Thank you for standing by. My name is Kate, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Hyperfine Q1 ’25 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Webb Campbell, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you for joining today's call. Earlier today, Hyperfine, Inc. released financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. A copy of the press release is available on the company's website as well as sec.gov. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained in this call that relate to expectations or projections of future events, results or performance are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, those relating to our operating trends and future financial performance, expense management, expectations for hiring, training and adoption, growth in our organization, market opportunity, commercial and international expansion, regulatory approvals and product development are based upon current estimates and various assumptions. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated or implied by these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these statements. For a list and description of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business, please refer to the Risk Factors section of our latest periodic filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast today, May 13, 2025. Hyperfine disclaims any intention or obligation, except as required by law, to update or revise any financial projections or forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. With that, I will turn the call over to Maria Sainz, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us. On the call with me today is our Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Brett Hale. In the first quarter, we delivered revenue of $2.1 million with the sale of six systems with a strong average selling price. We also reinforced our financial profile, taking steps to significantly reduce cash burn by completing a reorganization, and we further strengthened our balance sheet by raising $6 million through a registered direct offering to extend our cash run rate to the end of 2026. In the first quarter, we experienced some headwinds to revenue associated with the new political environment, which resulted in the loss of several deals at large academic institutions that were funded by grants. The first half of 2025 marks the end of a time in our company's commercial trajectory where our business relies primarily on U.S. hospital deals. As we have previously indicated, hospitals have proven to have protracted sales cycles and high variability in deal timing. We are committed and excited about Hyperfine’s future with diversified revenue across the three verticals of the hospital, the office setting, and international markets, and introducing our significantly improved product performance with our next-generation image quality. We still expect this catalyst to change the growth trajectory of Hyperfine starting in the second half of this year. I will now provide an update on our diversified growth catalyst coming to fruition in 2025. As we progress into the second half of 2025, our business will be a diversified portfolio with hospital, office, and international verticals providing a platform for higher growth and less variability. We have continued to make solid progress towards launch readiness for the office business. Several of the office accounts in the pilot program are now IAC accredited, have started to scan, and are going through the reimbursement process with CMS. NEURO PMR, our office clinical study, has begun enrollment and the two participating office sites are demonstrating strong enthusiasm for the Swoop system. NEURO PMR is a multicenter prospective observational study comparing AI-powered portable MRI and conventional high-field MRI with respect to pathology findings, clinical utility, and patient experience in the neurology office setting to assess different use cases for the subsystem. The study is being run by two private neurology practices, the Dent Neurologic Institute and Texas Neurology. The study has a target enrollment of 100 patients. Enrollment is progressing very well, and I am pleased to report the study is about halfway enrolled, and we now expect the study to conclude ahead of our previous estimate by the end of the third quarter of 2025. Additionally, in the last couple of weeks, we have conducted training for our field teams on the office market opportunity. On the technology front, we continue to improve the image quality of our unique AI-powered portable MRI to drive broad clinical utility and mainstream adoption. We expect to obtain clearance for our next-generation software in the first half of the year and expect the commercial rollout in the second half of the year. Meanwhile, we continue to work towards clearance and launch of another generation of Swoop System Technology later this year. These releases will bring a step function improvement in image quality, approaching the quality obtained from conventional 1.5 Tesla MRI systems, as noted by several key opinion leaders involved in our development process. We believe this level of image quality will make the adoption of portable brain MRI quicker for new users, enabling a shorter learning curve and accelerating market uptake of our technology. Our strategy for growth is based on-site of care expansion. Our focus is on building an office business, expanding to multiple sites inside the hospital, and driving adoption in international markets. The neurology office setting is an incredibly compelling opportunity for the Swoop system. Neurologists directly impact 100 million patient lives in the United States. They order an average of 500 to 600 MRIs annually, and only a very small fraction of the private neurology practices have MR imaging equipment on-site. We plan to launch in the office mid-2025, and as highlighted previously, the team has made a lot of progress towards launch readiness by initiating pilot accounts, initiating the NEURO PMR study, and most recently, training the field teams. Now moving to the hospital opportunity. We have continued our expansion into the emergency department as an additional call point in the hospital given the importance of time to scan and patient progress and supported by the clinical work we have done in stroke. MRI availability for the triage of stroke patients in the ER is very limited, and patients and clinicians often endure long waits. Data from ACTION PMR shows that AI-powered portable MRI in ischemic stroke triage can help address patients quickly and provide valuable clinical insights in this highly time-sensitive environment. ACTION PMR evaluating the use of the Swoop system for ischemic stroke patients completed enrollment at 100 patients across four leading institutions globally. Data was presented most recently at the 2025 International Stroke Conference. To drive expansion into the PMR, we plan to support additional projects to generate clinical evidence that will demonstrate the clinical workflow and economic value of the use of the Swoop system in this new site of care. Besides selling on the clinical benefits of using the Swoop system in the hospital, we have focused our team on highlighting the potential favorable economic impact of using the Swoop system. We have compiled data from key Swoop system accounts documenting incremental conventional scans enabled by the use of the Swoop system in critical care and cost savings in care associated with the use of the Swoop system enabling faster decision-making and discharge as appropriate. This real-world data is another valuable tool our commercial teams are now using in their accounts. I am pleased to report we have seen an increase in multiple unit deals in the hospital setting in our pipeline illustrating the increase across several hospital call points. Finally, turning to our international commercialization activities, we continue to see strong interest and healthy demand in our markets across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. I’m also pleased to share that we continue to anticipate regulatory approval and market entrance in India in the second half of the year. As I said on our last call, 2025 will be a tale of two halves with our first-half performance based on our legacy business with a heavy mix of hospital deals. The second half of 2025 will be favorably impacted by the launch of two new AI-powered technology releases with significant improvements in image quality, the launch of our office business, and the adoption from existing and new international markets, including India driving healthy growth and diversification of our revenue in the second half of 2025 and beyond. I remain confident in the opportunity in front of us and the execution and capabilities of our team. I will now turn over the call to Brett to review our Q1 performance and provide an update to 2025 guidance.

