OKYO Pharma Ltd 20-F for FY2025
OKYO Pharma Ltd (OKYO)
About this 20-F
OKYO Pharma Ltd filed this 20-F on July 18, 2025, covering the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (FY2025).
Headline figures
Fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, as reported in this filing, compared with the same period a year earlier where the filing states it.
- Net loss
- $4.71M
- compared with a net loss of $16.83M a year earlier
- Diluted EPS
- -$0.20
- compared with -$0.57 a year earlier
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
OR
For
the fiscal year ended
OR
For the transition period from to
OR
Commission
file number:
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter and translation of Registrant’s name into English)
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(Address of principal executive offices)
OKYO Pharma Limited
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Copies to:
Ed Lukins
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (UK) LLP
107 Cheapside
London EC2V 6DN
United Kingdom
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Ordinary Shares of no par value | NASDAQ Capital Market |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of July 3, 2025: ordinary shares.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
☐
Yes ☒
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer ☐ | Accelerated filer ☐ | Smaller reporting company ☐ | |
| Emerging
growth company |
If
an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by checkmark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
If
the securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant
included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
| U.S. GAAP ☐ | International Accounting Standards Board ☒ |
Other ☐ |
If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
☐
Yes
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| i |
INTRODUCTION
In this Annual Report on the Form 20-F references to “OKYO,” “OKYO Pharma Ltd,” “the company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to OKYO Pharma Ltd and its wholly owned subsidiary, OKYO Pharma Inc.
Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks and trade names in this annual report may be referred to without the ® and ™ symbols, but such references should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto. This annual report contains additional trademarks, service marks and trade names of others, which are the property of their respective owners. We do not intend to use or display other companies’ trademarks, service marks and trade names to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.
In this annual report, unless otherwise stated, all references to “U.S. dollars” or “US$” or “$” or “cents” are to the currency of the United States of America, and all references to “Pounds Sterling” or “Sterling” or “£” or “pence” are to the currency of the United Kingdom.
In this annual report, any reference to any provision of any legislation shall include any amendment, modification, re-enactment or extension thereof. Words importing the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, and words importing the masculine gender shall include the feminine or neutral gender.
| ii |
Presentation of Financial Information AND OTHER DATA
This annual report includes our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended March 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, which are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB. None of our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
Our financial information is presented in United States dollars. For the convenience of the reader, in this annual report, unless otherwise indicated, translations from Pounds Sterling into U.S. dollars were made at the rate of £1.00 to $1.289607, which was the rate on March 31, 2025. Such U.S. dollar amounts are not necessarily indicative of the amounts of U.S. dollars that could actually have been purchased upon exchange of Pounds Sterling at the dates indicated.
We have made rounding adjustments to some of the figures included in this annual report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that preceded them.
| iii |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements contained in this Annual Report, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management, are forward-looking statements. The words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “objective,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” and “ongoing,” or the negative of these terms, or other comparable terminology intended to identify statements about the future. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from the information expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and opinions contained in this annual report are based upon information available to us as of the date of this annual report and, while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. Forward-looking statements include statements about:
| ● | the development of product candidates, including statements regarding the timing of initiation, completion and the outcome of clinical studies or trials and related preparatory work, the period during which the results of the trials will become available and our research and development programs; | |
| ● | our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our product candidates in the indications for which we plan to develop them, and any related restrictions, limitations or warnings in the label of an approved drug or therapy; | |
| ● | our plans to research, develop, manufacture and commercialize our product candidates; | |
| ● | the timing of our regulatory filings for our product candidates; | |
| ● | the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates; | |
| ● | our ability to raise additional capital and our ability to continue as a going concern; | |
| ● | our commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and strategy; | |
| ● | our expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection; | |
| ● | our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel; | |
| ● | our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately; | |
| ● | our estimates regarding future revenue, expenses and needs for additional financing; and | |
| ● | regulatory developments in the United States, European Union, United Kingdom and foreign countries. |
You should refer to the section titled “Risk Factors” for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this annual report will prove to be accurate.
Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
You should read this Annual Report and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this Annual Report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
| iv |
PART I
ITEM 1: IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not Applicable
ITEM 2: OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3: KEY INFORMATION
A. Selected Financial Data
The following table summarizes our consolidated financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The consolidated financial statement data for the years ended March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements, as presented at the end of this Annual Report, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, and audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Our functional currency is the pound Sterling. However, for financial reporting purposes, our financial statements, which are prepared using the functional currency, have been translated into U.S. dollars. Our assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date, our expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period presented and shareholders’ equity is translated based on historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments are not included in determining net income (loss) but are included in foreign exchange translation adjustment to other comprehensive loss, a component of shareholders’ equity.
Foreign currency transactions in currencies different from the functional currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange differences resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at period-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in general and administrative expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
As of March 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the representative exchange rates were £1.00 = $1.289607, £1.00 = $1.2626 and £1.00 = $1.23472, respectively.
| 1 |
Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included at the end of this Annual Report and the related notes and Item 5, “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” below.
Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss Data:
| Years Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| (in thousands except per share data) | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | (2,254 | ) | $ | (8,244 | ) | $ | (6,338 | ) | |||
| General and administrative | (4,838 | ) | (7,506 | ) | (6,849 | ) | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | (7,092 | ) | (15,750 | ) | (13,187 | ) | ||||||
| Loss from operations | (7,092 | ) | (15,750 | ) | (13,187 | ) | ||||||
| Other income (expense) | (878 | ) | (1,053 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||||
| Tax (charge)/credit | 3,264 | (22 | ) | 12 | ||||||||
| Net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders | (4,706 | ) | (16,825 | ) | (13,272 | ) | ||||||
| Other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (159 | ) | 141 | (441 | ) | |||||||
| Total comprehensive loss | (4,865 | ) | (16,684 | ) | (13,713 | ) | ||||||
| Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share | (0.20 | ) | (0.57 | ) | (0.61 | ) | ||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
| As of March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| (in thousands except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,561 | $ | 827 | $ | 4,045 | ||||||
| Working capital | (5,552 | ) | (5,883 | ) | (2,060 | ) | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,677 | 1,541 | 5,204 | |||||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity/(deficit) | (5,550 | ) | (5,880 | ) | (2,053 | ) | ||||||
We define working capital as current assets less current liabilities.
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
| 2 |
D. Risk Factors
Our business has significant risks. You should consider carefully the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and the related notes. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our results could materially differ from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, as a result of certain factors including the risks described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report and our other SEC filings. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our product candidates are in the early stages of development and it may be some years until we generate revenue, if at all.
Our product candidates urcosimod (formally known as OK-101) and OK-201, are both early in the development stage. Our ability to generate product revenue, which is not expected to occur for several years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development of the product candidates, many stages of clinical trials, regulatory approval and eventual commercialization. We currently generate no revenue from sales of any product and may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable product.
There is a high degree of failure for product candidates as they progress through clinical trials and clinical trial data may be interpreted in varying ways which may delay, limit or prevent future regulatory approvals.
Many companies in the life sciences and biotechnology sector have made significant initial progress only to suffer significant setbacks in later stage clinical trials and there is a high failure rate for product candidates as they proceed through clinical trials. Data obtained from pre-clinical and clinical activities is subject to varying interpretations which may delay, limit or prevent applications for regulatory approvals.
The development of pharmaceutical products carries significant risk of failure in early and late stage development programs.
The development of pharmaceutical products is inherently uncertain, even in late-stage product development programs. There is a high failure rate in the development of pharmaceutical products and there is a substantial risk of adverse, undesirable, unintended or inconclusive results from testing or pre-clinical or clinical trials, which may substantially delay, or halt entirely, or make uneconomic, any further development of our products and may prevent or limit the commercial use of such products.
While the pre-clinical development of urcosimod and initial studies in animal models and humans have been encouraging, the scope of these studies is limited, and significant risks exist that urcosimod may never progress to a commercially viable product. Laboratory studies in animal models carry the risk that similar results may not be seen or reproduced in future tests and trials, and there can be no guarantee that a successful test in a mouse or other animal model will be capable of being reproduced in a human clinical trial. Small scale trials and the results thereof, can be misleading as to efficacy, safety and other findings, as the outcome may be influenced by laboratory or demographic factors and not due to the chemistry or biological effect of the drug candidate being evaluated. Larger scale trials often fail to produce the same positive results seen in small scale trials for a variety of reasons and clinical trials in humans frequently fail to reproduce efficacy seen in animal trials in the laboratory. Failure can often result after significant sums have been expended on research and often where initial trial results (both in animals and in humans) have shown very encouraging results.
| 3 |
Management intends to continue to conduct laboratory and pre-clinical trials to establish safety and efficacy of our products. Due to the inherent risks involved in developing pharmaceutical products, there is a risk that some or all of our products will not ultimately be successfully developed or launched. In addition, our clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy. Successful completion of one stage of development of a pharmaceutical product does not ensure that subsequent stages of development will be successful. Our inability to market any of our products currently under development would adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Any commercial development of urcosimod is highly dependent on a number of factors, including:
| ● | the successful conduct of further human trials in the initial indications of neuropathic corneal pain (NCP) and Dry Eye Disease (DED); | |
| ● | receipt of marketing approvals for urcosimod in the United States and other jurisdictions where separate approval is required and where we subsequently choose to market urcosimod; | |
| ● | launching commercial sales of urcosimod, if and when approved; | |
| ● | acceptance of urcosimod by patients, the medical community and third-party payers; | |
| ● | Urcosimod competing effectively with existing therapies and in particular with established products addressing the same clinical needs; | |
| ● | Urcosimod influencing the treatment guidelines in relevant territories; and | |
| ● | further clinical trials to provide additional data to support commercialization of urcosimod and to permit wider label claims. |
If any of these milestones are not met, our business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Capital.
We will need to raise substantial additional capital to develop and commercialize our product candidates and our failure to obtain funding when needed may force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or collaboration efforts.
As of March 31, 2025, our cash and cash equivalents balance was approximately $1.6 million and our working capital deficit was approximately $5.6 million. Due to our recurring losses from operations and the expectation that we will continue to incur losses in the future, we will be required to raise additional capital to complete the development and commercialization of our current product candidates. We have historically relied upon private and public sales of our equity, as well as debt financings to fund our operations. In order to raise additional capital, we may seek to sell additional equity and/or debt securities or obtain a credit facility or other loan, which we may not be able to do on favorable terms, or at all. Our ability to obtain additional financing will be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and investor sentiment. If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and/or commercialization of our product candidate, restrict our operations or obtain funds by entering into agreements on unfavorable terms. Failure to obtain additional capital at acceptable terms would result in a material and adverse impact on our operations.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.
PKF Littlejohn, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, has included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion that accompanies our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2025, indicating that our liquidity position post July 2026 raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to improve our liquidity position by July 2026, we may not be able to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue as a going concern and, therefore, be required to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities other than in the normal course of business which could cause investors to suffer the loss of all or a substantial portion of their investment.
| 4 |
We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.
The amount of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of our future expenditures, including further research and development activity. The amount of net losses will also depend on our success in developing and commercializing urcosimod and other products that may generate significant revenue. Any failure by us to become and remain profitable could depress the value of our ordinary shares and could impair our ability to expand our business, maintain our research and development efforts, diversify our product offerings or continue our operations.
We will need to spend extensively on further research activities and there can be no guarantee that we will have access to sufficient funds to fully realize our research and development plan or to commercialize any products derived from research activities.
We expect to incur further significant expenses in connection with our ongoing research and development activities in relation to our products, including funding future clinical studies, registration, manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution. In order to finance fully our strategy, we may require more capital than is available from our existing cash balances.
Access to adequate additional financing, whether through debt financing, an equity capital raise or a suitable partnering transaction may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise capital, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or commercialization efforts. Any additional equity fundraising may be dilutive for our shareholders.
Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business financial condition, prospects and results of operation and may lead us to delay, reduce or abandon research and development programs or commercialization of some of our products.
Risks Related to Commercialization of Our Product Candidates
Even if we successfully develop a product which shows efficacy in human subjects there remain high barriers to commercial success
Even if we were to receive regulatory approval for urcosimod or any other products, we may be unable to commercialize them.
There are a number of factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize urcosimod or any other products on our own, including:
| ● | our inability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel; | |
| ● | the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to or persuade adequate numbers of potential practitioners to prescribe any future products; | |
| ● | unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization; | |
| ● | costs of marketing and promotion above those anticipated by us; and | |
| ● | the inability to secure a suitable level of pricing and/or reimbursement approval from the relevant regulatory authorities in the countries we are targeting. |
While we may only seek to enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales and marketing services in non-core territories, any such arrangements could result in our product revenues (or the profitability of such product revenues) being lower than if we were to market and sell the products itself. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our products or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. Acceptable third parties may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our products, which in turn would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
| 5 |
We have also invested and will continue to invest resources into the development of other products, such as OK-201. Even where these products are successfully developed and marketing approval is secured from relevant regulatory authorities, these products might not achieve commercial success. Factors which could limit commercial success of a product include but are not limited to:
| ● | limited market acceptance or a lack of recognition of the unmet medical need for the product amongst prescribers; | |
| ● | new competitor products entering the market; | |
| ● | the number and relative efficacy, safety or cost of competitive products; | |
| ● | an inability to supply a sufficient amount of the product to meet market demand; | |
| ● | insufficient funding being available to market the product adequately; | |
| ● | an inability to enforce intellectual property rights, or the existence of third-party intellectual property rights; | |
| ● | safety concerns arising pre- or post-launch resulting in negative publicity or product withdrawal or narrowing of the product label and the group of persons who may receive the product; | |
| ● | labelling being restricted/narrowed in the future and in the future by regulatory agencies; and | |
| ● | refusals by government or other healthcare payors to fund the purchase of the products by healthcare providers at a commercially viable level (or at all) or otherwise to restrict the availability of approved products on other grounds. |
If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, prospects and results of operations.
We face significant competition from pharmaceutical companies. We have competitors internationally, including major multinational pharmaceutical companies, universities and research institutions. With respect to urcosimod for the treatment of DED, there are a number of established companies engaged in the development and marketing of preparations addressing the DED market. In addition, there are a wide range of products addressing the DED market currently approved and marketed by a number of large and small pharmaceutical companies
All of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, such as larger research and development teams, proven marketing and manufacturing organizations and well-established sales forces. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing drug products that are more effective or less costly than products which we are currently developing or which it may develop.
Established pharmaceutical companies may invest heavily to accelerate the discovery and development of products that could make our products less competitive. In addition, any new product that competes with an approved product must demonstrate compelling advantages in efficacy, convenience, tolerability or safety in order to overcome price competition and to be commercially successful. Accordingly, our competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection, receiving approval from the FDA, the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or that of another relevant regulatory authority or discovering, developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products before we do, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The availability and price of our competitors’ products could limit the demand, and the price we are able to charge, for any of our products, if approved for sale. We will not achieve our business plan if acceptance is inhibited by price competition or the reluctance of physicians to switch from existing drug products to our products, or if physicians switch to other new drug products or choose to reserve our products for use in limited circumstances. Competition from lower-cost generic pharmaceuticals may also result in significant reductions in sales volumes or prices for our products, which could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on third party supply, development and manufacturing and clinical service relationships and on single manufacturing sites for certain products. Our business strategy utilizes the expertise and resources of third parties in a number of areas, including the conduct of clinical trials, other product development, manufacture and the protection of our intellectual property rights in various geographical locations. This strategy creates risks for us by placing critical aspects of our business in the hands of third parties whom we may not be able to manage or control adequately and who may not always act in our best interests.
| 6 |
Where we are dependent upon third parties for the development or manufacture of certain products, our ability to procure or manufacture in a manner which complies with regulatory requirements may be constrained, and our ability to develop and deliver such material on a timely and competitive basis may be materially adversely affected, which may impact revenues.
Regulatory requirements for pharmaceutical products tend to make the substitution of suppliers and contractors costly and time-consuming. Alternative suppliers may not be able to manufacture products effectively or obtain the necessary manufacturing licenses from relevant regulatory authorities. The unavailability of adequate commercial quantities, the inability to develop alternative sources, a reduction or interruption in supply of contracted services, or a significant increase in the price of materials and services, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manufacture and market our products or to fulfill orders from our distributors or licensees, which in turn would have a material adverse impact on our cash flows.
Insurance coverage and reimbursement may be limited, unavailable or may be reduced over time in certain market segments for our products.
Government authorities and third-party payers, such as private health insurers, decide which pharmaceutical products they will cover and the amount of reimbursement. Reimbursement may depend upon a number of factors, including the payer’s determination that use of a product is:
| ● | a covered benefit under the payor’s health plan; | |
| ● | safe, effective and medically necessary; | |
| ● | appropriate for the specific patient; | |
| ● | cost-effective; and | |
| ● | neither experimental nor investigational. |
Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a product from a government or other third- party payer is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products.
We may not be able to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to coverage and reimbursement, or to demonstrate commercial value compared to existing established treatments. Even if we are able to furnish the requested data, there is no guarantee that a third-party payor will cover a product. If reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability.
We may, in the future, seek approval to market our products in the UK, EU, the U.S. and in selected other jurisdictions. In the UK and EU, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to national governmental control and pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can, in some circumstances, take several years after obtaining marketing approval for a product. In addition, market acceptance and sales of our products will depend significantly on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers and may be affected by existing and future healthcare reform measures.
The continuing efforts of governments, insurance companies, managed care organizations and other payers of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of healthcare and/or impose price controls may materially adversely affect our ability to set prices for our products, generate revenues and achieve or maintain profitability. Any reduction in government reimbursement programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payers, which may materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
| 7 |
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
The expiration of certain intellectual property rights or an inability to obtain, maintain or enforce adequate intellectual property rights for products that are marketed or in development may result in additional competition from other third-party products. Third parties may have blocking intellectual property rights which could prevent the sale of products by us or require that compensation be paid to such third parties
The extent of our success will, to a significant degree, depend on our ability to establish, maintain, defend and enforce adequate intellectual property rights and to operate without infringing the proprietary or intellectual property rights of third parties. We have been granted, or have in-licensed rights under, a number of key patent families for urcosimod (or other proprietary rights), and patent applications are pending in the UK, U.S., the EU, and certain other jurisdictions. We may develop or acquire further technology or products that are not patentable or otherwise protectable. The strength of patents in the pharmaceutical field involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. Patents or other rights might not be granted under any pending or future applications filed or in-licensed by us and any claims allowed might not be sufficiently broad to protect our technologies and products from competition. Competitors may also successfully design around key patents held by us, thereby avoiding a claim of infringement. There is a risk that not all relevant prior art has been identified with respect to any particular patent or patent application and the existence of such prior art may invalidate any patents granted (or result in a patent application not proceeding to grant). Patents or other registerable rights might also be revoked for other reasons after grant. Third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of any granted patents. Our defense of our proprietary rights could involve substantial costs (even if successful) and could result in declarations of invalidity or significantly narrow the scope of those rights, limiting their value.
Competitors may have filed applications or been granted patents, or obtained additional patents and proprietary rights, which relate to and could be infringed by our products. An adverse outcome with respect to third party rights such as claims of infringement of patents or third-party proprietary rights by us could subject us to significant liabilities or require us to obtain a license for the continued use of the affected rights, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, or require us to cease commercialization and development efforts, or the sale of the relevant products, in whole or in part in the relevant jurisdictions.
We could be subject to claims for compensation by third parties claiming an ownership interest in the intellectual property rights relating to a commercially successful product. This may include claims from employee inventors in territories which permit such claims even where we own the intellectual property rights in question. Any such failure to defend our proprietary intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to obtain, maintain, defend or enforce the intellectual property rights covering our products
To date, we have had certain patents licensed to us in jurisdictions we consider to be important to our business. However, we cannot predict:
| ● | the degree and range of protection any patents will afford against competitors and competing technologies, including whether third parties will find ways to invalidate or otherwise circumvent the patents by developing a competitive product that falls outside its scope; | |
| ● | if, or when any patents will be granted; | |
| ● | that granted patents will not be contested, invalidated or found unenforceable; | |
| ● | whether or not others will obtain patents claiming aspects similar to those covered by the Company’s patents and patent applications; | |
| ● | whether we will need to initiate litigation or administrative proceedings, or whether such litigation or proceedings will be initiated by third parties against us, which may be costly and time consuming; and | |
| ● | whether third parties will claim that our technology infringes upon their rights. |
While we believe that we have novel composition of matter on the urcosimod peptide and novel methods of its use in treating either NCP or DED, we cannot be sure that these patent applications will issue as patents. Each patent office has different patentability requirements, but we believe that the license patent applications contain patentable subject matter. The process for issuance of a patent involves correspondence with each local patent office in the jurisdictions in which the patent application is filed. That process, patent prosecution, involves a discussion of any relevant prior art and typically a discussion of the scope of the claims. The patent prosecution process can take several years depending on the jurisdiction and is not in the control of the patent owner, but in the control of the local patent office. We cannot be sure the outcome of the patent prosecution will be successful and result in issued patents.
Patent protection is of importance to us in maintaining our competitive position in our planned product lines and a failure to obtain or retain adequate protection could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
| 8 |
We may not be able to prevent disclosure of our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information.
We rely on trade secret protection to protect our interests in proprietary know-how and in processes for which patents are difficult to obtain or enforce. If we are unable to protect our trade secrets adequately the value of our technology and products could be significantly diminished. Furthermore, our employees, consultants, contract personnel or third-party partners, either accidentally or through willful misconduct, may cause serious damage to our programs and/or our strategy by disclosing confidential information to third parties. It is also possible that confidential information could be obtained by third parties as a result of breaches of our physical or electronic security systems. Any disclosure of confidential data into the public domain or to third parties could allow third parties to access confidential information and use it in competition with us. In addition, others may independently discover the confidential information. Any action to enforce our rights against any misappropriation or unauthorized use and/or disclosure of confidential information is likely to be time-consuming and expensive, and may ultimately be unsuccessful, or may result in a remedy that is not commercially valuable. Any such loss of confidential information or failure to enforce our rights in relation to such confidential information, or unsatisfactory outcome of any related litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operation.
Our product candidates could infringe patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties.
Our commercial success depends upon our ability, and the ability of any third party with which we may partner to develop, manufacture, market and sell our products and use our patent- protected technologies without infringing the patents of third parties.
Our products may infringe or may be alleged to infringe existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future which may result in costly litigation and could result in our having to pay substantial damages or limit our ability to commercialize our products.
Because some patent applications in Europe, the U.S. and many foreign jurisdictions may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, patent applications in such jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, and publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patents that may cover our technologies, our products or the use of our products. Additionally, pending patent applications which have been published can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our technologies, our products or the use of our products. As a result, we may become party to, or threatened with, future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding patents with respect to our products and technology.
If we are sued for patent infringement, we would need to demonstrate that our products or methods either do not infringe the patent claims of the relevant patent or that the patent claims are invalid, and we may not be able to do this. If we are found to infringe a third party’s patent, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our products and technology or we may elect to enter into such a license in order to settle litigation or in order to resolve disputes prior to litigation. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we are able to obtain a license, it could be non- exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies that are licensed to us and could require us to make substantial royalty payments. We could also be forced, including by court order, to cease commercializing the infringing technology or products. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our products or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similarly negative impact on our business.
Any such claims are likely to be expensive to defend, and some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than us because they have substantially greater resources. Moreover, even if we are successful in defending any infringement proceedings, we may incur substantial costs and divert management’s time and attention in doing so, which could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Operations
Risks relating to managing growth, employee matters and other risks relating to our business
Growth may place significant demands on our management and resources. We expect to experience growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations in connection with the continued development and, in due course, the potential commercialization of our products.
This potential growth will place a significant strain on our management and operations, and we may have difficulty managing this future potential growth.
We are highly dependent on our current executive officers and their services are critical to the successful implementation of our product development and regulatory strategies. While suitable contracts of employment and consultancy agreements are in place, including six to 12 months’ notice periods for all executive officers, they may give notice to terminate their employment or services with us at any time. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers and our inability to find suitable replacements could harm our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and ability to achieve the successful development or commercialization of our products.
| 9 |
Challenges in identifying and retaining key personnel could impair our ability to conduct and grow our operations effectively. Our ability to compete in the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified management and sales teams. We are intending to recruit our own commercial team and expand our existing central infrastructure team. Many of the other pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions that we compete against for qualified personnel have greater financial and other resources, different risk profiles and a longer history in the industry than we do. We might not be able to attract or retain these key people on conditions that are economically feasible. Our inability to attract and retain these key people could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial conditions and results of operation.
We may become subject to product liability claims.
We face an inherent risk of product liability and associated adverse publicity as a result of the clinical testing of our products and sales of our products once marketing approval is received from relevant regulatory authorities.
Criminal or civil proceedings might be filed against us by any study subjects, patients, relevant regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical companies, and any other third party using or marketing our products. Any such product liability claims may include allegations of defects in manufacturing or design, negligence, strict liability, a breach of warranties and a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product.
If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our products, if approved. Even if we successfully defend ourselves against such product liability claims it could require significant financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:
| ● | decreased demand for our products due to negative public perception; | |
| ● | injury to our reputation; | |
| ● | withdrawal of clinical study participants or difficulties in recruiting new study participants; | |
| ● | initiation of investigations by regulators; | |
| ● | costs to defend or settle the related litigation; | |
| ● | diversion of management’s time and our resources; | |
| ● | substantial monetary awards to patients, study participants or subjects; | |
| ● | product recalls, withdrawals or labelling, marketing or promotional restrictions; | |
| ● | loss of revenues from product sales; or | |
| ● | the inability to commercialize any of our products, if approved. |
Although we will maintain levels of insurance customary for our sector to cover our current and future business operations, any claim that may be brought against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our insurance policies also have various exclusions, and we may be subject to a product liability claim for which we have no coverage. In such cases, we would have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or that are not covered by our insurance, and we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts.
| 10 |
If we or our partners, licensees and subcontractors were unable to obtain and maintain appropriate insurance coverage at an acceptable cost, or to protect ourselves in any way against actions for damages, this would seriously affect the marketing of our products and, more generally, be detrimental to our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.
Our employees, contractors, consultants and commercial partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards.
We are exposed to the risk of employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, consultants, commercial partners or vendors engaging in fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct could include intentional failures to comply with FDA or EMA regulations or those of other relevant regulatory authorities, to provide accurate information to the FDA, EMA or other relevant regulatory authorities, or to comply with manufacturing standards we have established.
In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the life sciences and biotechnology sector are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, bribery and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements.
Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical studies, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental or relevant regulatory authority investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions, and our reputation.
We may be vulnerable to disruptions of information technology systems or breaches of data security. We are dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, store and transmit confidential information, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information. It is important that we do so in a secure manner to maintain confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. Any failure to do so could adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operation or financial condition.
The relationship of the UK with the EU could impact our ability to operate efficiently in certain jurisdictions or in certain markets.
The UK formally exited the EU on January 31, 2020, which is commonly known as Brexit. Under the terms of its departure, the UK entered a transition period during which it continued to follow all EU rules until December 31, 2020, or the Transition Period. On December 30, 2020, the UK and EU signed the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which includes an agreement on free trade between the two parties.
There is considerable uncertainty resulting from a lack of precedent and the complexity of the UK and EU’s intertwined legal regimes as to how Brexit (following the Transition Period) will impact the medical devices industry in Europe. Since a significant proportion of the regulatory framework in the UK applicable to our business and product candidates is derived from EU directives and regulations, Brexit could materially impact the regulatory regime with respect to the development, manufacture, importation, approval and commercialization of our product candidates in the UK or the EU. The impact will largely depend on the model and means by which the UK’s relationship with the EU is governed post-Brexit and the extent to which the UK chooses to diverge from the EU regulatory framework. For example, following the Transition Period, the UK will no longer be covered by the centralized procedures for obtaining EU-wide marketing authorizations and our product candidates will therefore require a separate marketing authorization for such products to be marketed in the UK. It is also unclear as to whether the relevant authorities in the EU and the UK are adequately prepared for the additional administrative burden caused by Brexit. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any marketing approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, would prevent us from, or delay commercialization of, product candidates in the UK and/or the EEA and restrict our ability to generate revenue and achieve and sustain profitability.
| 11 |
If any of these outcomes occur, we may be forced to restrict or delay efforts to seek regulatory approval in the UK for its product candidates, which could significantly and materially harm our business. There is a degree of uncertainty regarding the overall impact that Brexit will have on the process to obtain regulatory approval in the UK for product candidates.
Further, the UK’s withdrawal from the EU has resulted in the relocation of the EMA from the UK to the Netherlands. This relocation has caused, and may continue to cause, disruption in the administrative and medical scientific links between the EMA and the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, including delays in granting clinical trial authorization or marketing authorization, disruption of importation and export of medical devices, active substance and other components of new drug formulations, and disruption of the supply chain for clinical trial product and final authorized formulations. The cumulative effects of the disruption to the regulatory framework may add considerably to the development lead time to marketing authorization and commercialization of product candidates in the EU and/or the UK. Brexit may also result in a reduction of funding to the EMA once the UK no longer makes financial contributions to EU institutions, such as the EMA. If funding to the EMA is so reduced, it could create delays in the EMA issuing regulatory approvals for our product candidates and, accordingly, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
Even if we complete the necessary clinical trials, we cannot predict when, or if, we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates and whether the approval may be for a narrower indication than we seek.
We cannot commercialize a product candidate until the appropriate regulatory authorities have reviewed and approved the product candidate. The FDA must review and approve any new pharmaceutical product before it can be marketed and sold in the United States. The FDA regulatory review and approval process, which includes evaluation of preclinical studies and clinical trials of a product candidate and proposed labeling, as well as the evaluation of the manufacturing process and manufacturers’ facilities, all of which is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. To obtain approval, we must, among other things, demonstrate with substantial evidence from well-controlled clinical trials that the product candidate is both safe and effective for each indication where approval is sought. Even if our product candidates meet the FDA’s safety and effectiveness endpoints in clinical trials, the FDA may not complete their review processes in a timely manner, or we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval. The FDA has substantial discretion in the review and approval process and may refuse to file our application for substantive review or may determine after review of our data that our application is insufficient to allow approval of our product candidates. The FDA may require that we conduct additional preclinical studies, clinical trials or manufacturing validation studies and submit that data before it will reconsider our application. Additional delays may result if an FDA Advisory Committee or other regulatory authority recommends non-approval or restrictions on approval. In addition, we may experience delays or rejections based upon additional government regulation from future legislation or administrative action, or changes in regulatory authority policy during the period of product development, clinical trials and the review process.
The FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities also may approve a product candidate for more limited indications than requested or may impose significant limitations in the form of narrow indications, warnings or a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS. These regulatory authorities may require precautions or contraindications with respect to conditions of use or may grant approval subject to the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials. In addition, the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities may not approve the labeling claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates. Any of the foregoing scenarios could harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates and negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Delays in obtaining regulatory approval of our manufacturing process and facility or disruptions in our manufacturing process may delay or disrupt our product development and commercialization efforts.
We do not currently operate manufacturing facilities for clinical or commercial production of our product candidates. Before we can begin to commercially manufacture our product candidates, whether in a third-party facility or in our own facility, if and when established, we must obtain regulatory approval from the FDA for our manufacturing process and facility. A manufacturing authorization must also be obtained from the appropriate European Union and UK regulatory authorities and from other foreign regulatory authorities, as applicable. In order to obtain approval, we will need to ensure that all of our processes, methods and equipment are compliant with Current Good Manufacturing Practice (‘cGMP’), and perform extensive audits of vendors, contract laboratories and suppliers. If any of our vendors, contract laboratories or suppliers are found to be non-compliant with cGMP, we may experience delays or disruptions in manufacturing while we work with these third parties to remedy the violation or while we work to identify suitable replacement vendors. The cGMP requirements govern quality control of the manufacturing process and documentation policies and procedures. In complying with cGMP, we will be obligated to expend time, money and effort in production, record keeping and quality control to assure that the product meets applicable specifications and other requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we would be subject to possible regulatory action and may not be permitted to sell any product candidate that we may develop.
| 12 |
If we or our third-party manufacturers fail to comply with applicable cGMP regulations, the FDA, EMA and other regulatory authorities can impose regulatory sanctions including, among other things, refusal to approve a pending application for a new product candidate or suspension or revocation of a pre-existing approval. Such an occurrence may cause our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects to be harmed.
Additionally, if the supply of our products from our third-party manufacturers to us is interrupted for any reason, including due to regulatory requirements or actions (including recalls), adverse financial developments at or affecting the supplier, failure by the supplier to comply with cGMP requirements, contamination, business interruptions or labor shortages or disputes, there could be a significant disruption in commercial supply of our products. We do not currently have a backup manufacturer of our product candidate supply for clinical trials or commercial sale. An alternative manufacturer would need to be qualified through a supplement to its regulatory filing, which could result in further delays. The regulatory authorities also may require additional clinical trials if a new manufacturer is relied upon for commercial production. Switching manufacturers may involve substantial costs and could result in a delay in our desired clinical and commercial timelines.
If our competitors are able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity for products that constitute the same drug and treat the same indications as our product candidates, we may not be able to have competing products approved by applicable regulatory authorities for a significant period of time. In addition, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for any of our products, such exclusivity may not protect us from competition.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and the European Union, may designate products for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the FDA may designate a product candidate as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as having a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. In the European Union, the EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products grants orphan drug designation to promote the development of products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition affecting not more than five in 10,000 people in the European Union. Additionally, orphan drug designation is granted for products intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition and when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the drug in the European Union would be sufficient to justify the necessary investment in developing the drug or biologic product. In the European Union, orphan drug designation entitles a party to a number of incentives, such as protocol assistance and scientific advice specifically for designated orphan medicines, and potential fee reductions depending on the status of the sponsor.
The designation as an orphan product does not guarantee that any regulatory agency will accelerate regulatory review of, or ultimately approve, that product candidate, nor does it limit the ability of any regulatory agency to grant orphan drug designation to product candidates of other companies that treat the same indications as our product candidates prior to our product candidates receiving exclusive marketing approval.
