Colliers International Group Inc. Q3 FY2022 Earnings Call
Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI)
Call artefacts
No matching 8-K earnings release linked yet.
No 10-Q stored for this quarter yet.
Call audio is not captured yet.
A slide deck is not captured yet.
Transcript
Auto-generated speakersGood day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Colliers International’s Group Third Quarter 2022 Investor Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. Legal counsel requires us to advise that the discussion scheduled to take place today may contain forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown uncertainties. Actual results may be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements contemplated in the forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements is contained in the company's annual information form as filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators and the company's annual report on Form 40-F as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. Today is November 1, 2022. And at this time, for opening remarks and introductions, I would now like to turn the conference over to the Global Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Jay Hennick. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you, operator. Good morning, and thanks for joining us for the third quarter conference call. As the operator mentioned, I'm Jay Hennick, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company and with me is Christian Mayer, Chief Financial Officer. As always, this call is being webcast and is available in the Investor Relations section of our website. A presentation deck is also available there to accompany today's call. Earlier today, Colliers reported very solid third quarter results with outsourcing and advisory, investment management, and leasing all up strongly, more than offsetting any softness in capital markets, which obviously has been impacted by higher interest rates, availability of capital, and geopolitical uncertainties. As you can see, growing recurring revenues and earnings now at 55% of our pro forma EBITDA, together with broader diversification across service lines, across geography, and across client types is demonstrating that the Colliers diversified services model is more balanced and more resilient than ever. For the quarter, revenues were $1.1 billion, up 12% in local currency. Adjusted EBITDA was $145 million, up 21%, adjusted EPS was $1.42, up 11%, all versus the prior period. For nine months, revenues were $3.2 billion, up 21%. Adjusted EBITDA was $428 million year-to-date, up 24%, and adjusted EPS was $4.69, up 20% versus the prior year. Here are some of the highlights. With the recent acquisitions of Rockwood and Versus, our investment management business now represents about 30% of our pro forma EBITDA, and total assets under management has surpassed the $92 billion mark, firmly establishing Colliers as one of the top global players in the rapidly growing alternative private capital industry. We have strategically built our IM business over the past six years, and we have done it the right way. Today, 85% of our assets under management are in perpetual or long-dated strategies with 70% of that capital invested in highly defensive and sought-after asset classes like alternatives and infrastructure. In addition, each of our investment platforms has a long history of delivering top-tier investment returns for investors and best-in-class leadership teams, both significant and direct equity in their own operations while benefiting from the collective resources of the whole. The Colliers perpetual partnership philosophy has been a real differentiator for us, creating a permanent capital source for our partners and perfect alignment for our investors and for our shareholders. We are very excited about the potential of this rapidly growing segment of our business. We also continue to aggressively grow our core service business. During the quarter, we acquired PEAKURBAN, adding significant engineering capabilities and a new growth engine to our market-leading service operations in Australia and Asia Pacific. We bolstered our presence in the Nordics with an agreement to acquire Pangea Property Partners, a leading real estate advisory firm in Norway and Sweden. Once the transaction is completed, Colliers will be the number one player in the Nordic region, together with our existing operations in Denmark and Finland, and the group will provide further strength and opportunity to the rest of our business in Europe and around the world. Finally, just after the quarter end, we added Arcadia Property Management to our rapidly growing and highly successful U.S. services business. This acquisition adds further scale and capability to our property management operations, principally in the U.S. Southwest. As you will hear from Christian in a few minutes, despite our very solid results for the quarter, we're adjusting our outlook slightly for the balance of the year. Let me conclude by reinforcing a few things. Colliers is a highly respected global brand and operating platform with a broadly diversified business model and multiple engines for growth. We have virtually unlimited growth opportunities and a clear history of being able to capitalize, especially in times of dislocation as we are seeing now. Currently, 55% of our earnings come from recurring revenue streams, including our Investment Management segment, which now makes up about 30% of our business, as I mentioned. Colliers is more balanced and more resilient than ever, and you can easily see this from the results we delivered. The Colliers strategy and way of business has stood the test of time. Our proven track record has delivered about 20% annual growth in share value over 27 years. That is a track record that is really second to none. As the Chief Architect of our company since its founding, I continue to believe that Colliers is not being valued properly and has not been valued properly over the past several years, regardless of current market conditions. I say this because we have built an incredible company with a unique operating culture, diversified business mix, significant recurring revenues, and a demonstrated ability to create significant shareholder value year after year over a long period of time. It is truly difficult to find investment opportunities as well-managed and growth-oriented as we are at Colliers. But perhaps most importantly, our leadership team owns the largest stake in our company by a country mile. We have more skin in this game than absolutely anyone. Now let me turn things over to Christian for his comments.
