Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Quantum Corporation Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Financial Results Conference Call. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Quantum's Vice President of Corporate Affairs and Corporate Secretary, Tara Ilges. Please proceed.

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining today's conference call to discuss Quantum's Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Financial Results. With me on today's call are Hugues Meyrath, Quantum's CEO; and Laura Nash, Chief Accounting Officer. Following management's prepared remarks, we will open the call to questions from analysts. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that comments made on today's call may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact should be viewed as forward-looking including any projections of revenue, margins, expenses, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income, cash flows or other financial operational or performance topics. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that we refer to as risk factors. Risk factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from our forecast. For more information, please refer to the detailed descriptions we provide about these and additional risk factors under the Risk Factors section in our 10-K and 10-Qs filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company does not intend to update or alter forward-looking statements once they are issued, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except where required by applicable law. Please note that today's press release and management statement during today's call will include certain financial information in GAAP and non-GAAP measures. We will include definitions and reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP items in our press release. With that, it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Quantum's CEO, Hugues Meyrath.

Thank you, Tara, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us for our second quarter earnings conference call. As announced earlier this afternoon, we made solid progress during the quarter with revenue at the high end of our guidance range. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $5 million lower from the prior quarter and we achieved positive adjusted EBITDA. These results demonstrate the initial benefits of the restructuring we implemented in June. Although there is still more work to be done, I believe this puts the company on the right track and sets the stage for continued progress in the quarters ahead. Also notable during the quarter, we reached a key milestone toward our goal of becoming debt-free by entering into a definitive agreement with Dialectic to convert approximately $52 million in term debt to senior secured convertible notes, subject to shareholder approval. At the same time, we also eliminated the existing leverage and minimum liquidity requirements and agreed that $15 million of proceeds from our standby equity purchase agreement can be used for additional working capital if required. This important milestone in our financial transformation provides increased financial flexibility to execute on our operating initiatives and revitalized go-to-market strategy. To underscore this point, I can confidently say that this is the best financial position that Quantum has been in for some time. Assuming we receive shareholder approval for the aforementioned debt exchange, the company will have eliminated $140 million in total debt from the balance sheet since the peak debt in 2020. As I discussed last quarter, since taking on the CEO role, I focused on building a leadership team and Board of Directors that combine deep market expertise with operational excellence. Most recently, we added Geoff Barrall as Chief Product Officer, who is a highly respected technology innovator and leader with a decades-long track record across the enterprise storage industry. He founded BlueArc, served as CTO of Hitachi Vantara and most recently was CPO at Index Engines, where he led product and engineering strategies that shaped several category-defining storage and data management platforms. At Quantum, Geoff is conducting a comprehensive review of our product portfolio and pipeline, identifying along with sales where we can deliver the greatest value, sharpen roadmap priorities and align engineering investments directly with customer needs and market opportunities. His leadership is ensuring that our innovation engine is tightly focused on the solutions and use cases where Quantum can lead and win. This alignment across