Good afternoon and welcome to Globant’s First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. I'm Arturo Langa, Investor Relations Officer at Globant. All participants on this call will be in listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded and streamed live on YouTube. By now, you should have received a copy of the earnings release. If you have not, a copy is available on our website, investors.globant.com. Also, you will find our shareholder letter, which contains the same content as the prepared remarks you will hear today. In order to craft a more engaging and interactive session, we've shortened our prepared remarks and allocated more time to the Q&A section. We will begin with remarks by our Chief Executive Officer, Martin Migoya, and our Chief Financial Officer, Juan Urthiague, followed by a Q&A session where they will be joined by Chief Technology Officer, Diego Tartara, and our Chief Operating Officer, Patricia Pomies. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that some of the comments on our call today may be deemed forward-looking statements. This includes our business and financial outlook and the answers to some of your questions. Such statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties described in the company's earnings release and other filings with the SEC. Please note that we follow IFRS accounting rules in our financial statements. During our call today, we will report non-IFRS or adjusted measures, which is how we track performance internally and the easiest way to compare Globant to our peers in the industry. You will find a reconciliation of IFRS and non-IFRS measures at the end of the press release we published on our Investor Relations website announcing this quarter's results. I will now turn the call over to Martin Migoya.

Hello, and good day, everyone. It's great to be here again. We're pleased to report another solid quarter with revenues reaching $611.1 million, representing a healthy 8.6% year-over-year growth in constant currency, outperforming most of our peers. While our Q1 performance came in below our initial expectations and our revised annual guidance now aligns more closely with broader industry trends, we remain confident in the strength and resilience of our business. The fundamentals that fuel Globant's long-term growth are strong. The AI opportunity is both profound and transformative. It is a market that could reach $4.3 trillion by 2035. Our 10 years of strategic investment in artificial intelligence uniquely position us to lead this new era. We're not merely adapting; we're helping define the AI-powered future of work and digital transformation. That said, we're currently operating in a challenging macroeconomic environment. The probability of a recession in the US has risen significantly since February. Consumer spending has softened, and uncertainty from trade tariffs has impacted a good portion of our customers. We observed a slower pace of pipeline conversion in the US, and growth in some countries in Latin America has been lower than expected. Although some near-term challenges are present, we see this as transitory as the pipeline remains robust with a 20% increase over last year. I'm also pleased to see strong growth in markets where Globant has undertaken major investments recently, including our new market region of The Middle East and APAC as well as Europe. In this environment, we need to stay focused on long-term value creation and transformative impact. Our way forward is based on three core pillars. First, our 100 Square Accounts: one of the greatest assets is our 100 Square customer base and the distribution network we have built over time. Throughout our history, we have consistently added new studios and practices such as digital enterprise and GAT creative studios as innovative services to distribute across a set of clients who value us for pushing boundaries and delivering forward-thinking solutions. We continue to deepen these relationships with these strategic clients aiming to unlock new opportunities and deliver transformative value across their business units. Second, our AI studios are purpose-built to lead comprehensive AI transformation programs for each industry we serve. Their mission is to help clients realize the full potential of AI, conducting in-depth assessments across all business areas, identifying use cases, processes, efficiencies, and emerging opportunities for intelligent automation. From this foundation, our AI studios design and implement scalable AI-powered solutions that target the most impactful workflows and business outcomes. This industry-specific structured approach is supported by our deep technical expertise and our enterprise AI platforms, enabling the orchestration of intelligent agents that deliver measurable innovation and lasting value to our clients. Finally, the Globant subscription model reimagines how we deliver engineering, creativity, and automation services by introducing a consumption-based subscription framework. Clients subscribe to AI-powered capacity through AI Pods, which are dedicated delivery units that combine the power of autonomous AI agents powered by Globant’s enterprise AI with orchestration and oversight from our experts. Delivery is limited in tokens, representing the complexity and volume