Generally, if a product candidate with an orphan drug designation receives the first marketing approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to a period of marketing exclusivity, which precludes the FDA or the EMA from approving another marketing application for a product that constitutes the same drug treating the same indication for that marketing exclusivity period, except in limited circumstances. If another sponsor receives such approval before we do (regardless of our orphan drug designation), we will be precluded from receiving marketing approval for our product for the applicable exclusivity period. The applicable period is seven years in the United States and 10 years in the European Union. The exclusivity period in the European Union can be reduced to six years if a product no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation or if the product is sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer justified. Orphan drug exclusivity may be revoked if any regulatory agency determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantity of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.
| 13 |
Even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity for a product candidate, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product candidate from competition because different drugs can be approved for the same condition. In the United States, even after an orphan drug is approved, the FDA may subsequently approve another drug for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the latter drug is not the same drug or is clinically superior in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. In the European Union, marketing authorization may be granted to a similar medicinal product for the same orphan indication if:
| ● | the second applicant can establish in its application that its medicinal product, although similar to the orphan medicinal product already authorized, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior; | |
| ● | the holder of the marketing authorization for the original orphan medicinal product consents to a second orphan medicinal product application; or | |
| ● | the holder of the marketing authorization for the original orphan medicinal product cannot supply sufficient quantities of orphan medicinal product. |
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, our product candidates will remain subject to regulatory oversight.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, they will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, record-keeping and submission of safety and other post-market information. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to monitor the quality, safety and clinical effectiveness of the product.
Some of our product candidates are classified as biologics in the United States, and therefore, can only be sold if we obtain a biologics license application, or BLA, from the FDA. The holder of an approved BLA also must submit new or supplemental applications and obtain FDA approval for certain changes to the approved product, product labeling or manufacturing process. In addition, the holder of an approved BLA must comply with the FDA’s advertising and promotion requirements, such as those related to the prohibition on promoting products for uses or in patient populations that are not described in the product’s approved labeling (known as “off-label use”). Advertising and promotional materials must comply with FDA rules and are subject to FDA review, in addition to other potentially applicable federal and state laws.
In addition, product manufacturers and their facilities are subject to payment of user fees and continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP requirements and adherence to commitments made in an NDA or foreign marketing application. If we, or a regulatory authority, discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured or if a regulatory authority disagrees with the promotion, marketing or labeling of that product, a regulatory authority may impose restrictions relative to that product, the manufacturing facility or us, including requiring recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing.
If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements following approval of our product candidates, a regulatory or enforcement authority may:
| ● | issue a warning letter asserting that we are in violation of the law; | |
| ● | seek an injunction or impose administrative, civil or criminal penalties or monetary fines; | |
| ● | suspend or withdraw regulatory approval; |
| 14 |
| ● | suspend any ongoing clinical trials; | |
| ● | refuse to approve a pending NDA or comparable foreign marketing application (or any supplements thereto) submitted by us or our strategic partners; | |
| ● | restrict the marketing or manufacturing of the product; | |
| ● | seize or detain the product or otherwise require the withdrawal of the product from the market; | |
| ● | refuse to permit the import or export of the product; or | |
| ● | refuse to allow us to enter into supply contracts, including government contracts. |
Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate negative publicity. The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize our product candidates and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In addition, the FDA’s policies, and those of the EMA and other regulatory authorities, may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Even if we obtain and maintain approval for our product candidates in a major pharmaceutical market such as the United States, we may never obtain approval for our product candidates in other major markets.
In order to market any products in a country or territory, we must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such countries or territories regarding safety and effectiveness. Clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not mean that regulatory approval will be obtained in any other country. Approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. Seeking regulatory approvals in all major markets could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and may require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials, which would be costly and time-consuming. Regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent the introduction of our product candidates in those countries. For example, in many jurisdictions outside of the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products would also be subject to approval. Satisfying these and other regulatory requirements is costly, time consuming, uncertain and subject to unanticipated delays. In addition, our failure to obtain regulatory approval in any country may delay or have negative effects on the process for regulatory approval in other countries. We currently do not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, whether in the United States, the European Union or any other international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be compromised.
We may seek a conditional marketing authorization in the European Union for some or all of our current product candidates, but we may not be able to obtain or maintain such designation.
As part of its marketing authorization process, the EMA may grant marketing authorizations for certain categories of medicinal products on the basis of less complete data than is normally required, when doing so may meet unmet medical needs of patients and serve the interest of public health. In such cases, it is possible for the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, to recommend the granting of a marketing authorization, subject to certain specific obligations to be reviewed annually, which is referred to as a conditional marketing authorization.
| 15 |
This may apply to medicinal products for human use that fall under the jurisdiction of the EMA, including those that aim at the treatment, the prevention, or the medical diagnosis of seriously debilitating or life-threatening diseases and those designated as orphan medicinal products.
A conditional marketing authorization may be granted when the CHMP finds that, although comprehensive clinical data referring to the safety and therapeutic utility of the medicinal product have not been supplied, all the following requirements are met:
| ● | the risk-benefit balance of the medicinal product is positive; | |
| ● | it is likely that the applicant will be in a position to provide the comprehensive clinical data; | |
| ● | unmet medical needs will be fulfilled; and | |
| ● | the benefit to public health of the immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product concerned outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional data is still required. |
The granting of a conditional marketing authorization is restricted to situations in which only the clinical part of the application is not yet fully complete. Incomplete preclinical or quality data may only be accepted if duly justified and only in the case of a product intended to be used in emergency situations in response to public health threats. Conditional marketing authorizations are valid for one year, on a renewable basis. The holder will be required to complete ongoing trials or to conduct new trials with a view to confirming that the benefit-risk balance is positive. In addition, specific obligations may be imposed in relation to the collection of pharmacovigilance data.
Granting a conditional marketing authorization allows medicines to reach patients with unmet medical needs earlier than might otherwise be the case and will ensure that additional data on a product is generated, submitted, assessed and acted upon.
Healthcare legislative reform measures may have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.
In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and continue to be, several legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of our product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, or the MMA, changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The MMA expanded Medicare coverage for outpatient drug purchases by adding a new Medicare Part D program and introduced a new reimbursement methodology based on average sales prices for Medicare Part B physician-administered drugs. In addition, the MMA authorized Medicare Part D prescription drug plans to limit the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class in their formularies. The MMA’s cost reduction initiatives and other provisions could decrease the coverage and price that we receive for any approved products. While the MMA applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates. Therefore, any reduction in reimbursement that results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. Similar regulations or reimbursement policies may be enacted in international markets, which could similarly impact our business.
| 16 |
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (‘PPACA’) (as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010) was passed, which substantially changes the way healthcare is financed by both the government and private insurers, and significantly impacts the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, it is now known as the Affordable Heathcare Act (“ACA”). The ACA, among other things: (i) addresses a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected; (ii) increases the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; (iii) establishes annual fees and taxes on manufacturers of certain branded prescription drugs; (iv) expands the availability of lower pricing under the 340B drug pricing program by adding new entities to the program; and (v) establishes a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D.
Additional changes that may affect our business include those changes governing enrollment in federal healthcare programs, reimbursement changes, rules regarding prescription drug benefits under the health insurance exchanges and fraud and abuse and enforcement. Continued implementation of the PPACA and the passage of additional laws and regulations may result in the expansion of new programs such as Medicare payment for performance initiatives, and may impact existing government healthcare programs, such as by improving the physician quality reporting system and feedback program.
For each state that does not choose to expand its Medicaid program, there likely will be fewer insured patients overall, which could impact the sales, business and financial condition of manufacturers of branded prescription drugs. Where patients receive insurance coverage under any of the new options made available through the PPACA, manufacturers may be required to pay Medicaid rebates on that resulting drug utilization. The U.S. federal government also has announced delays in the implementation of key provisions of the ACA.
In addition, there have been judicial and congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and we expect the current administration and Congress will likely continue to seek legislative and regulatory changes, including repeal and replacement of certain provisions of the ACA.
The Trump Administration issued a proposed rule on March 10, 2025 (“Proposed Rule”) amending regulations governing insurance coverages subject to the ACA.
In conjunction with the Proposed Rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued a statement explaining that the proposed regulations include “critical and necessary steps to protect people from being enrolled in Marketplace coverage without their knowledge or consent, promote stable and affordable health insurance markets, and ensure taxpayer dollars fund financial assistance only for the people the ACA set out to support.” To support its position, CMS cited a report from the Paragon Health Institute suggesting “4 to 5 million people were improperly enrolled in subsidized ACA coverage in 2024, costing federal taxpayers up to $20 billion.” The impact analysis that accompanies the Proposed Rule shows that the Proposed Rule will reduce enrollment in the ACA plans, reduce the number of people who access premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions that make coverage more affordable, and limit benefits available to individuals.
The Proposed Rule contains a variety of key changes to the regulations governing health insurance subject to the ACA that will impact those seeking to obtain health coverage through state and federal insurance marketplaces (the “Marketplace”). In this regard, the Proposed Rule does the following:
● Allows insurers to deny coverage to individuals who have past-due premium from prior coverage, allowing insurers to consider past due premium amounts as owed as the initial premium for new coverage.
● Excludes persons who are Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) from eligibility to enroll in a health insurance plans offered on the Marketplace or access premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.
● Requires CMS to apply a “preponderance of the evidence” standard before terminating an agent for cause as to their agreement with CMS to solicit and sell Marketplace coverage.
● Eliminates the ability of an individual to certify to their income when applying for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions, instead requiring income determinations be reconciled with tax filing or other information potentially creating coverage delays and administrative barriers. In addition, if an individual does not file a Federal income tax return for two years, the individual will not be eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions.
● Institutes income eligibility verifications for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions and charges people auto-reenrolled into zero-premium plans a small monthly payment until they confirm their eligibility information.
● Adjusts the automatic enrollment hierarchy for individuals.
● Shortens the annual open enrollment period from the current period, November 15 to January 15, reducing it by one month, to November 15 to December 15.
| 17 |
● Removes the monthly special enrollment period (“SEP”) for qualified individuals who become eligible for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions because their projected household income falls to or below 150% of the federal poverty level, which means that these individuals will have to wait before they can access premium tax credits and cost sharing reductions.
● Changes de minimis thresholds for the actuarial value for plans subject to essential health benefits (“EHB”) requirements and for income-based cost-sharing reduction plan variations.
● Updates the annual premium adjustment percentage methodology to establish a premium growth measure that according to the Proposed Rule reflects premium growth in all affected markets, increasing the cost of coverage.
● Prohibiting insurance companies subject to ACA requirements from providing coverage for services related to a sex-trait modification as an essential health benefit.
We expect that the ACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on the price that we receive for any approved product. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain profitability, or commercialize our products.
The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General in the US issued final regulations on November 30, 2020 to eliminate safe harbor protection under the anti-kickback statute for drug price reductions that pharmaceutical manufacturers pay to Medicare and Medicaid plan sponsors and their pharmacy benefit managers. The proposal reflects a clear intent to substantially alter many of the current drug discount and services compensation practices among pharmaceutical manufacturers and Medicare and Medicaid managed care organizations and their pharmacy benefit managers. The proposal also reflects a skepticism that current drug discount and compensation practices among manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers are sufficiently transparent to health plans to ensure that all appropriate cost reductions and value is passed through to health plans and reflected in lower health plans costs and lower premiums for beneficiaries. The Biden Administration has delayed the effective date of this rule until January 1, 2023, and a lawsuit initiated by the Pharmaceutical Care Management Administration has challenged this final rule. If the regulation becomes effective it could result in lower prices for pharmaceutical products in general.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued an interim final rule on November 20, 2020 that would tie prices for certain drugs under Medicare Part B to the lowest price for those drugs available in certain countries that are members of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. This “most favored nation” drug pricing rule is also the subject of lawsuits, and a federal court has placed an injunction on the implementation of the rule. This rule, if finalized, could also result in lower prices for pharmaceutical products in general.
| 18 |
The Trump Administration will have the opportunity to address these regulations as well as drug pricing, health care access, and other health care reform issues. Any further legislative or administrative action to reduce reimbursement or health benefits to beneficiaries under the Medicare or Medicaid program could affect the payment we could collect from the sale of any product in the United States.
We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our product candidates or additional pricing pressures.
We are subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations and standards as well as contractual obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our reputation, subject us to significant fines and liability, or otherwise adversely affect our business
or prospects.
We are subject to data privacy and protection laws, regulations, policies and contractual obligations that apply to the collection, transmission, storage, processing and use of personal information or personal data, which among other things, impose certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of personal information.
The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve in jurisdictions worldwide, and there has been an increasing focus on privacy and data protection issues with the potential to affect our business. Failure to comply with laws, regulations and other obligations governing personal information could result in enforcement actions against us, including fines, imprisonment of company officials and public censure, processing penalties, claims for damages by affected individuals, damage to our reputation and loss of goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
The EU and UK GDPR applies extraterritorially and implements stringent operational requirements for controllers and processors of personal data. For example, the EU and UK GDPR: (i) require detailed disclosures to data subjects; (ii) require disclosure of the legal basis on which personal data is processed; (iii) make it harder to obtain valid consent for processing; (iv) require the appointment of a data protection officers where sensitive personal data (i.e. health data) is processed on a large scale; (v) provide more robust rights for data subjects; (vi) introduce mandatory data breach notification through the EU and in the UK; (vii) impose additional obligations when contracting with service providers; and (viii) require an appropriate privacy governance framework to be implemented including policies, procedures, training and data audit. The EU GDPR permits Member State derogations for certain issues and, accordingly, we are also subject to EU national laws relating to the processing of certain data such as genetic data, biometric data and data concerning health. Complying with these numerous, complex and often changing regulations is expensive and difficult. Failure by us, or our partners or service providers, to comply with the EU and/or UK GDPR could result in regulatory investigations, enforcement notices and/ or fines of up to the higher of 20,000,000 Euros/17,500,000 GBP or up to 4% of our total worldwide annual turnover. In addition to the foregoing, any breach of privacy laws or data security laws, particularly those resulting in any security incident or breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized use or disclosure of sensitive or confidential patient or consumer information, could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and financial condition
As a data controller, we are accountable for any third-party data service providers we engage to process personal data on our behalf. We attempt to address the associated risks by performing security assessments, detailed due diligence and regularly performing privacy and security reviews of its vendors and requiring all such third-party providers with data access to sign agreements, including business associate agreements, and where required under EU or UK law, obligating them to only process data according to our instructions and to take sufficient security measures to protect such data. There is no assurance that these contractual measures and our own privacy and security-related safeguards will protect us from the risks associated with the third-party processing, storage and transmission of such information. Any violation of data or security laws by our third-party processors could have a material adverse effect on our business and result in the fines and penalties outlined above. We are also subject to evolving European privacy laws on electronic marketing and cookies.
Further, Brexit and ongoing developments in the United Kingdom have created uncertainty with regard to data protection regulation in the United Kingdom. The UK is also updating its data protection law via the Data (Use and Access) Bill 2025 that is currently being considered by the UK Parliament. This is expected to be passed in Q2 2025 assuming no major legislative delays. While certain provisions may require secondary legislation for implementation, the core reforms are likely to take effect within months of the Bill’s approval and will modify certain aspects of the UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018. These proposed changes will require us to modify certain aspects of our data protection compliance program.
| 19 |
Privacy and data security requirements are also either in place or underway in the United States. There are a broad variety of data protection laws that may be applicable to our activities, and a range of enforcement agencies at both the state and federal levels that can review companies for privacy and data security concerns based on general consumer protection laws. The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general can all be aggressive in reviewing privacy and data security protections for consumers. New laws also are being considered or have been implemented at both the state and federal levels. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, or the CCPA, which became effective on January 1, 2020, requires companies that process information on California residents to make new disclosures to consumers about their data collection, use and sharing practices, provides such individuals with new data privacy rights (including the ability to opt out of certain disclosures of personal information), imposes new operational requirements for covered businesses, provides a private right of action for data breaches and creates a statutory damages framework. Virginia became the second state to adopt a comprehensive privacy legislation on March 2, 2021 with enactment of the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. Many other states are considering similar legislation, and a broad range of legislative measures also have been introduced at the federal level. Although there are limited exemptions for clinical trial data under the CCPA, the CCPA and other similar laws could impact our business activities depending on how it is interpreted and exemplifies the vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data.
Additionally, regulations promulgated pursuant to the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as amended, establish privacy and security standards that limit the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information, or protected health information, and require the implementation of administrative, physical and technological safeguards to protect the privacy of protected health information and ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information. These provisions may be applicable to our business or that of our collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants. Determining whether protected health information has been handled in compliance with applicable privacy standards and our contractual obligations can be complex and may be subject to changing interpretation. If we are unable to properly protect the privacy and security of protected health information, we could be found to have violated these privacy and security laws and/or breached certain contracts with our business partners (including as a business associate). Further, if we fail to comply with applicable privacy laws, such as, to the extent applicable, HIPAA privacy and security standards, we could face significant civil and criminal penalties. In the United States, the Department of Health and Human Services’ and state attorney’s general enforcement activity can result in financial liability and reputational harm, and responses to such enforcement activity can consume significant internal resources. In addition, state attorneys general are authorized to bring civil actions seeking either injunctions or damages in response to violations that threaten the privacy of state residents. We cannot be sure how these regulations will be interpreted, enforced or applied to our operations. In addition to the risks associated with enforcement activities and potential contractual liabilities, our ongoing efforts to comply with evolving laws and regulations at the federal and state level may be costly and require ongoing modifications to our policies, procedures and systems.
Given the breadth and depth of changes in data protection obligations, preparing for and complying with the GDPR, CCPA and other similar law requirements are rigorous and time-intensive and require significant resources and a review of our technologies, systems and practices, as well as those of any third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants that process or transfer personal data. Changes involving the GDPR, CCPA or other laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of sensitive data, such as healthcare data or other personal information from our clinical trials, could require us to change our business practices and put in place additional compliance mechanisms, may interrupt or delay our development, regulatory and commercialization activities and increase our cost of doing business, and could expose us to government enforcement actions, regulatory investigations, private litigation and significant fines, penalties and remediation costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, any failure by our third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants to comply with applicable law, regulations or contractual obligations related to data privacy or security could result in proceedings against us by governmental entities or others, fines, reputational harm and other liabilities.
| 20 |
We may publish privacy policies and other documentation regarding our collection, processing, use and disclosure of personal information and/or other confidential information. Although we endeavor to comply with our published policies and other documentation, we may at times fail to do so or may be perceived to have failed to do so. Moreover, despite our efforts, we may not be successful in achieving compliance if our employees or vendors fail to comply with our published policies and documentation. Such failures can subject us to potential foreign, local, state and federal action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Moreover, subjects about whom we or our partners obtain information, as well as the providers who share this information with us, may contractually limit our ability to use and disclose the information. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights or failed to comply with data protection laws or applicable privacy notices even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could harm our business.
It is possible that new and existing laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices and our efforts to comply with the evolving data protection rules may be unsuccessful. If so, this could result in government-imposed or court–imposed fines, or penalties or orders requiring that we change our practices, which could adversely affect our business. We must devote significant resources to understanding and complying with this changing landscape. Failure to comply with local and foreign laws, including US federal and state laws regarding privacy and security of personal information could expose us to government-imposed fines and penalties under such laws, penalties or orders requiring that we change our practices, claims for damages or other liabilities, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, litigation and significant costs for remediation, reputational harm, diminished profits and earnings, additional reporting requirements and/or oversight, any of which could adversely affect our business, our results of operations or prospects. We also face a threat of consumer class actions related to these laws and the overall protection of personal data. Even if we are not determined to have violated these laws, government or court investigations into these issues typically require the expenditure of significant resources and generate negative publicity. Any of the foregoing could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation and our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
We are subject to the U.K. Bribery Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-corruption laws, as well as export control laws, import and customs laws, trade and economic sanctions laws and other laws governing our operations.
Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or the U.K. Bribery Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 §201, the U.S. Travel Act 1961, and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where we do business. The U.K. Bribery Act 2010, the FCPA and these other laws generally prohibit us and our employees and intermediaries from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper or prohibited payments, or anything else of value, to government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. Under the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, we may also be liable for failing to prevent a person associated with us from committing a bribery offense. We and our commercial partners operate in a number of jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential U.K. Bribery Act or FCPA violations, and we participate in collaborations and relationships with third parties whose corrupt or illegal activities could potentially subject us to liability under the U.K. Bribery Act, FCPA or local anti-corruption laws, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. In addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted.
We are also subject to other laws and regulations governing our international operations, including regulations administered by the governments of the United Kingdom and the United States, and authorities in the European Union, including applicable export control regulations, economic sanctions and embargoes on certain countries and persons, anti-money laundering laws, import and customs requirements and currency exchange regulations, collectively referred to as the Trade Control laws.
There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in ensuring our compliance with all applicable anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act, the FCPA or other legal requirements, including Trade Control laws. If we are not in compliance with the U.K. Bribery Act, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws, we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential violations of the U.K. Bribery Act, the FCPA, other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws by United Kingdom, United States or other authorities could also have an adverse impact on our reputation, our business, results of operations and financial condition.
| 21 |
Our relationships with customers, physicians and third-party payors will be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws, false claims laws, health information privacy and security laws and other healthcare laws and regulations. If we are found in violation of these laws and regulations, we may be required to pay a penalty or be suspended from participation in federal or state healthcare programs, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we obtain FDA approval for our product candidates and begin commercializing them in the United States, our operations will be directly, or indirectly through our prescribers, customers and purchasers, subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil and criminal false claims laws and Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2010 and regulations. These laws will impact, among other things, our proposed sales, marketing and educational programs. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy laws by both the U.S. federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The laws that will affect our operations include, but are not limited to:
| ● | the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons or entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, in return for either the referral of an individual, or the purchase, leasing, furnishing or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of a good, facility, item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand, and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other. The PPACA amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it; | |
| ● | federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment or approval from Medicare, Medicaid or other government payors that are false or fraudulent. The PPACA provides, and recent government cases against pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers support the view that federal Anti-Kickback Statute violations and certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, may implicate the False Claims Act of 1863; | |
| ● | the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, which created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, a person from knowingly and willfully executing a scheme or from making false or fraudulent statements to defraud any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private); | |
| ● | HIPAA (as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009), and their implementing regulations, which impose certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information without appropriate authorization by entities subject to the rule, such as health plans, health care clearinghouses and health care providers, and their respective business associates that perform certain functions or activities that involve the use or disclosure of protected health information on their behalf; | |
| ● | federal transparency laws, including the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, that require certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the CMS information related to: (i) payments or other “transfers of value” made to physicians and teaching hospitals and (ii) ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; | |
| ● | federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers; and | |
| ● | state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, state and local laws that require drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures, and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts. |
| 22 |
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant criminal, civil and administrative sanctions including monetary penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, and exclusion from participation in government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, reputational harm, and we may be required to curtail or restructure our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations.
The risk of our being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that many of them have not been fully interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of interpretations. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply with multiple jurisdictions with different compliance and/or reporting requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur substantial costs.
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the generation, handling, use, storage, treatment, manufacture, transportation and disposal of, and exposure to, hazardous materials and wastes, as well as laws and regulations relating to occupational health and safety. We contract with third parties that conduct operations on our behalf that involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biologic materials. Our contractors also produce and dispose of hazardous waste products. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our contractors’ use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages and any liability could exceed our resources, and our clinical trials or regulatory approvals could be suspended. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties. Our third-party contractors may not carry specific biological or hazardous waste insurance coverage, and their property, casualty and general liability insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for damages and fines arising from biological or hazardous waste exposure or contamination.
Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance for certain costs and expenses that we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials or other work-related injuries, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biologic, hazardous or radioactive materials.
In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which have tended to become more stringent over time. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions or liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
| 23 |
Computer system failures, cyber-attacks or deficiencies in our, or related parties’, cyber security could result in a material disruption of our product development programs, compromise sensitive information related to our business or trigger contractual and legal obligations, any of which could potentially expose us to liability or reputational harm or otherwise adversely affect our business and financial results.
We have implemented our security measures designed to protect the information (including but not limited to intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information) in our possession, custody or control. Our internal computer systems and those of current and future third parties (such as vendors, CROs, collaborators or others) on which we rely may fail and are vulnerable to breakdown, breach, interruption or damage from computer viruses, computer hackers, malicious code, employee error or malfeasance, theft or misuse, denial-of-service attacks, sophisticated nation-state and nation-state-supported actors, unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures or other compromise. Despite our security practices, there is a risk that we may be subject to phishing and other cyberattacks in the future. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased.
We may not be able to anticipate all types of security threats, and we may not be able to implement preventive measures effective against all such security threats. The techniques used by cyber criminals change frequently, may not be recognized until launched, and can originate from a wide variety of sources, including outside groups such as external service providers, organized crime affiliates, terrorist organizations or hostile foreign governments or agencies. Our information technology and other internal infrastructure systems, including corporate firewalls, servers, leased lines and connection to the Internet, face the risk of systemic failure that could disrupt our operations. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Likewise, we rely on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates or any future product candidates and to conduct clinical trials, and similar events relating to their computer systems could also have a material adverse effect on our business.
To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate use, disclosure of or access to confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability, our competitive position could be harmed and the further development and commercialization of our product candidates or any future product candidates could be hindered or delayed. If we were to experience a significant cybersecurity breach of our information systems or data, the costs associated with the investigation, remediation and potential notification of the breach to counterparties, data subjects, regulators or others could be material. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful. Moreover, if the information technology systems of our vendors, CROs, collaborators or other contractors or consultants become subject to disruptions or security breaches, we may have insufficient recourse against such third parties and we may have to expend significant resources to mitigate the impact of such an event, and to develop and implement protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology and cybersecurity infrastructure, we could suffer significant business disruption, including transaction errors, supply chain or manufacturing interruptions, processing inefficiencies, data loss or the loss of or damage to intellectual property or other proprietary information. Furthermore, any such event that leads to unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of personal information, including personal information regarding clinical trial participants or employees, could harm our reputation, compel us to comply with federal and/or state breach notification laws and foreign law equivalents, cause us to breach our contractual obligations, subject us to mandatory corrective action, and otherwise subject us to liability under laws, regulations and contracts that protect the privacy and security of personal information, which could result in significant legal and financial exposure and reputational damages. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to incur significant additional expenses in order to enhance our protective measures or to remediate any information security vulnerability.
The financial exposure from the events referenced above could either not be insured against or not be fully covered through any insurance that we maintain. There can be no assurance that the limitations of liability in our contracts would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages as a result of the events referenced above.
| 24 |
Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Securities
The prices of our ordinary shares may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could result in substantial losses for holders of our ordinary shares.
The market price of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market may be volatile and fluctuate substantially. The stock market in general and the market for smaller pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, holders of our ordinary shares may not be able to sell their ordinary shares at or above the price at which they were purchased. The market price for ordinary shares may be influenced by many factors, including:
| ● | the success of competitive products or technologies; | |
| ● | results of clinical trials of urcosimod, OK-201 and any other future product candidate that we develop; | |
| ● | results of clinical trials of product candidates of our competitors; | |
| ● | changes or developments in laws or regulations applicable to urcosimod, OK-201 and any other future product candidates that we develop; | |
| ● | our entry into, and the success of, any collaboration agreements with third parties; | |
| ● | developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights; | |
| ● | the recruitment or departure of key personnel; | |
| ● | the level of expenses related to any of our product candidates or clinical development programs; | |
| ● | the results of our efforts to discover, develop, acquire or in-license additional product candidates, products or technologies; | |
| ● | actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts; | |
| ● | variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us; | |
| ● | market conditions in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors; | |
| ● | general economic, industry and market conditions; | |
| ● | the trading volume of our ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market; and | |
| ● | the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section |
| 25 |
The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights typically offered to shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
We are incorporated under the laws of Guernsey. The rights of holders of ordinary shares and, therefore, certain of the rights of any potential future holders of our ordinary shares, are governed by the laws of Guernsey, including the provisions of the Companies Law (Guernsey) 2008, and by our Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation, or Articles. These rights differ in certain respects from the rights of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. See “Description of Share Capital and Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation —-Differences in Corporate Law” in this report for a description of the principal differences between the provisions of the Guernsey Companies Law applicable to us and, for example, the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to stockholders’ rights and protections.
If we engage in future acquisitions or strategic partnerships, this may increase our capital requirements, dilute our shareholders, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities and subject us to other risks.
We intend to continue to evaluate various acquisitions and strategic partnerships, including licensing or acquiring complementary drugs, intellectual property rights, technologies or businesses. Any potential acquisition or strategic partnership may entail numerous risks, including:
| ● | increased operating expenses and cash requirements; | |
| ● | the assumption of additional indebtedness or contingent liabilities; | |
| ● | assimilation of operations, intellectual property and drugs of an acquired company, including difficulties associated with integrating new personnel; | |
| ● | the diversion of our management’s attention from our existing drug programs and initiatives in pursuing such a strategic partnership, merger or acquisition; | |
| ● | retention of key employees, the loss of key personnel and uncertainties in our ability to maintain key business relationships; | |
| ● | risks and uncertainties associated with the other party to such a transaction, including the prospects of that party and their existing drugs or drug candidates and regulatory approvals; and | |
| ● | our inability to generate revenue from acquired technology and/or drugs sufficient to meet our objectives in undertaking the acquisition or even to offset the associated acquisition and maintenance costs. |
| 26 |
As a Foreign Private Issuer (‘FPI’), we are exempt from a number of rules under the U.S. securities laws and are permitted to file less information with the SEC than U.S. public companies.
We are an FPI, as defined in the SEC rules and regulations and, consequently, we are not subject to all of the disclosure requirements applicable to companies organized within the United States. For example, we are exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act, that regulate disclosure obligations and procedural requirements related to the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations applicable to a security registered under the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers and directors are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our securities. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. public companies. We are also not required to file financial statements prepared in U.S. GAAP, to comply with Regulation FD and the proxy rules. Accordingly, there may be less publicly available information concerning our company than there is for U.S. public companies.
As an FPI, we will file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the close of each fiscal year ended March 31 and reports on Form 6-K relating to certain material events promptly after we publicly announce these events. However, because of the above exemptions for FPIs, our ordinary share holders will not be afforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies organized in the United States.
While we are an FPI, we are not subject to certain NASDAQ corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. listed companies.
We are entitled to rely on a provision in NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules that allows us to follow the laws of Guernsey with regard to certain aspects of corporate governance. This allows us to follow certain corporate governance practices that differ in significant respects from the corporate governance requirements applicable to U.S. companies listed on NASDAQ.
For example, we have elected to rely on the exemption allowing us to follow the laws of Guernsey instead of NASDAQ regulations that require a listed U.S. company to (i) have a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (ii) require non-management directors to meet on a regular basis without management present and (iii) promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers that should address certain specified items.
In accordance with our NASDAQ listing, our audit, risk and disclosure committee are required to comply with the provisions of Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, both of which are also applicable to NASDAQ-listed U.S. companies. Because we have elected to rely on the exemption allowing us to follow the laws of Guernsey, however, our audit, risk and disclosure committee is not subject to additional NASDAQ requirements applicable to listed U.S. companies, including an affirmative determination that all members of the audit, risk and disclosure committee are “independent,” using more stringent criteria than those applicable to us as an FPI. Furthermore, NASDAQ’s corporate governance rules require listed U.S. companies to, among other things, seek shareholder approval for the implementation of certain equity compensation plans and issuances of ordinary shares, however as an FPI, we may elect to follow the rules applicable to companies admitted to listing on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange in lieu of these NASDAQ requirements.
We may lose our FPI status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses.
As an FPI, we are not required to comply with all of the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. We may no longer be an FPI as early as September 30, 2025 (the end of our second fiscal quarter in the fiscal year following this filing), which would require us to comply with all of the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers as of March 31, 2026. In order to maintain our current status as an FPI, either (a) a majority of our outstanding voting securities must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States or (b)(i) a majority of our executive officers or directors cannot be U.S. citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50% of our assets must be located outside the United States and (iii) our business must be administered principally outside the United States. If we lose our status as an FPI, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for FPIs. We may also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in accordance with various SEC and NASDAQ rules. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher than the cost we would incur as an FPI. As a result, we expect that a loss of FPI status would increase our legal and financial compliance costs and is likely to make some activities highly time consuming and costly. We also expect that if we were required to comply with the rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, it would make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors.
| 27 |
We are an emerging growth company (EGC) within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, and will take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.
We are an EGC, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, 2012). For as long as we continue to be an EGC, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not EGCs, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As an EGC, we are required to report only two years of financial results and selected financial data compared to three and five years, respectively, for comparable data reported by other public companies. We may take advantage of these exemptions until we are no longer an EGC. We could be an EGC for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the aggregate market value of our ordinary shares s held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any September 30 (the end of our second fiscal quarter) before that time, in which case we would no longer be an EGC as of the following March 31 (our fiscal year-end). We cannot predict if investors will find our ordinary shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our ordinary shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our ordinary shares and the price of our ordinary shares may be more volatile in the event that we decide to make an offering of our ordinary shares.
If we fail to establish and maintain proper internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404(a), requires that beginning with our second annual report following our IPO, management assesses and report annually on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Although Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404(b), requires our independent registered public accounting firm to issue an annual report that addresses the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we have opted to rely on the exemptions provided in the JOBS Act, and consequently will not be required to comply with SEC rules that implement Section 404(b) until such time as we are no longer an EGC.
Pursuant to Section 404, we will be required to furnish a report by our senior management on our internal control over financial reporting. However, while we remain an EGC, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To prepare for eventual compliance with Section 404, once we no longer qualify as an EGC, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. The presence of material weaknesses could result in financial statement errors which, in turn, could lead to errors in our financial reports, delays in our financial reporting, which could require us to restate our operating results or our auditors may be required to issue a qualified audit report. We might not identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal controls in connection with evaluating our compliance with Section 404 (a). In order to establish, maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we will need to expend significant resources and provide significant management oversight.
Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal control may require specific compliance training of our directors and employees, entail substantial costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, take a significant period of time to complete and divert management’s attention from other business concerns. These changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal control.
