OLD MARKET CAPITAL Corp 10-Q for FY2024 Q1
OLD MARKET CAPITAL Corp (OMCC)
About this 10-Q
OLD MARKET CAPITAL Corp filed this 10-Q on August 16, 2023, covering the quarter ended June 30, 2023 (FY2024 Q1).
Headline figures
Quarter ended June 30, 2023, as reported in this filing, compared with the same period a year earlier where the filing states it.
- Revenue
- $7.08M
- down 37.2% from $11.28M a year earlier
- Net income
- $1.56M
- compared with a net loss of $1.78M a year earlier
- Diluted EPS
- $0.21
- compared with -$0.24 a year earlier
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission file number:
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
||
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
☐ |
|
Accelerated filer |
☐ |
☒ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
||
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes
As of August 14, 2023, approximately
NICHOLAS FINANCIAL, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
Part I . |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2023 and March 31, 2023 |
|
1 |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Item 2. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
16 |
Item 3. |
|
|
26 |
|
Item 4. |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II . |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
27 |
|
Item 1A. |
|
|
27 |
|
Item 2. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 3. |
|
|
28 |
|
Item 6. |
|
|
29 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2023 |
|
|
March 31, 2023 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Finance receivables, net of unearned discounts and fees and accrued interest receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less: Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Finance receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repossessed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Line of credit, net of debt issuance costs |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Shareholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Treasury stock: |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest and fee income on finance receivables |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Unrealized losses on equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Total revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Shareholders' |
|
|||||
Balance at March 31, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-13, net of tax |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Treasury stock |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net Income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at June 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Shareholders' |
|
|||||
Balance at March 31, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
Forfeitures |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
||
Treasury stock |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at June 30, 2022 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Nicholas Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used in) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amortization of operating of lease right-of-use assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Unrealized loss on equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amortization of dealer discounts |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Amortization of insurance and fee commissions |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Accretion of purchase price discount |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Principal reduction on operating lease liabilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repossessed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase and origination of finance receivables |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Principal payments received and proceeds from repossessed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchases of equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Payments for property and equipment |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from the disposal property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repayments on credit facilities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Repayment of PPP Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Cancellations of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Repurchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
Cash at the beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash the end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Income taxes paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental schedule of noncash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cancellations of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
See Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
Nicholas Financial, Inc. (“Nicholas Financial – Canada” or the Company) is a Canadian holding company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia with several wholly-owned United States subsidiaries, including Nicholas Financial, Inc., a Florida corporation (“NFI”). The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2023, and the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Nicholas Financial – Canada, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and with Article 8 of Regulation S-X thereunder. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes to the consolidated financial statements required by U.S. GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to ensure the information is not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2024. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2023. The March 31, 2023 consolidated balance sheet included herein has been derived from the March 31, 2023 audited consolidated balance sheet included in the aforementioned Form 10-K.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables.
Reclassifications
In certain instances, amounts reported in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income (loss).
Note 2. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued the Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. Among other things, the amendments in this ASU require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Companies will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The ASU also requires additional disclosures related to estimates and judgments used to measure all expected credit losses.
The Company adopted this standard effective April 1, 2023. The initial impact of adoption was a $
In March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, which removes the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings and requires entities to evaluate whether a modification provided to a customer results in a new loan or continuation of an existing loan. The amendments enhance existing disclosures and require new disclosures for receivables when there has been a modification in contractual cash flows due to a customer experiencing financial difficulties. Additionally, the amendments require public business entities to disclose gross charge-off information by year of origination in the vintage disclosures. This ASU became effective for us on April 1, 2023. We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2024 using the modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company does not believe there are any other recently issued accounting standards that have not yet been adopted that will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
5
Note 3. Earnings Per Share
The Company has granted stock compensation awards with nonforfeitable dividend rights which are considered participating securities. Earnings per share is calculated using the two-class method, as such awards are more dilutive under this method than the treasury stock method. Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which excludes the participating securities. The Company's participating securities are non-vested restricted shares which are not required to share losses, and accordingly, are not allocated losses in periods of net loss. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares from stock compensation awards. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, potentially dilutive securities that were not included in the diluted per share calculation because they would be anti-dilutive comprise
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) per consolidated statements of income |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Percentage allocated to shareholders * |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Denominator for Basic earnings per share - weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Per share income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
* Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding and unvested restricted stock units expected to vest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Percentage allocated to shareholders |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
||
Note 4. Finance Receivables
Finance Receivables Portfolio, net
Finance receivables consist of Contracts and Direct Loans and are detailed as follows:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
||
Finance receivables |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unearned dealer discounts |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Unearned insurance commissions and fees |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Unearned purchase price discount |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Finance receivables, net of unearned discounts and fees and accrued interest receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Finance receivables, net |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||
6
Contracts and Direct Loans each comprise a portfolio segment which consists of groups of loans sharing common risk factors. The following tables present selected information on the entire portfolio of the Company:
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
||
Contract Portfolio |
|
2023 |
|
|
2023 |
|
||
Average APR |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
||
Average discount |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
||
Average term (months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Number of active contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
||
Direct Loan Portfolio |
|
2023 |
|
|
2023 |
|
||
Average APR |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
||
Average term (months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Number of active contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL)
The ACL reflects the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the expected cash flows of finance receivables. Provisions for credit losses are recorded in amounts sufficient to maintain an ACL at an adequate level to provide for estimated losses over the lives of the finance receivables. Portfolio segments are comprised of homogeneous loans sharing common risk factors. Accordingly, loans are not individually evaluated for collectability. Consistent with the application during prior reporting years, the Company continues charging credit losses against the allowance when the account reaches 120 days contractually delinquent and any recoveries on finance receivables previously charged to the ACL are credited to the ACL when collected.
The Company uses a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model to forecast expected credit losses. Historical information about losses generally provides a basis for the estimate of expected credit losses. The Company has utilized its own historical data as well as its peer group companies' data from FFIEC Call Report filings. This data has been used to produce regression analyses designed to quantify the impact of reasonable and supportable forecasts in projective models.
