Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Anterix Third Quarter Update Conference Call. At this time, all participants have been placed on a listen-only mode and we will open the floor for your questions and comments after the presentation. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to your host Natasha Vecchiarelli. Ma'am, the floor is yours.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. With me today are Brian McAuley, our Chairman; Morgan O'Brien, our CEO; Rob Schwartz, our President and COO; and Tim Gray, our CFO. Before we begin, please note that any statements we make during this call that are not based on historical facts constitute forward-looking statements and our actual results could differ materially from those implied. Information regarding the risk factors that could cause such differences can be found in our public filings, including our most recently filed Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2019. A copy of our recent 10-Q can be found on our Investor Relations web page. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Morgan O'Brien.

Thank you, Natasha, and thank you everybody for joining us this afternoon. The last time we had a chance to review with investors on our progress on the FCC regulatory front, we said that all signs were pointing to the fact that a decision was getting close. Those signs continue, and we believe that the staff of the wireless bureau has virtually completed its analysis of the issues and has made recommendations on the proceeding to the Chairman. We do not rule out the possibility, as happened on the issuance of the NPRM, that the matter could be handled by circulation, a process where each commissioner has the opportunity to vote on the item outside of a formal open meeting session. We share our investors' impatience with the process, but the most important thing is to get a ruling that works well for our principal objective, which is to meet the needs of the electric utilities and other critical infrastructure enterprises for broadband at 900 megahertz. I thought it might be useful to spend a few minutes outlining just how far we've come. Starting in 2014, this was a quest by a single small player to revamp completely the 30-year status quo at 900 megahertz. Previous efforts by the FCC to make improvements have been defeated by incumbents and by their trade associations, including EWA. The FCC environment then and now was hostile to speculators who bought spectrum licensed under one set of rules and then tried to change the rules to allow a flip of the spectrum for profit. Aligned against change were the electric utilities, the railroads, oil and gas, vendors linked to the incumbents like Motorola, Harris, and Kenwood, and a half dozen or so major trade associations like Edison Electric, UTC, API, and the Association of American Railroads. If the FCC were to create a broadband portion of the band, we believe that the minimum useful block size in a commercial sense would be 3x3 megahertz. So that meant all other incumbents would have to move into the new 2x2 created from the remaining spectrum in the band. From the standpoint of a capital raise, or as it turned out, to raise this, we would be swimming upstream in an investor environment focused on huge new blocks of spectrum of 5G and the consumer versus enterprise volume spectrum. Where are we now five years later? Motorola and AAR are among the influential parties now on the record supporting a broadband proposal. Importantly, Edison Electric Institute, by far the most influential trade association for the utilities, moved away from its earlier participation in an effort opposing the rulemaking and now is playing a very constructive role, particularly in other efforts to make broadband available for its members. Suffice it to say that even some of the most relentless opponents of change have revised their positions, either to embrace the new broadband opportunity or to concede its existence and to try to nibble around the edges, particularly advantage to themselves. Anterix is now recognized in major industry events as the new and innovative player that's delivering on private LTE. While we wait for the FCC to act, a few new things on the record are particularly encouraging. On December 5, 2019, at the House Subcommittee on communications and technology hearing, on accountability and oversight of the FCC, Chairman Pai was asked the following question. One promising innovation in wildfire mitigation is the falling line conductor. It uses low-latency private LTE networks to de-power our broken line before it hits the ground, becoming a fire hazard. Do you have a view on how such technologies can help mitigate wildfire threats and the need for preemptive electrical shutoffs? When will the FCC complete its 900 megahertz proceeding that impacts the ability of utilities to use such technologies? Chairman Pai's response was, 'I agree that new technologies help mitigate public safety emergencies such as wildfires. Robust next-generation broadband networks can encourage the development of such technologies. That is why the FCC is pursuing a comprehensive strategy to facilitate America's superiority in 5G technology, which is the 5G fast plan. The plan includes three key components: pushing more spectrum into the marketplace, updating infrastructure policy, and modernizing updated regulations. Under my leadership, the FCC has proposed to make a segment of the 900 megahertz available for mobile broadband. I am confident, the Chairman said, we will be able to move forward in that proceeding in the near future.' At the oversight hearing, the Chairman and fellow commissioners were asked the