 106.4% | 106.4% | |||
Individual Goals (30% weighting) | 100.5% | 100.5% | 100.5% | |||
Aggregate Payout % | 104.6% | 104.6% | 104.6% | |||
Aggregate Payout Amount | $1,556,371 | $1,098,615 | $863,198 |
38 | AMH
2025 Equity Awards
The Committee believes equity awards help align management and shareholder interests by supporting long-term value creation and
promoting the retention and stability of our executive management team. In the first quarter of 2025, the Committee granted the NEOs
a mix of PSUs which vest after a three-year performance period and time-based RSUs which vest ratably in equal annual installments
over three years. Each target grant was comprised of 60% PSUs and 40% of RSUs.
In January 2025, the Committee granted RSUs and PSUs with the intended target values set forth below, with the number of units
determined by dividing the target value by the closing share price on the grant date.
2025 Annual Equity Grant | Bryan Smith | Chris Lau | Sara Vogt-Lowell |
RSUs | $1,870,000 | $980,000 | $550,000 |
PSUs | $2,805,000 | $1,470,000 | $825,000 |
The Committee considered Mr. Smith’s recommendations, as well as market data and recommendations provided by its independent
compensation advisor, in determining the annual equity grants to Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell.
The PSUs have a three-year performance period tied to the achievement of both relative TSR (50%) and absolute Core FFO per share
growth goals (50%), which were set in the first quarter of 2025. Payouts on PSUs at achievement of threshold goals will be 50% of
target and maximum achievement will be 200% of target. PSU payouts are linearly interpolated for performance between the threshold,
target, and maximum performance goals, with no payout for a measure if performance is below threshold for that measure. Core FFO
growth is measured annually based on year-over-year change in Core FFO per share. At the end of each of the three annual periods,
the payout for that portion of the Core FFO PSUs related to each year is determined based on that year's Core FFO growth compared
to the target and the final payout is based on the average of the three years' payouts. TSR is measured over the performance period
based on changes in stock price, assuming reinvestment of dividends.
PSU Payout Level % of Target | Relative TSR Performance (50% weighting) | Core FFO Growth Achieved (50% weighting) |
200% | 75th Percentile | Maximum achievement against absolute Core FFO growth goal |
100% | 50th Percentile | Target achievement against absolute Core FFO growth goal |
50% | 25th Percentile | Threshold achievement against absolute Core FFO growth goal |
The company’s TSR performance will be compared to the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITs Index. Based on the recommendation of
Semler Brossy, the Committee transitioned from a Committee-selected peer group of companies used previously to a third-party
market index as the comparator group for relative TSR performance in 2025. The Committee believes that use of a broad-based index
provides a more objective and transparent benchmark, reduces subjectivity associated with periodic peer group composition changes,
and enhances consistency in performance measurement over time. We have omitted the specific absolute Core FFO growth goals
because disclosure would result in competitive harm. We intend to disclose the goals and actual results at the conclusion of the
performance period.
2026 Proxy Statement | 39
Performance of 2023-2025 PSUs
The PSUs granted in 2023 (the "2023 PSUs") had the same design as our 2025 PSUs described above, with pre-established, objective
performance measures resulting in a number of PSUs becoming earned at the end of the performance period based on relative TSR
performance and Core FFO growth, except that the relative TSR portion for the 2023 PSUs was measured against a peer group of
thirty publicly traded REITs and other residential real estate companies as disclosed in our 2024 proxy statement, rather than the index
described above. For the 2023 PSUs, the company achieved relative TSR Performance at the 63rd percentile of the applicable peer
group, resulting in a payout of 151.9% for the relative TSR component. The company also achieved annual Core FFO growth of 7.9%,
6.6%, and 5.4%, respectively, for each year of the performance period, resulting in an annual award of 172.0%, 139.1% and 111.2%,
respectively, and overall award and payout of 140.8% for the Core FFO growth component. The aggregate payout is 146.4% of target
for the 2023 PSUs, as certified by the Committee in February 2026.
Three-Year Relative TSR Achievement (50% Weighting) | Three-Year Core FFO Achievement (50% Weighting) | ||||
Relative TSR Percentile | Peer Group TSR | Relative TSR Payout % | Annual Core FFO Growth | Core FFO Payout % | |
75th Percentile | 24.68% | 200% | 9.0% | 200% | |
50th Percentile | 12.50% | 100% | 5.0% | 100% | |
25th Percentile | 0.59% | 50% | 1.0% | 50% | |
2023-2025 Actual TSR Percentile | 2023-2025 Actual TSR | Relative TSR Payout Achieved | 2023-2025 Actual Core FFO Growth | Core FFO Payout Achieved | |
63rd Percentile | 16.3% | 151.9% | 7.9%, 6.6% and 5.4% | 140.8% | |
Based on the relative TSR achievement and Core FFO achievement described above, the overall PSU payout was 146.4% of the
original target award for each of the NEOs.
2026 Compensation Outlook
In November 2025, the Committee, in consultation with its
independent compensation consultant Semler Brossy, and taking
into consideration the competitiveness of the company’s
executive pay practices, approved the 2026 compensation
program. The Committee considered Mr. Smith’s
recommendations in determining the base salaries,
performance-based cash incentive award targets and equity
grant amounts to Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell.
Base salaries: The Committee reviewed base salaries for 2026
and considered, among other things, a market analysis
performed by Semler Brossy and, with respect to the executives
that report to him, the recommendations of Mr. Smith. The base
salaries for 2026 are set forth below. Mr. Smith received a base
salary increase of 17.6% and Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell each
received a base salary increase of 3.6%. In approving these
salaries, the Committee considered the strong performance of
each NEO, including their contributions to the company’s
strategic plan, the relative pay of each NEO compared to similar
roles at competitors and peer companies, and the intense
competition for top talent in the real estate industry. Additionally,
with respect to Mr. Smith, the Committee considered his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer in 2025, following his
prior service as Chief Operating Officer, and determined to align
his base salary with market levels for chief executive officers
among the company’s peers over time. The Committee
approved his base salary increase in 2026 consistent with that
approach.
Performance-based cash incentive award: As in 2025, the
2026 performance-based cash incentive award for NEOs will
depend 70% on the achievement of Core FFO goals and 30%
on the achievement of leadership goals and generally include
objectives related to business strategy, sustainability, technology
oversight, and team development. The 2026 target award level
as a percentage of base salary for Mr. Smith was increased from
175% in 2025 to 200% in 2026 and was unchanged from 2025
for each of the other NEOs.
Long-term performance and time-based equity incentives:
The 2026 equity awards consist of a mix of PSUs and time-
based RSUs, with 60% of the NEOs' grants being PSUs. This is
the same mix as in 2025. The PSU design is unchanged from
2025. The PSUs have a three-year performance period tied to
the achievement of both relative TSR (50%) and Core FFO
growth goals (50%), which were set in the first quarter of 2026.