The Company also considers the need to adjust historical information to reflect the extent to which current conditions differ from the conditions that existed for the period over which historical information was evaluated. These adjustments to historical loss information may be qualitative or quantitative in nature. The Company considers changes in international, national, regional and local conditions, changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, portfolio bankruptcy trends, maturity terms extensions, changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, the effect of other external factors, such as competition, legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses, the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the levels of such concentrations, changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of loans, changes in the quality of the loan review system, changes in the experience, depth, and ability of lending management, and reasonable and supportable economic forecasts, which cover the lives of the finance receivables.
The Company discounts expected cash flows at the financial asset’s effective interest rate. The effective interest rate is defined in the ASC 326 as the contractual interest rate adjusted for any net deferred fees or costs, premium, or discount existing at the origination or acquisition of the financial assets. For the Company, this is calculated using prepayment adjusted contractual cash flows relative to the amortized cost. The Company also considers prepayment and curtailment effects in calculation of its effective interest rate.
According to ASC 326-20-30-9, estimating expected credit losses is highly judgmental and requires to produce reasonable and supportable forecasts of expected credit losses. The Company has elected to forecast the first four quarters of the credit loss estimate and revert to a long-run average of each considered economic factor as permitted in ASC 326-20-30-9. Based on the final values in the forecast and the uncertainty of a post-pandemic recovery, management has elected to revert over four quarters. The Company also uses information provided by the FOMC to obtain various forecasts for unemployment rate and gross domestic product, as well as other economic factors that are considered as part of its ACL calculations.
The Company elected not to measure an allowance on accrued interest which included as a component of amortized cost and limited to performing accounts, defined as an account that is less than 61 days past due. Accrual of interest income on finance receivables is suspended when a loan is contractually delinquent for 61 days or more, or the collateral is repossessed, whichever is earlier. Consistent with the application in the prior reporting periods, the Company continue timely reversing the accrual of interest income when the loan is contractually delinquent 61 days or more. All of these such accounts are accounted for in the calculation for allowance for credit losses.
7
The Company defines a non-performing asset as one that is 61 or more days past due, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy account, or a Chapter 13 bankruptcy account that has not been confirmed by the courts, for which the accrual of interest income is suspended. Upon confirmation of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy account (BK13), the account is immediately charged-off. Upon notification of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, an account is monitored for collectability. In the event the debtors’ balance is reduced by the bankruptcy court, the Company records a loss equal to the amount of principal balance reduction. The remaining balance is reduced as payments are received. In the event an account is dismissed from bankruptcy, the Company will decide whether to begin repossession proceedings or to allow the customer to make regularly scheduled payments.
Prior to adoption of ASU 2016-13 the Company was periodically evaluating composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, historical loan loss experience, delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankrupt accounts when determining management’s estimate of probable credit losses and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Management utilized significant judgment in determining probable incurred losses and in identifying and evaluating qualitative factors. This approach aligned with the Company’s lending policies and underwriting standards. If the allowance for credit losses is determined to be inadequate, then an additional charge to the provision is recorded to maintain adequate reserves based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
The Company used a trailing twelve-month net charge-off as a percentage of average finance receivables, and applied this percentage to ending finance receivables to estimate probable credit losses. This approach reflected the current trends of incurred losses within the portfolio and closely aligns the allowance for credit losses with the portfolio’s performance indicators. Estimating the allowance for credit losses using the trailing twelve-month charge-off analysis reflected portfolio performance adjusted for seasonality. Management evaluated qualitative factors to support its allowance for credit losses. The Company examined the impact of macro-economic factors, such as year-over-year inflation, as well as portfolio performance characteristics, such as changes in the value of underlying collateral, level of nonperforming accounts, delinquency trends, and accounts with extended terms.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the changes in the allowance for credit losses on Contracts and Direct Loans for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2023 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of period, prior to adoption of ASU 2016-13 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Impact of adoption of ASU 2016-13 |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Charge-offs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance at June 30, |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2022 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Charge-offs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance at June 30, |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
The following table presents details of the allowance for credit losses segregated by portfolio segment as of June 30, 2023, calculated in accordance with the current expected credit losses methodology (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
As of June 30, 2023 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Modeled expected credit losses |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Qualitative adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
8
The following table presents gross charge-offs and recoveries by receivable origination year for total portfolio:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
Three months ended June 30, 2023 |
|
|||||||||
|
Gross Charge-offs |
|
|
Gross Recoveries |
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|||
2024 |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Total |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
The following table presents gross charge-offs and recoveries by receivable origination year for Contract segment of portfolio:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
Three months ended June 30, 2023 |
|
|||||||||
|
Gross Charge-offs |
|
|
Gross Recoveries |
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|||
2024 |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Total |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
The following table presents gross charge-offs and recoveries by receivable origination year for Direct segment of portfolio:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
Three months ended June 30, 2023 |
|
|||||||||
|
Gross Charge-offs |
|
|
Gross Recoveries |
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|||
2024 |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
||
Total |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
The following table shows portfolio delinquencies by origination fiscal year as of June 30, 2023:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
Prior |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Current |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
30-59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
90-120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
9
The following table shows Contracts portfolio delinquencies by origination fiscal year as of June 30, 2023:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
Prior |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Current |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
30-59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
90-120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
The following table shows Direct loans portfolio delinquencies by origination fiscal year as of June 30, 2023:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
Prior |
|
Total |
|
|||||||
Current |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
30-59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
90-120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|||||||
The following table is an assessment of the credit quality by creditworthiness:
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
June 30, 2023 |
|
|
March 31, 2023 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
Direct Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
Performing accounts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||
Non-performing accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Chapter 13 bankruptcy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Finance receivables |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||
A performing account is defined as an account that is less than
In certain circumstances, the Company will grant obligors one-month payment extensions. The only modification of terms in those circumstances is to advance the obligor’s next due date by one month and extend the maturity date of the receivable. There are no other concessions, such as a reduction in interest rate, or forgiveness of principal or of accrued interest. Accordingly, the Company considers such extensions to be insignificant delays in payments.