of work performed. Clients can expand their usage through additional pack subscriptions, offering a clear scalable path to increase value over time. This consumption-based model aligns incentives around outcomes, not hours. It offers a flexible and transparent way to collaborate with our clients while complementing our traditional delivery models. This transformation will integrate directly into our existing client relationship teams and build on the strong relationship we have established with our network of incredible clients, a network built on trust, long-term collaboration, and shared appreciation for innovation. YPF has already adopted this model. JM Family and other enterprise clients are exploring it as well, demonstrating early traction and trust in this new way of engaging with Globant. The Globant subscription model was born from our deep understanding that many organizations struggle to make the savings and efficiencies generated by AI tangible. While the potential of AI is clear, converting this promise into concrete business outcomes remains elusive for most enterprises. Our model addresses this challenge directly, delivering measurable results through defined output, traceable token usage, and integrated performance monitoring, making AI's value visible, actionable, and aligned with strategic goals. While we expand our commercial models, we also want to reaffirm the importance of our traditional delivery methods. Fixed price and time and material contracts remain the predominant form of engagement with our clients. Many organizations will continue to prefer these models, and we are fully equipped with the right talent, proven methodologies, and robust value frameworks to deliver excellence through them as we have been doing for the last 22 years. This quarter, within Globant Enterprise AI, we introduced Globant CODA, a powerful agent-driven suite. It brings together our most advanced AI agents and platforms into a single cohesive solution that simplifies and accelerates the entire software development lifecycle. Weeks ago, Globant’s Code Fixer AI Agent achieved the highest score of the SWE-bench Multimodal benchmark, a prestigious dataset for evaluating AI systems on visual software engineering tasks. In this context, our ability to evolve becomes our competitive advantage. Our new AI-powered subscription model is helping us to create more scalable, predictable, and adaptive partnerships with clients, enabling continuous delivery of engineering, creativity, and business process automation through our AI Pods and our Enterprise AI platform. During this quarter we closed several strategic deals that reflect the creative application of our technology solutions. In the Middle East, we announced a new reinvention partnership with the Saudi Pro League, implementing our Competition Management Solution. With the new platform, future SPL seasons will be managed through a digital ecosystem. This will be powered by AI and data analysis to speed up manual tasks and allow competition staff to focus on innovation. In the United Kingdom, we have reached a major milestone through our partnership with Formula 1. We recently launched the new Team Content Delivery System at the Australian Grand Prix 2025. This innovative technology solution is designed to enhance the competitive experience for race teams by providing engineers and team principals with real-time and archived video and data analysis. We are also partnering with AIB on their Teller app. Teller is a specialized transaction processing application in AIB Northern Ireland Branches, integrated with AIB’s core systems to support efficient transaction management. The bank undertook a significant upgrade of the application to further enhance performance and resilience. We accelerated development using Globant Enterprise AI to ensure delivery in a record time of eight months. In Argentina, we recently announced a reinvention partnership with YPF, the continent’s third-largest oil and gas company. We will improve their supply chain management with agentic AI and will create an integrated operating model that will continuously learn and evolve. It will make complex decisions through expert-supervised algorithms, ensuring compliance with the company’s internal policies and standards across their extensive supply chain network of approximately 5,000 suppliers. Globant’s effort connects with YPF’s vision to enhance operational efficiency across all areas and position the company as a globally competitive player, generating $30 billion in exports by 2030. Our creative GUT Network continues to produce outstanding work for top brands globally, including Corona for its 100th anniversary in Mexico, foodpanda with a new affordability campaign across six Asian markets, and MercadoLibre's ongoing expansion. Our global partnerships also continue to evolve. In recent months we received multiple recognitions from Google, Amazon Web Services, and Adobe, reflecting the strong focus on developing these strategic relationships. As a founder and CEO, I am deeply committed to our reinvention vision. We remain focused on delivering high-value solutions that reflect both human ingenuity and technological excellence. We will continue to evolve our core strengths and business models, while pursuing long-term value creation.