Payouts on PSUs at achievement of threshold goals will be 50%
of target and maximum achievement will be 200% of target. The
time-based RSUs will vest ratably over three years. The
Committee awarded RSUs and PSUs with the target values set
forth below, with the number of units determined by dividing the
target value by the closing share price on each respective grant
date, which was January 2, 2026 for the RSUs, and February
20, 2026 for the PSUs.
40 | AMH
2026 Compensation | Bryan Smith | Chris Lau | Sara Vogt-Lowell |
Base Salary | $1,000,000 | $725,000 | $570,000 |
Annual Cash Incentive Target | 200% | 150% | 150% |
Annual RSU Grant | $2,200,000 | $1,015,000 | $570,000 |
Annual PSU Grant | $3,300,000 | $1,522,500 | $855,000 |
Role of Management and Board in
Determining the Compensation of
Executive Officers
In 2025, Mr. Smith attended the meetings of the Committee. He
did not vote on items before the Committee and was not present
during the Committee’s discussions and determination
concerning his compensation. The Committee solicited his views
on the performance of the executive officers reporting to him and
considered his recommendations for their compensation. For
2025, the Committee set base salaries, bonus and equity
compensation for our NEOs after considering the views of our
compensation consultant and other Board members and, except
with respect to his own compensation, Mr. Smith’s
recommendations.
Role of Compensation Consultant
Semler Brossy serves as the Committee’s independent, third-
party compensation consultant. The Committee considered
Semler Brossy’s advice on a range of compensation matters,
including its consideration of potential enhancements to the
2025 compensation program, benchmarking analysis of peer
compensation practices and its recommendations for the 2026
compensation program, in each case as discussed in more
detail throughout this CD&A.
Semler Brossy reports directly to the Committee and does not
provide services to the company’s management that are not
under the Committee’s purview. Since its engagement, a
representative of Semler Brossy has attended meetings of the
Committee and will continue to do so upon request. The
Committee annually considers all factors relevant to Semler
Brossy’s independence, as required by the Committee’s charter.
Based on this review, the Committee determined that Semler
Brossy is independent and free of conflicts of interest.
Benchmarking Peer Group
The Committee monitors the effectiveness of our executive
compensation programs at least annually. For the compensation
programs to be effective, the Committee believes that the
compensation practices of other public real estate companies
with which we compete for talent is one tool in assessing and
determining pay for our executive officers. Semler Brossy assists
the Committee with these analyses. The Committee uses
benchmarking for informational purposes only. The median (50th
percentile) serves as a reference point and indicator of
competitive market trends and the Committee uses it as the
starting point when setting our executive compensation, but the
Committee also considers a number of other factors, including
skills, experience, performance and future potential of each
executive.
2026 Proxy Statement | 41
The company's peer group for 2025 compensation decisions is set forth in the following table. The peer group was based on
similarities in industry sector, size (capitalization and assets), and underlying business fundamentals.
Name | Ticker | Property Focus | ||
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | AVB | Multi-family | ||
Brixmor Property Group, Inc | BRX | Open-air shopping centers | ||
Camden Property Trust | CPT | Multi-family | ||
Douglas Emmett, Inc. | DEI | Class-A office Buildings and Apartment | ||
Equity Residential | EQR | Multi-family | ||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. | ESS | Multi-family | ||
Extra Space Storage, Inc. | EXR | Self-Storage Properties | ||
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | HST | Hotels | ||
Invitation Homes | INVH | Single-family rental | ||
Kilroy Realty Corporation | KRC | Premier Office Submarkets | ||
Kimco Realty Corporation | KIM | Open-air shopping centers | ||
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. | MAA | Multi-family | ||
Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | PK | Hotel Properties | ||
Regency Centers Corporation | REG | Open-air shopping centers | ||
Sun Communities, Inc. | SUI | Manufactured Home and RV Communities | ||
Tricon Residential, Inc.(1) | Formerly TCN | Single-family rental | ||
UDR, Inc. | UDR | Multi-family |
(1) Tricon Residential was taken private in 2024 and is no longer publicly traded.
Equity Grant Practices
must be approved by the Committee, which consists entirely of
independent trustees. Grants occur only at meetings or upon
written actions of the Board or the Committee and are made
effective as of the date of the meeting or written action or a
future date if appropriate, such as in the case of a new hire. In
2025, the Committee delegated limited authority to Mr. Smith to
approve equity awards to employees who are not executive
officers.
Awards are also subject to the terms of the 2021 Equity
Incentive Plan. All awards of RSUs granted to date to employees
under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan vest over several years.
In general, the Committee considers equity awards for executive
officers in connection with their annual performance review. In
determining equity awards, our Committee considers, among
other factors, input from other Board members and the
independent compensation consultant, the company’s overall
financial performance, operational achievements, including
acquisitions and the recommendations of our Chief Executive
Term of Employment
Each of our NEOs serves at the pleasure of our Board. We have
not entered into employment agreements with any of our NEOs.
However, each NEO is party to a severance and change-in-
control letter agreement, which provides for certain contractual
protections in the event of termination under specified
circumstances. These agreements establish severance benefits
in the event of a termination by the company without cause or
resignation for good reason, as well as change-in-control (CIC)
protections in the event of termination within a specified period
following a qualifying CIC event. These agreements provide
clarity and certainty to executives while reinforcing retention and
alignment with shareholder interests. Further details regarding
the specific severance and CIC provisions can be found in the
section "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control."
42 | AMH
Retirement Savings Opportunities
All full-time employees, including our NEOs, are able to
participate in a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k)
plan”), after a prescribed period of employment. We provide this
plan to help our employees save for retirement in a tax efficient
manner. Under the 401(k) plan, participating employees are
eligible to defer a portion of their salary beginning the January 1
or July 1 that first follows the completion of six months of
employment, and we make a matching contribution commencing
six months after they are eligible to begin contributing to the
401(k) plan.
Health and Welfare Benefits
We provide to all full-time employees, including our NEOs, a
competitive benefits package, which includes health and welfare
benefits, such as medical, dental, short- and long-term disability
insurance and life insurance benefits.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Code imposes a $1,000,000 limit on the
annual deduction that may be claimed for compensation paid to
each of the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and
certain other executive officers of the company.
While the Committee considers the tax and accounting impact of
various forms of incentive compensation and compensation
elements on the company’s financial statements, tax and
accounting treatment is generally not the basis underlying the
decision to award a particular form of compensation if the
Committee deems the award the most appropriate incentive to
achieve the company’s compensation goals.