If either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting or, at the appropriate time, our independent auditors are unwilling or unable to provide us with an unqualified report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as required by Section 404(b), then in the event we have decided to make an offering of our ordinary shares, investors may lose confidence in our operating results, the price of our ordinary shares could decline and we may be subject to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. In addition, if we are unable to meet the requirements of Section 404, we may not be able to remain listed on NASDAQ.
| 28 |
We will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a company that publicly listed on NASDAQ in the United States, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a U.S. public company, and particularly after we no longer qualify as an EGC, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur previously. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 1987, the listing requirements of NASDAQ and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on non-U.S. reporting public companies, including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our senior management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives.
Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which in turn could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified senior management personnel or members for our board of directors.
However, these rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.
Pursuant to Section 404, we will be required to furnish a report by our senior management on our internal control over financial reporting. However, while we remain an EGC, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To prepare for eventual compliance with Section 404, which is required once we no longer qualify as an EGC, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that we will not be able to conclude, within the prescribed timeframe or at all, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404. If we identify one or more material weaknesses, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.
| 29 |
Claims of U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us.
We are incorporated under the laws of Guernsey. Certain members of our board of directors and senior management are not residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible to serve process on such persons or us in the United States or to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts against them or us based on civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts against them or us, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.
See “Description of Share Capital and Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation—Enforcement of Civil Liabilities.” Additionally, it may be difficult to assert securities law claims in actions originally instituted outside of the United States. Foreign courts may refuse to hear a securities law claim because foreign courts may not be the most appropriate forum in which to bring such a claim. Even if a foreign court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that the law of the jurisdiction in which the foreign court resides, and not U.S. law, is applicable to the claim. Further, if U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact, which can be a time-consuming and costly process, and certain matters of procedure would still be governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the foreign court resides.
The rights afforded to shareholders are governed by Guernsey law. Not all rights available to shareholders under English law or U.S. law will be available to shareholders.
The rights afforded to shareholders will be governed by Guernsey law and by our Articles, and these rights differ in certain respects from the rights of shareholders in typical English companies and U.S. corporations. In particular, Guernsey law significantly limits the circumstances under which shareholders of companies may bring derivative actions and, in most cases, only the corporation may be the proper claimant or plaintiff for the purposes of maintaining proceedings in respect of any wrongful act committed against it. Neither an individual nor any group of shareholders has any right of action in such circumstances. In addition, Guernsey law does not afford appraisal rights to dissenting shareholders in the form typically available to shareholders of a U.S. corporation.
The insolvency laws of Guernsey and other jurisdictions may not be as favorable to you as the U.S. bankruptcy laws.
We are incorporated under the laws of Guernsey. In the event of a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar event, proceedings could be initiated in Guernsey or another relevant jurisdiction. The bankruptcy, insolvency, administrative and other laws of our and our subsidiaries’ jurisdictions of organization or incorporation may be materially different from, or in conflict with, each other and those of the United States, including in the areas of rights of creditors, shareholders, priority of governmental and other creditors and duration of the proceeding. The application of these laws, or any conflict among them, could call into question whether any particular jurisdiction’s law should apply, adversely affecting your ability to enforce your rights under the ordinary shares in those jurisdictions or limit any amounts that you may receive.
If we are a passive foreign investment company (‘PFIC’), there could be adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Internal Revenue Code, we will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which (1) 75% or more of our gross income consists of passive income or (2) 50% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. For purposes of these tests, passive income includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and certain rents and royalties. In addition, for purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets and received directly its proportionate share of the income of such other corporation. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined below under “Certain U.S. and Guernsey Tax Considerations-Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders”) holds our shares, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse tax consequences regardless of whether we continue to qualify as a PFIC, including ineligibility for any preferred tax rates on capital gains or on actual or deemed dividends, interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred, and additional reporting requirements.
| 30 |
We do not believe that we were a PFIC for our taxable year ended March 31, 2025 but cannot provide any assurances regarding our PFIC status for any past, current or future taxable years. The determination of whether we are a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis applying principles and methodologies which in some circumstances are unclear and subject to varying interpretation. In particular, the characterization of our assets as active or passive may depend in part on our current and intended future business plans, which are subject to change. In addition, for our current and future taxable years, the total value of our assets for PFIC testing purposes may be determined in part by reference to the market price of our ordinary shares from time to time, which may fluctuate considerably. Under the income test, our status as a PFIC depends on the composition of our income which will depend on the transactions we enter into in the future and our corporate structure. The composition of our income and assets is also affected by how, and how quickly, we spend the cash we raise in any offering.
In certain circumstances, a U.S. Holder of shares in a PFIC may alleviate some of the adverse tax consequences described above by making, where available, a qualified electing fund, or QEF, election to include in income its pro rata share of the corporation’s income on a current basis or a mark-to-market election. A U.S. Holder may make a QEF election with respect to our ordinary shares only if we agree to furnish such U.S. Holder annually with a PFIC annual information statement as specified in the applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations.
For further discussion of the PFIC rules and the adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences in the event we are classified as a PFIC, see the section of this report entitled “Certain U.S. and Guernsey Tax Considerations-Material U.S. Federal Income Considerations for U.S. Holders.”
A change in our tax residence could have a negative effect on our future profitability.
Although we are incorporated under the laws of Guernsey, our affairs are, and are intended to continue to be, managed and controlled in the United Kingdom for tax purposes and therefore we are resident in the United Kingdom for U.K. and Guernsey tax purposes. It is possible that in the future, whether as a result of a change in law or the practice of any relevant tax authorities or as a result of any change in the conduct of our affairs or for any other reason, we could become, or be regarded as having become, a resident in a jurisdiction other than the United Kingdom. If we cease to be a U.K. tax resident, we may be subject to a charge to U.K. corporation tax on chargeable gains on our assets and to unexpected tax charges in other jurisdictions on our income. Similarly, if the tax residency of any of our subsidiaries were to change from their current jurisdiction for any of the reasons listed above, we may be subject to a charge to local capital gains tax on the assets.
We may be unable to use net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certain built-in losses to reduce future tax payments or benefit from favorable U.K. tax legislation.
As a U.K. resident trading entity, we are subject to U.K. corporate taxation. Due to the nature of our business, we have generated losses since inception. As of March 31, 2025, we had cumulative carryforward tax losses of $35,852,225. Subject to any relevant restrictions, we expect these to be available to carry forward and offset against future operating profits. As a company that carries out extensive research and development activities, we benefit from the U.K. research and development tax credit regime for small and medium-sized companies, whereby we are able to surrender the trading losses that arise from our qualifying research and development activities for a payable tax credit of up to 33.35% of eligible research and development expenditures. Qualifying expenditures largely comprise employment costs for research staff, consumables and certain internal overhead costs incurred as part of research projects. Certain subcontracted qualifying research expenditures are eligible for a cash rebate of up to 21.67%. The majority of our pipeline research, clinical trials management and manufacturing development activities are eligible for inclusion within these tax credit cash rebate claims. Our ability to continue to claim payable research and development tax credits in the future may be limited because we may no longer qualify as a small or medium-sized company.
| 31 |
We may benefit in the future from the United Kingdom’s “patent box” regime, which allows certain profits attributable to revenues from patented products to be taxed at an effective rate of 10%. We are the exclusive licensee or owner of several patent applications which, if issued, would cover our product candidates, and accordingly, future upfront fees, milestone fees, product revenues and royalties could be taxed at this tax rate. When taken in combination with the enhanced relief available on our research and development expenditures, we expect a long-term lower rate of corporation tax to apply to us. If, however, there are unexpected adverse changes to the U.K. research and development tax credit regime or the “patent box” regime, or for any reason we are unable to qualify for such advantageous tax legislation, or we are unable to use net operating loss and tax credit.
Changes and uncertainties in the tax system in the countries in which we have operations could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and reduce net returns to our shareholders.
Our tax position could be adversely impacted by changes in tax rates, tax laws, tax practice, tax treaties or tax regulations or changes in the interpretation thereof by the tax authorities in the United Kingdom, the United States and other jurisdictions as well as being affected by certain changes currently proposed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and their action plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Such changes may become more likely as a result of recent economic trends in the jurisdictions in which we operate, particularly if such trends continue.
Our actual effective tax rate may vary from our expectation and that variance may be material. A number of factors may increase our future effective tax rates, including: (1) the jurisdictions in which profits are determined to be earned and taxed; (2) the resolution of issues arising from any future tax audits with various tax authorities; (3) changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities; (4) increases in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, including transaction costs and impairments of goodwill in connection with acquisitions; (5) changes in the taxation of share-based compensation; (6) changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, and changes in generally accepted accounting principles; and (7) challenges to the transfer pricing policies related to our structure.
A tax authority may disagree with tax positions that we have taken, which could result in increased tax liabilities. For example, Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, or HMRC, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, or another tax authority could challenge our allocation of income by tax jurisdiction and the amounts paid between our affiliated companies pursuant to our intercompany arrangements and transfer pricing policies, including methodologies for valuing developed technology and amounts paid with respect to our intellectual property development. Similarly, a tax authority could assert that we are subject to tax in a jurisdiction where we believe we have not established a taxable connection, often referred to as a “permanent establishment” under international tax treaties, and such an assertion, if successful, could increase our expected tax liability in one or more jurisdictions.
A tax authority may take the position that material income tax liabilities, interest and penalties are payable by us, for example where there has been a technical violation of contradictory laws and regulations that are relatively new and have not been subject to extensive review or interpretation, in which case we expect that we might contest such assessment. High-profile companies can be particularly vulnerable to aggressive application of unclear requirements. Many companies must negotiate their tax bills with tax inspectors who may demand higher taxes than applicable law appears to provide. Contesting such an assessment may be lengthy and costly and if we were unsuccessful in disputing the assessment, the implications could increase our anticipated effective tax rate, where applicable.
Risks Related to Our Reliance on Third Parties
We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates.
We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third parties, including independent clinical investigators and third-party CROs, to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials and to monitor and manage data for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. In engaging these third parties, we typically have to, and expect to have to, negotiate budgets and contracts, which may result in delays to our development timelines and increases costs. Additionally, there is a limited number of qualified third-party service providers that specialize or have the expertise required to achieve our business objectives, and so it may be challenging to find alternative investigators or CROs, or do so on commercially reasonable terms. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our reliance on these third parties does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our third-party contractors and CROs are required to comply with GCP requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Economic Area and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for all our product candidates in clinical development. Regulatory authorities enforce these GCP requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. If we fail to exercise adequate oversight over any of our CROs or if we or any of our CROs fail to comply with applicable GCP requirements, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon a regulatory inspection of us or our CROs or other third parties performing services in connection with our clinical trials, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials complies with GCP regulations. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with product produced under applicable cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
| 32 |
Further, these investigators and CROs are not our employees, and we will not be able to control, other than by contract, the amount of resources, including time, which they devote to our product candidates and clinical trials. If independent investigators or CROs fail to devote sufficient resources to the development of our product candidates, or if their performance is substandard, it may delay or compromise the prospects for approval and commercialization of our product candidates. These investigators and CROs may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical studies or other drug development activities, which could affect their performance on our behalf. In addition, the use of third-party service providers requires us to disclose our proprietary information to these parties, which increases the risk that a competitor will discover them or that this information will be misappropriated or disclosed.
If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our results of operations and commercial prospects would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.
Repeating clinical trials or switching or engaging additional CROs involves additional cost and requires our management’s time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a clinical trial has to be repeated or when a new CRO commences work. As a result, delays could occur, which could materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines.
Our reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.
We have engaged CROs specializing in ophthalmic drug development, to prepare and support the IND filing, and we must, at times, share our proprietary technology and confidential information, including trade secrets, with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, collaborative research agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our collaborators, advisors, employees and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor’s discovery of our proprietary technology and confidential information or other unauthorized use or disclosure of such technology or information would impair our competitive position and may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Despite our efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of these agreements, independent development or publication of information including our trade secrets by third parties. A competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
| 33 |
We utilize, and expect to continue to utilize, third parties to conduct our product manufacturing for the foreseeable future, and these third parties may not perform satisfactorily.
We will rely on contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) for the manufacturing of clinical batches and intend to continue to rely on third parties to manufacture our preclinical study and clinical trial product supplies. If our current CMOs, or any future third-party manufacturers, do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or manufacture our product candidates in accordance with regulatory requirements, or if there are disagreements between us and our CMOs or any future third-party manufacturers, we will not be able to complete, or may be delayed in completing, the preclinical studies required to support future investigational new drug, or IND, submissions and the clinical trials required for approval of our product candidates.
In addition to our current CMOs, we may rely on additional third parties to manufacture ingredients of our product candidates in the future and to perform quality testing, and reliance on these third parties entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured the product candidates ourselves, including:
| ● | reduced control for certain aspects of manufacturing activities; | |
| ● | termination or nonrenewal of manufacturing and service agreements with third parties in a manner or at a time that is costly or damaging to us; and | |
| ● | disruptions to the operations of our third-party manufacturers and service providers caused by conditions unrelated to our business or operations, including the bankruptcy of the manufacturer or service provider. |
Any of these events could lead to clinical trial delays or failure to obtain regulatory approval or impact our ability to successfully commercialize any of our product candidates. Some of these events could be the basis for FDA, EMA or other regulatory authority action, including injunction, recall, seizure or total or partial suspension of product manufacture.
Any contamination in our manufacturing process, shortages of raw materials or failure of any of our key suppliers to deliver necessary components could result in delays in our clinical development or marketing schedules.
Given the complex nature of formulating, manufacturing and packaging of clinical drugs, there is a risk of contamination. Any contamination could adversely affect our ability to produce product candidates on schedule and could, therefore, harm our results of operations and cause reputational damage. In addition, some of the raw materials required in our manufacturing process are derived from biologic sources and are difficult to procure and may be subject to contamination or recall. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of outside agents or other contaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of a product candidate that may not be detectable in final product testing. A material shortage, contamination, recall or restriction on the use of certain chemical substances in the manufacture of our product candidates could adversely impact or disrupt the commercial manufacturing or the production of clinical material, which could adversely affect our development timelines and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
To the extent we rely on a third-party manufacturing facility for commercial supply, that third party will be subject to significant regulatory oversight with respect to manufacturing our product candidates.
The preparation of therapeutics for clinical trials or commercial sale is subject to extensive regulation. Components of a finished therapeutic product approved for commercial sale or used in late-stage clinical trials must be manufactured in accordance with cGMP requirements. These regulations govern manufacturing processes and procedures, including record keeping, and the implementation and operation of quality systems to control and assure the quality of investigational products and products approved for sale. To the extent that we utilize third-party facilities for commercial supply, the third party’s facilities and quality systems must pass an inspection for compliance with the applicable regulations as a condition of regulatory approval. In addition, the regulatory authorities may, at any time, audit or inspect the third-party manufacturing facility or the associated quality systems for compliance with the regulations applicable to the activities being conducted. If, for example, these facilities do not pass a plant inspection, the FDA will not approve the applicable New Drug Application (‘NDA’) or biologics license application, or BLA.
We do not directly control the manufacturing of, and are completely dependent on, our CMOs for compliance with cGMP requirements. If our CMOs cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no direct control over the ability of our CMOs to maintain adequate quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel. Furthermore, all of our CMOs are engaged with other companies to supply and/or manufacture materials or products for such companies, which exposes our CMOs to regulatory risks for the production of such materials and products. As a result, failure to meet the regulatory requirements for the production of those materials and products may generally affect the regulatory clearance of our CMOs’ facilities. Our failure, or the failure of third parties, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including clinical holds, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our products and product candidates.
Our potential future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to commercialize any products that receive regulatory approval on a timely and competitive basis.
ITEM 4: INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. History and Development of the Company
We were originally incorporated in the British Virgin Islands as a British Virgin Islands Business Company on July 4, 2007 under the BVI Business Companies Act 2004 with company number 1415559 under the name Jellon Enterprises, Inc. Our legal and commercial name was changed to Minor Metals & Mining, Inc. on October 24, 2007, to Emerging Metals Limited on November 28, 2007, to West African Minerals Corporation on December 9, 2011, and to OKYO Pharma Corporation on January 10, 2018. On March 9, 2018, shareholders approved the cancellation of our AIM listing and migration to Guernsey. On July 3, 2018, following the approval of the Guernsey Companies Registry, we were registered under the Guernsey Companies Law under the name OKYO Pharma Limited, as a Guernsey company with limited liability, an indefinite life and company number 65220. We are domiciled in Guernsey. On July 17, 2018, our Ordinary Shares were admitted to listing on the standard segment of the Official List of the FCA and admitted to trading on the standard listing of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange, until May 22, 2023. From May 22, 2023, the principal trading market for our ordinary shares has been the NASDAQ Capital Market.
Our registered office is located at Martello Court, Admiral Park, St. Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 3HB and our telephone number is +44 (0) 20 7495 2379. Our website address is www.okyopharma.com. The reference to our website is an inactive textual reference only and the information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this annual report. Our agent for service of process in the United States is OKYO Pharma US, Inc.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as us, that file electronically, with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
| 34 |
B. Business Overview
Overview
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing next-generation therapeutics to improve the lives of patients suffering from inflammatory eye diseases and ocular pain. Our research program focuses on a novel G Protein-Coupled Receptor, or GPCR, which we believe plays a key role in the pathology of specific ocular eye diseases of high unmet medical need. Our therapeutic approach involves targeting a specific member of this class of GPCR receptors called CMKLR1 (or ChemR23) that is involved in the inflammatory and pain modulation pathways that drive these conditions. Our lead clinical product candidate, urcosimod (formerly called OK-101), is a lipidated peptide (See Figure 1) designed to specifically bind to ChemR23 and block its role in producing ocular pain and inflammation.
FIGURE 1:
We initiated clinical studies of urcosimod with the treatment of dry-eye disease (DED) and have more recently been focusing our clinical program on urcosimod to treat neuropathic corneal pain (NCP), a major unmet medical need.
Importantly, we were pleased to announce on February 12, 2025, that our lead drug candidate, OK-101, was officially assigned the United States Adopted Name (USAN) “urcosimod”. Consequently, all press releases after the date of February 12, 2025 contain the new drug name “urcosimod” instead of OK-101 in the body of the text, with the alert to the reader of this change by inserting the wording “urcosimod (formerly called OK-101)” in the beginning paragraph of all press releases after February 12, 2025. The text in this annual report will cover those earlier press releases that were released using the initial name of OK-101, along with the later press releases using the urcosimod name.
On February 21, 2018, we announced that we successfully obtained (via assignment from Biovitas Limited, a related party) a license from OTT to patents owned or controlled by OTT and a sub-license from OTT to certain patents licensed by OTT from TMC to support our ophthalmic disease drug programs. These licenses gave us the right to exploit the IP estate covering urcosimod (formerly called OK-101) which is directed to compositions-of-matter plus methodologies for treating ocular inflammation, DED, utilizing chemerin or lipid-linked chemerin analogues such as urcosimod.
We also have a license from TMC to a separate IP estate for treating symptoms of ocular neuropathic pain, uveitis and associated pain. The scope of our use of the TMC IP, granted to us through the sublicense with OTT, is commensurate with the scope of use of the IP granted to OTT from TMC. This intellectual property forms the basis of our urcosimod program, which is discussed in greater detail below.
| 35 |
URCOSIMOD
Urcosimod, our lead clinical product candidate (See Figure 2), was initially focused on keratoconjunctivitis sicca, commonly referred to as DED, which is a multifactorial disease caused by an underlying inflammation resulting in the lack of lubrication and moisture in the surface of the eye. DED is one of the most common ophthalmic conditions encountered in clinical practice. Symptoms of DED include constant discomfort and irritation accompanied by inflammation of the ocular surface, visual impairment and potential damage to the ocular surface. There are presently approximately 38 million people suffering from DED in the U.S. alone (Farrand et al. AJO 2017; 182:90; Market Scope 2023 Dry Eye Product Market Review), with the disease affecting approximately up to 34% of the population aged 50+ (Dana et al. AJO 2019; 202:47), and with women representing approximately two-thirds of those affected (Matossian et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 28:502–514.
Figure 2:
The clinical development of urcosimod to treat DED included a successful initial phase 2 trial of urcosimod in 240 DED patients (See section below regarding urcosimod to treat DED) which showed statistically significant improvement in ocular pain as measured by a visual analog scale (VAS score) that was durable throughout the trial with p values = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01 at Days 29, 57 and 85, respectively. Clinical data from this DED trial was the basis for our decision in mid-2024 to focus further development of urcosimod to treat NCP.
Urcosimod to Treat Neuropathic Corneal Pain (NCP)
Neuropathic corneal pain (NCP) is a debilitating condition characterized by persistent, severe eye pain caused by nerve damage, impacting a significant number of patients worldwide. NCP has remained a challenging condition to treat since there are no FDA approved topical drugs available to treat this condition. Current treatments for neuropathic corneal pain are limited to short term NSAIDs, steroids, gabapentin, and opioids in severe cases. Neuropathic pain occurs through changes in both peripheral and central neurons leading to allodynia and hyperalgesia. Peripheral sensitization from the inflammatory cytokines during and after ocular surface injury alters responsiveness of peripheral sensory neurons, which initiates complex neuroinflammatory and electrophysiological signaling in the central nervous system that amplify the pain signaling. Urcosimod aims to address this urgent medical need with its innovative approach.
Urcosimod, our novel, non-opioid therapeutic candidate, is designed to target and alleviate the debilitating pain associated with corneal nerve damage, a condition for which there are currently no FDA approved treatments. Neuropathic corneal pain, often resulting from conditions like dry eye disease, surgery, or infections, can severely impact a patient’s quality of life, with current management options limited to pain relief strategies that offer only partial or temporary respite.
The chemerin receptor (ChemR23) that urcosimod targets to produce its anti-inflammatory activity is not only expressed on select populations of immune cells, but is now believed to be expressed, as well, on neurons and glial cells in the dorsal root ganglion, spinal cord, and retina.
In a separate set of animal model experiments, we evaluated the pain-reducing activity of urcosimod in a ciliary nerve ligation mouse model of corneal neuropathic pain. In collaboration with Pedram Hamrah, MD, Professor of Ophthalmology, an internationally recognized cornea specialist, and clinician-scientist at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, we previously demonstrated that urcosimod suppresses corneal neuropathic pain in a mouse model of ciliary nerve ligation developed in Dr. Hamrah’s laboratory. urcosimod was topically administered to mice in comparison to the positive control gabapentin which was administered via intraperitoneal injection. Pain relief was evaluated by an eye-wipe count, and urcosimod was shown to reduce corneal pain similar to that of gabapentin, a commonly used anticonvulsant oral drug typically used to treat neuropathic pain for conditions such as shingles and other systemic nerve pain disorders. Notably, the drug concentration of urcosimod used in this study was identical to that used in mouse models of DED that demonstrated ocular anti-inflammatory activity. Urcosimod had no neurotoxic effect and did not affect the corneal epithelial integrity.
Based on the success of the animal model experiments, we concluded that urcosimod has the potential to address both the increased inflammatory cytokines resulting from tear film imbalance as well as heightened neurosensory abnormalities through peripheral corneal nerve damage. Consequently, we believe that urcosimod has the potential to treat neuropathic corneal pain.
| 36 |
On July 28, 2023, we announced an agreement with Tufts Medical Center to conduct a 40-patient open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of urcosimod in subjects with neuropathic corneal pain (“NCP”). The Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application for NCP was planned to be filed in Q4 of 2023, with study enrollment planned to commence after IND allowance by the FDA.
On October 9, 2023, we announced the filing of the IND with the FDA for the development of urcosimod to treat NCP. The NCP trial, designed as a single-center trial, was planned to be conducted at Tufts Medical Center with Professor Pedram Hamrah, MD, a leading expert in NCP, serving as Principal Investigator of the study. The trial, once started, was anticipated to take 6-9 months to conduct, and was anticipated to have a minor budgetary impact, with a total cost for the trial, including cost of drug manufacture and formulation, amounting to under $2 million.
On February 9, 2024, we announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had cleared urcosimod as its first Investigational New Drug (IND) application for the treatment of NCP. Notably, our initial IND submission to FDA proposed an open-label design for the clinical trial. Based on positive feedback from FDA, the Phase 2 study was now altered to be a single-center, double-masked, randomized, 12-week placebo-controlled trial comparing urcosimod to placebo in NCP patients. A total of 48 patients were planned for the study, with NCP disease confirmed via confocal microscopy. The primary endpoint was designated to be the measure of VAS pain relief scores. These protocol changes would thus enable a statistically valid demonstration of a true drug effect of urcosimod on NCP symptoms.
On October 23, 2024, we announced that the first patient had been dosed in the Phase 2 trial of topical ocular urcosimod to treat NCP. The Phase 2 study is designed as a double-masked, randomized, 12-week placebo-controlled trial in NCP patients. A total of 48 patients were planned to enroll for the study, with NCP disease confirmed via confocal microscopy. The urcosimod trial is designed as a single-center trial and is being led by Pedram Hamrah, MD, of Tufts Medical Center, as Principal Investigator. Dr. Hamrah is Professor and Vice Chair of Research and Academic Programs, and Director of the Center for Translational Ocular Immunology at Tufts Medical Center. He is one of the world’s foremost experts on NCP and treats patients with ocular pain from across the United States and worldwide.
On February 12, 2025, we announced that our lead drug candidate, OK-101, was officially assigned the United States Adopted Name (USAN) “urcosimod”. The USAN suffix “-mod” in urcosimod denotes its classification as a modulator of key inflammatory and neuropathic pathways, critical to addressing ocular conditions such as neuropathic corneal pain (NCP) and dry eye disease (DED). The USAN program, jointly managed by the American Medical Association (AMA), the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), and the American Pharmacists Association (AphA), assigns unique nonproprietary names to pharmaceutical substances to ensure clarity in medical communication.
On March 31, 2025, we announced successfully establishing that urcosimod has been shown to be stable for over two and a half years in single-use ampoules used for administration of the drug to patients. Commercial marketing of ophthalmic drugs for ocular conditions which typically utilizes small plastic bottles has seen an increasing utilization of single-use ampoules by patients for ocular conditions such as DED, for ease of use, and for minimizing concerns regarding potential loss of sterility with use of plastic bottles for daily administration of drug over extended periods of weeks and months.
On April 30, 2025, we announced plans to accelerate the clinical development of urcosimod to treat NCP through the analysis of its data following an early closure of the Phase 2 trial. This Phase 2 trial of urcosimod to treat NCP was being conducted at a single trial site at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, MA. The decision to close the trial with 17 patients having presently completed the study was due to our strong desire to immediately interrogate the currently masked data by unmasking the data set. We announced that analysis of the data from these patients, with the closing of this trial, should take no longer than 6 weeks. This decision to close the trial would also enable us to significantly cut the time to our requesting an end-of-phase 2 meeting with FDA to cover plans for the drug’s further clinical development. Notably, a number of patients who completed the trial requested compassionate use of urcosimod which we are seeking to arrange with Tufts Medical Center, subject to the necessary FDA consents.
On May 1, 2025, we announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted Fast Track designation to urcosimod for the treatment of neuropathic corneal pain (NCP). Fast Track designation by the FDA is granted to facilitate the development and expedite the review of therapies that aim to treat serious conditions and fulfill unmet medical needs. This designation is intended to accelerate the availability of new treatments to patients, providing earlier access to potentially beneficial therapies. The Fast Track designation provides several key benefits, including more frequent meetings with the FDA to discuss the drug’s development plan, eligibility for Accelerated Approval and Priority Review if relevant criteria are met, and a potential Rolling Review of the New Drug Application (NDA).
| 37 |
On July 16, 2025, we announced results from the 18-patient Phase 2 trial of urcosimod to treat NCP patients. This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 Proof-of-Concept trial of urcosimod to treat NCP was conducted at a single trial site at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, MA, with Pedram Hamrah, M.D., a leading expert in NCP, as Principal Investigator. An important point to remember regarding analysis of the data from the trial was that the trial was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked Phase 2 study, with 48 patients needed to power the trial for statistically significant p values in the study. With OKYO announcing in April (see April 30, 2025 paragraph above) the decision to stop the trial after 18 patients had completed the 3-month dosing regimen, the Company sacrificed expecting p values in the study in the interest of breaking the database code so that a determination could be immediately made in the unmasked database of whether the reduction in VAS scores was primarily attributable to patients on drug. This trial was thus an effort to demonstrate a drug effect for urcosimod to treat NCP. The additional advantage of this strategy was to save the roughly 6-8 months needed to enroll the remaining 30 patients in order to get to the major purpose of the trial – demonstrating urcosimod’s potential to benefit patients with NCP.
What follows is a description of the results from this Phase2 trial:
The Primary Objective of this Phase 2 trial was assessing the efficacy of the two doses of OK-101 (0.05% and 0.1%) in comparison to placebo in reducing symptoms of neuropathic corneal pain, as measured by the mean change from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores from Visit 1 (Day 0) through the end of treatment at Visit 4 (Week 12). The VAS scale used in the trial is a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.
The study enrolled 18 patients at a single site (Tufts Medical Center in Boston, MA) with 17 patients completing the study. One patient was withdrawn due to a medical reason not related to drug. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive topical delivery to the eye of 0.05% urcosimod, or 0.1% urcosimod, or placebo, four times daily for 12 weeks.
Top Line Data
For the per-protocol population, the change in mean pain score was 5.5 in the 0.05% urcosimod group (n = 4) and 2.75 in the placebo group (n =4), reflecting a 2.75 delta difference between drug and placebo following the 12-week treatment period. Notably, 75% of patients treated with 0.05% urcosimod in this group achieved greater than 80% improvement in pain severity based on VAS scores. Urcosimod (0.05%) demonstrated a marked reduction in pain scores as early as Week 4, with a mean change of 5.25 compared to 3.0 in placebo group. Moreover, for the 0.05% urcosimod group a statistically significant reduction in mean pain scores was observed from Visit 1 to the end of treatment Visit 4 (p-value = 0.025). The placebo group also showed a statistically significant improvement from baseline (Visit 1) to the final visit (Visit 4), with a p-value = 0.035. However, mean improvement seen in the placebo group was only half what was seen for the 0.05% urcosimod group (2.75 vs 5.5). Moreover, for the placebo group’s reduction from Visit 1 to the end of treatment Visit 4, 75% of those patients had only mild to borderline moderate NCP pain scores (0-4 on the scale of 0-10) at baseline. In contrast, all the patients in the 0.05% urcosimod group had moderate to severe NCP pain scores (5-9 on the scale of 0-10), indicating a more challenging baseline condition. While the between-group difference in the per-protocol population did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07), the 0.05% urcosimod group demonstrated a consistent numerical advantage over placebo. These results, alongside consistent trends observed across time points, strongly support continued evaluation of urcosimod for treatment of the NCP indication.
In the intent-to-treat population, 67% of patients in the 0.05% urcosimod group (n =6) demonstrated greater than 50% improvement in pain, as measured by VAS scores, compared to 33% in the placebo group (n = 6). The mean reduction in pain severity from baseline (Visit 1) to end of treatment (Visit 4), measured by VAS, was 4.2 in the 0.05% urcosimod group and 2.5 in the placebo group. The comparison between groups in this population yielded a p-value of 0.2 and therefore did not meet the threshold for statistical significance.
The drug-effect size of 0.05% urcosimod when compared to placebo at week 12, using Cohen-d demonstrated a strong treatment effect (Cohen-d value > 1.2). Cohen-d is a standard statistical measure used to assess and compare the effect size of the trial drug relative to the placebo.
In line with earlier findings from a previously conducted Phase 2 trial to evaluate urcosimod to treat dry eye disease, results from the 0.1% drug treatment group in this trial also showed less efficacy than the 0.05% drug treatment group.
That this observation has now been made in two independent trials is a compelling argument that this difference in efficacy observed for the 0.05% and 0.1% doses is real. The Company has an active effort underway to provide an explanation for this difference in efficacy. OKYO is also continuing to evaluate additional data from this trial and plans to present a larger data set from the study after ongoing analyses of the data have been completed.
Initial Studies with Urcosimod to Treat Dry Eye Disease (DED)
On May 2, 2023, we announced that the first patient has been screened for our Phase 2b, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of urcosimod (formerly called OK-101). Because the drug is designed to be administered topically, we were able to skip the standard Phase 1 studies typically expected with orally delivered or injectable drug candidates in non-life-threatening conditions and we opened the first trial with urcosimod as a Phase 2b clinical trial in DED patients. This trial was conducted in approximately 240 DED patients.
On June 6, 2023, we announced that patients in the ongoing phase 2b trial began dosing in the randomized portion of the phase 2b, multi-center, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of topical ocular urcosimod to treat DED, following the two-week placebo run-in period intended to minimize the placebo effect.
On September 8, 2023, we announced that we had completed full enrollment of patients in the randomized portion of the Phase 2b multi-center, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial of topical ocular urcosimod to treat DED. A total of 240 patients have been enrolled in this study.
On December 4, 2023, we announced the last patient of the ongoing 240-patient double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b clinical trial of urcosimod to treat DED had completed the 12-week urcosimod dosing study. In addition, data analysis plans for the trial had been finalized and submitted to FDA for feedback, in anticipation of the database lock, subsequent data analysis, and reporting of top-line findings on urcosimod.
