Welcome to Naveen Churchill Direct Lending Corps' second quarter 2026 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the management team's prepared remarks. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. I'd now like to turn the call over to Robert Pong, Head of Investor Relations for NCDL. Robert, please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to Naveen Churchill Direct Lending Corps' second quarter 2026 earnings call. Today, I'm joined by NCDL's Chairman, President, and CEO, Ken Kinsell, and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Shai Vickness. Following our prepared remarks, we will be available to take your questions. Today's call may include forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, and undue reliance should not be placed thereon. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, and projections about the company, our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs and opinions, and our assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward looking statements. We ask that you refer to the company's most recent filings with the SEC for important risk factors. Any forward-looking statements made today do not guarantee future performance and undue reliance should not be placed on them. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements at any time. Our earnings release, 10-Q, and supplemental earnings presentations are available on the news and investors sections of our website at ncdl.com. Now I would like to turn the call over to Ken. Thank you, Robert.

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. During my prepared remarks, I will start with the discussion of our second quarter results, followed by some comments and thoughts on the current market environment, our portfolio positioning, and a strategic initiative that occurred post-quarter end. First, I'd like to start by reviewing our financial results for the quarter. Overall, we continue to be pleased with the operating performance of NCDL and our investment portfolio, despite a challenging market environment. This morning, we reported second quarter net investment income of $0.41 per share, fully covering our $0.36 per share base quarterly distribution. Based on our results, the board has declared a total third quarter distribution of $0.38 per share, consisting of a regular quarterly distribution of $0.36 per share and a supplemental distribution of $0.02 per share. During the quarter, gross originations totaled approximately $12 million, compared to $83 million in the first quarter of this year. The decline in gross originations quarter-over-quarter was driven by two factors. Our desire to manage our leverage ratio towards the upper end of our target leverage range, and timing of certain transactions, which were underwritten in the second quarter, but ultimately closed in July. As I'll discuss later in my prepared remarks, the Churchill platform continues to see strong asset growth and new originations. Net asset value at June 30th was $17.19 per share, compared to $17.50 per share at March 31, driven by unrealized markdowns and a realized losses on two amendments that Shai will touch on in his remarks. In terms of the current market conditions and economic environment, the first half of 2026 has been one of the most closely watched periods in private credits history, unfolding against a backdrop of elevated public market volatility, geopolitical tensions, and negative headlines. These headlines have been driven by concerns around AI disruption, software exposure, and increased redemption activity in private BDCs. We continue to believe there is a significant disconnect between the narrative and the media and the underlying fundamentals in private credit, particularly with our investment portfolio and the continued strength of our credit metrics. Dispersion amongst private credit managers has started to emerge. In our view, and we think it will continue to be a focus area with investors. Amid these market conditions, private equity M&A activity was highly selective in the second quarter, as financial-sponsored deal activity slowed compared to the first quarter, despite overall global M&A recording new highs. Private equity volumes were relatively light compared to prior periods, driven by continued market volatility as buyers navigated geopolitical uncertainties and AI-driven disruptions. The gap between strategic acquirers and private equity sponsors widened as financial sponsors faced disciplined underwriting and tighter credit constraints. However, in June and July, we experienced a material increase in deals reviewed over prior months, as transaction activity across our platform has returned to a more normalized level. We attribute this to our focus on the core traditional middle market, as well as our relationships with high-quality private equity sponsors. In terms of spreads, we started to see a widening of direct lending spreads early in the second quarter, driven by the recent market concerns, volatility, and disruption. Today, spreads have stabilized around a more normalized level of between $475 and $500 over for traditional first lien loans. As far as the interest rate environment is concerned, given that inflation remains above the Fed's targets, expectations for rate cuts for the remainder of the year have diminished, with the forward SOFR curve now showing potential rate hikes. This shift from earlier in the year is largely driven by persistent inflation, a resilient labor market, as well as geopolitical tensions which have created economic uncertainty. Despite all of these factors, we continue to view private credit and direct lending as an attractive asset class with a compelling risk return profile. Turning to our investment activity. The first half of 2026 brought a more measured environment for new LBO volume, reflecting the broader macroeconomic backdrop. U.S. private equity deal volume and direct lending volume for private equity-backed borrowers declined materially quarter over quarter. Despite that, the Churchill platform delivered strong investment activity, outpacing the market by a meaningful margin while maintaining our underwriting standards and high level of selectivity. During the second quarter, at the platform level, Churchill closed or committed to over 80 transactions totaling approximately $4.3 billion, with the majority of that volume concentrated in senior lending. As I mentioned earlier, gross originations at NCDL were muted in the quarter, which was intentional, given that we were operating slightly above our target leverage range at the end of the first quarter and as a result of timing to close transactions underwritten in June. We remain focused on actively reinvesting cash received from repayments and sales into high-quality assets while optimizing our use of leverage. During the second quarter, investment fundings totaled approximately $24.8 million, and repayments and sales totaled approximately $67.5 