Thank you, Jay. My comments follow the flow of the slides posted on the Investor Relations section of colliers.com accompanying this call. Please note that the non-GAAP measures referenced on this call are as defined in this morning's press release. All references to revenue growth are expressed in local currency. Our third-quarter revenues were $1.1 billion, up 12% relative to the prior year period, with revenues up strongly in our Outsourcing & Advisory and Investment Management service lines. Our Leasing operations also generated solid growth, benefiting from increased activity in office and industrial asset classes. Capital Markets activity softened in the quarter, reflecting the impact of higher interest rates, reduced availability of capital, and geopolitical uncertainty. Internal growth was 4% with the balance from acquisitions completed during the past 12 months. Adjusted EBITDA for Q3 was $145 million, up 17% from one year ago, with margins at 13.1%, up 100 basis points relative to the prior year quarter. Third quarter, Americas revenues were $695 million, up 13% over the prior period. Growth was led by Outsourcing & Advisory up 27%, driven by engineering and design, including recent acquisitions. Leasing activity was up 21%, with growth in both office and industrial asset classes. Capital markets activity, including debt origination was down 8% as clients paused to reassess the clearing prices for sales transactions given a rising rate environment as well as availability of debt capital. Adjusted EBITDA was $67 million, up 2% from last year. The margin in the Americas was 9.6% relative to 10.7% in the prior year period and was impacted by higher discretionary and variable costs and a reduction in high-margin capital markets transactions. EMEA revenues for Q3 were $164 million, up 23% from one year ago, with growth across all service lines, particularly project management. Although, growth was unevenly distributed across countries, revenue growth was particularly strong in the United Kingdom, more than offsetting the impact of higher interest rates and geopolitical uncertainty in other markets. Adjusted EBITDA was $13 million versus $15 million last year, with the margin primarily impacted by revenue mix with a higher proportion of project management at modest margins. Asia Pacific revenues were $153 million, down 4% and were impacted by higher interest rates and COVID-19 restrictions in several Asian markets, especially China. Adjusted EBITDA was $21 million, flat relative to the prior year quarter on lower costs resulting from reduced variable compensation. Third quarter Investment Management revenues were $96 million, up 23% from the prior year period. Excluding pass-through carried interest, revenues were up 62%, driven by acquisitions and management fee growth from increased assets under management. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $37 million, up 33% versus the comparative quarter. As a reminder, our reported adjusted EBITDA is equivalent to fee-related earnings, or FRE, that many pure-play IM firms report since our IM earnings come predominantly from recurring management fees. We have generated solid new capital commitments from investors across our fund portfolio during the first nine months of the year, albeit at a slower pace than during 2021. Similar to our last quarter, we are currently seeing investors take more time to make capital allocation decisions. We ended the quarter with $87 billion of AUM, including Versus, which closed just after quarter end, our AUM now exceeds $92 billion. Our fee-paying AUM is now $51 billion, given the private and defensive nature of the real estate and real assets in our portfolio, we expect our FP AUM to remain stable despite this market turbulence. Our financial leverage ratio as of September 30, 2022, defined as net debt to pro forma EBITDA was 1.5 times, including acquisitions that have been announced but were not completed as of September 30, our financial leverage is 2.0 times inside our stated comfort zone. We expect to deleverage over time using our operating cash flow to pay down debt. We repurchased 373,000 shares during the past month for total consideration of $35 million under our normal course issuer bid. Year-to-date, we have repurchased 1.4 million shares for total consideration of $161 million. Given our future growth prospects, strong financial capacity, and our current market valuation, we believe it is prudent to make modest share repurchases at this time. We are updating our outlook for the full year 2022 to reflect year-to-date operating results, contributions from acquisitions, the operating impact of rising global interest rates and geopolitical uncertainties, as well as adverse foreign exchange impacts on EPS. The outlook is subject to risks and uncertainties as outlined in the accompanying slides. We now expect our adjusted EBITDA margin to improve by 60 basis points to 80 basis points relative to 2021 from a combination of higher margin acquisitions and internal operating leverage. We also expect our tax rate and NCI share of earnings to be slightly higher than anticipated, reflecting our expected mix of earnings for the full year. As a result, we now expect our adjusted earnings per share to grow this year at a mid-teens percentage rate relative to the low 20s rate previously anticipated. That concludes my prepared remarks. I would now like to open the call for questions. Operator, can you please open the line?