On January 8, 2024, we announced urcosimod successfully achieved statistical significance for both sign and symptom endpoints in its first-in-human phase 2b trial of urcosimod in patients with DED. The double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial was conducted at six sites in the U.S. and enrolled 240 subjects with DED dosed twice-daily (BID). Patients were randomly divided into 3 cohorts, with one of the cohorts dosed with 0.05% urcosimod (n=81), a second with 0.1% urcosimod (n=80), and the third cohort with vehicle (n=79). The duration of a patient’s treatment was 14 weeks, including a 2-week run-in period on placebo, to exclude placebo responders from the study, followed by 12 weeks in the randomized portion of the study.
| ● | Statistically significant drug effects were observed in FDA-recognized efficacy endpoints as early as the 15-day first visit after dosing. urcosimod demonstrated superiority when compared to placebo across at least two symptoms of DED including burning measured by the Ora Calibra© 4-symptom questionnaire as well as burning/stinging measured by a visual analogue scale as early as Day 15 (p = 0.04 and p=0.03, respectively). |
| ● | A statistically significant improvement in blurred vision was also achieved at Day 29 (p = 0.01). Urcosimod also demonstrated superiority when compared to placebo in the sign endpoint of total conjunctival staining as measured by the Ora Calibra© Staining Scale as early as Day 29 (p = 0.034). |
| ● | Regarding the safety profile of the drug, urcosimod exhibited placebo-like tolerability with a very low adverse event profile and no drug-related severe ocular TEAEs were seen. Additionally, fewer subjects in the urcosimod treated arm discontinued study medication (2.5%) compared to discontinuations in the placebo treated patients (3.8%). |
On March 22, 2024, we announced additional key findings from analyses of the clinical data set from the 240 patient Phase 2, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of urcosimod ophthalmic solution in patients with DED.
| ● | We reported additional urcosimod (0.05%) data, including conjunctival staining measured at Day 85 (p=0.056) demonstrating durability in this sign endpoint. |
| ● | In addition, there were significant improvements in burning/stinging (p = 0.01, 0.006, 0.003 and 0.01 at Days 15, 29, 57 and 85, respectively) and in blurred vision (p = 0.09, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.06 at Days 15, 29, 57 and 85, respectively) which demonstrated sustained improvements throughout the trial. |
| ● | Additional data analyses also showed statistically significant improvement in ocular pain measured by VAS that was durable throughout the trial with p values = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01 at Days 29, 57 and 85, respectively. Furthermore, urcosimod improved tear film break-up time (TFBUT) as early as Day 15 and the improvement lasted throughout the trial with p values = 0.01, 0.05, 0.02, and 0.03 at Days 15, 29, 57 and 85, respectively. |
| ● | Moreover, data obtained from daily symptom diaries maintained by patients during the trial, commonly referred to as patient-reported outcome data, confirmed several of the DED symptoms also measured in the clinic, exhibiting significant improvements as early as Day 1 through Day 15 for pain, burning/stinging, eye dryness and itching, with p values of 0.01, 0.06, 0.005 and 0.009, respectively. |
The clinical data for urcosimod to treat DED was encouraging, however, the decision was made in mid-2024 to switch further clinical development of urcosimod to treat NCP, particularly due to the positive data observed in reduction of ocular pain in the DED trial, as well as the key realization that there is no FDA-approved drug to treat NCP as compared to seven approved drugs presently available on the market to treat DED.
| 38 |
OK-201
On August 6, 2019, we signed a collaborative agreement with Tufts Medical Center, Boston and Pedram Hamrah, MD, Professor of Ophthalmology at Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA to evaluate OKYO’s BAM8-22 analogues, including OK-201, as non-opioid analgesics to suppress corneal neuropathic pain using a mouse ocular pain model developed in Dr. Hamrah’s laboratory.
On April 28, 2021, we announced positive results of OK-201, a non-opioid analgesic drug candidate delivered topically in Dr. Hamrah’s mouse neuropathic corneal pain model, as a potential drug to treat acute and chronic ocular pain. Importantly, OK-201 demonstrated a reduced corneal pain response equivalent to that of gabapentin, a commonly used oral drug for neuropathic pain. These observations demonstrated preclinical ‘proof-of-concept’ for the topical administration of OK-201 as a potential non-opioid analgesic for ocular pain. Current treatments for corneal pain are limited to short term NSAIDs, steroids and oral gabapentin and opioids in severe cases.
Although the results with OK-201 were encouraging, due to subsequent success obtained with urcosimod (see section on urcosimod) in follow-on animal model studies utilizing the same mouse neuropathic corneal pain model as for OK-201, we have decided to maintain this drug candidate at the exploratory level while we focus our primary energy on the urcosimod program to treat DED and NCP, based on urcosimod’s combination of anti-inflammatory and ocular pain-reducing activities in animal models of these conditions.
Intellectual Property
We consider the protection of our proprietary technologies and products, as well as our ability to maintain patent protection that covers the composition of matter of our product candidates, their methods of use, and other related technologies and inventions, to be a critical element in the success of our business. As of June 30, 2025, our owned and licensed intellectual property included 8 issued patents and 15 pending patent applications in the U.S. and abroad.
Issued United States patent directed to lipidated chemerin fragments or analogs has a statutory expiration date of March 13, 2034, with potential patent term extension available until 2039, following the grant of marketing authorization. Issued United States patent directed to methods of using lipidated chemerin fragments or analogs for treating neuropathic pain has a statutory expiration date of March 13, 2034 (plus 187 days of patent term adjustment, or PTA), with potential patent term extension available until 2039, following the grant of marketing authorization. Issued United States patent directed to methods of using lipidated chemerin fragments or analogs for treating DED has a statutory expiration date of January 23, 2037, with potential patent term extension available until 2041, following the grant of marketing authorization. We have pending patent applications for lipidated chemerin fragments or analogs and methods of use thereof that, if issued, would be expected to expire in the United States and in countries outside of the United States between 2034 and 2043, excluding any patent term adjustment that might be available following the grant of the patent and any patent term extensions that might be available following the grant of marketing authorizations.
Issued United States patent directed to lipidated BAM8-22 peptides or analogs and methods of use thereof has a statutory expiration date of November 9, 2036 (plus 70 days of PTA), with potential patent term extension available until 2042, following the grant of marketing authorization. We have pending patent applications for lipidated BAM8-22 peptides or analogs and methods of use thereof that, if issued, would be expected to expire in the United States and in countries outside of the United States between 2036 and 2040, excluding any patent term adjustment that might be available following the grant of the patent and any patent term extensions that might be available following the grant of marketing authorizations.
We plan to protect our intellectual property position by, among other things, licensing or filing our own U.S. and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technologies and products, and any inventions or improvements that are important to the development and implementation of our business. We also may seek patent protection, if available, with respect to biomarkers and diagnostic methods that may be used to determine optimal patient populations for use of our product candidates.
Wherever possible, we seek to protect our inventions by filing U.S. patent applications as well as foreign counterpart applications in select countries. Because patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy for at least 18 months after the applications are filed, and since publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions covered by each of our issued or pending patent applications, or that we were the first to file for protection of inventions set forth in such patent applications. Our planned or potential products may be covered by third-party patents or other intellectual property rights, in which case continued development and marketing of our products would require a license. Required licenses may not be available to us on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If we do not obtain these licenses, we could encounter delays in product introductions while we attempt to design around the patents, or we could find that the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses are not possible.
In addition to patent protection, we also rely on know-how, trade secrets and the careful monitoring of proprietary information, all of which can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect some of our proprietary technologies and processes by entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, and contractors. These agreements may be breached, we may not have adequate remedies for any breach and our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the extent that our employees or our consultants or contractors use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may also arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
License Agreement for Urcosimod
On Target Therapeutics (OTT) and Tufts Medical Centre (TMC) entered into a license agreement on April 3, 2017, or the Master License, pursuant to which OTT licensed exclusive rights to certain patent applications that describe and claim lipidated chemerin peptides and their uses in DED, or Chemerin. The Master License remains in effect until the royalty term has expired with respect to all licensed products in all countries. The Master License may be terminated by either party in the event of a material breach and in addition, OTT may terminate the Master License at any time upon 90 days’ notice.
| 39 |
On May 22, 2017, OTT entered into a license and sublicense agreement with Panetta Partners Limited, one of our principal stockholders, relating to Chemerin, or the Chemerin License Agreement, which was licensed from OTT and sublicensed from TMC. On May 1, 2018, we entered into an assignment of the Sublicense with Panetta Partners Limited. Under the terms of the Chemerin License Agreement, we have exclusive rights to Chemerin. Specifically, we have the benefit of the exclusive worldwide rights to a U.S. patent application (which if issued would expire in 2036). In addition, we have exclusive worldwide rights to a Patent Cooperation Treaty, or PCT, patent which has been nationalized in the U.S., Europe, Japan, Australia and Canada and if issued it would expire in 2037. The Chemerin License Agreement provides for the payment by us of up to $4.9 million in development milestone payments and up to $37 million in sales milestones as follows:
Development milestone payments being:
| ● | $300,000 upon first patient enrolled in a Phase I clinical trial; | |
| ● | $600,000 upon first patient enrolled on a Phase II clinical trial; | |
| ● | $1,500,000 upon first patient enrolled in a Phase III clinical trial; and | |
| ● | $2,500,000 upon first commercial sale of a licensed product. |
Sales milestones payments as follows:
| ● | $2,000,000 on first achievement of annual net sales of $50,000,000; | |
| ● | $4,000,000 on first achievement of annual net sales of $100,000,000; | |
| ● | $6,000,000 on first achievement of annual net sales of $250,000,000; | |
| ● | $10,000,000 on first achievement of annual net sales of $500,000,000; and | |
| ● | $15,000,000 on first achievement of annual net sales of $1,000,000,000. |
The above payments equate to low and declining single digit percentage royalties on net sales.
We believe that we have novel composition-of-matter coverage on the lipidated chemerin peptide lead analogues and novel method-of-use claims in treating DED and other ophthalmic diseases. Each patent office has different patentability requirements, but we believe that the license patent applications 16/070,467 (U.S. patent application entitled “Compounds and methods for treating inflammation”; applicant: Tufts Medical Center / Trustees of Tufts College) and PCT/US2017/014605 (U.S. patent application entitled “Compounds and methods for treating inflammation”; applicant Tufts Medical Center / Trustees of Tufts College) contain patentable subject matter. The process for issuance of a patent involves a correspondence with each local patent office in the jurisdictions in which the patent application is filed. That process, patent prosecution, involves a discussion of any relevant prior art and typically a discussion of the scope of the claims. The patent prosecution process can take several years depending on the jurisdiction and is not in the control of the patent owner, but in the control of the local patent office.
The subject matter of the licensed IP may have been developed with government financial assistance and are subject to certain federal regulations under the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. In particular, the federal government retains a “nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license” for its own benefit to inventions produced with its financial assistance. The Bayh-Dole Act also provides federal agencies with “march-in rights” and allows the government certain rights to require products to be manufactured in the United States. March-in rights allow the government, in specified circumstances, to require the contractor or successors in title to the patent to grant a “nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive license” to a “responsible applicant or applicants.” If the patent owner refuses to do so, the government may grant the license itself.
| 40 |
OK-201
We entered into a license agreement with TMC on May 1, 2018, relating to intellectual property and proprietary technology for the use of certain lipidated BAM peptides in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Under the terms of the license agreement, we have acquired an exclusive license to certain patents (pending and issued), inventions (including future patent filings on lipidated BAM molecules related to the licensed patents). The license agreement requires an upfront license fee of $15,000 (£11,000), which has been paid by us and annual maintenance fees of $15,000 (£11,000) commencing on the first anniversary of the license agreement. The maintenance fees decrease to $10,000 after the three-year anniversary until the first commercial sale. The license agreement also provides for further development and sales milestone payments and royalties.
On February 23, 2021, we announced that patent No. 10,899,796 entitled “Compounds and Methods for Treating Pain” was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The patent is directed to a class of BAM peptides linked to specific lipids that demonstrate potential for treating symptoms of neuropathic pain, ocular pain, ocular inflammation and/or DED. The work recited in this patent lays out the potential of this class of lipidated BAM analogues as non-opioid analgesics for ocular pain management without the side effects and potential abuse associated with opioid medications and is the foundation of our OK-201 program. In addition to the license from TMC we have a collaboration agreement with TMC pursuant to which TMC has agreed to make available the services of Dr Pedram Hamrah M.D. as principal investigator and nominated reach associate to carry out investigative and research studies in furtherance of our OK-201 corneal neuropathic pain program. The patent will expire in early 2036.
Government Regulation
Overview
Government authorities in most jurisdictions extensively regulate the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture, distribution and marketing of pharmaceutical products such as those that the company is developing. Obtaining regulatory approvals and ensuring subsequent compliance with applicable laws and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial and managerial resources. Regulatory requirements in different jurisdictions vary, and the timing and success of efforts to obtain regulatory approvals can be highly uncertain. Development of a successful drug candidate, from identification of a candidate drug compound, through preclinical and clinical testing, to filing of a marketing approval application, to registration, typically takes more than ten years.
Drug development is a highly structured process divided into two major stages, preclinical and clinical. In the preclinical stage, the toxicology and mode of action of an active compound is evaluated. The clinical stage is designed to prove the safety of any new pharmaceutical, determine dosage requirements and, predominantly in the later phases, prove its therapeutic utility. This stage is carried out in three phases, which, as a developer moves through the phases, require increasingly large, complex, expensive and time-consuming clinical studies. During Phase 1, the product candidate is initially given to a small number of healthy human subjects or patients and tested for safety, tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion. During Phase 2, additional trials are conducted in a larger, but still relatively limited, patient population to verify that the product candidate has the desired effect and to identify optimal dosage levels. Furthermore, possible adverse effects and safety risks are identified. The therapeutic utility of the product candidate for specific targeted diseases is also studied in more depth. During Phase 3, trials are undertaken to further evaluate dosage, to provide statistically significant evidence of clinical effectiveness and to further study the safety in an expanded patient population at multiple clinical trial sites. Phase 3 trials may require several hundreds or thousands of patients and are therefore the most expensive and time-consuming to conduct. At any time during one of the phases, a trial may produce a negative result, in which case the developer may choose to end the development project, or a regulator could force clinical trials to terminate.
Following completion of the Phase 3 trials, the developer submits all the preclinical and clinical trial documentation as well as extensive data characterizing the manufacturing process to the regulator to seek regulatory approval to market the formulation as a pharmaceutical product. The regulator reviews all the information related to the safety of the active compound, and whether the pharmacological effect claimed by the developer on the proposed label can be substantiated by the results of the clinical trials. The regulator has the option to decide to approve the application as requested, ask for changes to the claims made by the developer, ask for more information, require that further clinical trials are undertaken, or refuse to approve the formulation for sale.
| 41 |
Even after initial regulatory approval has been obtained, further studies, including Phase 4 post-approval safety studies, may be required to provide additional data on safety and will be required to gain approval for the use of a product as a treatment for clinical indications other than those for which the product was initially tested. There are also continuing, annual user fee requirements for any marketed products and the establishments at which such products are manufactured, as well as new application fees for supplemental applications with clinical data. In addition, regulatory authorities require post-marketing reporting to monitor the adverse effects of the product. Results of post-approval programs may limit or expand the further marketing of the products. Further, if there are any modifications to the product, including changes in indication, manufacturing process or labeling, or a change in the manufacturing facility, an application seeking approval of such changes or, as the case may be, notification, must be submitted to the relevant regulatory authorities before the modified product can be commercialized. Moreover, an approved drug product may be subject to a REMS, which could impose a number of post-approval obligations, including (among other things) a communication plan for physicians regarding safe use of the drug, distribution and use restrictions, and/or periodic assessments of the effectiveness of the REMS. Finally, studies may be required as a contingency of regulatory approval (post-approval commitments), and completion of these studies within a regulator mandated time frame may be required.
European Union
The development, marketing and sale of medicinal products in the EU is subject to extensive pre- and post- marketing regulation by regulatory authorities at both the EU and national levels. The requirements, regulatory approvals and processes governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country, although there is some degree of EU wide harmonization.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials of medicinal products in the EU must be conducted in accordance with EU and national regulations, focusing, in particular on traceability, apply to clinical trials of advanced therapy medicinal products. If the sponsor of the clinical trial is not established within the EU, it must appoint an entity within the EU to act as its legal representative. The sponsor must take out a clinical trial insurance policy and, in most EU countries, the sponsor is liable to provide ‘no fault’ compensation to any study subject injured in the clinical trial.
Prior to commencing a clinical trial, the sponsor must obtain a clinical trial authorization from the relevant regulatory authority, and a positive opinion from an independent ethics committee. The application for a clinical trial authorization must include, among other things, a copy of the trial protocol and an investigational medicinal product dossier containing information about the manufacture and quality of the medicinal product under investigation. Currently, clinical trial authorization applications must be submitted to the regulatory authority in each Member State in which the trial will be conducted. Under the new Regulation on Clinical Trials, which is currently expected to take effect in 2019, there will be a centralized application procedure where one national authority takes the lead in reviewing the application and the other national authorities have only a limited involvement. Any substantial changes to the trial protocol or other information submitted with the clinical trial applications must be notified to or approved by the relevant competent authorities and ethics committees. Medicines used in clinical trials must be manufactured in accordance with cGMP.
Marketing Approval
In the EU medicinal products can only be commercialized after obtaining marketing authorization, or MA. There are three procedures for obtaining marketing approvals: the centralized procedure, the decentralized procedure and the mutual recognition procedure/national procedure.
| 42 |
The Community marketing authorization, which is issued by the European Commission through the centralized procedure, based on the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the EMA, is valid throughout the entire territory of the EU. The centralized procedure is mandatory for certain types of products, such as biotechnology medicinal products, orphan medicinal products, and medicinal products containing a new active substance indicated for the treatment of AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, autoimmune and viral diseases. The centralized procedure is optional for products containing a new active substance not yet authorized in the EU, or for products that constitute a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the EU.
Marketing approvals obtained using the decentralized procedure are available for products not falling within the mandatory scope of the Centralized Procedure. An identical dossier is submitted to the regulatory authorities of each of the Member States in which the marketing approval is sought, one of which is selected by the applicant as the Reference Member State, or RMS. The competent authority of the RMS prepares a draft assessment report, a draft summary of the product characteristics and a draft of the labeling and package leaflet, which are sent to the other the concerned Member States, or CMSs, for their approval. A CMS can raise an objection, based on the assessment report, the summary of product characteristics, the labeling and the package leaflet on the grounds of potential serious risk to public health. If no such objections are raised the product will be granted a national marketing authorization in the RMS and all of the selected CMSs. Where a product has already been authorized for marketing in a Member State, this decentralized procedure approval can be recognized in other Member States through the mutual recognition procedure.
Marketing approvals obtained using the national procedure are issued by a single regulatory authority of one of the Member States and only apply to the territory covered by the relevant regulatory authority. They are available for products not falling within the mandatory scope of the centralized procedure. Once a product has been authorized for marketing in a Member State through the national procedure, any application in another Member State must be by the mutual recognition procedure whereby the marketing approval can also be recognized in other Member States through the mutual recognition procedure.
Under the procedures described above, before granting the MA, the EMA or the relevant regulatory authority of the Member States of the EU makes an assessment of the risk-benefit balance of the product on the basis of scientific criteria concerning its quality, safety and therapeutic utility.
The holder of a marketing authorization in any Member State of the EU is subject to various obligations under applicable EU regulations, such as pharmacovigilance obligations, requiring it to, among other things, report and maintain detailed records of adverse reactions, and to submit periodic safety update reports to the regulatory authorities. The holder must also ensure that the manufacturing and batch release of its product is in compliance with the applicable requirements. The marketing approval holder is further obligated to ensure that the advertising and promotion of its products complies with applicable laws, which can differ from Member State to Member State of the EU.
Data Exclusivity
MAAs for generic medicinal products in the EU do not need to include the results of preclinical and clinical trials, but instead can refer to the data included in the marketing approval of a reference product for which regulatory data exclusivity has expired. If a marketing approval is granted for a medicinal product containing a new active substance, that product benefits from eight years of data exclusivity, during which generic MAAs referring to the data of that product may not be accepted by the regulatory authorities, and a further two years of market exclusivity, during which such generic products may not be placed on the market. The two-year period may be extended to three years if during the first eight years a new therapeutic indication with significant clinical benefit over existing therapies is approved.
| 43 |
There is a special regime for biosimilars, or biological medicinal products that are similar to a reference medicinal product but that do not meet the definition of a generic medicinal product, for example, because of differences in raw materials or manufacturing processes. For such products, the results of appropriate preclinical or clinical trials must be provided, and guidelines from the EMA detail the type of quantity of supplementary data to be provided for different types of biological product. There are no such guidelines for complex biological products, such as gene or cell therapy medicinal products, and so it is unlikely that biosimilars of those products will currently be approved in the EU. However, guidance from the EMA states that they will be considered in the future in light of the scientific knowledge and regulatory experience gained at the time.
Orphan Medicinal Products
The EMA’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, or COMP, may recommend orphan medicinal product designation to promote the development of products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting not more than five in 10,000 persons in the EU. Additionally, designation is granted for products intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition and when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the product in the EU would be sufficient to justify the necessary investment in developing the medicinal product. The COMP may only recommend orphan medicinal product designation when the product in question offers a significant clinical benefit over existing approved products for the relevant indication. Following a positive opinion by the COMP, the European Commission adopts a decision granting orphan status. The COMP will reassess orphan status in parallel with EMA review of a marketing authorization application and orphan status may be withdrawn at that stage if it no longer fulfills the orphan criteria (for instance because in the meantime a new product was approved for the indication and no convincing data are available to demonstrate a significant benefit over that product). Orphan medicinal product designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers and ten years of market exclusivity is granted following marketing authorization. During this period, the competent authorities may not accept or approve any similar medicinal product, unless it offers a significant clinical benefit. This period may be redacted to six years if the orphan medicinal product designation criteria are no longer met, including where it is shown that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity.
United States
Standard Procedure
In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 and its implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as the FDA’s refusal to approve pending NDAs or BLAs, withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties.
The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:
| ● | completion of preclinical laboratory studies, animal studies and formulation studies in compliance with the FDA’s good laboratory practice regulations; | |
| ● | submission to the FDA of an IND, which the FDA must approve before human clinical trials may begin; | |
| ● | approval of the human clinical trial by the institutional review board, or IRB, at each clinical site before each trial may be initiated; | |
| ● | performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with applicable IND and other clinical trial-related regulations, sometimes referred to as GCPs to establish the safety and clinical utility of the proposed product candidate for its proposed indication; | |
| ● | submission to the FDA of a BLA or NDA; | |
| ● | satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of the production facility or facilities where the product is produced to assess compliance with the FDA’s cGMP requirements to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality, purity and potency; | |
| ● | potential FDA audit of the preclinical and/or clinical trial sites that generated the data in support of the NDA; and | |
| ● | FDA review and approval of the BLA or NDA prior to any commercial marketing or sale of the product in the United States. |
| 44 |
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Other potential consequences include, among other things:
| ● | restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls; | |
| ● | fines, warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials; | |
| ● | refusal of the FDA to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs, or suspension or revocation of product approvals; | |
| ● | product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or | |
| ● | injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. |
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials involve the administration of the IND to human patients under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the requirement that all research patients provide their informed consent in writing for their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. In addition, an IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution. Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on their website. Regulatory authorities, IRBs or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
Marketing Approval
Assuming successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the preclinical studies and clinical trials, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls, or CMC, and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA or BLA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications. In most cases, the submission of an NDA or BLA is subject to a substantial application user fee. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act guidelines that are currently in effect, the FDA has a goal of 10 months from the date of filing of a standard NDA for a new molecular entity to review and act on the submission. This review typically takes 12 months from the date the NDA is submitted to the FDA because the FDA has approximately two months to make a filing decision.
In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, certain NDAs or supplements to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements.
| 45 |
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs within the first 60 days after submission, before accepting them for filing, to determine whether they are sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review. The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is manufactured, processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product’s continued safety, quality and purity.
The FDA may refer an application for a novel drug to an advisory committee. An advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
Before approving a BLA or NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA may inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCP requirements.
After evaluating the NDA or BLA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval letter, or, in some cases, a complete response letter (which generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA and may require additional clinical or preclinical testing in order for the FDA to reconsider the application). Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval. If and when those conditions have been met to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA will typically issue an approval letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications.
Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product, require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug’s safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution and use restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS, which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes, and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.
Orphan Drug Designation
Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the FDA may designate a biologic product as an “orphan drug” if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition (generally meaning that it affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or more in cases in which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making a biologic product available in the United States for treatment of the disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product).
If a product with orphan status receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan product exclusivity, meaning that the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug or biologic product for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan exclusivity or if the party holding the exclusivity fails to assure the availability of sufficient quantities of the drug to meet the needs of patients with the disease or condition for which the drug was designated. Competitors, however, may receive approval of different products for the same indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity or obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity.
| 46 |
Post-Approval Requirements for the EU and United States
The FDA and the relevant regulatory authorities in the EU strictly regulate marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market in their respective territories. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The regulatory authorities actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.
In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the relevant regulatory authorities and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by them to confirm compliance with cGMP requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior approval of the relevant regulatory authorities before being implemented. Regulations laid down by the FDA and the regulatory authorities in the EU also require investigation and correction of any deviations from the requirements of cGMP and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the marketing approval holder and any third-party manufacturers that the marketing approval holder may decide to use.
Other Healthcare Laws in the EU and United States
The company will also be subject to healthcare regulation and enforcement by the U.S. federal government and the state governments in the EU and any other countries in which the company conducts its business, including its research, and the marketing and distribution of its product candidates and products once they have obtained marketing approval. Failure to comply with these laws, where applicable, can result in the imposition of significant civil penalties, criminal penalties, exclusion from participating in health care programs, additional reporting requirements and oversight if the company becomes subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws and other sanctions. The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate in the United States include: the federal fraud and abuse laws, including the federal anti-kickback and false claims laws; federal data privacy and security laws; and federal transparency laws related to payments and/or other transfers of value made to physicians and other healthcare professionals and teaching hospitals. Many U.S. states have similar laws and regulations that may differ from each other and federal law in significant ways. Moreover, several U.S. states have enacted legislation requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers to, among other things, establish marketing compliance programs, file periodic reports with the state, and make periodic public disclosures on sales and marketing activities, and prohibiting certain other sales and marketing practices. Rules and legislation covering more or less the same subject matter as those in the United States apply to in countries in the EU and to other countries. These can differ between jurisdictions and can sometimes result in lower or higher exposure in those countries than in the United States. Where a product is sold in a number of countries compliance efforts can therefore be complicated.
Coverage and Reimbursement in the EU and United States
Sales of products developed from our product candidates, if approved, will depend, in part, on the extent to which such products will be covered by third party payors, such as government health care authorities, government health care programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. These third-party payors are increasingly limiting coverage or reducing reimbursements for medical products and services. In the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. In addition, the U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have continued implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products.
Governments influence the price of medicinal products in the EU through their pricing and reimbursement rules and control of national healthcare systems that fund a large part of the cost of those products to consumers. Some jurisdictions operate positive and negative list systems under which products may only be marketed once a reimbursement price has been agreed. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval, some of these countries may require the completion of clinical trials that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies. Other Member States allow companies to fix their own prices for medicines but monitor and control company profits. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general in the EU governments influence the price of medicinal products through their pricing and reimbursement.
| 47 |
The adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and the adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit our net revenue and results. Decreases in third party reimbursement for our product candidates or a decision by a third-party payor to not cover our product candidates could reduce physician usage of the Company’s product candidates, once approved, and have a material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and financial condition.
Privacy and Data Protection Laws in Europe
We are subject to European laws relating to our and our suppliers’, partners’ and subcontractors’ collection, control, processing and other use of personal data (i.e., any data relating to an identifiable living individual, whether that individual can be identified directly or indirectly). We are subject to the supervision of local data protection authorities in those jurisdictions where we are established, where we offer goods or services to EU residents and where we monitor the behavior of individuals in the EU (i.e., undertaking clinical trials). We and our suppliers, partners and subcontractors process personal data including in relation to our employees, employees of customers, clinical trial patients, healthcare professionals and employees of suppliers including health and medical information. The data privacy regime in the EU includes the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, the e-Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC) and the e-Privacy Regulation (once in force) and the national laws and regulations implementing or supplementing each of them.
The GDPR requires that personal data is only collected for specified, explicit and legal purposes as set out in the GDPR or local laws, and the data may then only be processed in a manner consistent with those purposes. The personal data collected and processed must be adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purposes for which it is collected and processed, it must be held securely, not transferred outside of the EEA, (unless certain steps are taken to ensure an adequate level of protection) and must not be retained for longer than necessary for the purposes for which it was collected. In addition, the GDPR requires companies processing personal data to take certain organizational steps to ensure that they have adequate records, policies, security, training and governance frameworks in place to ensure the protection of data subject rights, including as required to respond to complaints and requests from data subjects. For example, the GDPR requires us to make more detailed disclosures to data subjects, requires disclosure of the legal basis on which we can process personal data, makes it harder for us to obtain valid consent for processing, will require the appointment of a data protection officer where sensitive personal data (i.e., health data) is processed on a large scale, introduces mandatory data breach notification throughout the EU and imposes additional obligations on us when we are contracting with service providers.
In addition, to the extent a company processes, controls or otherwise uses “special category” personal data (including patients’ health or medical information, genetic information and biometric information), more stringent rules apply, further limiting the circumstances and the manner in which a company is legally permitted to process that data. Finally, the GDPR provides a broad right for Member States to create supplemental national laws which may result in divergence across Europe making it harder to maintain a consistent operating model or standard operating procedures. Such laws, for example, may relate to the processing of health, genetic and biometric data, which could further limit our ability to use and share such data or could cause our costs to increase, and harm our business and financial condition.
We depend on a number of third parties in relation to the provision of our services, a number of which process personal data on our behalf. With each such provider we enter into contractual arrangements to ensure that they only process personal data according to our instructions, and that they have sufficient technical and organizational security measures in place. Where we transfer personal data outside the EU, we do so in compliance with the relevant data export requirements from time to time. We take our data protection obligations seriously, as any improper, unlawful or accidental disclosure, loss, alteration or access to, personal data, particularly sensitive personal data (i.e., special category), could negatively impact our business and/or our reputation.
We are also subject to EU laws on personal data export, as we may transfer personal data from the EU to other jurisdictions which are not considered by the European Commission to offer adequate protection of personal data. Such transfers need to be legitimized by a valid transfer mechanism under the GDPR. There is currently ongoing litigation challenging the commonly used transfer mechanisms, the European Commission approved model clauses. In addition, the U.S. Privacy Shield is currently under review by the European Commission. As such, it is uncertain whether the Privacy Shield framework and/or model clauses will be invalidated in the near future. These changes may require us to find alternative bases for the compliant transfer of personal data from the EU to the United States and we are monitoring developments in this area. Invalidation of any mechanism on which we rely could require operational changes and increased costs and may lead to governmental enforcement actions, litigation, fines and penalties or adverse publicity that could have an adverse effect on our business.
| 48 |
The EU is in the process of replacing the e-Privacy Directive with a new set of rules taking the form of a regulation, which will be directly implemented in the laws of each Member State, without the need for further enactment. The draft e-Privacy Regulation imposes strict opt-in marketing rules with limited exceptions for business-to-business communications and alters rules on third-party cookies, web beacons and similar technology. Regulation of cookies and web beacons may lead to broader restrictions on online research activities, including efforts to understand users’ internet usage. The current draft also significantly increases fining powers to the same levels as GDPR (i.e., the greater of 20 million Euros or 4% of total global annual revenue). The European Commission proposed the ePrivacy Regulation in January 2017. It was intended to take effect alongside the EU GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) on 25 May 2018.However, the final text is still to be agreed, with the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament disagreeing on a number of issues.
There are costs and administrative burdens associated with compliance with the GDPR and the resultant changes in the EU and EEA member states’ national laws and the introduction of the e-Privacy Regulation once it takes effect. Any failure or perceived failure to comply with global privacy laws carries with it the risk of significant penalties and sanctions of up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover. These laws or new interpretations, enactments or supplementary forms of these laws, could create liability for us, could impose additional operational requirements on our business, could affect the manner in which we use and transmit patient information and could increase our cost of doing business. Claims of violations of privacy rights or contractual breaches, even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in adverse publicity that could harm our business.
C. Organizational Structure
The following table sets out details of our only subsidiary:
| Name | Principal activity | Registered address | Percentage shareholding | Country of incorporation | ||||||
| OKYO Pharma US Inc. | Clinical stage biotechnology company | 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 1402 New York, NY 10170 | 100 | % | USA | |||||
D. Property, Plant and Equipment
The below table contains information regarding existing or planned material tangible fixed assets owned or leased by OKYO Pharma Ltd and its Subsidiary. We believe that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any future expansion of our operations.
| Location | Tenure | Principal use | ||
| 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 1402 New York, NY 10170 | 2 Months | CEO Office |
| 49 |
ITEM 4A: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5: OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing at the end of this Annual Report. We present our consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB.
Some information included in this discussion and analysis, including statements regarding industry outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other statements regarding our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. You should read the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
We maintain our books and records in Pounds Sterling, and we prepare our financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars.
Overview
For a description of business highlights in 2024, please refer to “Item 4B. Information on the Company—Business Overview”.
Foreign currency translations
Items included in the financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, which is our presentation currency.
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of foreign currency transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement.
The financial statements of overseas subsidiary undertakings are translated into our functional currency on the following basis:
| ● | Assets and liabilities at the rate of exchange ruling at the year-end date. | |
| ● | Profit and loss account items at the average rate of exchange for the year. |
Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities, borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to equity (and recognized in the statement of comprehensive income) on consolidation.
Components of Our Results of Operations
Revenues
To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the near future. If our development efforts for our product candidates are successful and result in regulatory approval, we may generate revenue in the future from product sales.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses
R&D expenses consist primarily of costs incurred in connection with the R&D of our product candidates and are expensed as incurred. These expenses consist of:
| ● | expenses incurred under agreements with CROs, CMOs, as well as investigative sites and consultants that conduct our clinical trials, preclinical studies and other scientific development services; | |
| ● | manufacturing scale-up expenses and the cost of acquiring and manufacturing materials for preclinical studies and clinical trial materials; | |
| ● | employee-related expenses, including salaries, related benefits, travel and share-based compensation expense for employees engaged in R&D functions; | |
| ● | costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements; |
| 50 |
| ● | facilities costs, depreciation and other expenses, which include rent and utilities; and | |
| ● | fees for maintaining our third-party licensing agreements. |
We recognize external development costs based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information provided to us by our service providers.
Our direct R&D expenses are tracked on a program-by-program basis for our product candidates and consist primarily of external costs, such as fees paid to outside consultants, CROs and CMOs in connection with our preclinical development, manufacturing and clinical development activities. Our direct R&D expenses by program also include fees incurred under our license agreements. We do not allocate employee costs or facility expenses, including depreciation or other indirect costs, to specific programs because these costs are deployed across multiple programs and, as such, are not separately classified. We use internal resources primarily to oversee the R&D as well as for managing our preclinical development, process development, manufacturing and clinical development activities. These employees work across multiple programs and, therefore, we do not track their costs by program.
