Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Universal Display Corporation's first quarter 2026 earnings conference call. My name is Sherry, and I will be your conference moderator for today's call. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the call over to Darius Liu, Senior Director of Investor relations. Please proceed.

Thank you and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Universal Display's first quarter earnings conference call. Joining me on the call today are Steve Abramson, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Brian Millard, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Before Steve begins, let me remind you that today's call is a property of Universal Display. Any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of any portion of this call in any form without the express written consent of Universal Display is strictly prohibited. Further, this call is being webcast live and will be made available for a period of time on Universal Display's website. This call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of the live webcast of this call, April 30, 2026. During this call, we may make forward-looking statements based on current expectations. These statements are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties, and our actual results may differ materially. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in the company's periodic reports filed with the SEC and should be referenced by anyone considering making any investments in the company's securities. Universal Display disclaims any obligation to update any of these statements. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Steve Abramson.

Thanks, Daris, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today and for your continued interest in Universal Display. Let me begin with how we are thinking about the business, both in the context of today's environment and the longer-term opportunity we continue to see ahead. While the near-term backdrop has become more challenging, our long-term view remains unchanged. Our leadership at OLED, built on sustained innovation and deep customer integration, positions us well to navigate the near-term macro uncertainty while continuing to capture the industry's long-term growth opportunities. We operate a high-margin business model with strong free cash flow generation, long-standing partnerships across the OLED ecosystem, and a balance sheet that provides meaningful strategic and financial flexibility. At the same time, visibility across the consumer electronics value chain has become more limited in recent months. A more cautious demand environment, higher component costs, and supply constraints are adding complexity to demand forecasting. These dynamics are consistent with what we are hearing broadly across the industry and reflected in newly published conservative outlooks from third-party market research firms. Against this backdrop of increased uncertainty, we believe it is prudent to moderate our near-term revenue expectations. Brian will provide additional details shortly. Despite these near-term dynamics, our profitability, cash flow generation, and lean operating model remain strong. We ended the quarter with approximately $911 million in cash and investments, supporting a measured and balanced capital allocation approach centered on investing in innovation, pursuing strategic opportunities, and returning capital to shareholders. Over the last 12 months, we returned more than $187 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We announced today the authorization of a new $400 million share repurchase program following the full utilization of our prior $100 million authorization. While we remain disciplined in our approach, this authorization underscores our confidence in the long-term trajectory of the business and the strength of our task generation model. Looking beyond the near term, the growth runway for OLEDs remained as compelling as ever. adoption is expanding across IT, automotive, televisions, and foldables, and emerging architectures such as Tandem. At the same time, performance expectations continue to rise across key dimensions, including brightness, power efficiency, lifetime, and color performance. As these requirements increase, materials and technology innovation becomes even more critical, reinforcing the value of our capabilities and our role in enabling progress across the OLED ecosystem. Phosphorescent Blue continues to be a significant opportunity for the industry and a key area of focus for us. As specifications advance and new architectures emerge, expectations for Blue are becoming more demanding and more varied across applications. In turn, we are aligning our blue development program to meet these increasingly complex specifications. While this evolution is extending the development path, our conviction in the commercialization of phosphorescent blue has not wavered. The value proposition is clear. When adopted, we believe phosphorescent blue has the potential to deliver up to an initial 25% improvement in OLED panel energy efficiency. A meaningful advance at a time when devices are being asked to do more, run longer, and perform better. That is a compelling proposition for the industry, and the market interest reflects it. We look forward to sharing additional technical detail next week during our invited paper presentation at SID Display Week. Supporting this work is an increasingly powerful in-house R&D engine. We are applying AI and machine learning at greater scale to enhance material discovery, evaluate candidates more effectively, and prioritize development pathways. For example, these tools allow us to predict thermal processing stability up to 10,000 times faster than traditional density functional theory while achieving near comparable accuracy. By combining AI-driven modeling with more than 20 years of proprietary data, deep device expertise, and decades of OLED know-how, we are accelerating progress in Phosphorus and Blue while also advancing innovation across our next-generation red, green, and yellow emissive materials. More broadly, earlier this month at ICDT, China's largest display technical symposium, we highlighted a meaningful shift underway in the industry. As performance requirements continue to broaden, progress increasingly depends on advancing materials, device architecture, and display design together with a greater emphasis on energy efficiency. The system-level approach is supporting the development of advanced OLED architectures, such as tandem and hybrid structures, advanced pixel layouts, and PSF, helping address the evolving performance demands across applications. This direction aligns well with our longstanding development philosophy and reinforces our role in enabling innovative OLED solutions as the industry evolves and grows. One example we shared in the invited paper was the incorporation of our phosphorescent material into the industry's first commercial green PSF product targeting BT 2020 specifications introduced by VisionOx. This milestone highlights the growing role of our phosphorescent materials in enabling next-generation OLED architectures and reinforces our position at the forefront of OLED innovation. The same depth of collaboration extends across our broader customer base. During the first quarter, we announced new long-term agreements with Tien Ma and LG Display. These agreements underscore the value we deliver and the trust we have built over multiple technology cycles. At the industry level, we believe OLED is entering the early stages of a multi-year capacity expansion cycle. Significant new Gen 8.6 investments are progressing in Korea and China to support growing adoption across IT and automotive applications. Samsung Display's $3.1 billion facility is reportedly nearing commercial shipments, and BOE's $9 billion fab has entered customer sample validation and is targeting mass production in the second half of this year. VisionOx has begun equipment move-in at its $7.6 billion facility, and TCL China Star continues construction on its $4.1 billion greenfield plan. We view this year as the beginning of a longer ramp, with output increasing over time as facilities move through qualification, yield ramp, and production scaling. Taking together these developments across technology roadmaps, customer engagement, and manufacturing capacity reinforce our conviction in OLED's long-term growth trajectory, and in the increasingly important role we play in enabling next-generation architectures that advance performance. With our materials leadership, deep customer partnerships, strong financial foundation, and disciplined capital allocation, we believe we are uniquely positioned to drive sustainable long-term value creation. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Brian.