Thank you. Our first question comes from Chandni Luthra with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Could you discuss as we think about a tougher economic environment ahead? What kind of levers do you have to pull, how would you think about potential cost cuts, and is there a way to frame that as we go into 2023?
Well, Chandni, thanks for the question. We always manage our costs closely. And as you know, our cost structure is highly variable, particularly in our transactional business, predominantly commission-based that flexes directly with revenue. As we talked about feeling softness in our capital market service line, and this is going to continue, I think, for a little while until interest rates and credit conditions stabilize in the market. The rest of our business is doing well, as you saw in the results. And as a result, we don't have a reason for a formal cost-cutting program right now. But I can say that we have our budget process underway currently. And certainly, cost management is top of mind for that as we prepare for 2023 with varying levels of transaction revenues that could transpire over the next 12 months. Finally, I'd add that these times, challenging times are good times to invest in recruiting, and we're going to continue to do that and bring on new talent in our various service lines as we look ahead.
Chandni, I want to emphasize some points made by Christian and share my own perspective. Our business is becoming increasingly resilient and diversified, and during this quarter, it has primarily been affected by the weakness in capital markets. However, when you consider the overall picture for the final quarter and the upcoming year, this impact is a minor part of our business and represents a small portion of our EBITDA. While we acknowledge this situation, we do not believe it will hinder the growth and development of our business moving forward.
Very helpful. Thank you. And for my follow-up, so as we think about the implied guidance for the fourth quarter, especially on the EBITDA portion, $208 million at the midpoint, I think implies high-single-digit year-on-year growth, very strong sequentially, I think, up 45%. Help us understand what portion of that EBITDA growth would you attribute to organic versus inorganic? And just trying to understand the incremental acquisitions that part of the business in Q3 from Q2, how much are they contributing, and how should we think about the split in the fourth quarter?
Certainly, we recently completed the Versus acquisition in mid-October and have another acquisition in Europe that is expected to finalize soon. Therefore, we anticipate additional contribution from these new deals, along with the transactions we executed earlier this year. Most of the EBITDA growth in the fourth quarter will be driven by acquisitions. However, we also expect our organic growth in Outsourcing & Advisory to remain strong in the fourth quarter, similar to how it has been throughout the year. The leasing environment appears to be favorable, and we are closely monitoring the Capital Markets, which is a critical area of focus for us.
Great. Thank you so much.
And also Investment Management, Chandni, I forgot to mention the organic components in investment management, Harrison Street and the European business that we've owned for years, they'll also have organic growth to contribute for Q4.
Thank you.
Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Michael Doumet with Scotiabank. Your line is now open.
Good morning, everyone. I have a follow-up question related to some earlier inquiries. Looking at your 2022 guidance based on my calculations, it indicates a mid-single-digit negative internal growth for Q4, which is a shift from the positive internal growth of 4% in Q3. Can you please confirm if this expected decline is solely due to capital markets in Q4?
Yeah. That's right, Michael. That's the area that we're most focused on, and certainly, you could see it in the Q3 results as well.
And most impacted, obviously, by higher interest rates and availability of capital for sure. I mean, and the other thing that does impact us and we really can't control this is currency fluctuations.
Got it. Yeah. No, look, that makes sense to me. I think it makes sense to everybody. If I look back, organic growth in Capital Markets has amounted to approximately 40% since 2019, I guess, based on your disclosure. You've done a good job expanding the platform, increasing the headcount. There's a lot of things you've done internally, obviously, but we're seeing activity soften now. And I'm just wondering if there's a bogey just in terms of what number we think that you guys will eventually normalize to based on what you're seeing in the interest rate environment. Just as we think about where our Capital Markets can go in the next couple of quarters and what effectively normalization periods look like.
Michael, we've been adding producers and market share over the last couple of years, the last six quarters, for sure, post-pandemic. So that's a lever. Our producers are becoming more productive over time. We don't think that's going to change. They're going to remain at higher productivity levels than they were in the past. So if you look at market conditions and the impact of our ability to complete transactions, interest rates, the availability of capital. I mean those are the factors that we're focused on. But fundamentally, I think our Capital Markets business is well positioned and is going to continue to grow as we add more producers and take market share. I've also got a couple of acquisitions in Capital Markets that we'll add to our scale and have added to our scale over the past year or two. So we're pretty bullish from a long-term perspective about our Capital Markets business.