A non-performing account is defined as an account that is contractually delinquent for
In the event an account is dismissed from bankruptcy, the Company will decide whether to begin repossession proceedings or to allow the customer to make regularly scheduled payments.
10
The following tables present certain information regarding the delinquency rates experienced by the Company with respect to Contracts and Direct Loans, excluding Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts:
|
|
Contracts |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Balance |
|
|
30 – 59 |
|
|
60 – 89 |
|
|
90 – 119 |
|
|
120+ |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
June 30, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
March 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Direct Loans |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands, except percentages) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Balance |
|
|
30 – 59 |
|
|
60 – 89 |
|
|
90 – 119 |
|
|
120+ |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
June 30, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
March 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
% |
|||||||
Note 5. Credit Facility
Westlake Credit Facility
The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default and covenants, including but not limited to financial and operating results around tangible net worth, collateral performance indicator, excess spread ratio. Subject to Company’s compliance with certain terms and conditions, the lender waived its rights and remedies under the Agreement applicable to the excess spread ratio covenant and collateral performance indicator through September 30, 2024.
As of June 30, 2023, the Company had aggregate outstanding indebtedness, net of debt issuance costs, under the Credit Facility of $
Future maturities of debt as of June 30, 2023 are as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|||
FY2024 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
FY2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Note 6. Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of approximately $
11
During the quarter ended December 31, 2022, the Company determined there was not sufficient positive evidence of future earnings to support a position that it will be able to realize its net deferred tax asset. The Company has significant negative evidence to overcome in the form of cumulative pre-tax losses from continuing operations. Therefore, it will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on its U.S. federal and state net deferred tax asset. The Company does
Note 7. Leases
The Company leases its corporate headquarter and central business operations hub.
The Company’s lease liability was $
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases in effect as of June 30, 2023, are as follows:
in thousands |
|
|
|
|
FY2024 (remaining nine months) |
|
$ |
|
|
FY2025 |
|
|
|
|
FY2026 |
|
|
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments |
|
|
|
|
Present value adjustment |
|
|
( |
) |
Operating lease liability |
|
$ |
|
|
The following table reports information about the Company’s lease cost for the three months ended June 30, 2023 (in thousands):
Lease cost: |
|
|
|
|
Operating lease cost |
|
$ |
|
|
Variable lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Total lease cost |
|
$ |
|
The following table reports information about the Company’s lease cost for the three months ended June 30, 2022 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cost: |
|
|
|
|
Operating lease cost |
|
$ |
|
|
Variable lease cost |
|
|
|
|
Total lease cost |
|
$ |
|
12
The following table reports other information about the Company’s leases for the three months ended June 30, 2023 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Other Lease Information |
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease - Operating Cash Flows (Fixed Payments) |
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Lease - Operating Cash Flows (Liability Reduction) |
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted Average Lease Term - Operating Leases |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate - Operating Leases |
|
|
|
The following table reports other information about the Company’s leases for the three months ended June 30, 2022 (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Other Lease Information |
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease - Operating Cash Flows (Fixed Payments) |
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Lease - Operating Cash Flows (Liability Reduction) |
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted Average Lease Term - Operating Leases |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate - Operating Leases |
|
|
|
Note 8. Fair Value Disclosures
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, finance receivables, and the Credit Facility. Each of these financial instruments are not carried at fair value.
Finance receivables, net, approximates fair value based on the price paid to acquire Contracts. The price paid reflects competitive market interest rates and purchase discounts for the Company’s chosen credit grade in the economic environment. This market is highly liquid as the Company acquires individual loans on a daily basis from dealers.
The initial terms of the Contracts generally range from
Repossessed assets, which are not financial instruments, are valued at the lower of the finance receivable balance prior to repossession or the estimated net realizable value of the repossessed asset. The Company estimates the net realizable value using estimated auction wholesale proceeds less costs to sell plus insurance claims outstanding, if any.
13
Based on current market conditions, the fair value of the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2023 was estimated to be equal to the book value.
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Description |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|||||
Cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
June 30, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
March 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
Finance receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
June 30, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
March 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
Repossessed assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
June 30, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
March 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
Credit Facility: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
June 30, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
March 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||||
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. There were none at June 30, 2023 and March 31, 2023.
Level 1 is for financial assets and liabilities that have a regular mark to market mechanism for setting a fair market value. These assets and liabilities are considered to have readily observable, transparent prices and therefor a reliable, fair market value. Management has determined that this level to be most appropriate for cash.
Level 2 is for financial assets and liabilities that do not have regular market pricing, but whose fair value can be determined based on other data values or market pricing.
At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3. Management has determined that this level to be most appropriate for the finance receivables, repossessed assets, and Credit Facility.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in certain claims and legal proceedings in the normal course of business of which one, if decided adversely to the Company, would, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Specifically, the Company has been sued together with several other defendants, in a lawsuit styled: Nicholas Financial, Inc. v. Jeremiah Gross, No. 21CY-CV02148-01, 7th Judicial Circuit, Clay County, Missouri. On March 9, 2021 the Company filed suit against Jeremiah Gross for a deficiency balance owed to the Company following the 2018 surrender and sale of his motor vehicle which secured a loan from the Company. On April 22, 2021 a default judgment for $
14
Note 10. Stock Plans
In May 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) authorized a new stock repurchase program allowing for the repurchase of up to $
The timing and actual number of repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market and economic conditions. The Company’s stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
In August 2019, the Company’s Board authorized additional repurchases of up to $
The following table summarizes treasury share transactions under the Company's stock repurchase program:
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Amount |
|
||||
Treasury shares at the beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
||
Treasury shares purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|||
Treasury shares at the end of period |
|
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
||
For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock.