Thank you, Steve. Revenue for the first quarter of 2026 was $142 million, compared to $166 million in the first quarter of 2025. While material volumes decreased by approximately 4% year-over-year, total revenue decreased by 14%. This year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by customer mix, as well as tariff-related purchasing activity by Chinese customers in the prior year period and a softer macro environment between periods. The ratio of materials to royalty and licensing revenue during the first quarter was approximately 1.5 to 1. For the full year, we continue to expect this ratio to average closer to 1.3 to 1, as customer mix normalizes. As Steve discussed, the operating environment has become more challenging over the past few months. Near-term visibility has declined as macro pressures lay on consumer demand assumptions, while higher memory pricing and supply constraints continue to temper and market expectations. Based on current forecasts, we expect second quarter revenue to be sequentially higher than the first quarter, and we continue to expect the second half of the year to be stronger than the first half. At the same time, given reduced near-term visibility and the evolving macro backdrop, we believe it is prudent to revise our full-year revenue guidance range to $630 to $670 million from our prior guidance range of $650 to $700 million. Turning to materials, total material sales were $84 million in the first quarter, compared to $86 million in the first quarter of 2025. Green emitter sales, which include our yellow-green emitters, were $64 million in both periods. Red emitter sales were $20 million in the first quarter of 2026, compared to $21 million in the first quarter of 2025. As we've discussed in the past, material buying patterns can vary quarter to quarter. First quarter royalty and licensing fees were $54 million compared to $74 million in the prior year period, primarily reflecting changes in customer mix. Adesis revenue in the first quarter was $4.3 million compared to $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2025. First quarter cost of sales was $36 million, resulting in a total gross margin of 75%, which is consistent with our full-year gross margin guidance range of 74% to 76%. This compares to cost of sales of $38 million and total gross margin of 77% in the first quarter of 2025. Operating expenses, excluding cost of sales, were $63 million in the first quarter, compared to $58 million in the prior year period. Operating income for the quarter was $43 million, representing an operating margin of approximately 30%, compared to operating income of $70 million, and an operating margin of approximately 42% in the first quarter of 2025. The year-over-year decline reflects lower volumes, customer and product mix, and higher input costs. Non-operating expense for the quarter was $6.2 million, primarily reflecting foreign exchange and investment-related items. This included a $3 million foreign exchange loss related to movements in the Korean won associated with the tax receivable, as well as a $2.7 million investment loss on our marketable equity securities. The income tax rate was 21% in the first quarter of 2026. For the full year, we now expect our effective tax rate to be approximately 20%. Net income for the first quarter was $36 million, or 76 cents per diluted share, compared to $64 million, or $1.35 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2025. We generated $109 million of operating cash flow in the first quarter and ended March with approximately $911 million in cash and investments. During the first quarter, we repurchased approximately 633 000 shares of common stock for 66 million dollars and completed our previously authorized 100 million dollar share repurchase program having repurchased a total of approximately 924 000 shares under that authorization building on this the board authorized a new 400 million dollar share repurchase program and declared a cash dividend of 50 cents per share for the second quarter. These actions reflect our continued commitment to a disciplined and balanced capital allocation framework underpinned by strong free cash flow generation. We remain thoughtful but opportunistic in our approach to share repurchases while maintaining the flexibility to invest and support future growth. With that, I'll turn the call back to Steve.

