Good day, and welcome to the International General Insurance Holdings Ltd. First Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Conference Call. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Robin Sidders, Head of Corporate Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, John. And good morning, and welcome to today's conference call. Today, we'll be discussing the financial results for the first quarter 2026, which you will have seen in our press release, which we issued after the market closed yesterday. You can find a copy of the press release in the Investors section of our website at iginsure.com, and we've also posted a supplementary investor presentation, which can be found on our website as well on the Presentations page in the Investors section. On today's call are our Executive Chairman of IGI, Wasef Jabsheh; President and CEO, Waleed Jabsheh; and Chief Financial Officer, Pervez Rizvi. As always, Wasef will begin the call with some high-level comments before handing over to Waleed to walk through the drivers of the results for the first quarter of 2026 and finish up with our views on market conditions and our outlook for the remainder of the year. Then we'll open the call up for Q&A. I'll begin with some customary safe harbor language. Our speakers' remarks may contain forward-looking statements. Some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words. We caution you that such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated by us will, in fact, be achieved. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. While actual events or results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including the risk factors set forth in the company's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2025, the company's reports on Form 6-K and other filings with the SEC as well as our results press release issued yesterday evening. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. During this call, we'll use certain non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to the nearest GAAP measure, please see our earnings release, which has been filed with the SEC and is available on our website. With that, I'll turn the call over to our Executive Chairman, Wasef Jabsheh.

Thank you, Robin, and good day, everyone. Thank you for joining us on today's call. As you saw from our first quarter financial results that we issued last night, we are off to a strong start in 2026. On their own, these results are excellent, but viewed in the context of our long-term performance, they underscore the value of consistency and discipline in executing our strategy. Long-term success in our business depends heavily on consistency and discipline. No matter what is going on in the world around us — this is particularly true for IGI given the scope of our portfolio, the high-severity lines of business we are writing and our global footprint. Our value proposition and promise is to provide peace of mind in times of uncertainty, to maximize shareholders' returns over time while being a stable, reliable and fair partner to our customers. The first quarter of 2026 has certainly seen its fair share of uncertainty with the ongoing conflict in the Middle East — socially, politically and economically. It is not just impacting the region, but is having global ramifications as well. Already, we are hearing insured market loss estimates upwards of the EUR 3 billion mark. When we established IGI in Amman, Jordan, almost 25 years ago, our initial focus was almost exclusively on the Middle East region. It's a region we know and understand well and where our relationships are some of the longest in our history. I'll leave it to Waleed to talk more about our Middle East exposures and the dynamics of what is happening in the region. But before I do, I want to reiterate how pleased I am with our performance in the first quarter, notwithstanding the tragic consequences of the war. As we look ahead to our 25th anniversary year in 2027, I'm immensely proud of all that we have accomplished at IGI. We are a relatively small player in the global insurance landscape, yet we are definitely punching well above our weight in terms of expertise and execution. This is clearly demonstrated in our financial performance and the significant value that we generate for our shareholders consistently year after year. I will now hand over to Waleed to discuss the numbers in more detail and talk about market conditions and our outlook. And I'll remain on the call for any questions at the end. Waleed?