In the first quarter, we continued to navigate a fluid global context. Revenues reached $611.1 million. This represents a 7% increase year-over-year and 8.6% in constant currency, a figure slightly below our February guidance. This performance was influenced by the challenging macroeconomic and geopolitical context, which has affected spending patterns among some of our largest customers, particularly in Latin America. The market deteriorated towards the end of February as a result of the tariff discussions. Still, three of our four regional business units posted solid growth. North America increased the top line by 6.0% year-over-year, Europe by 13.4% year-over-year, and New Markets continued to scale exponentially, posting an 84.4% year-over-year growth. However, we saw a challenging performance in Latin America, which was down close to 9% year-over-year, with notable contractions in Mexico and Brazil, which were partially offset by strong growth in Argentina. From a vertical perspective, we saw year-over-year growth across most of our verticals. However, we experienced some delays in project ramps, specifically in some large accounts in tariff-impacted industries such as Airlines, Pharma, and High Tech. Our revenue per IT head increased by 2.8% year-over-year and 2.3% quarter-over-quarter in the first quarter of 2025, reflecting the value and efficiency we deliver and our ability to remain disciplined in pricing. Turning to our margin trends, our adjusted gross margin for the quarter stood at 38%, flat on a year-over-year basis, reflecting our premium positioning, geographic diversification, and improving service mix. Our adjusted operating margin for the quarter was 14.8%. While this metric fell short of our expectations, this was mainly driven by our lower-than-expected revenues. Our adjusted net income for the first quarter of 2025 was $67.8 million, translating into an adjusted diluted EPS of $1.50 for the quarter, almost flat on a year-over-year basis. Turning to our balance sheet, as of the first quarter of 2025, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments stood at $120.2 million, and our net debt was $167 million, translating into a healthy low net debt ratio, reflecting our prudent balance sheet management and providing us with substantial financial flexibility and liquidity. Regarding free cash flow, we consumed $5.7 million in the first quarter, in line with prior years. Looking ahead, considering the impact to our customers of the macroeconomic uncertainties and tariffs, and given our exposure to B2B2C customers, which affects our visibility, we have undertaken a thorough review of our forecast, with the goal of de-risking our estimates to the extent possible. Based on this, we are introducing our second-quarter 2025 guidance of at least $612 million in revenues or 4.2% year-over-year growth. This expected growth includes a neutral FX impact. For the full year 2025, we are revising our revenue guidance to at least $2,464 million, which would represent a 2.0% year-over-year growth, translating into a similar figure in constant currency terms. In terms of profitability, we are targeting an adjusted operating margin of at least 15% for both the second quarter of 2025 and the full year 2025. The IFRS effective income tax rate is expected to be in the 20% to 22% range for both the second quarter and the full year 2025. For adjusted diluted EPS, we forecast at least $1.52 for Q2, assuming an average of 45.7 million diluted shares outstanding during the second quarter and at least $6.10 for the full year 2025, assuming an average of 45.8 million diluted shares outstanding during 2025. We are taking clear and decisive steps to maximize our financial health and navigate the current environment effectively. Our short-term focus for the remainder of the year will be on driving growth through strategic investments in our AI Industry studios and our 100-squared accounts, while focusing at the same time on protecting our margins and cash flow. With respect to margins, the main areas of focus are optimizing utilization, which stood at 78.2% in Q1 2025 compared to 79.3% in both the previous quarter and Q1 2024. Disciplined pricing strategies, strategic geographic mix of our talent and revenue, footprint optimization, and infrastructure streamlining are ongoing, particularly through the integration of recently acquired companies. SG&A investments will be sharply focused on bolstering our sales capabilities and go-to-market initiatives, while concurrently maintaining a lean overall structure. As of Q1 2025, adjusted SG&A as a percentage of sales stood at 18.3%, and we target this metric to trend downwards by the end of the year, as our top line expands. With regards to our cash generation, we are actively working to improve this critical metric through several initiatives. These include extending supplier payment terms wherever possible, targeting a reduction in our DSO, and implementing a significant reduction in capital expenditures, with a clear prioritization towards investments in artificial intelligence. We aim for prudent M&A activity to ensure accretive transactions in a fluid market. However, as discussed by Martin, we will remain bold in our technology bets and will continue to execute decisively on our long-term strategic goals. This balanced approach is of utmost importance to us. Thank you for your continued support. See you shortly at the Q&A session.

Thank you, Juan, and hi, everyone. So as we go through the Q&A section of this call, I will first announce your name. At this point, please unmute your line and then ask your question. Then please mute your line after your question is done. I would also like to ask for you to please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. So with that in mind, we will take our first question from the line of Tien-tsin Huang from JPMorgan. Tien Tsin, please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, thank you, Arturo. I know that the environment has been challenging for a lot of the companies here. I'm just curious how quickly do you think you can recover some of the demand or spend, specifically in Latin America, just to start with that? Because it sounds like that's where a lot of the change emerged. What are you doing to reenergize growth there? Have you seen some of the work get canceled? Are these just delays? I'm just trying to get a better understanding of how that might shape up here in the short term and the midterm, starting with Latam and any other areas that were a little troubled.