Perfect. Those are my questions for you. Thanks, guys.
Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And the next question comes from Stephen Sheldon with William Blair. Your line is open.
Hey. Thanks. First question here, I just wanted if you could provide some more detail on the Americas margin and especially the higher discretionary and variable costs, what are those? And how are you thinking about adjusted EBITDA margins in the Americas looking forward, although I know the mix between capital markets and other business lines and the impact on that?
Hey, Stephen. That's a good question. The Americas, as you know, through 2021, and this is true across the business. There was not much travel. There wasn't much client engagement directly, conferences, and stuff like that. That activity has resumed pretty strongly in 2022. We've been very active meeting with our clients in person, attending conferences, other discretionary and variable costs like that have increased significantly after a couple of years of virtually shutting those kinds of costs down. So you're seeing the impact of that in our margins in the Americas. You're also seeing the impact of our business performing very strongly in the first half of the year and our revenue producers hitting their higher commission thresholds earlier in the year. And as a result, they are earning higher splits, and the margins that we generate as a firm are slightly lower from that phenomenon. And those commission levels, they reached that annually. So that is something that will reset in January, but certainly another factor driving the Americas margin in particular. Finally, I note in our Capital Markets business, we have a debt origination platform and debt originations at profitable service line, more profitable than the other types of services, and that the impact of reduced activity in debt origination is having an impact on the margin as well in the quarter.
Got it. Yeah. That's helpful. Maybe a follow-up, I think you'd mentioned a favorable recruiting environment right now. Just curious how much your producer headcount has grown if we look back over the last few quarters of the last year in the brokerage businesses? And are you seeing more urgency in this environment within the smaller or maybe more independent teams to look at joining bigger established platforms like Colliers? I guess just what are you seeing there from an urgency standpoint?
Well, we don't share our recruiting numbers with anyone, but I say that we have been very aggressive from a recruiting standpoint over the past number of years. You can see that in our numbers as our numbers have ramped up over the past number of years. And so I would say that recruiting is top of mind for us more so now. We think, while others are running for cover, there's a tremendous opportunity for us to redouble our efforts in a couple of areas in a couple of markets. We're very strategic about our recruiting. Colliers is if not the most highly respected name in the industry. In North America, it's probably number two. And it is far and away a very comfortable place for people to come to, and we're surely seeing that in our recruiting numbers, size of transactions that were that the new recruits are handling, size of deals that they're handling Christian made a comment earlier about hitting thresholds earlier in the year. Part of that is just the power of our recruiting. And that's just not North America-based it's global. So there's a global initiative around recruiting, filling specific gaps, particularly in areas where our Investment Management operations have strength and infrastructure and other, I would say, recession-proof or recession-resistant asset classes. So we're trying to strategically up our game in terms of the expertise in those asset class areas.
Great. Thank you.
Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Stephen MacLeod with BMO Capital. Your line is now open.
Thank you. Good morning, guys. Just wanted to follow up on a couple of things. I'm just wondering if you can talk a little bit about the Capital Markets backdrop and sort of how it evolved through the quarter? I mean, did you see some strength towards the beginning of the quarter and maybe some weakness towards the end? Just trying to get a sense of how that unfolded with respect to how your revenues unfolded in the capital markets business.
It's a great question, Stephen. The first couple of months after Labor Day saw a noticeable decline, but there are still plenty of buyers and sellers in the market with capital to invest. The issue lies in the disconnect between the expected value and the ability to purchase assets due to the current interest rate situation and general capital availability. There is significant pent-up demand that we believe will begin to materialize over time, depending on how interest rates fluctuate, the availability of capital, and existing owners facing debt obligations. Many factors could influence the market trends going forward. However, the exciting aspect for Colliers right now is our increased diversification. It's crucial for investors to keep everything in context, including the scale of Capital Markets, its contributions, potential future scenarios, and overall impact on the company. While we would certainly like to see enhanced revenue and profitability from our robust Capital Markets sector, we understand its eventual rebound will not drastically affect the company as a whole. I wanted to emphasize this point, especially to someone like you who has been following us for so long.
Okay, that's helpful, Jay. I appreciate that. Regarding the acquisition pipeline, you mentioned that you've recently closed a deal and are in the process of closing another one. How do you view the acquisition pipeline as we enter a period of softness in 2023?