million. It's also important to remind everyone that at Churchill, we focus on the traditional core middle market, benefiting from our differentiated sourcing and long-term track record. We continue to target companies with $10 to $100 million of EBITDA, which we believe helps insulate us from the more aggressive structures, loosening terms prevalent in the upper middle market and broadly syndicated loan space. We believe that risk-adjusted returns in this segment of the market remain among the most compelling in private credit, particularly for scaled, highly selective managers with deep private equity relationships. We see the core middle market as a durable opportunity to generate long-term value and enhance portfolio diversification for our investors. As far as our investment portfolio and credit quality is concerned, overall company performance across our portfolio remains healthy, which we believe reflects the quality of the deal flow we have experienced over the last several years. While we did experience a few company-specific credit challenges in the quarter, which is not overly surprising to us given the current market environment, our high-quality, well-diversified investment portfolio continues to perform well and in line with our expectations. During these periods of market volatility and economic uncertainty, it is important to remain focused on our core values and pillars that have benefited Churchill over the past two decades. We have deep expertise, substantial experience, strong relationships, relevant size and scale, and a differentiated approach to sourcing and originating high-quality deal flow. Our ability to navigate these market conditions and environments stems from our experienced investment, operating, and management teams. Our weighted average internal risk rating was 4.3 at the end of the second quarter, consistent with the prior quarter, and versus an original rating of 4.0 for all of our investments at the time of origination. Our internal watch list kicked up to approximately 10.8 percent of fair value compared to 8.4 percent at the end of the first quarter. As a reminder, we employ a dynamic internal risk rating system with a one through ten rating scale. Our watch list starts at a six rating and we ensure that our workout team is involved early on in the process of a potential credit challenge or event. The percentage of watch list names for NCDL remains consistent with the Churchill platform and our long-term historical averages. Credit metrics and fundamentals within the NCDL portfolio remain strong with portfolio company total net leverage of 5.2 times and interest coverage of 2.5 times on traditional middle market first lien loans. Interest coverage increased during the quarter from 2.3 times at the end of the first quarter. These credit metrics are a direct result of our conservative structuring and relatively low attachment points that we target when underwriting new transactions. During the second quarter, we added four new names to non-accrual with a total cost of $33.3 million and a fair value of $18.7 million. At June 30th, non-accruals represented 2.7% of our total investment portfolio on a cost basis and 1.5% on a fair value basis. Despite the increase in non-equalance this quarter compared to prior quarters, we believe these percentages continue to compare favorably versus current BDC industry averages and the long-term historical BDC average. At June 30th, we had 244 companies in our portfolio and our top 10 portfolio companies represented approximately 13% of the total fair value. This diversification remains a key focus of ours and is critical as we seek to maintain exceptional credit quality and originate additional attractive investment opportunities. We have achieved this diversification with a continued high level of selectivity, facilitated by the significant proprietary deal flow, our sourcing engine is able to generate from the breadth and depth of our PE relationships. As we highlighted last quarter, market concerns regarding AI's potential disruption of software businesses have raised a lot of questions about private credit portfolios software exposure. We believe this underscores the importance of a diversified approach to portfolio construction. As a reminder, we have relatively low exposure to software, as these are not the type of deals we tend to underwrite. The rapid pace of innovation in the software sector, often coupled with higher leverage attachment points and less room for error, were key reasons we passed on many software deals. As of June 30th, software businesses represented approximately 2.4% of NCDL's total investment portfolio at fair value. While AI will certainly contribute to disruption in the technology sector, the full impact remains difficult to assess at this time. We continue to monitor AI and its potential impact across the portfolio as we have done long before these headlines emerged. We maintain an active dialogue with the senior management teams of all of our borrowers, as well as the private equity firms that own them, so that we have an informed and real-time view on this and any other risks our borrowers may face. Overall, we feel very positive as to how we are positioned relative to the risk that AI may pose to our portfolio companies. Before I conclude and turn it over to Shai, I'd like to provide an update on a new strategic initiative for NCDL. In July, we successfully closed a joint venture with an institutional partner in which we will deploy assets and investments that align with the Churchill platform and NCDL's investment strategy and portfolio allocation. We'll also utilize a manageable level of leverage at the JV, and we believe this equity investment will be accretive to NCDL's long-term earnings profile. We believe this partnership is a testament to the Churchill platform with an experienced management team, investment, and operating teams, as well as a successful track record of investing and operating across various market conditions and cycles. In summary, we are pleased with our financial results and the continued strength of NCDL's investment portfolio, despite a few underperforming names and additions to the non-accrual list this quarter. We have constructed a defensive portfolio balanced across multiple measures, including sponsor, position size, as well as industry and sector concentration. This has been critical to our success throughout our history and is a key reason why we are optimistic about our future performance and long-term prospects. From a forward-looking perspective, we also remain optimistic about the long-term outlook for the private credit industry, despite the headline noises in the market. Overall credit metrics remain strong and stable, and we believe systemic risk concerns are overstated and that our focus on the core traditional middle market continues to offer structural advantages. And now, I'll turn the call over to Shai to discuss our financial results in more detail.

