Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining Dropbox's Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay from the Investor Relations section of Dropbox's website following this call. I will now turn the call over to Peter Stabler. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Dropbox's second quarter 2024 earnings call. Before we get started, I'd like to remind you that our remarks today will include forward-looking statements, such as our financial guidance and expectations, including our long-term objectives and forecast for our third quarter and fiscal year 2024 and our expectations regarding our revenue growth, profitability, operating margin and free cash flow, as well as our expectations regarding our business, assets, products, strategies, technology, employees, users, demand, and the macroeconomic environment. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. They are also based on assumptions as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them as a result of new information or future events. Factors and risks that could cause our actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are set forth in today's earnings release and in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. We'll also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP results is provided in our earnings release and on our website at investors.dropbox.com. I'll now turn the call over to Dropbox's Co-Founder and CEO, Drew Houston.

Thanks, Peter, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to our Q2 2024 earnings call. Joining me today is Tim Regan, our Chief Financial Officer. I'll first share our business and product highlights from the quarter, and then Tim will review our Q2 financial results and provide an updated outlook for the remainder of the year. I'll start with our business performance. Revenue for the quarter was slightly better than we anticipated, with growth in self-serve individual plans offsetting continued challenges within our Teams business. Net new paying user growth improved quarter-over-quarter, but we expect some volatility to return in the second half of the year. Within our individual SKUs, we're encouraged by the performance of our essentials product, which posted strong growth in the quarter. Among our document workflow products, performance was largely as expected as strong adoption of DocSend’s Advanced Data Room helped to offset expected seasonal pressure in our FormSwift business. While we continue our work to improve our core FSS performance and prepare for an expanded rollout of Dash, our AI-powered universal search product, we remain focused on driving shareholder returns through spending discipline and our commitment to returning the excess free cash flow to shareholders via our share purchase program. I'll now share some additional thoughts on our top priorities. As a reminder, this year in our core business, we're primarily focused on improving our Teams performance. In parallel, we continue our work to improve the features and functionality of Dash, our AI-enabled universal search product. As we shared previously, the health of our Teams business is important because our Teams plans feature higher net revenue retention rates, greater customer lifetime value, and more opportunities for license expansion and cross-selling of new products like Dash. As part of our investments here, in Q1, we made progress on driving improved trial starts, Teams invitations, and higher weekly engagement. And now in Q2, we made further improvements to onboarding and invitation flows, which helped increase the number of users activated within new Teams. This increase in activation is important because we've seen that the earlier we demonstrate value to multiple team members, the more likely Teams customers retain and expand. These positive indicators reflect some of the progress we're making to improve the health of our Teams top of funnel. However, we continue to face headwinds from factors, including the challenging macro environment for SMBs, price sensitivity following our recent Teams price increase, and changes we made to the storage limits for our advanced Teams plan. These headwinds have thus far largely offset the progress we've made across our top of funnel initiatives. To combat these headwinds and to ensure a tight alignment of our product development and go-to-market efforts, we recently concluded an in-depth refinement of our customer segmentation model. The segmentation work informs our product roadmaps and guides both our self-serve motion and outbound sales teams as we build integrated sales campaigns targeted at key user profiles across our priority industries and geographies. For example, we know that our most passionate customers are often those whose professional work centers on external sharing or people who work with large files and create media for a living, or some of our most loyal users who've relied on Dropbox for years because of Dropbox's upload speeds and sync performance. And we're committed to all these customers and are focusing our product development and go-to-market efforts to support them across priority industries and verticals like professional services, manufacturing, or media. All of these customers are united in needing Dropbox to do three primary jobs for them: securing, organizing, and sharing all their digital content. In April, we launched several new features that aligned with these customer jobs to be done. First, we launched FSS end-to-end encryption and DocSend Advanced Data Rooms to help customers secure their content and share multiple files with a single link. We launched Microsoft co-authoring to help customers stay organized with their content. And third, we improved our replay functionality to help users share and comment on video content. We continue to invest in these themes during the second quarter. Specifically, we focused on improving the sharing experience for our customers, given that over 50% of new customer sign-ups are driven by sharing. And over the years, as we've expanded the number of surfaces we address, the sharing experience became somewhat