Thanks, Brian. Two and a half weeks ago, we rang the NASDAQ closing bell to mark 30 years as a publicly listed company. We started with little more than a bold idea to help revolutionize the display industry. At a time when CRT televisions dominated the living rooms, our journey required tenacity, resilience, and a long-term vision. Over these three decades, OLED has evolved from a laboratory concept into a global display platform powering billions of devices and supporting an industry estimated at approximately $50 billion this year. We're proud of how far we've come and even more energized by how far we will go in the years ahead. The best of Universal Display is still to come. I would like to thank each of our employees for their drive, desire, dedication, and heart in elevating and shaping Universal Display's accomplishments and advancements. We are committed to being a leader in the OLED ecosystem, achieving superior long-term growth and delivering cutting-edge technologies and materials for the industry, for our customers, and for our shareholders. And with that, operator, let's start the Q&A.

Thank you, Mr. Abramson. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. And for participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question is from Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Brian Lee Lee Hey, everyone. Thanks for taking the questions. Starting with the guidance revision here, I know starting off the year, you guys had kind of talked about how you're always tied to the square meter surface area growth, and And you had alluded to sort of mid-single-digit, maybe 6% specifically, as sort of the guiding principle for your revenue outlook for 2026. Clearly, you know, the year has been weaker. Smartphone cuts have accelerated. But are you seeing that in capacity growth, too? And if so, can you quantify? And then as it relates to the smartphone pressures, can you speak to kind of the high-end and mid-range? Those are the areas that you obviously have the most exposure to, given OLED is well-prepped, represented there. But what's your view on kind of what the high- and mid-range parts of the market are going to do this year if, you know, overall smartphones are now expected to be down, call it 50%, 20%, depending on who you talk to? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks, Brian. Firstly, on the guidance, there has been an overall change in growth expectations this year, both in terms of area as well as units over the last two months since February. And on the area, now there's a projection of roughly a 2% growth in square area this And as you know, we occasionally do grow below that overall area industry growth because of customer efficiencies and other factors that come into place. As it relates to the capacity, the capacity plans that we've talked about and that Steve reiterated today in his prepared remarks continue to be moving forward at full force. Samsung and BOE is coming online this year and VisionOx and China Star thereafter. So that is all really no changes as it relates to that. And to your last point on smartphones this year, certainly the more premium models are expected to be more insulated from some of the memory concerns. But with OLEDs now having 65, you know, plus percent penetration, we are, you know, in the mid and even some of the low-end models as well. So there is exposure that OLED has to the mid and low-end that would be subject to some of the memory concerns out there. And that has evolved even over the last two and a half months here.

Great. That's helpful. And then maybe a couple more here, just on the China revenue contribution in Q1. And that was particularly soft, especially in the context of Korean customers still spending quite a bit. Can you speak to the trends you're seeing in China? Is there inventory? Is there end market demand, share issues? Just what's happening with the China backdrop? Because it does seem like your two Korean customers spent a pretty good amount here in Q1.

Well, Brian, as you know, the China revenues are much lumpier over the course of the year than the Korean revenues. We still have a very strong position, obviously, in China, working closely with all of our Chinese customers, and we believe that that's going to pick up throughout the year.