Thank you very much for the question. Listen, I believe that there are pieces of information inside what we said in my initial remarks that were the size of the pipeline. Surprisingly, the size of the pipeline is 20% higher than in the same period last year and even higher than Q4. So that's a pretty good sign of how things are evolving. I think many of the deals are just being delayed. Mexico is suffering. Brazil is suffering. And, there's a lot of uncertainty, and decisions are just being pushed out. That started a week later than our February earnings call. And evolving into this quarter that we're reporting now, and we want to be very sensible about that information and saying, listen, we're seeing an adjustment for the full year. I see a pretty good probability for Q2, and I'm not seeing major struggles, of course, unless something new appears in the market, which I don't think is the case. But I'm seeing that number quite solid right now and the full year too. So recovery in Latin America is already happening. I mentioned some of the deals that are pushing us forward. Some of that recovery is coming from Argentina. Some of that recovery is coming from Chile and some other geographies. Mexico is also improving slowly. It's not being seen in the numbers of Q1, but we are seeing it a little bit better. So with all that, I think we're going to have a quarter like we described in Q2. But unfortunately, the whole year was lower than what we expected at the very beginning of the year. I don't know if Juan wants to add something to that.

So basically, when you look at the Q2 number, which is just slightly above where we ended Q1. The idea is that we're trying to put out guidance for the year, which, you know, if you do the math, it's basically a very similar second half relative to the first half. We're trying to be sensitive enough so that the rest of the year looks at least where we are today. We don't see further deterioration. When you look at the second quarter number, we feel it's quite solid at this point. So that seems to be kind of a lower end basically or a bottom for the year. And the pipeline that Martin is describing is what somehow gives us some comfort of hopefully a better second half, which is not embedded in the numbers that we're providing because we don't want to go through another situation where the uncertainty doesn't allow us to put out the numbers we want. So the business is there, the pipeline is there. We are trying to put numbers in a place where we feel comfortable and we are confident we're going to be able to meet at least the $612 million that we guided for the second quarter.

Yeah. I would like to reiterate that the amount of opportunities, the quality of the opportunities, I think, is outstanding. The things that are happening in the market with the technology is outstanding. So just people are saying, okay, let's put this on hold, let's put that on hold in many different industries. I would say that financial services were the least affected. But then all the rest of the lines were kind of in tough environments, right? But the long term for the business, I think, is outstanding. The amount of opportunities is rising, and the quality of opportunities is rising too. So I'm very positive about the future as always.

Okay. It's unusual for Globant to miss the quarterly outlook. I'm sure you'll learn and you won't. I'm just curious, is there anything to deteriorate and if they look to continue for whatever reason, do you have levers to pull to protect the margin and the profits given what we've learned so far since late February to date? Do you have levers to pull?

Yeah, guess the line is a little bit choppy, but I think you asked about protecting margins and profitability if the business deteriorates. As I discussed in my remarks, we have already taken a number of measures to protect those margins, to protect operating margin as well and to meet the EPS guidance. We feel that those measures that are in place should be at least for what we see the business today, they are enough. But definitely, if we see another change in the market, we will have to take further additional measures to protect profitability. I mean, we definitely believe that growth is okay, but it's also important to focus on profitability and protecting margins. That's why we mentioned specifically a number of things that we are doing. And also on the cash flow front, right? We are trying to take measures on every front until we see an acceleration in the top line.

Yeah, high priority initiatives, all of them.

The next question comes from the line of Jim Schneider from Goldman Sachs. Jim, please go ahead. Your line is open.

First of all, I was wondering if you could maybe frame for us sort of the backlog that you see, not the pipeline, but the backlog of signed contracts and maybe your coverage level of backlog relative to the revenue guidance at this point in time, maybe comparing that versus what you were seeing in Q1 of last year, maybe just as a first start?

For the second quarter, I think that the level of comfort and level of visibility is high enough. We try to ensure that the number provided is at least the number we are targeting, we're trying to meet. For sure, there is more uncertainty for the second half of the year. That's why when you look at our second half implied guidance, it’s basically somehow following with the current numbers with just a small improvement in Q3. So I think that the way we build the current forecast includes or has embedded the current visibility, which of course is lower than prior years. That's why we did have to adjust our full-year guidance.

And then maybe as a follow-up, could you talk about maybe parts of the US business outside of the LATAM, which is clearly being impacted by tariffs. What parts of the business there slowed? Was it confined to one or two geographies, whether it be airlines or something else? Maybe just talk about the profile of the US business, please.

Yes. Look, it was pretty much all over the place. Entertainment was performing a little bit lower. High-tech, it was the lowest. Healthcare also took some dip, although we're seeing it recovering much better now. Travel and hospitality have gone down. It's interesting because, you know, between professional services and financial services were kind of the most even performances, but then all the rest that are related to consumers took a big hit. So it's pretty obvious to us that that is something much larger than just one specific sector hitting the thing.