Thank you, Maria. I will recap our financial results for the first quarter of 2025 before providing an update on our financial guidance. Revenue for the first quarter of 2025 was $2.1 million. In the first quarter of 2025, we sold six units with a strong average selling price. During the first quarter, we continued to experience longer deal timing and processes for U.S. hospitals and the loss of several deals due to significant reductions and cancellations of grant funding to academic institutions. Our average selling price and pipeline remain strong, but U.S. hospital critical care deal sales cycles continue to experience variability and are longer than in past quarters. Also, during the first quarter, a majority of our United States sales personnel were newly hired. These new members of our sales teams are gaining traction with customers while training to be prepared to build awareness and visibility of our next-generation imaging technology once cleared and launched. Gross profit for the first quarter of 2025 was $0.9 million and gross margin for the first quarter of 2025 was 41.3%, representing a 20 basis point improvement versus the prior year period. We continue to drive healthy margins at our stage, and we believe we are well positioned for meaningful margin expansion at scale. R&D expenses for the first quarter of 2025 were $5.0 million, compared to $5.6 million in the first quarter of 2024. Sales, general, and administrative expenses for the first quarter of 2025 were $6.7 million, compared to $6.4 million in the first quarter of 2024. Net loss for the first quarter of 2025 was $9.4 million equating to a net loss of $0.12 per share as compared to a net loss of $9.8 million or a net loss of $0.14 per share for the same period of the prior year. Our net cash burn including financing in the first quarter of 2025 was $4.6 million. As of March 31, 2025, we have $33.1 million in cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet, inclusive of $6 million registered direct financing in February. For the first quarter of 2025, our net cash burn excluding financing was $10.1 million down 16% from $12.0 million in 2024. The first quarter is typically our highest cash burn quarter during the year due to several annual one-time costs. Reducing cash burn remains a significant focus for us, and we will continue to prioritize spending discipline and optimize our operating leverage in 2025. Now turning to financial guidance, beginning with our revenue outlook. For the first half of 2025, we now expect revenue to be in the range of $5 million to $6 million. Our updated expectations for the first-half revenue are a result of several U.S. deals recently lost due to cancellations of grant funding to certain academic institutions by the federal government. We believe we’ll be able to more precisely forecast our second-half revenue over the coming months as our growth catalysts play out. And for the full year, we now expect revenue growth to be in the range of 10% to 20% over 2024. For the full-year 2025, we are also updating our gross margin outlook to 47% to 50% for the year, representing a 280 basis point increase in gross margin on a year-over-year basis at the midpoint. We expect the progression of gross margin percentage increase to closely follow our sales growth, and we expect second-half gross margin percentages to exceed the first half. We remain optimistic that we will surpass 50% gross margin comfortably and sustainably as we realize higher volume driven by our growth catalysts. Lastly, we now expect total cash burn to be in the range of $25 million to $28 million for the full-year 2025, representing a 31% decline in cash burn on a year-over-year basis at the midpoint. We’ve taken several steps to enhance our financial profile. We completed a restructuring in the first quarter to reduce operating costs, extend cash runway and transition our organization from a development stage to a commercial stage company. We also bolstered our balance sheet with a $6 million financing. We will execute upon our plan with strong spending discipline while maintaining appropriate investments in our growth catalysts. We continue to see a cash runway for the business to the end of 2026. Before turning the line back to Maria, I want to briefly touch upon the topics of tariffs. We have been closely monitoring recent government commentary and actions and the potential impact on our business. Our 2025 guidance assumes that our business will not materially be impacted by tariffs. Additionally, at this time, we have sufficient inventory on hand to meet current demand. We will continue to follow the situation closely and provide updates to the market as needed. I would like to now turn the call back to Maria for closing comments.