Thank you, Ken, and good morning, everyone. I will now review our second quarter financial results in more detail. During the second quarter, NCDL reported net investment income of $0.41 per share in line with our first quarter NII. Total investment income declined to $44.3 million compared to $46.3 million in the first quarter of 2026. This was primarily driven by the modest decline in the size of our investment portfolio, as well as a modest decline in portfolio yields. At June 30th, our gross debt-to-equity ratio was 1.29 times compared to 1.32 times at March 31st of this year, and our net debt-to-equity ratio was 1.23 times compared to 1.26 times at the end of the first quarter. In July, we paid our second quarter distribution of $0.38 per share, and for the third quarter, our board has declared another $0.38 per share distribution. This consists of a regular quarterly distribution of $0.36 per share and a supplemental distribution of $0.02 per share. Both distributions will be paid on October 28th to shareholders of record as of September 30th. We continue to operate with a base plus supplemental dividend program that sees us paying out a portion of the excess earnings over and above our regular dividend of $0.36 per share. For the most recent quarter, we generated $0.05 per share of incremental earnings above our regular distribution, and we were distributing $0.02 of the excess earnings in the form of a supplemental distribution. Our total gap net income in the second quarter was $0.07 per share compared to $0.18 per share in the first quarter. Second quarter net income included $0.34 per share of net realized and unrealized losses. Net realized losses of approximately $0.23 per share were primarily driven by amendments of two underperforming debt investments during the quarter. The net unrealized losses of 11 cents per share were primarily due to a decrease in the fair value of certain underperforming portfolio companies as market spreads remain broadly stable throughout the quarter, partially offset by the reversal of unrealized losses on underperforming debt positions that were restructured or amended during the period. By June 30th, our net asset value is $17.19 per share compared to $17.50 per share on March 31st, representing a 1.8% decline quarter per quarter, largely due to the impact of realized and unrealized losses during the quarter. At the end of Q2, NCDL's investment portfolio had a fair value of $1.9 billion, modestly down from the $2 billion at the end of the first quarter. Gross originations totaled $12.1 million and gross investment fundings totaled $24.8 million, compared to $82.9 million and $85.4 million of gross originations and gross investment fundings, respectively, in the first quarter of 2026. As Ken mentioned earlier, investment activity slowed in the quarter, driven by continued market volatility as private equity-sponsored buyers navigated geopolitical uncertainties as well as AI disruptions. Late in the second quarter and in July, however, we have seen a meaningful pickup in deals reviewed and a return to more normalized levels of transaction activity across the platform. During the second quarter, sales and repayments totaled $67.5 million, a rate of approximately 3.4%, relatively in line with last quarter, but still below our long-range assumption of 5% per quarter, attributable to lower sponsor M&A activity in the second quarter. We did have full repayments on three larger positions within NCDL, totaling $59 million, and partial prepayments for another $9 million. We have been actively reinvesting capital received from repayments with a view towards maintaining leverage at the upper end of our target range. Additionally, we remain focused on redeploying capital into traditional middle market transactions across the capital structure with the vast majority of new investments into senior secured first lien loans. At June 30th, our total investment portfolio consisted of 244 names compared to 236 names at the end of the first quarter. Diversification across portfolio companies remains a key focus of ours, with our top 10 portfolio companies representing only 13.2% of the fair value of the portfolio, consistent with the prior quarter. Our largest exposure is only 1.6% of the total portfolio, and our average position size remains at 0.4%. As far as asset deployment and selection, during the second quarter, our modest amount of new originations were primarily spread across senior first lien loans and equity positions. Of the $12.1 million of gross originations, $5.9 million were in senior loans and $4.8 million were invested in equity positions across five names. The balance was deployed into subordinated debt positions. As we mentioned in our last earnings call, we were intentionally deploying more dollars into our equity bucket in recent quarters versus junior debt with a focus on slightly increasing the percentage of equity to drive capital appreciation within NCDL. Spreads on new investments in the second quarter were modestly higher than the prior quarter, with the average spread on first lien loans at approximately 475 basis points. Our weighted average yield on debt and income-producing