same question about the need for FCC action to assist in the reduction of tragic wildfires in California. Their answers on the record give us further optimism that the 900 megahertz broadband item enjoys wide support and is nearing resolution. Subordinate only to the effort to achieve finality at the FCC. A paramount effort on our part is preparing for the clearing of incumbents from the proposed broadband spectrum allocation. Our investors may recall that there are about 400 incumbents who are licensed in that portion of the band, which the FCC is proposing for broadband. And of that number, the Anterix team has already contacted over half. A spectrum transactions database has been designed, constructed, tested, and is in use. We've hired additional experienced team members to assist in the negotiation of spectrum acquisitions and spectrum retuning plans. As we announced previously, a strategic agreement with EWA is in place, and it's allowing us to leverage their resources in membership to multiply our efforts to reach out to incumbents and to the dealers who represent them. We believe this relationship will speed up the rebanding process and allows us to deliver cleared spectrum for broadband use efficiently without causing undue disruption to the incumbents who decide to continue narrowband operations. Of course, all of our efforts are key first to markets for critical infrastructure customers who have already been in discussions with us. Anterix and its proposed business plan do not exist in a vacuum. From among dozens of relevant proceedings that are on our radar screen is the following: 3GPP is the standards body that establishes and maintains the LTE specification. In December, it adopted plans to accommodate a range of channel sizes including specifically three megahertz channels to lay the groundwork for 5G. We're monitoring the 3GPP work closely to help ensure the smooth evolution of LTE 4G systems to 5G. And over the next few years, we'll be carefully monitoring new 3GPP releases for enhancements likely to be useful for critical infrastructure, such as communications, ultra-reliability in ultra-low latency, a massive new IoT or Internet of Things feature set, and additional network slicing capabilities. The investors who are following the record in the proceeding will note that much of the opposition to our proposal for 900 megahertz broadband has given way to requests for relatively minor changes in the way that the rebranding will be handled. An example of the ex parte filings by LCRA and NextEra that contest the number of complex system markets that should be exempt from any mandatory retuning process. Also, on the record, our continued efforts to reward in broadband without the cost. In the letter dated February 13, 2020, San Diego Gas & Electric placed on the record a compelling case for the FCC's prop decision to enable broadband at 900 megahertz. It listed four separate uses for a private LTE system that supports wildfire risk mitigation by improving internal communications. Those four were falling conductor protection systems, updating its SCADA radio communication system, mobile workforce safety and communications, and weather stations. As previously made public in its comments, SDG&E identifies its spectrum focus as 900 megahertz and CBRS. Among other things, SDG&E applauds the FCC for efforts to rationalize the 900 megahertz band and laments that SDG&E faces overwhelming legal and public interest duties to serve utility customers at reasonable costs and protect against wildfires. Now our investors know that these use case requirements are exactly those that drove Anterix more than five years out to be the first-party to suggest the 900 megahertz band was a perfect home for our broadband LTE solution critical infrastructure players. Of course, a few utilities seem unable to accept the fact that half of the 900 megahertz spectrum in the major U.S. markets was assigned either by lottery more than 30 years ago or in a protracted series of options where parties such as Anterix predecessor bought the rights to the licenses from the FCC for fair market value. Additional 900 megahertz spectrum was purchased in the secondary marketplace over many years from licensees that acquired it from the FCC for free. The thrust of their arguments seems to be that the introduction of new broadband technologies somehow forfeits those rights in favor of the newly awakened interest and needs of the utilities. We encourage any party to review the long record in this proceeding to see just how much work Anterix has done making the case for repurposing the 900 megahertz band for just the kind of LTE services with SDG&E and some of its fellow utilities require. Neither Anterix nor any other holder of license rights acquired by option from the FCC or purchased from other licensees would start down the long and expensive road for regulatory updating of its spectrum if the reward for success in that endeavor were to lose its rights in favor of companies who sat on their hands during those auctions. It'd be catastrophic to the underpinnings of the U.S. wireless market to conclude that the results of spectrum auctions could be nullified by private enterprises seeking spectrum for freight. At Anterix, we continue to believe that private broadband LTE at 900 megahertz is a compelling solution to the needs of the utility industry for more resilient, reliable, and secure wireless networks. The marketplace has served well as the best way for potential usage of spectrum to meet and negotiate access to that spectrum with licensed holders. We expect the FCC to continue its reliance on that bedrock principle. Now I'll turn it over to Rob.