I think the fact that we are a company that, of course, we have a wide array of services, but a big part of what we do is still on the growth side, right? We have a lot of B2B2C customers with consumers that somehow are being impacted by tariffs, by the uncertainty of what's going to be like in the US going forward. And those are the industries that initially, at least on many of our customers put some kind of a break on certain projects. That happens in, as Martin was saying, in terms of the automotive, some of the technology customers that we have, and some of the retailers. So mostly you see that concentrated on consumer-facing customers.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Bergen from TD Cowen. Brian, your line is open.

I wanted to ask about your top 10 clients. Can you dig in a little bit further on what you saw specifically in some of those accounts and how you are thinking about those accounts now in 2Q in the second half? So obviously, Disney and then potentially some Middle Eastern clients and any other ones you think are important to call out?

In general, if you look at the performance on a sequential basis, pretty much most groups performed in a similar fashion. However, already getting into Q2, we see stabilization. That's why the expected number is slightly ahead of the Q1 number. Probably the ones that have more consumer-facing exposure suffered a little bit more. But in general, already into Q2, we see more stabilization. Clearly, markets will continue to outperform with very high year-over-year growth and we're going to see sequential growth there as well. At this point, we're also seeing positive numbers in Europe, positive numbers in the US. Maybe the one region that will stay behind will continue to be Latin America, at least during the second quarter.

And how are you managing kind of the employee base here and the resourcing plans as you go forward? Can you talk about your intentions here as you move through the balance of the year?

Yes. I think the strategy is the same. I mean, we have been globalizing our delivery footprint in the last 10 years. When we did the IPO, Argentina was 70% of our employees. Today, we have a very balanced portfolio of countries from where we serve, you know, being Colombia, India, Argentina, the three main locations that will continue to be the case. We will continue to be a diversified delivery footprint as well today. That's going to continue. Of course, we will prioritize where demand is going as we have always done. But in general, the overall strategy doesn't change. Having a global delivery footprint to serve more global customers. As you can see today, the US is about 55% of revenues, Europe is getting very close to becoming the second-largest revenue generation area. And we have seen a very nice uptick in the share of new markets. So we are building a global delivery footprint for a global revenue company.

The next question comes from the lines of Jamie Freeman from Susquehanna.

I was wondering if you could comment on the competitive position of the company apropos of application development versus infrastructure. Is it difficult to compete purely as a great application development provider yet having less mindshare in infrastructure in this environment?

I think it's interesting to go through our revenue per head, right? When you see the revenue per head still growing, it's a measure that we are adding more value to our customers and seeking deals that are a lot of value added for our customers. On the enterprise side, the cloud ops studio that we have is performing very well, and we have very deep expertise there as pretty much everything we do is going into cloud, into the infrastructure side. I think that with all the AI projects that are happening, that area, that specific area is gaining a lot of momentum. And, I believe that, in essence, every day becomes more and more, the AI landscape becomes more and more complex. Every day it is more and more difficult to create something only thinking about cloud or only thinking about AI. You need everything together. And this is where we're going. I mean, Globant has become a much more balanced company in terms of our studios. We're playing on the digital side; we're also playing on the enterprise side with a good portion of our business, and we're also playing now on the creative side. So the three components are very important components of pretty much any solution that you build today. So, I think that if you only focus on one of them, it will be difficult. But as we are balanced between the three of them, I think that we are in a pretty good position to create better solutions for our customers through our AI studios, our subscription model, and the way we change how companies buy these types of services. In some way, we're simplifying the access to technology for companies. This is an extremely important option that we are providing now to our customers, which is being very well accepted and a very good and important conversation starter for many of our customers. And again, the most important asset we have built are all those customers with whom we have a very good relationship that they value us for how we can innovate, for how we can implement many of the latest technologies to them. So I believe that more and more, and that's a testament of how we have been doing things, it's about having a balanced approach to technology because it's not just about having one of those things.

In terms of the increase in the revenue per head, that's very interesting. Do you see that more as the revenue realization related to automation, or is there a reduced linearity? Any context you could give us about revenue per head would be helpful.

Yeah, there is, Jamie, there is a little bit of everything: a little bit of higher value added services, a little bit of an improvement in how we deliver some of our services. There is also a higher share of Europe and new markets which come at a higher revenue per head than Latin America. So you have different factors. And also, there is a lot of careful management in terms of our pricing. I mean, there are many deals that are not good enough in our view. And we also try to protect our margins through having a good grip on pricing. There are a lot of deals out there that we could get at very low pricing, low margins or even negative margins. We're trying to put everything in balance. And that's why you are seeing our revenue per head going up sequentially and year-over-year.