The table below summarizes our R&D expenses incurred by program:
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Direct research and development expense by program: | ||||||||||||
| Urcosimod | $ | 2,224,675 | $ | 8,179,510 | $ | 6,243,753 | ||||||
| OK-201 | 29,569 | 64,061 | 93,945 | |||||||||
| Total direct research and development expense | $ | 2,254,244 | $ | 8,243,571 | $ | 6,337,698 | ||||||
| Total research and development expense | $ | 2,254,244 | $ | 8,243,571 | $ | 6,337,698 | ||||||
R&D activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials and related product manufacturing expenses. As a result, we expect that our R&D expenses will increase substantially over the next several years as we increase personnel costs and prepare for regulatory filings related to our product candidates. We also expect to incur additional expenses related to milestone, royalty payments and maintenance fees payable to third parties with whom we have entered into license agreements to acquire the rights related to our product candidates.
The successful development and commercialization of our product candidates is highly uncertain. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the preclinical and clinical development of any of our product candidates or when, if ever, material net cash inflows may commence from any of our product candidates. This uncertainty is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with development and commercialization, including the uncertainty of:
| ● | the scope, progress, outcome and costs of our preclinical development activities, clinical trials and other R&D activities; | |
| ● | establishing an appropriate safety profile with IND- and CTA-enabling studies; | |
| ● | successful patient enrollment in, and the initiation and completion of, clinical trials; | |
| ● | the timing, receipt and terms of any marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities; | |
| ● | establishing commercial manufacturing capabilities or making arrangements with third-party manufacturers; | |
| ● | development and timely delivery of commercial-grade drug formulations that can be used in our clinical trials and for commercial launch; | |
| ● | obtaining, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights; | |
| ● | significant and changing government regulation; | |
| ● | launching commercial sales of our product candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or in collaboration with others; and | |
| ● | maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of the product candidates following approval. |
| 51 |
We may never succeed in achieving regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. We may obtain unexpected results from our clinical trials. We may elect to discontinue, delay or modify clinical trials.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, related benefits, travel and share-based compensation expense for personnel in executive, finance and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include professional fees for legal, consulting, accounting and audit services.
We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our headcount to support our continued research activities and development of our product candidates. We also anticipate that we will incur increased accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, compliance, director and officer insurance costs, as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with being a public company.
Taxation
The tax expense for a period represents the total of current taxation and deferred taxation. The charges in respect of current taxation are based on the estimated taxable profit for the relevant year. Taxable profit for the year is based on the profit as shown in the income statement, as adjusted for items of income or expenditure which are not deductible or chargeable for tax purposes. The current tax liability for the year is calculated using tax rates which have either been enacted or substantively enacted at the relevant balance sheet date.
Under UK tax legislation, small and medium entity R&D relief allows us to claim back up to 14.5% of our surrenderable losses as a tax cash credit.
| 52 |
A. Results of Operations
The results of operations that follow reflect the historic periods under review and should not be taken as indicative of future performance.
Comparison of Years Ended March 31, 2025 and 2024
The following tables summarizes our results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:
| Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | Change | ||||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | (2,254,244 | ) | $ | (8,243,571 | ) | $ | 5,989,327 | ||||
| General and administrative | $ | (4,837,653 | ) | $ | (7,506,161 | ) | $ | 2,668,508 | ||||
| Total Operating expenses | $ | (7,091,897 | ) | $ | (15,749,732 | ) | $ | 8,657,835 | ||||
| Other Income/ (Expense) | (878,174 | ) | (1,053,313 | ) | 175,139 | |||||||
| Tax (charge)/credit | 3,263,779 | (22,416 | ) | 3,286,195 | ||||||||
| Net Loss | $ | (4,706,292 | ) | $ | (16,825,461 | ) | $ | 12,119,169 | ||||
| Other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | (158,973 | ) | 141,095 | (300,068 | ) | |||||||
| Total Comprehensive (Loss) | $ | (4,865,265 | ) | $ | (16,684,366 | ) | $ | 11,819,101 | ||||
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development activities were $2,254,244 for the year ended March 31, 2025 compared to $8,243,571 for the year ended March 31, 2024, a decrease of $5,989,327. The decrease is due to the completion of the clinical trial in DED and the initiation of a smaller and less costly 48 patient clinical trial in NCP.
General and Administrative Expenses
Operating expenses were $4,837,653 for the year ended March 31,2025 as compared to $7,506,161 for the year ended March 31, 2024, a decrease of $2,668,508. This is predominantly due to decreases in chairman and employee bonuses, a reduction in D&O insurance premiums, a reduction in consultancy spend and a decrease in option charges due to the surrender of unvested options.
Other Expenses
Other expenses were $878,174 for the year ended March 31, 2025 as compared to $1,053,313 for the year ended March 31, 2024. Other expenses is comprised of the interest due on a related party loan as well as interest due and repayable in cash on convertible loan notes issued in 2025.
Income Tax (Charge)/ Credit
An income tax credit of $3,263,779 was recognized for the year ended March 31, 2025 and an income tax charge of $22,416 was recognized for the year ended March 31, 2024. The credit was due to tax receipt for 2023 research and development expenditure credits of $1,411,748 and a provision for the expected 2024 research and development expenditure credits of $1,852,031.
Comparison of Years Ended March 31, 2024 and 2023
The following tables summarizes our results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023:
| Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | Change | ||||||||||
| Operating Expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | (8,243,571 | ) | $ | (6,337,698 | ) | $ | (1,905,873 | ) | |||
| General and administrative | $ | (7,506,161 | ) | $ | (6,849,502 | ) | $ | (656,659 | ) | |||
| Total Operating expenses | $ | (15,749,732 | ) | $ | (13,187,200 | ) | $ | (2,562,532 | ) | |||
| Other Income/ (Expense) | (1,053,313 | ) | (96,687 | ) | (956,626 | ) | ||||||
| Tax credit | (22,416 | ) | 12,202 | (34,618 | ) | |||||||
| Net Loss | $ | (16,825,461 | ) | $ | (13,271,685 | ) | $ | (3,553,776 | ) | |||
| Other comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | 141,095 | (441,015 | ) | 582,110 | ||||||||
| Total Comprehensive (Loss) | $ | (16,684,366 | ) | $ | (13,712,700 | ) | $ | (2,971,666 | ) | |||
| 53 |
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development activities were $8,243,571 for the year ended March 31, 2024 compared to $6,337,698 for the year ended March 31, 2023, an increase of $1,905,873. The increase is due to an increase in R&D activity focused on progressing the Phase II trials for OK-101.
General and Administrative Expenses
Operating expenses were $7,506,161 for the year ended March 31,2024 as compared to $6,849,502 for the year ended March 31, 2023, an increase of $656,659. The increase is predominantly due to costs relating to additional public and investor relations marketing expenses as we increased our activities to progress our pipeline.
Other Expenses
Other expenses were $1,053,313 for the year ended March 31, 2024, as compared to $96,687 for the year ended March 31, 2023. Other expenses is comprised of the interest due on a related party loan.
Income Tax (Charge)/ Credit
An income tax charge of $22,416 was recognized for the year ended March 31, 2024 and an income tax credit of $12,202 was recognized for the year ended March 31, 2023. Credits are obtained at a rate of 14.5% of 230% of our qualifying research and development expenditure. The decrease in the provision is due primarily to a revision of the income tax credit policy for the year ended March 31, 2023 due to stricter requirements by the UK tax authorities Research and Development Expenses
| 54 |
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have not generated any revenue and have incurred operating losses and negative cash flows from our operations. We have funded our operations to date primarily with proceeds from the sale of our ordinary shares, exercise of warrants and convertible loan notes.
As of March 31, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1,560,902.
Through March 31, 2025 we received net cash proceeds from the sale and issuance of ordinary shares of $1,705,742 and proceeds from the issuance of Convertible Loan Notes of $950,000.
Post March 31, 2025, we have raised an additional $2.7m through our ATM facility.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows for each of the periods presented:
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (1,810,931 | ) | $ | (9,490,537 | ) | $ | (7,695,242 | ) | |||
| Net cash used in investing activities | (1,208 | ) | - | (5,916 | ) | |||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 2,655,742 | 6,208,508 | 9,323,354 | |||||||||
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 843,603 | $ | (3,282,029 | ) | $ | 1,622,196 | |||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
Our use of cash in each of the years ended March 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, resulted primarily from our net losses, adjusted for non-cash charges and changes in components of working capital. Net cash used in operating activities of $1,810,931 during the year ended March 31, 2025 decreased by $7,679,606 compared to the year ended March 31, 2024. The decrease is primarily due to fees, expenses and interest being settled in shares, share options surrendered, and research and development tax rebates received.
Net cash used in operating activities of $9,490,537 during the year ended March 31, 2024 increased by $1,795,295 compared to the year ended March 31, 2023. The increase in net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to increase in activity progressing towards the phase II trials in urcosimod.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
During the year ended March 31, 2025 $1,208 was used for investing activities. During the year ended March 31, 2024 and the year ended March 31, 2023, no cash was used for investing activities and $5,916 of cash respectively, in investing activities for the purchases of property and equipment.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
During the year ended March 31, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities was $2,655,742, consisting of net cash proceeds from our sale and issuance of ordinary shares of $1,705,742 and proceeds from the issuance of Convertible Loan Notes of $950,000.
During the year ended March 31, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $6,208,508, consisting of net cash proceeds from our sale and issuance of ordinary shares.
During the year ended March 31, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $9,323,354, consisting of net cash proceeds from our sale and issuance of ordinary shares plus a $2million loan from a related party.
Funding Requirements
We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance the preclinical activities, manufacturing and clinical trials of our product candidates and as we:
| ● | seek regulatory approvals for any product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials; |
| 55 |
| ● | establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure in anticipation of commercializing any product candidates for which we may obtain marketing approval and intend to commercialize on our own or jointly; | |
| ● | hire additional clinical, medical and development personnel; | |
| ● | expand our infrastructure and facilities to accommodate our growing employee base; and | |
| ● | maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio. |
We do not believe that our existing cash, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future. We have experienced net losses and significant cash outflows from cash used in operating activities over the past years, and as of March 31, 2025, had an accumulated deficit of $143million, net loss for the year ended March 31, 2025, of $4.7million and net cash used in operating activities of $1.8million.
We have prepared cash flow projections that include the costs associated with the continued clinical trials and additional investment to fund that operation. On the basis of those projections, we conclude that significant doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we expect. If we receive regulatory approval for our other product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development and commercialization of pharmaceutical product candidates, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our working capital requirements. Our future funding requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a result of many factors, including:
| ● | the scope, progress, outcome and costs of our preclinical development activities, clinical trials and other research and development activities; | |
| ● | the costs, timing, receipt and terms of any marketing approvals from applicable regulatory authorities; | |
| ● | the costs of future activities, including product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval; | |
| ● | the revenue, if any, received from commercial sale of our products, should any of our product candidates receive marketing approval; | |
| ● | the costs and timing of hiring new employees to support our continued growth; | |
| ● | the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending intellectual property-related claims; and | |
| ● | the extent to which we acquire technologies. |
Until such time, if ever, that we can generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability, we expect to finance our cash needs through equity offerings and other financing activities such as debt arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity, your ownership interest will be diluted. If we raise additional funds through other third-party funding, collaboration agreements, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements or marketing and distribution arrangements, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market products or product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
| 56 |
Borrowings
In August 2022, we entered into a short-term credit facility with a related party for $2million to support short term liquidity. The loan is available for a period of 6 months upon first draw-down and carries an interest rate of 16% per annum, with additional default interest of 4% if the loan is not repaid after the 6-month period.
In February 2023, we entered into an additional short-term credit facility with a related party for $0.5million to further support short term liquidity, under the same terms as the loan above. The capital on this additional facility was repaid in March 2023.
In October 2023 the loan from Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd was converted into Ordinary Shares in OKYO with accrued interest at a rate of 20%. The principal of $2million plus accrued interest was converted into 2,100,000 of our Ordinary Shares. As at March 31, 2023 the full amount had been drawn down against the loan and $98,627 of interest had been accrued. The total balance due at March 31, 2023 for this loan was $2,207,209.
Due to the Ordinary Share conversion there was no loan balance from Tiziana Life Sciences at March 31, 2024.
On July 15, 2024, 500,000 Ordinary Shares, with no par value, of Okyo Pharma Ltd were issued to Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd in lieu of additional accrued interest in respect of this agreement.
On September 24, 2024, we entered into a fixed term unsecured loan agreement with an existing shareholder for $550,000 at an interest rate of 20% per annum to be repaid by June 1, 2026. The loan is convertible into shares at the election of the noteholder at a price of $0.70 per share.
On October 28, 2024, we entered into a fixed term unsecured loan agreement with an existing shareholder for $250,000 at an interest rate of 20% per annum to be repaid by November 1, 2026. The loan is convertible into shares at the election of the noteholder at a price of $0.70 per share.
On January 16, 2025, we entered into a fixed term unsecured loan agreement with an existing shareholder for $150,000 at an interest rate of 20% per annum to be repaid by February 1, 2027. The loan is convertible into shares at the election of the noteholder at a price of $0.70 per share.
C. Research and Development Expenses, Patents and Licenses, etc.
See “Item 4.B.—Business Overview,” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
D. Trend Information
See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Trend Information.”
| 57 |
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual commitments and obligations as of March 31, 2025 and 2024.
As at March 31, 2025
| (in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 Year | Between 1 and 5 Years | More than 5 Years | ||||||||||||
| Borrowings | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
| Operating lease obligations | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
| Total | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - |
As at March 31, 2024
| (in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 Year | Between 1 and 5 Years | More than 5 Years | ||||||||||||
| Borrowings | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
| Operating lease obligations | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 7 | $ | 7 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Please refer to “Item 4 B. Business Overview” and “Item 10.C. Material Contracts” for further details.
G. Safe Harbor
This Annual Report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act and as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See the section titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.
| 58 |
ITEM 6: DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A. Directors and Senior Management
The following table sets forth information regarding our directors and senior management as of the date of this annual report.
| Name | Age | Position | ||
| Gabriele Marco Antonio Cerrone MBA (2) | 53 | Non-Executive Chairman | ||
| Dr. Gary S. Jacob | 78 | CEO and Executive Director | ||
| Dr. Raj Patil | 68 | Chief Scientific Officer | ||
| Keeren Shah | 49 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Willy Simon (1) (2) (3) | 74 | Senior Non-Executive Director | ||
| John Brancaccio (1) (2) (3) | 77 | Non-Executive Director | ||
| Bernard Denoyer (1) (2) (3) | 78 | Non-Executive Director |
| (1) | Remuneration Committee member |
| (2) | Nomination Committee member |
| (3) | Audit, risk and disclosure Committee member |
Gabriele Marco Antonio Cerrone – Non-Executive Chairman
Gabriele Cerrone has been the Non-Executive Chairman of our company since January 2021. Mr. Cerrone is the Founder of Tiziana Life Sciences Limited and has been its Executive Chairman since April 2014. Mr. Cerrone has founded 10 biotechnology companies in oncology, infectious diseases and molecular diagnostics, and has listed seven of these companies on NASDAQ, and two to the Main Market and AIM Market in London. Mr. Cerrone co-founded Cardiff Oncology, Inc., an oncology company and served as its Co-Chairman; he was a co-founder and served as Chairman of both Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and was a Director of and led the restructuring of Siga Technologies, Inc. Mr. Cerrone also co-founded FermaVir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and served as Chairman of the Board until its merger in September 2007 with Inhibitex, Inc. Mr. Cerrone served as a director of Inhibitex, Inc. until its US$2.5bn sale to Bristol Myers Squibb Co in 2012. Mr. Cerrone is the Executive Chairman and Founder of NASDAQ-listed Tiziana Life Sciences Limited, an oncology focused therapeutics company; Co-Founder of Actavia Therapeutics Inc., a company focused on the development of therapeutics for leukaemias; Co-Founder of Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Executive Chairman and Co-Founder of Gensignia Life Sciences, Inc., a molecular diagnostics company focused on oncology using microRNA technology; Non-Executive Chairman and Founder of Accustem Sciences Limited; and founder of BioVitas Capital Ltd. Mr. Cerrone graduated from New York University’s Stern School of Business with a master’s degree in business administration (MBA).
| 59 |
Dr. Gary S. Jacob
Dr. Gary S. Jacob has served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company since January 2021. From November 2018 to March 2020, Dr. Jacob was the Chief Executive Officer of Immuron Limited, an Australian microbiome biopharmaceutical company. From July 2008 until December 2017, Dr. Jacob was President and Chief Executive Officer of Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, where he held various positions from July 2008 to November 2018 and he served as its Chairman from September 2013 to November 2018. On December 12, 2018, Synergy Pharmaceuticals Inc. filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. From March 19, 2014 until February 2024, Dr. Jacob was the Chairman of the Board of Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biotechnology company, and earlier served as its Chief Executive Officer from May 15, 2013 until March 19, 2014. Dr. Jacob served as Chief Executive Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from May 2003 until January 2013 and a director from October 2004 until January 2013. Dr. Jacob also serves as a director of Actavia Lifesciences, Inc., and is a past director of Cardiff Oncology, Inc. Dr. Jacob has over 35 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries across multiple disciplines including research & development, operations and business development. Prior to 1999, Dr. Jacob served as a Monsanto Science Fellow, specializing in the field of glycobiology, and from 1997 to 1998 Dr. Jacob was Director of Functional Genomics, Corporate Science & Technology, at Monsanto Company. Dr. Jacob also served from 1990 to 1997 as Director of Glycobiology at G.D. Searle Pharmaceuticals Inc. During the period of 1986 to 1990, he was Manager of the G.D. Searle Glycobiology Group at Oxford University, England.
Dr. Raj Patil
Dr. Raj Patil has served as Chief Scientific Officer of our company since March 2021. Dr. Patil has over 15 years of ophthalmic drug development experience, including research & development, operations and business development. Dr. Patil previously worked with Ora, as Vice President of Research & Development, where he was responsible for driving all anterior and posterior segment ocular research of Ora’s R&D Institute. From 2013 until 2018, Dr. Patil worked at iVeena Delivery Systems as Vice President of Advanced Ocular Delivery Systems. Dr. Patil’s tenure at iVeena included a two-year sabbatical in Singapore, where he served as an Associate Professor of Ophthalmology at DUKE/NUS Medical School, and Principal Investigator at Singapore Eye Research Institute. From 2004 until 2013, Dr. Patil also held a number of leadership roles at Alcon/Novartis Institute of Biomedical Research, including Associate Director of Research and Head of Molecular Pharmacology - glaucoma and retina research. Prior to 2004, Dr. Patil served as an Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Cell Biology & Genetics at the University of Nebraska Medical Centre in Omaha from 2001 until 2004, and as an Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology & Pharmacology at Washington University in St. Louis from 1992 until 2000. Dr. Patil received his PhD in Biochemistry from National Chemical Laboratory/University of Pune, India, and completed his postdoctoral training in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. He is the recipient of the Olga Keith Wiess Special Scholar Award from the Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation, and NIH Director’s New Innovator Award. Dr. Patil has authored over 50 peer-reviewed research articles, serves as reviewer and editorial board member for numerous journals, and is frequently invited to lecture at academic and industry events.
Keeren Shah
Keeren Shah has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2020. Ms. Shah currently also serves as the Chief Operating and Financial Officer of Tiziana Life Sciences Limited, Accustem Sciences Inc and Actavia Lifesciences, Inc., having previously served as the Group Financial Controller for all businesses from June 2016 to July 2020. Prior to joining us, Ms. Shah spent 10 years at Visa, Inc. as a Senior Leader in its finance team where she was responsible for key financial controller activities, financial planning and analysis, and core processes as well as leading and participating in key transformation programs and Visa Inc.’s initial public offering. Before joining Visa, Ms. Shah also held a variety of finance positions at other leading companies including Arthur Andersen and BBC Worldwide. She holds a Bachelor of Arts with Honors in Economics and is a member of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
Willy Simon – Non-Executive Director
Willy Jules Simon has been a director of our company since November 2015. He is a banker and worked at Kredietbank N.V. and Citibank London before serving as an executive member of the Board of Generale Bank NL from 1997 to 1999 and as the chief executive of Fortis Investment Management from 1999 to 2002. He acted as chairman of Bank Oyens & van Eeghen from 2002 to 2004. He was chairman of AIM-traded Velox3 plc (formerly 24/7 Gaming Group Holdings plc) until 2014 and had been a director of Playlogic Entertainment Inc., a NASDAQ OTC listed company. Willy Simon has been the chairman of Bever Holdings, a company listed in Amsterdam, since 2006 and Chairman of Ducat Maritime since 2015. He is also a non-executive director of Tiziana Life Sciences Limited, AccuStem Sciences Inc and Actavia Lifesciences, Inc.
John Brancaccio – Non-Executive Director
John Brancaccio, a retired CPA, has served as a director of our company since June 2020. From April 2004 until May 2017, Mr. Brancaccio was the Chief Financial Officer of Accelerated Technologies, Inc., an incubator for medical device companies. Mr. Brancaccio has been a director of Tiziana Life Sciences Limited since July 2020. Mr. Brancaccio served as a director of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from April 2004 until its merger with Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in January 2013 and was a director of Tamir Biotechnology, Inc. (formerly Alfacell Corporation) from April 2004 until May 2020, as well as a director of Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from December 2013 until June 2025. Mr. Brancaccio served as a director of Synergy from July 2008 until April 2019. He is also a non-executive director of AccuStem Sciences Inc and Actavia Therapeutics Inc. Mr. Brancaccio is a past director of Cardiff Oncology, Inc.
Bernard Denoyer– Non-Executive Director
Bernard F. Denoyer, a retired CPA, has served as a director of our company since December 2021. Mr. Denoyer served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Secretary of Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc, from July 2008 until his retirement in June 2017. Between 2004 and January 2013 Mr. Denoyer concurrently served as Principal Financial Officer of Synergy’s former parent company, Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., until its merger with Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. From October 2000 to December 2003, Mr. Denoyer was an independent consultant. Prior to this, Mr. Denoyer served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of META Group, Inc., between June 1994 and October 2000.
| 60 |
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.
B. Compensation
Total Compensation for the Non-Executive Chairman and Non-Executive Directors
The table below sets out the total remuneration received by the Non-Executive Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors for the year ended March 31, 2025.
| Name | Position | Fees earned or paid in cash ($000) (1) | Options awarded ($000) (2) | Other ($000) (3) | Total ($000) | |||||||||||||
| Gabriele Cerrone | Non-Executive Chairman | 450 | - | 472 | 922 | |||||||||||||
| Willy Simon | Non-Executive Director | 41 | 35 | - | 76 | |||||||||||||
| John Brancaccio | Non-Executive Director | 40 | 45 | - | 85 | |||||||||||||
| Bernard Denoyer | Non-Executive Director | 40 | 11 | - | 51 | |||||||||||||
| (1) | The amounts have been translated into U.S. dollars from Pounds Sterling based upon the representative exchange rates as of March 31, 2025 of £1.00 = $1.27581 |
| (2) | Represents the fair value of incentive stock options granted during the year to March 31, 2025 using the Black-Scholes model for computing stock-based compensation expense as of the date of grant. |
| (3) | Represents the bonus for Gabriele Cerrone, settled in shares. |
Narrative Disclosure to the Compensation table
Gabriele Cerrone
We entered into an appointment agreement with Gabriele Cerrone on January 6, 2021 to serve as our Non-Executive Chairman. This agreement entitles Mr. Cerrone to receive a consultancy fee of £120,000 per year. Effective from 1 October 2023 the Company has agreed to pay to the Consultant a fee of £450,000 per annum (plus VAT if any), increased from the prior level of £150,000, in twelve equal monthly instalments. In respect of the period from October 1, 2023 to September 30, 2024 the increased element of the fee of £300,000 will be settled by the issue of 200,532 ordinary shares accruing in 12 fixed monthly tranches with such shares to be issued at the end of each 3 month period.
Mr Cerrone was awarded a bonus of $348k in the year ended March 31, 2025.
Mr Cerrone’s bonus awarded for $934k in the year ended March 31, 2024 comprised of $614k awarded in recognition of his renegotiation with Tuft and dealing with the Office of Research Administration (ORA) regarding payment terms and $320k awarded in recognition of his efforts in arranging the global private placing in September 2023. Both bonuses were settled via the issuance of shares.
Mr Cerrone’s bonus awarded for $300k in the year ended March 31, 2023 comprised of $150k awarded in recognition of his support in the offering in May 2022 to list the Company on NASDAQ and $150k awarded in recognition of his efforts in arranging the global private placing in March 2023.
In March 2023 Mr Cerrone was granted a long-term realization bonus on the basis that (i) were the Company to be sold, during the currency of his directorship or in the period of 6 years thereafter, for a price of, in excess of, US$275,000,000 that Mr Cerrone receive a bonus equal to 3.5% of the value of the Company (and not just the excess); and (ii) in the event that the Company to be sold, during the currency of his directorship or in the period of 6 years thereafter, for a price of, in excess of, US$500,000,000, Mr Cerrone would, instead of the 3.5% bonus, receive a bonus equal to 6.5% of the enterprise value of the Company (and not just the excess over US$500,000,000). The terms of the award are to make appropriate provision for any “spin-off” of assets and for the eventuality that the Company be sold for non-cash consideration. Mr Cerrone be responsible for all tax liabilities in connection with any payment of the award.
In addition to payment any payments that may become due elsewhere under this Agreement, Consultant is awarded and shall be entitled to a conditional payment on the following basis:
a) in the event that, during the period whilst Consultant is a director (executive or non-executive of the Company) and in the period of 6 (six) years following any termination or resignation of his directorship, either: (i) there is a sale, in one or a series of transactions, of all or substantially all of the assets (calculated on the basis of book values taking into account the fair value of the triggering transaction(s)) of the Group Companies (or a licence of the same on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis), where the Enterprise Value equals or exceeds US$275,000,000; or (ii) there is either a change of control (as defined below) of the Company where the Enterprise Value equals or exceeds US$275,000,000, Consultant will be entitled to receive a cash bonus in the amount equal to the Enterprise Value multiplied by three and one half (3.5) per cent; and
b) in the event that, during the period whilst Consultant is a director (executive or non-executive of the Company) and in the period of 6 (six) years following any termination or resignation of his directorship, either: (i) there is a sale, in one or a series of transactions, of all or substantially all of the assets (calculated on the basis of book values taking into account the fair value of the triggering transaction(s)) of the Group Companies (or a licence of the same on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis), where the Enterprise Value equals or exceeds US$500,000,000; or (ii) there is either a change of control (as defined below) of the Company where the Enterprise Value equals or exceeds US$500,000,000, paragraph (a) shall not apply but Consultant will instead be entitled to receive a cash bonus in the amount equal to the Enterprise Value multiplied by six and one half (6.5) per cent; and
Non -Executive Director remuneration
The remuneration of our non-executive directors is determined by our board as a whole, based on a review of current practices in other companies.
| 61 |
Compensation of Executive Directors
The table below sets the remuneration of each of the Executive Directors for the financial year ended March 31, 2025.
| Name | Position | Fees earned or paid in cash ($000) | Bonus earned or paid in cash ($000) | Options awarded ($000) (1) | Total ($000) | |||||||||||||
| Gary Jacob | Executive Director | 350 | 100 | 228 | 678 | |||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the fair value of incentive stock options granted during the year to March 31, 2025 using an appropriate valuation model for computing stock-based compensation expense as of the date of grant. |
Narrative Disclosure to the Compensation table
We entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Gary S. Jacob, our Chief Executive Officer, on December 21, 2020 and amended the agreement on January 19, 2021. Pursuant to the agreement, Dr. Jacob had an annual salary of $350,000 and a cash bonus of up to 50% of his annual salary based on annual performance goals. In May 2022, it was agreed that Mr Jacobs base salary would increase from US$350,000 to US$450,000 effective from June 1, 2022, provided that the increase will initially accrue but only be paid following a future equity raise.
Dr. Jacob is also entitled to the same fringe benefits as we provide to our other executives from time to time and is eligible to receive employee share incentives. If Dr. Jacob’s employment with the company is terminated without cause, or if he resigns for good reason, Dr. Jacob will also be entitled to receive severance equal to continuation of his base salary as then currently in effect for 12 months following his date of termination and will be eligible for a pro-rated bonus and for reimbursement for medical coverage premiums for 6 months following his date of termination. Dr. Jacob’s severance benefits are conditioned on, amongst other things, his execution of our standard separation agreement and a general release of claims in our favor.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information regarding all outstanding equity awards for our directors, executive officers, and non-executive directors, as of March 31, 2025.
| Name | Ordinary Shares Underlying Options |
Exercise Price Per Ordinary Share ($) |
Grant Date | Expiration Date | ||||||||
| Gary Jacob | 84,615 | 2.13 | 03/14/2023 | 03/14/2033 | ||||||||
| 50,000 | 1.46 | 03/13/2024 | 03/13/2034 | |||||||||
| 307,960 | 1.60 | 29/01/2025 | 29/01/2035 | |||||||||
| 200,000 | 1.50 | 28/03/2025 | 28/03/2035 | |||||||||
| Willy Simon | 6,154 | 2.13 | 03/14/2023 | 03/14/2033 | ||||||||
| 20,000 | 1.65 | 11/24/2023 | 11/24/2033 | |||||||||
| 40,000 | 1.46 | 03/13/2024 | 03/13/2034 | |||||||||
| 12,848 | 1.60 | 29/01/2025 | 29/01/2035 | |||||||||
| 50,000 | 1.50 | 28/03/2025 | 28/03/2035 | |||||||||
| John Brancaccio | 15,385 | 2.13 | 03/14/2023 | 03/14/2033 | ||||||||
| 20,000 | 1.65 | 11/24/2023 | 11/24/2033 | |||||||||
| 40,000 | 1.46 | 03/13/2024 | 03/13/2034 | |||||||||
| 6,509 | 1.60 | 29/01/2025 | 29/01/2035 | |||||||||
| 50,000 | 1.50 | 28/03/2025 | 28/03/2035 | |||||||||
| Bernard Denoyer | 3,077 | 2.13 | 03/14/2023 | 03/14/2033 | ||||||||
| 10,000 | 1.46 | 03/13/2024 | 03/13/2034 | |||||||||
| 3,613 | 1.60 | 29/01/2025 | 29/01/2035 | |||||||||
| 15,000 | 1.50 | 28/03/2025 | 28/03/2035 | |||||||||
Employee Share Option Plan with Non-Employee Sub-Plan and US Sub-Plan
The main features of the Unapproved Share Option Plan are summarized below.
Eligibility
All executive directors, officers and employees of the Company and any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Unapproved Share Option Plan. The Remuneration Committee selects the individuals to whom share options are to be granted from time to time.
Grant of options
Options may be granted at such time or times as the Remuneration Committee (or the Board, excluding any interested Director, until a Remuneration Committee is formally established) determines.
Exercise price and adjustments to options
While the Ordinary Shares are admitted to trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market, the exercise price per Ordinary Share may not be less than the average of the middle market quotations for an Ordinary Share for the five dealing days immediately prior to the date of grant. If the Ordinary Shares are not admitted to trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market, the exercise price will be the amount specified by the Remuneration Committee. If the Ordinary Shares are newly issued the exercise price may not, in any event, be less than the nominal value of an Ordinary Share. In the event of any variation in the share capital of the Company the exercise price and/or the number of Ordinary Shares comprised in each option may be adjusted as the Remuneration Committee determines. No adjustment may be made which will reduce the exercise price below the nominal value of an Ordinary Share.
| 62 |
Rights and restrictions
An option granted under the Unapproved Share Option Plan is not transferable. The option certificate will specify when the option will lapse, and such date may not be later than the tenth anniversary of its date of grant. Except in the circumstances referred to below, an option will only be exercisable on or after the date which is three years after the date of grant.
If the participant ceases to be employed by the Company by reason of injury, disability, ill-health or redundancy; or because the business or company that employs them is transferred out of the ultimate ownership of the Company, their option may be exercised within six months after such cessation or transfer. In the event of the death of a participant, the personal representatives of a participant may exercise their option within six months after the date of death. The extent to which an option may be exercised in these circumstances will be determined by reference to any exercise conditions and time vesting provisions set out in the option certificate unless the Remuneration Committee decides otherwise and is satisfied that any waiver of such provisions does not constitute a reward for failure.
On cessation of employment for any other reason (or when a participant serves or has been served with, notice of termination of such employment), the option will lapse unless the Remuneration Committee exercises its discretion to allow the exercise of the option for a period not exceeding 6 months from the date of such cessation or notice. In such circumstances and where exercise is permitted, the extent to which an option may be exercised will be determined by reference to any exercise conditions and time vesting provisions set out in the option certificate unless the Remuneration Committee decides otherwise and is satisfied that any waiver of such provisions does not constitute a reward for failure.
Corporate events
Options, to the extent not already exercisable, will become exercisable immediately prior to a change in control of the Company, in the event of a takeover of the Company, in the event that an officer becomes entitled or bound to acquire Ordinary Shares or in the event that the court sanctions a compromise or arrangement for the reconstruction of the Company or its amalgamation with any other company. In such event, all share options may be exercised for a limited period and will lapse to the extent not exercised. Options, to the extent not already exercisable, will become exercisable in the event that the Company is proposed to be voluntarily wound up and all share options may be exercised within a limited period in connection with the winding up, failing which they will lapse. In such circumstances and where exercise is permitted, the extent to which an option may be exercised will be determined by reference to any exercise conditions set out in the option certificate unless the Remuneration Committee decides otherwise and is satisfied that any waiver of such provisions does not constitute a reward for failure.
Performance conditions
The exercise of share options may be subject to the satisfaction of such performance conditions, if any, as may be specified and subsequently varied and/or waived by the Remuneration Committee.
Issuance of Ordinary Shares
The Ordinary Shares issued upon the exercise of share options granted under the Unapproved Share Option Plan will rank pari passu with the Company’s issued Ordinary Shares on the date of exercise, save as regards any rights arising by reference to a record date prior to the date of such exercise.
| 63 |
Plan limit
Options may not be granted under the Unapproved Share Option Plan if such grant would result in the total number of “Dilutive Shares” exceeding 15% of the Company’s issued share capital from time to time. “Dilutive Shares” means, on any date, all shares of the Company which (a) have been issued, or transferred out of treasury, on the exercise of share options granted, or in satisfaction of any other awards made, under any share incentive scheme (including the Unapproved Share Option Plan) in the shorter of the five years ending on (and including) that date and the period since adoption of the Plan; and (b) remain capable of issue, or transfer out of treasury, under any subsisting share options granted by the Company.