Thanks, Morgan, and good afternoon, everyone. As Morgan just highlighted, our regulatory process is taking longer than we expected, but we've used this additional time to create widespread awareness of the critical need for private LTE networks and the ideal nature of how low-band spectrum can enable these networks. What began initially as a seasoning of the industry through our advocacy and education is evolving. Equipment vendors, service providers, and customers are actively engaging with us to develop plans for solving critical use cases at 900 megahertz. Let me focus on some of the key initiatives of this past quarter that demonstrate our progress. Even in the absence of a final FCC report and order, our customer pipeline continues to grow. A key indicator of this progress is the five experimental licenses for 900 megahertz broadband granted by the FCC to enable various market pilots and initial network deployments. Today, I'm pleased to share that a large state-owned public power utility has recently applied for an experimental license to pilot use cases that will enable their planned digital grid modernization. While I can't share the name of the entity under NDA, I can elaborate on the goal of that project. Leveraging 900 megahertz broadband spectrum, this utility will be working to build a standards-based LTE private network to enhance its operational and programmatic capabilities. We look forward to the FCC's acting expeditiously to grant this license, so that we can share more on this exciting development. We continue to see and participate in a steady pipeline of RFPs and RFIs that are being issued by utilities. A number of these utilities are seeking replacements of legacy networks to meet their expanding field area network needs. We also continue to prioritize our federal and state efforts as part of our top-down program as we look to drive utility industry regulators to understand and support the benefits that private LTE networks offer to our nation. For example, this past month, I had the opportunity to present at the United States Energy Association event that focused on broadband for critical infrastructure. The USEA membership includes major players in all sectors of the American energy industry, who directly influence grid modernization programs. And just last week, we participated in the winter NARUC Conference, a gathering of state Public Utility Commissioners. Our board member and former FCC Commissioner and California PUC Commissioner Rachelle Chong participated in a panel where she discussed the role that advanced communications networks serve in wildfire mitigation and other major disasters. We met with utility commissioners to hear firsthand how they are approaching grid modernization and wireless networks. Also, worth noting there was an educational session entitled Spectrum Tutorial 101 offered to district commissioners, further showing the topic of spectrum is becoming a more prominent part of these regulatory discussions. The National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, better known as NIST, has convened a specialized community of critical infrastructure stakeholders, including Anterix, to focus on mitigating cyber attacks on commercial and utility scale, distributed energy resources and electric distribution grid operations. This project will create an industrial IoT test bed, including interconnected sensors, data transfer, and communication systems like Anterix' private LTE instruments and other commercial off-the-shelf devices network together. It will focus on demonstrating data integrity and malware prevention, detection, and mitigation by using existing commercial and open-source cybersecurity products to reduce the industrial IoT attack surface for distributed energy resources. By the end of the year, the project is expected to result in a published NCCoE practice guide for the industry. A great example of accelerating industry dynamics is a press release Motorola issued in January announcing a private LTE product called Nitro that is specifically built for 900 megahertz spectrum. In demonstrating its confidence in 900 megahertz, Motorola stated that it anticipates the FCC creating broadband at 900 megahertz and is therefore focused on leveraging Nitro LTE product for use both on 900 megahertz broadband as well as the complementary CBRS band that's coming to auction this summer. We also see this new CBRS mid-band spectrum as highly complementary to Anterix' 900 megahertz spectrum. Mid-band spectrum is ideal for serving campuses and inside buildings with additional capacity and ultra-low latency. It's great to have Motorola join the private LTE infrastructure vendor ecosystem, which importantly includes Ericsson, Nokia and others, and we look forward to our continued work with these key partners in offering powerful 900 megahertz based broadband solutions to our shared target customers. This Motorola announcement was showcased at the utility industry's major technology conference DISTRIBUTECH which took place in January in San Antonio. We took this opportunity to both witness and participate in this growing focus on private LTE as a critical enabler of a modernized, resilient, and secure electric grid. We had discussions with a substantial number of utilities at this event and saw a significant number of vendor booths throughout the showroom floor where demonstrations of private LTE and integrated solutions were being displayed. At DISTRIBUTECH last year, private LTE was seen as a new concept, something to be considered as a potential solution to current problems. The industry was in a discovery stage looking for potential solutions to the increasing challenges of connectivity to a rapidly growing number of sensors and controls to support modernizing the electric grid. This year, however, many of these same attendees and others were now taking action, assessing the right way to implement private LTE solutions to address their growing requirements. Last year potential customers were asking questions about what private LTE could do. This year, the focus shifted to how a private LTE network should be implemented and what options were available to solve their needs. At DISTRIBUTECH, I also participated in the panel entitled, 'When Utilities and Telcos Get Together.' And I was joined by leaders from Southern Company, the New York Power Authority, Ericsson, and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative. In this standing remote discussion, what impressed me the most was that the case for private LTE was made multiple times directly by the utilities themselves. I walked away from this panel convinced that we are now part of a seemingly self-propelled industry-led movement. The utility broadband alliance also made a strong showing at DISTRIBUTECH. As many of you remember, a year ago at the same event, we, together with other fellow founding members, launched the UBBA. We are rightly proud of the progress that's been made with more than 100 individuals actively involved in UBBA activities and working groups that joined together on private broadband initiatives. In its initial year, UBBA has organized multiple face-to-face member events, hosted a series of well-attended webinars, and produced thought leadership pieces, including a recent collaborative white paper on cybersecurity. In addition, member task forces have collectively created RFP templates to guide utilities on the questions to ask when evaluating private LTE deployments. They've created business model templates to help in creating support within the utility organizations and in rate cases, defining use cases and architectural frameworks that leverage private LTE as the core communication network. In the year ahead, UBBA utility members are targeting for it to be a utility-led, utility-funded and self-governed organization. As President and COO, my focus today is on appropriately staffing our team at all levels to meet our long-term objective and on attracting and retaining the right talent. As we complete the last quarter of our fiscal 2020 year, I'm pleased with where we are as an organization today. I think we are fast approaching the end of the beginning. Going forward, we will continue to see the adoption of private LTE networks across industries and will capitalize on the growing momentum of our 900 megahertz offering. And with that, I'll turn it over to Tim.