Well, first of all, this was a record year of acquisitions for us if we complete the last acquisition before year end, which we fully expect to do. That will put us well over $1 billion in acquisitions this year, which is by far a record year for us. So to your main question, when the markets get tough, we get excited. And so we have great opportunity out there. We have worked very hard over a long period of time to build relationships with prospective acquisition targets. And I think that as other people find it more difficult to fund acquisitions or to complete them, the Colliers proposition of our perpetual partnership approach just gets better and stronger. And we're just as an organization, for many years, have been exceptional partners to our operating partners across the board. So we're quite excited about acquisitions. We hope to be able to continue the pace over time, but we still will be very strategic and discerning as we have for 27 years in terms of creating shareholder value.
Thanks, Jay. I have one more question. You mentioned that there are many buyers and sellers in the market. What do you think needs to change to break the logjam? Is it related to interest rates, the availability of capital, or are people just waiting for more certainty in 2023? I'm interested to know if you are hearing any consistent feedback from your leads.
It's a combination of factors, Stephen. Six to nine months ago, sellers expected a certain return on their assets, while buyers believed they could purchase assets at favorable financial conditions. Currently, that gap has increased significantly. Many are hesitating, which is evident in our Investment Management business. Typically, we conduct an asset sales program as part of regular operations, but we're currently slowing that process because the returns we would receive from selling assets now are lower than they were in February. We possess high-quality assets and are confident that their values will eventually recover. Additionally, in our alternative asset classes, we see our revenues reset each year, providing a buffer against rising interest rates. As a result, buyers tend to acquire our assets more swiftly compared to those with numerous fixed-rate lease agreements in traditional real estate.
Okay. Well, that’s great. Thanks so much for the color. Appreciate it.
Thank you. One moment for next question. Our next question comes from Daryl Young with TD Securities. Your line is now open.
Hey. Good morning, everyone. I have a two-part question around the Investment Management business. I think you mentioned the capital raising was slightly tougher currently. But as you look out to 2023, is there a pipeline you can speak to in terms of new funds in the market and how those might evolve next year? And then just secondly, on the valuation of the portfolio. Is there any mark-to-market risks that we should be considering next year?
I will let Christian address the second part of your question. Regarding the first part, it's clear that fundraising is currently softer than it has been. There are many reasons for this that go beyond just high interest rates and other economic factors. However, we are performing better than most, and our pipeline of potential investors for our group of investing companies is significantly larger than in previous years. Many of these investors have not yet made final commitments, but we remain optimistic that the quality of our asset classes will allow us to capture more than our fair share of capital. As Christian mentioned in his prepared remarks, we anticipate slightly lower capital raising this year compared to last, but not by a substantial amount. Still, the pipeline of new opportunities heading into 2023 is the largest it has ever been for us. Christian, would you like to add anything?
To address your question on valuation, we focus on private real estate and real assets that are appraised quarterly. Unlike some competitors who have substantial investments in publicly traded assets, our valuations are not influenced by public market fluctuations. We assess the value of our assets quarterly through third-party evaluations. Our portfolio consists of assets that can adjust rental prices frequently, such as student housing, which sees annual rent adjustments, and seniors housing, where there is monthly turnover that allows for regular rent repricing. This setup provides us with a degree of inflation protection and helps maintain market values. We are confident in our ability to preserve the market values across our alternative and infrastructure portfolios, and we do not anticipate any significant adverse changes in our portfolio's market values in the upcoming quarters.
Okay. Great. And then maybe just one more staying on the IM theme. It might be a little bit early days to talk about integration and synergies. But when I look at all the deals you've done, I wonder if there is potential for margin upside compared to what it would seem on each individual business if you think you can get some synergies from the integration of sales and marketing efforts or if there is upside to the consolidated platform in the years to come.
There is definitely potential for improvement, but it's going to require time to achieve that. We're looking at consolidating areas like distribution and back-office operations. However, I believe we can achieve some early successes by collaborating with certain platforms to enhance their margins to more suitable levels, drawing on our internal experience in this area. That is our immediate focus, and we hope to make some progress in this regard. For instance, in the last quarter, the margin in our Investment Management business, excluding promotions, was around 47%, which is quite high to begin with, and it's one of the advantages we have in that sector.
Got it. Okay. I’ll hop back in the queue. Thanks very much.
Thank you. One moment for next question, please. Our next question comes from Frederic Bastien with Raymond James. Your line is open.
Good morning, guys. Wondering if Harrison Street and the IM businesses that you brought on, are they in the process of raising capital currently? And if so, can you update us on how the fundraising is going?