fragmented and inconsistent, which introduced some unnecessary friction and led to some declines in sharing activity. By better aligning our customer experience across platforms, we've been able to reverse these declines, driving year-over-year increases in sharing during Q2. We're excited to see how the focus on improving this user experience translates to increased customer engagement, and we will continue this work to further reduce sharing friction for our users in the quarters ahead. And while Teams is a primary focus for us, individuals remain an important part of our business. In particular, we continue to see more of our individual users sign up through their mobile devices, and it's critical that we offer a compelling experience to these customers. To that end, in Q2, we launched a redesigned mobile web experience, extending the experience we launched to our web-based customers last fall. We also rolled out a redesigned mobile upsell experience focused on educating the user on how trials work and giving them peace of mind that they'll be reminded before the trial ends. Collectively, these changes led to a sizable increase in trial starts and helped contribute to our additions in paying users this quarter. I also wanted to highlight some of the foundational work we're doing on our platform to make it easier for customers to purchase multiple products from us. Historically, customers who purchased an additional product like Replay had to connect and mirror their FSS subscription with these new licenses. So, it's an all or nothing proposition with limited flexibility. We've now addressed this challenge by launching partial provisioning, providing customers the ability to add products for subsets of their Teams. And later this year, we expect to roll out standalone purchasing of products untethered from an FSS subscription as we aim to give our customers the option to purchase the products that are best suited for them. Partial provisioning and standalone purchasing will not only provide greater flexibility when selling our current products, but will be critical to the expanded rollout of Dash, which we expect to offer as both an add-on feature to existing FSS plans as well as a standalone product. Additionally, we continue to iterate on our bundling strategy. As we've discussed, our launch of product bundles last October fell short of our expectations. In response, we've lowered our pricing on some of these bundles last quarter. This change in price mitigated some of the pressures we had been seeing, but did not lead to a meaningful inflection in users converting to these plans. We're therefore devoting our efforts to ensuring that we're offering a compelling mix of features and functionality to these plans across our mobile, desktop, and web surfaces, whereas our initial strategy was primarily web-focused. We've gotten a lot of valuable experience in beginning to introduce bundles for our customers, including extending our commerce and identity platforms to enable bundled products. These foundational improvements will enable us to offer future combinations of features and functionality as we launch or acquire new products. I'll now provide a quick update on Dash, our AI-powered universal search product. This quarter, we made great progress on improving the Dash products and capabilities and evolving our go-to-market approach. For example, the team once again drove double-digit increases in search success rates for new and existing users and nearly doubled some of our search relevance metrics. The team also drove engagement increases in key Dash features such as stacks on the start page, and all these are positive signs that we're building a performant and high-quality product. We also continue to engage deeply with potential customers and incorporate their feedback into our roadmap. For example, based on user feedback, we're enriching Dash with deeper AI summarization capabilities and continuing our work to maximize search efficiency. Beyond potential end users, we're also closely partnering with IT administrators as they play a central role in deployment across organizations. Based on these conversations, it's clear that IT admins have a lot of unmet needs when it comes to securing their team's content across multiple content platforms. Security is therefore a central focus in our Dash development efforts, and we're confident we're going to have a competitive offering that provides admins with a lot of new control and transparency that they need. We've also been working on our planned go-to-market strategy. Over half a million paying teams trust Dropbox to secure, organize, and share digital assets. Our teams are already busy identifying the best prospects for our outbound sales motion, where we're already seeing strong signals of interest from our FSS customers. And as awareness of universal search and Dash's capabilities grow, we'll also lean into a self-service sales motion. In closing, we continue to make progress on improving the user experience of our core FSS product, and we're seeing some positive responses in our funnel. At the same time, we're investing in capabilities that will improve the purchasing flexibility for our customers who want to buy multiple products from us. We're still facing headwinds, and we expect the second half of the year to include some volatility, but we're confident that the investments we're making better position us to help our customers secure, organize, and share all of their digital content. We're also excited by the improvements we've made to our Dash product. We'll have more to share in the coming months as we move closer to expanding our rollout. While we work to achieve both improved core performance and a successful Dash expansion, we remain committed to driving shareholder returns, seeking efficiency gains, and investing prudently. I want to thank everyone on the Dropbox team for working hard to fulfill our vision and also thank our shareholders for their support. I'll now turn the call over to Tim to share a recap of our second quarter financial performance, as well as our expectations for the remainder of the year.