Alternative settlement on exercise
Instead of delivering the number of Ordinary Shares specified in the exercise notice, the Remuneration Committee may make a cash payment with the option holder’s consent or deliver Ordinary Shares equal to the value of the Ordinary Shares over which the option is exercised, less the relevant exercise price, or may deliver a combination of the above two.
Alteration
The Remuneration Committee may alter the Unapproved Share Option Plan except that (apart from minor amendments to benefit the administration of the Share Option Plan, to correct typographical or other errors, to take account of a change in legislation or to obtain or maintain favorable tax, exchange control or regulatory treatment for participants or the Company) no alteration to the advantage of participants or to the Unapproved Share Option Plan limit described above can be made without the prior approval of Shareholders in general meeting.
No amendment may have a materially adverse effect on share options granted before the amendment without the relevant option holder’s consent.
Termination and Plan period
The Remuneration Committee may terminate or suspend the operation of the Unapproved Share Option Plan at any time, whereupon no further share options shall be granted but in all other respects the provisions of the Unapproved Share Option Plan shall remain in force. In any event, no share options may be granted after the date which is five years after the date the Unapproved Share Option Plan is adopted.
| 64 |
C. Board Practices
Corporate Governance Practices
We are a “foreign private issuer,” as defined by the SEC. As a result, in accordance with NASDAQ listing requirements, we may rely on home country governance requirements and certain exemptions thereunder rather than complying with NASDAQ corporate governance standards. While we voluntarily follow most NASDAQ corporate governance rules, we may choose to take advantage of the following limited exemptions:
| ● | Exemption from filing quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information or current reports on Form 8-K upon the occurrence of specified significant events. | |
| ● | Exemption from Section 16 rules requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades in a short period of time, which will provide less data in this regard than shareholders of U.S. companies that are subject to the Exchange Act. | |
| ● | Exemption from the NASDAQ requirement requiring disclosure of any waivers of the code of business conduct and ethics for directors and officers. | |
| ● | Exemption from the requirement that our board have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities. | |
| ● | Exemption from the requirement to have independent director oversight of director nominations. |
We follow the QCA code corporate governance practices in lieu of NASDAQ corporate governance requirements as follows:
| ● | We do not follow NASDAQ Rule 5620(c) regarding quorum requirements applicable to meetings of shareholders. Such quorum requirements are not required under English law. In accordance with generally accepted business practice, our Articles of Association will provide alternative quorum requirements that are generally applicable to meetings of shareholders. | |
| ● | We do not follow NASDAQ Rule 5605(b)(2), which requires that independent directors regularly meet in executive sessions where only independent directors are present. Our independent directors may choose to meet in executive sessions at their discretion. |
Although we may rely on certain home country corporate governance practices, we must comply with NASDAQ’s Notification of Noncompliance requirement (NASDAQ Rule 5625) and the Voting Rights requirement (NASDAQ Rule 5640). Further, we must have an audit committee that satisfies NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(3), which addresses audit committee responsibilities and authority and requires that the audit committee consist of members who meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(ii).
We intend to take all actions necessary for us to maintain compliance as a foreign private issuer under the applicable corporate governance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the rules adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ listing rules. Accordingly, our shareholders will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of NASDAQ. For an overview of our corporate governance principles, see the section titled “Description of Share Capital and Articles of Association—Differences in Corporate Law.”
| 65 |
Compliance with the Quoted Companies Alliance Corporate Governance Code
All companies with securities admitted to trading on LSE are required to include on their website details of a recognized corporate governance code that the board of directors of the company have decided to apply, how the company complies with that code, and where it departs from its chosen corporate governance code an explanation of the reasons for doing so. This information is required to be reviewed annually.
The company has decided to apply the Corporate Governance Code published by the Quoted Companies Alliance, or the QCA Code. The QCA Code sets out a standard of minimum best practice for small and midsize quoted companies. The Company will continue to follow these rules despite the delisting from the LSE.
Composition of Our Board of Directors
Our board of directors is currently composed of five members. Our board of directors has determined that, of our five directors, three of the directors, Mr. John Brancaccio, Mr. Bernard Denoyer and Mr. Simon, each do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is “independent” as that term is defined under NASDAQ rules.
In accordance with our Articles, each of our directors for whom it is the third annual general meeting following the annual general meeting at which they were elected or last re-elected, or who was appointed by the board since the previous annual general meeting, shall retire from office but shall be eligible to stand for re-election. See “Description of Share Capital and Articles of Association—Articles of Association—Board of Directors.”
The expiration of the current terms of the members of the Board of Directors and the period each member has served in that term are as follows:
| Name | Year Current Term Began | Year Current Term Expires | ||||||
| Gabriele Cerrone | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||
| Gary Jacob | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||
| Willy Simon | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||
| John Brancaccio | 2024 | 2025 | ||||||
| Bernard Denoyer | 2024 | 2025 |
The Company has adopted best practice for corporate governance in its country of incorporation so all directors will retire and stand for re-election at each annual general meeting (as opposed to reliance upon rotational reappointment).
Committees of Our Board of Directors
Our board of directors has three standing committees: an audit, risk and disclosure committee, a remuneration committee and a nomination committee.
| 66 |
Audit, Risk and Disclosure Committee
The audit, risk and disclosure committee, which consists of John Brancaccio, Bernard Denoyer and Willy Simon, assists the board of directors in overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes. Mr. Brancaccio serves as chairman of the audit, risk and disclosure committee. The audit, risk and disclosure committee consists exclusively of members of our board who are financially literate, and Mr. Brancaccio is considered an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable NASDAQ rules and regulations.
Our board has determined that all of the members of the audit, risk and disclosure committee satisfy the “independence” requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. The audit, risk and disclosure committee will be governed by a charter that complies with NASDAQ rules.
The audit, risk and disclosure committee’s responsibilities include:
| ● | recommending the appointment of the independent auditor to the general meeting of shareholders; | |
| ● | the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of any accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit services; | |
| ● | pre-approving the audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor before the auditor is engaged to render such services; | |
| ● | evaluating the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence, and presenting its conclusions to the full board of directors on at least an annual basis; | |
| ● | reviewing and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our financial statements and our financial reporting process; | |
| ● | reviewing, approving or ratifying any related party transactions. |
| 67 |
Remuneration Committee
The remuneration committee consists of Mr. Brancaccio, Mr. Denoyer and Mr. Simon. Mr. Simon serves as chairman of the remuneration committee. Under SEC and NASDAQ rules, there are heightened independence standards for members of the remuneration committee, including a prohibition against the receipt of any compensation from us other than standard board member fees.
The remuneration committee’s responsibilities include:
| ● | identifying, reviewing and proposing policies relevant to the compensation and benefits of our directors and executive officers; | |
| ● | evaluating each executive officer’s performance in light of such policies and reporting to the board; and | |
| ● | overseeing and administering our employee share option scheme or equity incentive plans in operation from time to time. |
Nomination Committee
The nomination committee consists of Mr. Denoyer, Mr. Brancaccio and Mr. Simon. Mr. Denoyer serves as chairman of the nomination committee. The nomination committee’s responsibilities include:
| ● | drawing up selection criteria and appointment procedures for directors; | |
| ● | recommending nominees for election to our board of directors and its corresponding committees; | |
| ● | assessing the functioning of individual members of our board of directors and executive officers and reporting the results of such assessment to the board of directors; and | |
| ● | developing corporate governance guidelines. |
None of our non-employee directors have any service contracts with OKYO Pharma Ltd or our subsidiary that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.
D. Employees
As of March 31, 2025, we had 4 full time employees. Two of our employees were engaged in research and development and three employees were engaged in management, administration and finance. All three are located in the United States. None of our employees are members of labor unions. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
Insurance and Indemnification
To the extent permitted by the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008, we are empowered to indemnify our directors against any liability they incur by reason of their directorship. We maintain directors’ and officers’ insurance to insure such persons against certain liabilities. We expect to enter into a deed of indemnity with each of our directors and executive officers prior to, or as soon as practicable, following the filing of this annual report.
In addition to such indemnification, we provide our directors and executive officers with directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.
Insofar as indemnification of liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our board of directors, executive officers, or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
E. Share Ownership
See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.”
| 68 |
ITEM 7: MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth information relating to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of June 19, 2025 by:
| ● | each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares; and | |
| ● | each member of our board of directors and each of our executive officers. |
The number of ordinary shares beneficially owned by each entity, person, board member, or executive officer is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any ordinary shares over which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power as well as any ordinary shares that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days of June 19, 2025 through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all ordinary shares held by that person.
| Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
| Name of beneficial owner | Shares | % | ||||||
| 5% or Greater Shareholders: | ||||||||
| Gabriele Cerrone(1) | 10,172,677 | 27.09 | ||||||
| Executive Officers and Directors: | ||||||||
| Gabriele Cerrone(1) | 10,172,677 | 27.09 | ||||||
| Willy Simon(2) | 35,359 | * | ||||||
| Gary Jacob (3) | 104,808 | * | ||||||
| John Brancaccio(4) | 25,201 | * | ||||||
| Bernard Denoyer(5) | 4,872 | * | ||||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons)(3) | 10,252,660 | 27.54 | ||||||
| * | Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the total outstanding ordinary shares. |
| (1) | Mr. Gabriele Cerrone is the ultimate beneficial owner of ordinary shares through Planwise Group Limited and Panetta Partners Limited. |
| (2) | Includes 26,410 stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 19, 2025 |
| (3) | Includes 58,975 stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 19, 2025 |
| (4) | Includes 31,865 stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 19, 2025 |
| (5) | Consists of 4 872 stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 19, 2025 |
| 69 |
B. Related Party Transactions
The following is a description of related party transactions we have entered into since April 1, 2022, with the beneficial owners of 5% or more of our ordinary shares, which are our only voting securities, and senior management and members of our board of directors.
Indemnity Agreements
We have entered into deeds of indemnity with each of our directors.
Shared services Agreements
We have entered into a Shared Services agreement with Tiziana whereby we are charged for shared services such as payroll and rent.
Related Person Transaction Policy
Our board of directors has adopted a written related person transaction policy, effective as of May 10, 2022. This policy covers, any transaction or proposed transactions between us and a related person that are material to us or the related person, including without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. In reviewing and approving any such transactions, our audit, risk and disclosure committee is tasked to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See “Item 18. Financial Statements”.
Legal Proceedings
Except as disclosed in this paragraph, there are no governmental, legal or arbitration proceedings (including any such proceedings which are pending or threatened of which the Company is aware), which may have, or have had during the 12 months prior to the date of this annual report, a significant effect on the Company’s and/or our financial position or profitability. In addition to the proceedings set out in this section, the Company is not involved in other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.
B. Significant Changes
See Note 25 of our consolidated financial statements at the end of this Annual Report for a description of the significant changes since March 31, 2024.
| 70 |
ITEM 9: THE LISTING
A. Listing Details
From May 22, 2023, the principal trading market for our ordinary shares has been the NASDAQ Capital Market. Prior to this date the primary market was the main market of the London Stock Exchange (LSE), where our ordinary shares have been listed since July 17, 2018. Prior to July 17, 2018 we were listed on the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange since 2014.
Our ordinary shares traded on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange under the symbol “OKYO” since July 17, 2018 until May 19, 2023 when we delisted from the London Stock Exchange.
Our American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, were trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “OKYO” from May 17, 2022 until May 21, 2023. These were substituted for ordinary shares in OKYO Pharma Ltd on May 22, 2023.
B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C. Markets
Our ordinary shares are now listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “OKYO”. The listing of our ordinary shares on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange ceased on May 21, 2023.
D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E. Dilution
Not applicable.
| 71 |
F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
We incorporate by reference into this Annual Report the description of our amended articles of association contained in our Registration Statement on Form F-1 originally filed with the SEC on March 4, 2022, as amended.
C. Material Contracts
Except as otherwise disclosed in this Annual Report (including the exhibits hereto), we are not currently, and have not been in the last two years, party to any material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.
D. Exchange Controls
There are no governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in the United Kingdom that may affect the import or export of capital, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use by us, or that may affect the remittance of dividends, interest, or other payments by us to non-resident holders of our ordinary shares, other than withholding tax requirements. There is no limitation imposed by English and our Guernsey law or our articles of association on the right of non-residents to hold or participate in shareholders vote.
| 72 |
E. Taxation
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders
The following discussion describes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the ownership and disposition of our Ordinary shares by U.S. Holders. This discussion applies to U.S. Holders that purchase our Ordinary shares pursuant to this offering and hold such Ordinary shares as capital assets for tax purposes. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, and the income tax treaty between the United Kingdom and the United States, or the Treaty, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to specific U.S. Holders in light of their particular circumstances or to U.S. Holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law (such as certain financial institutions, insurance companies, dealers or traders in securities or other persons that generally mark their securities to market for U.S. federal income tax purposes, tax-exempt entities or governmental organizations, retirement plans, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, grantor trusts, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities, currencies or notional principal contracts, certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United States, persons who hold our Ordinary shares as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion transaction,” “synthetic security” or integrated investment, persons that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar, persons who are subject to the tax accounting rules of Section 451(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, persons that own directly, indirectly or through attribution 10% or more (by vote or value) of our equity, corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, partnerships and other pass-through entities, and investors in such pass-through entities). This discussion does not address any U.S. state or local or non-U.S. tax consequences or any U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum tax consequences.
As used in this discussion, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our Ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (1) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (2) a corporation (or entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia, (3) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source or (4) a trust (i) with respect to which a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions or (ii) that has elected under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a domestic trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our Ordinary shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to an investment in such Ordinary shares will depend upon the status and activities of such entity and the particular partner. Any such entity and a partner in any such entity should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to it (and, as applicable, its partners) of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our Ordinary shares.
We have not sought, nor will we seek, a ruling from the IRS with respect to the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposition of the Ordinary shares or that any such position would not be sustained. Persons considering an investment in our Ordinary shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the particular tax consequences applicable to them relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of our Ordinary shares, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and non-U.S. tax laws.
Passive Foreign Investment Company (PFIC) Rules
In general, a corporation organized outside the United States will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which either (1) at least 75% of its gross income is “passive income,” or the PFIC income test, or (2) on average at least 50% of its assets, determined on a quarterly basis, are assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, or the PFIC asset test. Passive income for this purpose generally includes, among other things, dividends, interest, royalties, rents, and gains from the sale or exchange of property that give rise to passive income. Assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income generally include cash, even if held as working capital or raised in a public offering, marketable securities, and other assets that may produce passive income. Generally, in determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account.
| 73 |
Although PFIC status is determined on an annual basis and generally cannot be determined until the end of the taxable year, based on the nature of our current and expected income and the current and expected value and composition of our assets, we do not believe we were a PFIC for our 2025 tax year and we do not expect to be a PFIC for our current taxable year. There can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC in future taxable years. Even if we determine that we are not a PFIC for a taxable year, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with our conclusion and that the IRS would not successfully challenge our position. Because of the uncertainties involved in establishing our PFIC status, our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion regarding our PFIC status, and also expresses no opinion with respect to our predictions or past determinations regarding our PFIC status.
If we are a PFIC in any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder owns our ordinary shares, the U.S. Holder could be liable for additional taxes and interest charges under the “PFIC excess distribution regime” upon (1) a distribution paid during a taxable year that is greater than 125% of the average annual distributions paid in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our ordinary shares, and (2) any gain recognized on a sale, exchange or other disposition, including, under certain circumstances, a pledge, of our ordinary shares, whether or not we continue to be a PFIC. Under the PFIC excess distribution regime, the tax on such distribution or gain would be determined by allocating the distribution or gain ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our ordinary shares. The amount allocated to the current taxable year (i.e., the year in which the distribution occurs or the gain is recognized) and any year prior to the first taxable year in which we are a PFIC will be taxed as ordinary income earned in the current taxable year. The amount allocated to other taxable years will be taxed at the highest marginal rates in effect for individuals or corporations, as applicable, to ordinary income for each such taxable year, and an interest charge, generally applicable to underpayments of tax, will be added to the tax.
If we are a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds our ordinary shares, we must generally continue to be treated as a PFIC by that U.S. Holder for all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder holds such ordinary shares, unless we cease to meet the requirements for PFIC status and the U.S. Holder makes a “deemed sale” election with respect to our ordinary shares. If the election is made, the U.S. Holder will be deemed to sell our ordinary shares it holds at their fair market value on the last day of the last taxable year in which we qualified as a PFIC, and any gain recognized from such deemed sale would be taxed under the PFIC excess distribution regime. After the deemed sale election, the U.S. Holder’s ordinary shares would not be treated as shares of a PFIC unless we subsequently become a PFIC.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds our ordinary shares and one of our non-United States subsidiaries is also a PFIC (i.e., a lower-tier PFIC), such U.S. Holder would be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of the shares of the lower-tier PFIC and would be taxed under the PFIC excess distribution regime on distributions by the lower-tier PFIC and on gain from the disposition of shares of the lower-tier PFIC even though such U.S. Holder would not receive the proceeds of those distributions or dispositions. Any of our non-United States subsidiaries that have elected to be disregarded as entities separate from us or as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes would not be corporations under U.S. federal income tax law and accordingly, cannot be classified as lower-tier PFICs. However, a non-United States subsidiary that has not made the election may be classified as a lower-tier PFIC if we are a PFIC during your holding period and the subsidiary meets the PFIC income test or PFIC asset test.
If we are a PFIC, a U.S. Holder may not be subject to tax under the PFIC excess distribution regime on distributions or gain recognized on our ordinary shares if a valid “mark-to-market” election is made by the U.S. Holder for our ordinary shares. An electing U.S. Holder generally would take into account as ordinary income each year, the excess of the fair market value of our ordinary shares held at the end of such taxable year over the adjusted tax basis of such ordinary shares. The U.S. Holder would also take into account, as an ordinary loss each year, the excess of the adjusted tax basis of such ordinary shares over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the excess of amounts previously included in income over ordinary losses deducted as a result of the mark-to-market election. The U.S. Holder’s tax basis in our ordinary shares would be adjusted annually to reflect any income or loss recognized as a result of the mark-to-market election. Any gain from a sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares in any taxable year in which we are a PFIC would be treated as ordinary income and any loss from such sale, exchange or other disposition would be treated first as ordinary loss (to the extent of any net mark-to-market gains previously included in income) and thereafter as capital loss. If, after having been a PFIC for a taxable year, we cease to be classified as a PFIC because we no longer meet the PFIC income or PFIC asset test, the U.S. Holder would not be required to take into account any latent gain or loss in the manner described above and any gain or loss recognized on the sale or exchange of the ordinary shares would be classified as a capital gain or loss.
| 74 |
A mark-to-market election is available to a U.S. Holder only for “marketable stock.” Generally, stock may be considered marketable stock if it is “regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange” within the meaning of applicable U.S. Treasury regulations. A class of stock is regularly traded during any calendar year during which such class of stock is traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter.
The tax consequences that would apply if we are a PFIC would also be different from those described above if a U.S. Holder were able to make a valid Qualified Electing Fund (QEF) election. As we do not expect to provide U.S. Holders with the information necessary for a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election, prospective investors should assume that a QEF election will not be available.
The U.S. federal income tax rules relating to PFICs are very complex. Prospective U.S. investors are strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the impact of PFIC status on the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, the consequences to them of an investment in a PFIC, any elections available with respect to the ordinary shares and the IRS information reporting obligations with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares of a PFIC.
Distributions
Subject to the discussion above under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules”, a U.S. Holder that receives a distribution with respect to our ordinary shares generally will be required to include the gross amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend when actually or constructively received by the U.S. Holder to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of our current and/or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). To the extent a distribution received by a U.S. Holder is not a dividend because it exceeds the U.S. Holder’s pro rata share of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, it may be treated first as a tax-free return of capital and reduce (but not below zero) the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. Holder’s ordinary shares. To the extent the distribution exceeds the adjusted tax basis of the U.S. Holder’s ordinary shares, the remainder will be taxed as a capital gain. Because we may not account for our earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, U.S. Holders should expect all distributions to be reported to them as dividends. The amount of a dividend will include any amounts withheld by the company in respect of United Kingdom taxes.
Distributions on our ordinary shares that are treated as dividends generally will constitute income from sources outside the United States for foreign tax credit purposes and generally will constitute passive category income. Subject to applicable limitations, some of which vary depending upon the U.S. Holder’s particular circumstances, any United Kingdom income taxes withheld from dividends on ordinary shares at a rate not exceeding the rate provided by the Treaty will be creditable against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. The rules governing foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the creditability of foreign taxes in their particular circumstances. In lieu of claiming a foreign tax credit, U.S. Holders may, at their election, deduct foreign taxes, including any United Kingdom income tax, in computing their taxable income, subject to generally applicable limitations under U.S. law. An election to deduct foreign taxes instead of claiming foreign tax credits applies to all foreign taxes paid or accrued in the taxable year. The amount of any dividend income paid in a currency other than the U.S. dollar will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of actual or constructive receipt, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend amount. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gain or loss if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt.
Distributions paid on our ordinary shares may not be eligible for the “dividends received” deduction generally allowed to corporate shareholders with respect to dividends received from U.S. corporations under the Internal Revenue Code. Dividends paid by a “qualified foreign corporation’’ to non-corporate U.S. Holders are eligible for taxation at a reduced capital gains rate rather than the marginal tax rates generally applicable to ordinary income provided that a holding period requirement (more than 60 days of ownership, without protection from the risk of loss, during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date) and certain other requirements are met. Each U.S. Holder is advised to consult their tax advisors regarding the availability of the reduced tax rate on dividends to their particular circumstances. However, if we are a PFIC for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or the preceding taxable year (see discussion above under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules’’), we may not be treated as a qualified foreign corporation, and therefore the reduced capital gains tax rate described above may not apply.
| 75 |
A non-United States corporation (other than a corporation that is classified as a PFIC for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or the preceding taxable year) generally will be considered to be a qualified foreign corporation with respect to any dividend it pays on ordinary shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States.
The amount of any dividend income that is paid in Pounds Sterling will be the U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date of receipt, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt (actual or constructive), a U.S. Holder should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income. A U.S. Holder may have foreign currency gains or losses if the dividend is converted into U.S. dollars after the date of receipt (actual or constructive).
Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Our Ordinary Shares
Subject to the discussion above under “Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules”, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between the amount realized (i.e., the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received) on the sale, exchange or other disposition and such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the ordinary shares. Such capital gain or loss generally will be a long-term capital gain taxable at a reduced rate for non-corporate U.S. Holders or a long-term capital loss if, on the date of sale, exchange or other disposition, the ordinary shares were held by the U.S. Holder for more than one year. Any capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder that is not a long-term capital gain is taxed at ordinary income tax rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss recognized from the sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares will generally be a gain or loss from sources within the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.
Medicare Tax
Certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds generally are subject to a 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their net investment income, which may include their gross dividend income and net gains from the disposition of our ordinary shares. If you are a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust, you are encouraged to consult your tax advisors regarding the applicability of this Medicare tax to your income and gains in respect of your investment in our ordinary shares.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
U.S. Holders may be required to file certain U.S. information reporting returns with the IRS with respect to an investment in our ordinary shares, including, among others, IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets). In addition, each U.S. Holder who is a shareholder of a PFIC must file an annual report containing certain information. U.S. Holders paying more than $100,000 for our ordinary shares may be required to file IRS Form 926 (Return by a U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation) reporting this payment. Substantial penalties and other adverse circumstances may be imposed upon a U.S. Holder that fails to comply with the required information reporting.
Dividends on and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares generally have to be reported to the IRS unless the U.S. Holder establishes a basis for exemption. Backup withholding may apply to amounts subject to reporting if the holder (1) fails to provide an accurate U.S. taxpayer identification number or otherwise establish a basis for exemption, or (2) is described in certain other categories of persons. However, U.S. Holders that are corporations generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding tax rules.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability if the required information is furnished by the U.S. Holder on a timely basis to the IRS.
U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the backup withholding tax and information reporting rules.
EACH PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR IS URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISOR ABOUT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR ORDINARY SHARES IN LIGHT OF THE INVESTOR’S OWN CIRCUMSTANCES. IN ADDITION, SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS WERE RECENTLY ENACTED. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD ALSO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH CHANGES IN U.S. TAX LAW AS WELL AS POTENTIAL CONFORMING CHANGES IN STATE TAX LAWS.
| 76 |
U.K. Taxation
The following is intended as a general guide to current U.K. tax law and Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, or HMRC, published practice applying as at the date of this annual report (both of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retrospective effect) relating to the holding of ordinary shares. It does not constitute legal or tax advice and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all U.K. tax considerations relating to the holding of ordinary shares, or all of the circumstances in which holders of ordinary shares may benefit from an exemption or relief from U.K. taxation. It is written on the basis that the company does not (and will not) directly or indirectly derive 75% or more of its qualifying asset value from U.K. land, and that the company is and remains solely resident in the U.K. for tax purposes and will therefore be subject to the U.K. tax regime and not the U.S. tax regime save as set out above under “U.S. Federal Income Taxation.”
Except to the extent that the position of non-U.K. resident persons is expressly referred to, this guide relates only to persons who are resident (and, in the case of individuals, domiciled or deemed domiciled) for tax purposes solely in the U.K. and do not have a permanent establishment or fixed base in any other jurisdiction with which the holding of the ordinary shares is connected, or U.K. Holders, who are absolute beneficial owners of the ordinary shares (where the ordinary shares are not held through an Individual Savings Account or a Self-Invested Personal Pension) and who hold the ordinary shares as investments.
This guide may not relate to certain classes of U.K. Holders, such as (but not limited to):
| ● | persons who are connected with the company; | |
| ● | financial institutions; | |
| ● | insurance companies; | |
| ● | charities or tax-exempt organizations; | |
| ● | collective investment schemes; | |
| ● | pension schemes; | |
| ● | market makers, intermediaries, brokers or dealers in securities; | |
| ● | persons who have (or are deemed to have) acquired their ordinary shares by virtue of an office or employment or who are or have been officers or employees of the company or any of its affiliates; and | |
| ● | individuals who are subject to U.K. taxation on a remittance basis. |
THESE PARAGRAPHS ARE A SUMMARY OF CERTAIN U.K. TAX CONSIDERATIONS AND ARE INTENDED AS A GENERAL GUIDE ONLY. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ALL HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES OBTAIN ADVICE AS TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL OF THE ORDINARY SHARES IN THEIR OWN SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES FROM THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS. IN PARTICULAR, NON-U.K. RESIDENT OR DOMICILED PERSONS ARE ADVISED TO CONSIDER THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF ANY RELEVANT DOUBLE TAXATION AGREEMENTS.
| 77 |
Dividends
Withholding Tax
Dividends paid by the company will not be subject to any withholding or deduction for or on account of U.K. tax, irrespective of the residence or particular circumstances of the holders of ordinary shares.
Income Tax
An individual U.K. Holder may, depending on his or her particular circumstances, be subject to U.K. tax on dividends received from the company. An individual holder of ordinary shares who is not resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom should not be chargeable to U.K. income tax on dividends received from the company unless he or she carries on (whether solely or in partnership) a trade, profession or vocation in the U.K. through a branch or agency to which the ordinary shares are attributable. There are certain exceptions for trading in the U.K. through independent agents, such as some brokers and investment managers.
All dividends received by an individual U.K. Holder from us or from other sources may form part of that U.K. Holder’s total income for income tax purposes and may constitute the top slice of that income. A nil rate of income tax will apply to the first £500 of taxable dividend income received by the individual U.K. Holder in a tax year. Income within the nil-rate band will be taken into account in determining whether income in excess of the £500 tax-free allowance falls within the basic rate, higher rate or additional rate tax bands. Dividend income in excess of the tax-free allowance will (subject to the availability of any income tax personal allowance) be taxed at 8.5 per cent. to the extent that the excess amount falls within the basic rate tax band, 33.75 per cent. to the extent that the excess amount falls within the higher rate tax band and 39.35 per cent. to the extent that the excess amount falls within the additional rate tax band.
Corporation Tax
A corporate holder of ordinary shares who is not resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom should not be chargeable to U.K. corporation tax on dividends received from the company unless it carries on (whether solely or in partnership) a trade in the United Kingdom through a permanent establishment to which the ordinary shares are attributable.
Corporate U.K. Holders should not be subject to U.K. corporation tax on any dividend received from the company so long as the dividends qualify for exemption, which should be the case, provided the dividends fall within an exempt class and certain conditions are met. If the conditions for the exemption are not satisfied, or such U.K. Holder elects for an otherwise exempt dividend to be taxable, U.K. corporation tax will be chargeable on the amount of any dividends (at the current rate of 25%).
Chargeable Gains
A disposal or deemed disposal of ordinary shares by a U.K. Holder may, depending on the U.K. Holder’s circumstances and subject to any available exemptions or reliefs (such as the annual exemption), give rise to a chargeable gain or an allowable loss for the purposes of U.K. capital gains tax and corporation tax on chargeable gains.
If an individual U.K. Holder who is subject to U.K. income tax at either the higher or the additional rate is liable to U.K. capital gains tax on the disposal of ordinary shares, the current applicable rate will be 20%. For an individual U.K. Holder who is subject to U.K. income tax at the basic rate and liable to capital gains tax on such disposal, the current applicable rate would be 10%, save to the extent that any capital gains when aggregated with the U.K. Holder’s other taxable income and gains in the relevant tax year exceed the unused basic rate tax band. In that case, the rate currently applicable to the excess would be 20%.
If a corporate U.K. Holder becomes liable to U.K. corporation tax on the disposal (or deemed disposal) of ordinary shares, the main rate of U.K. corporation tax (currently 25%) would apply. Indexation allowance is not available in respect of disposals of ordinary shares acquired on or after January 1, 2018 (and only covers the movement in the retail prices index up until March 31, 2017, in respect of assets acquired prior to that date). A holder of ordinary shares which is not resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom should not normally be liable to U.K. capital gains tax or corporation tax on chargeable gains on a disposal (or deemed disposal) of ordinary shares unless the person is carrying on (whether solely or in partnership) a trade, profession or vocation in the United Kingdom through a branch or agency (or, in the case of a corporate holder of ordinary shares, through a permanent establishment) to which the ordinary shares are attributable. However, an individual holder of ordinary shares who is treated as resident outside the United Kingdom for the purposes of a double tax treaty, or who has ceased to be resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom for a period of less than five years and who disposes of ordinary shares during that period may be liable on his or her return to the United Kingdom to U.K. tax on any capital gain realized (subject to any available exemption or relief).
| 78 |
Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax
The discussion below relates to the holders of our ordinary shares or ordinary shares wherever resident, however it should be noted that special rules may apply to certain persons such as market makers, brokers, dealers or intermediaries.
Issue of Shares
No U.K. stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax, or SDRT, is payable on the issue of the ordinary shares in the company.
Transfers of Shares
Transfers of the ordinary shares (including instruments transferring ordinary shares and agreements to transfer ordinary shares) are not subject to UK stamp duty or UK SDRT.
Issue and Transfers of Ordinary Shares
U.K. stamp duty or SDRT is not payable on the issue or transfer of (including an agreement to transfer) ordinary shares in a Guernsey incorporated entity. Guernsey has no issue or transfer taxes on ordinary shares.
| 79 |
F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G. Statements by Experts
Not applicable.
H. Documents on Display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 20-F and reports on Form 6-K. You may inspect and copy reports and other information filed with the SEC at the public reference facilities of the SEC located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of the documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov from which certain filings may be accessed.
We also make available on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report and the text of our reports on Form 6-K, including any amendments to these reports, as well as certain other SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our website address is www.okyopharma.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.
I. Subsidiary Information
For information on our subsidiaries, see “Item 4C. Organizational Structure.”
ITEM 11: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business, which are principally limited to interest rate fluctuations and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We maintain significant amounts of cash and cash equivalents that are in excess of federally insured limits in various currencies, placed with one or more financial institutions for varying periods according to expected liquidity requirements.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate sensitivity is impacted by changes in the underlying U.S. and U.K. bank interest rates. Our surplus cash and cash equivalents have been invested in interest-bearing savings and money market accounts from time to time. We have not entered into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the conservative nature of our investment portfolio, which is predicated on capital preservation of investments with short-term maturities, we do not believe an immediate one percentage point change in interest rates would have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio, and therefore we do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be significantly affected by changes in market interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We maintain our consolidated financial statements in the functional currency Pounds Sterling. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Exchange gains or losses arising from foreign currency transactions are included in the determination of net income (loss) for the respective periods.
| 80 |
For financial reporting purposes, our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the functional currency, and translated into the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet dates and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates and shareholders’ equity is translated based on historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments are not included in determining net income (loss) but are included in foreign exchange adjustment to accumulate other comprehensive loss, a component of shareholders’ equity.
We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities in order to reduce our currency exposure, but we may begin to do so in the future. Instruments that may be used to hedge future risks may include foreign currency forward and swap contracts. These instruments may be used to selectively manage risks, but there can be no assurance that we will be fully protected against material foreign currency fluctuations.
ITEM 12: DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
A. Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B. Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C. Other Securities
Not applicable.
D. American Depositary Shares
Not applicable.
| 81 |
PART II
ITEM 13: DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AN DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14: MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2024. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of March 31, 2025, there were no material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting described below, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and IFRIC interpretations as applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.
Because of their inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an informal evaluation, based on regular verbal discussions between management and the audit committee, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Commission of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, as revised in 2013. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that the Company did maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of the period ended March 31, 2025 and no material weaknesses were identified.
| 82 |
ITEM 16A: AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
The members of our audit, risk and disclosure committee are Mr John Brancaccio, Mr Bernard Denoyer and Mr. Willy Simon. Mr. John Brancaccio is the chair of the audit, risk and disclosure committee. Each of our audit, risk and disclosure committee members satisfies the independence requirements of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Marketplace Rules and the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. John Brancaccio is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F.