Good morning. Thank you, Wasef, and thank you all for joining us today. As Wasef said, I'm very pleased with our performance in the first quarter. In the face of increasing competitive pressures and heightened global uncertainty, our results are a clear demonstration of our resilience and stability. Our diversified platform and strong and consistent execution provide us with a lot of optionality, as we've said in the past, and I truly commend all of our people for their focus and skill in capitalizing on the opportunities that are coming out of this uncertainty. Just turning specifically to the results for the first quarter. I'm going to focus on the key points, the drivers behind the numbers, and then we'll open it up for any questions you may have at the end. And I'll start with some key highlights for the first quarter. We recorded gross written premiums of $197.2 million. That's a 4.5% decline from Q1 2025 and reflects our cycle management actions in the face of increasingly tough market conditions. We recorded new business across our portfolio, but this was offset somewhat by the nonrenewal of two reinsurance programs. One was non-renewed by our decision and the other one where the cedent decided to retain and not buy the reinsurance anymore. Underwriting income came in at $37.7 million. That's an increase of 35.1% over the first quarter of 2025, and that resulted in a combined ratio of 89.1% for the quarter. That's 5.3 points better than Q1 of last year and in line with our long-term averages. The combined ratio for Q1 includes about $15 million of net losses related to the Middle East conflict, and I'll talk about that more in a moment. Return on average equity was 12.7%, and the core ROE was 14.3%, both also in line with our long-term averages. Book value per share was $15.60. That's a slight decline from year-end 2025, but that includes total capital return to shareholders of almost $65 million. That's made up of $51.5 million in dividends, which includes the special dividend of $1.15 that we paid out in April. Further share repurchases amounted to just over $13.1 million. Net premiums earned were $111.2 million, relatively flat with the same period of last year. The combined ratio of 89.1% for the first quarter includes 19.2 points of catastrophe losses, primarily related to the Middle East war losses, and 29 points of favorable prior year reserve development. That compares to Q1 of last year, where the combined ratio was 94.4%, which included 25 points of accident year catastrophe losses and just under 23 points of favorable reserve development. One thing to point out is that during the first quarter of this year, currency revaluation movements were much less of a feature than some prior quarters and especially compared to the first quarter of last year. All in, we delivered core operating income of $24.4 million or $0.56 per share for Q1 of this year versus $19.5 million or $0.42 per share for the first quarter of last year. Specifically on our segment results, we'll start off with the short-tail segment, where conditions continue to be quite mixed. And that's evident in our results for the first quarter. Rates are still adequate overall, but there's a lot of variation in the level of adequacy from one line to another. And I'll expand on this in a few minutes. Top line was down just 4%. Underwriting income was down considerably year-over-year, but still in very positive territory at $9.5 million. This is in spite of the level of losses related to the war, again, amounting to about $15 million, mainly recorded in the political violence line, as well as an energy loss in the Persian Gulf. This ultimately really speaks to how we manage risk and the resilience we've built in our portfolio. In the reinsurance segment, where conditions are becoming more competitive in the business we write, underwriting income was up just under 6% for the first quarter. That's on a lower level of gross written premium and net earned premiums. As I said, there were two programs we non-renewed. But on the flip side, we're starting to see some decent opportunities in the specialty treaty lines. I'll also talk about that in a moment. The long-tail segment was a bright spot in our segment results. We posted a 22% increase in top line, driven by new business in most lines, but most notably within the professional indemnity and marine liability lines. You'll recall that this has been the more challenging area of our portfolio for the past two to three years and where we took the decision to nonrenew business with the expectation that in doing so, the overall profitability profile of the segment would improve. Ultimately, underwriting income was up significantly by about $25 million, and that's on a slightly higher net earned premiums due to a higher volume of premiums written. Just quickly to the balance sheet. Total assets were $2.1 billion. Total investments and cash were $1.3 billion. Allocation to fixed income securities generated just over $14 million investment income in the first quarter, and that's a yield of 4.3%. The average duration came down very slightly to 3.5 years. During Q1, we repurchased a little over 545,000 common shares. Average price per share was $24.11. At the end of the quarter, we had about 4.1 million shares still outstanding under our existing 5 million common share repurchase authorization. Total equity was $653.6 million at the end of the quarter, and that includes the almost $65 million in capital returned to shareholders, the common share dividend mentioned earlier, including the special that was paid in April. That compares to total equity of just over $710 million at the end of 2025. Ultimately, we recorded a return on average equity of 12.7% and a core operating ROE of 14.3%. So very strong results, especially considering the overall market softening and the heightened level of uncertainty around the globe. Now before I turn to our market outlook, I'd just like to expand on some of Wasef's comments about the Middle East as it continues to be an important region for us. And I think that in some pockets, there's still a bit of a perception that IGI is predominantly a Middle Eastern company. Now in reality, we're a truly global company with a strong presence and understanding of all our markets. That's particularly true in the Middle East through our offices in Amman and Dubai, where we've been serving clients for decades now. Specific losses incurred in the first quarter of the