investments at cost remained consistent with the prior quarter at 9.3%. In terms of portfolio allocation, at June 30th, First Lean Loans represented approximately 89.6% of the total portfolio, while junior debt and equity comprised 7.3% and 3.1% respectively. Our allocation strategy remains unchanged as we continue to target a portfolio comprised of roughly 90% senior loans with the balance allocated to junior debt and equity. We strongly believe that our focus on the traditional middle market segment will benefit NCDL shareholders over the long term as we see meaningfully higher spreads and tighter documentation terms in the traditional middle market as compared to the upper middle and BSL markets. Turning to credit quality, we continue to be very pleased with the overall health and strength of our investment portfolio, despite a few credit challenges during the second During the quarter, we placed four new portfolio companies on non-equal status with a cost basis of $33.3 million and a fair value of $18.7 million. At quarter end, NCBL had nine total names on non-equal, representing 1.5% on a fair value basis and 2.7% at cost. This compares to 0.6% and 1.3% of the total portfolio at fair value and cost respectively as of the end of Q1. Our portfolio continues to perform well and in line with our expectations as we have been operating with a historically low level of non-accruals for an extended period. On June 30th, our weighted average internal risk rating was 4.3 times, consistent with the prior quarter, and our watch list, consisting of names with internal risk ratings of six or worse, increased slightly to 10.8% at the end of the second quarter compared to 8.4% as the end of the first quarter. This was largely driven by a few underperforming names, as we discussed earlier. Our watchlist percentage remains consistent with the Churchill platform overall, as well as our long-term historical averages. And finally, our conservative approach to underwriting is highlighted by our weighted average net leverage across the portfolio of 5.2 times and interest coverage of 2.5 times as of the end of the second quarter. Now turning to the right-hand side of our balance sheet, our debt-to-equity ratio June 30th is 1.29 times gross compared to 1.32 times at March 31st. And on a net basis, our debt-to-equity ratio was 1.23 times at June 30th, net of our cash position at quarter end. Our goal remains to redeploy capital receipt from repayments and maintain leverage towards the upper end of our target range of 1 to 1.25 times debt-to-equity. And our focus for the near term is on optimizing the asset mix within the portfolio and actively reinvesting cash receiving repayments and sales into high-quality assets. Subjected to quarter end, we completed two capital structure transactions. First, in July, we redeemed NCDL CLO3 with an aggregate principal balance of $297.9 million, inclusive of accrued interest, which we redeemed in full at par. CO3 had an interest rate of SOFR plus 211 basis points. Second, also in July, we completed a successful $100 million tap of our existing 2030 unsecured notes, which brings the aggregate amount of unsecured notes issued by NCDL to $400 million. As a strong sign of ongoing support from our parent company, TIA purchased 100% of the notes issued. Also, in connection with the TAP, we entered into an interest rate swap covering the incremental issuance, resulting in NCDL paying a floating rate of SOFR plus 2.55% on the incremental debt, which matures on March 15, 2030, together with the existing $300 million of unsecured notes issued in 2025. Giving effect to both of these capital structure transactions, the redemption of CLO3 and the unsecured debt issuance, our pro forma weighted average cost of debt was SOFR plus 188 basis points, largely unchanged from what we reported last quarter. Pro forma for the incremental issuance, our unsecured notes now represent approximately 41% of NCDL's outstanding debt, providing us with even greater operational flexibility, and we maintain our investment-grade ratings from both Moody's and Fitch. We were pleased to have successfully completed both transactions, and we will continue to look for ways to optimize the debt capital structure of NCDL going forward. Before turning back to Ken, I'd like to briefly discuss a new strategic initiative for NCDL. In July, after quarter end, we partnered with an institutional investor to form a joint venture with a total equity commitment of up to $106 million. NCDL committed 87.5% of the equity to the joint venture, with our partner committing the remainder. At closing, we sold a portfolio of approximately $150 million of first lien loans to the joint venture and expects to continue to ramp the joint venture towards a portfolio of approximately $300 million over the coming quarters. The leverage employed at the joint venture, together with its high-quality and diversified portfolio, should provide for accretive returns to NCDL and further support our earnings profile. Additionally, the joint venture provides NCDL with incremental capacity to deploy into our attractive pipeline of deal flow. With that, I'll turn it back to Ken for closing remarks.