Note 11. Restructuring Activities
Costs related to the Company's previously disclosed restructuring plan are summarized as follows:
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||
|
Total Cost Estimated |
|
|
Incurred to Date |
|
|
Remaining cost |
|
|||
Branch Closures |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
Severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cease-use of contractual services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Professional fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total restructuring cost |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|||
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Information
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are based on management’s current beliefs and assumptions, as well as information currently available to management. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, "forecast", “will”, "would", “may”, “plan,” “believe”, “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although Nicholas Financial, Inc., including its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” “we”, “us”, or “our”) believes that the expectations reflected or implied in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. As a result, actual results could differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report may include, without limitation statements about (1) the expected benefits, costs and timing of the Company’s restructuring and change in operating strategy, including its servicing arrangement with Westlake Portfolio Management, LLC (collectively with its affiliate Westlake Capital Finance, LLC, “Westlake”) (including without limitation the servicing fees, classified as administrative costs), its loan agreement with Westlake (including without limitation anticipated interest payments thereunder), and its restructuring activities; (2) the availability and use of excess capital (including by acquiring loan portfolios or businesses or by investing outside of the Company’s traditional business); (3) the continuing impact of COVID-19 on our customers and our business, (4) projections of revenue, income, and other items relating to our financial position and results of operations, (5) statements of our plans, objectives, strategies, goals and intentions, (6) statements regarding the capabilities, capacities, market position and expected development of our business operations, and (7) statements of expected industry and general economic trends. These statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
16
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or expected. All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report are based on information available to the Company as the date of filing of this Quarterly Report, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement. Prospective investors should also consult the risk factors described from time to time in the Company’s other filings made with the SEC, including its reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and annual reports to shareholders.
Restructuring and Change in Operating Strategy
The Company announced on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2022 a change in its operating strategy and restructuring plan with the goal of reducing operating expenses and freeing up capital. As part of this plan, the Company has shifted from a decentralized to a regionalized business model in which each of its originators focuses on a specific region in the Company’s smaller target market footprint, and the Company has entered into a loan servicing agreement with Westlake Portfolio Management, LLC (“WPM”, and, collectively with its affiliate, Westlake Capital Finance, LLC, “Westlake”). An affiliate of Westlake, Westlake Services, LLC, is the beneficial owner of approximately 6.8% of the Company’s common stock.
17
While the Company intends to continue Contract purchase and origination activities, albeit on a much smaller scale, its servicing, collections and recovery operations have been outsourced to Westlake. The Company has ceased all originations of Direct Loans.
The Company anticipates that execution of its evolving restructuring plan will free up capital and permit the Company to allocate excess capital to increase shareholder returns, whether by acquiring loan portfolios or businesses or by investing outside of the Company’s traditional business. The overall timeframe and structure of the Company’s restructuring remains uncertain.
Although the Company no longer employs the branch-based model, it remains committed to its core product of financing primary transportation to and from work for the subprime borrower through the local independent automobile dealership. The Company's strategy includes risk-based pricing (rate, yield, advance, term, collateral value) and a commitment to the underwriting discipline required for optimal portfolio performance. The Company’s principal goals are to increase its profitability and its long-term shareholder value. During fiscal 2023, the Company focused on the following items:
•restructuring the Company’s business by downsizing and streamlining operations and reducing
expenses;
•outsourcing servicing, collections and recovery operations;
•discontinuing our local branch model in favor of a regionalized business model;
•optimizing our technology to better fit the Company’s restructured operations; and
•terminating our live checks program for prospective new customers
In fiscal 2023, the Company also restructured and consolidated its operations by closing all of its brick and mortar branch locations in 18 states — Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin. As a result, as of June 30, 2023, the Company only had two offices in two states – its headquarters in Florida and its central business operations hub in North Carolina, and the Company expects to focus its business operations in the foreseeable future in seven states — Florida, Georgia, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
Although the Company had been licensed to provide Direct Loans in 14 states — Alabama, Florida, Georgia (over $3,000), Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Tennessee during fiscal 2023 the Company has cancelled, not renewed, or otherwise terminated all of such Direct Loan licenses.
Consequently, the Company has not originated any new Direct Loans since the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2023 and the Company does not intend to originate any new Direct Loans going forward. However, the Company expects its third-party service provider to continue to service the Company’s existing Direct Loans. The Company’s total Direct Loans portfolio comprises approximately 14% of its total portfolio, and the Company expects its total Direct Loans portfolio to be reduced over time as such Direct Loans are paid off for otherwise liquidated until there are no Direct Loans in the Company’s portfolio, which at the current rate of such activity is expected to occur sometime during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2027.
Following the restructuring and consolidation of the Company’s operations, the Company does not expect to expand in either its current markets or any new markets.
Restructuring Activities
The closing of branches and consolidation of the workforce pursuant to the restructuring plan were substantially completed by March 31, 2023. The Company recorded the majority of lease terminations and employee-related charges in the second half of Fiscal Year 2023. The Company expects significant annual operating cost savings to substantially exceed the upfront costs associated with the restructuring.
Westlake Loan Agreement
On January 18, 2023, the Company, through its subsidiaries, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Westlake, pursuant to which Westlake is providing the Company a senior secured revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $50 million (the “Credit Facility”).
The availability of funds under the Credit Facility is generally limited to an advance rate of between 70% and 85% of the value of the Company’s eligible receivables. Outstanding advances under the Credit Facility will accrue interest at a rate equal to the secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) plus a specified margin, subject to a specified floor interest rate. Unused availability under the Credit Agreement will accrue interest at a low interest rate. The commitment period for advances under the Credit Facility is two years. We refer to the expiration of that time period as the “Maturity Date.”