product, sales, and customer success is already fostering a faster, more data-driven decision cycle, one that's anchored in real-world customer feedback and measurable return on investment. As part of our revitalized go-to-market strategy, our CRO and I met with more than 60 customers and partners this quarter. What this confirmed is that Quantum has a very loyal customer and partner installed base, as well as a very solid sales team. Our customers believe in the value we provide and they want us to succeed. Regionally, we're seeing strong execution across the globe. EMEA continues to execute and perform well. APAC revenue more than doubled quarter-over-quarter following our shift to a new distribution model. As a reminder, we nominated new exclusive distributors after ending a relationship with Quantum Storage Asia, also known as QSA. QSA is an unrelated and unaffiliated entity and is not authorized to use our name, sell our products, or sell our support. Under Gregg Pugmire's leadership, the Americas business rebounded and outperformed other regions, reflecting the tighter structure and coordination between inside and field sales teams. I would also like to point out that we closed the quarter with one of the largest backlogs in recent history, over $25 million compared to our historical target range of $8 million to $10 million, underscoring strong sales traction and customer confidence. Ultimately, our focus remains on the customer experience, aligning more deeply with trusted long-term partners to deliver transformative data solutions at scale across industries and borders. One of the most meaningful proof points this quarter was winning the Library of Congress 100-year Archive project. After a rigorous 2-year evaluation, they moved away from a competing platform and selected Quantum's ActiveScale Cold Storage and Scalar i7 RAPTOR to preserve the nation's most valuable digital archive for generations to come. This wasn't just a competitive win; it was validation of the architecture we've been building. ActiveScale is unlike anything else on the market. It's an end-to-end object storage platform with intelligent tiering across flash, disk, and tape, so customers can get the right performance at the right cost as data ages from hot to hold. Our patented two-dimensional erasure coding delivers a high level of durability, efficiency, and cyber resilience that traditional object stores can't match, which is exactly why an organization like the Library of Congress chose Quantum. Scalar i7 RAPTOR is the backbone of the solution. It's the industry's densest tape system, delivering up to 200% more capacity per rack, outstanding power efficiency, and an automated cyber-resilient architecture. It's built for true hyperscale archiving, and customers see that. It recently achieved Veeam Ready status and won Best of Show at IBC, Europe's largest media and entertainment conference, reaffirming our leadership in secure high-density storage for markets like government, research, and media. And we're building on that leadership. Last week, we introduced new capabilities in ActiveScale that fundamentally changed what cold data can do. With industry-first ranged restore and more than five times faster access to small objects, customers can now pull back only the data they need instead of rehydrating entire files. That means long-term archive and AI data lakes can behave like active query-ready data sets. Cold data becomes live data, instantly usable for AI training, inference, analytics, compliance, and more. No other vendor can do that. On the innovation front, I also want to highlight our strategic partnership with Entanglement. They chose Quantum as the storage fabric for their next-generation AI and HPC data centers. The future of AI isn't just about faster compute; it's about secure, scalable, high-durability data infrastructure that can feed those compute engines continuously and efficiently. Our solutions give them exactly that: tiered sovereign cyber-resilient storage with the scale and performance AI requires. Together, we're enabling a new class of regionalized AI infrastructure, one that brings compute to the data, protects the data with post-quantum encryption, and supports massive AI and HPC workloads at scale. This partnership underscores something we're seeing across the market. The next era of AI depends on the intelligent data platform, and Quantum is becoming the platform of choice. With that, let me turn the call over to Laura Nash, our Chief Accounting Officer, to review our second fiscal quarter results in more detail and our third fiscal quarter outlook. Laura, please go ahead.