Thank you, Shai. In closing, while the first half of 2026 was an eventful period of time in the private credit market, we are pleased with how the team navigated these challenging market conditions. We also remain confident that NCDL is well positioned for the second half of the year with an experienced investment team and our ability to originate high-quality investments in various market conditions and economic environments. We continue to benefit from our competitive advantages in the core middle market, as well as our long-term successful track record. Thank you all for joining us today and for your interest in NCDL. I will now turn the call over to the operator for Q&A.

Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad and a confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we pull for questions. And the first question comes from the line of Melissa Weddell with UBS. Please proceed.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions today. I wanted to first follow up on the comment about new originations this quarter and intentionally allocating a little bit more towards equity exposure for future NAV appreciation. I'm curious how you weigh that between the opportunity to, you know, play for future NAV appreciation, which could be years down the line, versus maybe allocating sort of down the stack a little bit, maybe to some junior debt positions, just for a little bit of yield pickup and how you really balance those two things?

Yeah. Hey, Melissa, thank you. It's Shai pegs with questions. So yeah, look, I think when we're talking about sort of the allocations across the portfolio, I think the first thing to just sort of anchor around is that, you know, our focus is predominantly in senior secured first lien, and that's not changing. So our expectation is that will continue to comprise, you know, call it 90% of the portfolio. And we continue to believe that the levered senior trade is highly attractive, even relative to junior debt. Now, you know, you can make a bet on sort of which way you think interest rates are going, obviously, now, you know, with sort of a relatively stable to potentially increasing rate environment. Again, I think that is even more clear that the levered senior trade is attractive. And then on the equity side, what we're really talking about is going from call it, you know, one and a half to 2% equity to three to 4% equity. So these are not sort of material movements in the overall allocation percentage, but that ability to get a little bit more equity in the book, especially if the equity positions that have been invested over the last number of years are starting to mature, we think that gives us an opportunity to generate some of those capital gains and have that sort of NAV appreciation that we can then redeploy into the pipeline. And then, you know, deemphasizing a little bit the junior capital while still actively investing there. And as I think you saw, you know, roughly 40% of the capital we deployed this last quarter was actually into junior debt position. So it's not that we're not investing there. It's still a focus, but it's slightly deemphasized in favor of equity. So, you know, again, these are moves on the margin, but the key takeaway is we believe very strongly in the leveraged senior trade, and we think adding a little bit of incremental equity to the book makes sense, just given the maturity profile of the vehicle.