Human Capital and Compensation
Committee Report
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board
of Trustees of AMH has reviewed and discussed with
management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and
Analysis. Based on this review and discussion, the Human
Capital and Compensation Committee recommended to the
Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be
included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of AMH for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
This report is provided by the following independent trustees
who comprise the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee:
THE HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
Douglas Benham, Chair
Winifred Webb
Jay Willoughby
Matthew Zaist
2026 Proxy Statement | 43
Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides compensation information for our NEOs determined in accordance with SEC rules for the three fiscal
years ended December 31, 2025.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) (1) | Bonus ($) | Option Awards ($) | Stock Awards ($) (2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (3) | All Other Compensation ($) (4) | Total ($) |
Bryan Smith CEO | 2025 | 850,000 | – | – | 5,114,700 | 1,556,371 | 14,107 | 7,535,178 |
2024 | 731,500 | – | – | 2,263,000 | 1,404,375 | 13,883 | 4,412,758 | |
2023 | 624,000 | – | – | 2,058,400 | 1,035,347 | 13,293 | 3,731,040 | |
Chris Lau CFO | 2025 | 700,000 | – | – | 2,680,400 | 1,098,615 | 14,106 | 4,493,121 |
2024 | 649,000 | – | – | 7,263,000 | 1,041,645 | 13,894 | 8,967,539 | |
2023 | 624,000 | – | – | 2,058,400 | 1,036,246 | 13,276 | 3,731,922 | |
Sara Vogt-Lowell CAO/CLO | 2025 | 550,000 | – | – | 1,504,300 | 863,198 | 14,082 | 2,931,580 |
2024 | 525,000 | – | – | 1,144,200 | 702,188 | 13,901 | 2,385,289 | |
2023 | 500,000 | – | – | 1,099,600 | 691,938 | 13,268 | 2,304,806 |
(1)Mr. Smith’s salary was increased to $850,000 effective January 1, 2025 in connection with his promotion to CEO.
(2)RSU awards and PSU awards are valued at the grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. RSU awards are valued based on the closing
share price on the NYSE of $36.75 and $34.47 per share for Class A common shares on the date of grant for 2025 and 2023 grants, respectively,
and $36.07 and $34.73 per share for Class A common shares on the date of grant for January 3, 2024 and February 21, 2024 grants, respectively.
The payout of the PSU awards will be between 0% and 200% of target based on the achievement of both Core FFO growth goals and TSR relative
to a group of peer companies. The portion of PSU awards linked to Core FFO growth goals (50%) was valued at $36.75, $36.07 and $34.47 per
PSU award based on the closing share price on the NYSE on the grant date and assuming target level of performance for 2025, 2024 and 2023
grants is probable, respectively. The portion of PSU awards linked to relative TSR (50%) was valued at $48.27, $46.85 and $45.91 per PSU award
based on a multifactor Monte Carlo model for the performance period of January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027, January 1, 2024 to December 31,
2026 and January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025 using a valuation date share price of $36.75, $36.07 and $34.47 for 2025, 2024 and 2023 grants,
respectively. Volatility and risk-free rate assumptions used in the multifactor Monte Carlo model are based on term structure and are disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following represents the aggregate grant date fair value for RSU awards and PSU awards granted in 2025 as well
as the value of PSU awards at maximum vesting on the grant date.
2025 RSU Awards ($) | 2025 PSU Awards ($) | Total of RSUs and PSUs ($) | 2025 PSU Awards Maximum ($) | ||
Bryan Smith | 1,870,000 | 3,244,700 | 5,114,700 | 5,610,000 | |
Chris Lau | 980,000 | 1,700,400 | 2,680,400 | 2,940,000 | |
Sara Vogt-Lowell | 550,000 | 954,300 | 1,504,300 | 1,650,000 | |
(3)The amounts reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column reflect actual payments made to each NEO under the AIP for fiscal
years 2025, 2024 and 2023.
(4)All Other Compensation consists of (i) 401(k) plan contributions by the company of $14,000 to each named executive officer for 2025 and (ii)
imputed income related to the vesting of stock awards of $107, $106 and $82 in 2025 for Mr. Smith, Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell, respectively.
44 | AMH
Grants of Plan Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information relating to grants of plan based awards to the NEOs during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2025.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (4) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (5) | |||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) (1) | Target ($) (1) | Maximum ($) (1) | Threshold (#) (1) | Target (#) (1) | Maximum (#) (1) | |||
Bryan Smith | ||||||||||
PSU Award | 1/2/2025 | – | – | – | 38,164 | 76,327 | 152,654 | – | 3,244,700 | |
RSU Award | 1/2/2025 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 50,885 | 1,870,000 | |
Annual Incentive | – | – | 1,487,500 | 2,629,156 | – | – | – | – | – | |
Chris Lau | ||||||||||
PSU Award | 1/2/2025 | – | – | – | 20,000 | 40,000 | 80,000 | – | 1,700,400 | |
RSU Award | 1/2/2025 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 26,667 | 980,000 | |
Annual Incentive | – | – | 1,050,000 | 1,855,875 | – | – | – | – | – | |
Sara Vogt-Lowell | ||||||||||
PSU Award | 1/2/2025 | – | – | – | 11,225 | 22,449 | 44,898 | – | 954,300 | |
RSU Award | 1/2/2025 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,966 | 550,000 | |
Annual Incentive | – | – | 825,000 | 1,458,188 | – | – | – | – | – | |
(1)The amounts shown in these columns represent the range of possible incentive payouts based upon achievement of performance targets.
(2)Represents fiscal year 2025 cash incentive award opportunity granted under the 2025 AIP, assuming 177% payout for Maximum achievement
calculated as 70% of the award based on Core FFO at maximum payout of 200% and 30% of the award based on individual goals at maximum
payout of 122.5%. As described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the AIP does not provide for threshold performance.
(3)Amounts in the “Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards” columns relate to payout opportunities of the PSUs granted in 2025,
which were granted under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. Threshold is based upon achieving threshold performance in each of the Core FFO and
the rTSR performance metrics. Maximum is based on achievement of maximum performance in each of the Core FFO and the rTSR performance
metrics. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional details regarding the 2025 PSU program.
(4)Amounts in the “All Other Stock Awards; Number of Shares of Stock or Units” column relate to the 2025 RSUs. The RSUs vest over three years in
three equal annual installments. All RSUs were granted under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan.
(5)Amounts reflect the fair value of RSUs and PSUs computed as of the grant date, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the
effect of estimated forfeitures. For RSUs, the fair value is computed by multiplying the number of RSUs awarded by the fair market value of the
company’s Class A common shares on the grant date. For PSUs, the fair value of the portion of awards linked to Core FFO growth goals is
computed by multiplying the number of these PSU awards by the fair market value of the company's Class A common shares on the grant date while
the fair value of the portion of awards linked to TSR relative to a group of peer companies is computed by multiplying the number of these PSU
awards by the grant date fair value of $48.27 per share based on a multifactor Monte Carlo model.