Thank you, Brett. As we get closer to mid-2025, my confidence in driving a new office business, expanding in the hospital, and into more international markets and bringing forward the highest performing image quality in the Swoop system increases significantly. The team is laser focused on our growth drivers and very excited about the future of our company. With that, I want to thank you for your time and open up the line for questions.

Your first question comes from the line of Frank Takkinen with Lake Street. Your line is open.

Hi, thank you for taking the questions. Hi, Maria. Hi, Brett. I was hoping we could start with one on some of the pilot activity ongoing in the office setting. Most curious, I know you touched on a little bit in your prepared remarks, but just most curious about kind of initial feedback and whether or not this has resulted in you kind of changing strategy, changing any timelines to go into these markets? And then I have one follow-up after that. Thanks.

Maria, do you want to take that?

Sorry, I was talking to myself. I was on mute. Sorry, Frank. Thank you for the question. And I was saying that we have really taken a very methodical approach to working through the pilot phase and made sure that we follow very closely the accounts from how we have pitched to them their interest in the technology to then really understanding the deal cycle, making sure that we are ready to support them and chaperone any activities associated with accreditation, and then even down to implementation. So we have now passed the pilot accounts, gone through all of them, and are now accredited by IAC. They’re all scanning and they’re all going now through the CMS registration and the motion. And I would say in the training meeting that we had for our sales team, we had one of those pilot neurologists come to speak to them. It is really encouraging to hear how they are thinking about this opportunity in terms of transforming their practice, being able to offer more, being able to be actually a more full-service supplier and how easy they report feeling the technology is to operate and to bring on board. So I would say, if anything, we are feeling more bullish. I am also incredibly encouraged by the two very large neurology practices that are participating in NEURO PMR. The rate at which they are enrolling patients is exceeding our expectations, which is a great testament to their enthusiasm. And also, we are seeing a variety of cases that they are willing to use in triaging patients with the Swoop system. So I am feeling that it is really the right thing for us to diversify, and there’s an opportunity there that is very substantial, and we’re going to be moving into that launch phase here in the next several weeks as we hit the midpoint of the year with the field team now trained.