Thank you, Hugues. Good afternoon to those joining us on the phone and webcast. I will provide an overview of the company's GAAP and non-GAAP financial results for our second fiscal quarter 2026 ended September 30, 2025. Before I begin, I would like to emphasize that all comparisons to financial figures in prior periods reflect the company's previous restatement of financial results as well as certain revisions to immaterial misstatements of published quarterly financial results for the fiscal year 2025. Revenue in the quarter was $62.7 million compared to $64.3 million in the first fiscal quarter of 2026 and $71.8 million in the prior year second quarter. We saw a notable increase in backlog to over $25 million at the end of the second quarter, which is significantly above our historical target run rate of $8 billion to $10 billion and has given us a strong start to fiscal third quarter. GAAP gross margin for the second quarter was 37.6%, compared to 35.3% in the prior quarter and 42.7% in the fiscal second quarter of 2025. Although we still have more work to do in order to expand our gross margins back above 40%, the sequential improvement in the second quarter reflects the initial operating efficiencies from our restructured service organization. GAAP operating expenses for the second quarter were $31.7 million compared to $35.3 million in the prior quarter and $36.2 million in the year-ago quarter. Operating expenses on a non-GAAP basis for the second quarter were $24.8 million compared to $30 million in the fiscal first quarter of 2026 and $30.4 million in the year-ago quarter. The $5.2 million sequential reduction in operating expenses and $5.6 million reduction from the year-ago quarter primarily reflects the realized savings from a lowered cost structure following our recent restructuring actions in the current fiscal year. GAAP net loss for the fiscal second quarter was $46.5 million or a loss of $3.49 per share compared to a net loss of $17.2 million or a loss of $1.87 per share in the previous quarter and a net loss of $12.2 million or a loss of $2.54 per share in the year-ago second quarter. The primary driver for the increase in our net loss was due to the most recent debt amendment to our term line. As Hugues previously mentioned, this amendment provides us with covenant relief and access to proceeds from the standby equity purchase agreement for working capital. It was treated as a partial debt extinguishment for accounting purposes and resulted in a sizable noncash loss, largely due to the issuance of the forbearance warrants. The warrants were recorded at a fair value of approximately $25 million and our liability classification will introduce some volatility into our GAAP earnings on a go-forward basis as the warrant valuation is adjusted for our stock price at each reported period. Non-GAAP loss for the second quarter was $7.1 million or a loss of $0.54 per share compared to a net loss of $14.5 million or a loss of $1.58 per share in the prior quarter and a net loss of $7.4 million or a loss of $1.54 per share in the same quarter a year ago. The improvement in non-GAAP net loss for the quarter reflects a combination of the improvement in gross margin and a significant reduction in operating expenses. While we continue to bear approximately $6 million of interest expense per quarter, as we execute on our plans to become debt-free, we will expect to benefit from the reduced interest burden. Adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter improved sequentially to a positive $0.5 million from a negative $6.5 million in the first fiscal quarter of 2026, and compared to a positive $1.1 million in the prior year quarter. The achievement of positive adjusted EBITDA above our expectation of approximately breakeven for the fiscal second quarter was primarily driven by the execution of our restructuring initiatives that significantly lowered our cost structure over the prior quarter. Turning to the overview of debt and liquidity at quarter end. Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at the end of the fiscal second quarter were approximately $15.3 million. Total outstanding term debt at quarter end was $106.1 million and the company's net debt position was approximately $90.8 million. As Hugues previously mentioned, in late September, the company announced a definitive agreement to restructure approximately $52 million of outstanding term debt held by Dialectic for senior secured convertible notes, which is subject to shareholder approval. Upon closing, the proposed debt exchange transaction will meaningfully reduce the company's future outstanding debt and interest expense while also increasing our overall liquidity and financial flexibility. Turning to the company's outlook for the fiscal third quarter of 2026. Revenue for the third quarter is expected to be approximately $67 million, plus or minus $2 million. We expect the third quarter non-GAAP operating expenses to be approximately $25 million, plus or minus $2 million, reflecting the continued realized benefit from our most recent cost reduction actions. As a result, non-GAAP adjusted net loss per share for the fiscal third quarter is anticipated to be a negative $0.51, plus or minus $0.10 per share based on an estimated 14 million shares outstanding. Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal third quarter is expected to be positive $1 million, plus or minus $1 million. With that, I'll now hand the call back to Hugues.