2026 Proxy Statement | 45
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth information for each NEO with respect to the outstanding unvested equity awards as of the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2025.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) (1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Dates | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) (2) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) (3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested (#) (4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Units That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | |
Bryan Smith | 2/23/2017 | 20,000 | – | 23.38 | 2/23/2027 | – | – | – | – | |
2/22/2018 | 10,000 | – | 19.40 | 2/22/2028 | – | – | – | – | ||
2/7/2023 | – | – | – | – | 7,242 | 232,468 | 65,170 | 2,091,957 | ||
1/3/2024 | – | – | – | – | 15,354 | 492,863 | 51,821 | 1,663,454 | ||
1/2/2025 | – | – | – | – | 50,885 | 1,633,409 | 76,327 | 2,450,097 | ||
Chris Lau | 2/22/2018 | 2,500 | – | 19.40 | 2/22/2028 | – | – | – | – | |
2/7/2023 | – | – | – | – | 7,242 | 232,468 | 65,170 | 2,091,957 | ||
1/3/2024 | – | – | – | – | 15,354 | 492,863 | 51,821 | 1,663,454 | ||
2/21/2024 | – | – | – | – | 143,968 | 4,621,373 | – | – | ||
1/2/2025 | – | – | – | – | 26,667 | 856,011 | 40,000 | 1,284,000 | ||
Sara Vogt- Lowell | ||||||||||
2/7/2023 | – | – | – | – | 3,869 | 124,195 | 34,814 | 1,117,529 | ||
1/3/2024 | – | – | – | – | 7,764 | 249,224 | 26,201 | 841,052 | ||
1/2/2025 | – | – | – | – | 14,966 | 480,409 | 22,449 | 720,613 | ||
(1) All option awards vested ratably over a period of four years from the date of grant (February 23, 2017 for grants that expire on February 23, 2027
and February 22, 2018 for grants that expire on February 22, 2028).
(2)RSUs vest in three annual installments beginning one year from the date of grant except for the RSU award granted to Chris Lau on February 21,
2024, which cliff vests five years from the date of grant.
(3)The value shown in this column assumes a price of $32.10 per share, the closing price for the company’s Class A common shares on the NYSE on
December 31, 2025.
(4)Represents outstanding PSUs at the probable outcome as of December 31, 2025. The PSUs will vest upon achievement of the performance targets
at the conclusion of the three-year performance period.
46 | AMH
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2025
The following table provides information about options exercised by and RSU and PSU awards vested for the NEOs during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2025.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | ||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (1) | |
Bryan Smith | – | – | 72,415 | 2,540,984 | |
Chris Lau | – | – | 72,415 | 2,540,984 | |
Sara Vogt-Lowell | 42,500 | 834,925 | 38,095 | 1,336,364 | |
(1)Value realized was calculated by multiplying the number of shares vested by the closing price of our Class A common shares on the vesting dates of
January 3, 2025, February 1, 2025, February 4, 2025 and February 7, 2025, for Mr. Smith, Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell.
Pension/Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plans
We do not maintain a pension plan or deferred compensation
plan for any of our employees, including the NEOs.
Potential Payments Upon Termination
or Change in Control
Payments Upon Termination
The Committee, in consultation with its independent
compensation consultant, provides severance and change of
control letter agreements with each of the NEOs which provide
that, in the event of a termination by the company without cause
or a resignation for good reason, each NEO would be entitled to
receive a lump sum severance payment equal to a specified
percentage of his or her annual base salary and target bonus,
which is 200% for Mr. Smith, 125% for Mr. Lau, and 100% for
Ms. Vogt-Lowell, and payment of COBRA health coverage for up
to 24 months for Mr. Smith, 15 months for Mr. Lau, and 12
months for Ms. Vogt-Lowell, or, if earlier, until eligibility for
coverage with a subsequent employer.
The severance benefit levels described above reflect the
severance letter agreements effective February 2026. The
amounts shown in the "Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change in Control" table below assume a termination on
December 31, 2025 but reflect the benefit levels under the
February 2026 severance letter agreements.
Additionally, the following indicate our general practice:
•vested stock options following a voluntary termination of
employment (other than for death or disability) must be
exercised within three months following the individual’s last
date of employment or are otherwise forfeited;
•unvested time-based RSUs and PSUs are forfeited (except
in the case of death or disability or a qualifying retirement);
•payment of any amounts contributed by the participant and
the company under the 401(k) plan; and
•accrued and unused vacation pay paid in a lump sum.
Payments Upon Death or Disability
In the event of the death or permanent and total disability of an
NEO while employed by the company, the NEO will receive the
401(k) plan contributions noted above and accrued unused
vacation pay, in addition to the following:
•all unvested outstanding stock options held by the NEO
accelerate and vest as of the date of death or disability, as
defined in the plan, and may be exercised during the one
year period following the date of death or termination due to
disability, but prior to expiration of the option;
•all unvested time-based RSUs and restricted share grants
held by the NEO accelerate and vest as of the date of
death or disability, as defined in the plan;
•for all unvested PSUs, (i) if the termination date is prior to
the end of the performance period, such awards will vest
based on target performance (pro-rated for the number of
days the NEO worked for the company during such period)
and (ii) if the termination date is after the end of the
performance period, such awards will vest based on actual
performance; and
•the NEO will receive payments under the company’s life
insurance program or disability plan, as applicable, similar
to all other employees of the company.
Payments Upon Retirement
NEOs participate in our equity awards retirement policy on the
same terms as other employees. The policy is intended to
recognize long-tenured employees who have contributed to the
growth and success of the company. Specifically, in the event of
an NEO’s qualifying retirement, all unvested outstanding RSUs,
PSUs and stock options held by the NEO that were granted will
continue to vest on the schedule set forth on the award, and any
vested option may be exercised during the one year period
following the vesting, but prior to expiration of the option.
2026 Proxy Statement | 47
A qualifying retirement is a voluntary termination other than for
cause or as a result of death or disability where the NEO (i) is at
least 55 years old and has provided service for at least five
years, and the sum of the NEO’s age and total years of service
is at least 70, and (ii) the NEO executes a customary non-
compete or non-solicit agreement, if requested by the
Committee or the Chief Executive Officer. None of our NEOs
were eligible for a qualifying retirement as of the end of fiscal
year 2025.
Payments Upon a Change in Control
The severance and change of control letter agreements with
each of the NEOs provide that, in the event of a termination by
the company without cause or a resignation for good reason by
the executive within two years of a "change in control," each
NEO would be entitled to receive a lump sum severance
payment equal to a specified percentage of his or her annual
base salary and target bonus, which is 300% for Mr. Smith,
225% for Mr. Lau, and 200% for Ms. Vogt-Lowell, and payment
of COBRA health coverage for up to 24 months (36 months for
Mr. Smith), or until he or she is eligible for the health coverage of
a subsequent employer.