Got it. That sounds great. Thanks for that. And then just for my follow-up, maybe a two-parter. First, on the grant-funded headwind in Q1, is this an instance where if some of those grants start to come back online that business could be recovered? Or are you guys kind of thinking of that as lost business at this point? And then as a second part, just any update on kind of initial receptivity with the international distributors would be great? Thanks.

Sure. So I think given how I think across academic institutions, the tone of clinicians around grant funding confidence is clearly very, very sobering. So we are not expecting that they come back, even though some of the institutions that were actually that we were affected by were on the front page of main news streams and they have received some of it back. There is no appetite to do anything eagerly with any grant funding because there’s no confidence whether that is going to stick. Stay, get retracted. It's just a very unsettling time in that respect. Definitely, we are moving away from betting on grant funding for deals that may have had that and we are putting all of our efforts on other deals that don’t have grant funding. It is not every deal in the hospital that has grant funding as the source of funding for the acquisition of the equipment. So I don’t think we expect them to come back. The question is, are we able here in the second quarter to deliver the quarter and then make anything up, or is it going to be more challenging to find deals? As we say, most of it is hospital deals, and they have long sales cycles. And then as it relates to international, we continue to see a lot of interest, and we are now seeing a lot of the business internationally is very hospital-based. So we are seeing our distributors work through the pipeline. We’re seeing the implementations from last year start to generate sort of clinical activity that is encouraging. So we’re starting to go deeper in some countries with our distributors to really, so we’re looking at establishing centers of excellence. We’re looking at establishing networks of users that can actually communicate and maybe not collaborate, but communicate as the pioneers on the use of Swooping in different markets. And in our prepared remarks we stated that we still feel like we will get India clearance for approval from the CDSCO, and we will do market entrance in the second half.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions.

Thank you, Frank.

Your next question comes from the line of Larry Biegelsen with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Hi, team. This is Simran on for Larry. Thanks for taking the questions here. Maybe just on guidance. If I do the math, you took the full-year '25 outlook down by about $1 million at the midpoint. It does imply slightly lower second-half sales than before at the midpoint. So, I guess, you did lay out a number of growth catalysts that you expect to come online in the second half. So maybe what's changed in your second-half guidance since you set your initial guidance in mid-March? And can you talk more broadly about your expectations for the selling cycle, the hospital selling cycle, and capital environment for the remainder of the year?

Brett, do you want to start? Hi, Simran.

Yes, I’ll take that. So, I think two things on revenue guidance. We, on the first half, we adjusted it to $5 million to $6 million. As Maria highlighted, predominantly that’s coming from the grant funding related activities that we do not anticipate necessarily coming back. So the first half we adjusted, and then we also adjusted the full-year guidance, which is also incorporating some of that grant funding related revenue that we do not anticipate capturing here for fiscal year ‘25. So no major changes in terms of our anticipation for second-half guidance; how we think about the prospects of the business, the growth drivers will all be in place. But given what we saw in Q1 in terms of grant funding, we’ve made adjustments to both the first-half as well as the full-year guidance.

And I think you had a question regarding the capital cycle. I think that’s, I don’t know that we are seeing anything different than what we have been messaging for the last several quarters, which is they are definitely getting longer. I think about 1.5 years ago or so, I was estimating our hospital deals were going to take us about nine months or so. I would say often now they are a year or 1.5 years in some instances. So we have a really robust pipeline of hospital deals, but they are going to take their time to happen. And I would say it’s probably in that one year to 1.5 year timeframe now as we think about where that stands.

Got it. That’s very helpful. And maybe just a follow-up on the in-office expansion. Have you talked about how many office sites of care are in the launch readiness phase? And can you elaborate on the economics of selling in the office versus the hospital setting in light of today’s macro environment? I know on the previous call you’ve talked about flexible payment models here.