And some of our competitors are chasing those deals where you need to pay to get them and then get some kind of deal in exchange for that. But we are totally aware of that, saying, listen. We don't want to enter into a deal where we need to offer any kind of advantage or maybe in those deals where we don't like the profit that we are making. I mean, if we're not making a good profit, we walk away. And we have been extremely selective on those deals. Buying revenue today is a pretty common standard in many occasions, and we don't like those deals.

Our next question comes from the line of Maggie Nolan from William Blair. Maggie, please go ahead.

I'm curious if your margins are different on the Latin American revenue compared to the rest of the business and how maybe the softness in Latin America is flowing through the margins and impacting the financials right now?

Not necessarily; I would say they're not very different in the different regions. You don't see a lot of dispersion there. I think what is very important is that we need to remain sensitive in terms of how we price the deals, about looking for the right margins for the deals, protecting. I think at the end of the day, it's very easy sometimes to get deals at lower prices. We discussed this many times. Taking prices down is very easy; taking them up again is very hard. So it's always a balance. Of course, we don't like to lose deals, and we try to win as many deals as we can. But that has to have a limit at some point.

And I also think that a good customer with good margin is also a signal of the health of that relationship, right? And we always prefer to pursue healthy relationships and to put that in front of everything. So for us, a deal in Latin America or a deal in the US should be healthy anyway. So we have a pretty centralized way of understanding margins and understanding how we want to close the deals. And that's something that we try to spread across all the places. So I don't know if that answered your question.

And then on the new commercial models, how much traction are you getting there? Is there anything that you can quantify maybe as a percentage or part of your AI revenue? And then is your goal to have this become a material percentage of revenue over time?

AI revenue is growing a lot. I mean, it's something that surprises us the way and the amount of deals. It’s interesting to see that that growth is connected to the complexity of the market. So as it becomes more and more complex, companies want to implement that. And again, you know, I said this many times, AI projects are very good for social media and are very easy if you want to do a demo or do it in social media. But then when you want to take it to enterprise levels, it's a totally different game. So there's a lot of activity around that. Pretty much AI is involved in every single project. I mean, there's not a single project that we are pitching today that doesn't have a component. Even in those very old customers, all of them are getting some kind of flavor and components around that. Now our latest model, our latest subscription model, what it does is provides the customers with a way of changing that engagement that we have had for the last 22 years into an evolved new model. And, I will let Diego explain a little bit more about that. But I think that having this new conversation is triggering a lot of interest, a lot of early interest from our customers. We already closed many deals around that. We are not disclosing any numbers; it's not substantial yet. But my plan moving forward is that at some point, we'll start disclosing it as it gains momentum. And I hope that this is something that will be leading again. It's like, when you subscribe to any subscription that you can imagine, now you can subscribe to Globant and get the engineering that you need, the creativity that you need, the process automation that you need, and pay for consumption instead of just paying for the hour, only paying with a monthly fee. So this is a pretty revolutionary approach. We haven't seen any of our competitors doing it. And we're extremely proud that we cracked that nut. And as I said in my remark, AI efficiencies have been a little bit elusive to become tangible. And with this model, what we are doing is we’re providing our customers with an effective way to make those savings real. So whenever you had a team of five engineers, we call it that way, now you may have a subscription that is much cheaper than those five engineers. But on the back, there are the set of agents producing the software supervised by a human that allows the quality and output not to have hallucination, and it's the same Globant quality as always. So that produces a better alignment of interests between our customers and us. And that produces something we are looking for, which is more and more conversations around that new model and that new way of doing things. I don't know if Diego wants to add.

I think, Maggie, to put it super simply, it has been a discussion we've been having about the future of the company and how we provide value for a long, long time. I think time and people have been a good proxy of the value being delivered to our client, and that is no longer the case. So our immediate approach was to engage in a different way. One would think, like, immediately that that best way and approach has to do with turnkey solutions, fixed price. And the truth to be told is that we don't like those types of contracts. But let me tell you why. Those have an end. They don’t speak about a relationship. Those have a set mandate. And the relationship you have with your client makes change, which is, you know, evolving products, discovery, etc., a case you don't want. And that's not the type of relationship we get. So we started exploring a new way of doing things, and I think we want a subscription model that pretty much represents that. Let's represent the value we are delivering in a different way. Let's measure that. Let's make sure we continue to provide value and efficiencies and quality the way Globant has been doing, but taking advantage of the latest technology and all it can do. Let's take that to the limit. And that's what we have put together.