The company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan provides that upon
the occurrence of a “change in control” of the company in which
provision is made in writing in connection with the “change in
control” for continuation of the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan or
substitution of new options, restricted shares, RSUs and PSUs,
then the awards will continue without any accelerated vesting;
provided, however, that if an award is assumed, continued or
substituted upon the consummation of any “change in control”
and the employment of the grantee with the company is
terminated without cause or by the grantee for good reason
within two years following the consummation of such “change in
control,” such award will be fully vested and may be exercised in
full, to the extent applicable, beginning on the date of such
termination and for the one-year period immediately following
such termination or for such longer period as the Committee will
determine.
The company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan provides that upon
the occurrence of a “change in control” of the company in which
the applicable equity award is not continued, assumed or
substituted:
•all outstanding unvested time-based RSUs and restricted
share grants will vest immediately;
•all outstanding unvested stock options vest 15 days before
consummation of such a change in control and are
exercisable during such 15-day period, with such exercise
conditioned upon and effective immediately before
consummation of the change in control; and
•for unvested PSUs, (i) if less than half of the performance
period has lapsed, such awards will be treated as though
target performance has been achieved immediately prior to
the occurrence of the “change in control,” and (ii) if at least
half the performance period has lapsed, such awards will
vest based on actual performance determined as of a date
reasonably close to the date of the “change in control” as
determined by the Human Capital and Compensation
Committee in its sole discretion, or if actual performance is
not determinable, such awards will be treated as though
target performance has been achieved.
The Committee may also, in its sole discretion, cancel any
outstanding awards under the plan in exchange for payment.
A “change in control” is defined in the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan
to include:
•the dissolution or liquidation of the company or a merger in
which the company does not survive;
•the sale of substantially all of the company’s assets;
•any transaction that results in any person or entity owning
50% or more of the combined voting power of all classes of
our shares; or
•any transaction the Board specifies as a change in control.
48 | AMH
The following table shows the estimated value of potential payments to our NEOs pursuant to (i) a qualifying termination, (ii) a change
in control event (“CIC”) followed by a qualifying termination, (iii) a change in control event with no termination but in which equity
awards are not continued, assumed or substituted or (iv) death or disability, each as described above. The amounts assume the event
occurred as of December 31, 2025 and reflect the benefit levels under the severance letter agreements effective February 2026. The
acceleration of unvested equity awards (or, for qualifying retirements, the value of awards that will no longer have a service
requirement) assumes a closing market price of our Class A common shares on December 31, 2025 of $32.10.
Name | Compensation Element | Qualifying Termination, no CIC ($) | Qualifying Termination, CIC ($) | CIC Without Termination ($) | Death or Disability ($) |
Bryan Smith | Cash Incentive (1) | 4,675,000 | 7,012,500 | – | – |
Continuation of Health Benefits (2) | 57,100 | 85,600 | – | – | |
Value of Vesting of All Outstanding Unvested RSU Awards (3) | – | 2,358,740 | 2,358,740 | 2,358,740 | |
Value of Vesting of All Outstanding Unvested PSU Awards (4) | – | 4,605,034 | 4,605,034 | 4,605,034 | |
TOTAL | 4,732,100 | 14,061,874 | 6,963,774 | 6,963,774 | |
Chris Lau | Cash Incentive (5) | 2,187,500 | 3,937,500 | – | – |
Continuation of Health Benefits (2) | 48,400 | 77,400 | – | – | |
Value of Vesting of All Outstanding Unvested RSU Awards (3) | – | 6,202,715 | 6,202,715 | 6,202,715 | |
Value of Vesting of All Outstanding Unvested PSU Awards (4) | – | 3,438,937 | 3,438,937 | 3,438,937 | |
TOTAL | 2,235,900 | 13,656,552 | 9,641,652 | 9,641,652 | |
Sara Vogt-Lowell | Cash Incentive (6) | 1,375,000 | 2,750,000 | – | – |
Continuation of Health Benefits (2) | 28,500 | 57,100 | – | – | |
Value of Vesting of All Outstanding Unvested RSU Awards (3) | – | 853,828 | 853,828 | 853,828 | |
Value of Vesting of All Outstanding Unvested PSU Awards (4) | – | 1,840,068 | 1,840,068 | 1,840,068 | |
TOTAL | 1,403,500 | 5,500,996 | 2,693,896 | 2,693,896 |
(1)Represents the applicable multiple of annual salary and target bonus ($2,337,500), which is 200% for a qualifying termination with no change in
control and 300% for a qualifying termination with a change in control.
(2)Represents the projected cost of COBRA health coverage for a maximum of 24 months for Mr. Smith, 15 months for Mr. Lau and 12 months for Ms.
Vogt-Lowell for a qualifying termination with no change in control and 36 months for Mr. Smith and 24 months for Mr. Lau and Ms. Vogt-Lowell for a
qualifying termination with a change in control as of December 31, 2025.
(3)Represents the number of outstanding RSUs multiplied by the closing price of the company’s Class A common shares on December 31, 2025, as
applicable.
(4)Represents the number of outstanding PSUs at target multiplied by the closing price of the company’s Class A common shares on December 31,
2025, as applicable.
(5)Represents the applicable multiple of annual salary and target bonus ($1,750,000), which is 125% for a qualifying termination with no change in
control and 225% for a qualifying termination with a change in control.
(6)Represents the applicable multiple of annual salary and target bonus ($1,375,000), which is 100% for a qualifying termination with no change in
control and 200% for a qualifying termination with a change in control.
2026 Proxy Statement | 49
CEO Pay Ratio
Presented below is the ratio of annual total compensation of our
CEO in 2025, Bryan Smith, to the annual total compensation of
our median employee (excluding Mr. Smith). The ratio presented
below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner
consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the
Exchange Act.
We selected the median employee in 2025 based on the 1,597
full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal workers (excluding
Mr. Smith) employed by the company or any of its consolidated
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2025. In identifying our median
employee, we calculated the annual total cash compensation/
W-2 compensation of each employee as of December 31, 2025.
Total cash compensation for these purposes included base
salary and cash incentives and was calculated using internal
human resources/tax records, including Form W-2 information.
We did not apply any cost-of-living adjustments as part of the
calculation.
The 2025 annual total compensation as determined under Item
402 of Regulation S-K for our CEO was $7,535,178. The 2025
annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of
Regulation S-K for our median employee was $75,937. The ratio
of our CEO’s annual total compensation to our median
employee’s total compensation for fiscal year 2025 is 99 to 1.
Pay Versus Performance Tables
relationship between compensation actually paid and certain company performance for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024,
2023, 2022 and 2021.