Thank you, Laura. In closing, the second fiscal quarter marked a pivotal step forward for Quantum with initial evidence of progress from the restructuring actions we've taken, combined with tangible proof points resulting from our refreshed leadership and reinvigorated sales team. We've fortified our financial foundation by significantly reducing operating expenses, added liquidity by raising additional capital, and proposed a transformative debt exchange to decrease our outstanding debt by 50%. With renewed customer loyalty, a reenergized team, and sharpened go-to-market strategy, Quantum is poised for growing momentum and value creation in the quarters ahead. With that, I'll now turn the call to the operator for the Q&A session.

We take the first question from the line of Elle Niebuhr from Lake Street Capital Markets.

This is Elle on for Eric Martinuzzi. I was just wondering if you could give a little more color on your pipeline build. So given the new senior sales additions, what is the current health of the North American pipeline? And then are there any new lead development processes implemented recently?

Yes, I can touch base on that. The pipeline is actually pretty good. As we mentioned, we have record backlog in the $25 million range. It's really a bit all over the place across the product line; from tape, tape media, anywhere DXi has a pretty solid pipeline as well, and StorNext, it's pretty much across the board. So no specific issues in the pipeline right now. I think the changes in the sales force have been really impactful. The team is very energized, and frankly, we see our three geographical teams competing with each other, which is great. So it's a positive dynamic. With regard to lead generation, we actually are changing the lead generation program and trying to focus on qualifying leads down to opportunities and pass some of those to our channel partners. So it's part of our way to reinvigorate the channels; it's not the focus just on leads, but to qualify them as far as we can to the finish line before we hand it over to our partners. So I'm really pleased with the progress so far.

Awesome. Good to hear. And then one more for me. Just going off of product R&D, what are your development priorities for DXi backup appliances, the Scalar tape libraries, and the StorNext file management software?

Yes, I mean, good question. We have a lot of products in the portfolio. I think from a tape library perspective with i7 launching, we feel like our focus right now is scaling manufacturing, and it's really in the final touches of the product, right? So it's about trying to build and sell as many of those as possible; that's kind of the phase we're in. This could be a really big product for us. ActiveScale Cold Storage and ActiveScale in general has its own dedicated team. There was a press release yesterday with the Ranged Restore, and we talked about it during the call. So they're on the path of continuing to improve and specifically, for us the winning combinations, having object store focused on cold storage and whatever we can do that's differentiated because it's the combination of ActiveScale and tape libraries together that make a killer combination in the market. They have their team, so we don't really have to prioritize that versus something else. StorNext, we have a new Chief Product Officer, Geoff Barral; StorNext is super important to us. So we're in the midst of reinvigorating the roadmap on StorNext. And as we talked in the prior calls, it's a very important product for us, we have a huge installed base. We're getting a lot of feedback daily from our customers about what they need. So we're realigning resources to focus on that and make sure we put more energy into our core StorNext customers. With regards to DXi, I think it's a product, again, like in good shape with its separate development team. So our focus right now on DXi really is about lead generation conversion to opportunities and really scaling sales onto the DXi side of things.

We take the next question from the line of Nehal Chokshi from Northland Capital Markets.

That backlog number is jaw-dropping, congratulations. That's amazing. So let's talk about that backlog. Let's frame this up in terms of bookings. Well, first, before we do that, that backlog is just product? Or is that kind of plus book services as well?

It's Laura here. Thank you for your questions. So the backlog is product.

Product bookings were up 28% year-over-year, at least. Is that correct?

I think Hugues can add to this, but what we're seeing is that the sales team really executed well towards the end of the quarter. There is a significant effort to drive the revenue linearity. We've previously discussed the need to achieve a more linear revenue and invoicing pattern. Hugues, do you have anything else to add on this?

Yes. I don't have on top of my mind what the number was a year ago. But from a mix, there was a very strong mix across the product line as well. We definitely have a little bit of manufacturing limitations in terms of our ability to ship the lower-end tape libraries. So there's a bit of that. You have some hyperscaler demand in there. And with the new sales team in place, a lot of people have been closing a lot of deals late in the quarter, and we do not have the ability to ship them this quarter. So that backlog is going to be useful as we enter the next quarter, the current quarter.

Got it. And is there a significant customer concentration in the backlog?

Sorry, I didn't hear the question. Do you mind repeating?

Of the $25 million product backlog, is there a significant customer concentration, particularly considering there are some hyperscalers involved? For instance, does a specific customer account for 15% or 20% of that backlog, or something similar?