Thanks, Rob. Good afternoon, everyone. As both Morgan and Rob noted, signs continue to point to the idea that the FCC is nearing its decision on the 900 megahertz proceeding. And consistent with that view, we have ramped up our spectrum clearing efforts pre-report and order. As discussed in the past, we believe this proactive approach we are taking now will lead to faster deployment of broadband, and we are focusing on those areas where we have compelling customer opportunities. And as Morgan shared earlier, it is important to note that as part of our clearing efforts, our outbound outreach to incumbents has significantly increased. As a result, we are learning even more about the systems they represent and are actively working to map out and locate alternative channels within the 2x2 portion of the 900 megahertz band or in other bands to speed up the channel transition process. Our efforts, joined by those of EWA, are designed to put us on an expedited path to clearing the portion of the band that will be utilized for broadband and in tandem, are intended to position us to meet our projected revenue goals as discussed at our Investor Day in May 2019. On the clearing front, the third quarter of our fiscal year included $500,000 of spend for spectrum acquisitions and an additional $300,000 for initial deposits in connection with future spectrum acquisitions. Our balance sheet reflects these transactions as an increase to our intangible assets. And as a reminder, prior to the important order, only acquisitions will be capitalized. Post-report and order, all clearing related costs will be capitalized. Looking at the current quarter of our fiscal year, to date we've spent approximately $600,000 and $3.6 million currently committed for spectrum acquisitions to be paid at the closing of the respective transactions. Based on recent FCC proceedings, I'd also note that we anticipate some additional spend may be required to affect broadband licensing upon a report and order. Once the report and order is voted, we'll be back to investors for additional guidance on our previously announced projections. Looking at our financial results for the third fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2019, the company reported a net loss of $8.8 million or negative $0.52 per share versus a net loss of $8.4 million or negative $0.57 per share for the same quarter in the previous year. Last year's third quarter included approximately $400,000 for restructuring-related charges due to the realignment of our business. Our cash position continues to be strong. As of December 31, 2019, the company had $150 million of available cash and is debt-free. Our cash spend for the third quarter was approximately $7 million, which was in line with our expectations. Moving forward, operational readiness and spectrum clearing are key areas of focus for our organization. In preparation for our operating business, we expect our spend to continue to increase as we acquire and clear additional spectrum and advance our robust customer pipeline. That concludes our prepared remarks. I'll now turn it back over to the operator for questions.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the floor is now open for questions. Your first question is coming from Mike Crawford. Your line is open.