Year | Summary Compensation Table Total Pay for CEO (1)(2) | CAP to CEO (3) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total Pay for Other NEOs (1)(2) | Average CAP to Other NEOs (3) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | GAAP Net Income (5) | per Share (6) | |
TSR (4) | Peer Group TSR (4) | |||||||
($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |
2025 | ||||||||
2024 | ||||||||
2023 | ||||||||
2022 | ||||||||
2021 | ||||||||
(1)For 2025, the CEO was Bryan Smith . The other NEOs were Chris Lau and Sara Vogt-Lowell. For each year shown in 2024 and earlier, the CEO was
Jack Corrigan, Bryan Smith, Chris Lau and Sara Vogt-Lowell.
(2)The values reflected in this column reflect the “Total” compensation set forth in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) for each corresponding
fiscal year for the corresponding year's CEO or other NEOs, as applicable. See the footnotes to the SCT for further detail regarding the amounts in
this column.
(3)Compensation actually paid (“CAP”) is defined by the SEC and is computed in accordance with SEC rules by subtracting the amounts in the “Stock
Awards” and “Option Awards” columns of the SCT for each year from the “Total” column of the SCT and then: (i) adding the fair value as of the end
of the reported year of all awards granted during the reporting year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the reporting year; (ii) adding
the amount equal to the change as of the end of the reporting year (from the end of the prior year) in fair value (whether positive or negative) of any
awards granted in any prior year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the reporting year; (iii) adding the amount equal to the change
as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value (whether positive or negative) of any awards granted in any prior year for
which all applicable vesting conditions were satisfied at the end of or during the reporting year; (iv) subtracting, for any awards granted in any prior
year that are forfeited during the reporting year, the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior year; (v) adding the value of any dividends
(or dividend equivalents) paid in the reporting year on unvested equity awards and the value of accrued dividends (or dividend equivalents) paid on
performance awards that vested in the reporting year; and (vi) adding, for awards that are granted and vest in the same year, the fair value as of the
vesting date. The following tables reflect the adjustments made to SCT total compensation to compute CAP for our CEO and average CAP for our
other NEOs.
50 | AMH
CEO
Year | SCT Total Comp | Minus SCT Equity Awards | Plus Value of New Unvested Awards as of 12/31 | Plus Annual Change in Value of Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested | Plus Change in Value from Prior Year End to Vesting Date for Awards that Vested During Year | Plus Dividends on Unvested Awards/Accrued Dividends | Equals CAP |
($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |
2025 | ( | ( | ( |
Year | SCT Total Comp | Minus SCT Equity Awards | Plus Value of New Unvested Awards as of 12/31 | Plus Annual Change in Value of Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested | Plus Change in Value from Prior Year End to Vesting Date for Awards that Vested During Year | Plus Dividends on Unvested Awards/Accrued Dividends | Equals CAP |
($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |
2025 | ( | ( | ( |
(4)Reflects the cumulative TSR of the company and the MSCI US REIT Index for the year ended December 31, 2021, the two years ended December
31, 2022, the three years ended December 31, 2023, the four years ended December 31, 2024 and the five years ended December 31, 2025,
assuming a $100 investment at the closing price on December 31, 2020 and the reinvestment of all dividends.
(5)Amounts in thousands.
(6)See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional details on Core FFO per share.
Relationship of SEC CAP to Performance
as set forth in the table above), to (i) our cumulative TSR, (ii) our GAAP net income, and (iii) our Core FFO per share (in each case as
set forth in the table above). The first graph further illustrates the relationship of our cumulative TSR and the cumulative TSR of our
constituent companies in the MSCI US REIT Index for the covered years.
2026 Proxy Statement | 51
performance compensation for the most recently completed fiscal year are listed in the table below. The manner in which these
measures, together with certain non-financial performance measures, determine the amounts of incentive compensation paid to our
NEOs is described above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section.
Significant Financial Performance Measures |
52 | AMH
2026 Proxy Statement | 53
Board
Recommendation
Our Board unanimously
recommends that you
vote "FOR" approval, on
an advisory basis, of the
compensation of our
named executive
officers.
54 | AMH
Advisory Vote on Executive
Compensation
Pursuant to Section 14A(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, we are
including in these proxy materials a separate resolution, subject
to shareholder vote, to approve, in a non-binding advisory vote,
the compensation of our NEOs as described in this proxy
statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item
of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our
NEOs and the philosophy, policies and practices described in
this proxy statement. The advisory vote will be presented on an
annual basis unless otherwise disclosed.
At the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, approximately 95%
of the votes cast on this proposal were voted in favor of the
company’s executive compensation. The Human Capital and
Compensation Committee considered the results of the
shareholder vote in making its compensation decisions for our
NEOs. Additionally, at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
approximately 97% of the votes cast on this proposal were voted
in favor of the company’s executive compensation.
You are encouraged to carefully review the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section as well as the information
contained in the compensation tables and accompanying
narrative discussion contained in this proxy statement.
As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis section, our compensation philosophy and practices
seek to pay for performance and align shareholder and
executive interests.
Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders to indicate their
support for the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this
proxy statement by voting “FOR” the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of AMH approve, on an
advisory basis, the compensation paid to the company’s
named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy
statement for the Annual Meeting pursuant to Item 402 of
Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative
discussion that accompanies the compensation tables.”
The vote on the compensation of our NEOs is advisory and non-
binding on the company. However, the Human Capital and
Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing
and administering the company’s executive compensation
programs, will consider the outcome of the vote when making
future compensation decisions regarding our NEOs. We will
conduct the next advisory vote on executive compensation at the
2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
2026 Proxy Statement | 55
Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions
Related Party Transaction Approval
Policy and Procedures
We have adopted a written policy for the review and approval of
related party transactions requiring disclosure under Item 404(a)
of Regulation S-K. This policy provides that either the Audit
Committee or our full Board is responsible for reviewing and
approving or disapproving all interested transactions, meaning
any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which (1) the
amount involved may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any
fiscal year, (2) the company or one of our subsidiaries will be a
participant and (3) a related person has a direct or indirect
material interest. A related person is defined as an executive
officer, trustee or nominee for election as trustee, or a greater
than 5% beneficial owner of our common shares, or an
immediate family member of the foregoing. The policy may deem
certain interested transactions to be pre-approved. The Related
Party Transaction Policy is available at www.amh.com under
“Investor Relations”.
2025 Related Party Transactions
Mr. Corrigan’s brother-in-law, Tom Maloney, is an employee of
the company and received compensation during 2025 valued at
$265,000. Mr. Corrigan’s daughter, Kelly Corrigan, is an
employee of the company and received compensation during
2025 valued at $147,208. Other than the transactions described
in this section, which were each approved under the Related
Party Transaction Policy, we have not participated in any other
transactions with a related party since the beginning of 2025.
56 | AMH
General Information About the
Annual Meeting
Date, time and place of the Annual Meeting: The Annual
Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 14, 2026 at 9:00 a.m.,
Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be held in virtual-only
format. You may attend the meeting virtually or by proxy. You will
be able to attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting,
vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during
the meeting by visiting: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/
AMH2026.