Okay. Fair enough. Thanks, Steve. And then last one for me, Maybe this one for you as well, Steve. I think you made a comment during your prepared remarks about different architectures, and one caught my attention. You mentioned hybrid architectures, and I think you mentioned Tiamla by name. But is there any notable progress or developments that UDC is seeing with TADF hybrid recipes? And, you know, maybe bigger picture question, why are customers looking at hybrid to begin with instead of just a full phosphorescent system?

So hybrid means a bunch of different things. And I think it was separate than the Tien Ma issue. Hybrid in this context means you combine a layer of phosphorescent technology with a layer of fluorescent technology. And what that does is it enables you to get the best of both technologies. So you can get the efficiency from phosphorescence and the color points and lifetimes from fluorescence. And that type of technology can expand the market. And that's, I think, what our customers are looking for.

Okay. Yeah, makes sense. I'll pass it on. Thanks for the clarification. Thanks, Brian.

Our next question is from James Rusciutti with Needham & Company. Please proceed.

Hi, thanks. I'm just wondering, given the softer environment, and you may have given this, Brian, but I'm just wondering how we should be thinking about OPEX as we look out over the balance of the year.

Yeah, so we had guided back in February mid to high single-digit growth in OPEX this year. I think it's trending more toward mid at this point. And as we've always been, we've always had a very lean OPEX organization, you know, continuing to fund R&D and all the the investment opportunities we need to make there but maintaining a lean SG&A organization and that continues to be the case and we're being very you know cautious on spend this year just based on the overall environment sure makes sense with respect to the the separate release you made regarding a new presentation, new paper at the upcoming SID show on Blue.

When last did you guys deliver a paper on Blue at that conference? Can you remind me?

It's been a few years. You know, we have – some of our customers have presented papers on Blue in recent years, but it's been a while since we have. And, you know, we're excited to share some of the progress that we've made over the last few years in our blue development efforts. And this is really, you know, our first blue paper in quite some time. So we're excited to get that out there and share those details next week.

And then one final question, if I may, just – and this relates to the question Brian just asked about China. And if you think about what happened regarding tariffs last year, when did you see the biggest stockpiling of materials as related to some of the tariff concerns that some of the Chinese display manufacturers had? I'm trying to get a sense of how much that played a role in the decline in China this quarter.

Yeah, it was the largest in April, but there certainly was some toward the end of Q1. And at the time, you know, as time went on, it became clear to us that a lot of the strength that we had in the Chinese market in Q1 of 25 was tariff related. But the largest bit of it was in April following the U.S. tariff announcement and customers placing significant orders thereafter. But it was in both Q1 and Q2 last year. Got it. Thank you. Thanks, Jim.

Our next question is from Scott Searle with Roth Capital Partners. Please proceed.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe to follow up on the China front a little bit, I was hoping to get a little more granularity in terms of some of the linearity that you're seeing and historic buying patterns ahead of new fab capacity launch, if you could remind us what that's looked like in the past. And also wondering just your latest thoughts in terms of China and exposure more on the smartphone fund relative to IT or TVs. Qualcomm last night, I think, was referencing they thought things start to loosen up as we get into the September quarter. So I'm wondering if you're starting to see some of that, I'll call it optimism or order patterns from your customers in China, and then I'll follow up.

Sure. So on your point about fab ramps and volumes associated with fab ramps, historically, especially many years ago, So there was a good bit of yield issues and challenges as our customers turned on new They've gotten much more efficient in their use of materials, but we do have a component of our guidance this year is reflective of materials that will be needed to bring on new capacity coming online this year. As it relates to the year and what we're expecting, we do continue to expect mid to a high 40% of revenues to be in the first half and the balance in the second half, which does imply a continued ramp over heading into the second half.

Brian, just to follow up on that, do you have visibility at this point in time to China specifically in that recovery?

We always get ongoing forecasts from customers and have routine conversations with them about what their forecasts are expected. As you know, our China market, as Steve just said a few minutes ago, So it's been very lumpy historically, and that continues to be the case. But we have visibility right now to what we expect for the rest of the year. And, you know, we feel that our guidance range properly balances the outcomes that we can see ahead of us. And we do expect China revenues to grow in the coming quarters, as Steve mentioned earlier.