The next question comes from the line of Jonathan Lee from Guggenheim. Jonathan, please go ahead.

How should we be thinking about the revised growth outlook as it relates to composition between ongoing ramps versus hunting versus farming? And how does that compare to composition from prior years?

When you look at the full-year number today, Jonathan, you look at Q1, you look at the Q2 guidance, you're going to see that it's basically maintaining the same level of revenues for the rest of the year. And the way we are building that is with a majority of that already contracted. We try to, on purpose, to reduce as much as possible, many potential upsides coming from coming or even from taking more risk on the farming side. So we will try to put out a number that we feel has a higher degree of certainty than the ones or maybe a lower risk than the one we would have taken at another moment. Given the uncertainty that we're seeing, given that we were expecting a better Q1 than what it ended up being, we're expecting a recovery already into Q2 that is not showing, it's pretty much stable. And we try to say, okay, if this is not happening as we expected back in February, let's somehow assume that this uncertainty that we're seeing continues throughout the rest of the year. And let's try to put a number that removes most of that uncertainty, as I said, to the extent possible.

And just as a follow-up, can you update us on what you're seeing at your top customer? Understand there was a pull forward late last year, but is there still an expectation for that account to be up, call it, mid-high single digits this year?

At this point, we're seeing that account finishing around the mid-single digit number, given that it started a little bit below where we were planning before and looking already into the second quarter. So we feel that it should be more in line with a mid-single-digit type of year-over-year growth at this point. We are already in the process of having some conversations about some new things that they have recently mentioned in the press, but that is something that's going to take some more time to materialize.

The next question comes from the line of Sean Kennedy from Mizuho. Sean, please go ahead.

I was wondering about the demand environment for professional services. It seems like it recovered a bit this quarter sequentially. And has your outlook changed significantly over the last few months with those pressuring the sector broadly?

So part of the recovery comes from during Q4, typically there are furloughs in that sector. Those are not in Q1, they typically happen in December. Part of the recovery is there, and we see a stable number for that industry. We're not seeing big changes, neither positive nor negative. So it's going to be stable. We're going to see better numbers in other industries like VFSI. We are going to see better numbers in travel and hospitality. We're going to see better numbers in healthcare, for example.

And then for Latin America specifically, are there I thought Globant was overweight financial services. Is it kind of just a broad pullback in the demand environment? Or is it really focused on a few key sectors down there?

It's mostly focused on countries and sectors. Argentina is doing extremely well, showing very, very solid growth. But that is being offset by some of our customers in Brazil and Mexico. In Mexico, that's mainly BFSI. But when you look at BFSI as a whole, we are having good traction in the US; we're having good traction in Europe. So it's not a sector that as a whole will look bad. It's going to actually look good even with the issues in some of our customers in Latin America.

Thank you, Sean. The next question comes from the line of Divya Goyal from Scotiabank. Divya, please go ahead.

I just wanted to get some color on the capital positioning of the company with the current macro dynamics. So if you could provide how have some of the capital priorities changed? And what are some of the imminent measures you are taking or have taken in order to ensure you meet the profitability guidelines that you've put forth?

I think the first part was about capital, right? And protection of cash flow generation. Am I right? The second part was about margin? So we closed the quarter with about $155 million in net debt. We have a facility which is up to $725 million. You have to keep in mind that Globant usually consumes cash in the first half of the year and generates a lot of cash in the second half of the year. Having said that, the plan, as I mentioned in my initial remarks, is to protect and actually generate more cash. We have taken measures to make our CapEx investments lower for the year and prioritize those areas related to our AI investments at the expense of some of maybe certain offices and certain things that we were able to postpone for the future. So we will be protecting cash flow generation. As I mentioned, cutting or reducing a little bit or prioritizing our CapEx investments, extending DSO payment terms whenever possible towards our vendors. At the same time, we're working very hard to reduce the DSO.

And also, on the M&A side, we'll be much more focused on really adding value and generating deals that are accretive for the company. Everything changed when the multiple changes. So we have a new reality there, and we'll be much more cautious on that specific, much more limited. We have always been cautious. So much more limited in terms of how we do M&A, right?