Yeah, Melissa, it's Ken as well. And I would just add on the private equity side, and I think you know this about our platform. Today, we have investments, commitments in over 350 U.S. middle market private equity funds that we manage overall. And obviously, along with that, we get co-investment opportunities that are often very attractive, and so we're leaning into those opportunities as well. It's a very small part of our portfolio, but those opportunities are coming from, by and large, very high-quality mid-market private equity funds that have fantastic track records, and the opportunity to co-invest with them we think is quite unique, and so we want to make sure that we're taking advantage of that.

I appreciate that. If I could follow on with a question about the JV. It certainly looks like you're trying to ramp it fairly quickly by seeding that with, it looks like half the capacity, I think my math is right, from the existing portfolio. I'm curious if you're willing to share how long you're aiming to take to ramp that vehicle more fully, and then what the yield profile might be between loans that you keep on balance sheet and loans that would go into the JV and how that plays into target ROE, things like that.

Yeah, sure. So, yeah, you're right in terms of your math. We dropped down $150 million of assets at the launch of the joint venture, and our goal is to get that to roughly $300 million in assets. And I would say that that should happen over the medium term, so call it inside 12 months to get the remainder fully ramped. And the focus there is going to be on almost 100% senior secured first lien loans, so taking advantage of that levered senior trade. And the assets will be very similar, frankly, to what's up in the BDC as well. So it'll participate in the pipeline. It could acquire assets from time to time from NCDL as well, and that will enable it to ramp and generate that levered trade. And, again, if you think about the credit facility employed there and sort of the target leverage for that vehicle, consistent with other JVs that you've seen sort of in that, you know, two times leverage range at the joint venture level, that will allow us to generate those incremental returns and be accretive to the overall earnings profile of NCDL.

Thank you.

All right. Thank you.

Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. And the next question comes from the line of Aaron Cyganovic with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Hey, this is Alex Brewer, Aaron's associate at Truist. Just on the credit, you mentioned a few company-specific challenges during the quarter. I was just curious if there's any color that you could add on the take-up and non-accruals and the watchlist percentage.

Yeah, look, I mean, I think it's important to sort of put, Alex, the new non-accruals in the context of sort of the historical performance, which has been very strong, right? So the fact that we have a handful of incremental non-accruals, I believe, for this quarter is sort of not overly surprising, just as sort of the portfolio evolves and matures. But again, if you look at the composition of those names that are going on the watch list, you know, frankly, we get this question a lot, right? Are there trends? Are there things, industries? And each of the four really were across four separate industries with no real through line, right? So they're going to be company specific in terms of the performance, but, you know, we're not seeing, frankly, a real trend or overarching sort of concern around the overall credit quality of the portfolio. So modest increase in the watch list, not surprising, just given the maturity of the portfolio and the current environment. And then as we think about the non-accrual percentage, right, still fairly low in the context of the overall industry, right? So on a relative performance basis, you know, quite solid on any metric, right, that you would look at. So things like, you know, quarter over quarter or even first half NAB change in the book, as well as the non-accrual percentage relative to the overall industry, we still feel very good, but clearly an increase from the prior quarter, but that's something we're keeping a very close eye on.

Yeah, this is Ken. I would agree with that. And I would say that if you look at the four names, very much idiosyncratic. You know, there really is no theme. And in each case, in each of the four, we did have ongoing sponsor support. So the sponsors, you know, obviously engaged, stepped up, provided incremental capital, you know, worked to try to address these issues. So, you know, I think sponsor behavior was, you know, as we would have hoped for. But, again, not every situation goes as planned. So we're going to have a small handful of these names. Again, we have 244 names today in our portfolio. There are four here that, you know, we're dealing with, but there is really no common theme, you know, either industry or otherwise. You know, I will say overall, you know, obviously, given all the dynamics and the noise about AI that we've heard during the first half of the year, there's no AI theme here at all. And I think, you know, it's just a function of some businesses that in a higher for longer environment may be a bit more challenged. But overall, we continue to be happy with the quality of the portfolio and the overall, you know, ongoing monitoring and support we've received from our sponsors.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude the question and answer session. And I would like to turn the call back over to Ken Kensell for closing remarks.

Thank you very much. And thank you all for joining us today. We very much appreciate your interest and support. And hopefully all of you have a great remainder to the summer, and we'll look forward to getting together on our next quarterly call.

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.