No, it's not specifically to one hyperscaler; it's fairly blended across products. There is a little bit from one of the hyperscalers but not in a meaningful way that this would skew this off.

Did that Library of Congress one go into backlog? Or was that recognized into revenue within the quarter?

It's in backlog.

It's in backlog. Okay. Would that be potentially the largest element within your backlog then?

I mean, Library of Congress is a go ahead, Laura, yes.

I was going to say, yes. So there is a mix of customers, geographies, and product types within that. Library of Congress is one component, but not necessarily the largest component.

Okay. All right. So the bottom line is here is that you are seeing significant product momentum. And it sounds like you're attributing this to the changes in the organization that you brought to the table. Is that correct?

I think it's certainly a component that sales has been executing extremely well. For sure. I mean, between the beginning of the quarter and the last day of the quarter, we've seen a change in sales momentum and sales culture, where we did accelerated bookings throughout the quarter, and they continue to close deals in the first month of this quarter as well. So I think it's a good sign from a recovery perspective. Past that, I think it's an endurance race, right? We have to deliver quarter after quarter. And I think they do have that mindset. But it's definitely a good moment for the sales team.

Okay. And don't you guys have significant federal vertical exposure?

We do have some federal business as well. I would say it's probably understaffed in an area where we need to put more heads into, to grow the business.

Okay. But the government shutdown did not impact that portion of the business there, it sounds like.

Yes. I mean not significantly, but I think now we have to go back and flow some of those deals, right? So fortunately, we're back on track there.

Okay. Given the substantial product bookings backlog, your $65 million indicates that your product revenue would still decline year-over-year. Please explain the reasoning behind your guidance, considering the strong bookings momentum observed during the September quarter and the first 1.5 months of the December quarter.

So you're asking why we're guiding so low in the current quarter?

I mean that implies that you're expecting a big fall-off in bookings momentum. Is that what it's implying or no? That's the question.

Yes. Look, I mean, there are a couple of challenges we still have that I'm not 100% comfortable with, right? We definitely had a huge spike in bookings, like I said, it's an endurance race, and it's the first quarter as CEO. I understood first quarter for our CRO, and it's the first quarter for North America's VP; I think we did great. But we have to continue to close, and there was an impressive rate the sample of three to four months, right? So I think fundamentally, there's nothing to indicate that they can't continue to execute on that. But we definitely want to make sure that we provide like we're on solid footing as we move forward and don't overpromise. I do think from a supply chain perspective, we still have some challenges; most of them are associated with the manufacturing of the tape libraries. I think we left money on the table, specifically in the lower and mid-range market in tape libraries because of our inability to manufacture and ship fast enough. And I think that challenge expands a little bit to even the higher end of the tape libraries. I think our transition to Avnet is not fully complete, and that causes a little bit of a pause regarding how we can monetize some of those bookings in the current quarter.

Okay. Got it. That's helpful. Final question for me. Product gross margin while gross margin did improve significantly overall, Laura, as you know, that's due to basically cost takeouts in the service organization. When we look at the product gross margin, it's still down like 500-plus basis points year-over-year. Can you put a narrative behind why that is? And do you expect an improvement on that product gross margin, and if so, why?

Yes. I mean, I can give you a macro reason first before we go into the details, but the biggest issue we have is we have too many SKUs, too many platforms, and there's tightness in many of the platforms we have from a supply perspective. Prices are going up on some of the levers, some platforms have aging DDR4 in there, which is tight. So I think there's, in general, the supply chain is tight across the board from a cost perspective and quite not super consistent from a pricing perspective. And I think that's kind of something we need to work through. We are focusing on reducing platforms and figuring out who the optimum partner is for us and how we streamline our supply chain so that we can deliver more consistent margins moving forward. It's something that takes two to three quarters to get through, but definitely get the message; and I think there are a lot of tightness right now in the supply chain affecting the cost.

As there are no further questions, we conclude today's conference call of Quantum Corporation. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.