Thank you. With this now I guess Rob you described it as a self-propelled process with the utilities. Are there any changes to the licensing six to 11 utilities by 2024?

Yes, hi, Mike thanks for the question. No, I think look the concept of self-propelled I said is that we're really seeing a continued rising tide of interest from a broader base of utilities and more and more utilities moving through what we think of as sort of the funnel from initial interest, as I talked about, to really getting engaged in figuring out the how and when they can deploy systems. That's all completely supportive of the momentum that we'd expect to be seeing and really exceeding momentum, we're hoping to see at this point, given the projections we put out back at Investor Day. So, no I think it's still completely in line with where we think we need to be in order to be able to achieve those goals.

Okay, great. And then just if we were to do a couple of assumptions like one that there's a report in order that comes out in the next couple of months. And then it's largely in line along with the discussions that have formed throughout this whole record-making process. Would you then expect licenses one you do start to print in your first few licenses for there to be a delay and cash received or revenues recognized until spectrum is cleared, or is it going to be a case-by-case basis?

Hey, Mike, this is Tim. It's going to be a case-by-case basis. It's really going to depend on the contract we signed with the respective customer to where we are clearing on that set of territories. So there could be different iterations of how it could happen. We could clear enough to have a 3x3 right away. We could clear enough to have a 1.4 by 1.4 and then they grow into the 3x3 as we clear that. And the pricing of a lease may vary based off of those variables. So we'll see really contract-by-contract.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question is coming from Simon Flannery. Your line is live.

Great. Thank you. Good evening. So on the timing, is it fair to think that the C-band was sort of the elephant in the room and if we can get that voted through next week that the wireless bureau can sort of turn their attention to and hear the next in the hopper. Is that your understanding?

Hey Simon, it's Morgan. Certainly that proceeding was a monster probably one of the most complex in the last decade or so. So it will be a relief for us that to have it through the python and we can then hope that attention can turn to ours and others that are less monumental.

Okay. And you talked a lot about 3x3. I think in the past you've also talked about 5x5. Is that off the table at this point?

No, but let me make sure I clarify that point. 5x5 in every way is preferable to 3x3 even more so than just arithmetically. But there are very serious operators operating in narrowband at 900 megahertz, and we have to take those operations seriously. And the way this rule-making is likely to come out, each of those incumbents will have a choice. They can move to 2x2 and stay in the same 5x5, or they can move to some other portion of the spectrum 800 megahertz being the most likely where they can decide to use a whole different technology altogether to maybe move from a dispatch type of functionality to over-the-top cellular type applications. Our team, of course, will be motivated where it's practical and reasonable to move people off of 900 megahertz because yes, ultimately it makes a lot of sense for the public interest for that spectrum to be broadband. But that's a bridge too far right now. We're focused on making sure that we get the most rapid and therefore the most constructive process of moving incumbents and listening to their needs and meeting them.