18
The Loan Agreement contains customary events of default and negative covenants, including but not limited to those governing indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, and sales of assets. The Loan Agreement also requires the Company to maintain (i) a minimum tangible net worth equal to the lower of $40 million and an amount equal to 60% of the outstanding balance of the Credit Facility and (ii) an excess spread ratio of no less than 8.0%. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets as collateral for their obligations under the Credit Facility. If an event of default occurs, Westlake could increase borrowing costs, restrict the Company's ability to obtain additional advances under the Credit Facility, accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, enforce their interest against collateral pledged under the Loan Agreement or enforce such other rights and remedies as they have under the loan documents or applicable law as secured lenders. Subject to Company’s compliance with certain terms and conditions, the lender waived its rights and remedies under the Agreement applicable to the excess spread ratio covenant and collateral performance indicator through September 30, 2024.
If the Company prepays the loan and terminate the Credit Facility prior to the Maturity Date, then the Company would be obligated to pay Westlake a termination fee in an amount equal to a percentage of the average outstanding principal balance of the Credit Facility during the immediately preceding 90 days. If the Company were to sell its accounts receivable to a third party prior to the Maturity Date, then the Company would be obligated to pay Westlake a fee in an amount equal to a specified percentage of the proceeds of such sale.
On January 18, 2023, in connection with entering into the Loan Agreement, the Company terminated its credit agreement with Wells Fargo (the “WF Credit Agreement”), and the indebtedness under that agreement (consisting of a revolving line of credit in a maximum principal amount of $60 million (with an outstanding balance of approximately $43 million)) was repaid in full. The Company did not incur any termination penalties in connection with the termination of the WF Credit Agreement.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The Company’s critical accounting estimate (i.e., that involves a significant level of estimation uncertainty and has or is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations) relates to the allowance for credit losses, which reflects the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the expected cash flows of finance receivables.
There has been one change in our critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our Annual Report on 2023 Form 10-K related the Company's adoption of ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and subsequent amendments to the guidance: ASU 2018-19 in November 2018, ASU 2019-04 in April 2019, ASU 2019-05 in May 2019, ASU 2019-10 and -11 in November 2019, ASU 2020-02 in February 2020 and ASU 2022-02 in March 2022.
Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL)
The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 for measurement of current expected credit losses on April 1, 2023. An impairment model required by ASU 2016-13 is not prescriptive in the methodology used to determine the expected credit loss estimate. Therefore, management has flexibility in selecting the methodology. However, the expected credit losses must be estimated over a financial asset's remaining expected life, adjusted for prepayments, utilizing quantitative and qualitative factors. The estimate of current expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable economic forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amounts. Historical loss experience is the starting point for estimating expected credit losses. Adjustments are made to historical loss experience to reflect differences in asset-specific risk characteristics, such as underwriting standards, portfolio mix or asset terms, and differences in economic conditions - both current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. When the Company is not able to make or obtain reasonable and supportable forecasts for the entire life of the financial asset, it has estimated expected credit losses for the remaining life after the forecasted period using an approach that reverts to historical credit loss information.
The Company selected a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to estimate its base allowance for credit losses. Management has elected to use this approach after analysis and consideration. Below are a few of the key decision points that contributed to the election:
19
DCF methodologies work properly with an amortizing approach. In order to estimate expected credit losses using methods that project future principal and interest cash flows (that is, a discounted cash flow method), the Company discounts expected cash flows at the financial asset’s effective interest rate. When a discounted cash flow method is applied, the allowance for credit losses must reflect the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the expected cash flows.
The Company applies historical loss experience to forecast expected credit losses. Historical information about losses generally provides a basis for the estimate of expected credit losses. The Company also considers the need to adjust historical information to reflect the extent to which current conditions differ from the conditions that existed for the period over which historical information was evaluated. These adjustments to historical loss information may be qualitative or quantitative in nature.
Reasonable and supportable macroeconomic forecasts are required for the Company’s ACL model. The Company reviews macroeconomic forecasts to use in its ACL. The projected change in creditworthiness is modeled using information provided by FOMC, such as unemployment rate and GDP. The Company adjusts the historical loss experience by relevant qualitative factors for these expectations.
As loans receivable are originated, provisions for credit losses are recorded in amounts sufficient to maintain an ACL at an adequate level to provide for estimated losses over the remaining expected life of the finance receivables. The Company uses its historical loss experience and macroeconomic factors to forecast expected credit losses.
While the Company utilizes a systematic methodology in determining its allowance, the allowance is based on estimates, and ultimate losses may vary from current estimates. The estimates are reviewed periodically and, as adjustments become necessary, are reported in earnings in the periods in which they become known.
After adoption, all changes in the ACL, net of charge-offs and recoveries, are recorded as “Provision for credit losses” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Introduction
The Company finances primary transportation to and from work for the subprime borrower. We do not finance luxury cars, second units or recreational vehicles, which are the first payments customers tend to skip in time of economic insecurity. We finance the main and often only vehicle in the household that is needed to get our customers to and from work. The amounts we finance are much lower than most of our competitors, and therefore the payments are significantly lower, too. The combination of financing a “need” over a “want” and making that loan on comparatively affordable terms incentivizes our customers to prioritize their account with us.
For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the dilutive earnings per share were $0.21 as compared to dilutive loss per share of $0.24 for the three months ended June 30, 2022. Net income was $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 as compared to net loss of $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. Interest and fee income on finance receivables decreased 41.3% to $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 as compared to $12.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. Provision for credit losses decreased 82.3% to $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 as compared to $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022.