Purpose of this proxy solicitation: We are providing these
proxy materials on behalf of the Board to ask for your vote and
to solicit your proxies for use at our Annual Meeting or any
adjournments or postponements thereof. We have delivered and
made these materials available to you on the Internet because
you were a shareholder as of March 20, 2026, the Record Date
fixed by the Board, and are therefore entitled to receive notice of
the Annual Meeting and to vote on matters presented at the
meeting.
Availability of proxy statement and annual report: All
shareholders receiving this proxy statement should have also
received a paper copy or access to an electronic copy of the
2025 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Additional copies
are available at: www.amh.com under “Investor Relations.”
The company will furnish any shareholder with a paper copy
of the 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K, excluding exhibits,
without charge, upon a written request to: Investor
Relations, AMH, 280 Pilot Road, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119.
Copies of exhibits will be provided at a copying charge of
$0.20 per page to reimburse us for a portion of the cost.
Who can vote: Only shareholders of record at the close of
business on the Record Date of March 20, 2026 will be entitled
to vote at the Annual Meeting, or at any adjournment or
postponement of the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date,
approximately 363,160,711 of the company’s Class A common
shares and 635,075 Class B common shares were issued and
outstanding. Holders of Class A common shares and Class B
common shares vote together on the matters for the election of
trustees, ratification of the appointment of the company’s
independent registered public accounting firm and approval, on
an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs. If your
shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, trustee or other
nominee, you may vote your shares at the virtual meeting only if
you obtain a legal proxy from your brokerage firm, bank or other
nominee.
Voting Rights: Each holder of Class A common shares is
entitled to one vote per share. Our charter does not permit
cumulative voting.
Each holder of Class B common shares is entitled to fifty votes
per share. The Class B shares were issued when the company
was organized to provide voting rights to holders of non-voting
units in the company’s operating partnership corresponding with
their equity ownership. In connection with certain transactions
where 48,119,891 operating partnership units were issued for
the contribution of assets to the company, the Hughes Family
received 635,075 Class B shares at a ratio of one Class B share
for every 49 operating partnership units received and all Class B
shares are currently held by an affiliate of the Hughes Family, HF
LLC. At the option of HF LLC, the operating partnership units
may be converted into an equivalent number of Class A common
shares. To the extent HF LLC converts the operating partnership
units, the Class B common shares automatically convert into
Class A common shares on a one-for-one basis, which supports
alignment between the Hughes Family’s equity ownership and
their voting rights.
As of the Record Date for the Annual Meeting, including their
ownership of common shares and operating partnership units,
the Hughes Family owns approximately 18.4% of the company
on a fully diluted basis. Including their Class B shares, the
Hughes Family holds approximately 15.0% of the eligible votes
for the Annual Meeting, which is less than their ownership in the
company.
How votes are counted: Provided that shareholders entitled to
cast at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the
Annual Meeting are present virtually or by proxy at the Annual
Meeting, each matter may be approved as follows:
•Proposal 1 (Trustee Election) – For the election of
trustees, the trustee nominees who receive an affirmative
majority of the votes cast (i.e., the number of votes cast
“for” a trustee nominee must exceed the number of votes
cast “against” that nominee) at the Annual Meeting will be
elected as trustees of the company. Common shares not
voted (whether by abstention, broker non-vote or otherwise)
will not affect the vote. Our charter does not permit
cumulative voting in the election of our trustees.
•Proposal 2 (EY Ratification) – The affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the
holders of our common shares is required to approve
Proposal 2. Common shares not voted (whether by
abstention or otherwise) will not affect the vote. For
purposes of the foregoing, a majority of the votes cast
means that the number of votes that are cast and are voted
“for” the resolution must exceed the number of votes that
are voted “against” the resolution.
2026 Proxy Statement | 57
•Proposal 3 (Say-on-Pay) – The advisory vote on executive
compensation in Proposal 3 is non-binding, however, the
Human Capital and Compensation Committee will consider
and take into account the voting results in making future
executive compensation decisions. The affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the
holders of our common shares is required to approve
Proposal 3. Common shares not voted (whether by
abstention, broker non-vote or otherwise) will not affect the
vote. For purposes of the foregoing, a majority of the votes
cast means that the number of votes that are cast and are
voted “for” the resolution must exceed the number of votes
that are voted “against” the resolution.
Trustee nominees who do not receive a majority of the
votes cast: If a nominee who is currently serving as a trustee is
not re-elected, Maryland law provides that the trustee would
continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover” trustee.
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each trustee
nominee who does not receive the required majority vote for
election must submit a resignation. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee would then make a
recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject
the resignation or take other action. The Board would act on the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s
recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and rationale
within 90 days from the date the election results were certified. If
a trustee’s resignation is accepted by the Board, the Board may
fill the resulting vacancy or decrease the size of the Board as
provided in our bylaws.
How to vote:
If you attend the Annual Meeting: Shares held in your name
as the shareholder of record may be voted at the virtual Annual
Meeting. Shares for which you are the beneficial owner but not
the shareholder of record may be voted at the virtual Annual
Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the bank, broker,
trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to
vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting,
we recommend that you also vote by proxy as described below
so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend
the Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting is limited
to shareholders (or their authorized representatives) as of March
20, 2026.
If you don’t attend the Annual Meeting: Whether you hold
shares directly as the shareholder of record or through a bank,
broker, trustee or other nominee as the beneficial owner, you
may direct how your shares are voted without attending the
Annual Meeting. There are three ways to vote by proxy:
•By Internet – Shareholders may submit votes over the
Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or
voting instruction form. Internet voting is available 24 hours
a day until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the
Annual Meeting.
•By Telephone – If provided on your proxy card or voting
instruction form, you may submit votes over the telephone
by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting
instruction form. When voting, you will need to have
available the control number that appears on the card or
form. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the day before the Annual
Meeting.
•By Mail – Shareholders may submit votes by mail by
completing, signing and dating the proxy card or voting
instruction form and mailing it in the accompanying pre-
addressed postage-paid envelope.
How proxies will be voted: If you grant a proxy and do not
revoke it before the applicable voting deadline, the persons
designated as proxies will vote the common shares represented
thereby, if any, in the manner specified. If you are a
shareholder of record and grant a proxy but do not indicate
how your shares should be voted on a matter, the common
shares represented by your properly completed proxy will
be voted (1) “FOR” the election of each of the Board’s ten
nominees for trustee, (2) “FOR” the ratification of the
appointment of EY as our independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal year 2026, (3) “FOR” approval of
the compensation of our NEOs and (4) in the discretion of
the proxy holders on any other matter that may properly
come before the Annual Meeting.