year were primarily in the political violence book and predominantly in the UAE and Bahrain relating to physical damage as well as the energy loss I mentioned earlier on the upstream side relating to damage to an oil facility in the Persian Gulf. Now this provides a good pivot for me to turn to our view of the market. The world is clearly a lot more uncertain today than even a year ago. We are seeing instability in many regions around the world, and this is leading to an interesting dynamic in that we're seeing some decent opportunities come out of this uncertainty and dislocation. It's an unfortunate reality of our business that market corrections and improving conditions only happen after significant loss and tragedy. So what this represents really is a little short-term pain for a longer-term gain. The elevated level of competitive pressure across the market that we talked about on the last quarter's call is still very much prevalent, but our vast diversification, broad product offering, global footprint and the local knowledge that we have provides us with a level of resilience and, as we always say, optionality. Turning a bit to our geographic markets and the opportunities we're seeing, I'll start with the Middle East. As I mentioned earlier, we've got teams in Amman and Dubai. They work closely with our London teams to capitalize on the opportunities arising from the current dynamic. Where we're seeing the most opportunity here is obviously in the political violence line, as that is where the bulk of the losses are. And that's in a market which is long overdue for a risk-adjusted pricing correction. Pricing is now many multiples of where it was before the war. And when I say that, I mean in some cases, the rate increases we're achieving are amounting to thousands of percentage points. Policy structures are improving. Limits are shrinking significantly. And where there's historically been an overabundance of Middle East political violence capacity, it's now much less ample. There's very clearly a changing perception of war risk in the region. We can capitalize on that effectively and efficiently because we already have significant experience, long-standing relationships, and a presence in the region. Now in other geographic regions like the U.S., Europe, and Asia-Pacific, the story is fairly similar to what we've said on prior calls. I'm not going to spend too much time on this, but we're continuing as always to look at these markets in a bigger way and at new markets at the same time. Now turning to specific lines of business. I'll start with our reinsurance segment, our treaty portfolio. Margins here are still healthy, but competitive pressures are becoming increasingly prevalent. The opportunities here are more concentrated in specialty treaty lines, where there have been significant losses: basically marine, energy, and terror and political violence. You'll recall that we added a new senior specialty treaty reinsurance underwriter late last year. So we're well positioned at the right time to develop and diversify this part of the portfolio. In our long-tail segment, we continue to be cautiously optimistic as we've been saying for the last couple of quarters. We're seeing some new opportunities and good deal flow, and you saw that in our first quarter results, especially in the more niche segments like marine liability. Specifically relating to the Baltimore bridge collapse back in 2024, we've all seen in the news reports that losses are now estimated to be as high, if not in excess, of $2.8 billion. That makes it the single largest loss in the history of the marine market. This is affecting marine markets globally, particularly the liability side. I want to be clear that IGI doesn't expect any material change in our loss estimates related to this event that we recorded two years ago. Instead, I think this is clearly an opportunity for us to capitalize on improved pricing and demand for capital to grow and expand our direct liability book. We've already seen some of that in 2026, and it's widely expected that renewal rates for the remainder of this year and into 2027 will continue to improve. Now turning to our short-tail portfolio. I've already spoken about political violence. Short-tail marine lines like cargo and specifically cargo war and war on land are seeing some positive traction coming out of the war in the Middle East in these areas. Our energy book and certain areas of our property book, two of our largest lines, are clearly tougher than a year ago. And even since the beginning of this year, we've seen competitive pressures further increase to the point of, honestly, being quite irrational in some cases. Having said that, we continue to see relatively healthy conditions in the more specialist lines like construction and engineering; a continued excellent deal flow; and contingency also continues to be a bright spot, and that's a book that continues to grow for us. So definitely some very good opportunities in the pipeline for us, despite the competitive pressures in some pockets. In the context of our size, breadth of offering, global footprint, financial strength and ultimately, the expertise of our people, it is a little easier for us to move the dial and write new healthy-margin business. We've got a lot of levers to work with, and we're in the position we need to be in right now to take advantage of the opportunities in front of us. Now the underpinning of our strategy and what our track record is built upon, as we've always said, is our disciplined execution. This is embedded in our DNA. We are a resilient company with a quarter-century history of consistency and stability. Our position in the market is much stronger today, and we've shown that we won't compromise on our principles or values under pressure. We've demonstrated clearly that we're not afraid to say no when business doesn't meet our terms or profitability thresholds. And we won't, under any circumstances, sacrifice the bottom line to benefit the top line. Our focus is on intelligent risk selection, paying attention to the small print and being aware of what's going on around us. It's embedded in our corporate culture. So we will continue to do what we do best: deliver on our promise of being a fair partner to all our stakeholders while generating superior value for our shareholders. So I'm going to pause here, and we will turn it over for questions. Operator, we're ready to take the first question, please.