Yeah, Frederic. We are almost constantly in the market, raising capital. And I can tell you we have a number of funds currently in various stages of the capital raising process. Some of the perpetual funds are perpetually raising capital as they expand over time, not really at liberty to talk about specific funds, but that's the general view.
Is it conceivable then that you could exit the year with a number in AUM that's a lot higher than the 92% you reported or you disclosed?
Well, I would say higher, a lot is a relative term. We'll see how we do as we enter the final quarter of the year.
Okay. You mentioned earlier that the promotes are affecting the margins on the investment management side. The margins seem to be in line with what you reported in the second quarter, but they're slightly below the 40% threshold you have been guiding us towards. Is this due to those promoters, and what can we anticipate in the next couple of quarters?
Yeah, Frederic. We didn't have any carried interest in the third quarter. So our margin in the third quarter was 38%. And we brought on a couple of new acquisitions in the quarter, and that's having a bit of an impact on the margin mix there. But our view would be that, excluding carried interest, we will certainly look to enhance our margins over time as well. And back to your question about capital raising, there was tremendous operating leverage from raising new funds. And that will help us over time enhance our margin profile in this business as well.
I'm sort of the same line of thinking with respect to valuation. So just wondering if given the opportunity to invest an incremental dollar today, would you favor buying back your own stock or still deploy it on M&A or both?
The answer is both. However, considering our current trading situation, we should be able to proceed with our stock buyback. It's important to strike a balance between short-term decisions and long-term considerations when adding something significant to our business.
One moment for next question, please. And I have a follow-up with Michael Doumet with Scotiabank.
Hey, guys. Thanks for the follow-up. A question on the margins. Obviously, there was some compression in Americas and the EMEA in Q3. That was offset by a gain in Corporate. But year-to-date, your EBITDA margins are up 40 basis points. So that implies EBITDA margins will be up in Q4 versus last year. So again, just trying to get a sense if that's all in Investment Management. If there's something in Corporate again or generally, what you expect in trends in the regions?
Yeah. I think all of the above, Michael. I think we do expect to have some level of operating leverage from the existing operations on a full-year basis. But the majority will be from the acquisitions. And as we've talked about, the Investment Management acquisitions are very high margin relative to the other service lines, and that is I think the key driver.
Okay. Anything in specific, Christian, on the Corporate side, Q4?
Yeah. I mean I think the biggest one is going to be that variable incentive compensation that certainly, last year was an outsized year and this year will be more modest in terms of the incentive compensation.
Okay. That makes sense. And last one, sorry, guys. But for leasing, I imagine there is some cyclicality related to that business, but you previously pointed to some strength in office given some of the dynamics there in the last couple of years, especially with the pent-up demand as several renewals got pushed back. So how much runway do you think you have in office from pent-up demand that could potentially offset some of the other categories if we do head into a slowdown?
Yeah. That's a good question, Michael. Office leasing has been challenged over the last couple of years. I think this quarter, we finally broke through the 2019 levels. So our office leasing levels are actually above Q3 2019 for the first time. And there is a significant number of lease maturities coming due in 2023. And occupiers are going to have to make decisions about their premises. And that will be an opportunity for our teams to help our clients and negotiate new leases and generate revenue. So I think office leasing has some pretty good dynamics at play for those reasons. And industrial leasing continues to be an area of strength and should be resilient as well, at least in the coming quarter or two.
Perfect. Thanks guys.
Thank you. One moment for next question. And I have a follow-up with Daryl Young with TD Securities.
Hey. Just one more for me. With respect to hiring on producers, I think historically, in the Americas, you've had a bit of a margin drag as you've staffed up just before they become fully productive and maybe some incentives to bring them over. Is that a dynamic we should consider across 2023 if you do find there's opportunities for good people?
Yes, that's the nature of that business for sure. However, we operate on a global scale, and the proportion of recruiting that occurs is quite small compared to our overall broker group. We may have around 5,000 revenue producers worldwide, and the recruitment rate is typically about 3% to 4% annually. This is all accounted for in our financials and budget planning.
Got you. Perfect. Thanks very much.
Thank you. I'm currently showing no further questions at this time. I'd like to hand the conference back to Mr. Hennick for any closing remarks.
Thank you very much, operator. Thanks, everyone for joining us on this third quarter conference call. Looking forward to our fourth quarter, which is obviously the biggest quarter for Colliers, and that will be in February. So thanks for participating, and thank you, operator, for coordinating this call.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a wonderful day.