And then on the margins, the second part of your question, I also mentioned some actions that we're taking, trying to work on utilization levels, which are below our target. We are working on efficiencies in terms of infrastructure, offices. We're working on protecting our margin through being cautious in terms of pricing and so on and so forth.

That's helpful. Just to complete the discussion here, are you undertaking or anticipate undertaking any specific restructuring efforts in any of the global geographies you operate in?

No. Divya, that's not in the plan. We see a lot of, as Martin described, the pipeline is there, the need for technology is there. I think uncertainty will have to go away at some point and companies will continue investing in growth as they have been doing in the last 20 years.

And companies cannot avoid going through these transformation processes. I mean, pretty much nobody can look away from the efficiencies that can be made using AI in every single sector of the company, the efficiencies that can be done in how we interact with consumers, customers, and how emotional you become when you connect with them. And those things, AI helps a lot. So pretty much no customer in any sector can look away from that. So that is materializing into pipeline growth. And, of course, I think decisions will be a little bit more fluid moving forward, but we hope that that's the new reality. At the very beginning of the year, we were a little bit tough even more after we reported earnings with all the tariff things and things that happened that were absolutely unexpected. But in any case, that is very helpful.

Our next question comes from the line of Arvind Ramnani from Piper Sandler. Arvind, please go ahead.

When you think about kind of the updated guidance, I'm really trying to understand kind of what's going to drive some upside or downside. So in a sense, like, if we're looking at this like eight months from now and you come in sort of below your updated guidance, what would have to happen? And if you were to come back closer to kind of the prior guidance you basically kind of gave three months ago, what will drive that? And, what I'm really trying to figure out is, like, things are moving fairly quickly both on the tariff side and the macro side. And I don't necessarily want to be overly optimistic or pessimistic, but I'm just trying to figure out the factors that can get us to a different range than what you've guided to.

The way you know the numbers are built, if you think about our prior guidance, we were expecting to do $623 million at the midpoint. And then Q2, Q3, and Q4 have embedded sequential growth rates there, right? So what happened when we reported was that things got a lot worse, and we were not able to offset those challenges already in Q1. So we ended up a notch below what we expected. And looking into Q2, we are seeing that we're going to be just a little bit up relative to Q1. And we are seeing stabilization in other regions. So somehow we said, okay, let's assume that this uncertainty will continue. We cannot assume a meaningful recovery in the second half of the year, because at least we want to be able to see if things get better; we want to be able to achieve that. But we cannot put that into the guidance for the year as we did last time. So that's how we've given the guidance. So I think that, as you said, things are moving a lot very quickly. And what we believe is that the vast majority of what we are seeing was due to all the changes and uncertainty that is happening and impacting our customers. Hence, if those things go away, the pipeline is there, and the opportunities are there. The guys in the field are bringing the opportunities. We need to close more, and we need to close faster. If that happens because things get better, there might be some upside. And then on the opposite, as you said, if things go the other way, you know, at least what we try to do with this guidance is put out a number that we feel is as safe as possible with the current scenario.

That's certainly helpful. And I guess there's obviously some level of number of working days and everything seasonality that naturally impacts sequential growth. I understand that. With that said, when I look at your Q1, it was negative 5%. And then Q2 is like flat, which just mathematically implies like a 500 bps turnaround in terms of sequential growth. Right? Like, basically, between Q4 last year and Q1 your revenue declined. But now you see it's going to be flat. And then Q3 and Q4 is about flattish about 1% in order to- So is there enough optimism that's getting you from, like, you declined in Q1, but now in Q2, you're going to start seeing flat?

We would try to put out a guidance that contemplates the uncertainty that we have in front of us. We see the second quarter stabilizing very clearly related to Q1 as of now. So the numbers that we are putting, to the extent possible, include all that uncertainty and hopefully allow us to at least meet those targets.

And just one last follow-up here. I mean, one could argue that you had a good macro in January and February and March when things started to shake. April was kind of the worst month, and April sits more in Q2. So given that the last six weeks are probably the most volatile. How have the last six weeks gone for you guys?

The second quarter numbers are showing some stabilization. In a way, they are part of that. We are not seeing deterioration. That's what I can tell you. That's why the number shows a stable number throughout the year. We are not assuming any major or any significant improvement in numbers that we put out. And we did take some, I mean, we tried to put a number again that at least we can meet.

Unfortunately, that's all the time that we have for the Q&A session today. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Martin for some closing remarks. Martin, please go ahead.

Thank you very much, everyone, for participating today. Really looking forward to see you on our next quarter earnings. Thank you so much.