ITEM 16B: CODE OF ETHICS
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all of our employees, officers and directors and is available on our website at https://www.okyopharma.com. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provides that our directors and officers are expected to avoid any action, position or interest that conflicts with the interests of our company or gives the appearance of a conflict. Our directors and officers have an obligation under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to advance our company’s interests when the opportunity to do so arises. We expect that any amendment to this code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report, and you should not consider information on our website to be part of this Annual Report.
ITEM 16C: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following table sets forth, for each of the years indicated, the aggregate fees billed to us for services rendered by PKF Littlejohn LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm and Mazars, our previous independent registered public accounting firm:
| Mazars LLP | Year Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Audit fees | - | - | ||||||
| Other assurance services(1) | 27 | 7 | ||||||
| Total | 27 | 7 | ||||||
| PKF Littlejohn LLP | Year Ended March 31, | |||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Audit fees | 134 | 126 | ||||||
| Other assurance services(1) | 22 | 25 | ||||||
| Total | 156 | 151 | ||||||
| (1) | Other assurance services include interim reviews, analyzing the processes, controls, and operations equired for other filings |
ITEM 16D: EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E: PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
None.
ITEM 16F: CHANGE IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
None.
| 83 |
ITEM 16G: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, requires foreign private issuers, including our company, to comply with various corporate governance practices. In addition, NASDAQ rules provide that foreign private issuers may follow home country practices in lieu of the NASDAQ corporate governance standards, subject to certain exceptions and except to the extent that such exemptions would be contrary to U.S. federal securities laws. The home country practices followed by our company in lieu of NASDAQ rules are described below:
| ● | We do not follow NASDAQ’s quorum requirements applicable to meetings of shareholders. Such quorum requirements are not required under Guernsey law. In accordance with generally accepted business practice, our articles of association provide alternative quorum requirements that are generally applicable to meetings of shareholders. | |
| ● | We do not follow NASDAQ’s requirements that non-management directors meet on a regular basis without management present. Our board of directors may choose to meet in executive session at their discretion. | |
| ● | We do not follow NASDAQ’s requirements to seek shareholder approval for the implementation of certain equity compensation plans, the issuances of ordinary shares under such plans, or in connection with certain private placements of equity securities. In accordance with Guernsey law, we are not required to seek shareholder approval to allot ordinary shares in connection with applicable employee equity compensation plans. We will follow Guernsey law with respect to any requirement to obtain shareholder approval prior to any private placements of equity securities. |
We intend to take all actions necessary for us to maintain compliance as a foreign private issuer under the applicable corporate governance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ’s listing standards.
Because we are a foreign private issuer, our directors and senior management are not subject to short-swing profit and insider trading reporting obligations under Section 16 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act. They are, however, subject to the obligations to report changes in share ownership under Section 13 of the Exchange Act and related SEC rules.
ITEM 16H: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 16J: INSIDER TRADING POLICIES
Our
insider trading policy has been
| 84 |
ITEM 16K: CYBERSECURITY
As
a biopharmaceutical company, we must comply with extensive regulations, including requirements imposed by the Federal Drug Administration
related to adequately safeguarding patient information and reporting cybersecurity incidents to the SEC. We work with our cybersecurity
consultant on assessing cybersecurity risk and on policies and practices aimed at mitigating these risks.
We rely heavily on our supply chain to deliver our products and services, and a cybersecurity incident at a supplier, subcontractor or business partner could materially adversely impact us. We require that our subcontractors report cybersecurity incidents to us so that we can assess the impact of the incident on us. Notwithstanding the extensive approach we take to cybersecurity, we may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity incident that could have a material adverse effect on us. While we maintain cybersecurity insurance, the costs related to cybersecurity threats or disruptions may not be fully insured.
ITEM 16L: DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
| 85 |
PART III
ITEM 17: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have elected to furnish financial statements and related information specified in Item 18.
ITEM 18: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See the Financial Statements beginning on page F-1.
ITEM 19: EXHIBITS
| * | Filed Herewith |
| 86 |
SIGNATURES
The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
| OKYO Pharma Ltd | ||
| By: | /s/ Gary Jacob | |
| Gary Jacob | ||
| Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Date: July 18, 2025 | ||
| 87 |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OKYO PHARMA LIMITED
| F-1 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of OKYO Pharma Limited
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of OKYO Pharma Limited and its subsidiary (the “Group”) as of March 31, 2025 and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2025 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as of March 31, 2025 and 2024 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2025 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Going Concern Uncertainty
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Group will continue as a going concern. As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Group is pre-revenue and its business model requires significant ongoing expenditure on research and development that include the costs to progress the clinical pipeline. The Group requires additional financing facilities during the going concern period in order to initiate the next phase of trials in Neuropathic Corneal Pain and for working capital purposes. The Directors are taking steps to put engagements and plans in place to ensure that sufficient funds will be forthcoming and has been consistently successful in raising additional funds when required. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Group in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Group is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We have served as the Group’s auditor since 28 November 2022.
Date: July 18, 2025
| F-2 |
OKYO Pharma Limited
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | ||||||||
| Current taxation receivable | ||||||||
| Other receivables | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| Property and Equipment, net | ||||||||
| Total non-current assets | ||||||||
| Total assets | ||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Trade and other payables | ||||||||
| Related party payable | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Shareholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
| Share premium | ||||||||
| Share options reserve | ||||||||
| Convertible Loan Note Reserve | ||||||||
| Warrants reserve | ||||||||
| Foreign currency translation reserve | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Retained deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | ||||||||
| F-3 |
OKYO Pharma Limited
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other (expense): | ||||||||||||
| Finance expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss from operations before income taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Income tax | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Loss for the year | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Other Comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||
| Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common shareholders | $ | ) | $ | ) | $ | ) | ||||||
| F-4 |
OKYO Pharma Limited
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
| No. of Shares | Share Capital | Options reserve | Warrant reserve | Convertible Loan Note Reserve | Retained Earnings | Translation Reserve | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2022 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares fundraising net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expenses settled in shares | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options charge | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeiture | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrants charge | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the period | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currency translation | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2023 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares fundraising net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expenses settled in shares | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of shares, related party loan conversion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options charge | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeiture | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warrants charge | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the period | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currency translation | — | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2024 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expenses settled in shares | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued in lieu of consultancy fees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued in lieu of Bonus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued in lieu of interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued for Fundraising, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fees on CLN issuance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options charge | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Options forfeiture | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from Convertible loan note | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total transactions | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss for the period | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currency translation | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive income | — | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at March 31, 2025 | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| F-5 |
OKYO Pharma Limited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
| Loss from operations before income taxes | ( | ) | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | |||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Share option charge | ||||||||||||
| Warrant charge | ||||||||||||
| Forfeiture of options | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Depreciation of fixed assets | ||||||||||||
| (Gain)/Loss on foreign exchange | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Expenses settled in shares | ||||||||||||
| Shares Issued in lieu of consultancy fees | ||||||||||||
| Shares Issued in lieu of bonus | ||||||||||||
| CLN Fees settled in shares | ||||||||||||
| Shares Issued in lieu of interest | ||||||||||||
| Convertible loan interest accrued | ||||||||||||
| Net increase/(decrease) in related party payables | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Net (increase)/decrease in operating assets/other receivables | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Net (decrease)/increase in trade and other payables | ||||||||||||
| Cash inflow from taxation | ||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from fundraising, net and issuance of ordinary shares | ||||||||||||
| Proceeds from convertible loan note | ||||||||||||
| Loan from related party | ||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | ||||||||||||
| Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalent, beginning of period | ||||||||||||
| Exchange difference | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalent, end of period | ||||||||||||
| Non Cash items: | ||||||||||||
| Conversion of related party loan into shares | ||||||||||||
| F-6 |
1. Reporting Entity
OKYO Pharma Limited (the “Company” or “OKYO”) is a company domiciled in Guernsey and listed on the main market on the NASDAQ Capital Market (NASDAQ: OKYO). The Company was previously dual listed with a standard listing on the main market of the London Stock Exchange (LSE: OKYO) until May 22, 2023 when it delisted from the standard segment of the main market of the London Stock Exchange.
The Company is dedicated to developing an innovative treatment for neuropathic corneal pain and dry eye disease. Through its proprietary chemerin peptide, urcosimod (formally known as OK-101), the Company aims to provide targeted therapy that not only alleviates pain but also controls inflammation, while enhancing ocular residence time for more effective, lasting relief.
The ultimate parent of the group is Panetta Partners Limited, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands.
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been applied consistently to all the years presented unless otherwise stated.
Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements of the Group have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), IFRIC interpretations and the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008 as applicable to companies reporting under IFRS.
Basis of measurement
Going Concern
The
Group has experienced net losses and significant cash outflows from cash used in operating activities over the past years, and as of
March 31, 2025, had an accumulated deficit of $
The
Directors have prepared cash flow projections that include the costs associated with the continued clinical trials and additional investment
to fund that operation. On the basis of those projections, the directors conclude that, without raising additional funding, the company
will not be able to initiate the next phase of trials and meet its liabilities as they fall due within the next 12 months from the date
when these financial statements are issued. The cash balance as at the beginning of July 2025 is approximately $
The
Directors are however aware, through their own extensive experience in the sector, that this position is not uncommon in the context
of a pre-revenue life sciences company principally involved in cash consuming research and development activity. The Directors took strategic
advantage of the opportunity to dual list the Company on NASDAQ in May 2022 in order to be able to access potential liquidity in the
US, which is generally a more favorable environment for life sciences companies to raise money and where there are more specialist investors
focused on early-stage opportunities. The Company raised $
The Directors are taking steps to put engagements and plans into place to ensure that sufficient funds will be forthcoming to progress the clinical pipeline. These steps include deferred payments of existing liabilities, working capital cost reductions and raising additional equity.
Until and unless the Group and Company secures sufficient investment to fund their clinical pipeline, there is a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Group and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, and therefore, that it may be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. Despite this material uncertainty, the Directors conclude that it is appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting as the Directors are confident, based on the previous fund-raising history as well as additional measures being planned, that sufficient funds will be forthcoming and accordingly they have prepared these financial statements on a going concern basis.
| F-7 |
New and Revised Standards
Standards in effect in 2025
There are no new IFRS standards, amendments to standards or interpretations that are mandatory for the financial year beginning on April 1, 2024, that are relevant to the Group or that have had any material impact in the year to March 31, 2025. New standards, amendments to standards and interpretations that are not yet effective, have been deemed by the Group as currently not relevant, and not likely to have a material impact on the Group, and hence are not listed here.
Basis of consolidation
Subsidiary undertakings are all entities over which the Group exercises control. The Group has control when it can demonstrate all of the following: (a) power over the investee; (b) exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and (c) the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s return.
The existence and effect of both current voting rights and potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether control of an entity is exercised. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date at which the Group obtains control and are de-consolidated from the date at which control ceases.
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated upon consolidation. Unrealised losses are also eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.
Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Board. The Board allocates resources to and assess the performance of the segments. The Board considers there to be only one operating segment being the research and development of biotechnological and pharmaceutical products.
Taxation
The tax credit for the year represents the total of current taxation and deferred taxation. The credit in respect of current taxation is based on the estimated taxable loss for the year. Taxable profit or loss for the year is based on the profit or loss as shown in the statement of comprehensive income, as adjusted for items of income or expenditure which are not deductible or chargeable for tax purposes. The current tax asset for the year is calculated using tax rates which have either been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and expected to apply when the related deferred tax is realised, or the deferred liability is settled. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that the future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
In the current year, Research and Development tax credits submitted to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”) have been provided for. These have been estimated based on eligible research and development expenditure. In the years ended March 31, 2024 and 2023, Research and Development tax credits were not provided for in the year that the costs were incurred. This policy is as a result of the UK tax authority’s new regime of reviewing nearly every tax claim it receives. Any difference compared to the amount rebated is recognized when the cash is received from the UK tax authorities.
Foreign currency translation
Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency), which is Pounds sterling.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars, which is the Group’s presentation currency.
| F-8 |
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of foreign currency transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement.
The financial statements are translated into US dollars on the following basis:
| ● | Assets and liabilities at the rate of exchange ruling at the year-end date. | |
| ● | Profit and loss account items at the average rate of exchange for the year. |
Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities, borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are taken to equity (and recognized in the statement of comprehensive income) on consolidation.
License fees
Payments related to the acquisition of rights to a product or technology are capitalised as intangible assets if it is probable that future economic benefits from the asset will flow to the Group and the cost of the asset can be reliably measured.
Payments made which provide the right to perform research are carefully evaluated to determine whether such payments are to fund research or acquire an asset. Licence fees expenses are recognised as incurred.
Research and development
All on-going research and development expenditure is currently expensed in the period in which it is incurred. Due to the regulatory environment inherent in the development of the Group’s products, the criteria for development costs to be recognised as an asset, as set out in IAS 38 ‘Intangible Assets’, are not met until a product has been granted regulatory approval and it is probable that future economic benefit will flow to the Group. The Group currently has no such qualifying expenditure.
Financial instruments
The Group classifies a financial instrument, or its component parts, as a financial liability, a financial asset or an equity instrument in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement and the definitions of a financial liability, a financial asset and an equity instrument.
The Group evaluates the terms of the financial instrument to determine whether it contains an asset, a liability or an equity component. Such components shall be classified separately as financial assets, financial liabilities or equity instruments.
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
| (a) | Financial assets, initial recognition and measurement and subsequent measurement |
At initial recognition financial assets are measured at their fair value. Subsequent measurement depends on their classification. Financial assets such as receivables, cash and cash equivalents and deposits are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less loss allowance.
The Group does not hold any financial assets at fair value through profit or loss or fair value through other comprehensive income.
| (b) | Financial liabilities, initial recognition and measurement and subsequent measurement |
At initial recognition, financial liabilities are measured at their fair value minus, if appropriate, any transaction costs that are directly attributable to the issue of the financial liability. All financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Interest expense and foreign exchange gains and losses are recognized in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is also recognized in profit or loss.
The Group’s financial liabilities include trade and other payables.
| F-9 |
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash at bank and on hand.
Impairment
Impairment of financial assets measured at amortised cost
At each reporting date the Group recognises a loss allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost.
In establishing the appropriate amount of loss allowance to be recognised, the Group applies either the general approach or the simplified approach, depending on the nature of the underlying group of financial assets.
General approach
The general approach is applied to the impairment assessment of refundable lease deposits and other refundable lease contributions, restricted cash and cash and cash equivalents.
Under the general approach the Group recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the 12-month expected credit losses, unless the credit risk on the financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition, in which case a loss allowance is recognised at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses.
Simplified approach
The simplified approach is applied to the impairment assessment of other receivables.
Under the simplified approach the Group always recognises a loss allowance for a financial asset at an amount equal to the lifetime expected credit losses.
Impairment of non-financial assets
| i) | Non-financial assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. | |
| ii) | Non-financial assets are impaired when their carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is measured as the higher of fair value less cost of disposal and value in use. The value in use is calculated as being net projected cash flows based on financial forecasts discounted back to present value. |
Ordinary shares of the Company are classified as equity.
Property, plant and equipment
| (i) | Recognition and measurement |
Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Costs include expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. Purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related equipment is capitalised as part of that equipment.
When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.
| F-10 |
Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, IT and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of property, IT and equipment, and are recognized in profit or loss. When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in the revaluation reserve are transferred to retained earnings.
| (ii) | Depreciation |
Depreciation is calculated on the depreciable amount, which is the cost of an asset, less its residual value.
Depreciation is recognised in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment.
The estimated useful lives for the current period and the comparative period are as follows:
DISCLOSURE OF ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES
| IT and equipment |
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date. Depreciation is allocated to the operating expenses line of the statement of comprehensive income.
Leases
All leases are accounted for by recognising a right-of-use asset and a lease liability except for:
| ● | Leases of low value assets; and | |
| ● | Leases with a duration of 12 months or less. |
The Group has leases for its offices. The group does not have leases greater than 12 months. There are no leases reflected on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. The Group does not have any leases of low value assets. Variable lease payments which do not depend on an index or a rate (such as lease payments based on a percentage of Group sales) are excluded from the initial measurement of the lease liability and asset.
At lease commencement date, the Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability in its consolidated statement of financial position. The right-of-use asset is measured at cost, which is made up of the initial measurement of the lease liability, any initial direct costs incurred by the Group, an estimate of any costs to dismantle and remove the asset at the end of the lease, and any lease payments made in advance of the lease commencement date (net of any incentives received).
The Group depreciates the right-of-use asset on a straight-line basis from the lease commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. The Group also assesses the right-of-use asset for impairment when such indicators exist.
At the commencement date, the Group measures the lease liability at the present value of the lease payments unpaid at that date, discounted using the Group’s incremental borrowing rate because as the lease contracts are negotiated with third parties it is not possible to determine the interest rate that is implicit in the lease. The incremental borrowing rate is the estimated rate that the Group would have to pay to borrow the same amount over a similar term, and with similar security to obtain an asset of equivalent value. This rate is adjusted should the lessee entity have a different risk profile to that of the Group.
Lease payments included in the measurement of the lease liability are made up of fixed payments (including in substance fixed), variable payments based on an index or rate, amounts expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee and payments arising from options reasonably certain to be exercised.
Subsequent to initial measurement, the liability will be reduced by lease payments that are allocated between repayments of principal and finance costs. The finance cost is the amount that produces a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the lease liability.
| F-11 |
Short term leases exempt from IFRS 16 are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are recognised in profit and loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
The calculation of the fair value of equity-settled share based awards and the resulting charge to the statement of comprehensive income requires assumptions to be made regarding future events and market conditions. These assumptions include the future volatility of the Company’s share price. These assumptions are then applied to a recognized valuation model in order to calculate the fair value of the awards.
Where employees, Directors or advisers are rewarded using share based payments, the fair value of the employees’, Directors’ or advisers’ services are determined by reference to the fair value of the share options/warrants awarded. Their value is appraised at the date of grant and excludes the impact of any nonmarket vesting conditions (for example, profitability and sales growth targets).
In accordance with IFRS 2, a charge is made to the statement of comprehensive income for all share-based payments including share options based upon the fair value of the instrument used and warrants issued in return for services. A corresponding credit is made to a share based payment reserve – options, in the case of options awarded to employees, Directors, advisers and other consultants. A corresponding credit is made to a share based payment reserve – warrants, in the case of warrants issued in return for services.
Warrants
Warrants are issued by the Group in return for services and as part of a financing transaction.
Warrants issued in return for services.
Warrants issued in return for services fall within scope of IFRS 2 and are classified as a share-based payment. The share-based payment is measured at fair value and charged to the Statement of comprehensive income. There is no remeasurement of fair value.
Warrants issued as part of a financing transaction.
Warrants issued as part of a financing transaction fall outside the scope of IFRS 2. These are classified as equity instruments because a fixed amount of cash is exchanged for a fixed amount of equity. The relative fair value is recognised within equity and is not remeasured.
Classification of these instruments is governed by the so-called ‘fixed’ test for non-derivatives, and the ‘fixed for fixed’ test for derivatives. Under the fixed test, a non-derivative contract will qualify for equity classification only where there is no contractual obligation for the issuer to deliver a variable number of its own equity instruments. Under the fixed for fixed test, a derivative will qualify for equity classification only where it will be settled by the issuer exchanging a fixed amount of cash or another financial asset for a fixed number of its own equity instruments.
Warrants issued by the Company as part of a financing transaction, are classified as equity instruments because a fixed amount of cash is exchanged for a fixed amount of equity of the Company. No other features exist that would result in financial liability classification.
| F-12 |
Convertible loan notes
The Group issues Convertible loan notes which can be classified as equity or a liability depending on whether the fixed for fixed condition is met or not.
Where the fixed for fixed condition is met
The Group classifies convertible loan notes that meet the fixed for fixed condition as equity instruments and records the principal of the loan note as equity in a Convertible loan note reserve. Upon redemption of the instrument and the issue of share capital, the amount is reclassified from the convertible loan note reserve to share capital and share premium.
The accrued interest on the principal amount is recorded as a liability as it can be settled in cash or equity at the discretion of the noteholder.
Fair Value Measurement
Management have assessed the categorization of the fair value measurements using the IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy. Categorization within the hierarchy has been determined on the basis of the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the relevant asset as follows;
Level 1 - valued using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;
Level 2 - valued by reference to valuation techniques using observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1;
Level 3 - valued by reference to valuation techniques using inputs that are not based on observable market data.
| F-13 |
3. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY
The preparation of financial information in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice, in the case of the Group being IFRS as issued by the IASB, requires the directors to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenditure and the disclosures made in the financial statements. Such estimates and judgements must be continually evaluated based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events.
The following are considered to be the key sources of estimation uncertainty:
Share-based payments
The Group accounts for share-based payment transactions for employees in accordance with IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, which requires the measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for the options on our ordinary shares, based on the fair value of the award on the grant date.
The Directors selected the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model as the most appropriate method for determining the estimated fair value of our share-based awards without market conditions. For performance-based options that include vesting conditions relating to the market performance of our ordinary shares, a Monte Carlo pricing model was used in order to reflect the valuation impact of price hurdles that have to be met as conditions to vesting.
The Group makes estimates as to the useful life of an option award, the expected price volatility of the underlying share, risk free interest rate for the term of the award and correlations and volatilities of the shares of peer group companies. The Group also makes estimates as to the vesting period for awards that have performance-based criteria.
The resulting cost of an equity incentive award is recognised as an expense over the requisite service period of the award, which is usually the vesting period. Compensation expense is recognised over the vesting period using the straight-line method.
The assumptions used for estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions are disclosed in note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.
4. OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses are stated after charging/(crediting):
SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
| Group | 2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2023 $ | |||||||||
| Year Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| Group | 2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2023 $ | |||||||||
| Director fees including bonus (excluding Chairman’s bonus) | ||||||||||||
| Chairman’s bonus | ||||||||||||
| Auditor’s Remuneration (refer to Note 20) | ||||||||||||
| Legal and Professional fees | ||||||||||||
| FX Gains and losses | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||||||
| F-14 |
5. SEGMENTAL REPORTING
During the year under review management identified the Group’s only operating segment as the research and development of biotechnological and pharmaceutical products. This one segment is monitored, and strategic decisions are made based upon it and other non-financial data collated from industry intelligence. The form of financial reporting reported to the Board is consistent with those presented in the annual financial statements.
6. EMPLOYEES INCLUDING OFFICERS, EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
DISCLOSURE OF EMPLOYEES COST AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES EXPLANATORY
2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2023 $ | ||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2023 $ | ||||||||||
| Group | ||||||||||||
| Staff costs comprised: | ||||||||||||
| Directors’ salaries | ||||||||||||
| Wages and salaries | ||||||||||||
| Social security costs | ||||||||||||
| Recruitment costs | ||||||||||||
| Total employee benefits expense | ||||||||||||
| The average monthly number of employees, including directors, employed by the group during the years ending March 31, 2025, March 31, 2024, and March 31, 2023 were: | ||||||||||||
| Research and Development | ||||||||||||
| Corporate and administration | ||||||||||||
The
Group and Company made $
| F-15 |
7. REMUNERATION OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Directors of the Group and Company received the following remuneration during the years ended March 31, 2025 2024 and 2023:
SCHEDULE OF REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $’000 | Directors’ fees | Bonus | Salary | Share based payment expenses | Directors’ fees | Bonus | Salary | Share based payment expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| G. Cerrone (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| G Jacob (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W Simon | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J Brancaccio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B Denoyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| $’000 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||
| Directors fees | Bonus | Salary | Share based payment expenses | |||||||||||||
| G. Cerrone (1) | ||||||||||||||||
| G Jacob | ||||||||||||||||
| W Simon | ||||||||||||||||
| J Brancaccio | ||||||||||||||||
| B Denoyer | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Gabriele
Cerrone’s bonus awarded for $ Gabriele
Cerrone’s bonus awarded for $ All bonuses were settled via the issuance of shares. |
| (2) |
| F-16 |
SCHEDULE OF SHARE OPTIONS GRANTED TO DIRECTORS
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Number of options | Number of options | Number of options | ||||||||||
| J Brancaccio | ||||||||||||
| G Jacob | ||||||||||||
| W Simon | ||||||||||||
| B Denoyer | ||||||||||||
No director has yet benefitted from any increase in the value of share capital since issuance of the options and no director exercised share options in the year.
The Key Management Personnel of the Group are members of the leadership team who have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group either directly or indirectly. They include all Directors of the Board (executive and non-executive). Key Management Personnel compensation is set out below.
SCHEDULE OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL COMPENSATION
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| $’000 | $’000 | $’000 | ||||||||||
| Short-term employee benefits | ||||||||||||
| Share based payments | ||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
8. TAXATION
SCHEDULE OF TAX CREDIT PERIOD
2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2023 $ | ||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2023 $ | ||||||||||
| Group | ||||||||||||
| Current year tax charge/(credit) | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments in respect of prior periods | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Deferred tax | ||||||||||||
| Origination and reversal of timing differences | ||||||||||||
| Total tax charge/(credit) for the period | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| The tax charge/(credit) for the year is different from the standard rate of corporation tax in the United Kingdom of 19%. The difference can be reconciled as follows: | ||||||||||||
| Loss before taxation | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Loss charged at standard rate of corporation tax | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Tax losses arising in the year not recognized | ||||||||||||
| Tax losses surrendered for Research and Development | ||||||||||||
| Expenses not deductible for taxation | ||||||||||||
| Tax increase from effect of capital allowances and depreciation | ||||||||||||
| Difference in tax rates | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Research and Development enhanced expenditure | ||||||||||||
| Research and Development tax credits claimed in respect of previous periods | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Consolidation adjustment in relation to foreign exchange movements | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Total tax charge/(credit) for the period | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
No deferred tax asset has been recognized in respect of trading losses carried forward because of uncertainty as to when these losses will be recoverable.
The
Group has tax losses of $
The Research and Development tax credits claimed in respect of previous
periods relates to prior period R&D tax refunds received for $
| F-17 |
9. FINANCE INCOME AND COSTS
SCHEDULE OF FINANCE COST
2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2024 $ | ||||||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2025 $ | 2024 $ | 2024 $ | ||||||||||
| Finance Income | ||||||||||||
| Interest income | ||||||||||||
| Total finance income | ||||||||||||
| Finance Expenses | ||||||||||||
| Finance Charges | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Convertible Loan Note Interest | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Interest expense on related party loan | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total finance expenses | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
| Total finance income/(expenses) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Details of the Group’s property, plant and equipment are as follows:
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| $ | IT equipment | Total | ||||||
| Cost | ||||||||
| At 1 April 2024 | ||||||||
| Additions | ||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Foreign exchange | ||||||||
| At March 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||
| At 1 April 2024 | ||||||||
| Charge in year | ||||||||
| Write Off Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Foreign exchange | ||||||||
| At March 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| Net Book Value as at March 31, 2025 | ||||||||
| $ | IT equipment | Total | ||||||
| Cost | ||||||||
| At April 1, 2023 | ||||||||
| Additions | ||||||||
| Disposals | ( | ) | ( | |||||
| Foreign exchange | ||||||||
| At March 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Depreciation | ||||||||
| At April 1, 2023 | ||||||||
| Charge in year | ||||||||
| Write Off Disposals | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Foreign exchange | ||||||||
| At March 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Net Book Value as at March 31, 2024 | ||||||||
The Group’s property, plant and equipment is located in the following operating segments:
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT LOCATED OPERATING SEGMENT
| Group | Net Book Value March 31 2025 | |||
| $ | ||||
| UK | ||||
| US | ||||
| Total | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 2,035 | |||
| Group | Net Book Value March 31 2024 | |||
| $ | ||||
| UK | ||||
| US | ||||
| Total | ||||
| Property, plant and equipment | ||||
| F-18 |
11. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
SUMMARY OF PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
| $ | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||
| $ | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Group | ||||||||
| Other receivables | ||||||||
| VAT receivable | ||||||||
| Prepayments | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other receivables | ||||||||
There are no differences between the carrying amount and fair value of any of the trade and other receivables above.
Prepayments include no prepaid invoices relating to the OK-101 project.
12. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
SCHEDULE OF TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
| $ | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||
| $ | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Group | ||||||||
| Trade payables | ||||||||
| Other payables | ||||||||
| Accruals | ||||||||
| Bonus accrual | ||||||||
| Trade and other payables | ||||||||
Capital Management
For the purpose of the Company’s capital management, capital includes called up share capital, share premium, share based payments for options, share based payments for warrants and all other equity reserves attributable to the equity holders of the parent as reflected in the statement of financial position.
The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to maximise shareholder value through the optimisation of the debt and equity balance.
The Company manages its capital to maximise the return to the shareholders through the optimisation of equity. The capital structure of the Company as at March 31, 2025 and 2024 consists of equity attributable to equity holders of the Company, comprising issued capital, reserves and retained deficit as disclosed.
The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, in light of economic conditions and the strategy approved by shareholders. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares and release the Company’s share premium account. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes during the year ended March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024.
Share capital and premium
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of nil par value shares of a single class. The Company may issue fractional shares and a fractional share shall have the corresponding fractional rights, obligations and liabilities of a whole share of the same class or series of shares. Shares may be issued in one or more series of shares as the Directors may by resolution determine from time to time.
Each share in the Company confers upon the shareholder:
| ● | the right to one vote at a meeting of the shareholders or on any resolution of shareholders; | |
| ● | the right to an equal share in any dividend paid by the Company; and | |
| ● | the right to an equal share in the distribution of the surplus assets of the Company on its liquidation. |
The Company may by resolution of the Directors redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire all or any of the shares in the Company subject to regulations set out in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation.
On May 22, 2023, the Company delisted from the standard segment of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and had a sole listing on the NASDAQ capital market. In conjunction with the delisting, there was a share consolidation of 65 to 1. The effect of the share consolidation has been reflected below for all periods.
| F-19 |
SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED ISSUE UNLIMITED NUMBER OF PAR VALUE SHARES
| Shares | Share capital | |||||||
| Issued ordinary shares of US$0.00 each | Number | $ | ||||||
| At March 31, 2023 | ||||||||
| Issue of share for fundraising, net Sept-Dec 2023 | ||||||||
| Expenses settled in shares | ||||||||
| Issuance of Shares to related party – Loan Conversion | ||||||||
| At March 31, 2024 | ||||||||
| Expenses settled in shares | ||||||||
| Bonus settled in Shares | ||||||||
| Issue of share for fundraising, net | ||||||||
| Shares in lieu interest | ||||||||
| At March 31, 2025 | ||||||||
Share options reserve
The share-based payment reserve for options represents the cost to issue share-based compensation, primarily share options, based on their grant date fair value.
Share warrants reserve
The share-based payment reserve for warrants represent the cost to issue warrants based on their grant date fair value.
Convertible Loan Note reserve
The convertible loan note reserve represents the proceeds received on issuance of convertible loan notes classified as equity instruments, accrued interest and any relative fair value adjustments.
Retained Deficit reserve
Retained deficit represent the cumulative profits/(losses) of the entity which have not been distributed to shareholders.
Translation reserve
The translation reserve represents the unrealised gains or losses from the foreign currency translation of Companies within the Group.
Dividends
The
Directors paid
| F-20 |
Options
The Company operates share-based payment arrangements to remunerate Directors and key employees in the form of a share option scheme. It also issues options in lieu of fees to key suppliers and collaborators. The exercise price of the option is normally equal to the market price of an ordinary share in the Company at the date of grant.
In May 2023, the company delisted from the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and carried out a share consolidation of 65 to 1. The effect of the share consolidation has been reflected below for all periods in the calculation of the number of options issued and the weighted average exercise price.
SCHEDULE OF OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Options | Weighted Average exercise price ($) | Options | Weighted Average exercise price ($) | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at April 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercisable at March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||
| Options | Weighted Average exercise price (cents) | |||||||
| Outstanding at April 1 | ||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||
| Forfeited | ( | ) | ||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31 | ||||||||
| Exercisable at March 31 | ||||||||
| F-21 |
During the years ending March 31, 2025, March 31, 2024, and March 31, 2023 options were exercised.
The
total outstanding fair value charge of the share option instruments is deemed to be approximately $
The weighted average contractual life of options outstanding at March 31, 2025 is years. (2024: years).
SCHEDULE OF SHARE OPTIONS OUTSTANDING EXPIRY DATES AND EXERCISE PRICES
| Grant Date | Expiry Date | Exercise Price $ | Share Options as at March 31, 2025 | |||||||
| March 14, 2023 | ||||||||||
| October 20, 2023 | ||||||||||
| November 24, 2023 | ||||||||||
| March 1, 2024 | ||||||||||
| March 13, 2024 | ||||||||||
| January 29, 2025 | ||||||||||
| March 28, 2025 | ||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||
Fair value of options granted
The Directors have used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of most of the options applying the assumptions below.
Historical volatility relies in part on the historical volatility of a group of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to the Company and in part on the company’s own share price volatility. Where sufficient historical data is available, the Company uses its own share price to calculate volatility.
The Company has not paid any dividends on share capital since its inception and does not anticipate paying dividends on its share capital in the foreseeable future.
The Company has estimated a forfeiture rate of zero.
| F-22 |
SCHEDULE OF SHARE BASED PAYMENT AWARD MODEL INPUTS OPTIONS GRANTED
| March 28, 2025 | ||||
| Grant date share price | $ | |||
| Exercise share price | $ | |||
| Vesting periods | ||||
| Risk free rate | % | |||
| Expected volatility | % | |||
| Option life | ||||
| January 29, 2025 | January 29, 2025 | January 29, 2025 | January 29,2025 | January 29,2025 | ||||||||||||||||
| Grant date share price | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Exercise share price | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||
| Vesting periods | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk free rate% | % | % | % | % | % | |||||||||||||||
| Expected volatility% | % | % | - | % | - | % | % | |||||||||||||
| Option life | ||||||||||||||||||||
The model inputs for options granted during the year ended March 31, 2024 valued under the Black Scholes Valuation model are:
| March 1, 2024 | March 13, 2024 | |||||||
| Grant date share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Exercise share price | $ | $ | ||||||
| Vesting periods | ||||||||
| Risk free rate | % | % | ||||||
| Expected volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Option life | ||||||||
| Grant Date | ||||||||||||||||
| July 26, 2023 | October 20, 2023 | November 20, 2023 | November 24, 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Grant date share price | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Exercise share price | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Vesting periods | ||||||||||||||||
| Risk free rate | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
| Expected volatility | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||
| Option life | ||||||||||||||||
Modification of share based payments.