20
Non-GAAP financial measures
From time-to-time the Company uses certain financial measures derived on a basis other than generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), primarily by excluding from a comparable GAAP measure certain items the Company does not consider to be representative of its actual operating performance. Such financial measures qualify as “non-GAAP financial measures” as defined in SEC rules. The Company uses these non-GAAP financial measures in operating its business because management believes they are less susceptible to variances in actual operating performance that can result from the excluded items and other infrequent charges. The Company may present these financial measures to investors because management believes they are useful to investors in evaluating the primary factors that drive the Company’s core operating performance and provide greater transparency into the Company’s results of operations. However, items that are excluded and other adjustments and assumptions that are made in calculating these non-GAAP financial measures are significant components to understanding and assessing the Company’s financial performance. Such non-GAAP financial measures should be evaluated in conjunction with, and are not a substitute for, the Company’s GAAP financial measures. Further, because these non-GAAP financial measures are not determined in accordance with GAAP and are, thus, susceptible to varying calculations, any non-GAAP financial measures, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Portfolio Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average finance receivables (1) |
|
$ |
120,773 |
|
|
$ |
179,455 |
|
Average indebtedness (2) |
|
$ |
22,078 |
|
|
$ |
60,829 |
|
Interest and fee income on finance receivables |
|
$ |
7,083 |
|
|
$ |
12,064 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Net interest and fee income on finance receivables |
|
$ |
6,583 |
|
|
$ |
11,496 |
|
Gross portfolio yield (3) |
|
|
23.46 |
% |
|
|
26.89 |
% |
Interest expense as a percentage of average finance receivables |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Provision for credit losses as a percentage of average finance receivables |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
8.12 |
% |
Net portfolio yield (3) |
|
|
19.67 |
% |
|
|
17.50 |
% |
Operating expenses as a percentage of average finance receivables (4) |
|
|
14.03 |
% |
|
|
21.11 |
% |
Pre-tax yield as a percentage of average finance receivables (5) |
|
|
5.64 |
% |
|
|
(3.61 |
)% |
Net charge-off percentage (6) |
|
|
9.58 |
% |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
Finance receivables |
|
$ |
112,242 |
|
|
$ |
180,053 |
|
Allowance percentage (7) |
|
|
13.68 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Total reserves percentage (8) |
|
|
16.84 |
% |
|
|
5.95 |
% |
Note: All income performance indicators expressed as percentages have been annualized.
21
Analysis of Credit Losses
Implementation of ASU 2016-13
We adopted ASU 2016-13 on April 1, 2023, as further described in "Significant Accounting Policies" to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Upon implementation of ASU 2016-13, we recognized a decrease to our opening retained earnings balance of approximately $0.2 million, which reflects an increase to the allowance for credit losses (ACL) of approximately $0.2 million.
ASU 2016-13 introduces a new accounting model to measure credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized costs. In contrast to the previous incurred loss model, ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized cost to be determined based on the total current expected credit losses over the life of those financial asset or group of assets.
Our process for determining the ACL considers a customer's willingness and ability to pay along with other risk characteristics, including loan size, effective interest rate, loan term, geographic location, expected loss patterns, loan modification programs and other macroeconomic factors. In addition to our quantitative ACL, we also incorporate qualitative adjustments that may relate to risks and changes in current economic conditions that may not be reflected in quantitatively derived results.
Prior to adoption of ASU 2016-13 the Company used a trailing twelve-month charge-off analysis to calculate the allowance for credit losses and took into consideration the composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions, estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, historical loan loss experience, delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankrupt accounts when determining management’s estimate of probable credit losses and adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. By including recent trends such as delinquency, non-performing assets, and bankruptcy in its determination, management believed that the allowance for credit losses reflected the current trends of incurred losses within the portfolio and was aligned with the portfolio’s performance indicators.
If the allowance for credit losses was determined to be inadequate, then an additional charge to the provision was recorded to maintain adequate reserves based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio. Conversely, the Company could identify abnormalities in the composition of the portfolio, which would indicate the calculation is overstated and management judgment may be required to determine the allowance of credit losses for both Contracts and Direct Loans.
Non-performing assets are defined as accounts that are contractually delinquent for 61 or more days past due or Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts. For these accounts, the accrual of interest income is suspended, and any previously accrued interest is reversed. Upon notification of a bankruptcy, an account is monitored for collection with other Chapter 13 accounts. In the event the debtors’ balance is reduced by the bankruptcy court, the Company will record a loss equal to the amount of principal balance reduction. The remaining balance will be reduced as payments are received by the bankruptcy court. In the event an account is dismissed from bankruptcy, the Company will decide based on several factors, whether to begin repossession proceedings or allow the customer to begin making regularly scheduled payments.
Beginning March 31, 2018, the Company allocated a specific reserve for the Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts using a look back method to calculate the estimated losses. Based on this look back, management calculated a specific reserve of approximately $252 thousand for these accounts as of June 30, 2023.
The provision for credit losses decreased to $0.6 million for the three months ended on June 30, 2023, from $3.6 million for the three months ended on June 30, 2022, largely due to adoption of ASU 2016-13. Prior to April 1, 2023, the Company recorded losses based on the trailing twelve-month charge-offs, and applied this calculated percentage to ending finance receivables to calculate estimated probable credit losses for purposes of determining the allowance for credit losses. Upon adoption of ASC 326 on April 1, 2023, expected credit losses were determined by comparing the amortized cost of finance receivables with the present value of the estimated future principal and interest cash flows. The current period provision reflects the change in the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the expected cash flows of finance receivables.
The net charge-off percentage increased to 9.6% for the three months ended on June 30, 2023, from 6.5% for the three months ended on June 30, 2022, primarily driven by increased delinquencies and loan defaults. (See the Portfolio Summary table in the “Introduction” above for the definition of net charge-off percentage). Management attributes these increased delinquencies and loan defaults primarily to the fact that the beneficial impact of the government’s prior COVID-19-related assistance to the Company’s customers had subsided at a time when those customers began facing increased inflationary pressures affecting their cost of living, and expects that the net charge-off percentage will remain, for the foreseeable future, at levels higher than those experienced in prior years for the same reasons.
The delinquency percentage for Contracts more than twenty-nine days past due, excluding Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts, as of June 30, 2023 was 19.8%, an increase from 9.5% as of June 30, 2022. The delinquency percentage for Direct Loans more than twenty-nine days past due, excluding Chapter 13 bankruptcy accounts, as of June 30, 2023 was 23.0%, an increase from 5.1% as of June 30, 2022. The changes in delinquency percentage for both Contracts and Direct Loans was driven primarily by market and economic pressure and its adverse impact on consumers.
In accordance with our policies and procedures, certain borrowers qualify for, and the Company offers, one-month principal payment deferrals on Contracts and Direct Loans.