Thank you, Drew. I'll cover our financial highlights from Q2, provide guidance for Q3, and offer some updated thoughts on our full year 2024 outlook. Starting with our results for the second quarter. Total revenue for Q2 increased 1.9% year-over-year to $635 million, slightly ahead of the high end of our prior guidance range. As expected, foreign exchange rates had a minimal impact on revenue for the quarter, yielding a 1.8% year-over-year constant currency growth rate. Total ARR grew to a total of $2.573 billion, up 2.9% year-over-year. On a constant currency basis, growth was 2.2% year-over-year. We exited the quarter with 18.22 million paying users, adding approximately 63,000 net new paying users on a sequential basis. Average revenue per paying user was $139.93. Relative paying user strength across our self-serve individual plans was offset by continued challenges for a Teams product and expected seasonality and other pressures weighing on our FormSwift and Sign businesses. Before we continue with further discussion of our P&L, I would like to note that unless otherwise indicated, all income statement figures mentioned are non-GAAP and exclude stock-based compensation, amortization of purchasing tangibles, certain acquisition-related expenses, net loss on real estate assets, and workforce reduction expenses. Our non-GAAP net income also includes the income tax effect of the aforementioned adjustments. With that, let's continue with the second quarter P&L. Gross margin was 84.5% for the quarter. As mentioned previously, the primary driver of the year-over-year increase in gross margin was the increase in the useful life of our servers from four to five, effective January 1st of this year. This change resulted in approximately $9 million of benefit to gross profit in the second quarter. The impact of this change was weighted towards the first half of this year. For the full year, we expect a benefit of approximately $30 million. Operating expenses were $308 million, up approximately 2% year-over-year. Operating margin was 35.9%, ahead of our guidance of 33% and up 170 basis points from the year-ago period. Compared to our guidance, we ended the quarter with modestly lower marketing and outside services spend. Hiring in the quarter was also lower than originally anticipated as we've identified additional efficiency opportunities across our operations. Net income for the second quarter was $194 million, up 12% year-over-year. Diluted EPS for the first quarter was $0.60 based on $324 million diluted weighted average shares outstanding compared to $0.51 in the year-ago quarter, representing an 18% year-over-year increase. Moving on to our cash balance and cash flow. We ended the quarter with cash and short-term investments of $1.1 billion. As a reminder, in the second quarter, we paid the second tranche of our partial San Francisco headquarters lease buyout, totaling $14.9 million. Second quarter cash flow from operations was $231 million, an increase of 23% versus the year-ago period. Capital expenditures in the quarter totaled $6 million. This resulted in quarterly free cash flow of $225 million, compared to $185 million in Q2 of 2023. Free cash flow per share was $0.69, representing a 28% year-over-year increase. In the quarter, we also added $35 million to our finance leases for data center equipment. In Q2, we repurchased just over 11 million shares, spending $260 million. As of the end of the second quarter, we had approximately $868 million remaining under our current repurchase authorization. Our philosophy on share repurchases has not changed. We remain committed to returning a significant portion of our free cash flow to shareholders in the form of share repurchases with the intention of reducing our share counts over time. I'd now like to share our 2024 third quarter and updated full year guidance, where I will also provide some context on the thinking behind this guidance. For the third quarter of 2024 we expect revenue to be in the range of $635 million to $638 million. We expect an FX tailwind of less than $0.5 million. We expect non-GAAP operating margin to be approximately 32%. Finally, we expect diluted weighted average shares outstanding to be in the range of 317 million to 322 million shares based on our trailing 30-day average share price. For the full year, we are narrowing our full year revenue outlook on an as-reported and constant currency basis by raising the bottom of our ranges by $5 million. As a result, our reported revenue guidance adjusts to $2.540 billion to $2.550 billion, while our constant currency guidance suggests $2.537 billion to $2.547 billion. Consistent with prior guidance, we expect gross margin to be in the range of 83% to 83.5%. For non-GAAP operating margin, we now expect to land between 33.5% and 34% for the full year, up from our prior guidance of 32.5% to 33%. Our expectation for free cash flow is unchanged at $910 million to $950 million. We continue to expect between $20 million and $30 million of capital expenditures for the year. Our outlook for finance lease additions is unchanged at approximately 7% of revenue for the full year. Finally, we expect diluted weighted average shares outstanding to be in the range of 323 million to 328 million shares based on our trailing 30-day average share price. This represents a reduction of 3 million shares for each end of the range, one compared to our previous full-year guidance of 326 million to 331 million shares. I'll now share some additional context regarding our outlook. Consistent with our historical approach, our guidance reflects what we have a high degree of visibility into today. The operating environment remains challenging for small businesses, and our outlook embeds our expectations for some increased near-term volatility, particularly with regard to our Teams business where we anticipate near-term down-sell risk associated with some larger accounts that will likely impact our paying user count in Q3 and Q4. In addition, we also expect seasonal pressure on FormSwift's paying user count as customers that primarily use FormSwift during tax season depart the platform, and to a lesser extent some headwinds within our Sign business stemming from the security incident we mentioned last quarter. Each of these factors will serve as headwinds to our revenue, billings, and paying user numbers. Thus, we expect to end the year with total paying users roughly flat from where we ended the second quarter. Regarding non-GAAP operating margin, our raised full-year outlook reflects our performance year-to-date and our continued hiring discipline, along with an emphasis on hiring in low-cost locations. Sequentially, we expect some incremental expense as we invest in marketing initiatives and prepare for an annual customer-focused event in the fourth quarter, while also maintaining some optionality to spend behind discrete initiatives. Additionally, our second half outlook embeds a decreasing benefit to gross margin from the aforementioned change in the useful life of our servers. We are maintaining our full-year free cash flow guidance. While we are pleased with the improved outlook for full year non-GAAP operating margin, there are several factors that impact the flow-through to free cash flow. For example, the aforementioned items impacting our paying user numbers have a more immediate impact on billings and cash. Similarly, FX rates have deteriorated since our initial guidance, which also has a more immediate impact on billings and cash. We also expect to earn less interest income given our increased share repurchase activity, which impacts free cash flow but does not impact operating margins. In conclusion, we continue to focus on solidifying our core file sync and share business by focusing on our core competencies and bringing more value to our customers. Our objective with the core business is to continue to drive revenue growth and lay the foundation for our future, while concurrently generating profitability and increasing cash flow per share. We also continue to invest in new sources of long-term growth, most notably Dash, where we are getting closer to introducing this functionality more broadly to our customers. We are making progress across these objectives and believe that these efforts will culminate in creating long-term value for our shareholders. With that, operator, please open the line for questions.