In January 2025, all options granted prior to December 2022 were surrendered and new options at a lower exercise price, with a proportionate reduction in the number of options, were granted. The Company reduced the exercise price for options granted to employees and directors to $. This was approved by directors at a board meeting held on January 28, 2025.
The fair value of the modified options at the date of modification was determined using the option pricing models as described above. The incremental fair value was recognised as an expense over the period from the modification date to the end of the vesting period. The expense for the original option grant will continue to be recognised as if the terms had not been modified. The fair value of the modified options was determined using the same models and principles as described above.
| F-23 |
Warrants
On May 22, 2023, the Company delisted from the standard segment of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and had a sole listing on the NASDAQ capital market. In conjunction with the delisting, there was a share consolidation of 65 to 1. The effect of the share consolidation has been reflected below for all periods.
As
part of the acquisition of the OK-101 project, the underlying scientific founders of the OK-101 Project (inukshuk Holdings), who will
continue to be involved in the development of the Project, received
warrants were granted or exercised in the year to March 31, 2025 or March 2024.
SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS OUTSTANDING AND WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE
| March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||
| Warrants | Weighted Average exercise price (cents) | Warrants | Weighted Average exercise price (cents) | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at April 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Granted | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding at March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
| Exercisable at March 31 | ||||||||||||||||
The Directors have estimated the fair value of the warrants in services provided using the Black-Scholes valuation model based on the assumptions below.
The remaining fair value of the warrant instruments is (2024: ). For the consideration warrants, the charge has been expensed over the vesting period. For all other warrants, the charge has been expensed over the service period. A share-based payment charge for the year of $ (2024: $) has been expensed in the statement of comprehensive income.
| F-24 |
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are liquidity risk, interest rate risk and credit risk. The Directors regularly review and agree policies for managing each of these risks which are summarized below.
Liquidity risk
The Group’s policy is to regularly monitor current and expected liquidity requirements to ensure that it maintains sufficient reserves of cash to meet its liquidity requirements in the short and long term. The Group ordinarily finances its activities through cash generated from by private and public offerings of equity and debt securities.
The table below summarizes the maturity profile of the Group’s financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted payments:
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES BASED ON CONTRACTUAL UNDISCOUNTED PAYMENTS
| $ | Less than 3 months | 3 to 12 months | Total | |||||||||
| Group | 2025 | |||||||||||
| $ | Less than 3 months | 3 to 12 months | Total | |||||||||
| Trade and other payables | ||||||||||||
| Related party payables | ||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| $ | Less than 3 months | 3 to 12 months | Total | |||||||||
| Group | 2024 | |||||||||||
| $ | Less than 3 months | 3 to 12 months | Total | |||||||||
| Trade and other payables | ||||||||||||
| Related party payables | ||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
Credit risk
Credit risk is managed on a Group basis. Credit risk arises principally from cash and cash equivalents and deposits with banks and financial institutions.as well as outstanding receivables. The Group reviews its banking arrangements carefully to minimize such risks and currently has no customers and therefore this risk is viewed as minimal. Management monitor loans between members of the Group as part of their internal reporting and assess outstanding receivables for ability to be repaid.
| F-25 |
Interest rate risk
The Group has limited exposure to interest-rate risk arising from its bank deposits and convertible loan note instruments. These deposit accounts are held at variable interest rates based on Barclays Bank plc, Alpha Group International plc, Wells Fargo and Penn Community Bank base rates.
The Directors do not consider the impact of possible interest rate changes based on current market conditions to be material to the net result for the year or the equity position at the year-end for either the year ended March 31, 2025 or March 31, 2024.
16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
All related party transactions occurred in the normal course of operations.
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd
Tiziana
Life Sciences Ltd is a related party as the entity is controlled by a person that has significant influence over the Group. The Company
shares premises and other resources with Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd and there is a shared services agreement in place between the Company
and Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd. As at March 31, 2025, the Company had incurred $
Tiziana
Life Sciences Ltd also paid other invoices on behalf of the Company. As of March 31, 2025, Tiziana had paid $
In
August 2022, Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd issued a short-term credit facility to OKYO Pharma for $
Directors – (See Note 7 also)
At
March 31, 2025, the Company owed John Brancaccio $
At
March 31, 2025, the Company owed Bernard Denoyer $
At
March 31, 2025, the Company owed Gary Jacobs $
At
March 31, 2025, the Company owed Willy Simon $
At
March 31, 2025, the Company owed Gabriele Cerrone $
| F-26 |
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to equity holders of the Group by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year.
In May 2023, the company delisted from the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and carried out a share consolidation of 65 to 1. The weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue shown below has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this share consolidation. As such, the number of shares presented below may not be consistent with that presented elsewhere.
| Year ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| (Loss) attributable to equity holders of the company ($) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (adjusted) | ||||||||
| Basic and dilutive loss per share (dollars per share) | ) | ) | ||||||
| Year ended March 31, | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| (Loss) attributable to equity holders of the company ($) | ( | ) | ||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue (adjusted) | ||||
| Basic and dilutive loss per share (dollars per share) | ) | |||
As the Group is reporting a loss from continuing operations for the year then, in accordance with IAS 33, the share options are not considered dilutive because the exercise of the share options would have an anti-dilutive effect. The basic and diluted earnings per share as presented on the face of the Statement of comprehensive income are therefore identical.
| F-27 |
18. LEASES
The Group is a lessee and does not have any leases as a lessor.
All leases are accounted for by recognising a right-of-use asset and a lease liability except for:
| ● | Leases of low value assets; and |
| ● | Leases with a duration of 12 months or less. |
The Group has leases for its offices. The Group does not have leases of low value assets. The group does not have leases greater than 12 months.
For leases over office buildings and factory premises the Group must keep those properties in a good state of repair and return the properties in their original condition at the end of the lease.
During the year to March 31, 2023, the Group entered into new lease agreement on its existing office. The new leases has a term shorter than 12 months, so the Group has applied the exemption allowed by paragraph 5a in IFRS 16 in respect of short term leases.
Operating leases
At March 31, 2025 and March 31, 2024, the company had annual commitments under non-cancellable operating leases:
SCHEDULE OF CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES OF LEASE LIABILITIES
| Operating leases which expire: | March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | ||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| Within one year | ||||||||
| F-28 |
19. AUDITOR’S RENUMERATION
During the period, the group obtained the following services from the company’s auditors PKF, our independent registered public accounting firm and Mazars, our previous independent registered public accounting firm.:
SCHEDULE OF COMPANY AUDITORS FEES
| Mazars LLP | March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | March 3,1 2023 | |||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Fees payable to the company’s auditors for the audit of the parent company and consolidated financial statements | ||||||||||||
| Fees payable to the company’s auditors for other services: | ||||||||||||
| Audit-related assurance services | ||||||||||||
| Total auditor’s remuneration | ||||||||||||
| PKF Littlejohn LLP | March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | March 31, 2023 | |||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||
| Fees payable to the company’s auditors for the audit of the parent company and consolidated financial statements | ||||||||||||
| Fees payable to the company’s auditors for other services: | ||||||||||||
| Audit-related assurance services | ||||||||||||
| Total auditor’s remuneration | ||||||||||||
20. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:
SCHEDULE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT
| March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2024 | |||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| Cash at bank and in hand: | ||||||||
| GBP | ||||||||
| EURO | ||||||||
| USD | ||||||||
21. CONVERTIBLE LOAN INSTRUMENTS
On September 24, 2024, we entered
into a fixed term unsecured loan agreement with an existing shareholder for $
On October 28, 2024, we entered
into a fixed term unsecured loan agreement with an existing shareholder for $
On January 16, 2025, we entered into a fixed term unsecured loan agreement
with an existing shareholder for $
22. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Group’s main financial commitments relate to the contractual payments in respect of its licensing agreements. Due to the uncertain nature of scientific research and development and the length of time required to reach commercialisation of the products of this research and development, pre-clinical, clinical and commercial milestone obligations are not provided for until there is a reasonable certainty that the obligation will become payable. Contractual commitments are detailed where amounts are known and certain.
| ● | OK-101 – We are obligated to pay to On Target Therapeutics the following additional amounts in respect of the first licensed product or service which achieves the stated development milestones: |
SCHEDULE OF MILESTONES PAYMENT
| (a) | First Patient Enrolled in a Phase I Human Clinical trial | $ | ||||
| (b) | First Patient Enrolled in a Phase II Human Clinical trial | $ | ||||
| (c) | First Patient Enrolled in a Phase III Human Clinical trial | $ |
| ● | BAM8
– The Group are committed to paying an annual license maintenance fee until the first commercial sale. The annual license maintenance
fee is $ |
23. POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
Post
the year end, the Group has raised $
| F-29 |
Exhibit 12.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Gary Jacob, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of OKYO Pharma Ltd; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: |
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: July 18, 2025
| /s/ Gary Jacob | |
| Gary Jacob | |
| Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 12.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Keeren Shah, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of OKYO Pharma Ltd; |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| 4. | The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: |
| a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
| b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
| c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |
| d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
| 5. | The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |
| b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: July 18, 2025
| /s/ Keeren Shah | |
Keeren Shah |
|
| Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 13.1
CERTIFICATION
The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with OKYO Pharma Ltd’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
Gary Jacob, Chief Executive Officer of OKYO Pharma Ltd, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and | |
| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OKYO Pharma Ltd |
Date: July 18, 2025
|
/s/ Gary Jacob |
|
| Name: Gary Jacob | |
| Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 13.2
CERTIFICATION
The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with OKYO Pharma Ltd’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
Keeren Shah, Chief Financial Officer of OKYO Pharma Ltd, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and | |
| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OKYO Pharma Ltd |
Date: July 18, 2025
|
/s/ Keeren Shah |
|
| Name: Keeren Shah | |
| Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 15.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors of OKYO Pharma Ltd:
We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 18, 2025 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet for the year ended March 31, 2025 and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the period ended March 31, 2025, and the related notes, for OKYO Pharma Ltd, which report appears in the March 31, 2025 annual report on Form 20-F.
/s/ PKF Littlejohn LLP.
PKF Littlejohn LLP
London
July 18, 2025
Exhibit 19.1
OKYO
PHARMA LTD
INSIDER TRADING POLICY
| 1. | PURPOSE |
This Insider Trading Policy (this “Policy”) states the policy with respect to transactions in the securities of OKYO Pharma Ltd. (the “Company”), and the handling of confidential information about the Company and other companies with which the Company does business. The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted this Policy to promote compliance with federal and state securities laws that prohibit certain persons who are aware of material nonpublic information about a company from (i) trading in securities of that company, or (ii) providing material nonpublic information to other persons who may trade on the basis of that information.
| 2. | PERSONS SUBJECT TO THE POLICY |
This Policy applies to all members of the Company’s Board of Directors (collectively, “directors” and each, a “director”), officers and employees of the Company. The Company may also determine that other persons should be subject to this Policy, such as contractors or consultants who have access to material nonpublic information about the Company. With respect to any person covered by this Policy, this Policy also applies to that person’s family members, other members of that person’s household, and entities controlled by that person, as described below under “Transactions by Family Members and Others” and “Transactions by Entities That You Influence or Control.”
| 3. | TRANSACTIONS SUBJECT TO THE POLICY |
This Policy applies to transactions in the Company’s securities (collectively, “Company Securities”), including the Company’s common shares, restricted stock, options to purchase common shares, or any other type of security the Company may issue, including (but not limited to) preferred stock, convertible debentures and warrants. In addition, this Policy applies to derivative securities that are not issued by the Company but which relate to Company Securities, such as exchange-traded put or call options or swaps. This Policy similarly applies to transactions in or relating to the securities of certain other companies with which the Company does business.
| 4. | INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY |
Persons subject to this Policy have ethical and legal obligations to maintain the confidentiality of information about the Company and to not engage in transactions in Company Securities while in possession of material nonpublic information. Each individual is responsible for making sure that he or she complies with this Policy, and that any family member, household member or related entity whose transactions are subject to this Policy, as discussed below, also comply with this Policy. In all cases, the responsibility for determining whether an individual is in possession of material nonpublic information rests with that individual, and any action on the part of the Company, the Administrator (as defined below) or any other employee or director pursuant to this Policy (or otherwise) does not in any way constitute legal advice or insulate an individual from liability under applicable securities laws. You could be subject to severe legal penalties and disciplinary action by the Company for any conduct prohibited by this Policy or applicable securities laws, as described below under “Consequences of Violations.”
| -1- |
| 5. | ADMINISTRATION OF THE POLICY |
The “Administrator” of this Policy is the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Executive Officer if a Chief Financial Officer has not been designated, or such other individual designated by the Company’s Board of Directors from time to time. All determinations and interpretations by the Administrator are final and not subject to further review.
| 6. | PRINCIPAL STATEMENT OF POLICY |
(a) Trading in Company Securities and Disclosure of Nonpublic Information. No director, officer or other employee of the Company (or any other person designated by this Policy or by the Administrator as subject to this Policy) who is aware of material nonpublic information relating to the Company may, directly or indirectly through family members or other persons or entities:
(i) engage in transactions in Company Securities, except as otherwise specified in this Policy under the heading “Limited Exceptions;”
(ii) recommend the purchase or sale of any Company Securities;
(iii) disclose material nonpublic information to persons within the Company whose jobs do not require them to have that information, or to persons outside of the Company, including, but not limited to, family, friends, business associates, investors and consultants, except as required in the performance of regular corporate duties and only to the extent appropriate confidentiality protections are effective and the disclosure conforms to Company policies; or
(iv) assist anyone engaged in the above activities.
(b) Trading in Securities of Other Companies. No director, officer or other employee of the Company (or any other person designated by this Policy or by the Administrator as subject to this Policy) who, in the course of working for the Company, learns of material nonpublic information about a company with which the Company does or intends to do business, including a customer, supplier or service provider of the Company, may trade in that company’s securities until the information becomes public or is no longer material.
(c) No Exceptions. There are no exceptions to this Policy, except as specifically noted herein. Transactions that may be necessary or justifiable for independent reasons (such as the need to raise money for an emergency expenditure), or small transactions, are not excluded from this Policy. The securities laws do not recognize any mitigating circumstances, and, in any event, even the appearance of an improper transaction must be avoided to preserve the Company’s reputation for adhering to the highest standards of conduct.
| -2- |
| 7. | DEFINITION OF MATERIAL NONPUBLIC INFORMATION |
(a) Material Information. Information is considered “material” if a reasonable investor would consider that information important in making a decision to buy, hold or sell securities. Any information that could be expected to impact the Company’s stock price, whether it is positive or negative, is considered material. There is no bright-line standard for assessing materiality; rather, materiality is based on an assessment of all of the facts and circumstances, and is often evaluated by enforcement authorities with the benefit of hindsight. While it is not possible to define all categories of material information, some examples of information that ordinarily would be regarded as material are:
| ● | operating or financial results or projections, including earnings guidance; | |
| ● | analyst upgrades or downgrades of the Company or one of its securities; | |
| ● | corporate transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions or restructurings; | |
| ● | dividend, share repurchase or recapitalization matters; | |
| ● | debt or equity financing matters; | |
| ● | regulatory matters, such as the status of applications with, and related feedback from, the U.S. Government and applicable foreign regulatory bodies; | |
| ● | a change in the Board of Directors or senior management; | |
| ● | a change in auditors or disagreements with auditors; | |
| ● | impending bankruptcy or the existence of severe liquidity problems; | |
| ● | litigation or regulatory proceedings and investigations; | |
| ● | the imposition of a ban on trading in Company Securities or other securities; | |
| ● | intellectual property and other proprietary information; | |
| ● | research milestones; and | |
| ● | significant corporate developments, including with respect to material contracts, and research and development activities. |
(b) Nonpublic Information. Information is considered “nonpublic” if that information has not been broadly disclosed to the marketplace, such as by press release or a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and/or the investing public has not had time to fully absorb that information. Nonpublic information may include:
| ● | information available to a select group of persons subject to confidentiality obligations to the Company; | |
| ● | undisclosed facts that are the subject of rumors, even if the rumors are widely circulated; and | |
| ● | information that has been entrusted to the Company on a confidential basis. |
| -3- |
As a general rule, information should not be considered fully absorbed by the investing public until the second business day after the day on which the information is released. If, for example, the Company makes an announcement at 9 am ET on Monday, a person subject to this Policy should not trade in Company Securities until the market opens on Wednesday. If such an announcement were made at 6 pm ET on Monday, the person subject to this Policy should not trade in Company Securities until the market opens on Thursday. Depending on the particular circumstances, the Company may determine that a longer or shorter period should apply.
| 8. | TRANSACTIONS BY FAMILY MEMBERS AND OTHERS |
This Policy applies to your family members who reside with you, anyone else who lives in your household and any family members who do not live in your household but whose transactions in Company Securities are directed by you or are subject to your influence or control, such as parents or children who consult with you before they trade in Company Securities (collectively, “Family Members”). You are responsible for the transactions of your Family Members and therefore should make them aware of the need to confer with you before they trade in Company Securities, and you should treat all such transactions for the purposes of this Policy and applicable securities laws as if the transactions were for your own account. This Policy does not, however, apply to personal securities transactions of Family Members where the purchase or sale decision is made by a third party not controlled by, influenced by or related to you or your Family Members.
| 9. | TRANSACTIONS BY ENTITIES THAT YOU INFLUENCE OR CONTROL |
This Policy applies to any entities that you influence or control, including any corporations, partnerships or trusts (collectively, “Controlled Entities”), and transactions by these Controlled Entities should be treated for the purposes of this Policy and applicable securities laws as if they were for your own account.
| 10. | LIMITED EXCEPTIONS |
This Policy does not apply in the case of the following transactions (although these transactions may nevertheless be subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), applicable to directors and executive officers):
(a) Option Exercises. This Policy does not apply generally to the exercise of an option, including a cashless exercise solely through the Company or the exercise of a tax withholding right through the Company to satisfy tax withholding requirements. However, this Policy does apply to any sale of stock received upon exercise of an option, including any deemed sale caused by an election to make a cashless exercise through a broker, or any other market sale for the purpose of generating the cash necessary to pay the option exercise price.
| -4- |
(b) Rule 10b5-1 Plans. Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act provides a defense from insider trading liability under Rule 10b-5. In order to be eligible to rely on this defense, a person subject to this Policy must enter into a Rule 10b5-1 plan for transactions in Company Securities that meets certain conditions specified in the Rule (a “Rule 10b5-1 Plan”). If the plan meets the requirements of Rule 10b5-1, Company Securities may be purchased or sold without regard to certain insider trading restrictions. To comply with this Policy, a Rule 10b5-1 Plan must be approved by the Administrator and meet the requirements of Rule 10b5-l and the Company’s “Guidelines for Rule 10b5-l Plans,” which are set forth in Appendix 10(b) to this Policy. In general, to ensure that a Rule 10b5-1 Plan is entered into at a time when the person entering into the plan is not aware of material nonpublic information, it must be entered into during an Open Trading Window. Once the plan is adopted, the person must not exercise any influence over the amount of securities to be traded, the price at which they are to be traded or the date of the trade. The plan must either specify the amount, pricing and timing of transactions in advance or delegate discretion on these matters to an independent third party.
Any Rule 10b5-l Plan must be submitted for approval at least five business days prior to the entry into the Rule 10b5-l Plan. No further pre-approval of transactions conducted pursuant to the Rule 10b5-l Plan will be required.
(c) 401(k) Plan. This Policy does not apply to purchases of Company Securities in the Company’s 401(k) plan resulting from your periodic contribution of money to the plan pursuant to your payroll deduction election. This Policy does apply, however, to certain elections you may make under the 401(k) plan, including: (i) an election to increase or decrease the percentage of your periodic contributions that will be allocated to any Company stock fund; (ii) an election to make an intra-plan transfer of an existing account balance into or out of any Company stock fund; (iii) an election to borrow money against your 401(k) plan account if the loan will result in a liquidation of some or all of any Company stock fund balance; and (iv) an election to pre-pay a plan loan if the pre-payment will result in allocation of loan proceeds to any Company stock fund.
(d) Transactions Not Involving a Purchase or Sale. Bona fide gifts are not transactions subject to this Policy, unless the person making the gift has reason to believe that the recipient intends to sell the Company Securities while the director, officer or employee is aware of material nonpublic information, or the person making the gift is subject to the trading restrictions specified below under “Additional Procedures” and the sales by the recipient of the Company Securities occur outside an Open Trading Window (as defined below). Further, transactions in mutual funds that are invested in Company Securities are not transactions subject to this Policy.
| 11. | SPECIAL AND PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS |
The Company has determined that there is a heightened legal risk and/or the appearance of improper or inappropriate conduct if the persons subject to this Policy engage in certain types of transactions. Therefore, it is the Company’s policy that any persons covered by this Policy may not engage in any of the following transactions, or should otherwise consider the Company’s preferences as described below:
(a) Short-Term Trading. Short-term trading of Company Securities may be distracting to the person and may unduly focus the person on the Company’s short-term stock market performance instead of the Company’s long-term business objectives. For these reasons, all persons subject to this Policy who purchase Company Securities in the open market are discouraged from selling any Company Securities of the same class during the six months following the purchase (or vice versa). Furthermore, such short-term trading by directors or executive officers (as defined by Rule 16a-l) may result in short-swing profit liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
| -5- |
(b) Short Sales. Short sales of Company Securities (i.e., the sale of a security that the seller does not own) may evidence an expectation on the part of the seller that the securities will decline in value, and therefore have the potential to signal to the market that the seller lacks confidence in the Company’s prospects. In addition, short sales may reduce a seller’s incentive to seek to improve the Company’s performance. For these reasons, short sales of Company Securities are prohibited. Furthermore, Section 16(c) of the Exchange Act prohibits directors and executive officers (as defined by Rule 16a-l) from engaging in short sales. Short sales arising from certain types of hedging transactions are subject to the paragraph below captioned “Hedging Transactions.”
(c) Publicly-Traded Options. Given the relatively short term of publicly-traded options, transactions in options may imply that a director, officer or employee is trading based on material nonpublic information and focus that director’s, officer’s or other employee’s attention on short-term performance at the expense of the Company’s long-term objectives. Accordingly, transactions in put options, call options or other derivative securities, on an exchange or in any other organized market, are prohibited by this Policy. Option positions arising from certain types of hedging transactions are subject to the paragraph below captioned “Hedging Transactions.”
(d) Hedging Transactions. Hedging or monetization transactions can be accomplished through a number of possible mechanisms, including through the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds. Such hedging transactions may permit a director, officer or employee to continue to own Company Securities, but without the full risks and rewards of ownership. When that occurs, the director, officer or employee may no longer have the same objectives as the Company’s other stockholders. Therefore, directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in any such transactions.
(e) Margin Accounts and Pledged Securities. Securities held in a margin account as collateral for a margin loan may be sold by the broker without the customer’s consent if the customer fails to meet a margin call. Similarly, securities pledged (or hypothecated) as collateral for a loan may be sold in foreclosure if the borrower defaults on the loan. Because a margin sale or foreclosure sale may occur at a time when the pledgor is aware of material nonpublic information or otherwise is not permitted to trade in Company Securities, directors, officers and other employees are prohibited from holding Company Securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company Securities as collateral for a loan unless the arrangement is specifically approved in advance by the Administrator. Pledges of Company Securities arising from certain types of hedging transactions are subject to the paragraph above captioned “Hedging Transactions.”
(f) Standing and Limit Orders. Standing and limit orders (except standing and limit orders under approved Rule 10b5-1 Plans, as described above) create heightened risks for insider trading violations similar to the use of margin accounts. There is no control over the timing of purchases or sales that result from standing instructions to a broker, and as a result the broker could execute a transaction when a director, officer or other employee is in possession of material nonpublic information. The Company therefore discourages placing standing or limit orders on Company Securities. If a person subject to this Policy determines that they must use a standing order or limit order, the order should be limited to short duration and should otherwise comply with the restrictions and procedures outlined below under the heading “Additional Procedures.”
| -6- |
| 12. | ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES |
The Company has established additional procedures in order to assist the Company in the administration of this Policy, to facilitate compliance with laws prohibiting insider trading while in possession of material nonpublic information, and to avoid the appearance of any impropriety. These additional procedures are applicable only to those individuals described below.
(a) Pre-Clearance Procedures. All directors, officers and employees of the Company, as well as the Family Members and Controlled Entities of such persons, may not engage in any transaction in Company Securities without first obtaining pre-clearance of the transaction from the Administrator. A request for pre-clearance should be submitted to the Administrator at least two business days in advance of the proposed transaction. The Administrator is under no obligation to approve a transaction submitted for pre-clearance, and may determine not to permit the transaction. If a person seeks pre-clearance and permission to engage in the transaction is denied, then he or she should refrain from initiating any transaction in Company Securities and should not inform any other person of the restriction.
When a request for pre-clearance is made, the requestor should carefully consider whether he or she may be aware of any material nonpublic information about the Company and should describe fully those circumstances to the Administrator. The requestor should also indicate whether he or she has effected any non-exempt “opposite-way” transactions (e.g., an open market sale would be “opposite” any open market purchase, and vice versa) within the past six months, and should be prepared to report the proposed transaction on an appropriate Form 4 or Form 5. The requestor should also be prepared to comply with SEC Rule 144 and file Form 144, if necessary, at the time of any sale.
A request for pre-clearance must be made in writing, preferably by submission of a completed Request for Pre-Clearance in the form of EXHIBIT A to this Policy. Pre-cleared transactions should be effected promptly. Requestors are required to refresh the request for pre-clearance if a pre-cleared transaction is not effected within five business days after pre-clearance is received.
Furthermore, requestors must immediately notify the Administrator following the execution of any transaction.
(b) Quarterly Trading Restrictions. Directors, officers and employees, as well as their Family Members and Controlled Entities, may not conduct any transactions involving the Company’s Securities (other than as specified by this Policy) except during an Open Trading Window. An “Open Trading Window” generally begins on the second business day following the day of public release of the Company’s quarterly earnings and ends 15 calendar days prior to the end of the then current quarter. The Administrator will notify directors, officers and employees of the opening and closing of the trading window.
| -7- |
(c) Event-Specific Trading Restriction Periods. From time to time, an event may occur that is material to the Company and is known by only a few directors, officers and/or employees. So long as the event remains material and nonpublic, the persons designated by the Administrator may not trade Company Securities. In addition, material developments impacting the Company may occur in a particular fiscal quarter that, in the judgment of the Administrator, make it advisable that designated persons should refrain from trading in Company Securities even during the ordinary Open Trading Window described above. In that situation, the Administrator may notify these persons that they should not trade in the Company’s Securities, without disclosing the reason for the restriction. The existence of an event-specific trading restriction period or the closing of the Open Trading Window will be announced by the Administrator to persons designated by the Administrator. Even if the Administrator has not designated you a person who should not trade due to an event-specific restriction, you may not trade while aware of material nonpublic information. Exceptions will not be granted during an event-specific trading restriction period.
(d) Exceptions.
(i) The quarterly trading restrictions and event-driven trading restrictions do not apply to those transactions to which this Policy does not apply, as described above under the heading “Limited Exceptions,” nor do they apply to an election to participate in an employer plan during an open enrollment period.
(ii) The Administrator in his or her discretion may approve other or further exceptions to these requirements on a case-by-case basis in extraordinary circumstances. Any request for an exception pursuant to this paragraph must be submitted in advance and in writing, and any approval must be in writing.
| 13. | POST-TERMINATION TRANSACTIONS |
This Policy continues to apply to transactions in Company Securities even after termination of service to the Company. If an individual is in possession of material nonpublic information when his or her service terminates, that individual may not trade in Company Securities until that information has become public or is no longer material. The pre-clearance procedures specified under the heading “Additional Procedures” above and applicable to directors and certain executives will continue to apply for a period of six months after a termination of service, in order to facilitate compliance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
| 14. | CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATIONS |
The purchase or sale of securities while aware of material nonpublic information, or the disclosure of material nonpublic information to others who then trade in the Company’s Securities, is prohibited by federal and state laws. Insider trading violations are pursued vigorously by the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcement authorities. Punishment for insider trading violations is severe and could include significant fines and imprisonment. While the regulatory authorities concentrate their efforts on the individuals who trade, or who tip inside information to others who trade, the federal securities laws also impose potential liability on companies and other “controlling persons” if they fail to take reasonable steps to prevent insider trading by company personnel.
In addition, an individual’s failure to comply with this Policy may subject the individual to Company-imposed sanctions, up to and including termination of employment, whether or not the employee’s failure to comply results in a violation of law. Needless to say, a violation of law, or even an SEC investigation that does not result in prosecution, can tarnish a person’s reputation and irreparably damage a career.
| 15. | REPORTING OF VIOLATIONS |
Any person who violates this Policy or any federal or state law governing insider trading or tipping, or who knows of or reasonably suspects any such violation by another person, should report the matter immediately by following the procedures set forth in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as it may be amended from time to time. Employees are obligated to report suspected and actual violations of Company policy or the law. Doing so brings the concern into the open so that it can be resolved quickly and more serious harm can be prevented. Failure to do so could result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
If you encounter a situation or are considering a course of action and its appropriateness is unclear, do not hesitate to reach out the Administrator with any questions; even the appearance of impropriety can be very damaging and should be avoided, and the Administrator may be in the best position to provide helpful information or other resources.
| 16. | CERTIFICATION |
All persons subject to this Policy may be required to certify and re-certify, from time to time, their understanding of, and intent to comply with, this Policy.
| 17. | AMENDMENT |
This Policy may be amended by the Board of Directors or any committee or designee to which the Board of Directors delegates this authority.
The Administrator has the authority to make determinations under, and interpretations of, this Policy, as specified in this Policy under the heading “Administration of the Policy.” In addition, the Administrator is authorized to approve amendments to this Policy that: (i) correct obvious errors (e.g., typographical or grammatical errors); (ii) are necessitated by changes in legal requirements; (iii) are necessary to clarify the meaning of this Policy; or (iv) are administrative in nature, such as the provisions of this Policy under the heading “Additional Procedures.”
| -8- |
Appendix 10(b)
Guidelines for Rule 10b5-1 Plans⁎
Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act provides a defense from insider trading liability under Rule 10b-5. In order to be eligible to rely on this defense, a person subject to our Insider Trading Policy must enter into a Rule 10b5-l Plan for transactions in Company Securities (as defined in the Insider Trading Policy) that meets certain conditions specified in the Rule. If the plan meets the requirements of Rule 10b5-l, Company Securities may be purchased or sold without regard to certain insider trading restrictions. In general, a Rule 10b5-l Plan must be entered into at a time when the person entering into the plan is not aware of material nonpublic information. Once the plan is adopted, the person must not exercise any influence over the amount of securities to be traded, the price at which they are to be traded or the date of the trade. The plan must either specify the amount, pricing and timing of transactions in advance or delegate discretion on these matters to an independent third party.
As specified in the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, a Rule 10b5-l Plan must be approved by the Administrator and meet the requirements of Rule 10b5-l and these guidelines. Any Rule 10b5-l Plan must be submitted for approval at least five business days prior to the entry into the Rule 10b5-l Plan. Once a 10b5-1 Plan is approved, no further pre-approval of transactions conducted pursuant to the plan will be required.
The following guidelines apply to all Rule 10b5-l Plans:
| ● | You may not enter into, modify or terminate a trading program outside of an Open Trading Window or while in possession of material nonpublic information. | |
| ● | All Rule 10b5-l Plans must have a duration of at least six months and no more than two years. | |
| ● | If a Rule 10b5-l Plan is terminated, you must wait at least 30 days before trading outside of the Rule 10b5-l Plan. | |
| ● | If a trading program is terminated, you must wait until the commencement of the next Open Trading Window before a new Rule 10b5-l Plan may be adopted. | |
| ● | You may not commence sales under a trading program until at least 30 days following the date of establishment of a trading program. Any modification of a trading program must not take effect for at least 30 days from the date of modification. | |
| ● | You may not enter into any transaction in Company Securities while the Rule 10b5-l Plan is in effect. |
The approval or adoption of a Rule 10b5-l Plan in no way reduces or eliminates a person’s obligations under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, including disclosure obligations and liability for short-swing profits. Persons subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act should consult with their own counsel in implementing a Rule 10b5-l Plan.
⁎ Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd. Insider Trading Policy.
| -9- |
Exhibit A
Request for Pre-Clearance⁎
For pre-clearance to transact in Company Securities.
Upon executing a transaction, directors, officers and employees must immediately notify the Company.
| Transaction Vehicle (check one) | Transaction Initiated By (check one) | |
| ☐ Open Market Transaction | ☐ Employee or immediate family member directly | |
| ☐ Equity Compensation Plan | ☐ Court or government decree (e.g., divorce decree) | |
| ☐ Other (specify): | ☐ Broker (provide name, firm, telephone and e-mail): |
| Type of Transaction (check one) |
| ☐ Purchase or acquire common stock |
| ☐ Sell or dispose of common stock |
| ☐ Move Company Securities from one account to another (e.g., in or out of a trust) |
| ☐ Dispose of fractional shares |
| ☐ Pledge Company Securities for margin account, or otherwise |
| ☐ Exercise options without subsequent sale |
| ☐ Exercise options with subsequent sale (e.g., a “cashless exercise”) |
| ☐ Other (describe): |
| Transaction Detail (provide the following information) |
| Number of securities: |
| Estimated share price: |
| Contemplated execution date: |
| Date of your last “opposite way” transaction⁎⁎: |
Certification
I certify that I have fully disclosed the information requested in this form, I have read the OKYO Pharma Ltd. Insider Trading Policy, I am not in possession of material nonpublic information, and to the best of my knowledge and belief the proposed transaction will not violate the OKYO Pharma Ltd. Insider Trading Policy.
| Signature: | ||
| Print Name: | ||
| Date: |
| ⁎ | Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd. Insider Trading Policy. |
| ** | If a Section 16 insider buys and sells (or sells and buys) Company Securities within a six-month time frame and such transactions are not exempt under SEC rules, the two transactions can be “matched” for purposes of Section 16. The insider may be sued and will be strictly liable for any profits made, regardless of whether the insider was in possession of material nonpublic information. |
| -10- |