Great. Thank you. And, Steve, to maybe follow up on the hybrid architecture, as I understand it, it sounds like that's been complicated, the process and timeline for the adoption of Blue. I'm wondering if you could give us some thoughts in terms of how you're seeing customers looking to implement Blue, whether it's in a hybrid architecture or otherwise, if that is part of basically the hesitation or kind of extended the timeline for adoption.

Well, I think you've hit an important point. The customers, I mean, customers are looking at a number of different ways to implement blue using phosphorescence and fluorescence, and because you're using multiple materials, the matching in those materials becomes even more complicated, so it does delay. It delays the timeline. It also, as we are continuing our development efforts, we're working on specific implementations to meet our customers' needs. Gotcha, and Steve, just to follow up on that, and then i'll get back in the queue but from an economic standpoint and performance standpoint for the customer do the hybrid architectures meet what the customers need that these are commercially deployable products and we've just kind of i'll call it having had an extended timeline related to the complexity of the new architectures well i'll answer multiple ways you have to talk to our customers on the product introduction um in terms of in terms of the timing But having said that, it's a question of clearly a question of when, not if, and we're working really hard with our customers to make sure that glue gets introduced as quickly as possible.

And Scott, just adding on to Steve's comments, when LG Display, you know, May of last year, they went out at SID Display Week last year and showcased a hybrid tandem tablet using our material that was using one layer of fluorescent one layer of phosphorescent and they noted at that at that time both at the show as well as in their press release that it was a commercially performing display that they had validated using commercial equipment so that you know we believe evidence the the use of our material in a commercial system great thanks so much i'll get back in the queue Thanks, Scott.

As a reminder, to star one on your telephone keypad, if you would like to ask a question, our next question is from Martin Yang with Oppenheimer & Company. Please proceed.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. My question first is on the guidance. Can you maybe talk about the guidance range when it comes to your expectations broken and down by capacity-related ups and downs, product release timing, and then on the line Yeah.

So, Martin, our guidance range really reflects, you know, specifically, we already know what capacity is going to be online this year. That is unchanged since February. What has changed is the overall macro environment with, you know, certainly what's going on in the Middle East and, you know, oil prices being where they are and therefore gas prices for consumers, all that is new. And we've seen people that we talk to in the industry as well as the market research firms that track the industry all lowering their estimates over the last two months for the year just based on what's out there. As it relates to, you know, specific models and end markets, certainly the mid-range smartphones, mid and to the extent that OLEDs are in the low end, which we are in a few models of low end as well, those are the areas where I think we're seeing the most pressure. And certainly, the expectations for OLED smartphone growth this year have come down since February as well.

A follow-up on your capacity input in your guidance, because we are getting new GNA fabs online, do you feel confident that you have a good sense of how those new fabs will consume materials for the year?

Yeah, we have not heard that there's any, you know, shift in the plans that our customers have to bring that capacity online. And, you know, there is an expectation of the equipment, you know, Samsung is expected in the middle of this year to have their equipment for mass production and BOE shortly thereafter. That has been the case and was expected back in February as well when we issued guidance. And so things in terms of the new capacity coming online, that's really not changed since February, and we do believe that they will come online, and we know our customers are actively working to make sure that capacity is utilized.

Got it. Last question for me on IP. can you maybe remind us your approach to IP protection or starting to see more fluorescent OLED developers outside of China, mainly in Korea? Can you maybe remind us your IP position as well as your approach to protect your IP?

Well, we firmly believe that when you have inventions, you need to protect them, and we protect them with our IP worldwide. We have over 7,000 patents worldwide, and we utilize our IP as part of our product development because we have strong IP protection as well as the best materials on the market. And we believe that that is a winning combination. It has been for quite some time.

Thanks, Martin.

Thank you. This will conclude our question and answer session. I would like to turn the program back to Brian Millard for any additional closing remarks.

Thank you for your questions. We remain confident in long-term opportunities ahead for universal display and the OLED industry, and we appreciate your continued interest. We look forward to speaking with you again next quarter.

Thank you. This will conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect at this time, and thank you for your participation.