Thank you. One moment for our first question that comes from the line of Brent Thill with Jefferies. Please proceed.

Hi, Drew. Hi, Tim. Thank you again for taking my questions. This is Luv Sodha on for Brent Thill. Maybe the first one for you, Drew. As we look at a bunch of the horizontal applications, there's been a big investor debate around seat-based pricing versus volume-based pricing in the age of AI. As you look at Dash, could you just share your thoughts on the monetization plans there? And how do you think you're injecting more volume-based pricing to make up for any seat-based degradation that you might see?

Sure. Thanks for the question. To clarify, Dash is currently in beta and not yet generating revenue. Our approach to pricing and packaging will largely draw from our experiences with Dropbox 1.0. We'll leverage our strategy around freemium models, self-service options, and virality from sharing, and then transition into self-service team accounts before moving to managed accounts. We plan to use similar strategies with Dash. We anticipate that the pricing model will be straightforward. While we are open to adjusting based on factors like AI usage or volume-based pricing, our goal is to keep things simple for our customers. So far, in discussions with potential clients, we haven't encountered significant pushback or concerns regarding a simple subscription model.

Got it. And then just a quick follow-up on the Teams, the challenges that you're seeing on the Teams side. I guess, is there a way to dig deeper and parse out how much of this is macro versus the pricing reaction? And is there an element of competitive share losses on that side? Just additional thoughts there would be appreciated. Thank you.

I believe the trends we observed last quarter are continuing. The price increases implemented over the past few years have generally been beneficial, but they have also pulled some demand forward. For new customers, the combination of higher prices and increased price sensitivity has weakened our initial customer engagement, which we are actively addressing. One approach has been to reverse some of the pricing changes made last October when we introduced bundles. Additionally, we are focusing on improving the onboarding experience by removing unnecessary steps. We're observing positive early results as we simplify the onboarding process, making it easier for teams to invite members and get set up, and as we streamline some sharing features. Overall, we're refining the basic user experience and enhancing viral loops.

Got it. And none of it is competitive, right?

I'm sure some of it is competitive, although I wouldn't say there is anything significantly different. We've been competing against Microsoft and Google since the company's inception, so I wouldn't point to any new competitive dynamics. However, the platform companies or the products bundled in the office suite will be our primary competitors in most instances. That's definitely a factor, but it has also been a consideration for the past decade.

Got it. Thank you so much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steven Enders with Citi. Please go ahead.