If you hold shares through a broker or nominee and do not
provide the broker or nominee with specific voting instructions,
under the rules that govern brokers or nominees in such
circumstances, your broker or nominee will have the discretion
to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on non-routine
matters. As a result:
•Your broker or nominee will not have the authority to
exercise discretion to vote such shares with respect to
Proposals 1 and 3 because NYSE rules treat these matters
as non-routine.
•Your broker or nominee will have the authority to exercise
discretion to vote such shares with respect to Proposal 2
because the matter is treated as routine under the NYSE
rules.
Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast with respect
to any proposal and, as a result, will have no effect on the
outcome of the vote of any proposal.
Changing your vote: You may change your vote before the
vote at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the following
procedures. If you are the shareholder of record, you may
change your vote (1) by mailing a new proxy card or voting
instruction form bearing a later date (which automatically
revokes the earlier proxy), (2) by submitting a later dated vote
over the Internet or by telephone, (3) by providing a written
notice of revocation to the Secretary at AMH, 280 Pilot Road,
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, prior to your shares being voted or
(4) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting virtually.
58 | AMH
Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting alone will not cause
your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you
specifically make that request. For shares you hold beneficially
in the name of a bank, broker, trustee or other nominee, you
may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to
your bank, broker, trustee or nominee in accordance with their
instructions, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your
bank, broker, trustee or other nominee giving you the right to
vote your shares, by attending the meeting and voting virtually.
Quorum to conduct business at the Annual Meeting: A
quorum is required to hold the Annual Meeting. The presence at
the Annual Meeting virtually or by proxy of shareholders entitled
to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual
Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction
of business. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining
whether a quorum exists. A broker non-vote occurs with respect
to a proposal when a broker, trustee or other nominee has
discretionary authority to vote on one or more proposals to be
voted on at a meeting of shareholders but is not permitted to
vote on other proposals without instructions from the beneficial
owner and the beneficial owner fails to provide the nominee with
such instructions. If the shareholders present or represented by
proxy at the Annual Meeting represent less than a majority of all
the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting, the Annual
Meeting may be adjourned to a later date for the purpose of
obtaining a quorum.
If additional matters are presented at the meeting: Other than
the items of business described in this proxy statement, we are
not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual
Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxy
holders, Bryan Smith and Sara Vogt-Lowell, will have the
discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly
presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If any of our
nominees is not able to serve for any reason or for good cause
will not serve as a candidate for trustee, the persons named as
proxy holders will vote any shares represented by your proxy for
such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by the
Board.
The inspector of elections: The inspector of elections will be a
representative from Broadridge.
Contacting our transfer agent: Please contact our transfer
agent at the phone number or address listed below, with
questions concerning shares, dividend checks, transfer of
ownership or other matters pertaining to your share account:
Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, Shareholder Services, 1110 Centre
Point Curve, Suite 101, Mendota Heights, MN 55120, phone
number: (800) 937-5449.
Costs of this proxy solicitation: We will pay the cost of
soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, certain
trustees, officers and regular employees of the company and its
affiliates may solicit the return of proxies by telephone or
personal interview.
To the extent that our trustees, officers or other employees
participate in this solicitation, they will not receive any
compensation for their participation, other than their normal
compensation.
Deadlines for receipt of shareholder proposals: Any
shareholder proposal (including nominations for trustee)
pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 intended to be presented at the
2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and included in the
company’s 2027 proxy statement must be received by us at our
executive offices no later than November 27, 2026. Any such
proposal should be sent to the attention of our Secretary at the
address noted below and must meet the requirements of the
SEC rules and our bylaws.
In addition, pursuant to the advance notice provision in the
company’s bylaws, notice of any proposal that a shareholder
wishes to propose for consideration at the 2027 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders (including nominations for trustee), but does not
seek to include in the company’s 2027 proxy statement, must be
delivered to the company no earlier than October 28, 2026 and
no later than 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on November 27, 2026 if
the shareholder wishes for the company to describe the nature
of the proposal in the company’s 2027 proxy statement as a
condition to exercising its discretionary authority to vote proxies
on the proposal. Any shareholder proposals or notices submitted
to the company for the 2027 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
should be addressed to: Secretary, AMH, 280 Pilot Road, Las
Vegas, Nevada 89119.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing advance notice
requirements under our bylaws, to comply with the universal
proxy rules under the Exchange Act shareholders who intend to
solicit proxies in support of trustee nominees other than the
company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the
information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.
Other Matters: The Board knows of no other matters to be
presented for shareholder action at the Annual Meeting. If any
other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for
action, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote
the common shares represented by the proxy in accordance with
their best judgment on such matters.
Householding: If you share an address with one or more other
shareholders, you may have received notification that you will
receive only a single copy of the 2025 Annual Report and proxy
statement for your entire household unless you have notified us
that you wish to continue receiving individual copies. This
practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce
printing and mailing costs. If you would like to revoke your
consent to “householding,” or if you are receiving multiple copies
at your address and would like to enroll in “householding,”
please submit your request to Secretary, AMH, 280 Pilot Road,
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, or call us at (805) 413-5300. If you
own your shares in “street name,” please contact your broker,
bank, trustee or other intermediary to make your request.
AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT 280 PILOT ROAD LAS VEGAS, NV 89119 | VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 13, 2026. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ AMH2026 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 13, 2026. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
V87423-P48663 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS | |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. | DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
American Homes 4 Rent | |||||||||||||
The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR the following: | |||||||||||||
1. | Election of Trustees | ||||||||||||
Nominees: | For | Against | Abstain | The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. | For | Against | Abstain | ||||||
1a. | Matthew Hart | o | o | o | |||||||||
1b. | Bryan Smith | o | o | o | 2. | Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as American Homes 4 Rent’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2026. | o | o | o | ||||
1c. | Douglas Benham | o | o | o | |||||||||
1d. | Jack Corrigan | o | o | o | |||||||||
1e. | Tamara Gustavson | o | o | o | |||||||||
1f. | Michelle Kerrick | o | o | o | |||||||||
1g. | Lynn Swann | o | o | o | 3. | Advisory Vote to Approve American Homes 4 Rent’s Named Executive Officer Compensation. | o | o | o | ||||
1h. | Winifred Webb | o | o | o | |||||||||
1i. | Jay Willoughby | o | o | o | |||||||||
1j. | Matthew Zaist | o | o | o | NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies may vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. | ||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | |||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date | ||||||||||
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting
to be Held on May 14, 2026:
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
V87424-P48663 |
AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 14, 2026 9:00 AM PT This proxy is solicited by the Board of Trustees The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Bryan Smith and Sara Vogt-Lowell, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the common shares of AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held online at 9:00 AM Pacific Time on May 14, 2026, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMH2026, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted for the election of all nominees listed on the reverse side and in favor of proposals 2 and 3. Continued and to be signed on reverse side |