Great. I recall that previously you mentioned that soon after reporting and ordering, you could announce your first deal, whether it be a contract or a MOU. Is that still your expectation?

Yes. Simon, I think we continue to make good progress. And I mentioned sort of the breadth of customers and the expansion of the pipeline. We're tracking to meet our objectives. So I think we're still on track to meet that specific objective.

Obviously as we get closer to report and order it does add to the confidence of customers to be able to transact. But as we've talked about, these are complicated large entities that are, even just the formality of their approval process, is significant. And so getting through that process is something we're very focused on, but actively involved in as well.

Yes. Let me just finally add the fact that, no matter how comfortable we are with the way the FCC is tracking, these ultra-conservative organizations want to see it in writing the decision. And then they can start cranking up their machinery to make decisions. We're optimistic that when the FCC order comes out, a lot of that machine will start to crank and they ought to be able to crank simultaneously throughout the industry. We certainly have done a lot of missionary work and spade work. And many of the efforts we have been taking, while we waited through this process, should bear fruit. So stay tuned. I think that it's hard to exaggerate how much importance there will be when we actually have the rules and then we can actually start delivering broadband spectrum for implementation and commercial operation.

Thanks a lot.

Thank you.

Your next question is coming from George Sutton. Your line is live.

This is Adam on for George. Thanks for taking my question. Rob, could you provide some additional clarity on where things have trended with potential customer discussions in terms of structure of contracts?

Unfortunately Adam, it's a good question, but I can't give you too much because most of those were under NDA. Until we actually have something executed, we can’t really disclose the details. But I think just to kind of restate about the continued progress. First of all, each of these are bespoke transactions with large institutions, and so they're all going to have their own individual nuances. But our objective that we set out and we've talked about trying to go for long-term relationships, long-term leases of spectrum, is absolutely still our straight down the fairway approach, and we're seeing good traction on those kinds of deals. There are going to be nuances to all of these to fit within both the commercial needs, the delivery timing of when they want to deploy, and the regulatory requirements of the individual states where the utilities have their specific approval requirements. And so absolutely, we'll see things differently through each of those lenses. But overall we're still going in the same direction; everything we're seeing is allowing us to go that way to say that we want to engage with long-term relationships with our spectrum with these great credit customers, and we're on track to do so.

Great. Thank you. And then along the same lines, when you talk to potential customers, have there been any new use cases the utilities have generated themselves?

Yeah. Really when I talk briefly about the work with the utility broadband alliance, I think it's a good forum to be able to see that happening. And so as I mentioned at DistribuTECH this past month, there was a full day utility broadband alliance meeting, which I'm happy to say we're a member of now, having helped start it, but now we're really just a member in that the utilities have really taken the leadership. And there's specifically a working group there that focuses on those use cases. And so they're constantly evolving more and more of those needs. Specifically in that audience now, it's not just us also as vendors. We've got a large vendor community and interestingly, we also have invited in and there is fed rate wireless that's representing the CBRS opportunities that we talked about being complementary; even AT&T now has joined that group, which we think is constructive as well that it's representing the full gamut of options that are in the marketplace. But overall we see that there are new use cases coming. And we've seen one of the utilities that's joined recently has been talking about the necessity for drones and being able to do non-line of sight drone flight as a new example and use case that's being discussed there. We've talked about the West Coast falling line conductor case that was important to them, which really translates into the ability to have situational awareness for any major catastrophe. And so that's also becoming a more important use case. I was on a panel at DistribuTECH where there were a lot of discussions about cybersecurity and the specific needs of what a private network will do. And that's really getting escalated within utilities. We're seeing a lot of the use cases we saw emerge because of an urgent need to connect devices and sensors onto networks. Now the cyber aspect is becoming a more pressing need. I talked about the work we're doing with the national cybersecurity center of excellence. We're seeing those use cases starting to come into it as well. So there's a large and growing number of use cases, but I think the key point is that it's not us bringing those to the table now. It's being generated by the industry for the industry. And a lot of that information is being published by the utility broadband alliance. And so I'm pretty sure that that's information we'll be able to share soon.