Okay, great. Thanks for taking the questions here. I guess maybe just to start just on Dash on the AI product set. I guess what's kind of been the feedback you've gotten so far for how customers might be thinking about adopting that and utilizing it? And I guess, secondarily, how are you thinking about the monetization for that at this point in trying to drive share of wallet within customers?

Early feedback has been positive. The key thing we look for is whether the value proposition resonates clearly. It's difficult to find anyone who isn't dealing with the chaos of having numerous tabs open and multiple search boxes in the modern landscape of distributed work. When we demonstrate to customers that these are solvable issues, they are often pleasantly surprised. The value proposition is indeed resonating. Regarding Dash specifically, we have made significant strides in enhancing the product's quality. For instance, in the second quarter, we achieved substantial improvements in search success rates and search ranking quality, which is crucial as our primary focus is to perfect the product experience first. After solidifying engagement and retention, we will shift our attention to distribution and monetization. I am quite pleased with the advancements we've made in product quality. It's encouraging to see the initial product gaining traction with customers utilizing it for searching their private information. People realize that while ChatGPT is useful, there are numerous inquiries it cannot address, such as the expiration of a lease or the location of a specific slide from last year’s product deck or launch. Existing tools fall short, but Dash effectively resolves these queries. In another area that's something that's been interesting is that the IT admins have a lot of unmet needs around keeping track of what everybody's sharing across multiple platforms. We see a lot of opportunity to solve some new, or to address some new unmet needs on the security side. So we're very excited about the roadmap for Dash, and we'll have a lot more to share on the specifics of both the product functionality and some of the pricing and packaging in the coming months this year.

Okay. That's helpful context. We look forward to seeing how things develop. Regarding some of the document workflow products, it seems there has been an impact with Sign and FormSwift, particularly during tax season. Can you provide more clarity on what occurred or what the customer activity was following the security challenges with Sign and how that is affecting the outlook?

So pretty contained. To begin with, the Sign business is a low single-digit percentage of our overall revenue. We've seen a pretty minimal impact on the business or on the Sign business overall. Importantly, everything we know indicates that the incident was isolated to the Dropbox Sign infrastructure, meaning it didn't impact the other Dropbox products. Overall, the incident hasn't had a material impact on our overall revenue or operations, and we don't believe it's likely to.

Okay. I appreciate the commentary there and thanks for taking the question.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kash Rangan with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Hi, thank you very much. Good to talk to you, Drew and team. Drew, I was curious to get your thoughts on a couple of things. So, the right to win for Dropbox with Dash, I know, it's not out yet. But what gives Dropbox the right to win in this space? And do you think this new subcategory you're trying to honor by actually bringing a new category of users that may not be initially spurred by document sharing and the things that Dropbox has been always good with? Ultimately, do you think there is maybe an unmet need in the market for perhaps Dropbox, right? Not that you would not have considered. I'm sure you've popped through all this stuff where you have a lower price point, fraction of the functionality, but then these folks get used to the system, you maybe throw in AI for free, and then you upsell them to the premier versions of Dropbox. I'm just wondering how you're thinking about potential decision paths down the line. Thank you so much, once again.