22
Three months ended June 30, 2023 compared to three months ended June 30, 2022
Interest and Fee Income on Finance Receivables
Interest and fee income on finance receivables, which consist predominantly of finance charge income, decreased 41.3% to $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023, from $12.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in originations of Contracts and discontinued originating Direct Loans pursuant to its restructuring plan.
The portfolio yield decreased to 23.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to 26.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The net portfolio yield increased to 19.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2023, compared to 17.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The substantial improvement in net portfolio yield was primarily a result of reduced provision for credit losses following the adoption of ASC 326.
As part of the Company’s restructuring and change in operating strategy disclosed above, the Company realized significant savings in operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2023 as evident by a ratio of operating expenses as a percentage of average finance receivable of 14.1% as compared to 21.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2023, and 2022, respectively. Management expects that the operating expenses will continue declining as the Company transitioned its servicing and collections activities to Westlake under the Servicing Agreement.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses decreased to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 compared to $9.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributed to restructuring initiative associated with branch closures and transition of the servicing process to Westlake under our servicing agreement. These factors had a direct beneficial effect and lead to the decrease in salary and wages as a result of the Company’s headcount reduction. Similarly, operating expenses as a percentage of average finance receivables also decreased to 14.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2023 from 21.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2022 as a result of the factors above and a decrease in the average receivables balance.
Provision Expense
The provision for credit losses decreased to $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 from $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022, largely due to a change in the accounting policy related to the adoption of ASC 326, while the net charge-off percentage increased to 9.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2023 from 6.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2022.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The following table summarizes the Company’s average cost of borrowed funds:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Variable interest under the Credit Facility |
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
0.68 |
% |
Credit spread under the Credit Facility |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Average cost of borrowed funds |
|
|
8.43 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
SOFR rates have increased to 5.1%, which represented the daily SOFR rate as required under the Westlake Credit Agreement, as of June 30, 2023 compared to 1.5% as of June 30, 2022 required by Wells Fargo Credit Facility.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded an income tax expense of approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 compared to an income tax benefit of approximately $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The Company’s effective tax rate decreased to 8.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2023 from 26.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2022. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2023 is primarily attributable to the establishment of a valuation allowance subsequent to June 30, 2022.
23
Contract Procurement
As of June 30, 2023, the Company purchased Contracts in the states listed in the table below. The Contracts purchased by the Company are predominantly for used vehicles for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, less than 1% were for new vehicles.
The following tables present selected information on Contracts purchased by the Company.
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|||
State |
|
Number of |
|
|
Net Purchases |
|
||||||
FL |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
4,749 |
|
OH |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
2,982 |
|
GA |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
KY |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
MO |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
NC |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
IN |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
SC |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
AL |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
MI |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
450 |
|
NV |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
568 |
|
TN |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
296 |
|
IL |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
489 |
|
PA |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
614 |
|
TX |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
526 |
|
WI |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
264 |
|
ID |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
294 |
|
UT |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
71 |
|
AZ |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24 |
|
KS |
|
- |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
22,354 |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||
Contracts |
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Purchases |
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
22,354 |
|
Average APR |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
Average discount |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Average term (months) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Average amount financed |
|
$ |
12,420 |
|
|
$ |
11,552 |
|
Number of Contracts |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
1,935 |
|
Direct Loan Origination
The following table presents selected information on Direct Loans originated by the Company.
Direct Loans |
|
Three months ended |
|
|||
Originated |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
|
Purchases/Originations |
|
N/A |
|
$ |
8,215 |
|
Average APR |
|
N/A |
|
|
31.2 |
% |
Average term (months) |
|
N/A |
|
|
25 |
|
Average amount financed |
|
N/A |
|
$ |
4,128 |
|
Number of loans |
|
N/A |
|
|
1,990 |
|
24
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s cash flows are summarized as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|||||
|
|
2023 |
|
|
2022 |
|
||
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating activities |
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
|
$ |
(1,361 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
12,905 |
|
|
|
(9,307 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(13,850 |
) |
|
|
9,444 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
(1,224 |
) |
The Company’s primary use of working capital for the quarter ended June 30, 2023 was funding the purchase of Contracts, which are financed substantially through cash from principal and interest payments received, and the Company’s line of credit.
Please refer to “Note 5 – in the Annual Report on Form 10-K” for disclosure on the Company’s prior credit facility with Wells Fargo under the WF Credit Agreement, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.
On January 18, 2023, the Company through its subsidiaries, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Westlake, pursuant to which Westlake is providing the Company a senior secured revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $50 million (the “Credit Facility”).
The availability of funds under the Credit Facility is generally limited to an advance rate of between 70% and 85% of the value of the Company's eligible receivables. Outstanding advances under the Credit Facility will accrue interest at a rate equal to the secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) plus a specified margin, subject to a specified floor interest rate. Unused availability under the Credit Agreement will accrue interest at a low interest rate. The commitment period for advances under the Credit Facility is two years. We refer to the expiration of that time period as the “Maturity Date.”
The Loan Agreement contains customary events of default and negative covenants, including but not limited to those governing indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, and sales of assets. The Loan Agreement also requires the Company to maintain (i) a minimum tangible net worth equal to the lower of $40 million and an amount equal to 60% of the outstanding balance of the Credit Facility and (ii) an excess spread ratio of no less than 8.0%. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company granted a security interest in substantially all of their assets as collateral for their obligations under the Credit Facility. If an event of default occurs, Westlake could increase borrowing costs, restrict the Company's ability to obtain additional advances under the Credit Facility, accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, enforce their interest against collateral pledged under the Loan Agreement or enforce such other rights and remedies as they have under the loan documents or applicable law as secured lenders. Subject to Company’s compliance with certain terms and conditions, the lender waived its rights and remedies under the Agreement applicable to the excess spread ratio covenant and collateral performance indicator through September 30, 2024.