Yes. So, we haven’t mentioned how many accounts are in the pilot phase. I would say it’s fair to say it’s like a handful. And those are the ones that have gone now through the motions indefinitely in the last several weeks, the accreditation, the starting scan, and then the beginning of the process around reimbursement and CMS registration. Again, we have now gone through the drill of implementation. I would say as simple as implementation, which is shipping a device and training on the device, is a very, very different experience in the hospital than in the office. In the hospital, the moment we get a PO, usually we ship the device, and the hospital has no problem storing a device and implementing it when their teams are all ready, and all the connectivity has happened and lots of those things. With the office, they really pick a date, and at that date, everything needs to happen. You need to open the crate, you need to put the device into motion, you need to train the team, and it’s sort of one and done. And sometimes we need to do it after hours or over the weekend, because that is the time that they have available. So again, it’s been a handful of accounts with whom we’ve actually learned the whole drill from pitching a deal all the way to implementing and the different steps. In terms of pricing, I think we are continuing to talk about flexibility to accommodate. They definitely have an appetite to pay overtime rather than all at once. It depends on the size of the account. I think we’re doing an economic model to understand whether they are really ready for our device. A lot of it depends on the number of cases that they refer. We talked about the fact that they do 500 on average and a neurology office refers about 500 to 600 patients a year for an MRI. So that definitely is front-running when this makes sense at our price point. But we are seeing variability in the way we’re potentially going to transact with the offices based on their size and their appetite to pay more upfront or pay more over time. Brett, feel free to add any other commentary here.

No, I think that’s fair. I mean, there are over 2,000 neurology offices and there obviously is segmentation within that size. So, there are some that are more sole proprietary that have a look and feel of what their business looks like versus those that are more than five to 10 practitioners within a setting. So each one of those has a little bit different dynamics. I would say health economics has been something that’s been front and center both in the office setting as well as what we’re bringing to the hospital setting. So, each one of those has a very compelling use case and then, but does we do allow for some degree of making sure that we can practice where it makes sense for their business model.

Great. Thank you so much.

Your next question comes from the line of Yuan Zhi with B. Riley Securities. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Thank you for taking our questions. Maria, maybe on the tariff. Because of tariffs, can you clarify if some of your international orders are delayed to a later time, or they were just canceled?

I can take that. Yes, ahead.

We have yes, go ahead.

Yes. So I mean, today we haven’t had any impact of any tariff-related delays of any of our transactions with our third-party distributors to date. So that hasn’t come to fruition. We’re in the early stages as you know of international market development, but to date, no direct tariff impact.

Got it. Maybe a follow-up question there. So based on for the Q1 2025 product revenue, most of the products from the U.S. market were a very minor contribution from international and any reason why?

There has been variability in our sales mix in individual quarters. For the first quarter of 2025, we sold six units and the effective average selling price was $254,000, which is quite strong. However, sales and demand can vary from quarter to quarter, so I don't have specific comments on the mix for Q1.

Yep. Got it. And maybe one last question from us. So now we are in May, what is your current visibility for the first half of 2025, and then for the full year 2025? The other way to think about this is which bucket of orders you think are at risk and which are the buckets of orders you think you have higher confidence.

I think as we think about, I mean as we think about the second half of this year, that’s when we get into these more balanced portfolio of opportunities. And we have the hospital, we have international, we add to international India, and we have the office. So we are managing sort of the pipeline across all of those buckets to have higher confidence as to how things are going to play out based on different sales cycles and timeframes. So, as I said, the pipeline is very robust. We have also now had a little more run time with the new team, which as we said was close to 50% of an upgrade at the beginning of the year. And we are very impressed by the pipelines that they are driving as well as new individuals as well as the legacy team. So I would say the pipeline looks very robust, and we’re starting to build a pipeline for the office for the second half. Most of what is going to be driving still the business in this second quarter to round up the first half is going to be hospital. That’s why there is definitely a significant ramp in total business between the two halves, the first and the second.

Yes, got it. Thanks for answering our question.

Thank you.

I will turn the call back over to Maria for closing remarks.

Well, thank you very much for attending today’s call and your questions, and we look forward to updating you at the end of the second quarter. Take good care.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today’s call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.