Sure, sure. Yes. Thanks, Kash. So first on Dash, the origin of Dash was really kind of solving the modern equivalent of or today's equivalent of the problem I started with when I founded the company, which is really in the beginning, I felt like my stuff was everywhere, I couldn't find it. Back then, it looked like my files were on these different devices and operating systems. The solution was like, let's sync everything to the cloud. But today, kind of back to that familiar problem, like my stuff is everywhere, can't find it. But in addition to files, we do a lot of work in our browsers now. What used to be 100 files on my desktop is now also 100 tabs in my browser. It's really that kind of first principles frustration as an end user personally, where I'm like, it is so hard to find just the basic information I need at work. This is a problem that's getting worse not better as one of the unintended consequences of the proliferation of all the different tools within platforms that we're using, and a recognition that no one's solving this problem at scale. Microsoft hasn't solved this problem, Google hasn't, no one has. It didn't seem like there was anyone really putting the necessary firepower on solving this problem. I'd summarize by saying this is a universal knowledge worker need. When we talk to our customers, it's like hard to find someone who doesn't have this problem. Our right to win is it's a natural evolution for our customers. Especially, certainly Dropbox customers. It doesn't take a lot to explain that we're evolving from helping you organize your files to organizing all your cloud content. That's a pretty straightforward logical leap for people. For people who aren't Dropbox files and can share customers, it gives us a big reason to be relevant to new generations of folks that grew up in the browser instead of the file system. We're certainly not the only company working on this, but our scale and our privacy and security track record are a big advantage when we talk to customers. For example, we're launching Dash, we already have 0.5 million paying business accounts already and 18 million subscribers. Once we're happy with the product experiences, you can believe that we'll be turning on distribution and introducing our existing customer base to Dash as rapidly as possible. We also see some promising early signal that folks that are paying files and can share subscribers adopt and retain on Dash at twice the rate as people who are just kind of visiting the website or who aren't. On the trust side, this is top of mind for every customer, as people are entrusting us with their most important information and have been for a long time. AI, as you'd imagine, amplifies these concerns even more as people want a lot of transparency and control about where their data goes as they put it into these new apps or new AI systems. The fact that we're very transparent about this and have a track record, and we already have all these companies storing their most important information on Dropbox makes this a lot more of a natural evolution for us than someone starting from scratch or a start-up or even a growth stage start-up. Compared to platform companies, what we're seeing is that a lot, as you see like Microsoft Copilot or Google's similar features in Workspace, they work super well within their ecosystem but don't work outside. Universal search is by definition a platform-agnostic thing because at the end of the day we all use tools from many of the different ecosystems. It's very rare that you or your team are just in one. We think that's a big advantage for Dropbox, and it's been in our DNA to tie together all these disparate tools and ecosystems. We're putting a lot more attention to this than any individual company, even the bigger companies. You mentioned the second part regarding creativity in pricing and packaging. How can we attract people? Can we offer certain products for free or explore other options beyond a basic subscription? The answer is definitely yes. We have significantly innovated our approach in the past and I'm confident we will do so again. We'll take the best elements but I expect some things will change. We previously discussed volume-based pricing as opposed to seat-based pricing, using free options or loss leaders, and bundling. We will investigate all of these strategies.

Thanks so much for the detailed compliments. Thank you so much.

Thanks, Kash.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Patrick Walravens with Citizens JMP. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. This is Austin Colon for Pat. When you think about some of the things you guys have been working through, whether it's the go-to-market for the individual plans or the pricing on bundles. I mean, what inning do you feel like you're in on plugging some of these holes and getting to a place where you really have the right fit across these plans? Thank you.

I don't have a specific inning number for you. This year marks our initial concerted effort in some areas of the funnel, and we are starting to see those efforts pay off, although there is still significant potential for growth. It's difficult to predict beyond what we have already communicated in our guidance. However, we definitely see many opportunities to reduce friction in the onboarding process, team expansion, and sharing. We achieved some positive milestones last quarter. Sharing has increased year-on-year, which is a turnaround from a slight decline, and that's encouraging. One of the key ways to grow the business is to enhance our technical infrastructure to support cloud content and move beyond just files. These long-term investments will be crucial as we scale up Dash, and we have numerous investments planned.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from Mark Murphy with JPMorgan.

Thank you very much. Tim, you had mentioned that hiring was slower than anticipated. I think you said due to recognizing additional efficiencies. I'm wondering if you can elaborate on the nature of the efficiencies. For instance, are you using some lower-cost regions? Are you seeing some productivity gain from internal use of GenAI, maybe from GitHub Copilot or something along those lines? Is there something different that you're enabling?

Sure. Good question, Mark. I think it's a little bit of all of those things. Our margin outperformance was largely driven by lower headcount-related costs as we identified efficiencies across our operations. This includes slowing the pace of hiring in some areas, prioritizing hiring in lower-cost locations, exactly to your point. Lastly, I'll note that we're managing our vendor and software spend closely. So those are some of the efficiencies we're driving, and we'll continue to look for additional opportunities.

Okay, understood. And then, Drew, I appreciated all the insights you provided while you were answering Kash's question. Can you remind us if there is any update on when you think Dash is going to reach GA and where your thoughts are on the pricing strategy for Dash so that we might be able to kind of run that through our models and start to think about a potential contribution ramp?

We'll have more information to share after our launches later this year. We plan to draw extensively from the successful strategies we've implemented with pricing and packaging at Dropbox. We will definitely offer Dash as a standalone option and subscription. We will also introduce it to our file sync and share customers in various ways, but it's too early to provide specific numbers or details for projections.

Thank you.

Thank you. And it appears that there's no further questions in queue, I will turn the call back to Peter Stabler for closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you next quarter. Hope you all have a great afternoon.

And thank you all for participating in today's conference. You may now disconnect.