Okay, great. And then one final question for you. We noticed recently on the FCC website that there was a lease proposal out where it would be leased to Motorola and then subleased by Disney in the L.A., San Diego MTA. Any perspective on that and how that would potentially affect realignment?

So I'm going to let Tim answer that. I'll tell you quickly. We have a historical relationship with Motorola that enables them to use some of our channels for those narrowband systems that they're deploying specifically on-campus environments. So, I think what you probably saw was not related to a broadband deployment, but more pertaining to that agreement.

Yeah, just to add on, since 2014 we've had an agreement with Motorola where they can lease spectrum for narrowband opportunities. We don't expect what they would be doing with Disney to be a long-term hindrance to our broadband opportunity. But we have those relationships like with Motorola has with Disney and with Motorola in some other pockets of the country, and that's what we've expected since we signed that lease at the time.

Great. Thank you.

Your next question is coming from Philip Cusick. Your line is live.

Hi, this is Reed for Phil. Thanks for taking my question. Two if I may. Of the 200 incumbents that you've contacted, what has the response been like? Were most already aware of the issue and what Anterix is looking to accomplish? And then the second one when you talk about pipeline growth, is this referring to RFPs or applications for experimental licenses or trials? And is this pipeline, does it grow and shrink or is it more linear in nature? Thanks.

So this is Morgan. Let me take a stab at the first half of that. The 200 or so contacts that we've already made reflect a wide range of circumstances from what you would expect, which is we never heard of you, do we have a license at 900 megahertz? To that level all the way up to absolute and in-depth understanding of the proposal and where we want to go with it, a possible interest in broadband, the possible interest in going to 800 megahertz instead, selling the license, and instead just using a cellular radio application for the dispatch functionality—everything you can imagine. But throwing it all together in a single bucket, I would say because we're so experienced at doing this. I mean, we've done this for literally decades. There isn't much new under the sun. We're seeing what we expected.

And this is Rob. To your second question, really sort of the pipeline growth. We kind of look at it in multi ways. One is clearly the number of entities that are part of that and the amount of interest we're seeing. And just as an example at Distributech, there are a number of new parties that have come up to us that are exploring and now are engaging in discussions with us to better understand how they can solve some of their specific needs. And the other way to measure sort of how far through the process they are. And you mentioned RFPs as one example. Some of the utilities approach us by getting some level of understanding, publishing an RFI or an RFP, getting responses from numerous types of vendors and then from that going through their own discovery process to determine what it is that they want to deploy and what timeline they want to deploy it. So we're seeing all of the above. We're seeing more utilities coming to the table. We're seeing more RFPs that are being issued. We're seeing a lot more cross-fertilization across the industry. And that's why I think it was the point I tried to make and what I said is that these utilities uniquely as a sector are relying upon each other to learn about the key elements of how they solve the same kind of problems. And so there really is an infectious process, in a good way, that’s allowing them to learn from each other. And so as we have more and more utilities moving through our pipeline and getting closer to transacting with us, but also going through the pilot process, we have other utilities that are riding along, learning from their efforts, and that helps them also move further down. And we obviously see the efficiency of that, but it also—it’s a great collective effort that brings more and more knowledge and interest from a bigger cross-section of utilities.

Thanks very much.

Your next question is coming from James Ratcliffe. Your line is live.

Thank you. One if I could. And if I'm jumping the gun on steps to discuss later then let me know. But in terms of the spend for retuning you talked previously $100 million to $120 million. Has any of that ramped up really, because it doesn't look like we've seen a significant ramp in free cash flow burn thus far, or is that still almost entirely ahead of us?

For the most part, James, that's ahead of us. I mean I talked about where we are, even quarter-to-date where we've spent some cash plus we've also got another roughly $3.5 million committed, and that continues to grow on a daily basis as we continue to move forward on the process. But yes it's—most of those costs are ahead of us.

Thank you.

We have no further questions from the lines.

Okay. Well, thanks everybody for your interest, and we look forward to talking very soon.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect your phone lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.