Our first question comes from the line of Rowland Mayor with RBC Capital Markets.

I wanted to quickly say that given all that's going on in the Middle East, I hope everyone in IGI's family is safe, and congratulations on a strong quarter given all the moving pieces.

Thank you, Rowland. I'm glad to say that everybody is in good shape and spirits.

Could you help me with this large non-cat energy loss? What was the size of it and what happened there?

Yes. Basically, this is an event that was a direct or indirect consequence of the war where a large support vessel in the energy industry collided with an offshore oil platform. The circumstances around it relate to the precautions that were not taken because of the war and the circumstances around the fighting, where not enough safety measures were taken: GPS was turned off, lights were turned off and they decided to make a run for it and ended up colliding with an offshore platform. So it was an unfortunate incident, but that's what we're here for. In terms of the amount for us, that loss amounted to about $10.5 million net to us in the quarter. So those were the circumstances of the loss.

Okay. That's very helpful. And then I wanted to ask on the durability of the opportunity in the political violence and war market. With all the excess capital in the industry today, would you expect that to be durable? Or do you think people will start to rush in once there's some signs of stability in the region?

It depends on your perception of the region. I can't control what the rest of the market does. I don't think if a political agreement comes to fruition that the market will necessarily pile back in and ignore what's happened over the last couple of months. There's a lot of pain. I mentioned the estimated market losses are upwards of EUR 3 billion, and some are talking close to EUR 4 billion. Put that into context: the global political violence market premium is estimated to be around $1.5 billion. So this event on its own, in one of the smallest political violence markets in the world, has created significant pain for those involved. I think regardless of what happens politically, the uncertainty will continue to be there. I hope this is a long-term opportunity where we could quickly make back a lot of the losses that we've incurred and the market can as a whole. As I mentioned earlier, we're seeing huge multiples in rate increases — in some cases, over the thousands of percent. So, short-term pain for longer-term gain, and I truly believe that is the case on this occasion.

And then if I could squeeze in one more. It looks like the first quarter had bigger reserve releases than other quarters. Can you maybe just walk through what drove the development this quarter?

Yes. I think that just reinforces how we approach the reserving side. Putting aside the events of the quarter, it was an excellent quarter for us and prior years continue to perform ahead of expectation. The releases weren't concentrated in any specific segment; it was pretty much across the board. It's a testament to the cautious approach that we always take to reserve releases. We expect that pattern to continue in the coming quarters and years. As the market changes, we update our plan loss ratios every six to twelve months based on our expectations and the changing market conditions. With the competitive pressures we've been seeing recently, our approach will become more cautious. In the initial 12 months of any accident year, we're pretty much reserving to plan. Following that, we start to take a hard look at actual incurred performance. On that basis, that dictates the level of reserve development that occurs.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Phillips with Oppenheimer.

I guess first a quick numbers question. Can you give a dollar impact of the two reinsurance contracts that rolled off in the quarter?

These are portfolios of business that we reinsure. Combined, it's probably in the mid-to-high single-digit millions of dollars in terms of gross written premium. One of them, to give some clarity, is the book we chose to walk away from because we brought in a specialty treaty underwriter late last year and that is the kind of book he would write. So it's basically bringing that capability in-house rather than relying on somebody else's portfolio. The second one, as I said, the cedent decided they wanted to retain the portfolio rather than reinsure part of it out, plain and simple.

Okay. I just want to circle back on the Middle East. Opportunity is obviously going to come from this. Waleed, when you talk about multiples of rate increases that are in the thousands, I'm trying to get a sense of what portion of your overall premium could be affected by this in terms of these opportunities. Political violence is large in losses but small in premium. What other lines could be affected by such strong rate increases?

It's very difficult and early to give exact numbers. By far the line that will be most impacted in terms of terms and conditions is the political violence side. Rates there are multiplying by 10, 15, 20x in many cases, limits are shrinking and capacity is dwindling. Where I think there's additional opportunity is on the marine side: anything related to war — hull war, cargo war, war on land. We haven't seen activity in those areas come to the same level as political violence yet, but I expect it will. Ultimately, the Strait of Hormuz is effectively still constrained with a limited number of ships going in and out. Until those ships can sail freely again, you won't see the abundance of that business. When that happens, there will be plenty of opportunity in those lines. Right now, our primary focus is the political violence side, which is the most immediate opportunity. I believe this will be a prolonged opportunity, and markets should be able to make back losses relatively quickly because conditions, and the heightened level of uncertainty and cautiousness by the market, will likely persist for a while.

The type of losses you experienced from these events in the Middle East — do they offer any different opportunity for recoverables later? For example, with the oil rig incident, are there opportunities for subrogation or recoveries from third parties?

Nothing outside of the ordinary. War is war; there is no broad recovery mechanism for war-related losses. In terms of the energy loss itself, the owners of the platform may seek recovery from the owners of the vessel. We insure the platform; we don't insure the vessel. Over time, there may be an element of recovery from the owners of the vessel. However, maritime law includes statute limitations that can limit how much you can recover, depending on the vessel's characteristics. We're not 100% certain what those limitations are in this case, but my suspicion is there will be some recovery. I wouldn't be confident that it will be a significant amount relative to the total loss.

One last question on the same topic. March was a busy month. Is it fair to extrapolate from March to think about what second quarter catastrophe losses might look like given your exposure in the Middle East?

March was definitely the busiest month. There will be continued development of these losses in Q2 — undoubtedly. Any losses that occur will continue to develop. There was further activity in April, but most of April was fairly quiet except for the first week to ten days. The event is not necessarily over, and if there is no political solution, the situation will continue to evolve. One positive aspect of political violence business is that coverages are generally provided on an aggregate basis: once an event impacts a policy and erodes the limit purchased, that aggregate limit is exhausted and you are not exposed to subsequent events under that same policy. So in answer to your question, I would expect continued development, but more limited than what we saw in Q1.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to management for closing remarks.

Well, thank you all for joining us today, as always, and thanks for your continued support for IGI. If anybody has any additional questions, please contact Robin and she will be happy to assist. We look forward to speaking to you all on the Q2 call. Have a good day, everyone. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.