If the Company prepays the loan and terminate the Credit Facility prior to the Maturity Date, then the Company would be obligated to pay Westlake a termination fee in an amount equal to a percentage of the average outstanding principal balance of the Credit Facility during the immediately preceding 90 days. If the Company were to sell its accounts receivable to a third party prior to the
Maturity Date, then the Company would be obligated to pay Westlake a fee in an amount equal to a specified percentage of the proceeds of such sale.
The Company has substantially completed its restructuring process to substantially decrease operating expenses and is developing a strategy with respect to its long-term use of cash. The related disclosure contained in “Restructuring and Change in Operating Strategy” is incorporated herein by reference.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
25
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not Applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act).
Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable level of assurance as of June 30, 2023 because of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relating to the design of the controls over accounting for credit losses in accordance with FASB ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (CECL), including the operation of these controls.
We will take certain measures to remediate the material weakness related to the design of the controls related to application of the CECL accounting standard, including designing and implementing formal procedures and controls related to secondary review of data input, model calculations, journal entries, and financial statement disclosures.
While we believe that our efforts for remediation will improve the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, these remediation efforts will be ongoing and will require time to operate for management to be able to conclude that the design is effective to remediate the material weakness identified. We may conclude that additional measures are necessary to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which may necessitate additional evaluation and implementation time.
Notwithstanding the material weakness, the Company has concluded that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2023 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The Company filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2023 on Wednesday, August 16, 2023, which was two business days following the filing deadline as extended pursuant to Rule 12b-25 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
In connection with the adoption of CECL, management in the process of establishing and is refining its internal procedures and controls to ensure finance receivables are appropriately accounted for in the accordance with FASB ASC Topic 326 and that required disclosures are complete and accurate. This includes procedures and controls over inputs and assumptions used in the estimation process, the use of third parties, and other risk-based considerations.
Other than described above, during the most recent fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
26
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in certain claims and legal proceedings in the normal course of business of which one, if decided adversely to the Company, would, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Specifically, the Company has been sued together with several other defendants, in a lawsuit styled: Nicholas Financial, Inc. v. Jeremiah Gross, No. 21CY-CV02148-01, 7th Judicial Circuit, Clay County, Missouri. On March 9, 2021 the Company filed suit against Jeremiah Gross for a deficiency balance owed to the Company following the 2018 surrender and sale of his motor vehicle which secured a loan from the Company. On April 22, 2021 a default judgment for $7,984.18 was entered against Mr. Gross. On December 22, 2021 Mr. Gross filed a motion to set aside the default judgment. The Court granted his motion on March 23, 2022. In his answer he asserted a class-action counterclaim against the Company seeking to represent a nationwide class of the Company’s customers who received allegedly deficient notices regarding the sale of their vehicles and whose vehicles were recovered and sold by the Company, and on behalf of Missouri customers who received allegedly deficient notices from the Company regarding the sale of their recovered vehicles and the calculation of the deficiency owed the Company. The Company filed its answer to the counterclaim on May 13, 2022. On September 9, 2022 the Company filed a motion for summary judgment as to all counts of the counterclaim and the Company's claim against Mr. Gross. The motion was argued on February 16, 2023. On March 27, 2023 the Court entered an order granting the motion in part and denying the motion in part. The Court found in favor of the Company as to the counterclaim regarding presale notices and prejudgment interest, and in Mr. Gross’s favor for the counterclaim as to post-sale notices. The Court denied the Company’s motion for summary judgment as to its claim for a deficiency against Mr. Gross. The remaining claim relates to post-sale notices sent to Missouri customers. The Company’s insurer has accepted the defense of this litigation under a reservation of rights.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the Risk Factor below and the other information set forth in this report, especially in the section “PART I – Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Forward Looking Statements,” you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2023, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
As part of its restructuring and change in operating strategy, the Company has outsourced its servicing, collection and recovery operations and is substantially dependent on Westlake for generation of revenue and debt financing.
As part of the Company’s restructuring and change in operating strategy, in December 2022, Westlake began servicing all receivables held by the Company under its Contracts and Direct Loans, except for charged-off and certain other receivables. The Company expects to add additional Contract receivables to the receivables pool covered under the servicing agreement with Westlake from time to time in the future, but will no longer originate Direct Loans. As a result, the Company has significantly reduced its footprint, closing all of its branches and retaining only 16 employees as of June 2023.
In January 2023, two of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a loan agreement with Westlake, pursuant to which Westlake is providing a senior secured revolving credit facility in the principal amount of up to $50 million. This facility replaced the Company’s prior facility with Wells Fargo.
Additional details on the servicing agreement, restructuring activities and loan agreement are incorporated herein by reference to “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Restructuring and Change in Operating Strategy” in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
27
The materialization of any of these risks may adversely affect our results of operations or financial position, potentially to a material extent.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
In May 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) authorized a new stock repurchase program allowing for the repurchase of up to $8.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or through other structures in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The authorization was effective immediately.
The timing and actual number of sharers will depend on a variety of factors, including stock price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market and economic conditions. The Company’s stock repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
In August 2019, the Company’s Board authorized additional repurchase of up to $1.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
28
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.11 |
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 |
|
|
|
32.21 |
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 |
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
+ Portions of this exhibit have been redacted in accordance with Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulations S-K.
1 This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is not filed as part of it.
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NICHOLAS FINANCIAL, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: August 16, 2023 |
|
/s/ Mike Rost |
|
|
Mike Rost |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: August 16, 2023 |
|
/s/ Irina Nashtatik |
|
|
Irina Nashtatik |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
30
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mike Rost, certify that:
Date: August 16, 2023 |
|
/s/ Mike Rost |
|
|
Mike Rost |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Irina Nashtatik, certify that:
Date: August 16, 2023 |
|
/s/ Irina Nashtatik |
|
|
Irina Nashtatik |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2023 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Mike Rost |
Mike Rost |
Chief Executive Officer |
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Dated: August 16, 2023
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Nicholas Financial, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2023 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Irina Nashtatik |
Irina Nashtatik |
Chief Financial Officer |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Dated: August 16, 2023